| 2016-01-07 17:00:12 | PLANNING AND ZONING - SIGNAGE COMMENTS: |
| | |
| | 1/6/15 |
| | |
| | 1. SHEET SP-1.0: |
| | |
| | A. 'AREA EXISTING PYLON SIGN:' FOR DETAIL 2 NEEDS TO BE |
| | UPDATED AND SHOULD EQUAL 373.3 SF. |
| | |
| | B. IT IS UNCLEAR HOW THE ALLOWABLE COPY AREA IN DETAIL |
| | 2 IS DETERMINED. |
| | |
| | C. PLEASE ADD DIMENSIONS TO THE SIGN GRAPHIC IN DETAIL |
| | 3. |
| | |
| | D. 'AREA NEW PYLON SIGN:' AND 'TOTAL SIGN' SQUARE |
| | FOOTAGE SHOULD BE THE SAME IN DETAIL 3, BUT ARE |
| | DIFFERENT. PLEASE REVIEW AND UPDATE. |
| | |
| | E. IT IS UNCLEAR HOW THE ALLOWABLE COPY AREA IN DETAIL |
| | 3 IS DETERMINED. ALLOWABLE COPY AREA FOR REPLACEMENT OF |
| | THE EXISTING FREESTANDING SIGN IS 20 FEET (HEIGHT) BY 8 |
| | FEET (WIDTH) PER RES. 3-14. |
| | |
| | 2. SHEET A - 4.0: |
| | |
| | A. DIMENSION BUIDLING WIDTH FOR DETERMINATION OF THE |
| | FACADE AREA CALCULATION. |
| | |
| | B. THE FRONT FACADE (EAST) GETS 100% OF THE PERMITTED |
| | COPY AREA. PLEASE CORRECT. |
| | |
| | C. THE SOUTH FACADE IN THE 'CALCULATION OF COPY AREA' |
| | IS INCORRECTLY DESCRIBED AS THE EAST FACADE. PLEASE |
| | CORRECT. |
| | |
| | D. REFERENCED SIGN SECTIONS FOR THE FRONT FACADE SHOULD |
| | BE SEC. 94-(D)(1)(B) AND THE REFERENCED SIGN SECTIONS |
| | FOR THE NON-FRONT FACADE SHOULD BE SEC. 94(D)(1)(C). |
| | |
| | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT: |
| | |
| | DANIELLE J. KITTREDGE, AICP |
| | SENIOR PLANNER |
| | PLANNING & ZONING DIVISION |
| | PHONE: (561)-822-1443 |
| | EMAIL: [email protected] |
| | |
| 2015-12-18 16:43:08 | PLANNING AND ZONING COMMENTS ***FAILED*** |
| | |
| | 12/18/15 |
| | |
| | 1. THERE ARE SEVERAL UN-SHADED BOXES ON THE SITE PLAN |
| | DEPICTING LOCATIONS WHERE THERE ARE UNENCLOSED COVERED |
| | AREAS. PLEASE UPDATE THE SITE PLAN AND ADD |
| | CROSSHATCHING. |
| | |
| | 2. 1,745 SQUARE FOOT AREA LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF |
| | PROPOSED VOLVO BUILDING IS DEPICTED AS ENCLOSED SQUARE |
| | FOOTAGE, BUT IS INSTEAD AN UNENCLOSED DRIVE THOUGH. |
| | |
| | 3. FOR DEPICTING REQUIRED PARKING FOR THE ENTIRE SITE |
| | IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT THE SQUARE FOOTAGE/NUMBER OF |
| | BAYS IS LISTED SEPARATELY FOR EACH BUILDING, THEN TOTAL |
| | AMOUNTS OF SQUARE FOOTAGE/NUMBER OF BAYS IS TOTALED FOR |
| | EACH USE TYPE TO SIMPLIFY HOW THE REQUIRED PARKING IS |
| | DETERMINED. |
| | |
| | 4. PLEASE REVIEW AND REVISE THE AREA OF THE PREVIOUS |
| | MARCUS JEWELERS BUILDING. PLAN INDICATES THIS AREA AS |
| | REQUIRED PARKING, BUT IT IS DISPLAY AREA. ADDITIONALLY, |
| | REVIEW THE CUSTOMER PARKING AREA NORTH OF THE DISPLAY |
| | PARKING AS ONE OR TWO SPACES COUNTED ARE ACTUALLY TO BE |
| | STRIPED FOR TURN AROUND. |
| | |
| | 5. PLEASE REVISE THE PARKING CALCULATION FOR THE |
| | SERVICE BAYS - THE PARKING CALCULATION IS 1 SPACE PER 3 |
| | BAYS RATHER THAN 3 SPACES PER 1 BAY. |
| | |
| | 6. INDICATE THE AREAS ON THE PLAN THAT ARE INCLUDED IN |
| | THE CALCULATION FOR 'OUTDOOR STORAGE/DISPLAY'. |
| | |
| | 7. THE PARKING CALCULATION FOR THE EXISTING |
| | HABITAT/TREE OF LIFE PLAZA IS 1 PER 300 SF PER THE |
| | ORIGINAL PLAN. (NOTE: ANY NEW SQUARE FOOTAGE WILL HAVE |
| | ITS PARKING DETERMINED BASED ON THE USE PROPOSED FOR |
| | THE SPACE.) |
| | |
| | 8. INCLUDE A NOTE FOR BUILDINGS M AND L THAT |
| | TRANSPORTATION CONCURRENCY IS STILL REQUIRED FOR THEIR |
| | CONSTRUCTION (THIS IS PER NOTES ON PREVIOUSLY APPROVED |
| | PLAN.) THERE MAY ALSO BE SOME ADDITIONAL SQUARE |
| | FOOTAGE/SERVICE BAYS ADJACENT TO THE OLD HUMMER SITE |
| | BASED ON 2005 PLAN, BUT ADDITIONAL VERIFICATION IS |
| | REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | 9. THE CHART APPEARS TO HAVE TWO COLUMNS CALCULATING '1 |
| | CAR PER 1,500 SF OUTDOOR DISPLAY PARKING'. WHAT IS THE |
| | DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE COLUMNS? |
| | |
| | 10. FOR BUILDING K ARE THE SQUARE FOOTAGES OF 2,287 AND |
| | 2,959 BOTH PART OF THE STRIVE BAYS OR PARTS/SHOWROOM? |
| | |
| | 11. DOES THE OLD HUMMER BUILDING HAVE ANY SERVICE BAYS? |
| | 2003/2005 PLAN INDICATED THERE WERE 23 FOR THAT |
| | BUILDING. |
| | |
| | 12. IN THE LIST OF BUILDINGS INCLUDE THE SQUARE FOOTAGE |
| | OF THE SERVICE AREAS FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY OR |
| | OTHERWISE CALL OUT ON THE SITE PLAN WHERE THE SERVICE |
| | BAY AREAS ARE LOCATED. |
| | |
| | 13. INDICATE AREA TO BE ENCLOSED/EXPANDED AS PART OF |
| | THE PROPOSAL. |
| | |
| | 14. PLEASE NOTE THAT PLAN SHOULD INCLUDE CALCULATIONS |
| | FOR BICYCLE PARKING AND LOADING AREAS AS INVENTORY FOR |
| | FUTURE SITE CHANGES. IF NOT INCLUDED ON THIS PLAN, IT |
| | WILL NEED TO BE INCLUDED ON THE NEXT SUBMITTAL FOR SITE |
| | PLAN MODIFICATION. |
| | |
| | 15. ANY COMMENTS ON SIGNAGE REVIEW WILL BE PROVIDED |
| | DEC. 29TH AND I WILL ALSO SEND A SAMPLE COPY OF HOW TO |
| | ADDRESS #3 WHEN I RETURN TO THE OFFICE ON DEC. 29. |
| | |
| | DANIELLE J. KITTREDGE, AICP |
| | SENIOR PLANNER |
| | |
| | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH |
| | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT |
| | PLANNING DIVISION |
| | PHONE: (561) 822-1443 |
| | EMAIL: [email protected] |