Plan Review Details - Project Z15100028
Plan Review Stops For Project Z15100028
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 1 Status P Date 11-09-2015 Cont ID  
Sent By cranford Date 11-09-2015 Time 14:31 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rbrown Date 11-12-2015 Time 11:06 Sent To  
Notes
2015-11-12 11:10:39DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, BUILDING DIVISION,
 COMMENTS:
  
 1. THIS REVIEW IS A CURSORY REVIEW AS IT RELATES TO THE
 SITE. IT IS NOT A REVIEW FOR FULL COMPLIANCE WITH
 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE. THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE TO BE
 ADDRESSED FOR PERMITTING.
  
 2. ANY PART OF AN ACCESSIBLE ROUTE WITH A SLOPE GREATER
 THAN 1:20 SHALL BE CONSIDERED A RAMP AND SHALL COMPLY
 WITH SECTION 405 OF FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY CODE.
  
 3. WHEN SUBMITTED FOR BUILDING PERMIT, THE PLANS SHALL
 SHOW THAT THE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION FOR THE BUILDINGS
 WILL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE HEIGHT, AREA AND
 OCCUPANCY LIMITATIONS IN CHAPTER 5 OF THE FLORIDA
 BUILDING CODE
  
 4. WHEN SUBMITTED FOR BUILDING PERMIT, COMPLIANCE WITH
 ALL BUILDING SEPARATION, PERCENTAGE OF OPENINGS AND
 OPENING PROTECTIVE REQUIREMENTS OF CHAPTERS 6 AND 7 OF
 THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE SHALL BE VERIFIED.
  
 5. ENCLOSED PARKING GARAGES. IF THE PARKING GARAGE DOES
 NOT HAVE WALL OPENINGS, OR SUFFICIENT WALL OPENINGS TO
 MEET THE DEFINITION OF AN OPEN PARKING GARAGE, IT WILL
 BE CONSIDERED AN ENCLOSED PARKING GARAGE AND MUST HAVE
 EXHAUST SYSTEMS. THE EXHAUST SYSTEMS SHALL BE DESIGNED
 TO MINIMIZE NOISE LEVELS USING INLINE FAN SILENCERS OR
 OTHER APPROVED METHODS.
  
 6. SEPARATE PERMITS REQUIRED. ALL APPLICABLE PERMITS
 AND SUB-PERMITS MUST BE OBTAINED BEFORE COMMENCING THE
 WORK. SEPARATE PERMITS, PLANS AND FEES, ARE REQUIRED
 FOR SIGNS, SWIMMING POOLS AND SPAS, GAS SYSTEMS,
 GENERATORS, FIRE ALARM SYSTEMS, FIRE SPRINKLER AND
 OTHER FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEMS, GREASE INTERCEPTORS,
 SITE LIGHTING, SITE LANDSCAPE, SITE IRRIGATION, ETC.
  
 7. EACH SEPARATE BUILDING SHALL HAVE A SEPARATE
 ADDRESS. FOR STREET ADDRESSING, CONTACT MICHAEL ORIO,
 GIS SUPPORT SPECIALIST, AT (561) 494 1080, OR BY EMAIL:
 [email protected]
  
 8. THIS PROJECT WILL BE SUBJECT TO ART IN PUBLIC PLACES
 (AIPP) ASSESSMENT. FOR ADVICE ON THE PROVISION OF
 PUBLIC ARTWORK IN LIEU OF THE AIPP ASSESSMENT, CONTACT
 SYBILLE WELTER, ART IN PUBLIC PLACES COORDINATOR, AT
 (561) 822-1521, OR BY EMAIL: [email protected]
  
 ROBERT BROWN
 BUILDING OFFICIAL
 TEL: 561 805 6652
 EMAIL: [email protected]
  

Review Stop ENG - PPRC ENGINEERING - PPRC
Rev No 1 Status F Date 11-09-2015 Cont ID  
Sent By cranford Date 11-09-2015 Time 14:30 Rev Time 0.00
Received By cranford Date 11-09-2015 Time 14:29 Sent To  
Notes
2015-11-09 14:30:26CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH
 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
  
 THIS IS A CONCEPTUAL LEVEL REVIEW. CONSTRUCTION LEVEL
 DETAILS, DESIGN CALCULATIONS AND THE POLLUTION
 PREVENTION PLAN WILL BE REVIEWED AS PART OF THE
 ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL AND BUILDING PERMIT
 APPLICATION PROCESSES. THE ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT
 APPROVAL APPLICATION FORMS CAN BE DOWNLOADED AT
 HTTP://WPB.ORG/ENGINEERING/FORMS-AND-PUBLICATIONS/
  
 THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO SITE
 PLAN APPROVAL.
  
 1. PLEASE SUBMIT A COPY OF THE PROPOSED UNITY OF
 CONTROL FOR APPROVAL BY THE CITY ATTORNEY DEPARTMENT.
  
 2. WILL THE INCREASE IN BUILDING SQUARE FOOTAGE RESULT
 IN AN INCREASE OF THE PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED PEAK POTABLE
 WATER DEMAND, SANITARY SEWER FLOW, OR SOLID WASTE
 COLLECTION YARDAGE?
  
 3. PLEASE REVISE THE DRIVEWAY APRONS TO MEET THE CITY?S
 ENGINEERING DESIGN STANDARDS. HTTP://WPB.ORG/ENGINEERIN
 G/ENGINEERING-SERVICES/ENGINEERING-STANDARDS/
  
 4. PLEASE PROVIDE A SEPARATE AUTOTURN EXHIBIT
 DEMONSTRATING THE TRUCKS WILL BE ABLE TO ACCESS THE
 VEHICLE DROP OFF LOCATIONS. ON SP-1, IT APPEARS THAT
 THE TRUCKS MUST CROSS INTO ON-COMING TRAFFIC ON
 EXCHANGE COURT IN ORDER TO ENTER THE SITE.
  
 5. PLEASE SHOW THE LOCATION OF THE PROPOSED SIGNAGE FOR
 THE VEHICLE DROP-OFF AREA(S).
  
 6. WHAT IS THE CROSS-HATCHED AREA SHOWN ON SHEET SP-4,
 APPROXIMATELY 350 FEET FROM THE NORTHEAST PROPERTY
 CORNER?
  
 7. A MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WILL BE REQUIRED FOR THE
 NON-STANDARD ELEMENTS (TREES AND TREE GRATES; PAVERS,
 ETC.) PROPOSED WITHIN THE CITY?S RIGHT-OF-WAY.
  
 8. PRELIMINARY, UPDATED FEMA FLOOD INSURANCE MAPS ARE
 AVAILABLE AT HTTP://WWW.CO.PALM-BEACH.FL.US/NEWSROOM/08
 14/08-26-14-FLOOD_MAPS.HTM. PLEASE REVIEW THE MAPS AND
 VERIFY THAT THE NEW MAPS WILL NOT IMPACT THE PROPOSED
 PROJECT.
  
 KELLY CRANFORD, P.E.
 PUBLIC WORKS CIP MANAGER
 [email protected]
 561-494-1098 (OFFICE)
  
 VINCE NOEL, PSM
 CITY SURVEYOR / REAL ESTATE SUPERVISOR
 [email protected]
 561-494-1096
  
 BRIAN COLLINS, PE
 CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER
 [email protected]
 561-494-1040
  
 FERDINAND RIVERA
 PUBLIC WORKS OPERATIONS MANAGER
 [email protected]
 561-822-2076
  
 TRACY WARD, PE
 SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER
 561-494-1120
 [email protected]
  
  

Review Stop FIRE FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No 2 Status P Date 12-01-2015 Cont ID  
Sent By scaldero Date 12-01-2015 Time 08:17 Rev Time 0.00
Received By scaldero Date 12-01-2015 Time 08:10 Sent To  
Notes
2015-12-01 08:17:16PERMIT #Z15100028
 REVIEW COMMENTS - FIRE DEPARTMENT
  
 APPROVED WITH COMMENTS:
  
 1) THERE IS A CONCERN REGARDING ACCESSIBILITY FOR FIRE
 DEPT. VEHICLES TO CIRCULATE THE ENTIRE PERIMETER OF THE
 PROPERTY AND BUILDINGS. THE TURNING RADIUS WITHIN THE
 GARAGE MAY NOT BE SUFFICIENT FOR EMERGENCY VEHICLES TO
 UTILIZE THE GARAGE TO CIRCULATE THROUGH THE SITE.
 THIS ITEM CAN BE REVIEWED AND ADDRESSED DURING PLAN
 REVIEW FOR THE MASTER PERMIT. ONE SUGGESTION IS THE
 PLACEMENT OF AN AUTO-TURN. OTHER SUGGESTIONS ARE
 WELCOMED.
  
  
 SUE ELLEN CALDERON
 ASST. FIRE MARSHAL
 OFFICE OF THE FIRE MARSHA
 WEST PALM BEACH FIRE RESCUE
 [email protected]
 (561) 804-4751
  

Review Stop FIRE FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No 1 Status F Date 10-29-2015 Cont ID  
Sent By scaldero Date 10-29-2015 Time 16:42 Rev Time 0.00
Received By scaldero Date 10-29-2015 Time 16:05 Sent To  
Notes
2015-10-29 16:42:03PERMIT # Z15100028
 REVIEW COMMENTS - FIRE DEPARTMENT
  
 1) IT IS UNCLEAR, BASED ON THE PLANS SUBMITTED, WHAT
 HAS ALREADY BEEN APPROVED THROUGH PPRC AND WHAT IS
 BEING PROPOSED AS PART OF THIS NEW REQUEST.
  
 2) THERE IS A CONCERN REGARDING ACCESSIBILITY FOR FIRE
 DEPARTMENT VEHICLES TO CIRCULATE THE ENTIRE PERIMETER
 OF THE PROPERTY AND BUILDINGS.
  
 3) 20 FOOT CLEARANCE IN WIDTH IS REQUIRED AT ALL GATES
 FOR FIRE DEPARTMENT ACCESS.
 PER SECTION 18.2.3.4.1.1 (NFPA 1), FIRE DEPARTMENT
 ACCESS ROADS SHALL HAVE A SURFACE DESIGNED TO
 ACCOMMODATE FIRE APPARATUS WEIGHING AT LEAST 32 TONS.
 ACCESS ROADS SHALL HAVE AN UNOBSTRUCTED WIDTH OF NOT
 LESS THAN 20 FEET AND AN UNOBSTRUCTED VERTICAL
 CLEARANCE OF NOT LESS THAN 13 FEET 6 INCHES.
  
 4) KNOX BOX/KNOX KEY SWITCH WILL BE REQUIRED AT ALL
 ACCESSIBLE GATES.
  
 SUE ELLEN CALDERON
 ASST. FIRE MARSHAL
 OFFICE OF THE FIRE MARSHAL
 WEST PALM BEACH FIRE RESCUE
 [email protected]
 (561) 804-4751
  

Review Stop L LANDSCAPING
Rev No 3 Status P Date 12-31-2015 Cont ID  
Sent By rcaranci Date 12-31-2015 Time 14:55 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rcaranci Date 12-31-2015 Time 14:55 Sent To  
Notes
2015-12-31 15:01:40FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER
 PROJECT: BRAMAN MOTORCARS Z15100028
 DECEMBER 31, 2015
 I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND
 PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:
  
 1. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE A SUMMARY OF THE CHANGES
 IN NUMBER OF TREES AND SHRUBS COMPARED TO THE LAST
 APPROVED LANDSCAPE PLAN TO QUANTIFY THE EFFECT OF THE
 PROPOSED AMENDMENT. BUBBLING THE AREAS OF CHANGE ON THE
 PLAN WOULD BE HELPFUL.
  
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 11/30/15:
 2. SATISFIED. PLEASE CORRECT THE LANDSCAPE PLAN TO BE
 CONSISTENT WITH THE SITE PLAN FOR THE FOLLOWING:
 ? NUMBER OF DISPLAY PARKING SPACES IN A ROW
 ? REPRESENTATION OF THE GATES ALONG EXCHANGE COURT AS
 SLIDING GATES INSTEAD OF SWING GATES
 3. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE ADDITIONAL PALMS OR TREES
 IN THE EASTERN LANDSCAPE BUFFER IN THE AREA OF THE FPL
 TRANSFORMERS TO MEET THE SPACING REQUIRED BY CODE AND
 THE INTENT OF ADDITIONAL SCREENING FOR THE BUILDING TO
 DECREASE THE VISUAL IMPACT FOR THE SETBACK WAIVER.
  
 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON
 THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE
 SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT
 SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.
  

Review Stop L LANDSCAPING
Rev No 2 Status F Date 11-30-2015 Cont ID  
Sent By rcaranci Date 11-30-2015 Time 11:31 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rcaranci Date 11-30-2015 Time 11:31 Sent To  
Notes
2015-11-30 11:32:25FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER
 PROJECT: BRAMAN MOTORCARS Z15100028
 NOVEMBER 30, 2015
 I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND
 PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:
  
 1. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE A SUMMARY OF THE CHANGES
 IN NUMBER OF TREES AND SHRUBS COMPARED TO THE LAST
 APPROVED LANDSCAPE PLAN TO QUANTIFY THE EFFECT OF THE
 PROPOSED AMENDMENT. BUBBLING THE AREAS OF CHANGE ON THE
 PLAN WOULD BE HELPFUL.
  
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 11/30/15:
 2. PLEASE CORRECT THE LANDSCAPE PLAN TO BE CONSISTENT
 WITH THE SITE PLAN FOR THE FOLLOWING:
 ? NUMBER OF DISPLAY PARKING SPACES IN A ROW
 ? REPRESENTATION OF THE GATES ALONG EXCHANGE COURT AS
 SLIDING GATES INSTEAD OF SWING GATES
 3. PLEASE PROVIDE ADDITIONAL PALMS OR TREES IN THE
 EASTERN LANDSCAPE BUFFER IN THE AREA OF THE FPL
 TRANSFORMERS TO MEET THE SPACING REQUIRED BY CODE AND
 THE INTENT OF ADDITIONAL SCREENING FOR THE BUILDING TO
 DECREASE THE VISUAL IMPACT FOR THE SETBACK WAIVER.
  
 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON
 THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE
 SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT
 SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.
  

Review Stop L LANDSCAPING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 11-10-2015 Cont ID  
Sent By rcaranci Date 11-10-2015 Time 09:14 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rcaranci Date 11-10-2015 Time 09:14 Sent To  
Notes
2015-11-10 09:18:42NOVEMBER 5, 2015
 I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND
 PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:
  
 1. PLEASE PROVIDE A SUMMARY OF THE CHANGES IN NUMBER OF
 TREES AND SHRUBS COMPARED TO THE LAST APPROVED
 LANDSCAPE PLAN TO QUANTIFY THE EFFECT OF THE PROPOSED
 AMENDMENT. BUBBLING THE AREAS OF CHANGE ON THE PLAN
 WOULD BE HELPFUL.
  
 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON
 THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE
 SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT
 SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.
 RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER 561-822-1462
  
  

Review Stop PARK PARKING
Rev No 1 Status   Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time  
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***

Review Stop POLICE POLICE
Rev No 1 Status   Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time  
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***

Review Stop PW PUBLIC WORKS
Rev No 1 Status P Date 11-09-2015 Cont ID  
Sent By cranford Date 11-09-2015 Time 14:32 Rev Time 0.00
Received By cranford Date 11-09-2015 Time 14:32 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***

Review Stop STORM STORMWATER
Rev No 1 Status P Date 11-09-2015 Cont ID  
Sent By cranford Date 11-09-2015 Time 14:32 Rev Time 0.00
Received By cranford Date 11-09-2015 Time 14:31 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***

Review Stop SURVEY SURVEYING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 11-09-2015 Cont ID  
Sent By cranford Date 11-09-2015 Time 14:31 Rev Time 0.00
Received By cranford Date 11-09-2015 Time 14:31 Sent To  
Notes
2015-11-09 14:31:31SEE COMMENTS UNDER ENG PPRC

Review Stop TRAFFIC TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 11-09-2015 Cont ID  
Sent By cranford Date 11-09-2015 Time 14:31 Rev Time 0.00
Received By cranford Date 11-09-2015 Time 14:30 Sent To  
Notes
2015-11-09 14:31:13SEE COMMENTS UNDER ENG PPRC

Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 3 Status P Date 01-05-2016 Cont ID  
Sent By eschneid Date 01-05-2016 Time 09:56 Rev Time 2.00
Received By eschneid Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2016-01-05 09:56:43CONDITIONS WILL BE INCLUDED ON PLANNING BOARD REPORT

Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 2 Status F Date 11-30-2015 Cont ID  
Sent By eschneid Date 11-30-2015 Time 16:17 Rev Time 5.00
Received By eschneid Date 11-30-2015 Time 16:17 Sent To  
Notes
2015-12-08 10:14:56CASE NO. PB 1222N
 BRAMAN MOTORCARS CPD - SERVICE BAY AMENDMENT
 2901 OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD
  
 - CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446
  
 - PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN
 WRITTEN FORMAT.
  
 - WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF ELEVEN
 (11) PAPER COPIES AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY IN .PNG FORMAT
 OF ALL PLANS. PLEASE NOTE THAT CHANGES ON THE
 RESUBMITTED PLANS OR THE SUBMITTAL OF INFORMATION/PLANS
 TO ADDRESS THE COMMENTS MAY RESULT IN ADDITIONAL
 COMMENTS.
  
 - THE PPRC COMMENTS SHALL BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED AND
 SUBMITTED TO THE PLANNING DIVISION BY 5 PM ON MONDAY,
 DECEMBER 14, 2015, TO BE ELIGIBLE TO BE SCHEDULED FOR
 THE JANUARY 20, 2016 PLANNING BOARD MEETING.
  
 - PLEASE NOTE THAT IF THE PLANNING DIVISION HAS NOT
 RECEIVED A RESPONSE TO THE COMMENTS WITHIN 60 DAYS FROM
 THE DATE OF THESE COMMENTS (BY JANUARY 30, 2016), THE
 CASE SHALL BE CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN. ANY FURTHER ACTION
 SHALL REQUIRE A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION.
  
 - PLEASE NOTE THAT PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED COMMENTS WERE NOT
 SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED; THEREFORE, THE APPLICANT WILL
 BE ACCESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE WILL IS 20% OF
 THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE ($600).
  
 - PUBLIC HEARING NOTIFICATION SIGNAGE SHALL BE POSTED
 IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION
 94-39(I)(5) OF THE ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT
 REGULATIONS.
  
 1) NEW COMMENT: THE REVISED DRIVEWAY ENTRANCES ALONG
 EXCHANGE COURT SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE CITY?S
 ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT FOR TECHNICAL FUNCTIONALITY.
  
 2) REPEAT COMMENT: DEMONSTRATE HOW A TRUCK WOULD ACCESS
 THE RELOCATED 10 FOOT X 50 FOOT LOADING SPACE ON THE
 FIRST LEVEL OF THE PARKING GARAGE. THE NARRATIVE OF HOW
 A TRUCK ACCESSES THIS SPACE DOES NOT DEMONSTRATE HOW
 THE TRUCK WOULD ACCESS THE SPACE. THE TURN IN FROM
 OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD AND IMMEDIATE TURN AGAIN DOWN THE
 DRIVE AISLE VISUALLY LOOK TO SEVERE FOR A BIG DELIVERY
 TRUCK TO NEGOTIATE. THE ARCHITECTURAL FLOOR PLANS DO
 NOT SHOW A LOADING SPACE AT THE SAME LOCATION AS THE
 SITE PLAN. BOTH PLANS SHOW NUMEROUS CONFLICTING LINES
 (CURB LINES?) WHICH WOULD MAKE IT DIFFICULT IF NOT
 IMPOSSIBLE TO ACCESS THE SPACE. THE PLANS SHALL ALL
 MATCH AND VERIFY THAT THIS IS A USABLE LOADING SPACE OR
 AN ALTERNATE SPACE SHALL BE PROVIDED ON THE SITE.
  
 3) REPEAT COMMENT: THE RELOCATED BICYCLE PAD WITH RACKS
 DOES NOT COMPLY WITH THE LOCATIONAL REQUIREMENTS OF
 SECTION 94-485(Q)2. THE BICYCLE PARKING SPACES SHALL BE
 ACCESSIBLE WITHOUT REQUIRING THE USER TO TRAVERSE A
 LANDSCAPE AREA (IN THIS CASE SOD) OR TO NEGOTIATE
 BETWEEN PARKED CARS IF THE PARKING SPACES ARE IN USE.
 THERE IS AN AREA IN FRONT OF BUILDING E THAT COULD
 EASILY FIT THE BICYCLE PARKING.
  
 4) REVISED COMMENT: PLEASE VERIFY THAT THE HEIGHT OF
 THE NEW GARAGE IS 77 FEET 9 INCHES. THIS HEIGHT SHALL
 BE INCLUDED IN THE SITE DATA TABLE. WHILE THIS IS TWO
 (2) FEET TALLER THAN THE ORIGINALLY APPROVED GARAGE,
 BASED ON THE METHOD OF HEIGHT/SETBACK MEASUREMENT IN
 THE ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS, THERE IS
 ACTUALLY NO INCREASE IN THE REQUIRED EAST SIDE SETBACK.
 PLEASE USE THE SAME WAIVER VALUES OF 13.5 FEET FOR THE
 BUILDING AND 22 FEET FOR THE BUILDING OVERHANG IN THE
 WAIVER AS SHOWN ON THE CURRENTLY APPROVED SITE PLAN.
 THERE IS NO NEED TO UPDATE THE JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT.
  
 5) REVISED COMMENT: THE NEW PORSCHE SERVICE BAY
 CONFIGURATION APPEARS TO HAVE 18 SERVICE BAYS, NOT 17
 AS LISTED. THE AREAS THAT ARE NOT FOR SERVICE USE SHALL
 BE MARKED ON THE SITE AND ARCHITECTURAL PLANS. IF THE
 SPACE IS NOT MARKED AS SOMETHING OTHER THAN SERVICE,
 THEN IT WILL RESULT IN ONE EXTRA REQUIRED PARKING SPACE
 ON THE SITE.
  
 6) REPEAT COMMENT: THE TOTAL INTERIOR SPACE COUNTED FOR
 PARKING IS 120,390 SQUARE FEET, WHICH AT 1 PARKING
 SPACE PER 500 SQUARE FEET REQUIRES 241 PARKING SPACES,
 NOT 240 AS LISTED. THE SERVICE PARTS/STORAGE AREAS ARE
 COVERED BY THE 1ST LEVEL OF THE GARAGE. THESE TWO AREAS
 ARE COVERED AND NOT OPEN TO THE SKY; THEREFORE, THEY
 SHALL BE COUNTED TOWARDS MEETING THE ENCLOSED AREA
 PARKING REQUIREMENTS. THIS SHALL BE ALL UNDER ONE LINE
 ITEM ON THE PARKING TABLE, NOT TWO AS SHOWN ON THE
 REVISED PLANS.
  
 7) NEW COMMENT: THERE ARE 537, NOT 534 PARKING SPACES
 PROVIDED. PLEASE UPDATE THE TABLE.
  
 8) REPEAT COMMENT: THERE ARE SOME INCONSISTENT CURB
 LINES WITHIN THE DRIVEWAY BETWEEN BUILDINGS D AND E ON
 THE ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN. (SEE ZONING COMMENT NO.
 2).
  
 9) REPEAT COMMENT: THE PAVING AND DRAINAGE PLAN DOES
 NOT SHOW SAME DIMENSIONS AS THE SITE PLAN ON THE NORTH
 SIDE OF THE MINI BUILDING FOR THE DRIVE AISLE AND
 PARKING STALL DEPTH.
  
 10) NEW COMMENT: PLEASE CLARIFY THE GATES ALONG
 EXCHANGE CT. STAFF WAS UNDER THE IMPRESSION THAT THESE
 WILL BE ROLLING GATES (DETAILS ON SITE PLAN INDICATE
 THIS); HOWEVER, THE LANDSCAPE PLANS CALL THEM OUT AS
 SWING GATES. IN EITHER CASE, THE GATES LOOK LIKE THEY
 WILL BE CONFLICTING WITH LANDSCAPE WHEN THEY ARE OPEN.
 NOTE THE SWING GATES WILL BLOCK THE DRIVE AISLES WHEN
 THEY ARE OPENED, SO ROLLING GATES SEEM TO BE A BETTER
 OPTION.
  
 11) NEW COMMENT: THE CIVIL PLANS CALL OUT NEW LIGHT
 POLES NORTH OF THE NEW MINI SERVICE AREA. THESE ARE NOT
 CALLED OUT AS NEW ON THE SITE PLAN. PLEASE REMEMBER
 THAT ALL NEW LIGHT POLES SHALL BE SET BACK FIVE (5)
 FEET FROM THE PROPERTY LINE.
  
 12) REPEAT COMMENT (FROM PPRC MEETING): AT THE PPRC
 MEETING, THE BUILDING OFFICIAL MADE A COMMENT REGARDING
 FIRE EGRESS FROM THE NORTH SIDE OF THE BUILDING TO THE
 PUBLIC SIDEWALK NETWORK SO THAT PEOPLE WOULD NOT NEED
 TO WALK THROUGH A POTENTIAL HAZARD IN THE BUILDING TO
 GET OUT ON THE SOUTH SIDE. STAFF IS UNABLE TO LOCATE
 THIS ON THE PLANS.
  

Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 11-10-2015 Cont ID  
Sent By eschneid Date 11-10-2015 Time 10:40 Rev Time 10.00
Received By eschneid Date 11-10-2015 Time 10:40 Sent To  
Notes
2015-11-10 10:42:57CASE NO. PB 1222N
 BRAMAN MOTORCARS CPD - SERVICE BAY AMENDMENT
 2901 OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD
  
 - CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446
  
 - PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN
 WRITTEN FORMAT.
  
 - WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF ELEVEN
 (11) PAPER COPIES AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY IN .PNG FORMAT
 OF ALL PLANS. PLEASE NOTE THAT CHANGES ON THE
 RESUBMITTED PLANS OR THE SUBMITTAL OF INFORMATION/PLANS
 TO ADDRESS THE COMMENTS MAY RESULT IN ADDITIONAL
 COMMENTS.
  
 - THE PPRC COMMENTS SHALL BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED AND
 SUBMITTED TO THE PLANNING DIVISION BY 5 PM ON FRIDAY,
 NOVEMBER 20, 2015, TO BE SCHEDULED FOR THE DECEMBER 15,
 2015 PLANNING BOARD MEETING.
  
 - PLEASE NOTE THAT IF THE PLANNING DIVISION HAS NOT
 RECEIVED A RESPONSE TO THE PPRC COMMENTS WITHIN 60 DAYS
 FROM THE DATE OF THE PPRC MEETING (BY JANUARY 12,
 2015), THE CASE SHALL BE CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN. ANY
 FURTHER ACTION SHALL REQUIRE A NEW DEVELOPMENT
 APPLICATION.
  
 - PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1)
 RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED
 COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE
 APPLICANT WILL BE ACCESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE
 WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE ($600).
  
 - PUBLIC HEARING NOTIFICATION SIGNAGE SHALL BE POSTED
 IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION
 94-39(I)(5) OF THE ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT
 REGULATIONS.
  
 1) THE DRIVEWAY ENTRANCES ALONG EXCHANGE COURT SHALL BE
 RECONFIGURED SO THAT THE LARGE TRUCKS AND CAR CARRIERS
 ACCESSING THE SITE ARE NOT FORCED TO UTILIZE THE
 ONCOMING LANE OF TRAFFIC WHEN ENTERING OR LEAVING THE
 SITE. ADDITIONALLY, THE TRUCK TURNING MOVEMENTS SHALL
 NOT FORCE THE TRUCKS INTO PARKING SPACES OR OVER
 LANDSCAPE BUFFERS AS SHOWN ON THE SUBMITTED PLANS. THIS
 WAS CONVEYED TO UDKS DURING THE PUBLIC HEARINGS FOR THE
 RECENTLY APPROVED EXPANSION.
  
 2) DEMONSTRATE HOW A TRUCK WOULD ACCESS THE RELOCATED
 10 FOOT X 50 FOOT LOADING SPACE ON THE FIRST LEVEL OF
 THE PARKING GARAGE.
  
 3) WHERE IS THE THIRD REQUIRED 10 FOOT X 50 FOOT
 LOADING SPACE? IT SHALL NOT BE SHOWN BLOCKING A DRIVE
 AISLE OR PARKING AND SHALL BE ACCESSIBLE BY A TRUCK.
 STAFF UNDERSTANDS THAT THERE ARE ADDITIONAL AREAS
 ON-SITE THAT MAY BE USED TO LOAD AND UNLOAD DURING
 CERTAIN TIMES THAT MAY NOT BE OFFICIALLY DESIGNATED
 LOADING SPACES.
  
 4) THE RELOCATED BICYCLE PAD WITH RACKS DOES NOT COMPLY
 WITH THE LOCATIONAL REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 94-485(Q)2.
  
 5) THERE ARE AREAS ON THE PLANS WHERE PARKING TAGS AND
 THE ACTUAL NUMBER OF SPACES DO NOT AGREE. SOME EXAMPLES
 ARE LISTED BELOW, THERE ARE MORE. ALL PARKING SHALL BE
 ACCURATELY REFLECTED ON THE PLANS AND ON THE DATA
 TABLES.
 A. THE ROW OF CUSTOMER PARKING IN FRONT OF THE BMW
 SHOWROOM IS INCORRECTLY LABELED AS 10 SPACES WHEN IT
 HAS 11 SPACES.
 B. THE SOUTHWEST VEHICLE DISPLAY BAY (FRONTING
 OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD) ONLY HAS 11 DISPLAY BAYS NOT 12
 AS LISTED.
  
 6) UPON COUNTING THE CUSTOMER PARKING SPACES, THERE IS
 A PARKING ROW WITH 11 SPACES ALONG OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD
 THAT IS MARKED AS HAVING ONLY 10 SPACES. THIS EITHER
 NEEDS TO BE CORRECTED OR A WAIVER FOR THE NUMBER OF
 PARKING SPACES IN A ROW NEEDS TO BE APPROVED BY THE
 CITY COMMISSION. IF REQUESTED, JUSTIFICATION FOR THIS
 WAIVER IS REQUIRED.
  
 7) STAFF COUNTS 252 SURFACE PARKING SPACES PROVIDED,
 NOT 247 AS STATED ON THE PLANS. RECOUNT YOUR PARKING
 NUMBERS. ACCURATE INFORMATION IS REQUIRED.
  
 8) STAFF COUNTS 289 SURFACE VEHICLE DISPLAY SPACES, NOT
 246 AS STATED ON THE PLANS. PART OF THIS DISCREPANCY IS
 THE SEVEN MISLABELED VEHICLE DISPLAY BAYS. THE
 REMAINDER IS THE 24 SPACES THAT ARE NOT INCLUDED IN THE
 AREA JUST LABELED "BRICK PAVER PARKING" WHICH IS IN
 FRONT OF BUILDING B. PLEASE PROVIDE HOW THE AMOUNT OF
 OUTDOOR VEHICLE DISPLAY AREA WAS CALCULATED. STAFF
 CALCULATED A DIFFERENT AMOUNT AND THUS THE PARKING
 COUNT PROVIDED ON THE PLANS DO NOT MATCH THE STAFF'S
 TOTAL REQUIRED.
  
 9) DETAILS FROM THE APPROVED SITE PLAN ARE NOT INCLUDED
 ON THE RESUBMITTED PLANS. SOME EXAMPLES ARE LISTED
 BELOW. PLEASE ENSURE THAT YOU USE THE JULY 9, 2015
 REVISION THAT WAS APPROVED, NOT THE JULY 8, 2015
 VERSION THAT WAS SUBMITTED.
 A. REMOVABLE BOLLARD LABELS AND LOCATIONS.
 B. THE SETBACKS AND DIMENSIONS OF THE BICYCLE PAD
 BEHIND BUILDING B.
 C. THE WAIVER TABLE.
  
 10) PLEASE EXPLAIN HOW THE BUILDING LOT COVERAGE
 INCREASED AND A VISUAL COMPARISON OF THE APPROVED VS.
 THE NEW PLANS SHOWS MORE PAVED AREAS AND LESS
 LANDSCAPE, YET THE AMOUNT OF ON-SITE LANDSCAPE
 PERCENTAGE DID NOT DECREASE.
  
 11) THE NEW PORSCHE SERVICE BAY CONFIGURATION APPEARS
 TO HAVE 18 SERVICE BAYS, NOT 17 AS LISTED.
  
 12) THE NEW CENTER SERVICE BAY (BEHIND BUILDING D) IS
 LISTED ON THE SITE PLAN AS HAVING 12 BAYS, BUT STAFF
 ONLY COUNTS 10 BAYS. PLEASE EXPLAIN.
  
 13) STAFF CANNOT VERIFY PARKING REQUIREMENTS WITHOUT
 ACCURATE COUNT OF THE SERVICE BAYS.
  
 14) THE TOTAL INTERIOR SPACE COUNTED FOR PARKING IS
 120,390 SQUARE FEET, WHICH AT 1 PARKING SPACE PER 500
 SQUARE FEET REQUIRES 241 PARKING SPACES, NOT 240 AS
 LISTED.
  
 15) THERE ARE SOME INCONSISTENT CURB LINES WITHIN THE
 DRIVEWAY BETWEEN BUILDINGS D AND E ON THE ARCHITECTURAL
 SITE PLAN.
  
 16) THE TOTAL NUMBER OF SPACES IN THE GARAGE IS 653
 WHEN ADDING UP THE LINE ITEMS ON SHEET A-2.0 (5TH FLOOR
 SHOWS A REDUCTION OF 4 SPACES VS. APPROVED PLAN). THIS
 AFFECTS EITHER THE INVENTORY OR SERVICE PARKING SPACES.
 STAFFS COUNT OF THE SPACES ON THE 5TH FLOOR ONLY RESULT
 IN 117 PARKING SPACES. THE "RECONDITIONING SPACES" MAY
 NOT COUNT TOWARD MEETING PARKING REQUIREMENTS.
  
 17) STAFF EXPECTS THAT THE NEW GARAGE WILL RESULT IN
 THE VEHICLE DISPLAY SPACES ONLY HOLDING ONE CAR PER
 SPACE AS INTENDED AND NOT MULTIPLE CARS THAT BOTH
 ENCROACH INTO DRIVE AISLES, BUT ALSO TAKE UP MORE
 SQUARE FOOTAGE, WHICH THEN RESULTS IN THE REQUIREMENT
 FOR MORE CUSTOMER PARKING SPACES.
  
 18) THE GARAGE HEIGHT HAS INCREASED. THIS REQUIRES THE
 CITY COMMISSION TO APPROVE A REVISED SETBACK WAIVER. IF
 REQUESTED, JUSTIFICATION FOR THIS WAIVER IS REQUIRED.
  
 19) THE PAVING AND DRAINAGE PLAN DOES NOT SHOW SAME
 DIMENSIONS AS THE SITE PLAN ON THE NORTH SIDE OF THE
 MINI BUILDING FOR THE DRIVE AISLE AND PARKING STALL
 DEPTH.
  
 20) PLEASE EXPLAIN WHY THERE ARE SABAL PALMS PLANTED ON
 TOP OF THE FPL TRANSFORMERS IN THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF
 THE SITE.
  
 21) PROVIDE THE FOUNDATION PLANTING CALCULATIONS SO
 THAT STAFF CAN VERIFY THE 30% MINIMUM IS MET FOR THE
 NEW BUILDINGS.
  

  Print


Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved