 |
Plan Review Details - Project Z15090026
| Plan Review Stops For Project Z15090026 |
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
06-14-2017 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rbrown |
Date |
06-14-2017 |
Time |
09:08 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rbrown |
Date |
06-14-2017 |
Time |
09:08 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2017-06-14 09:10:52 | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, BUILDING DIVISION, | | | COMMENTS: | | | | | | THE FOLLOWING ADVISORY NOTES FROM THE PREVIOUS REVIEW | | | SHOULD BE ADDRESSED WHEN THE PLANS ARE SUBMITTED FOR | | | BUILDING PERMIT: | | | | | | 1. THIS REVIEW IS A CURSORY REVIEW AS IT RELATES TO THE | | | SITE. IT IS NOT A REVIEW FOR FULL COMPLIANCE WITH | | | FLORIDA BUILDING CODE. THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE TO BE | | | ADDRESSED FOR PERMITTING. | | | | | | 2. WHEN SUBMITTED FOR BUILDING PERMIT, THE PLANS SHALL | | | SHOW THAT THE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION FOR THE BUILDINGS | | | WILL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE HEIGHT, AREA AND | | | OCCUPANCY LIMITATIONS IN CHAPTER 5 OF THE FLORIDA | | | BUILDING CODE | | | | | | 3. THE ADDITION TO THE EXISTING BUILDING IS COVERED BY | | | CHAPTER 11 OF THE FLORIDA EXISTING BUILDING CODE. THE | | | HEIGHT AND/OR AREA INCREASE DUE TO THE PROPOSED | | | ADDITION SHALL NOT INCREASE THE TOTAL BUILDING HEIGHT | | | AND/OR AREA BEYOND THAT ALLOWED UNDER THE APPLICABLE | | | PROVISIONS OF CHAPTER 5 OF THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE | | | FOR THE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION USED. | | | | | | 4. SEPARATE PERMITS REQUIRED. ALL APPLICABLE PERMITS | | | AND SUB-PERMITS MUST BE OBTAINED BEFORE COMMENCING THE | | | WORK. SEPARATE PERMITS, PLANS AND FEES, ARE REQUIRED | | | FOR SIGNS, GAS SYSTEMS, GENERATORS, FIRE ALARM SYSTEMS, | | | FIRE SPRINKLER AND OTHER FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEMS, | | | GREASE INTERCEPTORS, SITE LIGHTING, SITE LANDSCAPE, | | | SITE IRRIGATION, ETC. | | | | | | ROBERT BROWN | | | BUILDING OFFICIAL | | | TEL: 561 805 6652 | | | EMAIL: [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
05-10-2016 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rbrown |
Date |
05-10-2016 |
Time |
20:34 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
tward |
Date |
06-09-2017 |
Time |
11:08 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2016-05-10 20:37:19 | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, BUILDING DIVISION, | | | COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1. THIS REVIEW IS A CURSORY REVIEW AS IT RELATES TO THE | | | SITE. IT IS NOT A REVIEW FOR FULL COMPLIANCE WITH | | | FLORIDA BUILDING CODE. THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE TO BE | | | ADDRESSED FOR PERMITTING. | | | | | | 2. WHEN SUBMITTED FOR BUILDING PERMIT, THE PLANS SHALL | | | SHOW THAT THE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION FOR THE BUILDINGS | | | WILL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE HEIGHT, AREA AND | | | OCCUPANCY LIMITATIONS IN CHAPTER 5 OF THE FLORIDA | | | BUILDING CODE | | | | | | 3. THE ADDITION TO THE EXISTING BUILDING IS COVERED BY | | | CHAPTER 11 OF THE FLORIDA EXISTING BUILDING CODE. THE | | | HEIGHT AND/OR AREA INCREASE DUE TO THE PROPOSED | | | ADDITION SHALL NOT INCREASE THE TOTAL BUILDING HEIGHT | | | AND/OR AREA BEYOND THAT ALLOWED UNDER THE APPLICABLE | | | PROVISIONS OF CHAPTER 5 OF THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE | | | FOR THE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION USED. | | | | | | 4. SEPARATE PERMITS REQUIRED. ALL APPLICABLE PERMITS | | | AND SUB-PERMITS MUST BE OBTAINED BEFORE COMMENCING THE | | | WORK. SEPARATE PERMITS, PLANS AND FEES, ARE REQUIRED | | | FOR SIGNS, SWIMMING POOLS AND SPAS, GAS SYSTEMS, | | | GENERATORS, FIRE ALARM SYSTEMS, FIRE SPRINKLER AND | | | OTHER FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEMS, GREASE INTERCEPTORS, | | | SITE LIGHTING, SITE LANDSCAPE, SITE IRRIGATION, ETC. | | | | | | ROBERT BROWN | | | BUILDING OFFICIAL | | | TEL: 561 805 6652 | | | EMAIL: [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
ENG - PPRC |
ENGINEERING - PPRC |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
06-08-2017 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
mkhan |
Date |
06-08-2017 |
Time |
16:32 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
mkhan |
Date |
06-08-2017 |
Time |
16:32 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2017-06-08 16:39:10 | PASSED WITH FOLLOWING PROVISO: | | | | | | 1. PLANS DO NOT CLEARLY SHOW ANY EXISTING WATER, SEWER | | | AND FIRE LINE CONNECTION TO THE SITE OR HOW THE | | | NEW/BUILDING ADDTION WILL BE SERVED FOR WATER, SEWER | | | AND FIRE PROTECTION. PLEASE VERIFY THE NEED. IF | | | PROPOSED RESTROOM IS TO BE CONNECTED TO ALREADY | | | EXISTING WATER/SEWER, PLUMBING PERMIT WILL NEED TO BE | | | SOUGHT FROM CITY'S BUILDING DEPARTMENT. | | | | | | 2. PLAN DOES NOT SHOW ANY EXISTING OR PROPOSED GARBAGE | | | BIN/DUMPSTER. FOR GARBAGE COLLECTION/SANITATION NEED | | | CONTACT THE CITY'S PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT. | | | | | | 3. INSTALL A SIDEWALK FULL LENTH ALONG THE WESTERN | | | PROPERTY LINE I.E. EAST SIDE OF WEBSTER AVE. WITH | | | HANDICAP ACCESSIBLE RAMP AT THE INTERSECTION. | | | | | | 4. AN ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL APPLICATION WILL | | | BE REQUIRED FROM THE ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT. | | | THE ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL APPLICATION FORMS | | | CAN BE DOWNLOADED FROM THE FOLLOWING WEBSITE LINK: | | | | | | HTTP://WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/ENGINEERING-PUBLIC-WORKS/FOR | | | MS,-PERMITS-APPLICATIONS | | | | | | 5. ON THE LANDSCAPING PLAN, WHEN SUBMITTED IN THE NEXT | | | REVIEW PHASE, SHOW LOCATIONS OF ALL WATER METERS, | | | VALVES, CLEAN-OUTS, LIGHT POLES, ETC. ROOT BARRIERS MAY | | | BE REQUIRED WHERE PLANTINGS ARE NEAR UNDERGROUND | | | STORMWATER, SANITARY, OR POTABLE WATER LINES. ALSO | | | CLEARLY INDICATE ALL EXISTING AND PROPOSED EASEMENTS ON | | | THE LANDSCAPE PLAN; | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
ENG - PPRC |
ENGINEERING - PPRC |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
05-10-2016 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
cranford |
Date |
05-10-2016 |
Time |
14:41 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
cranford |
Date |
05-10-2016 |
Time |
14:38 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2016-05-10 14:40:58 | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT | | | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO | | | ISSUANCE OF CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZATION INCLUDING | | | BUILDING PERMITS AND ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL. | | | | | | 1. A UNITY OF TITLE APPLICATION WILL BE REQUIRED FROM | | | THE ENGINEERING DIVISION OF THE PUBLIC WORKS | | | DEPARTMENT. THE APPLICATION FOR UNITY OF TITLE CAN BE | | | DOWNLOADED AT | | | HTTP://WPB.ORG/ENGINEERING/FORMS-AND-PUBLICATIONS/ | | | | | | 2. PLEASE PROVIDE COPIES OF THE ORB FOR THE ALLEY | | | ABANDONMENT. | | | | | | | | | KELLY CRANFORD, P.E. | | | CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN MANAGER | | | [email protected] | | | 561-494-1098 (OFFICE) | | | | | | VINCE NOEL, PSM | | | CITY SURVEYOR / REAL ESTATE SUPERVISOR | | | [email protected] | | | 561-494-1096 | | | | | | TRACY WARD, PE | | | SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER | | | 561-494-1120 | | | [email protected] | | | | | | LAURA LE, PE | | | PUBLIC UTILITIES ENGINEER | | | 561-494-1093 | | | [email protected] | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
06-09-2017 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
pleduc |
Date |
06-09-2017 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
pleduc |
Date |
06-09-2017 |
Time |
14:54 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2017-06-09 14:58:39 | 2ND REVIEW RESPONSE | | | | | | AFTER A REVIEW OF THE PPRC RESPONSE LETTER DATED MAY 8, | | | 2017, FROM MANAGED LAND ENTITLEMENTS, TOERIC SCHNEIDER, | | | PRINCIPAL PLANNER, THE PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED FIRE | | | PREVENTION BUREAU COMMENTS HAVE BEEN ADDRESSED. | | | | | | THE BUREAU'S APPROVAL OF THIS SUBMITTED PROJECT DOES | | | NOT CONSTITUTE IT'S FINAL REVIEW OR APPROVAL. | | | | | | THE BUREAU SHALL REVIEW ALL SUBMITTED BUILDING PLANS AT | | | THE APPROPRIATE TIME AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE | | | REQUIREMENTS OF ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND STANDARDS. | | | | | | | | | PETER LEDUC | | | FIRE MARSHAL | | | WEST PALM BEACH FIRE RESCUE | | | 561-804-4709 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
05-05-2016 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
pleduc |
Date |
05-05-2016 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
pleduc |
Date |
05-05-2016 |
Time |
13:30 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2016-05-05 13:52:11 | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS WERE SUBMITTED BY PETER LEDUC, | | | FIRE MARSHAL, BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION, WEST PALM | | | BEACH FIRE RESCUE. | | | | | | THIS REVIEW CAN ONLY BE CONSIDERED PRELIMINARY AS THE | | | DRAWINGS THAT WERE REVIEWED WERE NOT COMPLETE. | | | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS CAN BE EXPECTED WHEN FULL DRAWINGS | | | ARE SUBMITTED FOR PERMIT. | | | | | | THE FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU HAS NO OBJECTIONS TO THE | | | PROPOSED PROJECT. | | | | | | 1. CONSTRUCTION, DEMOLITION, AND RENOVATION TO COMPLY | | | WITH NFPA 241. EXTRA ATTENTION SHALL BE GIVEN TO THE | | | PERMITTING AND LOCATION OF CONSTRUCTION TRAILERS. A | | | PERMIT IS REQUIRED FOR ANY CONSTRUCTION TRAILER RELATED | | | TO THIS PROJECT. SEPARATION DISTANCES FROM MAIN | | | STRUCTURES AS WELL AS OTHER TRAILERS SHALL BE CLOSELY | | | MONITORED FOR THE REQUIREMENTS OF FIRE SPRINKLER | | | PROTECTION. | | | | | | 2. SITE ACCESS AND EXIT POINTS ARE TO BE CLEARLY | | | IDENTIFIED AND MAINTAINED FOR EMERGENCY VEHICLES DURING | | | ALL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. | | | | | | 3. THE BUILDING ADDRESS SHALL BE CLEARLY VISIBLE FROM | | | ALL ACCESS ROADWAYS, INCLUDING DURING CONSTRUCTION. | | | ADDRESS NUMBERS SHALL CONTRAST WITH THEIR BACKGROUND | | | AND SHALL NOT BE LESS THAN SIX (6) INCHES IN HEIGHT | | | WITH A ONE (1) INCH STROKE FOR ALL BUILDINGS. | | | | | | 4. DURING CONSTRUCTION, TRASH AND DEBRIS IS TO BE | | | REMOVED FROM THE SITE DAILY OR MORE OFTEN TO REDUCE THE | | | ACCUMULATION OF POTENTIAL LIFE AND FIRE SAFETY HAZARDS. | | | | | | 5. THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE BUILDING SHALL COMPLY WITH | | | THE 5TH EDITION OF THE FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE, | | | INCLUDING NFPA 1 & 101, CHAPTER 42 STORAGE OCCUPANCIES, | | | AND ALL ASSOCIATED FIRE CODES. | | | | | | 6. COMPLETE LIFE SAFETY PLANS FOR EACH OCCUPANCY SHALL | | | BE PROVIDED THAT ILLUSTRATE OCCUPANT LOADS, TRAVEL | | | DISTANCES, COMMON PATHS OF TRAVEL, DEAD-END CORRIDORS, | | | EXIT SIGNS, EMERGENCY LIGHTING, EXITS LEADING TO A | | | PUBLIC WAY, FIRE EXTINGUISHER LOCATIONS, AND ALL FIRE | | | SAFETY FEATURES AND EQUIPMENT. | | | | | | 7. PER FLORIDA 69A-60.0081; NOTICE SIGNAGE IS REQUIRED | | | FOR STRUCTURES WITH LIGHT-FRAME TRUSS-TYPE | | | CONSTRUCTION. ANY COMMERCIAL, INDUSTRIAL, OR ANY | | | MULTIUNIT RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURE OF THREE UNITS OR MORE | | | WHICH USES HORIZONTAL OR VERTICAL LIGHT-FRAME | | | TRUSS-TYPE CONSTRUCTION IN ANY PORTION SHALL BE MARKED | | | WITH A MALTESE CROSS SIGN MEASURING 8 INCHES | | | HORIZONTALLY AND 8 INCHES VERTICALLY, OF A BRIGHT RED | | | REFLECTIVE COLOR. THE APPROVED SYMBOL SHALL BE PLACED | | | WITHIN 24 INCHES TO THE LEFT OF THE MAIN ENTRY DOOR. | | | A. STRUCTURES WITH LIGHT-FRAME TRUSS ROOFS SHALL BE | | | MARKED WITH THE LETTER "R". | | | B. STRUCTURES WITH LIGHT-FRAME TRUSS FLOOR SYSTEMS | | | SHALL BE MARKED WITH THE LETTER "F". | | | C. STRUCTURES WITH LIGHT-FRAME TRUSS FLOOR AND ROOF | | | SYSTEMS SHALL BE MARKED WITH THE LETTERS "R/F". | | | | | | 8. THE BUREAU'S APPROVAL OF THIS SUBMITTED PROJECT DOES | | | NOT CONSTITUTE IT'S FINAL REVIEW OR APPROVAL. | | | | | | 9. THE BUREAU SHALL REVIEW ALL SUBMITTED BUILDING PLANS | | | AT THE APPROPRIATE TIME AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE | | | REQUIREMENTS OF ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND STANDARDS. | | | | | | PETER LEDUC | | | FIRE MARSHAL | | | 561-804-4709 | | | [email protected] | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
L |
LANDSCAPING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
09-13-2017 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rcaranci |
Date |
09-13-2017 |
Time |
11:29 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rcaranci |
Date |
09-13-2017 |
Time |
11:29 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2017-09-13 11:30:12 | FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER 561-822-1462 | | | PROJECT: 417& 431 BUNKER ROAD Z15090026 | | | SEPTEMBER 13, 2017 | | | I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND | | | PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1. SATISFIED. PLEASE CORRECT THE SITE DATA CHART TO | | | REFLECT THE REQUIRED OPEN SPACE AS 40 PERCENT OF THE | | | SITE AREA, AND USE TO CALCULATE THE REQUIRED TREES, | | | FLOWERING TREES AND SHRUBS. ALSO PROVIDE THE ACTUAL | | | OPEN SPACE PROVIDED PER SECTION 94-243 TABLE VIII-3. | | | | | | 2. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE THE CALCULATION FOR THE | | | REQUIRED 15 PERCENT LANDSCAPE AREA, AND THE ACTUAL AREA | | | PROVIDED PER SECTION 94-243 TABLE VIII-3. | | | PLEASE ADD LANDSCAPE AREA TO MEET THE 15 PERCENT | | | REQUIREMENT. | | | | | | 3. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE ADDITIONAL LANDSCAPING | | | AROUND THE STRUCTURE TO MEET THE 30% REQUIREMENT FOR | | | TREES, SHRUBS OR HEDGES PER SECTION 94-443 (E)(1). | | | | | | 4. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE A 5 FOOT LANDSCAPE BUFFER | | | WHERE POSSIBLE ON THE SITE PER SECTION 94-443 (B). | | | THE LANDSCAPE BUFFER CAN BE EXPANDED ON THE BUNKER ROAD | | | SIDE TO MEET THE 5 FOOT REQUIREMENT. THIS WILL ALSO | | | ALLOW PLACEMENT OF REQUIRED TREES IN THIS AREA. | | | | | | 5. SATISFIED. THE FLOOR PLAN SHOWS A DOOR EXITING INTO | | | THE PROPOSED LANDSCAPE AREA. PLEASE REVISE TO SHOW | | | WHERE THE EGRESS WILL BE ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN. | | | | | | 6. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE A TERMINAL ISLAND AND TREE | | | AT THE END OF EACH ROW OF PARKING PER SECTION | | | 94-443(C)(3) A. | | | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS FOR THE PLAN RESUBMITTED FOR JUNE | | | 2017 PPRC: | | | 7. SATISFIED. LANDSCAPE BUFFER MAY BE ADDED TO THE | | | WEBSTER AVENUE PROPERTY LINE DEPENDING ON THE | | | DETERMINATION OF THE PARKING LOCATION. | | | | | | 8. SATISFIED. THE ROYAL POINCIANA DOES NOT MEET THE | | | RIGHT TREE RIGHT PLACE STANDARDS FOR TREES PROPOSED | | | UNDER THE EXISTING POWER LINES. PLEASE REVISE TO A | | | SMALLER SPECIES. | | | | | | 9. SATISFIED. THE FOXTAIL PALMS HAVE HIGH MAINTENANCE | | | REQUIREMENTS FOR FERTILIZER AND WATER. PLEASE CONSIDER | | | ANOTHER SPECIES. | | | | | | 10. SATISFIED. REVISE THE REQUIRED TREE QUANTITY TO 7. | | | ONE PER 1600 SQUARE FEET OR PORTION THEREOF. | | | | | | PLEASE UNDERSTAND THAT ADDITIONAL INFORMATION MAY BE | | | REQUESTED, AND STAFF MAY HAVE ADDITIONAL COMMENTS AS | | | THE REVIEW PROCESS CONTINUES. | | | CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL | | | 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON | | | THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE | | | SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT | | | SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
L |
LANDSCAPING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
06-13-2017 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rcaranci |
Date |
06-13-2017 |
Time |
13:16 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rcaranci |
Date |
06-13-2017 |
Time |
13:16 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2017-06-13 13:16:45 | FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER 561-822-1462 | | | PROJECT: 417& 431 BUNKER ROAD Z15090026 | | | JUNE 13, 2017 | | | I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND | | | PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1. SATISFIED. PLEASE CORRECT THE SITE DATA CHART TO | | | REFLECT THE REQUIRED OPEN SPACE AS 40 PERCENT OF THE | | | SITE AREA, AND USE TO CALCULATE THE REQUIRED TREES, | | | FLOWERING TREES AND SHRUBS. ALSO PROVIDE THE ACTUAL | | | OPEN SPACE PROVIDED PER SECTION 94-243 TABLE VIII-3. | | | | | | 2. NOT SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE THE CALCULATION FOR | | | THE REQUIRED 15 PERCENT LANDSCAPE AREA, AND THE ACTUAL | | | AREA PROVIDED PER SECTION 94-243 TABLE VIII-3. | | | PLEASE ADD LANDSCAPE AREA TO MEET THE 15 PERCENT | | | REQUIREMENT. | | | | | | 3. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE ADDITIONAL LANDSCAPING | | | AROUND THE STRUCTURE TO MEET THE 30% REQUIREMENT FOR | | | TREES, SHRUBS OR HEDGES PER SECTION 94-443 (E)(1). | | | | | | 4. NOT SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE A 5 FOOT LANDSCAPE | | | BUFFER WHERE POSSIBLE ON THE SITE PER SECTION 94-443 | | | (B). | | | THE LANDSCAPE BUFFER CAN BE EXPANDED ON THE BUNKER ROAD | | | SIDE TO MEET THE 5 FOOT REQUIREMENT. THIS WILL ALSO | | | ALLOW PLACEMENT OF REQUIRED TREES IN THIS AREA. | | | | | | 5. SATISFIED. THE FLOOR PLAN SHOWS A DOOR EXITING INTO | | | THE PROPOSED LANDSCAPE AREA. PLEASE REVISE TO SHOW | | | WHERE THE EGRESS WILL BE ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN. | | | | | | 6. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE A TERMINAL ISLAND AND TREE | | | AT THE END OF EACH ROW OF PARKING PER SECTION | | | 94-443(C)(3) A. | | | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS FOR THE PLAN RESUBMITTED FOR JUNE | | | 2017 PPRC: | | | 7. LANDSCAPE BUFFER MAY BE ADDED TO THE WEBSTER AVENUE | | | PROPERTY LINE DEPENDING ON THE DETERMINATION OF THE | | | PARKING LOCATION. | | | | | | 8. THE ROYAL POINCIANA DOES NOT MEET THE RIGHT TREE | | | RIGHT PLACE STANDARDS FOR TREES PROPOSED UNDER THE | | | EXISTING POWER LINES. PLEASE REVISE TO A SMALLER | | | SPECIES. | | | | | | 9. THE FOXTAIL PALMS HAVE HIGH MAINTENANCE REQUIREMENTS | | | FOR FERTILIZER AND WATER. PLEASE CONSIDER ANOTHER | | | SPECIES. | | | | | | 10. REVISE THE REQUIRED TREE QUANTITY TO 7. ONE PER | | | 1600 SQUARE FEET OR PORTION THEREOF. | | | | | | PLEASE UNDERSTAND THAT ADDITIONAL INFORMATION MAY BE | | | REQUESTED, AND STAFF MAY HAVE ADDITIONAL COMMENTS AS | | | THE REVIEW PROCESS CONTINUES. | | | CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL | | | 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON | | | THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE | | | SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT | | | SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
L |
LANDSCAPING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
05-09-2016 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rcaranci |
Date |
05-09-2016 |
Time |
13:50 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rcaranci |
Date |
05-09-2016 |
Time |
13:50 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2016-05-09 13:51:23 | FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER 561-822-1462 | | | PROJECT: 417& 431 BUNKER ROAD Z15090026 | | | MAY 9, 2016 | | | I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND | | | PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1. PLEASE CORRECT THE SITE DATA CHART TO REFLECT THE | | | REQUIRED OPEN SPACE AS 40 PERCENT OF THE SITE AREA, AND | | | USE TO CALCULATE THE REQUIRED TREES, FLOWERING TREES | | | AND SHRUBS. ALSO PROVIDE THE ACTUAL OPEN SPACE PROVIDED | | | PER SECTION 94-243 TABLE VIII-3. | | | | | | 2. PLEASE PROVIDE THE CALCULATION FOR THE REQUIRED 15 | | | PERCENT LANDSCAPE AREA, AND THE ACTUAL AREA PROVIDED | | | PER SECTION 94-243 TABLE VIII-3. | | | | | | 3. PLEASE PROVIDE ADDITIONAL LANDSCAPING AROUND THE | | | STRUCTURE TO MEET THE 30% REQUIREMENT FOR TREES, SHRUBS | | | OR HEDGES PER SECTION 94-443 (E)(1). | | | | | | 4. PLEASE PROVIDE A 5 FOOT LANDSCAPE BUFFER WHERE | | | POSSIBLE ON THE SITE PER SECTION 94-443 (B). | | | | | | 5. THE FLOOR PLAN SHOWS A DOOR EXITING INTO THE | | | PROPOSED LANDSCAPE AREA. PLEASE REVISE TO SHOW WHERE | | | THE EGRESS WILL BE ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN. | | | | | | 6. PLEASE PROVIDE A TERMINAL ISLAND AND TREE AT THE END | | | OF EACH ROW OF PARKING PER SECTION 94-443(C)(3) A. | | | PLEASE UNDERSTAND THAT ADDITIONAL INFORMATION MAY BE | | | REQUESTED, AND STAFF MAY HAVE ADDITIONAL COMMENTS AS | | | THE REVIEW PROCESS CONTINUES. | | | CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL | | | 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON | | | THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE | | | SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT | | | SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
PARK |
PARKING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
|
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
PW |
PUBLIC WORKS |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
05-10-2016 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
cranford |
Date |
05-10-2016 |
Time |
14:41 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
cranford |
Date |
05-10-2016 |
Time |
14:41 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
STORM |
STORMWATER |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
12-29-2017 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
eschneid |
Date |
12-29-2017 |
Time |
12:19 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
eschneid |
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2017-12-29 12:19:22 | REVIEWED BY ERIC SCHNEIDER |
|
|
| Review Stop |
STORM |
STORMWATER |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
09-05-2017 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
tward |
Date |
09-05-2017 |
Time |
13:59 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
tward |
Date |
09-05-2017 |
Time |
14:07 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2017-09-05 14:06:02 | COMMENTS BELOW BASED ON THE SEPTEMBER1, 2017 REVIEW | | | PACKAGE. | | | | | | 1. NEW FEMA FIRM MAPS AND TWO FEET OF FREEBOARD ABOVE | | | BASE FLOOD ELEVATION FOR STRUCTURES IN SPECIAL FLOOD | | | HAZARD AREAS WILL BE EFFECTIVE ON OCTOBER 5, 2017 IF | | | RESOLUTION PASSES AT SECOND READING BEFORE CITY | | | COMMISSION. | | | | | | 2. SIDEWALK SHALL BE 6" THICK WHEREEVER IT IS ADJACENT | | | TO DROP CURB OR VALLEY GUTTER AND SUSCEPTIBLE TO WHEEL | | | LOADS. | | | | | | 3. LABEL VERTICAL DATUM ON THE ENGINEERING PLAN AND | | | PROVIDE THE CONVERSION FACTOR TO NGVD 1929. | | | | | | TRACY L. WARD, P.E. | | | ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | | [email protected] | | | 561-494-1120 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
STORM |
STORMWATER |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
06-09-2017 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
tward |
Date |
06-09-2017 |
Time |
11:06 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
tward |
Date |
06-09-2017 |
Time |
11:09 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2017-06-09 11:08:47 | THIS IS A CONCEPTUAL LEVEL REVIEW. CONSTRUCTION LEVEL | | | DETAILS, DESIGN CALCULATIONS AND THE POLLUTION | | | PREVENTION PLAN WILL BE REVIEWED AS PART OF THE | | | ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL AND BUILDING PERMIT | | | APPLICATION PROCESSES. THE ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT | | | APPROVAL APPLICATION FORMS CAN BE DOWNLOADED AT HTTP:// | | | WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/ENGINEERING-PUBLIC-WORKS/FORMS,-PER | | | MITS-APPLICATIONS | | | | | | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO SITE | | | PLAN APPROVAL: | | | | | | 1. PRELIMINARY, UPDATED FEMA FLOOD INSURANCE MAPS ARE | | | AVAILABLE AT | | | HTTP://MAPS.CO.PALM-BEACH.FL.US/GIS/FLOODZONES.ASPX?. | | | PLEASE REVIEW THE MAPS AND VERIFY THAT THE NEW MAPS | | | WILL NOT IMPACT THE PROPOSED PROJECT. | | | | | | 2. THE FREEBOARD REQUIREMENT FOR STRUCTURES IN A | | | SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD AREA IS ONE FOOT ABOVE BASE FLOOD | | | ELEVATION. THE CITY COMMISSION WILL BE CONSIDERING | | | RAISING THE FREEBOARD REQUIREMENT TO TWO FEET IN THE | | | NEAR FUTURE. | | | | | | 3. NO ENGINEERING PLANS WERE PROVIDED. | | | | | | 4. WEBSTER AVE. SHOULD BE LABELED AS 40? R/W ON SITE | | | PLAN SHEET A-100. | | | | | | 5. SHOW EASEMENTS AND UTILITIES ON THE LANDSCAPE PLANS. | | | | | | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO | | | ISSUANCE OF CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZATION INCLUDING | | | BUILDING PERMITS AND ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL. | | | | | | 1. AN ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL APPLICATION WILL | | | BE REQUIRED FROM THE ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT. | | | THE ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL APPLICATION FORMS | | | CAN BE DOWNLOADED AT: HTTP://WPB.ORG/DEPARTMENTS/ENGINE | | | ERING-PUBLIC-WORKS/FORMS,-PERMITS-APPLICATIONS | | | | | | TRACY WARD, PE | | | SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER | | | ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | | 561-494-1120 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
STORM |
STORMWATER |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
05-10-2016 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
cranford |
Date |
05-10-2016 |
Time |
14:41 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
cranford |
Date |
05-10-2016 |
Time |
14:41 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
SURVEY |
SURVEYING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
05-10-2016 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
cranford |
Date |
05-10-2016 |
Time |
14:41 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
cranford |
Date |
05-10-2016 |
Time |
14:41 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
TRAFFIC |
TRAFFIC ENGINEERING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
12-29-2017 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
eschneid |
Date |
12-29-2017 |
Time |
12:17 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
eschneid |
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2017-12-29 12:18:16 | REVIEW BY ERIC SCHNEIDER |
|
|
| Review Stop |
TRAFFIC |
TRAFFIC ENGINEERING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
09-28-2017 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2017-09-20 10:25:26 | THIS IS AN INITIAL LEVEL REVIEW. CONSTRUCTION LEVEL | | | DETAILS WILL BE REVIEWED AS PART OF THE ENGINEERING | | | DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL AND BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION | | | PROCESS. THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS NEED TO BE ADDRESSED | | | PRIOR TO SITE PLAN APPROVAL: | | | - SHEET A-201 ? REMOVE 90 DEGREE PARKING SPACE DETAIL | | | AND REPLACE WITH PARALLEL PARKING DETAIL. | | | - THE ADA PARKING SPACE ON BUNKER IS NOT ACCESSIBLE. | | | PREFERABLY THE PARKING SPACE SHOULD BE 13? WIDE AND A | | | 60" WIDE ACCESS AISLE MUST BE PROVIDED. DETAILS OF | | | ACCESSIBLE ON STREET PARALLEL PARKING SPACES CAN BE | | | FOUND AT: | | | HTTPS://WWW.ACCESS-BOARD.GOV/GUIDELINES-AND-STANDARDS/S | | | TREETS-SIDEWALKS/PUBLIC-RIGHTS-OF-WAY/BACKGROUND/ACCESS | | | -ADVISORY-COMMITTEE-FINAL-REPORT/X02-6-VEHICULAR-WAYS-A | | | ND-FACILITIES | | | | | | -LABEL WIDTH AND LENGTH OF PARALLEL PARKING SPACES. | | | - PROVIDE A PAVEMENT MARKING PLAN FOR REVIEW. SHOW ALL | | | OF BUNKER ROAD. SHOW LANE WIDTHS, PAVEMENT MARKINGS, | | | AND DISTANCE OF PARALLEL PARKING SPACES FROM A FIXED | | | POINT, E.G. POINT OF TANGENCY OF CURB RETURN. | | | - LABEL SIDEWALK WIDTH | | | - SHEET C-01, PROVIDE DRIVEWAY PROFILE. NOTE THAT CITY | | | DETAIL CWPB NO-GC-7 ISN?T ADA COMPLIANT FOR NARROW | | | SIDEWALKS. | | | - WHY ARE TWO DRIVEWAYS PROPOSED ON WEBSTER? | | | - WHY IS THERE A LARGE DROP CURB PROPOSED AT THE SOUTH | | | ENTRANCE OF WEBSTER? ONLY TWO DOORS ARE SHOWN ON | | | BUILDING. | | | - WILL LOADING ON WEBSTER BLOCK SIDEWALK? | | | - BUNKER ROAD, REVIEW ADA ACCESSIBILITY OF SIDEWALK. IT | | | APPEARS THE EXISTING CURB RAMP AT THE EAST END OF THE | | | PROPERTY IS NOT ADA COMPLIANT. | | | | | | ERIK D. FERGUSON, P.E. | | | SENIOR PROJECT ENGINEER | | | 561-494-1092 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
TRAFFIC |
TRAFFIC ENGINEERING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
05-10-2016 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
cranford |
Date |
05-10-2016 |
Time |
14:41 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
cranford |
Date |
05-10-2016 |
Time |
14:41 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
12-29-2017 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
eschneid |
Date |
12-29-2017 |
Time |
12:17 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
eschneid |
Date |
12-29-2017 |
Time |
12:17 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
09-28-2017 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
eschneid |
Date |
09-28-2017 |
Time |
17:02 |
Rev Time |
2.50 |
| Received By |
eschneid |
Date |
09-28-2017 |
Time |
17:02 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2017-09-28 17:05:20 | CASE NO. ISPR 15-05 | | | RESUBMITTAL COMMENTS | | | 417 BUNKER ROAD WAREHOUSE ADDITION | | | 431 BUNKER ROAD | | | | | | - CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446 | | | | | | - PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN | | | WRITTEN FORMAT. | | | | | | - WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF FIVE | | | (5) PAPER COPIES AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY IN .PDF FORMAT | | | OF ALL PLANS. PLEASE NOTE THAT CHANGES ON THE | | | RESUBMITTED PLANS OR THE SUBMITTAL OF INFORMATION/PLANS | | | TO ADDRESS THE COMMENTS MAY RESULT IN ADDITIONAL | | | COMMENTS. | | | | | | - PLEASE NOTE THAT IF THE PLANNING DIVISION HAS NOT | | | RECEIVED A RESPONSE TO THE PPRC COMMENTS WITHIN 60 DAYS | | | FROM THE DATE OF THESE COMMENTS (BY NOVEMBER 28, 2017), | | | THE CASE SHALL BE CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN. ANY FURTHER | | | ACTION SHALL REQUIRE A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION. | | | | | | - PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE ADDITIONAL | | | (1) RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF | | | PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE | | | SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE APPLICANT WILL BE ACCESSED | | | A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL | | | APPLICATION FEE ($200). | | | | | | 1) REPEAT COMMENT: BUILDING PERMIT NO. 11060763 FOR 417 | | | BUNKER ROAD SHOWS A LOFT AREA IN THE BUILDING. THE | | | SUBMITTED SITE PLAN SHOWS THIS AS A ONE STORY BUILDING. | | | BASED ON THE DIMENSIONS PROVIDED ON THE SURVEY, THE | | | LOFT SQUARE FOOTAGE WAS NOT INCLUDED IN THE OVERALL | | | SQUARE FOOTAGE TOTAL FOR THE 417 BUNKER ROAD BUILDING. | | | ALL SQUARE FOOTAGE IN THE BUILDINGS COUNTS TOWARD THE | | | OVERALL SQUARE FOOTAGE ON THE SITE. PLEASE PROVIDE THE | | | LOFT SQUARE FOOTAGE. THE SECOND FLOOR SQUARE FOOTAGE OF | | | THE EXISTING TWO STORY BUILDING OR THE PROPOSED SQUARE | | | FOOTAGE OF THE ADDITION NEEDS TO BE REDUCED ACCORDINGLY | | | TO NOT EXCEED THE 0.75 FAR PERMITTED ON THE SITE. --- | | | THANK YOU FOR PROVIDING THE TWO PHOTOS SHOWING THE MAIN | | | AREA OF THE BUILDING NOT HAVING LOFT SPACE; HOWEVER, | | | THESE DO NOT SHOW THE AREA ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF THE | | | CURTAINS, WHERE THE CITED BUILDING PERMIT SHOWS THE | | | LOFT SPACE. STAFF IS WILLING TO MEET ON-SITE TO | | | VISUALLY VERIFY THAT THERE IS NO LOFT SQUARE FOOTAGE. | | | | | | 2) THE ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN AND THE CONCEPTUAL | | | ENGINEERING PLAN SHOW THE NORTHERN PROPERTY LINE OFF | | | SET FROM THE ACTUAL PROPERTY LINE (ALSO SHOWN ON THE | | | PLAN). THUS, THE SETBACK DIMENSION LINES ORIGINATE AT | | | THE INCORRECT LOCATION. | | | | | | 3) REVISED COMMENT: THE 19 FOOT SETBACK DIMENSION TAG | | | DOES NOT REACH THE NORTH BUILDING WALL. | | | | | | 4) REVISED COMMENT: THE SITE AND LANDSCAPE PLAN | | | INCORRECTLY SHOW THE LOCATION OF THE WATER METER ALONG | | | BUNKER ROAD. THE WATER METER IS LOCATED WITHIN THE | | | SIDEWALK, NOT THE LANDSCAPE AREA. | | | | | | 5) REVISED COMMENT: THE REMOVAL OF THE EXISTING CURB | | | CUT OPENING ALONG BUNKER ROAD IS NOT REFLECTED ON THE | | | CONCEPTUAL ENGINEERING PLAN. ALL PLANS NEED TO SHOW THE | | | SAME CONDITIONS. | | | | | | 6) REVISED COMMENT: THE BICYCLE RACK ELEMENT SHOWN ON | | | THE SITE PLAN NEEDS TO BE MOVED AWAY FROM THE BUILDING. | | | THE PHYSICAL AREA FOR THE PARKING NEEDS TO BE SIX (6) | | | FEET FROM THE WALL. THE RACK NEEDS TO BE CENTERED | | | WITHIN THE SIX (6) FOOT AREA SO A BICYCLE SECURELY | | | FASTENED. PLEASE REFER TO THE STANDARD DETAIL ON SHEET | | | A-201 FOR THE EXAMPLE. | | | | | | 7) CONDITION: THE EXISTING WALL OPENINGS MUST BE SEALED | | | AND THE FLOOR REMOVED TO OPEN IT TO THE FIRST FLOOR | | | BELOW SO THAT THE 1,068 SQUARE FOOT AREA IS CONSIDERED | | | ABANDONED. | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
06-13-2017 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
eschneid |
Date |
06-13-2017 |
Time |
18:02 |
Rev Time |
5.00 |
| Received By |
eschneid |
Date |
06-12-2017 |
Time |
15:57 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2017-06-13 18:04:42 | CASE NO. ISPR 15-05 | | | JUNE 14, 2017 PPRC COMMENTS | | | 417 BUNKER ROAD WAREHOUSE ADDITION | | | 425 BUNKER ROAD | | | | | | - CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446 | | | | | | - PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN | | | WRITTEN FORMAT. | | | | | | - WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF FIVE | | | (5) PAPER COPIES AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY IN .PDF FORMAT | | | OF ALL PLANS. PLEASE NOTE THAT CHANGES ON THE | | | RESUBMITTED PLANS OR THE SUBMITTAL OF INFORMATION/PLANS | | | TO ADDRESS THE COMMENTS MAY RESULT IN ADDITIONAL | | | COMMENTS. | | | | | | - PLEASE NOTE THAT IF THE PLANNING DIVISION HAS NOT | | | RECEIVED A RESPONSE TO THE PPRC COMMENTS WITHIN 60 DAYS | | | FROM THE DATE OF THE PPRC MEETING (BY AUGUST 14, 2017), | | | THE CASE SHALL BE CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN. ANY FURTHER | | | ACTION SHALL REQUIRE A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION. | | | | | | - PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1) | | | RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED | | | COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE | | | APPLICANT WILL BE ACCESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE | | | WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE ($200). | | | | | | 1) BUILDING PERMIT NO. 11060763 FOR 417 BUNKER ROAD | | | SHOWS A LOFT AREA IN THE BUILDING. THE SUBMITTED SITE | | | PLAN SHOWS THIS AS A ONE STORY BUILDING. BASED ON THE | | | DIMENSIONS PROVIDED ON THE SURVEY, THE LOFT SQUARE | | | FOOTAGE WAS NOT INCLUDED IN THE OVERALL SQUARE FOOTAGE | | | TOTAL FOR THE 417 BUNKER ROAD BUILDING. ALL SQUARE | | | FOOTAGE IN THE BUILDINGS COUNTS TOWARD THE OVERALL | | | SQUARE FOOTAGE ON THE SITE. PLEASE PROVIDE THE LOFT | | | SQUARE FOOTAGE. THE SECOND FLOOR SQUARE FOOTAGE OF THE | | | EXISTING TWO STORY BUILDING OR THE PROPOSED SQUARE | | | FOOTAGE OF THE ADDITION NEEDS TO BE REDUCED ACCORDINGLY | | | TO NOT EXCEED THE 0.75 FAR PERMITTED ON THE SITE. | | | | | | 2) PLEASE PROVIDE AN UPDATE ON THE STATUS OF THE ALLEY | | | ACQUISITION. | | | | | | 3) THE SURVEY SHOWS THE DIMENSION FROM THE CENTER LINE | | | OF THE ABANDONED ALLEY TO THE EXISTING 417 BUNKER ROAD | | | BUILDING AS 12 FEET. ADDING THE OTHER HALF OF THE | | | ABANDONED ALLEY (7 FEET), RESULTS IN A 19 FOOT SETBACK | | | TO 417 BUNKER ROAD, NOT 19 FEET 10.28 INCHES AS SHOWN | | | BY THE ARCHITECT. ALL PLANS SHALL SHOW THE SAME, | | | ACCURATE CONDITIONS. | | | | | | 4) THE SURVEY AND THE EXISTING LANDSCAPE PLAN SHOW A | | | BACKFLOW PREVENTER ALONG BUNKER ROAD. NEITHER THE | | | PROPOSED SITE PLAN NOR THE PROPOSED LANDSCAPE PLAN SHOW | | | A BACKFLOW PREVENTER IN THE SAME LOCATION OR A | | | DIFFERENT REPLACEMENT LOCATION. | | | | | | 5) PROVIDE CIVIL PLANS SHOWING THE LOCATION OF EXISTING | | | AND PROPOSED UTILITIES, INCLUDING THE BACKFLOW | | | PREVENTER AND THE ADJACENT OVERHEAD LINES. THE | | | UTILITIES MUST ALSO BE SHOWN ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN. | | | | | | 6) PERMIT NO. 14090842 SHOWS TWO AIR HANDLER UNITS | | | LOCATED IN THE AREA THAT IS PROPOSED TO BE ABANDONED. | | | PROVIDE A SECOND FLOOR DEMOLITION PLAN AND NEW FLOOR | | | PLAN TO SHOW WHERE THESE AIR HANDLER UNITS WILL BE | | | RELOCATED OUTSIDE OF THE 1,068 SQUARE FOOT ABANDONED | | | AREA. THE NEW FLOOR PLAN SHALL HOW THE EXISTING WALL | | | OPENINGS WILL BE SEALED AND THE FLOOR REMOVED TO OPEN | | | IT TO THE FIRST FLOOR BELOW SO THAT THIS AREA IS | | | ABANDONED. | | | | | | 7) CITY STAFF HAS NO RECORD OF APPROVING THE HEAD IN | | | PARKING SPACES ALONG WEBSTER AVENUE. THESE "PARKING | | | SPACES" DO NOT COMPLY WITH THE CITY'S DEPTH REQUIREMENT | | | OF 18 FEET PROVIDED ON-SITE. THE PARKING SPACES | | | OVERHANG THE RIGHT-OF-WAY BETWEEN ONE (1) AND FOUR (4) | | | FEET, WHICH IS NOT PERMITTED BY THE CITY. UNLESS YOU | | | CAN PROVIDE EVIDENCE THAT THE CITY APPROVED A PERMIT | | | FOR THE PARKING SPACES AS SHOWN, YOU WILL NEED TO | | | REMOVE THE PARKING SPACES THAT OVERHANG THE | | | RIGHT-OF-WAY. | | | | | | 8) IF AN ALTERNATIVE CONFIGURATION OF THE PARKING | | | SPACES CAN BE ACHIEVED (NOT 90 DEGREES) WHICH MEETS | | | CITY DIMENSIONAL STANDARDS, THEN THE FOLLOWING FACTORS | | | SHALL BE TAKEN INTO ACCOUNT: | | | | | | A. DOORS MAY NOT OPEN INTO A PARKING SPACE. | | | B. PARKING SPACES MAY NOT ENCROACH INTO THE VISIBILITY | | | TRIANGLE. | | | | | | 9) IF AN ALTERNATIVE CONFIGURATION OF THE PARKING | | | SPACES MEETING CITY DIMENSIONAL STANDARDS CANNOT BE | | | ACHIEVED, THEN THE REQUIRED FIVE (5) FOOT WIDE | | | LANDSCAPE BUFFER SHALL BE INSTALLED ALONG WEBSTER | | | AVENUE. | | | | | | 10) SINCE THE SITE HAS NO CONFORMING PARKING SPACES, | | | YOU WILL NEED TO PROVIDE AT LEAST ONE PARKING SPACE ON | | | SITE WHICH CONFORMS TO CITY STANDARDS. THIS SPACE MUST | | | BE AN ADA ACCESSIBLE SPACE. YOU MAY CONTACT THE CITY'S | | | TRAFFIC ENGINEERING DIVISION TO SEE IF IT IS | | | APPROPRIATE TO INSTALL CODE COMPLIANT ON-STREET | | | PARALLEL PARKING ON BUNKER ROAD. THE BUILDING DIVISION | | | WOULD NEED TO APPROVE IF THE ADA SPACE COULD BE | | | PROVIDED ON-STREET. | | | | | | 11) THE CURB CUT OPENING ALONG BUNKER ROAD MUST BE | | | REMOVED AND A FLUSH SIDEWALK INSTALLED. THIS MAY OPEN | | | UP ADDITIONAL ON-STREET PARKING OPPORTUNITIES. | | | | | | 12) THE COMPLETION OF THE SIDEWALK ON THE EAST SIDE OF | | | WEBSTER AVENUE IS REQUIRED. | | | | | | 13) ALL LANDSCAPE AREAS NEED TO BE PROTECTED FROM | | | VEHICULAR ENCROACHMENT BY A TYPE D CURB. THIS IS NOT | | | CLEARLY SHOWN ON ANY PLANS. | | | | | | 14) THANK YOU FOR PROVIDING METAL TRIM ALONG THE TOP OF | | | THE BUILDING. THE LARGE EXPANSES OF BLANK FA?ADE LEND | | | THEMSELVES TO ADDITIONAL ARCHITECTURAL ENHANCEMENTS. | | | PLEASE UPDATE THE ELEVATIONS TO SHOW THE EXISTING | | | ARCHITECTURAL DETAILS THAT EXIST BUT ARE NOT SHOWN. | | | | | | 15) PROVIDE A CROSS-SECTION OF THE PROPOSED ADDITION. | | | | | | 16) THE BICYCLE RACK ELEMENT SHOWN ON THE SITE PLAN | | | EXCEEDS THE SIZE OF THE ELEMENTS SHOWN ON THE BICYCLE | | | RACK DETAIL. THE SITE PLAN SHALL SHOW THE ACCURATE RACK | | | ELEMENT AND THE DIMENSIONS OF THE BICYCLE PARKING AREA | | | ON THE PLAN TO VERIFY THAT THE BICYCLE PARKING AREA | | | CONFORMS TO THE MINIMUM CITY DIMENSIONAL STANDARDS | | | SHOWN ON THE BICYCLE RACK DETAIL AND THAT A PARKED | | | BICYCLE WILL NOT HANG OVER THE RAISED STEP OR BLOCK | | | ACCESS TO THE ENTRY DOOR. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
05-11-2016 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
eschneid |
Date |
05-11-2016 |
Time |
12:24 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
eschneid |
Date |
05-11-2016 |
Time |
12:24 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2016-05-11 12:25:07 | CASE NO. ISPR 15-05 | | | 417 BUNKER ROAD WAREHOUSE ADDITION | | | 425 BUNKER ROAD | | | | | | - CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446 | | | | | | - PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN | | | WRITTEN FORMAT. | | | | | | - WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF FIVE | | | (5) PAPER COPIES AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY IN .PDF FORMAT | | | OF ALL PLANS. PLEASE NOTE THAT CHANGES ON THE | | | RESUBMITTED PLANS OR THE SUBMITTAL OF INFORMATION/PLANS | | | TO ADDRESS THE COMMENTS MAY RESULT IN ADDITIONAL | | | COMMENTS. | | | | | | - PLEASE NOTE THAT IF THE PLANNING DIVISION HAS NOT | | | RECEIVED A RESPONSE TO THE PPRC COMMENTS WITHIN 60 DAYS | | | FROM THE DATE OF THE PPRC MEETING (BY JULY 11, 2016), | | | THE CASE SHALL BE CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN. ANY FURTHER | | | ACTION SHALL REQUIRE A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION. | | | | | | - PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1) | | | RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED | | | COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE | | | APPLICANT WILL BE ACCESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE | | | WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE ($200). | | | | | | 1) PLEASE EXPLAIN WHY THE TOTAL BUILDING AREA SHOWS | | | 16,778 SQUARE FEET YET THE GROSS BUILDING IS SHOWN AS | | | 19,389 SQUARE FEET IN THE BUILDING DATA TABLE. NOTE: | | | THE TRAFFIC LETTER IS ONLY FOR 16,778 SQUARE FEET. | | | | | | 2) A PORTION OF THE WESTERN BUILDING IS SHOWN AS HAVING | | | TWO STORIES. PROVIDE THE BREAKDOWN OF THE GROUND FLOOR | | | AND SECOND STORY AREA OF THIS BUILDING SO THAT STAFF | | | CAN VERIFY THE LOT COVERAGE CALCULATION. NOTE: THE | | | EXISTING 68.20% LOT COVERAGE EXCEEDS THE ALLOWED | | | MAXIMUM OF 60% LOT COVERAGE IN THE GENERAL COMMERCIAL | | | ZONING DISTRICT. IN ORDER TO ADD THE SQUARE FOOTAGE TO | | | CONNECT THE BUILDINGS, YOU WILL NEED TO REMOVE SQUARE | | | FOOTAGE TO BRING THE SITE INTO CONFORMANCE OR GET THE | | | APPROVAL OF A VARIANCE BY THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS. | | | | | | 3) THE PROPOSED 1,680 SQUARE FOOT ADDITION WILL RESULT | | | IN A FLOOR AREA RATIO WHICH EXCEEDS THE MAXIMUM | | | PERMITTED 0.75 FAR, WHICH IS NOT PERMITTED. | | | | | | 4) SHEET A-100 LISTS EIGHT EXISTING PARKING SPACES. | | | REVIEWS OF THE SURVEY AND SITE CONDITIONS VERIFY THAT | | | THERE ARE NOT EIGHT EXISTING PARKING SPACES ALONG | | | WEBSTER AVENUE AS STATED. THERE ARE ONLY SEVEN SPACES | | | STRIPED AND NONE OF THEM CONFORM TO CITY STANDARDS. THE | | | SPACES ARE ALL LESS THAN 18 FEET IN DEPTH AND ADA SPACE | | | IS NOT 12 FEET WIDE. SINCE THE SITE HAS NO CONFORMING | | | PARKING SPACES, YOU WILL NEED TO PROVIDE ONE PARKING | | | SPACE ON SITE WHICH CONFORMS TO CITY STANDARDS. | | | | | | 5) THE NORTH PROPERTY LINE ABUTS A RESIDENTIAL ZONING | | | DISTRICT, SO THE ADDITION IS REQUIRED TO BE A MINIMUM | | | OF 15 FEET FROM THE NORTH PROPERTY LINE. | | | | | | 6) SHEET A-201 LABELS THE NORTH PORTION OF THE WESTERN | | | BUILDING AS TWO STORIES, WHEN THE SOUTH PORTION OF THE | | | BUILDING IS TWO STORIES. | | | 7) WHY DO THE ELEVATIONS ON SHEET A-301 SHOW THE | | | ADDITION AS TWO STORIES? THIS SQUARE FOOTAGE IS NOT | | | ACCOUNTED FOR IN ANY OF THE SUBMITTED DOCUMENTS. | | | | | | 8) THE ADDITION IS SHOWN AS 1,672 SQUARE FEET ON SHEET | | | A-100, YET IT IS LISTED AS 1,680 SQUARE FEET ON THE | | | DATA TABLE. ALL VALUES SHALL AGREE. | | | | | | 9) PLEASE CONSIDER ARCHITECTURAL ENHANCEMENTS TO THE | | | BUILDING EXTERIOR. | | | | | | 10) PLEASE PROVIDE LANDSCAPE IN THE PLANTER THAT WAS | | | FILLED IN ALONG BUNKER AVENUE AND ALONG THE WEST SIDE | | | OF THE BUILDING. | | | | | | 11) REMOVE THE OBSOLETE NONCOMPLYING SIGN FRAME ON THE | | | ROOF OF THE BUILDING. | | | | | | 12) ONE BICYCLE PARKING SPACE, CONFORMING TO CITY | | | STANDARDS, IS REQUIRED ON-SITE. | | | |
|
|
| |
Print |
|
Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved |
 |