| Plan Review Stops For Project Z14080019 |
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
09-10-2014 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
cranford |
Date |
09-03-2014 |
Time |
10:56 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rbrown |
Date |
09-10-2014 |
Time |
12:01 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2014-09-10 12:10:29 | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, BUILDING DIVISION, | | | COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1. THIS REVIEW IS A CURSORY REVIEW AS IT RELATES TO THE | | | SITE. IT IS NOT A REVIEW FOR FULL COMPLIANCE WITH | | | FLORIDA BUILDING CODE. THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE TO BE | | | ADDRESSED FOR PERMITTING. | | | | | | 2. THE PROPOSED BUILDING WILL BE IN FLOOD ZONE AE. THE | | | ELEVATION OF THE FIRST FLOOR OF THE BUILDING AND ALL | | | ASSOCIATED MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT (CHILLERS, GENERATORS | | | ETC.) SHALL BE 6 INCHES (FREEBOARD) ABOVE THE BASE | | | FLOOD ELEVATION. | | | | | | 3. ANY PART OF AN ACCESSIBLE ROUTE WITH A SLOPE GREATER | | | THAN 1:20 SHALL BE CONSIDERED A RAMP AND SHALL COMPLY | | | WITH SECTION 405 OF FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY CODE. | | | | | | 4. WHEN SUBMITTED FOR BUILDING PERMIT, THE PLANS SHALL | | | SHOW THAT THE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION FOR THE BUILDINGS | | | WILL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE HEIGHT, AREA AND | | | OCCUPANCY LIMITATIONS IN CHAPTER 5 OF THE FLORIDA | | | BUILDING CODE | | | | | | 5. WHEN SUBMITTED FOR BUILDING PERMIT, COMPLIANCE WITH | | | ALL BUILDING SEPARATION, PERCENTAGE OF OPENINGS AND | | | OPENING PROTECTIVE REQUIREMENTS OF CHAPTERS 6 AND 7 OF | | | THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE SHALL BE VERIFIED. | | | | | | 6. ALL APPLICABLE PERMITS AND SUB-PERMITS MUST BE | | | OBTAINED BEFORE COMMENCING THE WORK.94, OR BY EMAIL: | | | [email protected] | | | | | | ROBERT BROWN | | | BUILDING OFFICIAL | | | TEL: 561 805 6652 | | | EMAIL: [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
ENG - PPRC |
ENGINEERING - PPRC |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
12-31-2014 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
cranford |
Date |
12-31-2014 |
Time |
14:55 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
cranford |
Date |
12-31-2014 |
Time |
14:49 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2014-12-31 14:55:44 | ENGINEERING/PUBLIC WORKS DEPT. | | | LAND DEVELOPMENT AND STORMWATER | | | 3RD REVIEW | | | | | | THE PROPOSED BUILDING IS NOT WITHIN THE CITY OF WEST | | | PALM BEACH POTABLE WATER SERVICE AREA. IF THE BUILDING | | | IS NOT PROPOSED TO BE SERVED BY RIVIERA BEACH | | | UTILITIES, PROVIDE A WRITTEN REQUEST FROM RIVIERA BEACH | | | REQUESTING THAT SERVICE BE PROVIDED BY THE CITY OF WEST | | | PALM BEACH. | | | | | | | | | KELLY CRANFORD, P.E. | | | LAND DEVELOPMENT ENGINEER | | | ENGINEERING & PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT | | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | [email protected] | | | 561-494-1098 (OFFICE) |
|
|
| Review Stop |
ENG - PPRC |
ENGINEERING - PPRC |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
09-03-2014 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
cranford |
Date |
09-03-2014 |
Time |
10:57 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
cranford |
Date |
09-03-2014 |
Time |
10:57 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2014-09-03 08:45:43 | ENGINEERING/PUBLIC WORKS DEPT. | | | LAND DEVELOPMENT / STORMWATER | | | | | | THIS IS A CONCEPTUAL LEVEL REVIEW. CONSTRUCTION | | | DETAILLS WILL BE REVIEWED AS PART OF THE ENGINEERING | | | DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL AND BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION | | | PROCESSES.A RIGHT-OF-WAY PERMIT FROM THE ENGINEERING | | | DEPARTMENT WILL BE REQUIRED FOR ALL WORK WITHIN THE | | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH RIGHT-OF-WAY. THE APPLICATION | | | FORMS AND CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS CAN BE FOUND AT | | | HTTP://WPB.ORG/ENGINEERING/FORMS-AND-PUBLICATIONS/ | | | | | | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO SITE | | | PLAN APPROVAL. | | | | | | 1. SHOW THE DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE AREAS ON THE PLANS. THE | | | PROPOSED LOCATIONS MUST BE EASILY ACCESSIBLE TO THE | | | SOLID WASTE TRUCKS (35 FT LONG, 15 FT HIGH). THE DESIGN | | | MUST COMPLY WITH SECTION 74-35(A)(9) OF THE CODE OF | | | ORDINANCES. INCLUDE THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH GARBAGE | | | RECEPTACLE DETAI ON THE PLANS. [CODE OF ORDINANCES, | | | SECTION 94-444(B), FIGURE XIV-3] | | | | | | 2. PROVIDE CALCULATIONS DEMONSTRATING THE PROPOSED SIZE | | | AND QUANTITY OF TRASH BINS IS APPROPRIATE FOR THE WASTE | | | YARDAGE ANTICIPATED TO BE GENERATED BY THE COMPLEX | | | | | | 3. PROVIDE STORMWATER CALCULATIONS AND CONSTRUCTION | | | PLANS. THE PROJECT MUST PROVIDE ADEQUATE STORMWATER | | | MANAGEMENT, INCLUDING NOT MODIFYING THE VELOCITY OR | | | VOLUME OF OFF-SITE STORMWATER DISCHARGE. COMPLIANCE | | | WITH CHAPTER 40E-4 FAC WILL DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE WITH | | | THIS PROVISION. [CODE OF ORDINANCES SECTIONS 90-201, | | | 94-35(C )(11), 94-307, AND 94-580] | | | | | | 4. THE SUBMITTED SURVEY AND PLANS REFERENCE VERTICAL | | | DATUM NAVD 1988. THE SECTION 78-9 OF THE CITY?S CODE OF | | | ORDINANCES SPECIFIES NGVD 1929 AS THE OFFICIAL CITY | | | VERTICAL DATUM. REVISE THE PLANS TO REFERENCE NGVD | | | 1929. | | | | | | 5. STRIPING TO COMPLY WITH CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH CODE | | | OF ORDINANCES, ARTICLE XV, SECTION 94-485. ADD A | | | TYPICAL PARKING SPOT STRIPING DETAIL TO THE PLANS. | | | | | | 6. REVISE THE PLANS TO SHOW THE EXISTING EASEMENTS OVER | | | THE 48-INCH STORMWATER SYSTEM. | | | | | | 7. SHOW THE EXTENT OF FLOOD ZONE AE ON THE SITE PLAN. | | | | | | 8. THE PROPOSED BUILDING IS NOT WITHIN THE CITY OF WEST | | | PALM BEACH POTABLE WATER SERVICE AREA. IF THE BUILDING | | | IS NOT PROPOSED TO BE SERVED BY RIVIERA BEACH | | | UTILITIES, PROVIDE A WRITTEN REQUEST FROM RIVIERA BEACH | | | REQUESTING THAT SERVICE BE PROVIDED BY THE CITY OF WEST | | | PALM BEACH. | | | | | | KELLY CRANFORD, P.E. | | | LAND DEVELOPMENT ENGINEER | | | ENGINEERING & PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT | | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | [email protected] | | | 561-494-1098 (OFFICE) | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
ENG-P |
ENGINEERING PLANNING REVIEW |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
10-07-2014 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
cranford |
Date |
10-07-2014 |
Time |
09:32 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
cranford |
Date |
10-06-2014 |
Time |
15:55 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2014-10-07 09:12:33 | ENGINEERING/PUBLIC WORKS DEPT. | | | LAND DEVELOPMENT AND STORMWATER | | | 2ND REVIEW | | | | | | 1. SECTION 78-9 OF THE CITY'S CODE OF ORDINANCES | | | SPECIFIES NGVD 1929 AS THE OFFICIAL CITY VERTICAL | | | DATUM. REVISE THE PLANS TO REFLECT THE OFFICIAL CITY | | | VERTICAL DATUM. | | | | | | 2. THE STRIPING DETAIL SHOWN ON SHEET C6.04 DOES NOT | | | MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF STALL PAINTING DETAIL INCLUDED | | | IN SECTION 94-485 OF THE CITY'S CODE OF ORDINANCES. | | | STALL PAINTING IS TO BE DOUBLE STRIPPED WITH 4 INCH | | | LINES WITH A 12 INCH SEPARATION BETWEEN THE LINES. | | | WHEEL STOPS MUST BE PROVIDED AS SHOWN IN FIGURE XIV-2 | | | OF SECTION 94-443 OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES. | | | | | | 3. PER DETAIL 21 ON SHEET C6.04 (CITY STANDARD DETAIL | | | P-9), FORCEMAINS ARE TO ENTER THE RECEIVING MANHOLE AT | | | 180 DEGREES PLUS 10 DEGREES FROM THE GRAVITY OUTFLOW | | | LINE. THE CONFIGURATION SHOWN ON SHEET C4.01 SHOWS THE | | | ANGLE BETWEEN THE PROPOSED FORCE MAIN AND THE GRAVITY | | | LINE TO BE APPROXIMATELY 140 DEGREES. REVISE THE | | | CONFIGURATION SHOWN ON SHEET C4.01 TO MATCH THE DETAIL | | | 21. | | | | | | 4. REVISE THE PLANS TO SHOW ALL EXISTING EASEMENTS, | | | INCLUDING THE CITY'S EASEMENT OVER THE EXISTING | | | DRAINAGE PIPE. | | | | | | 5. VERIFY THAT THE "RIGHT TURN ONLY" SIGNS, SHOWN NEAR | | | THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE PARKING LOT, IS IN THE | | | CORRECT LOCATION AND ORIENTATION. IT APPEARS THAT THE | | | EASTERN MOST OF THE TWO SIGNS SHOULD BE ROTATED 90 | | | DEGREES, FACING THE WEST BOUND TRAFFIC AND THE OTHER | | | SIGN IS INTENDED FOR SOUTH BOUND TRAFFIC AND SHOULD BE | | | A "LEFT TURN ONLY" SIGN. | | | | | | 6. THE PROPOSED BUILDING IS NOT WITHIN THE CITY OF WEST | | | PALM BEACH POTABLE WATER SERVICE AREA. IF THE BUILDING | | | IS NOT PROPOSED TO BE SERVED BY RIVIERA BEACH | | | UTILITIES, PROVIDE A WRITTEN REQUEST FROM RIVIERA BEACH | | | REQUESTING THAT SERVICE BE PROVIDED BY THE CITY OF WEST | | | PALM BEACH. | | | | | | 7. PRIOR TO START OF CONSTRUCTION, PERMITS WILL BE | | | REQUIRED FOR THE CITY'S CONSTRUCTION SERVICE AND | | | ENGINEERING DIVISIONS. | | | | | | KELLY CRANFORD, P.E. | | | LAND DEVELOPMENT ENGINEER | | | ENGINEERING & PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT | | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | [email protected] | | | 561-494-1098 (OFFICE) |
|
|
| Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
10-10-2014 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
pleduc |
Date |
10-10-2014 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
pleduc |
Date |
10-10-2014 |
Time |
10:46 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2014-10-10 10:53:37 | 2ND REVIEW RESPONSE | | | | | | AFTER A REVIEW OF THE PPRC RESPONSE LETTER DATED | | | 9/15/14, FROM SONG & ASSOCIATES, TO ERIC SCHNEIDER, | | | SENIOR PLANNER, THE PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED FIRE | | | PREVENTION BUREAU COMMENTS HAVE BEEN ADDRESSED. | | | HOWEVER, AN AREA OF CONCERN THAT REMAINS IS A TURN | | | AROUND OR (BACK-UP) LANE OFF OF THE ACCESS LANE IN | | | FRONT OF THE BUILDING. THIS BACK-UP LANE WAS DISCUSSED | | | AT AN ONSITE MEETING ON 9/25/14. THIS BACK-UP LANE IS | | | REQUIRED AND SHOULD BE INCOPRATED INTO THE ANY FUTURE | | | SUBMITTED DRAWINGS. | | | | | | THE BUREAU'S APPROVAL OF THIS SUBMITTED PROJECT DOES | | | NOT CONSTITUTE IT'S FINAL REVIEW OR APPROVAL. | | | | | | THE BUREAU SHALL REVIEW ALL SUBMITTED BUILDING PLANS AT | | | THE APPROPRIATE TIME AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE | | | REQUIREMENTS OF ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND STANDARDS. | | | | | | PETER LEDUC | | | FIRE MARSHAL | | | WEST PALM BEACH FIRE RESCUE | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
09-08-2014 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
pleduc |
Date |
09-08-2014 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
pleduc |
Date |
09-08-2014 |
Time |
14:25 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2014-09-08 14:55:56 | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS WERE SUBMITTED BY PETER LEDUC, | | | FIRE MARSHAL, BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION. | | | | | | THIS REVIEW CAN ONLY BE CONSIDERED PRELIMINARY AS THE | | | DRAWINGS THAT WERE REVIEWED WERE NOT COMPLETE. | | | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS CAN BE EXPECTED WHEN FULL DRAWINGS | | | ARE SUBMITTED FOR PERMIT. | | | | | | THE FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU HAS NO OBJECTIONS TO THE | | | PROPOSED PROJECT. | | | | | | 1. CONSTRUCTION, DEMOLITION, AND RENOVATION TO COMPLY | | | WITH NFPA 241. | | | | | | 2. SITE ACCESS AND EXIT POINTS ARE TO BE CLEARLY | | | IDENTIFIED AND MAINTAINED FOR EMERGENCY VEHICLES DURING | | | ALL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. | | | | | | 3. THE BUILDING ADDRESS SHALL BE CLEARLY VISIBLE FROM | | | ALL ACCESS ROADWAYS, INCLUDING DURING CONSTRUCTION. | | | ADDRESS NUMBERS SHALL CONTRAST WITH THEIR BACKGROUND | | | AND SHALL NOT BE LESS THAN SIX (6) INCHES IN HEIGHT | | | WITH A ONE (1) INCH STROKE FOR ALL BUILDINGS. | | | | | | 4. TRASH AND DEBRIS IS TO BE REMOVED FROM THE SITE | | | DAILY OR MORE OFTEN TO REDUCE THE ACCUMULATION OF | | | POTENTIAL LIFE AND FIRE SAFETY HAZARDS. | | | | | | 5. THE BUILDING CONSTRUCTON SHALL COMPLY WITH NFPA 101, | | | LIFE SAFETY CODE, FLORIDA 2010 EDITION, INCLUDING | | | CHAPTER 12, NEW ASSEMBLY OCCUPANCIES. | | | | | | 6. A NFPA 13 COMPLAINT FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM IS | | | REQUIRED FOR THIS STRUCTURE. SEPARATE SHOP DRAWINGS, | | | ARE REQUIRED TO BE SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY | | | THE FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU PRIOR TO ANY INSTALLATION. | | | | | | 7. A MONITORED FIRE ALARM SYSTEM IS REQUIRED FOR THIS | | | STRUCTURE. SEPARATE SHOP DRAWINGS, ARE REQUIRED TO BE | | | SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE FIRE PREVENTION | | | BUREAU PRIOR TO ANY INSTALLATION. | | | | | | 8. PLEASE PROVIDE FIRE FLOW CALCULATIONS AND ENSURE THE | | | PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANT IS SUFFICIENT TO PROVIDE THE | | | FLOW. | | | | | | 9. COMPLETE LIFE SAFETY PLANS FOR THE BUILDING SHALL BE | | | PROVIDED THAT ILLUSTRATE OCCUPANT LOADS, TRAVEL | | | DISTANCES, EXITS, EXIT DISCAHRGES, PUBLIC WAYS, | | | EMERGENCY LIGHTING, DEAD-END CORRIDORS AND ALL FIRE | | | SAFETY EQUIPMENT. | | | | | | 10. OCCUPANT LOADS FOR ALL SPACES SHALL BE DETERMINED | | | AND SUBMITTED WITH THE SUBMITTED PLAN AND WHEN APPROVED | | | THEY ARE REQUIRED TO BE POSTED WHERE APPLICABLE. | | | | | | 11. ALL PORTABLE FIRE EXTINGUISHERS LOCATIONS SHALL BE | | | CLEARLY IDENTIFIED AND INDICATED ON THE PLAN. | | | | | | 12. KNOX-BOX KEY SYSTEM SHALL BE REQUIRED FOR THIS | | | BUILDING. | | | | | | 13. ALL KITCHEN EQUIPMENT AND OPERATIONS SHALL COMPLY | | | WITH NFPA 96, STANDARD FOR VENTILATION CONTROL AND FIRE | | | PROTECTION OF COMMERCIAL COOKING OPERATIONS. | | | EXTINGUISHMENT AND VENTILATION SYSTEM SHOP DRAWINGS | | | SHALL BE SUBMITTED SEPARATELY FOR APPROVAL. | | | | | | 14. NOTICE IS REQUIRED FOR STRUCTURES WITH LIGHT-FRAME | | | TRUSS-TYPE CONSTRUCTION. ANY COMMERCIAL, INDUSTRIAL, OR | | | ANY MULTIUNIT RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURE OF THREE UNITS OR | | | MORE WHICH USES HORIZONTAL OR VERTICAL LIGHT-FRAME | | | TRUSS-TYPE CONSTRUCTION IN ANY PORTION SHALL BE MARKED | | | WITH AN APPROVED SYMBOL. THE APPROVED SYMBOL SHALL BE | | | PLACED WITHIN 24 INCHES TO THE LEFT OF THE MAIN ENTRY | | | DOOR. | | | | | | 15. THE ENTRY ACCESS ROAD SHOWS 16 FEETT AND THE ACCESS | | | DRIVE IS 12 FEET WIDE. THESE ACCESS ROAD ARE FIRE LANES | | | AND ARE REQUIRED TO BE 20 FEET WIDE. | | | | | | 16. THE DOUBLE ENTRY GATES ARE REQUIRED TO HAVE KNOX | | | KEY SWITCHES FOR 24 HOUR EMERGENCY ENTRY ACCESS. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
L |
LANDSCAPING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
|
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
PARK |
PARKING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
|
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
POLICE |
POLICE |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
|
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
PW |
PUBLIC WORKS |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
|
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
STORM |
STORMWATER |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
12-19-2014 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
tward |
Date |
12-19-2014 |
Time |
16:55 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
tward |
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2014-12-19 17:05:44 | 1. NOTE 4 ON SHEET C5.01 LISTS NAVD88. | | | | | | 2. DRIVEWAY ON FLAGLER DRIVE AT SW CORNER OF SITE IS | | | SHOWN TO GET NEW VALLEY GUTTER INSTEAD OF REPLACEMENT | | | OF CURB WITH TYPE 'F' CURB AND GUTTER AND THE REMOVAL | | | OF THE DRIVEWAY APRON BETWEEN THE CURB AND SIDEWALK. | | | THIS WORK SHOULD ALSO BE SHOWN ON THE DEMOLOTION PLAN | | | FOR CONTINUITY. | | | | | | 3. PRIOPOSED STORM MISSING FROM THE LIGHTING AND | | | PHOTOMETRICS PLANS. | | | | | | 4. THERE IS NOT ANY "CONTROLS" IN STRUCTURE S-10 TO | | | REGULATE STORMWATER RUNOFF INTO THE EXFILTRATION | | | TRENCH. IT APPEARS EXFILTRATION TRENCH WILL BE | | | SURCHARGED ONLY WHEN THE RETENTION AREA FILLS UP. | | | | | | 5. SWPPP SHOULD INCLUDE PROTECTION OF INLETS ON FLAGLER | | | DRIVE. | | | | | | TRACY L. WARD, P.E. | | | SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER | | | PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT | | | 561-494-1120 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
STORM |
STORMWATER |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
11-06-2014 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
tward |
Date |
11-06-2014 |
Time |
15:45 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
tward |
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2014-11-06 16:22:43 | 1. RIGHT-OF-WAY PERMIT WILL BE REQUIRED FOR WORK ON N. | | | FLAGLER DRIVE. CONSTRUCTION TO MEET CITY OF WEST PALM | | | BEACH MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS AND FOLLOW CITY OF WEST PALM | | | BEACH DETAILS AND SPECIFICATIONS. | | | | | | 2. ANY CONSIDERATION GIVEN TO REMOVING THE CURB CUT ON | | | N. FLAGLER DRIVE AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE SITE | | | AND CONSTRUCTING TYPE 'F' CURB AND GUTTER? | | | | | | 3. DROP CURB SHOULD BE CONSTRUCTED ACROSS THE NEW | | | DRIVEWAYS. | | | | | | 4. TYPE 'D' CURBING ON EITHER SIDE OF DRIVEWAY APRON | | | SHOULD NOT BE CONSTRUCTED WITHIN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY. | | | | | | 5. PROVIDE DETAIL FOR EXFILTRATION TRENCH. | | | | | | 6. LABEL AND PROVIDE A DETAIL FOR THE CONTROL STRUCTURE | | | FOR SURCHARGING THE DRAINAGE SYSTEM AND EXFILTRATION | | | TRENCH. | | | | | | 7. CONSIDER PROVIDING A LEVEL SWALE BOTTOM AND WIDENING | | | THE SIDE SLOPES AS THE ROAD SLOPES UP FROM THE LOW | | | POINT. | | | | | | 8. ARE THE SWALES CONNECTED TO THE DRAINAGE SYSTEM OR | | | WILL THEY DRAIN THROUGH INFILTRATION? | | | | | | 9. AT DRAINAGE STRUCTURE S-4, RAISE THE PAVEMENT SPOT | | | GRADE OF 7.75 WEST OF THE STRUCTURE SO THAT THIS | | | PORTION OF THE DRIVEWAY DRAINS EAST TO THE STRUCTURE. | | | | | | 10. ON ALL OF THE PLAN SHEETS, SHOW THE PROPOSED | | | EASEMENT OVER THE EXISTING 48" STORM PIPE. | | | | | | 11. VERTICAL DATUM ON GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN SHOULD | | | BE NGVD 1929 INSTEAD OF NAVD 1988 PER CITY CODE. | | | | | | 12. SITE PLAN NEEDED WITH THE STORMWATER POLLUTION | | | PREVENTION PLAN SHOWING THE LOCATIONS OF THE BMPS. | | | | | | 13. SHOW EXISTING 48" STORM PIPE ON THE HARDSCAPE PLAN. | | | | | | 14. PROPOSED LIGHTPOLE SLA2 SHOULD BE LOCATED OUTSIDE | | | THE PROPOSED EASEMENT OVER THE EXISTING 48" STORM PIPE. | | | | | | 15. SHOW PROPOSED UTILITIES ON THE LIGHTING AND | | | PHOTOMETRIC PLAN. | | | | | | 16. BOTTOM OF RETENTION BASIN SHOULD BE A MINIMUM OF | | | 12" ABOVE THE SEASONAL HIGH WATER ELEVATION. | | | | | | TRACY L. WARD, P.E. | | | SR. STORMWATER ENGINEER | | | ENGINEERING AND PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT | | | 561-494-1120 | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
STORM |
STORMWATER |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
09-10-2014 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
tward |
Date |
09-10-2014 |
Time |
11:18 |
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
tward |
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2014-09-10 11:24:09 | 1. NO PAVING, GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN PROVIDED. | | | | | | 2. VERTICAL DATUM SHALL BE NGVD 1929. SURVEY SHOWS | | | VERTICAL DATUM TO BE NAVD 1988. | | | | | | 3. SUBMIT WITH ENGINEERING PERMIT APPLICATION: | | | A. EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN | | | B. DRAINAGE AND LAND USE CALCULATIONS | | | | | | 4. PRIOR TO START OF CONSTRUCTION, PROVIDE: | | | A. SFWMD ERP OR ERP MODIFICATION | | | B. FDEP NPDES STORMWATER CONSTRUCTION PERMIT | | | | | | TRACY L. WARD, P.E. | | | SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER | | | ENGINEERING AND PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT | | | (561) 494-1120 | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
SURVEY |
SURVEYING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
12-23-2014 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
vnoel |
Date |
12-23-2014 |
Time |
08:08 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
vnoel |
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2014-12-23 08:12:04 | 1. UNITY OF TITLE APPLICATION RECEIVED. OWNER CONTACTED | | | FOR MISSING INFORMATION. | | | 2. EASEMENT INFORMATION PROVIDED TO OWNER. SHOW | | | PROPOSED 25' DRAINAGE EASEMENT OVER EXISTING LINE ON | | | ALL SHEETS. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
SURVEY |
SURVEYING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
10-16-2014 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
vnoel |
Date |
10-16-2014 |
Time |
07:56 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
vnoel |
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2014-10-16 07:56:33 | 1. ELEVATIONS NEED TO BE REVISED. FORMULA FOR | | | CONVERSION IS NOT ACCEPTABLE. | | | 2. INFORMATION CONCERNING EXISTING AND PROPOSED | | | EASEMENT WAS SUPPLIED TO APPLICANT ON 9/19/14. | | | 3. ITEMS 3 THRU 5 OF FIRST SUBMITTAL STILL APPLY. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
SURVEY |
SURVEYING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
09-08-2014 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
vnoel |
Date |
09-08-2014 |
Time |
09:21 |
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
vnoel |
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2014-09-08 09:33:17 | 1. SURVEY DOES NOT SHOW EXISTING DRAINAGE EASEMENTS. | | | DATUM TO BE NGVD-29 PER CODE. | | | 2. PREVIOUS DISCUSSIONS INCLUDED THE TERMINATION OF | | | EXISTING EASEMENTS AND THE GRANTING OF A NEW EASEMENT | | | FOR THE DRAINAGE OUTFALL. | | | 3. SITE/CIVIL PLANS WILL REQUIRE A SEPARATE SUBMITTAL | | | TO ENGINEERING SERVICES. | | | 4. CITY WILL REQUIRE REQUEST FROM RIVIERA BEACH IN | | | ORDER TO PROVIDE WATER AND SEWER SERVICE PER INTERLOCAL | | | AGREEMENT. | | | 5. UNITY OF TITLE WILL BE REQUIRED. APPLICATION IS MADE | | | THROUGH ENGINEERING SERVICES. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
TRAFFIC |
TRAFFIC ENGINEERING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
bcollins |
Date |
09-09-2014 |
Time |
11:26 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
02-12-2015 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
eschneid |
Date |
02-12-2015 |
Time |
10:34 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
eschneid |
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
12-16-2014 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
eschneid |
Date |
12-16-2014 |
Time |
15:58 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
eschneid |
Date |
12-16-2014 |
Time |
15:58 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2014-12-16 16:04:49 | CASE NO. ZBA 3311/ISPR 14-06 - RESUBMITTAL 11/21/14 | | | FPL MANATEE EDUCATION CENTER | | | 6000 NORTH FLAGLER DR. | | | | | | - CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446 | | | | | | - PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN | | | WRITTEN FORMAT. | | | | | | - WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF FOUR | | | (4) PAPER COPIES AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY IN .PDF FORMAT | | | OF ALL PLANS. PLEASE NOTE THAT CHANGES ON THE | | | RESUBMITTED PLANS OR THE SUBMITTAL OF INFORMATION/PLANS | | | TO ADDRESS THE COMMENTS MAY RESULT IN ADDITIONAL | | | COMMENTS. | | | | | | - PLEASE NOTE THAT IF THE PLANNING DIVISION HAS NOT | | | RECEIVED A RESPONSE TO THE COMMENTS WITHIN 60 DAYS FROM | | | THE DATE OF THE COMMENTS (BY FEBRUARY 16, 2014), THE | | | CASE SHALL BE CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN. ANY FURTHER ACTION | | | SHALL REQUIRE A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION. | | | | | | - PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1) | | | RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED | | | COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE | | | APPLICANT WILL BE ACCESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE | | | WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE ($200). | | | | | | 1) REPEAT COMMENT: THE SURVEY SHALL SHOW ALL EXISTING | | | EASEMENTS. STAFF NEEDS TO VERIFY THAT THERE ARE NO SITE | | | FEATURES OR LANDSCAPING BEING INSTALLED IN CONFLICT | | | WITH THE EASEMENTS. | | | | | | 2) REPEAT COMMENT: THE CITY'S FIRE DEPARTMENT CONTINUES | | | TO HAVE CONCERNS REGARDING THE EMERGENCY VEHICLE ACCESS | | | TO THE BUILDING. THE ACCESS ISSUE NEEDS TO BE RESOLVED | | | PRIOR TO SITE PLAN APPROVAL. PLEASE PROVIDE WRITTEN | | | SIGN OFF OF THE FINAL EMERGENCY ACCESS LAYOUT FROM THE | | | CITY'S FIRE DEPARTMENT. | | | | | | 3) REPEAT COMMENT: THE ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT | | | REGULATIONS ONLY PERMIT A 20 SQUARE FOOT SIGN FOR THIS | | | SITE. THE SIGN DETAIL SHOWS A SIGN THAT IS LARGER THAN | | | 20 SQUARE FEET, SINCE THE MANATEE THAT IS ATTACHED TO | | | THE PANEL WITH THE TEXT HAS TO BE COUNTED AS PART OF | | | THE SIGN AREA. THE SIDE MANATEE ON THE ROCKS ADJACENT | | | TO THE SIGN ARE NOT COUNTED TOWARD THE SIGN AREA. | | | | | | 4) REVISED COMMENT: PLEASE REMEMBER THE CONDITIONS OF | | | CERTIFICATION REQUIRE THAT FPL SHALL ASSIST THE CITY IN | | | CORRECTING THE LOCATION OF THE DRAINAGE EASEMENT SO | | | THAT IT CORRESPONDS WITH THE LOCATION OF THE EXISTING | | | DRAINAGE PIPE. PLEASE SHOW THE PROPOSED EASEMENT | | | LOCATION (INFORMATION HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO FPL BY VINCE | | | NOEL, CITY SURVEYOR) ON THE SITE PLAN SO THAT STAFF MAY | | | VERIFY THAT THERE ARE NO CONFLICTS WITH SITE FEATURES | | | AND LANDSCAPING. | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
11-04-2014 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
eschneid |
Date |
11-04-2014 |
Time |
13:43 |
Rev Time |
4.00 |
| Received By |
eschneid |
Date |
11-04-2014 |
Time |
13:43 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2014-11-04 13:43:56 | CASE NO. ZBA 3311 - RESUBMITTAL 9/19/14 | | | FPL MANATEE EDUCATION CENTER | | | 6000 NORTH FLAGLER DR. | | | | | | - CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446 | | | | | | - PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN | | | WRITTEN FORMAT. | | | | | | - WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF FOUR | | | (4) PAPER COPIES AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY IN .PDF FORMAT | | | OF ALL PLANS. PLEASE NOTE THAT CHANGES ON THE | | | RESUBMITTED PLANS OR THE SUBMITTAL OF INFORMATION/PLANS | | | TO ADDRESS THE COMMENTS MAY RESULT IN ADDITIONAL | | | COMMENTS. | | | | | | - PLEASE NOTE THAT IF THE PLANNING DIVISION HAS NOT | | | RECEIVED A RESPONSE TO THE COMMENTS WITHIN 60 DAYS FROM | | | THE DATE OF THE COMMENTS (BY JANUARY 3, 2014), THE CASE | | | SHALL BE CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN. ANY FURTHER ACTION SHALL | | | REQUIRE A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION. | | | | | | REPEAT COMMET: THE CONDITIONS OF CERTIFICATION REQUIRE | | | THAT THE SITE PLAN BE REVIEWED AS AN INFORMAL SITE | | | PLAN. THESE COMMENTS RELATE TO THE SITE PLAN; HOWEVER, | | | FPL HAS NOT YET FILED THE INFORMAL SITE PLAN REVIEW | | | APPLICATION. PLANS TO ADDRESS THE REMAINING COMMENTS | | | SHALL BE FILED AS PART OF THE INFORMAL SITE PLAN | | | REVIEW. | | | | | | 1) REPEAT COMMENT: THE SURVEY SHALL SHOW ALL EXISTING | | | EASEMENTS. STAFF NOTES THAT THE CURRENT DRAINAGE | | | EASEMENT TRAVERSING EAST/WEST ACROSS THE SITE IS NOT | | | SHOWN. | | | | | | 2) REPEAT COMMENT: PLEASE REMEMBER THE CONDITIONS OF | | | CERTIFICATION REQUIRE THAT FPL SHALL ASSIST THE CITY IN | | | CORRECTING THE LOCATION OF THE DRAINAGE EASEMENT SO | | | THAT IT CORRESPONDS WITH THE LOCATION OF THE EXISTING | | | DRAINAGE PIPE. | | | | | | 3) PARTIAL REPEAT: WHO IS PROVIDING EMERGENCY SERVICE | | | TO THE MANATEE EDUCATION CENTER BUILDING? PROVIDE A | | | TURNING RADIUS DRAWING VERIFYING THAT FIRE RESCUE | | | VEHICLES, INCLUDING AMBULANCES, CAN ACCESS THE BUILDING | | | VIA THE DRIVEWAY. SEE THE COMMENTS ISSUED BY THE FIRE | | | DEPARTMENT REGARDING THE ACCESS TO THE BUILDING. THE | | | ACCESS ISSUE NEEDS TO BE RESOLVED PRIOR TO SITE PLAN | | | APPROVAL. | | | | | | 4) NEW COMMENT: PLEASE EXPLAIN WHY THE SITE PLAN SHOWS | | | A 20 FOOT WIDE STABILIZED FIRE TRUCK ACCESS ROAD, YET | | | THE DETAIL ON SHEET C8.03 SHOWS ONE DETAIL WITH A 12 | | | FOOT WIDTH AND A DIFFERENT DETAIL WITH A 15 FOOT WIDTH. | | | | | | 5) PARTIAL REPEAT: THE BUFFER LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS | | | SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR ALL FOUR SIDES OF THE PROPERTY. | | | PLEASE NOTE THAT THE DIMENSIONS USED TO CALCULATE THE | | | BUFFERS SHALL MATCH THE SURVEY. | | | | | | A. THE NORTH BUFFER SHALL USE THE SURVEY DIMENSION | | | LENGTH OF 463 FEET. THIS WILL REQUIRE 16 TREES - 16 | | | TREES ARE PROVIDED. | | | B. THE SOUTH BUFFER SHALL USE THE SURVEY DIMENSION | | | LENGTH OF 585 FEET. THIS WILL REQUIRE 20 TREES - 19 | | | TREES LISTED AS PROVIDED. STAFF RECOMMENDS A MEETING | | | WITH THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT TO DISCUSS THE TREE COUNT, | | | AS COUNTING TREES/PALMS FROM THE EAST AND WEST BUFFER | | | INSTEAD ON THE SOUTH BUFFER MAY ACHIEVE THE REQUIRED | | | TREE COUNT. THE EAST AND WEST BUFFER APPEAR TO EXCEED | | | THE COUNTS. | | | C. THE WEST BUFFER SHALL LIST THAT PALM TREES ARE | | | COUNTED AT A 2:1 RATIO AS TREES. | | | | | | 6) PARTIAL REPEAT: PLEASE INDICATE HOW THE 89 PROVIDED | | | SHADE TREES WERE CALCULATED. THE PLANT SCHEDULE ONLY | | | SHOWS 73 SHADE TREES. IF THE PALM SUBSTITUTION IS BEING | | | USED (2:1) THEN PLEASE ANNOTATE THIS IN THE LANDSCAPE | | | TABULATIONS. | | | | | | 7) PARTIAL REPEAT: HOW WILL TRASH PICK-UP FOR THE | | | BUILDING BE PROVIDED? PLEASE PROVIDE VERIFICATION FROM | | | FERDINAND RIVERA-NEGRON, CITY SANITATION, APPROVING THE | | | FPL PROPOSED TRASH PICK-UP PLAN OUTLINED IN THE E-MAIL | | | TO PLANNING ON SEPTEMBER 19, 2014. HOW WILL RECYCLING | | | BE ACHIEVED? | | | | | | 8) NEW COMMENT: THE DETAILS FOR THE FENCE, GATES AND | | | COLUMNS ALONG NORTH FLAGLER DRIVE SHOW THESE FEATURES | | | TALLER THAN SIX (6) FEET. THE FENCE AND GATES ARE SHOWN | | | WITH A SETBACK OF 25 FEET AND THE COLUMNS ARE SHOWN | | | WITH AN APPROXIMATELY 24 FOOT SETBACK. THE ZONING AND | | | LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS LIMIT FENCES IN | | | RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICTS TO FOUR (4) FEET IN HEIGHT | | | WITHIN THE 25 FOOT FRONT SETBACK. IN ORDER TO HAVE THE | | | FENCE, GATES AND COLUMNS AS SHOWN, THEY NEED TO BE | | | FULLY LOCATED OUTSIDE OF THE 25 FOOT FRONT SETBACK. | | | | | | 9) NEW COMMENT: THE ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT | | | REGULATIONS ONLY PERMIT A 20 SQUARE FOOT SIGN FOR THIS | | | SITE. THE SIGN DETAIL SHOWS A SIGN THAT IS LARGER THAN | | | 20 SQUARE FEET. | | | | | | 10) NEW COMMENT: THE BICYCLE RACKS THEMSELVES MEET CITY | | | STANDARDS, HOWEVER; THE PLACEMENT OF THE RACKS ON THE | | | PAD IN A LINEAR PATTERN DOES NOT SEEM TO PROVIDE | | | FUNCTIONING BICYCLE PARKING. STAFF SUGGESTS USING THE | | | ?HEAD IN? PARKING, AS SHOWN PREVIOUSLY. THIS REQUIRES A | | | MINIMUM PAD DEPTH OF SIX (6) FEET. THE DIMENSIONS OF | | | THE BICYCLE PAD, INCLUDING THE BICYCLE RACKS, ARE | | | REQUIRED ON A DETAIL. | | | | | | 11) NEW COMMENT: THE PARKING SPACE DETAILS THAT HAVE | | | BEEN PROVIDED ON THE PLANS DO NOT CONFORM TO CITY OF | | | WEST PALM BEACH STANDARDS. THE CITY REQUIRES DOUBLE | | | STRIPING FOR THE PARKING SPACES IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE | | | STALL PAINTING DETAIL FOUND IN SECTION 94-485 OF THE | | | ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS. | | | | | | 12) NEW COMMENT: THE MOUNTING HEIGHT ON THE PHOTOMETRIC | | | PLAN LISTS THE SLC MOUNTING HEIGHT AT 14 FEET WHILE THE | | | DETAILS SHEET SHOWS THEM AT 12 FEET. THIS WILL NEED TO | | | BE CORRECTED AT TIME OF BUILDING PERMIT. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
09-10-2014 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
eschneid |
Date |
09-10-2014 |
Time |
13:27 |
Rev Time |
4.00 |
| Received By |
eschneid |
Date |
09-10-2014 |
Time |
13:27 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2014-09-10 13:27:38 | CASE NO. ZBA 3311 | | | FPL MANATEE EDUCATION CENTER | | | 6000 NORTH FLAGLER DR. | | | | | | - CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446 | | | | | | - PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN | | | WRITTEN FORMAT. | | | | | | - WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF TEN | | | (10) PAPER COPIES AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY IN .PNG FORMAT | | | OF ALL PLANS. PLEASE NOTE THAT CHANGES ON THE | | | RESUBMITTED PLANS OR THE SUBMITTAL OF INFORMATION/PLANS | | | TO ADDRESS THE COMMENTS MAY RESULT IN ADDITIONAL | | | COMMENTS. | | | | | | - THE PPRC COMMENTS SHALL BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED AND | | | SUBMITTED TO THE PLANNING DIVISION BY NOON ON MONDAY, | | | SEPTEMBER 15, 2014, TO BE ELIGIBLE FOR SCHEDULING FOR | | | THE OCTOBER 2, 2014 ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS MEETING. | | | | | | - PLEASE NOTE THAT IF THE PLANNING DIVISION HAS NOT | | | RECEIVED A RESPONSE TO THE PPRC COMMENTS WITHIN 60 DAYS | | | FROM THE DATE THE PPRC MEETING (BY NOVEMBER 10, 2014), | | | THE CASE SHALL BE CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN. ANY FURTHER | | | ACTION SHALL REQUIRE A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION. | | | | | | - PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1) | | | RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED | | | COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE | | | APPLICANT WILL BE ACCESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE | | | WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE ($324). | | | | | | THE CONDITIONS OF CERTIFICATION REQUIRE THAT THE USE OF | | | THE SITE AS THE MANATEE EDUCATION CENTER (F.K.A. | | | MANATEE VIEWING CENTER) BE REVIEWED BY THE ZONING BOARD | | | OF APPEALS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CLASS B SPECIAL USE | | | PERMIT REQUIREMENTS. ADDITIONALLY, THE CONDITIONS OF | | | CERTIFICATION REQUIRE THAT THE SITE PLAN BE REVIEWED AS | | | AN INFORMAL SITE PLAN. THIS PPRC MEETING WILL COMMENT | | | ON BOTH THE USE AND THE SITE PLAN; HOWEVER, FPL HAS NOT | | | YET FILED THE INFORMAL SITE PLAN REVIEW APPLICATION. | | | | | | 1) THE SURVEY SHALL SHOW ALL EXISTING EASEMENTS. STAFF | | | NOTES THAT THE CURRENT DRAINAGE EASEMENT TRAVERSING | | | EAST/WEST ACROSS THE SITE IS NOT SHOWN. | | | | | | 2) PLEASE REMEMBER THE CONDITIONS OF CERTIFICATION | | | REQUIRE THAT FPL SHALL ASSIST THE CITY IN CORRECTING | | | THE LOCATION OF THE DRAINAGE EASEMENT SO THAT IT | | | CORRESPONDS WITH THE LOCATION OF THE EXISTING DRAINAGE | | | PIPE. | | | | | | 3) THE WALKWAY LEADING IN FROM FLAGLER DRIVE SHALL BE A | | | MINIMUM OF EIGHT (8) FEET IN WIDTH. | | | | | | 4) THE WALKWAY LEADING FROM THE DROP-OFF AREA TO THE | | | WATERFRONT PROMENADE SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF EIGHT (8) | | | FEET IN WIDTH. | | | | | | 5) THE REMAINING WALKWAYS IN THE LAWN AREA TO THE EAST | | | AND NORTH OF THE MANATEE SCULPTURE SHALL BE A MINIMUM | | | OF SIX (6) FEET IN WIDTH. | | | | | | 6) WHO IS PROVIDING EMERGENCY SERVICE TO THE MANATEE | | | EDUCATION CENTER BUILDING? IF IT IS THE CITY OF WEST | | | PALM BEACH, THEN 20 FOOT WIDE ACCESS AISLES ARE | | | REQUIRED. ADDITIONALLY, PROVIDE A TURNING RADIUS | | | DRAWING VERIFYING THAT FIRE RESCUE VEHICLES, INCLUDING | | | AMBULANCES, CAN ACCESS THE BUILDING VIA THE DRIVEWAY. | | | | | | 7) THERE SHALL BE TREES LINING THE WALKWAY LEADING IN | | | FROM FLAGLER DRIVE TO PROVIDE SHADE TO PEDESTRIANS. | | | | | | 8) PROVIDE THE DIMENSIONS FOR ALL THE DRIVE AISLES. | | | | | | 9) THE CITY'S LANDSCAPE REGULATIONS REQUIRE THAT THE | | | BUFFER HEDGE RUN THE LENGTH OF THE BUFFER. WHY HAVE | | | SECTIONS BEEN LEFT EMPTY WITH OTHER SECTIONS HAVING A | | | DOUBLE HEDGE? | | | | | | 10) THE REQUIRED BUFFER LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS SHALL BE | | | PROVIDED FOR ALL FOUR SIDES OF THE PROPERTY. PLEASE | | | NOTE THAT THE DIMENSIONS USED TO CALCULATE THE BUFFERS | | | SHALL MATCH THE SURVEY. | | | | | | 11) THE LANDSCAPE TABULATIONS ARE NOT BASED ON THE | | | CORRECT AMOUNT OF OPEN SPACE ON THE PORTION OF THE SITE | | | IN WEST PALM BEACH. OPEN SPACE IS CALCULATED BY TOTAL | | | PROPERTY AREA MINUS STRUCTURES. PAVED AREAS ARE | | | INCLUDED AS PART OF THE OPEN SPACE CALCULATIONS. UPDATE | | | THE TABLE ACCORDINGLY. PLEASE NOTE THAT TREES INSTALLED | | | ON THE RIVIERA BEACH PORTION OF THE SITE WILL NOT COUNT | | | TOWARD MEETING WEST PALM BEACH REQUIREMENTS. | | | | | | 12) NOT ALL OF THE REQUIRED LANDSCAPE DATA HAS BEEN | | | PROVIDED ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN (EX. XERISCAPE TABLE, | | | NUMBER OF SHADE TREES REQUIRED, NUMBER OF FLOWERING | | | TREES REQUIRED, NUMBER OF SHRUBS REQUIRED, PARKING LOT | | | LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS, ETC.). PLEASE REVIEW ARTICLE | | | XIV, CHAPTER 94 OF THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH ZONING | | | AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS. | | | | | | 13) PROVIDE VERIFICATION THAT THE 38 TREES REMOVED HAVE | | | BEEN REPLACED BY TREES THAT WILL PROVIDE EQUAL OR | | | GREATER SIZE/CANOPY. | | | | | | 14) THE OVERSIZE VEHICLE PARKING REQUIRES TERMINAL | | | ISLANDS AT THE NORTH AND SOUTH ENDS, INCLUDING THE | | | TERMINAL ISLAND TREE. THESE ISLANDS SHALL BE CURBED. | | | ADDITIONALLY, D CURBING SHALL BE PROVIDED ALONG THE | | | EAST SIDE OF THE SPACES TO PROTECT THE LAWN AREA FROM | | | VEHICULAR ENCROACHMENT. | | | | | | 15) HOW WILL TRASH PICK-UP FOR THE BUILDING BE | | | PROVIDED? | | | | | | 16) TRASH AND RECYCLING CONTAINERS SHALL BE PROVIDED. | | | | | | 17) THE CITY SUGGESTS TEXTURED/COLORED ASPHALT FOR | | | WHERE THE ADA/BICYCLE PARKING PATH CROSSES THE DRIVE TO | | | THE BUILDING. | | | | | | 18) PLEASE PROVIDE DETAILS ON THE FENCES, WALLS, | | | PAVILION, LIGHT POLES AND THEIR FIXTURES, AND BICYCLE | | | RACKS AND THE PAD. DIMENSIONS SHALL BE INCLUDED. | | | | | | 19) THE LANDSCAPE PLAN SHOWS A TAG FOR TREE TYPE CE2, | | | YET THE PLANT SCHEDULE ON SHEET C8.01 DOES NOT IDENTIFY | | | THIS TYPE OF TREE. | | | | | | 20) IS ANY ENTRY SIGNAGE PROPOSED? | | | | | | 21) PARKING SPACE DETAILS ARE REQUIRED ON THE PLANS. | | | |
|
|
| |
Print |