Plan Review Details - Project Z15090030
Plan Review Stops For Project Z15090030
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 1 Status P Date 10-14-2015 Cont ID  
Sent By llouie Date 10-14-2015 Time 11:43 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rbrown Date 10-14-2015 Time 11:43 Sent To  
Notes
2015-10-14 11:47:30DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, BUILDING DIVISION,
 COMMENTS:
  
 1. THIS REVIEW IS A CURSORY REVIEW AS IT RELATES TO THE
 SITE. IT IS NOT A REVIEW FOR FULL COMPLIANCE WITH
 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE. THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE TO BE
 ADDRESSED FOR PERMITTING.
  
 2. THE PLANS APPARENTLY SHOW AN ACCESSIBLE WALKWAY FROM
 THE 13TH STREET SIDEWALK AROUND TO THE FRONT ENTRANCE
 OF THE PROPOSED BUILDING. PLEASE CONFIRM THAT TO BE
 CORRECT AS THE WALKWAY IS REQUIRED. WHEN SUBMITTED FOR
 PERMIT, THE PLANS SHALL SHOW AT LEAST ONE ACCESSIBLE
 ROUTE, COMPLYING WITH SECTIONS 206.2 AND 402.2 OF
 FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY CODE, FROM THE PUBLIC
 RIGHT-OF-WAY TO ALL ACCESSIBLE BUILDING OR FACILITY
 ENTRANCES.
  
 3. ANY PART OF AN ACCESSIBLE ROUTE WITH A SLOPE GREATER
 THAN 1:20 SHALL BE CONSIDERED A RAMP AND SHALL COMPLY
 WITH SECTION 405 OF FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY CODE.
  
 4. WHEN SUBMITTED FOR BUILDING PERMIT, THE PLANS SHALL
 SHOW THAT THE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION FOR THE BUILDINGS
 WILL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE HEIGHT, AREA AND
 OCCUPANCY LIMITATIONS IN CHAPTER 5 OF THE FLORIDA
 BUILDING CODE
  
 5. WHEN SUBMITTED FOR BUILDING PERMIT, COMPLIANCE WITH
 ALL BUILDING SEPARATION, PERCENTAGE OF OPENINGS AND
 OPENING PROTECTIVE REQUIREMENTS OF CHAPTERS 6 AND 7 OF
 THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE SHALL BE VERIFIED.
  
 6. SEPARATE PERMITS REQUIRED. ALL APPLICABLE PERMITS
 AND SUB-PERMITS MUST BE OBTAINED BEFORE COMMENCING THE
 WORK. SEPARATE PERMITS, PLANS AND FEES, ARE REQUIRED
 FOR SIGNS, SWIMMING POOLS AND SPAS, GAS SYSTEMS,
 GENERATORS, FIRE ALARM SYSTEMS, FIRE SPRINKLER AND
 OTHER FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEMS, GREASE INTERCEPTORS,
 SITE LIGHTING, SITE LANDSCAPE, SITE IRRIGATION, ETC.
  
 7. THIS PROJECT MAY BE SUBJECT TO ART IN PUBLIC PLACES
 (AIPP) ASSESSMENT. FOR ADVICE ON THE PROVISION OF
 PUBLIC ARTWORK IN LIEU OF THE AIPP ASSESSMENT, CONTACT
 SYBILLE WELTER, ART IN PUBLIC PLACES COORDINATOR, AT
 (561) 822-1521, OR BY EMAIL: [email protected]
  
 ROBERT BROWN
 BUILDING OFFICIAL
 TEL: 561 805 6652
 EMAIL: [email protected]
  
Review Stop ENG - PPRC ENGINEERING - PPRC
Rev No 2 Status P Date 11-20-2015 Cont ID  
Sent By cranford Date 11-20-2015 Time 09:52 Rev Time 0.00
Received By cranford Date 11-16-2015 Time 13:39 Sent To  
Notes
2015-11-20 09:51:09NO ADDITIONAL COMMENTS.
  
 POTABLE WATER DEMAND:
 EXISTING: 13,422 SF X 0.2 GPD/SF = 2684 GPD
 CUMBERLAND: 4952 SF X 0.2 = 990 GPD
  
 SOLID WASTE
 EXIST: 5 LBS/ 100 SF X 13422 = 671 LBS PER DAY
 CUMBERLAND: 2 LBS/100 SF X 4952 SF = 99 LBS PER DAY
Review Stop ENG - PPRC ENGINEERING - PPRC
Rev No 1 Status F Date 10-13-2015 Cont ID  
Sent By cranford Date 10-13-2015 Time 15:40 Rev Time 0.00
Received By cranford Date 10-13-2015 Time 15:39 Sent To  
Notes
2015-10-13 15:40:53CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH
 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
  
 THIS IS A CONCEPTUAL LEVEL REVIEW. CONSTRUCTION LEVEL
 DETAILS, DESIGN CALCULATIONS AND THE POLLUTION
 PREVENTION PLAN WILL BE REVIEWED AS PART OF THE
 ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL AND BUILDING PERMIT
 APPLICATION PROCESSES. THE ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT
 APPROVAL APPLICATION FORMS CAN BE DOWNLOADED AT
 HTTP://WPB.ORG/ENGINEERING/FORMS-AND-PUBLICATIONS/
  
 THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO SITE
 PLAN APPROVAL.
  
 1. PLEASE SUBMIT ESTIMATES FOR THE PEAK POTABLE WATER
 DEMAND, SANITARY SEWER FLOW, AND SOLID WASTE COLLECTION
 YARDAGE.
  
 2. PLEASE INCLUDE THE CITY STANDARD DETAIL FOR THE
 DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE ON THE PLANS. MINIMUM DIMENSIONAL
 REQUIREMENTS FOR THE ENCLOSURE ARE LISTED IN CODE OF
 ORDINANCES, SECTION 94-444(B), ALSO SEE FIGURE XIV-3 OF
 THE SAME SECTION.
  
 3. PLEASE PROVIDE AN AUTOTURN ANALYSIS DEMONSTRATING
 THE SOLID WASTE COLLECTION VEHICLE CAN ACCESS THE
 PROPOSED DUMPSTER AND COMPACTOR LOCATIONS. THE TRASH
 DUMPSTER/COMPACTORS MUST LOCATED IN AREAS EASILY
 SERVICED BY THE CITY SANITATION EQUIPMENT AND MANPOWER
 PER SECTION 74-35(A)(5) OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES.
  
 4. PRELIMINARY, UPDATED FEMA FLOOD INSURANCE MAPS ARE
 AVAILABLE AT HTTP://WWW.CO.PALM-BEACH.FL.US/NEWSROOM/08
 14/08-26-14-FLOOD_MAPS.HTM. PLEASE REVIEW THE MAPS AND
 VERIFY THAT THE NEW MAPS WILL NOT IMPACT THE PROPOSED
 PROJECT.
  
 5. PLEASE REVISE THE DRIVEWAY APRONS TO MEET THE CITY?S
 ENGINEERING DESIGN STANDARDS. HTTP://WPB.ORG/ENGINEERIN
 G/ENGINEERING-SERVICES/ENGINEERING-STANDARDS/
  
 6. PLEASE REVISE THE LANDSCAPE PLAN TO SHOW LOCATIONS
 OF ALL WATER METERS, VALVES, CLEAN-OUTS, LIGHT POLES,
 ETC. ROOT BARRIERS MAY BE REQUIRED WHERE PLANTINGS ARE
 NEAR UNDERGROUND STORMWATER, SANITARY, OR POTABLE WATER
 LINES.
  
 7. PLEASE SHOW THE SIGHT TRIANGLES ON THE GROUND FLOOR
 LANDSCAPING PLAN FOR THE INTERSECTIONS AND VEHICULAR
 EXITS. (SECTION 94-305E, CODE OF ORDINANCES)
  
 8. PLEASE REVISE TO PLANS TO SHOW REMOVAL OF THE
 EXISTING DUMPSTER DRIVEWAY AND WESTERN MOST ENTRANCE
 OFF OF 13TH STREET. THE CURB LINE AND SIDEWALK WILL
 NEED TO BE RESTORED FROM BROADWAY TO THE EASTERN
 PROPERTY LINE. (SECTION 2.21.2 AND CHAPTER XII OF THE
 CITY RIGHT OF WAY CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS MANUAL)
  
 9. THE SUBMITTED TRAFFIC IMPACT STATEMENT EVALUATED THE
 PALM BEACH LAKES / AUSTRALIAN AND AUSTRALIAN / 25TH
 STREET INTERSECTIONS. PLEASE ALSO EVALUATE THE
 INTERSECTION OF 13TH AND AUSTRALIAN.
  
 10. IF THE FIRE LINE OFF OF 13TH STREET IS NOT UTILIZED
 PROPOSED SITE REDEVELOPMENT, IT IS TO BE REMOVED BACK
 TO THE MAIN. (SECTION 2.23 OF THE CITY RIGHT OF WAY
 CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS MANUAL)
  
 11. PER SECTION 2.21.2 OF THE CITY RIGHT OF WAY
 STANDARDS MANUAL, PROJECTS WHICH DISTURB 40% OR MORE OF
 A ROADWAY (LINEAR FOOTAGE) PER BLOCK WILL BE REQUIRED
 TO MILL AND RESURFACE THE ENTIRE BLOCK. PLEASE SCHEDULE
 A MEETING WITH THE CITY?S TRAFFIC ENGINEER TO FINALIZE
 THE DESIGN OF 13TH STREET. A PRELIMINARY EVALUATION OF
 THE PROJECT LOCATION INDICATES THAT FULL DEPTH
 RECLAMATION FROM AUSTRALIAN TO THE EASTERN PROPERTY
 LINE IS PREFERRED BY THE CITY IN LIEU OF MILLING AND
 RESURFACING THE ENTIRE BLOCK.
  
 12. THE LANDSCAPE PLAN (CFG08.0) PROPOSES TREES WITHIN
 THE SWALE ALONG 13TH STREET. PER SECTION 78-94 OF THE
 CODE OF ORDINANCES, NO PLANTING ARE PERMITTED IN ANY
 SWALE AREA. IF A VARIANCE OR WAIVER TO SUBMITTED TO
 ALLOW PLANTINGS WITHIN THE SWALE, THE APPLICANT WILL
 NEED TO DEMONSTRATE THAT THE TREES WITHIN THE CLEAR
 ZONE DO NOT CAUSE A TRAFFIC HAZARD.
  
 13. PLEASE SUBMIT COUNTY APPROVAL OF THE PROPOSED
 LANDSCAPING WITHIN PALM BEACH LAKES BLVD. AND
 AUSTRALIAN AVENUE.
  
 14. PLEASE SUBMIT COUNTY APPROVAL OF THE EXISTING
 DRIVEWAY CURB CUTS WITHIN PALM BEACH LAKES BLVD.
 RIGHT-OF-WAY.
  
 15. A MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WILL BE REQUIRED FOR THE
 NON-STANDARD ELEMENTS (PAVERS AND LANDSCAPING) PROPOSED
 WITHIN THE 13TH STREET RIGHTS-OF-WAY.
  
 THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO
 ISSUANCE OF CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZATION INCLUDING
 BUILDING PERMITS AND ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL.
  
 1. AN ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL APPLICATION WILL
 BE REQUIRED FROM THE ENGINEERING DIVISION OF THE PUBLIC
 WORKS DEPARTMENT. THE ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL
 APPLICATION FORMS CAN BE DOWNLOADED AT
 HTTP://WPB.ORG/ENGINEERING/FORMS-AND-PUBLICATIONS/
  
 2. SOLID WASTE YARDAGE WILL NEED TO BE VERIFIED AS PART
 OF THE FINAL DESIGN TO VERIFY THAT THE DESIGN INCLUDES
 APPROPRIATE NUMBER AND SIZE OF TRASH BINS.
  
 KELLY CRANFORD, P.E.
 LAND DEVELOPMENT ENGINEER
 [email protected]
 561-494-1098 (OFFICE)
  
 VINCE NOEL, PSM
 CITY SURVEYOR / REAL ESTATE SUPERVISOR
 [email protected]
 561-494-1096
  
 BRIAN COLLINS, PE
 CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER
 [email protected]
 561-494-1040
  
 FERDINAND RIVERA
 PUBLIC WORKS OPERATIONS MANAGER
 [email protected]
 561-822-2076
  
 TRACY WARD, PE
 SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER
 561-494-1120
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop FIRE FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No 1 Status P Date 10-09-2015 Cont ID  
Sent By pleduc Date 10-09-2015 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By pleduc Date 10-09-2015 Time 14:47 Sent To  
Notes
2015-10-09 15:07:47THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS WERE SUBMITTED BY PETER LEDUC,
 FIRE MARSHAL, BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION, WEST PALM
 BEACH FIRE RESCUE.
  
 THIS REVIEW CAN ONLY BE CONSIDERED PRELIMINARY AS THE
 DRAWINGS THAT WERE REVIEWED WERE NOT COMPLETE.
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS CAN BE EXPECTED WHEN FULL DRAWINGS
 ARE SUBMITTED FOR PERMIT.
  
 THE FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU HAS NO OBJECTIONS TO THE
 PROPOSED PROJECT.
  
 1. CONSTRUCTION, DEMOLITION, AND RENOVATION TO COMPLY
 WITH NFPA 241. EXTRA ATTENTION SHALL BE GIVEN TO THE
 PERMITTING AND LOCATION OF CONSTRUCTION TRAILERS. A
 PERMIT IS REQUIRED FOR ANY CONSTRUCTION TRAILER RELATED
 TO THIS PROJECT. SEPARATION DISTANCES FROM MAIN
 STRUCTURES AS WELL AS OTHER TRAILERS SHALL BE CLOSELY
 MONITORED FOR THE REQUIREMENTS OF FIRE SPRINKLER
 PROTECTION.
  
 2. SITE ACCESS AND EXIT POINTS ARE TO BE CLEARLY
 IDENTIFIED AND MAINTAINED FOR EMERGENCY VEHICLES DURING
 ALL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES.
  
 3. THE BUILDING ADDRESS SHALL BE CLEARLY VISIBLE FROM
 ALL ACCESS ROADWAYS, INCLUDING DURING CONSTRUCTION.
 ADDRESS NUMBERS SHALL CONTRAST WITH THEIR BACKGROUND
 AND SHALL NOT BE LESS THAN SIX (6) INCHES IN HEIGHT
 WITH A ONE (1) INCH STROKE FOR ALL BUILDINGS.
  
 4. DURING CONSTRUCTION, TRASH AND DEBRIS IS TO BE
 REMOVED FROM THE SITE DAILY OR MORE OFTEN TO REDUCE THE
 ACCUMULATION OF POTENTIAL LIFE AND FIRE SAFETY HAZARDS.
  
 5. THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE BUILDING SHALL COMPLY WITH
 THE 5TH EDITION OF THE FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE,
 INCLUDING NFPA 1 & 101, AND ALL ASSOCIATED FIRE CODES.
  
 6. MOTOR FUEL DISPENSING FACILITIES AND REPAIR GARAGES
 SHALL COMPLY WITH NFPA 30 A, 2012 EDITION
  
 7. FLAMMABLE AND COMBUSTIBLE LIQUIDS SHALL COMPLY WITH
 NFPA 30, 2012 EDITION
  
 8. . ALL EXIT DISCHARGE LOCATIONS SHALL BE CLEARLY
 ILLUSTRATED ON THE PLAN.
  
 9. ALL ILLUMINATED EXIT SIGNS AND EMERGENCY LIGHTING
 EQUIPMENT SHALL BE ILLUSTRATED ON THE PLAN.
  
 IF AN EMERGENCY POWER GENERATOR IS PROPOSED, WHAT IS
 (ARE) THE PRIMARY AND SECONDARY POWER SOURCES?
  
 10. ALL KITCHEN EQUIPMENT AND OPERATIONS SHALL COMPLY
 WITH NFPA 96, STANDARD FOR VENTILATION CONTROL AND FIRE
 PROTECTION OF COMMERCIAL COOKING OPERATIONS.
 EXTINGUISHMENT AND VENTILATION SYSTEM SHOP DRAWINGS
 SHALL BE SUBMITTED SEPARATELY FOR APPROVAL.
  
 11. ALL PORTABLE FIRE EXTINGUISHERS LOCATIONS SHALL BE
 CLEARLY IDENTIFIED AND INDICATED ON THE PLAN.
  
 12. COMPLETE LIFE SAFETY PLANS FOR EACH OCCUPANCY SHALL
 BE PROVIDED THAT ILLUSTRATE OCCUPANT LOADS, TRAVEL
 DISTANCES, COMMON PATHS OF TRAVEL, DEAD-END CORRIDORS,
 EXIT SIGNS, EMERGENCY LIGHTING, EXITS LEADING TO A
 PUBLIC WAY, FIRE EXTINGUISHER LOCATIONS, AND ALL FIRE
 SAFETY FEATURES AND EQUIPMENT.
  
 13. PER FLORIDA 69A-60.0081; NOTICE SIGNAGE IS REQUIRED
 FOR STRUCTURES WITH LIGHT-FRAME TRUSS-TYPE
 CONSTRUCTION. ANY COMMERCIAL, INDUSTRIAL, OR ANY
 MULTIUNIT RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURE OF THREE UNITS OR MORE
 WHICH USES HORIZONTAL OR VERTICAL LIGHT-FRAME
 TRUSS-TYPE CONSTRUCTION IN ANY PORTION SHALL BE MARKED
 WITH A MALTESE CROSS SIGN MEASURING 8 INCHES
 HORIZONTALLY AND 8 INCHES VERTICALLY, OF A BRIGHT RED
 REFLECTIVE COLOR. THE APPROVED SYMBOL SHALL BE PLACED
 WITHIN 24 INCHES TO THE LEFT OF THE MAIN ENTRY DOOR.
 A. STRUCTURES WITH LIGHT-FRAME TRUSS ROOFS SHALL BE
 MARKED WITH THE LETTER "R".
 B. STRUCTURES WITH LIGHT-FRAME TRUSS FLOOR SYSTEMS
 SHALL BE MARKED WITH THE LETTER "F".
 C. STRUCTURES WITH LIGHT-FRAME TRUSS FLOOR AND ROOF
 SYSTEMS SHALL BE MARKED WITH THE LETTERS "R/F".
  
 14. THE BUREAU'S APPROVAL OF THIS SUBMITTED PROJECT
 DOES NOT CONSTITUTE IT'S FINAL REVIEW OR APPROVAL.
  
 15. THE BUREAU SHALL REVIEW ALL SUBMITTED BUILDING
 PLANS AT THE APPROPRIATE TIME AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH
 THE REQUIREMENTS OF ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND STANDARDS.
  
  
  
  
Review Stop L LANDSCAPING
Rev No 3 Status F Date 01-05-2016 Cont ID  
Sent By rcaranci Date 01-05-2016 Time 10:27 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rcaranci Date 01-05-2016 Time 10:27 Sent To  
Notes
2016-01-05 10:28:42FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER 561-822-1462
 PROJECT: 1255 PALM BEACH LAKES RESUBMITTAL 1/4
 Z15090030
 JANUARY 4, 2015
 I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND
 PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:
  
 1. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE A TREE SURVEY
 IDENTIFYING EXISTING TREES ON THE PROPERTY AND INDICATE
 THE SPECIES, SIZE, AND IF THEY WILL BE REMOVED,
 RELOCATED, OR REMAIN. PLEASE PROVIDE A MITIGATION CHART
 TO REFLECT THE TREE INVENTORY, AND PROVIDE PERTINENT
 INFORMATION FOR EACH TREE PER SECTION 94-448 (E)
 INCLUDING SPECIES, CANOPY SIZE AND REPLACEMENT
 REQUIREMENT FOR ANY TREES PROPOSED TO BE REMOVED.
 PLEASE CORRECT THE FOLLOWING ON THE TREE DISPOSITION
 PLAN:
 ? ALL TREES WITH A CANOPY OF LESS THAN 35 FEET MUST BE
 MITIGATED 1:1 WITH A TREE IN THE SAME CATEGORY.
 INDICATE THIS ON THE CHART.
 ? ALL TREES WITH A CANOPY 35 FEET OR OVER MUST BE
 MITIGATED WITH A CORRESPONDING SQUARE FOOTAGE OF
 CANOPY. INDICATE THIS ON THE CHART.
 ? THERE ARE SEVERAL EXISTING TREES ON SITE THAT THE
 LISTED CONDITION NEEDS TO BE VERIFIED IN ORDER TO
 PRESERVE ALL HEALTHY TREES ON SITE. STAFF DOES NOT
 SUPPORT REMOVAL OF HEALTHY TREES FROM THE EXISTING
 BUFFERS.
 ? THE MITIGATION SHOWING PROPOSED TREES NEEDS TO BE
 INCLUDED IN THE TREE DISPOSITION CHART.
  
 2. NOT SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE THE REQUIRED OPEN
 SPACE CALCULATION TO REFLECT THE REQUIRED 40 PERCENT OF
 THE TOTAL SITE AREA AND PROVIDE ALL REQUIRED SHADE AND
 FLOWERING TREE AND SHRUB CALCULATIONS PER SECTION
 94-442.
 THE SQUARE FOOTAGE PROVIDED FOR THE GROSS LOT AREA IS
 INCORRECT AND DOES NOT MATCH THE SURVEY DATA. BASED ON
 74067.84 SQ FT GROSS LOT AREA, THE 40% TO BE USED FOR
 TREE, FLOWERING TREE AND SHRUB MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS IS
 29627.36 SQ FT. PLEASE REVISE ALL CALCULATIONS.
  
 3. SATISFIED. PLEASE REMOVE REFERENCES TO SECTION
 94-113, AS THIS IS NOT APPLICABLE.
 94-113 IS STILL REFERENCED ON SHEET CFG8.2.
  
 4. SATISFIED. TREES, PALMS AND SHRUBS PROPOSED TO BE
 PLANTED IN THE RIGHT OF WAY CANNOT BE COUNTED TOWARD
 ONSITE REQUIREMENTS. PLEASE PROVIDE A SEPARATE PLANT
 LIST FOR ANY OFF SITE LANDSCAPING.
  
 5. NOT SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE THE REQUIRED TREES FOR
 ALL LANDSCAPE BUFFERS ON SITE PER SECTION 94-443.
  
 CALCULATIONS ARE TO BE BASED ON THE ENTIRE LENGTH OF
 THE BUFFER ON EACH SIDE OF THE LOT, AND A TREE PROVIDED
 FOR EACH 30 FEET OR PORTION THEREOF.
 SEE SECTION 94-443(B)(4) ..PAVED AREAS USE FOR
 PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION AND VEHICULAR ACCESS SHALL BE
 INCLUDED WHEN CALCULATING THE LENGTH OF THE BUFFER
 STRIP.
  
 6. NOT SATISFIED. A LANDSCAPE ISLAND MUST BE PROVIDED
 ON THE NORTH END OF THE ROW OF PARKING ALONG THE WEST
 SIDE OF THE BUILDING PER SECTION 94-443(C)(3).
 THE ISLAND MUST BE AT LEAST 5 FEET IN WIDTH NOT
 INCLUDING THE CURB.
  
 7. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE A SCREENING HEDGE ON THE
 WEST SIDE OF THE DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE.
  
 8. SATISFIED. PLEASE SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION
 94-443(C)(3) AND (4) TO PROVIDE THE REQUIRED LANDSCAPE
 AREAS WITHIN THE PARKING AREAS BASED ON PARKING SPACES
 AND OTHER PAVED AREAS.
 CALCULATIONS COULD NOT BE LOCATED.
  
 9. SATISFIED. PLEASE SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION
 94-443(E) AND PROVIDE LANDSCAPING FOR AT LEAST 30
 PERCENT OF THE LINEAR FEET AROUND THE EXTERIOR OF THE
 BUILDING.
 THE REAR OF THE BUILDING DOES NOT QUALIFY, AS IT IS THE
 HEDGE FOR THE BUFFER, AND SIDEWALKS SEPARATE IT FROM
 THE BUILDING.
  
 10. NOT SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE A ROOT BARRIER DETAIL
 AND SHOW LOCATIONS OF ROOT BARRIERS TO PROTECT
 INFRASTRUCTURE AND TREES FROM CONFLICTS. THIS INCLUDES
 WATER, SEWER, DRAINAGE, SIDEWALKS AND CURBS, AND ANY
 FIELD STRUCTURES THAT COULD BE IMPACTED BY TREE ROOTS.
  
 11. NOT SATISFIED. PLEASE SHOW ALL UTILITIES INCLUDING
 FPL, WATER, SEWER, AND DRAINAGE ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN.
 PLEASE PROVIDE SCREENING FOR ALL GROUND MOUNTED
 EQUIPMENT AND UTILITIES.
 LOCATIONS OF ABOVE GROUND VALVES, FPL, ETC. MUST BE
 SHOWN AND SCREENING SHOWN ON LANDSCAPE PLAN. UTILITIES
 HAVE BEEN REMOVED FROM RESUBMITTED LANDSCAPE PLAN.
  
  
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 11/20/15:
  
 12. NOT SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE A TREE PROTECTION
 PLAN SHOWING LOCATIONS OF TREE PROTECTION BARRIERS ON
 THE SAME SHEET WITH THE TREE PROTECTION DETAIL.
  
 PLEASE UNDERSTAND THAT ADDITIONAL INFORMATION MAY BE
 REQUESTED, AND STAFF MAY HAVE ADDITIONAL COMMENTS AS
 THE REVIEW PROCESS CONTINUES.
  
 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON
 THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE
 SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT
 SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.
  
Review Stop L LANDSCAPING
Rev No 2 Status F Date 11-20-2015 Cont ID  
Sent By rcaranci Date 11-20-2015 Time 16:51 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rcaranci Date 11-20-2015 Time 16:51 Sent To  
Notes
2015-11-20 16:55:13FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER 561-822-1462
 PROJECT: 1255 PALM BEACH LAKES RESUBMITTAL 11/20
 Z15090030
 NOVEMBER 20, 2015
 I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND
 PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:
  
 1. PARTIALLY SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE A TREE SURVEY
 IDENTIFYING EXISTING TREES ON THE PROPERTY AND INDICATE
 THE SPECIES, SIZE, AND IF THEY WILL BE REMOVED,
 RELOCATED, OR REMAIN. PLEASE PROVIDE A MITIGATION CHART
 TO REFLECT THE TREE INVENTORY, AND PROVIDE PERTINENT
 INFORMATION FOR EACH TREE PER SECTION 94-448 (E)
 INCLUDING SPECIES, CANOPY SIZE AND REPLACEMENT
 REQUIREMENT FOR ANY TREES PROPOSED TO BE REMOVED.
 PLEASE CORRECT THE FOLLOWING ON THE TREE DISPOSITION
 PLAN:
 ? ALL TREES WITH A CANOPY OF LESS THAN 35 FEET MUST BE
 MITIGATED 1:1 WITH A TREE IN THE SAME CATEGORY.
 INDICATE THIS ON THE CHART.
 ? ALL TREES WITH A CANOPY 35 FEET OR OVER MUST BE
 MITIGATED WITH A CORRESPONDING SQUARE FOOTAGE OF
 CANOPY. INDICATE THIS ON THE CHART.
 ? THERE ARE SEVERAL EXISTING TREES ON SITE THAT THE
 LISTED CONDITION NEEDS TO BE VERIFIED IN ORDER TO
 PRESERVE ALL HEALTHY TREES ON SITE. STAFF DOES NOT
 SUPPORT REMOVAL OF HEALTHY TREES FROM THE EXISTING
 BUFFERS.
 ? THE MITIGATION SHOWING PROPOSED TREES NEEDS TO BE
 INCLUDED IN THE TREE DISPOSITION CHART.
  
 2. NOT SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE THE REQUIRED OPEN
 SPACE CALCULATION TO REFLECT THE REQUIRED 40 PERCENT OF
 THE TOTAL SITE AREA AND PROVIDE ALL REQUIRED SHADE AND
 FLOWERING TREE AND SHRUB CALCULATIONS PER SECTION
 94-442.
 THE SQUARE FOOTAGE PROVIDED FOR THE GROSS LOT AREA IS
 INCORRECT AND DOES NOT MATCH THE SURVEY DATA. BASED ON
 74067.84 SQ FT GROSS LOT AREA, THE 40% TO BE USED FOR
 TREE, FLOWERING TREE AND SHRUB MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS IS
 29627.36 SQ FT. PLEASE REVISE ALL CALCULATIONS.
  
 3. NOT SATISFIED. PLEASE REMOVE REFERENCES TO SECTION
 94-113, AS THIS IS NOT APPLICABLE.
 94-113 IS STILL REFERENCED ON SHEET CFG8.2.
  
 4. SATISFIED. TREES, PALMS AND SHRUBS PROPOSED TO BE
 PLANTED IN THE RIGHT OF WAY CANNOT BE COUNTED TOWARD
 ONSITE REQUIREMENTS. PLEASE PROVIDE A SEPARATE PLANT
 LIST FOR ANY OFF SITE LANDSCAPING.
  
 5. NOT SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE THE REQUIRED TREES FOR
 ALL LANDSCAPE BUFFERS ON SITE PER SECTION 94-443.
  
 CALCULATIONS ARE TO BE BASED ON THE ENTIRE LENGTH OF
 THE BUFFER ON EACH SIDE OF THE LOT, AND A TREE PROVIDED
 FOR EACH 30 FEET OR PORTION THEREOF.
  
 6. NOT SATISFIED. A LANDSCAPE ISLAND MUST BE PROVIDED
 ON THE NORTH END OF THE ROW OF PARKING ALONG THE WEST
 SIDE OF THE BUILDING PER SECTION 94-443(C)(3).
 THE ISLAND MUST BE AT LEAST 5 FEET IN WIDTH NOT
 INCLUDING THE CURB.
  
 7. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE A SCREENING HEDGE ON THE
 WEST SIDE OF THE DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE.
  
 8. NOT SATISFIED. PLEASE SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION
 94-443(C)(3) AND (4) TO PROVIDE THE REQUIRED LANDSCAPE
 AREAS WITHIN THE PARKING AREAS BASED ON PARKING SPACES
 AND OTHER PAVED AREAS.
 CALCULATIONS COULD NOT BE LOCATED.
  
 9. NOT SATISFIED. PLEASE SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION
 94-443(E) AND PROVIDE LANDSCAPING FOR AT LEAST 30
 PERCENT OF THE LINEAR FEET AROUND THE EXTERIOR OF THE
 BUILDING.
 THE REAR OF THE BUILDING DOES NOT QUALIFY, AS IT IS THE
 HEDGE FOR THE BUFFER, AND SIDEWALKS SEPARATE IT FROM
 THE BUILDING.
  
 10. NOT SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE A ROOT BARRIER DETAIL
 AND SHOW LOCATIONS OF ROOT BARRIERS TO PROTECT
 INFRASTRUCTURE AND TREES FROM CONFLICTS. THIS INCLUDES
 WATER, SEWER, DRAINAGE, SIDEWALKS AND CURBS, AND ANY
 FIELD STRUCTURES THAT COULD BE IMPACTED BY TREE ROOTS.
 PLEASE PROVIDE ROOT BARRIER DETAIL ACCEPTABLE TO WEST
 PALM BEACH, AND SHOW LOCATIONS.
  
 11. NOT SATISFIED. PLEASE SHOW ALL UTILITIES INCLUDING
 FPL, WATER, SEWER, AND DRAINAGE ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN.
 PLEASE PROVIDE SCREENING FOR ALL GROUND MOUNTED
 EQUIPMENT AND UTILITIES.
 LOCATIONS OF ABOVE GROUND VALVES, FPL, ETC. MUST BE
 SHOWN AND SCREENING SHOWN ON LANDSCAPE PLAN.
  
  
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 11/20/15:
  
 12. PLEASE PROVIDE A TREE PROTECTION PLAN SHOWING
 LOCATIONS OF TREE PROTECTION BARRIERS ON THE SAME SHEET
 WITH THE TREE PROTECTION DETAIL.
  
 PLEASE UNDERSTAND THAT ADDITIONAL INFORMATION MAY BE
 REQUESTED, AND STAFF MAY HAVE ADDITIONAL COMMENTS AS
 THE REVIEW PROCESS CONTINUES.
  
 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON
 THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE
 SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT
 SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.
  
Review Stop L LANDSCAPING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 10-13-2015 Cont ID  
Sent By rcaranci Date 10-13-2015 Time 14:50 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rcaranci Date 10-13-2015 Time 14:50 Sent To  
Notes
2015-10-13 14:51:26I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND
 PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:
  
 1. PLEASE PROVIDE A TREE SURVEY IDENTIFYING EXISTING
 TREES ON THE PROPERTY AND INDICATE THE SPECIES, SIZE,
 AND IF THEY WILL BE REMOVED, RELOCATED, OR REMAIN.
 PLEASE PROVIDE A MITIGATION CHART TO REFLECT THE TREE
 INVENTORY, AND PROVIDE PERTINENT INFORMATION FOR EACH
 TREE PER SECTION 94-448 (E) INCLUDING SPECIES, CANOPY
 SIZE AND REPLACEMENT REQUIREMENT FOR ANY TREES PROPOSED
 TO BE REMOVED.
  
 2. PLEASE PROVIDE THE REQUIRED OPEN SPACE CALCULATION
 TO REFLECT THE REQUIRED 40 PERCENT OF THE TOTAL SITE
 AREA AND PROVIDE ALL REQUIRED SHADE AND FLOWERING TREE
 AND SHRUB CALCULATIONS PER SECTION 94-442.
  
 3. PLEASE REMOVE REFERENCES TO SECTION 94-113, AS THIS
 IS NOT APPLICABLE.
  
 4. TREES, PALMS AND SHRUBS PROPOSED TO BE PLANTED IN
 THE RIGHT OF WAY CANNOT BE COUNTED TOWARD ON SITE
 REQUIREMENTS. PLEASE PROVIDE A SEPARATE PLANT LIST FOR
 ANY OFF SITE LANDSCAPING.
  
 5. PLEASE PROVIDE THE REQUIRED TREES FOR ALL LANDSCAPE
 BUFFERS ON SITE PER SECTION 94-443.
  
 6. A LANDSCAPE ISLAND MUST BE PROVIDED ON THE NORTH END
 OF THE ROW OF PARKING ALONG THE WEST SIDE OF THE
 BUILDING PER SECTION 94-443(C)(3).
  
 7. PLEASE PROVIDE A SCREENING HEDGE ON THE WEST SIDE OF
 THE DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE.
  
 8. PLEASE SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 94-443(C)(3) AND
 (4) TO PROVIDE THE REQUIRED LANDSCAPE AREAS WITHIN THE
 PARKING AREAS BASED ON PARKING SPACES AND OTHER PAVED
 AREAS.
  
 9. PLEASE SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 94-443(E) AND
 PROVIDE LANDSCAPING FOR AT LEAST 30 PERCENT OF THE
 LINEAR FEET AROUND THE EXTERIOR OF THE BUILDING.
  
  
  
 10. PLEASE PROVIDE A ROOT BARRIER DETAIL AND SHOW
 LOCATIONS OF ROOT BARRIERS TO PROTECT INFRASTRUCTURE
 AND TREES FROM CONFLICTS. THIS INCLUDES WATER, SEWER,
 DRAINAGE, SIDEWALKS AND CURBS, AND ANY FIELD STRUCTURES
 THAT COULD BE IMPACTED BY TREE ROOTS.
  
 11. PLEASE SHOW ALL UTILITIES INCLUDING FPL, WATER,
 SEWER, AND DRAINAGE ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN. PLEASE
 PROVIDE SCREENING FOR ALL GROUND MOUNTED EQUIPMENT AND
 UTILITIES.
  
 PLEASE UNDERSTAND THAT ADDITIONAL INFORMATION MAY BE
 REQUESTED, AND STAFF MAY HAVE ADDITIONAL COMMENTS AS
 THE REVIEW PROCESS CONTINUES.
  
 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON
 THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE
 SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT
 SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.
  
 RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER
 561-822-1462
  
  
  
Review Stop PARK PARKING
Rev No 1 Status   Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time  
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop POLICE POLICE
Rev No 1 Status   Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time  
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop PW PUBLIC WORKS
Rev No 2 Status P Date 11-20-2015 Cont ID  
Sent By cranford Date 11-20-2015 Time 09:53 Rev Time 0.00
Received By cranford Date 11-20-2015 Time 09:52 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop PW PUBLIC WORKS
Rev No 1 Status F Date 10-13-2015 Cont ID  
Sent By cranford Date 10-13-2015 Time 15:42 Rev Time 0.00
Received By cranford Date 10-13-2015 Time 15:42 Sent To  
Notes
2015-10-13 15:42:41SEE COMMENTS UNDER ENG PPRC
Review Stop STORM STORMWATER
Rev No 1 Status P Date 10-13-2015 Cont ID  
Sent By cranford Date 10-13-2015 Time 15:41 Rev Time 0.00
Received By cranford Date 10-13-2015 Time 15:41 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop SURVEY SURVEYING
Rev No 1 Status P Date 10-13-2015 Cont ID  
Sent By cranford Date 10-13-2015 Time 15:41 Rev Time 0.00
Received By cranford Date 10-13-2015 Time 15:41 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop TRAFFIC TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No 2 Status P Date 11-25-2015 Cont ID  
Sent By cranford Date 11-25-2015 Time 08:24 Rev Time 0.00
Received By cranford Date 11-20-2015 Time 09:52 Sent To  
Notes
2015-11-25 08:24:45THE SIMMONS AND WHITE 11/3/15 ANALYSIS OF 13TH AND
 AUSTRALIAN INTERSECTION INDICATES THE PROPOSED
 DEVELOPMENT WILL NOT ADVERSELY IMPACT TRAFFIC ON CITY
 STREETS.
Review Stop TRAFFIC TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 10-13-2015 Cont ID  
Sent By cranford Date 10-13-2015 Time 15:42 Rev Time 0.00
Received By cranford Date 10-13-2015 Time 15:41 Sent To  
Notes
2015-10-13 15:42:12SEE COMMENTS UNDER ENG PPRC
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 2 Status F Date 11-20-2015 Cont ID  
Sent By llouie Date 11-20-2015 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By llouie Date 11-20-2015 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2015-11-20 10:36:56STAFF'S REVIEW HAS BEEN DIVIDED INTO TWO (2) SECTIONS.
 THE FIRST SECTION PERTAINS TO THE REQUEST TO CHANGE THE
 DEVELOPMENT ORDER TO ALLOW MOTOR VEHICLE FUEL SALES (NO
 SERVICE) AND ACCESSORY CONVENIENCE STORE AS A "USE
 PERMITTED BY RIGHT" WITHIN THE COMMERCIAL PLANNED
 DEVELOPMENT (CPD); AND THE SECOND SECTION CONTAINS
 STAFF'S COMMENTS AND QUESTIONS BASED ON A TECHNICAL
 REVIEW OF THE PLANS.
  
 USE COMMENTS:
  
 1.) 11/12/15 REPEAT COMMENT: STAFF CANNOT SUPPORT THE
 REQUEST TO AMEND THE DEVELOPMENT ORDER (ORDINANCE NO.
 2721-94) OF THE COMMERCIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT (CPD) TO
 PERMIT MOTOR VEHICLE FUEL SALES (NO SERVICE) AND
 ACCESSORY CONVENIENCE STORE AS A "USE BY RIGHT" IN THE
 CPD. THE APPLICANT HAS NOT PROVIDED ANY JUSTIFICATION
 TO WHY A GAS STATION AND CONVENIENCE STORE WOULD BE
 APPROPRIATE FOR THIS LOCATION/CPD.
  
 (STAFF'S RESPONSE: IT WAS DISCUSSED AT THE 11/12/15
 PPRC MEETING THAT A MARKET STUDY DEMONSTRATING THAT
 THERE IS A NEED FOR A GAS STATION/CONVENIENCE STORE IN
 THE AREA SHOULD BE PROVIDED BY THE APPLICANT; HOWEVER,
 NO MARKET STUDY AND/OR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION PROVIDING
 SUCH EVIDENCE WAS PROVIDED BY THE APPLICANT.)
  
 2.) 11/12/15 REPEAT COMMENT: PLEASE NOTE THAT STAFF HAS
 MAJOR CONCERNS WITH THE LOCATION OF THE PROPOSED USE
 WITHIN 0.25 MILE OF TWO (2) OTHER GAS
 STATION/CONVENIENCE STORES AND THREE (3) GAS
 STATIONS/CONVENIENCE STORES WITHIN 0.5 MILE FROM THE
 PROPOSED LOCATION. THE APPLICANT WILL NEED TO JUSTIFY
 WHY THE LOCATION IS APPROPRIATE GIVEN ITS PROXIMITY TO
 THE OTHER GAS STATIONS/CONVENIENCE STORES.
  
 (STAFF'S RESPONSE: IT WAS DISCUSSED AT THE 11/12/15
 PPRC MEETING THAT A MARKET STUDY DEMONSTRATING THAT
 THERE IS A NEED FOR A GAS STATION/CONVENIENCE STORE IN
 THE AREA SHOULD BE PROVIDED BY THE APPLICANT; HOWEVER,
 NO MARKET STUDY AND/OR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION PROVIDING
 SUCH EVIDENCE WAS PROVIDED BY THE APPLICANT.)
  
 3.) ALTHOUGH THE WAIVERS ARE BEING SOUGHT FOR THE
 MINIMUM DISTANCE FROM A RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICT AND
 SIZE OF THE CONVENIENCE STORE THROUGH THE PD AMENDMENT,
 THE APPLICANT SHOULD PROVIDE ADDITIONAL INFORMATION TO
 HOW THE WAIVERS WOULD BENEFIT (AND NOT BE A DETRIMENT
 TO) THE COMMUNITY.
  
 SITE PLAN TECHNICAL REVIEW:
  
 1.) 10/13/15 REPEAT COMMENT: PURSUANT TO ZLDR
 S.94-207(A), THE INTENT OF A PD DISTRICT IS TO
 ENCOURAGE THE USE OF INNOVATIVE LAND PLANNING AND
 DEVELOPMENT TECHNIQUES TO CREATE MORE DESIRABLE AND
 ATTRACTIVE DEVELOPMENT IN THE CITY. AT PRESENT TIME,
 THE SITE PLAN DOES NOT EXHIBIT ANY INNOVATIVE LAND
 PLANNING/DEVELOPMENT TECHNIQUES FOR STAFF TO SUPPORT
 THE PD AMENDMENT.
  
 (STAFF'S RESPONSE: THE REVISED PLAN SUBMITTED ON
 11/12/15 DOES NOT EXHIBIT ANY CHANGES TO ADDRESS THIS
 COMMENT. NO EFFORT HAS BEEN MADE TO ORIENTATE THE
 BUILDINGS IN A MANNER THAT IS INNOVATIVE, NOR DOES THE
 PROJECT ENHANCE THE INTERSECTION OF PALM BEACH LAKES
 BOULEVARD AND AUSTRALIAN AVENUE. THE OVERALL SITE
 DESIGN REMAINS UNCHANGED AS A TYPICAL SITE DESIGN FOR A
 GAS STATION AND CONVENIENCE STORE ESTABLISHMENT.)
  
 2.) 11/12/15 REPEAT COMMENT: EACH ROW OF PARKING SPACES
 SHALL BE TERMINATED BY LANDSCAPE ISLANDS OF NOT LESS
 THAN 5 FEET IN WIDTH AND NOT LESS THAN THE ADJACENT
 PARKING STALL. THE LANDSCAPE ISLAND SHALL HAVE A
 MINIMUM RADIUS OF 2.5 FEET AT ITS END SO AS TO ALLOW
 CAR MANEUVERING. THE LANDSCAPED ISLAND SHALL CONTAIN AT
 LEAST ONE (1) SHADE OR FLOWERING TREE. [ZLDR S.94-443]
  
 (STAFF'S RESPONSE: THE TERMINAL ISLAND AT THE SOUTHWEST
 CORNER OF THE PROPOSED CONVENIENCE STORE DOES NOT MEET
 THE MINIMUM DIMENSIONS.)
  
 3.) 11/12/15 REPEAT COMMENT: ALL PROPOSED SIGNAGE SHALL
 COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF ARTICLE XIII OF THE
 ZLDR. THE PROPOSED FREESTANDING SIGNAGE LOCATED AT ALL
 ACCESS POINTS DOES NOT COMPLY WITH THE STANDARDS OF THE
 CODE.
  
 (STAFF'S RESPONSE: PURSUANT TO ZLDR S.94-408(D)(2), THE
 MAXIMUM NUMBER OF LOW FREESTANDING SIGNS PERMITTED ON
 THE LOT IS THREE (3). THERE ARE A TOTAL OF NINE (9)
 FREESTANDING SIGNS PROPOSED FOR THE PROJECT, WHICH IS
 NOT PERMITTED.)
  
 4.) THE APPLICANT HAS NOTED THAT A BICYCLE RACK HAS
 BEEN ADDED TO THE SITE (REFERENCE: 11/12/15 APPLICANT?S
 RESPONSE TO PPRC COMMENTS); HOWEVER, IT IS UNCLEAR TO
 WHERE THE RACK IS LOCATED. PLEASE NOTATE THE LOCATION
 OF THE BICYCLE RACK IN THE PLANS, AND INCLUDE A RACK
 DETAIL THAT IS CONSISTENT WITH THE CITY'S STANDARDS FOR
 BICYCLE PARKING.
  
 5.) PLEASE ADDRESS THE FOLLOWING IN THE SITE DATA
 CALCULATIONS:
 - ACCORDING TO THE SURVEY OF THE PROPERTY, THE LOT AREA
 IS 74,052 SQ. FT. WHICH WAS CORRECT IN THE SITE DATA
 CALCULATIONS OF THE ORIGINAL SUBMITTAL. IT IS UNCLEAR
 TO WHY THIS NUMBER WAS INCORRECTLY CHANGED TO 73,506
 SQ. FT. IN THE RESUBMITTAL. PLEASE ADDRESS.
 - THE ZLDR DEFINES THE FRONT LOT LINE FOR A CORNER LOT
 AS THE BOUNDARY OF A LOT WHICH POSSESSES THE NARROWEST
 LENGTH. THEREFORE, THE FRONTAGE LIES ON THE WEST SIDE
 OF THE PROPERTY (AUSTRALIAN AVENUE). PLEASE CORRECT THE
 MINIMUM SETBACKS IN THE DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS TABLE
 ACCORDINGLY.
 - CORRECT CALCULATIONS FOR THE FOLLOWING: FAR, LOT
 FRONTAGE, LOT DEPTH, OPEN SPACE, CONVENIENCE STORE
 SQUARE FOOTAGE IN THE PARKING DATA, AND ANY OTHER
 CALCULATIONS IMPACTED BY THE CORRECTIONS.
 - INCLUDE CALCULATIONS FOR BICYCLE PARKING.
  
 6.) PLEASE ADDRESS THE FOLLOWING IN THE SHEET INDEX:
 - ACTUAL SHEET CFG04.2 SHOULD BE LABELED "CONSTRUCTION
 DETAIL" AND NOT "PAVING, GRADING AND DRAINAGE DETAIL."
 - ACTUAL SHEET CFG13.0, "SIGN PLAN" IS MISSING FROM THE
 PACKET OF PLANS.
 - LIGHT POLE FIXTURES SHALL BE SET BACK AT LEAST 5 FEET
 FROM THE PROPERTY LINE. [ZLDR S. 94-145(2)]
  
 GENERAL COMMENTS:
  
 1.) 11/12/15 REPEAT COMMENT: A TRAFFIC PERFORMANCE
 STANDARDS (TSP) REVIEW LETTER FROM PALM BEACH COUNTY
 DEPARTMENT OF ENGINEERING AND PUBLIC WORKS -TRAFFIC
 ENGINEERING DIVISION, INDICATING THAT THE PROPOSED
 PROJECT MEETS THE TRAFFIC PERFORMANCE STANDARDS OF PALM
 BEACH COUNTY IS REQUIRED PRIOR TO THE SCHEDULING OF A
 PUBLIC HEARING.
  
 (STAFF'S RESPONSE: STAFF HAS YET TO RECEIVE A TPS
 REVIEW LETTER FROM THE PBC TRAFFIC DIVISION INDICATING
 THAT THE TPS STANDARDS HAVE BEEN MET.)
  
  
 INSTRUCTIONS FOR RESUBMITTAL:
  
 * PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN WRITTEN
 FORMAT.
  
 * WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF
 FIFTEEN (15) PAPER COPIES, ONE (1) REDUCED COPY IN 8.5
 INCHES BY 11 INCHES, AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY OF ALL
 PLANS. PLEASE NOTE THAT CHANGES ON THE RESUBMITTED
 PLANS MAY RESULT IN ADDITIONAL COMMENTS.
  
 * PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1)
 RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED
 COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE
 APPLICANT WILL BE ASSESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE
 WILL BE 20 PERCENT ($600.00) OF THE ORIGINAL
 APPLICATION FEE.
  
 * CALL LINDA LOUIE @ (561) 822-1458 IF THERE ARE
 QUESTIONS. PLEASE NOTE THAT ANY CHANGES TO THE PLANS
 MAY RESULT IN ADDITIONAL COMMENTS.
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 1 Status F Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 10-13-2015 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By llouie Date 10-13-2015 Time 09:15 Sent To  
Notes
2015-10-13 09:20:05** STAFF'S REVIEW HAS BEEN DIVIDED INTO THREE (3)
 SECTIONS. THE FIRST SECTION PERTAINS TO THE REQUEST TO
 CHANGE THE DEVELOPMENT ORDER TO ALLOW MOTOR VEHICLE
 FUEL SALES (NO SERVICE) AND ACCESSORY CONVENIENCE STORE
 AS A "USE PERMITTED BY RIGHT" WITHIN THE COMMERCIAL
 PLANNED DEVELOPMENT (CPD); THE SECOND SECTION CONTAINS
 STAFF'S COMMENTS AND QUESTIONS BASED ON A TECHNICAL
 REVIEW OF THE PLANS; AND THE THIRD SECTION ARE GENERAL
 COMMENTS/QUESTIONS AS IT RELATES TO THE REQUIRED
 MATERIAL FOR THE APPLICATION SUBMITTAL. **
  
 USE COMMENTS:
  
 1.) STAFF CANNOT SUPPORT THE REQUEST TO AMEND THE
 DEVELOPMENT ORDER (ORDINANCE NO. 2721-94) OF THE
 COMMERCIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT (CPD) TO PERMIT MOTOR
 VEHICLE FUEL SALES (NO SERVICE) AND ACCESSORY
 CONVENIENCE STORE AS A "USE BY RIGHT" IN THE CPD. THE
 APPLICANT HAS NOT PROVIDED ANY JUSTIFICATION TO WHY A
 GAS STATION AND CONVENIENCE STORE WOULD BE APPROPRIATE
 FOR THIS LOCATION/CPD.
  
 2.) PROVIDE RESPONSES TO ZLDR S.94-273(46.1),
 ADDITIONAL STANDARDS FOR MOTOR VEHICLE FUEL SALES (NO
 SERVICE AND ACCESSORY CONVENIENCE STORE).
  
 3.) PLEASE NOTE THAT STAFF HAS MAJOR CONCERNS WITH THE
 LOCATION OF THE PROPOSED USE WITHIN 0.25 MILE OF TWO
 (2) OTHER GAS STATIONS/CONVENIENCE STORES AND THREE (3)
 GAS STATIONS/CONVENIENCE STORES WITHIN 0.5 MILE FROM
 THE PROPOSED LOCATION. THE APPLICANT WILL NEED TO
 JUSTIFY WHY THE LOCATION IS APPROPRIATE GIVEN ITS
 PROXIMITY TO THE OTHER GAS STATIONS/CONVENIENCE STORES
 IN THE AREA.
  
 SITE PLAN TECHNICAL REVIEW:
  
 1.) PURSUANT TO ZLDR S.94-207(A), THE INTENT OF A PD
 DISTRICT IS TO ENCOURAGE THE USE OF INNOVATIVE LAND
 PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT TECHNIQUES TO CREATE MORE
 DESIRABLE AND ATTRACTIVE DEVELOPMENT IN THE CITY. THE
 SITE PLAN DOES NOT EXHIBIT ANY INNOVATIVE LAND
 PLANNING/DEVELOPMENT TECHNIQUES FOR STAFF TO SUPPORT
 THE PD AMENDMENT. [ZLDR S.94-207(A)]
  
 2.) CHECK SITE DATA CALCULATIONS. CALCULATIONS FOR THE
 FAR, PERVIOUS SURFACE AREA AND OPEN SPACE NOT CORRECT.
  
 3.) PARKING STALL DIMENSIONS AND STRIPING SHALL COMPLY
 WITH THE REQUIREMENTS IN ZLDR S.94-485(J). THE STALL
 PAINTING DETAIL PROVIDED ON SHEET CFG04.1 DOES NOT
 CONFORM TO THE CITY'S STANDARDS FOR PARKING STALLS.
  
 4.) ONE (1) BICYCLE PARKING SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR EVERY
 TWENTY (20) AUTOMOBILE PARKING SPACES. THE DESIGN AND
 LOCATION OF BICYCLE PARKING SHALL COMPLY WITH THE
 CITY'S BICYCLE PARKING STANDARDS. [ZLDR S.94-485(Q)]
  
 5.) INDICATE IF WHEEL STOPS AND/OR A 2 FOOT CURB
 OVERHANG WILL BE PROVIDED FOR THE PARKING STALLS.
  
 6.) EACH ROW OF PARKING SPACES SHALL BE TERMINATED BY
 LANDSCAPE ISLANDS OF NOT LESS THAN 5 FEET IN WIDTH AND
 NOT LESS THAN THE LENGTH OF THE ADJACENT PARKING STALL.
 THE LANDSCAPE ISLAND SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM RADIUS OF 2.5
 FEET AT ITS END SO AS TO ALLOW CAR MANEUVERING. THE
 LANDSCAPED ISLAND SHALL CONTAIN AT LEAST ONE (1) SHADE
 OR FLOWERING TREE. [ZLDR S.94-443]
  
 7.) THE WALLS OF THE DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE SHALL BE
 LANDSCAPED WITH SHRUBS AND HEDGES PLANTED AT 2 FOOT
 INTERVALS. [ZLDR S.94-444(B)]
  
 8.) ALL PROPOSED SIGNAGE SHALL COMPLY WITH THE
 REQUIREMENTS OF ARTICLE XIII OF THE ZLDR. THE PROPOSED
 FREESTANDING SIGNS LOCATED AT ALL ACCESS POINTS DOES
 NOT COMPLY WITH THE STANDARDS OF THE CODE.
  
 9.) THE CANOPY SIGN LEGEND ON SHEET CFG12.0 INDICATES
 THAT THERE IS A SIGN ON THE REAR ELEVATION. THE DETAILS
 AND DIMENSIONS ARE MISSING.
  
 10.) SETBACK DIMENSIONS MISSING FOR THE PROPOSED
 FREESTANDING SIGNAGE.
  
 11.) LABEL ELEVATIONS WITH DIRECTIONS (I.E. NORTH,
 SOUTH, EAST AND WEST)
  
 12.) REFERENCE TO SHEET CFG04.2 MISSING FROM THE COVER
 SHEET.
  
 13.) PHOTOMETRICS AND LIGHTING PLAN DETAILS (SHEETS
 CFG10.0 AND CFG 10.1) MISSING FROM THE PLANS.
  
 GENERAL COMMENTS:
  
 1.) A TRAFFIC PERFORMANCE STANDARDS (TSP) REVIEW LETTER
 FROM PALM BEACH COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ENGINEERING AND
 PUBLIC WORKS - TRAFFIC ENGINEERING DIVISION, INDICATING
 THAT THE PROPOSED PROJECT MEETS THE TRAFFIC PERFORMANCE
 STANDARDS OF PALM BEACH COUNTY IS REQUIRED PRIOR TO THE
 SCHEDULING OF A PUBLIC HEARING.
  
 2.) PROVIDE LETTERS FROM AT&T, FPU, FPL AND COMCAST
 CONFIRMING THAT THE PROPOSED PROJECT DOES NOT ENCROACH
 INTO THEIR EASEMENTS OR OTHERWISE INTERFERE WITH THE
 PROVISIONS OF THEIR SERVICES.
  
 3.) HAS THERE BEEN ANY CONTACT/COMMUNICATION WITH THE
 NEIGHBORHOOD ASSOCIATIONS AND SCHOOL IN THE AREA
 REGARDING THE PROPOSAL?
  
  
 NOTES FOR RESUBMITTAL:
  
 * PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN
 WRITTEN FORMAT.
  
 * WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF
 FIFTEEN (15) PAPER COPIES, ONE (1) REDUCED COPY IN 8.5
 INCHES X 11 INCHES AND ONE (1) SET IN 11 INCHES X 17
 INCHES, AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY OF ALL PLANS. PLEASE
 NOTE THAT CHANGES ON THE RESUBMITTED PLANS MAY RESULT
 IN ADDITIONAL COMMENTS.
  
 * PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1)
 RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED
 COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE
 APPLICANT WILL BE ASSESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE
 WILL BE 20 PERCENT OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE.
  
 * PLEASE CONTACT LINDA LOUIE @ (561) 822-1458 IF THERE
 ARE QUESTIONS.
  
  Print


Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved