| Plan Review Stops For Project Z13110011 |
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
|
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
dkittred |
Date |
|
Time |
|
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
dkittred |
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2013-12-13 15:31:23 | | | | | | | | | 2013-12-13 15:25:53 | | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
ENG - PPRC |
ENGINEERING - PPRC |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
|
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
|
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
L |
LANDSCAPING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
|
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
PARK |
PARKING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
|
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
POLICE |
POLICE |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
|
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
PW |
PUBLIC WORKS |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
|
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
STORM |
STORMWATER |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
|
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
STORM |
STORMWATER |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
12-03-2013 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
tward |
Date |
12-03-2013 |
Time |
09:29 |
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
tward |
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2013-12-03 09:41:53 | 1. 12/2/13 SUBMITTAL INCLUDED 11/2013 OVERALL SITE PLAN | | | FOR MINOR SITE MODIFICATIONS DRAWING, 8/1984 HABITAT | | | SITE PLAN DRAWING, AND JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT. NO | | | SURVEY OR ENGINEERING PLANS WERE PROVIDED. | | | 2. PROPSOED 2-WAY ACCESS DRIVE ON THE SITE PLAN SHOULD | | | BE REVIEWED BY CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER. | | | 3. VERIFY IF THE DRIVEWAY CONNECTION AT THE SOUTHWEST | | | CORNER OF THE EXISTING INFINITI SALES BUILDING IS | | | EXISTING OR PROPOSED. | | | | | | TRACY L. WARD, P.E. | | | SENIOR STORM WATER ENGINEER | | | ENGINEERING AND PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT | | | 561-494-1120 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
SURVEY |
SURVEYING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
09-02-2014 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
vnoel |
Date |
09-02-2014 |
Time |
09:41 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
vnoel |
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
SURVEY |
SURVEYING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
02-04-2014 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
vnoel |
Date |
02-04-2014 |
Time |
08:54 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
vnoel |
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2014-02-04 08:58:08 | 1. COMBINATION OF PROPERTIES AS A CPD IS NOT THE SAME | | | AS A UNITY OF TITLE. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
SURVEY |
SURVEYING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
12-16-2013 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
vnoel |
Date |
12-16-2013 |
Time |
09:10 |
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
vnoel |
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2013-12-16 09:11:19 | AT A MINIMUM, A UNITY OF TITLE SHOULD BE APPLIED FOR. | | | APPLICATION IS MADE THROUGH ENGINEERING SERVICES. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
TRAFFIC |
TRAFFIC ENGINEERING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
09-05-2014 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
09-05-2014 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
bcollins |
Date |
09-05-2014 |
Time |
09:58 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2014-09-05 10:00:20 | SUBJECT TO FDOT APPROVAL. NOTE THAT 2 ALTERNATES WERE | | | PRESENTED AND MY PREFERENCE WAS FOR THE OPTION (A) THAT | | | MOVED THE DRIVEWAY FURTHER AWAY FROM OKEECHOBEE BLVD. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
TRAFFIC |
TRAFFIC ENGINEERING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
02-03-2014 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
bcollins |
Date |
02-03-2014 |
Time |
11:11 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2014-02-03 11:13:42 | ORIGINAL COMMENTS STILL APPLY. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
TRAFFIC |
TRAFFIC ENGINEERING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
12-12-2013 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
bcollins |
Date |
12-12-2013 |
Time |
10:46 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2013-12-12 11:02:57 | PROPOSED TWO-WAY ACCESS IS TOO CLOSE TO OKEECHOBEE | | | BOULEVARD AND SHOULD REMAIN ONE-WAY IN BASED ON SAFETY | | | CONSIDERATIONS. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
5 |
Status |
P |
Date |
10-28-2014 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
dkittred |
Date |
10-28-2014 |
Time |
09:49 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
dkittred |
Date |
10-16-2014 |
Time |
14:06 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2014-10-28 09:49:17 | 10/28/14 - PASSED WITH CONDITIONS: | | | | | | 1. TREES SHALL BE ADDED TO THE LANDSCAPE ISLANDS AT THE | | | TIME OF BUILDING PERMIT SUBMITTAL AS INDICATED ON THE | | | REDLINED APPROVED LANDSCAPE PLAN. | | | 2. VEGETATIVE LANDSCAPING SHALL BE ADDED TO THE PLANS | | | AT THE TIME OF BUILDING PERMIT SUBMITTAL AS INDICTED ON | | | THE REDLINED APPROVED LANDSCAPE PLAN. | | | 3. ADDITIONAL TREES SHALL BE INSTALLED IN THE FRONT | | | BUFFER AT THE TIME OF BUILDING PERMITS AS INDICATED ON | | | THE REDLINED APPROVED LANDSCAPE PLAN. | | | 4. SCALE ON LANDSCAPE PLAN IS INACCURATE AND NEEDS TO | | | BE CORRECTED. | | | 5. EXISTING PEDESTRIAN ACCESS FROM OKEECHOBEE BLVD. TO | | | THE SITE SHALL REMAIN AND WILL NEED TO BE REFLECTED ON | | | THE SITE PLAN AND LANDSCAPE PLAN ACCORDINGLY AT TIME OF | | | BUILDING PERMIT SUBMITTAL. | | | | | | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT: | | | | | | DANIELLE J. KITTREDGE, AICP | | | SENIOR PLANNER | | | PLANNING & ZONING DIVISION | | | PHONE: (561)-822-1443 | | | EMAIL: [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
F |
Date |
09-04-2014 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
dkittred |
Date |
09-04-2014 |
Time |
11:15 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
dkittred |
Date |
08-26-2014 |
Time |
11:31 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2014-09-04 11:15:39 | PLANNING AND ZONING COMMENTS: ***FAILED*** | | | | | | 9/4/14 | | | | | | 1. INSTALLATION OF THE DINNING DECK IS NEW SQUARE | | | FOOTAGE THAT MUST BE ACCOUNTED FOR IN THE PARKING | | | CALCULATIONS. PLEASE REVISE PARKING CALCULATION. | | | | | | 2. HOW DO CUSTOMERS WALK FROM THE CUSTOMER PARKING TO | | | THE BUILDING? THERE APPEARS TO BE NO CONNECTION. ALSO, | | | WHAT PATHWAY WILL BE UTILIZED FOR CUSTOMERS GOING FROM | | | THE BUILDING TO THE VEHICLE DISPLAY AREA? WILL THE | | | PATHWAY MEET ADA STANDARDS? | | | | | | 3. STANDARD STRIPING DETAIL FOR THE CITY WILL BE | | | EMAILED SEPARATELY. IT IS RECOMMENDED THIS DETAIL IS | | | USED TO REPLACE THE DETAIL ON THE PLANS BECAUSE IT IS | | | MORE ACCURATE. | | | | | | 4. THE DISPLAY AREA WEST OF THE CUSTOMER PARKING HAS NO | | | BACK-UP SPACE ON THE NORTHERN SIDE. STAFF IS | | | RECOMMENDING REMOVAL OF THE PROPOSED LANDSCAPE BARRIER | | | IN THE DRIVE AISLE TO ALLOW FOR ADEQUATE BACK-UP SPACE. | | | IF THE LANDSCAPE BARRIER IS TO REMAIN THEN ADEQUATE | | | BACK UP SPACE WILL BE REQUIRED. ADDITIONALLY, THERE IS | | | A DRAINAGE INLET ADJACENT TO THE PROPOSED LANDSCAPE | | | BARRIER AND OBSTRUCING THE FLOW TO THE INLET FROM THE | | | NORTH WILL NEED TO BE EVALUATED. | | | | | | 5. THERE IS A HATCHED AREA SHOWN ON THE SITE PLAN WHICH | | | IS LOCATED ON THE NORTHSIDE OF THE EASTERN DISPLAY | | | AREA. WHAT IS THIS SPACE BEING USED FOR? ADDITIONALLY, | | | LANDSCAPING SHOULD ALSO BE PROPOSED WITHIN THE | | | LANDSCAPE ISLAND IN THAT AREA. | | | | | | 6. THE RECONFIGURED 22? WIDE ACCESS POINTS TO PARKING | | | AREAS SHALL BE 24? REQUIRED FOR TWO-WAY TRAVEL. PROPER | | | TRAFFIC CONTROL (STOP SIGN, STOP BAR) SHALL ALSO BE | | | SHOWN FOR THESE LOCATIONS AS WELL AS ANY OTHER OTHER | | | TRAFFIC CONFLICT POINTS. | | | | | | 7. NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE DISPLAY PARKING SHOWS | | | TWO-WAY DIRECTIONAL ARROWS, HOWEVER, DRIVE AISLES ARE | | | REQUIRED TO BE A MINIMUM OF 24' FOR TWO-WAY TRAFFIC. | | | PLEASE REVISE OR EXPLAIN. | | | | | | 8. PLAN INDICATES INSTALLATION OF A NEW FREE STANDING | | | SIGN. EITHER INCLUDE PLANS WITH COPY AREA CALCULATIONS | | | TO SHOW COMPLIANCE WITH THE SIGN REGULATIONS OR A | | | SEPARATE MINOR PD AMENDMENT WILL BE REQUIRED IN THE | | | FUTURE AT THE TIME THE NEW SIGNAGE IS PROPOSED TO BE | | | INSTALLED. | | | | | | LANDSCAPING: | | | | | | 9. THERE ARE SEVERAL LANDSCAPE ISLANDS IN THE AFFECTED | | | AREA OF WORK WHERE NO TREES ARE PROPOSED. PLEASE REVIEW | | | LANDSCAPE ISLANDS AND PROPOSE ADDITIONAL TREES. | | | | | | 10. ON THE LANDSCAPING PLAN, THE DISPLAY PARKING | | | ADJACENT TO THE BUILDING HAS BEEN LABELED WITH 'LAWN'. | | | IS THIS CORRECT? | | | | | | 11. LANDSCAPING IS REQUIRED AROUND THE DUMPSTER | | | ENCLOSURE PER ZLDR SEC. 94-444(B) WHICH REQUIRES A | | | SHRUB OR HEDGE INSTALLED AT TWO-FOOT INTERVALS. | | | | | | 12. A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT WILL NEED TO BE SUBMITTED | | | REMOVAL OR RELOCATION OF TREES. | | | | | | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT: | | | | | | DANIELLE J. KITTREDGE, AICP | | | SENIOR PLANNER | | | PLANNING & ZONING DIVISION | | | PHONE: (561)-822-1443 | | | EMAIL: [email protected] | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
06-10-2014 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
dkittred |
Date |
06-10-2014 |
Time |
12:26 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
dkittred |
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2014-06-10 12:04:14 | PLANNING AND ZONING COMMENTS: | | | | | | 6/10/14 | | | | | | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS AND CONSIDERATIONS BASED ON VERBAL | | | AND EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE AFTER 2/10/2014 COMMENTS. | | | | | | 1. VERIFY WIDTH OF LANDSCAPE ISLANDS WHICH SHOULD BE A | | | MINIMUM OF 5' EXCLUDING THE CURBS.LANDSCAPE ISLANDS AND | | | DIVIDER MEDIANS SHALL COMPLY WITH ZLDR SEC. | | | 94-443(C)(3)(INCLUSIVE OF SUBSECTIONS A, B, C) AND (5). | | | | | | 2. AN EXISTING LANDSCAPE ISLAND ALONG OKEECHOBEE BLVD. | | | IS NOT INCLUDED ON THE PLAN. DUE TO THE NUMBER OF | | | PARKING SPACES, THE LANDSCAPE ISLAND IS REQUIRED AND | | | EITHER NEEDS TO REMAIN AS IS OR CAN BE RECONSTRUCTED | | | WITHIN THE PARKING ROW IF THERE IS A CONFLICT WITH THE | | | EXISTING LOCATION. | | | | | | 3. PLAN NEEDS TO DISTINGUISH BETWEEN WHAT IS EXISTING, | | | WHAT IS BEING REMOVED, AND WHAT IS NEW. | | | | | | 4. CONSIDERATION SHOULD BE GIVEN TO PEDESTRIAN | | | CIRCULATION AND ON-SITE TRAFFIC FLOW AND CIRCULATION. | | | (THIS HAS ONLY BEEN MADE AS A GENERAL COMMENT SINCE | | | SPECIFICS DIFFER BETWEEN THE THE DIFFERENT PLAN | | | RENDITIONS.) | | | | | | 5. CHART OF CALCULATIONS SHOULD BE INCLUDED ON THE PLAN | | | AND UPDATED WITH ANY CHANGES. | | | | | | 6. PARKING STRIPING DETAIL SHALL BE INCLUDED AND BE IN | | | COMPLIANCE WITH CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH STANDARDS. | | | | | | 7. RECONFIGURED 22' ACCESS POINT TO PARKING AREA SHALL | | | BE 24' REQUIRED FOR TWO-WAY TRAVEL. | | | | | | 8. SITE LANDSCAPING SHALL COMPLY WITH WITH THE | | | REQUIREMENTS OF ZLDR ARTICLE XIV. | | | | | | 9. IF ANY TREES WILL BE REMOVED OR RELOCATED A TREE | | | ALTERATION PERMIT THROUGH THE PLANNING DIVISION WILL BE | | | REQUIRED. | | | | | | | | | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT: | | | | | | DANIELLE J. KITTREDGE, AICP | | | SENIOR PLANNER | | | PLANNING & ZONING DIVISION | | | PHONE: (561)-822-1443 | | | EMAIL: [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
02-10-2014 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
dkittred |
Date |
02-10-2014 |
Time |
17:42 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
dkittred |
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2014-02-10 17:43:05 | PLANNING AND ZONING COMMENTS: | | | | | | 2/10/14 | | | | | | 1. NEW LANDSCAPING HAS TO DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE WITH | | | THE REQUIREMENTS OF ZLDR ARTICLE XIV. WILL NEW | | | LANDSCAPE AREAS BE SODDED? WHAT TYPE OF PLANT MATERIAL | | | IS PROPOSED IN THE LANDSCAPE BUFFER AROUND THE | | | BUILDING? A TREE WILL BE REQUIRED IN THE EXISTING | | | LANDSCAPE ISLAND ON THE EASTERN SIDE OF THE PROPERTY. | | | PLEASE REFER TO THE LANDSCAPE CHECKLIST IN THE | | | DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION. | | | | | | 2. IS CURBING PROPOSED AROUND NEW LANDSCAPE AREAS TO | | | PROTECT FROM VEHICLES? | | | | | | 3. DUMPSTER DETAIL DOES NOT MEET MINIMUM SIZE STANDARDS | | | (ZLDR SEC. 94-444, FIGURE XIV-3). PLEASE SPEAK WITH | | | MANNY GONZALEZ (561-494-1085) IN THE ENGINEERING DEPT. | | | TO DISCUSS WHETHER A REDUCED SIZE WOULD BE PERMITTED IF | | | YOU ARE NOT PROPOSING A DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE MEETING | | | MINIMUM STANDARDS. | | | | | | 4. PLEASE NOTE THAT 12 INCHES IS REQUIRED BETWEEN THE 4 | | | INCH WHITE LINES OF THE PARKING LOT STRIPING DETAIL. | | | | | | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT: | | | | | | DANIELLE J. KITTREDGE, AICP | | | SENIOR PLANNER | | | PLANNING & ZONING DIVISION | | | PHONE: (561)-822-1443 | | | EMAIL: [email protected] | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
12-13-2013 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
dkittred |
Date |
12-13-2013 |
Time |
15:33 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
dkittred |
Date |
11-25-2013 |
Time |
13:57 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2013-12-13 15:33:14 | PLANNING AND ZONING COMMENTS: | | | | | | 12/13/13 | | | 1. PLEASE CLARIFY ON THE PLAN WHAT IS NEW, EXISTING, OR | | | BEING REMOVED. | | | | | | 2. DIMENSION PARKING SPACES AND DRIVE AISLES ON THE | | | PLAN. | | | | | | 3. PROVIDE PARKING STRIPING DETAIL AND DUMPSTER DETAIL. | | | | | | 4. IN CLOSING OFF THE ACCESS POINT TO THE NORTH FOR | | | DISPLAY AREA, A PAVED STUBBED OUT OF THE DRIVE AISLE IS | | | REQUIRED FOR THE CARS BACKING OUT OF THE LAST SPACES IN | | | THE PARKING LOT TO THE NORTH. PLEASE DEMONSTRATE HOW | | | THIS PARKING AREA WILL WORK ONCE THE DRIVE AISLE IS | | | CLOSED OFF. | | | | | | 5. IT APPEARS THAT LANDSCAPING MAY NEED TO BE REMOVED | | | FOR THE PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS. PLEASE CLARIFY WHAT IS | | | BEING REMOVED AND WHERE NEW LANDSCAPING IS PROPOSED. IF | | | TREES ARE BEING REMOVED, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT WILL | | | BE REQUIRED. | | | | | | 6. IT APPEARS THAT ALL EXISTING LANDSCAPING AROUND THE | | | BASE OF THE BUILDING WILL BE REMOVED. THE CODE REQUIRES | | | AT LEAST 30 PERCENT OF THE LINEAR FEET AROUND THE | | | EXTERIOR OF ALL COMMERCIAL STRUCTURES SHALL BE PLANTED | | | WITH TREES, SHRUBS, OR HEDGES. IF THE SITE EXCEEDS THIS | | | REQUIREMENT THEN THE LANDSCAPING MAY BE REDUCED. IF THE | | | SITE DOES NOT COMPLY, THEN THE NON-CONFORMING SITUATION | | | CAN NOT BE INCREASED BY REMOVING THE LANDSCAPING. | | | | | | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT: | | | | | | DANIELLE J. KITTREDGE, AICP | | | SENIOR PLANNER | | | PLANNING & ZONING DIVISION | | | PHONE: (561)-822-1443 | | | EMAIL: [email protected] | | | | | 2013-12-13 15:32:47 | 12/13/13 - ADDITIONAL COMMENT: (RECEIVED FROM | | | ENGINEERING) | | | | | | UNITY OF TITLE (FOR THE WHOLE HABITAT SITE) WOULD BE | | | BENEFICIAL SINCE THIS PROPERTY'S UTILITY, IN SPECIFIC | | | THE SEWER SERVICE, RUNS THRU A SEPARATE PARCEL OF THE | | | HABITAT SITE TO PROVIDE SERVICE TO THE BUILDING UNDER | | | CONSIDERATION, WHICH IS IN A SEPARATE PARCEL OF THE | | | HABITAT CPD. | | | |
|
|
| |
Print |
