City of West Palm Beach eGovPlus

Plan Review Details - Project Z14110037

Plan Review Stops For Project Z14110037

Review Stop	B			BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No	1	Status	P	Date	12-10-2014			Cont ID
Sent By	rbrown			Date	12-10-2014	Time	11:35	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	rbrown			Date	12-10-2014	Time	11:35	Sent To

Notes

2014-12-10 11:41:04	DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, BUILDING DIVISION,
	COMMENTS:

	1. THIS REVIEW IS A CURSORY REVIEW AS IT RELATES TO THE
	SITE. IT IS NOT A REVIEW FOR FULL COMPLIANCE WITH
	FLORIDA BUILDING CODE. THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE TO BE
	ADDRESSED FOR PERMITTING.

	2. WHEN SUBMITTED FOR BUILDING PERMIT, THE PLANS SHALL
	SHOW THAT THE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION FOR THE BUILDINGS
	WILL BE THE SAME AS THE OTHER BUILDINGS AT THE PALM
	BEACH OUTLET MALL, OR WILL STILL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH
	THE HEIGHT, AREA AND OCCUPANCY LIMITATIONS IN CHAPTER 5
	OF THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE

	3. WHEN SUBMITTED FOR BUILDING PERMIT, COMPLIANCE WITH
	ALL BUILDING SEPARATION, PERCENTAGE OF OPENINGS AND
	OPENING PROTECTIVE REQUIREMENTS OF CHAPTERS 6 AND 7 OF
	THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE SHALL BE VERIFIED.

	4. ALL APPLICABLE PERMITS AND SUB-PERMITS MUST BE
	OBTAINED BEFORE COMMENCING THE WORK. SEPARATE PERMITS,
	PLANS AND FEES, ARE REQUIRED FOR SWIMMING POOLS AND
	SPAS, GAS SYSTEMS, GENERATORS, FIRE ALARM SYSTEMS, FIRE
	SPRINKLER AND OTHER FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEMS, GREASE
	INTERCEPTORS, SITE LIGHTING, SITE LANDSCAPE, SITE
	IRRIGATION, ETC.

	ROBERT BROWN
	BUILDING OFFICIAL
	TEL: 561 805 6652
	EMAIL: [email protected]

Review Stop	ENG - PPRC			ENGINEERING - PPRC
Rev No	1	Status	F	Date	12-08-2014			Cont ID
Sent By	cranford			Date	12-08-2014	Time	10:47	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	cranford			Date	12-08-2014	Time	10:47	Sent To

Notes

2014-12-08 10:47:26	PUBLIC WORKS DEPT.

	THIS IS A CONCEPTUAL LEVEL REVIEW. TECHNICAL DETAILS OF
	THE WATER, SEWER, STORMWATER, TRAFFIC CIRCULATION, AND
	SOLID WASTE COLLECTION WILL BE REVIEWED AS PART PART OF
	THE ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL AND BUILDING
	PERMIT APPLICATION PROCESSES. THE ENGINEERING
	DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL APPLICATION FORMS CAN BE
	DOWNLOADED AT
	HTTP://WPB.ORG/ENGINEERING/FORMS-AND-PUBLICATIONS/

	1. INDICATE THE LOCATIONS OF THE DUMPSTERS INTENDED TO
	BE SERVICE BY THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH SANITATION
	DEPARTMENT. DUMPSTERS MUST BE EASILY ACCESSIBLE BY THE
	CITY EQUIPMENT AND MANPOWER.
	2. INCLUDE AN ESTIMATE OF THE SOLID WASTE YARDAGE
	ANTICIPATED TO BE GENERATED BY THE EXPANDED FACILITY.

	PLEASE NOTE, A MODIFICATION OF THE EXISTING ENGINEERING
	DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL E12080012 WILL BE REQUIRED PRIOR
	TO START OF CONSTRUCTION.

	KELLY CRANFORD, P.E.
	LAND DEVELOPMENT ENGINEER
	[email protected]
	561-494-1098

	BRIAN COLLINS, P.E.
	TRAFFIC ENGINEER
	[email protected]
	561-494-1076

	VINCE NOEL, P.S.M.
	SURVEY / REAL ESTATE SUPERVISOR
	[email protected]
	561-494-1116

Review Stop	FIRE			FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No	1	Status	P	Date	12-04-2014			Cont ID
Sent By	pleduc			Date	12-04-2014	Time		Rev Time	0.00
Received By	pleduc			Date	12-04-2014	Time	14:38	Sent To

Notes

2014-12-04 15:08:46	THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS WERE SUBMITTED BY PETER LEDUC,
	FIRE MARSHAL, BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION, WEST PALM
	BEACH FIRE RESCUE.

	THIS REVIEW CAN ONLY BE CONSIDERED PRELIMINARY AS THE
	DRAWINGS THAT WERE REVIEWED WERE NOT COMPLETE.
	ADDITIONAL COMMENTS CAN BE EXPECTED WHEN FULL DRAWINGS
	ARE SUBMITTED FOR PERMIT.

	THE FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU HAS NO OBJECTIONS TO THE
	PROPOSED PROJECT.

	1. CONSTRUCTION, DEMOLITION, AND RENOVATION TO COMPLY
	WITH NFPA 241.

	2. SITE ACCESS AND EXIT POINTS ARE TO BE CLEARLY
	IDENTIFIED AND MAINTAINED FOR EMERGENCY VEHICLES DURING
	ALL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES.

	3. THE BUILDING ADDRESS SHALL BE CLEARLY VISIBLE FROM
	ALL ACCESS ROADWAYS, INCLUDING DURING CONSTRUCTION.
	ADDRESS NUMBERS SHALL CONTRAST WITH THEIR BACKGROUND
	AND SHALL NOT BE LESS THAN SIX (6) INCHES IN HEIGHT
	WITH A ONE (1) INCH STROKE FOR ALL BUILDINGS.

	4. TRASH AND DEBRIS IS TO BE REMOVED FROM THE SITE
	DAILY OR MORE OFTEN TO REDUCE THE ACCUMULATION OF
	POTENTIAL LIFE AND FIRE SAFETY HAZARDS.

	5. A NFPA 13 COMPLAINT FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEMIS REQUIRED
	FOR THIS PROJECT. SEPARATE SHOP DRAWINGS, ARE REQUIRED
	TO BE SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE FIRE
	PREVENTION BUREAU PRIOR TO ANY INSTALLATION.

	6. A MONITORED FIRE ALARM SYSTEM IS REQUIRED FOR THIS
	PROJECT. SEPARATE SHOP DRAWINGS, ARE REQUIRED TO BE
	SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE FIRE PREVENTION
	BUREAU PRIOR TO ANY INSTALLATION.

	7. ALL PORTABLE FIRE EXTINGUISHERS LOCATIONS SHALL BE
	CLEARLY IDENTIFIED AND INDICATED ON THE PLAN.

	8. COMPLETE LIFE SAFETY PLANS FOR THE BUILDING SHALL BE
	PROVIDED THAT ILLUSTRATE OCCUPANT LOADS, TRAVEL
	DISTANCES, DEAD-END CORRIDORS AND ALL FIRE SAFETY
	EQUIPMENT.

	9. KNOX-BOX KEY SYSTEM SHALL BE REQUIRED FOR EACH
	BUILDING.

	10. ALL EXISTING AND NEW FIRE HYDRANTS PLANNED FOR THIS
	DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE CLEARLY INDICATED AND IDENTIFIED
	ON THE PLAN. THE FIRE HYDRANT AND FDC'S FOR THIS
	PROJECT SHALL BE CLOSELY COORDINATED WITH THE BUREAU OF
	FIRE PREVENTION. IT WILL RECOMMEND THAT THE PROPOSED
	NEW HYDRANT LOCATIONS BE MOVED CLOSER TO THE BUILDING
	IN AN AGREEABLE LOCATION.

	11. NOTICE IS REQUIRED FOR STRUCTURES WITH LIGHT-FRAME
	TRUSS-TYPE CONSTRUCTION. ANY COMMERCIAL, INDUSTRIAL, OR
	ANY MULTIUNIT RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURE OF THREE UNITS OR
	MORE WHICH USES HORIZONTAL OR VERTICAL LIGHT-FRAME
	TRUSS-TYPE CONSTRUCTION IN ANY PORTION SHALL BE MARKED
	WITH AN APPROVED SYMBOL. THE APPROVED SYMBOL SHALL BE
	PLACED WITHIN 24 INCHES TO THE LEFT OF THE MAIN ENTRY
	DOOR.

	12. NO EXIT DOOR SHALL BE LOCKED FROM THE EGRESS SIDE.
	ANY AND ALL LOCKING MECHANISMS SHALL BE COMPLAINT WITH
	CHAPTER 7 OF THE FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE AND
	PRE-APPROVED (PRIOR TO INSTALLATION) BY THE BUREAU OF
	FIRE PREVENTION. CLOSE COORDINATION WITH THE BUREAU OF
	FIRE PREVENTION IS STRONGLY ENCOURAGED TO AVOID
	MISUNDERSTANDINGS, MISINTERPRETATIONS AND DELAYS
	RELATED TO EGRESS REQUIREMENTS.

	13. FOR THE FRONT DOOR OF EACH SPACE: PER SECTION
	7.2.1.5.9, THE LOCK/LATCH RELEASING MECHANISM ON ALL
	DOORS SHALL OPEN THE DOOR WITH NOT MORE THAN ONE
	RELEASING OPERATION. THE RELEASING MECHANISM SHALL HAVE
	AN OBVIOUS METHOD OF OPERATION THAT IS READILY OPERATED
	UNDER ALL LIGHTING CONDITIONS. THE RELEASING DEVICE
	SHOULD BE CAPABLE OF BEING OPERATED WITH ONE HAND AND
	SHOULD NOT REQUIRE TIGHT GRASPING, TIGHT PINCHING OR
	TWISTING OF THE WRIST TO OPERATE.

	A THUMB TURN LOCK MAY BE PERMITTED ON EACH MAIN ENTRY
	DOOR(S); HOWEVER, THE THUMB TURN LOCK SHALL BE EQUIPPED
	WITH A LOCK/UNLOCK INDICATOR WINDOW WITH SIGNAGE
	STATING THE DOOR(S) IS TO REMAIN UNLOCKED DURING
	BUSINESS HOURS.

	14. ALL LIFE SAFETY SYSTEMS SHALL BE CONSISTENT WITH
	AND FULLY INTERGRATED INTO THE OUTLET MALL'S CURRENT
	LIFE SAFETY SYSTEMS.

Review Stop	L		LANDSCAPING
Rev No	1	Status	Date		Cont ID
Sent By			Date	Time	Rev Time
Received By			Date	Time	Sent To

Notes

***NONE***

Review Stop	PARK		PARKING
Rev No	1	Status	Date		Cont ID
Sent By			Date	Time	Rev Time
Received By			Date	Time	Sent To

Notes

***NONE***

Review Stop	POLICE		POLICE
Rev No	1	Status	Date		Cont ID
Sent By			Date	Time	Rev Time
Received By			Date	Time	Sent To

Notes

***NONE***

Review Stop	PW		PUBLIC WORKS
Rev No	1	Status	Date		Cont ID
Sent By			Date	Time	Rev Time
Received By			Date	Time	Sent To

Notes

***NONE***

Review Stop	STORM			STORMWATER
Rev No	1	Status	F	Date	12-08-2014			Cont ID
Sent By	cranford			Date	12-08-2014	Time	10:48	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	cranford			Date	12-08-2014	Time	10:48	Sent To

Notes

2014-12-08 10:48:19

SEE ENG PPRC COMMENTS.

Review Stop	SURVEY			SURVEYING
Rev No	1	Status	F	Date	12-08-2014			Cont ID
Sent By	cranford			Date	12-08-2014	Time	10:49	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	cranford			Date	12-08-2014	Time	10:48	Sent To

Notes

2014-12-08 10:49:03

SEE ENG PPRC COMMENTS.

Review Stop	TRAFFIC			TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No	1	Status	F	Date	12-08-2014			Cont ID
Sent By	cranford			Date	12-08-2014	Time	10:49	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	cranford			Date	12-08-2014	Time	10:49	Sent To

Notes

2014-12-08 10:49:32

SEE ENG PPRC COMMENTS.

Review Stop	Z			ZONING
Rev No	2	Status	P	Date	02-02-2015			Cont ID
Sent By	eschneid			Date	02-02-2015	Time	19:19	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	eschneid			Date	02-02-2015	Time	19:18	Sent To

Notes

***NONE***

Review Stop	Z			ZONING
Rev No	1	Status	F	Date	12-10-2014			Cont ID
Sent By	eschneid			Date	12-10-2014	Time	10:16	Rev Time	8.00
Received By	eschneid			Date	12-10-2014	Time	10:16	Sent To

Notes

2014-12-10 10:17:18	PB 891AA
	PALM BEACH OUTLETS PBA 2B REVISIONS
	1801 PALM BEACH LAKES

	- CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446

	- PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN
	WRITTEN FORMAT.

	- WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF FIVE
	(5) PAPER COPIES AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY IN .PDF FORMAT
	OF ALL PLANS. PLEASE NOTE THAT CHANGES ON THE
	RESUBMITTED PLANS OR THE SUBMITTAL OF INFORMATION/PLANS
	TO ADDRESS THE COMMENTS MAY RESULT IN ADDITIONAL
	COMMENTS.

	- PLEASE NOTE THAT IF THE PLANNING DIVISION HAS NOT
	RECEIVED A RESPONSE TO THE PPRC COMMENTS WITHIN 60 DAYS
	FROM THE DATE OF THE PPRC MEETING (BY FEBRUARY 10,
	2015), THE CASE SHALL BE CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN. ANY
	FURTHER ACTION SHALL REQUIRE A NEW DEVELOPMENT
	APPLICATION.

	- PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1)
	RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED
	COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE
	APPLICANT WILL BE ACCESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE
	WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE ($60).

	1) THE SITE DATA TABLE SHALL BE AMENDED AT PROPOSED
	GROSS FLOOR AREA TO NOT STATE "THIS APPLICATION". FOR
	FUTURE REVIEW CLARITY, IT SHOULD LOOK LIKE:

	GROSS FLOOR AREA: 818,605 SF (PH1)
	932,397 SF (PH1 + PH2)

	THIS SHOULD ALSO BE REFLECTED IN THE CHART. NOTE: IT IS
	VERY CLEAR HOW MUCH SQUARE FOOTAGE IN EACH PHASE ON THE
	MASTER PLAN PBA CHART.

	2) PROVIDE THE OVERALL FINAL SITE PLAN SHOWING THE
	PHASE 2 BUILDOUT. THIS SHOULD BE A STANDALONE FSP-1.1,
	NOT THE BUILDINGS GHOSTED ON TOP OF THE CURRENT PARKING
	LAYOUT AS SHOWN ON FSP-1.

	3) TWO ADA SPACES APPEAR TO HAVE BEEN REMOVED WITHOUT
	THE CORRESPONDING UPDATE OF THE DATA TABLE.

	4) THE UTILITY LAYERS AND SOME OF THE INTERIOR CORRIDOR
	LAYERS DO NOT APPEAR TO HAVE BEEN TURNED ON FOR FSP-2.1
	AND 3.1. THE LAYERS SHOWN ON THE PREVIOUSLY APPROVED
	PLANS SHALL BE INCLUDED WITH THE NEW PLANS.

	5) THE BICYCLE RACK SOUTHEAST OF THE VALET STAND SHALL
	BE 11.5 FEET IN WIDTH.

	6) A PEDESTRIAN CROSS WALK SHALL BE INSTALLED ACROSS
	THE NARROW PORTION OF THE DRIVE AISLE SOUTH OF THE
	VALET STAND TO PROVIDE MORE OPTIONS TO THE WALKWAY
	NETWORK. THERE IS A CROSSING GENERALLY SHOWN IN THIS
	LOCATION ON THE CURRENTLY APPROVED PHASE 2 PLAN.

	7) SIGNS NOTIFYING DRIVERS OF THE PEDESTRIAN CROSSINGS
	SHALL BE INSTALLED FOR THE CROSSWALKS ADJACENT TO THE
	VALET STAND.

	8) THERE ARE UNSCREENED DUMPSTERS THAT ARE LOCATED
	WITHIN THE BUILDING J-1 SERVICE COURT. THESE DUMPSTERS
	SHALL EITHER BE LOCATED WITHIN AN ENCLOSURE THAT IS
	SHOWN ON THE SITE PLAN, OR BE REMOVED. ALTERNATIVELY, A
	SCREEN GATE MAY BE INSTALLED TO COVER THE ENTRANCE TO
	THE SERVICE AREA.

	9) THE SERVICE COURT FOR THE NEW PHASE 2 BUILDING NO
	LONGER SHOWS THE FOUNDATION PLANTING EXTENDING FIVE (5)
	FEET PAST THE SERVICE COURT OPENING AS REQUIRED BY THE
	DESIGN GUIDELINES. THIS IS NOT SHOWN ON THE SOUTH SIDE
	OF THE OPENING.

	10) THE COMPACTOR SHOWN IN THE SERVICE COURT FOR THE
	NEW PHASE 2 BUILDING IS NO LONGER SCREENED BY THE
	SERVICE COURT WALL.

	11) PROVIDE A REVISED OVERALL LANDSCAPE PLAN SHOWING
	PHASE 2 (SHEET LP-1.1) AND SHEETS LP-2.1 AND 2.3 WITH
	ALL THE EXISTING AND PROPOSED LANDSCAPE. THESE WILL BE
	THE PLANS OF RECORD FOR THE ULTIMATE BUILD-OUT OF THE
	PB OUTLETS. STAFF WILL NOT ACCEPT THE NEED TO MULTIPLE
	DOCUMENTS TO PIECE TOGETHER THE FINAL APPROVED
	LANDSCAPE.

	12) PLEASE CONSIDER PLANNING SOME MORE TREES ALONG THE
	NORTH SIDE OF THE NEW BUILDING AND THE J-3 SERVICE
	COURT TO SOFTEN THE LONG FACADES.

	13) A NEW BICYCLE RACK (NO DIMENSIONS) IS SHOWN EAST OF
	THE NEW BUS DROP OFF. THE SITE PLAN STILL SHOWS THE
	EXISTING BICYCLE RACK BETWEEN THE NEW BUS DROP OFF
	CANOPIES. WHILE STAFF SUPPORTS THE PROVISION OF MORE
	BICYCLE PARKING, IS IT THE INTENT TO HAVE BOTH RACKS?
	THE ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN DOES NOT SHOW EITHER RACK.

	14) BASED ON STAFF PEDESTRIAN OBSERVATION AND
	EXPERIENCE, STAFF RECOMMENDS THAT STEPPING STONE PATHS
	(OR EVEN FULL SIDEWALKS) BE INSTALLED LEADING FROM THE
	EXECUTIVE CENTER ENTRY ROAD SIDEWALK TO THE ADJACENT
	PARKING AREAS (STAFF HAS THIS ANNOTATED ON A PLAN TO
	SHOW EXAMPLES).

	15) PLEASE UPDATE PLANS TO REFERENCE THE NEW BUILDING
	AS J-11.