 |
Plan Review Details - Project Z15060029
| Plan Review Stops For Project Z15060029 |
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
08-12-2015 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rcaranci |
Date |
08-12-2015 |
Time |
09:32 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rbrown |
Date |
08-12-2015 |
Time |
09:32 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2015-08-12 09:39:31 | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, BUILDING DIVISION, | | | COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1. THIS REVIEW IS A CURSORY REVIEW AS IT RELATES TO THE | | | SITE. IT IS NOT A REVIEW FOR FULL COMPLIANCE WITH | | | FLORIDA BUILDING CODE. THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE TO BE | | | ADDRESSED FOR PERMITTING. | | | | | | 2. SHEET SP-1, SITE PLAN, SHOWS REGULAR PARKING SPACES | | | THAT ARE CLOSER THAN THE ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACE TO | | | THE ENTRANCE OF THE NORTH BUILDING. ALSO, THE PLAN DOES | | | NOT SHOW AN ACCESSIBLE ROUTE FROM THE ACCESSIBLE | | | PARKING SPACE TO THE NORTH BUILDING. PER SECTION 208.3 | | | OF FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY CODE ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES | | | ARE TO BE LOCATED ON THE SHORTEST POSSIBLE ROUTE OF | | | TRAVEL FROM ADJACENT PARKING TO AN ACCESSIBLE ENTRANCE | | | FOR EACH BUILDING. THE DESIGN OF ACCESSIBLE PARKING | | | SPACES SHALL COMPLY WITH SECTION 502 OF FLORIDA | | | ACCESSIBILITY CODE | | | | | | 3. WHEN SUBMITTED FOR BUILDING PERMIT, THE PLANS SHALL | | | SHOW THAT THE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION FOR THE BUILDINGS | | | WILL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE HEIGHT, AREA AND | | | OCCUPANCY LIMITATIONS IN CHAPTER 5 OF THE FLORIDA | | | BUILDING CODE | | | | | | 4. WHEN SUBMITTED FOR BUILDING PERMIT, COMPLIANCE WITH | | | ALL BUILDING SEPARATION, PERCENTAGE OF OPENINGS AND | | | OPENING PROTECTIVE REQUIREMENTS OF CHAPTERS 6 AND 7 OF | | | THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE SHALL BE VERIFIED. | | | | | | 5. SEPARATE PERMITS REQUIRED. ALL APPLICABLE PERMITS | | | AND SUB-PERMITS MUST BE OBTAINED BEFORE COMMENCING THE | | | WORK. SEPARATE PERMITS, PLANS AND FEES, ARE REQUIRED | | | FOR SIGNS, SWIMMING POOLS AND SPAS, GAS SYSTEMS, | | | GENERATORS, FIRE ALARM SYSTEMS, FIRE SPRINKLER AND | | | OTHER FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEMS, GREASE INTERCEPTORS, | | | SITE LIGHTING, SITE LANDSCAPE, SITE IRRIGATION, ETC. | | | | | | 6. EACH SEPARATE BUILDING SHALL HAVE A SEPARATE | | | ADDRESS. FOR STREET ADDRESSING, CONTACT MICHAEL ORIO, | | | GIS SUPPORT SPECIALIST, AT (561) 494 1080, OR BY EMAIL: | | | [email protected] | | | | | | ROBERT BROWN | | | BUILDING OFFICIAL | | | TEL: 561 805 6652 | | | EMAIL: [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
ENG - PPRC |
ENGINEERING - PPRC |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
11-20-2015 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
cranford |
Date |
11-20-2015 |
Time |
09:33 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
cranford |
Date |
11-20-2015 |
Time |
09:21 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2015-11-20 09:26:03 | PER MESSLER & ASSOCIATES REPORT: | | | | | | POTABLE WATER DEMAND: 262 GPD (5 PEOPLE PER BUILDING) | | | SANITARY FLOW: 0.15 GAL/SF/DAY X 7641 SF = 1146 GPD | | | SOLID WASTE: 1 LB/SF/DAY X 7641 SF = 764.1 LBS PER DAY |
|
|
| Review Stop |
ENG - PPRC |
ENGINEERING - PPRC |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
08-11-2015 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
cranford |
Date |
08-11-2015 |
Time |
13:52 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
cranford |
Date |
08-11-2015 |
Time |
13:50 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2015-08-11 13:52:39 | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT | | | | | | THIS IS A CONCEPTUAL LEVEL REVIEW. CONSTRUCTION LEVEL | | | DETAILS, DESIGN CALCULATIONS AND THE POLLUTION | | | PREVENTION PLAN WILL BE REVIEWED AS PART OF THE | | | ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL AND BUILDING PERMIT | | | APPLICATION PROCESSES. THE ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT | | | APPROVAL APPLICATION FORMS CAN BE DOWNLOADED AT | | | HTTP://WPB.ORG/ENGINEERING/FORMS-AND-PUBLICATIONS/ | | | | | | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO SITE | | | PLAN APPROVAL. | | | | | | 1. THE PRELIMINARY DRAINAGE AND UTILITY PLAN SHOWS | | | SANITARY LINES TYING INTO WATER MAINS AND SANITARY | | | LINES RUNNING THROUGH DRAINAGE STRUCTURES. PLEASE | | | REVISE THE PLAN TO SHOW THE INTENDED CONNECTION POINTS. | | | WATER SERVICES SHOULD CONNECT TO 8 INCH WATER MAIN | | | RATHER THAN THE 20 INCH. | | | | | | 2. THE EXISTING UTILITIES UNDER GEORGIA AVENUE DO NOT | | | APPEAR TO BE SHOWN CORRECTLY. PLEASE CONTACT THE | | | ENGINEERING DIVISION TO OBTAIN AS-BUILT INFORMATION. | | | | | | 3 PLEASE SUBMIT ESTIMATES FOR THE PEAK POTABLE WATER | | | DEMAND, SANITARY SEWER FLOW, AND SOLID WASTE COLLECTION | | | YARDAGE. | | | | | | 4. PLEASE INCLUDE THE DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE DETAIL ON THE | | | PLANS. MINIMUM DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS FOR THE | | | ENCLOSURE ARE LISTED IN CODE OF ORDINANCES, SECTION | | | 94-444(B), ALSO SEE FIGURE XIV-3 OF THE SAME SECTION. | | | | | | 5. PLEASE CORRECT THE NORTH ARROW ORIENTATION ON THE | | | PRELIMINARY DRAINAGE AND UTILITY PLAN AND LANDSCAPE | | | PLAN LP-1. | | | | | | 6. ON SUBMITTED SURVEY, BEARINGS DO NOT MATCH NORTH | | | ARROW DIRECTION. | | | | | | 7. ON SHEET SP-1, ?SOUTHERN? IS MISSPELLED ON THE | | | LOCATION MAP. | | | | | | 8. PRELIMINARY, UPDATED FEMA FLOOD INSURANCE MAPS ARE | | | AVAILABLE AT HTTP://WWW.CO.PALM-BEACH.FL.US/NEWSROOM/08 | | | 14/08-26-14-FLOOD_MAPS.HTM. PLEASE REVIEW THE MAPS AND | | | VERIFY THAT THE NEW MAPS WILL NOT IMPACT THE PROPOSED | | | PROJECT. | | | | | | 9. PLEASE REVISE THE DRIVEWAY APRONS TO MEET THE CITY?S | | | ENGINEERING DESIGN STANDARDS. HTTP://WPB.ORG/ENGINEERIN | | | G/ENGINEERING-SERVICES/ENGINEERING-STANDARDS/ | | | | | | 10. CONSTRUCTION WITHIN GEORGIA AVENUE RIGHT-OF-WAY | | | WILL NEED TO BE COORDINATED WITH CITY PROJECT WHICH IS | | | SCHEDULED TO BE ADVERTISED SOON. PLEASE CONTACT TRACY | | | WARD AT 561-494-1120. THE DEVELOPER MAY BE RESPONSIBLE | | | FOR CONSTRUCTION THAT IS NOT CONSISTENT WITH CITY?S BID | | | DOCUMENTS. | | | | | | 11. PLEASE REVISE THE LANDSCAPE PLAN TO SHOW LOCATIONS | | | OF ALL WATER METERS, VALVES, CLEAN-OUTS, LIGHT POLES, | | | ETC. ROOT BARRIERS MAY BE REQUIRED WHERE PLANTINGS ARE | | | NEAR UNDERGROUND STORMWATER, SANITARY, OR POTABLE WATER | | | LINES. | | | | | | 12. PLEASE SHOW THE SIGHT TRIANGLES ON THE GROUND FLOOR | | | LANDSCAPING PLAN FOR THE INTERSECTIONS AND VEHICULAR | | | EXITS. (SECTION 94-305E, CODE OF ORDINANCES) | | | | | | 13. NORTH PROPERTY CORNERS MUST BE SET. SURVEY NOTES | | | THAT PROPERTY CORNER IS UNDER CONCRETE. | | | | | | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO | | | ISSUANCE OF CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZATION INCLUDING | | | BUILDING PERMITS AND ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL. | | | | | | 1. AN ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL APPLICATION WILL | | | BE REQUIRED FROM THE ENGINEERING DIVISION OF THE PUBLIC | | | WORKS DEPARTMENT. THE ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL | | | APPLICATION FORMS CAN BE DOWNLOADED AT | | | HTTP://WPB.ORG/ENGINEERING/FORMS-AND-PUBLICATIONS/ | | | | | | 2. A UNITY OF TITLE APPLICATION WILL BE REQUIRED FROM | | | THE ENGINEERING DIVISION OF THE PUBLIC WORKS | | | DEPARTMENT. THE APPLICATION FOR UNITY OF TITLE CAN BE | | | DOWNLOADED AT | | | HTTP://WPB.ORG/ENGINEERING/FORMS-AND-PUBLICATIONS/ | | | | | | 3. SOLID WASTE YARDAGE WILL NEED TO BE VERIFIED AS PART | | | OF THE FINAL DESIGN TO VERIFY THAT THE DESIGN INCLUDES | | | APPROPRIATE NUMBER AND SIZE OF TRASH BINS. | | | | | | 4. PLEASE IDENTIFY THE SOURCE OF THE AS-BUILT | | | INFORMATION UTILIZED FOR THE POTABLE WATER, SANITARY | | | SEWER, AND STORM SEWER DESIGN. | | | | | | 5. INDICATE ON THE PLANS WHICH PORTIONS OF THE POTABLE | | | WATER, SANITARY SEWER, AND STORMWATER SYSTEM WILL | | | REMAIN PUBLICALLY OWNED AND WHICH SECTIONS WILL BE | | | MAINTAINED BY THE APPLICANT. TYPICALLY, THE CITY'S | | | OWNERSHIP STOPS AT THE RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE UNLESS | | | EXTENUATING CIRCUMSTANCES REQUIRED THE OWNERSHIP | | | DIVISION TO TAKE PLACE AT ANOTHER LOCATION. | | | | | | 6. THE PRELIMINARY DRAINAGE AND UTILITY PLAN SHOWS AN | | | EXISTING SANITARY SERVICE LINE BEING UTILIZED BY THE | | | PROPOSED SOUTHERN WAREHOUSE. THE SERVICE LINE IS SHOWN | | | PARTIALLY ON LOT 72A. IS THERE A UTILITY EASEMENT WHICH | | | WILL ALLOW THE USE OF THIS LINE? | | | | | | 7. EASEMENTS WILL NEED TO BE PROVIDED OVER ALL ON-SITE | | | PUBLICALLY OWNED UTILITIES. | | | | | | KELLY CRANFORD, P.E. | | | LAND DEVELOPMENT ENGINEER | | | [email protected] | | | 561-494-1098 (OFFICE) | | | | | | VINCE NOEL, PSM | | | CITY SURVEYOR / REAL ESTATE SUPERVISOR | | | [email protected] | | | 561-494-1096 | | | | | | BRIAN COLLINS, PE | | | CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER | | | [email protected] | | | 561-494-1040 | | | | | | FERDINAND RIVERA | | | PUBLIC WORKS OPERATIONS MANAGER | | | [email protected] | | | 561-822-2076 | | | | | | TRACY WARD, PE | | | SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER | | | 561-494-1120 | | | [email protected] | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
08-10-2015 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
pleduc |
Date |
08-10-2015 |
Time |
11:13 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
pleduc |
Date |
08-10-2015 |
Time |
11:12 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2015-08-10 11:23:09 | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS WERE SUBMITTED BY PETER LEDUC, | | | FIRE MARSHAL, BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION, WEST PALM | | | BEACH FIRE RESCUE. | | | | | | THIS REVIEW CAN ONLY BE CONSIDERED PRELIMINARY AS THE | | | DRAWINGS THAT WERE REVIEWED WERE NOT COMPLETE. | | | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS CAN BE EXPECTED WHEN FULL DRAWINGS | | | ARE SUBMITTED FOR PERMIT. | | | | | | THE FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU HAS NO OBJECTIONS TO THE | | | PROPOSED PROJECT. | | | | | | 1. CONSTRUCTION, DEMOLITION, AND RENOVATION TO COMPLY | | | WITH NFPA 241. EXTRA ATTENTION SHALL BE GIVEN TO THE | | | PERMITTING AND LOCATION OF CONSTRUCTION TRAILERS. A | | | PERMIT IS REQUIRED FOR ANY CONSTRUCTION TRAILER RELATED | | | TO THIS PROJECT. SEPARATION DISTANCES FROM MAIN | | | STRUCTURES AS WELL AS OTHER TRAILERS SHALL BE CLOSELY | | | MONITORED FOR THE REQUIREMENTS OF FIRE SPRINKLER | | | PROTECTION. | | | | | | 2. SITE ACCESS AND EXIT POINTS ARE TO BE CLEARLY | | | IDENTIFIED AND MAINTAINED FOR EMERGENCY VEHICLES DURING | | | ALL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. | | | | | | 3. THE BUILDING ADDRESS SHALL BE CLEARLY VISIBLE FROM | | | ALL ACCESS ROADWAYS, INCLUDING DURING CONSTRUCTION. | | | ADDRESS NUMBERS SHALL CONTRAST WITH THEIR BACKGROUND | | | AND SHALL NOT BE LESS THAN SIX (6) INCHES IN HEIGHT | | | WITH A ONE (1) INCH STROKE FOR ALL BUILDINGS. | | | | | | 4. DURING CONSTRUCTION, TRASH AND DEBRIS IS TO BE | | | REMOVED FROM THE SITE DAILY OR MORE OFTEN TO REDUCE THE | | | ACCUMULATION OF POTENTIAL LIFE AND FIRE SAFETY HAZARDS. | | | | | | 5. THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE BUILDING SHALL COMPLY WITH | | | THE 5TH EDITION OF THE FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE, | | | INCLUDING NFPA 1 & 101, AND ALL ASSOCIATED FIRE CODES. | | | | | | 6. COMPLETE LIFE SAFETY PLANS FOR EACH OCCUPANCY SHALL | | | BE PROVIDED THAT ILLUSTRATE OCCUPANT LOADS, TRAVEL | | | DISTANCES, COMMON PATHS OF TRAVEL, DEAD-END CORRIDORS, | | | EXIT SIGNS, EMERGENCY LIGHTING, EXITS LEADING TO A | | | PUBLIC WAY, FIRE EXTINGUISHER LOCATIONS, AND ALL FIRE | | | SAFETY FEATURES AND EQUIPMENT. | | | | | | 7. ALL EXISTING AND NEW FIRE HYDRANTS PLANNED FOR THIS | | | DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE CLEARLY INDICATED AND IDENTIFIED | | | ON THE PLAN AND CLOSELY COORDINATED WITH THE BUREAU OF | | | FIRE PREVENTION. | | | | | | 8. KNOX-BOX KEY SYSTEM IS STRONGLY RECOMMEND AT EACH | | | BUILDING FOR 24HR EMERGENCY ACCESS. | | | | | | 9. PER FLORIDA 69A-60.0081; NOTICE SIGNAGE IS REQUIRED | | | FOR STRUCTURES WITH LIGHT-FRAME TRUSS-TYPE | | | CONSTRUCTION. ANY COMMERCIAL, INDUSTRIAL, OR ANY | | | MULTIUNIT RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURE OF THREE UNITS OR MORE | | | WHICH USES HORIZONTAL OR VERTICAL LIGHT-FRAME | | | TRUSS-TYPE CONSTRUCTION IN ANY PORTION SHALL BE MARKED | | | WITH A MALTESE CROSS SIGN MEASURING 8 INCHES | | | HORIZONTALLY AND 8 INCHES VERTICALLY, OF A BRIGHT RED | | | REFLECTIVE COLOR. THE APPROVED SYMBOL SHALL BE PLACED | | | WITHIN 24 INCHES TO THE LEFT OF THE MAIN ENTRY DOOR. | | | STRUCTURES WITH LIGHT-FRAME TRUSS ROOFS SHALL BE MARKED | | | WITH THE LETTER "R". | | | | | | 10. NO EXIT DOOR SHALL BE LOCKED FROM THE EGRESS SIDE. | | | ANY AND ALL LOCKING MECHANISMS SHALL BE COMPLAINT WITH | | | CHAPTER 7 OF THE FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE AND | | | PRE-APPROVED (PRIOR TO INSTALLATION) BY THE BUREAU OF | | | FIRE PREVENTION. CLOSE COORDINATION WITH THE BUREAU OF | | | FIRE PREVENTION IS STRONGLY ENCOURAGED TO AVOID | | | MISUNDERSTANDINGS, MISINTERPRETATIONS AND DELAYS | | | RELATED TO EGRESS REQUIREMENTS. | | | | | | DOORS SHALL BE ARRANGED TO BE OPENED READILY FROM THE | | | EGRESS SIDE WHENEVER THE BUILDING IS OCCUPIED. LOCKS, | | | IF PROVIDED, SHALL NOT REQUIRE THE USE OF A KEY, TOOL, | | | OR SPECIAL KNOWLEDGE OR EFFORT FOR OPERATION FROM THE | | | EGRESS SIDE. | | | | | | INDICATE IF THE DOORS WILL BE EQUIPPED WITH ANY | | | LOCK/LATCH. IF THE DOORS WILL BE EQUIPPED WITH A | | | LOCK/LATCH, INDICATE HOW THE LOCK/LATCH WILL BE | | | RELEASED FROM THE EGRESS SIDE OF THE DOOR. | | | | | | PER SECTION 7.2.1.5.9, THE LOCK/LATCH RELEASING | | | MECHANISM ON ALL DOORS SHALL OPEN THE DOOR WITH NOT | | | MORE THAN ONE RELEASING OPERATION. THE RELEASING | | | MECHANISM SHALL HAVE AN OBVIOUS METHOD OF OPERATION | | | THAT IS READILY OPERATED UNDER ALL LIGHTING CONDITIONS. | | | THE RELEASING DEVICE SHOULD BE CAPABLE OF BEING | | | OPERATED WITH ONE HAND AND SHOULD NOT REQUIRE TIGHT | | | GRASPING, TIGHT PINCHING OR TWISTING OF THE WRIST TO | | | OPERATE. | | | | | | A THUMB TURN LOCK IS NOT PERMITTED ON THE MAIN ENTRY | | | DOOR(S). IN LIEU OF PANIC HARDWARE, THE MAIN ENTRY IS | | | PERMITTED TO BE EQUIPPED WITH A KEYED LOCK WITH | | | LOCK/UNLOCK INDICATOR WINDOW AND SIGNAGE STATING THE | | | DOOR IS TO REMAIN UNLOCKED DURING BUSINESS HOURS. NO | | | OTHER LOCKING OR LATCHING MECHANISMS ARE PERMITTED. | | | | | | THUMB-TURN LOCK ON OTHER EXIT DOORS ARE TO BE EQUIPPED | | | WITH AN ?OPEN/LOCKED? INDICATOR WINDOW (SUCH AS ADAMS | | | RITE 4089 OR SIMILAR). | | | | | | 11. THE BUREAU'S APPROVAL OF THIS SUBMITTED PROJECT | | | DOES NOT CONSTITUTE IT'S FINAL REVIEW OR APPROVAL. | | | | | | 12. THE BUREAU SHALL REVIEW ALL SUBMITTED BUILDING | | | PLANS AT THE APPROPRIATE TIME AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH | | | THE REQUIREMENTS OF ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND STANDARDS. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
L |
LANDSCAPING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
12-31-2015 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rcaranci |
Date |
12-31-2015 |
Time |
11:00 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rcaranci |
Date |
12-31-2015 |
Time |
11:00 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2015-12-31 11:01:03 | FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER | | | PROJECT: 4510 GEORGIA AVE RESUBMITTAL | | | DECEMBER 31, 2015 | | | STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT | | | REGULATIONS FOR THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION AND | | | PROVIDES THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE WATER NEEDS CATEGORY FOR | | | EACH SPECIES ON THE PLANT LIST FROM THE SFWMD WATERWISE | | | GUIDE TO SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH THE FLORIDA FRIENDLY | | | LANDSCAPE CHART. | | | | | | 2. SATISFIED. PLEASE REVISE THE LANDSCAPE AND | | | ENGINEERING PLANS TO AVOID CONFLICTS BETWEEN | | | LANDSCAPING AND WATER, SEWER, DRAINAGE, LIGHTING AND | | | FPL EQUIPMENT. PLEASE SHOW LOCATIONS OF ALL UTILITIES | | | AND EASEMENTS ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN. | | | | | | 3. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE SCREENING FOR ALL GROUND | | | MOUNTED EQUIPMENT AND UTILITIES. | | | | | | 4. SATISFIED. PLEASE INCLUDE A ROOT BARRIER DETAIL AND | | | SHOW LOCATIONS OF ROOT BARRIERS TO PROTECT | | | INFRASTRUCTURE AND TREES FROM CONFLICTS. THIS INCLUDES | | | WATER, SEWER, DRAINAGE, SIDEWALKS AND CURBS, AND ANY | | | FIELD STRUCTURES THAT COULD BE IMPACTED BY TREE ROOTS. | | | | | | 5. SATISFIED. PLEASE SHOW LOCATIONS OF MECHANICAL | | | EQUIPMENT SUCH AS A/C COMPRESSORS, ETC. | | | | | | 6. SATISFIED. TREES ADJACENT TO THE LOADING AREA WILL | | | CONFLICT WITH TRAFFIC AS THEY GROW. REVISE TREE SPECIES | | | IN ISLAND AND BUFFER OR LOCATION OF THE LANDSCAPE | | | ISLAND TO RECTIFY. | | | | | | 7. SATISFIED. THE PLACEMENT OF THE FAKAHATCHEE GRASS | | | BETWEEN THE COCOPLUM HEDGE AND THE FENCE WILL BE | | | DIFFICULT TO MAINTAIN, PLEASE REVISE SPECIES AND | | | PLACEMENT TO ALLOW ROOM FOR GROWTH AND LONG TERM | | | MAINTENANCE OF THE LANDSCAPING. THE AREA BETWEEN THE | | | BUILDING AND FENCE STILL DOES NOT HAVE ENOUGH ROOM TO | | | ALLOW ACCESS TO MAINTAIN THE HEDGE. | | | | | | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 12/13/15: | | | | | | 8. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE TRIPLE PALMS IN THE | | | LANDSCAPE ISLANDS ON EITHER SIDE OF THE DUMPSTER. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
L |
LANDSCAPING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
11-16-2015 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rcaranci |
Date |
11-16-2015 |
Time |
10:51 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rcaranci |
Date |
11-16-2015 |
Time |
10:51 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2015-11-16 10:53:38 | NOVEMBER 13, 2015 | | | STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT | | | REGULATIONS FOR THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION AND | | | PROVIDES THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE WATER NEEDS CATEGORY FOR | | | EACH SPECIES ON THE PLANT LIST FROM THE SFWMD WATERWISE | | | GUIDE TO SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH THE FLORIDA FRIENDLY | | | LANDSCAPE CHART. | | | | | | 2. SATISFIED. PLEASE REVISE THE LANDSCAPE AND | | | ENGINEERING PLANS TO AVOID CONFLICTS BETWEEN | | | LANDSCAPING AND WATER, SEWER, DRAINAGE, LIGHTING AND | | | FPL EQUIPMENT. PLEASE SHOW LOCATIONS OF ALL UTILITIES | | | AND EASEMENTS ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN. | | | | | | 3. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE SCREENING FOR ALL GROUND | | | MOUNTED EQUIPMENT AND UTILITIES. | | | | | | 4. SATISFIED. PLEASE INCLUDE A ROOT BARRIER DETAIL AND | | | SHOW LOCATIONS OF ROOT BARRIERS TO PROTECT | | | INFRASTRUCTURE AND TREES FROM CONFLICTS. THIS INCLUDES | | | WATER, SEWER, DRAINAGE, SIDEWALKS AND CURBS, AND ANY | | | FIELD STRUCTURES THAT COULD BE IMPACTED BY TREE ROOTS. | | | | | | 5. SATISFIED. PLEASE SHOW LOCATIONS OF MECHANICAL | | | EQUIPMENT SUCH AS A/C COMPRESSORS, ETC. | | | | | | 6. SATISFIED. TREES ADJACENT TO THE LOADING AREA WILL | | | CONFLICT WITH TRAFFIC AS THEY GROW. REVISE TREE SPECIES | | | IN ISLAND AND BUFFER OR LOCATION OF THE LANDSCAPE | | | ISLAND TO RECTIFY. | | | | | | 7. NOT SATISFIED. THE PLACEMENT OF THE FAKAHATCHEE | | | GRASS BETWEEN THE COCOPLUM HEDGE AND THE FENCE WILL BE | | | DIFFICULT TO MAINTAIN, PLEASE REVISE SPECIES AND | | | PLACEMENT TO ALLOW ROOM FOR GROWTH AND LONG TERM | | | MAINTENANCE OF THE LANDSCAPING. | | | THE AREA BETWEEN THE BUILDING AND FENCE STILL DOES NOT | | | HAVE ENOUGH ROOM TO ALLOW ACCESS TO MAINTAIN THE HEDGE. | | | | | | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 12/13/15: | | | | | | 8. PLEASE PROVIDE TRIPLE PALMS IN THE LANDSCAPE ISLANDS | | | ON EITHER SIDE OF THE DUMPSTER. | | | | | | PLEASE UNDERSTAND THAT ADDITIONAL INFORMATION MAY BE | | | REQUESTED, AND STAFF MAY HAVE ADDITIONAL COMMENTS AS | | | THE REVIEW PROCESS CONTINUES. | | | RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER 561-822-1462 | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
L |
LANDSCAPING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
08-03-2015 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rcaranci |
Date |
08-03-2015 |
Time |
14:38 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rcaranci |
Date |
08-03-2015 |
Time |
14:37 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2015-08-03 14:40:39 | STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT | | | REGULATIONS FOR THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION AND | | | PROVIDES THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1. PLEASE PROVIDE WATER NEEDS CATEGORY FOR EACH | | | SPECIES ON THE PLANT LIST FROM THE SFWMD WATERWISE | | | GUIDE TO SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH THE FLORIDA FRIENDLY | | | LANDSCAPE CHART. | | | | | | 2. PLEASE REVISE THE LANDSCAPE AND ENGINEERING PLANS TO | | | AVOID CONFLICTS BETWEEN LANDSCAPING AND WATER, SEWER, | | | DRAINAGE, LIGHTING AND FPL EQUIPMENT. PLEASE SHOW | | | LOCATIONS OF ALL UTILITIES AND EASEMENTS ON THE | | | LANDSCAPE PLAN. | | | | | | 3. PLEASE PROVIDE SCREENING FOR ALL GROUND MOUNTED | | | EQUIPMENT AND UTILITIES. | | | | | | 4. PLEASE INCLUDE A ROOT BARRIER DETAIL AND SHOW | | | LOCATIONS OF ROOT BARRIERS TO PROTECT INFRASTRUCTURE | | | AND TREES FROM CONFLICTS. THIS INCLUDES WATER, SEWER, | | | DRAINAGE, SIDEWALKS AND CURBS, AND ANY FIELD STRUCTURES | | | THAT COULD BE IMPACTED BY TREE ROOTS. | | | | | | 5. PLEASE SHOW LOCATIONS OF MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT SUCH | | | AS A/C COMPRESSORS, ETC. | | | | | | 6. TREES ADJACENT TO THE LOADING AREA WILL CONFLICT | | | WITH TRAFFIC AS THEY GROW. REVISE TREE SPECIES IN | | | ISLAND AND BUFFER OR LOCATION OF THE LANDSCAPE ISLAND | | | TO RECTIFY. | | | | | | 7. THE PLACEMENT OF THE FAKAHATCHEE GRASS BETWEEN THE | | | COCOPLUM HEDGE AND THE FENCE WILL BE DIFFICULT TO | | | MAINTAIN, PLEASE REVISE SPECIES AND PLACEMENT TO ALLOW | | | ROOM FOR GROWTH AND LONG TERM MAINTENANCE OF THE | | | LANDSCAPING. | | | PLEASE UNDERSTAND THAT ADDITIONAL INFORMATION MAY BE | | | REQUESTED, AND STAFF MAY HAVE ADDITIONAL COMMENTS AS | | | THE REVIEW PROCESS CONTINUES. | | | RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER | | | 561-822-1462 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
PARK |
PARKING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
08-12-2015 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
ssamuels |
Date |
08-12-2015 |
Time |
11:46 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
ssamuels |
Date |
08-12-2015 |
Time |
11:46 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2015-08-12 11:49:55 | Z - 15060029 | | | | | | BIKE RACK IS NOT SHOWN ON THE SITE PLAN. | | | | | | SEAN SAMUELS | | | PARKING FACILITY SUPERVISOR | | | PARKING ADMINSTRATION | | | 500 BANYAN BLVD | | | WPB, 33401 | | | TEL 561-822-1507 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
POLICE |
POLICE |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
|
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
PW |
PUBLIC WORKS |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
08-11-2015 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
cranford |
Date |
08-11-2015 |
Time |
13:53 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
cranford |
Date |
08-11-2015 |
Time |
13:53 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2015-08-11 13:53:33 | SEE COMMENTS UNDER ENG - PPRC |
|
|
| Review Stop |
STORM |
STORMWATER |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
08-11-2015 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
cranford |
Date |
08-11-2015 |
Time |
13:53 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
cranford |
Date |
08-11-2015 |
Time |
13:53 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2015-08-11 13:53:51 | SEE COMMENTS UNDER ENG - PPRC |
|
|
| Review Stop |
SURVEY |
SURVEYING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
08-11-2015 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
cranford |
Date |
08-11-2015 |
Time |
13:54 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
cranford |
Date |
08-11-2015 |
Time |
13:54 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2015-08-11 13:54:09 | SEE COMMENTS UNDER ENG - PPRC |
|
|
| Review Stop |
TRAFFIC |
TRAFFIC ENGINEERING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
08-11-2015 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
cranford |
Date |
08-11-2015 |
Time |
13:54 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
cranford |
Date |
08-11-2015 |
Time |
13:54 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2015-08-11 13:54:37 | SEE COMMENTS UNDER ENG - PPRC |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
02-03-2016 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
eschneid |
Date |
02-03-2016 |
Time |
13:48 |
Rev Time |
0.50 |
| Received By |
eschneid |
Date |
02-03-2016 |
Time |
13:48 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
01-08-2016 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
eschneid |
Date |
01-08-2016 |
Time |
17:13 |
Rev Time |
1.00 |
| Received By |
eschneid |
Date |
01-08-2016 |
Time |
16:21 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2016-01-08 17:13:42 | INFORMAL SITE PLAN REVIEW 15-03 | | | 12/18/15 RESUBMITTAL #2 | | | GENERAL LAND ACRES | | | 4600 BLOCK (EAST SIDE) GEORGIA AVENUE | | | | | | - CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446 | | | | | | - PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN | | | WRITTEN FORMAT. | | | | | | - WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF FIVE | | | (5) PAPER COPIES AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY IN PDF FORMAT | | | OF ALL PLANS. PLEASE NOTE THAT CHANGES ON THE | | | RESUBMITTED PLANS OR THE SUBMITTAL OF INFORMATION/PLANS | | | TO ADDRESS THE COMMENTS MAY RESULT IN ADDITIONAL | | | COMMENTS. | | | | | | - PLEASE NOTE THAT IF THE PLANNING DIVISION HAS NOT | | | RECEIVED A RESPONSE TO THESE COMMENTS WITHIN 60 DAYS | | | FROM THE DATE OF THE COMMENTS (BY MARCH 8, 2016), THE | | | CASE SHALL BE CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN. ANY FURTHER ACTION | | | SHALL REQUIRE A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION. | | | | | | - PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1) | | | ADDITIONAL RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF | | | PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE | | | SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE APPLICANT WILL BE ACCESSED | | | A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL | | | APPLICATION FEE ($400). | | | | | | 1) REPEAT COMMENT: THE SITE, CIVIL AND LANDSCAPE PLANS | | | SHOW DIFFERENT CONDITIONS (EX. BELOW). ALL PLANS SHALL | | | SHOW SAME CONDITIONS. | | | | | | A. THE DRIVEWAYS/ENTRANCES ARE SHOWN IN DIFFERENT | | | CONFIGURATIONS ON SITE/LANDSCAPE VS. CIVIL PLANS. THE | | | CURBED, ISLAND RADII ARE NOT DEPICTED ON THE | | | SITE/LANDSCAPE PLANS. | | | | | | 2) REPEAT COMMENT: THE PARKING DETAIL SHOWS THE ADA | | | SIGN IN THE NEIGHBORING PARKING SPACE (HEAD TO HEAD | | | PARKING). THE ADA STRIPING LOCATIONS (2 INCHES APART) | | | DO NOT MATCH THE CITY STANDARD DETAIL, WHICH REQUIRES | | | THE SAME SIX (6) INCH SPACING AS THE REGULAR PARKING | | | SPACES HAVE. | | | | | | 3) REPEAT COMMENT: THE BICYCLE PAD DIMENSION SHALL BE | | | INCLUDED ON THE SITE AND/OR CIVIL PLANS. NOTE: WHILE | | | THE DETAIL SHOWS THEM AS FOUR (4) FEET WIDE, SCALING | | | THE PLANS SHOWS LESS THAN FOUR (4) FEET. | | | | | | 4) REPEAT COMMENT: THE SITE DATA TABLE SHALL BE | | | CORRECTED AS FOLLOWS: | | | | | | A. THERE ARE TWO BICYCLE RACKS SO THERE ARE FOUR (4) | | | PROVIDED BICYCLE PARKING SPACES. | | | | | | 5) RECOMMENDATION: VERIFY ALL THE DIMENSION TAGS | | | BETWEEN THE SITE AND CIVIL PLANS. SOME APPEAR TO USE | | | DIFFERING MEASURE POINTS (EX. THE 43 FOOT EAST/WEST | | | DIMENSION) AND SOME SCALE CORRECTLY AND OTHER DO NOT. | | | STAFF IS CONCERNED THAT THIS COULD LEAD TO DELAYS AT | | | THE TIME OF PERMITTING. | | | | | | 6) RECOMMENDATION: THE CITY REQUIRES A 12 FOOT 6 INCH | | | WIDE OPENING FOR DUMPSTER ENCLOSURES. WHILE THIS IS | | | SHOWN ON THE STANDARD CITY DETAIL PROVIDED, THERE IS NO | | | DIMENSION TAG ON THE PLANS FOR THE OPENING AND IT | | | SCALES AT LESS THAN THE REQUIRED 12 FEET 6 INCHES. | | | STAFF RECOMMENDS VERIFYING THIS OPENING TO FORGO | | | PROBLEMS AT TIME OF PERMITTING. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
12-08-2015 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
eschneid |
Date |
12-08-2015 |
Time |
17:21 |
Rev Time |
4.00 |
| Received By |
eschneid |
Date |
12-08-2015 |
Time |
17:20 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2015-12-08 17:29:31 | INFORMAL SITE PLAN REVIEW 15-03 | | | 10/9/15 RESUBMITTAL #1 | | | 4600 BLOCK OF GEORGIA AVENUE WAREHOUSES | | | 4600 BLOCK (EAST SIDE) GEORGIA AVENUE | | | | | | - CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446 | | | | | | - PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN | | | WRITTEN FORMAT. | | | | | | - WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF FIVE | | | (5) PAPER COPIES AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY IN PDF FORMAT | | | OF ALL PLANS. PLEASE NOTE THAT CHANGES ON THE | | | RESUBMITTED PLANS OR THE SUBMITTAL OF INFORMATION/PLANS | | | TO ADDRESS THE COMMENTS MAY RESULT IN ADDITIONAL | | | COMMENTS. | | | | | | - PLEASE NOTE THAT IF THE PLANNING DIVISION HAS NOT | | | RECEIVED A RESPONSE TO THE THESE COMMENTS WITHIN 60 | | | DAYS FROM THE DATE OF THE COMMENTS (BY FEBRUARY 8, | | | 2016), THE CASE SHALL BE CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN. ANY | | | FURTHER ACTION SHALL REQUIRE A NEW DEVELOPMENT | | | APPLICATION. | | | | | | - PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1) | | | RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED | | | COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE | | | APPLICANT WILL BE ACCESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE | | | WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE ($200). | | | | | | 1) THE SITE, CIVIL AND LANDSCAPE PLANS SHOW DIFFERENT | | | CONDITIONS (EX. BELOW). ALL PLANS SHALL SHOW SAME | | | CONDITIONS. | | | | | | A. THE DRIVEWAYS/ENTRANCES ARE SHOWN IN DIFFERENT | | | CONFIGURATIONS ON SITE/LANDSCAPE VS. CIVIL. NOTE: THE | | | WALKWAY TO THE RIGHT-OF-WAY BY THE NORTH BUILDING DOES | | | NOT LOOK LIKE IT WILL FUNCTION PROPERLY AS SHOWN ON THE | | | SITE AND LANDSCAPE PLANS. | | | B. THE BICYCLE RACK BY THE NORTH BUILDING SHOWN ON THE | | | CIVIL PLAN DOES NOT APPEAR ON EITHER THE SITE OR | | | LANDSCAPE PLAN, THOUGH THERE IS TAG MARKER FOR A | | | BICYCLE RACK ON THE SITE PLAN. | | | C. THE CIVIL PLAN SHOWS A CURB AT THE HEAD OF THE | | | PARKING SPACES WHILE THE SITE AND LANDSCAPE PLAN SHOW | | | NO CURB. PLEASE REMEMBER THAT LANDSCAPE SHALL BE | | | PROTECTED FROM VEHICULAR ENCROACHMENT. | | | | | | 2) THE PARKING DETAIL SHOWS 8.5 FOOT WIDE SPACES AND | | | THE SPACES ON THE PLAN SCALE THAT DIMENSION. THE | | | DIMENSION TAG IS NINE (9) FEET. ADDITIONALLY, THE | | | PARKING SPACES SCALE AT 18.5 FEET DEEP, WHICH CONFLICTS | | | WITH THE DIMENSION TAG AND THE DETAIL. | | | | | | 3) PROVIDE THE WIDTH DIMENSIONS FOR THE TERMINAL AND | | | INTERIOR PARKING ISLANDS. | | | | | | 4) REPEAT COMMENT: THE PARKING DETAIL SHOWS THE ADA | | | SIGN IN THE NEIGHBORING PARKING SPACE (HEAD TO HEAD | | | PARKING). THE ADA STRIPING LOCATIONS (2 INCHES APART) | | | DO NOT MATCH THE CITY STANDARD DETAIL, WHICH REQUIRES | | | THE SAME SIX (6) INCH SPACING AS THE REGULAR PARKING | | | SPACES HAVE. ADDITIONALLY, NO WHEEL STOPS ARE SHOWN ON | | | THE PARKING DETAIL. BASED ON THE DEPICTED FIVE (5) FOOT | | | WIDE LANDSCAPE BUFFER, WHEEL STOPS WILL BE REQUIRED AND | | | SHALL BE SHOWN ON THE DETAIL AND THE PLAN. | | | | | | 5) THE SOUTH BUILDING HAS TWO ELEVATIONS LABELED AS | | | WEST ELEVATION - PLEASE CORRECT. | | | | | | | | | 6) REPEAT COMMENT: THE PBC TRAFFIC LETTER ONLY APPROVES | | | 7,605 SQUARE FEET OF WAREHOUSE USE. THE TWO BUILDINGS | | | TOTAL 7,641 SQUARE FEET. THE REVISED TRAFFIC APPROVAL | | | LETTER HAS NOT BEEN RECEIVED BY STAFF. | | | | | | 7) THE BICYCLE PARKING DETAIL SHOWS TWO RACKS ON ONE | | | PAD. THE PLANS SHOW EITHER ONE OR TWO PADS HAVING ONE | | | RACK. ALL DETAILS SHALL SHOW SITE CONDITIONS AND THE | | | CORRECT DIMENSIONS. THE BICYCLE PAD DIMENSION SHALL BE | | | INCLUDED ON THE SITE AND/OR CIVIL PLANS. | | | | | | 8) THE SITE DATA TABLE SHALL BE CORRECTED AS FOLLOWS: | | | | | | A. THE PARKING REQUIRED FOR 400 SQUARE FEET OF OFFICE | | | IS ONE (1) PARKING SPACE (LESS THAN 50% OF A PARKING | | | SPACE ROUNDS DOWN). | | | B. THE TOTAL NUMBER OF PARKING SPACES REQUIRED IS EIGHT | | | (8) PARKING SPACES. | | | C. THERE ARE TWO (2) PROVIDED ADA PARKING SPACES. | | | D. THERE ARE TWO (2) PROVIDED LOADING SPACES. | | | E. THERE ARE EITHER TWO (2) OR FOUR (4) PROVIDED | | | BICYCLE PARKING SPACES. | | | | | | 9) PROVIDE THE DIMENSION OF THE LOADING SPACES ON THE | | | SITE PLAN. | | | | | | 10) PROVIDE THE DIMENSION OF THE DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE ON | | | THE SITE PLAN. PLEASE NOTE THAT STAFF HAS SCALED THE | | | ENCLOSURE AS SHOWN AND IT DOES NOT MEET THE MINIMUM | | | REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY STANDARD DETAIL INCLUDED ON | | | THE SITE PLAN. | | | | | | 11) THE LANDSCAPE ISLANDS ADJACENT TO THE DUMPSTER | | | SHALL INCLUDE TREES TO TERMINATE THE PARKING ROWS. | | | | | | 12) REPEAT COMMENT: THE ROOT BARRIER DETAIL SHALL | | | REFERENCE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH UTILITIES NOT PALM | | | BEACH COUNTY UTILITIES. | | | | | | 13) AT THE PPRC MEETING, THE ENGINEERING SERVICES | | | REPRESENTATIVES PERMITTED THE TWO DRIVEWAYS AND THE | | | SPACING BETWEEN THEM - WAIVER FROM SECTION 94-313(1) | | | AND SECTION 94-313(2). | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
08-10-2015 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
eschneid |
Date |
08-10-2015 |
Time |
16:19 |
Rev Time |
4.00 |
| Received By |
eschneid |
Date |
08-10-2015 |
Time |
16:19 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2015-08-10 16:22:18 | INFORMAL SITE PLAN REVIEW 15-03 | | | 4600 BLOCK OF GEORGIA AVENUE WAREHOUSES | | | 4600 BLOCK (EAST SIDE) GEORGIA AVENUE | | | | | | - CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446 | | | | | | - PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN | | | WRITTEN FORMAT. | | | | | | - WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF FIVE | | | (5) PAPER COPIES AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY IN PDF FORMAT | | | OF ALL PLANS. PLEASE NOTE THAT CHANGES ON THE | | | RESUBMITTED PLANS OR THE SUBMITTAL OF INFORMATION/PLANS | | | TO ADDRESS THE COMMENTS MAY RESULT IN ADDITIONAL | | | COMMENTS. | | | | | | - PLEASE NOTE THAT IF THE PLANNING DIVISION HAS NOT | | | RECEIVED A RESPONSE TO THE PPRC COMMENTS WITHIN 60 DAYS | | | FROM THE DATE OF THE PPRC MEETING (BY OCTOBER 10, | | | 2015), THE CASE SHALL BE CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN. ANY | | | FURTHER ACTION SHALL REQUIRE A NEW DEVELOPMENT | | | APPLICATION. | | | | | | - PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1) | | | RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED | | | COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE | | | APPLICANT WILL BE ACCESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE | | | WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE ($400). | | | | | | 1) PLEASE NOTE THAT IF THE CONSTRUCTION VALUE OF THE | | | BUILDINGS EXCEEDS $500,000, THEN THE PROJECT WILL BE | | | SUBJECT TO THE ARTS IN PUBLIC PLACES REQUIREMENTS. | | | | | | 2) SECTION 94-313(1) LIMITS THE NUMBER OF ACCESS POINTS | | | FOR THIS PROJECT TO ONE ACCESS POINT. PLEASE REVISE THE | | | SITE PLAN TO CONFORM TO THIS REQUIREMENT. NOTE: GEORGIA | | | AVENUE IS CLASSIFIED AS A COLLECTOR ROADWAY AND THUS | | | WOULD REQUIRE A 125 FOOT SEPARATION BETWEEN ACCESS | | | POINTS IF THE TWO ACCESS POINTS SHOWN WERE PERMITTED | | | -SECTION 94-313(2). | | | | | | 3) PROVIDE THE DRIVEWAY WIDTH DIMENSIONS ON THE SITE | | | PLAN, BOTH AT THE NARROWEST POINT AND AT THE PROPERTY | | | LINE. STAFF HAS SCALED THE PLAN AND IT APPEARS THAT THE | | | GEORGIA AVENUE FRONTAGE IS INTERRUPTED BY MORE THAN THE | | | 25 PERCENT PERMITTED BY SECTION 94-443(B)(2). | | | | | | 4) PROVIDE THE DIMENSION OF THE SIDEWALK TO THE ADA | | | ACCESS AISLE. | | | | | | 5) HOW DOES SOMEONE PARKING IN THE ADA SPACE ACCESS THE | | | NORTHERN BUILDING? | | | | | | 6) THE LANDSCAPE ISLAND ADJACENT TO THE LOADING SPACE | | | SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF FIVE (5) FEET IN WIDTH WHEN | | | MEASURED INSIDE THE CURB. PLEASE SHOW A DIMENSION LINE | | | ON THE PLAN TO VERIFY THIS DISTANCE (IT SEEMS TO SCALE | | | AT ONLY FOUR (4) FEET IN WIDTH). | | | | | | 7) WHY DO THE DRIVE AISLES NEED TO BE SO WIDE? | | | | | | 8) THE PARKING DETAIL SHOWS THE ADA SIGN IN THE | | | NEIGHBORING PARKING SPACE. THE ADA STRIPING LOCATIONS | | | (2 INCHES APART) DO NOT MATCH THE CITY STANDARD DETAIL, | | | WHICH INCLUDES THE SAME 6 INCH SPACING AS THE REGULAR | | | PARKING SPACES HAVE. | | | | | | 9) THE SITE DATE TABLE MENTIONS THERE IS A CANOPY ON | | | THE SITE. THE SITE PLANS AND ELEVATIONS DO NOT SHOW ANY | | | CANOPIES. PLEASE CLARIFY. | | | | | | 10) THE BUILDINGS ARE SHOWN WITH DIFFERENT DIMENSIONS | | | ON THE ELEVATIONS AND SITE PLAN. PLEASE CLARIFY. | | | | | | 11) PLEASE CONSIDER ADDING SOME ARCHITECTURAL DETAILS | | | TO THE WEST, EAST AND NORTH ELEVATIONS OF THE NORTH | | | BUILDING AND THE WEST, EAST AND SOUTH ELEVATIONS ON THE | | | SOUTH BUILDING. THIS CAN BE AS SIMPLE AS ADDITIONAL | | | HORIZONTAL OR VERTICAL BANDING (SIMILAR TO HOW THE | | | GARAGE DOORS ARE FRAMED OUT) OR MORE ELABORATE SUCH AS | | | REAL OR FAKE WINDOWS. NOTE: SOUTH BUILDING HAS TWO | | | ELEVATIONS MISLABELED. | | | | | | 12) THE SITE DATA TABLE INCORRECTLY LISTS THE REQUIRED | | | PARKING FOR THE OFFICE PORTION OF THE BUILDING. THE | | | OFFICE RATIO IS AT 1 PARKING SPACE PER 350 SQUARE FEET. | | | | | | 13) PLEASE CLARIFY WHO THE END USER IS ANTICIPATED TO | | | BE FOR THESE BUILDINGS. THESE BUILDINGS APPEAR TO BE | | | CONSTRUCTED FOR FLEX INDUSTRIAL PURPOSES YET THE PBC | | | TRAFFIC LETTER AND PARKING CALCULATIONS IS FOR | | | WAREHOUSE USE. THIS SEEMS TO SEVERELY RESTRICT THE | | | ABILITY TO LEASE THE PROPERTY (I.E. NO CONTRACTORS, | | | MANUFACTURING OR ANY KIND, ETC. IS PERMITTED). NOTE: | | | THE FLEX INDUSTRIAL PARKING RATIO IS COUNTED AT 1 | | | PARKING SPACE PER 500 SQUARE FEET. | | | | | | 14) THE PBC TRAFFIC LETTER ONLY APPROVES 7,605 SQUARE | | | FEET OF WAREHOUSE USE. THE TWO BUILDINGS TOTAL 7,641 | | | SQUARE FEET. THE BUILDINGS SHALL BE MADE SMALLER AND | | | MAY NOT INCLUDE OFFICE AREA AS A SEPARATE USE UNDER THE | | | SITE DATA CONCURRENCY APPROVAL BOX. | | | | | | 15) THANK YOU FOR PROVIDING THE BICYCLE RACK DETAIL. | | | WHERE WILL THIS BE LOCATED ON THE SITE PLAN? | | | ADDITIONALLY, ONLY TWO BICYCLE PARKING SPACES ARE | | | REQUIRED, WHICH EQUATES TO ONE RACK ELEMENT, NOT TWO AS | | | SHOWN ON THE DETAIL. | | | | | | 16) EACH BUFFER IS DEFICIENT ONE REQUIRED BUFFER TREE. | | | SECTION 94-443(B)(4) STATES, "AT LEAST ONE SHADE OR | | | FLOWERING TREE SHALL BE PLANTED IN A REQUIRED BUFFER | | | STRIP FOR EACH 30 LINEAR FEET OR PORTION THEREOF." THE | | | LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS TABLE SHALL SHOW THE "PORTION | | | THEREOF" ROUNDED UP, WHICH RESULTS IN ONE MORE TREE PER | | | SIDE. | | | | | | 17) WHILE THE ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS | | | PERMIT TWO PALMS TO BE COUNTED AS ONE TREE EQUIVALENT, | | | PALMS ARE REQUIRED TO BE IN GROUPS OF THREE. THE TWO | | | GROUPS OF TWO SABLE PALMS ARE SPACED 40 FEET APART, | | | WHICH MAY NOT BE COUNTED AS A GROUPING OF THREE. THE | | | NORTHERN TWO SABLE PALMS DO NOT HAVE THE THIRD REQUIRED | | | PALM. | | | | | | 18) THE FOUNDATION PLANTING LINE ITEM SHALL BE BROKEN | | | DOWN PER BUILDING. | | | | | | 19) THE SITE AND LANDSCAPE PLANS SHALL SHOW THE | | | UTILITIES. THE BACKFLOW PREVENTER SHALL BE SCREENED. | | | | | | 20) WHERE WILL THE A/C UNITS BE PLACED? THESE SHALL BE | | | SCREENED FROM THE VIEW OF THE PUBLIC. | | | | | | 21) THE ROOT BARRIER DETAIL SHALL REFERENCE CITY OF | | | WEST PALM BEACH UTILITIES NOT PALM BEACH COUNTY | | | UTILITIES. | | | |
|
|
| |
Print |
|
Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved |
 |