City of West Palm Beach eGovPlus

Plan Review Details - Project Z14020012

Plan Review Stops For Project Z14020012

Review Stop	B		BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No	2	Status	Date			Cont ID
Sent By			Date	Time	11:08	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	dkittred		Date	Time		Sent To

Notes

***NONE***

Review Stop	B			BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No	1	Status	F	Date	03-11-2014			Cont ID
Sent By	rbrown			Date	03-11-2014	Time	20:17	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	rbrown			Date	03-11-2014	Time	20:17	Sent To

Notes

2014-03-11 20:33:08	DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, BUILDING DIVISION,
	COMMENTS:

	1. THIS REVIEW IS A CURSORY REVIEW AS IT RELATES TO THE
	SITE. IT IS NOT A REVIEW FOR FULL COMPLIANCE WITH
	FLORIDA BUILDING CODE. THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE TO BE
	ADDRESSED FOR PERMITTING.

	2. PROXIMITY OF ACCESSIBLE PARKING. THE SURVEY DRAWING
	AND CIVEL ENGINEERING SHEETS C-1 AND C-2 SHOW THE
	ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES LOCATED SUCH THAT THEY ARE
	THE CLOSEST PARKING SPACES TO THE BUILDING ENTRANCE.
	SHEETS MP1.0, SP1.0 AND A1.0S ALL SHOW THE PROPOSED
	ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES FURTHER FROM THE BUILDING
	ENTRANCE SUCH THAT THEY WOULD NO LONGER BE THE CLOSEST
	PARKING SPACES TO THE BUILDING ENTRANCE. PER SECTION
	208.3 OF FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY CODE ACCESSIBLE PARKING
	SPACES ARE TO BE LOCATED ON THE SHORTEST POSSIBLE ROUTE
	OF TRAVEL FROM ADJACENT PARKING TO AN ACCESSIBLE
	ENTRANCE FOR EACH BUILDING. THE DESIGN OF ACCESSIBLE
	PARKING SPACES SHALL COMPLY WITH SECTION 502 OF FLORIDA
	ACCESSIBILITY CODE

	3. CONSTRUCTION TYPE. WHEN SUBMITTED FOR BUILDING
	PERMIT, THE PLANS SHALL SHOW THAT THE TYPE OF
	CONSTRUCTION FOR THE BUILDINGS WILL BE IN ACCORDANCE
	WITH THE HEIGHT, AREA AND OCCUPANCY LIMITATIONS IN
	CHAPTER 5 OF THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE

	4. BUILDING SEPARATION. WHEN SUBMITTED FOR BUILDING
	PERMIT, COMPLIANCE WITH ALL BUILDING SEPARATION,
	PERCENTAGE OF OPENINGS AND OPENING PROTECTIVE
	REQUIREMENTS OF CHAPTERS 6 AND 7 OF THE FLORIDA
	BUILDING CODE SHALL BE VERIFIED.

	5. ADDITION TO EXISTING BUILDING. THE ADDITION TO THE
	EXISTING BUILDING IS COVERED BY CHAPTER 10 OF THE
	FLORIDA EXISTING BUILDING CODE. THE HEIGHT AND/OR AREA
	INCREASE DUE TO THE PROPOSED ADDITION SHALL NOT
	INCREASE THE TOTAL BUILDING HEIGHT AND/OR AREA BEYOND
	THAT ALLOWED UNDER THE APPLICABLE PROVISIONS OF CHAPTER
	5 OF THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE FOR THE TYPE OF
	CONSTRUCTION USED.

	6. ALL APPLICABLE PERMITS AND SUB-PERMITS MUST BE
	OBTAINED BEFORE COMMENCING THE WORK.

	ROBERT BROWN
	BUILDING OFFICIAL
	TEL: 561 805 6652
	EMAIL: [email protected]

Review Stop	ENG - PPRC		ENGINEERING - PPRC
Rev No	1	Status	Date		Cont ID
Sent By			Date	Time	Rev Time
Received By			Date	Time	Sent To

Notes

***NONE***

Review Stop	FIRE		FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No	1	Status	Date	03-07-2014			Cont ID
Sent By	pleduc		Date	03-07-2014	Time	16:49	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	pleduc		Date	03-07-2014	Time	16:47	Sent To

Notes

2014-03-07 16:49:11	PLEASE SEE THE NOTES FOR CASE # 14020011.

	PETER LEDUC, FIRE MARSHAL

Review Stop	L		LANDSCAPING
Rev No	1	Status	Date		Cont ID
Sent By			Date	Time	Rev Time
Received By			Date	Time	Sent To

Notes

***NONE***

Review Stop	PARK			PARKING
Rev No	1	Status	P	Date		Cont ID
Sent By				Date	Time	Rev Time
Received By				Date	Time	Sent To

Notes

***NONE***

Review Stop	POLICE		POLICE
Rev No	1	Status	Date		Cont ID
Sent By			Date	Time	Rev Time
Received By			Date	Time	Sent To

Notes

***NONE***

Review Stop	PW		PUBLIC WORKS
Rev No	1	Status	Date		Cont ID
Sent By			Date	Time	Rev Time
Received By			Date	Time	Sent To

Notes

***NONE***

Review Stop	STORM		STORMWATER
Rev No	1	Status	Date		Cont ID
Sent By			Date	Time	Rev Time
Received By			Date	Time	Sent To

Notes

***NONE***

Review Stop	SURVEY			SURVEYING
Rev No	2	Status	P	Date	04-08-2014			Cont ID
Sent By	vnoel			Date	04-08-2014	Time	07:44	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	vnoel			Date		Time		Sent To

Notes

***NONE***

Review Stop	SURVEY			SURVEYING
Rev No	1	Status	F	Date	02-25-2014			Cont ID
Sent By	vnoel			Date	02-25-2014	Time	13:16	Rev Time
Received By	vnoel			Date		Time		Sent To

Notes

2014-02-25 13:41:15	1. ADD TIES FROM BUILDING TO PROPERTY LINES ON SURVEY.
	2. CITY DATUM IS NGVD-29. REVISE ALL PLANS ACCORDINGLY.
	3. SHOW LINE AND LABEL BEARING BASE BETWEEN THE 2
	MONUMENTS ON SURVEY.
	4. SITE/CIVIL PLANS WILL REQUIRE A SEPARATE SUBMITTAL
	TO ENGINEERING SERVICES.

Review Stop	TRAFFIC		TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No	1	Status	Date				Cont ID
Sent By			Date		Time		Rev Time	0.00
Received By	bcollins		Date	04-07-2014	Time	16:53	Sent To

Notes

***NONE***

Review Stop	Z		ZONING
Rev No	3	Status	Date				Cont ID
Sent By			Date		Time		Rev Time	0.00
Received By	dkittred		Date	04-18-2014	Time	14:30	Sent To

Notes

***NONE***

Review Stop	Z			ZONING
Rev No	2	Status	F	Date	04-08-2014			Cont ID
Sent By	dkittred			Date	04-08-2014	Time	11:09	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	dkittred			Date	03-25-2014	Time	10:47	Sent To

Notes

2014-04-08 11:13:22	PLANNING AND ZONING COMMENTS:

	4/8/2014

	COMMENTS TO BE ADDRESSED:

	1. THE EMAIL PROVIDED AS SUPPORT FOR THE COMMENT
	REGARDING THE SIDEWALK/PATHWAY BEING OUTSIDE THE LEASE
	AREA DOES NOT SPECIFICALLY ACKNOWLEDGE THE SIDEWALK
	WALK AND IT IS UNCLEAR IF THE VERSION OF THE SITE PLAN
	REVIEWED AND COMMENTED ON IN THE EMAIL CONTAINED THE
	SIDEWALK OUTSIDE THE LEASE AREA AT THAT TIME. PLEASE
	PROVIDE A RESPONSE FROM ST. MARY'S SPECIFICALLY
	INDICATING THIS WORK OUTSIDE THE LEASE AREA IS
	PERMITTED. (PREVIOUS COMMENT 9)

	2. PRELIMINARY LIGHTING HAS BEEN REVIEWED VIA EMAIL AND
	WAITING FOR FINAL PAPER SUBMITTAL. (PREVIOUS COMMENT
	16)

	3. DESIGN GUIDELINES (SECTION 2(G)) FOR THE ST. MARY'S
	CSPD REQUIRED THAT A MINIMUM OF 50% OF THE REQUIRED
	SHRUBS BE NATIVE TO PALM BEACH COUNTY OR DESIGNATED AS
	VERY DROUGHT TOLERANT. LANDSCAPE SHEET 1 OF 2 INDICATES
	THAT 100% OF THE REQUIRED SHRUBS ARE NATIVE, HOWEVER,
	LANDSCAPE SHEET 2 OF 2 DOES NOT INDICATE IN THE CHART
	THAT ANY OF THE SHRUBS ARE NATIVE. PLEASE CLARIFY THIS
	REFERENCE TO THE SHRUBS BEING NATIVE. OR WAS THE ITEM
	INTENDED TO MEAN THAT 100% OF THE REQUIRED SHRUBS ARE
	DROUGHT TOLERANT? IF CHANGES ARE REQUIRED BASED ON THE
	RESPONSE TO THIS ITEM PLEASE CONTACT ME TO DETERMINE IF
	THE CHANGE CAN BE ADDRESSED AT THE TIME OF SUBMITTAL OF
	THE LANDSCAPE PERMIT FOR THE SITE. (PREVIOUS COMMENT
	19)

	4. COMMENTS ON THE TREE ALTERATION PERMIT ARE UNDER
	PROJECT NUMBER Z14020013.


	CORRECTIONS THAT CAN BE MADE AT THE TIME OF SUBMITTAL
	OF A BUILDING/LANDSCAPE PERMIT:

	5. DISTANCE BETWEEN DOUBLE STRIPES ON THE PARKING
	DETAIL ON SHEET C-3 SHOULD BE 12" RATHER THAN 16". THE
	PLAN PACKET INCLUDES TWO STRIPING DETAILS IN THE
	PACKET. YOU MAY WANT TO OMIT ONE.

	6. BICYCLE PARKING SPACES PROVIDED IS 2 RATHER THAN 4.
	RACKS HOLD 1 BICYCLE EACH.

	7. CALCULATION FOR HANDICAP SPACES IS BASED ON THE
	TOTAL NUMBER OF SPACES PROVIDED, NOT THE MINIMUM
	PARKING REQUIRED BY CODE. AS A RESULT, 2 HANDICAP
	SPACES ARE REQUIRED AND 2 HAVE BEEN PROVIDED.

	8. THE LIVE OAK PROPOSED ON THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE
	SITE NEEDS TO BE LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF THE
	SIDEWALK WITHIN THE LANDSCAPE PARKING ISLAND UNLESS
	JUSTIFICATION IS PROVIDED FOR ITS LOCATION.
	ADDITIONALLY, MOVING THE TREE MORE NORTHWARD WILL AVOID
	ANY VISUAL OBSTRUCTIONS AT THE TIME THE FUTURE
	CONNECTION ROAD IS CONSTRUCTED.

	9. IT APPEARS THAT LOCATIONS FOR THE AC UNITS HAVE BEEN
	IDENTIFIED ON THE PLANS WITH SQUARES, BUT THEY ARE NOT
	LABELED. SOME OF THESE 'SQUARES' HAVE LANDSCAPING
	PROPOSED OVER TOP OF THESE AREAS. PLEASE IDENTIFY THESE
	SQUARES AND CONFLICTS WITH THE LANDSCAPING. (PREVIOUS
	COMMENT 13)

	10. PER THE FIRE DEPT., THE FDC SHOULD BE MOVED TO THE
	SAME LOCATION AS THE PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANT NEAR THE
	DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE. (PLEASE CONTACT PETER LEDUC, FIRE
	MARSHAL WITH ANY QUESTIONS - (561)804-4709
	[email protected].)

	IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT:

	DANIELLE J. KITTREDGE, AICP
	SENIOR PLANNER
	PLANNING & ZONING DIVISION
	PHONE: (561)-822-1443
	EMAIL: [email protected]

Review Stop	Z			ZONING
Rev No	1	Status	F	Date	03-05-2014			Cont ID
Sent By	dkittred			Date	03-05-2014	Time	10:31	Rev Time
Received By	dkittred			Date		Time		Sent To

Notes

2014-03-12 10:32:17	PLANNING AND ZONING COMMENTS:

	3/5/14

	SITE PLAN:

	1. PARKING STRIPING DETAIL NEEDS TO BE UPDATED (GRAPHIC
	WILL BE PROVIDED FOR REFERENCE).

	2. PROVIDE BICYCLE PARKING IN ACCORDANCE WITH ZLDR SEC.
	94-485(Q).

	3. PROVIDE LOADING AREA IN ACCORDANCE WITH ZLDR SEC.
	94-485(P).

	4. INCLUDE PARKING CALCULATION FOR HANDICAP ACCESSIBLE
	SPACES.

	5. THE LOT COVERAGE CALCULATION ON SHEET SP1.0 APPEARS
	TO BE THE LOT SIZE RATHER THAN LOT COVERAGE
	CALCULATION. PLEASE VERIFY.

	6. TRAFFIC CONCURRENCY LETTER FROM PALM BEACH COUNTY
	WILL BE REQUIRED BEFORE FINAL APPROVAL.

	7. MINIMUM HEIGHT OF DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE WALL IS SIX (6)
	FEET (ZLDR SEC. 94-444(B) FIGURE XIV-3). PLEASE CLARIFY
	PROPOSED HEIGHT OF DUMPSTER ON THE PLAN.

	8. PLEASE CLARIFY LEASE AREA VERSUS PROPERTY LINE.

	9. PLEASE CLARIFY THE EASTERN SIDEWALK LOCATION. IT
	APPEARS TO BE OUTSIDE THE LEASE AREA.

	10. THERE IS A SIDEWALK ON THE EAST SIDE OF THE
	HANDICAP PARKING SPACES PROVIDING A CONNECTION TO THE
	SOUTH. THIS CONNECTION IS ONLY SHOWN ON THE SITE PLAN
	(SP1.0) AND NOT CARRIED THROUGH TO THE OTHER SHEETS.
	PLEASE CORRECT.

	11. HOW WILL PEDESTRIANS USING THE SIDEWALK AROUND THE
	ROUNDABOUT BE PROTECTED FROM VEHICLES IN THE
	ROUNDABOUT? IS THE SIDEWALK RAISED?

	12. THE SIDEWALK ALIGNMENT IN THE LANDSCAPE ISLAND ON
	THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE ROUNDABOUT IS NOT
	CONSISTENT BETWEEN THE SITE PLAN AND LANDSCAPE PLAN.
	ADDITIONALLY, A FIRE HYDRANT IS BEING PROPOSED ON THE
	UTILITY PLAN WITHIN THIS LANDSCAPE ISLAND WHICH WILL
	AFFECT THE PROPOSED PLANTINGS.

	13. WILL THERE BE ANY OTHER OUTDOOR MECHANICAL
	EQUIPMENT OR UTILITIES IN ADDITION TO THE GENERATOR AND
	TRANSFORMER SHOWN ON THE SITE PLAN SUCH AS POOL
	EQUIPMENT, AIR CONDITIONING UNITS, BACKFLOW PREVENTERS?
	IF SO, PLEASE INDICATE AND PROVIDE PROPER SCREENING.
	ADDITIONAL SCREENING SHOULD ALSO BE PROPOSED AROUND THE
	TRANSFORMER.

	14. WHAT IS THE TRAFFIC CONTROL PROPOSED FOR THE
	ALIGNMENT OF THE NEW DRIVEWAYS ON THE PLAN? HAS ANY
	CONSIDERATION BEEN MADE FOR THE TRAFFIC FLOW WITH THE
	FUTURE ENTRY ROAD ON THE MASTER PLAN?

	15. SITE PLAN INDICATES THE EXISTING FREESTANDING SIGN
	TO BE RELOCATED. PLEASE INCLUDE ON THE SITE PLAN WHERE
	THE FREESTANDING SIGN WILL BE RELOCATED TO SO IT CAN BE
	ACCOUNTED FOR IN THE MINOR PD AMENDMENT. IF A NEW
	FREESTANDING SIGN WILL BE CONSTRUCTED RATHER THAN
	RELOCATED, COMPLIANCE WITH THE ST. MARY'S CSPD MASTER
	SIGNAGE PROGRAM WILL NEED TO BE DEMONSTRATED.
	A NEW 3' X 2' DIRECTIONAL PARKING SIGN IS BEING
	PROPOSED ON THE SOUTH PORTION OF THE SITE. ADDITIONAL
	DESIGN INFORMATION IS NEEDED ON THIS SIGN TO EVALUATE
	CONSISTENCY OF THIS SIGN WITH THE MASTER SIGNAGE PLAN
	FOR ST. MARY'S CSPD.

	16. PLEASE REVIEW LIGHTING GUIDELINES OF THE ST. MARY'S
	CSPD AND DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS
	OR NOTATE WHERE THE PLAN DEVIATES FROM THE GUIDELINES.
	IT WILL BE IMPORTANT THAT THE PROPOSED LIGHTING
	FIXTURES ARE AESTHETICALLY COMPATIBLE WITH WHAT IS
	EXISTING ON THE ST. MARY'S CAMPUS.

	17. TREE ALTERATION PERMIT WAS RECEIVED BUT IT ONLY
	CONTAINED A LIST OF TREES TO BE REMOVED. A SITE PLAN
	INDICATING THE LOCATION OF THE TREES TO BE REMOVED AND
	CALCULATION FOR REPLACEMENT WILL NEED TO BE SUBMITTED
	PER ZLDR SEC. 94-448.

	LANDSCAPING:

	18. 75% OF REQUIRED TREES ARE TO BE SHADE TREES. SHEET
	1 OF 2 OF THE LANDSCAPE PLAN INDICATES ONLY 63% IS
	PROVIDED. IS THERE A REASON THE 75% CANNOT BE MET?

	19. THE DESIGN GUIDELINES (SECTION 2(G)) FOR THE ST.
	MARY'S CSPD REQUIRE THAT A MINIMUM OF 75% OF THE TREES
	AND PALMS REQUIRED BY CODE AND THE GUIDELINES BE NATIVE
	TO PALM BEACH COUNTY. SIMILARLY A MINIMUM OF 50% OF THE
	SHRUBS REQUIRED TO BE INSTALLED SHALL BE NATIVE TO PALM
	BEACH COUNTY.

	20. LOCATION OF UTILITIES THAT MAY IMPACT THE PLANTINGS
	SHOULD BE DEPICTED ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN WHICH INCLUDES
	BUT IS NOT LIMITED TO LOCATION OF UTILITY AND DRAINAGE
	EASEMENTS, OVERHEAD LINES, WATER METERS, TRANSFORMERS
	CHECK VALVES, CLEAN-OUTS, FIRE HYDRANTS, LIGHT POLES,
	ETC.

	21. THE DIVIDER MEDIAN LANDSCAPE AREA ON THE WESTERN
	SIDE OF THE PARKING LOT SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 5' IN
	WIDTH EXCLUDING THE CURBING.

	22. PLEASE REVIEW AND VERIFY COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION
	6(D) REQUIRED PLANT MATERIAL SPECIFICATIONS OF THE ST.
	MARY'S CSPD REGARDING PLANT HEIGHT, CLEAR TRUNK, AND
	SPREAD REQUIREMENTS.

	GENERAL COMMENTS FOR RESUBMITTING:

	A. PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS MADE BY
	DEPARTMENTS IN A WRITTEN FORMAT WHEN RESUBMITTING.

	B. 15 SETS OF REVISED PLANS AND/OR DOCUMENTS SHALL BE
	PROVIDED, ALONG WITH ONE REDUCED COPY AND AN ELECTRONIC
	COPY OF ALL PLANS. YOU MAY VERIFY PRIOR TO RESUBMITTAL
	IF A REDUCED NUMBER PLANS CAN BE SUBMITTED.

	C. IF NO RESPONSE IS RECEIVED WITHIN 60 DAYS OF THE
	ISSUANCE OF THESE COMMENTS, THE APPLICATION WILL BE
	CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN AND ANY FURTHER ACTION WILL
	REQUIRE SUBMISSION OF A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION.

	D. PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1)
	RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED
	COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE
	APPLICANT WILL BE ACCESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE
	WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE.

	IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT:

	DANIELLE J. KITTREDGE, AICP
	SENIOR PLANNER
	PLANNING & ZONING DIVISION
	PHONE: (561)-822-1443
	EMAIL: [email protected]