 |
Plan Review Details - Project Z15090027
| Plan Review Stops For Project Z15090027 |
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
10-13-2015 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
cranford |
Date |
10-13-2015 |
Time |
12:03 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rbrown |
Date |
10-14-2015 |
Time |
12:27 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2015-10-14 12:43:10 | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, BUILDING DIVISION, | | | COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1. THIS REVIEW IS A CURSORY REVIEW AS IT RELATES TO THE | | | SITE. IT IS NOT A REVIEW FOR FULL COMPLIANCE WITH | | | FLORIDA BUILDING CODE. THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE TO BE | | | ADDRESSED FOR PERMITTING. | | | | | | 2. NUMBER OF ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES. SHEET A0 DOES | | | NOT STATE HOW MANY ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES ARE | | | PROPOSED. THE PLANS FOR PARKING LEVEL 2A, 3A/3B, 3C, | | | AND 4A/4B, EACH SHOW 44 PARKING SPACES PROVIDED BUT | | | ONLY 1 ACCESSIBLE SPACE. THE PLANS FOR PARKING LEVEL 4C | | | ABD 5A/5B EACH SHOW 46 PARKING SPACES PROVIDED AND NO | | | ACCESSIBLE SPACE. THE PLANS FOR PARKING LEVEL 5C SHOWS | | | 55 PARKING SPACES PROVIDED AND NO ACCESSIBLE SPACE. THE | | | MINIMUM NUMBER OF ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES PROVIDED | | | SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH FAIR HOUSING ACT AND | | | SECTION 208.2 OF FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY CODE. | | | | | | 3. PARKING SPACE #8 ON THE 2ND FLOOR PLANDOES NOT HAVE | | | A SAFE ROUTE TO THE NEAREST ELEVATOR OR THE HOTEL LOBBY | | | ELEVATORS. PER SECTION 208.3 OF FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY | | | CODE, ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES ARE TO BE LOCATED ON | | | THE SHORTEST POSSIBLE ROUTE OF TRAVEL FROM ADJACENT | | | PARKING TO AN ACCESSIBLE ENTRANCE FOR EACH BUILDING. | | | THE DESIGN OF ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES SHALL COMPLY | | | WITH SECTION 502 OF FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY CODE. ALSO, | | | ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACE ACCESS AISLES SHALL BE LOCATED | | | SO THAT THE USER IS NOT COMPELLED TO WALK OR WHEEL | | | BEHIND ANOTHER PARKED VEHICLE OR IN THE TRAVEL LANE. | | | THE ACCESS AISLES SHALL ALSO COMPLY WITH THE OTHER | | | PROVISIONS OF SECTION OF 502.3 OF FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY | | | CODE. | | | | | | 4. NO VAN ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES ARE SHOWN. PER | | | SECTION 208.2.4 OF FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY CODE, ONE IN | | | EVERY SIX ACCESSIBLE SPACES (AT LEAST ONE) IN A PARKING | | | STRUCTURE, SHALL BE ?VAN ACCESSIBLE? AND DESIGNED IN | | | ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION OF 502 OF FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY | | | CODE (VERTICAL CLEARANCE NOT LESS THAN 98 INCHES AT | | | SPACE AND VEHICULAR ACCESS ROUTE) | | | | | | 5. WHEN SUBMITTED FOR BUILDING PERMIT, THE PLANS SHALL | | | SHOW THAT THE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION FOR THE BUILDINGS | | | WILL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE HEIGHT, AREA AND | | | OCCUPANCY LIMITATIONS IN CHAPTER 5 OF THE FLORIDA | | | BUILDING CODE | | | | | | 6. WHEN SUBMITTED FOR BUILDING PERMIT, COMPLIANCE WITH | | | ALL BUILDING SEPARATION, PERCENTAGE OF OPENINGS AND | | | OPENING PROTECTIVE REQUIREMENTS OF CHAPTERS 6 AND 7 OF | | | THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE SHALL BE VERIFIED. | | | | | | 7. ENCLOSED PARKING GARAGES. IF THE PARKING GARAGE DOES | | | NOT HAVE WALL OPENINGS, OR SUFFICIENT WALL OPENINGS TO | | | MEET THE DEFINITION OF AN OPEN PARKING GARAGE, IT WILL | | | BE CONSIDERED AN ENCLOSED PARKING GARAGE AND MUST HAVE | | | EXHAUST SYSTEMS. THE EXHAUST SYSTEMS SHALL BE DESIGNED | | | TO MINIMIZE NOISE LEVELS USING INLINE FAN SILENCERS OR | | | OTHER APPROVED METHODS. | | | | | | 8. SEPARATE PERMITS REQUIRED. ALL APPLICABLE PERMITS | | | AND SUB-PERMITS MUST BE OBTAINED BEFORE COMMENCING THE | | | WORK. SEPARATE PERMITS, PLANS AND FEES, ARE REQUIRED | | | FOR SIGNS, SWIMMING POOLS AND SPAS, GAS SYSTEMS, | | | GENERATORS, FIRE ALARM SYSTEMS, FIRE SPRINKLER AND | | | OTHER FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEMS, GREASE INTERCEPTORS, | | | SITE LIGHTING, SITE LANDSCAPE, SITE IRRIGATION, ETC. | | | | | | 9. EACH SEPARATE BUILDING OR TENANCY SHALL HAVE A | | | SEPARATE ADDRESS. FOR STREET ADDRESSING, CONTACT | | | MICHAEL ORIO, GIS SUPPORT SPECIALIST, AT (561) 494 | | | 1080, OR BY EMAIL: [email protected] | | | | | | 10. THIS PROJECT WILL BE SUBJECT TO ART IN PUBLIC | | | PLACES (AIPP) ASSESSMENT. FOR ADVICE ON THE PROVISION | | | OF PUBLIC ARTWORK IN LIEU OF THE AIPP ASSESSMENT, | | | CONTACT SYBILLE WELTER, ART IN PUBLIC PLACES | | | COORDINATOR, AT (561) 822-1521, OR BY EMAIL: | | | [email protected] | | | | | | ROBERT BROWN | | | BUILDING OFFICIAL | | | TEL: 561 805 6652 | | | EMAIL: [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
ENG - PPRC |
ENGINEERING - PPRC |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
11-25-2015 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
cranford |
Date |
11-25-2015 |
Time |
12:20 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
cranford |
Date |
11-25-2015 |
Time |
10:52 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2015-11-25 12:18:53 | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT | | | | | | PROPOSED PEAK POTABLE WASTER DEMAND/ SANITARY SEWER | | | FLOW = 46,115 GPD | | | | | | 1. PLEASE PROVIDE THE ESTIMATED SOLID WASTE COLLECTION | | | YARDAGE. TYPICAL WASTE GENERATION FOR HOTELS IS 1/2 | | | CUBIC YARD PER ROOM PER WEEK. THIS PROJECT PROPOSED 201 | | | ROOMS WHICH WOULD EQUATE TO 14.4 CUBIC YARDS PER DAY | | | FOR JUST THE HOTEL ROOMS. WASTE GENERATED BY THE BANK, | | | OFFICE SPACE, AND CATERING FACILITY WOULD BE IN | | | ADDITION TO THIS AMOUNT. PER CODE SECTION 74-31, | | | PRIVATE SOLID WASTE COLLECTION SERVICE MAY ONLY BE USED | | | IF THE CITY IS UNABLE TO PROVIDE SERVICE, WHICH IS | | | TYPICALLY OCCURS WHEN A FACILITY UTILIZES A ROLL-OFF | | | COMPACTOR OR DUMPSTER GREATER THAN 8 CUBIC YARDS. TO | | | PICK UP A ROLL-OFF COMPACTOR, THE TRUCK MUST BE ABLE TO | | | BACK UP STRAIGHT (NOT AT AN ANGLE) TO THE CONTAINER. | | | PLEASE PROVIDE A LETTER FROM A PRIVATE WASTE HAULER | | | STATING THEY ARE ABLE TO PROVIDE WATE SERVICE TO THE | | | BUILDING AS DESIGNED. | | | | | | 2. AS MENTIONED IN OUR ORIGINAL COMMENTS, A TRAFFIC | | | STUDY WILL BE REQUIRED FOR THIS PROJECT SHOWING HOW THE | | | PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT WILL AFFECT THE TRAFFIC VOLUME AND | | | SURROUNDING LOCAL ROADWAYS. | | | | | | 3. PLEASE REMOVE THE PROPOSED OAK TREE ALONG DIXIE FROM | | | WITHIN THE SHOWN THE SIGHT TRIANGLE FOR THE EXIT. | | | | | | 4. AS MENTIONED IN OUR ORIGINAL COMMENTS, THE SUBMITTED | | | SURVEY DOES NOT APPEAR TO BE COMPLETE AND ACCURATE. | | | PLEASE REFER TO FDOT MAINTENANCE MAPS FOR DIXIE AND | | | QUADRILLE. | | | | | | | | | KELLY CRANFORD, P.E. | | | LAND DEVELOPMENT ENGINEER | | | [email protected] | | | 561-494-1098 (OFFICE) | | | | | | VINCE NOEL, PSM | | | CITY SURVEYOR / REAL ESTATE SUPERVISOR | | | [email protected] | | | 561-494-1096 | | | | | | BRIAN COLLINS, PE | | | CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER | | | [email protected] | | | 561-494-1040 | | | | | | FERDINAND RIVERA | | | PUBLIC WORKS OPERATIONS MANAGER | | | [email protected] | | | 561-822-2076 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
ENG - PPRC |
ENGINEERING - PPRC |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
10-13-2015 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
cranford |
Date |
10-13-2015 |
Time |
12:01 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
cranford |
Date |
10-13-2015 |
Time |
12:01 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2015-10-13 12:01:11 | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT | | | | | | THIS IS A CONCEPTUAL LEVEL REVIEW. CONSTRUCTION LEVEL | | | DETAILS, DESIGN CALCULATIONS AND THE POLLUTION | | | PREVENTION PLAN WILL BE REVIEWED AS PART OF THE | | | ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL AND BUILDING PERMIT | | | APPLICATION PROCESSES. THE ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT | | | APPROVAL APPLICATION FORMS CAN BE DOWNLOADED AT | | | HTTP://WPB.ORG/ENGINEERING/FORMS-AND-PUBLICATIONS/ | | | | | | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO SITE | | | PLAN APPROVAL. | | | | | | 1. PLEASE SUBMIT ESTIMATES FOR THE PEAK POTABLE WATER | | | DEMAND, SANITARY SEWER FLOW, AND SOLID WASTE COLLECTION | | | YARDAGE. | | | | | | 2. A TRAFFIC STUDY WILL BE REQUIRED FOR THIS PROJECT | | | SHOWING HOW THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT WILL AFFECT THE | | | TRAFFIC VOLUME AND SURROUNDING LOCAL ROADWAYS. INCLUDE | | | TRAFFIC ACCIDENT DATA FOR AFFECTED STREET CORRIDORS. | | | ESTIMATE INCREASED OR DECREASED POTENTIAL. SAFETY | | | IMPROVEMENTS SHALL BE RECOMMENDED WHERE NECESSARY. | | | PLEASE SCHEDULE A MEETING WITH THE CITY TRAFFIC | | | ENGINEER (BRIAN COLLINS) TO DETERMINE THE SCOPE OF THE | | | REQUIRED STUDY. | | | | | | 3. PLEASE REVISE THE DRIVEWAY APRONS TO MEET THE CITY?S | | | ENGINEERING DESIGN STANDARDS. HTTP://WPB.ORG/ENGINEERIN | | | G/ENGINEERING-SERVICES/ENGINEERING-STANDARDS/ | | | | | | 4. THE CITY DOES NOT ALLOW UNSIGNALIZED, DOUBLE LEFT | | | TURN LANES AT EXITS. THE WEAVING DISTANCE IS TOO SHORT | | | AND THE CLEAR PATH IS NOT READILY APPARENT, WHICH | | | CONFUSES DRIVERS AND REDUCES THEIR ABILITY TO SAFELY | | | NAVIGATE THE TURN. PLEASE REVISE THE PLAN TO SHOW A | | | SINGLE TURN LANE ONTO SOUTH DIXIE. | | | | | | 5. APPROVAL FROM THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF | | | TRANSPORTATION (FDOT) FOR THE PROPOSED EXIT ON | | | QUADRILLE BOULEVARD. | | | | | | 6. THE STRIPING AND MARKING PLAN MUST INCLUDE SIGN(S) | | | ON THE ALLEY NOTIFYING DRIVERS THAT ALLEY IS ONE-WAY | | | ONLY. IF TWO-WAY TRAFFIC ON THE ALLEY IS PROPOSED, THE | | | ALLEY MUST BE WIDENED TO A MINIMUM WIDTH OF 20 FEET. | | | | | | 7. A MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WILL BE REQUIRED FOR THE | | | NON-STANDARD ELEMENTS (TREES AND TREE GRATES; PAVERS, | | | ETC.) PROPOSED WITHIN GARDENIA RIGHT-OF-WAY. | | | | | | 8. PLEASE PROVIDE AN AUTOTURN ANALYSIS DEMONSTRATING | | | THE SOLID WASTE COLLECTION VEHICLE CAN ACCESS THE | | | PROPOSED DUMPSTER AND COMPACTOR LOCATIONS. THE TRASH | | | DUMPSTER/COMPACTORS MUST LOCATED IN AREAS EASILY | | | SERVICED BY THE CITY SANITATION EQUIPMENT AND MANPOWER | | | PER SECTION 74-35(A)(5) OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES. IF A | | | ROLL-OFF COMPACTOR IS PROPOSED, PLEASE PROVIDE A LETTER | | | FROM THE PRIVATE PROVIDER VERIFYING THAT THEY CAN | | | PROVIDE SERVICE WITH THE CONFIGURATION SHOWN ON THE | | | PLANS. | | | | | | 9. PROVIDE VERTICAL PROFILES FOR THE PARKING GARAGE | | | RAMPS INCLUDING THE TRANSITION AREA GEOMETRY. | | | | | | 10. PRELIMINARY, UPDATED FEMA FLOOD INSURANCE MAPS ARE | | | AVAILABLE AT HTTP://WWW.CO.PALM-BEACH.FL.US/NEWSROOM/08 | | | 14/08-26-14-FLOOD_MAPS.HTM. PLEASE REVIEW THE MAPS AND | | | VERIFY THAT THE NEW MAPS WILL NOT IMPACT THE PROPOSED | | | PROJECT. | | | | | | 11. PLEASE SHOW THE SIGHT TRIANGLES ON THE GROUND FLOOR | | | LANDSCAPING PLAN FOR THE INTERSECTIONS AND VEHICULAR | | | EXITS. (SECTION 94-305E, CODE OF ORDINANCES) | | | | | | 12. PER SECTION 2.21.2 OF THE CITY RIGHT OF WAY | | | STANDARDS MANUAL, PROJECTS WHICH DISTURB 40% OR MORE OF | | | A ROADWAY (LINEAR FOOTAGE) PER BLOCK WILL BE REQUIRED | | | TO MILL AND RESURFACE THE ENTIRE BLOCK. PLEASE SCHEDULE | | | A MEETING WITH THE CITY?S TRAFFIC ENGINEER TO FINALIZE | | | THE DESIGN OF GARDENIA AND THE ALLEY. | | | | | | 13. PLEASE SHOW THE EXISTING DRIVEWAYS ON THE SOUTH | | | SIDE OF GARDENIA. CONSIDER ALIGNING THE ENTRANCES / | | | EXITS WITH THE EXISTING CURB CUTS. | | | | | | 14. A MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WILL BE REQUIRED FOR THE | | | NON-STANDARD ELEMENTS (PAVERS AND LANDSCAPING) PROPOSED | | | WITHIN THE GARDENIA STREET RIGHTS-OF-WAY. | | | | | | 15. PLEASE REVISE THE ELEVATION SHEET TO SHOW ALL | | | CANOPIES, CORNICES AND OTHER FEATURES WHICH PROJECT | | | FROM THE BUILDING FACE. | | | | | | 16. THE SUBMITTED SURVEY DOES NOT APPEAR TO BE COMPLETE | | | AND ACCURATE. PLEASE REFER TO FDOT MAINTENANCE MAPS FOR | | | DIXIE AND QUADRILLE. | | | | | | 17. DUE TO DIFFICULTY MAINTAINING AND REPLACING | | | UTILITIES WITHIN NARROW ALLEYS WITHOUT IMPACTING | | | ADJACENT BUILDINGS, NEW WATER OR SEWER CONNECTION ARE | | | NOT PERMITTED WITHIN CITY ALLEYS. PLEASE REVISE THE | | | DESIGN TO CONNECT TO THE EXISTING WATER AND SEWER | | | SYSTEMS ALONG THE MAIN ROADWAYS. | | | | | | 18. THE SUBMITTED NARRATIVE STATES THAT THE PROPOSED | | | PROJECT IS A 17-STORY BUILDING. THE PLANS SHOW 18 | | | STORIES. PLEASE CORRECT THE NARRATIVE TO MATCH THE | | | PLANS. | | | | | | 19. THE PARKING LAYOUT CONTAINS SEVERAL DEAD-ENDS | | | (ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES ON SHEET A1, STANDARD | | | PARKING ON SHEETS A4 THROUGH A10) WHICH DO NOT MEET | | | CODE REQUIREMENTS. TURN AROUND SPACES MUST BE PROVIDED | | | AT THE DEAD ENDS. SHOW PROFILE DETAILS FOR ANY PARKING | | | SPOTS PROPOSED UNDER RAMPS. REVISE THE PARKING LAYOUT | | | TO COMPLY WITH SECTIONS 94-111 AND 94-485 OF THE CODE | | | OF ORDINANCES | | | | | | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO | | | ISSUANCE OF CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZATION INCLUDING | | | BUILDING PERMITS AND ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL. | | | | | | 1. AN ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL APPLICATION WILL | | | BE REQUIRED FROM THE ENGINEERING DIVISION OF THE PUBLIC | | | WORKS DEPARTMENT. THE ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL | | | APPLICATION FORMS CAN BE DOWNLOADED AT | | | HTTP://WPB.ORG/ENGINEERING/FORMS-AND-PUBLICATIONS/ | | | | | | 2. A SEPARATE SUBMITTAL WILL BE REQUIRED TO THE | | | ENGINEERING DIVISION OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT FOR | | | PLAT APPROVAL. PLEASE CONTACT VINCE NOEL AT | | | [email protected] TO GET A COPY OF THE PLAT APPLICATION. | | | | | | 3. A SEPARATE SUBMITTAL WILL BE REQUIRED TO THE | | | ENGINEERING DIVISION OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT FOR | | | THE AERIAL / FOOTER ENCROACHMENT AGREEMENT. PLEASE | | | CONTACT VINCE NOEL AT [email protected] TO GET A COPY OF | | | THE APPLICATION. | | | | | | KELLY CRANFORD, P.E. | | | LAND DEVELOPMENT ENGINEER | | | [email protected] | | | 561-494-1098 (OFFICE) | | | | | | VINCE NOEL, PSM | | | CITY SURVEYOR / REAL ESTATE SUPERVISOR | | | [email protected] | | | 561-494-1096 | | | | | | BRIAN COLLINS, PE | | | CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER | | | [email protected] | | | 561-494-1040 | | | | | | FERDINAND RIVERA | | | PUBLIC WORKS OPERATIONS MANAGER | | | [email protected] | | | 561-822-2076 | | | | | | TRACY WARD, PE | | | SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER | | | 561-494-1120 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
11-24-2015 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
pleduc |
Date |
11-24-2015 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
pleduc |
Date |
11-24-2015 |
Time |
16:41 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2015-11-24 16:58:42 | AFTER A REVIEW OF THE PPRC RESPONSE LETTER DATED | | | NOVEMBER 16, 2015, FROM THOMAS ENGINEERING GROUP, TO | | | ANA MARIA APONTE, CITY URBAN DESIGNER, THE PREVIOUSLY | | | SUBMITTED FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU COMMENTS WERE NOT | | | NOTED. | | | | | | HOWEVER, THE PREVIOUS COMMENTS BY THE FIRE PREVENTION | | | BUREAU WERE RELATED TO BUILDING CONSTRUCTION PLAN | | | REVIEW. | | | | | | THE PROJECT IS SUPPORTED AND APPROVED BY THE BUREAU. | | | | | | THE BUREAU'S APPROVAL OF THIS SUBMITTED PROJECT DOES | | | NOT CONSTITUTE IT'S FINAL REVIEW OR APPROVAL. | | | | | | THE BUREAU SHALL REVIEW ALL SUBMITTED BUILDING PLANS AT | | | THE APPROPRIATE TIME AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE | | | REQUIREMENTS OF ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND STANDARDS. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
|
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
L |
LANDSCAPING |
| Rev No |
5 |
Status |
P |
Date |
06-03-2016 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rcaranci |
Date |
06-03-2016 |
Time |
14:04 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rcaranci |
Date |
06-03-2016 |
Time |
14:04 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2016-06-03 14:04:42 | FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER 561-822-1462 | | | PROJECT: COSMOPOLITAN/EATON PLACE Z15090027 RESUBMIT | | | JUNE 3, 2016 | | | I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND | | | PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE AN OPEN SPACE DIAGRAM TO | | | SHOW QUALIFIED OPEN SPACE AREAS FOR QBD-10 PER TABLE | | | IV-17 FOR: | | | PRIVATE OPEN SPACE 25%: INTERIOR COURTYARD, ROOFTOP | | | GARDEN OR TERRACE | | | AREA ON LEVEL 13 IS A ROOFTOP GARDEN, NOT A TERRACE PER | | | THE DEFINITIONS FOUND IN SECTION 94-109. GROUND FLOOR | | | AREAS SHOWN DO NOT QUALIFY AS INTERIOR COURTYARD AS | | | SHOWN, ONLY SHOW AREAS TO MEET THE DEFINITION. PLEASE | | | CLASSIFY EACH AREA AND SHOW TOTALS TO SHOW COMPLIANCE | | | WITH THE 25%. | | | | | | AREA INDICATED DOES NOT QUALIFY AS AN INTERIOR | | | COURTYARD. | | | | | | 2. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE CALCULATIONS TO SHOW THE | | | OPEN SPACE AREAS BY CATEGORY, AND PERCENTAGE OF | | | VEGETATED AREA AND TREE CANOPY TO MEET THE REQUIREMENTS | | | OF SECTION 94-109 TABLE IV-7. | | | PLEASE SHOW THE REQUIRED VEGETATED AREA FOR EACH | | | CATEGORY SUCH AS INTERIOR COURTYARD (20%) AND ROOFTOP | | | GARDEN (30%). | | | | | | AREA INDICATED DOES NOT QUALIFY AS AN INTERIOR | | | COURTYARD. VEGETATED AREA AND TREE CANOPY DO NOT MEET | | | CODE. | | | | | | | | | 3. SATISFIED. PLEASE SHOW REQUIRED STREET TREES AND | | | SAFE SIGHT TRIANGLES PER SECTION 94-113. ALL TREES | | | SHALL HAVE STRUCTURAL SOIL AREA SHOWN ON SHEET L-01, | | | AND BE LOCATED IN THE PUBLIC SIDEWALK ADJACENT TO THE | | | CURB ALONG GARDENIA AND SOUTH DIXIE. | | | PLEASE ADD A STREET TREE IN THE GAP ALONG GARDENIA, | | | SECOND FROM THE CORNER WITH QUADRILLE, AND ADD ROOT | | | BARRIER IF NEEDED ADJACENT TO THE WATER LINE. PLEASE | | | SHOW THE STRUCTURAL SOIL EXTENDING FROM THE TREE IN ALL | | | DIRECTIONS 5 FEET, EXCEPT CURB SIDE, AND SHOW THIS | | | MEASUREMENT ON THE DETAIL AND THE LANDSCAPE PLAN. | | | | | | SAFE SIGHT TRIANGLES ARE MEASURED FROM THE BACK OF CURB | | | FOR PROPERTIES WITHIN THE DOWNTOWN MASTER PLAN. PLEASE | | | LOCATE THE SST IN THE CORRECT LOCATION, AND PLACE | | | REQUIRED STREET TREE IN APPROPRIATE LOCATION OUTSIDE | | | THE SST IN THE S DIXIE SIDEWALK. | | | | | | 4. SATISFIED. STREET TREES LOCATED IN A SIDEWALK THAT | | | IS ADJACENT TO A PERVIOUS LANDSCAPE AREA SHALL HAVE THE | | | STRUCTURAL SOIL EXTENDED UNDER THE SIDEWALK TO MEET THE | | | LANDSCAPE AREA IF THE DISTANCE BETWEEN THE 5 FOOT | | | REQUIRED STRUCTURAL SOIL AND THE LANDSCAPE AREA IS LESS | | | THAN 4 FEET. PLEASE SHOW THESE AREAS ON THE LANDSCAPE | | | PLAN. | | | AFTER SHOWING THE CORRECT LOCATIONS OF STRUCTURAL SOIL, | | | RE-EVALUATE FOR THIS COMMENT. | | | | | | 5. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE A TREE SURVEY OF EXISTING | | | TREES, AND PROVIDE A TREE DISPOSITION PLAN. PROVIDE A | | | TREE MITIGATION CHART BASED ON THE LANDSCAPING PROPOSED | | | ON SITE. PLEASE PROVIDE A SEPARATE LIST FOR THE STREET | | | TREES. | | | PLEASE PROVIDE A MITIGATION CHART PER SECTION 94-448. | | | | | | 6. SATISFIED. PLEASE INDICATE THE PROPERTY LINE MORE | | | CLEARLY ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN. | | | PLEASE SHOW THE PROPERTY LINE AS BOLD AND ADD CORNER | | | MARKERS AS NECESSARY TO CLEARLY DEFINE IT. | | | | | | 7. SATISFIED. PLEASE CONSIDER ADDING PALMS TO THE | | | BUFFER ADJACENT TO THE DRIVE THROUGH AREA. | | | | | | 8. SATISFIED. THE LIGUSTRUM ADJACENT TO THE ALLEY MAY | | | BE TOO CONSTRICTED IN THE 5 FOOT BUFFER, PALMS MAY BE | | | MORE APPROPRIATE. | | | | | | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 12/15: | | | 9. SATISFIED. PLEASE ADD A DETAIL FOR THE GREEN WALL, | | | AND SHOW THE SYSTEM AND SPECIES USED TO ACHIEVE A | | | SUSTAINABLE COVERAGE OF PLANT MATERIAL. | | | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 1/21: | | | 10. SATISFIED. PLEASE CORRECT THE GREEN WALL PANEL | | | SECTION DETAIL 2 TO REMOVE REFERENCE TO OTHER PLANT | | | SPECIES TO MATCH THE PLANT SCHEDULE. | | | | | | 11. CONDITIONALLY SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE A PLAN FOR | | | THE STORAGE AND FINAL PLACEMENT OF RELOCATED TREES AND | | | PALMS DURING CONSTRUCTION AND AT INSTALLATION OF FINAL | | | LANDSCAPING. | | | | | | | | | | | | CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL | | | 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON | | | THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE | | | SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT | | | SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION. | | | | | | 2. PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF THE TREE ALTERATION PERMIT, THE | | | APPLICANT SHALL REVISE THE TREE DISPOSITION PLAN TO | | | INCLUDE DETAILS ON THE STORAGE AND FINAL PLACEMENT OF | | | RELOCATED TREES AND PALMS DURING CONSTRUCTION AND AT | | | INSTALLATION OF FINAL LANDSCAPING. | | | | | | 3. PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF THE TREE ALTERATION PERMIT, THE | | | APPLICANT SHALL REVISE THE LANDSCAPE PLAN TO INCLUDE | | | PROTECTION OR THE EXISTING STREET TREES ALONG DIXIE. | | | | | | 4. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE | | | RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PERMITTING AND INSTALLATION OF THE | | | STREET TREES AND RIGHT OF WAY LANDSCAPING AND | | | IRRIGATION APPROVED WITH THIS PETITION. | | | | | | 5. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE | | | RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THE ROAD RIGHT OF | | | WAY LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION ADJACENT TO THE | | | PROPERTY. THIS WILL BE THROUGH A SEPARATE MAINTENANCE | | | AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY. | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
L |
LANDSCAPING |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
02-03-2016 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rcaranci |
Date |
02-03-2016 |
Time |
11:40 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rcaranci |
Date |
02-03-2016 |
Time |
11:40 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2016-02-03 11:41:11 | FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER 561-822-1462 | | | PROJECT: COSMOPOLITAN/EATON PLACE Z15090027 RESUBMIT | | | 2-3 | | | FEBRUARY 3, 2016 | | | I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND | | | PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE AN OPEN SPACE DIAGRAM TO | | | SHOW QUALIFIED OPEN SPACE AREAS FOR QBD-10 PER TABLE | | | IV-17 FOR: | | | PRIVATE OPEN SPACE 25%: INTERIOR COURTYARD, ROOFTOP | | | GARDEN OR TERRACE | | | AREA ON LEVEL 13 IS A ROOFTOP GARDEN, NOT A TERRACE PER | | | THE DEFINITIONS FOUND IN SECTION 94-109. GROUND FLOOR | | | AREAS SHOWN DO NOT QUALIFY AS INTERIOR COURTYARD AS | | | SHOWN, ONLY SHOW AREAS TO MEET THE DEFINITION. PLEASE | | | CLASSIFY EACH AREA AND SHOW TOTALS TO SHOW COMPLIANCE | | | WITH THE 25%. | | | | | | AREA INDICATED DOES NOT QUALIFY AS AN INTERIOR | | | COURTYARD. | | | | | | 2. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE CALCULATIONS TO SHOW THE | | | OPEN SPACE AREAS BY CATEGORY, AND PERCENTAGE OF | | | VEGETATED AREA AND TREE CANOPY TO MEET THE REQUIREMENTS | | | OF SECTION 94-109 TABLE IV-7. | | | PLEASE SHOW THE REQUIRED VEGETATED AREA FOR EACH | | | CATEGORY SUCH AS INTERIOR COURTYARD (20%) AND ROOFTOP | | | GARDEN (30%). | | | | | | AREA INDICATED DOES NOT QUALIFY AS AN INTERIOR | | | COURTYARD. VEGETATED AREA AND TREE CANOPY DO NOT MEET | | | CODE. | | | | | | | | | 3. CONDITIONALLY SATISFIED. PLEASE SHOW REQUIRED STREET | | | TREES AND SAFE SIGHT TRIANGLES PER SECTION 94-113. ALL | | | TREES SHALL HAVE STRUCTURAL SOIL AREA SHOWN ON SHEET | | | L-01, AND BE LOCATED IN THE PUBLIC SIDEWALK ADJACENT TO | | | THE CURB ALONG GARDENIA AND SOUTH DIXIE. | | | PLEASE ADD A STREET TREE IN THE GAP ALONG GARDENIA, | | | SECOND FROM THE CORNER WITH QUADRILLE, AND ADD ROOT | | | BARRIER IF NEEDED ADJACENT TO THE WATER LINE. PLEASE | | | SHOW THE STRUCTURAL SOIL EXTENDING FROM THE TREE IN ALL | | | DIRECTIONS 5 FEET, EXCEPT CURB SIDE, AND SHOW THIS | | | MEASUREMENT ON THE DETAIL AND THE LANDSCAPE PLAN. | | | | | | SAFE SIGHT TRIANGLES ARE MEASURED FROM THE BACK OF CURB | | | FOR PROPERTIES WITHIN THE DOWNTOWN MASTER PLAN. PLEASE | | | LOCATE THE SST IN THE CORRECT LOCATION, AND PLACE | | | REQUIRED STREET TREE IN APPROPRIATE LOCATION OUTSIDE | | | THE SST IN THE S DIXIE SIDEWALK. | | | | | | 4. SATISFIED. STREET TREES LOCATED IN A SIDEWALK THAT | | | IS ADJACENT TO A PERVIOUS LANDSCAPE AREA SHALL HAVE THE | | | STRUCTURAL SOIL EXTENDED UNDER THE SIDEWALK TO MEET THE | | | LANDSCAPE AREA IF THE DISTANCE BETWEEN THE 5 FOOT | | | REQUIRED STRUCTURAL SOIL AND THE LANDSCAPE AREA IS LESS | | | THAN 4 FEET. PLEASE SHOW THESE AREAS ON THE LANDSCAPE | | | PLAN. | | | AFTER SHOWING THE CORRECT LOCATIONS OF STRUCTURAL SOIL, | | | RE-EVALUATE FOR THIS COMMENT. | | | | | | 5. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE A TREE SURVEY OF EXISTING | | | TREES, AND PROVIDE A TREE DISPOSITION PLAN. PROVIDE A | | | TREE MITIGATION CHART BASED ON THE LANDSCAPING PROPOSED | | | ON SITE. PLEASE PROVIDE A SEPARATE LIST FOR THE STREET | | | TREES. | | | PLEASE PROVIDE A MITIGATION CHART PER SECTION 94-448. | | | | | | 6. SATISFIED. PLEASE INDICATE THE PROPERTY LINE MORE | | | CLEARLY ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN. | | | PLEASE SHOW THE PROPERTY LINE AS BOLD AND ADD CORNER | | | MARKERS AS NECESSARY TO CLEARLY DEFINE IT. | | | | | | 7. SATISFIED. PLEASE CONSIDER ADDING PALMS TO THE | | | BUFFER ADJACENT TO THE DRIVE THROUGH AREA. | | | | | | 8. SATISFIED. THE LIGUSTRUM ADJACENT TO THE ALLEY MAY | | | BE TOO CONSTRICTED IN THE 5 FOOT BUFFER, PALMS MAY BE | | | MORE APPROPRIATE. | | | | | | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 12/15: | | | 9. SATISFIED. PLEASE ADD A DETAIL FOR THE GREEN WALL, | | | AND SHOW THE SYSTEM AND SPECIES USED TO ACHIEVE A | | | SUSTAINABLE COVERAGE OF PLANT MATERIAL. | | | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 1/21: | | | 10. SATISFIED. PLEASE CORRECT THE GREEN WALL PANEL | | | SECTION DETAIL 2 TO REMOVE REFERENCE TO OTHER PLANT | | | SPECIES TO MATCH THE PLANT SCHEDULE. | | | | | | 11. CONDITIONALLY SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE A PLAN FOR | | | THE STORAGE AND FINAL PLACEMENT OF RELOCATED TREES AND | | | PALMS DURING CONSTRUCTION AND AT INSTALLATION OF FINAL | | | LANDSCAPING. | | | | | | | | | | | | CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL | | | 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON | | | THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE | | | SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT | | | SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION. | | | 2. PRIOR TO FINAL APPROVAL, THE APPLICANT SHALL REVISE | | | THE TREE DISPOSITION PLAN TO INCLUDE DETAILS ON THE | | | STORAGE AND FINAL PLACEMENT OF RELOCATED TREES AND | | | PALMS DURING CONSTRUCTION AND AT INSTALLATION OF FINAL | | | LANDSCAPING. | | | 3. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE | | | RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PERMITTING AND INSTALLATION OF THE | | | STREET TREES AND RIGHT OF WAY LANDSCAPING AND | | | IRRIGATION APPROVED WITH THIS PETITION. | | | 4. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE | | | RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THE ROAD RIGHT OF | | | WAY LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION ADJACENT TO THE | | | PROPERTY. THIS WILL BE THROUGH A SEPARATE MAINTENANCE | | | AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY. | | | 5. PRIOR TO FINAL APPROVAL, THE APPLICANT SHALL REVISE | | | THE LANDSCAPE PLAN TO INCLUDE PROTECTION OR REPLACEMENT | | | OF EXISTING STREET TREES ALONG DIXIE. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
L |
LANDSCAPING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
01-21-2016 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rcaranci |
Date |
01-21-2016 |
Time |
16:38 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rcaranci |
Date |
01-21-2016 |
Time |
16:38 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2016-01-21 16:40:19 | FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER 561-822-1462 | | | PROJECT: COSMOPOLITAN/EATON PLACE Z15090027 RESUBMIT | | | 1/21 | | | JANUARY 21, 2016 | | | I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND | | | PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1. NOT SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE AN OPEN SPACE DIAGRAM | | | TO SHOW QUALIFIED OPEN SPACE AREAS FOR QBD-10 PER TABLE | | | IV-17 FOR: | | | PRIVATE OPEN SPACE 25%: INTERIOR COURTYARD, ROOFTOP | | | GARDEN OR TERRACE | | | AREA ON LEVEL 13 IS A ROOFTOP GARDEN, NOT A TERRACE PER | | | THE DEFINITIONS FOUND IN SECTION 94-109. GROUND FLOOR | | | AREAS SHOWN DO NOT QUALIFY AS INTERIOR COURTYARD AS | | | SHOWN, ONLY SHOW AREAS TO MEET THE DEFINITION. PLEASE | | | CLASSIFY EACH AREA AND SHOW TOTALS TO SHOW COMPLIANCE | | | WITH THE 25%. | | | | | | AREA INDICATED DOES NOT QUALIFY AS AN INTERIOR | | | COURTYARD. | | | | | | 2. NOT SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE CALCULATIONS TO SHOW | | | THE OPEN SPACE AREAS BY CATEGORY, AND PERCENTAGE OF | | | VEGETATED AREA AND TREE CANOPY TO MEET THE REQUIREMENTS | | | OF SECTION 94-109 TABLE IV-7. | | | PLEASE SHOW THE REQUIRED VEGETATED AREA FOR EACH | | | CATEGORY SUCH AS INTERIOR COURTYARD (20%) AND ROOFTOP | | | GARDEN (30%). | | | | | | AREA INDICATED DOES NOT QUALIFY AS AN INTERIOR | | | COURTYARD. VEGETATED AREA AND TREE CANOPY DO NOT MEET | | | CODE. | | | | | | | | | 3. NOT SATISFIED. PLEASE SHOW REQUIRED STREET TREES AND | | | SAFE SIGHT TRIANGLES PER SECTION 94-113. ALL TREES | | | SHALL HAVE STRUCTURAL SOIL AREA SHOWN ON SHEET L-01, | | | AND BE LOCATED IN THE PUBLIC SIDEWALK ADJACENT TO THE | | | CURB ALONG GARDENIA AND SOUTH DIXIE. | | | PLEASE ADD A STREET TREE IN THE GAP ALONG GARDENIA, | | | SECOND FROM THE CORNER WITH QUADRILLE, AND ADD ROOT | | | BARRIER IF NEEDED ADJACENT TO THE WATER LINE. PLEASE | | | SHOW THE STRUCTURAL SOIL EXTENDING FROM THE TREE IN ALL | | | DIRECTIONS 5 FEET, EXCEPT CURB SIDE, AND SHOW THIS | | | MEASUREMENT ON THE DETAIL AND THE LANDSCAPE PLAN. | | | | | | SAFE SIGHT TRIANGLES ARE MEASURED FROM THE BACK OF CURB | | | FOR PROPERTIES WITHIN THE DOWNTOWN MASTER PLAN. PLEASE | | | LOCATE THE SST IN THE CORRECT LOCATION, AND PLACE | | | REQUIRED STREET TREE IN APPROPRIATE LOCATION OUTSIDE | | | THE SST IN THE S DIXIE SIDEWALK. | | | | | | 4. SATISFIED. STREET TREES LOCATED IN A SIDEWALK THAT | | | IS ADJACENT TO A PERVIOUS LANDSCAPE AREA SHALL HAVE THE | | | STRUCTURAL SOIL EXTENDED UNDER THE SIDEWALK TO MEET THE | | | LANDSCAPE AREA IF THE DISTANCE BETWEEN THE 5 FOOT | | | REQUIRED STRUCTURAL SOIL AND THE LANDSCAPE AREA IS LESS | | | THAN 4 FEET. PLEASE SHOW THESE AREAS ON THE LANDSCAPE | | | PLAN. | | | AFTER SHOWING THE CORRECT LOCATIONS OF STRUCTURAL SOIL, | | | RE-EVALUATE FOR THIS COMMENT. | | | | | | 5. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE A TREE SURVEY OF EXISTING | | | TREES, AND PROVIDE A TREE DISPOSITION PLAN. PROVIDE A | | | TREE MITIGATION CHART BASED ON THE LANDSCAPING PROPOSED | | | ON SITE. PLEASE PROVIDE A SEPARATE LIST FOR THE STREET | | | TREES. | | | PLEASE PROVIDE A MITIGATION CHART PER SECTION 94-448. | | | | | | 6. SATISFIED. PLEASE INDICATE THE PROPERTY LINE MORE | | | CLEARLY ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN. | | | PLEASE SHOW THE PROPERTY LINE AS BOLD AND ADD CORNER | | | MARKERS AS NECESSARY TO CLEARLY DEFINE IT. | | | | | | 7. SATISFIED. PLEASE CONSIDER ADDING PALMS TO THE | | | BUFFER ADJACENT TO THE DRIVE THROUGH AREA. | | | | | | 8. SATISFIED. THE LIGUSTRUM ADJACENT TO THE ALLEY MAY | | | BE TOO CONSTRICTED IN THE 5 FOOT BUFFER, PALMS MAY BE | | | MORE APPROPRIATE. | | | | | | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 12/15: | | | 9. SATISFIED. PLEASE ADD A DETAIL FOR THE GREEN WALL, | | | AND SHOW THE SYSTEM AND SPECIES USED TO ACHIEVE A | | | SUSTAINABLE COVERAGE OF PLANT MATERIAL. | | | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 1/21: | | | 10. PLEASE CORRECT THE GREEN WALL PANEL SECTION DETAIL | | | 2 TO REMOVE REFERENCE TO OTHER PLANT SPECIES TO MATCH | | | THE PLANT SCHEDULE. | | | | | | 11. PLEASE PROVIDE A PLAN FOR THE STORAGE AND FINAL | | | PLACEMENT OF RELOCATED TREES AND PALMS DURING | | | CONSTRUCTION AND AT INSTALLATION OF FINAL LANDSCAPING. | | | | | | | | | | | | CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL | | | 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON | | | THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE | | | SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT | | | SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION. | | | 2. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE | | | RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PERMITTING AND INSTALLATION OF THE | | | STREET TREES AND RIGHT OF WAY LANDSCAPING AND | | | IRRIGATION APPROVED WITH THIS PETITION. | | | 3. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE | | | RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THE ROAD RIGHT OF | | | WAY LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION ADJACENT TO THE | | | PROPERTY. THIS WILL BE THROUGH A SEPARATE MAINTENANCE | | | AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
L |
LANDSCAPING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
12-15-2015 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rcaranci |
Date |
12-15-2015 |
Time |
15:26 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rcaranci |
Date |
12-15-2015 |
Time |
15:26 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2015-12-15 15:30:08 | FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER 561-822-1462 | | | PROJECT: COSMOPOLITAN Z15090027 RESUBMIT 12/15 | | | DECEMBER 15, 2015 | | | I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND | | | PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1. NOT SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE AN OPEN SPACE DIAGRAM | | | TO SHOW QUALIFIED OPEN SPACE AREAS FOR QBD-10 PER TABLE | | | IV-17 FOR: | | | PRIVATE OPEN SPACE 25%: INTERIOR COURTYARD, ROOFTOP | | | GARDEN OR TERRACE | | | AREA ON LEVEL 13 IS A ROOFTOP GARDEN, NOT A TERRACE PER | | | THE DEFINITIONS FOUND IN SECTION 94-109. GROUND FLOOR | | | AREAS SHOWN DO NOT QUALIFY AS INTERIOR COURTYARD AS | | | SHOWN, ONLY SHOW AREAS TO MEET THE DEFINITION. PLEASE | | | CLASSIFY EACH AREA AND SHOW TOTALS TO SHOW COMPLIANCE | | | WITH THE 25%. | | | | | | 2. NOT SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE CALCULATIONS TO SHOW | | | THE OPEN SPACE AREAS BY CATEGORY, AND PERCENTAGE OF | | | VEGETATED AREA AND TREE CANOPY TO MEET THE REQUIREMENTS | | | OF SECTION 94-109 TABLE IV-7. | | | PLEASE SHOW THE REQUIRED VEGETATED AREA FOR EACH | | | CATEGORY SUCH AS INTERIOR COURTYARD (20%) AND ROOFTOP | | | GARDEN (30%). | | | | | | 3. NOT SATISFIED. PLEASE SHOW REQUIRED STREET TREES AND | | | SAFE SIGHT TRIANGLES PER SECTION 94-113. ALL TREES | | | SHALL HAVE STRUCTURAL SOIL AREA SHOWN ON SHEET L-01, | | | AND BE LOCATED IN THE PUBLIC SIDEWALK ADJACENT TO THE | | | CURB ALONG GARDENIA AND SOUTH DIXIE. | | | PLEASE ADD A STREET TREE IN THE GAP ALONG GARDENIA, | | | SECOND FROM THE CORNER WITH QUADRILLE, AND ADD ROOT | | | BARRIER IF NEEDED ADJACENT TO THE WATER LINE. PLEASE | | | SHOW THE STRUCTURAL SOIL EXTENDING FROM THE TREE IN ALL | | | DIRECTIONS 5 FEET, EXCEPT CURB SIDE, AND SHOW THIS | | | MEASUREMENT ON THE DETAIL AND THE LANDSCAPE PLAN. | | | | | | 4. NOT SATISFIED. STREET TREES LOCATED IN A SIDEWALK | | | THAT IS ADJACENT TO A PERVIOUS LANDSCAPE AREA SHALL | | | HAVE THE STRUCTURAL SOIL EXTENDED UNDER THE SIDEWALK TO | | | MEET THE LANDSCAPE AREA IF THE DISTANCE BETWEEN THE 5 | | | FOOT REQUIRED STRUCTURAL SOIL AND THE LANDSCAPE AREA IS | | | LESS THAN 4 FEET. PLEASE SHOW THESE AREAS ON THE | | | LANDSCAPE PLAN. | | | AFTER SHOWING THE CORRECT LOCATIONS OF STRUCTURAL SOIL, | | | RE-EVALUATE FOR THIS COMMENT. | | | | | | 5. NOT SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE A TREE SURVEY OF | | | EXISTING TREES, AND PROVIDE A TREE DISPOSITION PLAN. | | | PROVIDE A TREE MITIGATION CHART BASED ON THE | | | LANDSCAPING PROPOSED ON SITE. PLEASE PROVIDE A SEPARATE | | | LIST FOR THE STREET TREES. | | | PLEASE PROVIDE A MITIGATION CHART PER SECTION 94-448. | | | | | | 6. NOT SATISFIED. PLEASE INDICATE THE PROPERTY LINE | | | MORE CLEARLY ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN. | | | PLEASE SHOW THE PROPERTY LINE AS BOLD AND ADD CORNER | | | MARKERS AS NECESSARY TO CLEARLY DEFINE IT. | | | | | | 7. SATISFIED. PLEASE CONSIDER ADDING PALMS TO THE | | | BUFFER ADJACENT TO THE DRIVE THROUGH AREA. | | | | | | 8. SATISFIED. THE LIGUSTRUM ADJACENT TO THE ALLEY MAY | | | BE TOO CONSTRICTED IN THE 5 FOOT BUFFER, PALMS MAY BE | | | MORE APPROPRIATE. | | | | | | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 12/15: | | | 9. PLEASE ADD A DETAIL FOR THE GREEN WALL, AND SHOW THE | | | SYSTEM AND SPECIES USED TO ACHIEVE A SUSTAINABLE | | | COVERAGE OF PLANT MATERIAL. | | | | | | CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL | | | 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON | | | THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE | | | SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT | | | SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION. | | | 2. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE | | | RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PERMITTING AND INSTALLATION OF THE | | | STREET TREES AND RIGHT OF WAY LANDSCAPING AND | | | IRRIGATION APPROVED WITH THIS PETITION. | | | 3. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE | | | RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THE ROAD RIGHT OF | | | WAY LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION ADJACENT TO THE | | | PROPERTY. THIS WILL BE THROUGH A SEPARATE MAINTENANCE | | | AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
L |
LANDSCAPING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
10-13-2015 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rcaranci |
Date |
10-13-2015 |
Time |
14:59 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rcaranci |
Date |
10-13-2015 |
Time |
14:59 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2015-10-13 15:00:28 | I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND | | | PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1. PLEASE PROVIDE AN OPEN SPACE DIAGRAM TO SHOW | | | QUALIFIED OPEN SPACE AREAS FOR QBD-10 PER TABLE IV-15 | | | FOR: | | | ? PRIVATE OPEN SPACE 25%: INTERIOR COURTYARD AND | | | ROOFTOP GARDEN | | | | | | 2. PLEASE PROVIDE CALCULATIONS TO SHOW THE OPEN SPACE | | | AREAS BY CATEGORY, AND PERCENTAGE OF VEGETATED AREA AND | | | TREE CANOPY TO MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 94-109 | | | TABLE IV-7. | | | | | | 3. PLEASE SHOW REQUIRED STREET TREES AND SAFE SIGHT | | | TRIANGLES PER SECTION 94-113. ALL TREES SHALL HAVE | | | STRUCTURAL SOIL AREA SHOWN ON SHEET L-01, AND BE | | | LOCATED IN THE PUBLIC SIDEWALK ADJACENT TO THE CURB | | | ALONG GARDENIA AND SOUTH DIXIE. | | | | | | 4. STREET TREES LOCATED IN A SIDEWALK THAT IS ADJACENT | | | TO A PERVIOUS LANDSCAPE AREA SHALL HAVE THE STRUCTURAL | | | SOIL EXTENDED UNDER THE SIDEWALK TO MEET THE LANDSCAPE | | | AREA IF THE DISTANCE BETWEEN THE 5 FOOT REQUIRED | | | STRUCTURAL SOIL AND THE LANDSCAPE AREA IS LESS THAN 4 | | | FEET. PLEASE SHOW THESE AREAS ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN. | | | | | | 5. PLEASE PROVIDE A TREE SURVEY OF EXISTING TREES, AND | | | PROVIDE A TREE DISPOSITION PLAN. PROVIDE A TREE | | | MITIGATION CHART BASED ON THE LANDSCAPING PROPOSED ON | | | SITE. PLEASE PROVIDE A SEPARATE LIST FOR THE STREET | | | TREES. | | | | | | 6. PLEASE INDICATE THE PROPERTY LINE MORE CLEARLY ON | | | THE LANDSCAPE PLAN. | | | | | | 7. PLEASE CONSIDER ADDING PALMS TO THE BUFFER ADJACENT | | | TO THE DRIVE THROUGH AREA. | | | | | | 8. THE LIGUSTRUM ADJACENT TO THE ALLEY MAY BE TOO | | | CONSTRICTED IN THE 5 FOOT BUFFER, PALMS MAY BE MORE | | | APPROPRIATE. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL | | | 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON | | | THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE | | | SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT | | | SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION. | | | 2. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE | | | RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PERMITTING AND INSTALLATION OF THE | | | STREET TREES AND RIGHT OF WAY LANDSCAPING AND | | | IRRIGATION APPROVED WITH THIS PETITION. | | | 3. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE | | | RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THE ROAD RIGHT OF | | | WAY LANDSCAPING AND IRRIGATION ADJACENT TO THE | | | PROPERTY. THIS WILL BE THROUGH A SEPARATE MAINTENANCE | | | AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY. | | | RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER | | | 561-822-1462 | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
PARK |
PARKING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
|
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
POLICE |
POLICE |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
|
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
PW |
PUBLIC WORKS |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
10-13-2015 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
cranford |
Date |
10-13-2015 |
Time |
12:04 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
cranford |
Date |
10-13-2015 |
Time |
12:04 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2015-10-13 12:05:05 | SEE COMMENTS UNDER ENG PPRC |
|
|
| Review Stop |
STORM |
STORMWATER |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
11-25-2015 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
cranford |
Date |
11-25-2015 |
Time |
12:21 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
cranford |
Date |
11-25-2015 |
Time |
12:21 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
STORM |
STORMWATER |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
10-13-2015 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
cranford |
Date |
10-13-2015 |
Time |
12:04 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
cranford |
Date |
10-13-2015 |
Time |
12:04 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2015-10-13 12:04:42 | SEE COMMENTS UNDER ENG PPRC |
|
|
| Review Stop |
SURVEY |
SURVEYING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
10-13-2015 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
cranford |
Date |
10-13-2015 |
Time |
12:04 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
cranford |
Date |
10-13-2015 |
Time |
12:03 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2015-10-13 12:03:58 | SEE COMMENTS UNDER ENG PPRC |
|
|
| Review Stop |
TRAFFIC |
TRAFFIC ENGINEERING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
01-14-2016 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
01-14-2016 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
bcollins |
Date |
01-14-2016 |
Time |
11:30 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2016-01-14 11:44:32 | COMMENTS ON TRAFFIC STUDY DATED JANUARY 2016. | | | | | | 1.PLEASE PROVIDE BASIS FOR TRIP DISTRIBUTION | | | 2.TRAFFIC ANALYSIS DID NOT INCLUDE BROADSTONE CLEMATIS | | | OR TRAFFIC THAT WILL BE GENERATED FROM THE AAF TRAIN | | | STATION. | | | 3. REPORT NEEDS TO SHOW GRAPHICS FOR EXISTING TRAFFIC | | | VOLUMES, BACKGROUND TRAFFIC VOLUMES, AND TOTAL TRAFFIC | | | VOLUMES WITH SITE TRAFFIC ADDED. | | | 4. THE INTERSECTION OF QUADRILLE/FERN SHOULD ALSO BE | | | ANALYZED AS A SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION AS FDOT HAS | | | APPROVED A SIGNAL AT THAT LOCATION. | | | 5. THE PROJECTED AM PEAK RIGHT TURN VOLUME FROM | | | NORTHBOUND QUADRILLE ONTO GARDENIA IS 118 VEHICLES PER | | | HOUR. THIS VOLUMES EXCEEDS THE PALM BEACH COUNTY | | | CRITERIA OF 75 VEHICLES PER HOUR FOR ADDING A RIGHT | | | TURN LANE. | | | 6. NOTWITHSTANDING THE TRANSPORTATION CONCURRENCY | | | EXEMPTION AREA, THE CITY REQUIRES A LOCAL AREA TRAFFIC | | | STUDY AND CAN REQUIRE MITIGATION, IF APPROPRIATE. | | | 7. DUE TO THE TRAFFIC IMPACTS THAT WILL BE GENERATED ON | | | QUADRILLE, THE STUDY SHOULD ALSO BE SENT TO FDOT. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
TRAFFIC |
TRAFFIC ENGINEERING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
10-13-2015 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
cranford |
Date |
10-13-2015 |
Time |
12:01 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
cranford |
Date |
10-13-2015 |
Time |
12:01 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2015-10-13 12:03:07 | SEE ENG PPRC COMMENTS |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
01-21-2016 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
aaponte |
Date |
01-21-2016 |
Time |
12:22 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
aaponte |
Date |
01-20-2016 |
Time |
14:15 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2016-01-20 15:15:11 | 1.PLEASE ADJUST THE SITE AREA TO REFLECT THE ACCURATE | | | NUMBER FROM SURVEY (48,609SF)- TOTAL SF ALLOWED BY | | | RIGHT = 133,675SF; TOTAL ADDITIONAL SF ALLOWED WITH TDR | | | = 133,675SF; TOTAL SF ALLOWED (BY RIGHT+TDRS)=267,350SF | | | 2.PLEASE CORRECT THE HOTEL PARKING REQUIREMENT BASED ON | | | THE DMP (SEC 94-111). | | | 3.PLEASE INDICATE THE SLOPE PERCENTAGE OF THE TWO RAMPS | | | CONNECTING THE TWO SIDES OF THE PARKING GARAGE. | | | 4.PROPOSED BUILDING ON DIXIE DOES NOT COMPLY WITH THE | | | MINIMUM 80% ACTIVE USE REQUIRED ALONG DIXIE HWAY. | | | PROPOSED ACTIVE USE IS OLY 58'-7" WHILE THE 80% ACTIVE | | | USE REQUIRED IS 72.4'. | | | 5.PLEASE UPDATE THE SITE PLAN TO REFLECT THE 7' GRASS | | | STRIP ALONG QUADRILLE AND THE 10' SIDEWALK EAST OF THE | | | GRASSED STRIP. | | | 6.SECTION ON SHEET A-2 INDICATE OFFICE SPACE ON LEVEL 4 | | | AND 5, BUT THE FLOOR PLAN SHOWS HOTEL ROOMS. PLEASE | | | CORRECT AND CLARIFY WHICH ONE IS THE PROPOSED USE. | | | 7.DEAD-END PARKING SI REQUIRED TO PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF | | | 3 FOOT BACK UP AREA AT THE TERMINUS OF THE AISLE. | | | 8.PROPOSED TAMDEM SPACES WILL REQUIRE THE BUILDING TO | | | PROVIDE 24 HOUR VALET SERVICE. | | | 9.ON FLOOR 8TH, PLEASE INDICATE THE ROOF OF THE GARAGE | | | ALONG THE ALLEY. | | | 10.EXTERIOR GRADE WOOD FINISH PANELING IS INDICATED ON | | | THE DIXIE BUILDING, BUT DESPITE IT IS SHOWN IN THE | | | ELEVATION ON QUADRILLE IT IS NOT CALLED OUT. AS SUCH. | | | PLEASE CLARIFY IF THAT MATERIAL IS NOT GOING TO BE USED | | | ON THE TOWER FACADE. | | | 11.STAFF RECOMMENDS THE BUIDING DESIGN TO BE MODIFIED | | | TO INDICATE THE LOCATION OF THE HOTEL ENTRANCE AND THE | | | OFFICE ENTRANCE. THE OFFICE ENTRANCE CURRENTLY APPEARS | | | TO BE HIDDEN UNDER A GARAGE FACADE, AND THE HOTEL | | | ENTRANCE IS NOT INDICATED ON THE QUADRILLE ELEVATION. | | | 12.PROJECT DOES NOT COMPLY WITH THE MINIMUM SETBACK | | | REQUIRED ABOVE THE 3RD STORY FOR PARKING USES ON | | | GARDENIA STREET. THE PROPOSED GARAGE HAS 6 LEVELS | | | EXPOSED TO THE STREET WITHOUT THE REQUIRED 27' SETBACK. | | | STAFF RECOMMENDS MODIFYING THE PARKING LAYOUT TO | | | INCREASE THE SIZE OF EACH LEVEL AND REDECE THE NUMBER | | | OF PARKING LEVELS. INCREASE THE PARKING TOWARDS THE | | | DIXIE HWAY SITE. | | | 13.HOW BIG IS THE DUMPSTER OR ROLL OFF COMPACTOR | | | PROPOSED? IF PRIVATE PICK UP NEEDED, A LETTER FROM ONE | | | OF THE CITY AUTHORIZED PRIVATE WASTE HAULER SHALL BE | | | PROVIDED CONFIRMING PRIVATE PROVIDER IS ABLE TO PROVIDE | | | WASTE SERVICE TO THE BUILDING AS DESIGNED. THERE ARE | | | SOME OVERHEAD POWER LINES THAT MAY AFFECT THE OPERATION | | | OF THE GARBAGE TRUCK. PLEASE CONFIRM CLEARANCE HEIGHT. | | | 14.PLEASE PROVIDE AUTO-TURN FOR THE TRUCK MOVEMENT FOR | | | WASTE DISPOSAL AND THE DRIVE THRU CIRCULATION INTO BOTH | | | LANES. | | | 15.SURFACE PARKING LOT CANNOT BE COUNTED AS PRIVATE | | | OPEN SPACE. | | | 16. PLEASE EXPLAIN HOW THE MAINTENANCE OF THE WALL IS | | | GOING TO BE CONDUCTED.TOTAL WALL HEIGHT IS 246'. IS THE | | | PROPOSED WAL FULLY PLANTED AS SEEMS BY THE DETAIL OR | | | SMALL LINEAR VERTICAL ELEMENTS AS SHOWN ON THE FACADE? | | | FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION PLEASE CONTACT ANA MARIA | | | APONTE AT 561-822-1439. | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
12-15-2015 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
aaponte |
Date |
12-15-2015 |
Time |
15:37 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
aaponte |
Date |
11-16-2015 |
Time |
15:36 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2015-12-15 11:42:32 | 2ND REVIEW. | | | 1. PASSENGER DROP-OFF AREA IS NOT ALLOWED ALONG | | | QUADRILLE BOULEVARD.- COMPLIED | | | 2. CURB CUTS ARE NOT PERMITTED ALONG QUADRILLE BLVD. | | | BANK DRIVE THRU EXIT CAN UTILIZE THE EXISTING ALLEY.- | | | COMPLIED | | | 3. STREET TREES SHALL BE PLANTED ALONG THE STREET | | | FRONTAGE, ADJACENT TO THE CURB. TREE GRATES SHALL BE | | | INSTALLED ON THOSE TREES ALONG GARDENIA STREET AND | | | DIXIE HWAY. TREES SHALL BE INSTALLED ON GRASS STRIP | | | ALONG QUADRILLE BLVD TO MAINTAIN CONSISTENCY ON THE | | | STREETSCAPE. COMPLIED. PLEASE ADD ONE ADDITIONAL TREE | | | ALONG GARDENIA BETWEEN THE FIRST AND THE THIRD TREE | | | COUNTING FROM QUADRILLE. A ROOT BARRIER WILL SUFFICE TO | | | AVOID ANY CONFLRICT WITH THE UTILITY LINE. | | | 4. PLEASE CLARIFY THE GARAGE ENTRANCE, IT SHOWS ONLY | | | ONE ENTRANCE ARROW BUT IT SEEMS IT SHALL BE TWO-WAY | | | DRIVEWAY.- COMPLIED | | | 5. PLEASE EXPLORE THE POSSIBILITY TO REDUCE THE NUMBER | | | OF CURB CUTS ALONG GARDENIA STREET.- COMPLIED. | | | 6. PLEASE EXPLORE THE POSSIBILITY TO MOVE THE GROUND | | | FLOOR PARKING SPACE BEHIND, AND THE OFFICE LOBBY ALONG | | | THE STREET FRONTAGE.- COMPLIED | | | 7. IS THERE ANY ACCESS AGREEMENT BETWEEN VITAL PRINTING | | | AND THE RUSSOS SUB PROPERTY?- ACKNOWLEDGED | | | 8. THE NON-ACTIVE USES SHALL BE ARCHITECTURALLY TREATED | | | ACCORDING TO SEC 94-109. SEE ALSO TABLE IV-4. COMPLIED. | | | PLEASE PROVIDE MORE PICTURES OF THE SPECIFIC PRODUCT | | | SPECIFIED FOR THE SCREENING. | | | 9. PLEASE CONFIRM COMPLIANCE WITH BLANK WALL | | | REGULATIONS FOR NORTH AND EAST ELEVATIONS. NOT | | | COMPLIED. PLEASE CALCULATE THE EXACT SQUARE FOOTAGE OF | | | THE WALL NOW PROPOSED AS A GREEN WALL. THE MAXIMUM AREA | | | OF SUCH WALL ALLOWED WITH NO OPENINGS IS 10,556SF BASED | | | ON THE TOTAL AREA OF THE FACADE OF 52,781 SF. | | | 10. CURB CUT ON DIXIE HWAY IS NOT DESIRABLE, PLEASE | | | CONSIDER UTILIZING THE ALLEY OR AT A MINIMUM REDUCING | | | THE CURB CUT TO ONLY ONE TRAVEL LANE. COMPLIED. STAFF | | | STILL SUGGEST TO LOOK FOR ALTERNATIVES TO REMOVE THE | | | CURB CUT ON DIXIE. | | | 11. PLEASE PROVIDE INFORMATION TO CONFIRM COMPLIANCE | | | WITH PLANAR BREAK REGULATIONS (TABLE IV-4). COMPLIED. | | | 12. THE PROJECT REQUIRES THE ACQUISITION OF TDRS. | | | PLEASE INDICATE THE SOURCE OF THE TDRS. ACKNOWLEDGED | | | | | | DOCUMENT SET | | | 13. PLEASE INDICATE THE REQUIRED SETBACK AND PROPERTY | | | LINE IN ALL FLOOR PLANS AND ELEVATIONS. NOT COMPLIED. | | | PLEASE PROVIDE THE REQUIRED SETBACK AS MEASURED FROM | | | THE BACK OF THE CURB ON SITE PLAN AND FLOOR PLANS AND | | | ELEVATIONS. | | | 14. THE GROSS BUILDING AREA CALCULATION TABLE SHALL | | | INDICATE THE BASE DEVELOPMENT CAPACITY (2.75 FAR) AND | | | IN A SEPARATE LINE THE INCENTIVE CAPACITY (ADDITIONAL | | | 2.75 FAR). PROJECT SITE 49,081SF. 2.75 FAR= 134,973 SF. | | | ADDITIONAL FAR ALLOWED BY THE QUADRILLE GARDEN DISTRICT | | | HOTEL AND OFFICE INCENTIVE = 134,973 SF. COMPLIED. | | | SURVEY NEEDS TO BE REVISED AND CALCULATIONS ADJUSTED. | | | 15. PARKING REQUIREMENT NUMBERS SHALL REFLECT THE DMP | | | REQUIREMENTS (TABLE IV-9). COMPLIED. PLEASE ADJUST | | | PARKING CALCULATION TO REFLECT HOTEL REQUIREMENT. | | | 16. PLEASE INSERT THE 1ST FLOOR PLAN IN THE CONTEXT | | | INDICATING THE ADJACENT BUILDINGS, ROADS, SIDEWALKS AND | | | STREET ELEMENTS. INCLUDE THE FOUR CORNERS OF GARDENIA | | | AND DIXIE, AND THE NORTH SIDE OF THE ALLEY. COMPLIED. | | | 17. PLEASE PROVIDE COLORED ELEVATIONS WITH CALL OUT | | | MATERIALS AND PICTURES REFERENCING THE PROPOSED | | | FINISHES. COMPLIED. | | | 18. ELEVATIONS FOR SMALL BUILDING SEEM TO BE | | | MISLABELED. COMPLIED | | | 19. PLEASE PROVIDE A SMALL DIAGRAM OF EACH FLOOR | | | INDICATING THE AREAS COUNTED AS PART OF THE FAR. | | | COMPLIED | | | | | | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS | | | 20. REPEART COMMENT. THE SUBMITTED SURVEY DOES NOT | | | APPEAR COMPLETE AND ACCURATE. PLEASE VERIFY FDOT | | | MAINTENANCE MAPS FOR DIXIE HWAY, THE SITE IS SMALLER | | | THAN REFLECTED ON SURVEY. FOR PURPOSES OF CALCULATING | | | THE FAR, THE SURVEY NEEDS TO INCLUDE THE TOTAL SQUARE | | | FOOTAGE OF THE PARCEL. | | | 21. ENGINEERING COMMENTS REGARDING GARBAGE COLLECTION | | | WILL AFFECT THE SITE PLAN. PLEASE ADJUST ENSURING | | | COMPLIANCE. | | | 22. PROJECT DOES NOT COMPLY WITH THE MINIMUM SETBACK | | | REQUIRED WHEN PARKING USES ARE PROPOSED ABOVE THE 3RD | | | FLOOR ALONG A SECONDARY STREET. MINIMUM SETBACK | | | REQUIRED IS 27' MEASURED FROM THE BACK OF THE CURB. | | | CURRENT PROJECT IS PROPOSING ONLY 17'. | | | 23. MAXIMUM BUILDING SETBACK ALONG AN AVENUE IS 30' . | | | PROPOSED PROJECT IS SET BACK 37' FROM THE BACK OF | | | CURB.PLEASE ADJUST. | | | 24. PLEASE VERIFY THE FACADE AND THE FLOOR PLANS MATCH | | | IN RELATION TO THE LOCATION OF THE WINDOW, DOORS, | | | OPENINGS ETC. (OFFICE LOBBY DOOR AND STAIR DOOR ON | | | GARDENIA ARE NOT REFLECTED ON ELEVATION. | | | 25. PLEASE INCLUDE DETAILS OF THE NEW GREEN WALLS | | | PROPOSED ON THE NORTH FACADE. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
10-13-2015 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
aaponte |
Date |
10-13-2015 |
Time |
15:21 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
aaponte |
Date |
10-13-2015 |
Time |
14:13 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2015-10-13 15:21:10 | 1. PASSENGER DROP-OFF AREA IS NOT ALLOWED ALONG | | | QUADRILLE BOULEVARD. | | | 2. CURB CUTS ARE NOT PERMITTED ALONG QUADRILLE BLVD. | | | BANK DRIVE THRU EXIT CAN UTILIZE THE EXISTING ALLEY. | | | 3. STREET TREES SHALL BE PLANTED ALONG THE STREET | | | FRONTAGE, ADJACENT TO THE CURB. TREE GRATES SHALL BE | | | INSTALLED ON THOSE TREES ALONG GARDENIA STREET AND | | | DIXIE HWAY. TREES SHALL BE INSTALLED ON GRASS STRIP | | | ALONG QUADRILLE BLVD TO MAINTAIN CONSISTENCY ON THE | | | STREETSCAPE. | | | 4. PLEASE CLARIFY THE GARAGE ENTRANCE, IT SHOWS ONLY | | | ONE ENTRANCE ARROW BUT IT SEEMS IT SHALL BE TWO-WAY | | | DRIVEWAY. | | | 5. PLEASE EXPLORE THE POSSIBILITY TO REDUCE THE NUMBER | | | OF CURB CUTS ALONG GARDENIA STREET. | | | 6. PLEASE EXPLORE THE POSSIBILITY TO MOVE THE GROUND | | | FLOOR PARKING SPACE BEHIND, AND THE OFFICE LOBBY ALONG | | | THE STREET FRONTAGE. | | | 7. IS THERE ANY ACCESS AGREEMENT BETWEEN VITAL PRINTING | | | AND THE RUSSOS SUB PROPERTY? | | | 8. THE NON-ACTIVE USES SHALL BE ARCHITECTURALLY TREATED | | | ACCORDING TO SEC 94-109. SEE ALSO TABLE IV-4. | | | 9. PLEASE CONFIRM COMPLIANCE WITH BLANK WALL | | | REGULATIONS FOR NORTH AND EAST ELEVATIONS. | | | 10. CURB CUT ON DIXIE HWAY IS NOT DESIRABLE, PLEASE | | | CONSIDER UTILIZING THE ALLEY OR AT A MINIMUM REDUCING | | | THE CURB CUT TO ONLY ONE TRAVEL LANE. | | | 11. PLEASE PROVIDE INFORMATION TO CONFIRM COMPLIANCE | | | WITH PLANAR BREAK REGULATIONS (TABLE IV-4). | | | 12. THE PROJECT REQUIRES THE ACQUISITION OF TDRS. | | | PLEASE INDICATE THE SOURCE OF THE TDRS. | | | | | | | | | DOCUMENT SET | | | 13. PLEASE INDICATE THE REQUIRED SETBACK AND PROPERTY | | | LINE IN ALL FLOOR PLANS AND ELEVATIONS. | | | 14. THE GROSS BUILDING AREA CALCULATION TABLE SHALL | | | INDICATE THE BASE DEVELOPMENT CAPACITY (2.75 FAR) AND | | | IN A SEPARATE LINE THE INCENTIVE CAPACITY (ADDITIONAL | | | 2.75 FAR). PROJECT SITE 49,081SF. 2.75 FAR= 134,973 SF. | | | ADDITIONAL FAR ALLOWED BY THE QUADRILLE GARDEN DISTRICT | | | HOTEL AND OFFICE INCENTIVE = 134,973 SF. | | | 15. PARKING REQUIREMENT NUMBERS SHALL REFLECT THE DMP | | | REQUIREMENTS (TABLE IV-9). | | | 16. PLEASE INSERT THE 1ST FLOOR PLAN IN THE CONTEXT | | | INDICATING THE ADJACENT BUILDINGS, ROADS, SIDEWALKS AND | | | STREET ELEMENTS. INCLUDE THE FOUR CORNERS OF GARDENIA | | | AND DIXIE, AND THE NORTH SIDE OF THE ALLEY. | | | 17. PLEASE PROVIDE COLORED ELEVATIONS WITH CALL OUT | | | MATERIALS AND PICTURES REFERENCING THE PROPOSED | | | FINISHES. | | | 18. ELEVATIONS FOR SMALL BUILDING SEEM TO BE | | | MISLABELED. | | | 19. PLEASE PROVIDE A SMALL DIAGRAM OF EACH FLOOR | | | INDICATING THE AREAS COUNTED AS PART OF THE FAR. | | | |
|
|
| |
Print |
|
Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved |
 |