| 2015-03-31 12:55:15 | PB 1577D |
| | BRAMAN AUDI SIGN AND COMPACTOR MINOR AMENDMENT |
| | 1ST RESUBMITTAL COMMENTS |
| | 2101 OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD |
| | |
| | - CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446 |
| | |
| | - PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN |
| | WRITTEN FORMAT. |
| | |
| | - WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF FIVE |
| | (5) PAPER COPIES AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY IN .PDF FORMAT |
| | OF ALL PLANS. PLEASE NOTE THAT CHANGES ON THE |
| | RESUBMITTED PLANS OR THE SUBMITTAL OF INFORMATION/PLANS |
| | TO ADDRESS THE COMMENTS MAY RESULT IN ADDITIONAL |
| | COMMENTS. |
| | |
| | - PLEASE NOTE THAT IF THE PLANNING DIVISION HAS NOT |
| | RECEIVED A RESPONSE TO THE PPRC COMMENTS WITHIN 60 DAYS |
| | FROM THE DATE OF THESE COMMENTS (BY MAY 31, 2015), THE |
| | CASE SHALL BE CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN. ANY FURTHER ACTION |
| | SHALL REQUIRE A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION. |
| | |
| | - PLEASE NOTE THAT IF COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE |
| | SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE APPLICANT WILL BE ACCESSED |
| | A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL |
| | APPLICATION FEE ($60). |
| | |
| | 1) REPEAT COMMENT: SHEET A-101 SHALL BE REVISED TO SHOW |
| | THE CORRECT NUMBER OF REQUIRED PARKING SPACES BASED ON |
| | THE REVISED NUMBER OF SERVICE BAYS SHOWN ON PERMIT |
| | 15010430. |
| | |
| | 2) NEW COMMENT: SHEET A-101 NOW SHOWS THE FIRE HYDRANT |
| | LOCATED WEST OF THE BUILDING IN THE MIDDLE OF THE |
| | LANDSCAPE ISLANDS INSTEAD OF THE SOUTHERN PORTION OF |
| | THE LANDSCAPE ISLAND. THE CIVIL AND LANDSCAPE PLANS |
| | SHOW THE HYDRANT IN THE SOUTH PORTION OF THE ISLAND. |
| | PLEASE FINALIZE THE LOCATION OF THIS FIRE HYDRANT AND |
| | HAVE ALL THE PLANS SHOW IT IN THE SAME PLACE. STAFF HAS |
| | COMMENTED ABOUT THE INCONSISTENT LOCATION OF THIS FIRE |
| | HYDRANT MORE THAN ONCE. |
| | |
| | 3) NEW COMMENT: THE LANDSCAPE PLAN HAS BEEN |
| | SIGNIFICANTLY CHANGED FROM THE INITIAL SUBMITTAL. THE |
| | FOLLOWING DEFICIENCIES HAVE BEEN IDENTIFIED: |
| | |
| | A. THE ALEXANDER PALMS PLANTED IN THE LANDSCAPE ISLANDS |
| | ALONG OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD AND CHILLINGWORTH DRIVE |
| | SHALL BE PLANTED AS TRIPLES TO COMPLY WITH THE CITY'S |
| | LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS. |
| | B. ONE RELOCATED SILVER BUTTONWOOD ON THE WEST PROPERTY |
| | LINE DOES NOT HAVE AN IDENTIFICATION TAG. |
| | C. TWO GREEN BUTTONWOODS ARE NOT INCLUDED ON THE |
| | WESTERN BUFFER CALCULATIONS. |
| | D. THE SABAL PALM TREES ALONG THE WESTERN BUFFER SHALL |
| | ONLY BE COUNTED AT A 2:1 RATIO FOR MEETING THE NUMBER |
| | OF REQUIRED TREES. |
| | E. THE SOLITARY SABAL PALM ALONG THE NORTHERN BUFFER |
| | MAY NOT COUNT AS A TREE TO MEET THE NUMBER OF REQUIRED |
| | TREES. |
| | F. THE ALEXANDER PALMS PLANTED IN THE LANDSCAPE BUFFER |
| | ALONG THE ALLEY SHALL BE PLANTED AS TRIPLES TO COMPLY |
| | WITH THE CITY'S LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS. NOTE: THE CODE |
| | COMPLIANCE CHART WOULD BE CORRECT IF THE TRIPLE TRUNK |
| | PALMS WERE ACTUALLY SHOWN ON THE PLANS AS THEY ARE ON |
| | THE ORIGINAL APPROVAL. |
| | G. THE 50 FOOT GAP BETWEEN THE TREES AT THE NORTHEAST |
| | PORTION OF THE NORTHERN BUFFER DOES NOT COMPLY WITH THE |
| | CITY'S LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS. |
| | H. THE CODE COMPLIANCE CHART INCORRECTLY LISTS 124 |
| | INSTEAD OF 114 TOTAL PROPOSED TREES (BASED ON THE |
| | INCORRECT CALCULATION OF THE SABAL PALMS). ALL DATA |
| | SHALL BE CORRECTED. |
| | I. PLEASE EXPLAIN HOW THE NUMBER OF PARKING LOT TREES |
| | INCREASED WHEN NO CHANGES OR ADDITIONS WERE DONE TO THE |
| | PARKING LOT TREE PLACEMENT. |
| | J. ONLY 94 SHADE TREES ARE LISTED ON THE PLANT |
| | SCHEDULE. |
| | |
| | 4) REPEAT COMMENT: ROOT BARRIERS ARE REQUIRED FOR THE |
| | TREE SHARING THE ISLAND WITH THE FIRE HYDRANT. THIS |
| | SHALL BE SHOWN ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN. CIVIL PLAN SHOWS |
| | IT CORRECTLY. |
| | |
| | 5) NEW COMMENT: WHY DID THE AMOUNT OF TREES TO BE |
| | PRESERVED ON-SITE DROP SO DRAMATICALLY? IT WENT FROM 76 |
| | INCHES TO 144 INCHES REMOVED. FIVE LIVE OAK TREES THAT |
| | WERE TO HAVE BEEN PRESERVED NO LONGER EXIST. THE 21 |
| | ROYAL PALMS THAT WERE TO REMAIN ON-SITE HAVE NOW BECOME |
| | 7 ROYAL PALMS. REVISED TREE ALTERATION CALCULATIONS ARE |
| | REQUIRED. INCLUDED WITH THE CALCULATIONS SHALL BE |
| | VERIFICATION THAT THE REPLACEMENT TREES HAVE THE SAME |
| | GROWTH POTENTIAL AS THE REMOVED TREES. |
| | |
| | |
| | |