Plan Review Details - Project Z14030060
Plan Review Stops For Project Z14030060
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 1 Status F Date 04-04-2014 Cont ID  
Sent By aaponte Date 04-04-2014 Time 10:49 Rev Time 0.00
Received By aaponte Date 04-09-2014 Time 10:56 Sent To  
Notes
2014-04-09 11:21:47DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, BUILDING DIVISION,
 COMMENTS:
  
 1. THIS REVIEW IS A CURSORY REVIEW AS IT RELATES TO THE
 SITE. IT IS NOT A REVIEW FOR FULL COMPLIANCE WITH
 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE. THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE TO BE
 ADDRESSED FOR PERMITTING.
  
 2. NO ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES ARE CURRENTLY SHOWN.
 PER THE FAIR HOUSING ACT, AT LEAST 2% OF THE PARKING
 SPACES PROVIDED FOR THE DWELLING UNITS MUST BE
 ACCESSIBLE. ALSO, ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES SERVING THE
 NON-RESIDENTIAL AREAS OF THE BUILDINGS SHALL BE
 PROVIDED IN NUMBERS SUFFICIENT TO COMPLY WITH SECTION
 208.2 OF FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY CODE,
  
 3. PER SECTION 208.3 OF FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY CODE
 ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES ARE TO BE LOCATED ON THE
 SHORTEST POSSIBLE ROUTE OF TRAVEL FROM ADJACENT PARKING
 TO AN ACCESSIBLE ENTRANCE FOR EACH
 BUILDING. THE DESIGN OF ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES SHALL
 COMPLY WITH SECTION 502 OF FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY CODE
  
 4. PER SECTION 208.2.4 OF FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY CODE,
 ONE IN EVERY SIX ACCESSIBLE SPACES (AT LEAST ONE) IN A
 PARKING STRUCTURE, SHALL BE VAN ACCESSIBLE AND DESIGNED
 IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION OF 502 OF FLORIDA
 ACCESSIBILITY CODE (VERTICAL CLEARANCE NOT LESS THAN 98
 INCHES AT SPACE AND VEHICULAR ACCESS ROUTE)
  
 5. WHEN SUBMITTED FOR BUILDING PERMIT, THE PLANS SHALL
 SHOW THAT THE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION FOR THE BUILDINGS
 WILL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE HEIGHT, AREA AND
 OCCUPANCY LIMITATIONS IN CHAPTER 5 OF THE FLORIDA
 BUILDING CODE
  
 6. WHEN SUBMITTED FOR BUILDING PERMIT, COMPLIANCE WITH
 ALL BUILDING SEPARATION, PERCENTAGE OF OPENINGS AND
 OPENING PROTECTIVE REQUIREMENTS OF CHAPTERS 6 AND 7 OF
 THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE SHALL BE VERIFIED.
  
 7. ENCLOSED PARKING GARAGES MUST HAVE EXHAUST SYSTEMS
 DESIGNED TO MINIMIZE NOISE LEVELS USING INLINE FAN
 SILENCERS OR OTHER APPROVED METHODS.
  
 8. THE NEW BUILDINGS SHALL BE SEPARATED FROM THE
 EXISTING BUILDINGS BY FIRE WALLS DESIGNED IN ACCORDANCE
 WITH SECTION 706 OF FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, OR THEY MUST
 BE CONSIDERED AS ADDITIONS AS COVERED BY CHAPTER 10 OF
 THE FLORIDA EXISTING BUILDING CODE.
  
 9. THE BRIDGES BETWEEN THE BUILDINGS AT LEVEL 5 AND
 LEVEL 6 SHALL BE DESIGNED IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION
 3104 OF FLORIDA BUILDING CODE SUCH THAT THE BUILDINGS
 ARE CONSIDERED SEPARATE.
  
 10. SHEET A-4 SHOWS A LONG DEAD END CORRIDOR FROM THE
 RESIDENTIAL UNITS TO THE CLOSEST EXIT STAIR. PER
 SECTION 1018.4 OF FLORIDA BUILDING CODE, THE DEAD END
 CORRIDOR SHALL NOT EXCEED 50 FEET.
  
 11. IT IS NOTED THAT ELEVATOR LOBBIES ARE NOT SHOWN.
 THE BUILDING AND BUILDING SYSTEMS MUST MEET ONE OF THE
 EXCEPTIONS GIVEN IN SECTION 1018.4.1 OF FLORIDA
 BUILDING CODE (SUCH AS ELEVATOR HOISTWAY
 PRESSURIZATION), IF ELEVATOR LOBBIES ARE NOT PROPOSED.
  
 12. IT IS NOTED THAT WIDENING OF THE ALLEY IS PROPOSED
 TO ACCOMODATE TWO-WAY VEHICULAR TRAFFIC. ON SHEET A-2,
 NO EXIT DISCHARGE DOOR IS YET SHOWN FOR THE STAIRWAY
 ADJACENT TO THE ALLEY, AND WHEN IT IS SHOWN THE EXIT
 DISCHARGE DOOR SHALL BE RECESSED SUCH THAT IT DOES NOT
 SWING INTO THE VEHICULAR TRAVEL LANE.
  
 13. ALL APPLICABLE PERMITS AND SUB-PERMITS MUST BE
 OBTAINED BEFORE COMMENCING THE WORK.
  
 14. FOR STREET ADDRESSING CONTACT SCOTT ALEF, GIS
 SUPPORT SPECIALIST, AT (561) 494 1094, OR BY EMAIL:
 [email protected]
  
 ROBERT BROWN
 BUILDING OFFICIAL
 TEL: 561 805 6652
 EMAIL: [email protected]
  
Review Stop ENG - PPRC ENGINEERING - PPRC
Rev No 2 Status F Date 11-10-2014 Cont ID  
Sent By cranford Date 11-10-2014 Time 09:46 Rev Time 0.00
Received By cranford Date 11-10-2014 Time 08:25 Sent To  
Notes
2014-11-10 08:58:24ENGINEERING/PULBLIX WORKS DEPT.
 LAND DEVELOPMENT
  
 THIS IS A CONCEPTUAL LEVEL REVIEW. CONSTRUCTION DETAILS
 WILL BE REVIEWED AS PART OF THE ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT
 APPROVAL AND BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION PROCESSES.
 THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO SITE
 PLAN APPROVAL.
  
 1. ON SHEETS C1 AND C2, CHANGE NOTES 4 AND 1 TO READ
 "ALLEYWAY SHALL BE RECONSTRUCTED TO MEET CITY OF WEST
 PALM BEACH STANDARDS."
  
 2. AFTER INSPECTING THE EXISITING SANITARY LINES, WE
 HAVE FOUND THE SANITARY LINE IN THE ALLEY TO BE IN POOR
 CONDITION. PLEASE REVISE THE DESIGN TO TIE INTO THE
 MAIN ALONG ROSEMARY.
  
 3.VERIFY THE SOUTHERN PARKING GARAGE RAMP SLOPE BETWEEN
 THE GROUND AND 2ND FLOORS. THE RAMP IS MARKED WITH A 6%
 SLOPE, BUT THE ELEVATIONS INDICATE THE RAMP CLIMBS FROM
 3 TO 14 FEET OVER THE 84 FT LENGTH OF THE RAMP.
  
 4. THE PROPOSED FLOOD PROTECTION FOR THE SOUTHERN
 PARKING GARAGE IS A PUMP. SHOW HOW THE ANY WATER
 COLLECTED IN THIS AREA IS GOING TO BE TREATED PRIOR TO
 DISCHARGE AND WHERE THE TREATED WATER WILL BE
 DISCHARGED.
  
 5. THE PROPOSED LAYOUT IS NOT ACCESSIBLE TO THE SOLID
 WASTE TRUCKS (35 FT LONG, 15 FT HIGH). THE PROPOSAL TO
 ROLL THE TRASH BINS INTO THE ALLEY WILL IMPEDE TRAFFIC
 FLOW WHILE THE BINS ARE IN THE ALLEY AND COMPLETELY
 BLOCK TRAFFIC WHEN THE SOLID WASTE TRUCKS ARE
 COLLECTING THE GARBAGE. REVISE THE DESIGN TO
 ACCOMMODATE THE TRUCKS WITHOUT REQUIRING THEM TO BACK
 AROUND CORNERS OR DOWN THE ALLEY AND TO COMPLY WITH
 SECTION 74-35(A)(9) OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES.
  
 6. VERIFY THAT THE PROPOSED SIZE AND QUANTITY OF TRASH
 BINS IS APPROPRIATE FOR THE WASTE YARDAGE ANTICIPATED
 TO BE GENERATED BY THE COMPLEX. CONSIDER USING A
 COMPACTOR TO REDUCE THE YARDAGE OF WASTE THAT WILL NEED
 TO BE COLLECTED.
  
 7. PROVIDE VERTICAL PROFILES FOR THE PARKING GARAGE
 RAMPS INCLUDING THE TRANSITION AREA GEOMETRY.
  
 KELLY CRANFORD, P.E.
 LAND DEVELOPMENT ENGINEER
 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
 CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH
 [email protected]
 561-494-1098 (OFFICE)
  
Review Stop ENG - PPRC ENGINEERING - PPRC
Rev No 1 Status F Date 11-10-2014 Cont ID  
Sent By cranford Date 08-20-2014 Time 14:31 Rev Time 0.00
Received By cranford Date 11-10-2014 Time 09:46 Sent To  
Notes
2014-08-20 14:30:23ENGINEERING/PULBLIX WORKS DEPT.
 LAND DEVELOPMENT AND STORMWATER
  
 THIS IS A CONCEPTUAL LEVEL REVIEW. CONSTRUCTION DETAILS
 WILL BE REVIEWED AS PART OF THE ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT
 APPROVAL AND BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATION PROCESSES.
 THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO SITE
 PLAN APPROVAL.
  
 1. INCLUDE PARKING PLANS FOR ALL LEVELS OF THE PARKING
 GARAGE AND ENSURE THAT THE ELEVATION VIEW OF THE GARAGE
 MATCHES THE PLAN VIEW. THE SUBMITTED PLANS DID NOT
 INCLUDE PARKING LAYOUTS FOR UNDERGROUND LEVELS 1B, 1D,
 OR 1E.
  
 2. THE PARKING LAYOUT CONTAINS SEVERAL DEAD-ENDS,
 INACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES, PARKING SPACES AND DRIVE
 AISLES WHICH DO NOT MEET CODE REQUIREMENTS. TURN AROUND
 SPACES MUST BE PROVIDED AT THE DEAD ENDS. SHOW PROFILE
 DETAILS FOR THE PARKING SPOTS PROPOSED UNDER RAMPS.
 REVISE THE PARKING LAYOUT TO COMPLY WITH SECTION 94-485
 OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES. ALSO , RESPOND TO THE
 RELATED ZONING, PARKING AND TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
 COMMENTS.
  
 3. THE PROPOSED FLOOD PROTECTION FOR THE SOUTHERN
 PARKING GARAGE, WHICH IS PROPOSED WITH A BOTTOM
 ELEVATION OF APPROXIMATELY 7.8 FT NGVD, IS A PUMP. SHOW
 HOW THE ANY WATER COLLECTED IN THIS AREA IS GOING TO BE
 TREATED PRIOR TO DISCHARGE AND WHERE THE TREATED WATER
 WILL BE DISCHARGED.
  
 4. THE PROPOSED LAYOUT IS NOT ACCESSIBLE TO THE SOLID
 WASTE TRUCKS (35 FT LONG, 15 FT HIGH). THE PROPOSAL TO
 ROLL THE TRASH BINS INTO THE ALLEY WILL IMPEDE TRAFFIC
 FLOW WHILE THE BINS ARE IN THE ALLEY AND COMPLETELY
 BLOCK TRAFFIC WHEN THE SOLID WASTE TRUCKS ARE
 COLLECTING THE GARBAGE. REVISE THE DESIGN TO
 ACCOMMODATE THE TRUCKS WITHOUT REQUIRING THEM TO BACK
 AROUND CORNERS OR DOWN THE ALLEY AND TO COMPLY WITH
 SECTION 74-35(A)(9) OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES.
  
 5. VERIFY THAT THE PROPOSED SIZE AND QUANTITY OF TRASH
 BINS IS APPROPRIATE FOR THE WASTE YARDAGE ANTICIPATED
 TO BE GENERATED BY THE COMPLEX. CONSIDER USING A
 COMPACTOR TO REDUCE THE YARDAGE OF WASTE THAT WILL NEED
 TO BE COLLECTED.
  
 6. THE PROJECT MUST PROVIDE ADEQUATE STORMWATER
 MANAGEMENT, INCLUDING NOT MODIFYING THE VELOCITY OR
 VOLUME OF OFF-SITE STORMWATER DISCHARGE. DESCRIBE HOW
 THIS WILL BE ACHIEVED. COMPLIANCE WITH CHAPTER 40E-4
 FAC WILL DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE WITH THIS PROVISION.
 [CODE OF ORDINANCES SECTIONS 90-201, 94-35(C )(11),
 94-307, AND 94-580]
  
 7. PROVIDE VERTICAL PROFILES FOR THE PARKING GARAGE
 RAMPS INCLUDING THE TRANSITION AREA GEOMETRY.
  
 8. PROVIDE DETAILS AND ELEVATION VIEWS OF THE LOADING
 AREA AND ADJACENT PARKING GARAGE RAMPS.
  
 THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED IN THE
 CONSTRUCTION PLANS SUBMITTED FOR DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL
 FROM THE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT.
  
 1. THE EXISTING WATER MAIN WITHIN THE ALLEY ALSO SERVES
 THE METER AT 522 CLEMATIS STREET. WATER SERVICE MUST
 CONTINUE TO BE PROVIDED FOR THIS ADDRESS.
  
 2. SEWAGE DEMAND CALCULATIONS WILL NEED TO BE PROVIDED
 AS PART OF THE FINAL DESIGN. THE 8-INCH GRAVITY SEWER
 LINE MAY NOT BE SUFFICIENT FOR THE PROPOSED DEMAND AND
 MAY NEED TO BE UPGRADED. RECENT INSPECTIONS OF THE
 8-INCH LINE INDICATE THAT IT IS NOT IN ACCEPTABLE
 CONDITION TO CONVEY ADDITIONAL FLOWS AND POSSIBLY MAY
 NOT WITHSTAND THE PROPOSED NEARBY SUBSURFACE
 CONSTRUCTION.
  
 3. THE AVAILABLE WATER PRESSURE WITHIN THE CITY MAY NOT
 BE ACCEPTABLE AT ELEVATIONS HIGHER THAN THE 2ND FLOOR.
 WE RECOMMEND THAT A LONG-TERM PRESSURE STUDY BE
 PERFORMED ON THE POTABLE WATER LINES PRIOR TO
 FINALIZATION OF THE DESIGN.
  
 4. SOLID WASTE YARDAGE WILL NEED TO BE ESTIMATED AS
 PART OF THE FINAL DESIGN TO VERIFY THAT THE DESIGN
 INCLUDES APPROPRIATE NUMBER AND SIZE OF TRASH BINS.
  
 5. AN EXISTING SOLID WASTE CUSTOMER IS LOCATED ON THE
 ALLEY EAST OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT. THE FINAL PLANS
 WILL NEED TO INCLUDE A PROPOSAL FOR CONTINUING THEIR
 SOLID WASTE SERVICE DURING CONSTRUCTION. THE ALLEY END
 WEST OF THE RAILROAD LINE AND THERE IS NOT CURRENTLY A
 PAVED OR STABILIZED TURNAROUND.
  
 6. STORMWATER CALCULATIONS WILL NEED TO BE SUBMITTED AS
 PART OF THE ENGINEERING DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL. IN
 ADDITION TO DEMONSTRATING THAT THE REQUIRED FLOOD
 PROTECTION AND WATER QUALITY TREATMENT IS PROVIDED, THE
 CALCULATION SHOULD INCLUDE THE PROPOSED PUMPED
 DISCHARGE FROM THE GARAGE, MOUNDING ANALYSIS FOR THE
 EXFILTRATION TRENCH, EVALUATION OF THE IMPACT (IF ANY)
 OF THE ROOF DRAIN VELOCITY INTO THE STORMWATER SYSTEM.
  
 KELLY CRANFORD, P.E.
 LAND DEVELOPMENT ENGINEER
 ENGINEERING & PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
 CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH
 [email protected]
 561-494-1098 (OFFICE)
  
Review Stop FIRE FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No 2 Status P Date 06-03-2014 Cont ID  
Sent By pleduc Date 06-03-2014 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By pleduc Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2014-06-03 11:23:162ND REVIEW RESPONSE
  
 AFTER A REVIEW OF THE PPRC RESPONSE LETTER DATED MAY
 23, 2014, FROM JON E. SCHMIDT AND ASSOCIATES TO ANA
 MARIA APONTE, PLANNER, THE PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED FIRE
 PREVENTION BUREAU COMMENTS HAVE BEEN ADDRESSED.
  
 THE BUREAU'S APPROVAL OF THIS SUBMITTED PROJECT DOES
 NOT CONSTITUTE IT'S FINAL REVIEW OR APPROVAL.
  
 THE BUREAU SHALL REVIEW ALL SUBMITTED BUILDING PLANS AT
 THE APPROPRIATE TIME AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE
 REQUIREMENTS OF ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND STANDARDS.
  
 PETER LEDUC
 FIRE MARSHAL
 WEST PALM BEACH FIRE RESCUE
  
Review Stop FIRE FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No 1 Status P Date 03-31-2014 Cont ID  
Sent By pleduc Date 03-31-2014 Time 12:16 Rev Time 0.00
Received By pleduc Date 03-31-2014 Time 10:50 Sent To  
Notes
2014-03-31 12:15:37THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS WERE SUBMITTED BY PETER LEDUC,
 FIRE MARSHAL, BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION, WEST PALM
 BEACH FIRE RESCUE.
  
 THIS REVIEW CAN ONLY BE CONSIDERED PRELIMINARY AS THE
 DRAWINGS THAT WERE REVIEWED WERE NOT COMPLETE.
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS CAN BE EXPECTED WHEN FULL DRAWINGS
 ARE SUBMITTED FOR PERMIT.
  
 1. CONSTRUCTION, DEMOLITION, AND RENOVATION TO COMPLY
 WITH NFPA 241.
  
 2. SITE ACCESS AND EXIT POINTS ARE TO BE CLEARLY
 IDENTIFIED AND MAINTAINED FOR EMERGENCY VEHICLES DURING
 ALL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES.
  
 3. THE BUILDING ADDRESS SHALL BE CLEARLY VISIBLE FROM
 ALL ACCESS ROADWAYS, INCLUDING DURING CONSTRUCTION.
 ADDRESS NUMBERS SHALL CONTRAST WITH THEIR BACKGROUND
 AND SHALL NOT BE LESS THAN SIX (6) INCHES IN HEIGHT
 WITH A ONE (1) INCH STROKE FOR ALL BUILDINGS.
  
 4. TRASH AND DEBRIS IS TO BE REMOVED FROM THE SITE
 DAILY OR MORE OFTEN TO REDUCE THE ACCUMULATION OF
 POTENTIAL LIFE AND FIRE SAFETY HAZARDS.
  
 5. ALL APARTMENT BUILDINGS SHALL COMPLY WITH THE
 FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE, 2010 EDITION, THE LIFE
 SAFETY CODE, 2009 EDITION, INCLUDING MORE SPECIFICALLY,
 CHAPTER 30, NEW APARTMENTS.
  
 6. ALL PARKING STRUCTURES SHALL COMPLY WITH NFPA 88A,
 PARKING STRUCTURES AND NFPA 101, THE LIFE SAFETY CODE,
 INCLUDING MORE SPECIFICALLY, CHAPTER 42 STORAGE
 OCCUPANCIES (PARKING STRUCTURES)
  
 7. THE SEPARATION AND OPENING PROTECTION BETWEEN THE
 PARKING GARAGE AND HOTEL SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE AND
 COMPLIANCE WITH THE SPECIFIC AND MOST STRINGENT
 PROVISION REQUIREMENT OF EITHER CHAPTER.
  
 8. SMOKE ALARMS ARE REQUIRED IN EVERY SLEEPING ROOM AND
 OUTSIDE OF THE SLEEPING ROOMS AND IN ALL LEVELS OF THE
 DWELLING UNITS. THESE DETECTORS SHALL BE HARD WIRED AND
 SHALL BE INTERCONNECTED TO ONE ANOTHER.
  
 9. INTERIOR FINISH CLASSIFICATIONS FOR ALL WALLS AND
 CEILINGS SHALL BE CLEARLY INDICATED ON THE SUBMITTED
 BUILDING PERMIT PLAN.
  
 10. A NFPA 13 COMPLAINT FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM AND NFPA
 14 COMPLIANT WET STANDPIPE SYSTEM ARE REQUIRED FOR THIS
 STRUCTURE. TEMPORARY STANDPIPES ARE REQUIRED WHEN THE
 BUILDING REACHES THREE LEVELS OR THIRTY FEET WHILE
 BEING CONSTRUCTED. SEPARATE SHOP DRAWINGS, ARE REQUIRED
 TO BE SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE FIRE
 PREVENTION BUREAU PRIOR TO ANY INSTALLATION.
  
 11. A MONITORED FIRE ALARM SYSTEM IS REQUIRED FOR THIS
 STRUCTURE. SEPARATE SHOP DRAWINGS, ARE REQUIRED TO BE
 SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE FIRE PREVENTION
 BUREAU PRIOR TO ANY INSTALLATION.
  
 12. ALL VERTICAL AND HORIZONTAL FIRE SEPARATIONS FOR
 THIS BUILDING SHALL BE CLEARLY IDENTIFIED AND INDICATED
 ON THE PLANS.
  
 13. ALL FIRE RATED OPENING PROTECTIONS (FIRE DOORS AND
 HARDWARE) SHALL BE CLEARLY IDENTIFIED AND INDICATED IN
 THE DOOR SCHEDULE. ALL DOORS THAT OPEN ONTO EXIT ACCESS
 CORRIDORS SHALL BE AT LEAST 20 MINUTE FIRE RATED AND BE
 EQUIPPED WITH SELF-CLOSING DEVICES THAT CAUSE THE DOOR
 TO POSITIVELY LATCH WHEN CLOSED. THIS REQUIREMENT SHALL
 BE CLEARLY INDICATED AND ILLUSTRATED ON THE DOOR
 SCHEDULE.
  
 14. PRESCRIPTIVE STRENGTH REQUIREMENTS FOR ALL
 HANDRAILS AND GUARDRAILS FOR THE BUILDING SHALL BE
 PROVIDED AND CLEARLY INDICATED ON THE PLANS.
  
 15. ALL EXIT DISCHARGE LOCATIONS SHALL BE CLEARLY
 ILLUSTRATED ON THE PLAN.
  
 16. ALL ILLUMINATED EXIT SIGNS AND EMERGENCY LIGHTING
 EQUIPMENT SHALL BE ILLUSTRATED ON THE PLAN.
  
 17. ALL PORTABLE FIRE EXTINGUISHERS LOCATIONS SHALL BE
 CLEARLY IDENTIFIED AND INDICATED ON THE PLAN.
  
 18. STAIR DETAIL SHALL BE PROVIDED INCLUDING MINIMUM
 RISE, RUN, AND TREAD DEPTH.
  
 19. KNOX-BOX KEY SYSTEM SHALL BE REQUIRED FOR THIS
 BUILDING.
  
 20. ALL ELEVATORS SHALL BE EQUIPPED WITH A REGION 7
 KEYWAY SYSTEM.
  
 21. TACTILE SIGNAGE SHALL BE INSTALLED AT ALL EXIT
 DOORS.
  
 22. COMPLETE LIFE SAFETY PLANS FOR THE BUILDING SHALL
 BE PROVIDED THAT ILLUSTRATE OCCUPANT LOADS, TRAVEL
 DISTANCES, DEAD-END CORRIDORS AND ALL FIRE SAFETY
 EQUIPMENT.
  
 23. OCCUPANT LOADS FOR ALL SPACES SHALL BE DETERMINED
 AND SUBMITTED WITH THE SUBMITTED PLAN AND WHEN APPROVED
 THEY ARE REQUIRED TO BE POSTED WHERE APPLICABLE.
  
 24. THE FIRE RATING OF ALL SHAFTS SHALL BE CLEARLY
 INDICATED ON THE BUILDING PLAN.
  
 25. REQUIRED FIRE SEPARATIONS BETWEEN EACH APARTMENT
 AND/OR TENANT SHALL BE CLEARLY INDICATED AND
 ILLUSTRATED ON THE BUILDING PLAN.
  
 26. REQUIRED CORRIDOR FIRE RATING SHALL BE CLEARLY
 INDICATED AND ILLUSTRATED ON THE BUILDING PLAN.
  
 27. ALL EXISTING AND NEW FIRE HYDRANTS PLANNED FOR THIS
 DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE CLEARLY INDICATED AND IDENTIFIED
 ON THE PLAN AND CLOSELY COORDINATED WITH THE BUREAU OF
 FIRE PREVENTION.
  
 28. ALL FIRE DEPARTMENT SPRINKLER SYSTEM CONNECTIONS
 (FDC,S) FOR THE PROJECT SHALL BE IDENTIFIED AND
 COORDINATED WITH THE BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION.
  
 29. ALL FIRE WATER MAINS, SIZES AND THEIR VALVE
 ASSEMBLIES SHALL BE CLEARLY IDENTIFIED AND ILLUSTRATED
 ON THE PLAN.
  
 30. ANNUALLY, EMERGENCY INSTRUCTIONS ARE TO BE PROVIDED
 TO EACH APARTMENT AND/OR TENANT. THESE INSTRUCTIONS ARE
 TO INDICATE THE LOCATION OF ALARMS, EGRESS PATHS, AND
 ACTIONS TO BE TAKEN IN THE EVENT OF A FIRE OR ALARM
 ACTIVATION.
  
 31. NOTICE IS REQUIRED FOR STRUCTURES WITH LIGHT-FRAME
 TRUSS-TYPE CONSTRUCTION. ANY COMMERCIAL, INDUSTRIAL, OR
 ANY MULTIUNIT RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURE OF THREE UNITS OR
 MORE WHICH USES HORIZONTAL OR VERTICAL LIGHT-FRAME
 TRUSS-TYPE CONSTRUCTION IN ANY PORTION SHALL BE MARKED
 WITH AN APPROVED SYMBOL. THE APPROVED SYMBOL SHALL BE
 PLACED WITHIN 24 INCHES TO THE LEFT OF THE MAIN ENTRY
 DOOR.
  
 32. THE BUREAU'S APPROVAL OF THIS SUBMITTED PROJECT
 DOES NOT CONSTITUTE IT'S FINAL REVIEW OR APPROVAL.
  
 33. THE BUREAU SHALL REVIEW ALL SUBMITTED BUILDING
 PLANS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF ALL
 APPLICABLE CODES AND STANDARDS.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
Review Stop L LANDSCAPING
Rev No 1 Status   Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time  
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop PARK PARKING
Rev No 3 Status F Date 11-06-2014 Cont ID  
Sent By ssamuels Date 11-06-2014 Time 16:39 Rev Time 0.00
Received By ssamuels Date 11-06-2014 Time 16:39 Sent To  
Notes
2014-11-06 16:49:24PARKING DEPARTMENT
 Z - 14030060
  
 AFTER REVIEWING THE FINAL PLANS FOR CLEMATIS PLACE, WE
 NOTICED THAT DATURA CURRENTLY HAS FOUR PARKING SPACES.
 THE PLANS ONLY SHOW TWO PARKING SPACES. I WOULD
 CONCLUDE THAT THEY ARE ELIMINATING TWO METER SPACES. WE
 WOULD REQUEST A PAYMENT IN ADVANCE OF $33,600 FOR THE
 REMOVAL OF THOSE METERS. CAN YOU PLEASE SUBMIT THIS
 BEFORE THE NOVEMBER 7 DEADLINE? THANKS FOR YOUR
 ASSISTANCE.
  
 PERMANENT REMOVAL
  
 CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH
 ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS
 SECTION94- I LL SUBSECTION (H) PAYMENT-IN-LIEU
  
 PAYMENT-IN-LIEU
 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENTS WITHIN THE DOWNTOWN MASTER PLAN
 (DMP) MAY ACCOMMODATE THEIR
 REQUIRED PARKING BY MAKING PAYMENT FOR EACH REQUIRED
 PARKING SPACE INTO THE DOWNTOWN PARKING
 TRUST FUND. THE FEE PER PARKING SPACE IS BASED UPON THE
 CURRENT CONSTRUCTION COST OF STRUCTURED
 PARKING, AS DETERMINED BY THE CITY PARKING
 ADMINISTRATOR, AND PAID AT THE TIME OF BUILDING PERMIT
 APPLICATION. PAYMENT INTO THE DOWNTOWN PARKING TRUST
 FUND IS NOT PAYMENT FOR AND DOES NOT
 PROVIDE THE RIGHT TO ANY PARKING SPACE IN ANY CITY
 FACILITY.
 A. PERMANENT REMOVAL OF A METER PARKING SPACE IS
 SIXTEEN THOUSAND EIGHT
 HUNDRED DOLLARS ($ 16,800.00).
  
 OTHER FEES
 THERE IS A ONE TIME $100.00 FEE PER METER FOR TEMPORARY
 REMOVAL AND REPLACEMENT.
  
 SEAN SAMUELS
 PARKING FACILITY SUPERVISOR
 PARKING ADMINSTRATION
 TEL : 561-822-1507
 [email protected]
  
  
  
  
Review Stop PARK PARKING
Rev No 2 Status F Date 08-20-2014 Cont ID  
Sent By ssamuels Date 08-20-2014 Time 17:07 Rev Time 0.00
Received By ssamuels Date 08-20-2014 Time 17:08 Sent To  
Notes
2014-08-20 17:33:16PARKING DEPT COMMENTS
  
 PLAN Z 14030060
  
 REMOVAL OF ON - STREET METERED PARKING SPACES WILL
 REQUIRED PAYMENT OF A FEE AS ESTABLISH BY THE PARKING
 ADMINSTRATOR.
  
 FEE: PERMANENT METER REMOVAL - $16,800 PER METER
 TEMPORARY METER REMOVAL - $100 PER METER
 METER HOOD RENTAL - $350 PER MONTH / PER METER
 $20 PER DAY INCLUDED HOLIDAY AND SUNDAY
  
 CONCERN ABOUT THE NUMBER PROVIDED FOR THE GARAGE FIRST
 LEVEL SLOPE PLEASE REFER TO THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH
 ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS CODE.
  
 PLEASE PROVIDE BICYCLE RACK SPECIFICATION BY CITY OF
 WEST PALM BEACH CODE SPECIFICATION
  
 PARKING DETAIL IS REQUIRED PER CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH
 INCLUDED ANGLE PARKING SPACES. H.C SYMBOL
  
 3RD LEVEL NO DIMENSION FOR SPACES IS PROVIDED.
  
 PLAN LACK FULL LAYOUT OF PARKING SPACES FOR ALL LEVELS
 OF GARAGES - UNDERGROUND LEVELS - 1B - 1D - 1 E
  
  
 SEAN SAMUELS
  
 TEL - 561-822-1507
 [email protected]
  
Review Stop PARK PARKING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 04-09-2014 Cont ID  
Sent By ssamuels Date 04-09-2014 Time 12:02 Rev Time 0.00
Received By ssamuels Date 04-09-2014 Time 12:02 Sent To  
Notes
2014-04-09 12:12:53PARKING DEPARTMENT
 Z 14030060
  
 REMOVAL OF ON - STREET METERED PARKING SPACES WILL
 REQUIRED PAYMENT OF A FEE AS ESTABLISH BY THE PARKING
 ADMINSTRATOR.
  
 FEE :
 PERMANENT METER REMOVAL - $16,800 PER METER.
 TEMPORARY METER REMOVAL - $100 PER METER
 METER HOOD RENTAL $350 PER MONTH/ PER METER
 METER HOOD RENTAL $20 PER DAY ( INCLUDED SUNDAY AND
 HOLIDAY)
  
 NO DIMENSION OF PARKING WAS PROVIDED FOR REGULAR AND
 HANDICAP SPACES.
 NO HANDICAP SPACE SHOW ON THE PLAN
 NO BIKE PARKING SPACE SHOW
  
  
 SEAN SAMUELS CPP
 PARKING ADMINSTRATION
 561-822-1507
 [email protected]
  
  
Review Stop POLICE POLICE
Rev No 1 Status   Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time  
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop PU PUBLIC UTILITIES
Rev No 1 Status P Date   Cont ID  
Sent By Jackson Date 06-18-2014 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2014-06-18 16:07:17SANITARY SEWER
  
 WE DO NOT RECOMMEND THE POINT OF TIE TO BE AT THE 24?
 CLAY GRAVITY LINE ON ROSEMARY. A TIE-IN TO THE EXISTING
 24? (VCP) CLAY LINE WOULD BE DISRUPTIVE AND EXPENSIVE.
 AFTER REVIEWING THE PLANS WITH JOSH MCDERMOTT,
 SUPERINTENDENT, WE?VE CONCLUDED THAT THE PREFERRED
 TIE-IN FOR THE SANITARY SEWER SHOULD THE 8? GRAVITY
 LINE THAT RUNS DOWN THE ALLEY BETWEEN THE TWO (2)
 PROPERTIES.
 ALTHOUGH THIS 8? CLAY LINE IS IN ?FAIR? CONDITION, IT
 IS REASONABLE TO EXPECT THAT THIS IS LESS COSTLY TO THE
 DEVELOPER AND LESSENS THE IMPACT TO THE EXISTING
 INFRASTRUCTURE ALONG ROSEMARY .
  
  
 JACKSON LOEBIG
 O&M SUPERINTENDENT
 PUBLIC UTILITIES DEPARTMENT
 CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH
 401 CLEMATIS STREET
 WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33401
  
 TEL: 561 494-1067
 CELL: 561 951-7656
  
  
Review Stop PW PUBLIC WORKS
Rev No 1 Status   Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time  
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop STORM STORMWATER
Rev No 2 Status F Date 06-02-2014 Cont ID  
Sent By tward Date 06-02-2014 Time 18:51 Rev Time 0.50
Received By cranford Date 08-20-2014 Time 14:32 Sent To  
Notes
2014-08-20 14:32:49SEE ENGINEERING COMMENTS
2014-06-02 19:32:591. DRAINAGE STRUCTURE S-202 APPEARS TO BE NEW. PROPOSED
 PIPE BETWEEN S-202 AND CS-2 WILL BE IN CONFLICT WITH
 EXISTING 6" WATER MAIN TO BE ABANDONED. CAN CS-2
 CONNECT TO EXISTING CURB INLET TO THE SOUTH OF CS-2
 INSTEAD? IT APPEARS IT WOULD CLEAR THE SANITARY MAIN IN
 THE ALLEY.
 2. SURVEY SHOWS THE GRATE ELEVATION OF THE EXISTING
 CURB INLET IN THE ALLEY TO BE 23.13 FT NGVD. THE PAVING
 AND DRAINAGE PLAN CALLS OUT A GRATE ELEVATION OF 22.0
 FT NGVD. LIKEWISE, THE GRATE ELEVATIONS FOR PROPOSED
 DRAINAGE STRUCTURES S-201, CS-2, CS-1 AND S-301 ON THE
 PAVING AND DRAINAGE PLAN ARE SHOWN TO BE MORE THAN 1
 FOOT BELOW EXISTING GRADES OF THE ALLEY AND ROSEMARY
 AVENUE.
 3. VERIFY THE WIDTH OF THE CONTROL STRUCTURES CAN "FIT"
 BOTH A WEIR BOX AND BAFFLE AND HAVE SUFFICIENT SPACE TO
 INSTALL BOTH.
 4. ON THE BAFFLE DETAIL, INDICATE MINIMUM DISTANCE
 BETWEEN BOTTOM OF BAFFLE AND INVERT OF EXFILTRATION
 TRENCH PIPE.
 5. DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS ON SHEET C3 INDICATE THE
 3-YEAR 1-HOUR DESIGN STORM TO BE 1 INCH. PER FDOT IDF
 CURVES, 3-YEAR 1 HOUR STORM IS CLOSER TO 2.8 INCHES.
 6. VALIDATE THE USE OF THE SFWMD EXFILTRATION TRENCH
 STANDARD FORMULA WITHOUT MODIFICATION WITH ONE SIDE OF
 THE TRENCH NEARLY ADJACENT TO THE WALL OF THE
 UNDERGROUND PARKING STRUCTURE.
 7. INDICATE HOW THE DRAINAGE OF THE UNDERGOUND PARKING
 STRUCTURES WILL BE MANAGED.
 8. TIE ROOF DRAINS INTO THE ONSITE DRAINAGE SYSTEM OR
 DISCAHRGE TO PERVIOUS AREAS WHERE POSSIBLE.
 9. WITH THE ENGINEERING PERMIT APPLICATION SUBMIT A
 STORMWATER POLLUTION PROTECTION PLAN.
 10. PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION OR DEMOLITION, SUBMIT A COPY
 OF THE FDEP GENERAL PERMIT FOR STORMWATER DISCHARGES
 ASSOCIATION WITH CONSTRUCTION SITES (NPDES PERMIT).
 11. WATER MAIN VALVES AND SANITARY LATERALS SHOULD NOT
 BE LOCATED NEAR OR UNDER TREE PLANTERS.
 12. ON THE ARCHITECTURAL VIEWS, SETBACK LINES AND
 PROPERTY LINES ARE MISLABELED.
  
 TRACY L. WARD, P.E.
 SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER
 ENGINEERING AND PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
 561-494-1120
  
  
  
Review Stop STORM STORMWATER
Rev No 1 Status F Date 04-04-2014 Cont ID  
Sent By tward Date 04-04-2014 Time 13:47 Rev Time  
Received By tward Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2014-04-04 13:57:141. INCLUDE WITH THE ENGINEERING PERMIT APPLICATION THE
 FOLLOWING:
 - SIGNED AND SEALED DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS AND LAND USE
 BREAKDOWN (PERVIOUS/IMPERVIOUS/BUILDING/ETC.)
 - SIGNED AND SEALED ENGINEERING PLANS INCLUDING PAVING,
 GRADING AND DRAINAGE PLAN AND AN EROSION CONTROL PLAN
 2. BEFORE START OF CONSTRUCTION, PROVIDE FDEP NPDES
 PERMIT
 3. WEIR BOX DETAIL SHOWS HEIGHT TO BE PIPE DIAMETER +
 6". BASED ON EXFILTRATION TRENCH DESIGN, THE HEIGHT
 SHOULD BE PIPE DIAMETER + 18" (6" BELOW AND 12" ABOVE
 THE PIPE).
 4. INCLUDE BAFFLES IN INLETS CONNECTED TO EXFILTRATION
 TRENCHES.
 5. WILL THE OVERHEAD ELECTRIC LINES IN THE ALLEY BE
 AFFECTED?
 6. SHOW PROPERTY LINES ON THE BUILDING SECTION SHEET
 A-6.
 7. WHERE IS THE ALLEY EXFILTRATION TRENCH IN RELATION
 TO THE SUBTERRANEAN PARKING AREAS?
  
 TRACY L. WARD, P.E.
 SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER
 ENGINEERING AND PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
 561-494-1120
Review Stop SURVEY SURVEYING
Rev No 3 Status   Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2014-08-27 10:24:241. PREVIOUS COMMENTS FROM REVIEW #2 STILL PERTAIN.
 2. RESPONSE FROM APPLICANT WAS THAT SANITATION HAD
 APPROVED AT PPRC. THAT IS INCORRECT. APPLICANT
 NEEDS TO CONTACT FERDINAND RIVERA AS PROPOSED
 COLLECTION IS NOT APPROVED.
Review Stop SURVEY SURVEYING
Rev No 2 Status F Date 06-12-2014 Cont ID  
Sent By vnoel Date 06-12-2014 Time 07:22 Rev Time 0.00
Received By vnoel Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2014-06-12 07:22:461. ORIGINAL COMMENTS CONCERNING REPLAT AND BRIDGE
 CROSSING STILL PERTAIN.
 2. AN ACCESS EASEMENT OVER THE EXPANDED ALLEY WILL BE
 REQUIRED.
 3. DEVELOPER'S AGREEMENT WILL BE REQUIRED FOR
 MAINTENANCE OF EXISTING AND PROPOSED PAVERS IN ALLEY
 AND ALONG DATURA, ROSEMARY AND CLEMATIS.
 4. SANITATION HAS NOT BEEN CONTACTED FOR APPROVAL.
 PROJECT WILL NOT BE APPROVED WITHOUT THEIR CONSENT.
 5. METER ASSEMBLIES NEED TO BE LOCATED OUTSIDE OF
 RIGHT-OF-WAY.
Review Stop SURVEY SURVEYING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 04-04-2014 Cont ID  
Sent By vnoel Date 04-04-2014 Time 09:45 Rev Time  
Received By vnoel Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2014-04-04 10:34:131. REPLAT WIL BE REQUIRED. APPLICATION IS MADE THROUGH
 ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR TECHNICAL REVIEW.
 2. REVISE SURVEY TO INCLUDE WEST ONE-HALF OF LOT 5.
 3. RIGHT-OF-WAY DEDICATION WILL BE REQUIRED FOR A
 PORTION OF DATURA ST.
 4. PRIVATE DRAINAGE CROSSING ALLEY WILL REQUIRE
 AGREEMENT.
 5. KEEP SANITARY CONNECTIONS OUT OF ALLEY.
 6. PROVIDE JUSTIFICATION FOR ABANDONMENT OF 6" WATER
 MAIN.
 7. SITE/CIVIL PLANS REQUIRE SEPARATE SUBMITTAL TO
 ENGINEERING SERVICES.
 8. BRIDGE CROSSING ALLEY WILL REQUIRE A SEPARATE
 AGREEMENT/PERMIT.
 9. SITE PLAN DOES NOT SHOW ADDITIONAL R/W PER
 MAINTENANCE MAP FOR WEST 1/2 OF LOT 5. DOORS CANNOT
 OPEN INTO RIGHT-OF-WAY.
 10. IS ADDITIONAL ALLYE WIDTH TO BE DEDICATED AS R/W?
 11. BRIDGE NOT SHOWN ON SHEET A-6, BUILDING SECTION.
 ADD RIGHT-OF-WAY LINES TOSECTION AND ELEVATIONS.
 12. APPROVAL OF SANITATION SUPERVISOR, FERDINAND
 RIVERA, WILL BE REQUIRED.
 13 PROPERTY CORNERS MISSING ALONG EAST LINE OF LOT 4.
Review Stop TRAFFIC TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No 1 Status F Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 04-08-2014 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By bcollins Date 04-08-2014 Time 14:42 Sent To  
Notes
2014-04-08 15:08:041. TRAFFIC MOVEMENTS SHALL BE SHOWN, USING AUTOTURN, TO
 DEPICT HOW ACCESS AND EGRESS FROM THE LOADING AREAS ARE
 ACHIEVED.
 2. TRAFFIC MOVEMENTS SHALL BE SHOWN, USING AUTOTURN, TO
 DEPICT HOW ACCESS AND EGRESS FROM THE PARKING AREAS ARE
 ACHIEVED.
 3. WILL THE ADDITIONAL PAVED WIDTH OF THE ALLEY BE
 DEDICATED AS ALLEY RIGHT OF WAY?
 4. ALL TRAFFIC LEAVING THE SITE ONTO THE ALLEY SHALL BE
 DIRECTED BY SIGNAGE TO ROSEMARY AVENUE.
 5. THE PROPOSED PATHWAY IS TOO CLOSE (2 FT.) TO THE
 ENTRANCE TO THE GARAGE. THIS PATHWAY SHOULD BE
 RESTRICTED TO ONE-WAY TRAFFIC WITH A MINIMUM 6FT.
 SEPARATION FROM THE GARAGE ACCESS.
 6. THE RAMP UP TO PARKING IN THE 5 STORY BUILDING IS
 NOT SHOWN ON THE SITE PLAN.
 7. REMOVAL OF ON STREET METERED PARKING SPACES WILL
 REQUIRE PAYMENT OF A FEE AS ESTABLISHED BY THE PARKING
 DEPARTMENT.
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 3 Status F Date 11-17-2014 Cont ID  
Sent By aaponte Date 11-17-2014 Time 16:10 Rev Time 0.00
Received By aaponte Date 11-17-2014 Time 16:10 Sent To  
Notes
2014-11-17 16:29:081. FITNESS ROOM CANNOT GO IN THE ROOFTOP TERRACE.
 PLEASE LOOK AT DEFINITION FOR ROOFTOP GARDENS AND
 ELEMENTS ALLOWED TO ENCROACH INTO THE MAXIMUM BUILDING
 HEIGHT.
 2. PLEASE IDENTIFY THE LOCATION OF THE EXISTING WINDOWS
 ON ADJACENT PROPERTY TO THE EAST.
 3.PLEASE CHECK THE SPACES EXCLUDED FROM THE FAR
 CALCULATION ( JANITOR ROOMS, TOILET NEXT TO ELEVATOR ON
 FIRST FLOOR, AREA ADJACENT TO ELEVATOR ON FLOORS 2 TO 5
 ON SOUTH TOWER).
 4. DRIVE AISLE IN SOUTH PARKING GARAGE IS ONLY 20' IN
 WIDTH WHILE 24' IS REQUIRED FOR 90 DEGREE PARKING.
 5. PLEASE INCLUDE IN THE PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT TABLE IN
 SHEET A-1 THE INFORMATION REGARDING COMPLIANCE WITH
 MAXIMUM BUILDING FOOTPRINT FOR EACH PARCEL.
 6. FAR TABLE IN SHEET A-1 SHOWS MAX FAR PERMITTED AS
 180,173.95 SF. THE CORRECT NUMBER IS 180,153.75 SF.
 7. GARAGE RAMP TO 2ND LEVEL HAS A SLOPE OF 8%. MAXIMUM
 ALLOWED IS 6% FOR A RAMP WITH PARKING.
 8. BALCONIES SHOWN ON THE DATURA ELEVATION FOR FLOORS 2
 TO 5 ARE NOT DEPICTED ON FLOOR PLANS.
 9. AT RETAIL FRONTAGE, DETAILS CALL FOR A "FABRIC
 CANOPY WITH METAL FRAMEWORK". PLEASE INCLUDE ADDITIONAL
 REFERENCE PICTURES FOR THIS TYPE OF AWNING TO
 DEMONSTRATE COMPATIBILITY WITH PROPOSED STYLE.
 10. PLEASE INCLUDE CALCULATION FOR THE PRIVATE OPEN
 SPACE ON THE SOUTH PARCEL, AND ADD A SUMMARY WITH THE
 OVERALL PRIVATE AND PUBLIC OPEN SPACE REQUIRED IF THE
 TWO PARCELS ARE PUT TOGETHER. INCLUDE A NOTE EXPLAINING
 HOW THE CALCULATION WAS DONE.
 11. SANITATION APPROVAL FOR PROPOSED GARBAGE DISPOSAL
 AND COLLECTION WILL BE REQUIRED. PLEASE CONTACT
 FERDINAND RIVERA AT 822-2076.
  
  
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 2 Status F Date 07-14-2014 Cont ID  
Sent By aaponte Date 07-14-2014 Time 15:58 Rev Time 0.00
Received By aaponte Date 07-14-2014 Time 15:57 Sent To  
Notes
2014-07-14 16:29:22RESPONSES TO COMMENTS FROM PREVIOUS REVIEW:
 3. INFORMATION REGADING COMPLIANCE WITH PRIVATE OPEN
 SPACE REQUIREMENTS PROVIDED IN LA DRAWINGS IS NOT
 SUFFICIENT. PLEASE INDICATE COMPLIANCE FOR EACH OF THE
 PARCELS REGARDING THE AMOUNT OF PUBLIC OPEN SPACE
 REQUIRED, PRIVATE OPEN SPACE REQUIRED, PERCENTAGE OF
 VEGETATED AREA REQUIRED, AND PERCENTAGE OF TREE CANOPY
 ACCORDING TO TABLE IV-7 AND IV-8. TABLE SHALL ALSO
 INCLUDE CALCULATIONS FOR THE PUBLIC OPEN SPACE
 REQUIRED.
 4. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REGARDING PROPOSED BRIDGE IS
 MISSING. FLOOR PLANS FOR 3RD, 4RD AND 5TH FLOOR MISSING
 FROM PACKET. IS THE BRIDGE IS ONLYY CONNECTING THE TWO
 ROOFTOP GARDENS? SECTION ON SHEET A8 SHOWS A PORTION OF
 A BRIDGE ALSO ON 5TH FLOOR.
 8. GROSS SQUARE FOOTAGE CALCULATIONS PROVIDED SEEM NOT
 TO INCLUDE A PORTION OF THE LOBBLY ON CLEMATIS STREET.
 PLEASE CLARIFY THE USE OF AREA EXCLUDED AROUND THE
 ELEVATOR ON THE 11TH FOOR, CORRIDORS LEADING TO
 MECHANICAL ROOMS SHALL BE INCLUDED IN THE FAR. IN
 GENERAL, PLEASE CONFIRM THE GROSS BUILDING AREA FOR ALL
 THE FLOOR. A ROUGH ESTIMATE OF THE FIRST FLOOR
 CALCULATED BY STAF FRESULTS IN 14,830SF VS 12,690SF
 INDICATED IN SHEET A-14 FOR THE CLEMATIS STREET
 BUILDING.
 SCHOOL BOARD APPROVAL IS FOR 166 UNITS, AND THE PROJECT
 CURRENTLY PROPOSED 168, PLEASE OBTAIN REVISED APPROVAL.
 10. ELEVATIONS PROVIDED AR BLACK AND WHITE AND IT IS
 VERY DIFFICULT TO READ THE ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN. PLEASE
 PROVIDE COLORED ELEVATIONS WITH SHADOWS TO BETTER ALLOW
 THE BUILDING ELEVATION REVIEW. THEY COULD BE RPOVIDED
 AT 11 BY 17 SIZE.
 13. PLEASE PROVIDE BACK UP INFORMATION TO CONFIRM
 COMPLIANCE WITH TABLE IV-4: FACADE ARTICULATION
 REQUIREMENTS. COMPLIANCE WITH PLANAR BREAK AND BLANK
 WALL WILL BE REQUIRED BETWEEN OTHERS INCLUDED IN
 TABLE.WHAT IS THE PROPOSED TREATMENT FOR THE WALL
 ADJACENT TO FPL?
 14. AUTO TURN ANALYSIS WAS NOT INCLUDED WITH
 RESUBMITTAL.
 17. FOUNTAIN INDICATED AS REMOVED IN RESPONSE LETTER IS
 STILL SHOWN IN LA AND SITE PLAN DRAWINGS. IT SHALL BE
 REMOVED OR MOVED CLOSER TO THE BUILDING AS IT BLOCKS
 PEDESTRIAN TRAFFIC.
 18. TREE GRATES ALONG DATURA SHALL BE LOCATED ADJACENT
 TO THE CURB.
 25. PLEASE INCLUDE DIMENSIONS IN ALL PARKING SPACES TO
 DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE.
  
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS FRO 2ND REVIEW
 1. PARKING ON NORTH SIDE OF ALLEY REQUIRES A 5 FEET
 LANDSCAPE BUFFER. ONE ALTERNATIVE IS TO RELOCATE THE
 PARKING AS 90 DEGREE BACKING UP ON THE ALLEY (BACK UP
 WIDTH SHALL BE MIN. 24').
 2. TREE GRATES ALONG DATURA STREET SHALL BE LOCATED
 ADJACENT TO THE BACK OF CURB.
 3. ENTIRE SIDEWALK WIDTH ALONG DATURA STREET SHALL BE
 CONCRETE.
 4. A TRANSITIONAL PAVER DESIGN SHALL BE DONE AT
 CLEMATIS AND ROSEMARY, AND ROSEMARY AND DATURA. FURTHER
 DISCUSSION NEEDED.
 5. PROPOSED CURB CUT ON DATURA ST. EXCEED MAXIMUM CURB
 CUT ALLOWED. MAXIMUM PERMITTED IS 25'.
 6. DUE TO THE PROPOSED RAMP SLOPE A BREAK OVER
 TRANSITION IS REQUIRED.
 7. PARKING RAMP CANNOT START WITHIN THE MINIMUM
 REQUIRED SETBACK.
 8. BIKE RACK SHALL FOLLOW CITY STANDARD.
 9. ALL MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT IN ROOF SHALL BE ENCLOSED
 AND SCREENED.
 10. PLEASE DIMENSION ALL PARKING SPACES INSIDE GARAGE.
 11. ALL SETBACKS ARE MEASURED FROM THE BACK OF CURB,
 NOT THE FACE OF CURB.
 12. PLEASE PROVIDE COLORED ELEVATIONS, PREFERABLY WITH
 SHADOWS. BLACK AND WHITE COPIES ARE REALLY DIFFICULT TO
 READ. PRINTED COLORED ELEVATIONS CAN BE 11 BY 17.
 13.PLEASE INCLUDE A STRUCTURAL SOIL DETAIL FOR ALL
 AREAS AROUND TREE GRATES (10' AROUND TREE UNDER
 SIDEWALK).
 14. PLEASE STUDY THE POSIBILITY TO RELOCATE THE WATER
 METER AND RPZ TO THE ALLEY FRONTAGE.
 15. PLEASE PROVIDE INFORMATION TO CONFIRM COMPLIANCE
 WITH ALL BUILDING REQUIREMENT ELEMENTS FOR EACH PARCEL
 (FOOTPRINT).
 16. DROP-OFF AREA ON CLEMATIS STREET IS NOT PERMITTED,
 SPACE SHALL BE MAINTAINED AS ON-STREET PARKING.
 17. PLEASE PROVIDE DOCUMENTATION FOR SANITATION
 APPROVAL ON TRASH COLECTION LOCATION.
 18. PLEASE PROVIDE A TABLE WITH ALL UNIT SIZE TO
 CONFIRM COMPLIANCE WITH MINIMUM UNIT SIZE AND AVERAGE
 UNIT SIZE REQUIRED.
 19. FLOOR PLANS FOR LEVEL 3, 4, AND 5 ARE MISSING FROM
 DRAWING SET.
 FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION PLEASE CONTACT ANA MARIA
 APONTE AT 561-822-1439.
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 04-07-2014 Cont ID  
Sent By aaponte Date 04-07-2014 Time 10:57 Rev Time 0.00
Received By aaponte Date 04-04-2014 Time 10:49 Sent To  
Notes
2014-04-04 11:44:091. PROPOSED COURTYARD IS NOT CURRENTLY PERMITTED IN THE
 CWD-CD. STAFF SUGGEST A CODE AMENDMENT TO ALLOW THE
 PROPOSED COURTYARD.
 2. A PASSGEWAY IS REQUIRED FOR THE CWD-10. PROPOSED
 PASSAGEWAY DOES NOT COMPLY WITH CODE REQUIREMENTS FOR
 PASSAGEWAY INTENDED FOR PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION.
 ADDITIONAL DISCUSSION WILL BE NECESSARY TO DETERMINE
 ALTENATIVE OPEN SPACES.
 3.PLEASE PROVIDE INFORMATION REGARDING COMPLIANCE WITH
 PRIVATE OPEN SPACE REQUIREMENT (LA AND HARDSCAPE
 DRAWINGS REQUIRED). TABLE INDICATING AMOUNT OF
 VEGETATED AREA, AND TREE CANOPY REQUIRED VS PROVIDED.
 20% OF SITE AS TERRACE ON TOP OF 2ND STORY.
 4.PLEASE PROVIDE DETAIL INFORMATION ABOUT THE PROPOSED
 BRIDGE OVER THE ALLEY ROW.
 5. PROPOSED BULB OUT ON CLEMATIS STREET SHALL BE
 REMOVED. CLEMATIS STREETSCAPE SHALL BE MAINTAINED
 CONSISTENT WITH THE EXISTING. REMOVED PROPOSED GREEN
 ISLAND FICUS.
 6. PLEASE INDICATE THE DIMENSION OF SETBACK ON DATURA
 STREET.
 7. PLEASE INDICATE THE PROPERTY LINE AND SETBACK LINE
 ON ALL FLOOR PLANS AND ELEVATIONS.
 8. PLEASE PROVIDE A GROSS BUILDING AREA TABLE AND AN
 ASSOCIATED GRAPHIC FOR EACH FLOOR INDICATING THE AREA
 CALCULATED FOR FAR AND EXCLUDED ON EACH FLOOR. USE
 DEFINITION OF GROSS BUILDING AREA IN SECTION 94-109.
 9. PLEASE PROVIDE A DEVELOPEMENT CAPACITY VS PROPOSED
 DEVELOPEMENT TABLE INDICATING THE AREA AND FAR OF EACH
 PARCEL.
 10.PLEASE PROVIDE COLORED ELEVATIONS (ASSIGN
 TRANSPARENCY TO STREET TREES), AND INDICATE MAIN
 MATERIALS, BUILDING HEIGHTS, SETBACK AND PROPERTY
 LINES.
 11. PLEASE INSERT COLOR ELEVATION IN THE STREET CONTEXT
 FOR EACH STREET FRONTAGE.
 12. WHAT ARE THE POSSIBILITIES TO BURY THE OVERHEAD
 ELECTRIC LINES ON DATURA STREET? PROPOSAL RELOCATES THE
 EXISTING POLES TO THE CITY ROW. FURTHER DISCUSSION ON
 ALTERNATIVES IS NECESSARY.
 13. PLEASE PROVIDE INFORMATION TO CONFIRM COMPLIANCE
 WITH TABLE IV-4: FACADE ARTICULATION REQUIREMENTS.
 14. PLEASE PROVIDE AUTO-TURN TO DEMONSTRATE LOADING
 AREA OPERATION.
 15. PLEASE STUDY THE OPTION TO NARROW THE ALLEY EXIT
 INTO ROSEMARY AVE TO REDUCE THE NEGATIVE IMPACT ON
 PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION.
 16. PLEASE DISCUSS THE POSSIBILITY TO RELOCATE THE BACK
 FLOW PREVENTORS TO THE ALLEY. THEY SHALL NOT BE LOCATED
 ON THE PRIMARY STREET IF THERE ARE OTHER OPTIONS.
 17. LP-1 SHOWS AN OAK AT THE ROSEMARY AVE/DATURA STREET
 CORNER, A-1 SHOWS A FOUNTAIN.
 18. DATURA STREETSCAPE SHALL BE CONSISTENT. SHADE TREES
 SHALL BE PROVIDED (OAKS ARE PLANTED ALONG 610 CLEMATIS
 BUILDING). TREE GRATES SHALL BE INSTALLED ADJACENT TO
 THE CURB.
 19. EXISTING TREES ALONG ROSEMARY AVENUE SHALL BE
 EVALUATED TO DETERMINE IF REPLACEMENT IS NEEDED.
 20. ROSEMARY AVENUE PAVERS SHALL NOT CONTINUE ALONG
 DATURA STREET.
 21. PLEASE CLARIFY WHAT ARE THE ARCHITECTURAL COLUMNS
 INDICATED IN HP-1.
 22. CLEMATIS PLAZA SHALL HAVE THE SAME PAVERS CURRENTLY
 INSTALLED ALONG CLEMATIS STREET.
 23. PLEASE CORRECT PARKING TABLE (MAX PARKIGN ALLOWED
 FOR RETAIL).
 24. PLEASE INDICATE PARKING DIMENSIONS (AISLE+SPACES).
 CONSIDER WIDER STALL REQUIRED WHEN COLUMNS PRESENT.
 25. PLEASE INDICATE CIRCULATION PATTER IN GARAGE.
 26. PLEASE INDICATE LOCATION OF HANDICAP SPACES AND
 GUEST PARKING.
 27. TANDEM SPACES FOR RESIDENTIAL USES SHALL BE
 ASSIGNED TO UNE SINGLE UNIT AND RESTRICTIVE COVENANT
 WILL BE REQUIRED. TANDEM FOR COMMERCIAL WILL COUNT AS 1
 SPACE UNLESS VALET PARKING IS PROVIDED, AND RESTRICTIVE
 COVENANT WILL BE REQUIRED.
 28.PLEASE PROVIDE REQUIRED BIKE PARKING FOR COMMERCIAL
 AND RESIDENTIAL USES. COMMERCIAL (5 SPACES + ONE
 SHOWER/CHANGING FACILITY) RESIDENTIAL (12 SPACES).
 29. PLEASE INDICATE LOCATION OF DUMPSTER FOR GARBAGE.
 30.PLEASE PROVIDE INFORMATION ABOUT PROPOSED STRUCTURES
 ON ROOF TOP (HEIGHT, USES) COMPLIANCE WITH TABLE IV-5.
 31. PLEASE PROVIDE INFORMATION ON COMPLIANCE WITH BLANK
 WALL REGULATIONS.
 FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION PLEASE CONTACT ANA MARIA
 APONTE AT 561-822-1439
  Print


Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved