 |
Plan Review Details - Project Z15050027
| Plan Review Stops For Project Z15050027 |
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
06-10-2015 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rbrown |
Date |
06-10-2015 |
Time |
11:00 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
aaponte |
Date |
06-10-2015 |
Time |
11:00 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2015-06-10 11:28:50 | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, BUILDING DIVISION, | | | COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1. THIS REVIEW IS A CURSORY REVIEW AS IT RELATES TO THE | | | SITE. IT IS NOT A REVIEW FOR FULL COMPLIANCE WITH | | | FLORIDA BUILDING CODE. THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE TO BE | | | ADDRESSED FOR PERMITTING. | | | | | | 2. NUMBER OF ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES. THERE DOES NOT | | | APPEAR TO BE PARKING DATA TABLE IN THE DOCUMENTS | | | SUBMITTED TO SHOW THE TOTAL NUMBER OF PARKING SPACES | | | AND THE NUMBER OF ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES PROPOSED TO | | | COMPLY WITH FAIR HOUSING ACT AND FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY | | | CODE, SECTION 208.2. | | | | | | 3. PER SECTION 208.2.4 OF FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY CODE, | | | ONE IN EVERY SIX ACCESSIBLE SPACES (AT LEAST ONE) IN A | | | PARKING STRUCTURE, SHALL BE "VAN ACCESSIBLE" AND | | | DESIGNED IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION OF 502 OF FLORIDA | | | ACCESSIBILITY CODE (VERTICAL CLEARANCE NOT LESS THAN 98 | | | INCHES AT SPACE AND VEHICULAR ACCESS ROUTE). THE NUMBER | | | OF ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES HAS NOT BEEN STATED SO THE | | | NUMBER OF VAN ACCESSIBLE SPACES IS NOT KNOWN. | | | | | | 4. PARKING LEVELS 2 THROUGH 9, EGRESS FROM RESIDENTIAL | | | UNITS 1 THROUGH 5 TO THE SW STAIR. SHEETS A5.02 THROUGH | | | A9.09, PARKING LEVELS 2 THROUGH 9, SHOW THE EGRESS FROM | | | RESIDENTIAL UNITS 1 THROUGH 5 TO THE SW STAIR GOING | | | THROUGH THE PARKING GARAGE. PER SECTION 1014.2 OF | | | FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, EGRESS SHALL NOT TAKE OCCUPANTS | | | THROUGH A HIGHER RISK AREA TO EXIT THE BUILDING. | | | | | | 5. PARKING LEVEL 1, EXIT DISCHARGE FROM NE AND SE | | | STAIRS NOT SHOWN. SHEET A9.01, PARKING LEVEL 1, SHOWS | | | THE NE AND SE STAIRS WITH NO ROUTE OR DOOR TO THE | | | STREET. SECTION 1003.6 OF FLORIDA BUILDING CODE. | | | | | | 6. PARKING LEVELS 2, AND 6 THOUGH 10, BLOCKED ACCESS TO | | | SW STAIR. SHEETS A9.02, AND 9.06 THROUGH 9.10, PARKING | | | LEVELS 2, AND 6 THOUGH 10, SHOW PARKING SPACES THAT | | | IMPEDE ACCESS TO THE SW STAIR. SECTION 1003.6 OF | | | FLORIDA BUILDING CODE. | | | | | | 7. PARKING LEVELS 2 THROUGH 11, FIRE RATED ENCLOSURE | | | NOT SHOWN FOR SE STAIR. SHEETS A9.02 THROUGH A9.11, | | | PARKING LEVELS 2 THROUGH 11, SHOW THE SE STAIR WITH NO | | | FIRE RATED SEPARATION FROM THE ELEVATORS. SECTION | | | 1022.1 OF FLORIDA BUILDING CODE. | | | | | | 8. PARKING LEVEL 4, ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACE AT SW | | | CORNER DOES NOT ACCESS ANY RESIDENTIAL UNITS OR | | | ELEVATOR. SHEET A9.04, PARKING LEVEL 4, SHOWS AN | | | ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACE IN THE SW CORNER THAT IS NOT | | | USABLE BECAUSE IT DOES NOT ACCESS ANY RESIDENTIAL UNIT, | | | OTHER OCCUPIABLE SPACE, OR ELEVATOR. PER SECTION 208.3 | | | OF FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY CODE ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES | | | ARE TO BE LOCATED ON THE SHORTEST POSSIBLE ROUTE OF | | | TRAVEL FROM ADJACENT PARKING TO AN ACCESSIBLE ROUTE. | | | | | | 9. PARKING LEVEL 11, NO ACCESS TO THE SW STAIR IS | | | SHOWN. SHEET A9.11, PARKING LEVEL 11, DOES NOT SHOW THE | | | FULL EXTENT OF THE PARKING SPACES AT THE WEST END OF | | | THE PARKING GARAGE AND ONLY SHOWS ACCESS TO THE NE AND | | | SE STAIRS. IF THERE IS NO ACCESS TO THE SW STAIR WHAT | | | IS THE MAXIMUM TRAVEL DISTANCE FROM THE WORST CASE | | | PARKING SPACE TO THE NEAREST STAIR TO COMPLY WITH | | | SECTION 1016.1 OF FLORIDA BUILDING CODE? | | | | | | 10. AMENIITIES LEVEL 12, ACCESS TO SW STAIR IS THROUGH | | | THE ELEVATOR LOBBY. SHEET A9.12, AMENITIES LEVEL 12, | | | SHOWS THE ONLY ACCESS TO THE SW STAIR GOING THROUGH THE | | | ELEVATOR LOBBY. ROLL DOWN SMOKE CURTAINS OR SOME OTHER | | | METHOD OF PREVENTING SMOKE FROM THE ELEVATOR SHAFT FROM | | | IMPEDING ACCESS TO THE STAIR WILL BE REQUIRED. SECTION | | | 1014.2 OF FLORIDA BUILDING CODE. | | | | | | 11. RESIDENTIAL LEVELS 13-22, ACCESS TO SW STAIR | | | WITHOUT GOING THROUGH THE ELEVATOR LOBBY. SHEET A9.13, | | | RESIDENTIAL LEVELS 13-22, PLEASE CONSIDER MOVING THE | | | CORRIDOR DOUBLE DOORS THAT ARE LOCATED OUTSIDE THE SW | | | STAIR, TO THE SOUTH, OR REVERSE THE DOOR SWING | | | DIRECTION, SO THAT OCCUPANTS CAN ACCESS THE SW STAIR | | | WITHOUT GOING THROUGH THE ELEVATOR LOBBY. SECTION | | | 1014.2 OF FLORIDA BUILDING CODE. | | | | | | 12. RESIDENTIAL LEVELS 13-22, DEAD END TRAVEL DISTANCE | | | FROM UNITS 19 AND 20. SHEET A9.13, RESIDENTIAL LEVELS | | | 13-22, PLEASE SHOW HOW THE DEAD END TRAVEL DISTANCE | | | FROM UNITS 19 AND 20 TO THE NEAREST EXIT COMPLIES WITH | | | FLORIDA BUIDING CODE. SECTION 1014.3 OF FLORIDA | | | BUILDING CODE. | | | | | | 13. WHEN SUBMITTED FOR BUILDING PERMIT, THE PLANS SHALL | | | SHOW THAT THE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION FOR THE BUILDINGS | | | WILL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE HEIGHT, AREA AND | | | OCCUPANCY LIMITATIONS IN CHAPTER 5 OF THE FLORIDA | | | BUILDING CODE. | | | | | | 14. WHEN SUBMITTED FOR BUILDING PERMIT, COMPLIANCE WITH | | | ALL BUILDING SEPARATION, PERCENTAGE OF OPENINGS AND | | | OPENING PROTECTIVE REQUIREMENTS OF CHAPTERS 6 AND 7 OF | | | THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE SHALL BE VERIFIED. | | | | | | 15. ENCLOSED PARKING GARAGES. IF THE PARKING GARAGE | | | DOES NOT HAVE WALL OPENINGS, OR SUFFICIENT WALL | | | OPENINGS TO MEET THE DEFINITION OF AN OPEN PARKING | | | GARAGE, IT WILL BE CONSIDERED AN ENCLOSED PARKING | | | GARAGE AND MUST HAVE EXHAUST SYSTEMS. THE EXHAUST | | | SYSTEMS SHALL BE DESIGNED TO MINIMIZE NOISE LEVELS | | | USING INLINE FAN SILENCERS OR OTHER APPROVED METHODS. | | | | | | 16. SEPARATE PERMITS REQUIRED. ALL APPLICABLE PERMITS | | | AND SUB-PERMITS MUST BE OBTAINED BEFORE COMMENCING THE | | | WORK. SEPARATE PERMITS, PLANS AND FEES, ARE REQUIRED | | | FOR SIGNS, SWIMMING POOLS AND SPAS, GAS SYSTEMS, | | | GENERATORS, FIRE ALARM SYSTEMS, FIRE SPRINKLER AND | | | OTHER FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEMS, GREASE INTERCEPTORS, | | | SITE LIGHTING, SITE LANDSCAPE, SITE IRRIGATION, ETC. | | | | | | 17. FOR STREET ADDRESSING, CONTACT MICHAEL ORIO, GIS | | | SUPPORT SPECIALIST, AT (561) 494 1080, OR BY EMAIL: | | | [email protected] | | | | | | ROBERT BROWN | | | BUILDING OFFICIAL | | | TEL: 561 805 6652 | | | EMAIL: [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
ENG - PPRC |
ENGINEERING - PPRC |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
08-18-2015 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
cranford |
Date |
08-18-2015 |
Time |
09:06 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
cranford |
Date |
08-11-2015 |
Time |
08:14 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2015-08-17 16:01:50 | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT | | | | | | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO SITE | | | PLAN APPROVAL. | | | | | | 1. PLEASE SCHEDULE A MEETING WITH THE CITY TRAFFIC | | | ENGINEER TO DISCUSS DETAILS OF THE STUDY REQUIREMENTS. | | | | | | 2. PLEASE SUBMIT A STRIPING PLAN FOR ENTIRE WIDTH OF | | | EVERNIA AND THE FRONTAGE ROAD. THE DESIGN SHOULD | | | UTILIZE 11 FT LANES, 30 DEGREE ANGLED PARKING ON BOTH | | | SIDES OF EVERNIA, AND MAINTAIN THE CURB AT THE EXISTING | | | LOCATION. A DISTANCE OF AT LEAST 25 FEET SHOULD BE | | | MAINTAINED BETWEEN THE GARAGE EXIT AND THE NEAREST | | | PARKING SPOT. | | | | | | 3. VERIFY THAT THE PROPOSED SIZE AND QUANTITY OF TRASH | | | BINS IS APPROPRIATE FOR THE WASTE YARDAGE ANTICIPATED | | | TO BE GENERATED BY THE COMPLEX. CONSIDER USING A | | | COMPACTOR TO REDUCE THE YARDAGE OF WASTE THAT WILL NEED | | | TO BE COLLECTED. SINCE THE DESIGN OF THE REFUSE | | | COLLECTION SYSTEM (COMPACTORS WITH BINS, ROLL OFF | | | COMPACTORS, TRASH BINS, AND RECYCLING) MUST BE | | | INCORPORATED INTO THE BUILDING AND SITE DESIGN, THE | | | SIZING NEEDS TO BE FINALIZED DURING SITE PLAN REVIEW. | | | | | | KELLY CRANFORD, P.E. | | | LAND DEVELOPMENT ENGINEER | | | [email protected] | | | 561-494-1098 (OFFICE) | | | | | | VINCE NOEL, PSM | | | CITY SURVEYOR / REAL ESTATE SUPERVISOR | | | [email protected] | | | 561-494-1096 | | | | | | BRIAN COLLINS, PE | | | CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER | | | [email protected] | | | 561-494-1040 | | | | | | FERDINAND RIVERA | | | PUBLIC WORKS OPERATIONS MANAGER | | | [email protected] | | | 561-822-2076 | | | | | | TRACY WARD, PE | | | CITY STORMWATER ENGINEER | | | 561-494-1120 | | | [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
ENG - PPRC |
ENGINEERING - PPRC |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
06-09-2015 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
cranford |
Date |
06-09-2015 |
Time |
09:04 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
cranford |
Date |
06-09-2015 |
Time |
09:03 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2015-06-09 09:04:10 | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT | | | | | | THIS IS A CONCEPTUAL LEVEL REVIEW. CONSTRUCTION LEVEL | | | DETAILS, DESIGN CALCULATIONS AND THE POLLUTION | | | PREVENTION PLAN WILL BE REVIEWED AS PART OF THE | | | ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL AND BUILDING PERMIT | | | APPLICATION PROCESSES. THE ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT | | | APPROVAL APPLICATION FORMS CAN BE DOWNLOADED AT | | | HTTP://WPB.ORG/ENGINEERING/FORMS-AND-PUBLICATIONS/ | | | | | | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO SITE | | | PLAN APPROVAL. | | | 1. PLEASE SUBMIT ESTIMATES FOR THE PEAK POTABLE WATER | | | DEMAND, SANITARY SEWER FLOW, AND SOLID WASTE COLLECTION | | | YARDAGE. | | | | | | 2. PLEASE REVISE THE LANDSCAPE PLAN TO SHOW LOCATIONS | | | OF ALL WATER METERS, VALVES, CLEAN-OUTS, LIGHT POLES, | | | ETC. | | | | | | 3. A TRAFFIC STUDY WILL BE REQUIRED FOR THIS PROJECT | | | SHOWING HOW THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT WILL AFFECT THE | | | TRAFFIC VOLUME AND SURROUNDING LOCAL ROADWAYS. INCLUDE | | | TRAFFIC ACCIDENT DATA FOR AFFECTED STREET CORRIDORS. | | | ESTIMATE INCREASED OR DECREASED POTENTIAL. SAFETY | | | IMPROVEMENTS SHALL BE RECOMMENDED WHERE NECESSARY. | | | PLEASE SCHEDULE A MEETING WITH THE CITY TRAFFIC | | | ENGINEER TO DISCUSS DETAILS OF THE STUDY REQUIREMENTS. | | | | | | 4. PLEASE SUBMIT A STRIPING PLAN FOR ENTIRE WIDTH OF | | | EVERNIA AND THE FRONTAGE ROAD. THE EXISTING ANGLED | | | PARKING ON EVERNIA MUST REMAIN. | | | | | | 5. A REPLAT WILL BE REQUIRED FOR ENTIRE PROPERTY. | | | PORTION OF EVERNIA STREET WILL REQUIRE DEDICATION TO | | | THE CITY. A DEVELOPER?S AGREEMENT WILL BE REQUIRED FOR | | | R/W IMPROVEMENTS AND AERIAL ENCROACHMENTS INTO R/W. | | | ACCESS EASEMENT WILL BE REQUIRED ALONG FRONTAGE ROAD. | | | | | | 6. IS IF THE ALLEY IS PROPOSED TO BE ONE-WAY? THE ALLEY | | | IS CURRENTLY DESIGNATED FOR TWO-WAY TRAFFIC. | | | | | | 7. PLEASE NOTE THAT THE ENTIRE ALLEY WILL BE REQUIRED | | | TO BE REBUILT. | | | | | | 8. PLEASE REVISE THE AUTO TURN TO DEMONSTRATE THE | | | LOADING BAYS AND DUMPSTER AREA ARE ACCESSIBLE WITHOUT | | | DRIVING INTO ON-COMING TRAFFIC LANES. SHOW THAT THE | | | PROPOSAL TO ROLL THE TRASH BINS INTO THE ALLEY WILL NOT | | | IMPEDE TRAFFIC FLOW WHILE THE BINS ARE IN THE ALLEY OR | | | COMPLETELY BLOCK TRAFFIC WHEN THE SOLID WASTE TRUCKS | | | ARE COLLECTING THE GARBAGE. | | | | | | 9. PLEASE PROVIDE A TRAFFIC ANALYSIS WHICH SUPPORTS THE | | | PROPOSED TWO ENTRANCE AND TWO EXIT LANES TO THE PARKING | | | GARAGE. | | | | | | 10. VERIFY THAT THE PROPOSED SIZE AND QUANTITY OF TRASH | | | BINS IS APPROPRIATE FOR THE WASTE YARDAGE ANTICIPATED | | | TO BE GENERATED BY THE COMPLEX. CONSIDER USING A | | | COMPACTOR TO REDUCE THE YARDAGE OF WASTE THAT WILL NEED | | | TO BE COLLECTED. | | | | | | 11. PROVIDE VERTICAL PROFILES FOR THE PARKING GARAGE | | | RAMPS INCLUDING THE TRANSITION AREA GEOMETRY. | | | | | | 12. RECTANGULAR RAPID FLASHING BEACONS (PEDESTRIAN | | | WARNING BEACONS) ARE REQUIRED AT ALL MID-BLOCK | | | CROSSINGS. | | | | | | 13. PLEASE REVISE THE CROSS WALK LOCATIONS AND | | | ORIENTATIONS TO MATCH THE DECEMBER 2014 CHEN MOORE | | | PLANS. | | | | | | 14. PORTIONS OF THE PLANS HAVE BEEN APPROVED FOR | | | CONSTRUCTION UNDER ENGINEERING APPROVAL E14100005. | | | PLEASE EITHER REMOVE, SHADE, OR GHOST THE UTILITIES | | | CURRENTLY UNDER CONSTRUCTION. | | | | | | 15. PLEASE REVISE THE DRAINAGE DESIGN TO CONNECT TO THE | | | SYSTEM ALONG THE FRONTAGE ROAD AS SHOWN ON THE APPROVED | | | CONSTRUCTION PLANS (E14100005). | | | | | | 16. PLEASE SHOW THE RIGHT-OF-WAY LINES ON ALL BUILDING | | | ELEVATIONS. ENCROACHMENT WILL REQUIRE EASEMENTS. | | | | | | 17. PLEASE REVISE THE PLANS TO NOT SHOW DOORWAYS | | | OPENING OUTWARD INTO THE ADJACENT RIGHTS OF WAY. | | | | | | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED IN THE PRIOR | | | TO ISSUANCE OF CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZATION INCLUDING | | | BUILDING PERMITS AND ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL. | | | | | | 1. AS SEPARATE SUBMITTAL WILL BE REQUIRED TO THE | | | ENGINEERING DIVISION OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT FOR | | | ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL. THE ENGINEERING | | | DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL APPLICATION FORMS CAN BE | | | DOWNLOADED AT | | | HTTP://WPB.ORG/ENGINEERING/FORMS-AND-PUBLICATIONS/ | | | | | | 2. AS SEPARATE SUBMITTAL WILL BE REQUIRED TO THE | | | ENGINEERING DIVISION OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT FOR | | | PLAT APPROVAL. PLEASE CONTACT VINCE NOEL AT | | | [email protected] TO GET A COPY OF THE PLAT APPLICATION. | | | | | | 3. SOLID WASTE YARDAGE WILL NEED TO BE ESTIMATED AS | | | PART OF THE FINAL DESIGN TO VERIFY THAT THE DESIGN | | | INCLUDES APPROPRIATE NUMBER AND SIZE OF TRASH BINS. | | | | | | KELLY CRANFORD, P.E. | | | LAND DEVELOPMENT ENGINEER | | | [email protected] | | | 561-494-1098 (OFFICE) | | | | | | VINCE NOEL, PSM | | | CITY SURVEYOR / REAL ESTATE SUPERVISOR | | | [email protected] | | | 561-494-1096 | | | | | | BRIAN COLLINS, PE | | | CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER | | | [email protected] | | | 561-494-1040 | | | | | | FERDINAND RIVERA | | | PUBLIC WORKS OPERATIONS MANAGER | | | [email protected] | | | 561-822-2076 | | | | | | TRACY WARD, PE | | | CITY STORMWATER ENGINEER | | | 561-494-1120 | | | [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
07-21-2015 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
pleduc |
Date |
07-21-2015 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
pleduc |
Date |
07-21-2015 |
Time |
12:14 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2015-07-21 12:17:34 | AFTER A REVIEW OF THE PPRC RESPONSE LETTER DATED JULY | | | 1, 2015, FROM HKS, TO THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES, THE PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED FIRE | | | PREVENTION BUREAU COMMENTS HAVE BEEN ADDRESSED. | | | | | | THE BUREAU'S APPROVAL OF THIS SUBMITTED PROJECT DOES | | | NOT CONSTITUTE IT'S FINAL REVIEW OR APPROVAL. | | | | | | THE BUREAU SHALL REVIEW ALL SUBMITTED BUILDING PLANS AT | | | THE APPROPRIATE TIME AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE | | | REQUIREMENTS OF ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND STANDARDS. | | | | | | PETER LEDUC | | | FIRE MARSHAL | | | WEST PALM BEACH FIRE RESCUE | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
06-09-2015 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
pleduc |
Date |
06-09-2015 |
Time |
17:24 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
pleduc |
Date |
06-08-2015 |
Time |
11:32 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2015-06-08 13:52:17 | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS WERE SUBMITTED BY PETER LEDUC, | | | FIRE MARSHAL, BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION, WEST PALM | | | BEACH FIRE RESCUE. | | | | | | THIS REVIEW CAN ONLY BE CONSIDERED PRELIMINARY AS THE | | | DRAWINGS THAT WERE REVIEWED WERE NOT COMPLETE. | | | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS CAN BE EXPECTED WHEN FULL DRAWINGS | | | ARE SUBMITTED FOR PERMIT. | | | THE FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU HAS NO OBJECTIONS TO THE | | | PROPOSED PROJECT. | | | | | | 1. CONSTRUCTION, DEMOLITION, AND RENOVATION TO COMPLY | | | WITH NFPA 241. EXTRA ATTENTION SHALL BE GIVEN TO THE | | | PERMITTING AND LOCATION OF CONSTRUCTION TRAILERS. A | | | PERMIT IS REQUIRED FOR ANY CONSTRUCTION TRAILER RELATED | | | TO THIS PROJECT. SEPARATION DISTANCES FROM MAIN | | | STRUCTURES AS WELL AS OTHER TRAILERS SHALL BE CLOSELY | | | MONITORED FOR THE REQUIREMENTS OF FIRE SPRINKLER | | | PROTECTION. | | | | | | 2. SITE ACCESS AND EXIT POINTS ARE TO BE CLEARLY | | | IDENTIFIED AND MAINTAINED FOR EMERGENCY VEHICLES DURING | | | ALL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. | | | | | | 3. THE BUILDING ADDRESS SHALL BE CLEARLY VISIBLE FROM | | | ALL ACCESS ROADWAYS, INCLUDING DURING CONSTRUCTION. | | | ADDRESS NUMBERS SHALL CONTRAST WITH THEIR BACKGROUND | | | AND SHALL NOT BE LESS THAN SIX (6) INCHES IN HEIGHT | | | WITH A ONE (1) INCH STROKE FOR ALL BUILDINGS. | | | | | | 4. DURING CONSTRUCTION, TRASH AND DEBRIS IS TO BE | | | REMOVED FROM THE SITE DAILY OR MORE OFTEN TO REDUCE THE | | | ACCUMULATION OF POTENTIAL LIFE AND FIRE SAFETY HAZARDS. | | | | | | 5. ALL APARTMENT BUILDINGS SHALL COMPLY WITH THE | | | FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE, 2012, 5TH EDITION, | | | THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE BUILDING SHALL COMPLY WITH THE | | | NFPA 1, FIRE CODE, 2012 EDITION; FLORIDA FIRE | | | PREVENTION CODE, 2012 EDITION, INCLUDING MORE | | | SPECIFICALLY, CHAPTER 30 NEW APARTMENT BUILDINGS. | | | | | | 6. ALL PARKING STRUCTURES SHALL COMPLY WITH NFPA 88A, | | | PARKING STRUCTURES AND NFPA 101, THE LIFE SAFETY CODE, | | | INCLUDING MORE SPECIFICALLY, CHAPTER 42 STORAGE | | | OCCUPANCIES (PARKING STRUCTURES) | | | | | | 7. THE SEPARATION AND OPENING PROTECTION BETWEEN THE | | | PARKING GARAGE AND APARTMENTS SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE | | | AND COMPLIANCE WITH THE SPECIFIC AND MOST STRINGENT | | | PROVISION REQUIREMENT OF EITHER CHAPTER. | | | | | | 8. SMOKE ALARMS ARE REQUIRED IN EVERY SLEEPING ROOM AND | | | OUTSIDE OF THE SLEEPING ROOMS AND IN ALL LEVELS OF THE | | | DWELLING UNITS. THESE DETECTORS SHALL BE HARD WIRED AND | | | SHALL BE INTERCONNECTED TO ONE ANOTHER. | | | | | | 9. INTERIOR FINISH CLASSIFICATIONS FOR ALL WALLS AND | | | CEILINGS SHALL BE CLEARLY INDICATED ON THE SUBMITTED | | | BUILDING PERMIT PLAN. | | | | | | 10. A NFPA 13 COMPLAINT FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM AND NFPA | | | 14 COMPLIANT WET STANDPIPE SYSTEM ARE REQUIRED FOR THIS | | | STRUCTURE. A SPRINKLER CONTROL VALVE AND A WATERFLOW | | | DEVICE SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR EACH FLOOR. TEMPORARY | | | STANDPIPES ARE REQUIRED WHEN THE BUILDING REACHES THREE | | | LEVELS OR THIRTY FEET WHILE BEING CONSTRUCTED. SEPARATE | | | SHOP DRAWINGS, ARE REQUIRED TO BE SUBMITTED, REVIEWED | | | AND APPROVED BY THE FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU PRIOR TO ANY | | | INSTALLATION. | | | IF A FIRE PUMP IS PROPOSED, WHAT IS(ARE) THE PRIMARY | | | AND SECONDARY POWER SOURCES? | | | | | | 11. A MONITORED NFPA 72 FIRE ALARM SYSTEM IS REQUIRED | | | FOR THIS STRUCTURE. SEPARATE SHOP DRAWINGS, ARE | | | REQUIRED TO BE SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE | | | FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU PRIOR TO ANY INSTALLATION. | | | CONSIDER A MAIN FIRE ALARM PANEL IN THE FIRE COMMAND | | | ROOM AND A SEPARATE ANNUCIATOR PANEL IN EACH OF THE | | | LOBBY'S. | | | | | | 12. ALL VERTICAL AND HORIZONTAL FIRE SEPARATIONS FOR | | | THIS BUILDING SHALL BE CLEARLY IDENTIFIED AND INDICATED | | | ON THE PLANS. | | | | | | 13. ALL FIRE RATED OPENING PROTECTIONS (FIRE DOORS AND | | | HARDWARE) SHALL BE CLEARLY IDENTIFIED AND INDICATED IN | | | THE DOOR SCHEDULE. ALL DOORS THAT OPEN ONTO EXIT ACCESS | | | CORRIDORS SHALL BE FIRE RATED AND BE EQUIPPED WITH | | | SELF-CLOSING DEVICES THAT CAUSE THE DOOR TO POSITIVELY | | | LATCH WHEN CLOSED. THIS REQUIREMENT SHALL BE CLEARLY | | | INDICATED AND ILLUSTRATED ON THE DOOR SCHEDULE. | | | | | | 14. PRESCRIPTIVE STRENGTH REQUIREMENTS FOR ALL | | | HANDRAILS AND GUARDRAILS FOR THE BUILDING SHALL BE | | | PROVIDED AND CLEARLY INDICATED ON THE PLANS. | | | | | | 15. ALL EXIT DISCHARGE LOCATIONS SHALL BE CLEARLY | | | ILLUSTRATED ON THE PLAN. | | | | | | 16. ALL ILLUMINATED EXIT SIGNS AND EMERGENCY LIGHTING | | | EQUIPMENT SHALL BE ILLUSTRATED ON THE PLAN. | | | IF AN EMERGENCY POWER GENERATOR IS PROPOSED, WHAT IS | | | (ARE) THE PRIMARY AND SECONDARY POWER SOURCES? | | | | | | 17. THE EMERGENCY COMMAND CENTER SHALL COMPLY WITH NFPA | | | 101, 11.8.6. A FIRE ALARM PANEL ALONE DOES NOT MEET ALL | | | THE LISTED REQUIREMENTS. CLOSE COORDINATION WITH THE | | | BUREAU IS STRONGLY ENCOURAGED. | | | | | | 18. COMPLETE LIFE SAFETY PLANS FOR EACH OCCUPANCY SHALL | | | BE PROVIDED THAT ILLUSTRATE OCCUPANT LOADS, TRAVEL | | | DISTANCES, COMMON PATHS OF TRAVEL, DEAD-END CORRIDORS, | | | EXIT SIGNS, EMERGENCY LIGHTING, EXITS LEADING TO A | | | PUBLIC WAY, FIRE EXTINGUISHER LOCATIONS, AND ALL FIRE | | | SAFETY FEATURES AND EQUIPMENT. | | | | | | 19. ALL PORTABLE FIRE EXTINGUISHERS LOCATIONS SHALL BE | | | CLEARLY IDENTIFIED AND INDICATED ON THE PLAN. | | | | | | 20. STAIR DETAIL SHALL BE PROVIDED INCLUDING MINIMUM | | | RISE, RUN, AND TREAD DEPTH. TACTILE SIGNAGE SHALL BE | | | INSTALLED AT ALL EXIT DOORS. | | | | | | 21. KNOX-BOX KEY SYSTEM SHALL BE REQUIRED FOR THIS | | | BUILDING. | | | | | | 22. ALL ELEVATORS SHALL BE EQUIPPED WITH A REGION 7 | | | KEYWAY SYSTEM. | | | | | | ANY BUILDING THAT IS MORE THAN THREE STORIES HIGH OR IN | | | WHICH THE VERTICAL DISTANCE BETWEEN THE BOTTOM TERMINAL | | | LANDING AND THE TOP TERMINAL LANDING EXCEEDS 25 FEET | | | MUST BE CONSTRUCTED TO CONTAIN AT LEAST ONE PASSENGER | | | ELEVATOR THAT IS OPERATIONAL AND WILL ACCOMMODATE AN | | | AMBULANCE STRETCHER 76 INCHES LONG AND 24 INCHES WIDE | | | IN THE HORIZONTAL POSITION. | | | | | | 23. REQUIRED FIRE SEPARATIONS BETWEEN EACH APARTMENT | | | AND/OR TENANT SHALL BE CLEARLY INDICATED AND | | | ILLUSTRATED ON THE BUILDING PLAN. | | | | | | 24. REQUIRED CORRIDOR FIRE RATING SHALL BE CLEARLY | | | INDICATED AND ILLUSTRATED ON THE BUILDING PLAN. | | | | | | 25. ALL EXISTING AND NEW FIRE HYDRANTS PLANNED FOR THIS | | | DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE CLEARLY INDICATED AND IDENTIFIED | | | ON THE PLAN AND CLOSELY COORDINATED WITH THE BUREAU OF | | | FIRE PREVENTION. | | | | | | 26. ALL FIRE DEPARTMENT SPRINKLER SYSTEM CONNECTIONS | | | (FDC,S) FOR THE PROJECT SHALL BE IDENTIFIED AND | | | COORDINATED WITH THE BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION. | | | CONSIDER MULTIPLE FDC'S I.E ONE FOR THE PARKING GARAGE, | | | ONE FOR LOWER APTS, ONE FOR UPPER, ETC. | | | | | | 27. ALL FIRE WATER MAINS, SIZES AND THEIR VALVE | | | ASSEMBLIES SHALL BE CLEARLY IDENTIFIED AND ILLUSTRATED | | | ON THE PLAN. | | | | | | 28. THE BUREAU'S APPROVAL OF THIS SUBMITTED PROJECT | | | DOES NOT CONSTITUTE IT'S FINAL REVIEW OR APPROVAL. | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
L |
LANDSCAPING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
09-03-2015 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rcaranci |
Date |
09-03-2015 |
Time |
09:55 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rcaranci |
Date |
09-03-2015 |
Time |
09:54 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2015-09-03 09:56:49 | FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER | | | PROJECT: ALL ABOARD FLORIDA | | | SEPTEMBER 1, 2015 | | | I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND | | | PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1. NOT SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE AN OPEN SPACE DIAGRAM | | | SHEET TO SHOW QUALIFIED OPEN SPACE AREAS FOR: | | | ? PUBLIC OPEN SPACE: FRINGE AREAS DO NOT QUALIFY. | | | ? PRIVATE OPEN SPACE: ROOFTOP GARDEN. | | | SQUARE FOOTAGE PROVIDED FOR PRIVATE OPEN SPACE DOES NOT | | | MEET THE REQUIRED 25 PERCENT (17,899 SQ FT). | | | | | | ARTIFICIAL TURF, SWIMMING POOL, RECREATION AREAS ARE | | | NOT VEGETATED AREA AS SHOWN ON L-621. PLEASE REVISE TO | | | CLEARLY IDENTIFY VEGETATED AREAS TO MEET THE 50% | | | REQUIREMENT. | | | | | | 2. SATISFIED. PLEASE REMOVE THE TREE REQUIREMENTS CHART | | | FROM SHEET LP-1 AND REPLACE WITH A CHART SHOWING | | | COMPLIANCE WITH TREE CANOPY AND VEGETATED AREA | | | PERCENTAGES FOR EACH OPEN SPACE CATEGORY TO MEET THE | | | REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 94-109 TABLE IV-7. | | | | | | 3. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE THE DROUGHT TOLERANCE | | | LEVEL FOR EACH PLANT SPECIES ON THE PLANT LIST CHARTS | | | TO VERIFY PERCENTAGES CLAIMED WITH THE FLORIDA FRIENDLY | | | LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 94-442 (G). | | | | | | 4. SATISFIED. PLEASE REMOVE THE SITE DESIGN FLEXIBILITY | | | CHART FROM SHEET L-600 AS IT IS NOT APPLICABLE. | | | | | | 5. SATISFIED. STREET TREES LOCATED IN A SIDEWALK SHALL | | | HAVE STRUCTURAL SOIL EXTENDING 5 FEET IN ALL DIRECTIONS | | | UP TO THE CURB. INDICATE STRUCTURAL SOIL LOCATIONS AND | | | PROVIDE A TYPICAL STRUCTURAL SOIL DETAIL ON THE | | | LANDSCAPE DETAIL PAGE. | | | | | | 6. SATISFIED. PLEASE ADD A DETAIL FOR THE TREE GRATES. | | | | | | THE TREE GRATES MUST BE U S FOUNDRY 9531. DETAIL CAN BE | | | PROVIDED TO REPLACE THE TREE GRATE DETAIL SUBMITTED ON | | | SHEET L-632. THE SAME STANDARD TREE GRATES MUST BE USED | | | FOR THE FRONTAGE ROAD STREET TREES ALSO. | | | | | | 7. NOT SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE AN ADDITIONAL OAK IN | | | THE PLANTING AREA IN THE SIDEWALK ALONG ROSEMARY FOR A | | | TOTAL OF 5 TREES. | | | | | | PLEASE REVISE THE PLANT LIST TO SHOW FLORIDA GRADE 1 | | | QUERCUS VIRGINIANA ?HIGHRISE? AT 14 FEET OR GREATER | | | HEIGHT. | | | | | | 8. SATISFIED. THERE IS A THEME OF BRICK PAVERS, TREE | | | PLACEMENT AND PARKING ALONG ROSEMARY THAT MATCHES ON | | | BOTH SIDES. THIS THEME SHOULD BE CONTINUED WITH THE NEW | | | DEVELOPMENT ALONG ROSEMARY AND TRANSITION CLEANLY TO | | | THE SIDEWALK ON EVERNIA. IF BRICK PAVERS ARE REMOVED | | | FOR CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES, THE PAVERS WILL NEED TO BE | | | CAREFULLY REMOVED, STORED AND REPLACED TO ASSURE THE | | | AREAS ARE RESTORED TO MATCH THE STREET THEME. | | | | | | STAFF DOES NOT SUPPORT REMOVAL OF THE EXISTING | | | HARDSCAPE IN THE ROSEMARY RIGHT OF WAY, AS IT IS PART | | | OF THE EXISTING STREETSCAPE DESIGN. THE 5 OAK TREES MAY | | | BE REMOVED AND REPLACED WITH FLORIDA GRADE 1 QUERCUS | | | VIRGINIANA ?HIGHRISE? AT 14 FEET OR GREATER HEIGHT. | | | | | | 9. SATISFIED. THE EXISTING TREE DISPOSITION PLAN | | | SUBMITTED SHOWS THE VERY LARGE LIVE OAK TREE AS BEING | | | REMOVED. THE APPLICANT AND CITY STAFF ARE ACTIVELY | | | TRYING TO FIND A PERMANENT LOCATION FOR THE TREE. THE | | | APPLICANT SHOULD CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING OPTIONS: | | | ? FIND AN ALTERNATIVE TO REMOVAL SUCH AS A TEMPORARY | | | HOLDING LOCATION BEFORE BEING MOVED TO A PERMANENT | | | LOCATION ON THE AAF STATION SITE. | | | ? WHEN MEETING THE PUBLIC OPEN SPACE REQUIREMENT, THERE | | | WILL BE AN OPPORTUNITY TO MOVE THE TREE INTO THIS | | | SPACE. | | | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 8/18/15: | | | 10. SATISFIED. THE EVERNIA STREET PLANTING AREAS AROUND | | | THE STREET TREES NEED TO BE SQUARE OR RECTANGULAR IN | | | SHAPE. | | | | | | 11. SATISFIED. THE EXISTING SABAL PALMS AT THE CORNER | | | IN THE STREET PLANTER NEED TO REMAIN, AS THEY MATCH THE | | | STREETSCAPE ON THE OPPOSITE SIDE. PLEASE REVISE. | | | | | | | | | CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL | | | 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON | | | THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE | | | SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT | | | SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION. | | | 2. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE | | | RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PERMITTING AND INSTALLATION OF THE | | | STREET TREES, TREE GRATES, RIGHT OF WAY LANDSCAPING AND | | | IRRIGATION APPROVED WITH THIS PETITION. | | | 3. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE | | | RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THE ROAD RIGHT OF | | | WAY LANDSCAPING, TREE GRATES, AND IRRIGATION, ADJACENT | | | TO THE PROPERTY ALONG ROSEMARY, EVERNIA AND THE | | | FRONTAGE ROAD INCLUDING THE AREAS ADJACENT TO THE | | | STATION. THIS WILL BE THROUGH A SEPARATE MAINTENANCE | | | AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
L |
LANDSCAPING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
08-11-2015 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rcaranci |
Date |
08-11-2015 |
Time |
11:10 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rcaranci |
Date |
08-11-2015 |
Time |
11:10 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2015-08-18 11:48:29 | I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND | | | PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1. NOT SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE AN OPEN SPACE DIAGRAM | | | SHEET TO SHOW QUALIFIED OPEN SPACE AREAS FOR: | | | ? PUBLIC OPEN SPACE: FRINGE AREAS DO NOT QUALIFY. | | | ? PRIVATE OPEN SPACE: ROOFTOP GARDEN. | | | SQUARE FOOTAGE PROVIDED FOR PRIVATE OPEN SPACE DOES NOT | | | MEET THE REQUIRED 25 PERCENT (17,899 SQ FT). | | | | | | 2. SATISFIED. PLEASE REMOVE THE TREE REQUIREMENTS CHART | | | FROM SHEET LP-1 AND REPLACE WITH A CHART SHOWING | | | COMPLIANCE WITH TREE CANOPY AND VEGETATED AREA | | | PERCENTAGES FOR EACH OPEN SPACE CATEGORY TO MEET THE | | | REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 94-109 TABLE IV-7. | | | | | | 3. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE THE DROUGHT TOLERANCE | | | LEVEL FOR EACH PLANT SPECIES ON THE PLANT LIST CHARTS | | | TO VERIFY PERCENTAGES CLAIMED WITH THE FLORIDA FRIENDLY | | | LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 94-442 (G). | | | | | | 4. SATISFIED. PLEASE REMOVE THE SITE DESIGN FLEXIBILITY | | | CHART FROM SHEET L-600 AS IT IS NOT APPLICABLE. | | | | | | 5. SATISFIED. STREET TREES LOCATED IN A SIDEWALK SHALL | | | HAVE STRUCTURAL SOIL EXTENDING 5 FEET IN ALL DIRECTIONS | | | UP TO THE CURB. INDICATE STRUCTURAL SOIL LOCATIONS AND | | | PROVIDE A TYPICAL STRUCTURAL SOIL DETAIL ON THE | | | LANDSCAPE DETAIL PAGE. | | | | | | 6. NOT SATISFIED. PLEASE ADD A DETAIL FOR THE TREE | | | GRATES. | | | | | | THE TREE GRATES MUST BE U S FOUNDRY 9531. DETAIL CAN BE | | | PROVIDED TO REPLACE THE TREE GRATE DETAIL SUBMITTED ON | | | SHEET L-632. THE SAME STANDARD TREE GRATES MUST BE USED | | | FOR THE FRONTAGE ROAD STREET TREES ALSO. | | | | | | 7. NOT SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE AN ADDITIONAL OAK IN | | | THE PLANTING AREA IN THE SIDEWALK ALONG ROSEMARY FOR A | | | TOTAL OF 5 TREES. | | | STAFF DOES NOT SUPPORT REMOVAL OF THE EXISTING | | | HARDSCAPE IN THE ROSEMARY RIGHT OF WAY, AS IT IS PART | | | OF THE EXISTING STREETSCAPE DESIGN. THE 5 OAK TREES MAY | | | BE REMOVED AND REPLACED WITH FLORIDA GRADE 1 QUERCUS | | | VIRGINIANA ?HIGHRISE? AT 14 FEET OR GREATER HEIGHT. | | | | | | 8. NOT SATISFIED. THERE IS A THEME OF BRICK PAVERS, | | | TREE PLACEMENT AND PARKING ALONG ROSEMARY THAT MATCHES | | | ON BOTH SIDES. THIS THEME SHOULD BE CONTINUED WITH THE | | | NEW DEVELOPMENT ALONG ROSEMARY AND TRANSITION CLEANLY | | | TO THE SIDEWALK ON EVERNIA. IF BRICK PAVERS ARE REMOVED | | | FOR CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES, THE PAVERS WILL NEED TO BE | | | CAREFULLY REMOVED, STORED AND REPLACED TO ASSURE THE | | | AREAS ARE RESTORED TO MATCH THE STREET THEME. | | | | | | STAFF DOES NOT SUPPORT REMOVAL OF THE EXISTING | | | HARDSCAPE IN THE ROSEMARY RIGHT OF WAY, AS IT IS PART | | | OF THE EXISTING STREETSCAPE DESIGN. THE 5 OAK TREES MAY | | | BE REMOVED AND REPLACED WITH FLORIDA GRADE 1 QUERCUS | | | VIRGINIANA ?HIGHRISE? AT 14 FEET OR GREATER HEIGHT. | | | | | | 9. SATISFIED. THE EXISTING TREE DISPOSITION PLAN | | | SUBMITTED SHOWS THE VERY LARGE LIVE OAK TREE AS BEING | | | REMOVED. THE APPLICANT AND CITY STAFF ARE ACTIVELY | | | TRYING TO FIND A PERMANENT LOCATION FOR THE TREE. THE | | | APPLICANT SHOULD CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING OPTIONS: | | | ? FIND AN ALTERNATIVE TO REMOVAL SUCH AS A TEMPORARY | | | HOLDING LOCATION BEFORE BEING MOVED TO A PERMANENT | | | LOCATION ON THE AAF STATION SITE. | | | ? WHEN MEETING THE PUBLIC OPEN SPACE REQUIREMENT, THERE | | | WILL BE AN OPPORTUNITY TO MOVE THE TREE INTO THIS | | | SPACE. | | | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 8/18/15: | | | 10. THE EVERNIA STREET PLANTING AREAS AROUND THE STREET | | | TREES NEED TO BE SQUARE OR RECTANGULAR IN SHAPE. | | | | | | 11. THE EXISTING SABAL PALMS AT THE CORNER IN THE | | | STREET PLANTER NEED TO REMAIN, AS THEY MATCH THE | | | STREETSCAPE ON THE OPPOSITE SIDE. PLEASE REVISE. | | | | | | | | | CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL | | | 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON | | | THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE | | | SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT | | | SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION. | | | 2. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE | | | RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PERMITTING AND INSTALLATION OF THE | | | STREET TREES, TREE GRATES, RIGHT OF WAY LANDSCAPING AND | | | IRRIGATION APPROVED WITH THIS PETITION. | | | 3. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE | | | RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THE ROAD RIGHT OF | | | WAY LANDSCAPING, TREE GRATES, AND IRRIGATION, ADJACENT | | | TO THE PROPERTY ALONG ROSEMARY, EVERNIA AND THE | | | FRONTAGE ROAD INCLUDING THE AREAS ADJACENT TO THE | | | STATION. THIS WILL BE THROUGH A SEPARATE MAINTENANCE | | | AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY. | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
L |
LANDSCAPING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
06-09-2015 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rcaranci |
Date |
06-09-2015 |
Time |
10:50 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rcaranci |
Date |
06-09-2015 |
Time |
10:50 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2015-06-09 10:52:49 | 1. PLEASE PROVIDE AN OPEN SPACE DIAGRAM SHEET TO SHOW | | | QUALIFIED OPEN SPACE AREAS FOR: | | | ? PUBLIC OPEN SPACE: FRINGE AREAS DO NOT QUALIFY. | | | ? PRIVATE OPEN SPACE: ROOFTOP GARDEN | | | | | | 2. PLEASE REMOVE THE TREE REQUIREMENTS CHART FROM SHEET | | | LP-1 AND REPLACE WITH A CHART SHOWING COMPLIANCE WITH | | | TREE CANOPY AND VEGETATED AREA PERCENTAGES FOR EACH | | | OPEN SPACE CATEGORY TO MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION | | | 94-109 TABLE IV-7. | | | | | | 3. PLEASE PROVIDE THE DROUGHT TOLERANCE LEVEL FOR EACH | | | PLANT SPECIES ON THE PLANT LIST CHARTS TO VERIFY | | | PERCENTAGES CLAIMED WITH THE FLORIDA FRIENDLY LANDSCAPE | | | REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 94-442 (G). | | | | | | 4. PLEASE REMOVE THE SITE DESIGN FLEXIBILITY CHART FROM | | | SHEET L-600 AS IT IS NOT APPLICABLE. | | | | | | 5. STREET TREES LOCATED IN A SIDEWALK SHALL HAVE | | | STRUCTURAL SOIL EXTENDING 5 FEET IN ALL DIRECTIONS UP | | | TO THE CURB. INDICATE STRUCTURAL SOIL LOCATIONS AND | | | PROVIDE A TYPICAL STRUCTURAL SOIL DETAIL ON THE | | | LANDSCAPE DETAIL PAGE. | | | | | | 6. PLEASE ADD A DETAIL FOR THE TREE GRATES. | | | | | | 7. PLEASE PROVIDE AN ADDITIONAL OAK IN THE PLANTING | | | AREA IN THE SIDEWALK ALONG ROSEMARY FOR A TOTAL OF 5 | | | TREES. | | | | | | 8. THERE IS A THEME OF BRICK PAVERS, TREE PLACEMENT AND | | | PARKING ALONG ROSEMARY THAT MATCHES ON BOTH SIDES. THIS | | | THEME SHOULD BE CONTINUED WITH THE NEW DEVELOPMENT | | | ALONG ROSEMARY AND TRANSITION CLEANLY TO THE SIDEWALK | | | ON EVERNIA. IF BRICK PAVERS ARE REMOVED FOR | | | CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES, THE PAVERS WILL NEED TO BE | | | CAREFULLY REMOVED, STORED AND REPLACED TO ASSURE THE | | | AREAS ARE RESTORED TO MATCH THE STREET THEME. | | | | | | 9. THE EXISTING TREE DISPOSITION PLAN SUBMITTED SHOWS | | | THE VERY LARGE LIVE OAK TREE AS BEING REMOVED. THE | | | APPLICANT AND CITY STAFF ARE ACTIVELY TRYING TO FIND A | | | PERMANENT LOCATION FOR THE TREE. THE APPLICANT SHOULD | | | CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING OPTIONS: | | | ? FIND AN ALTERNATIVE TO REMOVAL SUCH AS A TEMPORARY | | | HOLDING LOCATION BEFORE BEING MOVED TO A PERMANENT | | | LOCATION ON THE AAF STATION SITE. | | | ? WHEN MEETING THE PUBLIC OPEN SPACE REQUIREMENT, THERE | | | WILL BE AN OPPORTUNITY TO MOVE THE TREE INTO THIS | | | SPACE. | | | | | | | | | CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL | | | 1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON | | | THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE | | | SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT | | | SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION. | | | 2. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE | | | RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PERMITTING AND INSTALLATION OF THE | | | STREET TREES, TREE GRATES, RIGHT OF WAY LANDSCAPING AND | | | IRRIGATION APPROVED WITH THIS PETITION. | | | 3. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE | | | RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THE ROAD RIGHT OF | | | WAY LANDSCAPING, TREE GRATES, AND IRRIGATION. THIS WILL | | | BE THROUGH A SEPARATE MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH THE | | | CITY. | | | | | | RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER | | | 561-822-1462 | | | [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
PARK |
PARKING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
|
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
POLICE |
POLICE |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
|
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
PW |
PUBLIC WORKS |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
06-09-2015 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
cranford |
Date |
06-09-2015 |
Time |
09:04 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
cranford |
Date |
06-09-2015 |
Time |
09:04 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2015-06-09 09:04:42 | SEE COMMENTS UNDER ENGINEERING PPRC. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
STORM |
STORMWATER |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
06-09-2015 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
cranford |
Date |
06-09-2015 |
Time |
09:05 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
cranford |
Date |
06-09-2015 |
Time |
09:04 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2015-06-09 09:05:02 | SEE COMMENTS UNDER ENGINEERING PPRC. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
SURVEY |
SURVEYING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
06-09-2015 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
cranford |
Date |
06-09-2015 |
Time |
09:05 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
cranford |
Date |
06-09-2015 |
Time |
09:05 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
TRAFFIC |
TRAFFIC ENGINEERING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
06-09-2015 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
cranford |
Date |
06-09-2015 |
Time |
09:05 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
cranford |
Date |
06-09-2015 |
Time |
09:05 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2015-06-09 09:05:47 | SEE COMMENTS UNDER ENGINEERING PPRC. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
08-17-2015 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
aaponte |
Date |
08-17-2015 |
Time |
16:03 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
aaponte |
Date |
08-17-2015 |
Time |
16:03 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2015-08-17 16:41:07 | - PLEASE VERIFY COMPLIANCE WITH PRIVATE OPEN SPACE | | | REQUIRED. BASED ON LOT SIZE OF 71,599SF, PRIVATE OPEN | | | SPACE IS 17,899SF | | | - PARKING GARAGE ENTRANCE SHALL BE RAISED TO THE | | | SIDEWALK LEVEL. PATH OF TRAVEL SHALL BE CONSISTENT WITH | | | THE SIDEWALK.IN A SIMILAR WAY, ALLEY CURB CUT SHALL BE | | | DESIGNED TO MINIMIZE IMPACT ON PEDESTRIANS. | | | - RETAIL USES REQUIRED ALONG ROSEMARY AVENUE SHALL HAVE | | | A MINIMUM DEPTH OF 25 FEET. | | | - PLEASE PROVID INFORMATION TO CONFIRM COMPLIANCE WITH | | | FACADE ARCHITECTURAL TREATMENT FOR NON-ACTIVE USES. | | | - PORTION OF PARKING GARAGE IS ENCROACHING INTO | | | CONDITIONAL SETBACK. | | | - ROSEMARY STREET DESIGN SHALL BE MAINTAIN AS IT IS. | | | - EVERNIA STREET SHALL BE MAINTAINED AS ANGLE PARKING. | | | STREET SHALL BE RESTRIPED AS 30 DEGREE PARKING AND 11 | | | FOOT TRAVEL LANES. | | | - EXISTING STREET LIGHTS ON EVERNIA SHALL BE REPLACED | | | BY CITY STANDARD DECORATIVE LIGHTING. | | | - TREE GRATES ALONG EVERNIA STREET SHALL BE CITY | | | STANDARD. | | | - PLEASE PROVIDE INFORMATION TO CONFIRM COMPLIANCE WITH | | | BLANK WALL REGULATIONS (SKETCH OR TABLE ON HOW IT WAS | | | CALCULATED). | | | - CURB CUT FOR PARKIGN GARAGE ENTRACE EXCEED MAXIMUM | | | ALLOWED. A DAC VARIANCE WILL BE NEEDED. | | | | | | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS: | | | - PLEASE INDICATE PL, AND SETBACK LINE IN ALL DRAWINGS. | | | SHEET A1.02 IS MISSING THE INFORMATION. ALSO INCLUDE | | | THE LOCATION OF EXISTING CURB LINE. | | | - SHEET L-413.1 SHOWS A SECTION OF THE FRONTAGE ROAD | | | THAT DOES NOT SEEM ACCURATE. PLEASE INDICATE IN SITE | | | PLAN THE LOCATION OF THE SECTION. | | | - PLEASE VERIFY THE DIMENSION OF THE EXISTING SIDEWALK | | | AND THE LOCATION OF THE PROPERTY LINE. IT SEEMS THE | | | EXISTING SIDEWALK ALL UNDER ROW IS 13' IN WIDTH. | | | - SETBACK IS MEASURED FORM BACK OF EXISTING CURB. | | | SECTION ON SHEET L-413.2 NEEDS TO BE CLARIFIED. | | | - SHEET L-420 SHOWS COLUMNS ENCROACHING INTO THE SETBCK | | | ON EVERNIA STREET. | | | - LANDSCAPE AND FLOOR PLANS ARE NOT CONSISTENT. | | | LANDSCAPE SHOWS PLANTING BLOCKING THE LOBBY ACCESS FOR | | | THE RESIDENTIAL TOWER ON ROSEMARY AVE. | | | - SURVEY NEEDS TO INCORPORATE THE ROSEMARY ST | | | STREETSCAPE. IT SHALL ALSO BE INDICATED ON THE FIRST | | | FLOOR PLAN. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
06-15-2015 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
aaponte |
Date |
06-10-2015 |
Time |
16:46 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
aaponte |
Date |
06-10-2015 |
Time |
16:46 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2015-06-15 17:07:12 | 1. LOT AREA DEPICTED IN SURVEY INCLUDES THE PROPERTIES | | | FACING EVERNIA STREET ONLY. FOR THE PURPOSES OF | | | CALCULATING THE ALLOWABLE FAR THE NEW ROW ADJACENT TO | | | THE PROJECT BETWEEN EVERNIA ST AND THE E-W ALLEY CAN BE | | | INCLUDED, BUT NOT THE NEW ROAD NORTH OF THE ALLEY. | | | PLEASE RE-CALCULATE THE PERMITTED FAR AND ADJUST THE | | | PROJECT AS NECESSARY. | | | LOT AREA = 55,321SF + ROAD = APPROXIMATELY 6,650SF. | | | TOTAL AREA APPROX = 61,971SF | | | 2. SETBACKS ARE MEASURED FROM BACK OF CURB, NOT FACE OF | | | CURB. PLEASE INDICATE LOCATION OF EXISTING CURB, AND | | | PROPOSED IF MODIFIED. SETBACK SHALL BE MEASURED FROM | | | THE EXISTING CURB LINE, NOT PROPOSED. SETBACK SHALL BE | | | CONSISTENT ALONG THE FRONTAGE AND MEASURED FROM CURB | | | LINE FARTHER AWAY FROM THE CENTER LINE OF THE ROAD. | | | 3. PARKING GARAGE ENTRANCE SHALL BE RAISED TO MEET THE | | | SIDEWALK LEVEL. | | | 4. PLEASE INDICATE PL AND SETBACK LINE ON ALL FLOOR | | | PLANS AND ELEVATIONS. | | | 5. COLUMNS CANNOT ENCROACH INTO REQUIRED SETBACK LINE. | | | A PORTION OF THE BUILDING ON EVERNIA STREET IS | | | ENCROACHING INTO THE MINIMUM REQUIRED SETBACK. | | | 6. RETAIL SHALL BE PROVIDED ALONG A MINIMUM 80% OF THE | | | BUILDABLE LOT FRONTAGE ON ROSEMARY AVENUE (105' RETAIL | | | REQUIRED). | | | 7. DOORS CANNOT OPEN INTO THE REQUIRED SETBACK. | | | 8.PLEASE CONFIRM THE DUMPSTER WILL NOT BLOCK THE ALLEY | | | AND IT WILL BE ROLLED OUT ONLY AT THE TIME OF PICK UP. | | | 9. PLEASE PROVIDE AUTO TURN FOR THE LOADING AREAS. | | | 10. PARKING ENTRANCE EXCEED MAXIMUM 25 FEET ALLOWED. A | | | VARIANCE FROM DAC WILL BE REQUIRED. STAFF RECOMMENDS | | | REDUCING THE PARKING ENTRANCE. | | | 11. PLEASE INDICATE THE PARKING DIMENSIONS. DRIVE AISLE | | | SHALL BE 24 FEET WITH 90 DEGREE PARKING ADJACENT. | | | 12. PLEASE PROVIDE A TABLE INDICATING UNIT SIZE, AND | | | AVERAGE UNIT SIZE TO CONFIRM COMPLIANCE WITH CODE | | | REQUIREMENT. | | | 13. FULLY ENCLOSED STORAGE COUNTS AS PART OF THE FAR. | | | 14. STAIRS AND ELEVATORS COUNT AS PART OF THE FAR. | | | EXCEPT THOSE UTILIZED ONLY FOR THE GARAGE. | | | 15. PARKING GARAGE ELEVATIONS SHALL BE ARCHITECTURALLY | | | TREATED. | | | 16. PLEASE PROVIDE INFORMATION TO CONFIRM COMPLIANCE | | | WITH THE MINIMUM OPEN SPACE REQUIREMENT, FOR PUBLIC AND | | | PRIVATE OPEN SPACE. | | | 17. STREETSCAPE DESIGN ALONG ROSEMARY AVENUE SHALL BE | | | MAINTAINED. | | | 18. EVERNIA STREET SIDEWALK SHALL BE STANDARD CONCRETE. | | | 19. STREETSCAPE DESIGN ON EVERNIA STREET SHALL FOLLOW | | | DOWNTOWN STANDARD, TREE GRATES NEXT TO THE CURB. GREEN | | | ISLAND FICUS AS BASE PLANTING WILL BE OK. | | | 20.LIGHTING FIXTURES ON EVERNIA STREET SHALL FOLLOW | | | STANDARD DOWNTOWN FIXTURE. | | | 21. PLEASE CONFIRM COMPLIANCE WITH BLANK WALL | | | REGULATIONS. | | | 22. NEW FRONTAGE ROAD DESIGN SHALL BE PRESENTED WITH | | | MORE DETAIL AND DISCUSSED. | | | FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION PLEASE CONTACT ANA MARIA | | | APONTE AT 561-822-1439. |
|
|
| |
Print |
|
Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved |
 |