City of West Palm Beach eGovPlus

Plan Review Details - Project Z15040027

Plan Review Stops For Project Z15040027

Review Stop	B		BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No	2	Status	Date		Cont ID
Sent By			Date	Time	Rev Time	0.00
Received By			Date	Time	Sent To

Notes

***NONE***

Review Stop	B			BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No	1	Status	F	Date	05-13-2015			Cont ID
Sent By	rbrown			Date	05-13-2015	Time	12:36	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	rbrown			Date	05-13-2015	Time	12:36	Sent To

Notes

2015-05-13 12:50:07	DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, BUILDING DIVISION,
	COMMENTS:

	1. THIS REVIEW IS A CURSORY REVIEW AS IT RELATES TO THE
	SITE. IT IS NOT A REVIEW FOR FULL COMPLIANCE WITH
	FLORIDA BUILDING CODE. THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE TO BE
	ADDRESSED FOR PERMITTING.

	2. EGRESS FROM THE CONCOURSE LEVEL. SHEET A2.20,
	CONCOURSE LEVEL OVERALL PLAN, DOES NOT CLEARLY SHOW THE
	MEANS OF EGRESS FROM THE EAST SIDE OF THE CONCOURSE.
	WHAT ROLE, IF ANY DO THE DOES THE "RAMP/BRIDGE" PLAY ON
	EACH SIDE WITH RESPECT TO EGRESS?

	3. NOT ALL VISTORS TO THE FACILITY WILL BE ARRIVING BY
	CAR AND THE SUBMITTED PLANS DO NOT CLEARLY DELINEATE AN
	ACCESSIBLE ROUTE INTO THE FACILITY FROM THE MILITARY
	TRAIL AND HAVERHILL ROAD SIDWALKS. WHEN SUBMITTED FOR
	PERMIT, THE PLANS SHALL SHOW AT LEAST ONE ACCESSIBLE
	ROUTE, COMPLYING WITH SECTIONS 206.2 AND 402.2 OF
	FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY CODE, FROM THE PUBLIC
	RIGHT-OF-WAY TO ALL ACCESSIBLE BUILDING OR FACILITY
	ENTRANCES.

	4. WHEN SUBMITTED FOR PERMIT, THE PLANS SHALL SHOW AT
	LEAST ONE ACCESSIBLE ROUTE, COMPLYING WITH SECTIONS
	206.2 AND 402.2 OF FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY CODE,
	CONNECTING ACCESSIBLE BUILDING OR FACILITY ENTRANCES
	WITH ALL ACCESSIBLE SPACES AND ELEMENTS WITHIN THE
	BUILDING OR FACILITY.

	5. ANY PART OF AN ACCESSIBLE ROUTE WITH A SLOPE GREATER
	THAN 1:20 SHALL BE CONSIDERED A RAMP AND SHALL COMPLY
	WITH SECTION 405 OF FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY CODE.

	6. THE CLUBHOUSE PARKING (P6) AND THE WEST PARKING LOT
	(P5) ARE NOT CURRENTLY SHOWN TO HAVE ANY ACCESSIBLE
	PARKING. ACCESSIBLE PARKING SHALL BE DISTRIBUTED TO
	INCLUDE SPACES IN EACH PARKING AREA. PER SECTION 208.3
	OF FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY CODE ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES
	ARE TO BE LOCATED ON THE SHORTEST POSSIBLE ROUTE OF
	TRAVEL FROM ADJACENT PARKING TO AN ACCESSIBLE ENTRANCE
	FOR EACH BUILDING. THE DESIGN OF ACCESSIBLE PARKING
	SPACES SHALL COMPLY WITH SECTION 502 OF FLORIDA
	ACCESSIBILITY CODE

	7. PER SECTION 208.2.4 OF FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY CODE,
	ONE IN EVERY SIX ACCESSIBLE SPACES (AT LEAST ONE) IN A
	COVERED PARKING AREA, SHALL BE ?VAN ACCESSIBLE? AND
	DESIGNED IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION OF 502 OF FLORIDA
	ACCESSIBILITY CODE (VERTICAL CLEARANCE NOT LESS THAN 98
	INCHES AT SPACE AND VEHICULAR ACCESS ROUTE)

	8. WHEN SUBMITTED FOR BUILDING PERMIT, THE PLANS SHALL
	SHOW THAT THE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION FOR THE BUILDINGS
	WILL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE HEIGHT, AREA AND
	OCCUPANCY LIMITATIONS IN CHAPTER 5 OF THE FLORIDA
	BUILDING CODE.

	9. WHEN SUBMITTED FOR BUILDING PERMIT, COMPLIANCE WITH
	ALL BUILDING SEPARATION, PERCENTAGE OF OPENINGS AND
	OPENING PROTECTIVE REQUIREMENTS OF CHAPTERS 6 AND 7 OF
	THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE SHALL BE VERIFIED.

	10. SEPARATE PERMITS REQUIRED. ALL APPLICABLE PERMITS
	AND SUB-PERMITS MUST BE OBTAINED BEFORE COMMENCING THE
	WORK. SEPARATE PERMITS, PLANS AND FEES, ARE REQUIRED
	FOR SIGNS, SWIMMING POOLS AND SPAS, GAS SYSTEMS,
	GENERATORS, FIRE ALARM SYSTEMS, FIRE SPRINKLER AND
	OTHER FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEMS, GREASE INTERCEPTORS,
	SITE LIGHTING, SITE LANDSCAPE, SITE IRRIGATION, ETC.

	11. EACH SEPARATE BUILDING SHALL HAVE A SEPARATE
	ADDRESS. FOR STREET ADDRESSING, CONTACT MICHAEL ORIO,
	GIS SUPPORT SPECIALIST, AT (561) 494 1080, OR BY EMAIL:
	[email protected]

	ROBERT BROWN
	BUILDING OFFICIAL
	TEL: 561 805 6652
	EMAIL: [email protected]

Review Stop	ENG - PPRC			ENGINEERING - PPRC
Rev No	2	Status	P	Date	06-04-2015			Cont ID
Sent By	cranford			Date	06-04-2015	Time	09:38	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	cranford			Date	06-04-2015	Time	09:38	Sent To

Notes

***NONE***

Review Stop	ENG - PPRC			ENGINEERING - PPRC
Rev No	1	Status	F	Date	05-08-2015			Cont ID
Sent By	cranford			Date	05-08-2015	Time	13:43	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	cranford			Date	05-08-2015	Time	13:41	Sent To

Notes

2015-05-08 13:42:56	CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH
	PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT

	THIS IS A CONCEPTUAL LEVEL REVIEW. CONSTRUCTION LEVEL
	DETAILS, DESIGN CALCULATIONS AND THE POLLUTION
	PREVENTION PLAN WILL BE REVIEWED AS PART OF THE
	ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL AND BUILDING PERMIT
	APPLICATION PROCESSES. THE ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT
	APPROVAL APPLICATION FORMS CAN BE DOWNLOADED AT
	HTTP://WPB.ORG/ENGINEERING/FORMS-AND-PUBLICATIONS/

	THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO SITE
	PLAN APPROVAL.

	1. PLEASE SUBMIT ESTIMATES FOR THE PEAK POTABLE WATER
	DEMAND, SANITARY SEWER FLOW, AND SOLID WASTE COLLECTION
	YARDAGE.

	2. PLEASE REVISE THE LANDSCAPE PLAN TO SHOW LOCATIONS
	OF ALL WATER METERS, VALVES, CLEAN-OUTS, LIGHT POLES,
	ETC.

	3. PLEASE SHOW THE DUMPSTER LOCATION(S) FOR THE NEW
	BUILDINGS. THE TRASH DUMPSTER/COMPACTORS MUST LOCATED
	IN AREAS EASILY SERVICED BY THE CITY SANITATION
	EQUIPMENT AND MANPOWER PER SECTION 74-35(A)(5) OF THE
	CODE OF ORDINANCES. THE GATE WIDTH MUST BE A MINIMUM OF
	12.5 FEET.

	4. WHAT IS THE STATUS OF THE CLOSED LANDFILL REMOVAL?

	5. A TRAFFIC STUDY WILL BE REQUIRED FOR THIS PROJECT
	SHOWING HOW THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT WILL AFFECT THE
	TRAFFIC VOLUME AND SURROUNDING LOCAL ROADWAYS. INCLUDE
	TRAFFIC ACCIDENT DATA FOR AFFECTED STREET CORRIDORS.
	ESTIMATE INCREASED OR DECREASED POTENTIAL. SAFETY
	IMPROVEMENTS SHALL BE RECOMMENDED WHERE NECESSARY.
	PLEASE SCHEDULE A MEETING WITH THE CITY TRAFFIC
	ENGINEER TO DISCUSS DETAILS OF THE STUDY REQUIREMENTS.

	6. A SEPARATE AGREEMENT OR INTERLOCAL WILL BE NEEDED
	FOR THE USE OF RECLAIMED WATER. IT IS OUR UNDERSTANDING
	THAT THE COUNTY ,CITY AND ECR HAS BEEN IN DISCUSSION.

	7. PLEASE SHOW A TYPICAL SECTION FOR THE SOUTHERN
	BOUNDARY ALONG THE M-CANAL EASEMENT.

	8. WILL FOOD BE PREPARED IN ANY OF THE PROPOSED NEW
	BUILDINGS?

	THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED IN THE PRIOR
	TO ISSUANCE OF CONSTRUCTION AUTHORIZATION INCLUDING
	BUILDING PERMITS AND ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL.

	1. AS SEPARATE SUBMITTAL WILL BE REQUIRED TO THE
	ENGINEERING DIVISION OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT FOR
	ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL. THE ENGINEERING
	DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL APPLICATION FORMS CAN BE
	DOWNLOADED AT
	HTTP://WPB.ORG/ENGINEERING/FORMS-AND-PUBLICATIONS/

	2. AS SEPARATE SUBMITTAL WILL BE REQUIRED TO THE
	ENGINEERING DIVISION OF THE PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT FOR
	PLAT APPROVAL. PLEASE CONTACT VINCE NOEL AT
	[email protected] TO GET A COPY OF THE PLAT APPLICATION.

	3. SOLID WASTE YARDAGE WILL NEED TO BE ESTIMATED AS
	PART OF THE FINAL DESIGN TO VERIFY THAT THE DESIGN
	INCLUDES APPROPRIATE NUMBER AND SIZE OF TRASH BINS.

	4. PLEASE IDENTIFY THE SOURCE OF THE AS-BUILT
	INFORMATION UTILIZED FOR THE POTABLE WATER, SANITARY
	SEWER, AND STORM SEWER DESIGN.

	5. INDICATE ON THE PLANS WHICH PORTIONS OF THE POTABLE
	WATER, SANITARY SEWER, AND STORMWATER SYSTEM WILL
	REMAIN PUBLICALLY OWNED AND WHICH SECTIONS WILL BE
	MAINTAINED BY THE APPLICANT. TYPICALLY, THE CITY'S
	OWNERSHIP STOPS AT THE RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE UNLESS
	EXTENUATING CIRCUMSTANCES REQUIRED THE OWNERSHIP
	DIVISION TO TAKE PLACE AT ANOTHER LOCATION.

	KELLY CRANFORD, P.E.
	LAND DEVELOPMENT ENGINEER
	[email protected]
	561-494-1098 (OFFICE)

	VINCE NOEL, PSM
	CITY SURVEYOR / REAL ESTATE SUPERVISOR
	[email protected]
	561-494-1096

	BRIAN COLLINS, PE
	CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER
	[email protected]
	561-494-1040

	FERDINAND RIVERA
	PUBLIC WORKS OPERATIONS MANAGER
	[email protected]
	561-822-2076

	TRACY WARD, PE
	CITY STORMWATER ENGINEER
	561-494-1120
	[email protected]

Review Stop	FIRE			FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No	2	Status	P	Date	06-03-2015			Cont ID
Sent By	wjolin			Date	06-03-2015	Time	13:01	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	wjolin			Date	06-03-2015	Time	12:59	Sent To

Notes

2015-06-03 13:01:34	ADDITIONAL FIRE REVIEW COMMENTS MAY BE GENERATED AT THE
	TIME OF OFFICIAL SUBMISSION FOR PERMIT. REVIEW AND
	APPROVAL BY THE AHJ SHALL NOT RELIEVE THE OWNER,
	CONTRACTOR, ETC. OF THE RESPONSIBILITY OF COMPLIANCE
	WITH CODE (NFPA 1, SECTION 1.14.4). FBC SECTION 105.4.1
	PERMIT INTENT: A PERMIT ISSUED SHALL BE CONSTRUED TO BE
	A LICENSE TO PROCEED WITH THE WORK AND NOT AS AUTHORITY
	TO VIOLATE, CANCEL, ALTER OR SET ASIDE ANY OF THE
	PROVISIONS OF THE TECHNICAL CODES, NOR SHALL ISSUANCE
	OF A PERMIT PREVENT THE BUILDING OFFICIAL FROM
	THEREAFTER REQUIRING A CORRECTION OF ERRORS IN PLANS,
	CONSTRUCTION OR VIOLATIONS OF THIS CODE.

Review Stop	FIRE			FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No	1	Status	P	Date	05-07-2015			Cont ID
Sent By	wjolin			Date	05-07-2015	Time	1:18	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	wjolin			Date	05-07-2015	Time	11:19	Sent To

Notes

2015-05-07 11:21:43	5001 NORTH MILITARY TRAIL
	PERMIT #Z15040027
	REVIEW COMMENTS - FIRE DEPARTMENT

	PROJECT SHALL BE DESIGNED IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE 5TH
	EDITION OF THE FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE WHICH
	CONTAINS THE 2012 EDITION OF BOTH NFPA 1 AND NFPA 101
	WITH FLORIDA AMENDMENTS.

	CONSTRUCTION TRAILERS/MODULAR BUILDINGS REQUIRE A
	PERMIT. STRUCTURES WILL BE REQUIRED TO COMPLY WITH NFPA
	241. AUTOMATIC FIRE SPRINKLER PROTECTION WILL BE
	REQUIRED FOR CONSTRUCTION TRAILERS LARGER THAN A
	"DOUBLE-WIDE" OR THOSE STRUCTURES NOT IN COMPLIANCE
	WITH THE SEPARATION REQUIREMENTS FOUND IN NFPA 241.

	PER SECTION 18.2.3.2.1 (NFPA 1), APPROVED FIRE
	DEPARTMENT ACCESS ROADS SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR EVERY
	FACILITY, BUILDING, OR PORTION OF A BUILDING HEREAFTER
	CONSTRUCTED OR RELOCATED. A FIRE DEPARTMENT ACCESS ROAD
	SHALL EXTEND TO WITHIN 50 FEET OF AT LEAST ONE EXTERIOR
	DOOR THAT CAN BE OPENED FROM THE OUTSIDE AND THAT
	PROVIDES ACCESS TO THE INTERIOR OF THE BUILDING

	PER SECTION 18.2.3.4.1.1 (NFPA 1), FIRE DEPARTMENT
	ACCESS ROADS SHALL HAVE A SURFACE DESIGNED TO
	ACCOMMODATE FIRE APPARATUS WEIGHING AT LEAST 36 TONS.
	ACCESS ROADS SHALL HAVE AN UNOBSTRUCTED WIDTH OF NOT
	LESS THAN 20 FEET AND AN UNOBSTRUCTED VERTICAL
	CLEARANCE OF NOT LESS THAN 13 FEET 6 INCHES.

	MAY NEED A SITE FIRE LANE CONNECTING HAVERHILL ROAD TO
	MILITARY TRAIL.

	MAY NEED A FIRE COMMAND ROOM FOR A CAMPUS THIS LARGE.

	PER SECTION 18.2.3.5.3 (NFPA 1), FIRE LANES SHALL BE
	MARKED WITH FREESTANDING SIGNS READING, "FIRE LANE - NO
	PARKING BY ORDER OF THE FIRE DEPARTMENT." SIGNS SHALL
	BE 12" X 18" WITH A WHITE BACKGROUND AND RED LETTERS
	AND SHALL BE A MAXIMUM OF SEVEN FEET IN HEIGHT TO THE
	BOTTOM OF THE SIGN. SIGNS SHALL BE WITHIN SIGHT OF THE
	TRAFFIC FLOW AND BE SPACED A MAXIMUM OF 60 FEET APART.

	PER SECTION 18.3.4.1 (NFPA 1), FIRE HYDRANTS SHALL BE
	PROVIDED WITH CLEARANCES OF 7'-6" TO THE FRONT AND
	SIDES AND 4' TO THE BACKSIDE.

	PER SECTION 10.12.1.2 (NFPA 1), PROVIDE BUILDING
	ADDRESS VISIBLE FROM THE STREET. NUMBERS SHALL BE
	ATTACHED TO THE BUILDING AND BE AT LEAST SIX-INCHES IN
	HEIGHT WITH 1-INCH STROKE AND SHALL CONTRAST THE
	BACKGROUND.

	PROVIDE AN EXTERIOR KEY SAFE TO ALLOW EMERGENCY
	RESPONDERS NON-FORCIBLE ENTRY INTO THE BUILDING DURING
	NON-BUSINESS HOURS. A KEY SAFE CAN BE ORDERED FROM
	WWW.KNOXBOX.COM.

	PROVIDE A KNOX KEY SWITCH TO ALLOW GATE ACCESS TO
	EMERGENCY RESPONDERS. KEY SWITCH CAN BE ORDERED FROM
	WWW.KNOXBOX.COM.

	THE SUBMITTED SUMMARY INDICATES APPROXIMATELY 10 MAJOR
	EVENTS OTHER,THAN BASEBALL, ARE INTENDED TO BE HELD AT
	THE SITE DURING NON-SPRING TRAINING MONTHS. PLEASE
	ELABORATE.


	NOTE: ADDITIONAL PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS MAY BE GENERATED
	AT THE TIME OF ACTUAL PLAN REVIEW/PERMIT REQUEST.

	WESLEY JOLIN
	ASSISTANT FIRE MARSHAL
	WEST PALM BEACH FIRE RESCUE
	[email protected]
	(561) 805-6730

Review Stop	L			LANDSCAPING
Rev No	3	Status	F	Date	07-01-2015			Cont ID
Sent By	rcaranci			Date	07-01-2015	Time	09:11	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	rcaranci			Date	07-01-2015	Time	09:10	Sent To

Notes

2015-07-01 09:14:39	I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND
	PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:


	1. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE A TREE SURVEY IDENTIFYING
	EXISTING TREES ON THE PROPERTY AND INDICATE THE
	SPECIES, SIZE, AND IF THEY WILL BE REMOVED, RELOCATED,
	OR REMAIN.
	THE TREE SURVEY DOES NOT SHOW LOCATIONS OF ALL TREES ON
	THE SITE. SOME EXOTIC INVASIVE SPECIES ARE INCLUDED,
	AND OTHERS SUCH AS MELALEUCA, BRAZILIAN PEPPER, EARLEAF
	ACACIA, AND CHINABERRY ARE NOT. PLEASE EXPLAIN THE
	METHODOLOGY AS TO HOW TREES WERE CLASSIFIED TO BE
	RECORDED ON THE SURVEY OR LEFT OUT, AND REVISE THE
	INVENTORY ACCORDINGLY.

	2. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE A SHEET SHOWING THE CAD
	LAYER FOR THE AREAS COUNTED AS OPEN SPACE AND AREAS
	COUNTED AS LANDSCAPE OPEN SPACE.

	3. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE QUANTITIES AND DROUGHT
	TOLERANCE LEVEL FOR EACH SPECIES ON THE PLANT LIST.
	ONCE THE PLANT LIST IS FINALIZED, FURTHER REVIEW MAY
	PROCEED FOR PLACEMENT WITHIN THE PLAN. PROVIDE DROUGHT
	TOLERANCE LEVEL FOR GREEN ISLAND FICUS AND FLORITAM
	SOD.

	4. SATISFIED. THE LANDSCAPE BUFFER ADJACENT TO MILITARY
	TRAIL IS FILLED WITH LIGHTING, SIDEWALKS AND NET
	STRUCTURE THAT MINIMIZE THE AMOUNT OF LANDSCAPING TO
	PROVIDE BUFFERING AND SCREENING FROM THE ROAD AND
	ADJACENT PROPERTIES. PLEASE ARRANGE THE COMPONENTS TO
	CONSOLIDATE AND MAXIMIZE THE BUFFERING EFFECTIVENESS OF
	THE TREES, UNDERSTORY AND SHRUBS.

	5. SATISFIED. PLEASE ADD TREES TO THE LANDSCAPE IN THE
	NORTHWEST GRASS PARKING AREA. THESE MAY BE IN STRIPS TO
	PROVIDE SOME SHADE FOR CARS PARKING IN THE AREA.

	6. SATISFIED. PLEASE INDICATE ANY LITTORAL PLANTINGS
	IN THE LAKE.

	7. SEE CONDITION. PLEASE REVISE THE LANDSCAPE AND
	ENGINEERING PLANS TO AVOID CONFLICTS BETWEEN
	LANDSCAPING AND WATER, SEWER, DRAINAGE, LIGHTING AND
	FPL EQUIPMENT. PLEASE SHOW ALL THESE ON THE LANDSCAPE
	PLAN. CONFLICTS STILL EXIST AND WILL REQUIRE
	COORDINATION WITH ENGINEERING PLANS TO RESOLVE.

	8. SEE CONDITION. PLEASE PROVIDE SCREENING FOR ALL
	GROUND MOUNTED EQUIPMENT AND UTILITIES.

	9. NOT SATISFIED. THE FPL LINES ALONG THE EAST SIDE OF
	HAVERHILL ROAD WILL SUBSTANTIALLY LIMIT THE CHOICES FOR
	BUFFER TREES AND PLACEMENT. EXPANDED BUFFER AREAS OR
	UNDERGROUNDING THE LINES WILL ALLOW LARGER TREES AND
	IMPROVE BUFFERING.

	10. SATISFIED. LARGER SPECIES OF TREES ARE SUGGESTED
	FOR THE SOUTH BUFFER TO PROVIDE SOME BLOCKING OF
	EQUIPMENT GOING INTO THE CANAL RIGHT OF WAY FROM THE
	ADJACENT SPORTS FIELDS.

	ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 6/3/15:
	11. NOT SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE A CHART SHOWING TOTAL
	TREES BEING REMOVED AND TOTAL TREES BEING PROVIDED ON
	THE PROPOSED PLAN, INCLUDING ONE TO ONE REPLACEMENTS
	AND CANOPY SQUARE FOOTAGE FOR TREES OVER 35 FEET OF
	CANOPY. PLEASE ADD THE NUMBER OF TREES PROVIDED FOR
	MITIGATION.

	12. SEE CONDITION. PLEASE INCLUDE A ROOT BARRIER DETAIL
	AND SHOW LOCATIONS OF ROOT BARRIERS TO PROTECT
	INFRASTRUCTURE AND TREES FROM CONFLICTS. THIS INCLUDES
	WATER, SEWER, DRAINAGE, SIDEWALKS AND CURBS, AND ANY
	FIELD STRUCTURES THAT COULD BE IMPACTED BY TREE ROOTS.

	13. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE A WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT
	PLAN THAT ADDRESSES HOW ON SITE WILDLIFE WILL BE
	ADDRESSED DURING THE CLEARING PROCESS. THIS WILL
	INCLUDE ENCOUNTERS WITH SPECIES THAT ARE LISTED,
	ENDANGERED, PROTECTED, OR OF SPECIAL CONCERN. ALSO
	INCLUDE HOW CLEARING WILL BE IMPLEMENTED TO ENCOURAGE
	MOVEMENT OF ONSITE WILDLIFE TO THE CORRIDORS TO THE
	WATER CATCHMENT AREA.

	ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 6/30/15:
	14. THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING THE CITY PARK AREA BE
	INCLUDED IN THE WAIVER FOR REDUCTION IN THE OPEN SPACE
	FOR CALCULATION OF THE NUMBER OF TREES REQUIRED. A
	FINAL PLAN MUST BE SUBMITTED IN ORDER TO ASSESS THE
	EFFECT ON THE PARK WITH THE REDUCTION IN TREES. PLEASE
	PROVIDE CALCULATIONS FOR REQUIRED LANDSCAPING AND
	WAIVER REDUCTION FOR THE PARK SITE.

	15. PLEASE CONFIRM THAT THE PARK WILL BE CONSTRUCTED
	CONCURRENTLY WITH THE BALLPARK. PROVIDE ADDITIONAL
	INFORMATION AS TO THE TIMING, PARTICULARLY OF THE
	LANDSCAPE BUFFERS.

	16. PLEASE CORRECT THE CHART ON SHEET L-2.07 TO REFLECT
	THE CODE WORDING FOR FLORIDA FRIENDLY LANDSCAPE
	REQUIREMENTS, AND THE WATERWISE PUBLICATION FROM SFWMD.

	17. PLEASE CHANGE THE LANGUAGE FOR THE PRESERVATION OF
	SABAL PALMS ON SITE TO INDICATE THAT ALL SABAL PALMS
	THAT ARE SALVAGEABLE WILL BE SAVED FOR PLANTING ON
	SITE.

	18. PLEASE INCLUDE THE NUMBER OF TREES REDUCED BY THE
	WAIVER REQUEST IN THE LANDSCAPE DATA CHART SHEET
	L-2.07, AND THE NARRATIVE FOR THE WAIVER.

	19. PLEASE ADD TREES OR PALMS ALONG THE PEDESTRIAN
	ACCESS WALKS THAT WILL BE UTILIZED AS PART OF THE
	PEDESTRIAN CONNECTIVITY EXHIBIT, SO THAT THE FREQUENTLY
	USED WALKWAYS WILL HAVE SUFFICIENT CANOPY TO PROVIDE
	SHADE AND PROTECTION FROM THE SUN.

	20. PLEAS PROVIDE AN EXHIBIT SHOWING TOTAL OPEN SPACE
	FOR THE BALLPARK PORTION.

	CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
	1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON
	THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE
	SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT
	SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.

	2. ALL GROUND, WALL AND ROOF MOUNTED MECHANICAL AND
	UTILITY EQUIPMENT SHALL BE SCREENED FROM PUBLIC VIEW.

	3. PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF THE INFRASTRUCTURE PERMIT, THE
	APPLICANT SHALL REVISE THE LANDSCAPE AND ENGINEERING
	PLANS TO RESOLVE CONFLICTS BETWEEN LANDSCAPING AND
	WATER, SEWER, DRAINAGE, LIGHTING AND FPL EQUIPMENT, AND
	SHOW LOCATIONS OF ROOT BARRIERS.

	RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER 561-822-1462

Review Stop	L			LANDSCAPING
Rev No	2	Status	F	Date	06-04-2015			Cont ID
Sent By	rcaranci			Date	06-04-2015	Time	15:51	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	rcaranci			Date	06-04-2015	Time	15:51	Sent To

Notes

2015-06-04 15:59:14	PLEASE BE AWARE THAT THESE COMMENTS ARE BASED ON THE
	LANDSCAPE PLANS AND OTHER MATERIAL SUBMITTED 5/26/15.
	ANY CHANGES TO THE PLANS WILL RESULT IN FURTHER REVIEW
	AND COMMENTS.


	1. NOT SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE A TREE SURVEY
	IDENTIFYING EXISTING TREES ON THE PROPERTY AND INDICATE
	THE SPECIES, SIZE, AND IF THEY WILL BE REMOVED,
	RELOCATED, OR REMAIN.
	THE TREE SURVEY DOES NOT SHOW LOCATIONS OF ALL TREES ON
	THE SITE. SOME EXOTIC INVASIVE SPECIES ARE INCLUDED,
	AND OTHERS SUCH AS MELALEUCA, BRAZILIAN PEPPER, EARLEAF
	ACACIA, AND CHINABERRY ARE NOT. PLEASE EXPLAIN THE
	METHODOLOGY AS TO HOW TREES WERE CLASSIFIED TO BE
	RECORDED ON THE SURVEY OR LEFT OUT, AND REVISE THE
	INVENTORY ACCORDINGLY.

	2. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE A SHEET SHOWING THE CAD
	LAYER FOR THE AREAS COUNTED AS OPEN SPACE AND AREAS
	COUNTED AS LANDSCAPE OPEN SPACE.

	3. NOT SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE QUANTITIES AND
	DROUGHT TOLERANCE LEVEL FOR EACH SPECIES ON THE PLANT
	LIST. ONCE THE PLANT LIST IS FINALIZED, FURTHER REVIEW
	MAY PROCEED FOR PLACEMENT WITHIN THE PLAN. PROVIDE
	DROUGHT TOLERANCE LEVEL FOR GREEN ISLAND FICUS AND
	FLORITAM SOD.

	4. SATISFIED. THE LANDSCAPE BUFFER ADJACENT TO MILITARY
	TRAIL IS FILLED WITH LIGHTING, SIDEWALKS AND NET
	STRUCTURE THAT MINIMIZE THE AMOUNT OF LANDSCAPING TO
	PROVIDE BUFFERING AND SCREENING FROM THE ROAD AND
	ADJACENT PROPERTIES. PLEASE ARRANGE THE COMPONENTS TO
	CONSOLIDATE AND MAXIMIZE THE BUFFERING EFFECTIVENESS OF
	THE TREES, UNDERSTORY AND SHRUBS.

	5. SATISFIED. PLEASE ADD TREES TO THE LANDSCAPE IN THE
	NORTHWEST GRASS PARKING AREA. THESE MAY BE IN STRIPS TO
	PROVIDE SOME SHADE FOR CARS PARKING IN THE AREA.

	6. SATISFIED. PLEASE INDICATE ANY LITTORAL PLANTINGS
	IN THE LAKE.

	7. SEE CONDITION. PLEASE REVISE THE LANDSCAPE AND
	ENGINEERING PLANS TO AVOID CONFLICTS BETWEEN
	LANDSCAPING AND WATER, SEWER, DRAINAGE, LIGHTING AND
	FPL EQUIPMENT. PLEASE SHOW ALL THESE ON THE LANDSCAPE
	PLAN. CONFLICTS STILL EXIST AND WILL REQUIRE
	COORDINATION WITH ENGINEERING PLANS TO RESOLVE.

	8. SEE CONDITION. PLEASE PROVIDE SCREENING FOR ALL
	GROUND MOUNTED EQUIPMENT AND UTILITIES.

	9. NOT SATISFIED. THE FPL LINES ALONG THE EAST SIDE OF
	HAVERHILL ROAD WILL SUBSTANTIALLY LIMIT THE CHOICES FOR
	BUFFER TREES AND PLACEMENT. EXPANDED BUFFER AREAS OR
	UNDERGROUNDING THE LINES WILL ALLOW LARGER TREES AND
	IMPROVE BUFFERING.

	10. SATISFIED. LARGER SPECIES OF TREES ARE SUGGESTED
	FOR THE SOUTH BUFFER TO PROVIDE SOME BLOCKING OF
	EQUIPMENT GOING INTO THE CANAL RIGHT OF WAY FROM THE
	ADJACENT SPORTS FIELDS.

	ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 6/3/15:
	11. PLEASE PROVIDE A CHART SHOWING TOTAL TREES BEING
	REMOVED AND TOTAL TREES BEING PROVIDED ON THE PROPOSED
	PLAN, INCLUDING ONE TO ONE REPLACEMENTS AND CANOPY
	SQUARE FOOTAGE FOR TREES OVER 35 FEET OF CANOPY.

	12. PLEASE INCLUDE A ROOT BARRIER DETAIL AND SHOW
	LOCATIONS OF ROOT BARRIERS TO PROTECT INFRASTRUCTURE
	AND TREES FROM CONFLICTS. THIS INCLUDES WATER, SEWER,
	DRAINAGE, SIDEWALKS AND CURBS, AND ANY FIELD STRUCTURES
	THAT COULD BE IMPACTED BY TREE ROOTS.

	13. PLEASE PROVIDE A WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT PLAN THAT
	ADDRESSES HOW ON SITE WILDLIFE WILL BE ADDRESSED DURING
	THE CLEARING PROCESS. THIS WILL INCLUDE ENCOUNTERS WITH
	SPECIES THAT ARE LISTED, ENDANGERED, PROTECTED, OR OF
	SPECIAL CONCERN. ALSO INCLUDE HOW CLEARING WILL BE
	IMPLEMENTED TO ENCOURAGE MOVEMENT OF ONSITE WILDLIFE TO
	THE CORRIDORS TO THE WATER CATCHMENT AREA.

	CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
	1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON
	THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE
	SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT
	SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.
	2. ALL GROUND, WALL AND ROOF MOUNTED MECHANICAL AND
	UTILITY EQUIPMENT SHALL BE SCREENED FROM PUBLIC VIEW.

Review Stop	L			LANDSCAPING
Rev No	1	Status	F	Date	05-12-2015			Cont ID
Sent By	rcaranci			Date	05-12-2015	Time	16:18	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	rcaranci			Date	05-12-2015	Time	16:18	Sent To

Notes

2015-05-12 16:19:53	1. PLEASE PROVIDE A TREE SURVEY IDENTIFYING EXISTING
	TREES ON THE PROPERTY AND INDICATE THE SPECIES, SIZE,
	AND IF THEY WILL BE REMOVED, RELOCATED, OR REMAIN.

	2. PLEASE PROVIDE A SHEET SHOWING THE CAD LAYER FOR THE
	AREAS COUNTED AS OPEN SPACE AND AREAS COUNTED AS
	LANDSCAPE OPEN SPACE.

	3. PLEASE PROVIDE QUANTITIES AND DROUGHT TOLERANCE
	LEVEL FOR EACH SPECIES ON THE PLANT LIST. ONCE THE
	PLANT LIST IS FINALIZED, FURTHER REVIEW MAY PROCEED FOR
	PLACEMENT WITHIN THE PLAN.

	4. THE LANDSCAPE BUFFER ADJACENT TO MILITARY TRAIL IS
	FILLED WITH LIGHTING, SIDEWALKS AND NET STRUCTURE THAT
	MINIMIZE THE AMOUNT OF LANDSCAPING TO PROVIDE BUFFERING
	AND SCREENING FROM THE ROAD AND ADJACENT PROPERTIES.
	PLEASE ARRANGE THE COMPONENTS TO CONSOLIDATE AND
	MAXIMIZE THE BUFFERING EFFECTIVENESS OF THE TREES,
	UNDERSTORY AND SHRUBS.

	5. PLEASE ADD TREES TO THE LANDSCAPE IN THE NORTHWEST
	GRASS PARKING AREA. THESE MAY BE IN STRIPS TO PROVIDE
	SOME SHADE FOR CARS PARKING IN THE AREA.

	6. PLEASE INDICATE ANY LITTORAL PLANTINGS IN THE LAKE.

	7. PLEASE REVISE THE LANDSCAPE AND ENGINEERING PLANS TO
	AVOID CONFLICTS BETWEEN LANDSCAPING AND WATER, SEWER,
	DRAINAGE, LIGHTING AND FPL EQUIPMENT. PLEASE SHOW ALL
	THESE ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN.

	8. PLEASE PROVIDE SCREENING FOR ALL GROUND MOUNTED
	EQUIPMENT AND UTILITIES.

	9. THE FPL LINES ALONG THE EAST SIDE OF HAVERHILL ROAD
	WILL SUBSTANTIALLY LIMIT THE CHOICES FOR BUFFER TREES
	AND PLACEMENT. EXPANDED BUFFER AREAS OR UNDERGROUNDING
	THE LINES WILL ALLOW LARGER TREES AND IMPROVE
	BUFFERING.

	10. LARGER SPECIES OF TREES ARE SUGGESTED FOR THE SOUTH
	BUFFER TO PROVIDE SOME BLOCKING OF EQUIPMENT GOING INTO
	THE CANAL RIGHT OF WAY FROM THE ADJACENT SPORTS FIELDS.

	CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
	1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON
	THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE
	SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT
	SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.
	RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER
	561-822-1462

Review Stop	PARK		PARKING
Rev No	1	Status	Date		Cont ID
Sent By			Date	Time	Rev Time
Received By			Date	Time	Sent To

Notes

***NONE***

Review Stop	POLICE		POLICE
Rev No	1	Status	Date		Cont ID
Sent By			Date	Time	Rev Time
Received By			Date	Time	Sent To

Notes

***NONE***

Review Stop	PW			PUBLIC WORKS
Rev No	2	Status	P	Date	06-04-2015			Cont ID
Sent By	cranford			Date	06-04-2015	Time	09:40	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	cranford			Date	06-04-2015	Time	09:40	Sent To

Notes

***NONE***

Review Stop	PW			PUBLIC WORKS
Rev No	1	Status	F	Date	05-08-2015			Cont ID
Sent By	cranford			Date	05-08-2015	Time	13:43	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	cranford			Date	05-08-2015	Time	13:43	Sent To

Notes

2015-05-08 13:43:33

SEE COMMENTS UNDER PPRC ENGINEERING.

Review Stop	STORM			STORMWATER
Rev No	2	Status	P	Date	06-04-2015			Cont ID
Sent By	cranford			Date	06-04-2015	Time	09:38	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	cranford			Date	06-04-2015	Time	09:38	Sent To

Notes

***NONE***

Review Stop	STORM			STORMWATER
Rev No	1	Status	P	Date	05-08-2015			Cont ID
Sent By	cranford			Date	05-08-2015	Time	13:44	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	cranford			Date	05-08-2015	Time	13:43	Sent To

Notes

2015-05-12 10:34:00	1. VERIFY THE 18" PIPE CONNECTING THE TWO WET RETENTION
	AREAS ON THE WEST SIDE OF THE SITE IS OF SUFFICIENT
	SIZE TO PROVIDE STAGE EQUALIZATION BETWEEN THE WET
	DETENTION AREAS DURING LARGE STORM EVENTS.

	2. THE WET DETENTION AREAS TO MEET SFWMD DIMENSIONAL
	CRITERIA.

	3. WHERE IS EXFILTRATION PROPOSED? IT COULD NOT BE
	LOCATED ON THE DRAINAGE PLANS.

	4. VERIFY THE DESIGN OF THE STORMWATER MANAGEMENT
	SYSTEM INCLUDES RUNOFF FROM THE CITY'S PARK PARCEL.

	5. DELETE THE HINGED MANHOLE COVER DETAILS FOR BOTH
	STORM AND SANITARY SEWER.

	6. PROVIDE A CROSS SECTION OF THE BERM PROPOSED IN THE
	50' M-CANAL EASEMENT AND SHOW THE LIMITS OF THE BERM ON
	THE PLANS. WHO WILL BE RESPONSIBLE TO CONSTRUCT THE
	BERM?

	7. THE POINT OF INTERSECTION NEAR SHILOH DRIVE IS NOT
	SHOWN FOR THE EAST BOUNDARY LINE ON THE SITE PLAN.

	TRACY L. WARD, P.E.
	SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER
	ENGINEERING SERVICES DIVISION
	561-494-1120

2015-05-08 13:43:51	SEE COMMENTS UNDER PPRC ENGINEERING.

Review Stop	SURVEY			SURVEYING
Rev No	2	Status	P	Date	06-04-2015			Cont ID
Sent By	cranford			Date	06-04-2015	Time	09:39	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	cranford			Date	06-04-2015	Time	09:39	Sent To

Notes

***NONE***

Review Stop	SURVEY			SURVEYING
Rev No	1	Status	F	Date	05-08-2015			Cont ID
Sent By	cranford			Date	05-08-2015	Time	13:45	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	cranford			Date	05-08-2015	Time	13:44	Sent To

Notes

2015-05-08 13:44:55

SEE COMMENTS UNDER PPRC ENGINEERING.

Review Stop	TRAFFIC			TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No	2	Status	P	Date	06-04-2015			Cont ID
Sent By	cranford			Date	06-04-2015	Time	09:39	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	cranford			Date	06-04-2015	Time	09:39	Sent To

Notes

***NONE***

Review Stop	TRAFFIC			TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No	1	Status	F	Date	05-08-2015			Cont ID
Sent By	cranford			Date	05-08-2015	Time	13:45	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	cranford			Date	05-08-2015	Time	13:45	Sent To

Notes

2015-05-08 13:45:14

SEE COMMENTS UNDER PPRC ENGINEERING.

Review Stop	Z		ZONING
Rev No	2	Status	Date				Cont ID
Sent By			Date		Time		Rev Time	0.00
Received By	dkittred		Date	05-28-2015	Time	10:14	Sent To

Notes

***NONE***

Review Stop	Z			ZONING
Rev No	1	Status	F	Date	05-13-2015			Cont ID
Sent By	dkittred			Date	05-13-2015	Time	10:28	Rev Time
Received By	dkittred			Date		Time		Sent To

Notes

2015-05-13 10:31:00	PLANNING AND ZONING COMMENTS:

	5/13/2015

	BALLPARK OF THE PALM BEACHES COMMENTS FOR PPRC -
	PLANNING AND ZONING COMMENTS

	1. RECOMMEND RELOCATION OF THE TRAIL THAT GOES AROUND
	THE EAST AND NORTH SIDE OF THE MAINTENANCE COMPLEX TO
	ADDRESS SAFETY CONCERNS REGARDING VISIBILITY OF USERS
	ON THAT PORTION OF THE TRAIL.

	2. INTERLOCAL AGREEMENTS STATES IN SECTION B.3 THAT THE
	"COUNTY SHALL PROVIDE A BERM AND INSTALL A FENCE
	BETWEEN THE STADIUM PROPERTY AND CITY M-CANAL/WATER
	CATCHMENT AREA BUFFER." NO BERM OR FENCE WERE INDICATED
	ON THE PLANS.

	3. PROVIDE A CROSS SECTION OF THE BERM/LANDSCAPING
	ALONG THE SOUTH SIDE OF THE PROPERTY. IF THE BERM IS TO
	SERVE TO RETAIN WATER (STORMWATER/IRRIGATION RUN-OFF)
	ON-SITE, THEN THIS DRAINAGE AND RETENTION NEEDS TO
	OCCUR WITHIN THE BOUNDARIES OF THE STADIUM PROPERTY. IF
	THE BERM IS EITHER COMPLETELY OR PARTIALLY WITHIN THE
	BOUNDARIES OF THE STADIUM PROPERTY, THEN SITE PLAN WILL
	NEED TO BE REDESIGNED TO ACCOMMODATE THE BERM.

	4. LIGHT SPILLAGE GENERATED FROM THE MAIN STADIUM WAS
	NOT INCLUDED ON THE PHOTOMETRIC PLAN. PLEASE INCLUDE
	VERIFYING THERE WILL NOT BE ADDITIONAL LIGHT SPILLAGE
	IMPACTS FROM THE MAIN STADIUM.

	5. STAFF HAS CONCERN THAT THE LIGHT SPILLAGE AT
	RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY LINES IN SOME CASES ARE FOUR TO
	FIVE TIMES GREATER THAN WHAT IS NORMALLY PERMITTED. IS
	THERE ANYTHING THAT CAN BE DONE TO LOWER SOME OF THESE
	LIGHT SPILLAGE NUMBERS AND/OR PUT RESTRICTIONS ON A
	TIME THE LIGHTS MUST BE SHUT OFF BY?

	6. PLAN INDICATES DEDICATION OF RIGHT-OF-WAY ALONG
	HAVERHILL ROAD FOR PROPOSED TURN LANES. SHOULD THIS
	RIGHT-OF-WAY DEDICATION BE INCLUDED ON THE PLAT? WILL
	THE RIGHT-OF-WAY DEDICATION HAVE ANY EFFECT ON THE
	ACREAGE AND SITE CALCULATIONS?

	7. OVERHEAD UTILITY LINES ALONG HAVERHILL ROAD, AS
	SHOWN ON THE SITE PLAN, ARE LOCATED ON THE SUBJECT
	PROPERTY. ZLDR SECTION 94-207(5) REQUIRES THAT ALL
	UTILITIES SERVING THE DEVELOPMENT BE INSTALLED
	UNDERGROUND.

	8. PLEASE CLEARLY MARK LOCATION OF EXISTING UTILITY
	POLES ALONG ROADWAYS TO IDENTIFY CONFLICTS WITH
	LANDSCAPING, DRIVEWAYS, AND SIDEWALKS. THE DARK DASHED
	PROPERTY BOUNDARY LINE COVERS OVER THE OVERHEAD UTILITY
	LINE LOCATIONS SO IT IS NOT CLEAR WHERE ALL THE POLES
	ARE LOCATED.

	9. FENCING, NETTING, AND LIGHT POLES ARE BEING LOCATED
	WITHIN THE LANDSCAPE BUFFER IN SEVERAL INSTANCES. THESE
	ITEMS TAKE UP THE LIMITED LANDSCAPING SPACE AND ALSO
	CONFLICT WITH PROPOSED LANDSCAPING. PLEASE REVIEW THESE
	CONFLICTS ON MILITARY TRAIL AND ALONG THE NORTH BUFFER.
	TO MAXIMIZE THE LIMITED BUFFER AREA ESPECIALLY ON THE
	NORTH SIDE, NO FENCING, NETTING, OR LIGHTING SERVING
	THE BASEBALL FIELDS SHOULD BE LOCATED WITHIN THE
	LANDSCAPE BUFFER AREA.

	10. A WAIVER IS BEING REQUESTED TO ELIMINATE THE WALL
	REQUIREMENT BETWEEN THE RESIDENTIAL USE TO THE NORTH
	AND THE STADIUM PROPERTY. STAFF HAS SOME CONCERN OF THE
	PROXIMITY OF THE EXISTING MULTIFAMILY UNITS TO THE
	NORTH OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY AND IMPACT OF THE
	PROPOSED STADIUM USE ON THAT PROPERTY. IN ADDITION TO
	INCREASING THE LANDSCAPING BUFFERING ALONG THAT
	LOCATION IS THERE ANYTHING ELSE THAT CAN BE PROVIDED AS
	MITIGATION FOR NOT INSTALLING A WALL?

	11. FOR PEOPLE UTILIZING THE EAST PAVED PARKING LOT,
	HOW DO PEOPLE GET FROM THE PARKING AREA TO THE MAIN
	STADIUM WITHOUT HAVING TO WALK DOWN THE MAIN DRIVE
	AISLE? THERE IS A NORTH SOUTH PEDESTRIAN CONNECTION TO
	THE PRACTICE FIELDS BUT NO PEDESTRIAN PATHWAY TO THE
	MAIN STADIUM.

	12. THERE IS A PEDESTRIAN PLAZA LOCATED ON THE WEST
	SIDE OF THE MAIN STADIUM. PLEASE INDICATE WHERE
	PEDESTRIANS WILL CROSS THE DRIVEWAY THAT RUNS ALONG THE
	WEST SIDE OF THE PLAZA. THIS INCLUDES PEDESTRIANS
	ACCESSING THE PLAZA FROM THE NORTH AND THE SOUTH.

	13. PLEASE REVISE ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACE CALCULATION
	SP0.01 ON SHEET TO SHOW USE OF 5,187 RATHER THAN 5,235
	SPACES, OR CLARIFY WHY THE NUMBERS ARE DIFFERENT.

	14. BUILDING SQUARE FOOTAGE ON SHEET SP0.01 SHOWS AN
	OVERALL COUNT AND DIFFERENT PARTIAL BREAKDOWNS IN TWO
	OF THE SECTIONS. PLEASE PROVIDE ONE COMPREHENSIVE LIST
	OF STRUCTURES AND SQUARE FOOTAGES USED TO ARRIVE AT THE
	CALCULATION. THIS WILL BE IMPORTANT LATER IF SQUARE
	FOOTAGES NEED TO BE INCREASED, DECREASED, OR TRANSFER
	TO EVALUATE COMPLIANCE WITH THRESHOLDS FOR LEVELS OF
	REVIEW FOR A MAJOR OR MINOR PD AMENDMENT.

	15. PLEASE PROVIDE CLARIFICATION ON HOW VEHICLES WILL
	ENTER/EXIT THE LOADING DOCKS. ON THE NORTHERN LOADING
	DOCK IT APPEARS THE TRUCK WOULD HAVE TO BACK ALL THE
	WAY DOWN THE DRIVE AISLE TO ACCESS THE DOCK.

	16. PROVIDE CLARIFICATION IF NETS FOR THE PRACTICE
	FIELDS WILL BE UP ALL YEAR OR TAKEN DOWN AFTER SPRING
	TRAINING SEASON.

	17. THERE WAS NO BUS PARKING INDICATED ON THE SITE
	PLAN. HOW IS BUS PARKING PROPOSED TO BE HANDLED?

	18. APPLICATION INCLUDES A REQUEST FOR "RECREATION:
	OUTDOOR HIGH INTENSITY" AS A PRIMARY PERMITTED USE.
	THIS CATEGORY INCLUDES AMUSEMENT PARKS, DRIVE-IN
	THEATERS, GO-CART AND OTHER VEHICULAR TRACKS, GOLF
	COURSES, MINIATURE GOLF COURSES, SPORTS PARKS:
	TRAMPOLINES, BATTING CAGES, ETC., SPORTS AND RECREATION
	CAMPS, WATER SLIDES, AND WAVE POOLS. STAFF IS
	RECOMMENDING THE USES ONLY BE LIMITED TO SPORTS PARKS:
	TRAMPOLINES, BATTING CAGES, ETC. AND SPORTS AND
	RECREATION CAMPS SUBCATEGORIES WHICH ARE RELEVANT TO
	THE BASEBALL STADIUM. PLEASE CLARIFY THIS IS CONSISTENT
	WITH THE PROPOSED ACTIVITY ON THE SITE. ADDITIONALLY,
	REVIEW OF ADDITIONAL USES LISTED ON PAGE 17 OF THE
	JUSTIFICATION NEED TO BE REVIEWED WITH STAFF. SPECIAL
	EVENTS OF SEC. 78-151 IS NOT A "USE" THAT CAN BE
	REQUESTED AS SOMETHING PERMITTED BY RIGHT.

	19. THERE WAS NO TRAFFIC CONTROL (I.E. STOP SIGNS)
	SHOWN ON THE PLAN. WILL THIS BE PROVIDED IN THE
	REVISION REVIEW?

	20. PLEASE REVIEW DELINEATION OF SETBACKS ON THE SITE
	PLAN. THERE ARE TWO LOTS BEING PROPOSED, SO SETBACKS
	WILL NEED TO BE APPLIED SEPARATELY TO EACH LOT. PLEASE
	REVISE SITE PLAN AS NECESSARY.

	21. IN REVIEW OF THE MODIFICATION OF THRESHOLDS FOR A
	MINOR VERSUS MAJOR PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT ITEM
	"C" INCLUDES AN INCREASE OVER 10% OF THE PERMISSIBLE
	BUILDING HEIGHT AND ITEM "D" INCLUDES AN INCREASE OVER
	10% OF THE PERMISSIBLE FLOOR AREA RATION OR LOT
	COVERAGE. STAFF IS RECOMMENDING A CHANGE IN THE
	LANGUAGE TO STATE THAT RATHER THAN "PERMISSIBLE", IT
	STATES "APPROVED". ADDITIONAL REVIEW OF THE TRAFFIC
	IMPACT THRESHOLD WILL BE REQUIRED SO THERE ARE NO
	CONFLICTS WITH ANY RESTRICTIONS PLACED ON THE PROPERTY
	FROM A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT PERSPECTIVE.

	22. PROVIDE CALCULATIONS FOR SIGNAGE COPY AREA.
	ADDITIONALLY, PROPOSED SIGNS EXCEED MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE
	10 FEET IN HEIGHT FOR THE CS ZONING DISTRICT. WAIVER
	WITH JUSTIFICATION WILL NEED TO BE PROVIDED TO EXCEED
	THE MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE HEIGHT. [ZLDR SEC. 94-407(15) AND
	94-408(D)]

	23. WHAT IS THE STATUS OF THE MASTER SIGN PLAN FOR THE
	ENTIRE SITE?

	24. PROVIDE AN "ENHANCED" BUS SHELTER ON THE WEST AND
	EAST SIDE OF MILITARY TRAIL.

	25. BIKE PAD DIMENSIONS SHOWN IN SITE PLAN ARE
	INCORRECT AND NEED TO BE REVISED. THE MINIMUM WIDTH FOR
	A BIKE PAD CONTAINING 10 SPACES SHOULD BE 14', THE
	MINIMUM WIDTH FOR A PAD CONTAINING TWENTY SPACES SHOULD
	BE 26'- 6", AND FOR THE BIKE PAD AREA CONTAINING 48
	SPACES OR TWO ROWS OF 24 SPACES THE WIDTH SHOULD BE A
	MINIMUM OF 31'- 6".

	26. APPLICANT NEEDS TO INDICATE IN THE BIKE RACK DETAIL
	INCLUDED IN THE SITE PLAN WHICH BIKE RACK MODEL WILL BE
	INSTALLED ON THIS PROJECT. PLAN ONLY INDICATES TYPICAL
	STYLES.

	27. STAFF SUGGESTS REVISING THE PLACEMENT OF THE BIKE
	RACKS SHOWN ADJACENT TO ASTROS MILB FIELD #4 AND
	NATIONALS FIELD #4 TO AREAS CLOSER TO THE EAST PARKING
	LOT. STAFF ALSO SUGGESTS INCLUDING ADDITIONAL BIKE
	PARKING TO THE EAST OF THE STADIUM AND TO INCREASE THE
	NUMBER OF BIKE PARKING NORTH OF THE SOCCER FIELDS.

	28. WIDTH OF MULTIPURPOSE PATHS SHOULD BE INCREASED TO
	A MINIMUM OF 12 FEET.

	29. INCLUDE A NET AND/OR A FENCE OF SUFFICIENT HEIGHT
	BEHIND THE GOALS ON SOUTH SIDE OF SOCCER FIELDS.

	30. PROVIDE A PEDESTRIAN CROSSING ON HAVERHILL ROAD.

	31. PROVIDE ENHANCEMENTS TO EXISTING PEDESTRIAN
	CROSSING ON MILITARY TRAIL AT SHILOH DRIVE.
	ENHANCEMENTS SHOULD INCLUDE UTILIZATION OF A HIGH
	VISIBILITY SURFACE FOR THE CROSSING.

	32. PROVIDE PEDESTRIAN LIGHTING ALONG HAVERHILL SIDE OF
	THE PROPERTY.

	33. ZONING CONCURS WITH THE LANDSCAPING COMMENTS
	REGARDING INCREASE THE BUFFER ALONG MILITARY TRAIL
	THROUGH A COMBINATION OF INCREASE LANDSCAPE BUFFER
	WIDTH AND LAYERING OF PLANT MATERIAL TO INCREASE THE
	DENSITY OF THE BUFFER. SIMILAR TREATMENT SHOULD ALSO BE
	DONE ALONG THE PORTION OF THE NORTHERN BUFFER WHICH
	ABUTS THE RESIDENTIAL UNITS.

	34. PROVIDE TREES ON NORTHERN GRASS PARKING AREA. AS
	THE AREA DOES NOT CONSIST OF STRUCTURED PAVED PARKING
	LANDSCAPE ISLAND WITH CURBING IS NOT REQUIRED. PLEASE
	REVISE WAIVER NUMBER 6 REGARDING EXEMPTING THIS
	NORTHERN PARKING AREA FROM ALL LANDSCAPING
	REQUIREMENTS.

	35. A REQUEST WAS MADE TO PROVIDE AN EASEMENT ON THE
	CITY PARK PROPERTY FOR POTENTIAL FUTURE PALM TRAN
	SHELTER WHEN A ROUTE IS PROVIDED ALONG HAVERHILL ROAD.
	STAFF IS RECOMMENDING THAT THE EASEMENT FOR A POTENTIAL
	FUTURE PALM TRAN SHELTER BE LOCATED ON THE GRASS
	PARKING AREA LOCATED TO THE NORTH OF THE MAIN HAVERHILL
	ENTRANCE WHICH WILL PROVIDE MORE CENTRALIZED ACCESS TO
	BOTH THE BASEBALL STADIUM AND THE CITY PARK.

	GENERAL COMMENTS:

	36. SURVEY INDICATES FDOT STORMWATER RETENTION POND
	FENCE ENCROACHMENT ON THE NORTHEASTERN CORNER OF THE
	PROPERTY.

	37. AIPP REQUIREMENT FOR THE CITY WILL BE HANDLED
	THROUGH THE COUNTY AIPP PROCESS FOR APPROVAL.

	38. PLEASE REVIEW PAGE 15 OF THE EVENT MANAGEMENT PLAN,
	IT APPEARS THE DIRECTIONAL SIGNAGE FOR THE TURNPIKE AND
	I-95 IS IN THE WRONG LOCATION. APPLICANT IS RESPONSIBLE
	FOR OBTAINING ALL NECESSARY PERMITS FOR INSTALLATION OF
	PERMANENT AND TEMPORARY SIGNAGE LOCATED WITHIN ANY
	RIGHTS-OF-WAY.

	39. CITY PARK IS PROPOSED TO BE REVIEWED SEPARATELY
	THROUGH THE FSPR PROCESS. STAFF OFFERS THE FOLLOWING
	COMMENTS TO ENSURE SUBSTANTIAL INTEGRATION IN TO THE
	REST OF THE SITE:

	A. PROVIDE A PEDESTRIAN CONNECTION DIRECTLY FROM THE
	PARKING AREA TO THE SOCCER FIELDS TO THE SOUTH.
	CURRENTLY, UTILIZATION OF THE MULTIPURPOSE TRAIL IS THE
	PROPOSED ACCESS TO THE SOCCER FIELDS, BUT IT DOES NOT
	PROVIDE DIRECT ACCESS FROM THE PARKING LOT.

	B. REVIEW LANDSCAPING AND CURB CUT PROPOSALS FOR
	CONFLICTS WITH UTILITY POLES AND LINES.

	C. IN MOST INSTANCES THERE WILL BE TWO WALKING PATHS
	NEAR EACH OTHER ALONG HAVERHILL ROAD, THE EXISTING
	SIDEWALK ALONG THE STREET AND THE MULTIPURPOSE TRAIL.
	IF THE TWO CANNOT BE COMBINED AS PROPOSED ON THE
	MILITARY TRAIL SIDE OF THE PROPERTY, THEN PROVIDE
	VISUAL ENHANCEMENTS THROUGH LANDSCAPING, ETC. WHICH
	REDUCES THE APPEARANCE OF REDUNDANT PEDESTRIAN
	PATHWAYS.

	D. PROVIDE SAFE PEDESTRIAN ACCESS ROUTE FROM THE
	SIDEWALK ALONG HAVERHILL ROAD AT THE PARK ENTRANCE INTO
	TO THE MAIN PARK AREA.


	IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT:

	DANIELLE J. KITTREDGE, AICP
	SENIOR PLANNER
	PLANNING & ZONING DIVISION
	PHONE: (561)-822-1443
	EMAIL: [email protected]