Plan Review Details - Project Z13100035
Plan Review Stops For Project Z13100035
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 4 Status P Date 09-15-2014 Cont ID  
Sent By eschneid Date 09-15-2014 Time 16:19 Rev Time 1.00
Received By eschneid Date 08-19-2014 Time 16:39 Sent To  
Notes
2014-08-19 16:45:011) BUILDING #5/6 -ARCHITECTURE COMMENTS SATISFIED.
  
 2) BUILDING #7 - ARCHITECTURE COMMENTS SATISFIED.
  
  

Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 3 Status F Date 06-05-2014 Cont ID  
Sent By eschneid Date 06-05-2014 Time 10:22 Rev Time 2.00
Received By eschneid Date 06-05-2014 Time 10:22 Sent To  
Notes
2014-06-05 10:22:57CASE NO. PB1399O
 SEDONA COMMONS BUILDINGS #5/6 AND #7 MINOR AMENDMENT
 8132 OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD
 2ND RESUBMITTAL
  
 - CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446
  
 - PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN
 WRITTEN FORMAT.
  
 - WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF FOUR
 (4) PAPER COPIES AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY IN .PDF FORMAT
 OF ALL PLANS. PLEASE NOTE THAT CHANGES ON THE
 RESUBMITTED PLANS MAY RESULT IN ADDITIONAL COMMENTS.
  
 - PLEASE NOTE THAT IF THE PLANNING DIVISION HAS NOT
 RECEIVED A RESPONSE TO THESE COMMENTS WITHIN 60 DAYS
 FROM THE DATE OF THESE COMMENTS (BY AUGUST 5, 2014),
 THE CASE SHALL BE CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN. ANY FURTHER
 ACTION SHALL REQUIRE A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION.
  
 - PLEASE NOTE THAT PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED ARCHITECTURAL
 COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED;
 THEREFORE, YOU ARE BEING ACCESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE OF
 $60 (20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE).
  
 1) BUILDING #5/6
  
 A. THE ELEVATION SUBMITTED WITH THE MINOR AMENDMENT
 DOES NOT MATCH THE ELEVATION SUBMITTED WITH THE
 BUILDING PERMIT - THE WINDOW ON THE SOUTH ELEVATION HAS
 BEEN REMOVED ON THE BUILDING PERMIT SUBMITTAL. THIS IS
 INTERNAL TO THE SITE, SO STAFF DOES NOT OBJECT TO THE
 REMOVAL OF THE WINDOW; HOWEVER, ALL PLANS SHALL MATCH.
 NOTE: THE FLOOR PLAN DOES NOT SHOW THE WINDOW.
  
 5) BUILDING #7
  
 A. REPEAT COMMENT: THE PREVIOUS MINOR AMENDMENT
 APPROVAL FOR BUILDING #7 PERMITTED THE REDUCTION OF THE
 CITY COMMISSION APPROVED 9 DOORS TO 3 DOORS ON THE
 NORTHERN ELEVATION, PROVIDED THAT WINDOWS ARE PROVIDED
 IN THEIR PLACE WHERE THE 6 DOORS HAD BEEN. THE TWO END
 BAY LOCATIONS SHALL INCLUDE WINDOWS. THE ELEVATIONS
 SHOW WHAT APPEAR TO BE WINDOWS ON THE TWO END BAYS, BUT
 WHEN REVIEWING THE STRUCTURAL PLANS INCLUDED WITH THE
 BUILDING PERMIT AND THE FLOOR PLANS INCLUDED WITH THIS
 RESUBMITTAL, THESE LOCATIONS ARE NOT WINDOWS. THEY
 APPEAR TO BE STUCCO APPLICATIONS. PLEASE NOTE THAT THE
 SEDONNA COMMONS CPD WAS GRANTED WAIVERS WHEN IT WAS
 ORIGINALLY APPROVED. THE WAIVERS WERE BASED ON THE
 DESIGN OF THE SITE, WHICH INCLUDED THE BUILDING HAVING
 DOORWAYS AND FENESTRATION ON OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD;
 THEREFORE, THERE SHALL BE FENESTRATION FOR THE END BAYS
 ON THE NORTH FA?ADE OF THE BUILDING.
  
 B. REPEAT COMMENT: THE THREE DOORS SHALL HAVE A SIMILAR
 BANDING AROUND THEM AS THE WINDOWS TO ENHANCE THE
 APPEARANCE OF THE DOORWAY ELEMENTS. THIS WILL OFFSET
 THE FACT THAT THE DOORWAYS HAVE BEEN NARROWED WITH THE
 PROPOSED PLANS WHEN COMPARED TO THE APPROVED PLANS.
 PLEASE CONSIDER ALIGNING THE DOORS IN A SYMMETRICAL
 PATTERN ALONG THE FACADE. PLEASE NOTE THAT THE
 ELEVATIONS SUBMITTED WITH THE BUILDING PERMIT
 RESUBMITTAL SHOW THE BANDING AROUND THE DOORS AND
 SATISFIES THIS COMMENT.
  

Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 2 Status F Date 03-07-2014 Cont ID  
Sent By eschneid Date 03-07-2014 Time 11:50 Rev Time 4.00
Received By eschneid Date 03-07-2014 Time 11:50 Sent To  
Notes
2014-03-07 11:55:44CASE NO. PB1399O
 SEDONA COMMONS BUILDINGS #5/6 AND #7 MINOR AMENDMENT
 8132 OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD
 1ST RESUBMITTAL
  
 - CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446
  
 - PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN
 WRITTEN FORMAT.
  
 - WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF FOUR
 (4) PAPER COPIES AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY IN .PDF FORMAT
 OF ALL PLANS. PLEASE NOTE THAT CHANGES ON THE
 RESUBMITTED PLANS MAY RESULT IN ADDITIONAL COMMENTS.
  
 - PLEASE NOTE THAT IF THE PLANNING DIVISION HAS NOT
 RECEIVED A RESPONSE TO THE PPRC COMMENTS WITHIN 60 DAYS
 FROM THE DATE OF THESE COMMENTS (BY MAY 7, 2014), THE
 CASE SHALL BE CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN. ANY FURTHER ACTION
 SHALL REQUIRE A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION.
  
 - PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1)
 ADDITIONAL RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF
 PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE
 SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE APPLICANT WILL BE ACCESSED
 A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL
 APPLICATION FEE ($60).
  
 1) THANK YOU FOR PROVIDING THE FEBRUARY 20, 2014
 LETTER, FROM PALM BEACH COUNTY TRAFFIC ENGINEERING,
 WHICH EXTENDED THE BUILD-OUT DATE UNTIL DECEMBER 31,
 2014.
  
 2) REPEAT COMMENT: THE REVISED SITE PLAN SHOWS A 140
 SQUARE FOOT INCREASE IN BUILDING #5/6 MEDICAL OFFICE
 SQUARE FOOTAGE AND A 180 SQUARE FEET DECREASE IN THE
 BUILDING #7 RETAIL SQUARE FOOTAGE. THIS CONVERSION OF
 USE IS NOT REFLECTED IN THE FEBRUARY 20, 2014 PALM
 BEACH COUNTY TRAFFIC LETTER. EITHER CORRECT THE
 BUILDING SQUARE FOOTAGE OR PROVIDE SIGN-OFF FROM PALM
 BEACH COUNTY TRAFFIC ENGINEERING THAT THE CONVERSION OF
 USES MEETS THE COUNTY-WIDE TRAFFIC PERFORMANCE
 STANDARDS.
  
 3) IF PALM BEACH COUNTY TRAFFIC ENGINEERING APPROVES
 THE CONVERSION OF USES, THEN THE PARKING TABLE NEEDS TO
 BE AMENDED TO CORRECTLY SHOW THE REQUIRED PARKING FOR
 EACH USE - ONE LESS FOR RETAIL AND ONE MORE FOR OFFICE.
 THE TOTAL PARKING REMAINS THE SAME WITH THE CONVERSION
 OF USE.
  
 4) THE REVISED SITE PLAN DOES NOT USE THE SAME MEASURE
 POINTS AS THE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR THE DIMENSION
 LINES AND THEREFORE THE TWO BUILDINGS ARE NOT SHOWN THE
 SAME SIZE. FOR EXAMPLE: THE EAST/WEST DIMENSION LINE OF
 188 FEET ON THE SITE PLAN IS TO THE FURTHEST PROJECTION
 OF THE DECORATIVE PILASTERS AND THE ARCHITECTURAL FLOOR
 PLAN IS TO THE OUTSIDE WALL. THE FURTHEST PROJECTION OF
 THE PILASTERS IS 189' 4". THIS ALSO OCCURS ON THE
 NORTH/SOUTH DIMENSION. BOTH PLANS SHALL SHOW THE SAME
 MEASURE WITH THE SETBACKS TO THE NORTHERN AND WESTERN
 PROPERTY LINES SHOWN ONCE THE BUILDING SIZE IS
 RECTIFIED. PLEASE NOTE THAT WHILE THE LISTED DIMENSION
 LINES ONLY PERTAIN TO THE BUILDING AS SHOWN WITH AN
 APPROVED, REVISED PALM BEACH COUNTY TRAFFIC APPROVAL,
 THE COMMENT ABOUT USING THE SAME MEASURE POINTS APPLIES
 TO ANY BUILDING.
  
 5) BUILDING #7 - NO REVISED ELEVATIONS WERE PROVIDED TO
 VERIFY COMPLIANCE WITH THE COMMENTS BELOW:
  
 A. REPEAT COMMENT: THE PREVIOUS MINOR AMENDMENT
 APPROVAL FOR BUILDING #7 PERMITTED THE REDUCTION OF THE
 CITY COMMISSION APPROVED 9 DOORS TO 3 DOORS ON THE
 NORTHERN ELEVATION, PROVIDED THAT WINDOWS ARE PROVIDED
 IN THEIR PLACE WHERE THE 6 DOORS HAD BEEN. THE TWO END
 BAY LOCATIONS SHALL INCLUDE WINDOWS.
  
 B. REPEAT COMMENT: THE THREE DOORS SHALL HAVE A SIMILAR
 BANDING AROUND THEM AS THE WINDOWS TO ENHANCE THE
 APPEARANCE OF THE DOORWAY ELEMENTS. THIS WILL OFFSET
 THE FACT THAT THE DOORWAYS HAVE BEEN NARROWED WITH THE
 PROPOSED PLANS WHEN COMPARED TO THE APPROVED PLANS.
 PLEASE CONSIDER ALIGNING THE DOORS IN A SYMMETRICAL
 PATTERN ALONG THE FACADE.
  
 6) BUILDING #5/6
  
 A. REPEAT COMMENT: THE WEST SETBACK DIMENSION TO THE
 BUILDING (23" 8") IS SHOWN TO THE WRONG PLACE ON THE
 BUILDING. IT SHALL BE SHOWN TO THE FURTHEST PROJECTION
 OF THE DECORATIVE PILASTER.
  

Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 01-06-2014 Cont ID  
Sent By eschneid Date 01-06-2014 Time 15:22 Rev Time 2.00
Received By eschneid Date 01-06-2014 Time 15:22 Sent To  
Notes
2014-01-06 15:23:07CASE NO. PB1399O
 SEDONA COMMONS BUILDINGS #5/6 AND #7 MINOR AMENDMENT
 8132 OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD
  
 - CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446
  
 - PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN
 WRITTEN FORMAT.
  
 - WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF FIVE
 (5) PAPER COPIES AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY IN .PDF FORMAT
 OF ALL PLANS. PLEASE NOTE THAT CHANGES ON THE
 RESUBMITTED PLANS MAY RESULT IN ADDITIONAL COMMENTS.
  
 - PLEASE NOTE THAT IF THE PLANNING DIVISION HAS NOT
 RECEIVED A RESPONSE TO THE PPRC COMMENTS WITHIN 60 DAYS
 FROM THE DATE OF THESE COMMENTS (MARCH 6, 2014), THE
 CASE SHALL BE CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN. ANY FURTHER ACTION
 SHALL REQUIRE A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION.
  
 - PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1)
 ADDITIONAL RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF
 PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE
 SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE APPLICANT WILL BE ACCESSED
 A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL
 APPLICATION FEE ($60).
  
 1) PURSUANT TO THE PALM BEACH COUNTY TRAFFIC
 PERFORMANCE STANDARDS REVIEW LETTER ISSUED ON SEPTEMBER
 17, 2009, NO BUILDING PERMITS SHALL BE ISSUED BY THE
 CITY AFTER DECEMBER 31, 2012. AN EXTENSION OF THIS
 DEADLINE MAY BE ISSUED BY PALM BEACH COUNT. THE REVISED
 BUILD OUT LETTER MAY BE INCLUDED WITH THIS MINOR
 PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT.
  
 2) BUILDING #7
  
 A. THE ARCHITECTURAL FLOOR PLAN SHOWS THE BUILDING
 DIMENSION AT 189' 4" X 65' 2" WHILE THE SITE PLAN SHOWS
 THE BUILDING DIMENSION AS 189' 4" X 65". THESE 2" COME
 INTO PLAY AT THE FRONT SETBACK DIMENSION, WHICH IS
 LISTED AS 20' 4" BUT SHOULD BE 20' 2" WHEN COMPARING
 THE INFORMATION FROM THE APPROVED AND THE PROPOSED
 PLANS.
  
 B. THE PREVIOUS MINOR AMENDMENT APPROVAL FOR BUILDING
 #7 PERMITTED THE REDUCTION OF THE CITY COMMISSION
 APPROVED 9 DOORS TO 3 DOORS ON THE NORTHERN ELEVATION,
 PROVIDED THAT WINDOWS ARE PROVIDED IN THEIR PLACE WHERE
 THE 6 DOORS HAD BEEN. THE TWO END BAY LOCATIONS SHALL
 INCLUDE WINDOWS.
  
 C. THE THREE DOORS SHALL HAVE A SIMILAR BANDING AROUND
 THEM AS THE WINDOWS TO ENHANCE THE APPEARANCE OF THE
 DOORWAY ELEMENTS. THIS WILL OFFSET THE FACT THAT THE
 DOORWAYS HAVE BEEN NARROWED WITH THE PROPOSED PLANS
 WHEN COMPARED TO THE APPROVED PLANS. PLEASE CONSIDER
 ALIGNING THE DOORS IN A SYMMETRICAL PATTERN ALONG THE
 FACADE.
  
 3) BUILDING #5/6
  
 A. THE SQUARE FOOTAGE FOR BUILDING #5/6 HAS INCREASED
 140 SQUARE FEET AS SHOWN ON THE ARCHITECTURAL FLOOR
 PLAN (THE SOUTH PORTION OF THE BUILDING WAS LENGTHENED
 BY 4 FEET). THIS IS NOT REFLECTED ON THE SITE PLAN,
 WHICH SHOWS THE APPROVED 13,200 SQUARE FEET. THE
 ADDITIONAL SQUARE FOOTAGE REQUIRES ONE MORE PARKING
 SPACE ON THE SITE AND A REVISED PALM BEACH COUNTY
 TRAFFIC LETTER APPROVING THE ADDITIONAL SQUARE FOOTAGE.
  
 B. THE WEST SETBACK DIMENSION TO THE BUILDING IS
 INCORRECTLY STATED AS 25 FEET. THERE THE NEW BUILDING
 LAYOUT ADDED PROJECTIONS TO THE WEST SIDE OF THE
 BUILDING WHICH REDUCED THE DIMENSION BY 1' 4".
  
 C. ADD THE PAD DIMENSIONS FOR THE BICYCLE RACK AT THE
 NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE BUILDING.
  
 D. THE FLAGPOLE HEIGHT INFORMATION IS INCORRECT AND
 SHALL SHOW THE APPROVED 112 FOOT HEIGHT (SHEET SP-2).
  
 4) LANDSCAPE PLAN
  
 A. THE DIMENSIONS OF BUILDING #5/6 HAVE CHANGED, YET
 THIS IS NOT REFLECTED ON THE PROPOSED LANDSCAPE PLAN VS
 THE APPROVED LANDSCAPE PLAN.
  
 B. THE DATA TABLES NEED TO BE UPDATED ACCORDINGLY WITH
 REGARDS TO PERVIOUS/IMPERVIOUS AND OPEN SPACE WITH
 DIFFERENT SQUARE FOOTAGE.
  
 C. THE RELOCATED 10 FOOT FPL EASEMENT IS SHOWN
 INCLUDING THE PALM TREES ON THE NORTH AND EAST SIDE OF
 BUILDING #5/6. PROVIDE A LETTER FROM FPL APPROVING THIS
 CONDITION AND IF APPROVED, SHOW THE USE OF ROOT
 BARRIERS FOR THESE TREES
  
 D. PROVIDE ROOT BARRIERS TO THE OAK TREES IN THE
 PARKING ISLANDS TO THE EAST OF BUILDING #5/6.
  

  Print


Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved