| 2015-01-27 12:19:59 | PLANNING BOARD CASE NO. 1594B |
| | HULETT GAZEBO |
| | 7640 OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD |
| | |
| | - CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446 |
| | |
| | - PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN |
| | WRITTEN FORMAT. |
| | |
| | - WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF EFIVE |
| | (5) PAPER COPIES AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY IN .PDF FORMAT |
| | OF ALL PLANS. PLEASE NOTE THAT CHANGES ON THE |
| | RESUBMITTED PLANS OR THE SUBMITTAL OF INFORMATION/PLANS |
| | TO ADDRESS THE COMMENTS MAY RESULT IN ADDITIONAL |
| | COMMENTS. |
| | |
| | - PLEASE NOTE THAT IF THE PLANNING DIVISION HAS NOT |
| | RECEIVED A RESPONSE TO THE COMMENTS WITHIN 60 DAYS FROM |
| | THE DATE OF THESE COMMENTS (BY MARCH 27, 2015), THE |
| | CASE SHALL BE CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN. ANY FURTHER ACTION |
| | SHALL REQUIRE A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION. |
| | |
| | - PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1) |
| | RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED |
| | COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE |
| | APPLICANT WILL BE ACCESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE |
| | WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE ($60). |
| | |
| | 1) THE RECONFIGURED PARKING AREA LAYOUT DOES NOT MATCH |
| | THE BUILDING PERMIT FOR THE PARKING LOT (PERMIT |
| | 14030527). THE JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT INDICATES THAT |
| | THE PARKING LOTS WAS INSTALLED AS SHOWN ON THE MINOR |
| | AMENDMENT PLANS. THIS REQUIRES THAT THE PARKING LOT |
| | PERMIT BE REVISED TO CORRECTLY SHOW THE COMPLETED WORK. |
| | CURRENTLY, THERE WAS NO INSPECTION PERFORMED FOR THE |
| | PARKING LOT PERMIT. |
| | |
| | 2) WHY DID THE SPACES NEED TO BE SO MUCH WIDER? |
| | |
| | 3) THE FUEL TANKS IN THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE SITE |
| | ARE NO LONGER SHOWN WITH THE REQUIRED SCREENING. |
| | SCREENING SHALL BE PROVIDED. |
| | |
| | 4) THE RELOCATED BICYCLE RACKS ARE NOT FULLY ACCESSIBLE |
| | AS SHOWN. THE SOUTHERN RACK WOULD BE BLOCKED IF THE |
| | NORTHERN RACK IS OCCUPIED, A CAR IS PARKED AND BY THE |
| | LANDSCAPE. AN ALTERNATE DESIGN IS REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | 5) THE LANDSCAPE USED ON THE SITE HAS CHANGED SINCE THE |
| | LATEST LANDSCAPE PLAN WAS APPROVED AS PART OF THE TREE |
| | ALTERATION PERMIT. PLEASE EXPLAIN HOW THE (2) SOLITARE |
| | PALM-TRIPLE, THE SILVER BUTTONWOOD, AND THE CRAPE |
| | MYRTLE THAT WERE PREVIOUSLY APPROVED EQUATE TO THE |
| | PROPOSED OAK #54 TO NOW BE PRESERVED AND THE NEW CASSIA |
| | TREE. PLEASE REMEMBER THAT NO TREE LOSS MAY OCCUR AS |
| | PART OF THE MINOR AMENDMENT. |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | |
