Plan Review Details - Project Z14090015
Plan Review Stops For Project Z14090015
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 2 Status P Date 12-03-2014 Cont ID  
Sent By jroach Date 12-03-2014 Time 14:46 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jroach Date 12-03-2014 Time 14:46 Sent To  
Notes
2015-06-02 14:46:37PURSUANT TO AN EMAIL SENT ON 11/25/2014, ALL REVIEW
 COMMENTS WERE TO BE SUBMITTED PRIOR TO 12/3/2014. IF NO
 COMMENTS WERE RECEIVED BY THAT TIME, IT WOULD BE
 ASSUMMED THAT ALL PREVIOUS COMMENTS HAD BEEN ADDRESSED
 AND THAT NO NEW COMMENTS WERE BEING ISSUED.
  
 QUESTIONS/COMMENTS, PLEASE CONTACT THE FOLLOWING:
  
 JOHN P. ROACH, AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER
 CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH
 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT ? PLANNING DIVISION
 401 CLEMATIS STREET - P.O. BOX 3147
 WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33402
  
 P: 561.822.1448
 F: 561.822.1460
  
 E: [email protected]
  
 WWW.WPB.ORG
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 1 Status P Date 10-07-2014 Cont ID  
Sent By rbrown Date 10-07-2014 Time 19:52 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rbrown Date 10-07-2014 Time 19:52 Sent To  
Notes
2014-10-07 19:56:00DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, BUILDING DIVISION,
 COMMENTS:
  
 1. THIS REVIEW IS A CURSORY REVIEW AS IT RELATES TO THE
 SITE. IT IS NOT A REVIEW FOR FULL COMPLIANCE WITH
 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE. THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE TO BE
 ADDRESSED FOR PERMITTING.
  
 2. WHEN SUBMITTED FOR BUILDING PERMIT, THE PLANS SHALL
 SHOW THAT THE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION FOR THE BUILDINGS
 WILL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE HEIGHT, AREA AND
 OCCUPANCY LIMITATIONS IN CHAPTER 5 OF THE FLORIDA
 BUILDING CODE
  
 3. WHEN SUBMITTED FOR BUILDING PERMIT, COMPLIANCE WITH
 ALL BUILDING SEPARATION, PERCENTAGE OF OPENINGS AND
 OPENING PROTECTIVE REQUIREMENTS OF CHAPTERS 6 AND 7 OF
 THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE SHALL BE VERIFIED.
  
 4. ALL APPLICABLE PERMITS AND SUB-PERMITS MUST BE
 OBTAINED BEFORE COMMENCING THE WORK. SEPARATE PERMITS,
 PLANS AND FEES, ARE REQUIRED FOR SWIMMING POOLS AND
 SPAS, GAS SYSTEMS, GENERATORS, FIRE ALARM SYSTEMS, FIRE
 SPRINKLER AND OTHER FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEMS, GREASE
 INTERCEPTORS, SITE LIGHTING, SITE LANDSCAPE, SITE
 IRRIGATION, ETC.
  
 5. FOR STREET ADDRESSING CONTACT SCOTT ALEF, GIS
 SUPPORT SPECIALIST, AT (561) 494 1094, OR BY EMAIL:
 [email protected]
  
 ROBERT BROWN
 BUILDING OFFICIAL
 TEL: 561 805 6652
 EMAIL: [email protected]
  
Review Stop ENG - PPRC ENGINEERING - PPRC
Rev No 3 Status P Date 12-03-2014 Cont ID  
Sent By jroach Date 12-03-2014 Time 14:44 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jroach Date 12-03-2014 Time 14:44 Sent To  
Notes
2015-06-02 14:45:25PURSUANT TO AN EMAIL SENT ON 11/25/2014, ALL REVIEW
 COMMENTS WERE TO BE SUBMITTED PRIOR TO 12/3/2014. IF NO
 COMMENTS WERE RECEIVED BY THAT TIME, IT WOULD BE
 ASSUMMED THAT ALL PREVIOUS COMMENTS HAD BEEN ADDRESSED
 AND THAT NO NEW COMMENTS WERE BEING ISSUED.
  
 QUESTIONS/COMMENTS, PLEASE CONTACT THE FOLLOWING:
  
 JOHN P. ROACH, AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER
 CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH
 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT ? PLANNING DIVISION
 401 CLEMATIS STREET - P.O. BOX 3147
 WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33402
  
 P: 561.822.1448
 F: 561.822.1460
  
 E: [email protected]
  
 WWW.WPB.ORG
Review Stop ENG - PPRC ENGINEERING - PPRC
Rev No 2 Status P Date 12-01-2014 Cont ID  
Sent By cranford Date 12-01-2014 Time 14:20 Rev Time 0.00
Received By cranford Date 12-01-2014 Time 14:20 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop ENG - PPRC ENGINEERING - PPRC
Rev No 1 Status F Date 10-06-2014 Cont ID  
Sent By cranford Date 10-06-2014 Time 12:50 Rev Time 0.00
Received By cranford Date 10-06-2014 Time 12:03 Sent To  
Notes
2014-10-06 12:12:12ENGINEERING/PUBLIC WORKS DEPT.
 LAND DEVELOPMENT AND STORMWATER
  
 THIS IS A CONCEPTUAL LEVEL REVIEW. CONSTRUCTION DETAILS
 WILL BE REVIEWED AS PART OF THE ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT
 APPROVAL AND BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION PROCESSES. THE
 ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL APPLICATION FORMS CAN
 BE DOWNLOADED AT
 HTTP://WPB.ORG/ENGINEERING/FORMS-AND-PUBLICATIONS/
  
 THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO SITE
 PLAN APPROVAL.
  
 1. REVISE THE PLANS TO INDICATE WHICH PORTIONS OF THE
 POTABLE WATER, SANITARY SEWER, AND STORMWATER SYSTEM
 WILL REMAIN PUBLICALLY OWNED AND WHICH SECTIONS WILL BE
 MAINTAINED BY THE APPLICANT. TYPICALLY, THE CITY'S
 OWNERSHIP STOPS AT THE RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE UNLESS
 EXTENUATING CIRCUMSTANCES REQUIRED THE OWNERSHIP
 DIVISION TO TAKE PLACE AT ANOTHER LOCATION.
  
 2. RELOCATE THE PROPOSED MASTER METER LOCATIONS TO
 WITHIN OR IMMEDIATELY ADJACENT TO THE DIVISION AVENUE
 RIGHT-OF-WAY.
  
 3. INDICATE THE LOCATIONS OF THE DUMPSTERS INTENDED TO
 BE SERVICE BY THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH SANITATION
 DEPARTMENT. DUMPSTERS MUST BE EASILY ACCESSIBLE BY THE
 CITY EQUIPMENT AND MANPOWER. (SECTION 74-35(A)(5) OF
 THE CODE OF ORDINANCES.)
  
 4. INCLUDE AN ESTIMATE OF THE SOLID WASTE YARDAGE
 ANTICIPATED TO BE GENERATED BY THE FACILITY AND VERIFY
 THAT THE ENCLOSURE SIZE IS LARGE ENOUGH TO ACCOMMODATE
 THE NEEDED DUMPSTER SIZE. THE DUMPSTER ENCLOSURES WILL
 NEED TO MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 94-444 OF THE
 CODE OF ORDINANCES AND INCLUDE CITY ENGINEERING DETAIL
 GC-8 ON THE CONSTRUCTION PLANS.
  
 5. PLEASE DEMONSTRATE THAT THE PROJECT WILL PROVIDE
 ADEQUATE DRAINAGE AND STORMWATER MANAGEMENT, INCLUDING
 NOT MODIFYING THE VELOCITY OR VOLUME OF OFF-SITE
 STORMWATER DISCHARGE. DESCRIBE HOW THIS WILL BE
 ACHIEVED. COMPLIANCE WITH CHAPTER 40E-4 WILL
 DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE WITH THIS PROVISION. THE DESIGN
 SHALL INCLUDE APPROPRIATE MEASURES SHALL BE TAKEN TO
 ENSURE THAT REMOVAL OF STORMWATER WILL NOT ADVERSELY
 AFFECT NEIGHBORING PROPERTIES OR THE PUBLIC STORM
 DRAINAGE SYSTEM. PROVISIONS SHALL BE MADE FOR THE
 CONSTRUCTION OF FACILITIES, INCLUDING GRADING, GUTTERS,
 PIPING AND THE TREATMENT OF TURF, TO ACCOMMODATE
 STORMWATER AND TO PREVENT EROSION AND THE FORMATION OF
 SILT. [SECTIONS 90-201, 94-35(C )(11), AND 94-307].
  
 6. PLEASE SHOW THE LOCATIONS OF THE ROOF DRAINS AND
 INDICATE WHERE THE RUNOFF FROM THE ROOF DRAINS WILL BE
 DIRECTED. THE ROOF DRAIN PEAK DISCHARGE RATE AND
 VELOCITY WILL NEED TO BE INCLUDED IN THE FINAL DESIGN
 OF THE STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM.
  
 7. REVISE THE DRIVEWAY APRONS TO MEET THE CITY'S
 ENGINEERING DESIGN STANDARD GC-7.
  
 8. REVISE THE STRIPING DETAIL TO COMPLY WITH CITY OF
 WEST PALM BEACH CODE OF ORDINANCES, ARTICLE XV, SECTION
 94-485. (12 INCHES BETWEEN THE 4 INCH STRIPES RATHER
 THAN THE SHOWN 2 INCHES)
  
 9. INDICATE THE PROPOSED LOCATIONS OF THE STOP BARS AND
 STOP SIGNS.
  
 10. REVISE THE LANDSCAPE PLAN INCLUDE ROOT BARRIERS
 BETWEEN THE PROPOSED BUTTONWOOD TREES AND THE
 EXFILTRATION TRENCH.
  
 11. THE AVAILABLE WATER PRESSURE WITHIN THE CITY MAY
 NOT BE ACCEPTABLE AT ELEVATIONS HIGHER THAN THE 2ND
 FLOOR. WE RECOMMEND THAT A LONG-TERM PRESSURE STUDY BE
 PERFORMED ON THE POTABLE WATER LINES PRIOR TO
 FINALIZATION OF THE DESIGN.
  
 12. SECTION 78-9 OF THE CITY?S CODE OF ORDINANCES
 SPECIFIES NGVD 1929 AS THE OFFICIAL CITY VERTICAL
 DATUM. PLEASE REVISE THE PLANS AND SURVEY TO REFERENCE
 NGVD 29.
  
  
 KELLY CRANFORD, P.E.
 LAND DEVELOPMENT ENGINEER
 ENGINEERING & PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
 CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH
 [email protected]
 561-494-1098 (OFFICE)
  
Review Stop FIRE FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No 3 Status P Date 02-04-2015 Cont ID  
Sent By pleduc Date 02-04-2015 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By pleduc Date 02-04-2015 Time 11:04 Sent To  
Notes
2015-02-04 11:13:31THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS WERE SUBMITTED BY PETER LEDUC,
 FIRE MARSHAL, BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION, WEST PALM
 BEACH FIRE RESCUE.
  
 3RD REVIEW RESPONSE
  
 THIS REVIEW CAN ONLY BE CONSIDERED PRELIMINARY AS THE
 DRAWINGS THAT WERE REVIEWED WERE NOT COMPLETE.
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS CAN BE EXPECTED WHEN FULL DRAWINGS
 ARE SUBMITTED FOR PERMIT.
  
 THE FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU HAS NO OBJECTIONS TO THE
 PROPOSED PROJECT.
  
 AFTER A REVIEW OF THE PPRC RESPONSE DOCUMENTS DATED
 1/27/15, FROM JOHN ROACH, PRINCIPAL PLANNER, THE FIRE
 PREVENTION BUREAU COMMENTS HAVE BEEN ADDRESSED.
  
 THE BUREAU'S APPROVAL OF THIS SUBMITTED PROJECT DOES
 NOT CONSTITUTE IT'S FINAL REVIEW OR APPROVAL.
  
 THE BUREAU SHALL REVIEW ALL SUBMITTED BUILDING PLANS AT
 THE APPROPRIATE TIME AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE
 REQUIREMENTS OF ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND STANDARDS.
  
Review Stop FIRE FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No 2 Status P Date 11-26-2014 Cont ID  
Sent By pleduc Date 11-26-2014 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By pleduc Date 11-26-2014 Time 10:32 Sent To  
Notes
2014-11-26 10:37:45AFTER A REVIEW OF THE MATERIAL RECEIVED BY EMAIL ON
 11/25/14, TITLED DUNBAR VILLAGE RESUBMITTAL, FROM JOHN
 ROACH, PRINCIPAL PLANNER, THE PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED FIRE
 PREVENTION BUREAU COMMENTS HAVE BEEN ADDRESSED.
  
 THE BUREAU'S APPROVAL OF THIS SUBMITTED PROJECT DOES
 NOT CONSTITUTE IT'S FINAL REVIEW OR APPROVAL.
  
 THE BUREAU SHALL REVIEW ALL SUBMITTED BUILDING PLANS AT
 THE APPROPRIATE TIME AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE
 REQUIREMENTS OF ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND STANDARDS.
  
 PETER LEDUC
 FIRE MARSHAL
 WEST PALM BEACH FIRE RESCUE
  
Review Stop FIRE FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No 1 Status P Date 10-06-2014 Cont ID  
Sent By pleduc Date 10-06-2014 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By pleduc Date 10-06-2014 Time 15:57 Sent To  
Notes
2014-10-06 16:16:48THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS WERE SUBMITTED BY PETER LEDUC,
 FIRE MARSHAL, BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION, WEST PALM
 BEACH FIRE RESCUE.
 THIS REVIEW CAN ONLY BE CONSIDERED PRELIMINARY AS THE
 DRAWINGS THAT WERE REVIEWED WERE NOT COMPLETE.
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS CAN BE EXPECTED WHEN FULL DRAWINGS
 ARE SUBMITTED FOR PERMIT.
  
 THE FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU HAS NO OBJECTIONS TO THE
 PROPOSED PROJECT.
  
 1. CONSTRUCTION, DEMOLITION, AND RENOVATION TO COMPLY
 WITH NFPA 241.
  
 2. SITE ACCESS AND EXIT POINTS ARE TO BE CLEARLY
 IDENTIFIED AND MAINTAINED FOR EMERGENCY VEHICLES DURING
 ALL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES.
  
 3. THE BUILDING ADDRESS SHALL BE CLEARLY VISIBLE FROM
 ALL ACCESS ROADWAYS, INCLUDING DURING CONSTRUCTION.
 ADDRESS NUMBERS SHALL CONTRAST WITH THEIR BACKGROUND
 AND SHALL NOT BE LESS THAN SIX (6) INCHES IN HEIGHT
 WITH A ONE (1) INCH STROKE FOR ALL BUILDINGS.
  
 4. TRASH AND DEBRIS IS TO BE REMOVED FROM THE SITE
 DAILY OR MORE OFTEN TO REDUCE THE ACCUMULATION OF
 POTENTIAL LIFE AND FIRE SAFETY HAZARDS.
  
 5. ALL APARTMENT BUILDINGS SHALL COMPLY WITH THE
 FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE, 2010 EDITION, THE LIFE
 SAFETY CODE, 2009 EDITION, INCLUDING MORE SPECIFICALLY,
 CHAPTER 30, NEW APARTMENTS.
  
 6. A NFPA 13 COMPLAINT FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM AND NFPA
 14 COMPLIANT WET STANDPIPE SYSTEM ARE REQUIRED FOR EACH
 STRUCTURE. TEMPORARY STANDPIPES ARE REQUIRED WHEN THE
 BUILDING REACHES THREE LEVELS OR THIRTY FEET WHILE
 BEING CONSTRUCTED. SEPARATE SHOP DRAWINGS, ARE REQUIRED
 TO BE SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE FIRE
 PREVENTION BUREAU PRIOR TO ANY INSTALLATION.
  
 7. A MONITORED FIRE ALARM SYSTEM IS REQUIRED FOR EACH
 STRUCTURE. SEPARATE SHOP DRAWINGS, ARE REQUIRED TO BE
 SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE FIRE PREVENTION
 BUREAU PRIOR TO ANY INSTALLATION.
  
 8. ALL VERTICAL AND HORIZONTAL FIRE SEPARATIONS FOR
 THIS BUILDING SHALL BE CLEARLY IDENTIFIED AND INDICATED
 ON THE PLANS.
  
 9. COMPLETE LIFE SAFETY PLANS FOR THE BUILDING SHALL BE
 PROVIDED THAT ILLUSTRATE OCCUPANT LOADS, TRAVEL
 DISTANCES, DEAD-END CORRIDORS AND ALL FIRE SAFETY
 EQUIPMENT.
  
 10. REQUIRED FIRE SEPARATIONS BETWEEN EACH APARTMENT
 AND/OR TENANT SHALL BE CLEARLY INDICATED AND
 ILLUSTRATED ON THE BUILDING PLAN.
  
 11. REQUIRED CORRIDOR FIRE RATING SHALL BE CLEARLY
 INDICATED AND ILLUSTRATED ON THE BUILDING PLAN.
  
 12. ALL EXISTING AND NEW FIRE HYDRANTS PLANNED FOR THIS
 DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE CLEARLY INDICATED AND IDENTIFIED
 ON THE PLAN AND CLOSELY COORDINATED WITH THE BUREAU OF
 FIRE PREVENTION.
  
 13. ALL FIRE DEPARTMENT SPRINKLER SYSTEM CONNECTIONS
 (FDC,S) FOR THE PROJECT SHALL BE IDENTIFIED AND
 COORDINATED WITH THE BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION.
  
 14. ALL FIRE WATER MAINS, SIZES AND THEIR VALVE
 ASSEMBLIES SHALL BE CLEARLY IDENTIFIED AND ILLUSTRATED
 ON THE PLAN.
  
 15. ANNUALLY, EMERGENCY INSTRUCTIONS ARE TO BE PROVIDED
 TO EACH APARTMENT AND/OR TENANT. THESE INSTRUCTIONS ARE
 TO INDICATE THE LOCATION OF ALARMS, EGRESS PATHS, AND
 ACTIONS TO BE TAKEN IN THE EVENT OF A FIRE OR ALARM
 ACTIVATION.
  
 16. NOTICE IS REQUIRED FOR STRUCTURES WITH LIGHT-FRAME
 TRUSS-TYPE CONSTRUCTION. ANY COMMERCIAL, INDUSTRIAL, OR
 ANY MULTIUNIT RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURE OF THREE UNITS OR
 MORE WHICH USES HORIZONTAL OR VERTICAL LIGHT-FRAME
 TRUSS-TYPE CONSTRUCTION IN ANY PORTION SHALL BE MARKED
 WITH AN APPROVED SYMBOL. THE APPROVED SYMBOL SHALL BE
 PLACED WITHIN 24 INCHES TO THE LEFT OF THE MAIN ENTRY
 DOOR.
  
 17. 150?MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE DISTANCE FROM A FDC(FIRE
 DEPARTMENT CONNECTION) TO A FIRE HYDRANT. THE LOCATION
 OF THE FDC FOR EACH BUILDING SHALL BE COORDINATED
 THROUGHT THE BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION.
  
 18. NORMALLY HYDRANTS SHALL BE A MINIMUM DISTANCE OF 40
 FT. FROM A BUILDING. HYDRANTS CAN BE CLOSER THAN 40 FT.
 TO A BUILDING BASED UPON A REVIEW BY THE FIRE OFFICIAL.
  
 19 FIRE HYDRANT SPACING: 300? MINIMUM SEPARATION
 BETWEEN HYDRANTS IN A RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOOD.
  
 20. 7.5? CLEARANCE IN FRONT AND TO THE SIDES
 (SEMI-CIRCLE) OF HYDRANTS, 4.5? BEHIND.
  
 21. ALL FIRE LINE FOR FIRE HYDRANTS AND/OR SPRINKLER
 SYSTMES SHALL BE PERMITTED AND INSPECTED BY A BUREA OF
 FIRE PREVENTION FIRE INSPECTOR.
  
 22. FOR THE REQUIRED FIRE LANE TURN-AROUND AT THE
 DEADEND PARKING LOT AREAS THE WIDTH SHALL BE 20'
 MINIMUM. (THE LOADING AREA)
  
  
  
  
Review Stop PU PUBLIC UTILITIES
Rev No 1 Status N Date 02-15-2017 Cont ID  
Sent By mkhan Date 02-15-2017 Time 08:59 Rev Time 0.00
Received By mkhan Date 02-14-2017 Time 16:01 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop SURVEY SURVEYING
Rev No 2 Status P Date 12-03-2014 Cont ID  
Sent By jroach Date 12-03-2014 Time 14:40 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jroach Date 12-03-2014 Time 14:35 Sent To  
Notes
2015-06-02 14:44:32PURSUANT TO AN EMAIL SENT ON 11/25/2014, ALL REVIEW
 COMMENTS WERE TO BE SUBMITTED PRIOR TO 12/3/2014. IF NO
 COMMENTS WERE RECEIVED BY THAT TIME, IT WOULD BE
 ASSUMMED THAT ALL PREVIOUS COMMENTS HAD BEEN ADDRESSED
 AND THAT NO NEW COMMENTS WERE BEING ISSUED.
  
 QUESTIONS/COMMENTS, PLEASE CONTACT THE FOLLOWING:
  
 JOHN P. ROACH, AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER
 CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH
 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT ? PLANNING DIVISION
 401 CLEMATIS STREET - P.O. BOX 3147
 WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33402
  
 P: 561.822.1448
 F: 561.822.1460
  
 E: [email protected]
  
 WWW.WPB.ORG
Review Stop SURVEY SURVEYING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 10-06-2014 Cont ID  
Sent By vnoel Date 10-06-2014 Time 08:56 Rev Time  
Received By vnoel Date 10-06-2014 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2014-10-06 09:21:391. REPLAT WILL BE REQUIRED. SEPARATE SUBMITTAL IS MADE
 THROUGH ENGINEERING SERVICES.
 2. ELEVATIONS NEED TO BE ON NGVD-29 DATUM PER CITY
 CODE. SURVEY WAS NOT SIGNED AND SEALED.
 3. ON-SITE WATER AND SEWER FACILITIES WILL BE PRIVATE.
 4. LAYOUT DOES NOT MATCH MASTER PLAN.
 5. HOW IS GARBAGE COLLECTION BEING HANDLED? WRITTEN
 APPROVAL FROM FERDINAND RIVERA, SANITATION SUPERVISOR
 WILL BE REQUIRED.
 6. SITE/CIVIL PLANS WILL NEED SUBMITTAL TO ENGINEERING
 SERVICES.
Review Stop TRAFFIC TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No 3 Status P Date 12-03-2014 Cont ID  
Sent By jroach Date 12-03-2014 Time 14:45 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jroach Date 12-03-2014 Time 14:45 Sent To  
Notes
2015-06-02 14:46:00PURSUANT TO AN EMAIL SENT ON 11/25/2014, ALL REVIEW
 COMMENTS WERE TO BE SUBMITTED PRIOR TO 12/3/2014. IF NO
 COMMENTS WERE RECEIVED BY THAT TIME, IT WOULD BE
 ASSUMMED THAT ALL PREVIOUS COMMENTS HAD BEEN ADDRESSED
 AND THAT NO NEW COMMENTS WERE BEING ISSUED.
  
 QUESTIONS/COMMENTS, PLEASE CONTACT THE FOLLOWING:
  
 JOHN P. ROACH, AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER
 CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH
 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT ? PLANNING DIVISION
 401 CLEMATIS STREET - P.O. BOX 3147
 WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33402
  
 P: 561.822.1448
 F: 561.822.1460
  
 E: [email protected]
  
 WWW.WPB.ORG
Review Stop TRAFFIC TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No 2 Status P Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 12-02-2014 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By bcollins Date 12-02-2014 Time 16:34 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop TRAFFIC TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No 1 Status F Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 10-07-2014 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By bcollins Date 10-07-2014 Time 08:26 Sent To  
Notes
2014-10-07 08:28:49THE HOUSING AUTHORITY HAS INDICATED THAT THEY WOULD
 LIKE TO RELOCATE THE FPL POLES ON DIVISION STREET.
 WOULD THIS CHANGE THE SITE PLAN? SEE COMMENTS FROM K.
 CRANFORD REGARDING SIGNS, STRIPING, AND DRIVEWAY.
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 2 Status   Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 10-08-2014 Cont ID  
Sent By jroach Date 10-08-2014 Time 12:38 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jroach Date 10-08-2014 Time 12:38 Sent To  
Notes
2014-10-08 12:39:20PLANS AND PLATS REVIEW COMMITTEE (PPRC) ZONING REVIEW
 ___________________________________________
  
 DATE OF REVIEW: 10.08.2014
 PROJECT NO.: Z14090014 AND Z14090015
 CASE NO.: PB 1628A & B
 ADDRESS: 1624 DOUGLASS AVENUE
 APPLICANT/CONTACT: JON SCHMIDT & JOSH NICHOLS
 TELEPHONE NO.: 561.684.6141
 SCOPE OF REVIEW: NEW 120-UNIT MULTIFAMILY HOUSING
 DEVELOPMENT.
 ___________________________________________
  
 PLEASE PROVIDE A WRITTEN RESPONSE TO THE FOLLOWING
 REVIEW COMMENTS:
  
 1. THE COMMENTS PROVIDED HERE ARE FOR PURPOSES OF THE
 PLANS AND PLATS REVIEW COMMITTEE (PPRC). THESE DO NOT
 INCLUDE THE THOUGHTS AND CONCERNS THAT WERE EXPRESSED
 AT THE APPLICANT/STAFF MEETING THAT OCCURRED ON FRIDAY,
 OCTOBER 3, 2014. THOSE ITEMS THAT WERE DISCUSSED AT
 THAT TIME ARE STILL CONSIDERED A PART OF STAFF?S REVIEW
 OF THE PROJECT AND WILL BE FACTORED INTO ANY
 RECOMMENDATION THAT IS MADE. STAFF WOULD ENCOURAGE THAT
 AN ADDITIONAL APPLICANT/STAFF MEETING OCCUR IN THE VERY
 NEAR FUTURE TO FURTHER DISCUSS HOW THESE CONCERNS MAY
 BE ADDRESSED, POSSIBLE ALTERNATIVES, ETC.
  
 2. PURSUANT TO SECTION 94-10 OF THE CITY?S CODE OF
 ORDINANCES, ?NO APPLICATIONS WILL BE PROCESSED BY THE
 CITY, AND NO REVIEWS WILL BE CONDUCTED BY THE CITY,
 UNTIL AN APPLICANT HAS FIRST SHOWN THAT THE APPLICANT
 IS NOT FINANCIALLY INDEBTED TO THE CITY FOR ANY REASON,
 INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, AD VALOREM PROPERTY
 TAXES, SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS, CITY UTILITY CHARGES, AND
 OTHER GOVERNMENT-IMPOSED LIENS.? ACCORDING TO CITY
 RECORDS, THERE ARE SEVERAL PROPERTIES THROUGHOUT THE
 CITY THAT ARE OWNED BY THE HOUSING AUTHORITY AND HAVE
 OUTSTANDING LIENS/FINES.
  
 3. THE OVERALL SURVEY FOR DUNBAR VILLAGE IDENTIFIED THE
 120 FOOT DEEP PARCEL ALONG TAMARIND AVENUE AS ?FUTURE
 COMMERCIAL?. PLEASE CLARIFY. THIS PARCEL IS ZONED FOR
 PROFESSIONAL OFFICE / RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT.
  
 4. UTILITY LETTERS SHALL BE PROVIDED FROM THE REMAINING
 UTILITY COMPANIES (AT&T, COMCAST, AND FPL).
  
 5. PLEASE NOTE SPECIAL ATTENTION TO FPL AS THERE IS A
 BLANKET EASEMENT ACROSS THE PROPERTY IN WHICH THEY
 WOULD HAVE TO PROVIDE EASEMENT CONSENT TO ALL
 IMPROVEMENTS. ADDITIONALLY, JUST A REMINDER THAT
 SECTION 94-207(B)(5) REQUIRES THAT ALL UTILITIES WITHIN
 A PLANNED DEVELOPMENT BE LOCATED UNDERGROUND.
  
 6. WHILE EXEMPT FROM TRAFFIC CONCURRENCY REQUIREMENTS,
 THE TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO PALM
 BEACH COUNTY TO BE INCORPORATED INTO THE TPS
 SYSTEM/MODEL. PLEASE PROVIDE A LETTER FROM THE COUNTY
 INDICATING SUCH.
  
 7. FURTHER DISCUSSION NEEDS TO OCCUR AS TO HOW THE
 PLANNED DEVELOPMENT WILL BE APPROVED/REGULATED. THERE
 NEEDS TO BE CLARIFICATION AND DISCUSSION AS TO THE
 PROPOSED ?BUBBLE? MASTER PLAN, AN ADOPTED SITE PLAN,
 ETC.
  
 8. WILL THE SILVER PALMS DEVELOPMENT BE SUBDIVIDED FROM
 THE REST OF THE DUNBAR VILLAGE PARCEL, OR IS IT
 PROPOSED TO REMAIN AS-IS? THE SITE PLAN IDENTIFIES
 PROPERTY LINES ON THE NORTH AND SOUTH SIDES OF SILVER
 PALM PLACE, WHICH CURRENTLY DO NOT EXIST. ADDITIONALLY,
 THE SITE PLAN IDENTIFIES A 40 FOOT RIGHT-OF-WAY ON THE
 SOUTH SIDE OF THE SILVER PALM PLACE DEVELOPMENT. IS
 THIS PROPOSED TO BE DEDICATED TO THE CITY AS
 RIGHT-OF-WAY? PLEASE ENSURE THE PLAN CLEARLY IDENTIFIES
 AND DISTINGUISHES THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN PROPERTY
 LINES, PROPOSED EASEMENTS, ETC.
  
 9. PLEASE INCLUDE IN YOUR JUSTIFICATION OR RESPONSE HOW
 THE PROJECT IS DESIGNED TO COMPLY WITH SECTION
 94-222(E)(5) AND SECTION 94-222(G) REGARDING THE
 REQUIRED OPEN SPACE.
  
 10. THE DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS TABLE ON THE SITE PLAN
 DOES NOT CORRESPOND TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY?S
 ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS (SETBACKS ARE
 INCORRECT, THERE IS NO DISTINCTION IN SETBACKS BETWEEN
 RESIDENTIAL AND NONRESIDENTIAL, ETC). ADDITIONALLY,
 THIS TABLE STATES THAT THE PROPOSED ZONING DISTRICT IS
 RPD WITH AN MF20 UNDERLYING; CURRENTLY THE PROPERTY HAS
 AN MF32 ZONING DESIGNATION. IS THE PROPOSAL TO DOWNZONE
 THE PROPERTY PRIOR TO ESTABLISHING THE RPD? PLEASE
 CLARIFY.
  
 11. ARCHITECTURAL PLANS SHALL IDENTIFY BUILDING
 MATERIALS, INDICATING COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION
 94-222(H)(1).
  
 12. IN MANY LOCATIONS, THE LANDSCAPE PLANS REFERENCE
 THE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR DETAILS (I.E. FENCING,
 FOCAL POINT, ETC.); HOWEVER, THESE DETAILS WERE NOT
 PROVIDED WITHIN THE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS.
  
 13. THE PARKING DETAIL SHALL CONFORM TO THE CITY?S
 MINIMUM SPECIFICATIONS. PLEASE CONTACT ME FOR AN
 ELECTRONIC COPY.
  
 14. PURSUANT TO SECTION 94-222(H)(4), ALL BUILDINGS
 SHALL HAVE THEIR PRINCIPAL PEDESTRIAN ENTRANCE(S),
 INCLUSIVE OF FLAT, STEPPED OR SLOPED WALKWAYS, ON THE
 FRONTAGE LINE, CONNECTING THE FRONT ENTRANCE OF THE
 PRIMARY STRUCTURES WITH THE STREET.
  
 15. A DETAIL OR NOTE ON THE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS SHALL
 BE PROVIDED INDICATING COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION
 94-222(H)(6) AND (7):
  
  (6). WINDOWS SHALL BE RECESSED A MINIMUM OF TWO INCHES
 FROM THE EXTERIOR FACE OF THE FACADE.
  (7). ALL WINDOWS SHALL BE OPERABLE.
  
 16. PURSUANT TO SECTION 94-222(H)(10), SLIDING GLASS
 DOORS ARE NOT PERMITTED TO FACE THE STREET. THIS
 PROVISION SHALL ALSO BE APPLIED TO ALL NEW INTERNAL
 ?STREET? CONNECTIONS.
  
 17. THE SITE PLAN INDICATES THAT THERE ARE 134 PARKING
 SPACES, BUT ONLY 132 APPEAR TO BE SHOWN ON THE PLAN
 [NOT INCLUDING ON-STREET PARKING ON DIVISION AVENUE (AS
 NOTED ON THE PLANS)].
  
 18. PLEASE PROVIDE PERCENTAGES FOR ALL SITE DATA (I.E.
 BUILDING COVERAGE, OPEN SPACE, LANDSCAPE AREA, ETC.).
  
 19. BICYCLE PARKING SHALL BE EQUITABLY DIVIDED AMONGST
 THE VARIOUS ENTRANCES AND NOT CONSOLIDATED INTO ONE (1)
 LOCATION.
  
 20. A DETAIL SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR THE BIKE RACK. THE
 DETAIL SHALL INCLUDE THE TYPE OF BIKE RACK, AS WELL AS
 A LAYOUT OF SPACING, ETC. THE BIKE RACK SHALL MEET THE
 CITY?S MINIMUM APPROVED DESIGN (CONTACT ME FOR A COPY).
  
 21. SETBACKS SHALL BE MEASURED FROM THE PROPERTY LINE
 TO THE CLOSEST POINT OF THE STRUCTURE (INCLUDING
 SUPPORT COLUMNS FOR BALCONIES).
  
 22. PURSUANT TO SECTION 94-77, THE MAXIMUM BUILDING
 HEIGHT IS THE GREATER OF 40 FEET OR TWO (2) FEET IN
 HEIGHT FOR EACH ONE (1) FOOT OF SETBACK FROM SIDE OR
 REAR LOT LINES. ACCORDING TO THE SITE PLAN, THE REAR
 SETBACK IS APPROXIMATELY 21 FEET, MEANING THAT THAT
 MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT WOULD BE LIMITED TO 42 FEET.
  
 23. WHAT IS LOCATED IN THAT AREA TO THE EAST AND WEST
 OF THE PROPOSED POOL? ARE THERE ADDITIONAL STRUCTURES
 PROPOSED? IF SO, DETAILS SHALL BE PROVIDED.
  
 24. IDENTIFY THE LOCATIONS OF ALL FENCING ON THE SITE
 PLAN AND PROVIDE DETAILS ACCORDINGLY.
  
 25. PLEASE IDENTIFY THE LOCATIONS OF ALL DUMPSTERS,
 RECYCLING, BINS, ETC. ALL DUMPSTERS SHALL BE SCREENED
 IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 94-444(B).
  
 26. PURSUANT TO SECTION 94-304(D)(2)1.B. AND C., EVERY
 SWIMMING POOL SHALL BE ENCLOSED BY A PERMANENT FENCE OR
 SIMILAR STRUCTURE WHICH IS INSTALLED TO OBSTRUCT ACCESS
 BY PERSONS OTHER THAN THE OWNERS OR OCCUPANTS OF THE
 RESIDENCE WITHIN WHICH A SWIMMING POOL IS LOCATED.
 BARRIERS OR FENCES SHALL BE AT LEAST FOUR FEET IN
 HEIGHT ABOVE GRADE. ACCESS TO AN ACCESSORY SWIMMING
 POOL MUST BE THROUGH A BUILDING OR THROUGH A
 SELF-CLOSING AND SELF-LATCHING GATE.
  
 27. ARE THE SIDEWALKS ADJACENT TO THE PARKING RAISED
 ABOVE THE PARKING LOT, OR ARE THEY FLUSH WITH THE
 ASPHALT. IF THEY ARE RAISED, IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT ALL
 OF THE CURB LINES BE RELOCATED AND THAT THE WHEEL STOPS
 BE REMOVED. THE SPACE CAN BE 16 FEET IN LENGTH WITH A
 TWO (2) FOOT OVERHANG. PLEASE NOTE THAT SIDEWALKS MAY
 NEED TO BE WIDENED SO AS TO ALLOW CLEAR WIDTH OUTSIDE
 OF THE OVERHANG. PLEASE CONTACT ME FOR A GRAPHIC OR
 DISCUSS FURTHER.
  
 28. WHERE IS MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT PROPOSED TO BE
 LOCATED? ALL MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT SHALL BE SCREENED
 FROM VIEW; IF ON THE GROUND, SCREENING SHALL CONSIST OF
 A SOLID OPAQUE FENCE/WALL AND SHRUBS/HEDGES PLANTED AT
 TWO (2) FOOT INTERVALS.
  
 29. ALL GROUND FLOOR UNITS SHALL HAVE THEIR MAIN
 ENTRANCES FROM THE STREET.
  
 30. IS ANY SIGNAGE PROPOSED? IF SO, IT SHALL BE
 IDENTIFIED ON THE SITE PLAN AND DETAILS SHALL BE
 PROVIDED REGARDING HEIGHT, AREA OF SIGNAGE, ETC.
  
 31. PURSUANT TO SECTION 94-443(C)(3)A., TERMINAL
 LANDSCAPE ISLANDS SHALL BE A MINIMUM WIDTH OF FIVE (5)
 FEET AND SHALL EXTEND THE FULL LENGTH OF THE PARKING
 STALL.
  
 32. PLEASE CLARIFY WHY A COCOPLUM HEDGE IS BEING
 PLANTED AROUND THE PERIMETER OF THE PROPERTY, EVEN
 SEPARATING SIDEWALKS ALONG THE STREET FROM THE INTERIOR
 OF THE SITE, ETC. THIS STYLE OF PLANTING FURTHER
 EMPHASIZES THE SEPARATION OF THE PROJECT FROM THE
 SURROUNDING AREA, ETC.
  
 33. REQUIRED SHADE/FLOWERING TREES REQUIRE A CLEAR
 TRUNK OF AT LEAST FIVE (5) FEET. THERE ARE SEVERAL
 SPECIES LISTED WITH A CLEAR TRUNK OF ONLY FOUR (4)
 FEET.
  
 34. ALL LANDSCAPING SHALL BE IRRIGATED WITH AN
 AUTOMATIC SYSTEM PROVIDE 120% COVERAGE. THE NOTES ON
 THE LANDSCAPE PLANS ONLY INDICATE 100% COVERAGE.
  
 35. IT APPEARS THAT THERE ARE SEVERAL EXISTING TREES
 WITHIN THE AREA OF THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT. A TREE
 ALTERATION PERMIT SHALL BE PROVIDED ALONG WITH ALL OF
 THE REQUIRED MATERIALS FOR SUCH. MITIGATION SHALL BE
 DONE IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 94-448.
  
 36. ARE THE PROPOSED LIVE OAKS ALONG DIVISION AVENUE A
 SUFFICIENT DISTANCE AWAY THAT THEY WILL NOT BE IN
 CONFLICT WITH THE EXISTING/PROPOSED OVERHEAD LINES?
  
 37. A PHOTOMETRIC PLAN SHALL BE PROVIDED SHOWING THE
 LOCATION, HEIGHT, AND ILLUMINATION OF ALL OUTDOOR
 LIGHTING.
  
 38. INDICATE THE LOCATION OF EXISTING AND PROPOSED FIRE
 HYDRANTS LOCATED WITHIN 250 FEET OF THE PROPOSED
 STRUCTURES.
 ___________________________________________
  
 PLEASE NOTE THE FOLLOWING WHEN RESUBMITTING:
  
 A) WRITTEN RESPONSES TO COMMENTS MADE BY ALL
 DEPARTMENTS SHALL BE PROVIDED UPON RESUBMISSION.
  
 B) 15 SETS OF REVISED PLANS AND/OR DOCUMENTS SHALL BE
 PROVIDED, ALONG WITH ONE (1) REDUCED COPY (11IN X
 17IN), AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY OF ALL PLANS.
  
 C) PLEASE NOTE THAT RE-SUBMITTALS MAY BE SUBJECT TO
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS.
  
 D) IF NO RESPONSE IS RECEIVED WITHIN 60 DAYS OF THE
 ISSUANCE OF THESE COMMENTS, THE APPLICATION WILL BE
 CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN AND ANY FURTHER ACTION WILL
 REQUIRE SUBMISSION OF A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION.
  
 E) PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1)
 RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED
 COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE
 APPLICANT WILL BE ACCESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE
 WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE.
 ___________________________________________
  
 QUESTIONS/COMMENTS, PLEASE CONTACT THE FOLLOWING:
  
 JOHN ROACH, PRINCIPAL PLANNER
 CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH
 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT ? PLANNING DIVISION
 401 CLEMATIS STREET - P.O. BOX 3147
 WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33402
  
 PHONE: 561.822.1448
 FAX: 561.822.1460
  
 EMAIL: [email protected]
  
 WWW.WPB.ORG
  
  
  Print


Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved