Plan Review Details - Project Z15040035
Plan Review Stops For Project Z15040035
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 1 Status F Date 05-12-2015 Cont ID  
Sent By rcaranci Date 05-12-2015 Time 21:53 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rbrown Date 05-12-2015 Time 21:53 Sent To  
Notes
2015-05-12 22:05:04DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, BUILDING DIVISION,
 COMMENTS:
  
 1. THIS REVIEW IS A CURSORY REVIEW AS IT RELATES TO THE
 SITE. IT IS NOT A REVIEW FOR FULL COMPLIANCE WITH
 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE. THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE TO BE
 ADDRESSED FOR PERMITTING.
  
 2. ACCESSIBLE PARKING FOR PHASE 1. NO EXISTING SITE
 PLAN OR DEMOLITION PLAN HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO SHOW THE
 EXISTING ACCESSIBLE PARKING AND WHAT IS CURRENTLY AT
 THE LOCATION OF THE PROPOSED PALM BEACH DAY ACADEMY
 EDUCATION BUILDING THAT WILL BE CONSTUCTED UNDER PHASE
 1. SHEET SP-3B, INTERIM SITE PLAN, SHOWS THE PROPOSED
 PALM BEACH DAY ACADEMY EDUCATION BUILDING IN USE PRIOR
 TO THE CONSTRUCTION OF PHASE 2 - PROPOSED PALM BEACH
 DAY ACADEMY ATHLETICS/FINE ARTS COMPLEX BUILDING AND
 PRIOR TO THE INSTALLATION OF THE TWO ADJACENT
 ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES. PER SECTION 208.3 OF FLORIDA
 ACCESSIBILITY CODE ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES ARE TO BE
 LOCATED ON THE SHORTEST POSSIBLE ROUTE OF TRAVEL FROM
 ADJACENT PARKING TO AN ACCESSIBLE ENTRANCE FOR EACH
 BUILDING. THE DESIGN OF ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES SHALL
 COMPLY WITH SECTION 502 OF FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY CODE
  
 3. WHEN SUBMITTED FOR BUILDING PERMIT, THE PLANS SHALL
 SHOW THAT THE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION FOR THE BUILDINGS
 WILL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE HEIGHT, AREA AND
 OCCUPANCY LIMITATIONS IN CHAPTER 5 OF THE FLORIDA
 BUILDING CODE
  
 4. WHEN SUBMITTED FOR BUILDING PERMIT, COMPLIANCE WITH
 ALL BUILDING SEPARATION, PERCENTAGE OF OPENINGS AND
 OPENING PROTECTIVE REQUIREMENTS OF CHAPTERS 6 AND 7 OF
 THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE SHALL BE VERIFIED.
  
 5. SEPARATE PERMITS REQUIRED. ALL APPLICABLE PERMITS
 AND SUB-PERMITS MUST BE OBTAINED BEFORE COMMENCING THE
 WORK. SEPARATE PERMITS, PLANS AND FEES, ARE REQUIRED
 FOR SIGNS, SWIMMING POOLS AND SPAS, GAS SYSTEMS,
 GENERATORS, FIRE ALARM SYSTEMS, FIRE SPRINKLER AND
 OTHER FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEMS, GREASE INTERCEPTORS,
 SITE LIGHTING, SITE LANDSCAPE, SITE IRRIGATION, ETC.
  
 6. EACH SEPARATE BUILDING SHALL HAVE AN SEPARATE
 ADDRESS. FOR STREET ADDRESSING, CONTACT MICHAEL ORIO,
 GIS SUPPORT SPECIALIST, AT (561) 494 1080, OR BY EMAIL:
 [email protected]
  
 ROBERT BROWN
 BUILDING OFFICIAL
 TEL: 561 805 6652
 EMAIL: [email protected]
  
Review Stop ENG - PPRC ENGINEERING - PPRC
Rev No 2 Status P Date 08-25-2015 Cont ID  
Sent By cranford Date 08-25-2015 Time 14:42 Rev Time 0.00
Received By cranford Date 08-25-2015 Time 14:42 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop ENG - PPRC ENGINEERING - PPRC
Rev No 1 Status F Date 05-08-2015 Cont ID  
Sent By cranford Date 05-08-2015 Time 13:35 Rev Time 0.00
Received By cranford Date 05-08-2015 Time 13:34 Sent To  
Notes
2015-05-08 13:35:33CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH
 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
  
 THIS IS A CONCEPTUAL LEVEL REVIEW. CONSTRUCTION LEVEL
 DETAILS, DESIGN CALCULATIONS AND THE POLLUTION
 PREVENTION PLAN WILL BE REVIEWED AS PART OF THE
 ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL AND BUILDING PERMIT
 APPLICATION PROCESSES. THE ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT
 APPROVAL APPLICATION FORMS CAN BE DOWNLOADED AT
 HTTP://WPB.ORG/ENGINEERING/FORMS-AND-PUBLICATIONS/
  
  
 THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO SITE
 PLAN APPROVAL.
 1. PLEASE SHOW THE DUMPSTER LOCATION(S) FOR THE NEW
 BUILDINGS. THE TRASH DUMPSTER/COMPACTORS MUST LOCATED
 IN AREAS EASILY SERVICED BY THE CITY SANITATION
 EQUIPMENT AND MANPOWER PER SECTION 74-35(A)(5) OF THE
 CODE OF ORDINANCES. THE GATE WIDTH MUST BE A MINIMUM OF
 12.5 FEET.
  
 2. PLEASE VERIFY THAT THE TRUCK ROUTE TO THE DUMPSTER
 ENCLOSURE CAN WITHSTAND THE HEAVY LOADING OF THE FILLED
 SANITATION TRUCK. THE TRUCKS ARE RATED FOR 15,000 LBS
 PER AXLE.
  
 3. PLEASE SUBMIT ESTIMATES FOR THE PEAK POTABLE WATER
 DEMAND, SANITARY SEWER FLOW, AND SOLID WASTE COLLECTION
 YARDAGE.
  
 4. PLEASE SHOW THE SIGHT TRIANGLES ON THE LANDSCAPING
 PLAN FOR THE VEHICULAR EXITS. (SECTION 94-305E, CODE OF
 ORDINANCES)
  
 5. THE LANDSCAPING PLAN SHOWS INTENSIVE PLANTINGS
 WITHIN THE DRAINAGE AND FLOWAGE EASEMENT. THIS AREA WAS
 PREVIOUSLY DESIGNATED AS A BIOSWALE. PLEASE CLARIFY HOW
 THE STORMWATER WILL FLOW THROUGH THE INTENSIVE PROPOSED
 VEGETATION.
  
 6. THE PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANT CONFLICTS WITH THE
 PROPOSED PLANTINGS. AN 18-INCH CLEAR ZONE IS REQUIRED
 AROUND ALL FIRE HYDRANTS. PLEASE REVISE THE LANDSCAPE
 PLAN TO SHOW LOCATIONS OF ALL WATER METERS, VALVES,
 CLEAN-OUTS, LIGHT POLES, ETC. ROOT BARRIERS MAY BE
 REQUIRED WHERE PLANTINGS ARE NEAR UNDERGROUND
 STORMWATER, SANITARY, OR POTABLE WATER LINES.
  
 7. PLEASE REVISE THE LANDSCAPE PLAN TO SHOW LOCATIONS
 OF ALL WATER METERS, VALVES, CLEAN-OUTS, LIGHT POLES,
 ETC. ROOT BARRIERS MAY BE REQUIRED WHERE PLANTINGS ARE
 NEAR UNDERGROUND STORMWATER, SANITARY, OR POTABLE WATER
 LINES. ALSO CLEARLY INDICATE ALL EXISTING AND PROPOSED
 EASEMENTS ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN.
  
 8. PLEASE REVISE THE DRIVEWAY APRONS TO MEET THE CITY?S
 ENGINEERING DESIGN STANDARDS. PLEASE ALSO INCLUDE THE
 DETAILS FOR THE SIDEWALK RAMPS, HTTP://WPB.ORG/ENGINEER
 ING/ENGINEERING-SERVICES/ENGINEERING-STANDARDS/
  
 9. PLEASE SHOW THE APPROXIMATE LOCATIONS OF WATER AND
 SANITARY SERVICE FOR THE NEW BUILDINGS.
  
 10. WILL FOOD BE PREPARED IN ANY OF THE PROPOSED NEW
 BUILDINGS?
  
 11. PRELIMINARY, UPDATED FEMA FLOOD INSURANCE MAPS ARE
 AVAILABLE AT HTTP://WWW.CO.PALM-BEACH.FL.US/NEWSROOM/08
 14/08-26-14-FLOOD_MAPS.HTM. PLEASE REVIEW THE MAPS AND
 VERIFY THAT THE NEW MAPS WILL NOT IMPACT THE PROPOSED
 PROJECT.
  
 12. PLEASE PROVIDE A COPY OF THE ALTA/ACSM SURVEY WHICH
 HAS BEEN SIGNED/SEALED BY PROFESSIONAL SURVEY & MAPPER
 (PSM).
  
 THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED IN THE PRIOR
 TO ISSUANCE OF CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZATION INCLUDING
 BUILDING PERMITS AND ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL.
  
 1. AS SEPARATE SUBMITTAL WILL BE REQUIRED TO THE
 ENGINEERING DIVISION OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT FOR
 ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL. THE ENGINEERING
 DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL APPLICATION FORMS CAN BE
 DOWNLOADED AT
 HTTP://WPB.ORG/ENGINEERING/FORMS-AND-PUBLICATIONS/
  
 2. AS SEPARATE SUBMITTAL WILL BE REQUIRED TO THE
 ENGINEERING DIVISION OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT FOR
 PLAT APPROVAL. PLEASE CONTACT VINCE NOEL AT
 [email protected] TO GET A COPY OF THE PLAT APPLICATION.
  
 3. SOLID WASTE YARDAGE WILL NEED TO BE ESTIMATED AS
 PART OF THE FINAL DESIGN TO VERIFY THAT THE DESIGN
 INCLUDES APPROPRIATE NUMBER AND SIZE OF TRASH BINS.
  
 4. A MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WILL BE REQUIRED FOR THE
 NON-STANDARD ELEMENTS (PAVERS) PROPOSED WITHIN TUXEDO
 RIGHT-OF-WAY.
  
 5. PLEASE IDENTIFY THE SOURCE OF THE AS-BUILT
 INFORMATION UTILIZED FOR THE POTABLE WATER, SANITARY
 SEWER, AND STORM SEWER DESIGN.
  
 6. INDICATE ON THE PLANS WHICH PORTIONS OF THE POTABLE
 WATER, SANITARY SEWER, AND STORMWATER SYSTEM WILL
 REMAIN PUBLICALLY OWNED AND WHICH SECTIONS WILL BE
 MAINTAINED BY THE APPLICANT. TYPICALLY, THE CITY'S
 OWNERSHIP STOPS AT THE RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE UNLESS
 EXTENUATING CIRCUMSTANCES REQUIRED THE OWNERSHIP
 DIVISION TO TAKE PLACE AT ANOTHER LOCATION.
  
 7. EASEMENTS WILL NEED TO BE PROVIDED OVER ALL ON-SITE
 PUBLICALLY OWNED UTILITIES.
  
 8. THE STRIPING AND MARKING PLAN MUST INCLUDE SIGN(S)
 ON SOUTH FLAGLER DRIVE NOTIFYING DRIVERS THAT
 NORTHBOUND LEFT TURNS INTO THE CAMPUS ARE PROHIBITED
 DURING DROP-OFF AND PICK-UP TIMES LISTED ON THE
 APPROVED TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN.
  
 9. THE STRIPING AND MARKING PLAN MUST INCLUDE SIGN(S)
 OR MARKINGS INDICATING THAT TUXEDO LANE AND COCOANUT
 LANE WILL BE CLOSED TO VEHICULAR TRAFFIC FROM 7:45 AM
 TO 5:00 PM. (RESOLUTION 376-10)
  
 10. APPLICATION SHOULD INCLUDE A COPY OF THE TRAFFIC
 CONTROL PLAN WHICH HAS BEEN APPROVED BY THE CITY?S
 TRAFFIC ENGINEER. PLAN WILL INCLUDE LOCATIONS OF
 TRAFFIC DIRECTING PERSONNEL AND A WRITTEN NARRATIVE
 DESCRIBING HOW THE TRAFFIC CONTROL OPERATIONS WILL
 FUNCTION FOR THE PICK-UP AND DROP-OFF TIMES. (ORDINANCE
 4303-10)
  
 11. DRAINAGE DESIGN CALCULATIONS MUST DEMONSTRATE WATER
 QUALITY TREATMENT AND STORM ATTENUATION ARE PROVIDED
 ON-SITE. (ORDINANCE 4303-10)
  
 KELLY CRANFORD, P.E.
 LAND DEVELOPMENT ENGINEER
 [email protected]
 561-494-1098 (OFFICE)
  
 VINCE NOEL, PSM
 CITY SURVEYOR / REAL ESTATE SUPERVISOR
 [email protected]
 561-494-1096
  
 BRIAN COLLINS, PE
 CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER
 [email protected]
 561-494-1040
  
 FERDINAND RIVERA
 PUBLIC WORKS OPERATIONS MANAGER
 [email protected]
 561-822-2076
  
 TRACY WARD, PE
 CITY STORMWATER ENGINEER
 561-494-1120
 [email protected]
  
  
Review Stop FIRE FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No 1 Status P Date 05-06-2015 Cont ID  
Sent By pleduc Date 05-06-2015 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By pleduc Date 05-06-2015 Time 14:41 Sent To  
Notes
2015-05-06 15:11:01THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS WERE SUBMITTED BY PETER LEDUC,
 FIRE MARSHAL, BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION, WEST PALM
 BEACH FIRE RESCUE.
  
 THIS REVIEW CAN ONLY BE CONSIDERED PRELIMINARY AS THE
 DRAWINGS THAT WERE REVIEWED WERE NOT COMPLETE.
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS CAN BE EXPECTED WHEN FULL DRAWINGS
 ARE SUBMITTED FOR PERMIT.
  
 THE FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU HAS NO OBJECTIONS TO THE
 PROPOSED PROJECT.
  
 1. SHOULD THE PROPOSED COVERD WALKWAY AND METAL TRELLIS
 TRAVERSE A VEHICLE TRAVEL LANE OR DROP OFF AREA, A
 HEIGHT OF 13' 6" MAY BE REQUIRED.
  
 2. ADDITONAL COMMENTS MAY BE MADE WHEN THE OFFICAIL
 PLAN IS SUBMITTED AND REVIEWED.
  
Review Stop L LANDSCAPING
Rev No 3 Status P Date 01-22-2016 Cont ID  
Sent By rcaranci Date 01-22-2016 Time 08:37 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rcaranci Date 01-22-2016 Time 08:37 Sent To  
Notes
2016-01-22 09:10:08FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER
 PROJECT: PALM BEACH DAY ACADEMY Z15040035
 JANUARY 21, 2016
 I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND
 PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:
  
 1. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE CALCULATIONS TO SHOW THE
 LANDSCAPING AROUND THE STRUCTURES MEETS THE 30%
 REQUIREMENT FOR TREES, SHRUBS OR HEDGES PER SECTION
 94-443 (E)(1).
  
 2. SATISFIED. THE LANDSCAPE BUFFER MUST BE LANDSCAPED
 AT THE NORTH PROPERTY LINE PER SECTION 94-443(A)(2).
 CONCRETE AREAS CANNOT EXTEND INTO THE 5 FOOT BUFFER.
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 8/28/15:
 3. SATISFIED. PLEASE CORRECT THE SPECIFICATION SIZES ON
 THE SILVER BUTTONWOOD AND WILD TAMARIND TO REFLECT ONLY
 ONE SIZE. THE WILD TAMARIND SHOULD BE 14? AS NOTED IN
 THE RESPONSE LETTER.
 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
 1. PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF THE CERTIFICATE OF
 OCCUPANCY FOR THE EDUCATION BUILDING, ALL INVASIVE
 EXOTIC PLANTS SHALL BE REMOVED FROM THE ENTIRE SITE AND
 VERIFIED BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT.
  
 2. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON
 THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE
 SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT
 SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION
  
 3. PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF THE LANDSCAPE PERMIT,
 LOCATIONS OF ROOT BARRIERS TO PROTECT INFRASTRUCTURE
 AND TREES FROM CONFLICTS SHALL BE SHOWN ON THE
 LANDSCAPE PLAN. THIS INCLUDES WATER, SEWER, DRAINAGE,
 SIDEWALKS AND CURBS, AND ANY FIELD STRUCTURES THAT
 COULD BE IMPACTED BY TREE ROOTS.
  
Review Stop L LANDSCAPING
Rev No 2 Status F Date 08-28-2015 Cont ID  
Sent By rcaranci Date 08-28-2015 Time 15:09 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rcaranci Date 08-28-2015 Time 15:09 Sent To  
Notes
2015-08-28 15:10:39FROM: RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER
 PROJECT: PALM BEACH DAY ACADEMY
 AUGUST 28, 2015
 I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND
 PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:
  
 1. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE CALCULATIONS TO SHOW THE
 LANDSCAPING AROUND THE STRUCTURES MEETS THE 30%
 REQUIREMENT FOR TREES, SHRUBS OR HEDGES PER SECTION
 94-443 (E)(1).
  
 2. SATISFIED. THE LANDSCAPE BUFFER MUST BE LANDSCAPED
 AT THE NORTH PROPERTY LINE PER SECTION 94-443(A)(2).
 CONCRETE AREAS CANNOT EXTEND INTO THE 5 FOOT BUFFER.
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 8/28/15:
 3. PLEASE CORRECT THE SPECIFICATION SIZES ON THE SILVER
 BUTTONWOOD AND WILD TAMARIND TO REFLECT ONLY ONE SIZE.
 THE WILD TAMARIND SHOULD BE 14? AS NOTED IN THE
 RESPONSE LETTER.
 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
 1. PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF THE CERTIFICATE OF
 OCCUPANCY FOR THE EDUCATION BUILDING, ALL INVASIVE
 EXOTIC PLANTS SHALL BE REMOVED FROM THE ENTIRE SITE AND
 VERIFIED BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT.
  
 2. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON
 THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE
 SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT
 SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.
  
  
Review Stop L LANDSCAPING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 05-12-2015 Cont ID  
Sent By rcaranci Date 05-12-2015 Time 16:26 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rcaranci Date 05-12-2015 Time 16:26 Sent To  
Notes
2015-05-12 16:29:311. PLEASE PROVIDE CALCULATIONS TO SHOW THE LANDSCAPING
 AROUND THE STRUCTURES MEETS THE 30% REQUIREMENT FOR
 TREES, SHRUBS OR HEDGES PER SECTION 94-443 (E)(1).
  
 2. THE LANDSCAPE BUFFER MUST BE LANDSCAPED AT THE NORTH
 PROPERTY LINE PER SECTION 94-443(A)(2). CONCRETE AREAS
 CANNOT EXTEND INTO THE 5 FOOT BUFFER.
 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
 1. PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF THE CERTIFICATE OF
 OCCUPANCY FOR THE EDUCATION BUILDING, ALL INVASIVE
 EXOTIC PLANTS SHALL BE REMOVED FROM THE ENTIRE SITE AND
 VERIFIED BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT.
  
 RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER
 561-822-1462
Review Stop PARK PARKING
Rev No 1 Status   Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time  
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop POLICE POLICE
Rev No 1 Status   Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time  
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop PW PUBLIC WORKS
Rev No 2 Status P Date 08-25-2015 Cont ID  
Sent By cranford Date 08-25-2015 Time 14:42 Rev Time 0.00
Received By cranford Date 08-25-2015 Time 14:42 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop PW PUBLIC WORKS
Rev No 1 Status F Date 05-08-2015 Cont ID  
Sent By cranford Date 05-08-2015 Time 13:36 Rev Time 0.00
Received By cranford Date 05-08-2015 Time 13:36 Sent To  
Notes
2015-05-08 13:36:41SEE COMMENTS UNDER PPRC ENGINEERING
Review Stop STORM STORMWATER
Rev No 2 Status P Date 08-25-2015 Cont ID  
Sent By cranford Date 08-25-2015 Time 14:43 Rev Time 0.00
Received By cranford Date 08-25-2015 Time 14:43 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop STORM STORMWATER
Rev No 1 Status F Date 05-08-2015 Cont ID  
Sent By cranford Date 05-08-2015 Time 13:37 Rev Time 0.00
Received By cranford Date 05-08-2015 Time 13:36 Sent To  
Notes
2015-05-08 13:37:06SEE COMMENTS UNDER PPRC ENGINEERING
Review Stop SURVEY SURVEYING
Rev No 2 Status P Date 08-25-2015 Cont ID  
Sent By cranford Date 08-25-2015 Time 14:43 Rev Time 0.00
Received By cranford Date 08-25-2015 Time 14:43 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop SURVEY SURVEYING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 05-08-2015 Cont ID  
Sent By cranford Date 05-08-2015 Time 13:37 Rev Time 0.00
Received By cranford Date 05-08-2015 Time 13:37 Sent To  
Notes
2015-05-08 13:37:27SEE COMMENTS UNDER PPRC ENGINEERING
Review Stop TRAFFIC TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No 1 Status P Date 05-08-2015 Cont ID  
Sent By cranford Date 05-08-2015 Time 13:37 Rev Time  
Received By cranford Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2015-05-08 13:38:13SEE COMMENTS UNDER PPRC ENGINEERING
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 4 Status P Date 07-05-2016 Cont ID  
Sent By eschneid Date 07-05-2016 Time 13:01 Rev Time 0.00
Received By eschneid Date 07-05-2016 Time 13:01 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 3 Status F Date 01-22-2016 Cont ID  
Sent By eschneid Date 01-22-2016 Time 18:16 Rev Time 3.00
Received By eschneid Date 01-21-2016 Time 15:24 Sent To  
Notes
2016-01-22 18:18:40PB 1600E
 PALM BEACH DAY ACADEMY MINOR PD AMENDMENT - 1ST
 RESUBMITTAL 12/10/15
 1901 SOUTH FLAGLER DRIVE
  
 - CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446
  
 - PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN
 WRITTEN FORMAT.
  
 - WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF SIX
 (6) PAPER COPIES AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY IN .PDF FORMAT
 OF ALL PLANS. PLEASE NOTE THAT CHANGES ON THE
 RESUBMITTED PLANS OR THE SUBMITTAL OF INFORMATION/PLANS
 TO ADDRESS THE COMMENTS MAY RESULT IN ADDITIONAL
 COMMENTS.
  
 - PLEASE NOTE THAT IF THE PLANNING DIVISION HAS NOT
 RECEIVED A RESPONSE TO THE PPRC COMMENTS WITHIN 60 DAYS
 FROM THE DATE OF THESE COMMENTS (BY APRIL 22, 2016),
 THE CASE SHALL BE CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN. ANY FURTHER
 ACTION SHALL REQUIRE A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION.
  
 - PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1)
 ADDITIONAL RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF
 PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE
 SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE APPLICANT WILL BE ACCESSED
 A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL
 APPLICATION FEE ($60).
  
 1) FENCES AND GATES
  
 A. REVISED COMMENT: THE FENCE EXHIBIT PLAN SHOWS GATES
 THAT DO NOT COMPLY WITH RESOLUTION NO. 376-10. WHAT IS
 SHOWN AS GATE NO. 3 IS NOT INCLUDED IN THE TEMPORARY
 STREET CLOSURE, AND IT BLOCKS PEDESTRIANS AND
 BICYCLISTS FROM ACCESSING THE LIMITED STREET CLOSURE
 AREA ROADWAYS WHEN THEY ARE CLOSED TO VEHICULAR
 TRAFFIC. GATES WITHIN THE ROW NOT APPROVED BY
 RESOLUTION NO. 376-10 SHALL BE REMOVED FROM THE PLANS
 PRIOR TO APPROVAL OF THE MINOR AMENDMENT.
  
 B. REVISED COMMENT - CONDITION: THE RETAINING WALL WITH
 ADDITIONAL FENCING PROPOSED AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF
 THE ATHLETIC COMPLEX EXCEEDS THE ALLOWANCE OF SECTION
 94-302(C), WHICH ONLY PERMITS WALLS AND FENCES TO BE 48
 INCHES HIGH WITHIN THE FRONT SETBACK. THE HEIGHT IS
 MEASURED FROM THE EXTERIOR OF THE WALL, WHICH IN THIS
 EXCEEDS THE 48 INCHES IN HEIGHT. THE RESPONSE COMMENTS
 STATE THAT THIS WAS PREVIOUSLY APPROVED, WHICH IS
 INCORRECT. STAFF HAD REQUESTED INFORMATION ON THIS
 DURING THE REVIEW OF THE FORMAL SITE PLAN IN 2011 BUT
 WAS NEVER PROVIDED THE INFORMATION THAT WAS PROVIDED
 WITH THIS CURRENT APPLICATION. STAFF WILL CONDITION
 THIS APPROVAL THAT PRIOR TO APPROVAL OF BUILDING PERMIT
 FOR THE ATHLETIC COMPLEX, EITHER THE WALL IS
 CONSTRUCTED AT THE CODE PERMITTED 48 INCHES IN HEIGHT
 WITHIN THE FRONT SETBACK, THE WALL IS MOVED OUT OF THE
 SETBACK, OR A MAJOR PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT IS
 APPROVED BY THE CITY COMMISSION THAT GRANTS A WAIVER TO
 PERMIT A WALL EXCEEDING 48 INCHES WITHIN THE FRONT
 SETBACK.
  
 C. CONDITION: STAFF WILL APPROVE THE GENERAL LOCATION
 AND DESIGN OF THE WALLS, FENCES AND GATES AS PART OF
 THIS AMENDMENT. THE FINAL HEIGHT, DESIGN AND LOCATION
 WILL BE APPROVED AS PART OF THE BUILDING PERMIT
 APPLICATIONS FOR THE WALLS, GATES AND FENCES IN
 ACCORDANCE WITH THE REGULATIONS APPROVED AT THE TIME OF
 THE BUILDING PERMIT.
  
 2) REPEAT COMMENT: THE SITE DATA CHART SHALL REFERENCE
 RESOLUTION NO. 144-11, NOT ORDINANCE NO. 4303-10, AS IT
 IS THE LATEST LEGISLATION FOR THE SITE. THE REQUIRED
 SETBACKS FOR THE RELOCATED (OUT) BUILDING SHALL REFLECT
 THE APPROVED "REQUIRED" SETBACKS OF FRONT - FIVE FEET
 AND CORNER SIDE - 17 FEET. PLANS SHALL BE CORRECTED
 PRIOR TO APPROVAL OF THE MINOR AMENDMENT.
  
 3) REPEAT COMMENT: CORRECT THE DESIGNATION AND
 DIMENSION OF THE SETBACKS ON THE SITE DATA TABLE,
 INCLUDING THE PITT BUILDING AND THE OTHER FINAL SCHOOL
 BUILDINGS. LISTED SETBACKS CONFLICT WITH THE DIMENSIONS
 PROVIDED ON THE SURVEY. PLANS SHALL BE CORRECTED PRIOR
 TO APPROVAL OF THE MINOR AMENDMENT.
  
 4) NEW COMMENT: THERE ARE 10 BICYCLE PARKING SPACES,
 NOT FIVE, PROVIDED AS STATED ON THE SITE DATA TABLE.
 PLANS SHALL BE CORRECTED PRIOR TO APPROVAL OF THE MINOR
 AMENDMENT.
  
 5) NEW COMMENT: THE RELOCATED BUS PARKING HAS REMOVED
 TWO OF THE REQUIRED PARKING SPACES FROM THE SITE (61
 REQUIRED). PLANS SHOWING 61 PARKING PACED SHALL BE
 PROVIDED PRIOR TO APPROVAL OF THE MINOR AMENDMENT.
  
 6) REPEAT COMMENT - CONDITION: AN UPDATED LIGHTING PLAN
 IS REQUIRED WHICH CONFORMS TO THE NEW PEDESTRIAN PATH
 CONFIGURATION. PLEASE REMEMBER THE LIGHTING LEVELS MAY
 NOT EXCEED 0.5 FOOTCANDLES AT THE RESIDENTIAL ZONING
 BOUNDARIES (INCLUDING THE PEDESTRIAN LIGHTING). NO
 LIGHTING PLAN WAS SUBMITTED. CONFORMING PLANS SHALL BE
 PROVIDE PRIOR TO APPROVAL OF THE MINOR AMENDMENT.
  
 7) REVISED COMMENT - CONDITION: THE SQUARE FOOTAGE
 SHOWN ON THE BUILDING, THE SITE WALL AND THE NEW
 MONUMENT SIGN COMPLY WITH SQUARE FOOTAGE REQUIREMENTS.
 ITEMS THAT WILL NEED CLARIFICATION/CORRECTION AT TIME
 OF PERMITTING ARE THAT EXACT LOCATION OF THE SIGN ON
 THE SITE WALL. IT IS UNCLEAR IF IT IS MOUNTED TO THE
 PORTION OF THE WALL THAT IS SETBACK 25 FEET FROM
 FLAGLER DRIVE. FINAL SIGNAGE APPROVAL WILL OCCUR DURING
 THE BUILDING PERMIT REVIEW. PLEASE NOTE THAT THE SIGN
 SHOWN ON PLANS AS "EXISTING SIGN TO BE MODIFIED" DOES
 NOT EXIST AND SHALL BE REMOVED FROM THE PLANS. PLANS
 SHALL BE CORRECTED PRIOR TO APPROVAL OF THE MINOR
 AMENDMENT.
  
 8) REPEAT COMMENT: THE CIVIL PLAN SUBMITTED WITH THE
 MINOR SUBDIVISION APPLICATION DOES NOT MATCH THE PLAT
 AND SITE PLAN FOR THE PEDESTRIAN EASEMENT - THE PAVERED
 PEDESTRIAN PATH IS NOT WITHIN THE EASEMENT AT THE
 SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE PROPERTY. WHY DOES THIS
 DISCREPANCY CONTINUE TO OCCUR? ALL PLANS SHALL AGREE ON
 THE PATH AND THUS THE EASEMENT. IF THE PLAT AND SITE
 PLAN ARE CORRECT, THEN THE CIVIL PLAN WILL NEED TO BE
 CORRECTED AS PART OF THE MINOR AMENDMENT APPLICATION.
 PLEASE NOTE THAT STAFF WILL NOT PERMIT THE PAVERED
 WALKWAY TO CROSS THE MANHOLE COVER AS SHOWN ON THE
 CIVIL PLAN.
  
 9) CONDITION: PLEASE BE AWARE THAT PLANNING STAFF IS
 ACCEPTING THE LANDSCAPE THAT HAS BEEN SHOWN WITHIN THE
 DRAINAGE EASEMENT. ROOT BARRIERS WILL BE REQUIRED TO
 PROTECT ANY UNDERGROUND INFRASTRUCTURE. IF THE
 VEGETATION CAUSES THE DRAINAGE FACILITIES TO NOT
 FUNCTION PROPERLY OR DOES NOT SURVIVE IN THE PLANTED
 AREAS, THEN THE LANDSCAPE WILL NEED TO BE REPLACED.
  
 10) CONDITION: ALL PERIMETER BUFFERS, PARKING LOT
 LANDSCAPE AND FOUNDATION PLANTINGS NEED TO BE INSTALLED
 AS PART OF THE INTERIM PLAN.
  
  
  
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 2 Status F Date 10-26-2015 Cont ID  
Sent By eschneid Date 10-26-2015 Time 16:23 Rev Time 8.00
Received By eschneid Date 10-26-2015 Time 16:23 Sent To  
Notes
2015-10-26 16:24:15PB 1600E
 PALM BEACH DAY ACADEMY MINOR PD AMENDMENT
 1901 SOUTH FLAGLER DRIVE
  
 - CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446
  
 - PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN
 WRITTEN FORMAT.
  
 - WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF SIX
 (6) PAPER COPIES AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY IN .PDF FORMAT
 OF ALL PLANS. PLEASE NOTE THAT CHANGES ON THE
 RESUBMITTED PLANS OR THE SUBMITTAL OF INFORMATION/PLANS
 TO ADDRESS THE COMMENTS MAY RESULT IN ADDITIONAL
 COMMENTS.
  
 - PLEASE NOTE THAT IF THE PLANNING DIVISION HAS NOT
 RECEIVED A RESPONSE TO THE PPRC COMMENTS WITHIN 60 DAYS
 FROM THE DATE OF THESE COMMENTS (BY DECEMBER 26, 2015),
 THE CASE SHALL BE CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN. ANY FURTHER
 ACTION SHALL REQUIRE A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION.
  
 - PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1)
 ADDITIONAL RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF
 PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE
 SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE APPLICANT WILL BE ACCESSED
 A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL
 APPLICATION FEE ($60).
  
 1) REPEAT COMMENT: ALL PLANS SHALL MATCH THE CURRENT
 "AS BUILT" CONDITIONS OF THE WESTERN PORTION OF THE
 SITE. AN EXAMPLE OF WHERE PLANS DO NOT MATCH - THREE
 COMPACT PARKING SPACES WERE CONSTRUCTED, NOT TWO AS
 SHOWN ON THE SITE AND LANDSCAPE PLANS. ALL PLANS AND
 DATA TABLES SHALL BE UPDATED ACCORDINGLY. NOTE: THE
 SITE PLAN INCLUDES A NOTE THAT THE 2010 SURVEY WAS USED
 AS A BASE, NOT THE CURRENT 2015 SURVEY.
  
 2) REVISED COMMENT: THE UTILITY FEATURES ARE NOT
 IDENTIFIED ON THE LANDSCAPE PLANS. THIS IS REQUIRED SO
 THAT STAFF CAN VERIFY THERE ARE NOT CONFLICTS. PLEASE
 NOTE: RESOLUTION NO. 144-11 REQUIRES THAT IF THE
 EXISTING ANNE NORTON SCULPTURE GARDEN MATURE TREES
 ALONG THE BUFFER ARE REMOVED, THEN THE PALM BEACH DAY
 ACADEMY SHALL INSTALL THE REQUIRED BUFFER TREES. THERE
 SHALL BE A FIVE (5) FOOT AREA, CLEAR OF UTILITY,
 DRAINAGE OR THE PEDESTRIAN ACCESS EASEMENT AVAILABLE
 ALONG THE SOUTH PROPERTY LINE FOR LANDSCAPE THAT IS
 SEGREGATED FROM THE PEDESTRIAN ACCESS EASEMENT.
  
 3) REPEAT COMMENT: THE PEDESTRIAN PATH SHALL BE A
 SMOOTH CURVILINEAR PATH A MINIMUM OF FIVE (5) FEET IN
 WIDTH. IT SHALL NOT HAVE THE RIGHT ANGLES AS SHOWN ON
 THE PROPOSED PLAN. THE PEDESTRIAN ACCESS EASEMENT SHALL
 BE A MINIMUM OF FIVE (5) FEET WIDE FOR ITS ENTIRE
 LENGTH. THE SECTION NORTH OF THE PITT BUILDING SCALES
 AS NARROW AS 3.5 FEET IN WIDTH. ADDITIONALLY, THERE IS
 A LIGHT POLE SHOWN IN THIS AREA ON THE SITE PLAN THAT
 FURTHER REDUCES THE WIDTH OF THE PEDESTRIAN PATH TO
 LESS THAN THREE (3) FEET IN WIDTH. NOTE: THE PEDESTRIAN
 PATH NOTICE SIGNAGE SHALL NOT BE PLACED IN THE MIDDLE
 OF THE PATH, BUT OFF TO THE SIDE.
  
 4) NEW COMMENT: THE SITE PLAN SUBMITTED SHOWS AN
 OVERLAP OF THE LANDSCAPE BUFFER WITH THE PEDESTRIAN
 ACCESS EASEMENT AND PATH. THIS IN NOT PERMITTED.
 RESOLUTION NO. 144-11 REQUIRES THAT THE PUBLIC
 PEDESTRIAN ACCESS EASEMENT AREA SHALL NOT BE USED FOR
 THE PARKING OF VEHICLES, FOR THE LOCATION OF ANY REFUSE
 CONTAINER, OR FOR TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT LOCATION OF
 OTHER ITEMS WHICH WILL OBSTRUCT THE EASEMENT AREA.
  
 5) REPEAT COMMENT: PLEASE PROVIDE A PLAN WHICH SHOWS
 JUST THE FENCES AND GATES AND HOW THE VARIOUS PORTIONS
 OF THE CAMPUS WILL BE SECURED DURING SCHOOL AND NOT
 SCHOOL HOURS (THIS INCLUDES THE TUXEDO AND COCOANUT
 ROWS). THE PLAN SHALL DEMONSTRATE HOW THE OPEN GATES
 WILL NOT ENCROACH INTO THE ROW. IN ACCORDANCE WITH
 RESOLUTION NO. 376-10, PLEASE PROVIDE HOW PEDESTRIANS
 AND BICYCLISTS CAN ACCESS THE LIMITED STREET CLOSURE
 AREA ROADWAYS WHEN THEY ARE CLOSED TO VEHICULAR
 TRAFFIC. PLEASE REMEMBER THAT PBDA AGREED TO NOT GATE
 THE DRIVE BETWEEN THE PITT AND UNITY BUILDINGS SO AS TO
 CONTINUE TO PERMIT NEIGHBOR VEHICULAR ACCESS THROUGH
 THE SITE WHEN SCHOOL IS NOT IN SESSION. THIS HAS NOT
 BEEN CLEARLY DEMONSTRATED ON THE RESUBMITTED PLANS.
 ADDITIONALLY, THERE ARE FENCES AND GATES SHOWN WITHIN
 THE RIGHT-OF-WAY AT THE CURVE IN COCOANUT LANE THAT ARE
 NOT INCLUDED WITH THE APPROVAL OF THE LIMITED STREET
 CLOSURE GRANTED BY RESOLUTION NO. 376-10.
  
 5) REPEAT COMMENT: THE ALUMINUM FENCES AND GATES NEED
 TO PROVIDE THE HEIGHT ON THE DETAIL PLANS.
  
 6) NEW COMMENT: STAFF IS UNCLEAR AS TO WHAT THE FEATURE
 IS AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE ATHLETIC COMPLEX. IS
 THIS A WALL? A PATIO? A PATIO WITH A WALL? IT
 ENCROACHES INTO THE FRONT 25 FOOT SETBACK. PLEASE
 PROVIDE DETAILS FOR THIS FEATURE. DEPENDING ON WHAT
 THIS ACTUALLY IS WILL DETERMINE IF IT IS PERMITTED TO
 ENCROACH INTO THE SETBACK.
  
 7) REPEAT COMMENT: THE SITE DATA CHART SHALL REFERENCE
 RESOLUTION NO. 144-11, NOT ORDINANCE NO. 4303-10, AS IT
 IS THE LATEST LEGISLATION FOR THE SITE. THE REQUIRED
 SETBACKS FOR THE RELOCATED (OUT) BUILDING SHALL REFLECT
 THE APPROVED SETBACKS OF FRONT - FIVE FEET AND CORNER
 SIDE - 17 FEET.
  
 8) REVISED COMMENT: CORRECT THE DESIGNATION AND
 DIMENSION OF THE SETBACKS ON THE SITE DATA TABLE,
 INCLUDING THE PITT BUILDING AND THE OTHER FINAL SCHOOL
 BUILDINGS.
  
 9) REPEAT COMMENT: PROVIDE WRITTEN VERIFICATION FROM
 THE CITY'S ENGINEERING SERVICES DIVISION THAT THE
 4-SQUARE AND OTHER ITEMS APPLIED TO THE LIMITED CLOSURE
 SURFACE ARE PERMITTED BY ROADWAY STANDARDS. IF THIS
 APPROVAL IS NOT PROVIDED PRIOR TO SITE PLAN APPROVAL,
 THEN THE FEATURES SHALL BE REMOVED FROM THE PLANS.
  
 10) REPEAT COMMENT: THE APPROVED FORMAL SITE PLAN
 REQUIRES A SIX (6) FOOT PODOCARPUS HEDGE (AT
 INSTALLATION) ALONG COCOANUT LANE TO SCREEN THE BUS
 PARKING. THE HEDGE IS TO MEET THE BUS PARKING SCREENING
 REQUIREMENT OF RESOLUTION NO. 144-11. THE WILD TAMARIND
 TREE DOES NOT PROVIDE A VISUAL SCREEN AT BUS HEIGHT
 LEVEL. IT FURTHERMORE IS CLASSIFIED AS A MEDIUM TO
 LARGE TREE THAT WOULD NOT GROW ADEQUATELY WITHIN THE
 FIVE (5) FOOT LANDSCAPE AREA. ADDITIONALLY, THE USE OF
 THE NATAL PLUM SHRUB AT AN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL AND
 ADJACENT TO A PEDESTRIAN PATH IS NOT APPROPRIATE SINCE
 THE PLANT HAS SPINES (FROM UF IFAS EXTENSION "...IT
 SHOULD NOT BE PLANTED TOO CLOSELY TO WALKWAYS WHERE ITS
 LARGE, FORKED THORNS CAN INJURE PASSERSBY...")
  
 11) REVISED COMMENT: THE BUS PARKING SHOWN IN THE
 WESTERN PARKING AREA DURING THE INTERIM PLAN DOES NOT
 COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF RESOLUTION NO. 144-11.
 PLEASE PROVIDE HOW BUS PARKING WILL BE PROVIDED AND
 SCREENED IN ACCORDANCE WITH RESOLUTION NO. 144-11
 DURING THE INTERIM PHASE, ESPECIALLY IF THE UNITY
 BUILDING IS REMOVED.
  
 12) NEW COMMENT: THE LANDSCAPE FOR THE ENTIRE CAMPUS
 LANDSCAPE SHALL BE SHOWN ON THE LANDSCAPE PLANS. THIS
 SET OF PLANS WILL BE THE RECORD DRAWINGS.
  
 13) REVISED COMMENT: ALL PERIMETER BUFFERS, PARKING LOT
 LANDSCAPE AND FOUNDATION PLANTINGS NEED TO BE INSTALLED
 AS PART OF THE INTERIM PLAN.
  
 15) REPEAT COMMENT: PROVIDE THE HEIGHT OF THE BOAT MAST
 AND THE BOAT'S SETBACK FROM THE NORTH PROPERTY LINE.
 THE HEIGHT HAS NOT BEEN SHOWN ON THE BOAT DETAIL AND
 THE SETBACK IS NOT SHOWN ON THE PLANS.
  
 16) REVISED COMMENT: THE BICYCLE RACKS SHALL HAVE A
 MINIMUM SEPARATION OF 30 INCHES. THE BICYCLE RACK
 DETAIL SHALL BE REVISED TO REFLECT THIS STANDARD AND
 THE PAD SHALL BE INCREASED ACCORDINGLY. THE CORRECTED
 BICYCLE RACK PAD SHALL BE SHOWN ON ALL OF THE RELEVANT
 DRAWINGS.
  
 17) REPEAT COMMENT: AN UPDATED LIGHTING PLAN IS
 REQUIRED WHICH CONFORMS TO THE NEW PEDESTRIAN PATH
 CONFIGURATION. PLEASE REMEMBER THE LIGHTING LEVELS MAY
 NOT EXCEED 0.5 FOOTCANDLES AT THE RESIDENTIAL ZONING
 BOUNDARIES (INCLUDING THE PEDESTRIAN LIGHTING). NO
 LIGHTING PLAN WAS SUBMITTED. THERE ARE STILL POLES
 SHOWN WITHIN THE PEDESTRIAN EASEMENT.
  
 18) REPEAT COMMENT: THE PLANS AND ELEVATIONS SHOW
 SIGNAGE. PROVIDE SIGNAGE DETAILS SO STAFF MAY REVIEW
 FOR CODE COMPLIANCE. THIS WILL ENSURE THAT THE SIGN
 PERMITTING PROCESS GOES SMOOTHLY. INSUFFICIENT DETAILS
 TO VERIFY THE SIGNAGE WERE PROVIDED, SPECIFICALLY THE
 LENGTH OF THE SIGNS.
  
 19) REVISED COMMENT: THE FINISHED FLOOR ELEVATION TAG
 FOR THE ACADEMIC BUILDING'S SOUTH ELEVATION IS SHOWN
 ALMOST THREE (3) FEET ABOVE THE GRADE.
  
 20) REPEAT COMMENT: PROVIDE A ROOF PLAN TO SHOW THE
 LOCATION OF THE NEW ROOFTOP MECHANICAL AREAS. NO SHEET
 A2.0 WAS PROVIDED AS STATED IN THE RESPONSE COMMENTS.
  
 21) REPEAT COMMENT: THE MECHANICAL SCREEN WALL
 ELEVATION IS SHOWN AT 130 FEET, YET THE TOP OF THE WALL
 IS ALSO 130 FEET. PLEASE CORRECT THE ELEVATIONS.
  
 22) REPEAT COMMENT: PROVIDE FLOOR PLANS OF THE TWO NEW
 BUILDINGS THAT MATCH THE ELEVATIONS. THE FLOOR PLANS
 ARE DATED 2010, YET THE REVISED BUILDING ELEVATIONS ARE
 FROM 2015. THERE ARE DIFFERENCES IN WINDOWS AND DOORS.
  
 23) REPEAT COMMENT: WHY WERE THE HORIZONTAL SUN CONTROL
 AND LOUVER ELEMENTS REMOVED FROM THE BUILDING
 ELEVATIONS? NOT ONLY ARE THESE ELEMENTS FOUND ON THE
 EXISTING CLASSROOM BUILDING, BUT THEY WOULD GO A LONG
 WAY TO HELPING MAKE THE LARGE MECHANICAL SCREEN
 ENCLOSURES BLEND MORE WITH THE BUILDING ARCHITECTURE.
 PLEASE REMEMBER THAT THESE ELEMENTS WERE PRESENTED TO
 THE NEIGHBORHOOD AS PART OF THE ORIGINAL APPROVAL
 PROCESS TO GET THEIR SUPPORT IN ACCORDANCE WITH
 RESOLUTION NO. 144-11. THE STONE AND TILE VENEER THAT
 HAVE BEEN REMOVED WERE ALSO PART OF THE PACKAGE
 PRESENTED TO THE NEIGHBORHOOD AND CITY COMMISSION.
 NOTE: THE REMOVAL OF THESE ELEMENTS WILL REQUIRE THE
 NEW ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN TO BE PRESENTED TO THE
 NEIGHBORHOOD FOR THEIR SUPPORT PRIOR TO STAFF APPROVAL.
  
 24) CONDITION REMINDER: PLEASE REMEMBER THAT PER ORD.
 NO. 144-11, THE FOLLOWING ARE REQUIRED PRIOR TO THE
 FIRST BUILDING PERMIT FOR THE NEXT PHASE:
  
 A. PREPARE A CONSTRUCTION SITE SECURITY AND MANAGEMENT
 PLAN FOR APPROVAL BY THE CITY'S POLICE DEPARTMENT CRIME
 PREVENTION THROUGH ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGN (CPTED)
 OFFICIAL.
  
 B. RECORD A PLAT FOR THE ENTIRE PBDA CAMPUS. PRIOR TO
 RECORDATION, THE PLAT SHALL BE SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW
 THROUGH THE MINOR SUBDIVISION PROCESS TO INCLUDE ALL
 REQUIRED EASEMENTS. THE RELOCATION AND/OR ABANDONMENT
 OF EASEMENTS WILL REQUIRE APPLICATIONS TO BE FILED WITH
 THE ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT.
  
 C. SUBMIT COMPREHENSIVE EMERGENCY PLANS TO THE FIRE
 DEPARTMENT FOR THEIR APPROVAL.
  
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 05-11-2015 Cont ID  
Sent By eschneid Date 05-11-2015 Time 17:25 Rev Time 10.00
Received By eschneid Date 05-11-2015 Time 17:25 Sent To  
Notes
2015-05-11 17:27:40PB 1600E
 PALM BEACH DAY ACADEMY MINOR PD AMENDMENT
 1901 SOUTH FLAGLER DRIVE
  
 - CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446
  
 - PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN
 WRITTEN FORMAT.
  
 - WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF SIX
 (6) PAPER COPIES AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY IN .PDF FORMAT
 OF ALL PLANS. PLEASE NOTE THAT CHANGES ON THE
 RESUBMITTED PLANS OR THE SUBMITTAL OF INFORMATION/PLANS
 TO ADDRESS THE COMMENTS MAY RESULT IN ADDITIONAL
 COMMENTS.
  
 - PLEASE NOTE THAT IF THE PLANNING DIVISION HAS NOT
 RECEIVED A RESPONSE TO THE PPRC COMMENTS WITHIN 60 DAYS
 FROM THE DATE OF THE PPRC MEETING (BY JULY 13, 2015),
 THE CASE SHALL BE CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN. ANY FURTHER
 ACTION SHALL REQUIRE A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION.
  
 - PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1)
 RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED
 COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE
 APPLICANT WILL BE ACCESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE
 WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE ($60).
  
 1) AN UPDATED SURVEY IS REQUIRED. IT SHALL INCLUDE THE
 CURRENT "AS BUILT" CONDITIONS OF THE WESTERN PORTION OF
 THE SITE. THIS CONDITION SHALL BE THEN REFLECTED ON ALL
 THE PLANS. AN EXAMPLE OF DISCREPANCY - THREE COMPACT
 PARKING SPACES WERE CONSTRUCTED, NOT TWO AS SHOWN ON
 THE SITE AND LANDSCAPE PLANS. ALL PLANS AND DATE TABLES
 SHALL BE UPDATED ACCORDINGLY.
  
 2) NO PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING/CIVIL PLAN FOR THE NEW
 LAYOUT WAS PROVIDED.
  
 3) THE PEDESTRIAN PATH SHALL BE A SMOOTH CURVILINEAR
 PATH A MINIMUM OF FIVE (5) FEET IN WIDTH. IT SHALL NOT
 HAVE THE RIGHT ANGLES AS SHOWN ON THE PROPOSED PLAN.
 THE PATH IS SHOW AS LITTLE AS THREE (3) FEET WIDE IN
 PLACES.
  
 4) THE PRESCHOOL DROP OFF PULL OUT SHALL HAVE ROUNDED
 INTERIOR CORNERS TO FACILITATE A MORE PEDESTRIAN
 FRIENDLY PATH.
  
 5) PLEASE PROVIDE A PLAN THAT SHOWS JUST THE FENCES AND
 GATES AND HOW THE VARIOUS PORTIONS OF THE CAMPUS WILL
 BE SECURED DURING SCHOOL AND NOT SCHOOL HOURS (THIS
 INCLUDES THE TUXEDO AND COCOANUT ROWS). THE PLAN SHALL
 DEMONSTRATE HOW THE OPEN GATES WILL NOT ENCROACH INTO
 THE ROW. IN ACCORDANCE WITH RESOLUTION NO. 376-10,
 PLEASE PROVIDE HOW PEDESTRIANS AND BICYCLISTS CAN
 ACCESS THE LIMITED STREET CLOSURE AREA ROADWAYS WHEN
 THEY ARE CLOSED TO VEHICULAR TRAFFIC? PLEASE REMEMBER
 THAT PBDA AGREED TO NOT GATE THE DRIVE BETWEEN THE PITT
 AND UNITY BUILDINGS SO AS TO CONTINUE TO PERMIT
 NEIGHBOR VEHICULAR ACCESS THROUGH THE SITE WHEN SCHOOL
 IS NOT IN SESSION.
  
 6) DESIGNATE WHERE EACH FENCE TYPE WILL BE LOCATED. THE
 ALUMINUM FENCES AND GATES NEED TO PROVIDE THE HEIGHT ON
 THE DETAIL PLANS.
  
 7) WALLS WITHIN THE FRONT 25 FOOT SETBACK FROM FLAGLER
 DRIVE MAY NOT EXCEED FOUR (4) FEET IN HEIGHT, MEASURED
 FROM THE EXTERIOR GRADE AT THE PROPERTY LINE AT FLAGLER
 DRIVE. THE WALL IS SHOWN AS HIGH AS 7.5 FEET IN HEIGHT
 ABOVE THE GRADE INSIDE THE WALL, WHICH IS TOO HIGH, AND
 INCREASES THREE (3) FEET IN HEIGHT WHEN MEASURED AT
 FLAGLER DRIVE. THE HIGHEST POINT OF THE WALL
 ESTABLISHES ITS HEIGHT.
  
 8) THE SITE DATA CHART SHALL REFERENCE RESOLUTION NO.
 144-11, NOT ORDINANCE NO. 4303-10, AS IT IS THE LATEST
 LEGISLATION FOR THE SITE. THE REQUIRED SETBACKS FOR THE
 RELOCATED BUILDING SHALL REFLECT THE APPROVED SETBACKS
 OF FRONT - FIVE FEET AND CORNER SITE - 17 FEET.
  
 9) THE PITT BUILDING SETBACKS ARE LESS THAN THE
 SETBACKS LISTED ON THE FORMAL SITE PLAN APPROVED PLANS.
  
 10) PROVIDE WRITTEN VERIFICATION FROM THE CITY'S
 ENGINEERING SERVICES DIVISION THAT THE 4-SQUARE AND
 OTHER ITEMS APPLIED TO THE LIMITED CLOSURE SURFACE ARE
 PERMITTED BY ROADWAY STANDARDS.
  
 11) THE APPROVED FORMAL SITE PLAN REQUIRES A SIX (6)
 FOOT PODOCARPUS HEDGE (AT INSTALLATION) ALONG COCOANUT
 LANE TO SCREEN THE BUS PARKING.
  
 12) WHERE IS THE BUS PARKING IN THE INTERIM PLAN? HOW
 WILL THE BUS PARKING BE SCREENED IN ACCORDANCE WITH
 RESOLUTION NO. 144-11?
  
 13) HOW DOES THE ADA PARKING WORK IN THE INTERIM PLAN?
 THIS REQUIRES WRITTEN CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DIVISION
 APPROVAL.
  
 14) HOW DOES THE LANDSCAPE INSTALLATION WORK ON THE
 INTERIM PLAN? IT NEEDS TO COMPLY WITH THE CITY'S
 LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS.
  
 15) HOW THE EXISTING SIDEWALK ON INTERIM PLAN TIES INTO
 THE NEW SIDEWALK NETWORK NEEDS TO BE SHOWN.
  
 16) PROVIDE THE HEIGHT OF THE BOAT MAST AND THE BOAT'S
 SETBACK FROM THE NORTH PROPERTY LINE.
  
 17) PROVIDE DETAILS OF THE INTERPRETATIVE SIGN AND THE
 WIND SCULPTURE WHICH ARE LOCATED WITHIN THE FRONT
 SETBACK.
  
 18) VERIFY THAT THE DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE GATE OPENING IS
 A MINIMUM OF 12.5 FEET WIDE.
  
 19) THE DIMENSION TAGS ON THE PARKING STALL DETAILS ARE
 UNREADABLE. PLEASE INCREASE THE FONT SIZE.
  
 20) IS THE INTENT TO HAVE 18 FOOT DEEP PARKING SPACES
 WITH AN ADDITIONAL TWO (2) FOOT OVERHANG FOR THE
 VISITOR SPACES?
  
 21) PROVIDE DETAILS, WITH DIMENSIONS, FOR THE BICYCLE
 RACKS AND PADS. THE LAYOUT SHOWN ON THE SITE PLAN DOES
 NOT SEEM COMPLY WITH THE DIMENSION SHOWN ON THE PLAN.
  
 22) THE LANDSCAPE PLAN SHOWS FEATURES TO THE EAST OF
 THE BICYCLE RACK THAT ARE NOT SHOWN ON THE SITE PLAN.
 WHAT ARE THESE?
  
 23) WHY ARE THERE AREAS TO THE NORTH OF THE EDUCATION
 BUILDING THAT DO NOT HAVE A LANDSCAPE BUFFER, AND IN
 FACT HAVE PAVING TO THE PROPERTY LINE?
  
 24) THE SHRUBS AROUND THE TRANSFORMER ARE NOT SHOWN AND
 DESIGNATED ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN.
  
 25) IT APPEARS THAT THE FIRE HYDRANTS ALONG FLAGLER
 DRIVE ARE LOCATED WITHIN PLANTING BEDS. PLEASE VERIFY
 WITH THE FIRE DEPARTMENT THAT THE TYPES OF PLANTINGS
 ARE PERMITTED AROUND THE HYDRANTS.
  
 26) AN UPDATED LIGHTING PLAN IS REQUIRED WHICH CONFORMS
 TO THE NEW PEDESTRIAN PATH CONFIGURATION. PLEASE
 REMEMBER THE LIGHTING LEVELS MAY NOT EXCEED 0.5
 FOOTCANDLES AT THE RESIDENTIAL ZONING BOUNDARIES
 (INCLUDING THE PEDESTRIAN LIGHTING).
  
 27) THE PLANS AND ELEVATIONS SHOW SIGNAGE. PROVIDE
 SIGNAGE DETAILS SO STAFF MAY REVIEW FOR CODE
 COMPLIANCE. THIS WILL ENSURE THAT THE SIGN PERMITTING
 PROCESS GOES SMOOTHLY.
  
 28) THE CITY MEASURES THE HEIGHT OF STRUCTURES FROM THE
 FINISHED GRADE NOT THE FINISHED FLOOR. PLEASE PROVIDE
 THE HEIGHT DIMENSIONS BASED ON THIS STANDARD.
  
 29) PROVIDE A ROOF PLAN TO SHOW THE LOCATION OF THE NEW
 ROOFTOP MECHANICAL AREAS.
  
 30) THE MECHANICAL SCREEN WALL ELEVATION IS SHOWN AT
 130 FEET, YET THE TOP OF THE WALL IS ALSO 130 FEET.
 PLEASE CORRECT THE ELEVATIONS.
  
 31) PROVIDE FLOOR PLANS OF THE TWO NEW BUILDINGS THAT
 MATCH THE ELEVATIONS.
  
 32) WHY WERE THE HORIZONTAL SUN CONTROL AND LOUVER
 ELEMENTS REMOVED FROM THE BUILDING ELEVATIONS? NOT ONLY
 ARE THESE ELEMENTS FOUND ON THE EXISTING CLASSROOM
 BUILDING, BUT THEY WOULD GO A LONG WAY TO HELPING MAKE
 THE LARGE MECHANICAL SCREEN ENCLOSURES BLEND MORE WITH
 THE BUILDING ARCHITECTURE. PLEASE REMEMBER THAT THESE
 ELEMENTS WERE PRESENTED TO THE NEIGHBORHOOD AS PART OF
 THE ORIGINAL APPROVAL PROCESS TO GET THEIR SUPPORT IN
 ACCORDANCE WITH RESOLUTION NO. 144-11. THE STONE AND
 TILE VENEER THAT HAVE BEEN REMOVED WERE ALSO PART OF
 THE PACKAGE PRESENTED TO THE NEIGHBORHOOD AND CITY
 COMMISSION.
  
 33) PLEASE REMEMBER THAT PER ORD. NO. 144-11, THE
 FOLLOWING ARE REQUIRED PRIOR TO THE FIRST BUILDING
 PERMIT FOR THE NEXT PHASE:
  
 A. PROVIDE AN UPDATED TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN, APPROVED BY
 THE CITY'S TRAFFIC ENGINEER, WHICH INCLUDES THE
 LOCATIONS OF THE TRAFFIC DIRECTING PERSONNEL AND A
 WRITTEN NARRATIVE HOW THE TRAFFIC CONTROL OPERATIONS
 WILL FUNCTION FOR THE PICK-UP AND DROP-OFF TIMES. THE
 PROVIDED PLAN IS FOR THE CIRCULAR DRIVE AT THE PITT
 BUILDING.
  
 B. PREPARE A CONSTRUCTION SITE SECURITY AND MANAGEMENT
 PLAN FOR APPROVAL BY THE CITY'S POLICE DEPARTMENT CRIME
 PREVENTION THROUGH ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGN (CPTED)
 OFFICIAL.
  
 C. RECORD A PLAT FOR THE ENTIRE PBDA CAMPUS. PRIOR TO
 RECORDATION, THE PLAT SHALL BE SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW
 THROUGH THE MINOR SUBDIVISION PROCESS TO INCLUDE ALL
 REQUIRED EASEMENTS. THE RELOCATION AND/OR ABANDONMENT
 OF EASEMENTS WILL REQUIRE APPLICATIONS TO BE FILED WITH
 THE ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT.
  
 D. SUBMIT COMPREHENSIVE EMERGENCY PLANS TO THE FIRE
 DEPARTMENT FOR THEIR APPROVAL.
  
  Print


Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved