 |
Plan Review Details - Project Z15090024
| Plan Review Stops For Project Z15090024 |
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
09-28-2016 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rbrown |
Date |
09-28-2016 |
Time |
20:14 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rbrown |
Date |
09-28-2016 |
Time |
20:14 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2016-09-28 20:16:15 | COMMENTS ON ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES FROM PREVIOUS | | | REVIEW HAVE BEEN ADDRESSED. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
10-14-2015 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rbrown |
Date |
10-14-2015 |
Time |
10:49 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rbrown |
Date |
10-14-2015 |
Time |
10:49 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2015-10-14 10:56:51 | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, BUILDING DIVISION, | | | COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1. THIS REVIEW IS A CURSORY REVIEW AS IT RELATES TO THE | | | SITE. IT IS NOT A REVIEW FOR FULL COMPLIANCE WITH | | | FLORIDA BUILDING CODE. THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE TO BE | | | ADDRESSED FOR PERMITTING. | | | | | | 2. ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES. SHEET PSP-1 STATES THAT | | | 33 PARKING SPACES ARE REQUIRED BUT 25 PARKING SPACES | | | ARE BEING PROVIDED. THE PLANNER WILL ADVISE AS TO | | | WHETHER THE NUMBER OF PARKING SPACES PROVIDED IS | | | SUFFICIENT. IF MORE THAN 25 PARKING SPACES ARE TO BE | | | PROVIDED, AN ADDITIONAL ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACE WILL | | | BE REQUIRED. THE MINIMUM NUMBER OF ACCESSIBLE PARKING | | | SPACES PROVIDED SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION | | | 208.2 OF FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY CODE. | | | | | | 3. PLACEMENT OF ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACE(S). SHEET | | | PSP-1 SHOWS THAT THERE ARE REGULARE PARKING SPACES | | | CLOSER TO THE OFFICE ENTRANCE THAN THE ACCESSIBLE | | | PARKING SPACE. PER SECTION 208.3 OF FLORIDA | | | ACCESSIBILITY CODE, ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES ARE TO BE | | | LOCATED ON THE SHORTEST POSSIBLE ROUTE OF TRAVEL FROM | | | ADJACENT PARKING TO AN ACCESSIBLE ENTRANCE FOR EACH | | | BUILDING. THE DESIGN OF ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES SHALL | | | COMPLY WITH SECTION 502 OF FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY CODE | | | | | | 4. WHEN SUBMITTED FOR BUILDING PERMIT, THE PLANS SHALL | | | SHOW THAT THE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION FOR THE BUILDINGS | | | WILL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE HEIGHT, AREA AND | | | OCCUPANCY LIMITATIONS IN CHAPTER 5 OF THE FLORIDA | | | BUILDING CODE | | | | | | 5. WHEN SUBMITTED FOR BUILDING PERMIT, COMPLIANCE WITH | | | ALL BUILDING SEPARATION, PERCENTAGE OF OPENINGS AND | | | OPENING PROTECTIVE REQUIREMENTS OF CHAPTERS 6 AND 7 OF | | | THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE SHALL BE VERIFIED. | | | | | | 6. SEPARATE PERMITS REQUIRED. ALL APPLICABLE PERMITS | | | AND SUB-PERMITS MUST BE OBTAINED BEFORE COMMENCING THE | | | WORK. SEPARATE PERMITS, PLANS AND FEES, ARE REQUIRED | | | FOR SIGNS, SWIMMING POOLS AND SPAS, GAS SYSTEMS, | | | GENERATORS, FIRE ALARM SYSTEMS, FIRE SPRINKLER AND | | | OTHER FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEMS, GREASE INTERCEPTORS, | | | SITE LIGHTING, SITE LANDSCAPE, SITE IRRIGATION, ETC. | | | | | | | | | ROBERT BROWN | | | BUILDING OFFICIAL | | | TEL: 561 805 6652 | | | EMAIL: [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
ENG - PPRC |
ENGINEERING - PPRC |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
|
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
cranford |
Date |
11-16-2015 |
Time |
13:40 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2015-11-16 13:44:45 | RECOMMEND APPROVAL WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: | | | | | | 1. DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE INSIDE CLEARANCE MUST BE A | | | MINIMUM OF 12.5 FT. | | | | | | 2. A PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING PLANS (WATER, SEWER, | | | PAVING, AND DRAINAGE) WAS NOT SUBMITTED. WATER AND | | | SEWER CONNECTION LOCATIONS SHOWN ON THE PLANTING PLAN | | | ARE NOT INCLUDED IN THE SITE PLAN APPROVAL. | | | | | | 3. PALM BEACH COUNTY APPROVAL OF THE PROPOSED | | | STORMWATER CONNECTION WILL IS REQUIRED PRIOR TO | | | ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION APPROVAL. | | | | | | 4. PRIOR TO START OF CONSTRUCTION, SEPARATE SUBMITTALS | | | ARE REQUIRED TO THE ENGINEERING DIVISION OF THE PUBLIC | | | WORKS DEPARTMENT FOR ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL | | | AND UNITY OF TITLE APPROVAL. THE APPLICATION FORMS CAN | | | BE DOWNLOADED AT | | | HTTP://WPB.ORG/ENGINEERING/FORMS-AND-PUBLICATIONS/ | | | | | | | | | | | | PROJECT SUMMARY: 1.7 ACRES, 110,838 SF OF SELF-STORAGE | | | WATER DEMAND BASED ON 0.01 GALLONS PER SF = 1,108 GPD, | | | PEAK FLOW (X 2.5) = 115 GPH | | | SANITARY SAME AS POTABLE | | | SOLID WASTE = 7 LBS PER DAY PER 100 SF = 7,760 LBS PER | | | DAY | | | NEW PEAK HR TRIPS: 13 (7/6) AND 26 (14/12) |
|
|
| Review Stop |
ENG - PPRC |
ENGINEERING - PPRC |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
10-14-2015 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
cranford |
Date |
10-14-2015 |
Time |
08:26 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
cranford |
Date |
10-14-2015 |
Time |
08:24 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2015-10-14 08:26:12 | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT | | | | | | THIS IS A CONCEPTUAL LEVEL REVIEW. CONSTRUCTION LEVEL | | | DETAILS, DESIGN CALCULATIONS AND THE POLLUTION | | | PREVENTION PLAN WILL BE REVIEWED AS PART OF THE | | | BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION PROCESSES. | | | | | | 1. PLEASE SUBMIT ESTIMATES FOR THE PEAK POTABLE WATER | | | DEMAND, SANITARY SEWER FLOW, AND SOLID WASTE COLLECTION | | | YARDAGE. | | | | | | 2. PLEASE REVISE THE DRIVEWAY APRONS TO MEET THE CITY?S | | | ENGINEERING DESIGN STANDARDS. PLEASE ALSO INCLUDE THE | | | DETAILS FOR THE SIDEWALK RAMPS, HTTP://WPB.ORG/ENGINEER | | | ING/ENGINEERING-SERVICES/ENGINEERING-STANDARDS/ | | | | | | 3. PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING PLANS (WATER, SEWER, PAVING, | | | AND DRAINAGE) WERE NOT SUBMITTED. WATER AND SEWER | | | CONNECTION LOCATIONS SHOWN ON THE PLANTING PLAN ARE NOT | | | APPROVED. | | | | | | 4. PLEASE REVISE THE LANDSCAPE PLAN TO SHOW LOCATIONS | | | OF ALL WATER METERS, VALVES, CLEAN-OUTS, LIGHT POLES, | | | ETC. ROOT BARRIERS MAY BE REQUIRED WHERE PLANTINGS ARE | | | NEAR UNDERGROUND STORMWATER, SANITARY, OR POTABLE WATER | | | LINES. ALSO CLEARLY INDICATE ALL EXISTING AND PROPOSED | | | EASEMENTS ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN. | | | | | | 5. PLEASE SHOW THE SIGHT TRIANGLES (20 FT X 20 FT) ON | | | THE LANDSCAPING PLAN FOR THE INTERSECTIONS AND | | | VEHICULAR EXITS. (SECTION 94-305E, CODE OF ORDINANCES) | | | | | | 6. PLEASE REVISE THE DUMPSTER TO MEET THE MINIMUM | | | DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS FOR THE ENCLOSURE AS LISTED IN | | | CODE OF ORDINANCES, SECTION 94-444(B), ALSO SEE FIGURE | | | XIV-3 OF THE SAME SECTION. | | | | | | 7. PLEASE PROVIDE AN AUTOTURN ANALYSIS DEMONSTRATING | | | THE SOLID WASTE COLLECTION VEHICLE CAN ACCESS THE | | | PROPOSED DUMPSTER AND COMPACTOR LOCATIONS. THE TRASH | | | DUMPSTER/COMPACTORS MUST LOCATED IN AREAS EASILY | | | SERVICED BY THE CITY SANITATION EQUIPMENT AND MANPOWER | | | PER SECTION 74-35(A)(5) OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES. | | | | | | 8. PALM BEACH COUNTY APPROVAL OF THE PROPOSED | | | STORMWATER CONNECTION WILL BE REQUIRED PRIOR TO FINAL | | | SITE PLAN APPROVAL. | | | | | | 9. THE PLANTING PLAN (L-2) SHOWS STORMWATER BEING | | | CONVEYED THROUGH THE SITE THROUGH A NEW OFF-SITE | | | STRUCTURE. PLEASE EXPLAIN THE PROPOSED STORMWATER | | | SYSTEM DESIGN. | | | | | | 10. THE SUBMITTED PARKING DETAIL (SHEET PSP-1) DOES NOT | | | MATCH THE PLAN VIEW. ARE WHEEL STOPS PROPOSED OR WILL | | | RAISED CURBS BE USED? | | | | | | 11. PRELIMINARY, UPDATED FEMA FLOOD INSURANCE MAPS ARE | | | AVAILABLE AT HTTP://WWW.CO.PALM-BEACH.FL.US/NEWSROOM/08 | | | 14/08-26-14-FLOOD_MAPS.HTM. PLEASE REVIEW THE MAPS AND | | | VERIFY THAT THE NEW MAPS WILL NOT IMPACT THE PROPOSED | | | PROJECT. | | | | | | 12. PLEASE VERIFY THAT A 20-FT WIDE ACCESS IS NOT | | | REQUIRED FOR EMERGENCY ACCESS TO THE REAR OF THE | | | BUILDING. | | | | | | 13. SHOW PROPOSED SIDEWALK CONNECTING TO THE EXISTING | | | SIDEWALK AT THE SOUTHERN PROPERTY LINE. | | | | | | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO | | | ISSUANCE OF CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZATION INCLUDING | | | BUILDING PERMITS AND ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL. | | | | | | 1. A SEPARATE SUBMITTAL WILL BE REQUIRED TO THE | | | ENGINEERING DIVISION OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT FOR | | | ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL. THE ENGINEERING | | | DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL APPLICATION FORMS CAN BE | | | DOWNLOADED AT | | | HTTP://WPB.ORG/ENGINEERING/FORMS-AND-PUBLICATIONS/ | | | | | | 2. A UNITY OF TITLE APPLICATION WILL BE REQUIRED FROM | | | THE ENGINEERING DIVISION OF THE PUBLIC WORKS | | | DEPARTMENT. THE APPLICATION FOR UNITY OF TITLE CAN BE | | | DOWNLOADED AT | | | HTTP://WPB.ORG/ENGINEERING/FORMS-AND-PUBLICATIONS/ | | | | | | 3. SOLID WASTE YARDAGE WILL NEED TO BE ESTIMATED AS | | | PART OF THE FINAL DESIGN TO VERIFY THAT THE DESIGN | | | INCLUDES APPROPRIATE NUMBER AND SIZE OF TRASH BINS. | | | | | | 4. IDENTIFY THE SOURCE OF THE AS-BUILT INFORMATION | | | UTILIZED FOR THE POTABLE WATER, SANITARY SEWER, AND | | | STORM SEWER DESIGN. | | | | | | 5. DETAILS SHEETS WILL NEED TO UTILIZE STANDARD CITY OF | | | WEST PALM BEACH DETAILS, WHICH MAY BE DOWNLOADED AT | | | HTTP://WPB.ORG/ENGINEERING/FORMS-AND-PUBLICATIONS/ | | | | | | KELLY CRANFORD, P.E. | | | LAND DEVELOPMENT ENGINEER | | | [email protected] | | | 561-494-1098 (OFFICE) | | | | | | VINCE NOEL, PSM | | | CITY SURVEYOR / REAL ESTATE SUPERVISOR | | | [email protected] | | | 561-494-1096 | | | | | | BRIAN COLLINS, PE | | | CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER | | | [email protected] | | | 561-494-1040 | | | | | | FERDINAND RIVERA | | | PUBLIC WORKS OPERATIONS MANAGER | | | [email protected] | | | 561-822-2076 | | | | | | TRACY WARD, PE | | | SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER | | | 561-494-1120 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
10-09-2015 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
pleduc |
Date |
10-09-2015 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
pleduc |
Date |
10-09-2015 |
Time |
11:47 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2015-10-09 12:49:32 | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS WERE SUBMITTED BY PETER LEDUC, | | | FIRE MARSHAL, BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION, WEST PALM | | | BEACH FIRE RESCUE. | | | | | | THIS REVIEW CAN ONLY BE CONSIDERED PRELIMINARY AS THE | | | DRAWINGS THAT WERE REVIEWED WERE NOT COMPLETE. | | | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS CAN BE EXPECTED WHEN FULL DRAWINGS | | | ARE SUBMITTED FOR PERMIT. | | | THE FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU HAS NO OBJECTIONS TO THE | | | PROPOSED PROJECT. | | | | | | 1. CONSTRUCTION, DEMOLITION, AND RENOVATION TO COMPLY | | | WITH NFPA 241. EXTRA ATTENTION SHALL BE GIVEN TO THE | | | PERMITTING AND LOCATION OF CONSTRUCTION TRAILERS. A | | | PERMIT IS REQUIRED FOR ANY CONSTRUCTION TRAILER RELATED | | | TO THIS PROJECT. SEPARATION DISTANCES FROM MAIN | | | STRUCTURES AS WELL AS OTHER TRAILERS SHALL BE CLOSELY | | | MONITORED FOR THE REQUIREMENTS OF FIRE SPRINKLER | | | PROTECTION. | | | | | | 2. SITE ACCESS AND EXIT POINTS ARE TO BE CLEARLY | | | IDENTIFIED AND MAINTAINED FOR EMERGENCY VEHICLES DURING | | | ALL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. | | | | | | 3. THE BUILDING ADDRESS SHALL BE CLEARLY VISIBLE FROM | | | ALL ACCESS ROADWAYS, INCLUDING DURING CONSTRUCTION. | | | ADDRESS NUMBERS SHALL CONTRAST WITH THEIR BACKGROUND | | | AND SHALL NOT BE LESS THAN SIX (6) INCHES IN HEIGHT | | | WITH A ONE (1) INCH STROKE FOR ALL BUILDINGS. | | | | | | 4. DURING CONSTRUCTION, TRASH AND DEBRIS IS TO BE | | | REMOVED FROM THE SITE DAILY OR MORE OFTEN TO REDUCE THE | | | ACCUMULATION OF POTENTIAL LIFE AND FIRE SAFETY HAZARDS. | | | | | | 5. THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE BUILDING SHALL COMPLY WITH | | | THE 5TH EDITION OF THE FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE, | | | INCLUDING NFPA 1 & 101, AND ALL ASSOCIATED FIRE CODES. | | | | | | 6. A NFPA 13 COMPLAINT FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM AND NFPA | | | 14, CLASS 1, COMPLIANT WET STANDPIPE SYSTEM ARE | | | REQUIRED FOR THIS STRUCTURE. TEMPORARY STANDPIPES ARE | | | REQUIRED WHEN THE BUILDING REACHES THREE LEVELS OR | | | THIRTY FEET WHILE BEING CONSTRUCTED. SEPARATE SHOP | | | DRAWINGS, ARE REQUIRED TO BE SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND | | | APPROVED BY THE FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU PRIOR TO ANY | | | INSTALLATION. | | | | | | 7. FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM SHALL BE MONITORED BY AN | | | APPROVED SUPERVISING STATION IN ACCORDANCE WITH NFPA | | | 72. SEPARATE SHOP DRAWINGS, ARE REQUIRED TO BE | | | SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE FIRE PREVENTION | | | BUREAU PRIOR TO ANY INSTALLATION. | | | | | | 8. ALL PORTABLE FIRE EXTINGUISHERS LOCATIONS SHALL BE | | | CLEARLY IDENTIFIED AND INDICATED ON THE PLAN. | | | | | | 9. KNOX-BOX KEY SYSTEM SHALL BE REQUIRED FOR THIS | | | BUILDING. | | | | | | 10. ANY BUILDING THAT IS MORE THAN THREE STORIES HIGH | | | OR IN WHICH THE VERTICAL DISTANCE BETWEEN THE BOTTOM | | | TERMINAL LANDING AND THE TOP TERMINAL LANDING EXCEEDS | | | 25 FEET MUST BE CONSTRUCTED TO CONTAIN AT LEAST ONE | | | PASSENGER ELEVATOR THAT IS OPERATIONAL AND WILL | | | ACCOMMODATE AN AMBULANCE STRETCHER 76 INCHES LONG AND | | | 24 INCHES WIDE IN THE HORIZONTAL POSITION. | | | | | | 11. COMPLETE LIFE SAFETY PLANS FOR EACH OCCUPANCY SHALL | | | BE PROVIDED THAT ILLUSTRATE OCCUPANT LOADS, TRAVEL | | | DISTANCES, COMMON PATHS OF TRAVEL, DEAD-END CORRIDORS, | | | EXIT SIGNS, EMERGENCY LIGHTING, EXITS LEADING TO A | | | PUBLIC WAY, FIRE EXTINGUISHER LOCATIONS, AND ALL FIRE | | | SAFETY FEATURES AND EQUIPMENT. | | | | | | 12. ALL EXISTING AND NEW FIRE HYDRANTS PLANNED FOR THIS | | | DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE CLEARLY INDICATED AND IDENTIFIED | | | ON THE PLAN AND CLOSELY COORDINATED WITH THE BUREAU OF | | | FIRE PREVENTION. | | | | | | 13. ALL FIRE DEPARTMENT SPRINKLER SYSTEM CONNECTIONS | | | (FDC,S) FOR THE PROJECT SHALL BE IDENTIFIED AND | | | COORDINATED WITH THE BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION. | | | | | | 14. ALL FIRE WATER MAINS, SIZES AND THEIR VALVE | | | ASSEMBLIES SHALL BE CLEARLY IDENTIFIED AND ILLUSTRATED | | | ON THE PLAN. | | | | | | 15. THE PROPOSED 15' FIRE LANE IS NOT APPROVED. ALL | | | FIRE LANES SHALL BE 20' WITH A 30' TURNING RADIUS. | | | | | | 16. THE BUREAU'S APPROVAL OF THIS SUBMITTED PROJECT | | | DOES NOT CONSTITUTE IT'S FINAL REVIEW OR APPROVAL. | | | | | | 17. THE BUREAU SHALL REVIEW ALL SUBMITTED BUILDING | | | PLANS AT THE APPROPRIATE TIME AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH | | | THE REQUIREMENTS OF ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND STANDARDS. | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
L |
LANDSCAPING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
11-04-2015 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rcaranci |
Date |
11-04-2015 |
Time |
15:09 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rcaranci |
Date |
11-04-2015 |
Time |
15:09 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2015-11-04 15:10:14 | FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER | | | PROJECT: STORALL 1301 MERCER Z15090024 | | | NOVEMBER 4 , 2015 | | | I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND | | | PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1. SATISFIED. PLEASE REVISE THE EXISTING TREE LIST TO | | | IDENTIFY THE SPECIES BY SCIENTIFIC NAME. | | | | | | 2. CONDITIONALLY SATISFIED. PLEASE REVISE THE REQUIRED | | | OPEN SPACE CALCULATION ON SHEET L-2 TO REFLECT 40 | | | PERCENT OF THE TOTAL SITE AREA OF 74,053 AS 29,261 SQ | | | FT., AND CHECK ALL REQUIRED TREE AND SHRUB | | | CALCULATIONS. | | | | | | 3. SATISFIED. PLEASE IDENTIFY THE TYPE OF MOISTURE | | | SENSING CONTROLLER THAT WILL BE UTILIZED FOR THE | | | IRRIGATION OTHER THAN A RAINSWITCH. | | | | | | 4. SATISFIED. PLEASE CORRECT THE NUMBER OF PALMS | | | PROVIDED ON THE DATA CHART TO MATCH THE PLANT LIST | | | QUANTITY OF TEN. | | | | | | 5. SATISFIED. PLEASE CORRECT THE LINEAR FOOTAGE FOR | | | BUILDING LANDSCAPING TO REFLECT THE DEDUCTION OF THE | | | LOADING ZONE AND ENTRANCE AREAS. | | | | | | 6. SATISFIED. TOTAL TREES PROVIDED SHOULD BE 52, AS THE | | | PALMS ARE CREDITED AT TWO PALMS EQUAL TO ONE SHADE OR | | | FLOWERING TREE. | | | | | | 7. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE THE DROUGHT TOLERANCE | | | LEVEL FOR EACH PLANT SPECIES ON THE PLANT LIST, TO SHOW | | | COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 94-442(G) FLORIDA FRIENDLY | | | LANDSCAPING REQUIREMENTS. PLEASE LABEL THE SECTION IN | | | THE CHART AS SUCH. ADDING A COLUMN IDENTIFYING NATIVE | | | PLANTS IS ALSO SUGGESTED. | | | | | | 8. SATISFIED. PLEASE INCLUDE A ROOT BARRIER DETAIL AND | | | SHOW LOCATIONS OF ROOT BARRIERS TO PROTECT | | | INFRASTRUCTURE AND TREES FROM CONFLICTS. THIS INCLUDES | | | WATER, SEWER, DRAINAGE, SIDEWALKS AND CURBS, AND ANY | | | FIELD STRUCTURES THAT COULD BE IMPACTED BY TREE ROOTS. | | | | | | 9. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE SCREENING FOR ALL GROUND | | | MOUNTED EQUIPMENT AND UTILITIES. PROVIDE ADDITIONAL | | | LANDSCAPE SCREENING FOR THE DDCV ALONG MERCER AVE. | | | | | | 10. SATISFIED. THE FOUNDATION PLANTING IS LACKING IN | | | TREES. PLEASE PROVIDE ADDITIONAL SMALL TREES OR PALMS. | | | | | | | | | CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL | | | 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON | | | THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE | | | SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT | | | SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION. | | | 2. PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF THE LANDSCAPE PERMIT THE | | | APPLICANT SHALL REVISE THE REQUIRED OPEN SPACE | | | CALCULATION ON SHEET L-2 TO REFLECT 40 PERCENT OF THE | | | TOTAL SITE AREA OF 74,053 AS 29,261 SQ FT., AND CHECK | | | ALL REQUIRED TREE AND SHRUB CALCULATIONS. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
L |
LANDSCAPING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
10-13-2015 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rcaranci |
Date |
10-13-2015 |
Time |
14:39 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rcaranci |
Date |
10-13-2015 |
Time |
14:39 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2015-10-13 14:40:52 | I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND | | | PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1. PLEASE REVISE THE EXISTING TREE LIST TO IDENTIFY THE | | | SPECIES BY SCIENTIFIC NAME. | | | | | | 2. PLEASE REVISE THE REQUIRED OPEN SPACE CALCULATION ON | | | SHEET L-2 TO REFLECT 40 PERCENT OF THE TOTAL SITE AREA | | | OF 74,053 AS 29,261 SQ FT., AND CHECK ALL REQUIRED TREE | | | AND SHRUB CALCULATIONS. | | | | | | 3. PLEASE IDENTIFY THE TYPE OF MOISTURE SENSING | | | CONTROLLER THAT WILL BE UTILIZED FOR THE IRRIGATION | | | OTHER THAN A RAINSWITCH. | | | | | | 4. PLEASE CORRECT THE NUMBER OF PALMS PROVIDED ON THE | | | DATA CHART TO MATCH THE PLANT LIST QUANTITY OF TEN. | | | | | | 5. PLEASE CORRECT THE LINEAR FOOTAGE FOR BUILDING | | | LANDSCAPING TO REFLECT THE DEDUCTION OF THE LOADING | | | ZONE AND ENTRANCE AREAS. | | | | | | 6. TOTAL TREES PROVIDED SHOULD BE 52, AS THE PALMS ARE | | | CREDITED AT TWO PALMS EQUAL TO ONE SHADE OR FLOWERING | | | TREE. | | | | | | 7. PLEASE PROVIDE THE DROUGHT TOLERANCE LEVEL FOR EACH | | | PLANT SPECIES ON THE PLANT LIST, TO SHOW COMPLIANCE | | | WITH SECTION 94-442(G) FLORIDA FRIENDLY LANDSCAPING | | | REQUIREMENTS. PLEASE LABEL THE SECTION IN THE CHART AS | | | SUCH. ADDING A COLUMN IDENTIFYING NATIVE PLANTS IS ALSO | | | SUGGESTED. | | | | | | 8. PLEASE INCLUDE A ROOT BARRIER DETAIL AND SHOW | | | LOCATIONS OF ROOT BARRIERS TO PROTECT INFRASTRUCTURE | | | AND TREES FROM CONFLICTS. THIS INCLUDES WATER, SEWER, | | | DRAINAGE, SIDEWALKS AND CURBS, AND ANY FIELD STRUCTURES | | | THAT COULD BE IMPACTED BY TREE ROOTS. | | | | | | 9. PLEASE PROVIDE SCREENING FOR ALL GROUND MOUNTED | | | EQUIPMENT AND UTILITIES. PROVIDE ADDITIONAL LANDSCAPE | | | SCREENING FOR THE DDCV ALONG MERCER AVE. | | | | | | 10. THE FOUNDATION PLANTING IS LACKING IN TREES. PLEASE | | | PROVIDE ADDITIONAL SMALL TREES OR PALMS. | | | | | | | | | CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL | | | 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON | | | THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE | | | SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT | | | SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION. | | | | | | RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER | | | 561-822-1462 | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
PARK |
PARKING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
|
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
POLICE |
POLICE |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
|
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
PW |
PUBLIC WORKS |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
|
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
PW |
PUBLIC WORKS |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
10-14-2015 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
cranford |
Date |
10-14-2015 |
Time |
08:27 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
cranford |
Date |
10-14-2015 |
Time |
08:27 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2015-10-14 08:27:55 | SEE COMMENTS UNDER ENG PPRC |
|
|
| Review Stop |
STORM |
STORMWATER |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
|
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
STORM |
STORMWATER |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
10-14-2015 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
cranford |
Date |
10-14-2015 |
Time |
08:28 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
cranford |
Date |
10-14-2015 |
Time |
08:28 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2015-10-14 08:28:29 | SEE COMMENTS UNDER ENG PPRC |
|
|
| Review Stop |
SURVEY |
SURVEYING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
|
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
SURVEY |
SURVEYING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
10-14-2015 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
cranford |
Date |
10-14-2015 |
Time |
08:28 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
cranford |
Date |
10-14-2015 |
Time |
08:28 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2015-10-14 08:28:45 | SEE COMMENTS UNDER ENG PPRC |
|
|
| Review Stop |
TRAFFIC |
TRAFFIC ENGINEERING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
|
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
TRAFFIC |
TRAFFIC ENGINEERING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
10-14-2015 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
cranford |
Date |
10-14-2015 |
Time |
08:29 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
cranford |
Date |
10-14-2015 |
Time |
08:29 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2015-10-14 08:29:23 | SEE COMMENTS UNDER ENG PPRC |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
11-13-2015 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
dkittred |
Date |
11-13-2015 |
Time |
15:01 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
dkittred |
Date |
11-02-2015 |
Time |
13:41 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2015-11-13 15:00:59 | 11/6/15 APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS TO ADDRESS AT TIME OF | | | BUILDING PERMIT SUBMITTAL: | | | | | | 1. INCLUDE DETAIL FOR BICYCLE PARKING PAD MEETING | | | MINIMUM SPACING REQUIREMENTS. (72" LENGTH, 30" | | | SEPARATION BETWEEN RACKS, AND 24" FROM RACK TO EDGE OF | | | PAD.) PLEASE CONTACT ME IF YOU NEED THE INFORMATION | | | SHEETS FOR THE SPACING. | | | | | | 2. CORRECT ELEVATIONS TO SHOW SOUTHWEST AND NORTHWEST | | | EXIT DOORS ON THE BUILDING. | | | | | | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT: | | | | | | DANIELLE J. KITTREDGE, AICP | | | SENIOR PLANNER | | | PLANNING & ZONING DIVISION | | | PHONE: (561)-822-1443 | | | EMAIL: [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
10-29-2015 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
dkittred |
Date |
10-29-2015 |
Time |
10:55 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
dkittred |
Date |
10-27-2015 |
Time |
08:53 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2015-10-29 09:35:09 | PLANNING AND ZONING COMMENTS: | | | | | | 10/29/15 | | | | | | 1. RESPONSE TO PARKING WAIVER REDUCTION STANDARDS | | | STATES THAT THE ADJACENT SITE HAS EXCESS PARKING WHICH | | | CAN SATISFY THE PARKING REQUIREMENTS FOR THE SITE. HAVE | | | YOU CORRESPONDED WITH THE PROPERTY OWNER ABOUT 'USE' OF | | | THESE SPACES? I'LL NEED AT MINIMUM THE CALCULATION | | | EXPLAINING HOW THEY HAVE 41 EXCESS PARKING SPACES AS | | | WELL AS A LETTER FROM THE PROPERTY OWNER INDICATING | | | CONSIDERATION OF THEIR PARCEL FOR THE REMAINING PARKING | | | SPACES WITHIN 300 FEET OF YOUR PROJECT IS NOT A | | | PROBLEM. | | | | | | 2. BICYCLE PARKING SHOULD BE CLOSER TO THE DOOR. | | | INCLUDE BICYCLE PARKING DETAIL FOR PAD DIMENSIONS, | | | MINIMUM RACK SPACING, AND RACK STYLE. PLEASE CONTACT ME | | | FOR A HANDOUT ON MINIMUM SPACING REQUIREMENTS. PLEASE | | | NOTE EACH RACK PROVIDED CAN HOLD TWO BICYCLES, SO | | | BICYCLE PARKING PROVIDED IS ACTUALLY 4 SPACES ON THE | | | PLANS. | | | | | | 3. LOCATION OF LIGHT POLES HAVE BEEN INDICATED ON THE | | | PLANS AND IT APPEARS THEY MEET SETBACK REQUIREMENTS, | | | HOWEVER, THE PLAN WILL NEED TO INDICATE SETBACK | | | DIMENSIONS ON THE PLAN TO DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE. | | | | | | 4. DIMENSION DUMPSTER SETBACK. DUMPSTER MUST MEET | | | PROPERTY SETBACKS. | | | | | | 5. REVISE LOADING ZONE STRIPING SO PEOPLE DO NOT PARK | | | IN FRONT OF THE DUMPSTER AND BLOCK ACCESS TO IT. | | | | | | 6. ELEVATIONS (SHEET A-4 AND A-5) ONLY SHOW DOORS ON | | | THE FRONT OF THE BUILDING, HOWEVER, SHEET A-1 FLOOR | | | PLAN INDICATES THERE ARE ADDITIONAL DOORS ON THE | | | SOUTHWEST AND NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE BUILDING. PLEASE | | | REVISE FOR CONSISTENCY. [PART OF PREVIOUS COMMENT #15]. | | | CONSIDER WHERE PEOPLE ARE GOING WHEN THEY EXIT THESE | | | DOORS. | | | | | | | | | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT: | | | | | | DANIELLE J. KITTREDGE, AICP | | | SENIOR PLANNER | | | PLANNING & ZONING DIVISION | | | PHONE: (561)-822-1443 | | | EMAIL: [email protected] | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
10-13-2015 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
dkittred |
Date |
10-13-2015 |
Time |
11:29 |
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
dkittred |
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2015-10-06 16:27:42 | PLANNING AND ZONING COMMENTS: | | | | | | 10/13/15 | | | | | | 1. ON THE DATA CHART INCLUDE INDICATE OVERALL BUILDING | | | HEIGHT, IN FEET. | | | | | | 2. UNDER 'PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS', CORRECT | | | REQUIRED FAR TO BE 0.81 PER ORDINANCE 2236-88. | | | REQUESTED FAR OF 1.5 IS CONSISTENT WITH MAXIMUM | | | PERMITTED FAR IN AN OFFICE COMMERCIAL PLANNED | | | DEVELOPMENT, HOWEVER, IT EXCEEDS THE FAR ALLOWED UNDER | | | ORDINANCE 2236-88. PLEASE PROVIDE JUSTIFICATION AND | | | REQUEST A MODIFICATION TO THE ORIGINAL CPD FAR | | | THRESHOLD. | | | | | | 3. CORRECT SETBACK REFERENCES IN TABLE TO CORRESPOND TO | | | FRONT SETBACKS (AUSTRALIAN AVENUE VERSUS MERCER AVENUE) | | | IN ORDINANCE 2236-15. | | | | | | 4. REVIEW THE CALCULATION FOR PROPOSED OPEN SPACE. OPEN | | | SPACE MEANS "AN OPEN, UNENCLOSED AREA CONSISTING OF | | | SETBACKS, LANDSCAPING, BUFFERS, VEHICULAR AND | | | PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION FEATURES, AND SURFACE PARKING." | | | BASED ON THE BUILDING COVERAGE BEING 30%, THE OPEN | | | SPACE PROVIDED SHOULD BE CLOSER TO 70% RATHER THAN 40%. | | | | | | 5. THE BUILDING COVERAGE PERCENT IS 30% IN SITE DATA | | | AND 31% IN THE 'PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS' | | | CHART. PLEASE REVISE TO A CONSISTENT NUMBER. | | | | | | 6. INDICATE IN THE DATA CHART THE PROPOSED LANDSCAPE | | | AREA. MINIMUM 20% REQUIRED. | | | | | | 7. INDICATE ON PLANS THAT THE PROPOSED DUMPSTER | | | ENCLOSURE WILL MEET MINIMUM DIMENSIONS OF 12'-6" WIDTH | | | AND 13'-6" DEPTH. | | | | | | 8. PROVIDE MINIMUM 5 FOOT WIDE SIDEWALK ALONG MERCER | | | AVENUE (CITY CODE SEC. 78-8). | | | | | | 9. PROVIDE BICYCLE PARKING IN ACCORDANCE WITH ZLDR SEC. | | | 94-485(Q). | | | | | | 10. PROVIDE A BREAKDOWN OF HOW THE REQUIRED MINIMUM | | | PARKING WAS CALCULATED. IT APPEARS THE OFFICE SPACE | | | PROVIDED WITHIN THE BUILDING WAS NOT APPROPRIATELY | | | CALCULATED INTO THE REQUIRED PARKING. | | | | | | 11. PLEASE PROVIDE A WRITTEN RESPONSE DEMONSTRATING | | | COMPLIANCE WITH AND PROVIDING EVIDENCE TO SUPPORT A | | | PARKING WAIVER REDUCTION IN ACCORDANCE WITH ZLDR SEC. | | | 94-207(B)(13). | | | | | | 12. IS SITE LIGHTING BEING PROVIDED? IF YES, PROVIDE | | | PHOTOMETRIC PLAN DEMONSTRATING COMPLIANCE WITH ZLDR | | | SEC. 24-207(D)(8) REQUIRING THAT ILLUMINATION AT THE | | | PROPERTY LINE SHALL NOT EXCEED 1 FC. | | | | | | 13. IF LIGHT POLES ARE PROVIDED, THEY SHOULD BE | | | INDICATED ON THE SITE PLAN AND LOCATED OUTSIDE OF | | | REQUIRED SETBACKS. PLEASE INDICATE HEIGHT OF LIGHT | | | POLES. | | | | | | 14. PROVIDE ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON HOW THE CROSS | | | ACCESS BETWEEN THE SUBJECT PROPERTY AND PROPERTY TO THE | | | SOUTH WOULD FUNCTION? IF TRAVELING NORTH THROUGH THE | | | CROSS ACCESS EASEMENT, CAN YOU TURN RIGHT, OR ONLY | | | LEFT? DEPICT AREA TO THE SOUTH WHERE THE CROSS ACCESS | | | WOULD CONNECT TO THE SOUTHERN PROPERTY TO DEPICT THERE | | | WOULD BE NO SITE CONFLICTS. | | | | | | 15. HOW DO PEOPLE UTILIZING THE LOADING ZONES ACCESS | | | THE BUILDING? ELEVATIONS (SHEET A-4 AND A-5) ONLY SHOW | | | DOORS ON THE FRONT OF THE BUILDING, HOWEVER, SHEET A-1 | | | FLOOR PLAN INDICATES THERE ARE ADDITIONAL DOORS ON THE | | | SOUTHWEST AND NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE BUILDING. PLEASE | | | REVISE FOR CONSISTENCY. HOW DO PEOPLE REACH THE | | | ENTRANCE OR OTHER ACCESS POINTS TO THE BUILDING WITHOUT | | | HAVING TO WALK ITEMS DOWN THE DRIVE AISLE? | | | | | | 16. PROVIDE TRAFFIC CONCURRENCY APPROVAL LETTER FROM | | | PBC. | | | | | | 17. A REPLAT OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY MAY BE REQUIRED AS | | | DETERMINED BY THE CITY SURVEYOR. | | | | | | SIGNAGE | | | | | | 18. SIGNAGE MUST BE INCOMPLIANCE WITH OFFICE COMMERCIAL | | | (OC) SIGNAGE REGULATIONS FOUND WITHIN ZLDR SEC. 94-408. | | | FOR PRELIMINARY EVALUATION OF THE PROPOSED SIGNAGE | | | INCLUDE BUILDING FA?ADE AREA AND DIMENSION BUILDING | | | FA?ADE HEIGHT AND WIDTH WHICH IS USED TO DETERMINE | | | MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE COPY AREA. | | | | | | 19. MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE NUMBER OF WALL SIGNS IS THREE (3) | | | - ZLDR SEC. 94-408(1)(D). THE PLAN SHOWS FOUR SIGNS. | | | | | | 20. IN CALCULATING FREESTANDING SIGNAGE COPY AREA, THE | | | COPY AREA ON BOTH SIDES OF THE FREESTANDING SIGNAGE AND | | | BASE IS COUNTED AGAINST TOTAL ALLOWABLE FREESTANDING | | | SIGNAGE COPY AREA. | | | | | | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT: | | | | | | DANIELLE J. KITTREDGE, AICP | | | SENIOR PLANNER | | | PLANNING & ZONING DIVISION | | | PHONE: (561)-822-1443 | | | EMAIL: [email protected] | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
Print |
|
Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved |
 |