 |
Plan Review Details - Project Z13080021
| Plan Review Stops For Project Z13080021 |
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
09-30-2013 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jroach |
Date |
09-30-2013 |
Time |
14:59 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jroach |
Date |
09-30-2013 |
Time |
14:59 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2014-03-05 14:59:56 | PURSUANT TO THE EMAIL SENT TO ALL PLAN REVIEWERS ON | | | SEPTEMBER 25, 2013, ANY OUTSTANDING COMMENTS WERE TO BE | | | INSERTED INTO COMMUNITYPLUS PRIOR TO SEPTEMBER 30, | | | 2013. AS NO SUCH COMMENTS WERE MADE, IT WAS ASSUMMED | | | THAT ALL PREVIOUS COMMENTS HAD BEEN ADDRESSED. | | | | | | QUESTIONS/COMMENTS, CONTACT JOHN ROACH, PRINCIPAL | | | PLANNER, AT 561.822.1448. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
09-11-2013 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
pleduc |
Date |
09-06-2013 |
Time |
15:39 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rbrown |
Date |
09-11-2013 |
Time |
10:07 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2013-09-11 10:10:32 | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, BUILDING DIVISION, | | | COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1. IT IS NOTED THAT THE PLANS ARE VERY PRELIMINARY AT | | | THIS STAGE AND ARE NOT INTENDED TO SPECIFICALLY ADDRESS | | | BUILDING CODE REQUIREMENTS YET. THIS REVIEW IS A | | | CURSORY REVIEW AS IT RELATES TO THE SITE. IT IS NOT A | | | REVIEW FOR FULL COMPLIANCE WITH FLORIDA BUILDING CODE. | | | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE TO BE ADDRESSED FOR | | | PERMITTING. | | | | | | 2. THE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION FOR THE BUILDINGS SHALL BE | | | IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE HEIGHT, AREA AND OCCUPANCY | | | LIMITATIONS IN CHAPTER 5 OF THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE | | | | | | 3. COMPLIANCE WITH ALL BUILDING SEPARATION, PERCENTAGE | | | OF OPENINGS AND OPENING PROTECTIVE REQUIREMENTS OF | | | SECTION R302 OF FLORIDA BUILDING CODE (RESIDENTIAL) | | | SHALL BE VERIFIED. | | | | | | 4. ALL APPLICABLE PERMITS MUST BE OBTAINED BEFORE | | | COMMENCING THE WORK. | | | | | | 5. FOR STREET ADDRESSING CONTACT JOSH MILLS, GIS | | | SUPPORT SPECIALIST ON 561 494 1084 | | | | | | ROBERT BROWN | | | BUILDING OFFICIAL | | | TEL: 561 805 6652 | | | EMAIL: [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
ENG - PPRC |
ENGINEERING - PPRC |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
09-30-2013 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jroach |
Date |
09-30-2013 |
Time |
14:59 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jroach |
Date |
09-30-2013 |
Time |
14:59 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2014-03-05 14:59:26 | PURSUANT TO THE EMAIL SENT TO ALL PLAN REVIEWERS ON | | | SEPTEMBER 25, 2013, ANY OUTSTANDING COMMENTS WERE TO BE | | | INSERTED INTO COMMUNITYPLUS PRIOR TO SEPTEMBER 30, | | | 2013. AS NO SUCH COMMENTS WERE MADE, IT WAS ASSUMMED | | | THAT ALL PREVIOUS COMMENTS HAD BEEN ADDRESSED. | | | | | | QUESTIONS/COMMENTS, CONTACT JOHN ROACH, PRINCIPAL | | | PLANNER, AT 561.822.1448. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
ENG - PPRC |
ENGINEERING - PPRC |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
09-11-2013 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
mgonzale |
Date |
09-11-2013 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
1.00 |
| Received By |
mgonzale |
Date |
09-11-2013 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2013-09-11 12:26:05 | CASE 1624C (Z13080020) AND 1624D (Z13080021) PCC RESORT | | | | | | WATER | | | THE PLANS (POD A) INDICATE THAT THE PROPOSED WATER MAIN | | | WILL BE FED BY THREE (3) 8" TAPS TO THE EXISTING 10" | | | MAIN. THE 8" LINE TAP SOUTH OF THE MAIN ENTRANCE SHOULD | | | ELIMINATE THE CONCERN OF THE PROPOSED "TEMPORARY WATER | | | MAIN END" LOCATED AT THE END OF THE CUL DE SAC. | | | | | | A CAPACITY ANALYSIS MAY BE REQUIRED TO INVESTIGATE THE | | | NECESSITY OF CONNECTING THE EXISTING 10" WATER MAIN | | | THAT CURRENTLY STOPS ON EITHER SIDE (NORTH (8" DI) AND | | | SOUTH (10" DI)) OF THE BRIDGE AT THE M-CANAL. | | | | | | THE PROPOSED MASTER CONCEPTUAL PLAN IS SUFFICIENT AS | | | CURRENTLY DESIGNED. | | | | | | | | | SANITARY SEWER | | | THERE ARE TWO (2) PROPOSED LIFT STATIONS, ONE FOR POD A | | | AND A SECOND STATION PLANNED FOR THE RESORT CLUB. | | | | | | THE POD A LIFT STATION REQUIRES CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW | | | 4" FORCE MAIN TO CONNECT TO THE CITY'S EXISTING LIFT | | | STATION #77 (LS 77). THIS STATION WAS BUILT IN 1971 | | | UTILIZES A DRY CAN/WET CAN STATION DESIGN THAT WILL | | | REQUIRE UPGRADE IN THE NEAR FUTURE. | | | | | | IT MAY BE MORE COST EFFICIENT TO COMBINE THE NEED FOR A | | | NEW LIFT STATION AT POD A ALONG WITH THE CITY'S NEED TO | | | UPGRADE LS 77 INTO A SINGLE LIFT STATION TO SATISFY | | | BOTH AREAS. | | | | | | | | | STORM WATER | | | THE CURRENT DESIGN ROUTES ALL OF COLLECTED STORM FLOWS | | | TO THE ONSITE PONDS AND LAKES. | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
09-30-2013 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jroach |
Date |
09-30-2013 |
Time |
14:58 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jroach |
Date |
09-30-2013 |
Time |
14:58 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2014-03-05 14:58:41 | PURSUANT TO THE EMAIL SENT TO ALL PLAN REVIEWERS ON | | | SEPTEMBER 25, 2013, ANY OUTSTANDING COMMENTS WERE TO BE | | | INSERTED INTO COMMUNITYPLUS PRIOR TO SEPTEMBER 30, | | | 2013. AS NO SUCH COMMENTS WERE MADE, IT WAS ASSUMMED | | | THAT ALL PREVIOUS COMMENTS HAD BEEN ADDRESSED. | | | | | | QUESTIONS/COMMENTS, CONTACT JOHN ROACH, PRINCIPAL | | | PLANNER, AT 561.822.1448. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
09-06-2013 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
09-06-2013 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
pleduc |
Date |
09-06-2013 |
Time |
15:25 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2013-09-06 15:39:33 | ALL EMERGENCY VEHICLE ACCESSES, ENTRANCE AND EXIT, | | | SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 20FT CLEAR CLEARANCE, THE | | | ENTRANCE WAYS MAY POSE CONCERNS. ANY SECURITY GATES | | | SHALL HAVE KNOX KEY SWITCH ACCESS. | | | | | | ROUNDABOUTS AND DEADEND TURNAROUNDS SHALL ENSURE | | | EMERGENCY VEHICLE CLEARANCE; 50FT RADIUS IS MINIMUM. NO | | | PLANT LANDSCAPE OBJECT, SHALL BE CONTAINED IN THE | | | CENTER OF THESE AREAS. | | | | | | FIRE HYDRANT LOCATION MUST BE REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY | | | THE BUREAU. | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
PARK |
PARKING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
09-30-2013 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jroach |
Date |
09-30-2013 |
Time |
14:57 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jroach |
Date |
09-30-2013 |
Time |
14:56 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2014-03-05 14:57:25 | PURSUANT TO THE EMAIL SENT TO ALL PLAN REVIEWERS ON | | | SEPTEMBER 25, 2013, ANY OUTSTANDING COMMENTS WERE TO BE | | | INSERTED INTO COMMUNITYPLUS PRIOR TO SEPTEMBER 30, | | | 2013. AS NO SUCH COMMENTS WERE MADE, IT WAS ASSUMMED | | | THAT ALL PREVIOUS COMMENTS HAD BEEN ADDRESSED. | | | | | | QUESTIONS/COMMENTS, CONTACT JOHN ROACH, PRINCIPAL | | | PLANNER, AT 561.822.1448. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
POLICE |
POLICE |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
09-30-2013 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jroach |
Date |
09-30-2013 |
Time |
14:56 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jroach |
Date |
09-30-2013 |
Time |
14:56 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2014-03-05 14:56:52 | PURSUANT TO THE EMAIL SENT TO ALL PLAN REVIEWERS ON | | | SEPTEMBER 25, 2013, ANY OUTSTANDING COMMENTS WERE TO BE | | | INSERTED INTO COMMUNITYPLUS PRIOR TO SEPTEMBER 30, | | | 2013. AS NO SUCH COMMENTS WERE MADE, IT WAS ASSUMMED | | | THAT ALL PREVIOUS COMMENTS HAD BEEN ADDRESSED. | | | | | | QUESTIONS/COMMENTS, CONTACT JOHN ROACH, PRINCIPAL | | | PLANNER, AT 561.822.1448. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
POLICE |
POLICE |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
09-10-2013 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
09-10-2013 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
ktucker |
Date |
09-10-2013 |
Time |
10:02 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2013-09-10 10:20:34 | AT THIS TIME THERE IS NOT ENOUGH INFORMATION TO REVIEW | | | THE PLANS. BELOW ARE SUGGESTIONS FOR SECURITY FOR THE | | | RESIDENCES TO BE BUILT | | | | | | | | | CONDITIONS FOR APPROVAL | | | PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF THE FIRST BUILDING PERMIT, THE | | | APPLICANT SHALL PREPARE A CONSTRUCTION SITE SECURITY | | | AND MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR APPROVAL BY THE CITY OF WEST | | | PALM BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT CPTED OFFICIAL. | | | A. AFTER SITE CLEARING AND PLACEMENT OF CONSTRUCTION | | | TRAILERS, THE DEVELOPER/PROJECT MANAGER SHALL INSTITUTE | | | SECURITY MEASURES TO REDUCE OR ELIMINATE OPPORTUNITIES | | | FOR THEFT. THE MANAGEMENT PLAN SHALL INCLUDE, BUT NOT | | | BE LIMITED TO, TEMPORARY LIGHTING, SECURITY PERSONNEL, | | | VEHICLE BARRIERS, CONSTRUCTION/VISITOR PASS, | | | REDUCE/MINIMIZE ENTRY/EXIT POINTS, ENCOURAGE | | | SUBCONTRACTORS TO SECURE MACHINERY, TOOLS AT END OF | | | WORK DAY, FENCING WITH SCREENING AND OR ANY OTHER | | | MEASURE DEEMED APPROPRIATE TO PROVIDE A SAFE AND SECURE | | | WORKING ENVIRONMENT. | | | B. THE SECURITY MANAGEMENT PLAN SHALL BE MAINTAINED | | | THROUGHOUT THE CONSTRUCTION PHASE OF THE PROJECT. | | | NON-COMPLIANCE WITH THE APPROVED PLAN SHALL RESULT IN A | | | STOP-WORK ORDER FOR THE ENTIRE PLANNED UNIT | | | DEVELOPMENT. | | | C. PROPERTY SHALL BE POST ?NO TRESPASSING? SIGNS EVERY | | | 500 FEET AROUND THE PERIMETER OF THE SITE. | | | LIGHTING | | | A. EXTERIOR LIGHTING SHALL BE PLACED ABOVE OR NEAR | | | ENTRYWAYS AND GARAGES. | | | B. LANDSCAPING SHALL NOT CONFLICT WITH LIGHTING (TO | | | INCLUDE LONG-TERM TREE CANOPY GROWTH). | | | C. LANDSCAPING SHALL NOT COVER VIEW OF WINDOWS, | | | BUILDING ADDRESS NUMBERS, WALKWAYS. | | | D. PHOTOCELL SENSOR-ENGAGED LIGHTING SHALL BE UTILIZED | | | FOR DUSK TO DAWN OPERATION. | | | E. 10-15 FOOT PEDESTRIAN-SCALE LIGHTING SHALL BE USED | | | FOR ALL PEDESTRIAN WALKWAYS. | | | F. IT IS SUGGESTED THAT 25-FOOT LIGHT POLES BE USED FOR | | | THE STREET LIGHTING. | | | NUMERICAL ADDRESS | | | A. ILLUMINATION FOR NIGHTTIME VISIBILITY IS REQUIRED. | | | B. BI-DIRECTIONAL VISIBILITY FROM THE ROADWAY IS | | | REQUIRED. | | | DOORS | | | A. DOORS LEADING INTO A RESIDENTIAL UNIT, INCLUDING | | | INTERIOR GARAGE, OR DETACHED GARAGES, SHALL BE SOLID | | | CORE. | | | B. FRONT DOOR SIDE PANE WINDOW SHALL BE PLACED ON THE | | | OPPOSITE SIDE OF THE DOOR HANDLE AND LOCK MAKING THEM | | | UNREACHABLE. | | | C. EXTERIOR DOORS SHALL BE EQUIPPED WITH A 180-DEGREE | | | PEEPHOLE AND NON-REMOVABLE SECURITY HINGES. | | | LOCKS | | | A. ANTI-LIFTING AUXILIARY LOCKS SHALL BE INSTALLED ON | | | SLIDING DOORS AND WINDOWS. | | | B. ALL DOORS SHALL BE EQUIPPED WITH SINGLE CYLINDER | | | DEAD BOLT LOCK WITH A MINIMUM THROW OF ONE INCH AND AN | | | EMBEDMENT OF NOT LESS 5/8 INCH INTO THE HOLDING DEVICE. | | | C. PICK PLATES SHOULD BE PLACED ALL EXTERIOR DOORS. | | | ALARM SYSTEMS | | | A. HOMES SHALL BE PRE-WIRED FOR ALARM SYSTEM. | | | B. TELEPHONE LINES SHALL BE RUN UNDERGROUND WITH BOX | | | HOOK-UP ON INSIDE OF BUILDING VERSUS THE EXTERIOR OF | | | BUILDING WHERE TELEPHONE LINES CAN BE CUT MAKING ALARM | | | SYSTEM INOPERABLE. | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
PW |
PUBLIC WORKS |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
09-30-2013 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jroach |
Date |
09-30-2013 |
Time |
14:55 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jroach |
Date |
09-30-2013 |
Time |
14:55 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2014-03-05 14:55:53 | PURSUANT TO THE EMAIL SENT TO ALL PLAN REVIEWERS ON | | | SEPTEMBER 25, 2013, ANY OUTSTANDING COMMENTS WERE TO BE | | | INSERTED INTO COMMUNITYPLUS PRIOR TO SEPTEMBER 30, | | | 2013. AS NO SUCH COMMENTS WERE MADE, IT WAS ASSUMMED | | | THAT ALL PREVIOUS COMMENTS HAD BEEN ADDRESSED. | | | | | | QUESTIONS/COMMENTS, CONTACT JOHN ROACH, PRINCIPAL | | | PLANNER, AT 561.822.1448. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
STORM |
STORMWATER |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
10-29-2013 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jroach |
Date |
10-29-2013 |
Time |
15:19 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jroach |
Date |
10-29-2013 |
Time |
15:19 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2014-03-05 15:21:02 | ALL OUTSTANDING COMMENTS ARE BEING ADDRESSED VIA | | | CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL OR AT LATER STAGES OF THE | | | DEVELOPMENT PROCESS (I.E. PRIOR TO FINAL PLAT, ETC.). | | | | | | QUESTIONS/COMMENTS, CONTACT JOHN ROACH, PRINCIPAL | | | PLANNER, AT (561) 822.1448. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
STORM |
STORMWATER |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
10-01-2013 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
tward |
Date |
10-01-2013 |
Time |
01:50 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
tward |
Date |
10-01-2013 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2013-10-01 01:54:02 | 1. PROPOSED 20' DRAINAGE EASEMENT NEEDS TO BE PROVIDED | | | TO THE HOMEOWNER'S ASSOCIATION THAT MAINTAINS EMBASSY | | | DRIVE. THE EASEMENT SHOULD CONTINUE THROUGH LAKE AREA | | | (OR PROVIDE FLOW EASEMENT THROUGH LAKE ESEMENT) | | | TO THE OUTFALL AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE SITE. | | | 2. PREVIOUS COMMENTS TO BE ADDRESSES DURING LATER | | | PHASES OF DEVELOPMENT SUBMITTALS. | | | 3. PROPOSED DRAINAGE SYSTEM IS NOT TO HAVE A | | | DETRIMENTAL EFFECT ON THE EXISTING DRAINAGE SYSTEMS | | | DRAINING TO THE PROJECT'S DRAINAGE SYSTEM(S). | | | 4. WILL A 20' LAKE MAINTENANCE EASEMENT ALL ALONG THE | | | LAKES' EDGES BE OBTAINED OR AVAILABLE? | | | | | | TRACY L. WARD, P.E. | | | SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER | | | ENGINEERING AND PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT | | | 561-494-1120 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
STORM |
STORMWATER |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
09-11-2013 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
tward |
Date |
09-11-2013 |
Time |
06:13 |
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
tward |
Date |
09-11-2013 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2013-09-11 06:35:04 | 1. MASTER CONCEPTUAL PLAN LISTS SFWMD CRITERIA IN NAVD | | | 1988. CHANGE ELEVATION TO CITY'S VERTICAL DATUM - NGVD | | | 1929. | | | 2. THE MINIMUM PERIMETER ELEVATION IS MISSING FROM THE | | | SFWMD BASIN CRITERIA TABLE ON THIS SHEET. | | | 3. PROVIDE DRAINAGE EASEMENT FOR THE REMAINING LANDS | | | DRAINING THROUGH THE PROPOSED PROJECT. | | | 4. THE PLAT LISTS PCC RESORT PROPERTY OWNERS | | | ASSOCIATION, INC., PCC RESORT MASTER PROPERTY OWNERS | | | ASSOCIATION, INC. AND PCC HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC., | | | (TO WHOM ARE DEDICATED THE DRAINAGE EASEMENTS). THERE | | | ARE DEDICATION ACCEPTANCES FOR THE RESORT MASTER | | | PROPERTY OWNERS AND THE HOMEOWNERS ASSOCIATIONS BUT NOT | | | THE RESORT PROPERTY OWNERS ASSOCIATION. | | | 5. AUGUST 2014 IS SHOWN UPPER LEFT CORNER OF SHEETS 2 | | | -5 OF THE PLAT. | | | 6. SFWMD ERP OR ERP MODIFICATION WILL NEED TO BE | | | SUBMITTED TO CWPB ENGINEERING SERVICES BEFORE START OF | | | CONSTRUCTION. | | | 7. SWPPP WILL NEED TO BE SUBMITTED WITH THE ENGINEERING | | | PERMIT APPLICATION. | | | 8. FDEP NPDES CONSTRUCTION PERMIT WILL NEED TO BE | | | SUBMITTED TO ENGINEERING SERVICES BEFORE START OF | | | CONSTRUCTION. | | | | | | TRACY L. WARD, P.E. | | | SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER | | | ENGINEERING AND PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT | | | 561-494-1120 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
SURVEY |
SURVEYING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
09-30-2013 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jroach |
Date |
09-30-2013 |
Time |
14:53 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jroach |
Date |
09-30-2013 |
Time |
14:53 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2014-03-05 14:55:03 | PURSUANT TO THE EMAIL SENT TO ALL PLAN REVIEWERS ON | | | SEPTEMBER 25, 2013, ANY OUTSTANDING COMMENTS WERE TO BE | | | INSERTED INTO COMMUNITYPLUS PRIOR TO SEPTEMBER 30, | | | 2013. AS NO SUCH COMMENTS WERE MADE, IT WAS ASSUMMED | | | THAT ALL PREVIOUS COMMENTS HAD BEEN ADDRESSED. | | | | | | QUESTIONS/COMMENTS, CONTACT JOHN ROACH, PRINCIPAL | | | PLANNER, AT 561.822.1448. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
SURVEY |
SURVEYING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
09-09-2013 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
vnoel |
Date |
09-09-2013 |
Time |
08:14 |
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
vnoel |
Date |
09-09-2013 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2013-09-09 08:59:31 | 1. SEPARATE PLAT AND SITE/CIVIL SUBMITTALS WILL BE | | | REQUIRED WITH ENGINEERING SERVICES. | | | 2. DEAD END OF COCONUT PALM WILL NEED TO BE ADDRESSED. | | | 3. ARE ON-SITE WATER AND SEWER TO BE PUBLIC OR PRIVATE? | | | 4. ANY OFF-SITE CONGRESS AVE. IMPROVEMENTS WILL REQUIRE | | | PALM BEACH COUNTY APPROVAL AND PERMIT PRIOR TO FINAL | | | SITE PLAN APPROVAL. | | | 5. IMPROVEMENTS TO LIFT STATION #77 MAY BE REQUIRED. | | | 6. APPLICATION WILL BE NEEDED FOR ABANDONMENT OF | | | PORTION OF 60 FOOT DRAINAGE EASEMENT. | | | 7. CONTINUATION OF EXISTING DRAINAGE WILL NEED TO BE | | | ADDRESSED. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
TRAFFIC |
TRAFFIC ENGINEERING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
10-29-2013 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jroach |
Date |
10-29-2013 |
Time |
15:25 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jroach |
Date |
10-29-2013 |
Time |
15:25 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2014-03-05 15:28:10 | WHILE B. COLLINS, CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER, STILL HAD | | | CONCERNS REGARDING THE PROXIMITY OF THE TRAFFIC CIRCLE | | | TO CONGRESS AVENUE, IT WAS DETERMINED THAT THIS WOULD | | | NOT BE A BASIS FOR DENIAL AND THAT THE PROPOSAL PLAN | | | COULD MOVE FORWARD AS-IS. | | | | | | QUESTIONS/COMMENTS, CONTACT JOHN ROACH, PRINCIPAL | | | PLANNER, AT (561) 822-1448. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
TRAFFIC |
TRAFFIC ENGINEERING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
09-26-2013 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
09-26-2013 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
bcollins |
Date |
09-26-2013 |
Time |
14:21 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2013-09-30 09:43:21 | PER PREVIOUS COMMENTS, ROUNDABOUT IS TOO CLOSE TO MAJOR | | | ROAD. IN ADDITION, MOVING TRUCKS WOULD HAVE DIFFICULTY | | | MANUEVERING THROUGH GUARD HOUSE AREA. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
TRAFFIC |
TRAFFIC ENGINEERING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
09-06-2013 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
09-06-2013 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
bcollins |
Date |
09-06-2013 |
Time |
13:25 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2013-09-06 14:14:08 | 1. THE TRAFFIC CIRCLE IS LOCATED LESS THAN 200 FT. FROM | | | CONGRESS AVENUE WHICH IS CLOSE ENOUGH THAT IT WILL | | | LIKELY TO CREATE OPERATIONAL ISSUES PARTICULARLY WHEN | | | THE FUTURE ROADWAY CONNECTION TO THE SOUTH IS | | | CONSTRUCTED. | | | | | | 2. THERE IS A NEED TO DEMONSTRATE, THROUGH THE USE OF | | | AUTOTURN, THAT GARBAGE TRUCKS AND LARGER MOVING VANS | | | ARE ABLE TO MAKE THE TURNS FROM THE SOUTHBOUND LANE | | | APPROACHING THE TRAFFIC CIRCLE ONTO THE EXIT ROAD, AND | | | WITHIN THE CUL-DE-SACS AND INTERIOR ROADWAYS, AS WELL | | | AS TURNS INTO THE GATE AREA. | | | | | | 3. THE ENTRY ROAD IS 24 FT., THE TRAVEL PATH AROUND THE | | | CIRCLE IS 30 FT., AND THE SOUTHBOUND APPROACH TO THE | | | ROUNDABOUT IS 20 FT. - ALL ARE WIDE ENOUGH TO CARRY 2 | | | LANES OF TRAFFIC. STRIPING AND SIGNAGE SHOULD BE SHOWN | | | TO DEMONSTRATE HOW THESE ROADWAYS WOULD OPERATE. | | | | | | 4. THE ENGINEERING PLAN DEPICTS MEDIAN CURBS | | | ENCROACHING INTO THE TRAFFIC CIRCLE. | | | | | | 5 . ALL REQUIREMENTS RELATED TO A TRAFFIC SIGNAL AND | | | NORTHBOUND RIGHT TURN LANE ON CONGRESS AVENUE, AS | | | REQUIRED BY THE COUNTY'S CONCURRENCY APPROVAL LETTER OF | | | FEBRUARY 26, 2013, SHALL BE INCORPORATED INTO | | | CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL (PER PAGES 22-23 OF THE DESIGN | | | GUIDELINES (EXHIBIT E TO RESOLUTION 6-13). | | | | | | 6. ALL OFF SITE IMPROVEMENTS ON CONGRESS AVENUE NEED TO | | | BE APPROVED AND PERMITTED BY PALM BEACH COUNTY. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
10-29-2013 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jroach |
Date |
10-29-2013 |
Time |
15:25 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jroach |
Date |
10-29-2013 |
Time |
15:24 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
09-30-2013 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jroach |
Date |
09-30-2013 |
Time |
15:03 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jroach |
Date |
09-30-2013 |
Time |
15:03 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2014-03-05 15:04:30 | ZONING PLANS AND PLATS REVIEW COMMITTEE (PPRC) REVIEW | | | ___________________________________________ | | | | | | DATE OF REVIEW: 09.30.2013 | | | PROJECT NO.: Z13080020 AND Z13080021 | | | CASE NO.: PB 1635C AND C | | | ADDRESS: 3100-3200 NORTH CONGRESS AVENUE | | | APPLICANT/CONTACT: JONI BRINKMAN | | | TELEPHONE NO.: 561.366.1100 | | | ___________________________________________ | | | | | | PLEASE PROVIDE A WRITTEN RESPONSE TO THE FOLLOWING | | | REVIEW COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1. DOES THE EDGE OF WATER OCCUR ALONG THE PERIMTETER OF | | | THE DEVELOPMENT? ADJACENT TO WHITEHALL, PRESIDENTIAL | | | ESTATES, ETC. IT IS UNCLEAR AS TO WHERE THE EDGE OF | | | WATER IS PROPOSED. | | | ___________________________________________ | | | | | | PLEASE NOTE THE FOLLOWING WHEN RESUBMITTING: | | | | | | A) WRITTEN RESPONSES TO COMMENTS MADE BY ALL | | | DEPARTMENTS SHALL BE PROVIDED UPON RESUBMISSION. | | | | | | B) 15 SETS OF REVISED PLANS AND/OR DOCUMENTS SHALL BE | | | PROVIDED, ALONG WITH ONE (1) REDUCED COPY (11IN X | | | 17IN), AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY OF ALL PLANS. | | | | | | C) PLEASE NOTE THAT RE-SUBMITTALS MAY BE SUBJECT TO | | | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS. | | | | | | D) IF NO RESPONSE IS RECEIVED WITHIN 60 DAYS OF THE | | | ISSUANCE OF THESE COMMENTS, THE APPLICATION WILL BE | | | CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN AND ANY FURTHER ACTION WILL | | | REQUIRE SUBMISSION OF A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION. | | | | | | E) PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1) | | | RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED | | | COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE | | | APPLICANT WILL BE ACCESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE | | | WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE. | | | | | | F) IN ORDER TO BE CONSIDERED FOR THE NEXT PLANNING | | | BOARD AGENDA, ALL COMMENTS AND CONCERNS SHALL BE | | | SATISFACTORILY ADDRESSED. PLEASE SUBMIT ALL REVISED | | | DOCUMENTS/PLANS NO LATER THAN FRIDAY, SEPTEMBER 20, | | | 2013, TO BE CONSIDERED FOR THE OCTOBER 16, 2013, | | | PLANNING BOARD HEARING. | | | | | | G) TO BE PLACED ON THE OCTOBER 16, 2013, PLANNING BOARD | | | AGENDA, SIGNS SHALL BE POSTED ON THE PROPERTY NO LATER | | | THAN OCTOBER 1, 2013. SIGNAGE SHALL CONFORM AND BE | | | INSTALLED WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY?S ZONING | | | AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS, AS ALSO PROVIDED IN | | | THE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION. A SIGNED AND NOTARIZED | | | AFFIDAVIT SHALL BE PROVIDED BY THE DEADLINE REFERENCED | | | ABOVE. | | | ___________________________________________ | | | | | | QUESTIONS/COMMENTS, PLEASE CONTACT THE FOLLOWING: | | | | | | JOHN ROACH, PRINCIPAL PLANNER | | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT ? PLANNING DIVISION | | | 401 CLEMATIS STREET - P.O. BOX 3147 | | | WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33402 | | | | | | PHONE: 561.822.1448 | | | FAX: 561.822.1460 | | | | | | EMAIL: [email protected] | | | | | | WWW.WPB.ORG | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
09-11-2013 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jroach |
Date |
09-11-2013 |
Time |
11:38 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jroach |
Date |
09-11-2013 |
Time |
11:37 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2013-09-11 11:38:10 | ZONING PLANS AND PLATS REVIEW COMMITTEE (PPRC) REVIEW | | | ___________________________________________ | | | | | | DATE OF REVIEW: 09.11.2013 | | | PROJECT NO.: Z13080020 AND Z13080021 | | | CASE NO.: PB 1635C AND C | | | ADDRESS: 3100-3200 NORTH CONGRESS AVENUE | | | APPLICANT/CONTACT: JONI BRINKMAN | | | TELEPHONE NO.: 561.366.1100 | | | ___________________________________________ | | | | | | PLEASE PROVIDE A WRITTEN RESPONSE TO THE FOLLOWING | | | REVIEW COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1. DOES THE EDGE OF WATER OCCUR ALONG THE PERIMTETER OF | | | THE DEVELOPMENT? ADJACENT TO WHITEHALL, PRESIDENTIAL | | | ESTATES, ETC. IT IS UNCLEAR AS TO WHERE THE EDGE OF | | | WATER IS PROPOSED. | | | | | | 2. PAGES 6, 18 AND 22 OF THE DESIGN GUIDELINES INDICATE | | | THAT THE SURFACE OF THE WATER WILL ONLY BE 80 FEET WIDE | | | NEAR LOT 50?.I BELIEVE THIS SHOULD BE LOT 58. | | | | | | 3. CORNER LOTS ARE REQUIRED TO BE A MINIMUM OF 60 FEET | | | IN WIDTH, THE PROPOSED SITE PLAN / PLAT SHOWS LOTS THAT | | | ARE ONLY 55 FEET IN WIDTH. A MODIFICATION OF THIS WILL | | | REQUIRE A WAIVER FROM THE CITY?S ZONING AND LAND | | | DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS. | | | | | | 4. HOW DO YOU ANTICIPATE LOT 89 TO BE CONSTRUCTED? | | | | | | 5. THE DRAINAGE EASEMENTS ON LOTS 49 AND 60 APPEAR TO | | | BE SIGNIFICANTLY LARGER THAN 6 FEET. | | | | | | 6. THE SITE PLAN SHOWS THE DRAINAGE EASEMENTS BEING 6 | | | FEET WIDE, WHILE THE PLAT SHOWS 10 FEET. PLEASE ENSURE | | | THAT ALL PLANS ARE CONSISTENT. | | | | | | 7. PLEASE NOTE THAT THE REVISED DESIGN GUIDELINES DID | | | NOT REFLECT THAT WHICH WAS APPROVED BY THE CITY | | | COMMISSION. MAKE SURE THE REVISIONS ARE BEING DONE TO | | | THE CURRENTLY-APPROVED REGULATIONS. | | | | | | 8. HOW DOES THE PROPOSED LAKE CONFIGURATION ALONG | | | PRESIDENTIAL ESTATES CORRESPOND WITH EXISTING | | | VEGETATION? PAGE 24 OF THE DESIGN GUIDELINES REQUIRES | | | THAT THEY REMAIN IN THEIR CURRENT LOCATION, EVEN IF | | | THEY ENCROACH INTO THE EXISTING LAKE MAINTENANCE | | | EASEMENT, OR THAT THEY BE RELOCATED TO THE PROPERTY | | | OWNER?S PROPERTY. | | | | | | 9. WHAT IS THE STATUS OF THE MEDIAN IN CONGRESS AVENUE? | | | THIS WILL NEED TO BE CONSTRUCTED AS PART OF THE | | | DEVELOPMENT OF PBA #1. | | | | | | 10. A FORMAL SITE PLAN REVIEW WILL NEED TO BE SUBMITTED | | | FOR ALL COMMON-AREA LANDSCAPING, ENTRY LANDSCAPING, | | | BUFFER LANDSCAPING, ETC. | | | | | | 11. PLEASE PROVIDE STATUS OF SIGNALIZATION REQUIREMENT | | | ON CONGRESS AVENUE. PURSUANT TO PALM BEACH COUNTY, | | | SURETY NEEDS TO BE PROVIDED PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF | | | THE FIRST BUILDING PERMIT. | | | | | | 12. WHAT IS THE STATUS OF PROVIDING THE ENVIRONMENTAL | | | ASSESSMENTS REQUIRED ON PAGE 35 OF THE DESIGN | | | GUIDELINES? | | | | | | 13. WHAT IS THE STATUS OF PROVIDING THE | | | UTILITY/INFRASTRUCTURE REQUIREMENTS PROVIDED ON PAGE 36 | | | OF THE DESIGN GUIDELINES? | | | | | | 14. HOW WILL THE FIRE DEPARTMENT ACCESS THE RESIDENTIAL | | | SUBDIVISION? IT IS EXPECTED THAT THEY WOULD ENTER | | | THROUGH THE EGRESS LANE? TURNING RADIUS WOULD NEED TO | | | BE VERIFIED. | | | | | | 15. THERE DOESN?T APPEAR TO BE MUCH STACKING FOR GUEST | | | VEHICLES ENTERING INTO THE RESIDENTIAL SUBDIVISION (4 | | | CARS MAX). CARS BACKING UP INTO THE ROUND-ABOUT WILL | | | CAUSE NUMEROUS PROPERTY WITH RESIDENTS TRYING TO ENTER, | | | RESIDENTS/GUESTS COMING TO/FROM THE RESORT PARCEL, ETC. | | | | | | 16. THE PLAT SHOWS OPEN-SPACE TRACTS THAT ARE NOT | | | REFLECTED ON THE SITE PLAN. PLEASE ENSURE THAT ALL | | | PLANS ARE CONSISTENT. | | | ___________________________________________ | | | | | | PLEASE NOTE THE FOLLOWING WHEN RESUBMITTING: | | | | | | A) WRITTEN RESPONSES TO COMMENTS MADE BY ALL | | | DEPARTMENTS SHALL BE PROVIDED UPON RESUBMISSION. | | | | | | B) 15 SETS OF REVISED PLANS AND/OR DOCUMENTS SHALL BE | | | PROVIDED, ALONG WITH ONE (1) REDUCED COPY (11IN X | | | 17IN), AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY OF ALL PLANS. | | | | | | C) PLEASE NOTE THAT RE-SUBMITTALS MAY BE SUBJECT TO | | | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS. | | | | | | D) IF NO RESPONSE IS RECEIVED WITHIN 60 DAYS OF THE | | | ISSUANCE OF THESE COMMENTS, THE APPLICATION WILL BE | | | CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN AND ANY FURTHER ACTION WILL | | | REQUIRE SUBMISSION OF A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION. | | | | | | E) PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1) | | | RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED | | | COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE | | | APPLICANT WILL BE ACCESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE | | | WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE. | | | | | | F) IN ORDER TO BE CONSIDERED FOR THE NEXT PLANNING | | | BOARD AGENDA, ALL COMMENTS AND CONCERNS SHALL BE | | | SATISFACTORILY ADDRESSED. PLEASE SUBMIT ALL REVISED | | | DOCUMENTS/PLANS NO LATER THAN FRIDAY, SEPTEMBER 20, | | | 2013, TO BE CONSIDERED FOR THE OCTOBER 16, 2013, | | | PLANNING BOARD HEARING. | | | | | | G) TO BE PLACED ON THE OCTOBER 16, 2013, PLANNING BOARD | | | AGENDA, SIGNS SHALL BE POSTED ON THE PROPERTY NO LATER | | | THAN OCTOBER 1, 2013. SIGNAGE SHALL CONFORM AND BE | | | INSTALLED WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY?S ZONING | | | AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS, AS ALSO PROVIDED IN | | | THE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION. A SIGNED AND NOTARIZED | | | AFFIDAVIT SHALL BE PROVIDED BY THE DEADLINE REFERENCED | | | ABOVE. | | | ___________________________________________ | | | | | | QUESTIONS/COMMENTS, PLEASE CONTACT THE FOLLOWING: | | | | | | JOHN ROACH, PRINCIPAL PLANNER | | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT ? PLANNING DIVISION | | | 401 CLEMATIS STREET - P.O. BOX 3147 | | | WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33402 | | | | | | PHONE: 561.822.1448 | | | FAX: 561.822.1460 | | | | | | EMAIL: [email protected] | | | | | | WWW.WPB.ORG | | | |
|
|
| |
Print |
|
Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved |
 |