Plan Review Details - Project Z13120017
Plan Review Stops For Project Z13120017
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 1 Status P Date 01-07-2014 Cont ID  
Sent By rbrown Date 01-07-2014 Time 20:43 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rbrown Date 01-07-2014 Time 20:43 Sent To  
Notes
2014-01-07 20:48:32DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, BUILDING DIVISION,
 COMMENTS:
  
 1. THIS REVIEW IS A CURSORY REVIEW AS IT RELATES TO THE
 SITE. IT IS NOT A REVIEW FOR FULL COMPLIANCE WITH
 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE. THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE TO BE
 ADDRESSED FOR PERMITTING.
  
 2. WHEN SUBMITTED FOR BUILDING PERMIT, THE PLANS SHALL
 SHOW THAT THE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION FOR THE BUILDINGS
 WILL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE HEIGHT, AREA AND
 OCCUPANCY LIMITATIONS IN CHAPTER 5 OF THE FLORIDA
 BUILDING CODE
  
 3. WHEN SUBMITTED FOR BUILDING PERMIT, COMPLIANCE WITH
 ALL BUILDING SEPARATION, PERCENTAGE OF OPENINGS AND
 OPENING PROTECTIVE REQUIREMENTS OF CHAPTERS 6 AND 7 OF
 THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE SHALL BE VERIFIED. THE
 EQUIVALENT REQUIREMENTS FOR ONE AND TWO FAMILY
 DWELLINGS, AND TOWNHOUSES ARE IN SECTION R302 OF
 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE (RESIDENTIAL).
  
 4. ALL APPLICABLE PERMITS AND SUB-PERMITS MUST BE
 OBTAINED BEFORE COMMENCING THE WORK.
  
 5. FOR STREET ADDRESSING CONTACT JAMES JUDGE, GIS
 COORDINATOR, AT (561) 822 1226
  
 ROBERT BROWN
 BUILDING OFFICIAL
 TEL: 561 805 6652
 EMAIL: [email protected]
  
Review Stop FIRE FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No 1 Status P Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 01-23-2014 Time 14:35 Rev Time  
Received By   Date 01-06-2014 Time 13:30 Sent To  
Notes
2014-01-23 14:31:512ND REVIEW RESPONSE
  
 AFTER A REVIEW OF THE PPRC RESPONSE LETTER DATED
 JANUARY 21, 2014, FROM URBAN DESIGN KILDAY STUDIOS, TO
 ERIC SCHNEIDER, PRINCIPAL PLANNER, THE PREVIOUSLY
 SUBMITTED FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU COMMENTS HAVE BEEN
 ADDRESSED.
  
 THE BUREAU'S APPROVAL OF THIS SUBMITTED PROJECT DOES
 NOT CONSTITUTE IT'S FINAL REVIEW OR APPROVAL.
  
 THE BUREAU SHALL REVIEW ALL SUBMITTED BUILDING PLANS AT
 THE APPROPRIATE TIME AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE
 REQUIREMENTS OF ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND STANDARDS.
  
 PETER LEDUC
 FIRE MARSHAL
 WEST PALM BEACH FIRE RESCUE
  
  
2014-01-06 14:03:02THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS WERE SUBMITTED BY PETER LEDUC,
 FIRE MARSHAL, BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION, WEST PALM
 BEACH FIRE RESCUE.
  
 THIS REVIEW CAN ONLY BE CONSIDERED PRELIMINARY AS THE
 DRAWINGS THAT WERE REVIEWED WERE NOT COMPLETE.
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS CAN BE EXPECTED WHEN FULL DRAWINGS
 ARE SUBMITTED FOR PERMIT.
  
 1. SITE ACCESS AND EXIT POINTS ARE TO BE CLEARLY
 IDENTIFIED AND MAINTAINED FOR EMERGENCY VEHICLES DURING
 ALL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES.
  
 2. TRASH AND DEBRIS IS TO BE REMOVED FROM THE SITE
 DAILY OR MORE OFTEN TO REDUCE THE ACCUMULATION OF
 POTENTIAL LIFE AND FIRE SAFETY HAZARDS.
  
 3. ALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL COMPLY WITH THE FLORIDA FIRE
 PREVENTION CODE, 2010 EDITION, INCLUDING BUT NOT
 LIMITED TO, CHAPTER 14, NEW EDUCATIONAL OCCUPANCIES.
  
 4. A NFPA 13 COMPLAINT FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM IS
 REQUIRED FOR THIS STRUCTURE. SEPARATE SHOP DRAWINGS,
 ARE REQUIRED TO BE SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY
 THE FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU PRIOR TO ANY INSTALLATION.
  
 5. A MONITORED FIRE ALARM SYSTEM IS REQUIRED FOR THIS
 STRUCTURE. SEPARATE SHOP DRAWINGS, ARE REQUIRED TO BE
 SUBMITTED, REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE FIRE PREVENTION
 BUREAU PRIOR TO ANY INSTALLATION.
  
 6. A NFPA 72 COMPLIANT FIRE ALARM SYSTEM IS REQUIRED
 FOR THIS STRUCTURE.
  
 7. ALL KITCHEN EQUIPMENT AND OPERATIONS SHALL COMPLY
 WITH NFPA 96, STANDARD FOR VENTILATION CONTROL AND FIRE
 PROTECTION OF COMMERCIAL COOKING OPERATIONS.
 EXTINGUISHMENT AND VENTILATION SYSTEM SHOP DRAWINGS
 SHALL BE SUBMITTED SEPARATELY FOR APPROVAL.
  
 8. ALL EXISTING AND NEW FIRE HYDRANTS PLANNED FOR THIS
 DEVELOPMENT SHALL BE CLEARLY INDICATED AND IDENTIFIED
 ON THE PLAN. THE FIRE HYDRANTAND FDC'S FOR THIS PROJECT
 SHALL BE CLOSELY COORDINATED WITH THE BUREAU OF FIRE
 PREVENTION. IT WILL RECOMMENDED THAT THE PROPOSED NEW
 HYDRANT LOCATIONS BE MOVED CLOSER TO THE BUILDING IN AN
 AGREEABLE LOCATION.
  
 9. COMPLETE LIFE SAFETY PLANS FOR THE BUILDING SHALL BE
 PROVIDED THAT ILLUSTRATE OCCUPANT LOADS, TRAVEL
 DISTANCES, DEAD-END CORRIDORS AND ALL FIRE SAFETY
 EQUIPMENT.
  
 10. ALL FIRE RATED OPENING PROTECTIONS (FIRE DOORS AND
 HARDWARE) SHALL BE CLEARLY IDENTIFIED AND INDICATED IN
 THE DOOR SCHEDULE.
  
 11. PRESCRIPTIVE STRENGTH REQUIREMENTS FOR ALL
 HANDRAILS AND GUARDRAILS FOR THE BUILDING SHALL BE
 PROVIDED AND CLEARLY INDICATED.
  
 12. ALL EXIT DISCHARGE LOCATIONS SHALL BE CLEARLY
 ILLUSTRATED ON THE PLAN.
  
 13. ALL ILLUMINATED EXIT SIGNS AND EMERGENCY LIGHTING
 EQUIPMENT SHALL BE ILLUSTRATED ON THE PLAN.
  
 14. ALL PORTABLE FIRE EXTINGUISHERS LOCATIONS SHALL BE
 CLEARLY IDENTIFIED AND INDICATED ON THE PLAN.
  
 15. STAIR DETAIL SHALL BE PROVIDED INCLUDING MINIMUM
 RISE, RUN, AND TREAD DEPTH.
  
 16. NOTICE REQUIRED FOR STRUCTURES WITH LIGHT-FRAME
 TRUSS-TYPE CONSTRUCTION. ANY COMMERCIAL, INDUSTRIAL, OR
 ANY MULTIUNIT RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURE OF THREE UNITS OR
 MORE WHICH USES HORIZONTAL OR VERTICAL LIGHT-FRAME
 TRUSS-TYPE CONSTRUCTION IN ANY PORTION SHALL BE MARKED
 WITH AN APPROVED SYMBOL. THE APPROVED SYMBOL SHALL BE
 PLACED WITHIN 24 INCHES TO THE LEFT OF THE MAIN ENTRY
 DOOR.
  
 17. KNOX-BOX KEY SYSTEM SHALL BE REQUIRED FOR THIS
 BUILDING.
  
 18. BUILDING ADDRESSES ARE REQUIRED ON THE BUILDING.
 THE ADDRESS IS TO BE A MINIMUM OF AT LEAST 6" HIGH AND
 CONTRAST TO THE BACKGROUND THAT THEY ARE AFFIXED.
  
 19. THE BUREAU'S APPROVAL OF THIS SUBMITTED PROJECT
 DOES NOT CONSTITUTE IT'S FINAL REVIEW OR APPROVAL.
  
 20. THE BUREAU SHALL REVIEW ALL SUBMITTED BUILDING
 PLANS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF ALL
 APPLICABLE CODES AND STANDARDS.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
Review Stop PU PUBLIC UTILITIES
Rev No 1 Status   Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2014-01-07 14:07:33PROJECT IS P ASSED AS PROPOSED WITH FOLLOWING
 NOTATIONS:
  
  
 NOTE: WATER AND SEWER UTILITIES ARE LISTED AS
 'PRIVATE'.
  
  
 1. A FDC (FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTION) OR A PIV (POST
 INDICATOR VALVE) WAS NOT DETAILED ON PLANS.
  
  
  
  
 JACKSON LOEBIG
 O&M SUPERINTENDENT
 PUBLIC UTILITIES DEPARTMENT
 CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH
 401 CLEMATIS STREET
 WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33401
  
 TEL: 561 494-1067
 CELL: 561 951-7656
Review Stop STORM STORMWATER
Rev No 1 Status F Date 01-08-2014 Cont ID  
Sent By tward Date 01-08-2014 Time 12:25 Rev Time  
Received By tward Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2014-01-08 12:37:021. PROVIDE COPY OF SFWMD ERP PERMIT MODIFCATIONBEFORE
 START OF CONSTRUCTION.
 2. PROVIDE COPY OF NPDES NOI BEFORE START OF
 CONSTRUCTION.
 3. PROVIDE SIGNED AND SEALED SWPPP AND PGD PLANS WITH
 ENGINEERING PERMIT APPLICATION.
 4. PROVIDE SIGNED AND SEALED DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS WITH
 ENGINEERING PERMIT APPLICATION.
 5. ONLY CONCEPTUAL ENGINEERING PLAN SUBMITTED.
 6. WHAT PART OF STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM CURRENTLY
 EXISTS? WILL ANY OF THE EXISTING DRAINAGE SYSTEM BE
 REMOVED/ABANDONED?
 7. AVOID PLANTING OF TREES WITHIN 5 FEET OF UNDERGROUND
 UTILITIES.
 8. MINIMIZE THE NUMBER OF OUTFALLS INTO THE PRESERVE.
 9. INCORPORATE BAFFLES AND SEDIMENT SUMPS IN THE
 DRAINAGE STRUCTURES TO PREVENT OFFISITE DISCHARGE OF
 POLLUTANTS, SEDIMENTS AND FLOATABLES.
 10. DETAILS FOR CONTROL STRUCTURES AND EXFILTRATION
 TRENCHES WILL BE REQUIRED WITH THE ENGINEERING PERMIT
 APPLICATION.
  
 TRACY L. WARD, P.E.
 SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER
 ENGINEERING AND PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
 561-494-1120
  
Review Stop SURVEY SURVEYING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 01-02-2014 Cont ID  
Sent By vnoel Date 01-02-2014 Time 07:46 Rev Time  
Received By vnoel Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2014-01-02 08:35:131. REMOVE THE NOTE ALONG THE NORTH PROPERTY LINE:
 "PROPOSED 4' BOARDWALK BY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPER".
 2. EXISTING UTILITY EASEMENT WILL NEED TO BE MODIFIED
 OR TERMINATED WITH GRANT OF NEW EASEMENT. PROVIDE 2
 COPIES OF REVISED SKETCH AND LEGAL DESCRIPTION.
 3. STORMWATER WILL NEED TO APPROVE THE PROPOSED
 OUTFALLS INTO TRACT "P" OVER THE CONSERVATION EASEMENT.
 4. SEPARATE SUBMITTAL WILL BE REQUIRED FOR SITE/CIVIL
 PLAN REVIEW.
 5. PROPERTY APPRAISER SHOWS THIS AS TWO PARCELS. UNITY
 OF TITLE WILL BE REQUIRED. APPLICATION IS MADE THROUGH
 ENGINEERING SERVICES.
Review Stop TRAFFIC TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No 2 Status F Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 02-03-2014 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By bcollins Date 02-03-2014 Time 08:14 Sent To  
Notes
2014-02-03 08:15:261. THE LATEST CONCURRENCY REPORT, DATED JANUARY 27,
 2014, SHOWS THAT THE INTERSECTION OF OKEECHOBEE BLVD.
 AND BENOIST FARMS WILL OPERATE AT A FAILING LEVEL OF
 SERVICE F IN THE AM PEAK HOUR UNDER EXISTING GEOMETRICS
 AND SIGNAL TIMING.
 2. THE ANALYSIS DOES NOT SHOW QUEUE LENGTHS FOR THE
 EASTBOUND LEFT TURN LANE AT OKEECHOBEE BLVD. AND
 BENOIST FARMS. PREVIOUS LESS CONSERVATIVE ANALYSIS
 (HIGHER PEAK HOUR FACTORS) SHOWED THAT THE 300 FT. LEFT
 TURN LANE WOULD PROVIDE INADEQUATE STACKING AND THAT
 LEFT TURN WOULD, THEREFORE, SPILL OVER INTO THE THROUGH
 LANES. THE LATEST EVALUATION WOULD WORSEN THAT
 CONDITION EVEN MORE. FDOT IS ALSO REQUIRING A STRAFFIC
 STUDY FOR THIS CONDITION.
 3. OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD IS A MAJOR COMMUTER ROADWAY
 FROM THE WESTERN COMMUNITIES WITHIN THE CITY AND THE
 SIGNALS ARE TIMED FOR PROGRESSION OF TRAFFIC TO
 MINIMIZE DELAYS. ANY CHANGES IN SIGNAL TIMING MUST BE
 APPROVED BY PALM BEACH TRAFFIC COUNTY. THE APPLICANT'S
 "OPTIMIZATION" OF SIGNAL TIMING INCREASES DELAYS TO
 THROUGH TRAFFIC ON EASTBOUND OKEECHOBEE BLVD. AT
 BENOIST FARMS FROM 6 TO 46 SECONDS PER VEHICLE IN THE
 AM PEAK HOUR.
 4. THE APPLICANT'S ANALYSIS ASSUMES AN ADDITIONAL LANE
 ON THE SOUTHBOUND APPROACH AT OKEECHOBEE BLVD. AND
 BENOIST FARMS. HOWEVER, THE SITE PLAN DOES NOT SHOW
 THIS TURN LANE AND HOW IT WOULD BE CONSTRUCTED. IN
 ADDITION, THE IMPACT TO THE CITY'S FIRE STATION 7
 ACCESS AND EGRESS NEEDS TO BE EVALUATED FOR ANY CHANGES
 IN GEOMETRY.
 5. TURNING MOVEMENT WORKSHEET 1A SHOWS THAT ABOUT 70%
 OF THE SCHOOL TRAFFIC ENTERS FROM THE DRIVEWAY TO
 OAKTON COMMONS ACROSS FROM BENOIST FARMS RD. THIS
 TRAFFIC STACKS IN A SINGLE LANE ON THE NORTH SIDE OF
 THE SCHOOL AND HAS TO CROSS BOTH INCOMING AND OUTGOING
 TRAFFIC TO ENTER THE STACKED DROP OFF AREA. UPON
 LEAVING, THE 4 LANES OF STACKED DROP OFF TRAFFIC HAS TO
 MERGE FROM 2 LANES INTO A SINGLE LANE FOR EXIT. THE SUM
 OF THESE CONDITIONS RAISES CONCERN THAT TRAFFIC WILL BE
 STACKED ON SITE SUCH THAT IT SPILLS ONTO THE ADJACENT
 ROADWAYS.
  
Review Stop TRAFFIC TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No 1 Status F Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 01-08-2014 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By bcollins Date 01-08-2014 Time 08:28 Sent To  
Notes
2014-01-08 08:29:431. A TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO PROVIDE
 HCS ANALYSIS AT EACH DRIVEWAY AND USING EXISTING SIGNAL
 TIMING AT OKEECHOBEE/BENOIST FARMS. THE STUDY SHALL
 INCLUDE ANALYSIS OF THE AM AND PM PEAK HOURS AS WELL AS
 THE PM SCHOOL PEAK HOUR. GRAPHICS SHALL BE PROVIDED
 SHOWING EXISTING VOLUMES, SEASONAL ADJUSTMENTS AND
 GROWTH RATES, BACKGROUND VOLUMES FROM APPROVED
 DEVELOPMENT, TOTAL BACKGROUND TRAFFIC VOLUMES,
 PROJECTED SCHOOL TRAFFIC, NON-SCHOOL OAKTON COMMONS
 TRAFFIC, AND TOTAL TRAFFIC VOLUMES. QUEUING AND THE
 IMPACTS ON THE PUBLIC ROAD SYSTEM, PARTICULARLY THE
 INTERSECTION OF OKEECHOBEE/BENOIST FARMS SHALL BE
 EVALUATED. THE FINAL SCOPE SHALL BE DEVELOPED IN
 CONSULTATION WITH CITY STAFF. THIS STUDY SHALL BE
 SUBMITTED TO BOTH THE CITY AND FDOT.
 2. THE OPERATIONAL PLAN IS DIFFICULT TO FOLLOW, BUT
 APPEARS TO BE OVERLY OPTIMISTIC. IT WOULD BE HELPFUL TO
 SEE VIDEO RESULTS FROM A SIMILAR OPERATION, OR A
 COMPUTER SIMULATION OF THE OPERATION.
 3. IF SCHOOL TIMES ARE STAGGERED, EVALUATION OF EACH AM
 AND PM TIME PERIOD NEEDS TO BE ANALYZED AND RESIDUAL
 IMPACTS (REMAINING QUEUES, EXITING VEHICLES) CARRIED
 OVER TO THE NEXT TIME PERIOD. A CHART SHOWING PROJECTED
 ARRIVALS AND DEPARTURES WOULD BE HELPFUL.
 4. THE BENOIST FARMS ACCESS DRIVEWAY IS SHARED WITH
 WEST PALM BEACH FIRE STATION 7. ANY QUEUING ON THAT
 DRIVEWAY DURING DROP OFF OR PICK UP COULD RESULT IN
 INCREASED RESPONSE TIMES FOR EMERGENCIES.
 5. SITE DRIVEWAY VOLUMES ARE NOT CONSISTENT BETWEEN THE
 CONCURRENCY ANALYSIS REPORT PREPARED BY PINDER TROUTMAN
 AND THE OPERATIONAL MANAGEMENT PLAN PREPARED BY SIMMONS
 AND WHITE.
  
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 3 Status F Date 02-25-2014 Cont ID  
Sent By eschneid Date 02-24-2014 Time 15:46 Rev Time 4.00
Received By eschneid Date 02-24-2014 Time 15:46 Sent To  
Notes
2014-02-24 18:27:23CASE NO. PB 1446CC
 OAKTON COMMONS CPD - RENAISSANCE CHARTER SCHOOL
 8151 OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD
  
 - CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446
  
 - PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN
 WRITTEN FORMAT.
  
 - WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF FOUR
 (4) PAPER COPIES AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY IN .PDF FORMAT
 OF ALL PLANS. PLEASE NOTE THAT CHANGES ON THE
 RESUBMITTED PLANS OR THE SUBMITTAL OF INFORMATION/PLANS
 TO ADDRESS THE COMMENTS MAY RESULT IN ADDITIONAL
 COMMENTS.
  
 - PLEASE NOTE THAT IF THE PLANNING DIVISION HAS NOT
 RECEIVED A RESPONSE TO THE PPRC COMMENTS WITHIN 60 DAYS
 FROM THE DATE OF THESE COMMENTS (BY MAY 25, 2014), THE
 CASE SHALL BE CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN. ANY FURTHER ACTION
 SHALL REQUIRE A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION.
  
 - PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1)
 RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED
 COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE
 APPLICANT WILL BE ACCESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE
 WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE ($300).
  
 1) REVISED COMMENT: STAFF DISCUSSED THE CONNECTION OF
 THE COMMERCIAL/RESIDENTIAL CONNECTOR PATH WITH MIKE
 SMOLAK WITH THE OAKTON PRESERVE DEVELOPER AND GREG
 FAGAN. THEY INDICATED THAT THE PATH WOULD BE RELOCATED
 THROUGH THE PRESERVE AREA AT AN EXISTING HIGH POINT AND
 THEN RUN ALONG THE SOUTH END OF THE PRESERVE AREA
 (ADJACENT TO THE PARKING) AND NOT THE PATH ALONG OAKTON
 PRESERVE AS SHOWN ON THE RESUBMITTED PLANS. WHICH
 PATHWAY CONNECTION IS GOING TO BE UTILIZED? IF THE
 "THROUGH THE PRESERVE" OPTION IS THE FINAL PLAN, THEN
 THE SITE, LANDSCAPE AND LIGHTING PLANS SHALL BE REVISED
 TO REFLECT THE NEW ROUTE.
  
 2) NEW COMMENT: THE LANDSCAPE PLAN DOES NOT SHOW THE
 REVISED 36 FOOT WIDTH AT THE NORTH OF TRACT A. THERE IS
 AN OAK TREE AND A DAHOON HOLLY WHICH APPEAR THAT THEY
 WILL NEED TO BE RELOCATED TO THE EAST TO ACCOMMODATE
 THE ADJUSTED CURB LINE.
  
 3) NEW COMMENT: THE PHASE II EXPANSION TO THREE EXIT
 LANES AT BENOIST FARMS ROAD AND OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD
 REQUIRES THE THE LANDSCAPE STRIP ALONG THE WEST SIDE OF
 TRACT A BE REMOVED. THE ENTRY LANDSCAPE IN THIS AREA
 SHALL BE RELOCATED ONTO TRACT B AND THE SAME MATERIAL
 SHALL BE MAINTAINED (CURRENTLY THE LANDSCAPE STRADDLES
 THE LINE BETWEEN TRACTS A AND B). THIS SHALL BE STATED
 ON THE PLANS.
  
 4) NEW COMMENT: THE PRESERVE GUARD RAIL SHALL BE
 CONSTRUCTED SIMILAR TO THE GUARD RAIL USED AT THE
 CITY?S WATER TREATMENT PLANT (NOT DOT CORRUGATED
 METAL).
  
 5) NEW COMMENT: THE PRESERVE FENCE SHALL BE VINYL
 COATED.
  
 6) NEW COMMENT: PLEASE NOTE: THE ULTIMATE APPROVAL
 LETTER FOR THE PROJECT WILL INCLUDE TRAFFIC CONDITIONS
 FROM THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, THE PALM
 BEACH TRAFFIC DIVISION AND THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH.
  
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 2 Status F Date 02-05-2014 Cont ID  
Sent By eschneid Date 02-04-2014 Time 09:29 Rev Time 0.00
Received By eschneid Date 02-04-2014 Time 09:29 Sent To  
Notes
2014-02-04 16:54:19CASE NO. PB 1446CC
 OAKTON COMMONS CPD - RENAISSANCE CHARTER SCHOOL
 8151 OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD
  
 - CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446
  
 - PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN
 WRITTEN FORMAT.
  
 - WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF FOUR
 (4) PAPER COPIES AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY IN .PDF FORMAT
 OF ALL PLANS. PLEASE NOTE THAT CHANGES ON THE
 RESUBMITTED PLANS OR THE SUBMITTAL OF INFORMATION/PLANS
 TO ADDRESS THE COMMENTS MAY RESULT IN ADDITIONAL
 COMMENTS.
  
 - PLEASE NOTE THAT IF THE PLANNING DIVISION HAS NOT
 RECEIVED A RESPONSE TO THE PPRC COMMENTS WITHIN 60 DAYS
 FROM THE DATE OF THESE COMMENTS (BY APRIL 5, 2014), THE
 CASE SHALL BE CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN. ANY FURTHER ACTION
 SHALL REQUIRE A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION.
  
 - PLEASE NOTE THAT ALL OF THE PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED
 COMMENTS WERE NOT SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED SO YOU WILL BE
 ACCESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE IS 20% OF THE
 ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE ($300).
  
 1) REPEAT COMMENT - PROVIDE A PALM BEACH COUNTY TRAFFIC
 CONCURRENCY LETTER APPROVING THE CONVERSION OF USE. THE
 LETTER THAT WAS SUBMITTED INCLUDED COMMENTS THAT STILL
 NEED TO BE ADDRESSED.
  
 2) NEW COMMENT: THE BICYCLE PAD IS SHOWN AT 17 FEET
 WIDE FOR 6 BICYCLE RACKS. BASED ON THE INSTALLATION
 STANDARDS, THE BICYCLE PAD FOR 6 BICYCLE RACKS IS ONLY
 REQUIRED TO BE 16.5 FEET WIDE. WHILE THE PAD IS SHOWN
 WIDE ENOUGH, STAFF IS CONCERNED THAT THE RACK CLOSEST
 TO THE WALL IS INSTALLED WITH THE ADEQUATE MINIMUM
 SETBACK. PLEASE PROVIDE THE DISTANCE FOR THE FIRST
 ELEMENT FROM THE WALL, EITHER 2 FEET OR 2.5 FEET (16.5
 FOOT WIDE PAD OR 17 FOOT WIDE PAD, RESPECTIVELY).
  
 3) NEW COMMENT: THE TRAFFIC STUDY INDICATES THAT THE
 SIGNALIZED EXIT ONTO OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD WILL HAVE
 THREE LANES. THE SITE PLAN ONLY SHOWS THE EXISTING TWO
 LANE CONDITION. PLEASE CLARIFY.
  
 4) REVISED COMMENT: THE FDOT PRE-APPLICATION LETTER
 INCLUDES A CONDITION THAT A TRAFFIC STUDY IS REQUIRED
 TO DETERMINE IF THE LEFT TURN LANE AT BENOIST FARMS
 ROAD IS REQUIRED TO BE LENGTHENED. WHAT IS THE STATUS
 OF THE TRAFFIC STUDY?
  
 5) REPEAT COMMENT: PROVIDE A WRITTEN NARRATIVE
 VERIFYING HOW THE BUILDING MEETS THE DESIGN ELEMENTS
 FROM MASTER DESIGN GUIDELINES.
  
 A. THE REQUIREMENT IS THAT 50% OF EACH FACADE HAVE A
 SLOPED ROOF. THE EAST AND WEST FACADES ARE 122.67 FEET
 LONG WITH THE SLOPED ROOF SECTION 33 FEET LONG, WHICH
 IS ONLY 30%.
  
 6) NEW COMMENT: THE SIDEWALK ON THE EAST SIDE OF THE
 PRIMARY ENTRANCE ROAD HAS BEEN REMOVED FROM THE PLANS.
 THIS SIDEWALK IS REQUIRED BY THE ROAD MATRIX IN THE
 DESIGN GUIDELINES. IT SHALL BE INSTALLED AS PART OF THE
 COMPLETION OF PHASE III. THE ROAD MATRIX REQUIRES THAT
 THE SECONDARY ENTRANCE DRIVE HAVE A FIVE (5) FOOT WIDE
 SIDEWALK ON BOTH SIDES. THIS IS NOT SHOWN.
  
 7) REPEAT COMMENT: PROVIDE VERIFICATION THAT THE CODE
 COMPLIANT BUFFER MATERIAL IS INSTALLED BETWEEN TRACTS
 C-2 REPLAT AND TRACTS B, C-1 AND OAKTON PRESERVE
 (EXCLUDING THE TREE PRESERVE AREA).
  
 A. THERE IS ONE TREE REQUIRED ALONG THE NORTHERN
 PROPERTY LINE WHERE OAKTON PRESERVE EXTENDS SOUTH OF
 THE TRACT C-2/PRESERVE BOUNDARY.
 B. THERE IS ONE ADDITIONAL TREE REQUIRED ALONG THE
 EASTERN PROPERTY LINE OF TRACT C-2. STAFF IS DOUBLE
 COUNTING THE FOUNDATION PLANTING TREES AS BUFFER TREES.
  
 8) REVISED COMMENT: THE BACKFLOW PREVENTER SHALL HAVE
 THE COCOPLUM HEDGE WRAP THE SOUTH SIDE TO PROVIDE
 SCREENING.
  
 9) NEW COMMENT: IT APPEARS THAT THERE ARE 2 ALEXANDER
 PALMS ON TOP OF THE EXFILTRATION TRENCH THAT RUNS ALONG
 THE WEST SIDE OF THE PLAY AREA. NOTE: ROOT BARRIERS
 SHALL BE USED IN ANY AREAS WHERE TREES MAY IMPACT WATER
 OR SEWER LINES OR EXFILTRATION TRENCHES.
  
 10) REPEAT COMMENT: PLEASE PROVIDE A CONCEPTUAL
 APPROVAL LETTER FROM FDOT FOR THE PROPOSED CIRCULATION
 PLAN (NO NEGATIVE IMPACT TO OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD). FDOT
 HAS NOT APPROVED THE PLAN AS OF THE MEETING ON FEBRUARY
 4, 2014.
  
 11) NEW COMMENT: STAFF DISCUSSED THE CONNECTION OF THE
 COMMERCIAL/RESIDENTIAL CONNECTOR PATH WITH MIKE SMOLAK
 WITH THE OAKTON PRESERVE DEVELOPER. HE INDICATED THAT
 THERE IS A LARGE DROP-OFF FROM THE FINISHED GRADE OF
 THE RESIDENTIAL BOUNDARY TO THE EXISTING GRADE OF THE
 TREE PRESERVE AT THE BORDER OF THE 2 PROPERTIES. HE WAS
 NOT SURE THAT AN ADA COMPLIANT SIDEWALK MADE OF
 CONCRETE OR PAVERS WOULD BE EASILY ACHIEVED (POSSIBLE
 REQUIREMENT OF FILL AND/OR RETAINING WALL). THE OAKTON
 PRESERVE DEVELOPER EXPERIENCED SIMILAR ISSUES WITH
 THEIR PORTION OF THE REQUIRED SIDEWALK NETWORK WHERE IT
 IS ADJACENT TO THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH PRESERVE
 TRACT AND THEY DETERMINED THAT THE BEST OPTION WAS TO
 INSTALL AN ELEVATED BOARDWALK TO ACCOUNT FOR THE GRADE
 CHANGE. PLEASE UPDATE THE PLANS TO INCLUDE "BOARDWALK"
 AS A POSSIBLE PATH TYPE IN CASE THIS BECOMES THE
 PREFERRED PATH OPTION FOR PART OR ALL OF THE CONNECTOR
 PATH.
  
  
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 01-08-2014 Cont ID  
Sent By eschneid Date 01-08-2014 Time 12:55 Rev Time 4.00
Received By eschneid Date 01-08-2014 Time 12:55 Sent To  
Notes
2014-01-08 12:55:29CASE NO. PB 1446CC
 OAKTON COMMONS CPD - RENAISSANCE CHARTER SCHOOL
 8151 OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD
  
  
 - CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446
  
 - PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN
 WRITTEN FORMAT.
  
 - WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF FOUR
 (4) PAPER COPIES AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY IN .PDF FORMAT
 OF ALL PLANS. PLEASE NOTE THAT CHANGES ON THE
 RESUBMITTED PLANS MAY RESULT IN ADDITIONAL COMMENTS.
  
 - PLEASE NOTE THAT IF THE PLANNING DIVISION HAS NOT
 RECEIVED A RESPONSE TO THE PPRC COMMENTS WITHIN 60 DAYS
 FROM THE DATE OF THE PPRC MEETING (MARCH 7, 2014), THE
 CASE SHALL BE CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN. ANY FURTHER ACTION
 SHALL REQUIRE A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION.
  
 - PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1)
 RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED
 COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE
 APPLICANT WILL BE ACCESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE
 WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE ($300).
  
 1) THE REVISED PALM BEACH COUNTY TRAFFIC CONCURRENCY
 LETTER APPROVING THE CONVERSION OF USE IS REQUIRED.
  
 2) PROVIDE A COPY OF THE FDOT ROW PERMIT FOR THE NEW
 DRIVEWAY CONNECTION.
  
 3) THE FPU, FPL AND CITY SERVICE LETTERS ARE REQUIRED.
  
 4) THE SCHOOL IS PROPOSED TO HAVE BOTH ELEMENTARY AND
 MIDDLE SCHOOL CHILDREN; THEREFORE, THE REQUIRED SPACE
 CALCULATION SHALL INCLUDE BOTH THE ELEMENTARY 5
 VISITORS AND THE MIDDLE SCHOOL 10 VISITORS. THE TOTAL
 NUMBER OF SPACES REQUIRED IS 75 SPACES.
  
 5) FOR CLARITY PURPOSES, PLEASE PUT (159 PLUS 8
 TRANSIENT SPACES) NEXT TO THE 167 REQUIRED NUMBER AND
 (196 PLUS 8 TRANSIENT SPACES) NEXT TO THE 204 PROVIDED
 SPACES.
  
 6) PER THE OAKTON COMMONS DESIGN GUIDELINES, NO
 OVERNIGHT BUS PARKING IS PERMITTED ON-SITE.
  
 7) THE PLAN VIEW OF THE BICYCLE RACK DETAIL DOES NOT
 MATCH THE APPROVED ELEVATION VIEW STYLES. THE PROPOSED
 BICYCLE PARKING TABLE STATES THAT THERE WILL BE 6
 SPACES ON ONE RACK, WHICH WILL NOT WORK WITH THE
 APPROVED STYLES - REMEMBER THE WAVE STYLE RACK IS NOT
 PERMITTED IN WEST PALM BEACH. WHILE STAFF COMMENDS THE
 APPLICANT FOR PROPOSING 12 BICYCLE PARKING SPACES, THE
 SITE SHALL BE DESIGNED TO ACCOMMODATE THE EXPANSION OF
 THE NUMBER OF SPACES IF IT BECOMES EVIDENT THAT THERE
 IS A GREATER DEMAND THAN 12 SPACES.
  
 8) THE BICYCLE PARKING SPACES ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF THE
 BUILDING SHALL BE RELOCATED TO BE NEXT TO THE SPACES ON
 THE NORTH SIDE OF THE BUILDING IN ORDER TO BE LOCATED
 CLOSE TO THE PRINCIPAL ENTRANCE TO THE BUILDING, IN
 ACCORDANCE WITH THE ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT
 REGULATIONS.
  
 9) THE PARCEL B PROVIDED BICYCLE RACK NOTE SHOULD STATE
 4 SPACES ON 2 RACKS.
  
 10) THE SITE PLAN SHOWS THE BOARDWALK CONFIGURATION IN
 THE PRESERVE THAT WAS PROPOSED BY THE RESIDENTIAL
 DEVELOPER BUT DENIED BY THE CITY COMMISSION. PLEASE
 SHOW CORRECT DETAILS AND A REVISED TIE IN TO THE
 RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY.
  
 11) CONSTRUCT NORTHERN SIDEWALK AT 5 FEET IN WIDTH.
  
 12) PROVIDE A WRITTEN NARRATIVE VERIFYING HOW THE
 BUILDING MEETS THE DESIGN ELEMENTS FROM MASTER DESIGN
 GUIDELINES?
  
 13) PROVIDE LINE OF SIGHT DRAWING FROM THE EAST
 PROPERTY LINE OF THE BENOIST FARMS ENTRY DRIVEWAY, NOT
 THE PARCEL BOUNDARY TO VERIFY THAT THE ROOFTOP
 MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT IS SCREENED FROM THE EAST..
  
 14) THE DESCRIPTIVE TAGS FOR THE TREES LAYER DOES NOT
 APPEAR TO HAVE BEEN TURNED ON FOR THE PAPER COPY PRINT.
  
 15) PROVIDE THE SPECIFIC DETAILS FOR THE TRACT P 10
 FOOT WIDE PLANTING AREA AND THE APPROVAL OF THE
 PLANTING PLAN BY THE CITY'S ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE
 MANAGER. THE GENERIC CROSS SECTION DRAWING ON SHEET
 LP-3 IS NO LONGER SUFFICIENT.
  
 16) THE RIGHT-OF-WAY BUFFER ALONG OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD
 IS 620 FEET, WHICH REQUIRES 16 TREES NOT 15 AS STATED
 ON THE PLANS. PLEASE PROVIDE A LIST OF THE PRESERVED
 TREES WHICH CORRESPOND TO THE NUMBER ON THE PLAN SO
 THAT STAFF MAY VERIFY THE 16 BUFFER TREES HAVE BEEN
 PROVIDED.
  
 17) PROVIDE VERIFICATION THAT THE CODE COMPLIANT BUFFER
 MATERIAL IS INSTALLED BETWEEN TRACTS C-2 REPLAT AND
 TRACTS B, C-1 AND OAKTON PRESERVE (EXCLUDING THE TREE
 PRESERVE AREA).
  
 18) THE RELOCATION OF LANDSCAPE MATERIAL OFF OF TRACT B
 WILL REQUIRE VERIFICATION THAT TRACK B STILL MEETS
 MINIMUM LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS. PLEASE NOTE THAT THE
 PLANS SHOW THE TERMINAL ISLAND TREE REMAINING AT THE
 WEST END OF TRACT B, BUT THE TEXT SAYS THE LANDSCAPE
 MATERIAL WILL BE RELOCATED. THE TERMINAL TREE MAY NOT
 BE RELOCATED.
  
 19) PLEASE CLARIFY WHY THE LIGUSTRUM TREES ARE
 SPECIFIED AT 10 FEET IN HEIGHT WHEN THE DESIGN
 GUIDELINES REQUIRE 14 FOOT HEIGHT.
  
 20) PROVIDE THE FOUNDATION PLANTING CALCULATIONS.
  
 21) STAFF DOES NOT SUPPORT THE 95 FOOT GAP IN TREES
 ALONG OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD. THIS GAP IS TOO LARGE TO
 JUSTIFY IMPROVED AESTHETICS.
  
 22) A SOLITARY ALEXANDER PALM MAY NOT COUNT AS A
 TERMINAL ISLAND TREE (ADA SPACES NORTH OF BUILDING).
  
 23) THE BACKFLOW PREVENTOR, FIRE HYDRANTS AND
 TRANSFORMERS SHALL BE SHOWN ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN.
  
 24) HE PHOTOMETRIC CALCULATIONS SHALL EXTEND TO THE
 PROPERTY COMMERCIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PROPERTY LINES
 AND SHALL NOT EXCEED 1 FOOT CANDLE AT THE PROPERTY
 LINE.
  
 25) THERE SHALL BE PEDESTRIAN SCALE LIGHTING INSTALLED
 ALONG THE PATH TO THE RESIDENTIAL TOWNHOUSES.
  
 26) PROVIDE DETAILS ON THE LIGHT POLES AND FIXTURES.
  
 27) PLEASE EXPLAIN HOW PARENTS SHOWING UP BETWEEN THE
 TWO DROP OFF TIMES ARE HANDLED. AT THE SITE ON SUMMIT
 BOULEVARD, STAFF OBSERVED PARENTS DROPPING CHILDREN OFF
 IN FRONT OF THE SCHOOL WITH THE QUEUE LINE BLOCKED WITH
 CONES AND NO SCHOOL PERSONNEL MONITORING THE SITUATION
 BETWEEN DROP OFF TIMES. THIS IS NOT EXPLAINED IN THE
 OPERATIONAL PLAN PROVIDED.
  
 28) PLEASE PROVIDE A CONCEPTUAL APPROVAL LETTER FROM
 FDOT FOR THE PROPOSED CIRCULATION PLAN (NO NEGATIVE
 IMPACT TO OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD).
  
 29) WHAT HAPPENS IF A PERSON MISSES THE MIDDLE ENTRANCE
 FOR DROP OFF/PICK UP?
  
 PLEASE NOTE THAT THE SUBMITTAL OF INFORMATION/PLANS TO
 ADDRESS THE COMMENTS MAY RESULT IN ADDITIONAL COMMENTS.
  
  Print


Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved