Plan Review Details - Project Z14080027
Plan Review Stops For Project Z14080027
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 1 Status F Date 09-10-2014 Cont ID  
Sent By rbrown Date 09-10-2014 Time 12:34 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rbrown Date 09-10-2014 Time 12:34 Sent To  
Notes
2014-09-10 12:40:54DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, BUILDING DIVISION,
 COMMENTS:
  
 1. ACCORDING TO SHEET A-111, GROUND FLOOR PLAN, THE
 WEST PORTION OF THE TRAIN STATION BUILDING, FROM GRID
 LINE C THROUGH GRID LINE A IS OUTSIDE OF THE FEC
 RIGHT-OF-WAY, AND THEREFORE SUBJECT TO LOCAL
 JURISDICTION BUILDING DEPARTMENT PERMITTING AND
 INSPECTION. PLEASE CONFIRM THAT IS THE UNDERSTANDING OF
 THE PROJECT TEAM.
  
 2. THIS REVIEW IS A CURSORY REVIEW AS IT RELATES TO THE
 SITE. IT IS NOT A REVIEW FOR FULL COMPLIANCE WITH
 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE. THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE TO BE
 ADDRESSED FOR PERMITTING.
  
 3. WHEN SUBMITTED FOR BUILDING PERMIT, THE PLANS SHALL
 SHOW THAT THE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION FOR THE BUILDINGS
 WILL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE HEIGHT, AREA AND
 OCCUPANCY LIMITATIONS IN CHAPTER 5 OF THE FLORIDA
 BUILDING CODE
  
 4. WHEN SUBMITTED FOR BUILDING PERMIT, COMPLIANCE WITH
 ALL BUILDING SEPARATION, PERCENTAGE OF OPENINGS AND
 OPENING PROTECTIVE REQUIREMENTS OF CHAPTERS 6 AND 7 OF
 THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE SHALL BE VERIFIED.
  
 5. FOR STREET ADDRESSING CONTACT SCOTT ALEF, GIS
 SUPPORT SPECIALIST, AT (561) 494 1094, OR BY EMAIL:
 [email protected]
  
 ROBERT BROWN
 BUILDING OFFICIAL
 TEL: 561 805 6652
 EMAIL: [email protected]
  
Review Stop ENG - PPRC ENGINEERING - PPRC
Rev No 1 Status F Date 09-04-2014 Cont ID  
Sent By cranford Date 09-04-2014 Time 16:06 Rev Time 5.00
Received By cranford Date 09-04-2014 Time 15:08 Sent To  
Notes
2014-09-04 16:05:46ENGINEERING/PUBLIC WORKS DEPT.
 LAND DEVELOPMENT
  
 THIS IS A CONCEPTUAL LEVEL REVIEW. CONSTRUCTION DETAILS
 WILL BE REVIEWED AS PART OF THE ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT
 APPROVAL AND BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION PROCESSES.
 THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO SITE
 PLAN APPROVAL.
  
 ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL WILL BE REQUIRED PRIOR
 TO START OF CONSTRUCTION. THE APPLICATION FORMS CAN BE
 DOWNLOADED AT
 HTTP://WPB.ORG/ENGINEERING/FORMS-AND-PUBLICATIONS/
  
 1. SECTION 78-9 OF THE CITY'S CODE OF ORDINANCES
 SPECIFIES NGVD 1929 AS THE OFFICIAL CITY VERTICAL
 DATUM. REVISE THE PLANS TO REFERENCE VERTICAL DATUM
 NGVD 1929.
  
 2. REVISE THE ENTRANCE/EXIT FROM THE PROPOSED PARKING
 AREAS TO UTILIZE CITY DETAIL CG-6 OR CG-7. CITY
 ENGINEERING STANDARD DETAILS CAN BE DOWNLOADED FROM OUR
 WEBSITE AT HTTP://WPB.ORG/ENGINEERING/ENGINEERING-SERVI
 CES/ENGINEERING-STANDARDS/
  
 3. LABEL THE RADII AT THE PROPOSED INTERSECTIONS AND
 THE DRIVE AISLE WIDTHS IN THE PARKING AREA.
  
 4. REVISE THE LANDSCAPE PLAN TO SHOW THE LOCATION OF
 UNDERGROUND AND OVERHEAD UTILITIES WHICH MAY IMPACT THE
 LANDSCAPING. SOME OF THE PROPOSED TREES APPEAR TO BE ON
 TOP OF A SEGMENT OF THE PROPOSED EXFILTRATION TRENCH.
  
 5. SHOW THE VISIBILITY TRIANGLE ON THE LANDSCAPE PLANS
 AND DEMONSTRATE THAT THE PROPOSED DESIGN MEETS THE
 REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 94-305(E) OF THE CITY'S CODE OF
 ORDINANCES AT THE INTERSECTIONS AND VEHICULAR EXITS.
  
 6. SHOW THE ALL EXISTING UTILITIES, PROPOSED UTILITIES,
 AND CALL OUT WHICH EXISTING LINES ARE TO BE REMOVED OR
 ABANDONED. FACILITIES PROPOSED TO BE MAINTAINED BY THE
 CITY SHOULD BE LOCATED IN AREAS ACCESSIBLE WITH
 STANDARD CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT.
  
 7. REVISE THE PLANS TO SHOW THE PROPOSED RIGHTS-OF-WAY
 LINES. THE PROPOSED EXFILTRATION TRENCH WILL NEED TO BE
 LOCATED OUTSIDE OF THE AREA INTENDED FOR OPERATION AND
 MAINTENANCE BY THE CITY.
  
 8. HOW WILL THE SOLID WASTE BE REMOVED FROM THE SITE?
 THE TRASH CONTAINER/COMPACTOR MUST BE LOCATED IN AN
 AREA ACCESSIBLE TO CITY SANITATION TRUCKS, WHICH ARE
 TYPICALLY 35 FEET LONG AND 15 FT HIGH, (PER SECTION
 94-35A9 OF THE CODE) AND THE ENCLOSURE MUST MEET THE
 MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS SHOWN IN FIGURE XIV-3 IN SECTION
 94-444 OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES. PER CODE SECTION
 74-34(A)(2), A PRIVATE SOLID WASTE SERVICE PROVIDER MAY
 BE USED IF THE CITY IS UNABLE TO PROVIDE THE NEEDED
 SERVICE (E.G. CONTAINERS AND COMPACTORS OVER 8 CUBIC
 YARDS). AS PART OF THE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
 DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION, CALCULATIONS WILL NEED TO BE
 PROVIDED ESTIMATING THE VOLUME OF WASTE ANTICIPATED TO
 BE GENERATED BY THE FACILITY AND SHOWING THAT THE TRASH
 CONTAINER/RECEPTACLES HAVE BEEN SIZED APPROPRIATELY.
  
 9. THE PROJECT MUST PROVIDE ADEQUATE STORMWATER
 MANAGEMENT, INCLUDING NOT MODIFYING THE VELOCITY OR
 VOLUME OF OFF-SITE STORMWATER DISCHARGE. DESCRIBE HOW
 THIS WILL BE ACHIEVED. COMPLIANCE WITH CHAPTER 40E-4
 FAC WILL DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE WITH THIS PROVISION.
 [CODE OF ORDINANCES SECTIONS 90-201, 94-35(C )(11),
 94-307, AND 94-580]
  
 10. THE PLAN SETS CIRCULATED FOR REVIEW WERE NOT SIGNED
 OR SEALED BY A LICENSED PROFESSIONAL (ARCHITECT, CIVIL
 ENGINEER, AND/OR LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT). PLEASE SUBMIT
 SIGNED AND SEALED PLANS FOR FINAL APPROVAL. (FAC
 61G15-23.002, FS 481.221 AND 481.321)
  
 KELLY CRANFORD, P.E.
 LAND DEVELOPMENT ENGINEER
 ENGINEERING & PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
 CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH
 [email protected]
 561-494-1098 (OFFICE)
  
Review Stop FIRE FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No 1 Status F Date 09-08-2014 Cont ID  
Sent By pleduc Date 09-08-2014 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By pleduc Date 09-08-2014 Time 11:16 Sent To  
Notes
2014-09-08 11:49:59THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS WERE SUBMITTED BY PETER LEDUC,
 FIRE MARSHAL, BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION, WEST PALM
 BEACH FIRE RESCUE.
  
 THIS REVIEW CAN ONLY BE CONSIDERED PRELIMINARY AS THE
 DRAWINGS THAT WERE REVIEWED WERE NOT COMPLETE.
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS CAN BE EXPECTED WHEN FULL DRAWINGS
 ARE SUBMITTED FOR PERMIT.
  
 THE FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU HAS NO OBJECTIONS TO THE
 PROPOSED PROJECT.
  
 1. CONSTRUCTION, DEMOLITION, AND RENOVATION TO COMPLY
 WITH NFPA 241.
  
 2. SITE ACCESS AND EXIT POINTS ARE TO BE CLEARLY
 IDENTIFIED AND MAINTAINED FOR EMERGENCY VEHICLES DURING
 ALL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES.
  
 3. THE BUILDING ADDRESS SHALL BE CLEARLY VISIBLE FROM
 ALL ACCESS ROADWAYS, INCLUDING DURING CONSTRUCTION.
 ADDRESS NUMBERS SHALL CONTRAST WITH THEIR BACKGROUND
 AND SHALL NOT BE LESS THAN SIX (6) INCHES IN HEIGHT
 WITH A ONE (1) INCH STROKE FOR ALL BUILDINGS.
  
 4. TRASH AND DEBRIS IS TO BE REMOVED FROM THE SITE
 DAILY OR MORE OFTEN TO REDUCE THE ACCUMULATION OF
 POTENTIAL LIFE AND FIRE SAFETY HAZARDS.
  
 5. THE BUILDING CONSTRUCTION SHALL COMPLY WITH THE
 REQUIRERMENTS OF NFPA 130, FIXED GUIDEWAY TRANSIT AND
 PASSENEGER RAIL SYSTEMS AND NFPA 101, LIFE SAFETY CODE,
 FLORIDA 2010 EDITION; CHAPTER 12 NEW ASSEMBLY
 OCCUPANCIES.
  
 6. A NFPA 13 COMPLAINT FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM AND NFPA
 14 COMPLIANT WET STANDPIPE SYSTEM ARE REQUIRED FOR THIS
 STRUCTURE. SEPARATE SHOP DRAWINGS, ARE REQUIRED TO BE
 SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE FIRE PREVENTION
 BUREAU PRIOR TO ANY INSTALLATION.
  
 7. A MONITORED FIRE ALARM SYSTEM IS REQUIRED FOR THIS
 STRUCTURE. SEPARATE SHOP DRAWINGS, ARE REQUIRED TO BE
 SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE FIRE PREVENTION
 BUREAU PRIOR TO ANY INSTALLATION.
  
 8. KNOX-BOX KEY SYSTEM SHALL BE REQUIRED FOR THIS
 BUILDING.
  
 9. COMPLETE LIFE SAFETY PLANS FOR THE BUILDING SHALL BE
 PROVIDED THAT ILLUSTRATE OCCUPANT LOADS, TRAVEL
 DISTANCES, DEAD-END CORRIDORS AND ALL FIRE SAFETY
 EQUIPMENT.
  
 10. OCCUPANT LOADS FOR ALL SPACES SHALL BE DETERMINED
 AND SUBMITTED WITH THE SUBMITTED PLAN AND WHEN APPROVED
 THEY ARE REQUIRED TO BE POSTED WHERE APPLICABLE.
  
 11. A FIRE FLOW CALCULATION SHALL BE SUBMITTED SHAOWING
 ALL EXISTING AND NEW FIRE HYDRANTS PLANNED FOR THIS
 DEVELOPMENT AND BE CLEARLY INDICATED AND IDENTIFIED.
  
 12. ALL FIRE DEPARTMENT SPRINKLER SYSTEM CONNECTIONS
 (FDC,S) FOR THE PROJECT SHALL BE IDENTIFIED AND
 COORDINATED WITH THE BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION.
  
 13. THE FIRE RATING OF ALL SHAFTS SHALL BE CLEARLY
 INDICATED ON THE BUILDING PLAN.
  
 14. ALL VERTICAL AND HORIZONTAL FIRE SEPARATIONS FOR
 THIS BUILDING SHALL BE CLEARLY IDENTIFIED AND INDICATED
 ON THE PLANS.
  
 15. ALL PORTABLE FIRE EXTINGUISHERS LOCATIONS SHALL BE
 CLEARLY IDENTIFIED AND INDICATED ON THE PLAN.
  
 16. STAIR DETAIL SHALL BE PROVIDED INCLUDING MINIMUM
 RISE, RUN, AND TREAD DEPTH.
  
 17. ALL DIMENSIONS OF EACH PROPOSED ROOM/SPACE SHALL BE
 INDICATED ON THE PLAN.
  
 18. THE SERVICE YARD IS NOT A PUBLIC WAY AND EXITS CAN
 NOT BE ALLOWED TO DISCHARGE INTO THE AREA.
  
 19. A COMMON PATH OF TRAVEL FROM THE PLATFORM ENDS
 SHALL NOT EXCEED 82 FT OR ONE CAR LENGTH, WHICHEVER IS
 GREATER.
  
 20. THE CONCOURSE BRIDGE WIDTH SHALL MEET THE EXIT
 WIDTH REQUIREMENTS OF THE COMBINED OCCUPANCY LOAD
 LIMITS OF THE TRAIN PASSENGERS AND WAITING AREAS. A
 "SECURITY CHECKPOINT" IS LABLED ON THE CONCOURSE
 BRIDGE; ANY BARRIERS OR RESTRICTIONS FOR SECURITY
 REASONS SHALL BE COMPUTED INTO THE MEANS OF EGRESS
 CALCULATIONS AND APPROVED PRIOR TO INSTALLATION.
  
 20. WHERE MEANS OF EGRESS ROUTES FROM SEPARATE
 PLATFORMS CONVERGE, THE SUBSEQUENT CAPACITY OF THE
 EGRESS ROUTE SHALL BE SUFFICIENT TO MAINTAIN THE
 REQUIRED EVACATION TIME FROM THE INCIDENT PLATFORM.
  
Review Stop L LANDSCAPING
Rev No 1 Status   Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time  
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop PARK PARKING
Rev No 1 Status   Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time  
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop POLICE POLICE
Rev No 1 Status   Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time  
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop PW PUBLIC WORKS
Rev No 1 Status   Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time  
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop STORM STORMWATER
Rev No 1 Status   Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time  
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop SURVEY SURVEYING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 09-10-2014 Cont ID  
Sent By vnoel Date 09-10-2014 Time 08:32 Rev Time  
Received By vnoel Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2014-09-10 08:35:321. SEPARATE APPLICATION WILL NEED TO BE MADE TO
 ENGINEERING.
 2. CITY HAS BEEN MEETING WITH APPLICANT'S ENGINEER TO
 REVIEW PROGRESS PLANS. ANY FURTHER REVIEW WILL REQUIRE
 FORMAL SUBMITTAL.
Review Stop TRAFFIC TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No 1 Status   Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By bcollins Date 09-09-2014 Time 11:28 Sent To  
Notes
2014-09-09 11:33:30THE TURNING MOVEMENT OF BUSSES AND LARGE VEHICLES FROM
 THE ACCESS ROAD ONTO DATURA IS A CONCERN.
  
 NO PAVER BRICKS TO BE INSTALLED IN EXISTING OR FUTURE
 CITY ROAD RIGHTS OF WAY UNLESS APPLICANT ACCEPTS
 MAINTENANCE REAPONSIBILITY AND EXECUTES MAINTENANCE
 AGREEMENT.
  
 RIGHT OF WAY PERMIT(S) REQUIRED BY CITY CODE FOR ALL
 WORK WITHIN CITY ROAD RIGHTS OF WAY.
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 1 Status   Date 09-02-2014 Cont ID  
Sent By aaponte Date 09-02-2014 Time 08:47 Rev Time 0.00
Received By aaponte Date 09-02-2014 Time 08:47 Sent To  
Notes
2014-09-02 09:56:05THIS REVIEW IS CONDUCTED WITH THE UNDERSTANDING THAT
 THE AAF FACILITY IT IS NOT REQUIRED TO COMPLY WITH THE
 WPB ZONING REGULATIONS DUE TO FEDERAL REGULATIONS.
 1. WHY IS THE PARKING CALCULATION INDICATED IN THE
 DRAWINGS ONLY BASED ON 13,945SF? THE TOTAL SQUARE
 FOOTAGE FOR THE STATION IS 29,272SF.
 2. PARKING STALL SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 16' LONG WITH A
 2' CANTILEVER.
 3.PLEASE SHOW THE CONNECTION OF THE NEW ROADWAY AND
 SIDEWALK ON DATURA STREET WITH EXISTING SIDEWALK AND
 CURB.
 4. SHEET C-006 PAVING, GRADING, AND DRAINAGE PLAN:
 SECTION C-C OF THE NEW ACCESS ROAD SHOWS A 3.67' FOOT
 SIDEWALK ON THE WEST SIDE OF THE ROAD. STAFF BELIEVES
 THAT THIS SIDEWALK WIDTH IS INSUFFICIENT TO ACCOMMODATE
 THE LEVEL OF FUTURE PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY THAT IS
 EXPECTED IN THIS AREA.
 5. SHEET C-007 PAVING, GRADING, AND DRAINAGE PLAN:
 PLEASE SHOW THE RESULTS OF AUTOTURN FOR THE LARGEST
 VEHICLE EXPECTED TO REGULARLY MAKE TURNING MOVEMENTS
 (I.E. CITY TROLLEYS) AT THE INTERSECTIONS OF THE NEW
 ACCESS ROAD WITH DATURA AND EVERNIA STREETS.
 6.PLEASE SHOW THE PROPOSED SECTION OF THE ACCESS ROAD
 NORTH OF DATURA STREET.
 7. THE PLANS DO NOT DEPICT ANY BICYCLE PARKING. PER
 PREVIOUS DISCUSSIONS WITH AAF STAFF, THE CITY WOULD
 LIKE TO HAVE BIKE PARKING IN THE VICINITY OF THE
 STATION.
 8. THE PLANS DO NOT DEPICT ANY STREETSCAPE ELEMENTS OR
 AMENITIES (I.E. BENCHES) IN THE VICINITY OF THE
 STATION. STAFF WOULD RECOMMEND THAT STREETSCAPE
 ELEMENTS BE INCORPORATED IN THE VICINITY OF THE
 STATION.
 9. PLEASE INDICATE PROPOSED LOCATION OF LIGHT FIXTURES.
 ARE YOU PROPOSING SPECIALTY FIXTURES OR THE STANDARD
 CITY FIXTURE?
 10. WHAT ARE THE PROPOSED MATERIALS FOR THE PLAZA AND
 SIDEWALKS ALONG NEW ACCESS ROAD?
 11. THE NEW ACCESS ROAD IS INDICATED AS A RAISED ROAD
 BETWEEN EVERNIA ST AND THE ALLEY. STAFF SUGGEST THE
 SPECIAL TREATMENT BE EXTENDED TO DATURA STREET, IF
 DONE.
 12. THE PLANS DEPICT A "FPL YARD - WALLED AND GATED"
 AND A "UTILITY AND TRASH YARD - WALLED AND GATED". THE
 PLANS DO NOT SHOW ANY DETAILS ON EITHER ONE OF THESE
 AREAS. ALSO, IT DOES NOT APPEAR THAT THESE AREAS WILL
 BE SCREENED WITH ANY LANDSCAPING. STAFF WOULD REQUEST
 THAT THE APPLICANT PROVIDE ELEVATIONS AND DETAILS ON
 THE WALLS AND GATES FOR THESE AREAS AND ALSO EVALUATE
 THEIR SCREENING WITH LANDSCAPING.
 13. SHEETS A-051, A-111, AND A-201 SHOW A POLE FENCE
 SURROUNDING BOTH THE EAST AND WEST PERIMETER OF THE FEC
 ROW. WHILE SHEET A-201 SHOWS AND ELEVATION OF THE POLE
 FENCE, STAFF WOULD REQUEST THAT MORE DETAILS BE
 PROVIDED FOR THE LOOK OF THIS FENCE. ALSO, IT APPEARS
 THAT SEVERAL PORTIONS OF THIS FENCE WILL NOT BE
 SCREENED WITH LANDSCAPING. STAFF WOULD SUGGEST THAT THE
 FENCE BE SCREENED WITH EXTENSIVE LANDSCAPING. IN
 GENERAL FURTHER DISCUSSIONS ARE NECESSARY TO ADVANCE
 THE DESIGN OF THE PEDESTRIAN ENVIRONMENT AROUND THE
 STATION.
 14. SHEET A-111 SHOWS FENCE ON WEST SIDE LOCATED 4'
 INSIDE THE FEC ROW. CAN THE FENCE ON EAST SIDE BE
 LOCATED AT THE SAME DISTANCE FROM THE EASTERN TRACKS TO
 ALLOW FOR ADDITIONAL ROOM FOR LANDSCAPING ALONG
 QUADRILLE?
 15. WHAT TYPE OF PLANTING AREA OR TREE GRATES ARE
 PROPOSED FOR THE POINCIANA TREES?
 16. LANDSCAPE DRAWINGS DO NOT SHOW POINCIANAS ON THE
 EAST SIDE OF ROAD BETWEEN ALLEY AND DATURA ALONG
 ON-STREET PARKING, OR ON THE WEST SIDE OF ROAD SOUTH OF
 THE ALLEY. IS THERE A PARTICULAR REASON FOR THIS TREE
 GAP?
 17. THE POINCIANAS SHOWN ON THE WEST SIDE OF ROAD NORTH
 OF ALLEY ARE ON PRIVATE PROPERTY.
 18. THERE IS AN EXISTING SIDEWALK ON THE EAST SIDE OF
 THE CITY GARAGE. WHAT IS THE DISTANCE FROM THAT
 SIDEWALK TO THE NEW TRACKS? DOES IT NEED TO BE REMOVED?
 WILL IT BE REPLACED WITH LANDSCAPE?
 19. AS INDICATED ON LA-1, SOME ON-STREET PARKING SPACES
 WILL NEED TO BE REMOVED. ANY REMOVAL OF ON-STREET
 PARKING WILL REQUIRE THE PAYMENT OF A PARKING REMOVAL
 FEE.
 20. IS THE EXISTING ALLEY GOING TO REMAIN OPEN TO THE
 PUBLIC AS A PUBLIC ROW? IS IT GOING TO BE
 RESTORED/REPAVED FOR USE? THE EAST END OF ALLEY IS
 SHOWN WITH A PEDESTRIAN CROSSING (C-007).
 21. PLEASE INDICATE THE EXACT LOCATION OF THE NEW
 CROSSING ARMS ON CLEMATIS STREET AND FERN STREET.
 22. PLEASE INDICATE THE PROPOSED LOCATION FOR THE
 DECORATIVE ELEMENTS SLAVAGED FROM THE DATURA BUILDING.
 23. DRAWINGS DO NOT INDICATE ANY AREA FOR THE POTENTIAL
 LOCATION FOR THE PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE AT EVERNIA STREET.
  
  Print


Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved