City of West Palm Beach eGovPlus

Plan Review Details - Project Z15010030

Plan Review Stops For Project Z15010030

Review Stop	B			BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No	1	Status	F	Date	02-11-2015			Cont ID
Sent By	rbrown			Date	02-11-2015	Time	12:22	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	rbrown			Date	02-11-2015	Time	12:22	Sent To

Notes

2015-02-11 12:35:12	DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, BUILDING DIVISION,
	COMMENTS:

	1. THIS REVIEW IS A CURSORY REVIEW AS IT RELATES TO THE
	SITE. IT IS NOT A REVIEW FOR FULL COMPLIANCE WITH
	FLORIDA BUILDING CODE. THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE TO BE
	ADDRESSED FOR PERMITTING.

	2. FOR ANY BUILDING CROSSING A PROPERTY LINE, EITHER A
	RECORDED UNITY OF TITLE, OR SOME OTHER APPROVED LEGAL
	INSTRUMENT, SHALL BE INCLUDED WITH THE PERMIT
	APPLICATION, OR THE BUILDING MUST HAVE A FIRE WALL
	ALONG THE PROPERTY LINE, PER SECTION 702 OF FLORIDA
	BUILDING CODE, BUILDING, FIRE SEPARATION DISTANCE.

	3. WHEN SUBMITTED FOR PERMIT, THE PLANS SHALL SHOW AT
	LEAST ONE ACCESSIBLE ROUTE, COMPLYING WITH SECTIONS
	206.2 AND 402.2 OF FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY CODE, FROM THE
	PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY TO ALL ACCESSIBLE BUILDING OR
	FACILITY ENTRANCES.

	4. WHEN SUBMITTED FOR PERMIT, THE PLANS SHALL SHOW AT
	LEAST ONE ACCESSIBLE ROUTE, COMPLYING WITH SECTIONS
	206.2 AND 402.2 OF FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY CODE,
	CONNECTING ACCESSIBLE BUILDING OR FACILITY ENTRANCES
	WITH ALL ACCESSIBLE SPACES AND ELEMENTS WITHIN THE
	BUILDING OR FACILITY

	5. ANY PART OF AN ACCESSIBLE ROUTE WITH A SLOPE GREATER
	THAN 1:20 SHALL BE CONSIDERED A RAMP AND SHALL COMPLY
	WITH SECTION 405 OF FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY CODE.

	6. WHEN THE PLANS ARE SUBMITTED FOR PERMIT, PER SECTION
	208.3 OF FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY CODE, ACCESSIBLE PARKING
	SPACES ARE TO BE LOCATED ON THE SHORTEST POSSIBLE ROUTE
	OF TRAVEL FROM ADJACENT PARKING TO AN ACCESSIBLE
	ENTRANCE FOR EACH BUILDING. THE DESIGN OF ACCESSIBLE
	PARKING SPACES SHALL COMPLY WITH SECTION 502 OF FLORIDA
	ACCESSIBILITY CODE

	7. WHEN THE PLANS ARE SUBMITTED FOR PERMIT, PER SECTION
	208.2.4 OF FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY CODE, ONE IN EVERY SIX
	ACCESSIBLE SPACES (AT LEAST ONE) IN A PARKING
	STRUCTURE, SHALL BE VAN ACCESSIBLE AND DESIGNED IN
	ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION OF 502 OF FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY
	CODE (VERTICAL CLEARANCE NOT LESS THAN 98 INCHES AT
	SPACE AND VEHICULAR ACCESS ROUTE)

	8. WHEN SUBMITTED FOR BUILDING PERMIT, THE PLANS SHALL
	SHOW THAT THE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION FOR THE BUILDINGS
	WILL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE HEIGHT, AREA AND
	OCCUPANCY LIMITATIONS IN CHAPTER 5 OF THE FLORIDA
	BUILDING CODE

	9. WHEN SUBMITTED FOR BUILDING PERMIT, COMPLIANCE WITH
	ALL BUILDING SEPARATION, PERCENTAGE OF OPENINGS AND
	OPENING PROTECTIVE REQUIREMENTS OF CHAPTERS 6 AND 7 OF
	THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE SHALL BE VERIFIED.

	10. ENCLOSED PARKING GARAGES. IF THE PARKING GARAGE
	DOES NOT HAVE WALL OPENINGS, OR SUFFICIENT WALL
	OPENINGS TO MEET THE DEFINITION OF AN OPEN PARKING
	GARAGE, IT WILL BE CONSIDERED AN ENCLOSED PARKING
	GARAGE AND MUST HAVE EXHAUST SYSTEMS. THE EXHAUST
	SYSTEMS SHALL BE DESIGNED TO MINIMIZE NOISE LEVELS
	USING INLINE FAN SILENCERS OR OTHER APPROVED METHODS.

	11. ALL APPLICABLE PERMITS AND SUB-PERMITS MUST BE
	OBTAINED BEFORE COMMENCING THE WORK. SEPARATE PERMITS,
	PLANS AND FEES, ARE REQUIRED FOR SWIMMING POOLS AND
	SPAS, GAS SYSTEMS, GENERATORS, FIRE ALARM SYSTEMS, FIRE
	SPRINKLER AND OTHER FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEMS, GREASE
	INTERCEPTORS, SITE LIGHTING, SITE LANDSCAPE, SITE
	IRRIGATION, ETC.

	12. FOR STREET ADDRESSING, CONTACT MICHAEL ORIO, GIS
	SUPPORT SPECIALIST, AT (561) 494 1080, OR BY EMAIL:
	[email protected]

	ROBERT BROWN
	BUILDING OFFICIAL
	TEL: 561 805 6652
	EMAIL: [email protected]

2015-02-10 13:54:33

	-
	-

Review Stop	ENG - PPRC			ENGINEERING - PPRC
Rev No	2	Status	F	Date	04-15-2015			Cont ID
Sent By	cranford			Date	04-15-2015	Time	12:12	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	cranford			Date	04-15-2015	Time	11:53	Sent To

Notes

2015-04-15 12:12:50	PUBLIC WORKS DEPT. 2ND REVIEW

	THIS IS A CONCEPTUAL LEVEL REVIEW. CONSTRUCTION LEVEL
	DETAILS, DESIGN CALCULATIONS AND THE POLLUTION
	PREVENTION PLAN WILL BE REVIEWED AS PART OF THE
	ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL AND BUILDING PERMIT
	APPLICATION PROCESSES. THE ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT
	APPROVAL APPLICATION FORMS CAN BE DOWNLOADED AT
	HTTP://WPB.ORG/ENGINEERING/FORMS-AND-PUBLICATIONS/

	1) AS DISCUSSED WITH STAFF DURING OUR MEETING ON MARCH
	18, THE SUBMITTED TRAFFIC STUDIES DO NOT SUFFICIENTLY
	EVALUATE THE PROJECT'S IMPACT ON THE SURROUNDING LOCAL
	ROADWAYS. AS MENTIONED IN OUR ORIGINAL COMMENTS, PLEASE
	PROVIDE VEHICULAR AND PEDESTRIAN TRAFFIC STUDIES
	SHOWING HOW THE NEW SITE CONFIGURATION AND USE WILL
	EFFECT THE TRAFFIC VOLUME AND SURROUNDING LOCAL
	ROADWAYS AND WELL AS AN EVALUATION OF THE MINIMUM
	REQUIRED THROAT DEPTH (MRTD) NEEDED FOR EACH ON-SITE
	ACCESS POINT. THE RESULTS OF THE STUDY SHOULD SUPPORT
	TO PROPOSED MID-BLOCK PEDESTRIAN CROSSINGS AND MULTIPLE
	MID-BLOCK VEHICULAR STOPS.

	2) AS DISCUSSED WITH STAFF DURING OUR MEETING ON MARCH
	18, THE UNSIGNALIZED DOUBLE RIGHT TURN PROPOSED AT THE
	SOUTHERN EXIT IS AN UNSAFE CONDITION. PLEASE REMOVE
	UNSIGNALIZED DOUBLE RIGHT TURN.

	3) AS MENTIONED DURING OUR ORIGINAL REVIEW, THE
	PROPOSED POWER LINES ALONG TAMARIND MUST BE
	UNDERGROUND. THE SUBMITTED EMAIL FROM FPL INDICATES AN
	ESTIMATED COST FOR MOVING THE LINES UNDERGROUND RATHER
	THAN INDICATING THAT MOVING THE LINES IS NOT FEASIBLE.


	KELLY CRANFORD, PE
	CITY LAND DEVELOPMENT ENGINEER
	[email protected]
	561-494-1098 (OFFICE)

	VINCE NOEL, PSM
	CITY SURVEYOR / REAL ESTATE SUPERVISOR
	[email protected]
	561-494-1096

	BRIAN COLLINS, PE
	CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER
	[email protected]
	561-494-1040

	TRACY WARD, PE
	CITY STORMWATER ENGINEER
	561-494-1120
	[email protected]

Review Stop	ENG - PPRC			ENGINEERING - PPRC
Rev No	1	Status	F	Date	04-15-2015			Cont ID
Sent By	cranford			Date	04-15-2015	Time	12:13	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	cranford			Date	02-04-2015	Time	15:22	Sent To

Notes

2015-02-04 09:24:41	PUBLIC WORKS DEPT.

	THIS IS A CONCEPTUAL LEVEL REVIEW. CONSTRUCTION LEVEL
	DETAILS, DESIGN CALCULATIONS AND THE POLLUTION
	PREVENTION PLAN WILL BE REVIEWED AS PART OF THE
	ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL AND BUILDING PERMIT
	APPLICATION PROCESSES. THE ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT
	APPROVAL APPLICATION FORMS CAN BE DOWNLOADED AT
	HTTP://WPB.ORG/ENGINEERING/FORMS-AND-PUBLICATIONS/

	1) PLEASE SHOW ALL EXISTING EASEMENTS ON ALL OF THE
	SITE PLANS.

	2) PLEASE PROVIDE A COPY OF THE BROWNFIELD SITE
	REMEDIATION AGREEMENT WITH DEP.

	3) CLEARWATER WILL BE REQUIRED TO BE MILLED AND
	RESURFACED FROM BANYAN TO THE SOUTHERN PROPERTY LINE.

	4) THE EXISTING FIRE ACCESS EASEMENT OFF OF CLEARWATER
	WILL NEED TO BE ABANDONED. THE NEW EMERGENCY ACCESS
	ROUTE WILL NEED TO BE AT LEAST 20 FEET WIDE.

	5) THERE IS A FEE ASSOCIATED WITH THE PROPOSED REMOVAL
	OF THE METERED PARKING SPACES ALONG CLEARWATER.

	6) PLEASE PROVIDE VEHICULAR AND PEDESTRIAN TRAFFIC
	STUDIES SHOWING HOW THE NEW SITE CONFIGURATION AND USE
	WILL EFFECT THE TRAFFIC VOLUME AND SURROUNDING LOCAL
	ROADWAYS AND WELL AS AN EVALUATION OF THE MINIMUM
	REQUIRED THROAT DEPTH (MRTD) NEEDED FOR EACH ON-SITE
	ACCESS POINT. THE RESULTS OF THE STUDY SHOULD SUPPORT
	TO PROPOSED MID-BLOCK PEDESTRIAN CROSSINGS AND MULTIPLE
	MID-BLOCK VEHICULAR STOPS.

	7) REMOVE UNSIGNALIZED DOUBLE RIGHT TURN AT SOUTHERN
	EXIT.

	8) SHOW THE APPROXIMATE LOCATIONS OF THE FOUNDATION
	SUPPORTS FOR THE PROPOSED NEW BUILDING(S).

	9) THE EXISTING 36" WATER MAIN, WHICH CUTS THROUGH THE
	NORTHWEST CORNER OF PROPERTY, MUST REMAIN ACCESSIBLE
	FOR REPAIRS. NO CONSTRUCTION SHOULD BE PROPOSED WITHIN
	THE EXISTING UTILITY EASEMENT.

	10) THE THREE PROPOSED PARKING SPOTS FOR BANK CUSTOMERS
	DO NOT APPEAR TO BE ACCESSIBLE IF DRIVE THROUGH
	OCCUPIED.

	11) A DEVELOPER'S AGREEMENT WILL BE REQUIRED FOR ALL
	IMPROVEMENTS WITHIN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY.

	12) THE PROPOSED POWER LINES ALONG TAMARIND MUST BE
	UNDERGROUND.

	13) PLEASE DEMONSTRATE THAT THE PROPOSED PARKING
	COMPLIES WITH CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH CODE OF
	ORDINANCES, ARTICLE XV, SECTIONS 94-111, 94-313, AND
	94-485.

	14) PLEASE DEMONSTRATE THAT THE SPRAY FROM PROPOSED
	WATER FEATURE WILL NOT RESULT IN SLIPPERY PEDESTRIAN
	WALKING SURFACES.

	15) HAS THE CONDITION OF THE EXISTING STORMWATER SYSTEM
	BEEN EVALUATED?

	16) HAVE PRESSURE TESTS BEEN CONDUCTED ON THE POTABLE
	WATER LINE WHERE THE PROPOSED WATER, FIRE, AND
	IRRIGATION CONNECTIONS ARE PROPOSED? THE AVAILABLE
	WATER PRESSURE WITHIN THE CITY MAY NOT BE ACCEPTABLE AT
	ELEVATIONS HIGHER THAN THE 2ND FLOOR. WE RECOMMEND THAT
	A LONG-TERM PRESSURE STUDY BE PERFORMED ON THE POTABLE
	WATER LINES PRIOR TO FINALIZATION OF THE DESIGN.

	17) THE SANITARY MANHOLE WHERE THE SANITARY SEWER
	CONNECTION IS PROPOSED MAY NEED TO BE REHABILITATED AS
	PART OF THIS PROJECT. THE LOCATION OF THE PROPOSED
	SANITARY CONNECTION CANNOT BE APPROVED UNTIL FLOW
	ESTIMATES FROM THE PROPOSED LIFT STATION ARE PROVIDED.

	18) PLEASE DEMONSTRATE THAT THE PROJECT WILL PROVIDE
	ADEQUATE DRAINAGE AND STORMWATER MANAGEMENT. COMPLIANCE
	WITH CHAPTER 40E-4 WILL DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE WITH
	THIS PROVISION.
	APPROPRIATE MEASURES SHALL BE TAKEN TO ENSURE THAT
	REMOVAL OF STORMWATER WILL NOT ADVERSELY AFFECT
	NEIGHBORING PROPERTIES OR THE PUBLIC STORM DRAINAGE
	SYSTEM. [CO 94-35(C)(11)]

	19) PLEASE SHOW THE LOCATIONS OF THE ROOF DRAINS AND
	HOW THEY WILL CONNECT TO THE STORMWATER SYSTEM.
	CALCULATIONS WILL NEED TO BE PROVIDED AS PART OF THE
	ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT DEVELOPMENT PERMIT APPLICATION.

	KELLY CRANFORD, PE
	CITY LAND DEVELOPMENT ENGINEER
	[email protected]
	561-494-1098 (OFFICE)

	VINCE NOEL, PSM
	CITY SURVEYOR / REAL ESTATE SUPERVISOR
	[email protected]
	561-494-1096

	BRIAN COLLINS, PE
	CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER
	[email protected]
	561-494-1040

Review Stop	FIRE			FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No	2	Status	P	Date	04-06-2015			Cont ID
Sent By	pleduc			Date	04-06-2015	Time		Rev Time	0.00
Received By	pleduc			Date	04-06-2015	Time	13:53	Sent To

Notes

2015-04-06 13:59:23	AFTER A REVIEW OF THE PPRC RESPONSE LETTER DATED MARCH
	18, 2015, FROM THOMAS ENGINEERING GROUP, TO ANA MARIA
	APONTE, CITY URBAN DESIGNER, THE PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED
	FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU COMMENTS HAVE BEEN ADDRESSED.

	THE BUREAU'S APPROVAL OF THIS SUBMITTED PROJECT DOES
	NOT CONSTITUTE IT'S FINAL REVIEW OR APPROVAL.

	THE BUREAU SHALL REVIEW ALL SUBMITTED BUILDING PLANS AT
	THE APPROPRIATE TIME AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE
	REQUIREMENTS OF ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND STANDARDS.

	PETER LEDUC
	FIRE MARSHAL
	WEST PALM BEACH FIRE RESCUE

Review Stop	FIRE			FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No	1	Status	P	Date				Cont ID
Sent By				Date		Time		Rev Time	0.00
Received By	pleduc			Date	02-05-2015	Time	10:16	Sent To

Notes

2015-02-06 14:34:56	THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS WERE SUBMITTED BY PETER LEDUC,
	FIRE MARSHAL, BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION, WEST PALM
	BEACH FIRE RESCUE.

	THIS REVIEW CAN ONLY BE CONSIDERED PRELIMINARY AS THE
	DRAWINGS THAT WERE REVIEWED WERE NOT COMPLETE.
	ADDITIONAL COMMENTS CAN BE EXPECTED WHEN FULL DRAWINGS
	ARE SUBMITTED FOR PERMIT.

	THE FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU HAS NO OBJECTIONS TO THE
	PROPOSED PROJECT.

	1. CONSTRUCTION, DEMOLITION, AND RENOVATION TO COMPLY
	WITH NFPA 241.

	2. SITE ACCESS AND EXIT POINTS ARE TO BE CLEARLY
	IDENTIFIED AND MAINTAINED FOR EMERGENCY VEHICLES DURING
	ALL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES.

	3. THE BUILDING ADDRESS SHALL BE CLEARLY VISIBLE FROM
	ALL ACCESS ROADWAYS, INCLUDING DURING CONSTRUCTION.
	ADDRESS NUMBERS SHALL CONTRAST WITH THEIR BACKGROUND
	AND SHALL NOT BE LESS THAN SIX (6) INCHES IN HEIGHT
	WITH A ONE (1) INCH STROKE FOR ALL BUILDINGS.

	4. TRASH AND DEBRIS IS TO BE REMOVED FROM THE SITE
	DAILY OR MORE OFTEN TO REDUCE THE ACCUMULATION OF
	POTENTIAL LIFE AND FIRE SAFETY HAZARDS.

	5. ALL APARTMENT BUILDINGS SHALL COMPLY WITH THE
	FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE, 2010 EDITION, THE LIFE
	SAFETY CODE, 2009 EDITION, INCLUDING MORE SPECIFICALLY,
	CHAPTER 30, NEW APARTMENTS.

	6. ALL PARKING STRUCTURES SHALL COMPLY WITH NFPA 88A,
	PARKING STRUCTURES AND NFPA 101, THE LIFE SAFETY CODE,
	INCLUDING MORE SPECIFICALLY, CHAPTER 42 STORAGE
	OCCUPANCIES (PARKING STRUCTURES)

	7. THE SEPARATION AND OPENING PROTECTION BETWEEN THE
	PARKING GARAGE AND HOTEL SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE AND
	COMPLIANCE WITH THE SPECIFIC AND MOST STRINGENT
	PROVISION REQUIREMENT OF EITHER CHAPTER.

	8. FIRE DEPARTMENT ACCESS ROADS SHALL HAVE A SURFACE
	DESIGNED TO ACCOMMODATE FIRE APPARATUS WEIGHING AT
	LEAST 32 TONS. ACCESS ROADS SHALL HAVE AN UNOBSTRUCTED
	WIDTH OF NOT LESS THAN 20 FEET AND AN UNOBSTRUCTED
	VERTICAL CLEARANCE OF NOT LESS THAN 13 FEET 6 INCHES.

	9. FIRE LANES SHALL BE MARKED WITH FREESTANDING SIGNS
	READING, ?FIRE LANE - NO PARKING BY ORDER OF THE FIRE
	DEPARTMENT.? SIGNS SHALL BE 12? X 18? WITH A WHITE
	BACKGROUND AND RED LETTERS AND SHALL BE A MAXIMUM OF
	SEVEN FEET IN HEIGHT TO THE BOTTOM OF THE SIGN. SIGNS
	SHALL BE WITHIN SIGHT OF THE TRAFFIC FLOW AND BE SPACED
	A MAXIMUM OF 60 FEET APART.

	10. STAIRS AND EGRESS COMPONENTS SHALL CONFORM TO THE
	LIFE SAFETY REQUIREMENTS OF CHAPTER 7 OF NFPA 101
	FLORIDA 2012 EDITION.

	11. STAIRWAY IDENTIFICATION: NEW ENCLOSED STAIRS
	SERVING THREE OR MORE STORIES AND EXISTING ENCLOSED
	STAIRS SERVING FIVE OR MORE STORIES SHALL COMPLY WITH
	(A) THROUGH (L).
	(A) THE STAIRS SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH SPECIAL SIGNAGE
	WITHIN THE ENCLOSURE AT EACH FLOOR LANDING.
	(B) THE SIGNAGE SHALL INDICATE THE FLOOR LEVEL.
	(C) THE SIGNAGE SHALL INDICATE THE TERMINUS OF THE TOP
	AND BOTTOM OF THE STAIR ENCLOSURE.
	(D) THE SIGNAGE SHALL INDICATE THE IDENTIFICATION OF
	THE STAIR ENCLOSURE.
	(E) THE SIGNAGE SHALL INDICATE THE FLOOR LEVEL OF, AND
	THE DIRECTION TO, EXIT DISCHARGE.
	(F) THE SIGNAGE SHALL BE LOCATED INSIDE THE ENCLOSURE
	APPROXIMATELY 60-INCHES ABOVE THE FLOOR LANDING IN A
	POSITION THAT IS VISIBLE WHEN THE DOOR IS IN THE OPEN
	OR CLOSED POSITION.
	(G) THE FLOOR LEVEL DESIGNATION SHALL ALSO BE TACTILE.
	(H) THE SIGNAGE SHALL BE PAINTED OR STENCILED ON THE
	WALL OR ON A SEPARATE SIGN SECURELY ATTACHED TO THE
	WALL.
	(I) THE STAIRWAY IDENTIFICATION LETTER SHALL BE LOCATED
	AT THE TOP OF THE SIGN IN MINIMUM 1-INCH HIGH
	LETTERING.
	(J) SIGNAGE THAT READS ?NO ROOF ACCESS? AND IS LOCATED
	UNDER THE STAIRWAY IDENTIFICATION LETTER SHALL
	DESIGNATE STAIRWAYS THAT DO NOT PROVIDE ROOF ACCESS.
	LETTERING SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 1-INCH HIGH.
	(K) THE FLOOR LEVEL NUMBER SHALL BE LOCATED IN THE
	MIDDLE OF THE SIGN IN MINIMUM 5-INCH HIGH NUMBERS.
	MEZZANINE LEVELS SHALL HAVE THE LETTER ?M? OR OTHER
	APPROPRIATE IDENTIFICATION LETTER PRECEDING THE FLOOR
	NUMBER, WHILE BASEMENT LEVELS SHALL HAVE THE LETTER ?B?
	OR OTHER APPROPRIATE IDENTIFICATION LETTER PRECEDING
	THE FLOOR LEVEL NUMBER.
	(L) IDENTIFICATION OF THE LOWER AND UPPER TERMINUS OF
	THE STAIRWAY SHALL BE LOCATED AT THE BOTTOM OF THE SIGN
	IN MINIMUM 1-INCH HIGH LETTERS OR NUMBERS.

	12. EACH ELEVATOR LANDING AND LOBBY SHALL HAVE ACCESS
	TO AT LEAST ONE EXIT. EXIT ACCESS SHALL NOT REQUIRE THE
	USE OF A KEY, TOOL, SPECIAL KNOWLEDGE, OR SPECIAL
	EFFORT.

	13. ALL NEW ELEVATORS SHALL CONFORM TO THE FIRE
	FIGHTER?S EMERGENCY OPERATIONS REQUIREMENTS OF THE
	SAFETY CODE FOR ELEVATORS.

	14. PROVIDE FIRE LOAD CALCULATIONS FOR THIS PROJECT AND
	ENSURE THE WATER SUPPLY MEETS THE REQUIREMENT.

	15. EACH BUILDING SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH THEIR OWN FIRE
	HYDRANT(WATER SUPPLY) AND FDC CONNECTIONS WITHIN 150'.
	CLOSE COORDINATION WITH THE FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU FOR
	ADAQUATE LOCATIONS IS STRONGLY ENCORAGED.

	16. A NFPA 13 COMPLAINT FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM AND NFPA
	14 COMPLIANT WET STANDPIPE SYSTEM ARE REQUIRED FOR EACH
	STRUCTURE. TEMPORARY STANDPIPES ARE REQUIRED WHEN THE
	BUILDING REACHES THREE LEVELS OR THIRTY FEET WHILE
	BEING CONSTRUCTED. SEPARATE SHOP DRAWINGS, ARE REQUIRED
	TO BE SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE FIRE
	PREVENTION BUREAU PRIOR TO ANY INSTALLATION.

	17. FOR ISSUANCE OF A GENERAL BUILDING PERMIT, SECTION
	105.3.1.2(2) OF THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE REQUIRES
	SEALED FIRE PROTECTION CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS FOR THE
	DESIGN OR ALTERATION OF 50 OR MORE AUTOMATIC FIRE
	SPRINKLERS.

	18. A MONITORED FIRE ALARM SYSTEM IS REQUIRED FOR EACH
	STRUCTURE. SEPARATE SHOP DRAWINGS, ARE REQUIRED TO BE
	SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE FIRE PREVENTION
	BUREAU PRIOR TO ANY INSTALLATION.

	19. COMPLETE LIFE SAFETY PLANS FOR EACH OCCUPANCY SHALL
	BE PROVIDED THAT ILLUSTRATE OCCUPANT LOADS, TRAVEL
	DISTANCES, COMMON PATHS OF TRAVEL, DEAD-END CORRIDORS,
	EXIT SIGNS, EMERGENCY LIGHTING, EXITS LEADING TO A
	PUBLIC WAY, FIRE EXTINGUISHER LOCATIONS, AND ALL FIRE
	SAFETY FEATURES AND EQUIPMENT.

	20. ALL ELEVATORS SHALL BE EQUIPPED WITH A REGION 7
	KEYWAY SYSTEM. ANY BUILDING THAT IS MORE THAN THREE
	STORIES HIGH OR IN WHICH THE VERTICAL DISTANCE BETWEEN
	THE BOTTOM TERMINAL LANDING AND THE TOP TERMINAL
	LANDING EXCEEDS 25 FEET MUST BE CONSTRUCTED TO CONTAIN
	AT LEAST ONE PASSENGER ELEVATOR THAT IS OPERATIONAL AND
	WILL ACCOMMODATE AN AMBULANCE STRETCHER 76 INCHES LONG
	AND 24 INCHES WIDE IN THE HORIZONTAL POSITION.

	21. KNOX-BOX KEY SYSTEM SHALL BE REQUIRED FOR EACH
	BUILDING.

	22. FLORIDA STATUTE 553.885CARBON MONOXIDE ALARM
	REQUIRED.?
	?(1)EVERY SEPARATE BUILDING OR ADDITION TO AN EXISTING
	BUILDING, OTHER THAN A HOSPITAL, AN INPATIENT HOSPICE
	FACILITY, OR A NURSING HOME FACILITY LICENSED BY THE
	AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION, CONSTRUCTED ON
	OR AFTER JULY 1, 2008, AND HAVING A FOSSIL-FUEL-BURNING
	HEATER OR APPLIANCE, A FIREPLACE, AN ATTACHED GARAGE,
	OR OTHER FEATURE, FIXTURE, OR ELEMENT THAT EMITS CARBON
	MONOXIDE AS A BYPRODUCT OF COMBUSTION SHALL HAVE AN
	APPROVED OPERATIONAL CARBON MONOXIDE ALARM INSTALLED
	WITHIN 10 FEET OF EACH ROOM USED FOR SLEEPING PURPOSES
	IN THE NEW BUILDING OR ADDITION, OR AT SUCH OTHER
	LOCATIONS AS REQUIRED BY THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE. THE
	REQUIREMENTS OF THIS SUBSECTION MAY BE SATISFIED WITH
	THE INSTALLATION OF A HARD-WIRED OR BATTERY-POWERED
	CARBON MONOXIDE ALARM OR A HARD-WIRED OR
	BATTERY-POWERED COMBINATION CARBON MONOXIDE AND SMOKE
	ALARM. FOR A NEW HOSPITAL, AN INPATIENT HOSPICE
	FACILITY, A NURSING HOME FACILITY LICENSED BY THE
	AGENCY FOR HEALTH CARE ADMINISTRATION, OR A NEW STATE
	CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, AN APPROVED OPERATIONAL
	CARBON MONOXIDE DETECTOR SHALL BE INSTALLED INSIDE OR
	DIRECTLY OUTSIDE OF EACH ROOM OR AREA WITHIN THE
	HOSPITAL OR FACILITY WHERE A FOSSIL-FUEL-BURNING
	HEATER, ENGINE, OR APPLIANCE IS LOCATED. THIS DETECTOR
	SHALL BE CONNECTED TO THE FIRE ALARM SYSTEM OF THE
	HOSPITAL OR FACILITY AS A SUPERVISORY SIGNAL. THIS
	SUBSECTION DOES NOT APPLY TO EXISTING BUILDINGS THAT
	ARE UNDERGOING ALTERATIONS OR REPAIRS UNLESS THE
	ALTERATION IS AN ADDITION AS DEFINED IN SUBSECTION (3).

	23. ALL KITCHEN EQUIPMENT AND OPERATIONS SHALL COMPLY
	WITH NFPA 96, STANDARD FOR VENTILATION CONTROL AND FIRE
	PROTECTION OF COMMERCIAL COOKING OPERATIONS.
	EXTINGUISHMENT AND VENTILATION SYSTEM SHOP DRAWINGS
	SHALL BE SUBMITTED SEPARATELY FOR APPROVAL.

	24. FLAME SPREAD DETAILS ON ALL FOAM BACKED STUCCO TRIM
	PLANNED FOR BUILDING SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR AND/OR
	IDENTIFIED AND INDICATED ON THE PLAN.

	25. ALL VERTICAL AND HORIZONTAL FIRE SEPARATIONS FOR
	THIS BUILDING SHALL BE CLEARLY IDENTIFIED AND INDICATED
	ON THE PLANS.

	26. ALL FIRE RATED OPENING PROTECTIONS (FIRE DOORS AND
	HARDWARE) SHALL BE CLEARLY IDENTIFIED AND INDICATED IN
	THE DOOR SCHEDULE. ALL DOORS THAT OPEN ONTO EXIT ACCESS
	CORRIDORS SHALL BE AT LEAST 20 MINUTE FIRE RATED AND BE
	EQUIPPED WITH SELF-CLOSING DEVICES THAT CAUSE THE DOOR
	TO POSITIVELY

	27. SMOKE ALARMS ARE REQUIRED IN EVERY SLEEPING ROOM
	AND OUTSIDE OF THE SLEEPING ROOMS AND IN ALL LEVELS OF
	THE DWELLING UNITS. THESE DETECTORS SHALL BE HARD WIRED
	AND SHALL BE INTERCONNECTED TO ONE ANOTHER.

	28. INTERIOR FINISH CLASSIFICATIONS FOR ALL WALLS AND
	CEILINGS SHALL BE CLEARLY INDICATED ON THE SUBMITTED
	BUILDING PERMIT PLAN.

	29. THE BUREAU'S APPROVAL REVIEW OF THIS SUBMITTED
	PROJECT DOES NOT CONSTITUTE IT'S FINAL REVIEW OR FINAL
	APPROVAL.

	30. THE BUREAU SHALL REVIEW ALL SUBMITTED BUILDING
	PLANS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF NFPA 101,
	2012 FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE AND ALL THE
	APPLICABLE CODES AND STANDARDS.

	31.

Review Stop	L			LANDSCAPING
Rev No	2	Status	P	Date	06-24-2015			Cont ID
Sent By	rcaranci			Date	06-24-2015	Time	16:37	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	rcaranci			Date	06-24-2015	Time	16:37	Sent To

Notes

2015-06-24 16:43:26	27. SATISFIED. STREET TREES SHALL BE PLANTED ALONG THE
	ENTIRE FRONTAGE, ADJACENT TO THE CURB IN TREE GRATES
	AND AT 30 FOOT INTERVALS. MORE DETAIL IS NEEDED.
	28. SEE CONDITION. PLEASE PROVIDE INFORMATION ON
	PROPOSED GREEN WALLS. INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED FOR THE
	MANUFACTURER AND SYSTEM, BUT MORE DETAILS ARE NEEDED
	INCLUDING THE PLANT SPECIES, QUANTITIES AND
	CONSTRUCTION OF PLANTERS, AND MAINTENANCE DETAILS.
	29. SATISFIED. EXISTING LANDSCAPE WITHIN THE PALM TRAN
	LOOP MEDIAN CANNOT BE REMOVED AND REPLACED BY PROPOSED
	ROCK BARRIER. STAFF HAS ADDITIONAL INFORMATION THAT CAN
	BE EXPLORED ON SHADE PLANTS THAT MAY BE SUSTAINABLE IN
	THESE AREAS.
	30. SATISFIED. LANDSCAPING DRAWINGS DO NOT ACCURATELY
	REFLECT IMAGE ON 3D MODEL. SECTIONS AND ELEVATIONS MUST
	BE CORRECTED WITH ANY LANDSCAPE PLAN CHANGES.

	NEW COMMENTS 4/16/15:
	1. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE A SEPARATE SHEET DEFINING
	THE AREAS COUNTED AS PUBLIC OPEN SPACE AND PRIVATE OPEN
	SPACE IN ORDER TO VERIFY THE REQUIRED OPEN SPACE AND
	CALCULATE THE REQUIRED TREES AND SHRUBS.

	2. SATISFIED. PLEASE REVISE THE DATA TABLE ON SHEET
	LP-1 SHOWING CANOPY AREAS BY TREE TYPE IN QUALIFIED
	PUBLIC OPEN SPACE TO MEET THE TREE CANOPY AREA
	MEASUREMENTS AS PROVIDED IN SECTION 94-109 TABLE IV-8.

	3. SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE A DETAILED PLANT LIST WITH
	SPECIES, SIZES AND QUANTITIES OF PLANT MATERIAL
	PROPOSED. PLEASE PROVIDE SEPARATE PLANT LISTS FOR THE
	GROUND LEVEL AND UPPER DECKS.

	4. SEE CONDITION. COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 94-442 (G)
	FLORIDA FRIENDLY LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS MUST BE
	VERIFIED FOR THE PROPOSED LANDSCAPE MATERIAL WHEN A
	COMPLETE PLANT LIST IS SUBMITTED.

	5. SATISFIED. PLEASE SUBMIT A TREE SURVEY SHOWING THE
	SPECIES AND SIZES OF THE EXISTING TREES AND PALMS ON
	SITE, AND PROVIDE A LIST TO INDICATE WHICH TREES WILL
	BE REMOVED OR RELOCATED, OR PRESERVED IN PLACE.

	6. SATISFIED. PLEASE SHOW LOCATIONS OF GROUND MOUNTED
	SIGNAGE, LIGHTING FIXTURES AND UTILITIES ON THE
	LANDSCAPE PLAN AND MAKE ADJUSTMENTS TO AVOID CONFLICTS
	WITH LANDSCAPING.

	7. SEE CONDITION. A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT APPLICATION
	MAY BE SUBMITTED CONCURRENTLY WITH THIS PETITION TO BE
	REVIEWED CONCURRENTLY, AND ALL COMMENTS WILL BE
	INCLUDED AS PART OF THE REVIEW OF THIS PETITION.

	CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL:
	1. AT THE TIME OF SUBMISSION OF THE BUILDING PERMIT, A
	LANDSCAPE PERMIT SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO FINALIZE THE
	SPECIES AND PLACEMENT OF LANDSCAPING, AND PLACEMENT OF
	ROOT BARRIERS MEETING THE INTENT AND SPECIFICATIONS OF
	THE APPROVAL IN COMPLIANCE WITH ALL LANDSCAPE CODE
	REQUIREMENTS, INCLUDING FLORIDA FRIENDLY LANDSCAPE
	REQUIREMENTS.

	2. PRIOR TO THE REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF ANY TREES ON
	THE PROPERTY, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE
	SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE DEVELOPMENT
	SERVICES DEPARTMENT, PLANNING DIVISION.

	3. UPON SUBMITTAL OF THE ART IN PUBLIC PLACES
	APPLICATION, THE APPLICANT SHALL SUPPLY DETAILS OF THE
	GREEN WALL CONSTRUCTION AND A MAINTENANCE PLAN WITH
	SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE LONG TERM MAINTENANCE OF THE
	GREEN WALL FEATURES. SURETY MAY BE REQUIRED TO ENSURE
	FUTURE MAINTENANCE OF THE GREEN WALL FEATURES.

	4. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE
	RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PERMITTING AND INSTALLATION OF THE
	STREET TREES, TREE GRATES, RIGHT OF WAY LANDSCAPING AND
	IRRIGATION APPROVED WITH THIS PETITION.

	5. THE APPLICANT, SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL BE
	RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THE ROAD RIGHT OF
	WAY LANDSCAPING, TREE GRATES, AND IRRIGATION ADJACENT
	TO THE PROJECT. THIS WILL BE THROUGH A SEPARATE
	MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY.

2015-06-24 16:38:31	SUBJECT TO CONDITIONS INCLUDED

Review Stop	L			LANDSCAPING
Rev No	1	Status	F	Date	04-17-2015			Cont ID
Sent By	rcaranci			Date	04-17-2015	Time	16:25	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	rcaranci			Date	04-17-2015	Time	16:25	Sent To

Notes

2015-04-17 16:26:49	LANDSCAPING

	27. NOT SATISFIED. STREET TREES SHALL BE PLANTED ALONG
	THE ENTIRE FRONTAGE, ADJACENT TO THE CURB IN TREE
	GRATES AND AT 30 FOOT INTERVALS. MORE DETAIL IS NEEDED.
	28. NOT SATISFIED. PLEASE PROVIDE INFORMATION ON
	PROPOSED GREEN WALLS. INFORMATION WAS PROVIDED FOR THE
	MANUFACTURER AND SYSTEM, BUT MORE DETAILS ARE NEEDED
	INCLUDING THE PLANT SPECIES, QUANTITIES AND
	CONSTRUCTION OF PLANTERS, AND MAINTENANCE DETAILS.
	29. NOT SATISFIED. EXISTING LANDSCAPE WITHIN THE PALM
	TRAN LOOP MEDIAN CANNOT BE REMOVED AND REPLACED BY
	PROPOSED ROCK BARRIER. STAFF HAS ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
	THAT CAN BE EXPLORED ON SHADE PLANTS THAT MAY BE
	SUSTAINABLE IN THESE AREAS.
	30. NOT SATISFIED. LANDSCAPING DRAWINGS DO NOT
	ACCURATELY REFLECT IMAGE ON 3D MODEL. SECTIONS AND
	ELEVATIONS MUST BE CORRECTED WITH ANY LANDSCAPE PLAN
	CHANGES.

	NEW COMMENTS 4/16/15:
	1. PLEASE PROVIDE A SEPARATE SHEET DEFINING THE AREAS
	COUNTED AS PUBLIC OPEN SPACE AND PRIVATE OPEN SPACE IN
	ORDER TO VERIFY THE REQUIRED OPEN SPACE AND CALCULATE
	THE REQUIRED TREES AND SHRUBS.

	2. PLEASE REVISE THE DATA TABLE ON SHEET LP-1 SHOWING
	CANOPY AREAS BY TREE TYPE IN QUALIFIED PUBLIC OPEN
	SPACE TO MEET THE TREE CANOPY AREA MEASUREMENTS AS
	PROVIDED IN SECTION 94-109 TABLE IV-8.

	3. PLEASE PROVIDE A DETAILED PLANT LIST WITH SPECIES,
	SIZES AND QUANTITIES OF PLANT MATERIAL PROPOSED. PLEASE
	PROVIDE SEPARATE PLANT LISTS FOR THE GROUND LEVEL AND
	UPPER DECKS.

	4. COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 94-442 (G) FLORIDA FRIENDLY
	LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS MUST BE VERIFIED FOR THE
	PROPOSED LANDSCAPE MATERIAL WHEN A COMPLETE PLANT LIST
	IS SUBMITTED.

	5. PLEASE SUBMIT A TREE SURVEY SHOWING THE SPECIES AND
	SIZES OF THE EXISTING TREES AND PALMS ON SITE, AND
	PROVIDE A LIST TO INDICATE WHICH TREES WILL BE REMOVED
	OR RELOCATED, OR PRESERVED IN PLACE.

	6. PLEASE SHOW LOCATIONS OF GROUND MOUNTED SIGNAGE,
	LIGHTING FIXTURES AND UTILITIES ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN
	AND MAKE ADJUSTMENTS TO AVOID CONFLICTS WITH
	LANDSCAPING.

	7. A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT APPLICATION MAY BE
	SUBMITTED CONCURRENTLY WITH THIS PETITION TO BE
	REVIEWED CONCURRENTLY, AND ALL COMMENTS WILL BE
	INCLUDED AS PART OF THE REVIEW OF THIS PETITION.

Review Stop	PARK		PARKING
Rev No	1	Status	Date		Cont ID
Sent By			Date	Time	Rev Time
Received By			Date	Time	Sent To

Notes

***NONE***

Review Stop	POLICE		POLICE
Rev No	1	Status	Date		Cont ID
Sent By			Date	Time	Rev Time
Received By			Date	Time	Sent To

Notes

***NONE***

Review Stop	PW			PUBLIC WORKS
Rev No	2	Status	P	Date	04-15-2015			Cont ID
Sent By	cranford			Date	04-15-2015	Time	12:15	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	cranford			Date	04-15-2015	Time	12:15	Sent To

Notes

2015-04-15 12:15:24

PLEASE SEE ENG PPRC COMMENTS

Review Stop	PW			PUBLIC WORKS
Rev No	1	Status	F	Date	02-04-2015			Cont ID
Sent By	cranford			Date	02-04-2015	Time	15:52	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	cranford			Date	02-04-2015	Time	15:52	Sent To

Notes

2015-02-04 15:52:38

PLEASE SEE ENG PPRC COMMENTS

Review Stop	STORM			STORMWATER
Rev No	2	Status	P	Date	04-15-2015			Cont ID
Sent By	cranford			Date	04-15-2015	Time	12:15	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	cranford			Date	04-15-2015	Time	12:14	Sent To

Notes

2015-04-15 12:14:55

PLEASE SEE ENG PPRC COMMENTS

Review Stop	STORM			STORMWATER
Rev No	1	Status	F	Date	02-04-2015			Cont ID
Sent By	cranford			Date	02-04-2015	Time	15:53	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	cranford			Date	02-04-2015	Time	15:53	Sent To

Notes

2015-02-04 15:53:12

PLEASE SEE ENG PPRC COMMENTS

Review Stop	SURVEY			SURVEYING
Rev No	2	Status	F	Date	04-15-2015			Cont ID
Sent By	cranford			Date	04-15-2015	Time	12:17	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	cranford			Date	04-15-2015	Time	12:16	Sent To

Notes

2015-04-15 12:17:08

PLEASE SEE ENG PPRC COMMENTS

Review Stop	SURVEY			SURVEYING
Rev No	1	Status	F	Date	02-04-2015			Cont ID
Sent By	cranford			Date	02-04-2015	Time	15:54	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	cranford			Date	02-04-2015	Time	15:53	Sent To

Notes

2015-02-04 15:53:56

PLEASE SEE ENG PPRC COMMENTS

Review Stop	TRAFFIC			TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No	2	Status	F	Date	04-15-2015			Cont ID
Sent By	cranford			Date	04-15-2015	Time	12:17	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	cranford			Date	04-15-2015	Time	12:18	Sent To

Notes

2015-04-15 12:17:55

PLEASE SEE ENG PPRC COMMENTS

Review Stop	TRAFFIC			TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No	1	Status	F	Date	02-04-2015			Cont ID
Sent By	cranford			Date	02-04-2015	Time	15:54	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	cranford			Date	02-04-2015	Time	15:54	Sent To

Notes

2015-02-04 15:54:36

PLEASE SEE ENG PPRC COMMENTS

Review Stop	Z			ZONING
Rev No	2	Status	F	Date	04-16-2015			Cont ID
Sent By	aaponte			Date	04-16-2015	Time	15:38	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	aaponte			Date	04-16-2015	Time	15:05	Sent To

Notes

2015-04-16 17:02:43	1.PROJECT DATA SHALL BE REVISED TO INCLUDE FAR
	CALCULATIONS.
	2. THE MAJORITY OF THE SPACES INDICATED ON SHEET A-601
	AS QUALIFIED PUBLIC OPEN SPACES DO NOT MEET THE POS
	REQUIREMENTS. THE PUBLIC OPEN SPACE IS INTENDED TO
	CREATE A GATHERING PUBLIC SPACE SUCH AS A PLAZA OR
	PARK. IT IS NOT INTENDED TO BE GENERAL CIRCULATION
	AREAS.
	3. COMPLIED.
	4. COMPLIED
	5. PLEASE LOOK AT THE FOOTPRINT DEFINITION. FOOTPPINT
	IS CALCULATED BASICALLY AS THE AREA COVERED BY A ROOF
	ON EACH LEVEL, NOT NECESSARILY ENCLOSED, BUT COVERED.
	6. THE MAXIMUM FOOTPRINT LENGHT FOR THIS DISTRICT IS
	350 FEET, INCLUDING A MINIMUM OF 60 FEET SEPARATION
	BETWEEN PODIUM ELEMENTS. PROPOSED PROJECT DOES NOT
	COMPLY WITH THIS PROVISION. FURTHER DISCUSSION WILL BE
	NECESSARY TO DETERMINE IF THE DAC CAN APPROVED THE
	FOOTPRINT SEPARATION TO BE LOCATED AT THE ROOF TOP DECK
	LEVEL OR A CODE AMENDMEN.
	7. DAC APPROVAL WILL BE REQUIRED TO ALLOW CURB CUTS
	THAT EXCEED THE MAXIMUM 25 FEET WIDTH PERMITTED.
	8. PROPOSED DROP-OFF AND PASSENGER LOADING FOR HOTEL
	AND RESIDENTIAL USE DOES NOT COMPLY WITH CODE
	REQUIREMENTS IN SEC 94-109.
	9. AT THIS POINT THE PARKING GARAGE DOES NOT INCLUDE
	ANY STRUCTURAL ELEMENTS. PLEASE BE AWARE THE WIDTH OF
	THE PARKING SPACES IS LARGER IF STRUCTURAL ELEMENTS ARE
	ADJACENT TO THE SPACE. DEAD END PARKING AREAS SHALL
	HAVE A TURN AROUND SPACE.
	10. ADDITIONAL DETAIL WILL BE REQUIRED FOR THE LOCATION
	OF THE BIKE FACILITIES. EXACT DIMENSION OF THE SPACE
	AND LOCATION OF RACKS SHALL BE PROVIDED TO CONFIRM
	COMPLIANCE.
	11. OK.
	12. PLEASE CONTACT SYBILLE WALTER TO START THE ART IN
	PUBLIC PLACES PROCESS AS SOON AS POSSIBLE. THE PROJECT
	WILL BE REQUIRED TO DEDICATE 1% OF THE CONSTRUCTION
	COST FOR AN ART IN PUBLIC PLACES. SOME OF THE ART
	INSTALLATIONS MAY QUALIFIED BUT THEY REQUIRE APPROVAL
	BY THE AIPP COMMITTEE AND THE CITY COMMISSION.
	13. COMPLIANCE WITH PUBLIC OPEN SPACE SHALL BE REVISED.
	14. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION SHALL BE PROVIDED TO COMFIRM
	COMPLIANCE WITH THE FACADE ARTICULATION. THE FLOOR
	PLANS DO NOT INDICATE ANY OF THE DETAILS SHOWN ON THE
	FACADES.
	15. FURTHER DISCUSSION NECESSARY. PUBLIC OPEN SPACE
	INDICATED IN THE FIRST FLOOR DOES NOT QUALIFY.
	16.FURTHER DISCUSSION NECESSARY.
	17. IS THE BRIDGE TO THE TRAIN STATION AT THE 2ND LEVEL
	OF THE TRANSIT VILLAGE? IS IT LOCATED AT THE SAME
	ELEVATION? PLEASE SHOW HOW THE CONNECTION BETWEEN THE
	TRI-RAIL BRIDGE AND THE DECK IS PROPOSED.
	18. OK.
	19. MORE DETAIL NECESSARY.
	20. OK.
	21. SEE COMMENT NO. 12.
	22-26- RENDERINGS WILL BE REQUIRED FOR THE DAC SPECIAL
	REVIEW, AS WELL AS MORE DETAIL ON THE BUILDING DESIGN,
	FACADE ARTICULATION, LOCATION OR DOORS, WINDOWS ETC.
	27-30. SEE LANDSCAPE COMMENTS.

	FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION PLEASE CONTACT ANA MARIA
	APONTE AT 561-822-1439.

Review Stop	Z			ZONING
Rev No	1	Status	F	Date	02-11-2015			Cont ID
Sent By	aaponte			Date	02-11-2015	Time	10:45	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	aaponte			Date	02-10-2015	Time	12:24	Sent To

Notes

2015-02-11 09:37:41	BUILDING MASSING AND SITE PLAN COMMENTS:
	- PLEASE PROVIDE A PROJECT DATA TABLE INDICTING THE
	EXACT GROSS BUILDING AREA OF EACH BUILDING, MECHANICAL
	AREAS, AND PARKING GARAGES. INCLUDE FAR CALCULATIONS.
	PLEASE INCLUDE GRAPHIC INFO FOR EACH FLOOR.
	- PLEASE PROVIDE INFORMATION INDICATING THE EXACT AREAS
	ACCOUNTED FOR THE PUBLIC AND PRIVATE OPEN SPACE.
	- PLEASE INDICATE THE PROPERTY LINE AND THE SETBACK
	LINE IN ALL FLOOR PLANS AND ELEVATIONS.
	- BANYAN BOULEVARD IS AN AVENUE, PLEASE ADJUST THE
	REQUIRED SETBACK ACCORDINGLY.
	- PLEASE PROVIDE INFORMATION TO CONFIRM COMPLIANCE WITH
	MAXIMUM BUILDING FOOTPRINT REQUIRED AT EACH LEVEL
	(TABLE IV-21).INCLUDE A GRAPHIC INDICATING THE AREAS.
	- PROPOSED PROJECT DOES NOT COMPLY WITH THE MAXIMUM
	350' FOOTPRINT LENGHT, AND MINIMUM 60 FEET SEPARATION
	BETWEEN PODIUMS AND TOWERS.
	- PROPOSED CURB CUTS EXCEED THE MAXIMUM WIDTH ALLOWED
	FOR CURB CUTS.
	- PROPOSED DROP-OFF AND PASSENGER LOADING FOR HOTEL AND
	RESIDENTIAL USE DOES NOT COMPLY WITH CODE REQUIREMENTS.
	SEC 94-109.
	- PLEASE INDICATE DIMENSIONS ON ALL PARKING STALLS AND
	DRIVE AISLES TO CONFIRM COMPLIANCE.
	- PLEASE INDICATE LOCATION OF REQUIRED BIKE PARKIGN
	FACILITIES.
	- LOADING AREAS EXCEED THE REQUIREMENTS, AFFECTING THE
	PROJECT CIRCULATION.
	- WHAT IS THE PROPOSED ELEMENT AT THE SE CORNER OF THE
	PARKING GARAGE? A FOUNTAIN?
	- PLEASE PROVIDE INFORMATION TO CONFIRM COMPLIANCE WITH
	OPEN SPACE STANDARDS (TABLE IV-7 AND IV-8).
	- PLEASE PROVIDE INFORMATION TO CONFIRM COMPLIANCE WITH
	FACADE ARTICULATION REQUIREMENTS (TABLE IV-4).

	PUBLIC OPEN SPACE COMMENTS:
	- PROPOSED PUBLIC OPEN SPACE, LISTED AS RETAIL DECK,
	DOES NOT COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS IN SEC 94-109
	REGARDING ITS LOCATION AT THE GROUND FLOOR. FURTHER
	DISCUSSION NECESSARY.
	- IF PUBLIC OPEN SPACE IS ALLOWED ABOVE GROUND AS
	PROPOSED, ITS ACCESSIBILITY SHALL BE IMPROVED.
	CURRENTLY ONLY ONE SMALL STAIR IS PROVIDED FROM THE
	PALM TRAN LOOP, IN ADDITION TO THE PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE.
	- IS THE PUBLIC OPEN SPACE DECK LOCATED AT THE SAME
	ELEVATION THAN THE TRI-RAIL PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE?
	- CAN THE HOTEL HAVE A DIRECT ACCESS FROM THE PUBLIC
	OPEN SPACE?
	- PLEASE PROVIDE A GROUND FLOOR PEDESTRIAN CONNECTIVITY
	PLAN INDICATING ALL THE SIDEWALKS AND ACCESS POINTS FOR
	THE PROJECT, PUBLIC OPEN SPACE, AND ITS RELATION WITH
	THE TRAIN STATION AND SURROUNDING STREETS. DUE TO THE
	SIZE OF THE PROJECT, PEDESTRIAN IMPROVEMENTS WILL BE
	REQUIRED ON SURROUNDING STREETS TO PROVIDE PEDESTRIAN
	ACCESS TO THE PROJECT.
	- WHAT IS THE MINIMUM HEIGHT OF THE RETAIL DECK ABOVE
	THE PALM TRAN LOOP?
	- A PUBLIC ART COMPONENT WILL BE REQUIRED FOR THIS
	PROJECT. PELASE INDICATE INITIAL IDEAS FOR COMPLIANCE.

	GENERAL COMENTS:
	- PLEASE PROVIDE COLORED ELEVATIONS, INCLUDING CONTEXT.
	- PLEASE PROVIDE SECTIONS.
	- PEDESTRIAN WALK THRU ON CLEARWATER IS NOT REFLECTED
	IN THE 3D IMAGES.
	- PLEASE PROVIDE DETAILS ON PROPOSED FACADE MATERIALS.
	- OFFICE FLOOR PLANS DO NOT ACCURATELY REFLECT 3D
	IMAGES.

	LANDSCAPE COMMENTS:
	- STREET TREES SHALL BE PLANTED ALONG THE ENTIRE
	FRONTAGE, ADJACENT TO THE CURB IN TREE GRATES AND AT 30
	FEET INTERVALS.
	- PLEASE PROVIDE INFORMATION ON PROPOSED GREEN WALLS
	(TYPE OF PLANTS, CONSTRUCTABILITY, MAINTENANCE).
	- EXISTING LANDSCAPE WITHIN THE PALM TRAN LOOP MEDIAN
	CANNOT BE REMOVED AND REPLACED BY PROPOSED ROCK
	BARRIER.
	- LANDSCAPE DRAWINGS DO NTO ACCURATELY REFLECT IMAGE ON
	3D MODEL.

	FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION PLEASE CONTACT ANA MARIA
	APONTE AT 561-8221439