| Plan Review Stops For Project Z14080024 |
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
|
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
09-10-2014 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rbrown |
Date |
09-10-2014 |
Time |
11:29 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rbrown |
Date |
09-10-2014 |
Time |
11:29 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2014-09-10 11:33:22 | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, BUILDING DIVISION, | | | COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1. THIS REVIEW IS A CURSORY REVIEW AS IT RELATES TO THE | | | SITE. IT IS NOT A REVIEW FOR FULL COMPLIANCE WITH | | | FLORIDA BUILDING CODE. THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE TO BE | | | ADDRESSED FOR PERMITTING. | | | | | | 2. WHEN SUBMITTED FOR PERMIT, THE PLANS SHALL SHOW AT | | | LEAST ONE ACCESSIBLE ROUTE, COMPLYING WITH SECTIONS | | | 206.2 AND 402.2 OF FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY CODE, FROM THE | | | PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY TO ALL ACCESSIBLE BUILDING OR | | | FACILITY ENTRANCES. | | | | | | 3. SHOW AT LEAST ONE ACCESSIBLE ROUTE, COMPLYING WITH | | | SECTIONS 206.2 AND 402.2 OF FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY CODE, | | | CONNECTING ACCESSIBLE BUILDING OR FACILITY ENTRANCES | | | WITH ALL ACCESSIBLE SPACES AND ELEMENTS WITHIN THE | | | BUILDING OR FACILITY | | | | | | 4. ANY PART OF AN ACCESSIBLE ROUTE WITH A SLOPE GREATER | | | THAN 1:20 SHALL BE CONSIDERED A RAMP AND SHALL COMPLY | | | WITH SECTION 405 OF FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY CODE. | | | | | | 5. PER SECTION 208.3 OF FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY CODE | | | ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES ARE TO BE LOCATED ON THE | | | SHORTEST POSSIBLE ROUTE OF TRAVEL FROM ADJACENT PARKING | | | TO AN ACCESSIBLE ENTRANCE FOR EACH BUILDING. THE DESIGN | | | OF ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES SHALL COMPLY WITH SECTION | | | 502 OF FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY CODE | | | | | | 6. WHEN SUBMITTED FOR BUILDING PERMIT, THE PLANS SHALL | | | SHOW THAT THE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION FOR THE BUILDINGS | | | WILL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE HEIGHT, AREA AND | | | OCCUPANCY LIMITATIONS IN CHAPTER 5 OF THE FLORIDA | | | BUILDING CODE | | | | | | 7. WHEN SUBMITTED FOR BUILDING PERMIT, COMPLIANCE WITH | | | ALL BUILDING SEPARATION, PERCENTAGE OF OPENINGS AND | | | OPENING PROTECTIVE REQUIREMENTS OF CHAPTERS 6 AND 7 OF | | | THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE SHALL BE VERIFIED. | | | | | | 8. ALL APPLICABLE PERMITS AND SUB-PERMITS MUST BE | | | OBTAINED BEFORE COMMENCING THE WORK. | | | | | | 9. EACH BUILDING SHALL HAVE A SEPARATE STREET ADDRESS. | | | FOR STREET ADDRESSING CONTACT SCOTT ALEF, GIS SUPPORT | | | SPECIALIST, AT (561) 494 1094, OR BY EMAIL: | | | [email protected] | | | | | | ROBERT BROWN | | | BUILDING OFFICIAL | | | TEL: 561 805 6652 | | | EMAIL: [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
ENG - PPRC |
ENGINEERING - PPRC |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
12-01-2014 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
cranford |
Date |
12-01-2014 |
Time |
13:43 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
cranford |
Date |
12-01-2014 |
Time |
13:36 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2014-12-01 13:42:44 | STORM SYSTEM WEST AND SOUTH OF EXISTING STORM MANHOLE | | | (RIM ELEVATION 16.95) WILL BE PRIVATELY OWNED AND | | | MAINTAINED. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
ENG - PPRC |
ENGINEERING - PPRC |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
09-29-2014 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
cranford |
Date |
09-29-2014 |
Time |
14:54 |
Rev Time |
2.00 |
| Received By |
cranford |
Date |
09-29-2014 |
Time |
14:45 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2014-09-29 14:48:24 | ENGINEERING/PUBLIC WORKS DEPT. | | | LAND DEVELOPMENT AND STORMWATER | | | | | | 1. AS MENTIONED DURING THE ORIGINAL REVIEW, A | | | TURN-AROUND AT THE PROPOSED NEW END OF 14TH STREET. PER | | | SECTION 78-218 OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES: "NO ALLEY | | | SHALL BE VACATED OR CLOSED WHICH WOULD RESULT IN THE | | | CREATION OF A DEAD-END ALLEY UNLESS ADEQUATE TURNAROUND | | | OR CUL-DE-SAC IS PROVIDED. | | | | | | 2. REVISE THE PLANS TO INDICATE WHICH PORTIONS OF THE | | | POTABLE WATER, SANITARY SEWER, AND STORMWATER SYSTEM | | | WILL REMAIN PUBLICALLY OWNED AND WHICH SECTIONS WILL BE | | | MAINTAINED BY THE APPLICANT. | | | | | | 3. SHOW BOTH WATER LINES THAT RUN ALONG 14TH ST. | | | | | | KELLY CRANFORD, P.E. | | | LAND DEVELOPMENT ENGINEER | | | ENGINEERING & PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT | | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | [email protected] | | | 561-494-1098 (OFFICE) | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
ENG - PPRC |
ENGINEERING - PPRC |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
09-03-2014 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
cranford |
Date |
09-03-2014 |
Time |
15:49 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
cranford |
Date |
09-03-2014 |
Time |
15:48 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2014-09-03 15:49:13 | ENGINEERING/PUBLIC WORKS DEPT. | | | LAND DEVELOPMENT AND STORMWATER | | | | | | THIS IS A CONCEPTUAL LEVEL REVIEW. CONSTRUCTION DETAILS | | | WILL BE REVIEWED AS PART OF THE ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT | | | APPROVAL AND BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION PROCESSES. | | | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO SITE | | | PLAN APPROVAL. | | | | | | NO OBJECTIONS TO REZONING. | | | | | | ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL WILL BE REQUIRED PRIOR | | | TO START OF CONSTRUCTION. THE APPLICATION FORMS CAN BE | | | DOWNLOADED AT | | | HTTP://WPB.ORG/ENGINEERING/FORMS-AND-PUBLICATIONS/ | | | | | | 1. THE TRASH DUMPSTER/COMPACTORS MUST LOCATED IN AREAS | | | EASILY SERVICED BY THE CITY SANITATION EQUIPMENT AND | | | MANPOWER. HOW IS THE DUMPSTER PROPOSED TO BE ACCESSED | | | BY CITY SANITATION CREWS? WILL THE GATE BE LEFT OPEN | | | DURING NORMAL PICK-UP HOURS? SECTION 74-35(A)(5) OF THE | | | CODE OF ORDINANCES. | | | | | | 2. VERIFY THAT THE PROPOSED SIZE AND QUANTITY OF TRASH | | | DUMPSTER IS APPROPRIATE FOR THE WASTE YARDAGE | | | ANTICIPATED TO BE GENERATED BY THE COMPLEX. CONSIDER | | | USING A COMPACTOR TO REDUCE THE YARDAGE OF WASTE THAT | | | WILL NEED TO BE COLLECTED. | | | | | | 3. REVISE THE DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE TO MEET THE | | | REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 94-444 OF THE CODE OF | | | ORDINANCES AND INCLUDE CITY ENGINEERING DETAIL GC-8 ON | | | THE CONSTRUCTION PLANS. THE DETAIL CAN BE DOWNLOADED AT | | | HTTP://WPB.ORG/ENGINEERING/ENGINEERING-SERVICES/ENGINE | | | ERING-STANDARDS/ | | | | | | 4. THE PROJECT MUST PROVIDE ADEQUATE STORMWATER | | | MANAGEMENT, INCLUDING NOT MODIFYING THE VELOCITY OR | | | VOLUME OF OFF-SITE STORMWATER DISCHARGE. DESCRIBE HOW | | | THIS WILL BE ACHIEVED. COMPLIANCE WITH CHAPTER 40E-4 | | | FAC WILL DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE WITH THIS PROVISION. | | | [CODE OF ORDINANCES SECTIONS 90-201, 94-35(C )(11), | | | 94-307, AND 94-580] | | | | | | KELLY CRANFORD, P.E. | | | LAND DEVELOPMENT ENGINEER | | | ENGINEERING & PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT | | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | [email protected] | | | 561-494-1098 (OFFICE) | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
10-06-2014 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
pleduc |
Date |
10-06-2014 |
Time |
17:07 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
pleduc |
Date |
10-06-2014 |
Time |
17:07 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2014-10-06 17:10:20 | 2ND REVIEW RESPONSE | | | | | | AFTER A REVIEW OF THE PPRC RESPONSE LETTER DATED | | | SEPTEMBER 24, 2014, FROM LAND STEWARDSHIP COMPANY, TO | | | DANIELLE J. KITTREDGE, ACP SENIOR PLANNER, THE | | | PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU COMMENTS | | | HAVE BEEN ADDRESSED. | | | | | | THE BUREAU'S APPROVAL OF THIS SUBMITTED PROJECT DOES | | | NOT CONSTITUTE IT'S FINAL REVIEW OR APPROVAL. | | | | | | THE BUREAU SHALL REVIEW ALL SUBMITTED BUILDING PLANS AT | | | THE APPROPRIATE TIME AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE | | | REQUIREMENTS OF ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND STANDARDS. | | | PETER LEDUC | | | | | | FIRE MARSHAL | | | WEST PALM BEACH FIRE RESCUE | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
09-09-2014 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
pleduc |
Date |
09-08-2014 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
pleduc |
Date |
09-08-2014 |
Time |
13:19 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2014-09-08 13:44:09 | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS WERE SUBMITTED BY PETER LEDUC, | | | FIRE MARSHAL, BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION. | | | | | | THIS REVIEW CAN ONLY BE CONSIDERED PRELIMINARY AS THE | | | DRAWINGS THAT WERE REVIEWED WERE NOT COMPLETE. | | | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS CAN BE EXPECTED WHEN FULL DRAWINGS | | | ARE SUBMITTED FOR PERMIT. | | | | | | UPDATE 9/9/14. SCOTT LEWIS,OWNER OF PROPERTY, CONTACTED | | | ME VIA TELEPHONE AND DISCUSSED THE NOTED CONCERNS | | | BELOW. THIS PROPERTY IS CURRENT AND COMPLIANT WITH ITS | | | FIRE INSPECTIONS AND THE CONCERNS RELATED TO THE | | | PROPOSED EXPANSION WILL BE ADDRESSED ACCORDINGLY. | | | | | | THE FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU HAS NO OBJECTIONS TO THE | | | PROPOSED PROJECT. | | | | | | 1. CONSTRUCTION, DEMOLITION, AND RENOVATION TO COMPLY | | | WITH NFPA 241. | | | | | | 2. SITE ACCESS AND EXIT POINTS ARE TO BE CLEARLY | | | IDENTIFIED AND MAINTAINED FOR EMERGENCY VEHICLES DURING | | | ALL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. | | | | | | 3. THE BUILDING ADDRESS SHALL BE CLEARLY VISIBLE FROM | | | ALL ACCESS ROADWAYS, INCLUDING DURING CONSTRUCTION. | | | ADDRESS NUMBERS SHALL CONTRAST WITH THEIR BACKGROUND | | | AND SHALL NOT BE LESS THAN SIX (6) INCHES IN HEIGHT | | | WITH A ONE (1) INCH STROKE FOR ALL BUILDINGS. | | | | | | 4. TRASH AND DEBRIS IS TO BE REMOVED FROM THE SITE | | | DAILY OR MORE OFTEN TO REDUCE THE ACCUMULATION OF | | | POTENTIAL LIFE AND FIRE SAFETY HAZARDS. | | | | | | 5. CONSTRUCTION SHALL COMPLY WITH NFPA 101, FLORIDA | | | FIRE PREVENTION CODE, 2010 EDITION INCLUDING CHAPTER | | | 42, STORAGE OCCUPANCIES AND NFPA 1, INCLUDING | | | 13.3.3.25, NEW STORAGE OCCUPANCIES AND CHAPTER 34, | | | GENRAL STORAGE. | | | | | | 6. BASED ON THE PROPOSED SUBMITTAL A NFPA 13 COMPLAINT | | | FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM IS REQUIRED FOR THE BUILDING IN | | | THIS PROJECT. SEPARATE SHOP DRAWINGS, ARE REQUIRED TO | | | BE SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE FIRE | | | PREVENTION BUREAU PRIOR TO ANY INSTALLATION. | | | | | | 7. A MONITORED FIRE ALARM SYSTEM IS ALSO REQUIRED FOR | | | THE BUILDINGS OF THIS PROJECT. SEPARATE SHOP DRAWINGS, | | | ARE REQUIRED TO BE SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY | | | THE FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU PRIOR TO ANY INSTALLATION. | | | | | | 8. COMPLETE LIFE SAFETY PLANS FOR THE BUILDING SHALL BE | | | PROVIDED THAT ILLUSTRATE OCCUPANT LOADS, TRAVEL | | | DISTANCES, EXITS, EMERGENCY LIGHTING, DEAD-END | | | CORRIDORS AND ALL FIRE SAFETY EQUIPMENT. | | | | | | 9. OCCUPANT LOADS FOR ALL SPACES SHALL BE DETERMINED | | | AND SUBMITTED WITH THE SUBMITTED PLAN AND WHEN APPROVED | | | THEY ARE REQUIRED TO BE POSTED WHERE APPLICABLE. | | | | | | 10. ALL COMMODITIES FOR EACH BUILDING OR OUTSIDE SPACE | | | SHALL BE IDENTIFIED, INCLUDING TYPE OF RACKS, HEIGHTS, | | | PALLET TYPE, PACKAGING, ETC. | | | | | | 11. THE CONSTRUCTION TYPE OF THE BUILDING SHALL BE | | | CLEARLY IDENTIFIED. | | | | | | 12. OUTSIDE AREAS # 1 & # 2 MAY REQUIRE SPRINKLER | | | SYSTEM. NOTE # 10 AND 11 ABOVE. | | | | | | 13. FIRE FLOW CALCULATIONS SHALL BE SUBMITTED WITH | | | IDENTIFED FIRE HYDRANTS THAT MEET THE REQUIRED FLOW. | | | | | | 14. ALL EXISTING AND NEW FIRE HYDRANTS PLANNED FOR THIS | | | DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE CLEARLY INDICATED AND IDENTIFIED | | | ON THE PLAN AND CLOSELY COORDINATED WITH THE BUREAU OF | | | FIRE PREVENTION. | | | | | | 15. ALL FIRE DEPARTMENT SPRINKLER SYSTEM CONNECTIONS | | | (FDC,S) FOR THE PROJECT SHALL BE IDENTIFIED AND | | | COORDINATED WITH THE BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION. | | | | | | 16. KNOX-BOX KEY SYSTEM SHALL BE REQUIRED FOR THIS | | | BUILDING AND GATE AREAS. | | | | | | 17. NOTICE IS REQUIRED FOR STRUCTURES WITH LIGHT-FRAME | | | TRUSS-TYPE CONSTRUCTION. ANY COMMERCIAL, INDUSTRIAL, OR | | | ANY MULTIUNIT RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURE OF THREE UNITS OR | | | MORE WHICH USES HORIZONTAL OR VERTICAL LIGHT-FRAME | | | TRUSS-TYPE CONSTRUCTION IN ANY PORTION SHALL BE MARKED | | | WITH AN APPROVED SYMBOL. THE APPROVED SYMBOL SHALL BE | | | PLACED WITHIN 24 INCHES TO THE LEFT OF THE MAIN ENTRY | | | DOOR. | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
L |
LANDSCAPING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
|
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
PARK |
PARKING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
|
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
PARK |
PARKING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
|
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
ssamuels |
Date |
09-09-2014 |
Time |
17:46 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2014-09-09 17:51:34 | PARKING DEPARTMENT | | | Z - 14080024 | | | | | | PLAN DO NOT SHOW ANY DETAIL FOR ADA PARKING SPACE. | | | PLEASE PROVIDED PER THE CITY CODE PROVIDED. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
POLICE |
POLICE |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
|
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
PW |
PUBLIC WORKS |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
|
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
STORM |
STORMWATER |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
|
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
STORM |
STORMWATER |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
09-10-2014 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
tward |
Date |
09-10-2014 |
Time |
10:34 |
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
tward |
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2014-09-10 10:53:55 | NO OBJECTION TO THE REZONING REQUEST. THE FOLLOWING | | | COMMENTS SHOULD BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO FUTURE SUBMITALS | | | TO THE PLANNING DEPT. OR THE ENGINEERING DEPT. | | | 1. ON SHEET 1 OF 3, CONCEPTUAL ENGINEERING PLAN: | | | A. MOVE "(R/W TO BE ABANDONED)" NOTE ON 14TH STREET TO | | | WEST OF THE GATES. | | | B. ADD NOTE THAT WEST END OF ALLEY R/W WILL BE | | | ABANDONED. | | | | | | 2. IF ALLLEY R/W IS NOT ABANDONED, AN EASEMENT WILL BE | | | NEEDED FOR THE DRAINAGE PIPE CROSSING THE ALLEY R/W. | | | | | | 3.THE EXFILTRATION CALCULATIONS FOR THE SOUTH PORTION | | | ON SHEET 3 OF 3, INDICATE 170 LF OF TRENCH WILL BE | | | PROVIDED. SHEET 1 OF 3 ONLY SHOWS 150 LF OF TRENCH. | | | | | | 4. THE AREAS USED IN THE EXFILTRATION TRENCH | | | CALCULATIONS ON SHEET 3 OF 3 DO NOT MATCH THE AREAS | | | SHOWN ON THE SITE AREA MAP AT THE TOP OF SHEET SP-1. | | | | | | 5. PLACE THE WEIR WITH CONTROL ELEVATION 16.00 ON THE | | | NORTH SIDE OF THE EXISTING CB. | | | | | | 6. CONSIDER INSTALLING THE WEIRS IN THE EXISTING MH IN | | | 14TH STREET (AREA TO BE ABANDONED). | | | | | | 7. DRAINAGE STRUCTURE WILL BE NEEDED AT EAST LIMIT OF | | | 14TH ST R/W ABANDONMENT. DRAINAGE SYSTEM UPSTREAM OF | | | DRAINAGE STRUCTURE WOULD THEN NO LONGER BE MAINTAINED | | | BY THE CITY. | | | | | | 8. INDICATE VERTICAL DATUM ON CONCEPTUAL ENGINEERING | | | PLAN (SHOULD BE NGVD 1929). | | | | | | 9. SHOW UTILITIES ON THE LANDSCAPE PLANS. | | | | | | 10. IDENTIFY THE CONFLICTS BETWEEN DRAINAGE AND | | | WATER/SEWER MAINS ON THE CONCEPTUAL ENGINEERING PLAN. | | | | | | 11. CITY NOW REQUIRES THE MILLING AND RESURFACING A | | | MINIMUM OF 1" OF ASPHALT FOR 50 FEET EACH SIDE OF A | | | TRENCH CUT AND FOR FULL LANE WIDTH. | | | | | | TRACY L. WARD, P.E. | | | SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER | | | ENGINEERING AND PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT | | | (561) 494-1120 | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
SURVEY |
SURVEYING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
12-02-2014 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
vnoel |
Date |
12-02-2014 |
Time |
12:38 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
vnoel |
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2014-12-02 12:43:45 | PASSED CONDITIONAL ON UNITY OF TITLE AND COMMISSION | | | APPROVAL/PAYMENT OF ABANDONMENT. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
SURVEY |
SURVEYING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
10-02-2014 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
vnoel |
Date |
10-02-2014 |
Time |
10:26 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
vnoel |
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2014-10-02 10:31:55 | 1. EXISTENCE OF 2ND WATER MAIN AND LOCATION HAS BEEN | | | VERIFIED. | | | 2. UNITY OF TITLE STILL REQUIRED. | | | 3. WILL DEFER T TURNAROUND REQUIREMENT TO TRAFFIC | | | ENGINEER. | | | 4. A 20' UTILITY AND DRAINAGE EASEMENT WILL BE | | | RESERVED. | | | 5. FINAL APPROVAL WILL BE BASED ON COMPLETION OF | | | ABANDONMENT. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
SURVEY |
SURVEYING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
09-08-2014 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
vnoel |
Date |
09-08-2014 |
Time |
08:20 |
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
vnoel |
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2014-09-08 08:35:38 | 1. SITE/CIVIL PLANS WILL REQUIRE A SEPARATE SUBMITTAL | | | TO ENGINEERING SERVICES. | | | 2. VERIFY EXISTENCE OF WATER MAIN THRU NORTHERN PARKING | | | LOT. | | | 3. UNITY OF TITLE WILL BE REQUIRED. APPLICATION IS MADE | | | THROUGH ENGINEERING. | | | 4. A T - TURN AROUND MAY BE REQUIRED AT GATE. | | | 5. HOW WILL SANITATION COLLECTION BE HANDLED INSIDE | | | GATES? APPROVAL FROM FERDINAND RIVERA, SANITATION | | | SUPERVISOR, WILL BE REQUIRED PRIOR TO SITE PLAN | | | APPROVAL. | | | 6. EASEMENTS WILL BE REQUIRED OVER ANY ABANDONED | | | RIGHTS-OF-WAY. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
TRAFFIC |
TRAFFIC ENGINEERING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
10-17-2014 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
bcollins |
Date |
10-17-2014 |
Time |
13:56 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2014-10-17 13:56:13 | TURNAROUND NOT REQUIRED DUE TO NEED FOR ACCESS TO | | | PROPERTY. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
TRAFFIC |
TRAFFIC ENGINEERING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
09-09-2014 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
09-09-2014 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
bcollins |
Date |
09-09-2014 |
Time |
11:21 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2014-09-09 11:22:46 | IF ABANDONMENT IS APPROVED, TURNAROUND NEEDS TO BE | | | PROVIDED AT GATE. NOTE THAT CITY STANDARD P-4 WAS | | | REVISED IN AUGUST 2014. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
11-20-2014 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
dkittred |
Date |
11-20-2014 |
Time |
09:38 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
dkittred |
Date |
11-19-2014 |
Time |
09:29 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2014-11-20 09:38:16 | 11/20/14 - PREVIOUS COMMENTS REGARDING LANDSCAPING | | | CALCUATIONS HAVE BEEN ADDRESSED WITH 11/19/14 | | | SUBMITTAL. DK |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
10-21-2014 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
dkittred |
Date |
10-21-2014 |
Time |
08:47 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
dkittred |
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2014-10-21 08:46:57 | PLANNING AND ZONING COMMENTS: | | | | | | 10/21/14 | | | | | | 1. REGARDING PREVIOUS COMMENT NO. 2, THE APPLICANT | | | STATED THAT 'MIN.' WOULD BE REMOVED FROM THE PLAN TO | | | ADDRESS THE COMMENT. 'MIN. WAS STILL PRESENT ON THE | | | REVISED PLANS AND PLANS HAVE BEEN REDLINED TO REMOVE | | | THE WORD AND ALSO ADD MINIMUM PLANTING REQUIREMENT | | | BASED ON 40% MIN. OPEN SPACE REQUIRED. NO ACTION IS | | | REQUIRED BY THE APPLICANT. | | | | | | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT: | | | | | | DANIELLE J. KITTREDGE, AICP | | | SENIOR PLANNER | | | PLANNING & ZONING DIVISION | | | PHONE: (561)-822-1443 | | | EMAIL: [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
09-09-2014 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
dkittred |
Date |
09-09-2014 |
Time |
17:09 |
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
dkittred |
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2014-09-09 17:26:36 | PLANNING AND ZONING COMMENTS: ***FAILED*** | | | | | | 9/9/14 | | | | | | ITEMS TO REVISE ON PLANS: | | | | | | 1. ON SHEET SP-2, PLEASE REVISE THE OPEN SPACE | | | CALCULATION. THE ZLDRS DEFINE OPEN SPACE AS "AN OPEN, | | | UNENCLOSED AREA CONSISTING OF SETBACKS, LANDSCAPING | | | BUFFERS, VEHICULAR AND PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION FEATURES, | | | AND SURFACE PARKING." IT APPEARS THE BUILDING MAY HAVE | | | BEEN INCLUDED IN THE CALCULATION BASED ON THE NOTE | | | UNDER "EXISTING". PLEASE CLARIFY. | | | | | | 2. ON SHEET LP-1, THE CALCULATION FOR MINIMUM PLANTING | | | REQUIREMENTS IS BASED OFF OF THE MINIMUM OPEN SPACE | | | REQUIRED (40%) FOR THE PROPERTY RATHER THAN THE ACTUAL | | | OPEN SPACE PROVIDED PER ZLDR SEC. 94-442(B)(3). PLEASE | | | REVISE CALCULATION. | | | | | | 3. TREES ARE REQUIRED TO POSSESS A MINIMUM OF 5 FOOT | | | CLEAR TRUNK SPACE (ZLDR SEC. 94-445(4)). PLEASE INCLUDE | | | THIS REQUIREMENT IN PLANT LIST SPECIFICATIONS, WHERE | | | APPLICABLE. | | | | | | 4. INCLUDE A NOTE ON THE PLAN THAT THE PROPERTY OWNER | | | SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR MAINTAINING THE LANDSCAPE | | | AREAS ABUTTING THE SUBJECT PROPERTY WITHIN THE | | | RIGHT-OF-WAY. | | | | | | 5. PROVIDE BICYCLE PARKING IN ACCORDANCE WITH ZLDR SEC. | | | 94-485(Q). | | | | | | 6. INDICATE THE 5 FOOT BUFFER ON THE SOUTH PARCEL IS | | | FOR PHASE 2. | | | | | | 7. PROVIDE ADEQUATE BACK-UP CLEARANCE FOR VEHICLES | | | UTILIZING THE PARKING SPACE ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF THE | | | SOUTHERN HANDICAP PARKING SPACE AND THE PARKING SPACE | | | ON THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE PROPERTY (NOTE: THIS | | | SPACE WILL HAVE ADEQUATE BACK-UP CLEARANCE FOR THIS | | | PARKING SPACE WHEN PHASE 2 IS CONSTRUCTED, HOWEVER, IT | | | IS NOT CLEAR THERE IS ADEQUATE CLEARANCE PROVIDED IN | | | PHASE 1). PLEASE VERIFY. | | | | | | 8. DIMENSION THE WIDTHS OF "CURB CUTS" INTERNAL TO THE | | | PROPERTY. | | | | | | 9. WILL ALL IMPROVEMENTS ON THE ENGINEERING PLANS BE | | | DONE AT ONCE, OR WILL ANYTHING CORRESPOND WITH PHASE 2 | | | DEVELOPMENT? IF SO, IDENTIFY THE PHASING. | | | | | | | | | OTHER CONSIDERATIONS: | | | | | | 10. REQUIRED PARKING MEETS MINIMUM SIZE DIMENSIONS; | | | HOWEVER, BASED ON THE PROPOSED USE OF THE SITE, ARE | | | THERE ENOUGH SPACES LARGE ENOUGH IN SIZE TO ACCOMMODATE | | | LARGE VEHICLE PARKING? | | | | | | 11. ALTHOUGH SCREENING OF TEMPORARY OUTDOOR STORAGE OF | | | BULK GARDENING AND FARMING SUPPLIES IS EXEMPT UNDER | | | ZLDR SEC. 94-444(C), ADDITIONAL OPAQUE SCREENING AROUND | | | THE NORTHERN OUTDOOR STORAGE AREA IS RECOMMENDED TO | | | MINIMIZE THE VISUAL IMPACT ON SURROUNDING | | | NON-COMMERCIAL USES WHILE THE PROPOSED HEDGE MATURES. | | | | | | 12. PRELIMINARY PLANS PREVIOUSLY INCLUDED BUNKER AREAS | | | FOR STORAGE OF MULCH, ETC. ARE THESE STILL GOING TO BE | | | PROPOSED? IF NOT, HOW IS IT PROPOSED SUCH SIMILAR | | | MATERIAL WILL BE CONTAINED ON SITE? | | | | | | 13. GIVEN EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS (BUILDING ACCESS | | | POINTS AND UTILITIES), ARE THERE OPPORTUNITIES FOR | | | IMPROVING/CONTINUING THE ROW LANDSCAPING AREA LONG THE | | | NORTHERN SIDE OF THE BUILDING ON 14TH STREET TO | | | INCREASE VISUAL COMPATIBILITY WITH THE RESIDENTIAL USES | | | ACROSS THE STREET? | | | | | | | | | WHEN RESUBMITTING: | | | | | | A. PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS MADE BY | | | DEPARTMENTS IN A WRITTEN FORMAT WHEN RESUBMITTING. | | | | | | B. PROVIDE 15 SETS OF REVISED PLANS AND/OR DOCUMENTS | | | ALONG WITH ONE REDUCED COPY AND ELECTRONIC COPY OF ALL | | | PLANS. (YOU MAY CONTACT ME PRIOR TO SUBMITTING TO SEE | | | IF A REDUCED NUMBER OF SETS CAN BE SUBMITTED.) | | | | | | C. IF NO RESPONSE IS RECEIVED WITHIN 60 DAYS OF THE | | | ISSUANCE OF THESE COMMENTS, THE APPLICATION WILL BE | | | CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN AND ANY FURTHER ACTION WILL | | | REQUIRE SUBMISSION OF A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION. | | | | | | D. PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1) | | | RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED | | | COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE | | | APPLICANT WILL BE ACCESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE | | | WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE. | | | | | | E. IN ORDER TO BE CONSIDERED FOR THE OCTOBER 21, 2014 | | | PLANNING BOARD MEETING, ALL PLANS MUST BE REVISED AND | | | SUBMITTED NO LATER THAN SEPTEMBER 24, 2014. | | | | | | | | | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT: | | | | | | DANIELLE J. KITTREDGE, AICP | | | SENIOR PLANNER | | | PLANNING & ZONING DIVISION | | | PHONE: (561)-822-1443 | | | EMAIL: [email protected] | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
Print |