City of West Palm Beach eGovPlus

Plan Review Details - Project Z14090017

Plan Review Stops For Project Z14090017

Review Stop	B			BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No	1	Status	F	Date	10-07-2014			Cont ID
Sent By	rbrown			Date	10-07-2014	Time	18:00	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	rbrown			Date	10-07-2014	Time	17:59	Sent To

Notes

2014-10-07 18:13:58	DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, BUILDING DIVISION,
	COMMENTS:

	1. THIS REVIEW IS A CURSORY REVIEW AS IT RELATES TO THE
	SITE. IT IS NOT A REVIEW FOR FULL COMPLIANCE WITH
	FLORIDA BUILDING CODE. THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE TO BE
	ADDRESSED FOR PERMITTING.

	2. THE PROPOSED BUILDING WILL BE IN FLOOD ZONE AE. THE
	ELEVATION OF THE FIRST FLOOR OF THE BUILDING AND ALL
	ASSOCIATED MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT (CHILLERS, GENERATORS
	ETC.) SHALL BE 6 INCHES (FREEBOARD) ABOVE BASE FLOOD
	ELEVATION.

	3. PARKING GARAGE STAIRWELLS. ON SHEETS A2.02 AND A2.04
	THE TWO PARKING GARAGE STAIRWELLS ARE CURRENTLY SHOWN
	WITH NO DOORS TO PROTECT THE STAIRWELLS AT THE 2ND AND
	3RD FLOORS.

	4. PARKING GARAGE ELEVATOR VESTIBULE. ON SHEET A2.04
	THE 3RD FLOOR ELEVATOR VESTIBULE IS CURRENTLY SHOWN
	WITH NO DOORS TO PROTECT THE ELEVATOR SHAFT.

	5. WHEN SUBMITTED FOR BUILDING PERMIT, THE PLANS SHALL
	SHOW THAT THE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION FOR THE BUILDINGS
	WILL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE HEIGHT, AREA AND
	OCCUPANCY LIMITATIONS IN CHAPTER 5 OF THE FLORIDA
	BUILDING CODE

	6. WHEN SUBMITTED FOR BUILDING PERMIT, COMPLIANCE WITH
	ALL BUILDING SEPARATION, PERCENTAGE OF OPENINGS AND
	OPENING PROTECTIVE REQUIREMENTS OF CHAPTERS 6 AND 7 OF
	THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE SHALL BE VERIFIED.

	7. IF THE PARKING GARAGE DOES NOT HAVE WALL OPENINGS,
	OR SUFFICIENT WALL OPENINGS TO MEET THE DEFINITION OF
	AN OPEN PARKING GARAGE, IT WILL BE CONSIDERED AN
	ENCLOSED PARKING GARAGE AND MUST HAVE EXHAUST SYSTEMS.
	THE EXHAUST SYSTEMS SHALL BE DESIGNED TO MINIMIZE NOISE
	LEVELS USING INLINE FAN SILENCERS OR OTHER APPROVED
	METHODS.

	8. ALL APPLICABLE PERMITS AND SUB-PERMITS MUST BE
	OBTAINED BEFORE COMMENCING THE WORK. SEPARATE PERMITS,
	PLANS AND FEES, ARE REQUIRED FOR SWIMMING POOLS AND
	SPAS, GAS SYSTEMS, GENERATORS, FIRE ALARM SYSTEMS, FIRE
	SPRINKLER AND OTHER FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEMS, GREASE
	INTERCEPTORS, SITE LIGHTING, SITE LANDSCAPE, SITE
	IRRIGATION, ETC.

	BUILDING OFFICIAL
	TEL: 561 805 6652
	EMAIL: [email protected]

Review Stop	ENG - PPRC			ENGINEERING - PPRC
Rev No	1	Status	F	Date	09-30-2014			Cont ID
Sent By	cranford			Date	09-30-2014	Time	12:45	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	cranford			Date	09-30-2014	Time	10:18	Sent To

Notes

2014-09-30 10:43:22	ENGINEERING/PUBLIC WORKS DEPT.
	LAND DEVELOPMENT AND STORMWATER

	THIS IS A CONCEPTUAL LEVEL REVIEW. CONSTRUCTION DETAILS
	WILL BE REVIEWED AS PART OF THE ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT
	APPROVAL AND BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION PROCESSES. THE
	APPLICATION FORMS CAN BE DOWNLOADED AT
	HTTP://WPB.ORG/ENGINEERING/FORMS-AND-PUBLICATIONS/

	THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO SITE
	PLAN APPROVAL.

	1. PLEASE REVISE THE DRIVEWAY APRONS TO MEET THE CITY'S
	ENGINEERING DESIGN STANDARDS. PLEASE ALSO INCLUDE THE
	DETAILS FOR THE SIDEWALK RAMPS, HTTP://WPB.ORG/ENGINEER
	ING/ENGINEERING-SERVICES/ENGINEERING-STANDARDS/

	2. SHOW CROSS-SECTIONS SHOWING THE PROPOSED GRADING
	ALONG FLAGLER DRIVE AND ARKONA CT.

	3. INDICATE WHICH PORTIONS OF THE POTABLE WATER,
	SANITARY SEWER, AND STORMWATER SYSTEM WILL REMAIN
	PUBLICALLY OWNED AND WHICH SECTIONS WILL BE MAINTAINED
	BY THE APPLICANT.

	4. REVISE THE LANDSCAPE PLAN TO SHOW LOCATIONS OF ALL
	WATER METERS, VALVES, CLEAN-OUTS, LIGHT POLES, ETC.
	ROOT BARRIERS MAY BE REQUIRED WHERE PLANTINGS ARE NEAR
	UNDERGROUND STORMWATER, SANITARY, OR POTABLE WATER
	LINES.

	5. . WATER METERS ARE PROPERTY OF THE CITY. THEREFORE,
	METERS ARE TO BE LOCATED IN THE RIGHT-OFWAY UNLESS
	SHOWN ON THE PLANS JUST INSIDE THE PROPERTY, WITHIN AN
	EASEMENT. IF THE METER(S) ARE TO BE LOCATED WITHIN AN
	EASEMENT, A SKETCH AND LEGAL DESCRIPTION WILL BE
	REQUIRED.

	6. VERIFY THAT THE PROPOSED SIZE AND QUANTITY OF TRASH
	BINS IS APPROPRIATE FOR THE WASTE YARDAGE ANTICIPATED
	TO BE GENERATED BY THE COMPLEX. CONSIDER USING A
	COMPACTOR TO REDUCE THE YARDAGE OF WASTE THAT WILL NEED
	TO BE COLLECTED.

	7. THE PROJECT MUST PROVIDE ADEQUATE STORMWATER
	MANAGEMENT, INCLUDING NOT MODIFYING THE VELOCITY OR
	VOLUME OF OFF-SITE STORMWATER DISCHARGE. DESCRIBE HOW
	THIS WILL BE ACHIEVED. COMPLIANCE WITH CHAPTER 40E-4
	FAC WILL DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE WITH THIS PROVISION.
	[CODE OF ORDINANCES SECTIONS 90-201, 94-35(C )(11),
	94-307, AND 94-580] THE CALCULATIONS SHOULD ADDRESS THE
	IMPACT OF THE ROOF-DRAIN VELOCITY AND SEEPAGE FROM THE
	ADJOINING PROPERTIES THROUGH THE PROPOSED RETAINING
	WALLS.

	8. THE TRASH DUMPSTER/COMPACTORS MUST LOCATED IN AREAS
	EASILY SERVICED BY THE CITY SANITATION EQUIPMENT AND
	MANPOWER. HOW WILL THE DUMPSTER AREA BE ACCESSED BY
	CITY SANITATION CREWS? (SECTION 74-35(A)(5) OF THE CODE
	OF ORDINANCES.)

	9. PROVIDE VERTICAL PROFILES FOR THE PARKING GARAGE
	RAMPS INCLUDING THE TRANSITION AREA GEOMETRY.


	THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED IN THE
	CONSTRUCTION PLANS SUBMITTED FOR DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL
	FROM THE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT.

	1. COORDINATE THE BACKFLOW PREVENTER LOCATIONS WITH THE
	ARCHITECT AND OWNER. THEY ARE AN ABOVE GROUND FEATURE
	AND COULD DISTURB THEIR VIEW OR BE IN CONFLICT WITH THE
	VISUAL DESIGN OF THE SITE.

	2. THE AVAILABLE WATER PRESSURE WITHIN THE CITY MAY NOT
	BE ACCEPTABLE AT ELEVATIONS HIGHER THAN THE 2ND FLOOR.
	WE RECOMMEND THAT A LONG-TERM PRESSURE STUDY BE
	PERFORMED ON THE POTABLE WATER LINES PRIOR TO
	FINALIZATION OF THE DESIGN.

	3. SEWAGE DEMAND CALCULATIONS WILL NEED TO BE PROVIDED
	AS PART OF THE FINAL DESIGN. THE CONDITION OF THE
	EXISTING SERVICE LATERAL AND MANHOLE MAY NOT BE
	SUFFICIENT FOR THE PROPOSED DEMAND AND MAY NEED TO BE
	REPLACED. WE RECOMMEND AN INSPECTION OF THE EXISTING
	SYSTEM BE REQUESTED FROM OUR OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE
	DIVISION PRIOR TO FINALIZING THE DESIGN.

	KELLY CRANFORD, P.E.
	LAND DEVELOPMENT ENGINEER
	ENGINEERING & PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
	CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH
	[email protected]
	561-494-1098 (OFFICE)

Review Stop	FIRE			FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No	1	Status	F	Date	10-07-2014			Cont ID
Sent By	eschneid			Date	10-07-2014	Time	11:12	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	eschneid			Date	10-07-2014	Time	11:12	Sent To

Notes

2014-10-07 11:13:43	THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS WERE SUBMITTED BY PETER LEDUC,
	FIRE MARSHAL, BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION, WEST PALM
	BEACH FIRE RESCUE.
	THIS REVIEW CAN ONLY BE CONSIDERED PRELIMINARY AS THE
	DRAWINGS THAT WERE REVIEWED WERE NOT COMPLETE.
	ADDITIONAL COMMENTS CAN BE EXPECTED WHEN FULL DRAWINGS
	ARE SUBMITTED FOR PERMIT.
	THE FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU HAS NO OBJECTIONS TO THE
	PROPOSED PROJECT.
	1. CONSTRUCTION, DEMOLITION, AND RENOVATION TO COMPLY
	WITH NFPA 241. PAY CLOSE ATTENTION TO THE SEPARATION
	DIMENSIONS OF ANY CONSTRUCTION TRAILERS AS FIRE
	SPRINKLERS MAY BE REQUIRED.
	2. SITE ACCESS AND EXIT POINTS ARE TO BE CLEARLY
	IDENTIFIED AND MAINTAINED FOR EMERGENCY VEHICLES DURING
	ALL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES.
	3. THE BUILDING ADDRESS SHALL BE CLEARLY VISIBLE FROM
	ALL ACCESS ROADWAYS, INCLUDING DURING CONSTRUCTION.
	ADDRESS NUMBERS SHALL CONTRAST WITH THEIR BACKGROUND
	AND SHALL NOT BE LESS THAN SIX (6) INCHES IN HEIGHT
	WITH A ONE (1) INCH STROKE FOR ALL BUILDINGS.
	4. TRASH AND DEBRIS IS TO BE REMOVED FROM THE SITE
	DAILY OR MORE OFTEN TO REDUCE THE ACCUMULATION OF
	POTENTIAL LIFE AND FIRE SAFETY HAZARDS.
	5. ALL APARTMENT BUILDINGS SHALL COMPLY WITH THE
	FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE, 2010 EDITION, THE LIFE
	SAFETY CODE, 2009 EDITION, INCLUDING MORE SPECIFICALLY,
	CHAPTER 30, NEW APARTMENTS.
	6. ALL PARKING STRUCTURES SHALL COMPLY WITH NFPA 88A,
	PARKING STRUCTURES AND NFPA 101, THE LIFE SAFETY CODE,
	INCLUDING MORE SPECIFICALLY, CHAPTER 42 STORAGE
	OCCUPANCIES (PARKING STRUCTURES)
	7. THE SEPARATION AND OPENING PROTECTION BETWEEN THE
	PARKING GARAGE AND HOTEL SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE AND
	COMPLIANCE WITH THE SPECIFIC AND MOST STRINGENT
	PROVISION REQUIREMENT OF EITHER CHAPTER.
	8. A NFPA 13 COMPLAINT FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM AND NFPA
	14 COMPLIANT WET STANDPIPE SYSTEM ARE REQUIRED FOR THIS
	STRUCTURE, INCLUDING THE PARKING GARAGE. TEMPORARY
	STANDPIPES ARE REQUIRED WHEN THE BUILDING REACHES THREE
	LEVELS OR THIRTY FEET WHILE BEING CONSTRUCTED. SEPARATE
	SHOP DRAWINGS, ARE REQUIRED TO BE SUBMITTED, REVIEWED
	AND APPROVED BY THE FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU PRIOR TO ANY
	INSTALLATION.
	9. A MONITORED FIRE ALARM SYSTEM IS REQUIRED FOR THIS
	STRUCTURE. SEPARATE SHOP DRAWINGS, ARE REQUIRED TO BE
	SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE FIRE PREVENTION
	BUREAU PRIOR TO ANY INSTALLATION.
	10. COMPLETE LIFE SAFETY PLANS FOR THE BUILDING SHALL
	BE PROVIDED THAT ILLUSTRATE OCCUPANT LOADS, TRAVEL
	DISTANCES, DEAD-END CORRIDORS AND ALL FIRE SAFETY
	EQUIPMENT.
	11. OCCUPANT LOADS FOR ALL SPACES SHALL BE DETERMINED
	AND SUBMITTED WITH THE SUBMITTED PLAN AND WHEN APPROVED
	THEY ARE REQUIRED TO BE POSTED WHERE APPLICABLE.
	12. THE FIRE RATING OF ALL SHAFTS SHALL BE CLEARLY
	INDICATED ON THE BUILDING PLAN.
	13. ALL EXISTING AND NEW FIRE HYDRANTS PLANNED FOR THIS
	DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE CLEARLY INDICATED AND IDENTIFIED
	ON THE PLAN AND CLOSELY COORDINATED WITH THE BUREAU OF
	FIRE PREVENTION.
	14. ALL FIRE DEPARTMENT SPRINKLER SYSTEM CONNECTIONS
	(FDC,S) FOR THE PROJECT SHALL BE IDENTIFIED AND
	COORDINATED WITH THE BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION.
	15. ALL FIRE WATER MAINS, SIZES AND THEIR VALVE
	ASSEMBLIES SHALL BE CLEARLY IDENTIFIED AND ILLUSTRATED
	ON THE PLAN.
	16. ALL EXIT DISCHARGE LOCATIONS SHALL BE CLEARLY
	ILLUSTRATED ON THE PLAN.
	17. ALL ILLUMINATED EXIT SIGNS AND EMERGENCY LIGHTING
	EQUIPMENT SHALL BE ILLUSTRATED ON THE PLAN.

	18. ALL PORTABLE FIRE EXTINGUISHERS LOCATIONS SHALL BE
	CLEARLY IDENTIFIED AND INDICATED ON THE PLAN.

	19. KNOX-BOX KEY SYSTEM SHALL BE REQUIRED FOR THIS
	BUILDING.

	20. OFF STREET ACCESS TO THE FIRE PUMP ROOM IS
	REQUIRED. THE LOCATION OF THE DOOR INSIDE THE GARAGE
	AREA IS NOT APPROVED.

	21. BOTH STAIRWELLS OF THE PARKING GARAGE APPEAR TO BE
	UNPROTECTED. NO DOOR IS SHOWN AT THE STAIRWELL
	ENTRANCE.

	22. THE VESTIBULE DOOR AREAS OF THE PARKING GARAGE AREA
	SHALL BE PROTECTED FROM VEHICULAR TRAFFIC WITH
	BOLLARDS.

	23. THE VESTIBULE ON THE THIRD FLOOR OF THE PARKING
	GARAGE DOES NOT SHOW DOORS.

	24. ALL UNDERGROUND FIRE LINE WORK REQUIRES AN
	INSPECTION BY THE BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION.

Review Stop	L		LANDSCAPING
Rev No	1	Status	Date		Cont ID
Sent By			Date	Time	Rev Time
Received By			Date	Time	Sent To

Notes

2014-10-08 12:34:51

SEE ZONING REVIEW

Review Stop	PARK		PARKING
Rev No	1	Status	Date		Cont ID
Sent By			Date	Time	Rev Time
Received By			Date	Time	Sent To

Notes

***NONE***

Review Stop	POLICE		POLICE
Rev No	1	Status	Date		Cont ID
Sent By			Date	Time	Rev Time
Received By			Date	Time	Sent To

Notes

***NONE***

Review Stop	PW		PUBLIC WORKS
Rev No	1	Status	Date		Cont ID
Sent By			Date	Time	Rev Time
Received By			Date	Time	Sent To

Notes

***NONE***

Review Stop	STORM		STORMWATER
Rev No	1	Status	Date		Cont ID
Sent By			Date	Time	Rev Time
Received By			Date	Time	Sent To

Notes

***NONE***

Review Stop	SURVEY			SURVEYING
Rev No	1	Status	F	Date	10-02-2014			Cont ID
Sent By	vnoel			Date	10-02-2014	Time	13:16	Rev Time
Received By	vnoel			Date		Time		Sent To

Notes

2014-10-02 13:16:44	1. REPLAT WILL BE REQUIRED. SEPARATE SUBMITTAL FOR
	TECHNICAL REVIEW TO ENGINEERING SERVICES.
	2. UTILITY EASEMENT IN REAR OF PARCELS 1 & 2 WILL NEED
	TO BE ABANDONED.
	3. PLEASE NOTE THAT ARKONA COURT IS SUBJECT TO A
	MAINTENANCE MAP IN ROAD PLAT BOOK 9, PG. 3.
	4. SEPARATE SUBMITTAL TO ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR
	SITE/CIVIL REVIEW IS REQUIRED.
	5. HOW IS GARBAGE BEING PLANNED FOR COLLECTION? WRITTEN
	APPROVAL FROM FERDINAND RIVERA WILL BE REQUIRED.

Review Stop	TRAFFIC			TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No	1	Status	F	Date				Cont ID
Sent By				Date	10-08-2014	Time		Rev Time	0.00
Received By	bcollins			Date	10-08-2014	Time	07:51	Sent To

Notes

2014-10-08 07:55:41	1. REFERENCED TRAFFIC STUDY RECEIVED AND UNDER REVIEW.
	PLEASE NOTE THAT THIS IS AN IMMEDIATE AREA IMPACT STUDY
	NOT A CONCURRENCY STUDY.
	2. HOW DOES DROP OFF WORK?
	3. HOW DOES LOADING WORK? DO TRUCKS HAVE TO BACK UP
	INTO STREET. PROVIDE AUTOTURN FOR ALL TRUCK, INCLUDING
	GARBAGE TRUCKS, MOVEMENTS TO AND FROM THE SITE.

Review Stop	Z			ZONING
Rev No	1	Status	F	Date	10-08-2014			Cont ID
Sent By	eschneid			Date	10-08-2014	Time	08:42	Rev Time	6.00
Received By	eschneid			Date	10-06-2014	Time	13:45	Sent To

Notes

2014-10-08 08:42:13	CASE NO. PB 1559G
	FIFTEEN 15 RPD
	1515 S. FLAGLER DRIVE

	- CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446

	- PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN
	WRITTEN FORMAT.

	- WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF ELEVEN
	(11) PAPER COPIES AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY IN .PNG FORMAT
	OF ALL PLANS. PLEASE NOTE THAT CHANGES ON THE
	RESUBMITTED PLANS OR THE SUBMITTAL OF INFORMATION/PLANS
	TO ADDRESS THE COMMENTS MAY RESULT IN ADDITIONAL
	COMMENTS.

	- THE PPRC COMMENTS SHALL BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED AND
	SUBMITTED TO THE PLANNING DIVISION BY 5 PM ON FRIDAY,
	OCTOBER 17, 2014, TO BE SCHEDULED FOR THE NOVEMBER 18,
	2014 PLANNING BOARD MEETING.

	- PLEASE NOTE THAT IF THE PLANNING DIVISION HAS NOT
	RECEIVED A RESPONSE TO THE PPRC COMMENTS WITHIN 60 DAYS
	FROM THE DATE OF THE PPRC MEETING (BY DECEMBER 8,
	2014), THE CASE SHALL BE CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN. ANY
	FURTHER ACTION SHALL REQUIRE A NEW DEVELOPMENT
	APPLICATION.

	- PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1)
	RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED
	COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE
	APPLICANT WILL BE ACCESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE
	WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE ($600).

	- PUBLIC HEARING NOTIFICATION SIGNAGE SHALL BE POSTED
	IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION
	94-39(I)(5) OF THE ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT
	REGULATIONS (ZLDR).

	1) IS THE NAME OF THE FIFTEEN 15 OR 15 FIFTEEN? BOTH
	ARE USED.

	2) THE PROPOSED DENSITY OF 69.8 DWELLING UNITS PER ACRE
	IS INCONSISTENT WITH MAXIMUM PERMITTED DENSITY IN
	ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 94-207(A)(1)B OF THE ZLDR.

	3) THE JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT INCORRECTLY STATES THAT
	THE CURRENTLY APPROVED RPD INCLUDES 87 DWELLING UNITS.
	THERE ARE ONLY 84 DWELLING UNITS APPROVED. THE THREE
	GUEST UNITS MAY NOT BE COUNTED AS DWELLING UNITS AS
	THEY ARE PROHIBITED FROM HAVING KITCHEN FACILITIES, AND
	THEREFORE ARE NOT DWELLING UNITS. ALL CALCULATIONS
	BASED ON 87 UNITS SHALL BE CORRECTED.

	4) THE JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT INCORRECTLY STATES THAT
	THE ZLDR HAVE BEEN AMENDED TO NO LONGER REQUIRE A
	MINIMUM LOT SIZE FOR RPDS.

	5) ANY EASEMENTS CONFLICTING WITH THE PROPOSED BUILDING
	WILL NEED TO BE ABANDONED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION.

	6) THE BASE CIVIL, ARCHITECTURAL AND LANDSCAPE PLANS DO
	NOT ALL MATCH. EX. THE STAIRWELL NEXT TO THE BIKE
	STORAGE ROOM.

	7) PROVIDE DIMENSION LINES TO THE BALCONIES.

	8) THE APPLICATION IS REQUESTING A PARKING WAIVER. THE
	JUSTIFICATION PROVIDED FOR THE PARKING WAIVER IS
	INSUFFICIENT FOR THE CITY'S PLANNING DIVISION TO
	CONSIDER SUPPORTING A WAIVER. THE RESPONSE TO CRITERIA
	2 IMPLIES THAT THE PROVISION OF FEWER PARKING SPACES
	THAN ARE REQUIRED MAKES THE PROPOSED PROJECT CONFORM TO
	THE CONCEPTS OF NEW URBANISM, WHICH IS AN INACCURATE
	SUPPOSITION. THE RESPONSE TO CRITERIA 3 DOES NOT
	PROVIDE SPECIFIC EVIDENCE OR STUDIES, BUT RATHER STATES
	IN PARKING WAIVERS HAVE BEEN GRANTED WITHOUT PRESENTING
	WHERE AND FOR WHAT TYPE OF PROJECT THE WAIVERS WERE
	GRANTED. WHILE CRITERIA 4 AND 5 WERE NOT USED, THE
	APPLICATION INCORRECTLY STATES THAT THERE IS PARKING
	THAT COULD COMPLY WITH THE CRITERIA.

	9) THE ECONOMIC IMPACT ANALYSIS ESTIMATES THAT 8 FULL
	TIME WORKERS WILL BE NEEDED TO OPERATE THE RENTAL
	APARTMENT BUILDING. A PARKING SPACE SHALL BE PROVIDED
	FOR EACH OF THESE WORKERS IN ADDITION TO THE PARKING
	REQUIRED FOR THE RESIDENTS AND GUESTS.

	10) THE REQUIRED PARKING TABLE SHALL BE BROKEN DOWN TO
	SHOW ONE BEDROOM, TWO BEDROOM, GUEST, HC, ETC.
	REQUIREMENTS.

	11) THE PROJECT DOES NOT PROVIDE SUFFICIENT ADA SPACES
	FOR THE TOTAL NUMBER OF SPACES PROVIDED.

	12) THE SITE PLAN SHALL INCLUDE PARKING NUMBER TAGS FOR
	EACH ROW OF PARKING AND DIMENSION LINES FOR EACH
	PARKING ROW (DEPTH AND LENGTH) AND DRIVE AISLE.

	13) THERE ARE EIGHT PARKING SPACES THAT ARE NOT USABLE
	DUE TO THE COLUMN PLACEMENT, TO INCLUDE ONE ADA SPACE.

	14) THE PARKING TABLE STATES THERE ARE FOUR COMPACT
	SPACES IN THE GARAGE. THESE SHALL BE CLEARLY DESIGNATED
	ON THE PLANS.

	15) PROVIDE A TURNING RADIUS DIAGRAM FOR THE RAMP TO
	THE SOUTH OLIVE ACCESS POINT AND ON EACH FLOOR. SOME OF
	THE PARKING SPACES LOOK LIKE THEY WILL NOT FUNCTION DUE
	TO PROXIMITY TO THE TURN.

	16) PROVIDE THE WIDTHS OF ALL OF THE DRIVE AISLES AND
	SITE INGRESS/EGRESS POINTS ON THE PLANS.

	17) WHEEL STOPS ARE REQUIRED AT THE HEAD OF ALL THE
	PARKING SPACES WHICH ABOUT THE BUILDING OR GARAGE
	WALLS, COLUMNS, ETC.

	18) USING A DIAGRAM, PLEASE SHOW HOW THE DROP OFF WILL
	WORK IN FRONT OF THE BUILDING GIVEN THE GEOMETRY OF THE
	AREA. ADDITIONALLY, HOW WILL FIRST TIME USERS BE
	STOPPED FROM DRIVING TOO FAR FORWARD AND THEN HAVING TO
	BACK DOWN THE ENTRY DRIVE TO PULL INTO THE MOTOR COURT?

	19) PLEASE CLEARLY DELINEATE THE PATH FROM THE ADA
	PARKING SPACE IN THE MOTOR COURT TO THE FRONT DOOR OF
	THE BUILDING.

	20) BICYCLE PARKING IS REQUIRED FOR THIS PROJECT.
	PROVIDE THE BICYCLE PARKING TABLE. SHOW THE BICYCLE
	PARKING LOCATIONS ON THE PLAN AND INCLUDE A BICYCLE
	PARKING DETAIL WHICH INCLUDES THE PAD AND THE TYPE OF
	RACK USED.

	21) IS IT CORRECT THAT RESIDENTS ON THE SECOND FLOOR
	NEED TO WALK THROUGH THE ELEVATOR TO GET TO THEIR UNITS
	IF PARKED ON THE SECOND LEVEL OF THE PARKING GARAGE?
	PLEASE EXPLAIN HOW THAT TIMING WORKS.

	22) THE PLANS DO NOT SHOW ACCESS FROM THE TOP LEVEL OF
	THE GARAGE TO THE ELEVATORS.

	23) THE PLANS ARE DIFFICULT TO READ. THE HEDGE AND
	GROUND COVER LAYERS SHALL BE TURNED OFF ON THE SITE AND
	CIVIL PLANS AS BLACK OUT MANY OF THE FEATURES SUCH AS
	TREE AND UTILITY LOCATIONS.

	24) A SIDEWALK EASEMENT WILL BE REQUIRED FOR THE
	PORTION OF THE SIDEWALK ALONG ARKONA CT. ON THE SITE.

	25) PLEASE CLEARLY DELINEATE THE ADA PATH FROM THE
	ARKONA COURT SIDEWALK TO THE FRONT DOOR OF THE
	BUILDING.

	26) HOW DO RESIDENTS ACCESS FLAGLER DRIVE FROM THE BIKE
	STORAGE AREA WITH THEIR BICYCLES OR FROM THE FITNESS
	AREA IN THEIR WORKOUT ATTIRE? THERE IS NO DIRECT
	WALKWAY ACCESS FROM THESE AREAS TO FLAGLER DRIVE. THE
	EXIT DOOR ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF THE BIKE STORAGE AREA
	OPENS INTO A PLANTING BED. A LACK OF RESIDENT
	PEDESTRIAN ACCESS ALL OF THE SURROUNDING STREETS DOES
	NOT SUPPORT THE STATEMENT THAT THIS PROJECT FOLLOWS NEW
	URBAN CONCEPTS.

	27) PLEASE CONSIDER A WALKWAY FROM THE DOORWAYS ALONG
	THE EAST SIDE OF THE BUILDING TO FLAGLER DRIVE. A LACK
	OF RESIDENT PEDESTRIAN ACCESS ALL OF THE SURROUNDING
	STREETS DOES NOT SUPPORT THE STATEMENT THAT THIS
	PROJECT FOLLOWS NEW URBAN CONCEPTS.

	28) PROVIDE DIMENSIONS FOR THE WALKWAYS SHOWN ON THE
	SITE PLAN.

	29) THE UPPER PARKING DECK SITE PLAN SHALL SHOW THE
	LIGHT POLE LOCATIONS.

	30) PROVIDE DETAILS OF THE LIGHT POLES AND FIXTURES.
	WHY DO THESE NEED TO BE SO TALL? THEY BADLY DETRACT
	FROM THE ARCHITECTURE OF THE BUILDING.

	31) PROVIDE A PHOTOMETRIC PLAN IN ACCORDANCE WITH CITY
	REQUIREMENTS.

	32) HOW ARE THE TRASH RECEPTACLES PICKED UP?

	33) IS TRASH AREA COVERED?

	34) FENCE, WALL AND GATE DETAILS, TO INCLUDE HEIGHT.
	PLEASE NOTE THAT THE WALLS LOCATED WITHIN THE SETBACK
	ALONG ARKONA CT., FLAGLER DRIVE AND S. OLIVE AVENUE MAY
	NOT EXCEED SIX (6) FEET IN HEIGHT. A SIX (6) FOOT HIGH
	WALL ALONG THE STREET FRONTAGES DOES NOT FOLLOW NEW
	URBAN CONCEPTS.

	35) THE WALL ALONG VIKING ARMS IS LISTED AT SIX (6)
	FEET TALL, BUT EYEBALLS AT HIGHER THAN THIS ON SHEET
	C2.00. PLEASE BE AWARE THAT THE MEASURE IS FROM THE
	OUTSIDE GRADE.

	36) WHY IS THERE A GATE ALONG SOUTH OLIVE AVENUE AT THE
	SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE SITE, WHEN THE DRIVEWAY THAT IS
	15 FEET AWAY HAS NO GATE?

	37) THE SITE DESIGN FLEXIBILITY TABLE TAKES CREDIT FOR
	BERMS TO ACT AS SCREENING. NO CROSS SECTIONS WERE
	PROVIDED TO SHOW HOW THE BERMS FUNCTION. FURTHERMORE,
	IF BERMS ARE USED, THE PROJECT IS NOT ADHERING TO NEW
	URBAN CONCEPTS.

	38) PLEASE PROVIDE THE DATA TO VERIFY THE POINTS
	CLAIMED IN THE SITE FLEXIBILITY TABLE ON THE PLANS.

	39) THE TRANSFORMER PADS AND THE BACKFLOW PREVENTERS
	AND METERS NEED TO BE SCREENED FROM ARKONA COURT.

	40) THE LANDSCAPE PLAN SHALL SHOW THE UTILITY LINES,
	BACKFLOW PREVENTER, ETC., AND THERE SHALL BE NO
	CONFLICTS. PLEASE NOTE THAT THE BACKFLOW PREVENTER AND
	THE METERS APPEAR TO BE CONFLICTING WITH TREES.

	41) THE OPEN SPACE TABLE FOR SHADE TREES SHALL NOT
	INCLUDE THE FLOWERING TREES AS THESE ARE SEPARATE
	ITEMS.

	42) PLEASE EXPLAIN WHY NOT ALL THE TREES PROVIDED IN
	THE BUFFERS ARE COUNTED TO MEET THE BUFFER TREE
	REQUIREMENTS. A COUNT BY STAFF INDICATES THAT THE
	BUFFER TREE REQUIREMENTS ARE MET WITHOUT THE NEED TO
	COUNT ANY PALMS, OR AT WORST LESS THAN 35% OF ANY
	BUFFER IS PLANTED WITH PALMS.

	43) THE OPEN SPACE SHRUB REQUIREMENTS AND PROVIDED
	TABLE IS NEEDED.

	44) THE SHRUBS USED AS HEDGE MATERIAL NEED TO BE CALLED
	OUT AS INSTALLED AT A MINIMUM OF 24 INCHES IN HEIGHT,
	NOT BY CONTAINER SIZE.

	45) HOW IS THE LANDSCAPE IN THE ENTRY DRIVE AND THE
	MOTOR COURT PROTECTED FROM VEHICULAR ENCROACHMENT?

	46) PROVIDE A TABLE SHOWING COMPLIANCE WITH THE
	MULTIFAMILY FOUNDATION PLANTING REQUIREMENTS FOUND IN
	SECTION 94-443(D)(2) OF THE ZLDR.

	47) THE REQUIRED LANDSCAPE BUFFER ALONG THE SOUTH OLIVE
	AVENUE RIGHT-OF-WAY IS INTERRUPTED BY MORE THAN THE
	PERMITTED 20% AND THEREFOR REQUIRES A WAIVER.

	48) PROVIDE HOW THE SITE MEETS THE MITIGATION
	REQUIREMENTS AND CONDITIONS FROM THE PREVIOUSLY
	APPROVED TREE ALTERATION PERMITS AND MITIGATES ANY
	TREES NOT PREVIOUSLY INCLUDED.

	49) PROVIDE DETAILS ON THE SIGNAGE.

	50) IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE COMMENTS FROM THE
	NEIGHBORHOOD MEETINGS, PLEASE PROVIDE INFORMATION ON
	HOW THE CARS ON THE ROOF WILL BE SCREENED FROM VIEW
	FROM ABOVE.