Plan Review Details - Project Z13080018
Plan Review Stops For Project Z13080018
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 3 Status P Date 10-28-2013 Cont ID  
Sent By rbrown Date 10-28-2013 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By rbrown Date 10-28-2013 Time 21:23 Sent To  
Notes
2013-10-28 21:22:25DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, BUILDING DIVISION,
 COMMENTS:
  
 AS PREVIOUSLY STATED THIS REVIEW IS A CURSORY REVIEW AS
 IT RELATES TO THE SITE. IT IS NOT A REVIEW FOR FULL
 COMPLIANCE WITH FLORIDA BUILDING CODE. THE COMMENTS
 MADE HAVE BEEN ADDRESSED.
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 2 Status F Date 10-01-2013 Cont ID  
Sent By rbrown Date 10-01-2013 Time 11:43 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rbrown Date 10-01-2013 Time 11:43 Sent To  
Notes
2013-10-01 12:00:41DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, BUILDING DIVISION,
 COMMENTS:
  
 THE RESPONSE TO THE REVIEW COMMENTS FROM 9/11/13, IS
 NOTED. THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE THOSE THAT HAVE NOT
 BEEN COMPLETELY ADDRESSED. THE NUMBERING SEQUENCE FROM
 THE PREVIOUS REVIEW HAS BEEN RETAINED FOR CONSISTENCY
 AND EASE OF REFERENCE.
  
 1. THIS REVIEW IS A CURSORY REVIEW AS IT RELATES TO THE
 SITE. IT IS NOT A REVIEW FOR FULL COMPLIANCE WITH
 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE. THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE TO BE
 ADDRESSED FOR PERMITTING.
  
 6. LOCATION OF ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES. COMMENT NOT
 COMPLETELY ADDRRESSED. PARKING GARAGE SHEETS GA-1.0 AND
 GA-1.1 STILL SHOW PARKING SPACES 211, 398, 399, AND
 416, LOCATED SUCH THAT THE USER WOULD BE COMPELLED TO
 WALK, OR WHEEL, IN THE VEHICULAR TRAVEL LANE AND/OR
 BEHIND THE PARKED VEHICLES OF OTHER USERS, IN ORDER TO
 GET TO THE HOTEL. PLEASE SHOW ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES
 LOCATED SUCH THAT, IN ORDER TO GET FROM THEIR VEHICLE
 TO THE HOTEL BUILDING, THE USER WOULD NOT BE COMPELLED
 TO WALK, OR WHEEL, IN THE VEHICULAR TRAVEL LANE AND/OR
 BEHIND THE PARKED VEHICLES OF OTHER USERS. PER SECTION
 208.3 OF FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY CODE, ACCESSIBLE PARKING
 SPACES ARE TO BE LOCATED ON THE SHORTEST POSSIBLE ROUTE
 OF TRAVEL FROM ADJACENT PARKING TO AN ACCESSIBLE
 ENTRANCE FOR EACH BUILDING, AND SHALL BE LOCATED SUCH
 THAT THE ROUTE IS A SAFE ONE. THE DESIGN OF ACCESSIBLE
 PARKING SPACES SHALL COMPLY WITH SECTION 502 OF FLORIDA
 ACCESSIBILITY CODE
  
 11. WALKWAY CONNECTION TO CONVENTION CENTER BUILDING.
 SHEET A-0.2 SHOWS TWO PROPOSED COVERED WALKWAYS FROM
 THE HOTEL TO THE CONVENTION CENTER. COMMENT RESPONSE IS
 NOTED. FOR BUILDING PERMIT, CONDITION 3 OF THE
 EXCEPTION TO FBC 3104.5 WILL HAVE TO BE ADDRESSED BY
 UNTIY OF TITLE, UNITY OF CONTROL, OR SOME OTHER LEGAL
 MEANS BECAUSE THE BUILDINGS ARE NOT "ON THE SAME LOT".
  
 12. FIRST FLOOR PLAN SHEET A-1.01. THE FITNESS ROOM IS
 NOW SHOWN WITH TWO EXITS, BUT THE EXITS ARE NOT
 SEPARATED BY A DISTANCE OF AT LEAST 1/3 OF THE GREATEST
 DIAGONAL DIMENSION OF THE ROOM OR SPACE. WHEN SUBMITTED
 FOR PERMIT, THE PLANS SHALL SHOW THAT THE NUMBER AND
 SPACING OF EXITS COMPLY WITH SECTION 1021.4 OF THE
 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE.
  
 ROBERT BROWN
 BUILDING OFFICIAL
 TEL: 561 805 6652
 EMAIL: [email protected]
  
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 1 Status F Date 09-11-2013 Cont ID  
Sent By mgonzale Date 09-11-2013 Time 10:12 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rbrown Date 09-11-2013 Time 10:35 Sent To  
Notes
2013-09-11 11:18:55DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT, BUILDING DIVISION,
 COMMENTS:
  
 1. THIS REVIEW IS A CURSORY REVIEW AS IT RELATES TO THE
 SITE. IT IS NOT A REVIEW FOR FULL COMPLIANCE WITH
 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE. THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE TO BE
 ADDRESSED FOR PERMITTING.
  
 2. WHEN SUBMITTED FOR PERMIT, THE PLANS SHALL SHOW AT
 LEAST ONE ACCESSIBLE ROUTE, COMPLYING WITH SECTIONS
 206.2 AND 402.2 OF FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY CODE, FROM THE
 PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY TO ALL ACCESSIBLE BUILDING OR
 FACILITY ENTRANCES.
  
 4. WHEN SUBMITTED FOR PERMIT, THE PLANS SHALL SHOW AT
 LEAST ONE ACCESSIBLE ROUTE, COMPLYING WITH SECTIONS
 206.2 AND 402.2 OF FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY CODE,
 CONNECTING ACCESSIBLE BUILDING OR FACILITY ENTRANCES
 WITH ALL ACCESSIBLE SPACES AND ELEMENTS WITHIN THE
 BUILDING OR FACILITY
  
 5. ANY PART OF AN ACCESSIBLE ROUTE WITH A SLOPE GREATER
 THAN 1:20 SHALL BE CONSIDERED A RAMP AND SHALL COMPLY
 WITH SECTION 405 OF FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY CODE.
  
 6. LOCATION OF ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES. PARKING
 GARAGE SHEETS GA-1.1 AND GA-1.2 SHOW ACCESSIBLE PARKING
 SPACES LOCATED SUCH THAT, IN ORDER TO GET FROM THEIR
 VEHICLE TO THE HOTEL BUILDING, THE USER WOULD BE
 COMPELLED TO WALK, OR WHEEL, IN THE VEHICULAR TRAVEL
 LANE AND/OR BEHIND THE PARKED VEHICLES OF OTHER USERS.
 PER SECTION 208.3 OF FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY CODE,
 ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES ARE TO BE LOCATED ON THE
 SHORTEST POSSIBLE ROUTE OF TRAVEL FROM ADJACENT PARKING
 TO AN ACCESSIBLE ENTRANCE FOR EACH BUILDING, AND SHALL
 BE LOCATED SUCH THAT THE ROUTE IS A SAFE ONE. THE
 DESIGN OF ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES SHALL COMPLY WITH
 SECTION 502 OF FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY CODE
  
 7. VAN ACCESSIBLE PARKING. IT IS NOTED THAT THE PARKING
 DATA TABLE ON SHEET A-0.1 CORRECTLY STATES THAT A VAN
 ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACE IS REQUIRED. PLEASE INDICATE,
 ON PARKING GARAGE SHEET GA-1.1, WHICH OF THE ACCESSIBLE
 PARKING SPACES WILL BE DESIGNATED AS VAN ACCESSIBLE.
 PER SECTION 208.2.4 OF FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY CODE, ONE
 IN EVERY SIX ACCESSIBLE SPACES (AT LEAST ONE) IN A
 PARKING STRUCTURE, SHALL BE VAN ACCESSIBLE AND DESIGNED
 IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION OF 502 OF FLORIDA
 ACCESSIBILITY CODE (VERTICAL CLEARANCE NOT LESS THAN 98
 INCHES AT SPACE AND VEHICLE ACCESS ROUTE)
  
 8. THE TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION FOR THE BUILDINGS SHALL BE
 IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE HEIGHT, AREA AND OCCUPANCY
 LIMITATIONS IN CHAPTER 5 OF THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE
  
 9. COMPLIANCE WITH ALL BUILDING SEPARATION, PERCENTAGE
 OF OPENINGS AND OPENING PROTECTIVE REQUIREMENTS OF
 CHAPTERS 6 AND 7 OF THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE SHALL BE
 VERIFIED.
  
 10. IT IS NOTED FROM PARKING GARAGE SHEETS GA-2.0 AND
 GA-2.1, THAT THE PARKING GARAGE IS CURRENTLY DESIGNED
 AS AN OPEN GARAGE. SHOULD THE DESIGN CHANGE TO AN
 ENCLOSED PARKING GARAGE FOR ANY REASON, PLEASE NOTE
 THAT ENCLOSED PARKING GARAGES MUST HAVE EXHAUST SYSTEMS
 DESIGNED TO MINIMIZE NOISE LEVELS USING INLINE FAN
 SILENCERS OR OTHER APPROVED METHODS.
  
 11. WALKWAY CONNECTION TO CONVENTION CENTER BUILDING.
 SHEET A-0.2 SHOWS TWO PROPOSED COVERED WALKWAYS FROM
 THE HOTEL TO THE CONVENTION CENTER. WHERE THE WALKWAYS
 CONNECT TO THE CONVENTION CENTER BUILDING THE
 WALLS/DOORS/STOREFRONT THE CONSTRUCTION MUST BE 4-HOUR
 FIRE-RATED WITH 3-HOUR FIRE-RATED DOORS (OR SHUTTERS),
 OR THE ENTIRE HOTEL BUILDING MUST BE DESIGNED AND
 CONSTRUCTED AS AN ADDITION TO THE EXISTING CONVENTION
 CENTER BUILDING. IN THAT CASE THE ADDITION WOULD BE
 COVERED BY CHAPTER 10 OF THE FLORIDA EXISTING BUILDING
 CODE, AND THE HEIGHT AND/OR AREA INCREASE DUE TO THE
 PROPOSED ADDITION WOULD HAVE TO BE SHOWN TO NOT
 INCREASE THE TOTAL BUILDING HEIGHT AND/OR AREA BEYOND
 THAT ALLOWED UNDER THE APPLICABLE PROVISIONS OF CHAPTER
 5 OF THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE.
  
 12. FIRST FLOOR PLAN SHEET A-1.01. THE BAR, RESTAURANT,
 AND FITNESS ROOM ARE NOT CURRENTLY SHOWN TO HAVE TWO
 EXITS SEPARATED BY A DISTANCE OF AT LEAST 1/3 OF THE
 GREATEST DIAGONAL DIMENSION OF THE RESPECTIVE ROOM OR
 SPACE. WHEN SUBMITTED FOR PERMIT, THE PLANS SHALL SHOW
 THAT THE NUMBER AND SPACING OF EXITS COMPLY WITH
 SECTION 1021.4 OF THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE.
  
 13. SECOND FLOOR PLAN SHEET A-1.02. WITH THE CURRENT
 CONFIGURATION OF THE PLAN, THERE DOES NOT APPEAR TO BE
 ACCESS TO AN EXIT STAIR AT THE SOUTH END OF THE MEETING
 ROOM ACCESS CORRIDOR TO PROVIDE EGRESS IN AN EMERGENCY
 WITHOUT THE USE OF THE ESCALATORS FOR EMERGENCY
 EXITING. ESCALATORS SHALL NOT BE USED FOR REQUIRED
 MEANS OF EGRESS PURSUANT TO SECTION 1003.7 OF THE
 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE.
  
 14. ALL APPLICABLE PERMITS MUST BE OBTAINED BEFORE
 COMMENCING THE WORK.
  
 15. FOR STREET ADDRESSING CONTACT JOSH MILLS, GIS
 SUPPORT SPECIALIST ON 561 494 1084
  
 ROBERT BROWN
 BUILDING OFFICIAL
 TEL: 561 805 6652
 EMAIL: [email protected]
  
Review Stop ENG - PPRC ENGINEERING - PPRC
Rev No 1 Status F Date 09-11-2013 Cont ID  
Sent By mgonzale Date 09-11-2013 Time   Rev Time 2.00
Received By mgonzale Date 09-11-2013 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2013-09-11 10:12:27CASE 950NNN (Z13080018) CONVENTION CENTER HOTEL
  
 WATER
 EXISTING WATER UTILITIES ARE ALREADY LOCATED ADJACENT
 TO THE PROPERTY FOR THE FIRE LINE TAP (10 X 8) AND
 DOMESTIC WATER (12 X 12).
  
 HOWEVER, THE CONVENTION CENTER AND THE EXISTING HIGH
 RISE ALSO SHARE FROM THESE MAINS. A CAPACITY STUDY MAY
 BE NECESSARY TO CALCULATE THE DEMAND FLOW RESPECTIVE OF
 THESE EXISTING STRUCTURES AND USE.
  
 THE DDC AND DOMESTIC BACKFLOW PREVENTER FOR THE
 CONVENTION CENTER ARE CURRENTLY LOCATED AT THE
 SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE PROPOSED HOTEL SITE WITHIN FEET
 OF THE HOTELS? MASTER METER. IN FUTURE MRO TASKS, THIS
 ARRANGEMENT MAY LEAD TO CONFUSION.
  
 SANITARY SEWER
 THERE ARE TWO (2) SANITARY MANHOLES PROPOSED, HOWEVER
 SSMH #1 IS OF A DOG HOUSE DESIGN AND BASED ON FLOW, MAY
 NOT BE ALLOWED FOR CONNECTION TO THE GRAVITY MAIN. A
 MANHOLE WITH TAPERED INVERT CHANNELS MAY BE PREFERRED.
  
 THERE ARE TWO (2) CONNECTIONS TO EXISTING SANITARY LINE
 PROPOSED THAT MAY REQUIRE NEW MANHOLES TO COLLECT FLOW.
 THE CURRENT DESIGN SHOWN IS FOR 6" TIE-IN WYES TO THE
 MAIN WHICH MAY ARE NOT PREFERRED.
  
 THE COLLECTED FLOWS ARE THEN TRANSMITTED THROUGH THE
 NORTHERN PORTION OF FLAMINGO PARK, A RESIDENTIAL AREA.
 A CAPACITY ANALYSIS MAY BE REQUIRED TO FULLY UNDERSTAND
 THE IMPACT OF THESE ADDITIONAL GRAVITY FLOWS.
  
 STORM WATER
  
 THE CURRENT DESIGN ROUTES THE ALL STORM FLOWS TO THE
 84" RCP STORM WATER SYSTEM THAT SERVES THE CONVENTION
 CENTER, KRAVIS CENTER AND CITY PLACE.
  
 ADDITIONAL ATTENTION SHOULD BE CONSIDERED FOR THE
 NUMBER OF "CONNECTIONS TO EXISTING" DRAINAGE STRUCTURES
 AND CATCH BASINS. THESE ADDITIONAL FLOWS MAY IMPACT
 THESE APPURTENANCES BEYOND THEIR CURRENT DESIGN
 PARAMETERS.
  
  
  
  
  
  
Review Stop FIRE FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No 1 Status P Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By pleduc Date 10-04-2013 Time 08:53 Sent To  
Notes
2013-10-04 08:52:06CONVENTION CENTER HOTEL AND GARAGE
  
 BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION
  
 THE PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED COMMENTS HAVE BEEN ADDRESSED.
  
 THE BUREAU'S APPROVAL OF THIS SUBMITTED PROJECT DOES
 NOT CONSTITUTE IT'S FINAL REVIEW OR APPROVAL.
  
 THE BUREAU SHALL REVIEW ALL SUBMITTED BUILDING PLANS IN
 ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF ALL APPLICABLE
 CODES AND STANDARDS.
  
 PETER LEDUC
  
 BATTALION CHIEF, FIRE MARSHAL
 WEST PALM BEACH FIRE RESCUE
  
2013-09-06 16:06:18THIS SUBMITTAL IS QUITE DETAILED AND FURTHER REVEIW IS
 NEEDED; HOWEVER, ACCESS AND EXITING POINTS APPEAR TO BE
 IN ORDER.
  
 FURTHER REVIEW AND EVALUATION OF THE HYDRANT AND FDC
 LOCATIONS, FD CONTROL ROOM IS NEEDED WITH INPUT FROM
 OPERATIONAL PERSONNEL PRIOR TO FINAL APPROVAL.
  
 ALL LIFE AND FIRE SAFETY CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE IN
 COMPLIANCE WITH THE CURRENT 2010 EDITION OF THE FLORIDA
 FIRE PREVENTION CODE.
  
 SPRINKLER PROTECTION WITHIN THE PARKING GARAGE AND
 STANDPIPE CONNECTIONS IN THE STAIRWELLS IS REQUIRED.
  
Review Stop L LANDSCAPING
Rev No 1 Status   Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time  
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop PARK PARKING
Rev No 1 Status   Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time  
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop POLICE POLICE
Rev No 1 Status F Date 09-09-2013 Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By ktucker Date 09-09-2013 Time 13:12 Sent To  
Notes
2013-09-09 13:17:49NEED TO SEE A SECURITY PLAN SHOWING LOCATIONS OF
 CAMERAS AND CAMERAS WITH LIGHTING.
 NEED TO SEE LIGHTING PLANS FOR THE GARAGE
  
  
  
 CONDITIONS FOR APPROVAL
 PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF THE FIRST BUILDING PERMIT, THE
 APPLICANT SHALL PREPARE A CONSTRUCTION SITE SECURITY
 AND MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR APPROVAL BY THE CITY OF WEST
 PALM BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT CPTED OFFICIAL.
 A. AFTER SITE CLEARING AND PLACEMENT OF CONSTRUCTION
 TRAILERS, THE DEVELOPER/PROJECT MANAGER SHALL INSTITUTE
 SECURITY MEASURES TO REDUCE OR ELIMINATE OPPORTUNITIES
 FOR THEFT. THE MANAGEMENT PLAN SHALL INCLUDE, BUT NOT
 BE LIMITED TO, TEMPORARY LIGHTING, SECURITY PERSONNEL,
 VEHICLE BARRIERS, CONSTRUCTION/VISITOR PASS,
 REDUCE/MINIMIZE ENTRY/EXIT POINTS, ENCOURAGE
 SUBCONTRACTORS TO SECURE MACHINERY, TOOLS AT END OF
 WORK DAY, FENCING WITH SCREENING AND OR ANY OTHER
 MEASURE DEEMED APPROPRIATE TO PROVIDE A SAFE AND SECURE
 WORKING ENVIRONMENT.
 B. THE SECURITY MANAGEMENT PLAN SHALL BE MAINTAINED
 THROUGHOUT THE CONSTRUCTION PHASE OF THE PROJECT.
 NON-COMPLIANCE WITH THE APPROVED PLAN SHALL RESULT IN A
 STOP-WORK ORDER FOR THE ENTIRE PLANNED UNIT
 DEVELOPMENT.
 C. PROPERTY SHALL BE POST ?NO TRESPASSING? SIGNS EVERY
 500 FEET AROUND THE PERIMETER OF THE SITE.
  
 1.1 LIGHTING FOR HOTEL AREAS
 A. LANDSCAPING SHALL NOT OBSTRUCT VIEW OF WINDOWS,
 BUILDING ADDRESS NUMBERS, LIGHTING AND WALKWAYS.
 B. TIMER CLOCK OR PHOTOCELL SENSOR-ENGAGED LIGHTING FOR
 ABOVE OR NEAR ENTRYWAYS AND ALL PEDESTRIAN SIDEWALKS
 SHALL BE PROVIDED.
 C. LIGHTING FOR ENTRANCE SIGN SHALL BE PROVIDED.
 D. LIGHTING ON BUILDINGS SHALL BE AROUND PERIMETER OF
 ALL SIDES AND ON PEDESTRIAN WALKWAY SURROUNDING THE
 BUILDINGS.
 1.2 NUMERICAL ADDRESS
 A. ILLUMINATED FOR NIGHTTIME VISIBILITY IS REQUIRED.
 B. BI-DIRECTIONAL VISIBILITY FROM THE ROADWAY IS
 REQUIRED.
 C. ADDRESS NUMBERS ON DOORS NEED TO BE A MINIMUM OF 6
 INCHES HIGH.
 1.3 GUESTROOMS
 A. GUESTROOMS ALL NEED TO HAVE ELECTRONIC CARD.
 B. DOORS SHALL BE SOLID-CORE WOOD OR METAL, AND BE
 SELF-CLOSING AND SELF-LOCKING. THE DOOR LOCK MUST
 CONSIST OF A HIGH QUALITY DEADBOLT WITH AT LEAST A
 ONE-INCH BOLT. THE LOCK STRIKE-PLATE MUST BE BOLTED
 SECURELY TO THE METAL DOORFRAME OR BY USING THREE-INCH
 SCREWS WHEN ATTACHED TO A WOOD DOORJAMB. ACCESSIBLE
 SLIDING WINDOWS MUST HAVE SECONDARY SECURITY DEVICES
 ATTACHED TO PREVENT FORCED ENTRY OR LIFTING OUT OF THE
 FRAME.
 C. EACH GUESTROOM SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH IN-ROOM
 ELECTRONIC SAFES. (NOTE: MUST BE PREPLANNED BY
 ELECTRICAL ENGINEER FOR ELECTRICAL HOOK-UP.)
 D. GUESTROOMS SHALL NOT BE ACCESSIBLE FROM OUTSIDE
 UNLESS BY ELECTRONIC ACCESS.
 1.4 EXTERIOR
 A. EXTERIOR BUILDING LIGHTING SHALL BE REQUIRED FOR ALL
 EXIT WAY, EMERGENCY ACCESS, STAIRWAY AND UTILITY ROOM
 DOORS.
 B. SECONDARY ACCESS, OTHER THAN MAIN LOBBY, SHALL BE
 AVAILABLE BY CONTROLLED ACCESS.
 C. POOL AREA RESTRICTED ACCESS HELPS PREVENT
 UNAUTHORIZED USE, CURBS POTENTIAL VANDALISM AND
 PROVIDES GREATER SECURITY AND PROTECTION TO POOL USERS,
 ESPECIALLY CHILDREN.
 D. ALL EXITING DOORS NEED VIEW WINDOW OR PEEPHOLE.
 1.5 MISCELLANEOUS
  
 A. PAY PHONES SHALL BE KEPT IN OPEN AREAS, PREFERABLY
 WITHIN VIEW OF THE FRONT DESK.
 B. LEGENDS, MARQUIS MAPS, ETC., SHALL BE USED
 INDICATING LOCATIONS OF CONFERENCE ROOMS, ELEVATORS,
 STAIRS, LOBBY AREAS, RESTAURANTS, POOL, TENNIS COURT,
 WORKOUT ROOM, ETC.
 C. GIFT SHOP WINDOWS SHALL BE CLEAR TO INCREASE NATURAL
 SURVEILLANCE
 D. ATM INSTALLATION SHALL MEET FSS REQUIREMENTS
 E. STAIRWELLS SHALL HAVE CONVEX MIRRORS INSTALLED AT
 LANDINGS FOR EACH LEVEL.
 F. INTERIOR OF ELEVATORS SHALL UTILIZE MIRRORS AND CCTV
 G. INSTALL CCTV FOR SURVEILLANCE OF LOBBY, STAIRWELLS,
 PARKING LOTS, POOL, FITNESS ROOM, POOL RESTROOM
 CORRIDOR, LOADING DOCKS, VALET STAND, LOBBY, CHECK IN
 COUNTER, ESCALATOR LOBBIES AND SERVICE AREAS OF BANQUET
 ROOMS.
 H. ACCESS CONTROL TO ALL EMPLOYEE AREAS.
  
 1.6 PARKING GARAGE DESIGN
 A. PARKING GARAGE FIRST LEVEL SHALL HAVE RESTRICTED
 ACCESS FROM EXTERIOR COMMON GROUND AREA.
 B. EXTERIOR WALLS SURROUNDING THE FIRST FLOOR (GROUND
 LEVEL) PARKING SHALL BE AT LEAST 3 TO 4 FEET HIGH.
 C. METAL SCREENING SHALL BE IN PLACE BETWEEN THE TOP OF
 THE WALL (CRASH BARRIER) AND THE FLOORING OF THE SECOND
 PARKING LEVEL.
 D. OPEN MESH-TYPE SCREENING PROVIDES MAXIMUM VISIBILITY
 FROM THE EXTERIOR WHILE ELIMINATING THE OPPORTUNITY OF
 ACCESS BY SOMEONE CLIMBING OVER THE WALL.
 E. CRASH BARRIERS AROUND THE PERIMETER OF THE PARKING
 GARAGE AND THE SHEAR WALLS THROUGHOUT THE INTERIOR
 COULD BE ?-INCH STEEL CABLES OR WROUGHT IRON FENCING
 INSTEAD OF SOLID WALLS, ALLOWING FOR MORE NATURAL LIGHT
 AND AN UNOBSTRUCTED LINE OF SIGHT.
 F. GROUND LEVEL PEDESTRIAN EXITS THAT OPEN INTO
 NON-SECURE AREAS SHALL BE EMERGENCY EXITS ONLY AND
 FITTED WITH PANIC BAR HARDWARE.
 G. CENTER OF THE GARAGE SHALL HAVE CONNECTIVITY TO ALL
 CROSSWALKS.
 H. DIRECTIONAL ARROWS AND SIGNAGE INDICATING EXITS,
 STAIRS, AND ELEVATORS SHALL BE PROVIDED.
 I. PEDESTRIAN ENTRANCES SHALL BE ADJACENT TO VEHICLE
 ENTRANCES, OPEN AND FREE OF HIDDEN SPACES AND WIRED FOR
 CCTV SURVEILLANCE.
 J. PUBLIC AND PRIVATE PARKING SPACES SHALL BE
 DESIGNATED.
 K. WALLS AND SUPPORT STRUCTURES SHALL ALL BE
 CONSTRUCTED WITH OPEN SIDES TO AVOID CREATION OF HIDDEN
 SPACES.
 L. ACCESS POINTS TO THE FACILITY SHALL BE MINIMIZED.
 M. CEILINGS AND SOLID WALLS IN THE PARKING GARAGE SHALL
 OF LIGHT IN COLOR CONCRETE OR BE PAINTED WHITE TO
 INCREASE BRIGHTNESS WITHIN THE FACILITY.
 N. CONVEX MIRRORS SHALL BE INSTALLED IN STAIRWELL AND
 ELEVATOR AREAS.
 O. UTILIZE SECURITY VISION DOORS AT ENTRANCE TO
 STAIRWELLS ON EACH FLOOR.
 1.7 TELEPHONES
 A. EACH LEVEL OF THE PARKING GARAGE SHALL BE EQUIPPED
 WITH WELL-MARKED, DIRECT RING EMERGENCY TELEPHONES.
 B. TELEPHONES SHALL TERMINATE AT A CENTRAL STAFFED
 MONITORING OFFICE, STATION OR BOOTH.
 1.8 ELEVATORS
 A. ELEVATORS SHALL BE EQUIPPED WITH EMERGENCY TWO-WAY
 COMMUNICATION.
 B. ELEVATORS SHALL HAVE NO STOP BUTTON.
 C. ELEVATORS SHALL BE LOCATED CLOSE TO THE MAIN
 ENTRANCE, CONSTRUCTED TO AVOID HIDDEN SPACES AND
 UTILIZE CCTV SURVEILLANCE.
  
 STAIRWELLS
 A. STAIRWELLS SHOULD BE WELL LIT OR HAVE AN OPEN
 DESIGN.
 1.9 LIGHTING
 A. THE EXTERIOR OF THE PARKING GARAGE SHALL BE WELL LIT
 ON ALL SIDES.
 B. ALL LIGHTING SHALL BE VANDALISM RESISTANT.
 C. LIGHTING SHOULD BE PLACED WHERE USERS REQUIRE
 LIGHTS: OVER VEHICLES,
 STAIRWELLS, CCTVCAMERAS.
 D. LIGHTING FIXTURES SHOULD BE EXTENDED PAST THE BEAMS
 IN THE GARAGE
 CEILING
 E. ALL LIGHTING SHALL ADHERE TO ILLUMINATING
 ENGINEERING SOCIETY OF NORTH AMERICA (IESNA) STANDARDS
 FOR PARKING GARAGES UTILIZING LED LIGHTING. IF
 NECESSARY, PLEASE CONTACT THEM AT (212) 248-500 FOR
 FURTHER INFORMATION. ENHANCED LIGHTING SHALL BE USED AT
 ENTRANCE/EXITS TO REDUCE TRANSITION (FROM DAYLIGHT)
 WHEN ENTERING STRUCTURE.
 1.10 CAMERAS (IF INSTALLING CCTV)
 A. CCTV CAMERAS LOCATED ON EACH FLOOR OF THE PARKING
 GARAGE (AS WELL AS MONITORING ACCESS POINTS, ATTENDANT
 BOOTH, STAIRWELLS, LOBBY, ETC.).
 B. THE MONITORING AND CONTROL OF THE CCTV CAMERAS SHALL
 BE AT A CENTRAL MONITORING OFFICE OR BOOTH.
 C. A HIGH-RESOLUTION COLOR DIGITAL VIDEO CAMERA SYSTEM
 WITH MONITORING AND PHOTO PROCESSING PRINTOUT
 CAPABILITIES SHALL BE USED.
 1.11 LANDSCAPING
 A. VEGETATION, PLANT GROWTH AND LANDSCAPING AROUND THE
 PERIMETER OF THE PARKING GARAGE SHALL BE MINIMIZED AT
 HEIGHT OF NO MORE THAN 3 FEET AND TREE CANOPIES PRUNED
 ABOVE 8 FT FOR MATURE TREES. CLEAR ZONE FOR VISIBILITY
 BETWEEN 3 AND 8 FEET.
  
  
  
  
  
Review Stop PW PUBLIC WORKS
Rev No 1 Status   Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time  
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop STORM STORMWATER
Rev No 2 Status P Date 09-25-2013 Cont ID  
Sent By tward Date 09-25-2013 Time 21:53 Rev Time 0.00
Received By tward Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2013-09-25 21:48:101. ADD THESE NOTES TO TREES AND ACCENTS LANDSCAPE
 PLANS:
 A. NO TREES ARE TO PLANTED WITHIN 5 FEET OFEXISTING OR
 PROPOSED UNDERGROUND UTILITIES.
 B. USE PHYSICAL ROOT BARRIER WHEN TREES ARE WITHIN 10
 FEET OF UNDERGROUND UTILITIES. ROOT BARRIER TO BE NO
 CLOSER THAN 5 FEET TO UNDERGROUND UTILITY PIPE.
 2. ON SURVEY SHEET S-2, SHOW THE DRAINAGE EASEMENT LINE
 IN THE VACATED FLORIDA AVENUE (TRACT "A") (D.E. PER ORB
 15621, PG 1677 P.B.C.R.).
  
 TRACY L. WARD, P.E.
 SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER
 ENGINEERING AND PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
 561-494-1120
Review Stop STORM STORMWATER
Rev No 1 Status F Date 09-11-2013 Cont ID  
Sent By tward Date 09-11-2013 Time 08:53 Rev Time  
Received By tward Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2013-09-11 09:02:261. SHOW PROPOSED AND EXISTING UTILITIES ON LANDSCAPE
 PLANS.
 2. SHOW PROPOSED AND EXISTING UTILITIES ON LIGHTING
 PLAN.
 3. NEW DRAINAGE STRUCTURES SHOULD INCLUDE SUMPS AND
 BAFFLES TO REDUCE THE DISCHARGE OF SEDIMENT AND
 FLOATABLES INTO THE ROAD DRAINAGE SYSTEM (WHICH
 INCLUDES EXFILTRATION TRENCHES).
 4. SFWMD ERP OR ERP MODIFICATION WILL NEED TO BE
 SUBMITTED TO CWPB ENGINEERING SERVICES BEFORE START OF
 CONSTRUCTION.
 5. SWPPP WILL NEED TO BE SUBMITTED WITH THE ENGINEERING
 PERMIT APPLICATION.
 6. FDEP NPDES CONSTRUCTION PERMIT WILL NEED TO BE
 SUBMITTED TO ENGINEERING SERVICES BEFORE START OF
 CONSTRUCTION.
 7. SUBMIT SIGNED AND SEALED DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS WITH
 THE ENGINEERING PERMIT APPLICATION DEMONSTRATING THE
 PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT LAND USE IS CONSISTENT WITH THE
 DESIGN ASSUMPTIONS FOR THE OVERALL MASTER DRAINAGE
 SYSTEM.
  
 TRACY L. WARD, P.E.
 SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER
 ENGINEERING AND PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
 561-494-1120
Review Stop SURVEY SURVEYING
Rev No 2 Status P Date 10-24-2013 Cont ID  
Sent By vnoel Date 10-24-2013 Time 07:37 Rev Time 0.00
Received By vnoel Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2013-10-24 07:42:24PASSED, WITH CONDITIONS:
  
 1. ANY REQUIRED EASEMENTS FOR SIDEWALKS, UTILITIES,
 ETC. WILL BE GRANTED TO CITY PRIOR TO C.O.
 2. DEVELOPER'S AGREEMENT FOR RIGHT-OF WAY IMPROVEMENTS
 AND MAINTENANCE MAY BE REQUIRED.
Review Stop SURVEY SURVEYING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 09-09-2013 Cont ID  
Sent By vnoel Date 09-09-2013 Time 11:08 Rev Time  
Received By vnoel Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2013-09-09 11:38:151. SEPARATE SITE/CIVIL REVIEW APPLICATION TO
 ENGINEERING SERVICES WILL BE REQUIRED.
 2. WILL PARKING GARAGE TRACT REMAIN WITH SOUTH TOWER
 LLC? IF NOT, HOW IS PRIVATE ROADWAY TO BE HANDLED.
 3. IS SOUTH ROSEMARY AVE. A PROPOSED STREET NAME?
 4. SIDEWALK EASEMENTS WILL BE REQUIRED ALONG FLORIDA
 AND S. ROSEMARY.
 5. DEVELOPERS AGREEMENT MAY BE REQUIRED FOR PROPOSED
 RIGHT-OF-WAY IMPROVEMENTS.
Review Stop TRAFFIC TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No 3 Status P Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 10-28-2013 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By bcollins Date 10-28-2013 Time 16:17 Sent To  
Notes
2013-10-28 16:16:23SUGGESTED CONDITIONS:
  
 1. THE TROLLEY STOP SHOWN ON PLAN SHOULD BE REMOVED. IF
 A FUTURE (ADA ACCESSIBLE) STOP IS TO BE PROVIDED, IT
 WILL BE BASED ON THE TROLLEY ROUTING AND STOP LOCATIONS
 WHICH WILL BE DETERMINED AT A LATER DATE.
 2. TAXIS OR BUSSES WILL NOT BE PERMITTED TO STAND/PARK
 ALONG FLORIDA AVENUE OR ANY OTHER PUBLIC STREET.
Review Stop TRAFFIC TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No 2 Status F Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 09-27-2013 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By bcollins Date 09-27-2013 Time 08:16 Sent To  
Notes
2013-09-27 08:15:271. AS STATED IN PREVIOUS COMMENTS, THE BUS PARKING AREA
 ON FLORIDA AVENUE IS UNACCEPTABLE. IN ADDTION, IT
 SHOULD BE NOTED THAT THE PROPOSED LOCATION IS AT THE
 HEAD OF A T INTERSECTION WITH POTENTIAL SAFETY ISSUES.
 2. TAXIS WILL NOT BE PERMITTED TO STAND OR STAGE ON
 FLORIDA AVENUE. SIGNAGE TO THAT EFFECT MAY BE REQUIRED.
 3. ALL VALET PICK-UP AND DROP OFF SHALL BE FROM THE
 PORTE-COCHERE AND NOT FLORIDA AVENUE, EVEN DURING HIGH
 VOLUME EVENTS.
Review Stop TRAFFIC TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No 1 Status F Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By bcollins Date 09-10-2013 Time 15:41 Sent To  
Notes
2013-09-10 15:45:271. THE PROXIMITY OF THE HOTEL ENTRANCE AND VALET/DROP
 OFF TO OKEECHOBEE IS A CONCERN.
 2. DURING PEAK TRAFFIC TIMES, EXIT FROM THE
 VALET/DROP-OFF AREA SHOULD BE RIGHT TURN ONLY.
 3. IT IS UNDERSTOOD THAT DURING PEAK TRAFFIC AND
 SPECIAL EVENTS AT THE HOTEL AND CONVENTION CENTER THERE
 WILL BE EXCESSIVE DEMANDS PLACED ON THE ADJACENT
 ROADWAY NETWORK. THE APPLICANT SHOULD DEVELOP
 STRATEGIES TO MINIMIZE THE IMPACTS AND THEN DEVELOP
 TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT PLANS. DISTINCT SPECIFIC TRAFFIC
 MANAGEMENT PLANS BASED ON HOTEL/CONVENTION CENTER EVENT
 IMPACTS (E.G. LOW, MEDIUM, AND HIGH) SHOULD BE
 CONSIDERED.
 4. PAVER BRICKS (E.G. CROSSWALK) WILL NOT BE PERMITTED
 ON CITY RIGHT-OF-WAY UNLESS THERE IS A DEVELOPER
 MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT. SPECIALTY ASPHALT TREATMENTS
 (E.G. PAVER SYSTEMS, DURATHERM) ARE PREFERRED.
 5. ?NEW? STREET IS ONE-WAY AND PRIVATELY OWNED ? THE
 CITY PLACE SOUTH TOWER CONDO OWNS THE NORTH SIDE TO THE
 CENTER LINE. WHAT AGREEMENTS ARE IN PLACE AND FROM
 WHICH DIRECTION WILL TRAFFIC ENTER THE GARAGE?
 6. THE TRAFFIC STUDY INCLUDES A 20 PERCENT TRIP CREDIT
 FOR INTERNAL CAPTURE BETWEEN THE HOTEL AND CONVENTION
 CENTER. THIS NEEDS EXPLANATION AND JUSTIFICATION.
 7. FIGURE 1 IN THE TRAFFIC STUDY SHOWS PEAK HOUR HOTEL
 TRAFFIC VOLUMES. HOWEVER, THERE ARE NO TRIPS PROJECTED
 TO BE ARRIVING FROM THE EAST ? THESE WOULD BE THRU
 TRIPS ON WESTBOUND OKEECHOBEE AND LEFT TURNS AT
 SAPODILLA.
 8. THE OKEECHOBEE/SAPODILLA INTERSECTION SHOULD BE
 INCLUDED IN THE ANALYSIS.
 9. THE STUDY SHOULD EXTEND TO THE GARAGE ENTRANCE AND
 EXIT.
 10. THE STUDY INCLUDES ANALYSIS WITH OPTIMIZED SIGNAL
 TIMING. HOW DOES THIS WORK WITH THE COUNTY?S SIGNAL
 SYSTEM?
 11. QUEUING ANALYSIS SHOULD BE INCLUDED IN THE TRAFFIC
 STUDY
 12. THE TRAFFIC STUDY SHOULD ALSO SHOW THE HIGHEST
 GENERATION CASE OF SITE (HOTEL) GENERATED TRAFFIC - THE
 SITE PLAN SHOWS 620 VALET SPACES AND 207 REGULAR
 SPACES.
 13. WHERE IS THE TAXI WAITING AREA?
 14. HOW DO PEDESTRIANS GET FROM THE GARAGE TO THE
 HOTEL?
 15. BUS PARKING AREA SHALL BE RELOCATED FROM THE PUBLIC
 RIGHT OF WAY ON WEST SIDE OF FLORIDA AVENUE. SUGGEST
 SOUTH SIDE OF HOTEL OR CONVENTION CENTER PARKING AREA.
 HOW ARE BUSSES LOADED AND UNLOADED?
  
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 3 Status   Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 2 Status F Date 10-01-2013 Cont ID  
Sent By eschneid Date 10-01-2013 Time 18:46 Rev Time 0.00
Received By eschneid Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2013-10-01 18:47:56CASE NO. PB950NNNN
 CONVENTION CENTER HOTEL AND PARKING GARAGE - 9/20/13
 RESUBMITTAL
 901 FLORIDA AVENUE
  
 - CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446
  
 - PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN
 WRITTEN FORMAT.
  
 - WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF TEN
 (10) PAPER COPIES AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY IN .PNG FORMAT
 OF ALL PLANS. PLEASE NOTE THAT CHANGES ON THE
 RESUBMITTED PLANS MAY RESULT IN ADDITIONAL COMMENTS.
  
 - THE PPRC COMMENTS SHALL BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED AND
 SUBMITTED TO THE PLANNING DIVISION BY 5 PM ON OCTOBER
 18, 2013, TO BE SCHEDULED FOR THE NOVEMBER 19, 2013
 PLANNING BOARD MEETING.
  
 - PLEASE NOTE THAT IF THE PLANNING DIVISION HAS NOT
 RECEIVED A RESPONSE TO THESE COMMENTS WITHIN 60 DAYS
 (DECEMBER 1, 2013), THE CASE SHALL BE CONSIDERED
 WITHDRAWN. ANY FURTHER ACTION SHALL REQUIRE A NEW
 DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION.
  
 - PLEASE NOTE THAT SINCE PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED COMMENTS
 WERE NOT SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE APPLICANT WILL BE
 ACCESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE WILL BE 20% OF THE
 ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE ($600).
  
 1. PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT, A UNITY
 OF TITLE, UNITY OF CONTROL OR OTHER INSTRUMENT WILL BE
 REQUIRED FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE POOL AND HOT TUB,
 CABANAS, POOL DECK AND OTHER FEATURES THAT ARE ON THE
 CONVENTION CENTER PARCEL.
  
 2. REPEAT COMMENT: THE REMAINING OPEN SPACE AS PARK
 SQUARE FOOTAGE REMAINING IN THE CITYPLACE DRI IS 43,975
 SQUARE FEET FOR THE FOUR REMAINING UNDEVELOPED PARCELS
 - HOTEL SITE, HOTEL GARAGE SITE, OKEECHOBEE PARCEL AND
 TENT SITE. THE CITY HAS DIVIDED THE REMAINING OPEN
 SPACE AS PARK SQUARE FOOTAGE AMONG THE REMAINING
 PARCELS BASED ON THE PERCENTAGE OF EACH REMAINING
 PARCEL OF THE TOTAL REMAINING SQUARE FOOTAGE. THE HOTEL
 SITE IS RESPONSIBLE FOR 15,730 SQUARE FEET AND THE
 HOTEL GARAGE IS RESPONSIBLE FOR 8,254 SQUARE FEET OF
 OPEN SPACE AS PARK, FOR A TOTAL OF 23,984 SQUARE FEET.
 STAFF HAS CALCULATED THAT THE PROPOSED SITE DEVELOPMENT
 PLAN, INCLUDING BOTH THE HOTEL SITE AND THE HOTEL
 GARAGE, PROVIDE A TOTAL OF 12,880 SQUARE FEET OF OPEN
 SPACE AS PARK. THE PROPOSED PLAN HAS A DEFICIENCY OF
 11,104 SQUARE FEET OF OPEN SPACE AS PARK.
  
 SUGGESTION - DESIGN A LINEAR PARK ALONG THE NORTH SIDE
 OF THE HOTEL AND CONVENTION CENTER TO PROVIDE A
 PLEASANT PEDESTRIAN ROUTE FROM THE FRONT OF THE
 HOTEL/OKEECHOBEE & FLORIDA INTERSECTION TO THE FRONT OF
 THE CONVENTION CENTER. THIS ALLOWS THE CURRENTLY
 UNASSIGNED SPACE ON THE CONVENTION CENTER TO QUALIFY AS
 OPEN SPACE AS PARK. YOU WILL BE REQUIRED TO VERIFY THAT
 THIS ADDITIONAL AREA IS ENOUGH TO SATISFY THE FULL
 15,730 SQUARE FEET OF REQUIRED OPEN SPACE AS PARK.
 ADDITIONALLY, STAFF RECOMMENDS THAT THE BAR AND FITNESS
 CENTER BE RECONFIGURED SO THAT BAR PATRONS, POSSIBLY ON
 A TERRACE, CAN OVERLOOK THE NEW LINEAR PARK.
  
 3. REPEAT COMMENT: THE NORTH SIDE AND THE ROOF
 TREATMENTS OF THE GARAGE DO NOT PROVIDE ADEQUATE
 SCREENING TO PROTECT RESIDENTS OF CITYPLACE SOUTH TOWER
 FROM UNDESIRABLE VIEWS, LIGHTING, NOISE OR OTHER
 ADVERSE OFF-SITE EFFECTS FROM PARKING GARAGE. THE SITE
 PLAN SHALL PROVIDE REASONABLE VISUAL AND AUDITORY
 PRIVACY FOR ALL DWELLING UNITS LOCATED WITHIN AND
 ADJACENT TO THE SITE. THE LANDSCAPE BUFFER IS NOT
 SUSTAINABLE WITH OAK TREES IN A 4.5 FOOT WIDE PLANTING
 AREA. PLEASE REPLACE WITH ANOTHER SPECIES, PERHAPS A
 FLOWERING TREE WHICH WOULD PROVIDE COLOR DURING THE
 YEAR TO PROVIDE DESIRABLE SCREENING.
  
 4. REPEAT COMMENT: PROVIDE A PHOTOMETRIC PLAN SHOWING
 COMPLIANCE WITH THE ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT
 REGULATIONS. THIS SHALL SHOW THE PROPOSED SITE LIGHTING
 AND ITS IMPACT ON THE SURROUNDING PROPERTIES AND
 RIGHTS-OF-WAY. PLEASE REMEMBER THE COMMITMENT MADE TO
 THE GRANDVIEW HEIGHTS NEIGHBORHOOD REGARDING PEDESTRIAN
 SCALE LIGHTING ALONG FLORIDA AVENUE.
  
 5. PARTIAL REPEAT COMMENT: THE WEST SIDE OF THE GARAGE
 AND THE EAST SIDES OF THE HOTEL DO NOT PROVIDE ADEQUATE
 ACTIVE USES TO LINE FLORIDA AVENUE (CONTINUATION OF THE
 CHARACTER OF DEVELOPMENT FOR FLORIDA AVENUE STARTED BY
 THE WEST FA?ADE OF THE SOUTH TOWER) TO PROVIDE A
 DESIRABLE EXPERIENCE FOR USERS OF THE FLORIDA AVENUE
 CORRIDOR.
  
 SUGGESTION - RECONFIGURE THE INTERIOR SPACE, SUCH AS
 THE LOCATION OF THE DOCK OFFICE AND OTHER ACTIVE USES
 TO EXTEND THE ADDED FENESTRATION ALONG THE EXTERIOR
 WALL.
  
 6. REPEAT COMMENT: THE REDESIGN OF THE PEDESTRIAN
 CONNECTION ACROSS OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD SHALL BE
 INCLUDED WITH THIS APPLICATION TO ENSURE THAT THE SAFE
 PEDESTRIAN CROSSING OF OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD IS
 COORDINATED BASED ON THE EXPECTED VOLUME OF PEDESTRIANS
 THAT WILL BE GENERATED BY THE CONSTRUCTION OF A
 CONVENTION CENTER HOTEL.
  
 7. PARTIAL REPEAT COMMENT: THE CITYPLACE DRI REQUIRES A
 SIGNAGE PACKAGE TO BE SUBMITTED WITH THE LEVEL III
 APPLICATION. SIGNAGE DIMENSIONS SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR
 THE WALL SIGNS. THE EXISTING, RELOCATED SIGN MAY NOT
 INCREASE IN HEIGHT OR AREA. PLEASE PROVIDE DIMENSIONS
 OF THE EXISTING SIGN SO STAFF MAY VERIFY NEW SIGN SIZE.
  
 8. PARTIAL REPEAT COMMENT: THE PROPOSED DOWNTOWN
 TROLLEY STOP SHALL NOT BE REQUIRED TO SHARE A BUS
 DROP-OFF SPACE.
  
 9. PARTIAL REPEAT COMMENT: THE LANDSCAPE DATA AND
 COMPLIANCE TABLES REQUIRED BY ARTICLE XIV OF THE ZONING
 AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS WERE PROVIDED ON THE
 PLANS; HOWEVER, NOT ALL OF THE INFORMATION WAS ACCURATE
 OR COMPLETE. ADDITIONALLY, NO PALM TREE SUBSTITUTION
 TABLES WERE PROVIDED ON THE PLANS. ARE THE UPRIGHT OAKS
 MENTIONED IN THE RESPONSE SUPPOSED TO BE ?HIGH RISE?
 OAKS? THE PLANTING PLAN CALLS OUT REGULAR OAK TREES,
 WHICH ARE NOT ACCEPTABLE IN THE TREE GRATE LOCATIONS.
  
 10. REPEAT COMMENT: IT APPEARS THAT ALMOST HALF OF THE
 REQUIRED HOTEL SITE BUFFER LANDSCAPE IS NOT LOCATED ON
 THE HOTEL SITE, BUT RATHER ON THE CONVENTION CENTER OR
 THE RIGHT-OF-WAY.
  
 11. PARTIAL REPEAT COMMENT: WHILE A LANDSCAPE BUFFER
 WAS PROVIDED ON THE EAST SIDE OF THE GARAGE, IT IS
 WITHIN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY AND THE REQUIRED SIDEWALK HAS
 BEEN REMOVED. THE PALM TREES SHALL BE IN GROUPS OF
 THREE TO COUNT AS BUFFER TREES.
  
 12. REPEAT COMMENT: THE EXISTING LANDSCAPE PLANTINGS ON
 THE EAST SIDE OF ALABAMA AVENUE SHALL BE CONTINUED THE
 FULL LENGTH OF THE PROPERTY TO THE REAR OF THE
 TOWNHOUSE UNITS AND MAINTAINED BY THE HOTEL. THIS AREA
 IS PART OF THE CITYPLACE PLAT WITHIN THE CITYPLACE DRI
 AND PLANTINGS SHALL BE INSTALLED TO HELP SCREEN THE
 GARAGE.
  
 13. REPEAT COMMENT: THE PLANTING DETAILS DO NOT CLEARLY
 INDICATE THAT THE TOP OF THE ROOT BALL IS ABOVE THE
 SURROUNDING GRADE AT PLANTING. A NOTE SHALL BE ADDED TO
 THIS EFFECT AS OPPOSED TO PROVIDING THE SAME GRAPHIC
 AGAIN.
  
 14. REPEAT COMMENT: THE PARKING SPACE TYPICAL WIDTH
 SHALL BE PROVIDED ON THE PARKING PLAN. THE PARKING
 WIDTH FOR THE ANGLE SPACES WAS NOT PROVIDED. PLEASE
 NOTE THAT THE DIMENSION DISTANCE ACROSS THE LENGTH OF
 THE ANGLED SPACES IS TOO SHORT (REQUIRES 14?8?) AND
 THUS THE ROW OF PARKING IS SUBSTANDARD AND SHALL COMPLY
 WITH THE REGULATIONS. THE ADDITIONAL AREA COULD COME
 OUT OF THE AREA SHOWN WITH A THREE (3) FOOT DIMENSION
 LINE.
  
 15. REPEAT COMMENT: WHERE ARE THE MECHANICAL LIFTS
 COMING FROM THAT ARE SHOWN IN THE GARAGE? THE ADA
 PARKING SPACES ARE REQUIRED TO HAVE FULL ACCESS TO
 THEM, WHICH MEANS FULL WIDTH DRIVE AISLES, NOT DRIVE
 AISLES RESTRICTED BY VALET PARKED CARS. THE FIRST FLOOR
 AISLE BETWEEN THE ADA SPACES AND THE EXIT GATE FORCE
 CARS INTO A SINGLE LANE WITH OPPOSITE TRAFFIC FLOW. THE
 REMAINING AREA MAY BE CONFIGURED IN A ONE-WAY PATTERN,
 EXCEPT ON THE RAMP.
  
 16. PARTIAL REPEAT COMMENT: THE BICYCLE PARKING PAD
 SHOWN FOR THE HOTEL SHALL INCLUDE DIMENSIONS ON THE
 PLAN AND A BICYCLE RACK DETAIL SHOWING THE LENGTH AND
 WIDTH OF THE PAD AS WELL AS RACK ELEMENTS WHICH CONFORM
 TO CITY STANDARDS. ONE SHEET SHOWS BICYCLE PARKING BY
 THE WESTERN GARAGE CORNERS (NOT SHOWN ON ALL PLANS).
 THIS LOCATION DOES NOT CONFORM TO THE ZONING AND LAND
 DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS BICYCLE PARKING SITING CRITERIA
 AND IS LOCATED IN THE SIDEWALK. THESE APPEAR TO BE
 EXCESS BICYCLE PARKING SPACES IF SOME NEED TO BE
 REMOVED FROM THE GARAGE AREA. PROVIDE A BICYCLE PARKING
 REQUIREMENT CHART (1 PER 20 SPACES REQUIRED PARKING
 SPACES).
  
 17. REPEAT COMMENT: HOW WILL GARBAGE COLLECTION BE
 HANDLED AT THE CONVENTION CENTER HOTEL? VERIFICATION
 THAT FROM THE CITY SANITATION DEPARTMENT THAT THE CITY
 GARBAGE TRUCKS WILL DRIVE INTO THE HOTEL LOADING AREA
 AND HAVE ADEQUATE CLEARANCE TO PICK UP THE GARBAGE IS
 REQUIRED.
  
 18. REPEAT COMMENT: AS PART OF THE RECONFIGURATION OF
 THE MEDIANS ALONG FLORIDA AVENUE, THE HOTEL SHALL ENTER
 INTO AN AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY TO MAINTAIN THE MEDIANS
 AND RIGHT-OF-WAY PLANTINGS.
  
 19. NEW COMMENT: THE ADDITION OF THE UTILITY LINES TO
 THE PLANS SHOWS CONFLICTS BETWEEN TREES AND THE LINES.
 PLEASE ADJUST ACCORDINGLY.
  
 20. NEW COMMENT: THE OAK TREES LOCATED WITHIN THE TREE
 GRATES SHALL HAVE STRUCTURAL SOIL USED UNDERNEATH THE
 SURROUNDING SIDEWALK AREAS TO PROVIDE ROOT GROWTH
 AREAS.
  
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 09-10-2013 Cont ID  
Sent By eschneid Date 09-10-2013 Time 16:07 Rev Time 12.00
Received By eschneid Date 09-10-2013 Time 16:03 Sent To  
Notes
2013-09-10 16:07:38CASE NO. PB950NNNN
 CONVENTION CENTER HOTEL AND PARKING GARAGE
 901 FLORIDA
  
 - CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446
  
 - PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN
 WRITTEN FORMAT.
  
 - WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF TEN
 (10) PAPER COPIES AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY IN .PNG FORMAT
 OF ALL PLANS. PLEASE NOTE THAT CHANGES ON THE
 RESUBMITTED PLANS MAY RESULT IN ADDITIONAL COMMENTS.
  
 - THE PPRC COMMENTS SHALL BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED AND
 SUBMITTED TO THE PLANNING DIVISION BY 5 PM ON SEPTEMBER
 20, 2013, TO BE SCHEDULED FOR THE OCTOBER 14, 2013
 PLANNING BOARD MEETING.
  
 - PLEASE NOTE THAT IF THE PLANNING DIVISION HAS NOT
 RECEIVED A RESPONSE TO THE PPRC COMMENTS WITHIN 60 DAYS
 FROM THE DATE OF THE PPRC MEETING (NOVEMBER 11, 2013),
 THE CASE SHALL BE CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN. ANY FURTHER
 ACTION SHALL REQUIRE A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION.
  
 - PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1)
 RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED
 COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE
 APPLICANT WILL BE ACCESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE
 WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE ($600).
  
 - PUBLIC HEARING NOTIFICATION SIGNAGE SHALL BE POSTED
 IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF ORDINANCE NO.
 4357-11.
  
 1. PLEASE SEPARATE THE RESUBMITTED PLANS INTO SIMILAR
 GROUPINGS (EX. ARCHITECTURE, CIVIL, LANDSCAPE) TO
 STAPLE TOGETHER FOR THE RESUBMITTAL. THE COMBINATION OF
 ALL THE PLANS AS PREVIOUSLY SUBMITTED INTO ONE PACKET
 DOES NOT LEND ITSELF TO EASE OF STAFF REVIEW OR FILE
 STORAGE.
  
 2. PROVIDE THE LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE SUBJECT PARCELS
 IN WORD FORMAT.
  
 3. THE PROPOSED PLAN FOR THE HOTEL SHOWS PART OF THE
 POOL AND HOT TUB, CABANAS, AND THE POOL DECK ON THE
 CONVENTION CENTER PARCEL. THE HOTEL FEATURES SHALL ALL
 BE ON THE HOTEL SITE.
  
 4. IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE WATER CONSERVATION
 REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITYPLACE DRI, PLEASE INDICATE WHAT
 WATER CONSERVATION DEVICES AND METHODS THE PROJECT WILL
 USE. HAS CONSIDERATION BEEN GIVEN TO USING CISTERNS TO
 CAPTURE RAIN WATER FOR IRRIGATION USE?
  
 5. PLEASE INDICATE HOW THE ENERGY CONSERVATION
 REQUIREMENTS OUTLINED IN SECTIONS 14 AND 15 OF THE
 CITYPLACE DRI WILL BE MET. HAS CONSIDERATION BEEN GIVEN
 TO INSTALLING A GREEN ROOF OR SOLAR PANELS ON THE HOTEL
 ROOF TO PROMOTE ENERGY CONSERVATION?
  
 6. THE REMAINING OPEN SPACE AS PARK SQUARE FOOTAGE
 REMAINING IN THE CITYPLACE DRI IS 43,975 SQUARE FEET
 FOR THE FOUR REMAINING UNDEVELOPED PARCELS - HOTEL
 SITE, HOTEL GARAGE SITE, OKEECHOBEE PARCEL AND TENT
 SITE. THE CITY HAS DIVIDED THE REMAINING OPEN SPACE AS
 PARK SQUARE FOOTAGE AMONG THE REMAINING PARCELS BASED
 ON THE PERCENTAGE OF EACH REMAINING PARCEL OF THE TOTAL
 REMAINING SQUARE FOOTAGE. THE HOTEL SITE IS RESPONSIBLE
 FOR 15,730 SQUARE FEET AND THE HOTEL GARAGE IS
 RESPONSIBLE FOR 8,254 SQUARE FEET OF OPEN SPACE AS
 PARK, FOR A TOTAL OF 23,984 SQUARE FEET. STAFF HAS
 CALCULATED THAT THE PROPOSED SITE DEVELOPMENT PLAN,
 INCLUDING BOTH THE HOTEL SITE AND THE HOTEL GARAGE,
 PROVIDE A TOTAL OF 12,880 SQUARE FEET OF OPEN SPACE AS
 PARK. THE PROPOSED PLAN HAS A DEFICIENCY OF 11,104
 SQUARE FEET OF OPEN SPACE AS PARK.
  
 SUGGESTION - DESIGN A LINEAR PARK ALONG THE NORTH SIDE
 OF THE HOTEL AND CONVENTION CENTER TO PROVIDE A
 PLEASANT PEDESTRIAN ROUTE FROM THE FRONT OF THE
 HOTEL/OKEECHOBEE & FLORIDA INTERSECTION TO THE FRONT OF
 THE CONVENTION CENTER. YOU WILL BE REQUIRED TO VERIFY
 THAT THIS ADDITIONAL AREA IS ENOUGH TO SATISFY THE FULL
 15,730 SQUARE FEET OF REQUIRED OPEN SPACE AS PARK.
 ADDITIONALLY, STAFF RECOMMENDS THAT THE BAR AND FITNESS
 CENTER BE RECONFIGURED SO THAT BAR PATRONS, POSSIBLY ON
 A TERRACE, CAN OVERLOOK THE NEW LINEAR PARK.
  
 7. THE NORTH SIDE AND THE ROOF TREATMENTS OF THE GARAGE
 DO NOT PROVIDE ADEQUATE SCREENING TO PROTECT RESIDENTS
 OF CITYPLACE SOUTH TOWER FROM UNDESIRABLE VIEWS,
 LIGHTING, NOISE OR OTHER ADVERSE OFF-SITE EFFECTS FROM
 PARKING GARAGE. THE SITE PLAN SHALL PROVIDE REASONABLE
 VISUAL AND AUDITORY PRIVACY FOR ALL DWELLING UNITS
 LOCATED WITHIN AND ADJACENT TO THE SITE.
  
 8. PROVIDE A PHOTOMETRIC PLAN SHOWING COMPLIANCE WITH
 THE ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS.
  
 9. THE WEST SIDE OF THE GARAGE AND THE EAST SIDES OF
 THE HOTEL DO NOT PROVIDE ADEQUATE ACTIVE USES TO LINE
 FLORIDA AVENUE (CONTINUATION OF THE CHARACTER OF
 DEVELOPMENT FOR FLORIDA AVENUE STARTED BY THE WEST
 FA?ADE OF THE SOUTH TOWER) TO PROVIDE A DESIRABLE
 EXPERIENCE FOR USERS OF THE FLORIDA AVENUE CORRIDOR.
  
 SUGGESTION - RECONFIGURE THE INTERIOR SPACE, SUCH AS
 THE LOCATION OF THE DOCK OFFICE AND OTHER ACTIVE USES
 WITH ADDED FENESTRATION ALONG THE EXTERIOR WALL.
  
 10. THE REDESIGN OF THE PEDESTRIAN CONNECTION ACROSS
 OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD SHALL BE INCLUDED WITH THIS
 APPLICATION TO ENSURE THAT THE SAFE PEDESTRIAN CROSSING
 OF OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD IS COORDINATED BASED ON THE
 EXPECTED VOLUME OF PEDESTRIANS THAT WILL BE GENERATED
 BY THE CONSTRUCTION OF A CONVENTION CENTER HOTEL.
  
 11. HOW WILL PEDESTRIAN SAFETY BE ENSURED WHEN VALETS
 LEAVE THE GARAGE?
  
 12. THE CITYPLACE DRI REQUIRES A SIGNAGE PACKAGE TO BE
 SUBMITTED WITH THE LEVEL III APPLICATION. WHEN WILL THE
 CITY SEE A SIGNAGE PACKAGE? PLEASE NOTE THAT AS PART OF
 THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE SITE, THE CONVENTION CENTER
 SIGN WILL NEED TO BE RELOCATED OUT OF THE RIGHT-OF-WAY.
 THIS WILL HAVE THE EFFECT OF IMPROVED VISIBILITY WHEN
 APPROACHING THE FLORIDA AVENUE RIGHT TURN AND POSSIBLE
 CONGESTION AT THE ENTRANCE TO THE HOTEL ENTRANCE.
  
 13. PROVIDE SIGHT LINE DRAWINGS TO VERIFY THAT ALL OF
 THE ROOFTOP MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT IS SCREENED FROM VIEW
 IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITYPLACE DRI REQUIREMENTS.
  
 14. A DOWNTOWN TROLLEY STOP SHALL BE DESIGNED INTO THE
 SITE PLAN IN THE EVENT THAT THE DOWNTOWN TROLLEY
 ACCESSES THE HOTEL SITE. THE STOP SHALL NOT BE REQUIRED
 TO SHARE A BUS DROP-OFF SPACE.
  
 15. THE CITYPLACE DRI REQUIRES THE PRESERVATION,
 PROTECTION AND RELOCATION OF SIGNIFICANT VEGETATION
 WITHIN THE SITE. THE LANDSCAPE PLANS INCLUDE A SHEET
 SHOWING TREES TO BE REMOVED AND REFER TO THE TREE
 SURVEY FOR SPECIES AND SIZE. NO TREE SURVEY INCLUDED
 WITH THE SUBMITTAL. THE REMOVAL OF TREES REQUIRES THE
 APPROVAL OF A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT. NONE WAS
 SUBMITTED.
  
 16. THE SITE AND LANDSCAPE PLANS SHOW A DIFFERENT
 BUILDING FOOTPRINT, HARDSCAPE/LANDSCAPE AREAS, ETC.
 THAN THE CIVIL PLANS. ALL PLANS SHALL SHOW THE SAME
 CONDITIONS.
  
 17. WHY IS THE TOWER SETBACK LISTED AT 93'7" ON SHEET
 A-0.2 AND 92'2" ON SHEETS A-1.01 AND A-1.02 AND 78'2"
 ON SHEET A-0.1. SETBACKS SHALL BE CONSISTENT ON ALL
 SHEETS.
  
 18. NONE OF THE LANDSCAPE DATA AND COMPLIANCE TABLES
 REQUIRED BY ARTICLE XIV OF THE ZONING AND LAND
 DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS WERE PROVIDED ON THE PLANS.
 THIS INFORMATION SHALL BE INCLUDED. PLEASE NOTE THAT
 THE DATA TABLES SHALL CLEARLY DIFFERENTIATE BETWEEN THE
 LANDSCAPE MATERIAL INSTALLED ON THE HOTEL SITE, THE
 GARAGE SITE, THE CONVENTION CENTER AND THE
 RIGHT-OF-WAY.
  
 19. WHY DOES THE PLANT LIST INCLUDE TREES AND OTHER
 LANDSCAPE THAT IS NOT BEING PLANTED?
  
 20. THE CITY'S LANDSCAPE REGULATIONS ALLOW NO MORE THAN
 35% PALM TREES ON A SITE. THE SITE CONTAINS MORE THAN
 35% PALM TREES OVERALL AND THE HOTEL GARAGE IS 100%
 PALM TREES. IS THERE A REASON THE SITE IS BEING
 DESIGNED WITH MINIMAL SHADE?
  
 21. IT APPEARS THAT ALMOST HALF OF THE REQUIRED HOTEL
 SITE LANDSCAPE IS NOT LOCATED ON THE HOTEL SITE, BUT
 RATHER ON THE CONVENTION CENTER OR THE RIGHT-OF-WAY.
  
 22. SHEET AD- 21.01 STATES THAT ARTIFICIAL TURF WILL BE
 USED IN THE OVAL PARK AREA NORTH OF THE HOTEL, YET
 SHEET AD- 51.01 SHOWS THIS AREA AS BERMUDA GRASS. ALL
 PLANS SHALL SHOW SAME CONDITIONS. PLEASE NOTE THAT
 STAFF WILL NOT SUPPORT ARTIFICIAL TURF AT THIS
 LOCATION.
  
 23. WHY IS THE OVAL PARK AREA DESIGNED SO THAT THE
 MANHOLE IS IN THE OPEN AREA? THIS SEEMS TO LIMIT THE
 ABILITY TO EFFECTIVELY USE THE SPACE FOR EVENTS.
  
 24. A LANDSCAPE BUFFER IS REQUIRED ON THE EAST SIDE OF
 THE GARAGE. THE GARAGE COLOR ELEVATIONS AND SHEET A-0.1
 ARE INACCURATE AS THEY DEPICT LANDSCAPE ON THE EAST
 SIDE OF THE GARAGE. THE LANDSCAPE BUFFER AREA SHALL BE
 A MINIMUM OF FIVE (5) FEET WIDE TO SUPPORT ADEQUATE
 LANDSCAPE GROWTH. THE GARAGE DOES NOT HAVE THE
 "EXTENSIVE" LANDSCAPING AS STATED IN THE JUSTIFICATION
 STATEMENT.
  
 25. THE EXISTING LANDSCAPE PLANTINGS ON THE EAST SIDE
 OF ALABAMA AVENUE SHALL BE CONTINUED THE FULL LENGTH OF
 THE PROPERTY TO THE REAR OF THE TOWNHOUSE UNITS AND
 MAINTAINED BY THE HOTEL.
  
 26. THE PLANTING DETAILS DO NOT CLEARLY INDICATE THAT
 THE TOP OF THE ROOT BALL IS ABOVE THE SURROUNDING GRADE
 AT PLANTING.
  
 27. ALL PLANTINGS AND MODIFICATIONS TO THE
 RIGHTS-OF-WAY SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE CITY'S
 ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT.
  
 28. IS THE PARKING GARAGE EXCLUSIVE FOR HOTEL GUESTS OR
 WILL ANYONE ATTENDING AN EVENT AT THE CONVENTION CENTER
 BE ALLOWED TO SELF-PARK?
  
 29. HOW DO THE STAIRWELLS IN THE CORNERS OF THE GARAGE
 WORK? THERE DO NOT SEEM TO BE ANY DOORWAYS.
  
 30. ALL DEAD END PARKING ROWS IN THE GARAGE REQUIRE A
 DEDICATED TURN AROUND SPACE THAT SHALL BE MARKED "NO
 PARKING".
  
 31. THE PARKING SPACE TYPICAL WIDTH SHALL BE PROVIDED
 ON THE PARKING PLAN.
  
 32. THE DEPTH DIMENSION SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR COMPACT
 SPACE NO. 217.
  
 33. PARKING SPACES 208, 240 AND 403 ARE RENDERED
 UNUSABLE BY THE CANOPY FRAME POSTS.
  
 34. THE CITY WILL NOT APPROVE THE SPECIAL EVENT VALET
 PARKING PLAN. THIS PLAN DISCARDS THE REALITY THAT THERE
 WILL BE HOTEL GUESTS WHO ARE SELF-PARKED IN THE GARAGE.
 WHAT HAPPENS TO ALL OF THE WHEEL STOPS THAT EXIST IN
 THE PROPOSED TANDEM GARAGE SPACES? WHERE ARE THE
 MECHANICAL LIFTS COMING FROM THAT ARE SHOWN IN THE
 GARAGE? WHAT DO THE LIFTS LOOK LIKE? WHAT IS THE FLOOR
 TO CEILING HEIGHT WHERE THE LIFTS ARE PROPOSED? THE ADA
 SPACES MAY NOT BE USED FOR VALET PARKING.
  
 35. WHERE IS THE BICYCLE PARKING LOCATED FOR THE HOTEL?
  
 36. THE HOTEL ENTRANCE DOES NOT STACK 20 VEHICLES WITH
 A BYPASS LANE AS STATED IN THE JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT.
 IT HAS THE ABILITY TO PARK 20 VEHICLES WITH NO BYPASS.
  
 37. HOW WILL CONVENTION GOERS ACCESS THE BUS PARKING
 AREA? THERE DOES NOT APPEAR TO BE A FULLY COVERED ROUTE
 FROM THE FRONT DOOR TO THE BUS PARKING. FULL COVERAGE
 IS IMPORTANT FOR RAIN AND SUN PROTECTION.
  
 38. THE TURNING RADIUS DRAWING ON SHEET C 4.01 DOES NOT
 SHOW HOW THE TRUCK BACKS INTO THE LOADING AREA.
  
 39. HOW WILL GARBAGE COLLECTION BE HANDLED AT THE
 CONVENTION CENTER HOTEL? PROVIDE TRASH RECEPTACLES IN
 THE PARKING GARAGE.
  
 40. WHO IS RESPONSIBLE FOR MAINTAINING THE PARKING
 GARAGE (THIS INCLUDES EMPTYING THE TRASH RECEPTACLES)?
  
 41. AS PART OF THE RECONFIGURATION OF THE MEDIANS ALONG
 FLORIDA AVENUE, THE HOTEL SHALL ENTER INTO AN AGREEMENT
 WITH THE CITY TO MAINTAIN THE MEDIANS AND RIGHT-OF-WAY
 PLANTINGS.
  
 PLEASE BE ADVISED:
  
 THE PARKING GARAGE IS CONSIDERED A PRINCIPAL USE AS IT
 IS ON A STANDALONE PARCEL, WHICH REQUIRES REVIEW BY THE
 CITY COMMISSION AS A CLASS A SPECIAL USE IN ACCORDANCE
 WITH THE CITYPLACE DRI. PLEASE PROVIDE THE ANALYSIS OF
 THE REQUEST, TO INCLUDE THE SPECIAL USE STANDARDS AND
 THE ADDITIONAL APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS, AS PART OF THE
 RESUBMITTAL.
  
 THERE ARE COVERED PEDESTRIAN CONNECTIONS AND MODIFIED
 LANDSCAPE SHOWN ON THE CONVENTION CENTER PARCEL, WHICH
 MODIFY THE APPROVED CONVENTION CENTER SITE AND
 LANDSCAPE PLANS. AMENDED CONVENTION CENTER SITE AND
 LANDSCAPE PLANS ARE REQUIRED TO REFLECT THE NEW
 CONDITIONS THROUGH THE MINOR AMENDMENT PROCESS AS WAS
 DONE ON THE CURRENT HOTEL APPROVAL.
  
  
  Print


Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved