| 2013-12-13 13:26:40 | PLANS HAVE BEEN SUBMITTED TO CITYSCAPE AND REVIEW IS IN |
| | PROGRESS. (DK) |
| 2013-12-13 13:20:34 | 12/13/13 |
| | THE SUBMITTED PLAN NEEDS TO DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE WITH |
| | THE DESIGN STANDARDS IN ZLDR SECTION 94-324(A)(2) - |
| | ANTENNAS AND EQUIPMENT SHOULD BE SCREENED OR HIDDEN |
| | FROM PUBLIC VIEW. TO ACCOMPLISH THIS, PROPOSED ANTENNAS |
| | SHOULD BE FLUSH MOUNTED TO THE PARAPET OF THE BUILDING |
| | OR OTHER SIMILAR SOLUTION THAT WOULD BETTER CONCEAL THE |
| | ANTENNAS. ALSO, PLEASE PROVIDE INFORMATION REGARDING |
| | THE HEIGHT OF THE PARAPET VERIFYING THAT ALL EQUIPMENT |
| | WILL BE ADEQUATELY SCREENED FROM VIEW. |
| | |
| | NOTE: WITHIN SEC. 94-316 OF THE ZLDRS, REGARDING THE |
| | ORDER OF SITING ALTERNATIVES, CONCEALED ATTACHED |
| | ANTENNAS ARE HIGHER ON THE PRIORITY LIST THAN |
| | NON-CONCEALED ATTACHED ANTENNAS. "WHERE A LOWER RANKED |
| | ALTERNATIVE IS PROPOSED, THE APPLICANT MUST FILE |
| | RELEVANT INFORMATION AS INDICATED IN THE DEVELOPMENT |
| | STANDARDS (ARTICLE V AND VI) INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED |
| | TO AN AFFIDAVIT BY A RADIO FREQUENCY ENGINEER |
| | DEMONSTRATING THAT DESPITE DILIGENT EFFORTS TO ADHERE |
| | TO THE ESTABLISHED HIERARCHY WITHIN THE GEOGRAPHIC |
| | SEARCH, HIGHER RANKED OPTIONS ARE NOT TECHNICALLY |
| | FEASIBLE, PRACTICAL OR JUSTIFIED GIVEN THE LOCATION OF |
| | THE PROPOSED WIRELESS COMMUNICATION FACILITY." |
| | |
| | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT: |
| | |
| | DANIELLE J. KITTREDGE, AICP |
| | SENIOR PLANNER |
| | PLANNING & ZONING DIVISION |
| | PHONE: (561)-822-1443 |
| | EMAIL: [email protected] |
| | |
