City of West Palm Beach eGovPlus

Plan Review Details - Project Z15020009

Plan Review Stops For Project Z15020009

Review Stop	B			BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No	1	Status	F	Date	03-11-2015			Cont ID
Sent By	rbrown			Date	03-11-2015	Time	10:27	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	rbrown			Date	03-11-2015	Time	10:27	Sent To

Notes

2015-03-11 10:36:31	DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, BUILDING DIVISION,
	COMMENTS:

	1. THIS REVIEW IS A CURSORY REVIEW AS IT RELATES TO THE
	SITE. IT IS NOT A REVIEW FOR FULL COMPLIANCE WITH
	FLORIDA BUILDING CODE. THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE TO BE
	ADDRESSED FOR PERMITTING.

	2. FOR ANY BUILDING CROSSING A PROPERTY LINE, EITHER A
	RECORDED UNITY OF TITLE, OR SOME OTHER APPROVED LEGAL
	INSTRUMENT, SHALL BE INCLUDED WITH THE PERMIT
	APPLICATION, OR THE BUILDING MUST HAVE A FIRE WALL
	ALONG THE PROPERTY LINE, PER SECTION 702 OF FLORIDA
	BUILDING CODE, BUILDING, FIRE SEPARATION DISTANCE.

	3. DISPERSION OF ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES. SHEET SP-1
	CURRENTLY SHOWS REGULAR PARKING SPACES CLOSER TO THE
	ENTRANCES OF THE INDIVIDUAL SHOWROOMS (ROLLS ROYCE,
	BENTLEY, PRSCHE, ETC.) THAN THE ACCESSIBLE PARKING
	SPACES. PER SECTION 208.3 OF FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY CODE
	ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES ARE TO BE LOCATED ON THE
	SHORTEST POSSIBLE ROUTE OF TRAVEL FROM ADJACENT PARKING
	TO AN ACCESSIBLE ENTRANCE FOR EACH BUILDING. THE DESIGN
	OF ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES SHALL COMPLY WITH SECTION
	502 OF FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY CODE

	4. WHEN SUBMITTED FOR BUILDING PERMIT, THE PLANS SHALL
	SHOW THAT THE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION FOR THE BUILDINGS
	WILL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE HEIGHT, AREA AND
	OCCUPANCY LIMITATIONS IN CHAPTER 5 OF THE FLORIDA
	BUILDING CODE

	5. WHEN SUBMITTED FOR BUILDING PERMIT, COMPLIANCE WITH
	ALL BUILDING SEPARATION, PERCENTAGE OF OPENINGS AND
	OPENING PROTECTIVE REQUIREMENTS OF CHAPTERS 6 AND 7 OF
	THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE SHALL BE VERIFIED.

	6. IN CASE THE NEW SERVICE BAY BUILDING WILL BE
	CONSIDERED AN ADDITION TO THE EXISTING SERVICE BAY
	BUILDING, THE ADDITION TO THE EXISTING BUILDING IS
	COVERED BY CHAPTER 10 OF THE FLORIDA EXISTING BUILDING
	CODE. THE HEIGHT AND/OR AREA INCREASE DUE TO THE
	PROPOSED ADDITION SHALL NOT INCREASE THE TOTAL BUILDING
	HEIGHT AND/OR AREA BEYOND THAT ALLOWED UNDER THE
	APPLICABLE PROVISIONS OF CHAPTER 5 OF THE FLORIDA
	BUILDING CODE FOR THE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION USED.

	7. SEPARATE PERMITS REQUIRED. ALL APPLICABLE PERMITS
	AND SUB-PERMITS MUST BE OBTAINED BEFORE COMMENCING THE
	WORK. SEPARATE PERMITS, PLANS AND FEES, ARE REQUIRED
	FOR SWIMMING POOLS AND SPAS, GAS SYSTEMS, GENERATORS,
	FIRE ALARM SYSTEMS, FIRE SPRINKLER AND OTHER FIRE
	SUPPRESSION SYSTEMS, GREASE INTERCEPTORS, SITE
	LIGHTING, SITE LANDSCAPE, SITE IRRIGATION, ETC.

	8. FOR STREET ADDRESSING, CONTACT MICHAEL ORIO, GIS
	SUPPORT SPECIALIST, AT (561) 494 1080, OR BY EMAIL:
	[email protected]

	ROBERT BROWN
	BUILDING OFFICIAL
	TEL: 561 805 6652
	EMAIL: [email protected]

Review Stop	ENG - PPRC			ENGINEERING - PPRC
Rev No	3	Status	P	Date	05-26-2015			Cont ID
Sent By	cranford			Date	05-26-2015	Time	14:05	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	cranford			Date	05-26-2015	Time	13:45	Sent To

Notes

2015-05-26 14:05:46	PRIOR TO CONDUCTING ANY LAND DISTURBING OR LAND
	DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES:

	1. A BOND OR DEPOSIT IN AN AMOUNT COVERING THE COST
	ASSOCIATED WITH IMPLEMENTATION OF THE STORMWATER
	POLLUTANT PREVENTION PLAN (SWPPP) AND LAND
	STABILIZATION OF THE SITE MUST BE SUBMITTED TO THE
	PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT. THE BOND WILL BE RELEASED UPON
	APPROVED INSPECTION OF TIE-BEAMS OR SIMILAR VERTICAL
	CONSTRUCTION. (CITY CODE SECTION 94-450)

	2. ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL IS REQUIRED.
	TECHNICAL DETAILS OF THE WATER, SEWER, STORMWATER
	(INCLUDING SWPPP), TRAFFIC CIRCULATION, AND SOLID WASTE
	COLLECTION WILL BE REVIEWED AS PART PART OF THE
	ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL APPLICATION PROCESSES.
	THE ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL APPLICATION FORMS
	CAN BE DOWNLOADED AT
	HTTP://WPB.ORG/ENGINEERING/FORMS-AND-PUBLICATIONS/

	KELLY CRANFORD, P.E.
	LAND DEVELOPMENT ENGINEER
	PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
	CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH
	[email protected]
	561-494-1098 (OFFICE)

Review Stop	ENG - PPRC			ENGINEERING - PPRC
Rev No	2	Status	F	Date	04-06-2015			Cont ID
Sent By	cranford			Date	04-06-2015	Time	15:01	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	cranford			Date	04-06-2015	Time	14:55	Sent To

Notes

2015-04-06 15:01:24	2ND REVIEW COMMENTS

	1. TRAFFIC CONCURRENCY LETTER FROM PALM BEACH COUNTY
	HAS NOT YET BEEN SUBMITTED.

	ONCE CONCURRENCY LETTER HAS BEEN RECEIVED, STAFF WILL
	PASS THE SUBMITTAL CONTINGENT ON THE APPROVAL OF THE
	WAIVER FOR THE NUMBER AND LOCATION OF DRIVEWAYS.

	KELLY CRANFORD, PE
	CITY LAND DEVELOPMENT ENGINEER
	[email protected]
	561-494-1098 (OFFICE)

Review Stop	ENG - PPRC			ENGINEERING - PPRC
Rev No	1	Status	F	Date	03-10-2015			Cont ID
Sent By	cranford			Date	03-10-2015	Time	10:41	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	cranford			Date	03-10-2015	Time	08:26	Sent To

Notes

2015-03-10 09:57:52	PUBLIC WORKS DEPT.

	THIS IS A CONCEPTUAL LEVEL REVIEW. CONSTRUCTION LEVEL
	DETAILS, DESIGN CALCULATIONS AND THE POLLUTION
	PREVENTION PLAN WILL BE REVIEWED AS PART OF THE
	ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL AND BUILDING PERMIT
	APPLICATION PROCESSES. THE ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT
	APPROVAL APPLICATION FORMS CAN BE DOWNLOADED AT
	HTTP://WPB.ORG/ENGINEERING/FORMS-AND-PUBLICATIONS/

	1. THE SITE LAYOUT SHOWN ON SHEET SP-1 IS NOT
	CONSISTENT WITH THE LAYOUT SHOWN ON SHEETS SP-2. WHICH
	LAYOUT IS THE PROPOSED SITE CONFIGURATION?

	2. WE WILL DEFER TO THE CITY'S LEGAL DEPARTMENT FOR
	DETERMINATION OF THE DOCUMENT REQUIRED TO DEMONSTRATE
	COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 94-305(B) OF THE CODE OF
	ORDINANCES. "SETBACK ENCROACHMENTS. JOINT USE
	PROHIBITED. THE SETBACK OR OPEN SPACE OF A BUILDING ON
	ONE LOT SHALL NOT BE CONSIDERED AS THE SETBACK OR OPEN
	SPACE FOR A BUILDING ON ANY OTHER LOT EXCEPT WHERE
	UNITY OF TITLE IS PROVIDED FOR ALL AFFECTED
	PROPERTIES."

	3. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION APPROVAL WILL
	BE REQUIRED FOR THE WORK ALONG OKEECHOBEE BLVD.

	4. PLEASE SUBMIT A COPY OF THE TRAFFIC CONCURRENCY
	LETTER FROM PALM BEACH COUNTY.

	5. PLEASE SUBMIT APPLICATIONS FOR A DEVELOPMENT PERMIT
	AND RIGHT-OF-WAY PERMIT FROM THE ENGINEERING
	DEPARTMENT. APPLICATION FORMS CAN BE FOUND AT
	HTTP://WPB.ORG/ENGINEERING/FORMS-AND-PUBLICATIONS/
	(SECTIONS 2-421 AND 78-432, CODE OF ORDINANCES)

	6. PLEASE REVISE THE DRIVEWAY APRONS TO MEET THE CITY'S
	ENGINEERING DESIGN STANDARDS. PLEASE ALSO INCLUDE THE
	DETAILS FOR THE SIDEWALK RAMPS, HTTP://WPB.ORG/ENGINEER
	ING/ENGINEERING-SERVICES/ENGINEERING-STANDARDS/

	7. THE NUMBER OF PROPERTY ACCESS DRIVES EXCEEDS THE
	MAXIMUM NUMBER AND WIDTH ALLOWED FOR COMMERCIAL
	PROPERTIES. PER CODE OF ORDINANCES SECTION 94-313,
	NON-RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES WITH LESS THAN 300 REQUIRED
	PARKING SPACES MAY HAVE UP TO ONE ACCESS POINT ONTO
	EACH RIGHT-OF-WAY.

	8. PLEASE REVISE THE LANDSCAPE PLAN TO SHOW LOCATIONS
	OF ALL WATER METERS, VALVES, CLEAN-OUTS, LIGHT POLES,
	UNDERGROUND UTILITIES (WATER, SANITARY, STORM, GAS,
	ELECTRIC), ETC.

	9. PLEASE SHOW THE SIGHT TRIANGLES ON THE LANDSCAPING
	PLAN FOR THE INTERSECTIONS AND VEHICULAR EXITS.
	(SECTION 94-305E, CODE OF ORDINANCES)

	10. PLEASE REVISE PLANS TO INCLUDE THE CITY OF WEST
	PALM BEACH GARBAGE RECEPTACLE DETAIL. THE SHOWN DETAIL
	DOES NOT MEET THE MINIMUM DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS OF
	CODE OF ORDINANCES, SECTION 94-444(B), ALSO SEE FIGURE
	XIV-3 OF THE SAME SECTION. CITY STANDARD DETAIL GC-8
	MAY BE DOWNLOADED AT HTTP://WPB.ORG/ENGINEERING/ENGINEE
	RING-SERVICES/ENGINEERING-STANDARDS/

	11. WILL SOLID WASTE COLLECTION SERVICE BE PROVIDED BY
	THE CITY OR BY A PRIVATE COMPANY? PER SECTION 74-31 OF
	THE CODE OF ORDINANCES, EVERY COMMERCIAL ESTABLISHMENT
	WITHIN THE CITY SHALL SUBSCRIBE FOR REGULAR COMMERCIAL
	SOLID WASTE COLLECTION AND DISPOSAL SERVICES FROM THE
	CITY EXCEPT THOSE COMMERCIAL ESTABLISHMENTS FOR WHICH
	THE CITY IS UNABLE TO PROVIDE THE NEEDED SERVICES,
	E.G., CONTAINERS AND COMPACTORS OVER EIGHT CUBIC YARDS.
	FOR THESE SERVICES, THE COMMERCIAL ESTABLISHMENT MUST
	USE THE SERVICES OF A PROVIDER APPROVED TO OPERATE
	WITHIN THE CITY PURSUANT TO A FRANCHISE AGREEMENT. NO
	PERSON SHALL ATTEMPT TO USE CITY SERVICES WITHOUT
	HAVING FIRST SUBSCRIBED FOR SUCH SERVICES OR WITHOUT
	HAVING REQUESTED THE CITY TO PERFORM A SPECIAL SOLID
	WASTE COLLECTION AND DISPOSAL.

	12. PLEASE PROVIDE AN AUTOTURN ANALYSIS DEMONSTRATING
	THE SOLID WASTE COLLECTION VEHICLE CAN ACCESS THE
	PROPOSED DUMPSTER AND COMPACTOR LOCATIONS. THE TRASH
	DUMPSTER/COMPACTORS MUST LOCATED IN AREAS EASILY
	SERVICED BY THE CITY SANITATION EQUIPMENT AND MANPOWER
	PER SECTION 74-35(A)(5) OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES.

	13. SOLID WASTE YARDAGE WILL NEED TO BE ESTIMATED AS
	PART OF THE FINAL DESIGN TO VERIFY THAT THE ENCLOSURE
	SIZE IS APPROPRIATE FOR THE REQUIRED NUMBER AND SIZE OF
	TRASH BINS.

	KELLY CRANFORD, PE
	CITY LAND DEVELOPMENT ENGINEER
	[email protected]
	561-494-1098 (OFFICE)

	VINCE NOEL, PSM
	CITY SURVEYOR / REAL ESTATE SUPERVISOR
	[email protected]
	561-494-1096

	BRIAN COLLINS, PE
	CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER
	[email protected]
	561-494-1040

	FERDINAND RIVERA
	PUBLIC WORKS OPERATIONS MANAGER
	[email protected]
	561-822-2076

	TRACY WARD, PE
	CITY STORMWATER ENGINEER
	561-494-1120
	[email protected]

Review Stop	FIRE			FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No	2	Status	P	Date	05-27-2015			Cont ID
Sent By	pleduc			Date	05-27-2015	Time	15:48	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	pleduc			Date	05-27-2015	Time	15:48	Sent To

Notes

2015-05-27 15:56:24	AFTER A REVIEW OF THE PPRC RESPONSE LETTER DATED MAY
	19, 2015, FROM ERIC SCHNEIDER, PRINCIPAL PLANNER, THE
	PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU COMMENTS
	HAVE BEEN ADDRESSED.
	THE BUREAU'S APPROVAL OF THIS SUBMITTED PROJECT DOES
	NOT CONSTITUTE IT'S FINAL REVIEW OR APPROVAL.

	THE BUREAU SHALL REVIEW ALL SUBMITTED BUILDING PLANS AT
	THE APPROPRIATE TIME AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE
	REQUIREMENTS OF ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND STANDARDS.

	PETER LEDUC
	FIRE MARSHAL
	WEST PALM BEACH FIRE RESCUE

Review Stop	FIRE			FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No	1	Status	P	Date	03-09-2015			Cont ID
Sent By	pleduc			Date	03-09-2015	Time		Rev Time	0.00
Received By	pleduc			Date	03-09-2015	Time	13:10	Sent To

Notes

2015-03-09 13:42:52	THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS WERE SUBMITTED BY PETER LEDUC,
	FIRE MARSHAL, BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION, WEST PALM
	BEACH FIRE RESCUE.

	THIS REVIEW CAN ONLY BE CONSIDERED PRELIMINARY AS THE
	DRAWINGS THAT WERE REVIEWED WERE NOT COMPLETE.
	ADDITIONAL COMMENTS CAN BE EXPECTED WHEN FULL DRAWINGS
	ARE SUBMITTED FOR PERMIT.

	THE FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU HAS NO OBJECTIONS TO THE
	PROPOSED PROJECT.

	1. CONSTRUCTION, DEMOLITION, AND RENOVATION TO COMPLY
	WITH NFPA 241.

	2. SITE ACCESS AND EXIT POINTS ARE TO BE CLEARLY
	IDENTIFIED AND MAINTAINED FOR EMERGENCY VEHICLES DURING
	ALL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES.

	3. THE BUILDING ADDRESS SHALL BE CLEARLY VISIBLE FROM
	ALL ACCESS ROADWAYS, INCLUDING DURING CONSTRUCTION.
	ADDRESS NUMBERS SHALL CONTRAST WITH THEIR BACKGROUND
	AND SHALL NOT BE LESS THAN SIX (6) INCHES IN HEIGHT
	WITH A ONE (1) INCH STROKE FOR ALL BUILDINGS.

	4. TRASH AND DEBRIS IS TO BE REMOVED FROM THE SITE
	DAILY OR MORE OFTEN TO REDUCE THE ACCUMULATION OF
	POTENTIAL LIFE AND FIRE SAFETY HAZARDS.

	5. PLEASE PROVIDE THE OCCUPANCY TYPE OF EACH BUILDING.
	ARE THE BUILDINGS FUNCTIONING AS MULTIUSE OCCUPANCIES?
	INDICATE IF THE BUILDINGS ARE DESIGNED FOR MIXED USE
	(NON-SEPARATED) OR SEPARATED USE PER SECTION 6.1.14 OF
	NFPA 101. FOR NON-SEPARATED MIXED USE OCCUPANCIES, THE
	MOST STRINGENT FIRE AND LIFE SAFETY REQUIREMENTS OF
	EACH OCCUPANCY SHALL APPLY TO THE BUILDING.

	6. A NFPA 13 COMPLAINT FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM IS
	REQUIRED FOR EACH STRUCTURE, INCLUDING THE GARAGE WITH
	A NFPA 14 COMPLIANT WET STANDPIPE SYSTEM. TEMPORARY
	STANDPIPES ARE REQUIRED WHEN THE BUILDING REACHES THREE
	LEVELS OR THIRTY FEET WHILE BEING CONSTRUCTED. SEPARATE
	SHOP DRAWINGS, ARE REQUIRED TO BE SUBMITTED, REVIEWED
	AND APPROVED BY THE FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU PRIOR TO ANY
	INSTALLATION.

	7. PARKING STRUCTURES SHALL COMPLY WITH THE
	REQUIREMENTS OF NFPA 88A 2011 EDITION,AND NFPA 101,
	CHAPTER 42 AND ALL OTHER APPLICABLE CODES.\

	8. A MONITORED FIRE ALARM SYSTEM IS REQUIRED FOR THIS
	STRUCTURE. SEPARATE SHOP DRAWINGS, ARE REQUIRED TO BE
	SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE FIRE PREVENTION
	BUREAU PRIOR TO ANY INSTALLATION.

	9. ALL VERTICAL AND HORIZONTAL FIRE SEPARATIONS FOR
	THIS BUILDING SHALL BE CLEARLY IDENTIFIED AND INDICATED
	ON THE PLANS.

	10. ALL FIRE RATED OPENING PROTECTIONS (FIRE DOORS AND
	HARDWARE) SHALL BE CLEARLY IDENTIFIED AND INDICATED IN
	THE DOOR SCHEDULE. ALL DOORS THAT OPEN ONTO EXIT ACCESS
	CORRIDORS SHALL BE AT LEAST 20 MINUTE FIRE RATED AND BE
	EQUIPPED WITH SELF-CLOSING DEVICES THAT CAUSE THE DOOR
	TO POSITIVELY LATCH WHEN CLOSED. THIS REQUIREMENT SHALL
	BE CLEARLY INDICATED AND ILLUSTRATED ON THE DOOR
	SCHEDULE.

	11. ALL EXIT DISCHARGE LOCATIONS SHALL BE CLEARLY
	ILLUSTRATED ON THE PLAN. SHEET A-1.0 INDICATES A
	STAIRWAY EXIT DOOR THAT DISCHARGES INTO A PARTS STORAGE
	ROOM. THIS IS A NONCOMFORMING EXIT AND WILL BE DENIED.
	AN ALTERNATIVE EXIT SHALL BE DESIGNED IN COMPLIANCE
	WITH NFPA CHAPTER 7.

	12. ALL PORTABLE FIRE EXTINGUISHERS LOCATIONS SHALL BE
	CLEARLY IDENTIFIED AND INDICATED ON THE PLAN.

	13. STAIR DETAIL SHALL BE PROVIDED INCLUDING MINIMUM
	RISE, RUN, AND TREAD DEPTH.

	14. KNOX-BOX KEY SYSTEM SHALL BE REQUIRED FOR THIS
	BUILDING.

	15. ALL ELEVATORS SHALL BE EQUIPPED WITH A REGION 7
	KEYWAY SYSTEM.

	ANY BUILDING THAT IS MORE THAN THREE STORIES HIGH OR IN
	WHICH THE VERTICAL DISTANCE BETWEEN THE BOTTOM TERMINAL
	LANDING AND THE TOP TERMINAL LANDING EXCEEDS 25 FEET
	MUST BE CONSTRUCTED TO CONTAIN AT LEAST ONE PASSENGER
	ELEVATOR THAT IS OPERATIONAL AND WILL ACCOMMODATE AN
	AMBULANCE STRETCHER 76 INCHES LONG AND 24 INCHES WIDE
	IN THE HORIZONTAL POSITION.

	16. TACTILE SIGNAGE SHALL BE INSTALLED AT ALL EXIT
	DOORS.

	17. COMPLETE LIFE SAFETY PLANS FOR EACH OCCUPANCY SHALL
	BE PROVIDED THAT ILLUSTRATE OCCUPANT LOADS, TRAVEL
	DISTANCES, COMMON PATHS OF TRAVEL, DEAD-END CORRIDORS,
	EXIT SIGNS, EMERGENCY LIGHTING, EXITS LEADING TO A
	PUBLIC WAY, FIRE EXTINGUISHER LOCATIONS, AND ALL FIRE
	SAFETY FEATURES AND EQUIPMENT.

	18. OCCUPANT LOADS FOR ALL SPACES SHALL BE DETERMINED
	AND SUBMITTED WITH THE SUBMITTED PLAN AND WHEN APPROVED
	THEY ARE REQUIRED TO BE POSTED WHERE APPLICABLE.

	19. ALL ILLUMINATED EXIT SIGNS AND EMERGENCY LIGHTING
	EQUIPMENT SHALL BE ILLUSTRATED ON THE PLAN.

	20. THE FIRE RATING OF ALL SHAFTS SHALL BE CLEARLY
	INDICATED ON THE BUILDING PLAN.

	21. ALL EXISTING AND NEW FIRE HYDRANTS PLANNED FOR THIS
	DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE CLEARLY INDICATED AND IDENTIFIED
	ON THE PLAN AND CLOSELY COORDINATED WITH THE BUREAU OF
	FIRE PREVENTION.

	22. ALL FIRE DEPARTMENT SPRINKLER SYSTEM CONNECTIONS
	(FDC,S) FOR THE PROJECT SHALL BE IDENTIFIED AND
	COORDINATED WITH THE BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION.

	23. ALL FIRE WATER MAINS, SIZES AND THEIR VALVE
	ASSEMBLIES SHALL BE CLEARLY IDENTIFIED AND ILLUSTRATED
	ON THE PLAN.

	24. PER FLORIDA 69A-60.0081; NOTICE SIGNAGE IS REQUIRED
	FOR STRUCTURES WITH LIGHT-FRAME TRUSS-TYPE
	CONSTRUCTION. ANY COMMERCIAL, INDUSTRIAL, OR ANY
	MULTIUNIT RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURE OF THREE UNITS OR MORE
	WHICH USES HORIZONTAL OR VERTICAL LIGHT-FRAME
	TRUSS-TYPE CONSTRUCTION IN ANY PORTION SHALL BE MARKED
	WITH A MALTESE CROSS SIGN MEASURING 8 INCHES
	HORIZONTALLY AND 8 INCHES VERTICALLY, OF A BRIGHT RED
	REFLECTIVE COLOR. THE APPROVED SYMBOL SHALL BE PLACED
	WITHIN 24 INCHES TO THE LEFT OF THE MAIN ENTRY DOOR.
	1. STRUCTURES WITH LIGHT-FRAME TRUSS ROOFS SHALL BE
	MARKED WITH THE LETTER "R".
	2. STRUCTURES WITH LIGHT-FRAME TRUSS FLOOR SYSTEMS
	SHALL BE MARKED WITH THE LETTER "F".
	3. STRUCTURES WITH LIGHT-FRAME TRUSS FLOOR AND ROOF
	SYSTEMS SHALL BE MARKED WITH THE LETTERS "R/F".

Review Stop	L			LANDSCAPING
Rev No	3	Status	P	Date	05-20-2015			Cont ID
Sent By	rcaranci			Date	05-20-2015	Time	08:17	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	rcaranci			Date	05-20-2015	Time	08:17	Sent To

Notes

2015-05-20 08:18:59	ALL PREVIOUS COMMENTS SATISFIED.
	ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 4/13/15:
	12. SATISFIED. THE EASTERN BUFFER HAS BEEN INCREASED IN
	WIDTH, ALLOWING THE ADDITION OF LARGER BUFFER TREES TO
	BUFFER THE IMPACT OF THE MASS OF THE BUILDING. PLEASE
	ADD LARGER TREES TO THE BUFFER.
	CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
	1. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON
	THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE
	SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT
	SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.

Review Stop	L			LANDSCAPING
Rev No	2	Status	F	Date	04-13-2015			Cont ID
Sent By	rcaranci			Date	04-13-2015	Time	12:01	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	rcaranci			Date	04-13-2015	Time	12:01	Sent To

Notes

2015-04-13 12:03:32	RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER 561-822-1462
	APRIL 13, 2015
	I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND
	PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:

	1. SATISFIED. REVISE THE LANDSCAPE PLAN TO INCLUDE A
	LIST OF THE EXISTING TREES LOCATED ON THE PROPERTY AND
	INCLUDE THE SIZE, SPECIES AND WHETHER THEY WILL BE
	REMOVED, RELOCATED, OR PRESERVED IN PLACE. A TREE
	ALTERATION PERMIT IS REQUIRED FOR TREES BEING REMOVED
	(SOUTH AND EAST SIDES OF EXISTING SERVICE BUILDING) PER
	SECTION 94-448.

	2. SATISFIED. THE BUFFER LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST
	CORNER OF THE SITE IS REQUIRED TO BE FIVE (5) FEET
	WIDE, THE LANDSCAPE BUFFER ALONG OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD
	IS REQUIRED TO BE FIVE (5) FEET IN WIDTH. SECTIONS OF
	THE NORTH BUFFER MEASURE LESS THAN THE REQUIRED 5 FEET
	PER SECTION 94-443. THE DIMENSIONS SHALL BE CLEARLY
	SHOWN ON THE SITE PLAN.

	3. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE A SEPARATE SHEET LABELED
	?SITE PLAN AREA CALCULATIONS? SHOWING THE CAD LAYERS
	FOR THE FOLLOWING: TOTAL SITE AREA, TOTAL OPEN SPACE,
	LANDSCAPED OPEN SPACE, PERVIOUS AREA, IMPERVIOUS AREA
	AND SOD AREA WITH CORRESPONDING SQUARE FOOTAGES SHOWN.

	4. SATISFIED. PLEASE USE THE REQUIRED OPEN SPACE OF 40%
	FOR THE ENTIRE SITE TO CALCULATE THE NUMBER OF SHADE
	TREES, FLOWERING TREES AND SHRUBS REQUIRED BY SECTION
	94-442.

	5. SATISFIED. PROVIDE THE DATA TABLES/CALCULATIONS TO
	VERIFY THE COMPLIANCE OF THE ENTIRE BRAMAN MOTORCARS
	SITE WITH THE CITY?S LANDSCAPE REGULATIONS. THIS
	INCLUDES THE REQUIRED NUMBER OF TREES AND SHRUBS
	(SECTION 94-442 (B)(2) B.), THE REQUIRED NUMBER OF
	PERIMETER TREES BY BUFFER (SECTION 94-443 (B)), THE
	PERCENTAGE OF PALM TREES SUBSTITUTED FOR SHADE OR
	FLOWERING TREES (SECTION 94-442(C).), REQUIRED PARKING
	LOT LANDSCAPE (SECTION 94-443 (C)), AND REQUIRED
	FOUNDATION PLANTING (SECTION 94-443(E)(1)).

	6. SATISFIED. THE LIGHT POLES SHALL BE SHOWN ON THE
	LANDSCAPE PLAN. LIGHT POLES SHALL NOT INTERFERE WITH
	THE LONG TERM GROWTH OF THE TREES.

	7. SATISFIED. THERE IS NO TERMINAL TREE SHOWN AT THE
	SOUTHWESTERN ROW OF NEW PARKING OR NEXT TO THE PORSCHE
	SERVICE AREA ENTRANCE PARKING REQUIRED PER SECTION
	94-443(C).

	8. SATISFIED. ALL THE UTILITY FEATURES SHOWN ON THE
	CIVIL PLANS SHALL BE SHOWN ON LANDSCAPE PLAN AND IN THE
	SAME LOCATIONS. EX. NORTHEAST CORNER DOES NOT SHOW
	WATER METER, ETC. ITEMS. THE NEW SIX (6) INCH SANITARY
	SEWER SERVICE IS NOT SHOWN AND A TREE IS SHOWN ON TOP
	OF IT.

	9. SATISFIED. ALL HEDGES SHALL BE ALLOWED TO GROW TO
	THE MINIMUM 40 INCH HEIGHT WITHIN TWO YEARS OF PLANTING
	AS REQUIRED BY SECTION 94-445(4)E OF THE ZONING AND
	LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS. THE WAX JASMINE WILL NOT
	GROW TO 40 INCHES WITHIN THE TWO YEAR TIME FRAME, SO IT
	MAY NOT BE USED AS A HEDGE MATERIAL ALONG OKEECHOBEE
	BOULEVARD.

	10. SATISFIED. WHAT IS GOING TO BE USED TO PROTECT THE
	LANDSCAPE FROM VEHICULAR ENCROACHMENT AT THE SOUTHWEST
	CORNER OF THE SITE, IN THE MIDDLE PARKING BY THE GARAGE
	ENTRANCE AREA AND IN THE REAR OF THE SITE BY THE MINI
	SERVICE AREA?

	11. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE LANDSCAPING AND SCREENING
	FOR ALL GROUND MOUNTED EQUIPMENT INCLUDING FPL, WATER
	AND PHONE/ CABLE, GENERATORS, A/C UNITS ETC.

	ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 4/13/15:
	12. THE EASTERN BUFFER HAS BEEN INCREASED IN WIDTH,
	ALLOWING THE ADDITION OF LARGER BUFFER TREES TO BUFFER
	THE IMPACT OF THE MASS OF THE BUILDING. PLEASE ADD
	LARGER TREES TO THE BUFFER.

Review Stop	L			LANDSCAPING
Rev No	1	Status	F	Date	03-10-2015			Cont ID
Sent By	eschneid			Date	03-10-2015	Time	22:07	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	eschneid			Date	03-10-2015	Time	22:07	Sent To

Notes

2015-03-10 22:08:32	RAY CARANCI, LANDSCAPE PLANNER
	PROJECT: BRAMAN MOTORCARS
	MARCH 10, 2015
	I HAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REFERENCED PETITION, AND
	PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:

	1. REVISE THE LANDSCAPE PLAN TO INCLUDE A LIST OF THE
	EXISTING TREES LOCATED ON THE PROPERTY AND INCLUDE THE
	SIZE, SPECIES AND WHETHER THEY WILL BE REMOVED,
	RELOCATED, OR PRESERVED IN PLACE. A TREE ALTERATION
	PERMIT IS REQUIRED FOR TREES BEING REMOVED (SOUTH AND
	EAST SIDES OF EXISTING SERVICE BUILDING) PER SECTION
	94-448.

	2. THE BUFFER LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE
	SITE IS REQUIRED TO BE FIVE (5) FEET WIDE, THE
	LANDSCAPE BUFFER ALONG OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD IS REQUIRED
	TO BE FIVE (5) FEET IN WIDTH. SECTIONS OF THE NORTH
	BUFFER MEASURE LESS THAN THE REQUIRED 5 FEET PER
	SECTION 94-443. THE DIMENSIONS SHALL BE CLEARLY SHOWN
	ON THE SITE PLAN.

	3. PLEASE PROVIDE A SEPARATE SHEET LABELED ?SITE PLAN
	AREA CALCULATIONS? SHOWING THE CAD LAYERS FOR THE
	FOLLOWING: TOTAL SITE AREA, TOTAL OPEN SPACE,
	LANDSCAPED OPEN SPACE, PERVIOUS AREA, IMPERVIOUS AREA
	AND SOD AREA WITH CORRESPONDING SQUARE FOOTAGES SHOWN.

	4. PLEASE USE THE REQUIRED OPEN SPACE OF 40% FOR THE
	ENTIRE SITE TO CALCULATE THE NUMBER OF SHADE TREES,
	FLOWERING TREES AND SHRUBS REQUIRED BY SECTION 94-442.

	5. PROVIDE THE DATA TABLES/CALCULATIONS TO VERIFY THE
	COMPLIANCE OF THE ENTIRE BRAMAN MOTORCARS SITE WITH THE
	CITY?S LANDSCAPE REGULATIONS. THIS INCLUDES THE
	REQUIRED NUMBER OF TREES AND SHRUBS (SECTION 94-442
	(B)(2) B.), THE REQUIRED NUMBER OF PERIMETER TREES BY
	BUFFER (SECTION 94-443 (B)), THE PERCENTAGE OF PALM
	TREES SUBSTITUTED FOR SHADE OR FLOWERING TREES (SECTION
	94-442(C).), REQUIRED PARKING LOT LANDSCAPE (SECTION
	94-443 (C)), AND REQUIRED FOUNDATION PLANTING (SECTION
	94-443(E)(1)).

	6. THE LIGHT POLES SHALL BE SHOWN ON THE LANDSCAPE
	PLAN. LIGHT POLES SHALL NOT INTERFERE WITH THE LONG
	TERM GROWTH OF THE TREES.

	7. THERE IS NO TERMINAL TREE SHOWN AT THE SOUTHWESTERN
	ROW OF NEW PARKING OR NEXT TO THE PORSCHE SERVICE AREA
	ENTRANCE PARKING REQUIRED PER SECTION 94-443(C).

	8. ALL THE UTILITY FEATURES SHOWN ON THE CIVIL PLANS
	SHALL BE SHOWN ON LANDSCAPE PLAN AND IN THE SAME
	LOCATIONS. EX. NORTHEAST CORNER DOES NOT SHOW WATER
	METER, ETC. ITEMS. THE NEW SIX (6) INCH SANITARY SEWER
	SERVICE IS NOT SHOWN AND A TREE IS SHOWN ON TOP OF IT.

	9. ALL HEDGES SHALL BE ALLOWED TO GROW TO THE MINIMUM
	40 INCH HEIGHT WITHIN TWO YEARS OF PLANTING AS REQUIRED
	BY SECTION 94-445(4)E OF THE ZONING AND LAND
	DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS. THE WAX JASMINE WILL NOT GROW
	TO 40 INCHES WITHIN THE TWO YEAR TIME FRAME, SO IT MAY
	NOT BE USED AS A HEDGE MATERIAL ALONG OKEECHOBEE
	BOULEVARD.

	10. WHAT IS GOING TO BE USED TO PROTECT THE LANDSCAPE
	FROM VEHICULAR ENCROACHMENT AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF
	THE SITE, IN THE MIDDLE PARKING BY THE GARAGE ENTRANCE
	AREA AND IN THE REAR OF THE SITE BY THE MINI SERVICE
	AREA?

	11. PLEASE PROVIDE LANDSCAPING AND SCREENING FOR ALL
	GROUND MOUNTED EQUIPMENT INCLUDING FPL, WATER AND
	PHONE/ CABLE, GENERATORS, A/C UNITS ETC.

Review Stop	PW			PUBLIC WORKS
Rev No	2	Status	P	Date	05-26-2015			Cont ID
Sent By	cranford			Date	05-26-2015	Time	14:06	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	cranford			Date	05-26-2015	Time	14:06	Sent To

Notes

***NONE***

Review Stop	PW			PUBLIC WORKS
Rev No	1	Status	F	Date	03-10-2015			Cont ID
Sent By	cranford			Date	03-10-2015	Time	10:41	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	cranford			Date	03-10-2015	Time	08:26	Sent To

Notes

2015-03-10 10:42:00

PLEASE REFER TO ENGINEERING PPRC COMMENTS.

Review Stop	STORM			STORMWATER
Rev No	1	Status	P	Date	03-10-2015			Cont ID
Sent By	cranford			Date	03-10-2015	Time	10:42	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	cranford			Date	03-10-2015	Time	08:26	Sent To

Notes

2015-03-10 10:42:27

PLEASE REFER TO ENGINEERING PPRC COMMENTS.

Review Stop	SURVEY			SURVEYING
Rev No	1	Status	P	Date	03-10-2015			Cont ID
Sent By	cranford			Date	03-10-2015	Time	10:43	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	cranford			Date	03-10-2015	Time	10:42	Sent To

Notes

2015-03-10 10:42:51

PLEASE REFER TO ENGINEERING PPRC COMMENTS.

Review Stop	TRAFFIC			TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No	2	Status	P	Date	05-26-2015			Cont ID
Sent By	cranford			Date	05-26-2015	Time	14:07	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	cranford			Date		Time		Sent To

Notes

***NONE***

Review Stop	TRAFFIC			TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No	1	Status	F	Date	03-10-2015			Cont ID
Sent By	cranford			Date	03-10-2015	Time	10:43	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	cranford			Date	03-10-2015	Time	08:26	Sent To

Notes

2015-03-10 10:43:18

PLEASE REFER TO ENGINEERING PPRC COMMENTS.

Review Stop	Z			ZONING
Rev No	3	Status	F	Date	07-01-2015			Cont ID
Sent By	eschneid			Date	07-01-2015	Time	15:06	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	eschneid			Date	07-01-2015	Time	15:05	Sent To

Notes

2015-07-01 15:09:12	PB 1222M - POST PB RESUBMITTAL
	BRAMAN MOTORCARS CPD
	2901 OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD

	- CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446

	- PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN
	WRITTEN FORMAT.

	- WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF FOUR
	(4) PAPER COPIES AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY IN .PNG FORMAT
	OF ALL PLANS. PLEASE NOTE THAT CHANGES ON THE
	RESUBMITTED PLANS OR THE SUBMITTAL OF INFORMATION/PLANS
	TO ADDRESS THE COMMENTS MAY RESULT IN ADDITIONAL
	COMMENTS.

	- THESE COMMENTS SHALL BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED AND
	SUBMITTED TO THE PLANNING DIVISION BY 5 PM ON THURSDAY,
	JULY 9, 2015, TO BE ELIGIBLE TO BE SCHEDULED FOR THE
	AUGUST 17, 2015 CITY COMMISSION MEETING.

	1) PRIOR TO SCHEDULING A PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE CITY
	COMMISSION, THE APPLICANT SHALL:

	A. REPEAT COMMENT: SHOW ALL THE PARKING SPACES IN FRONT
	OF BUILDING D HAVING WHEEL STOPS OR OTHER BARRIER TO
	PREVENT CUSTOMERS FROM PARKING ACROSS THE SIDEWALK. NOT
	ALL SPACES SHOW A BARRIER.
	B. REPEAT COMMENT: REVISE THE PLANS TO SHOW THE BICYCLE
	RACK PAD BEHIND THE EXISTING BMW BUILDING WITH THE
	DIMENSIONS LABELED ON THE SITE PLAN AND THE CORRECT
	SIZE ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN. THE PAD IS SHOWN ON THE
	PLANS AT FOUR (4) FEET DEEP. THIS PAD NEEDS TO BE SHOWN
	TO SCALE TO VERIFY THAT IT WILL FIT IN THIS LOCATION.
	THE DETAIL INCLUDED ON SHEET SP-4 SHALL ALSO INCLUDE
	THIS SPECIFIC PAD, WITH RACK ELEMENTS AND DIMENSIONS.
	THE DIMENSION BETWEEN EACH RACK IS ELEMENT IS NOT SHOWN
	(30 INCHES ON CENTER).

	C. REPEAT COMMENT: CORRECT THE DATA ON THE MASTER SIGN
	PLAN, TO INCLUDE THE PROVISION OF SIGN DIMENSIONS ON
	THE ELEVATION DRAWINGS FOR ALL EXISTING AND PROPOSED
	SIGNS.
	- OKEECHOBEE AND PALM BEACH LAKES BOULEVARD FRONTAGE
	DIMENSIONS ARE INCORRECTLY SHOWN ON THE MASTER SIGN
	PLAN AT 1,816.21 LINEAR FEET. THE CORRECT LINEAR FEET
	ARE 1767.17 FEET. THE KEY DRAWING SHOWS A PORTION OF
	EXCHANGE COURT AS PART OF THE FRONTAGE.
	- ID SIGN "A" IS NOT SHOWN WITH THE ENTIRE HEIGHT AND
	FA?ADE DIMENSION. THIS IS A LOW FREESTANDING SIGN BY
	CODE DEFINITION AND SHALL BE INCLUDED (X2) UNDER THE
	LOW FREESTANDING SIGN TABLE.
	- THE BUILDING D&E FA?ADE SQUARE FOOTAGE AND TOTAL SIGN
	SQUARE FOOTAGE PERMITTED FOR EACH FA?ADE TABLE IS NOT
	INCLUDED. THIS WAS TO REMAIN ON THE PLANS; JUST WITHOUT
	CALLING OUT THE PROPOSED NUMBER OF SIGNS AND EXCESS
	SIGN SQUARE FOOTAGE, PER THE DISCUSSION AT THE LAST
	MEETING.
	- REMOVE THE LOGO SECTION FROM THE HIGH FREESTANDING
	SIGN CALCULATIONS - THIS AREA IS ALREADY INCLUDED ON
	THE SIGN BODY. REVISE THE TOTAL SIGN SQUARE FOOTAGE
	PROVIDED ACCORDINGLY..
	- THERE ARE INCORRECT HEIGHTS ON THE BRAMAN AND BMW
	SERVICE WALL SIGN DETAILS BASED ON THE APPROVED SIGN
	PERMITS.
	- THE "CERTIFIED PRE-OWNED" WAS SIGN DIMENSIONS ARE NOT
	PROVIDED.

	D. CORRECTLY LISTS THE WAIVERS THAT ARE BEING REQUESTED
	ON THE WAIVER TABLE. SEE PB REPORT FOR ACTUAL WAIVERS.
	ADDITIONALLY, THE HIGH FREESTANDING LINE SHOULD STATE:
	REQUIRED: OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD LINEAR FRONTAGE
	PROPOSED: OKEECHOBEE AND PALM BEACH LAKES BOULEVARDS
	LINEAR FRONTAGE
	WAIVER: USE ENTIRE ARTERIAL FRONTAGE FOR ONE SIGNAGE
	CALCULATION.

	E. REVISE THE LANDSCAPE PLAN TO REMOVE THE LABEL ON
	BUILDING C WHICH STATES "PROPOSED NEW FACILITY".

Review Stop	Z			ZONING
Rev No	2	Status	F	Date	03-30-2015			Cont ID
Sent By	eschneid			Date	03-30-2015	Time	19:09	Rev Time	5.00
Received By	eschneid			Date	03-30-2015	Time	19:09	Sent To

Notes

2015-03-30 19:12:32	PB 1222M ? RESUBMITTAL 3/20/2015
	BRAMAN MOTORCARS CPD
	2901 OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD

	- CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446

	- PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN
	WRITTEN FORMAT.

	- WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF ELEVEN
	(11) PAPER COPIES AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY IN .PNG FORMAT
	OF ALL PLANS. PLEASE NOTE THAT CHANGES ON THE
	RESUBMITTED PLANS OR THE SUBMITTAL OF INFORMATION/PLANS
	TO ADDRESS THE COMMENTS MAY RESULT IN ADDITIONAL
	COMMENTS.

	- THE PPRC COMMENTS SHALL BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED AND
	SUBMITTED TO THE PLANNING DIVISION BY 5 PM ON FRIDAY,
	APRIL 17, 2015, TO BE SCHEDULED FOR THE MAY 19, 2015
	PLANNING BOARD MEETING.

	- PLEASE NOTE THAT IF THE PLANNING DIVISION HAS NOT
	RECEIVED A RESPONSE TO THE PPRC COMMENTS WITHIN 60 DAYS
	FROM THE DATE OF THESE COMMENTS (BY MAY 30, 2015), THE
	CASE SHALL BE CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN. ANY FURTHER ACTION
	SHALL REQUIRE A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION.

	- PLEASE NOTE THAT THIS RESUBMITTAL DID NOT ADDRESS
	PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED COMMENTS; THEREFORE, THE APPLICANT
	WILL BE ACCESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE OF 20% OF THE
	ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE ($600).

	- PUBLIC HEARING NOTIFICATION SIGNAGE SHALL BE POSTED
	IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION
	94-39(I)(5) OF THE ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT
	REGULATIONS.

	GENERAL

	1) CONTINUE TO EVALUATE AS PROJECT MOVES FORWARD: WHAT
	INNOVATIVE FEATURES OF THE PROJECT WHICH MAKE THIS
	PROJECT MORE DESIRABLE AND ATTRACTIVE THAN AN AUTO
	DEALERSHIP THAT MEETS ALL CODE REQUIREMENTS? AT A
	MINIMUM THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT REQUIRES WAIVERS TO
	THE SIGNAGE, INTERNAL SETBACKS AND LANDSCAPE, AND
	NUMBER OF ACCESS POINTS.

	2) REVISED COMMENT: THE LANDSCAPE FOR THE SITE NEEDS TO
	BE SHOWN ON ONE UNIFIED PLAN. SUBMITTING TWO PLANS WITH
	CHANGED OVERLAPPING AREAS AND UNDEFINED DATA TABLES IS
	NOT ACCEPTABLE.

	3) CONDITION: A UNITY OF TITLE IS REQUIRED PRIOR TO THE
	CONSTRUCTION OF THE FIRST BUILDING COMPRISING OF THE
	NEW PORSCHE, BENTLEY, ROLLS BUILDING.

	4) WAIVERS REQUESTED: THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT PLAN
	DOES NOT COMPLY WITH THE SETBACK AND LANDSCAPE
	REQUIREMENTS FOR THE INTERIOR LOT LINES WITH THE
	EXISTING BRAMAN MOTORCARS DSI. ANY NON-COMPLAINANT
	AREAS WOULD NEED TO BE SPECIFICALLY APPROVED AS WAIVERS
	WITHIN THE CPD.

	5) CONDITION: PROVIDE VERIFICATION OF THE UTILITY
	EASEMENTS BEING ABANDONED PRIOR TO APPROVAL OF THE
	BUILDING PERMIT FOR THE BUILDING LOCATED ON THE
	EASEMENT.

	6) REPEAT COMMENT: PARKING AND LANDSCAPE COMPLIANCE
	SHALL BE SHOWN AND INSTALLED TO COMPLY WITH THE ZLDR
	FOR EACH PHASE OF THE DEVELOPMENT. STAFF HAS CALCULATED
	THAT THE NEW PORSCHE BUILDING WILL REQUIRE 49 PARKING
	SPACES (TWO OF WHICH ADA) WHEN IT BECOMES OPERATIONAL.
	THE PLANS ONLY SHOW 26 WITH ONE ADA SPACE.
	ADDITIONALLY, THE WESTERN BUFFER OF THE PARKING LOT
	DOES NOT HAVE A TURNAROUND SPACE FOR THE CUSTOMER
	PARKING. HOW WILL TRASH SERVICE BE PROVIDED? PLEASE
	VERIFY THAT THE BENTLEY, ROLLS, USED CAR AND BALANCE OF
	THE GARAGE WILL BE CONSTRUCTED AT ONE TIME.

	TRAFFIC

	7) REPEAT COMMENT: PROVIDE THE PALM BEACH COUNTY
	TRAFFIC CONCURRENCY APPROVAL LETTER.

	8) WAIVER REQUESTED: THE JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT LISTS
	SEVEN CURB CUTS BEING USED WHILE THE LATEST STREET VIEW
	SHOWS ONLY SIX BEING USED. PLEASE BE AWARE THE SITE
	EXCEEDS THE NUMBER OF PERMITTED ACCESS POINTS TO THE
	STREET NETWORK. OPENINGS ALONG BOTH OKEECHOBEE
	BOULEVARD AND EXCHANGE COURT NEED TO BE REDUCED.

	9) REPEAT COMMENT: PROVIDE A DRIVEWAY PREDETERMINATION
	LETTER OF APPROVAL FROM FDOT FOR THE WORK WITHIN THE
	OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD RIGHT-OF-WAY.

	10) CONDITION: A RIGHT-OF-WAY PERMIT WILL BE REQUIRED
	FOR ANY WORK WITHIN THE FDOT OR THE CITY RIGHT-OF-WAY.

	11) CONDITION: ALL CURB CUTS THAT ARE NOT BEING USED
	SHALL BE REMOVED AND THE SIDEWALK MADE FLUSH WITH THE
	ADJACENT SIDEWALK.

	12) CONDITION: THE PROPOSAL TO PLANT IN THE EXCHANGE
	COURT RIGHT-OF-WAY REQUIRES THE APPROVAL OF THE
	ENGINEERING SERVICES DIVISION. IRRIGATION SHALL BE
	SUPPLIED TO THESE TREES. A RECORDED AGREEMENT TO
	MAINTAIN AND REPLACE THE TREES AND IRRIGATION IS
	REQUIRED FROM BRAMAN.

	SITE

	13) CONDITION: ALL MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT, WHETHER GROUND
	OR ROOF MOUNTED, UTILITY EQUIPMENT, GENERATORS,
	TRANSFORMERS, ETC. SHALL BE SCREENED FROM VIEW OF THE
	PUBLIC.

	14) WAIVER REQUESTED: THE EAST SIDE SETBACK IS REQUIRED
	TO BE 27 FEET SINCE THE BUILDING THAT IS BEING
	CONSTRUCTED IS 75 FEET 8 INCHES TALL.

	15) REPEAT COMMENT: HOW TALL ARE THE GATES? THE COMMENT
	RESPONSE LISTS THE GATES AS 10 FEET TALL. PROVIDE A
	DETAIL THAT INCLUDES THE FENCE HEIGHT. PLEASE NOTE THAT
	THE GATES ALONG EXCHANGE COURT MAY NOT EXCEED EIGHT (8)
	FEET TALL. STAFF WILL NOT SUPPORT 10 FOOT TALL GATES
	ALONG OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD AS THESE WILL BE OUT OF
	SCALE WITH THE SITE CONDITIONS AT THE FRONTAGE LINE.

	16) NEW COMMENT: IS THE DOOR ON THE WEST SIDE OF THE
	ROLLS ROYCE DEALERSHIP INTENDED TO OPEN INTO THE
	LANDSCAPED AREA WITH THE HEDGE?

	17) NEW COMMENT: THE NEW DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE/COMPACTOR
	SHALL BE IN AN ENCLOSURE WITH A PERIMETER HEDGE ON
	THREE SIDES. THE PLANS SHALL SHOW A DIMENSIONED DETAIL
	OF THE DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE AND HAVE THE DIMENSION LINES
	SHOWN ON THE PLAN. THE ENCLOSURE MAY NOT BE ACCESSED
	FROM THE EAST SIDE DUE TO THE ADJACENT PARKING SPACES.
	THERE CONCEPTUAL PAVING, DRAINAGE, WATER AND WASTEWATER
	PLAN SHOWS TWO WATER METERS IN THE DRIVE AISLE TO
	ACCESS THE WEST SIDE OF THE DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE. PLEASE
	FIX THESE ITEMS.

	PARKING

	18) REPEAT COMMENT: STAFF IS UNABLE TO VERIFY THE
	PARKING REQUIRED FOR THE SITE DUE THE VARIOUS PLANS
	SHOWING DIFFERING SQUARE FOOTAGE FOR THE SAME AREAS
	(EX. THE BUILDING D AREAS AND THE PORSCHE SERVICE
	RECEPTION LIST DIFFERING SQUARE FOOTAGE ON THE SITE AND
	ARCHITECTURAL PLANS AND THE PRE-OWNED AREA IS LISTED
	WITH A DIFFERENT SQUARE FOOTAGE ON SHEETS SP-1.0 AND
	A-1.1). THE SITE PLAN PARKING DATA TABLE INCORRECTLY
	EXCLUDES THE SERVICE PARTS AND STORAGE AREAS BY SHOWING
	IT COMBINED WITH THE NUMBER OF SERVICE BAYS. PARKING
	SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR THE SERVICE PARTS AND STORAGE
	AREAS USING THE ENCLOSED AREA RATE OF 1 PARKING SPACE
	PER 500 SQUARE FEET. PROVIDE A COLOR CODED FLOOR PLAN
	THAT DEMARCATES THE INTERIOR SQUARE FOOTAGE, THE
	SERVICE BAY AREAS AND INTERNAL VEHICLE CIRCULATION
	AREAS. THE SQUARE FOOTAGES OF EACH AREA SHALL BE
	PROVIDED SO THAT STAFF CAN CALCULATE THE PARKING
	REQUIREMENTS.

	19) REVISED COMMENT: THE BICYCLE PAD AND RACK DETAILS
	DO NOT SHOW THE DIMENSIONS FOR THE BICYCLE PADS. THE
	DETAIL INCLUDED ON SHEET SP-4 ONLY SHOWS PARKING FOR
	SIX BICYCLES, NOT SEVEN AS STATED ON THE PLANS. PLEASE
	REMEMBER THAT ONE BICYCLE RACK ELEMENT HOLDS TWO
	BICYCLES, SO EACH BICYCLE PAD WILL HAVE AN EVEN NUMBER
	OF BICYCLE PARKING SPACES. THE BICYCLE PADS SHALL SHOW
	CODE COMPLIANT DIMENSIONS ON THE PLAN (THE BICYCLE PADS
	DO NOT SCALE AT THE REQUIRED SIX FOOT DEPTH).

	20) NEW COMMENT: THE SITE PLAN SHOWS A BICYCLE PAD
	BEING LOCATED UNDER THE RAMP IN THE GARAGE. THIS
	BICYCLE RACK IS NOT SHOWN ON THE ARCHITECTURAL PLAN.
	PLEASE INDICATE HOW IT WILL BE ACCESSED IN LIGHT OF THE
	PLANS SHOWING THIS AREA SURROUNDED BY SOLID WALLS. WHAT
	IS THE CLEARANCE AT THE PROPOSED LOCATION?

	21) REVISED COMMENT: THE AREA BEHIND THE FUTURE MINI
	DEALERSHIP (UNDER THE CANOPY) IS SHOWN AS HAVING A
	DEAD-END DOUBLE ROW OF PARKING. THERE SHALL BE ONE
	SPACE AT THE END MARKED AS A TURNAROUND SPACE WITH THE
	BACK-OUT ASSIST AREA INDENTING THREE (3) FEET FROM THE
	WEST SIDE OF THE SPACE.

	22) REPEAT COMMENT: PROVIDE DIMENSION TAGS FOR EACH NEW
	PARKING BAY - CURB FACE TO CURB FACE. THE WIDTH OF THE
	PARKING SPACES FLUCTUATES BETWEEN 8.5 FEET WIDE OR 9
	FEET WIDE IN DIFFERING ROWS, SO THE DIMENSION LINES
	WILL ENSURE THAT THE CURBING IS INSTALLED IN THE PROPER
	LOCATIONS.

	23) REVISED COMMENT: THE FLOOR GARAGE FLOOR PLANS SHALL
	INDICATE THE AREAS OF VEHICLE STORAGE AND SERVICE
	PARKING.

	24) NEW COMMENT: WHAT OCCURS IN THE "RECONDITIONING
	SPACE"?

	25) NEW COMMENT: HOW WILL THE WASH BAY ON THE 5TH FLOOR
	OF THE GARAGE FUNCTION? IT DOES NOT APPEAR THAT THERE
	IS ANYWHERE FOR THE WATER TO DRAIN.

	26) REVISED COMMENT: THE LOADING ZONE MENTIONED IN THE
	RESPONSE AS ON THE GROUND FLOOR OF THE PHASE 1 GARAGE
	NEEDS TO BE CLEARLY LABELED ON THE GARAGE SITE PLAN.

	27) NEW COMMENT: THE ADA PARKING SPACE IN FRONT OF THE
	PORSCHE DEALERSHIP IS REQUIRED TO HAVE A WHEEL STOP TO
	KEEP CARS FROM DRIVING ONTO THE SIDEWALK.

	SIGNAGE

	28) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUIRED: PLEASE NOTE THAT
	MINI IS ONLY PERMITTED THREE FACADE SIGNS BASED ON THE
	CURRENT LAYOUT OF BUILDING A. CHANGES TO CONNECT THIS
	BUILDING TO BUILDING B WOULD REDUCE THE NUMBER OF
	PERMITTED FACADE SIGNS. WITHOUT FURTHER INFORMATION,
	STAFF IS UNABLE TO VERIFY COMPLIANCE, BUT IT APPEARS
	THAT THE AT LEAST THE SOUTH ELEVATION SIGN IS TWICE AS
	LARGE AS PERMITTED.

	29) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUIRED: THE NEW BUILDING
	HAS 12 FACADE SIGNS. ONLY SIX FACADE SIGNS ARE
	PERMITTED.

	30) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUIRED: DIMENSIONS WERE
	NOT PROVIDED FOR STAFF TO DETERMINE HOW MUCH FACADE
	SIGN SQUARE FOOTAGE IS PERMITTED, NOR WAS INFORMATION
	PROVIDED ON HOW MUCH FACADE SIGN SQUARE FOOTAGE IS
	PROPOSED.

	31) REVISED COMMENT: HF SIGN A IS NOT SHOWN IN
	ACCORDANCE WITH ITS ORIENTATION ON THE SURVEY.

	32) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUIRED: STAFF CALCULATES
	1,640 SQ. FT. OF HIGH FREESTANDING SIGNAGE PROPOSED
	ALONG OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD (HF SIGNS B, C, D1, D2 AND
	E). WHICH EXCEEDS THE PERMITTED 1,363 SQ. FT.
	PERMITTED. USING LOW FREESTANDING SIGNS LIKE IN THE
	CONCEPT SKETCH COULD ALLEVIATE THIS SQUARE FOOTAGE
	EXCESS.

	33) ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REQUIRED: THERE ARE
	FREESTANDING SIGNS SHOWN ON THE PLAN WITH NO DETAILS
	ASSOCIATED WITH THEM IN FRONT OF THE NEW BUILDINGS.

	LIGHTING

	34) REVISED PHOTOMETRIC PLANS NOT SUBMITTED: THE
	SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE SUBMITTED PHOTOMETRIC BASE PLAN
	DIFFERS FROM THE SITE PLAN AT THE NUMBER OF PARKING
	SPACES. ALL PLANS SHALL SHOW THE SAME BASE CONDITIONS.

	35) REVISED PHOTOMETRIC PLANS NOT SUBMITTED:
	ILLUMINATION WITHIN A COMMERCIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT
	MAY NOT EXCEED ONE FOOTCANDLE AT OR BEYOND THE
	BOUNDARIES OF THE DEVELOPMENT. THE SOUTH, EAST AND
	NORTH PROPERTY LINES ALL HAVE VALUES EXCEEDING ONE
	FOOTCANDLE AT THE PROPERTY LINE. THE PHOTOMETRIC
	NUMBERS SHALL BE EXTENDED PAST THE PROPERTY LINE AND
	VERIFY THAT THE ONE FOOTCANDLE STANDARD IS NOT
	EXCEEDED.

	36) REVISED PHOTOMETRIC PLANS NOT SUBMITTED: THERE ARE
	INCONSISTENCIES WITH THE LIGHT POLE LOCATIONS INDICATED
	AS REMAINING ON THE CIVIL PLANS AND THE LIGHT POLE
	LOCATIONS SHOWN ON THE LIGHTING PLAN. THIS
	INCONSISTENCY IS ON THE SITE PLAN AS WELL.

Review Stop	Z			ZONING
Rev No	1	Status	F	Date	03-10-2015			Cont ID
Sent By	eschneid			Date	03-10-2015	Time	21:57	Rev Time	10.00
Received By	eschneid			Date	03-10-2015	Time	21:56	Sent To

Notes

2015-03-10 22:04:49	PB 1222M
	BRAMAN MOTORCARS CPD
	2901 OKEECHOBEE

	- CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446

	- PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN
	WRITTEN FORMAT.

	- WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF ELEVEN
	(11) PAPER COPIES AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY IN .PNG FORMAT
	OF ALL PLANS. PLEASE NOTE THAT CHANGES ON THE
	RESUBMITTED PLANS OR THE SUBMITTAL OF INFORMATION/PLANS
	TO ADDRESS THE COMMENTS MAY RESULT IN ADDITIONAL
	COMMENTS.

	- THE PPRC COMMENTS SHALL BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED AND
	SUBMITTED TO THE PLANNING DIVISION BY 5 PM ON FRIDAY,
	MARCH 20, 2015, TO BE SCHEDULED FOR THE APRIL 21, 2015
	PLANNING BOARD MEETING.

	- PLEASE NOTE THAT IF THE PLANNING DIVISION HAS NOT
	RECEIVED A RESPONSE TO THE PPRC COMMENTS WITHIN 60 DAYS
	FROM THE DATE OF THESE COMMENTS/THE PPRC MEETING (BY
	MAY 11, 2015), THE CASE SHALL BE CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN.
	ANY FURTHER ACTION SHALL REQUIRE A NEW DEVELOPMENT
	APPLICATION.

	- PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1)
	RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED
	COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE
	APPLICANT WILL BE ACCESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE
	WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE ($600).

	- PUBLIC HEARING NOTIFICATION SIGNAGE SHALL BE POSTED
	IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION
	94-39(I)(5) OF THE ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT
	REGULATIONS.

	GENERAL

	1) WHAT INNOVATIVE FEATURES OF THE PROJECT WHICH MAKE
	THIS PROJECT MORE DESIRABLE AND ATTRACTIVE THAN AN AUTO
	DEALERSHIP THAT MEETS ALL CODE REQUIREMENTS? AT A
	MINIMUM THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT REQUIRES WAIVERS TO
	THE SIGNAGE, INTERNAL SETBACKS AND LANDSCAPE, AND
	NUMBER OF ACCESS POINTS.

	2) PROVIDE FULL PLANS FOR THE ENTIRE AREA COVERED BY
	THE PROPOSED BRAMAN CPD. THIS INCLUDES SITE, LANDSCAPE,
	ELEVATIONS AND LIGHTING.

	3) THE JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT INDICATES THAT THE
	OWNERS DO NOT WANT TO PLAT OR UNIFY ANY OF THE NEW
	PARCELS EITHER AMONG THEMSELVES OR WITH THE EXISTING
	BRAMAN DSI PARCELS. AT A MINIMUM, THE EASTERN PARCELS
	WILL NEED TO BE JOINED SINCE THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT
	PLAN HAS THE NEW BUILDING STRADDLING MULTIPLE PARCEL
	LINES UNDER THE CURRENT PARCEL CONFIGURATION.

	4) THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT PLAN DOES NOT COMPLY WITH
	THE SETBACK AND LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE INTERIOR
	LOT LINES WITH THE EXISTING BRAMAN MOTORCARS DSI. ANY
	NON-COMPLAINANT AREAS WOULD NEED TO BE SPECIFICALLY
	APPROVED AS WAIVERS WITHIN THE CPD.

	5) ALL OVERHEAD UTILITY LINES IN THE AREAS WHERE ANY
	DEMOLITION OR CONSTRUCTION IS BEING DONE SHALL BE
	BURIED.

	6) PLEASE PROVIDE VERIFICATION OF THE UTILITY EASEMENTS
	BEING ABANDONED. STAFF CANNOT APPROVED A BUILDING
	CONSTRUCTED ON TOP OF A UTILITY EASEMENT.

	7) PARKING AND LANDSCAPE COMPLIANCE SHALL BE SHOWN AND
	INSTALLED TO COMPLY WITH THE ZLDR FOR EACH PHASE OF THE
	DEVELOPMENT.

	8) THE SITE HAS AN EXPIRED IRRIGATION PERMIT AND
	MISCELLANEOUS PERMIT THAT NEED TO BE RECTIFIED -
	09010281 AND 10080754.

	TRAFFIC

	9) PROVIDE THE PALM BEACH COUNTY TRAFFIC CONCURRENCY
	APPROVAL LETTER.

	10) THE JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT LISTS SEVEN CURB CUTS
	BEING USED WHILE THE LATEST STREET VIEW SHOWS ONLY SIX
	BEING USED. PLEASE BE AWARE THE SITE EXCEEDS THE NUMBER
	OF PERMITTED ACCESS POINTS TO THE STREET NETWORK.
	OPENINGS ALONG BOTH OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD AND EXCHANGE
	COURT NEED TO BE REDUCED.

	11) PROVIDE A DRIVEWAY PREDETERMINATION LETTER OF
	APPROVAL FROM FDOT FOR THE WORK WITHIN THE OKEECHOBEE
	BOULEVARD RIGHT-OF-WAY.

	12) A RIGHT-OF-WAY PERMIT WILL BE REQUIRED FOR ANY WORK
	WITHIN THE FDOT OR THE CITY RIGHT-OF-WAY.

	13) ALL CURB CUTS THAT ARE NOT BEING USED SHALL BE
	REMOVED AND THE SIDEWALK MADE FLUSH WITH THE ADJACENT
	SIDEWALK.

	14) THE PROPOSAL TO PLANT IN THE EXCHANGE COURT
	RIGHT-OF-WAY REQUIRES THE APPROVAL OF THE ENGINEERING
	SERVICES DIVISION. IRRIGATION SHALL BE SUPPLIED TO
	THESE TREES. A RECORDED AGREEMENT TO MAINTAIN AND
	REPLACE THE TREES AND IRRIGATION IS REQUIRED FROM
	BRAMAN.

	SITE

	15) PROVIDE THE SITE PLAN AT A LARGER SCALE.

	16) PROVIDE THE SETBACK DIMENSIONS FOR THE NEW MINI
	SERVICE DROP OFF BUILDING.

	17) ALL MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT, WHETHER GROUND OR ROOF
	MOUNTED, UTILITY EQUIPMENT, GENERATORS, TRANSFORMERS,
	ETC. SHALL BE SCREENED FROM VIEW OF THE PUBLIC.

	18) PROVIDE PLANS (ROOF, SITE, ETC.) SHOWING WHERE THE
	A/C AND OTHER MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT (TO INCLUDE
	GENERATORS) WILL BE LOCATED.

	19) THE EAST SIDE SETBACK IS REQUIRED TO BE 27 FEET,
	NOT 13 FEET, SINCE THE BUILDING THAT IS BEING
	CONSTRUCTED IS 75 FEET 8 INCHES TALL.

	20) HOW TALL ARE THE GATES?

	21) PROVIDE A CONTINUOUS CONNECTION FOR THE FRONT
	PARKING LOT BETWEEN THE BMW AND THE FUTURE BENTLEY
	DEALERSHIPS.

	22) WHY IS THE DRIVEWAY LEADING TO THE PORSCHE SERVICE
	DROP-OFF 40 FEET WIDE WHEN THERE ARE ONLY TWO 10 FOOT
	WIDE DOORWAYS INTO THE SERVICE BAY? THE PAVEMENT SHALL
	BE REDUCED AT THIS LOCATION AND A WIDER LANDSCAPE
	BUFFER INSTALLED.

	23) WHY IS THE DRIVEWAY LEADING OUT OF THE PORSCHE
	SERVICE DROP-OFF 35 TO 39 FEET WIDE, WHEN ONLY TWO CARS
	CAN EXIT AT THE SAME TIME? THE PAVEMENT SHALL BE
	REDUCED AT THIS LOCATION AND A WIDER LANDSCAPE BUFFER
	INSTALLED.

	24) THE SITE AND CIVIL PLANS DO NOT MATCH IN THE DEPTH
	OF THE PARKING SPACES AND THE DRIVE AISLES IN FRONT OF
	THE NEW BUILDINGS. EX. 18.5 FEET VS 18 FEET AND 24 FEET
	VS 24.5 FEET.

	25) THE SITE PLAN NEEDS TO SHOW THE AREA BEHIND THE
	TWO-STORY SALES AND SERVICE BUILDING IN ACCORDANCE WITH
	APPROVED PERMIT NO. 13060158, TO INCLUDE THE REQUIRED
	DIMENSIONS OF THE DRIVE AISLES AND PARKING SPACES.
	THESE SHALL BE INSTALLED AND REMAIN PER PLAN.

	PARKING

	26) STAFF IS UNABLE TO VERIFY THE PARKING REQUIRED FOR
	THE SITE DUE THE DIFFERING PLANS SHOWING SQUARE FOOTAGE
	THAT IN SOME INSTANCES DOUBLE COUNTS AREAS (EX. LISTS
	SQ. FT. OF ENTIRE SERVICE AREA TO INCLUDE THE SERVICE
	BAYS) OR DOES NOT LIST ALL THE INTERIOR AREA (EX.
	HALLWAYS ON THE ARCHITECTURAL FLOOR PLANS). PROVIDE A
	COLOR CODED FLOOR PLAN THAT DEMARCATES THE INTERIOR
	SQUARE FOOTAGE, THE SERVICE BAY AREAS AND INTERNAL
	VEHICLE CIRCULATION AREAS. THE SQUARE FOOTAGES OF EACH
	AREA SHALL BE PROVIDED SO THAT STAFF CAN CALCULATE THE
	PARKING REQUIREMENTS.

	27) THE BICYCLE RACK SHOWN SOUTH OF THE BMW SERVICE
	ENTRANCE ON THE BRAMAN DSI PLAN DOES NOT APPEAR TO HAVE
	BEEN INSTALLED. THIS LOCATION DOES NOT ADHERE TO THE
	CITY'S BICYCLE PARKING LOCATIONAL REQUIREMENTS. THE PAD
	SHALL BE SHOWN IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE CITY'S
	REGULATIONS.

	28) STAFF IS UNABLE TO LOCATE THE SIX SPACES NOT CITED
	IN THE PREVIOUS COMMENT.

	29) NO BICYCLE PAD OR RACK DETAILS, WITH DIMENSIONS,
	WERE PROVIDED ON THE PLANS.

	30) THE AREA BEHIND THE FUTURE MINI DEALERSHIP (UNDER
	THE CANOPY) IS SHOWN AS HAVING A DOUBLE ROW OF PARKING.
	THIS AREA IS CURRENTLY A NINE SPACE PARKING AREA (TEN
	SPACES DO NOT FIT WITH THE WALKWAY ON THE SOUTH SIDE)
	WITH A DETAIL AREA ON THE NORTH SIDE. THE DIMENSION IS
	NOT WIDE ENOUGH FOR A DOUBLE ROW OF PARKING AS THE
	AISLE IS SHOWN ON THE PROPOSED PLAN AT 22.6 FEET IN
	WIDTH. PLEASE NOTE IF PARKING ALONG THE NORTH SIDE OF
	THIS AREA CAN BE ACHIEVED, THEN A TERMINAL ISLAND TREE
	IS REQUIRED ON THE EAST SIDE.

	31) PROVIDE DIMENSION TAGS FOR EACH NEW PARKING BAY -
	CURB FACE TO CURB FACE.

	32) PROVIDE FLOOR PLANS FOR ALL LEVELS OF THE PARKING
	STRUCTURE, TO INCLUDE THE ROOF DECK. THE FLOOR PLANS
	SHALL INDICATE THE AREAS OF VEHICLE STORAGE, GARAGE
	EMPLOYEE PARKING AND SERVICE PARKING. IF THERE WILL BE
	INVENTORY STORAGE ON THE ROOF, THEN THIS SHALL BE
	COUNTED IN THE OUTDOOR DISPLAY AREA REQUIREMENTS.

	33) VERIFY WITH THE CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DIVISION IF
	ADA OR VAN ACCESSIBLE SPACES ARE REQUIRED IN THE
	PARKING STRUCTURE FOR THE 20 GARAGE EMPLOYEE AND
	SERVICE PARKING.

	34) ONLY TWO FUNCTIONAL, NOT THREE LOADING ZONES ARE
	SHOWN ON THE PLAN. THE ONE BY THE BENTLEY PARTS CANNOT
	BE ACCESSED BY THE TRUCK ITS DESIGNED FOR.

	SIGNAGE

	35) THE ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS
	PROHIBIT THE USE OF THREE DIMENSIONAL SCULPTURAL
	FIGURES THAT REPRESENT PRODUCTS SOLD BY A BUSINESS. THE
	MINI MOUNTED TO THE WALL IS NOT PERMITTED.

	36) PLEASE NOTE THAT MINI IS ONLY PERMITTED THREE
	FACADE SIGNS BASED ON THE CURRENT LAYOUT OF BUILDING A.
	CHANGES TO CONNECT THIS BUILDING TO BUILDING B WOULD
	REDUCE THE NUMBER OF PERMITTED FACADE SIGNS. WITHOUT
	FURTHER INFORMATION, STAFF IS UNABLE TO VERIFY
	COMPLIANCE, BUT IT APPEARS THAT THE AT LEAST THE SOUTH
	ELEVATION SIGN IS TWICE AS LARGE AS PERMITTED.

	37) THE NEW BUILDING HAS 12 FACADE SIGNS. ONLY SIX
	FACADE SIGNS ARE PERMITTED.

	38) DIMENSIONS WERE NOT PROVIDED FOR STAFF TO DETERMINE
	HOW MUCH FACADE SIGN SQUARE FOOTAGE IS PERMITTED, NOR
	WAS INFORMATION PROVIDED ON HOW MUCH FACADE SIGN SQUARE
	FOOTAGE IS PROPOSED.

	39) PROVIDE THE SIGN SETBACKS ON THE SITE AND LANDSCAPE
	PLANS. THE SIGNS SHALL NOT INTERFERE WITH THE LONG TERM
	GROWTH OF THE ADJACENT TREES.

	40) PLEASE CONFIRM THAT THE PLANS SHOW THE
	REORIENTATION OF HF SIGN A.

	41) THE LOCATION FOR HF SIGN E WILL NOT BE SUPPORTED BY
	STAFF AS IT CREATES AN UNSAFE VISIBILITY SITUATION FOR
	CARS EXITING THE SITE ONTO OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD.

	42) STAFF CALCULATES 1,640 SQ. FT. OF HIGH FREESTANDING
	SIGNAGE PROPOSED ALONG OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD (HF SIGNS
	B, C, D1, D2 AND E). WHICH EXCEEDS THE PERMITTED 1,363
	SQ. FT. PERMITTED. USING LOW FREESTANDING SIGNS LIKE IN
	THE CONCEPT SKETCH COULD ALLEVIATE THIS SQUARE FOOTAGE
	EXCESS.

	43) PLEASE NOTE THAT HF SIGN A AND C HAVE EXPIRED
	PERMITS THAT NEED TO BE RECTIFIED FOR THOSE TWO SIGNS.
	PERMITS 08120414 AND 08120415.

	44) THERE ARE FREESTANDING SIGNS SHOWN ON THE PLAN THAT
	DETAILS ASSOCIATED WITH THEM IN FRONT OF THE NEW
	BUILDINGS.

	LIGHTING

	45) THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE SUBMITTED PHOTOMETRIC
	BASE PLAN DIFFERS FROM THE SITE PLAN AT THE NUMBER OF
	PARKING SPACES. ALL PLANS SHALL SHOW THE SAME BASE
	CONDITIONS.

	46) PLEASE EXPLAIN THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE SMALL
	NUMBERS AND THE LARGE NUMBERS ON THE PHOTOMETRIC PLAN.

	47) ILLUMINATION WITHIN A COMMERCIAL PLANNED
	DEVELOPMENT MAY NOT EXCEED ONE FOOTCANDLE AT OR BEYOND
	THE BOUNDARIES OF THE DEVELOPMENT. THE SOUTH, EAST AND
	NORTH PROPERTY LINES ALL HAVE VALUES EXCEEDING ONE
	FOOTCANDLE AT THE PROPERTY LINE. THE PHOTOMETRIC
	NUMBERS SHALL BE EXTENDED PAST THE PROPERTY LINE AND
	VERIFY THAT THE ONE FOOTCANDLE STANDARD IS NOT
	EXCEEDED.

	48) PLEASE PROVIDE HOW THE LIGHTING WILL BE SHIELDED TO
	REFLECT LIGHT OR GLARE AWAY FROM THE ADJACENT PUBLIC
	THOROUGHFARES?

	49) THE LIGHT POSTS SHALL MEET THE REQUIRED FIVE (5)
	FOOT SETBACK REQUIREMENT. PLEASE PROVIDE SETBACK
	DIMENSIONS FOR THE LIGHT POSTS ON THE PLANS.

	50) THERE ARE INCONSISTENCIES WITH THE LIGHT POLE
	LOCATIONS INDICATED AS REMAINING ON THE CIVIL PLANS AND
	THE LIGHT POLE LOCATIONS SHOWN ON THE LIGHTING PLAN.
	THIS INCONSISTENCY IS ON THE SITE PLAN AS WELL.