Plan Review Details - Project Z15100025
Plan Review Stops For Project Z15100025
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 1 Status P Date 11-12-2015 Cont ID  
Sent By rbrown Date 11-12-2015 Time 12:10 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rbrown Date 11-12-2015 Time 12:09 Sent To  
Notes
2015-11-12 12:16:33DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, BUILDING DIVISION,
 COMMENTS:
  
 1. THIS REVIEW IS A CURSORY REVIEW AS IT RELATES TO THE
 SITE. IT IS NOT A REVIEW FOR FULL COMPLIANCE WITH
 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE. THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE TO BE
 ADDRESSED FOR PERMITTING.
  
 2. FOR SOMEONE NEEDING AN ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACE,
 WILL THE OWNER OF THE VEHICLE BE TAKING THE VEHICLE
 INTO THE VEHICLE ELEVATOR, AND CAN THE ELAVATOR
 ACCOMODATE AN ACCESSIBLE VAN. PER SECTION 208.2.4 OF
 FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY CODE, ONE IN EVERY SIX ACCESSIBLE
 SPACES (AT LEAST ONE) IN A PARKING STRUCTURE, SHALL BE
 ?VAN ACCESSIBLE? AND DESIGNED IN ACCORDANCE WITH
 SECTION OF 502 OF FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY CODE (VERTICAL
 CLEARANCE NOT LESS THAN 98 INCHES AT SPACE AND
 VEHICULAR ACCESS ROUTE)
  
 3. WHEN SUBMITTED FOR BUILDING PERMIT, THE PLANS SHALL
 SHOW THAT THE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION FOR THE BUILDINGS
 WILL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE HEIGHT, AREA AND
 OCCUPANCY LIMITATIONS IN CHAPTER 5 OF THE FLORIDA
 BUILDING CODE
  
 4. WHEN SUBMITTED FOR BUILDING PERMIT, COMPLIANCE WITH
 ALL BUILDING SEPARATION, PERCENTAGE OF OPENINGS AND
 OPENING PROTECTIVE REQUIREMENTS OF CHAPTERS 6 AND 7 OF
 THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE SHALL BE VERIFIED.
  
 5. ENCLOSED PARKING GARAGES. IF THE PARKING GARAGE DOES
 NOT HAVE WALL OPENINGS, OR SUFFICIENT WALL OPENINGS TO
 MEET THE DEFINITION OF AN OPEN PARKING GARAGE, IT WILL
 BE CONSIDERED AN ENCLOSED PARKING GARAGE AND MUST HAVE
 EXHAUST SYSTEMS. THE EXHAUST SYSTEMS SHALL BE DESIGNED
 TO MINIMIZE NOISE LEVELS USING INLINE FAN SILENCERS OR
 OTHER APPROVED METHODS.
  
 6. SEPARATE PERMITS REQUIRED. ALL APPLICABLE PERMITS
 AND SUB-PERMITS MUST BE OBTAINED BEFORE COMMENCING THE
 WORK. SEPARATE PERMITS, PLANS AND FEES, ARE REQUIRED
 FOR SIGNS, SWIMMING POOLS AND SPAS, GAS SYSTEMS,
 GENERATORS, FIRE ALARM SYSTEMS, FIRE SPRINKLER AND
 OTHER FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEMS, GREASE INTERCEPTORS,
 SITE LIGHTING, SITE LANDSCAPE, SITE IRRIGATION, ETC.
  
 7. FOR STREET ADDRESSING, CONTACT MICHAEL ORIO, GIS
 SUPPORT SPECIALIST, AT (561) 494 1080, OR BY EMAIL:
 [email protected]
  
 8. THIS PROJECT WILL BE SUBJECT TO ART IN PUBLIC PLACES
 (AIPP) ASSESSMENT. FOR ADVICE ON THE PROVISION OF
 PUBLIC ARTWORK IN LIEU OF THE AIPP ASSESSMENT, CONTACT
 SYBILLE WELTER, ART IN PUBLIC PLACES COORDINATOR, AT
 (561) 822-1521, OR BY EMAIL: [email protected]
  
 ROBERT BROWN
 BUILDING OFFICIAL
 TEL: 561 805 6652
 EMAIL: [email protected]
  
Review Stop ENG - PPRC ENGINEERING - PPRC
Rev No 2 Status F Date 08-16-2016 Cont ID  
Sent By vnoel Date 08-16-2016 Time 12:56 Rev Time 0.00
Received By vnoel Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2016-08-16 12:56:091. PRIVATE WASTE COLLECTION IS ONLY ALLOWED FOR LARGE
 ROLL-OFF COMPACTORS. PLEASE CONTACT FERDINAND RIVERA,
 PUBLIC WORKS OPERATIONS AT 822-2076 FOR DISCUSSION AND
 APPROVAL.
 2. THE 12 FOOT PORTION OF TRINITY PLACE WILL NEED TO BE
 DEDICATED TO THE CITY WHEN REPLATTED.
 3. PREVIOUS COMMENTS OF ENGINEERING AND PLAT SUBMITTAL
 STILL PERTAIN.
 4. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS FROM TRANSPORTATION, STORMWATER
 AND UTILITIES ARE FORTHCOMING.
Review Stop ENG - PPRC ENGINEERING - PPRC
Rev No 1 Status F Date 11-10-2015 Cont ID  
Sent By cranford Date 11-10-2015 Time 10:39 Rev Time 0.00
Received By cranford Date 11-10-2015 Time 10:38 Sent To  
Notes
2015-11-10 10:38:57CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH
 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
  
 THIS IS A CONCEPTUAL LEVEL REVIEW. CONSTRUCTION LEVEL
 DETAILS, DESIGN CALCULATIONS AND THE POLLUTION
 PREVENTION PLAN WILL BE REVIEWED AS PART OF THE
 ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL AND BUILDING PERMIT
 APPLICATION PROCESSES. THE ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT
 APPROVAL APPLICATION FORMS CAN BE DOWNLOADED AT
 HTTP://WPB.ORG/ENGINEERING/FORMS-AND-PUBLICATIONS/
  
 THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO SITE
 PLAN APPROVAL.
  
 1. PLEASE SUBMIT ESTIMATES FOR THE PEAK POTABLE WATER
 DEMAND, SANITARY SEWER FLOW, AND SOLID WASTE COLLECTION
 YARDAGE.
  
 2. A TRAFFIC STUDY WILL BE REQUIRED FOR THIS PROJECT
 SHOWING HOW THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT WILL AFFECT THE
 TRAFFIC VOLUME AND SURROUNDING LOCAL ROADWAYS. INCLUDE
 TRAFFIC ACCIDENT DATA FOR AFFECTED STREET CORRIDORS.
 ESTIMATE INCREASED OR DECREASED POTENTIAL. SAFETY
 IMPROVEMENTS SHALL BE RECOMMENDED WHERE NECESSARY.
 EVALUATE THE IMPACT ON THE TRINITY/DIXIE INTERSECTION
 DURING PEAK HOURS DURING SEASON. (STAFF HAS FREQUENTLY
 OBSERVED TRAFFIC BACKING UP ON DIXIE PASS THE
 INTERSECTION OF TRINITY.) PLEASE SCHEDULE A MEETING
 WITH THE CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER (BRIAN COLLINS) TO
 DETERMINE THE SCOPE OF THE REQUIRED STUDY.
  
 3. PLEASE SUBMIT DATA DEMONSTRATING THE PROPOSED VALET
 SERVICES, INCLUDING CARS WAITING TO ENTER THE
 ELEVATION, WILL NOT STACK OR QUEUE CARS WITHIN THE
 PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY.
  
 4. PLEASE EXPLAIN THE OPERATION OF THE PARKING GARAGE.
 WHAT HAPPENS IF ONE OR BOTH OF THE ELEVATORS BREAKS? IS
 A SINGLE ELEVATOR SUFFICIENT TO HANDLE TRAFFIC FLOWS
 DURING EVENTS (WEDDINGS, CONFERENCES, ETC.)?
  
 5. PLEASE REVISE THE DRIVEWAY APRONS TO MEET THE CITY?S
 ENGINEERING DESIGN STANDARDS. HTTP://WPB.ORG/ENGINEERIN
 G/ENGINEERING-SERVICES/ENGINEERING-STANDARDS/
  
 6. A MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WILL BE REQUIRED FOR THE
 NON-STANDARD ELEMENTS (TREES AND TREE GRATES; PAVERS,
 ETC.) PROPOSED WITHIN CITY RIGHT-OF-WAY.
  
 7. WHERE IS THE PROPOSED DUMPSTER/COMPACTOR LOCATION?
 PLEASE PROVIDE AN AUTOTURN ANALYSIS DEMONSTRATING THE
 SOLID WASTE COLLECTION VEHICLE CAN ACCESS THE PROPOSED
 DUMPSTER AND COMPACTOR LOCATIONS. THE TRASH
 DUMPSTER/COMPACTORS MUST LOCATED IN AREAS EASILY
 SERVICED BY THE CITY SANITATION EQUIPMENT AND MANPOWER
 PER SECTION 74-35(A)(5) OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES. IF A
 ROLL-OFF COMPACTOR IS PROPOSED, PLEASE PROVIDE A LETTER
 FROM THE PRIVATE PROVIDER VERIFYING THAT THEY CAN
 PROVIDE SERVICE WITH THE CONFIGURATION SHOWN ON THE
 PLANS.
  
 8. PROVIDE VERTICAL PROFILES FOR THE PARKING GARAGE
 RAMPS INCLUDING THE TRANSITION AREA GEOMETRY.
  
 9. PRELIMINARY, UPDATED FEMA FLOOD INSURANCE MAPS ARE
 AVAILABLE AT HTTP://WWW.CO.PALM-BEACH.FL.US/NEWSROOM/08
 14/08-26-14-FLOOD_MAPS.HTM. PLEASE REVIEW THE MAPS AND
 VERIFY THAT THE NEW MAPS WILL NOT IMPACT THE PROPOSED
 PROJECT.
  
 10. PLEASE SHOW THE SIGHT TRIANGLES ON THE GROUND FLOOR
 LANDSCAPING PLAN FOR THE INTERSECTIONS AND VEHICULAR
 EXITS. (SECTION 94-305E, CODE OF ORDINANCES)
  
 11. PER SECTION 2.21.2 OF THE CITY RIGHT OF WAY
 STANDARDS MANUAL, PROJECTS WHICH DISTURB 40% OR MORE OF
 A ROADWAY (LINEAR FOOTAGE) PER BLOCK WILL BE REQUIRED
 TO MILL AND RESURFACE THE ENTIRE BLOCK. ALL STRIPING
 WITHIN THE CITY RIGHTS-OF-WAY TO BE THERMOPLASTIC.
  
 12. PLEASE SCHEDULE A MEETING WITH THE CITY?S TRAFFIC
 ENGINEER TO FINALIZE THE DESIGN OF IMPROVEMENTS WITHIN
 THE TRINITY PLACE RIGHT-OF-WAY.
  
 13. PLEASE EXPLAIN THE ?BUS ZONE? NOTE ON SHEET A2.1
 ALONG DIXIE.
  
 14. PLEASE REVISE THE ELEVATION SHEET TO SHOW ALL
 CANOPIES, CORNICES AND OTHER FEATURES WHICH PROJECT
 FROM THE BUILDING FACE.
  
 15. THE AVAILABLE WATER PRESSURE IN THIS PORTION OF THE
 CITY MAY NOT BE ACCEPTABLE AT ELEVATIONS HIGHER THAN
 THE 2ND FLOOR. WE RECOMMEND A LONG-TERM PRESSURE STUDY
 BE PERFORMED PRIOR TO FINALIZATION OF THE UTILITY
 DESIGN.
  
 16. PLEASE SHOW THE LOCATIONS OF ROOF DRAINS AND
 INDICATE WHERE THE DISCHARGE WILL BE DIRECTED. RUNOFF
 VELOCITY AND VOLUME SHOULD NOT EXCEED EXISTING
 CONDITIONS.
  
 17. PLEASE REMOVE THE PROPOSED EXFILTRATION TRENCH FROM
 THE CITY?S RIGHT-OF-WAY ALONG DIXIE. WATER QUALITY
 TREATMENT AND STORM ATTENUATION ARE TO BE PROVIDED ON
 PROPERTY OWNED BY THE APPLICANT.
  
 18. PLEASE MEET WITH CITY ENGINEERING STAFF TO DISCUSS
 THE PROPOSED UTILITY CONNECTION LOCATION(S).
  
 19. PLEASE CLARIFY THE PLAN FOR THE PARKING SPACES
 ALONG TRINITY. ARE THE EXISTING METERED SPACES PROPOSED
 TO BE RELOCATED TO THE SHOWN LOCATIONS OR ARE THE SHOWN
 SPACES FOR VALET QUEUING ONLY? IF THE SPACES WILL BE
 FOR PUBLIC USE, CONSIDER DEDICATING A PORTION OF THE
 PROPERTY TO THE CITY FOR TRINITY PLACE RIGHT-OF-WAY.
  
 THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO
 ISSUANCE OF CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZATION INCLUDING
 BUILDING PERMITS AND ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL.
  
 1. AN ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL APPLICATION WILL
 BE REQUIRED FROM THE ENGINEERING DIVISION OF THE PUBLIC
 WORKS DEPARTMENT. THE ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL
 APPLICATION FORMS CAN BE DOWNLOADED AT
 HTTP://WPB.ORG/ENGINEERING/FORMS-AND-PUBLICATIONS/
  
 2. A SEPARATE SUBMITTAL WILL BE REQUIRED TO THE
 ENGINEERING DIVISION OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT FOR
 PLAT APPROVAL. PLEASE CONTACT VINCE NOEL AT
 [email protected] TO GET A COPY OF THE PLAT APPLICATION.
  
 3. A SEPARATE SUBMITTAL WILL BE REQUIRED TO THE
 ENGINEERING DIVISION OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT FOR
 THE AERIAL / FOOTER ENCROACHMENT AGREEMENT. PLEASE
 CONTACT VINCE NOEL AT [email protected] TO GET A COPY OF
 THE APPLICATION.
  
 KELLY CRANFORD, P.E.
 LAND DEVELOPMENT ENGINEER
 [email protected]
 561-494-1098 (OFFICE)
  
 VINCE NOEL, PSM
 CITY SURVEYOR / REAL ESTATE SUPERVISOR
 [email protected]
 561-494-1096
  
 BRIAN COLLINS, PE
 CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER
 [email protected]
 561-494-1040
  
 FERDINAND RIVERA
 PUBLIC WORKS OPERATIONS MANAGER
 [email protected]
 561-822-2076
  
 TRACY WARD, PE
 SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER
 561-494-1120
 [email protected]
  
  
Review Stop FIRE FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No 2 Status P Date 01-20-2016 Cont ID  
Sent By pleduc Date 01-20-2016 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By pleduc Date 01-20-2016 Time 10:33 Sent To  
Notes
2016-01-20 10:35:422ND REVIEW RESPONSE
  
 AFTER A REVIEW OF THE PPRC RESPONSE DOCUMENTS DATED
 JANUARY 7, 2016, FROM ANA MARIA APONTE, CITY URBAN
 DESIGNER, THE PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED FIRE PREVENTION
 BUREAU COMMENTS REMAIN CONSTRUCTION PLAN REVIEW
 RELATED.
  
 THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE RE- SUBMITTED TO HIGHLIGHT
 SIGNIFICANT REVIEW POINTS OF LIFE SAFETY THAT NEED TO
 BE ADDRESSED WITH THE BUILDING PLAN SUBMITTAL.
  
 6. ALL PARKING STRUCTURES SHALL COMPLY WITH NFPA 88A,
 PARKING STRUCTURES AND NFPA 101, THE LIFE SAFETY CODE,
 INCLUDING MORE SPECIFICALLY, CHAPTER 42 STORAGE
 OCCUPANCIES (PARKING STRUCTURES)
 IF THE VEHICLE IN THE VEHICLE ELEVATOR IS OCCUPIED, IT
 SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH A FIRE & LIFE SAFETY PROTECTION
 SYSTEM.
  
 16. THE 7TH FLOOR OPEN-AIRTERRACE AREA APPEARS TO
 REQUIRE A SECOND EXIT. A DETAILED ANALYSIS IS REQUIRED.
  
 17. THE 14TH FLOOR LEVEL APPEARS TO REQUIRE A THIRD
 EXIT. A DETAILED ANALYSIS IS REQUIRED.
  
 18. COMMAND ROOM
  
 PLEASE SWAP THE LOCATION OF THE FIRE CONTROL ROOM WITH
 THE EMERGENCY POWER ROOM AND PROVIDE A MAN-DOOR TO THE
 ROOM, NOT A ROLL-UP DOOR. THIS ALLOWS FOR GREATER FD
 OPERATIONAL CREW ACCESS
  
 19. RADIO
  
 PLEASE ENSURE THIS REQUIRMENT IS MET AND TESTED.
  
 THE BUREAU'S HAS NO OBJECTION TO THE PROJECT AND
 APPROVAL OF THIS SUBMITTED PROJECT DOES NOT CONSTITUTE
 IT'S FINAL REVIEW OR APPROVAL.
  
 THE BUREAU SHALL REVIEW ALL SUBMITTED BUILDING PLANS AT
 THE APPROPRIATE TIME AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE
 REQUIREMENTS OF ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND STANDARDS.
  
  
 PETER LEDUC
 FIRE MARSHAL
 WEST PALM BEACH FIRE RESCUE
 561-804-4709
 [email protected]
  
  
  
  
  
  
Review Stop FIRE FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No 1 Status F Date 11-05-2015 Cont ID  
Sent By pleduc Date 11-05-2015 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By rbrown Date 11-12-2015 Time 12:06 Sent To  
Notes
2015-11-05 15:18:48THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS WERE SUBMITTED BY PETER LEDUC,
 FIRE MARSHAL, BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION, WEST PALM
 BEACH FIRE RESCUE.
  
 THIS REVIEW CAN ONLY BE CONSIDERED PRELIMINARY AS THE
 DRAWINGS THAT WERE REVIEWED WERE NOT COMPLETE.
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS CAN BE EXPECTED WHEN FULL DRAWINGS
 ARE SUBMITTED FOR PERMIT.
  
 THE FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU HAS NO OBJECTIONS TO THE
 PROPOSED PROJECT.
  
 1. CONSTRUCTION, DEMOLITION, AND RENOVATION TO COMPLY
 WITH NFPA 241. EXTRA ATTENTION SHALL BE GIVEN TO THE
 PERMITTING AND LOCATION OF CONSTRUCTION TRAILERS. A
 PERMIT IS REQUIRED FOR ANY CONSTRUCTION TRAILER RELATED
 TO THIS PROJECT. SEPARATION DISTANCES FROM MAIN
 STRUCTURES AS WELL AS OTHER TRAILERS SHALL BE CLOSELY
 MONITORED FOR THE REQUIREMENTS OF FIRE SPRINKLER
 PROTECTION.
  
 2. SITE ACCESS AND EXIT POINTS ARE TO BE CLEARLY
 IDENTIFIED AND MAINTAINED FOR EMERGENCY VEHICLES DURING
 ALL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES.
  
 3. THE BUILDING ADDRESS SHALL BE CLEARLY VISIBLE FROM
 ALL ACCESS ROADWAYS, INCLUDING DURING CONSTRUCTION.
 ADDRESS NUMBERS SHALL CONTRAST WITH THEIR BACKGROUND
 AND SHALL NOT BE LESS THAN SIX (6) INCHES IN HEIGHT
 WITH A ONE (1) INCH STROKE FOR ALL BUILDINGS.
  
 4. DURING CONSTRUCTION, TRASH AND DEBRIS IS TO BE
 REMOVED FROM THE SITE DAILY OR MORE OFTEN TO REDUCE THE
 ACCUMULATION OF POTENTIAL LIFE AND FIRE SAFETY HAZARDS.
  
 5. THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE BUILDING SHALL COMPLY WITH
 THE 5TH EDITION OF THE FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE,
 INCLUDING NFPA 1 & 101, AND ALL ASSOCIATED FIRE CODES.
  
 6. ALL PARKING STRUCTURES SHALL COMPLY WITH NFPA 88A,
 PARKING STRUCTURES AND NFPA 101, THE LIFE SAFETY CODE,
 INCLUDING MORE SPECIFICALLY, CHAPTER 42 STORAGE
 OCCUPANCIES (PARKING STRUCTURES)
 IF THE VEHICLE IN THE VEHICLE ELEVATOR IS OCCUPIED, IT
 SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH A FIRE & LIFE SAFETY PROTECTION
 SYSTEM.
  
 7. THE SEPARATION AND OPENING PROTECTION BETWEEN THE
 PARKING GARAGE AND HOTEL SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE AND
 COMPLIANCE WITH THE SPECIFIC AND MOST STRINGENT
 PROVISION REQUIREMENT OF EITHER CHAPTER OF THE FIRE
 CODE.
  
 8. A NFPA 13 COMPLAINT FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM AND NFPA
 14 COMPLIANT WET STANDPIPE SYSTEM ARE REQUIRED FOR THIS
 STRUCTURE. TEMPORARY STANDPIPES ARE REQUIRED WHEN THE
 BUILDING REACHES THREE LEVELS OR THIRTY FEET WHILE
 BEING CONSTRUCTED. SEPARATE SHOP DRAWINGS, ARE REQUIRED
 TO BE SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE FIRE
 PREVENTION BUREAU PRIOR TO ANY INSTALLATION.
  
 FOR THE PROPOSED FIRE PUMP(S) , WHAT IS(ARE) THE
 PRIMARY AND SECONDARY POWER SOURCES?
  
 9. A CLASS A NFPA 72 COMPLIANT MONITORED FIRE ALARM
 SYSTEM IS REQUIRED FOR THIS STRUCTURE. SEPARATE SHOP
 DRAWINGS, ARE REQUIRED TO BE SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND
 APPROVED BY THE FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU PRIOR TO ANY
 INSTALLATION.
  
 10. ALL ELEVATORS SHALL BE EQUIPPED WITH A REGION 7
 KEYWAY SYSTEM.
 ALL NEW ELEVATORS SHALL CONFORM TO THE FIRE FIGHTER?S
 EMERGENCY OPERATIONS REQUIREMENTS OF ASME A17.1/CSA
 B44, SAFETY CODE FOR ELEVATORS.
  
 ANY BUILDING THAT IS MORE THAN THREE STORIES HIGH OR IN
 WHICH THE VERTICAL DISTANCE BETWEEN THE BOTTOM TERMINAL
 LANDING AND THE TOP TERMINAL LANDING EXCEEDS 25 FEET
 MUST BE CONSTRUCTED TO CONTAIN AT LEAST ONE PASSENGER
 ELEVATOR THAT IS OPERATIONAL AND WILL ACCOMMODATE AN
 AMBULANCE STRETCHER 76 INCHES LONG AND 24 INCHES WIDE
 IN THE HORIZONTAL POSITION.
  
 11. COMPLETE LIFE SAFETY PLANS FOR EACH OCCUPANCY SHALL
 BE PROVIDED THAT ILLUSTRATE OCCUPANT LOADS, TRAVEL
 DISTANCES, COMMON PATHS OF TRAVEL, DEAD-END CORRIDORS,
 EXIT SIGNS, EMERGENCY LIGHTING, EXITS LEADING TO A
 PUBLIC WAY, FIRE EXTINGUISHER LOCATIONS, AND ALL FIRE
 SAFETY FEATURES AND EQUIPMENT.
  
 12. ALL EXISTING AND NEW FIRE HYDRANTS PLANNED FOR THIS
 DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE CLEARLY INDICATED AND IDENTIFIED
 ON THE PLAN AND CLOSELY COORDINATED WITH THE BUREAU OF
 FIRE PREVENTION.
  
 13. ALL FIRE DEPARTMENT SPRINKLER SYSTEM CONNECTIONS
 (FDC,S) FOR THE PROJECT SHALL BE IDENTIFIED AND
 COORDINATED WITH THE BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION.
  
 14. ALL FIRE WATER MAINS, SIZES AND THEIR VALVE
 ASSEMBLIES SHALL BE CLEARLY IDENTIFIED AND ILLUSTRATED
 ON THE PLAN. TWO SEPARATE, SEPARATED WATER SUPPLIES
 SHALL BE CLEARLY INDICATED ON THE PLAN.
  
 15. PROVIDE BOLLARD PROTECTION AT THE ELEVATORS AND
 STAIRWAY DOORS OF THE PARKING LEVELS.
  
 16. THE 7TH FLOOR OPEN-AIRTERRACE AREA APPEARS TO
 REQUIRE A SECOND EXIT. A DETAILED ANALYSIS IS REQUIRED.
  
 17. THE 14TH FLOOR LEVEL APPEARS TO REQUIRE A THIRD
 EXIT. A DETAILED ANALYSIS IS REQUIRED.
  
 18. COMMAND ROOM
 THE FIRE COMMAND CENTER SHALL COMPLY WITH NFPA 1,
 CHAPTER 11, BUILDING SERVICES; 11.9 AND SHALL CONTAIN
 THE FOLLOWING FEATURES:
 1. SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 200 FT SQUARED WITH A MINIMUM
 DIMENSION OF 10 FT.
 2. THE FIRE DEPARTMENT COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM.
 3. A TELEPHONE FOR FIRE DEPARTMENT USE WITH CONTROLLED
 ACCESS TO THE PUBLIC TELEPHONE SYSTEM
 4. SCHEMATIC BUILDING PLANS INDICATING THE TYPICAL
 FLOOR PLAN AND DETAILING THE BUILDING CORE, MEANS OF
 EGRESS, FIRE PROTECTION SYSTEMS, FIRE-FIGHTING
 EQUIPMENT AND FIRE DEPARTMENT ACCESS AND THE LOCATION
 OF FIRE WALLS, FIRE BARRIERS, FIRE PARTITIONS, SMOKE
 BARRIERS AND SMOKE PARTITIONS
 5. A WORK TABLE.
 6. IF APPLICABLE, A HAZARDOUS MATERIAL MANAGEMENT PLAN
 FOR THE BUILDING.
 7. THE EMERGENCY VOICE/ALARM COMMUNICATION SYSTEM
 CONTROL UNIT.
 8. ANNUNCIATOR UNIT VISUALLY INDICATING THE LOCATION OF
 THE ELEVATORS AND WHETHER THEY ARE OPERATIONAL
 9. STATUS INDICATORS AND CONTROLS FOR AIR DISTRIBUTION
 SYSTEMS.
 10. CONTROLS FOR UNLOCKING STAIRWAY DOORS
 SIMULTANEOUSLY
 11. SPRINKLER VALVE AND WATER FLOW DETECTOR DISPLAY
 PANELS
 12. EMERGENCY AND STANDBY POWER STATUS INDICATORS
 13. FIRE PUMP STATUS INDICATORS
 14. GENERATOR SUPERVISION DEVICES AND MANUAL START AND
 TRANSFER FEATURES.
 15. PUBLIC ADDRESS SYSTEM, WHERE SPECIFICALLY REQUIRED
 BY OTHER SECTIONS OF THIS CODE
 16. CONTROLS REQUIRED FOR SMOKE CONTROL
 17. ELEVATOR FIRE RECALL SWITCH IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASME
 A17.1.
 18. ELEVATOR EMERGENCY OR STANDBY POWER SELECTOR
 SWITCH(ES), WHERE EMERGENCY OR STANDBY POWER IS
 PROVIDED
  
 19. RADIO
 NFPA 1, CHAPTER 11, BUILDING SERVICES; 11.10 TWO-WAY
 RADIO ENHANCEMENT SERVICES.
 11.10.1 IN ALL NEW AND EXISTING BUILDINGS, MINIMUM
 RADIO SIGNAL STRENGTH FOR FIRE DEPARTMENT
 COMMUNICATIONS SHALL BE MAINTAINED AT A LEVEL
 DETERMINED BY THE AHJ.
 MAINTAIN A MINIMUM RADIO SIGNAL STRENGTH OF 102.0 DBM
 FOR THE RADIO SYSTEM USED BY WEST PALM BEACH FIRE
 RESCUE. IF THE MINIMUM CANNOT BE MAINTAINED, A
 BI-DIRECTIONAL AMPLIFIED SYSTEM SHALL BE INSTALLED WITH
 A MINIMUM 2-HOUR RUN TIME BATTERY BACK-UP.
  
 20. KNOX-BOX KEY SYSTEM SHALL BE REQUIRED FOR THIS
 BUILDING.
 ANY GATES OR SECURITY ACCESS FEATURES SHALL BE PROVIDED
 WITH KNOX KEY ACCESS LOCKS, PADLOCKS AND/OR SWITCHES
 FOR 24 HOUR EMERGENCY ACCESS.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
Review Stop L LANDSCAPING
Rev No 3 Status P Date 05-18-2016 Cont ID  
Sent By rcaranci Date 05-18-2016 Time 10:46 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rcaranci Date 05-18-2016 Time 10:46 Sent To  
Notes
2016-05-18 10:46:46FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER
 PROJECT: CANOPY HOTEL Z15100025 RESUBMIT
 MAY18, 2016
  
 I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND
 PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:
  
 1. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE AN OPEN SPACE DIAGRAM TO
 SHOW QUALIFIED OPEN SPACE AREAS FOR:
 ? 25% PRIVATE OPEN SPACE AND IDENTIFY AS ROOFTOP GARDEN
 OR TERRACE
 QGD 25- 5400 SQ FT REQUIRED. PLEASE REFER TO THE
 DEFINITIONS OF THE PRIVATE OPEN SPACE CATEGORIES IN
 SECTION 94-109 FOR EACH OF THESE CATEGORIES AND
 IDENTIFY EACH ON THE PLAN TO SHOW COMPLIANCE.
  
 2. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE CALCULATIONS TO SHOW THE
 OPEN SPACE AREAS BY CATEGORY, AND PERCENTAGE OF
 VEGETATED AREA (30%) AND TREE CANOPY (20%) TO MEET THE
 REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 94-109 TABLE IV-7.
 ROOFTOP GARDEN IS THE CATEGORY FOR THE POOL DECK- 30%
 VEGETATED AREA AND 20% TREE CANOPY IS REQUIRED.
 TERRACE REQUIREMENT IS 20% VEGETATED AREA.
  
 3. SATISFIED. PLEASE SHOW THE CALCULATIONS FOR TREE
 CANOPY BY SPECIES PER SECTION 94-109 TABLE IV-8.
  
 4. SATISFIED. PLEASE SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH THE FLORIDA
 FRIENDLY LANDSCAPE CHART SECTION 94-446 (G) FOR THE
 ONSITE LANDSCAPING.
  
 5. SATISFIED. PLEASE REVISE THE EXISTING TREE
 DISPOSITION CHART FROM SHEET L-1 TO INDICATE THE
 EXISTING OAK TREES ARE IN THE RIGHT OF WAY, AND NOT ON
 SITE. PROVIDE THE NUMBER OF STREET TREES PROPOSED.
 STAFF RECOMMENDS REMOVAL OF THE THREE EXISTING TREES AS
 THEY ARE IN POOR CONDITION, AND REPLACE WITH NEW TREES
 PLANTED IN STRUCTURAL SOIL.
  
 6. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE OAK TREES AS STREET TREES
 ALONG TRINITY PLACE TO REMAIN CONSISTENT WITH THE
 EXISTING STREETSCAPE.
  
 7. SEE ZONING COMMENTS. PLEASE ADD ANOTHER STREET TREE
 AT THE EAST END OF THE SIDEWALK ALONG TRINITY PLACE TO
 MEET THE 30 FOOT SPACING REQUIREMENT.
  
 PLEASE SPACE THE TREES TO MEET THE 30 FOOT ON CENTER
 REQUIREMENT PER 94-113 (D) (2).
  
 8. SATISFIED. STREET TREES LOCATED IN A SIDEWALK SHALL
 HAVE STRUCTURAL SOIL EXTENDING 5 FEET IN ALL DIRECTIONS
 UP TO THE CURB. INDICATE STRUCTURAL SOIL LOCATIONS ON
 THE LANDSCAPE PLAN. STRUCTURAL SOIL DETAIL MAY NEED TO
 BE AMENDED TO BE CONSISTENT WITH OTHER INSTALLATIONS.
 THE STRUCTURAL SOIL DETAIL NEEDS TO SHOW THE STRUCTURAL
 SOIL EXTENDING 5 FEET IN ALL DIRECTIONS FROM THE TREE
 GRATE EXCLUDING THE CURB SIDE. ALSO SHOW THE LOCATIONS
 ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN.
  
 9. SATISFIED. PLEASE ADD PLANTING AREAS AROUND STREET
 TREES AT THE ENDS OF PARKING SPACES, AND PROVIDE 6 FOOT
 LONG BY 5 FOOT WIDE PLANTING AREAS WITH SHRUBS PLANTED
 TO BE CONSISTENT WITH THE STREETSCAPE FURTHER EAST ON
 TRINITY PLACE. SHRUBS MAY BE VARIED.
  
 10. SATISFIED. PLEASE ADD LANDSCAPING ALONG THE
 BUILDING ADJACENT TO DIXIE.
 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
 1. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE
 RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PERMITTING AND INSTALLATION OF THE
 STREET TREES AND RIGHT OF WAY LANDSCAPING AND
 IRRIGATION APPROVED WITH THIS PETITION.
 2. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE
 RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THE ROAD RIGHT OF
 WAY LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION ADJACENT TO THE
 DEVELOPMENT. THIS WILL BE THROUGH A SEPARATE
 MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY.
 3. IRRIGATION FOR STREET TREES AND LANDSCAPING IN THE
 RIGHT OF WAYS SHALL BE PROVIDED BY THE APPLICANT,
 SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS FROM THE SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT.
 ALL EXISTING CITY IRRIGATION LINES RUNNING TO
 INDIVIDUAL AREAS OR TREES SHALL BE REMOVED AND CAPPED
 IN SUCH A WAY TO ENSURE CITY IRRIGATION SUPPLY LINES
 SHALL REMAIN INTACT AND CONTINUOUS FOR OTHER AREAS
 SERVED BY THE LINES.
  
Review Stop L LANDSCAPING
Rev No 2 Status F Date 01-20-2016 Cont ID  
Sent By rcaranci Date 01-20-2016 Time 16:11 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rcaranci Date 01-20-2016 Time 16:10 Sent To  
Notes
2016-01-20 16:13:23FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER
 PROJECT: CANOPY HOTEL Z15100025 RESUBMIT 1/20
 JANUARY 20, 2016
  
 I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND
 PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:
  
 1. NOT SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE AN OPEN SPACE DIAGRAM
 TO SHOW QUALIFIED OPEN SPACE AREAS FOR:
 ? 25% PRIVATE OPEN SPACE AND IDENTIFY AS ROOFTOP GARDEN
 OR TERRACE
 QGD 25- 5400 SQ FT REQUIRED. PLEASE REFER TO THE
 DEFINITIONS OF THE PRIVATE OPEN SPACE CATEGORIES IN
 SECTION 94-109 FOR EACH OF THESE CATEGORIES AND
 IDENTIFY EACH ON THE PLAN TO SHOW COMPLIANCE.
  
 2. NOT SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE CALCULATIONS TO SHOW
 THE OPEN SPACE AREAS BY CATEGORY, AND PERCENTAGE OF
 VEGETATED AREA (30%) AND TREE CANOPY (20%) TO MEET THE
 REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 94-109 TABLE IV-7.
 ROOFTOP GARDEN IS THE CATEGORY FOR THE POOL DECK- 30%
 VEGETATED AREA AND 20% TREE CANOPY IS REQUIRED.
 TERRACE REQUIREMENT IS 20% VEGETATED AREA.
  
 3. SATISFIED. PLEASE SHOW THE CALCULATIONS FOR TREE
 CANOPY BY SPECIES PER SECTION 94-109 TABLE IV-8.
  
 4. SATISFIED. PLEASE SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH THE FLORIDA
 FRIENDLY LANDSCAPE CHART SECTION 94-446 (G) FOR THE
 ONSITE LANDSCAPING.
  
 5. SATISFIED. PLEASE REVISE THE EXISTING TREE
 DISPOSITION CHART FROM SHEET L-1 TO INDICATE THE
 EXISTING OAK TREES ARE IN THE RIGHT OF WAY, AND NOT ON
 SITE. PROVIDE THE NUMBER OF STREET TREES PROPOSED.
 STAFF RECOMMENDS REMOVAL OF THE THREE EXISTING TREES AS
 THEY ARE IN POOR CONDITION, AND REPLACE WITH NEW TREES
 PLANTED IN STRUCTURAL SOIL.
  
 6. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE OAK TREES AS STREET TREES
 ALONG TRINITY PLACE TO REMAIN CONSISTENT WITH THE
 EXISTING STREETSCAPE.
  
 7. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PLEASE ADD ANOTHER STREET TREE
 AT THE EAST END OF THE SIDEWALK ALONG TRINITY PLACE TO
 MEET THE 30 FOOT SPACING REQUIREMENT.
  
 PLEASE SPACE THE TREES TO MEET THE 30 FOOT ON CENTER
 REQUIREMENT PER 94-113 (D) (2).
  
 8. NOT SATISFIED. STREET TREES LOCATED IN A SIDEWALK
 SHALL HAVE STRUCTURAL SOIL EXTENDING 5 FEET IN ALL
 DIRECTIONS UP TO THE CURB. INDICATE STRUCTURAL SOIL
 LOCATIONS ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN. STRUCTURAL SOIL DETAIL
 MAY NEED TO BE AMENDED TO BE CONSISTENT WITH OTHER
 INSTALLATIONS.
 THE STRUCTURAL SOIL DETAIL NEEDS TO SHOW THE STRUCTURAL
 SOIL EXTENDING 5 FEET IN ALL DIRECTIONS FROM THE TREE
 GRATE EXCLUDING THE CURB SIDE. ALSO SHOW THE LOCATIONS
 ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN.
  
 9. SATISFIED. PLEASE ADD PLANTING AREAS AROUND STREET
 TREES AT THE ENDS OF PARKING SPACES, AND PROVIDE 6 FOOT
 LONG BY 5 FOOT WIDE PLANTING AREAS WITH SHRUBS PLANTED
 TO BE CONSISTENT WITH THE STREETSCAPE FURTHER EAST ON
 TRINITY PLACE. SHRUBS MAY BE VARIED.
  
 10. SATISFIED. PLEASE ADD LANDSCAPING ALONG THE
 BUILDING ADJACENT TO DIXIE.
 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
 1. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE
 RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PERMITTING AND INSTALLATION OF THE
 STREET TREES AND RIGHT OF WAY LANDSCAPING AND
 IRRIGATION APPROVED WITH THIS PETITION.
 2. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE
 RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THE ROAD RIGHT OF
 WAY LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION ADJACENT TO THE
 DEVELOPMENT. THIS WILL BE THROUGH A SEPARATE
 MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY.
 3. IRRIGATION FOR STREET TREES AND LANDSCAPING IN THE
 RIGHT OF WAYS SHALL BE PROVIDED BY THE APPLICANT,
 SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS FROM THE SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT.
 ALL EXISTING CITY IRRIGATION LINES RUNNING TO
 INDIVIDUAL AREAS OR TREES SHALL BE REMOVED AND CAPPED
 IN SUCH A WAY TO ENSURE CITY IRRIGATION SUPPLY LINES
 SHALL REMAIN INTACT AND CONTINUOUS FOR OTHER AREAS
 SERVED BY THE LINES.
  
Review Stop L LANDSCAPING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 11-10-2015 Cont ID  
Sent By rcaranci Date 11-10-2015 Time 09:10 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rcaranci Date 11-10-2015 Time 09:10 Sent To  
Notes
2015-11-10 09:11:48I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND
 PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:
  
 1. PLEASE PROVIDE AN OPEN SPACE DIAGRAM TO SHOW
 QUALIFIED OPEN SPACE AREAS FOR:
 ? 25% PRIVATE OPEN SPACE AND IDENTIFY AS ROOFTOP GARDEN
 OR TERRACE
  
 2. PLEASE PROVIDE CALCULATIONS TO SHOW THE OPEN SPACE
 AREAS BY CATEGORY, AND PERCENTAGE OF VEGETATED AREA
 (30%) AND TREE CANOPY (20%) TO MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF
 SECTION 94-109 TABLE IV-7.
  
 3. PLEASE SHOW THE CALCULATIONS FOR TREE CANOPY BY
 SPECIES PER SECTION 94-109 TABLE IV-8.
  
 4. PLEASE SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH THE FLORIDA FRIENDLY
 LANDSCAPE CHART SECTION 94-446 (G) FOR THE ONSITE
 LANDSCAPING.
  
 5. PLEASE REVISE THE EXISTING TREE DISPOSITION CHART
 FROM SHEET L-1 TO INDICATE THE EXISTING OAK TREES ARE
 IN THE RIGHT OF WAY, AND NOT ON SITE. PROVIDE THE
 NUMBER OF STREET TREES PROPOSED. STAFF RECOMMENDS
 REMOVAL OF THE THREE EXISTING TREES AS THEY ARE IN POOR
 CONDITION, AND REPLACE WITH NEW TREES PLANTED IN
 STRUCTURAL SOIL.
  
 6. PLEASE PROVIDE OAK TREES AS STREET TREES ALONG
 TRINITY PLACE TO REMAIN CONSISTENT WITH THE EXISTING
 STREETSCAPE.
  
 7. PLEASE ADD ANOTHER STREET TREE AT THE EAST END OF
 THE SIDEWALK ALONG TRINITY PLACE TO MEET THE 30 FOOT
 SPACING REQUIREMENT.
  
 8. STREET TREES LOCATED IN A SIDEWALK SHALL HAVE
 STRUCTURAL SOIL EXTENDING 5 FEET IN ALL DIRECTIONS UP
 TO THE CURB. INDICATE STRUCTURAL SOIL LOCATIONS ON THE
 LANDSCAPE PLAN. STRUCTURAL SOIL DETAIL MAY NEED TO BE
 AMENDED TO BE CONSISTENT WITH OTHER INSTALLATIONS.
  
 9. PLEASE ADD PLANTING AREAS AROUND STREET TREES AT THE
 ENDS OF PARKING SPACES, AND PROVIDE 6 FOOT LONG BY 5
 FOOT WIDE PLANTING AREAS WITH SHRUBS PLANTED TO BE
 CONSISTENT WITH THE STREETSCAPE FURTHER EAST ON TRINITY
 PLACE. SHRUBS MAY BE VARIED.
  
 10. PLEASE ADD LANDSCAPING ALONG THE BUILDING ADJACENT
 TO DIXIE.
 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
 1. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE
 RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PERMITTING AND INSTALLATION OF THE
 STREET TREES AND RIGHT OF WAY LANDSCAPING AND
 IRRIGATION APPROVED WITH THIS PETITION.
 2. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE
 RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THE ROAD RIGHT OF
 WAY LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION ADJACENT TO THE
 DEVELOPMENT. THIS WILL BE THROUGH A SEPARATE
 MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY.
 3. IRRIGATION FOR STREET TREES AND LANDSCAPING IN THE
 RIGHT OF WAYS SHALL BE PROVIDED BY THE APPLICANT,
 SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS FROM THE SUBJECT DEVELOPMENT.
 ALL EXISTING CITY IRRIGATION LINES RUNNING TO
 INDIVIDUAL AREAS OR TREES SHALL BE REMOVED AND CAPPED
 IN SUCH A WAY TO ENSURE CITY IRRIGATION SUPPLY LINES
 SHALL REMAIN INTACT AND CONTINUOUS FOR OTHER AREAS
 SERVED BY THE LINES.
 RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER
 561-822-1462
  
Review Stop PARK PARKING
Rev No 1 Status P Date 11-18-2015 Cont ID  
Sent By ssamuels Date 11-18-2015 Time 15:56 Rev Time 0.00
Received By ssamuels Date 11-18-2015 Time 15:56 Sent To  
Notes
2015-11-18 15:59:30CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH
 PARKING ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT
 500 BANYAN BLVD.,
 WEST PALM BEACH
 FL, 33401
  
 METER AND METER HOOD
  
 REMOVAL OF ON ? STREET METERED PARKING SPACE OR SPACES,
 WILL COST A FEE AS ESTABLISH BY THE PARKING
 ADMINISTRATOR. ALL PAYMENT WILL BE REQUIRED TO BE MADE
 TO THE PARKING DEPARTMENT.
  
 FEE:
  
 METER PERMANENT REMOVED - COST - $16,800 PER METER
  
 METER TEMPORARY REMOVED - COST - $100 PER REMOVE /
 REPLACED
  
 METER HOOD RENTAL PER ZONE
  
 ZONE A ------------------------ $350 PER MONTH / PER
 METER
  
 ZONE B ________________ $250 PER MONTH / PER METER
  
 ZONE C ------------------------ $ 150 PER MONTH / PER
 METER
  
 METER HOOD RENTAL PER DAY
  
 ZONE A ------------------------ $20 PER DAY / PER METER
 (INCLUDED SUNDAY AND HOLIDAY)
  
 ZONE B ________________ $ 15 PER MONTH / PER METER
  
 ZONE C ------------------------ $ 10 PER MONTH / PER
 METER
  
  
 THIS LOCATION WILL BE A ZONE B FOR VALET OPERATION.
  
  
Review Stop POLICE POLICE
Rev No 1 Status   Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time  
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop PW PUBLIC WORKS
Rev No 1 Status F Date 11-10-2015 Cont ID  
Sent By cranford Date 11-10-2015 Time 10:41 Rev Time 0.00
Received By cranford Date 11-10-2015 Time 10:40 Sent To  
Notes
2015-11-10 10:41:05SEE COMMENTS UNDER ENG PPRC
Review Stop STORM STORMWATER
Rev No 2 Status   Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2016-08-19 16:01:15REVIEW OF PLANS SUBMITTED ON MAY 2, 2016:
 1. PROVIDE DETAIL OF HOW EXFILTRATION TRENCH WILL BE
 CONSTRUCTED NEXT TO THE TREE ISLANDS.
  
 TRACY WARD
 SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER
 ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 561-494-1120
  
Review Stop STORM STORMWATER
Rev No 1 Status F Date 11-10-2015 Cont ID  
Sent By cranford Date 11-10-2015 Time 10:40 Rev Time 0.00
Received By cranford Date 11-10-2015 Time 10:40 Sent To  
Notes
2015-11-10 10:40:50SEE COMMENTS UNDER ENG PPRC
Review Stop SURVEY SURVEYING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 11-10-2015 Cont ID  
Sent By cranford Date 11-10-2015 Time 10:40 Rev Time 0.00
Received By cranford Date 11-10-2015 Time 10:40 Sent To  
Notes
2015-11-10 10:40:35SEE COMMENTS UNDER ENG PPRC
Review Stop TRAFFIC TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No 2 Status F Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 01-14-2016 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By bcollins Date 01-14-2016 Time 11:47 Sent To  
Notes
2016-01-14 11:49:06AS OF 1/14/16, NO TRAFFIC STUDY HAS BEEN RECEIVED.
Review Stop TRAFFIC TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 11-10-2015 Cont ID  
Sent By cranford Date 11-10-2015 Time 10:40 Rev Time 0.00
Received By cranford Date 11-10-2015 Time 10:40 Sent To  
Notes
2015-11-10 10:40:17SEE COMMENTS UNDER ENG PPRC
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 4 Status F Date 09-09-2016 Cont ID  
Sent By aaponte Date 09-09-2016 Time 10:22 Rev Time 0.00
Received By aaponte Date 09-08-2016 Time 14:51 Sent To  
Notes
2016-09-09 08:21:241. SHEET A1.1A STILL DOES NOT SHOW THE ACCCURATE
 ACCOUNT FOR THE FAR BASED ON THE GROSS BUILDING AREA
 DEFINITION IN THE CODE. STAIRS AND ELEVATORS SERVING
 THE PARKING LEVELS NEED TO BE COUNTED AS PART OF THE
 FAR. PLEASE ADJUST FAR TABLE TO REFLECT THOSE NUMBERS
 SND RE-SUBMIT SHEET A1.1A.
  
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 3 Status F Date 05-19-2016 Cont ID  
Sent By aaponte Date 05-19-2016 Time 12:05 Rev Time 0.00
Received By aaponte Date 05-02-2016 Time 12:04 Sent To  
Notes
2016-05-16 12:03:38COMMENTS 3RD REVIEW 5-16-2016
 1. SHEET A1.1A SHALL BE MODIFIED TO ACCURATELY INDICATE
 THE AREAS COUNTED AS FAR ACCORDING TO THE GROSS
 BUILDING AREA DEFINITION IN SEC 94-109 OF THE ZLDRS.
 HATCHED AREAS IN EACH FLOOR PLAN SHALL ONLY INCLUDE
 THOSE AREAS INCLUDED IN GBA. SUMMARY TABLE SHALL HAVE
 ALSO A SEPARATE COLUMN FOR MECHANICAL AND PARKING AREAS
 NOT INCLUDED IN GBA.
 2. PARKING REQUIREMENT TABLE IN SHEET A1.1A SHALL BE
 ADJUSTED TO REFLECT THE CODE REQUIREMENT FOR DOWNTOWN
 (TABLE IV-9).
 3. PLEASE REVISE THE PARKING LAYOUT TO CONFIRM
 COMPLIANCE WITH MINIMUM WIDTH OF PARKING SPACES IN
 THOSE CASES WHERE PARKING SPACE IS ADJACENT TO A COLUMN
 OR A WALL (94-111(C)(1). STRIPING SHALL COMPLY WITH
 CITY DETAIL.
 4. EAST ELEVATION SHOWS WINDOWN IN THE SE ROOM BUT THEY
 ARE NOT SHOWN IN THE FLOOR PLANS. PLEASE CLARIFY AND
 CONFIRM COMPLIANCE WITH BLANK WALL REGULATIONS.
 5. PLEASE INDICATE THE DEPTH OF THE ARCHITECTURAL
 FEATURES PROVIDED ON THE WALLS LESS THAN 3 FEET FROM
 THE PROPERTY LINE.
 6. FENESTRATION SHALL BE PROVIDED ON ALL FACADES
 ENCLOSING ACTIVE USES (2ND FLOOR MANAGER ROOM).
 7. PLEASE IDENTIFY THE PRELIMINARY LOCATION FOR
 COMPLIANCE WITH THE ART IN PUBLIC PLACES REQUIREMENT
 (CONTACT SYBLLE WELTER, ART IN PUBLIC PLACES
 COORDINATOR AT 822-1515).
 8. PLEASE TALK WITH TRACY WARD IN THE ENGINEERING
 DEPARTMENT TO MODIFY THE DESIGN OF THE EXFILTRATION
 TRENCH TO BE BELOW THE STRUCTURAL SOIL DEPTH (36")
 REQUIRED FOR STREET TREES ON TRINITY PLACE.
 9. PLEASE REDUCE THE SEPARATION OF THE TWO TREES IN
 FRONT OF THE HOTEL ENTRANCE TO A MORE CONSISTENT
 SPACING MATCHING THE OTHER TREES AS CLOSE AS POSSIBLE.
 WE RECOMMEND AROUND 35-40 FEET.
 11. PLEASE PROVIDE A HARDSCAPE DRAWINGS FOR DIXIE AND
 TRINITY. TRINITY PLACE SHALL MATCH THE EXISTING PATTERN
 ON THE EAST SIDE OF THE PROPERTY.
 12. SUBMITTED RENDERING ARE STILL NOT ACCURATELY
 REFLECTING THE EXISTING CONTEXT AND THE PROPOSED GROUND
 LEVEL CONDITIONS RESULTING FROM THE BUILDING.
 13. PLEASE PROVIDE PICTURES OF THE PROPOSED BUILDING
 MATERIALS INCLUDING THE GARAGE SCREENING.
  
 13. ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN COMMENTS:
 A. THE REVISED DESIGN HAS INTRODUCED ADDITIONAL
 ARCHITECTURAL LANGUAGE TO THE BUILDING DESIGN RESULTING
 IN DIFFERENT TREATMENT FOR EACH ELEVATION, AND IN
 DETRIMENT OF A MORE CONSISTENT OVERALL BUILDING DESIGN.
 REVISIONS TO THE FACADE DESIGN SHALL BE INTRODUCED.
 B. THE REQUIRED PLANAR BREAK ALONG TRINITY PLACE SHALL
 BE USED ON THE HIERARCHICAL TREATMENT OF THE BUILDING
 ELEMENTS. THE PROPOSED PLANAR BREAK IS LOCATED WHERE
 THE BUILDING ENTRANCE IS, AND AS SUCH IT SHOULD REFLECT
 OR CREATE A SIGNIFICANT ACCENT ON THE FACADE.
 C. ENTRANCE CANOPY SHALL BE LOWERED TO CREATE A
 PEDESTRIAN ENVIRONMENT AND SCALE.
 D. THE DIXIE HWAY FIRST FLOOR ELEVATION SHALL BE
 ADJUSTED TO REFLECT THE PROPOSED RESTAURANT AND
 HIGHLIGHT ITS ENTRANCE.
  
  
 COMMENTS 2ND REVIEW 1-20-2016:
 1. SATISFIED - PLEASE EXTEND THE SPECIALTY TREATMENT OF
 THE SIDEWALK ACROSS THE SOUTH CURB CUT. SHEET A2.1
 SHALL BE ADJUSTED TO REFLECT THE FLUSH CONDITION OF THE
 DRIVEWAY AS IT MEETS SIDEWALK.
  
 COMMENTS 1ST REVIEW 11-10-2015
 1. SATISFIED- 1. EXISTING BACK OF CURB ON TRINITY PLACE
 ALONG THE CITY PLAZA II BUILDING SHALL BE CONTINUED
 WEST AND ADJUSTED IN FRONT OF THE CANOPY HOTEL IF
 NECESSARY. NEW CURB CUT WILL BE THE NEW BACK OF CURB
 FOR THE PURPOSES OF MEASURING THE SETBACK REQUIREMENTS.
 2. SATISFIED- 2. TRAVEL LANE WIDTH SHALL BE MAINTAINED
 CONSISTENT FROM OLIVE AVE TO DIXIE HWAY AND CURB SHALL
 BE ADJUSTED IF NECESSARY.
 3. SATISFIED- 3. SETBACKS ARE MEASURED FROM BACK OF
 CURB (EXISTING CURB ON DIXIE HWAY, AND NEW CURB ON
 TRINITY PLACE).
 4. SATISFIED- 4. DOORS SHALL NOT SWING OVER THE MINIMUM
 REQUIRED SETBACK.
 5. UNDER REVIEW BY TE-5. PLEASE EXPLAIN HOW THE PARKING
 OPERATION IS GOING TO FUNCTION. SOME CONCERNS ARE:
 - CARS WAITING FOR THE ELEVATOR SHALL NOT BE STACKED
 IN THE PUBLIC ROW.
 - HOW LONG DOES IT TAKE FOR THE ELEVATOR TO GO UP AND
 DOWN?
 - WHAT HAPPENS IF THE ELEVATOR BREAKS DOWN?
 6. SATISFIED- DAC VARIANCE NOT NEEDED- 6. ACTIVE USES
 ARE REQUIRED ALONG 60% OF DIXIE HWAY ON ALL FLOORS UP
 TO 5TH STORY. PROJECT IS PROPOSEING PARKING USES ON
 FLOORS 3RD TO 5TH.
 7. SATISFIED- DAC VARIANCE NOT NEEDED- 7. PARKING IS
 ALLOWED ABOVE THE 5TH STORY WITHOUT ACTIVE USES, BUT A
 CONDITIONAL SETBACK OF 31' IS REQUIRED.
 8. SATISFIED- DAC VARIANCE NOT NEEDED- 8. PARKING IS
 ALLOWED ABOVE THE 5TH STORY WITHOUT ACTIVE USES, BUT A
 CONDITIONAL SETBACK OF 27? IS REQUIRED.
 9. NOT SATISFIED- EAST ELEVATION IS A BLANK WALL NOT
 PERMITTED BY THE CURRENT CODE.FURTHER DISCUSSION IS
 NECESSARY ON THIS ITEM.HOW IS THE INDICATED PLANNAR
 BREAK ON GARAGE FACING TRINITY PLACE REFLECTED ON THE
 FACADE? - 9. PLEASE PROVIDE INFORMATION TO CONFIRM
 COMPLIANCE WITH THE FACADE ARTICULATION REQUIREMENTS.
 PLEASE CONFIRM COMPLIANCE WITH FENESTRATION
 REQUIREMENTS AND COMPLIANCE WITH PROHIBITION FOR BLANK
 WALLS.
 10. SATISFIED-FURTHER DISCUSSION ON OPERATION
 NECESSARY. - 10. PROPOSED HOTEL IS NOT PROVIDING ANY
 LOADING AREA. PLEASE EXPLAIN HOW THE HOTEL IS GOING TO
 BE SERVICED WITHOUT A DEDICATED LOADING AREA. TRINITY
 PLACE IS A SINGLE LANE ROAD AND IT CANNOT BE BLOCK AT
 ANY TIME.
 11. SATISFIED-FURTHER DISCUSSION NECESSARY- 11. HOW IS
 THE PROJECT PROPOSING TO HANDLE GARBAGE COLLECTION?
 12. EAST ELEVATION SHOWN SOME ADDITIONAL WINDOWS ON THE
 SE ROOMS. PLEASE CLARIFY WHAT TYPE OF OPENING ARE
 PROPOSED AND INDICATE THEM IN THE FLOOR PLANS. PODIUM
 HEIGHT IS ACCEPTABLE, FURTHER DISCUSSION NECESSARY
 REGARDING THE BLANK WALL FACING CITY PLAZA II.12. -
 COMPATIBILITY WITH ADJACENT CITYPLAZA II BUILDING.
 FURTHER DISCUSSION NEEDED REGARDING THE PODIUM HEIGHT
 IN RELATION WITH THE CPII PODIUM HEIGHT, AND THE
 RELATIONSHIP OF SOME DESIGN ELEMENTS BETWEEN THE TWO
 BUILDINGS. THE GOAL IS TO MAKE THE ENTIRE BLOCK TO WORK
 AS A CONSISTENT URBAN BLOCK.
 13. SATISFIED. MECHANICAL SCREENING AND SOUND
 ATTENUATION FOR ALL MECHANICAL WILL BE REQUIRED.- 13.
 PLEASE EXPLAIN ANY ACTIONS TAKEN TO MINIMIZE THE NOISE
 AND LIGHT POLLUTION FROM THE ROOFTOP TERRACES INTO THE
 ADJACENT RESIDENTIAL BUILDING.
 14. SATISFIED. A FENCE WILL BE REQUIRED TO CONTROL
 ACCESS TO THE BACK OF CITY PLAZA II AND CANOPY HOTEL.-
 14. PLEASE PROVIDE ANY INFORMATION ON HOW THE REAR AND
 SIDE SETBACKS ARE GOING TO BE TREATED AT GROUND LEVEL.
 THERE SEEM TO BE SOME ODD LEFT OVER AREAS.
 15. SATISFIED, PLEASE PROVIDE A HARDSCAPE DRAWING.
 PLEASE PROVIDE HARDSCAPE DRAWINGS WITH DETAILS. LIGHT
 FIXTURE AND POLE ALONG TRINITY PLACE SHALL MATCH CITY
 PLAZA II, ALONG DIXIE HWAY SHALL MATCH DIXIE HWAY
 FIXTURE AND POLE.- 15. SIDEWALK TREATMENT ON TRINITY
 PLACE SHALL CONTINUE THE EXISTING TREATMENT/PATTERN ON
 THE EAST SIDE.
 16. SATISFIED.- 16. IS THE GROUND FLOOR RESTAURANT
 PROPOSED WITH ACCESS FROM DIXIE HWAY AND OUTDOOR
 SEATING?
 SUBMITTAL COMMENTS:
 1. OK.-1. PLEASE PROVIDE REDUCED DIAGRAMS OF EVERY
 FLOOR INDICATING THE AREAS THAT ARE COUNTED AS PART OF
 THE GROSS BUILDING AREA AND THE AREAS THAT ARE NOT.
 INCLUDE SQUARE FOOTAGE IN A SUMMARY TABLE.
 2. ELEVATIONS SHALL HAVE SHADOWS AND INCLUDE THE
 CONXTEXT IN THE SAME BLOCK AND AT LEAST 200' ACROSS THE
 ADJACENT STREETS. - 2. PLEASE PROVIDE COLORED
 ELEVATIONS WITH THE SURROUNDING CONTEXT. ELEVATIONS
 SHALL CONTAIN INFORMATION TO INDICATE ANY PLANAR BREAKS
 AND ITS DEPTH.
 3. SUBMITTED PEDESTRIAN RENDERINGS DO NOT SEEM ACCURATE
 TO THE SURROUNDING CONTEXT. SHEET A5.3 SHOWS TRINITY
 PLACE AS TWO LANE ROAD WITH A WIDE SIDEWALK ON THE
 NORTH SITE, WHICH IS NOT THE CASE. PLEASE MODIFY ANY
 PERSPECTIVES OR RENDERINGD TO ACCURATELY REFLECT THE
 CONTEXT AS WELL AS THE PROPOSED LANDSCAPE AND HARDSCAPE
 FOR THE PROJECT (SIDEWALK DIMENSIONS). - 3. PLEASE
 PROVIDE PEDESTRIAN LEVEL RENDERINGS OF THE PROPOSED
 HOTEL.
 4. NEED ADDITIONAL PICTURES OF GARAGE SCREENING
 MATERIAL - 4. PLEASE PROVIDE IMAGES OF PROPOSED FACADE
 MATERIALS AND GARAGE ARCHITECTURAL TREATMENT WITH
 GENERAL INFORMATION ON PROPOSED MATERIAL.
  
  
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 2 Status F Date 02-01-2016 Cont ID  
Sent By aaponte Date 02-01-2016 Time 12:07 Rev Time 0.00
Received By aaponte Date 01-29-2016 Time 16:32 Sent To  
Notes
2016-01-29 16:31:581. SATISFIED- 1. EXISTING BACK OF CURB ON TRINITY PLACE
 ALONG THE CITY PLAZA II BUILDING SHALL BE CONTINUED
 WEST AND ADJUSTED IN FRONT OF THE CANOPY HOTEL IF
 NECESSARY. NEW CURB CUT WILL BE THE NEW BACK OF CURB
 FOR THE PURPOSES OF MEASURING THE SETBACK REQUIREMENTS.
 2. SATISFIED- 2. TRAVEL LANE WIDTH SHALL BE MAINTAINED
 CONSISTENT FROM OLIVE AVE TO DIXIE HWAY AND CURB SHALL
 BE ADJUSTED IF NECESSARY.
 3. SATISFIED- 3. SETBACKS ARE MEASURED FROM BACK OF
 CURB (EXISTING CURB ON DIXIE HWAY, AND NEW CURB ON
 TRINITY PLACE).
 4. SATISFIED- 4. DOORS SHALL NOT SWING OVER THE MINIMUM
 REQUIRED SETBACK.
 5. UNDER REVIEW BY TE-5. PLEASE EXPLAIN HOW THE PARKING
 OPERATION IS GOING TO FUNCTION. SOME CONCERNS ARE:
 - CARS WAITING FOR THE ELEVATOR SHALL NOT BE STACKED
 IN THE PUBLIC ROW.
 - HOW LONG DOES IT TAKE FOR THE ELEVATOR TO GO UP AND
 DOWN?
 - WHAT HAPPENS IF THE ELEVATOR BREAKS DOWN?
 6. DAC VARIANCE REQUEST- 6. ACTIVE USES ARE REQUIRED
 ALONG 60% OF DIXIE HWAY ON ALL FLOORS UP TO 5TH STORY.
 PROJECT IS PROPOSEING PARKING USES ON FLOORS 3RD TO
 5TH.
 7. DAC VARIANCE REQUEST- 7. PARKING IS ALLOWED ABOVE
 THE 5TH STORY WITHOUT ACTIVE USES, BUT A CONDITIONAL
 SETBACK OF 31' IS REQUIRED.
 8. DAC VARIANCE REQUEST- 8. PARKING IS ALLOWED ABOVE
 THE 5TH STORY WITHOUT ACTIVE USES, BUT A CONDITIONAL
 SETBACK OF 27? IS REQUIRED.
 9. NOT SATISFIED- EAST ELEVATION IS A BLANK WALL NOT
 PERMITTED BY THE CURRENT CODE.FURTHER DISCUSSION IS
 NECESSARY ON THIS ITEM.HOW IS THE INDICATED PLANNAR
 BREAK ON GARAGE FACING TRINITY PLACE REFLECTED ON THE
 FACADE? - 9. PLEASE PROVIDE INFORMATION TO CONFIRM
 COMPLIANCE WITH THE FACADE ARTICULATION REQUIREMENTS.
 PLEASE CONFIRM COMPLIANCE WITH FENESTRATION
 REQUIREMENTS AND COMPLIANCE WITH PROHIBITION FOR BLANK
 WALLS.
 10. FURTHER DISCUSSION ON OPERATION NECESSARY. - 10.
 PROPOSED HOTEL IS NOT PROVIDING ANY LOADING AREA.
 PLEASE EXPLAIN HOW THE HOTEL IS GOING TO BE SERVICED
 WITHOUT A DEDICATED LOADING AREA. TRINITY PLACE IS A
 SINGLE LANE ROAD AND IT CANNOT BE BLOCK AT ANY TIME.
 11. FURTHER DISCUSSION NECESSARY- 11. HOW IS THE
 PROJECT PROPOSING TO HANDLE GARBAGE COLLECTION?
 12. PODIUM HEIGHT IS ACCEPTABLE, FURTHER DISCUSSION
 NECESSARY REGARDING THE BLANK WALL FACING CITY PLAZA
 II.12. - COMPATIBILITY WITH ADJACENT CITYPLAZA II
 BUILDING. FURTHER DISCUSSION NEEDED REGARDING THE
 PODIUM HEIGHT IN RELATION WITH THE CPII PODIUM HEIGHT,
 AND THE RELATIONSHIP OF SOME DESIGN ELEMENTS BETWEEN
 THE TWO BUILDINGS. THE GOAL IS TO MAKE THE ENTIRE BLOCK
 TO WORK AS A CONSISTENT URBAN BLOCK.
 13. SATISFIED. MECHANICAL SCREENING AND SOUND
 ATTENUATION FOR ALL MECHANICAL WILL BE REQUIRED.- 13.
 PLEASE EXPLAIN ANY ACTIONS TAKEN TO MINIMIZE THE NOISE
 AND LIGHT POLLUTION FROM THE ROOFTOP TERRACES INTO THE
 ADJACENT RESIDENTIAL BUILDING.
 14. SATISFIED. A FENCE WILL BE REQUIRED TO CONTROL
 ACCESS TO THE BACK OF CITY PLAZA II AND CANOPY HOTEL.-
 14. PLEASE PROVIDE ANY INFORMATION ON HOW THE REAR AND
 SIDE SETBACKS ARE GOING TO BE TREATED AT GROUND LEVEL.
 THERE SEEM TO BE SOME ODD LEFT OVER AREAS.
 15. NOT SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE HARDSCAPE DRAWINGS
 WITH DETAILS. LIGHT FIXTURE AND POLE ALONG TRINITY
 PLACE SHALL MATCH CITY PLAZA II, ALONG DIXIE HWAY SHALL
 MATCH DIXIE HWAY FIXTURE AND POLE.- 15. SIDEWALK
 TREATMENT ON TRINITY PLACE SHALL CONTINUE THE EXISTING
 TREATMENT/PATTERN ON THE EAST SIDE.
 16. SATISFIED.- 16. IS THE GROUND FLOOR RESTAURANT
 PROPOSED WITH ACCESS FROM DIXIE HWAY AND OUTDOOR
 SEATING?
 SUBMITTAL COMMENTS:
 1. OK.-1. PLEASE PROVIDE REDUCED DIAGRAMS OF EVERY
 FLOOR INDICATING THE AREAS THAT ARE COUNTED AS PART OF
 THE GROSS BUILDING AREA AND THE AREAS THAT ARE NOT.
 INCLUDE SQUARE FOOTAGE IN A SUMMARY TABLE.
 2. ELEVATIONS SHALL HAVE SHADOWS AND INCLUDE THE
 CONXTEXT IN THE SAME BLOCK AND AT LEAST 200' ACROSS THE
 ADJACENT STREETS. - 2. PLEASE PROVIDE COLORED
 ELEVATIONS WITH THE SURROUNDING CONTEXT. ELEVATIONS
 SHALL CONTAIN INFORMATION TO INDICATE ANY PLANAR BREAKS
 AND ITS DEPTH.
 3. SUBMITTED PEDESTRIAN RENDERINGS DO NOT SEEM ACCURATE
 TO THE SURROUNDING CONTEXT. SHEET A5.3 SHOWS TRINITY
 PLACE AS TWO LANE ROAD WITH A WIDE SIDEWALK ON THE
 NORTH SITE, WHICH IS NOT THE CASE. PLEASE MODIFY ANY
 PERSPECTIVES OR RENDERINGD TO ACCURATELY REFLECT THE
 CONTEXT AS WELL AS THE PROPOSED LANDSCAPE AND HARDSCAPE
 FOR THE PROJECT (SIDEWALK DIMENSIONS). - 3. PLEASE
 PROVIDE PEDESTRIAN LEVEL RENDERINGS OF THE PROPOSED
 HOTEL.
 4. NEED ADDITIONAL PICTURES OF GARAGE SCREENING
 MATERIAL - 4. PLEASE PROVIDE IMAGES OF PROPOSED FACADE
 MATERIALS AND GARAGE ARCHITECTURAL TREATMENT WITH
 GENERAL INFORMATION ON PROPOSED MATERIAL.
  
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 2ND REVIEW:
 1. PLEASE EXTEND THE SPECIALTY TREATMENT OF THE
 SIDEWALK TO THE ACROSS THE SOUTH CURB CUT. SHEET A2.1
 SHALL BE ADJUSTED TO REFLECT THE FLUSH CONDITION OF THE
 DRIVEWAY AS IT MEETS SIDEWALK.
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 11-10-2015 Cont ID  
Sent By aaponte Date 11-10-2015 Time 16:15 Rev Time 0.00
Received By aaponte Date 11-10-2015 Time 16:15 Sent To  
Notes
2015-11-10 16:22:031. EXISTING BACK OF CURB ON TRINITY PLACE ALONG THE
 CITY PLAZA II BUILDING SHALL BE CONTINUED WEST AND
 ADJUSTED IN FRONT OF THE CANOPY HOTEL IF NECESSARY. NEW
 CURB CUT WILL BE THE NEW BACK OF CURB FOR THE PURPOSES
 OF MEASURING THE SETBACK REQUIREMENTS.
 2. TRAVEL LANE WIDTH SHALL BE MAINTAINED CONSISTENT
 FROM OLIVE AVE TO DIXIE HWAY AND CURB SHALL BE ADJUSTED
 IF NECESSARY.
 3. SETBACKS ARE MEASURED FROM BACK OF CURB (EXISTING
 CURB ON DIXIE HWAY, AND NEW CURB ON TRINITY PLACE).
 4. DOORS SHALL NOT SWING OVER THE MINIMUM REQUIRED
 SETBACK.
 5. PLEASE EXPLAIN HOW THE PARKING OPERATION IS GOING TO
 FUNCTION. SOME CONCERNS ARE:
 - CARS WAITING FOR THE ELEVATOR SHALL NOT BE STACKED
 IN THE PUBLIC ROW.
 - HOW LONG DOES IT TAKE FOR THE ELEVATOR TO GO UP AND
 DOWN?
 - WHAT HAPPENS IF THE ELEVATOR BREAKS DOWN?
 6. ACTIVE USES ARE REQUIRED ALONG 60% OF DIXIE HWAY ON
 ALL FLOORS UP TO 5TH STORY. PROJECT IS PROPOSEING
 PARKING USES ON FLOORS 3RD TO 5TH.
 7. PARKING IS ALLOWED ABOVE THE 5TH STORY WITHOUT
 ACTIVE USES, BUT A CONDITIONAL SETBACK OF 31? IS
 REQUIRED.
 8. PARKING IS ALLOWED ABOVE THE 5TH STORY WITHOUT
 ACTIVE USES, BUT A CONDITIONAL SETBACK OF 27? IS
 REQUIRED.
 9. PLEASE PROVIDE INFORMATION TO CONFIRM COMPLIANCE
 WITH THE FA?ADE ARTICULATION REQUIREMENTS. PLEASE
 CONFIRM COMPLIANCE WITH FENESTRATION REQUIREMENTS AND
 COMPLIANCE WITH PROHIBITION FOR BLANK WALLS.
 10. PROPOSED HOTEL IS NOT PROVIDING ANY LOADING AREA.
 PLEASE EXPLAIN HOW THE HOTEL IS GOING TO BE SERVICED
 WITHOUT A DEDICATED LOADING AREA. TRINITY PLACE IS A
 SINGLE LANE ROAD AND IT CANNOT BE BLOCK AT ANY TIME.
 11. HOW IS THE PROJECT PROPOSING TO HANDLE GARBAGE
 COLLECTION?
 12. COMPATIBILITY WITH ADJACENT CITYPLAZA II BUILDING.
 FURTHER DISCUSSION NEEDED REGARDING THE PODIUM HEIGHT
 IN RELATION WITH THE CPII PODIUM HEIGHT, AND THE
 RELATIONSHIP OF SOME DESIGN ELEMENTS BETWEEN THE TWO
 BUILDINGS. THE GOAL IS TO MAKE THE ENTIRE BLOCK TO WORK
 AS A CONSISTENT URBAN BLOCK.
 13. PLEASE EXPLAIN ANY ACTIONS TAKEN TO MINIMIZE THE
 NOISE AND LIGHT POLLUTION FROM THE ROOFTOP TERRACES
 INTO THE ADJACENT RESIDENTIAL BUILDING.
 14. PLEASE PROVIDE ANY INFORMATION ON HOW THE REAR AND
 SIDE SETBACKS ARE GOING TO BE TREATED AT GROUND LEVEL.
 THERE SEEM TO BE SOME ODD LEFT OVER AREAS.
 15. SIDEWALK TREATMENT ON TRINITY PLACE SHALL CONTINUE
 THE EXISTING TREATMENT/PATTERN ON THE EAST SIDE.
 16. IS THE GROUND FLOOR RESTAURANT PROPOSED WITH ACCESS
 FROM DIXIE HWAY AND OUTDOOR SEATING?
 SUBMITTAL COMMENTS:
 1. PLEASE PROVIDE REDUCED DIAGRAMS OF EVERY FLOOR
 INDICATING THE AREAS THAT ARE COUNTED AS PART OF THE
 GROSS BUILDING AREA AND THE AREAS THAT ARE NOT. INCLUDE
 SQUARE FOOTAGE IN A SUMMARY TABLE.
 2. PLEASE PROVIDE COLORED ELEVATIONS WITH THE
 SURROUNDING CONTEXT. ELEVATIONS SHALL CONTAIN
 INFORMATION TO INDICATE ANY PLANAR BREAKS AND ITS
 DEPTH.
 3. PLEASE PROVIDE PEDESTRIAN LEVEL RENDERINGS OF THE
 PROPOSED HOTEL.
 4. PLEASE PROVIDE IMAGES OF PROPOSED FA?ADE MATERIALS
 AND GARAGE ARCHITECTURAL TREATMENT WITH GENERAL
 INFORMATION ON PROPOSED MATERIAL.
  
  Print


Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved