Plan Review Details - Project Z14110031
Plan Review Stops For Project Z14110031
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 2 Status   Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 1 Status F Date 12-10-2014 Cont ID  
Sent By rbrown Date 12-10-2014 Time 12:17 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rbrown Date 12-10-2014 Time 12:17 Sent To  
Notes
2014-12-10 12:25:35DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, BUILDING DIVISION,
 COMMENTS:
  
 1. THIS REVIEW IS A CURSORY REVIEW AS IT RELATES TO THE
 SITE. IT IS NOT A REVIEW FOR FULL COMPLIANCE WITH
 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE. THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE TO BE
 ADDRESSED FOR PERMITTING.
  
 2. PLEASE SHOW ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACE PROVISION FOR
 THE ECO-VILLAS. ALSO, PLEASE PROVIDE A COUNT OF
 ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES FOR EACH PARKING LOT AND THE
 TWO PHASES OF THE PARKING STRUCTURE. PER SECTION 208.3
 OF FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY CODE ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES
 ARE TO BE LOCATED ON THE SHORTEST POSSIBLE ROUTE OF
 TRAVEL FROM ADJACENT PARKING TO AN ACCESSIBLE ENTRANCE
 FOR EACH BUILDING. THE DESIGN OF ACCESSIBLE PARKING
 SPACES SHALL COMPLY WITH SECTION 502 OF FLORIDA
 ACCESSIBILITY CODE
  
 3. PER SECTION 208.2.4 OF FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY CODE,
 ONE IN EVERY SIX ACCESSIBLE SPACES (AT LEAST ONE) IN A
 PARKING STRUCTURE, SHALL BE "VAN ACCESSIBLE" AND
 DESIGNED IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION OF 502 OF FLORIDA
 ACCESSIBILITY CODE (VERTICAL CLEARANCE NOT LESS THAN 98
 INCHES AT SPACE AND VEHICULAR ACCESS ROUTE)
  
 4. WHEN SUBMITTED FOR BUILDING PERMIT, THE PLANS SHALL
 SHOW THAT THE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION FOR THE BUILDINGS
 WILL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE HEIGHT, AREA AND
 OCCUPANCY LIMITATIONS IN CHAPTER 5 OF THE FLORIDA
 BUILDING CODE.
  
 5. WHEN SUBMITTED FOR BUILDING PERMIT, COMPLIANCE WITH
 ALL BUILDING SEPARATION, PERCENTAGE OF OPENINGS AND
 OPENING PROTECTIVE REQUIREMENTS OF CHAPTERS 6 AND 7 OF
 THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE SHALL BE VERIFIED. THE
 EQUIVALENT REQUIREMENTS FOR THE SINGLE-FAMILY DWELLINGS
 ARE IN SECTION R302 OF FLORIDA BUILDING CODE
 (RESIDENTIAL).
  
 6. ENCLOSED PARKING GARAGES. IF THE PARKING GARAGE DOES
 NOT HAVE WALL OPENINGS, OR SUFFICIENT WALL OPENINGS TO
 MEET THE DEFINITION OF AN OPEN PARKING GARAGE, IT WILL
 BE CONSIDERED AN ENCLOSED PARKING GARAGE AND MUST HAVE
 EXHAUST SYSTEMS. THE EXHAUST SYSTEMS SHALL BE DESIGNED
 TO MINIMIZE NOISE LEVELS USING INLINE FAN SILENCERS OR
 OTHER APPROVED METHODS.
  
 7. ALL APPLICABLE PERMITS AND SUB-PERMITS MUST BE
 OBTAINED BEFORE COMMENCING THE WORK. SEPARATE PERMITS,
 PLANS AND FEES, ARE REQUIRED FOR SWIMMING POOLS AND
 SPAS, GAS SYSTEMS, GENERATORS, FIRE ALARM SYSTEMS, FIRE
 SPRINKLER AND OTHER FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEMS, GREASE
 INTERCEPTORS, SITE LIGHTING, SITE LANDSCAPE, SITE
 IRRIGATION, ETC.
  
 14. FOR STREET ADDRESSING CONTACT MICHAEL ORIO, GIS
 SUPPORT SPECIALIST, AT (561) 494 1080, OR BY EMAIL:
 [email protected]
  
 ROBERT BROWN
 BUILDING OFFICIAL
 TEL: 561 805 6652
 EMAIL: [email protected]
  
Review Stop ENG - PPRC ENGINEERING - PPRC
Rev No 2 Status   Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop ENG - PPRC ENGINEERING - PPRC
Rev No 1 Status F Date 12-08-2014 Cont ID  
Sent By cranford Date 12-08-2014 Time 10:56 Rev Time 0.00
Received By cranford Date 12-08-2014 Time 10:58 Sent To  
Notes
2014-12-08 10:56:42SEA PALM RESORT - FKA PRESIDENTS COUNTRY CLUB (PPRC
 Z14100031 / Z14110032)
  
 PUBLIC WORKS DEPT.
  
 THIS IS A CONCEPTUAL LEVEL REVIEW. TECHNICAL DETAILS OF
 THE WATER, SEWER, STORMWATER, TRAFFIC CIRCULATION, AND
 SOLID WASTE COLLECTION WILL BE REVIEWED AS PART PART OF
 THE ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL AND BUILDING
 PERMIT APPLICATION PROCESSES. THE ENGINEERING
 DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL APPLICATION FORMS CAN BE
 DOWNLOADED AT
 HTTP://WPB.ORG/ENGINEERING/FORMS-AND-PUBLICATIONS/
  
 A SEPARATE SUBMITTAL WILL BE REQUIRED TO PUBLIC WORKS
 DEPARTMENT FOR THE TECHNICAL REVIEW OF THE PLAT.
  
 1. REVISE THE DESIGN TO ACCOMMODATE THE CITY?S SOLID
 WASTE TRUCKS WITHOUT REQUIRING THEM TO BACK AROUND
 CORNERS OR DOWN THE ALLEY AND TO COMPLY WITH SECTION
 74-35(A)(5) OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES. THE SHOWN PAVED
 AREA AROUND THE DUMPSTER AND RECYCLING ENCLOSURES DOES
 NOT APPEAR TO BE LARGE ENOUGH FOR THE TRUCKS TO TURN
 AROUND PRIOR TO EXITING ALONG THE CURVED ACCESS ROAD.
  
 2.THE SITE PLAN APPEARS TO ONLY SHOW ROOM FOR ONE
 DUMPSTER WHICH WILL SERVE THE HOTEL, SUITE CONDOS,
 RESTAURANT, AND CLUB HOUSE. VERIFY THAT THE PROPOSED
 SIZE AND QUANTITY OF TRASH BINS IS APPROPRIATE FOR THE
 WASTE YARDAGE ANTICIPATED TO BE GENERATED BY THE
 COMPLEX. CONSIDER USING A COMPACTOR TO REDUCE THE
 YARDAGE OF WASTE THAT WILL NEED TO BE COLLECTED.
  
 3. PROVIDE AN ESTIMATE OF THE SOLID WASTE YARDAGE
 ANTICIPATED TO BE GENERATED BY THE EXPANDED FACILITY.
  
 4. PLAN SHEET SP-1 (OVERALL SITE PLAN) SHOWS THE HOTEL
 POOL AREA EXTENDING INTO THE LAKE AREA. PLEASE REVISE
 THE PLANS TO NOT SHOW IMPROVEMENTS WITHIN THE LAKE
 EASEMENT TRACT.
  
 5. ALSO ON PLAN SHEET SP-1, THERE IS A DASHED LING
 SHOWN CUTTING THROUGH PODS C1, C2, AND D WHICH APPEARS
 TO BE AN EXISTING WATER MAIN PROPOSED TO BE REMOVED.
 PLEASE EITHER LABEL THE LINE OR REMOVE IT FROM THE SITE
 PLAN.
  
 6. SHOW WHERE/HOW THE REQUIRED ? INCH OF DRY WATER
 QUALITY PRE-TREATMENT WILL BE PROVIDED FOR THE HOTEL
 AREA. [SECTIONS 90-201, 94-35(C )(11), AND 94-307 OF
 THE CODE OF ORDINANCES]
  
 7. INDICATE WHICH PORTIONS OF THE POTABLE WATER,
 SANITARY SEWER, AND STORMWATER SYSTEM WILL REMAIN
 PUBLICALLY OWNED AND WHICH SECTIONS WILL BE MAINTAINED
 BY THE APPLICANT.
  
 8. INCLUDE EASEMENTS FOR THE PIPED DRAINAGE CONNECTIONS
 BETWEEN THE LAKES ON THE PLAT. (THEY ARE SHOWN ON THE
 SITE PLAN, SHEET SP-1.)
  
 KELLY CRANFORD, P.E.
 LAND DEVELOPMENT ENGINEER
 [email protected]
 561-494-1098
  
 BRIAN COLLINS, P.E.
 TRAFFIC ENGINEER
 [email protected]
 561-494-1076
  
 VINCE NOEL, P.S.M.
 SURVEY / REAL ESTATE SUPERVISOR
 [email protected]
 561-494-1116
Review Stop FIRE FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No 2 Status P Date 01-08-2015 Cont ID  
Sent By pleduc Date 01-08-2015 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By pleduc Date 01-08-2015 Time 11:45 Sent To  
Notes
2015-01-08 11:52:35THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS WERE SUBMITTED BY PETER LEDUC,
 FIRE MARSHAL, BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION, WEST PALM
 BEACH FIRE RESCUE.
  
 THIS REVIEW CAN ONLY BE CONSIDERED PRELIMINARY AS THE
 DRAWINGS THAT WERE REVIEWED WERE NOT COMPLETE.
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS CAN BE EXPECTED WHEN FULL DRAWINGS
 ARE SUBMITTED FOR PERMIT.
  
 FURTHER COMMENTS OF FIRE PREVENTION WILL BE ADDRESSED
 DURING BUILDING PLAN SUBMITTAL.
  
  
Review Stop FIRE FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No 1 Status P Date 12-04-2014 Cont ID  
Sent By pleduc Date 12-04-2014 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By pleduc Date 12-04-2014 Time 16:19 Sent To  
Notes
2014-12-04 16:46:41THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS WERE SUBMITTED BY PETER LEDUC,
 FIRE MARSHAL, BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION, WEST PALM
 BEACH FIRE RESCUE.
  
 THIS REVIEW CAN ONLY BE CONSIDERED PRELIMINARY AS THE
 DRAWINGS THAT WERE REVIEWED WERE NOT COMPLETE.
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS CAN BE EXPECTED WHEN FULL DRAWINGS
 ARE SUBMITTED FOR PERMIT.
  
 THE FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU HAS NO OBJECTIONS TO THE
 PROPOSED PROJECT.
  
 1. CONSTRUCTION, DEMOLITION, AND RENOVATION TO COMPLY
 WITH NFPA 241.
  
 2. SITE ACCESS AND EXIT POINTS ARE TO BE CLEARLY
 IDENTIFIED AND MAINTAINED FOR EMERGENCY VEHICLES DURING
 ALL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES.
  
 3. THE BUILDING ADDRESS SHALL BE CLEARLY VISIBLE FROM
 ALL ACCESS ROADWAYS, INCLUDING DURING CONSTRUCTION.
 ADDRESS NUMBERS SHALL CONTRAST WITH THEIR BACKGROUND
 AND SHALL NOT BE LESS THAN SIX (6) INCHES IN HEIGHT
 WITH A ONE (1) INCH STROKE FOR ALL BUILDINGS.
  
 4. TRASH AND DEBRIS IS TO BE REMOVED FROM THE SITE
 DAILY OR MORE OFTEN TO REDUCE THE ACCUMULATION OF
 POTENTIAL LIFE AND FIRE SAFETY HAZARDS.
  
 5. THE HOTEL STRUCTURE SHALL COMPLY WITH THE CURRENT
 EDITIONS OF THE FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE, THE NFPA
 LIFE SAFETY CODE, INCLUDING MORE SPECIFICALLY, CHAPTER
 28, HOTELS AND DORMITORES.
  
 5. THE ECO-VILLAS SHALL COMPLY WITH THE CURRENT
 EDITIONS OF THE FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE, THE NFPA
 LIFE SAFETY CODE, INCLUDING MORE SPECIFICALLY, CHAPTER
 30, NEW APARTMENTS.
  
 6. ALL PARKING STRUCTURES SHALL COMPLY WITH THE CURRENT
 EDITION OF THE FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE, CHAPTER 42
 STORAGE OCCUPANCIES (PARKING STRUCTURES), AND NFPA 88A,
 PARKING STRUCTURES,
  
 7. THE CLUBHOUSE SHALL COMPLY THE CURRENT EDITIONS OF
 THE FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE, THE NFPA LIFE SAFETY
 CODE, INCLUDING MORE SPECIFICALLY, CHAPTER 12, NEW
 ASSEMBLY OCCUPANCIES AND CHAPTER 42 STORAGE OCCUPANCIES
 (PARKING STRUCTURES).
  
 8. THE RESTAURANT SHALL COMPLY THE CURRENT EDITIONS OF
 THE FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE, THE NFPA LIFE SAFETY
 CODE, INCLUDING MORE SPECIFICALLY, CHAPTER 12, NEW
 ASSEMBLY OCCUPANCIES.
  
 9. THE TENNIS SHOP APPAERS TO BE A MIXED OCCUPANCY AND
 SHALL BE IDENTIFIED AS TO THE PROPOSED STRICTIST
 OCCUPANCY OF COMPLIANCE.
  
 10. COMPLETE LIFE SAFETY PLANS FOR EACH OCCUPANCY SHALL
 BE PROVIDED THAT ILLUSTRATE OCCUPANT LOADS, TRAVEL
 DISTANCES, COMMON PATHS OF TRAVEL, DEAD-END CORRIDORS,
 EXIT SIGNS, EMERGECNY LIGHTING, EXITS LEADING TO A
 PUBLIC WAY, FIRE EXTINGUISHER LOCATIONS, AND ALL FIRE
 SAFETY FEATURES AND EQUIPMENT.
  
 11. ALL EXISTING AND NEW FIRE HYDRANTS PLANNED FOR THIS
 DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE CLEARLY INDICATED AND IDENTIFIED
 ON THE PLAN AND CLOSELY COORDINATED WITH THE BUREAU OF
 FIRE PREVENTION.
  
 12. ALL FIRE DEPARTMENT SPRINKLER SYSTEM CONNECTIONS
 (FDC,S) FOR THE PROJECT SHALL BE IDENTIFIED AND
 COORDINATED WITH THE BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION.
  
 13. ALL FIRE WATER MAINS, SIZES AND THEIR VALVE
 ASSEMBLIES SHALL BE CLEARLY IDENTIFIED AND ILLUSTRATED
 ON THE PLAN.
  
 14. KNOX-BOX KEY SYSTEM SHALL BE REQUIRED FOR EACH
 STRUCTURE.
  
 15. ANY GATES SHALL BE EQUIPPED WITH A KNOX KEY SWITCH
 SYSTEM.
  
 16. PER FLORIDA 69A-60.0081; NOTICE SIGNAGE IS REQUIRED
 FOR STRUCTURES WITH LIGHT-FRAME TRUSS-TYPE
 CONSTRUCTION. ANY COMMERCIAL, INDUSTRIAL, OR ANY
 MULTIUNIT RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURE OF THREE UNITS OR MORE
 WHICH USES HORIZONTAL OR VERTICAL LIGHT-FRAME
 TRUSS-TYPE CONSTRUCTION IN ANY PORTION SHALL BE MARKED
 WITH A MALTESE CROSS SIGN MEASURING 8 INCHES
 HORIZONTALLY AND 8 INCHES VERTICALLY, OF A BRIGHT RED
 REFLECTIVE COLOR. THE APPROVED SYMBOL SHALL BE PLACED
 WITHIN 24 INCHES TO THE LEFT OF THE MAIN ENTRY DOOR.
 1. STRUCTURES WITH LIGHT-FRAME TRUSS ROOFS SHALL BE
 MARKED WITH THE LETTER "R".
 2. STRUCTURES WITH LIGHT-FRAME TRUSS FLOOR SYSTEMS
 SHALL BE MARKED WITH THE LETTER "F".
 3. STRUCTURES WITH LIGHT-FRAME TRUSS FLOOR AND ROOF
 SYSTEMS SHALL BE MARKED WITH THE LETTERS "R/F".
  
 17. ALL COMMERCIAL KITCHEN EQUIPMENT AND OPERATIONS
 SHALL COMPLY WITH NFPA 96, STANDARD FOR VENTILATION
 CONTROL AND FIRE PROTECTION OF COMMERCIAL COOKING
 OPERATIONS. EXTINGUISHMENT AND VENTILATION SYSTEM SHOP
 DRAWINGS SHALL BE SUBMITTED SEPARATELY FOR APPROVAL.
  
 18. NO EXIT DOOR SHALL BE LOCKED FROM THE EGRESS SIDE.
 ANY AND ALL LOCKING MECHANISMS SHALL BE COMPLAINT WITH
 CHAPTER 7 OF THE FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE AND
 PRE-APPROVED (PRIOR TO INSTALLATION) BY THE BUREAU OF
 FIRE PREVENTION. CLOSE COORDINATION WITH THE BUREAU OF
 FIRE PREVENTION IS STRONGLY ENCOURAGED TO AVOID
 MISUNDERSTANDINGS, MISINTERPRETATIONS AND DELAYS
 RELATED TO EGRESS REQUIREMENTS.
  
Review Stop L LANDSCAPING
Rev No 1 Status   Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time  
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop PARK PARKING
Rev No 1 Status   Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time  
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop POLICE POLICE
Rev No 1 Status   Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time  
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop PW PUBLIC WORKS
Rev No 1 Status   Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time  
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop STORM STORMWATER
Rev No 2 Status   Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop STORM STORMWATER
Rev No 1 Status F Date 12-08-2014 Cont ID  
Sent By cranford Date 12-08-2014 Time 10:57 Rev Time 0.00
Received By cranford Date 12-08-2014 Time 10:57 Sent To  
Notes
2014-12-08 10:57:37SEE ENG PPRC COMMENTS.
Review Stop SURVEY SURVEYING
Rev No 2 Status   Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop SURVEY SURVEYING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 12-08-2014 Cont ID  
Sent By cranford Date 12-08-2014 Time 10:58 Rev Time 0.00
Received By cranford Date 12-08-2014 Time 10:58 Sent To  
Notes
2014-12-08 10:58:22SEE ENG PPRC COMMENTS.
Review Stop TRAFFIC TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No 2 Status   Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop TRAFFIC TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 12-08-2014 Cont ID  
Sent By cranford Date 12-08-2014 Time 10:59 Rev Time 0.00
Received By cranford Date 12-08-2014 Time 10:58 Sent To  
Notes
2014-12-08 10:59:01SEE ENG PPRC COMMENTS.
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 2 Status   Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 12-11-2014 Cont ID  
Sent By jroach Date 12-10-2014 Time 10:57 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jroach Date 12-10-2014 Time 10:58 Sent To  
Notes
2014-12-11 10:58:27PLANS AND PLATS REVIEW COMMITTEE (PPRC) ZONING REVIEW
 ___________________________________________
  
 DATE OF REVIEW: DECEMBER 10, 2014
 PROJECT NO.: Z14110031 AND Z14110032
 CASE NO.: PB CASE NO. 1624E AND F
 ADDRESS: 3100-3200 CONGRESS AVENUE
 APPLICANT/CONTACT: JONI BRINKMAN, URBAN DESIGN KILDAY
 STUDIOS
 TELEPHONE NO.: 561.366.1100
 SCOPE OF REVIEW: MAJOR PD AMENDMENT (HOTEL) AND MAJOR
 SUBDIVISION
 ___________________________________________
  
 PLEASE PROVIDE A WRITTEN RESPONSE TO THE FOLLOWING
 REVIEW COMMENTS:
  
 1. AS A FOLLOW UP TO YOUR EMAIL, FEES WILL NEED TO BE
 PROVIDED FOR THE ADDITIONAL MAJOR SUBDIVISIONS. IN THE
 END, I BELIEVE THERE WILL BE 3 TOTAL SUBDIVISION
 APPLICATIONS (1 FOR OVERALL PLAT + 1 FOR POD L1 + 1 FOR
 POD L2).
  
 2. WHAT HAS OCCURRED TO DATE, AND WHAT IS PLANNED,
 REGARDING OUTREACH TO THE SURROUNDING ASSOCIATIONS?
 PRIOR TO PUBLIC HEARING, THE PROPOSED PLAN SHALL BE
 PRESENTED TO THE SURROUNDING ASSOCIATIONS FOR COMMENT,
 QUESTIONS, ETC.
  
 3. A REVISED TRAFFIC CONCURRENCY LETTER SHALL BE
 PROVIDED BY PALM BEACH COUNTY.
  
 4. PLEASE PROVIDE UPDATED LETTERS FROM ALL OF THE
 UTILITY COMPANIES REGARDING THE PROPOSED SITE PLAN.
  
 5. PLEASE PROVIDE A SIGNED/NOTARIZED AFFIDAVIT
 REGARDING THE MAILING LIST (SEE PAGE 20 OF THE
 DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION).
  
 6. PLEASE PROVIDE A STRIKETHROUGH AND UNDERLINED
 VERSION OF THE DESIGN GUIDELINES TO INDICATE THOSE
 AREAS WHERE MODIFICATIONS ARE PROPOSED.
  
 7. THERE NEEDS TO BE CLEARER DEFINITION IN THE PLANS
 BETWEEN THE DIFFERENT PODS/PBAS. FOR CODE COMPLIANCE,
 ETC. A SITE PLAN AND LANDSCAPE PLAN SHOULD BE PREPARED
 FOR EACH PBA, WITH EACH PBA MEETING THE MINIMUM CODE
 REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY?S ZLDRS AND/OR THE DESIGN
 GUIDELINES. IF IT IS PREFERRED THAT EACH PBA NOT STAND
 ALONE AND MEET THE MINIMUM CODE REQUIREMENTS, THEN AN
 OVERALL SITE AND LANDSCAPE PLAN WOULD HAVE TO BE
 PREPARED WHICH SHOWS COMPLIANCE ACROSS THE ENTIRE SITE.
  
 8. SITE PLANS FOR EACH POD/PBA SHALL PROVIDE A SITE
 DATA TABLE INDICATING COMPLIANCE WITH THE CITY?S ZLDRS
 AND THE PD DESIGN GUIDELINES. FOR EXAMPLE, MAXIMUM FAR
 IS SHOWN, BUT IT IS NOT IDENTIFIED AS WHAT IS PROVIDED.
 WITHIN THE CPD, FAR SHALL INCLUDE ALL NON-RESIDENTIAL
 AND RESIDENTIAL USE SQUARE FOOTAGES.
  
 9. ARE THE SIGNS LABELED AT THE ENTRANCES TO EACH
 SINGLE FAMILY POD THE ENTRANCE SIGNS IDENTIFIED IN THE
 DETAIL ON SHEET SP-4? IF SO, PLEASE INDICATE SUCH ON
 THE SITE PLAN.
  
 10. THERE ARE A LOT OF AREAS WHERE PLANS WERE NOT
 PROVIDED FOR. EXAMPLES INCLUDE LANDSCAPING FOR THE
 TENNIS CENTER, THE PARKING IN POD C2, PERIMETER
 BUFFERS, ETC.
  
 11. THE LANDSCAPE PLANS FOR THE HOTEL SITE OVERLAP WHAT
 HAS BEEN DRAWN FOR THE ECO-VILLAS, AND THEY DON?T
 MATCH.
  
 12. THE POD LINES ON THE MASTER PLAN DO NOT APPEAR TO
 MATCH WHAT IS SHOWN ON THE SITE PLANS. ENSURE THAT ALL
 PLANS ARE CONSISTENT.
  
 13. THERE NEEDS TO BE MORE CLARITY IN THE SITE PLANS.
 THERE ARE LINE TYPES THAT ARE NOT IDENTIFIED,
 UNREADABLE, ETC. PROPERTY LINES AND PHYSICAL
 IMPROVEMENTS SHOULD BE MOST PROMINENT (BUILDINGS,
 SIDEWALKS, PATHS, ROADWAYS, PARKING, ETC.). UTILITIES,
 EASEMENTS, PBA BOUNDARIES, ETC. SHOULD BE LESS
 PROMINENT.
  
 14. WHAT IS THE DASHED LINE THAT RUNS THROUGH THE
 DRIVING RANGE, CLUBHOUSE, PARKING LOT, AND TENNIS
 COURTS?
  
 15. THE 12 FOOT FPL EASEMENT CROSSING POD D, POD C1,
 POD R, AND POD C2 IS NOT SHOWN ON THE SITE/LANDSCAPE
 PLAN.
  
 16. THE PHASE 2 PARKING STRUCTURE IS SHOWN OVER A
 UTILITY EASEMENT.
  
 17. THE LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR POD R, L1, AND L2 IS
 MISLABELED AS ?RESORT AND MULTIFAMILY STREETSCAPE?.
 THIS PLAN DOES INCLUDE STREETSCAPE FOR SINGLE FAMILY.
 ADDITIONALLY, THIS STREETSCAPE PLAN IS
 INSUFFICIENT/INCOMPLETE.
  
 18. STAFF CONTINUES TO HAVE ISSUES WITH THE DESIGN OF
 THE AREA AND PROPOSED CUL-DE-SAC ADJACENT TO LOT 1 OF
 POD L2, AND THE LACK OF CONNECTIVITY.
  
 19. THE CLUBHOUSE IS SHOWN ON TOP OF AN FPL EASEMENT.
  
 20. SIDEWALKS SHALL BE PROVIDED ON BOTH SIDES OF ALL
 STREETS. EXCEPTIONS MAY BE MADE FOR THE STREETS IN
 FRONT OF THE HOMES IN POD L2 (LOTS 19-30) AND POD L1.
 THE SIDEWALKS IN THESE AREAS NEED TO BE WITHIN THE
 DEDICATED STREET.
  
 21. CROSSWALKS SHALL BE PROVIDED ACROSS POD R TO
 CONNECT POD L2 TO POD L1.
  
 22. THE PLANS SHALL INDICATE PAVEMENT MARKINGS,
 SIGNAGE, DIMENSIONS OF ROADWAYS/DRIVEWAYS, ETC.
  
 23. I DON?T BELIEVE THE ECO-VILLAS (PBA #5) SHOULD BE
 SUBJECT TO THE ZERO-LOT LINE PROVISIONS PROVIDED WITHIN
 THE DESIGN GUIDELINES. PBA #5 HAS BEEN LISTED IN THE
 ZERO-LOT LINE REGULATIONS, AS WELL AS THE MULTIFAMILY
 REGULATIONS.
  
 24. 180 FEET SHOULD BE MAINTAINED BETWEEN POD L3 AND
 THE WESTERN-MOST PLATTED LOT LINE OF THE EXISTING
 SINGLE FAMILY ON EMBASSY DRIVE. ADDITIONALLY, THE 230
 FEET OF SEPARATION BETWEEN BUILDINGS SHOULD BE
 MAINTAINED.
  
 25. A 10 FOOT LANDSCAPE BUFFER NEEDS TO BE PROVIDED ON
 THE EAST SIDE OF THE PRESIDENTIAL WAY ACCESS DRIVE. THE
 INGRESS/EGRESS EASEMENT SHOULD BE RELOCATED TO
 ACCOMMODATE THIS LANDSCAPE BUFFER, AND THE EASEMENT
 WILL NEED TO BE WIDENED TO MATCH THE WIDTH OF THE
 ACCESS DRIVE.
  
 26. PLEASE EXPLAIN THE PROPOSED LOT CONFIGURATION FOR
 PODS L1 AND L2. DO THE LOTS FRONT ONTO A DEDICATED
 STREET? NO STREET NAMES AND NO INFORMATION HAS BEEN
 SHOWN ON THE PLATS. ADDITIONALLY, THE STREETS IN FRONT
 OF THE HOMES SHALL NOT DEAD-END UNLESS AN OPEN SPACE
 WITH A RADIUS OF 50 FEET IS PROVIDED. THE STREETS IN
 FRONT OF THE HOMES ARE TO HAVE A DEDICATION THAT IS AT
 LEAST 40 FEET IN WIDTH.
  
 27. LOT 1 ON PLAT L2 IS NOT LABELED.
  
 28. PROVIDE DETAILS REGARDING THE SCREENING AND THE
 LANDSCAPING AROUND THE LIFT STATION.
  
 29. STREET LIGHTS ARE SHOWN WITHIN THE BOUNDARY OF THE
 PHASE 2 PARKING GARAGE.
  
 30. STREET LIGHTS ARE SHOWN UNDER PARKING STRUCTURE 1.
  
 31. THE SITE PLAN SHOULD REFLECT THE SHARED PARKING
 CALCULATION PROVIDED BY PINDER TROUTMAN CONSULTING,
 INC.
  
 32. PURSUANT TO THE PARKING CALCULATION PROVIDED BY
 PINDER TROUTMAN CONSULTING, INC., 407 PARKING SPACES
 SHALL BE PROVIDED (NOT INCLUDING THE 51 RESORT
 COTTAGES). ACCORDING TO THE SITE PLAN, ONLY 400 PARKING
 SPACES ARE PROVIDED (NOT INCLUDING THE PHASE 2
 STRUCTURE). THEREFORE, THE PHASE 2 STRUCTURE NEEDS TO
 BE INCLUDED AS PART OF THE INITIAL CONSTRUCTION OR
 ADDITIONAL PARKING NEEDS TO BE PROVIDED.
  
 33. DETAILS NEED TO BE PROVIDED REGARDING ALL PROPOSED
 FENCING AND WALLS, INCLUDING THAT AT THE TENNIS COURTS.
  
 34. ALL POOLS ARE TO BE ENCLOSED BY A FENCE OR SIMILAR
 STRUCTURE THAT IS AT LEAST FOUR (4) FEET IN HEIGHT.
 PLANS ARE UNCLEAR AS TO WHETHER OR NOT THIS PROVISION
 IS BEING MET.
  
 35. ARE CARTS GOING TO BE UTILIZING SIDEWALKS? THERE
 ARE SEVERAL LOCATIONS WHERE THE SIDEWALKS ARE AT
 SIGNIFICANT ANGLES THAT PROBABLY COULD NOT BE
 MANEUVERED BY A GOLF CART. CONSIDERATION SHOULD BE MADE
 REGARDING USAGE OF THE PATHS AND SIDEWALKS.
  
 36. BIKE RACKS SHALL BE PROVIDED AT EACH FACILITY.
 PLEASE PROVIDE A DETAIL (CONTACT ME FOR ACCEPTABLE
 DESIGNS). PARKING FOR BIKES SHALL BE PROVIDED AT A
 RATIO OF 1 SPACE PER 20 AUTOMOBILE SPACES.
  
 37. THE PARKING SPACES BY THE CLUBHOUSE NEED TO PROVIDE
 24 FEET OF BACK-OUT.
  
 38. THE ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACE AT THE NORTH END OF
 PARKING STRUCTURE 1 NEEDS TO PROVIDE 24 FEET OF
 BACK-OUT.
  
 39. PLANS SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR THE PARKING STRUCTURES.
 THE PARKING CONFIGURATION SHOWN ON THE SITE PLAN DOES
 NOT ACCOUNT FOR ANY RAMPS, ETC. ADDITIONALLY, THE
 DESIGN GUIDELINES PROVIDE THAT THE UPPER LEVEL OF
 PARKING WILL BE COVERED AND LANDSCAPED OR OTHERWISE
 ENHANCED.
  
 40. THE FLOOR PLAN FOR THE HOTEL SHOWS AN ADDITIONAL
 RESTAURANT OF ALMOST 4,000 SQUARE FEET. THIS WAS NOT
 ACCOUNTED FOR IN ANY OF THE CALCULATIONS.
  
 41. THE FLOOR PLAN FOR THE RESTAURANT INDICATES THAT
 THERE IS MORE THAN 6,000 SQUARE FEET. PLEASE NOTE THAT
 OUTDOOR DINING/BAR AREA SHALL COUNT TOWARDS ALL
 CALCULATIONS (PARKING, TRAFFIC, ETC.).
  
 42. THE PROPOSED DESIGN GUIDELINES HAVE PBA #5
 (ECO-VILLAS) WITH A MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT OF 40 FEET.
 I THINK THIS SHOULD BE REDUCED TO REFLECT WHAT IS
 PROPOSED.
  
 43. THE PROPOSED DESIGN GUIDELINES HAVE PBA #4 (HOTEL)
 AS BEING A MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT OF 3 STORIES.
 ACCORDING TO THE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS, THE HOTEL IS
 PROPOSED TO BE 4 STORES.
  
 44. PLEASE PROVIDE THE BUILDING HEIGHTS OF ALL
 BUILDINGS, AS DEFINED BY THE CITY?S ZLDRS.
  
 45. THE ELEVATIONS SHOWN FOR THE ECO-VILLAS DO NOT
 MATCH THE FLOOR PLAN.
  
 46. BUILDING MATERIALS NEED TO BE SPECIFIED TO ENSURE
 COMPLIANCE WITH THE DESIGN GUIDELINES.
  
 47. THE SITE AND LANDSCAPE PLANS SHALL IDENTIFY THE
 LOCATION OF ALL MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT FOR ALL BUILDINGS,
 AS WELL AS PROVIDE THE REQUIRED SCREENING.
  
 48. A SCREEN WALL SHALL BE PROVIDED AROUND THE
 PERIMETER OF THE SERVICE/LOADING AREA, AND SHALL BE
 DESIGNED IN ACCORDANCE TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE
 DESIGN GUIDELINES.
  
 49. NO LIGHTING IS BEING PROVIDED ON THE TENNIS COURTS?
 IF SO, THIS SHALL BE PROVIDED WITHIN THE PHOTOMETRIC
 PLANS. LIGHTING LEVELS SHALL BE PROVIDED AT ALL POINTS
 ALONG THE BOUNDARY OF THE RPD/CPD.
  
 50. PLEASE CONFIRM THAT ALL LIGHTS ARE FULL CUT-OFF.
  
 51. THERE NEEDS TO BE A 5 FOOT SIDEWALK CONNECTING THE
 PRESIDENTIAL WAY ACCESS POINT TO THE INTERNAL
 CIRCULATION NETWORK.
  
 52. THERE NEEDS TO BE BETTER CONNECTIVITY BETWEEN THE
 TENNIS CENTER AND THE REST OF THE INTERNAL CIRCULATION
 NETWORK.
  
 53. THERE NEEDS TO BE BETTER CONNECTIVITY BETWEEN THE
 CLUBHOUSE AND THE HOTEL.
  
 54. ALONG THE MAIN ROADS, THE SIDEWALK SHOULD BE PULLED
 AWAY FROM THE CURB AND CREATE A PARKWAY THAT PROVIDES
 THE LIGHTING, TREES, ETC.
  
 55. AN ENLARGED SITE PLAN NEEDS TO BE PROVIDED FOR THE
 GREAT LAWN AREA. THIS WAS ONLY SHOWN ON THE OVERALL
 SITE PLAN.
  
 56. IN SEVERAL LOCATIONS, THE LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR THE
 ECO-VILLAS SHOWS TREES BEING PLANTED ON TOP OF CART
 PATHS/SIDEWALKS.
  
 57. THERE IS A DRAINAGE EASEMENT SHOWN ON THE MASTER
 PLAN CUTTING THROUGH THE DEVELOPMENT THAT IS NOT SHOWN
 ON THE PLATS OR SITE PLANS.
 ___________________________________________
  
 PLEASE NOTE THE FOLLOWING WHEN RESUBMITTING:
  
 A) WRITTEN RESPONSES TO COMMENTS MADE BY ALL
 DEPARTMENTS SHALL BE PROVIDED UPON RESUBMISSION.
  
 B) 15 SETS OF REVISED PLANS AND/OR DOCUMENTS SHALL BE
 PROVIDED, ALONG WITH ONE (1) REDUCED COPY (11IN X
 17IN), AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY OF ALL PLANS.
  
 C) PLEASE NOTE THAT RE-SUBMITTALS MAY BE SUBJECT TO
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS.
  
 D) IF NO RESPONSE IS RECEIVED WITHIN 60 DAYS OF THE
 ISSUANCE OF THESE COMMENTS, THE APPLICATION WILL BE
 CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN AND ANY FURTHER ACTION WILL
 REQUIRE SUBMISSION OF A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION.
  
 E) PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1)
 RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED
 COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE
 APPLICANT WILL BE ACCESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE
 WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE.
  
 F) IN ORDER TO BE CONSIDERED FOR THE JANUARY 21, 2015
 PLANNING BOARD AGENDA, ALL COMMENTS SHALL BE
 SATISFACTORILY ADDRESSED. PLEASE SUBMIT ALL REVISED
 DOCUMENTS/PLANS NO LATER THAN FRIDAY, DECEMBER 19,
 2014.
  
 G) TO BE PLACED ON THE JANUARY 21, 2015 PLANNING BOARD
 AGENDA, SIGNS SHALL BE POSTED ON THE PROPERTY NO LATER
 THAN JANUARY 6, 2015. SIGNAGE SHALL CONFORM AND BE
 INSTALLED WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY?S ZONING
 AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS, AS ALSO PROVIDED IN
 THE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION. A SIGNED AND NOTARIZED
 AFFIDAVIT SHALL BE PROVIDED BY THE DEADLINE REFERENCED
 ABOVE.
 ___________________________________________
  
 QUESTIONS/COMMENTS, PLEASE CONTACT THE FOLLOWING:
  
 JOHN ROACH, PRINCIPAL PLANNER
 CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH
 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT ? PLANNING DIVISION
 401 CLEMATIS STREET - P.O. BOX 3147
 WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33402
  
 PHONE: 561.822.1448
 FAX: 561.822.1460
  
 EMAIL: [email protected]
  
 WWW.WPB.ORG
  
  Print


Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved