Plan Review Details - Project Z13050021
Plan Review Stops For Project Z13050021
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 1 Status P Date 06-11-2013 Cont ID  
Sent By lmartine Date 06-11-2013 Time 15:54 Rev Time 0.00
Received By lmartine Date 06-11-2013 Time 15:54 Sent To  
Notes
2013-06-11 17:06:15BUILDING REVIEW COMMENTS
  
  
 :BUILDINGS J-11, J-1 AND J-2
 ONLY NEW AND REVISED FOOTPRINTS SHOWN, NO COMENTS AT
 THIS TIME.
  
 :BUILDINGS A, B, B-II AND C
 ONLY ELEVATIONS AND FOOTPRINT PROVIDED, NO COMMENTS AT
 THIS TIME.
  
 :BUILDINGS D,E, G AND H
 AGAIN, ELEVATIONS AND FOOTPRINT ONLY NO COMMENTS.
 BUILDING 'F' DID PROVIDE A SOMEWHAT COMPLETE PLAN FOR
 REVIEW. THE ONLY COMMENT WOULD BE TO PROVIDE AN
 EGRESS/LIFE SAFETY PLAN.
  
 : NO COMMENTS ON THE SIGN PACKAGE.
  
  
  
 LUIS MARTINEZ
 561-805-6710
  
  
  
Review Stop ENG - PPRC ENGINEERING - PPRC
Rev No 1 Status F Date 06-10-2013 Cont ID  
Sent By Mgonzale Date 06-10-2013 Time   Rev Time 1.00
Received By mgonzale Date 06-10-2013 Time   Sent To Z
Notes
2013-06-10 08:48:29PLANNING BOARD CASE NO 891U AND 891V
 (Z13050021,Z13050022)
  
 #1 DRAINAGE ELEMENTS IN PROXIMITY OF PROJECT WILL BE AN
 INTEGRAL PART OF THE PROJECT AS TO ANY IMPROVEMENTS OF
 DISTURBED AREAS. THIS WILL REQUIRE NPDES
 RESPONSABILITIES OVER THE DISTURBED AREAS.
  
 #2 PROJECT HAS INCREASED IN SQUARE FEET THEREFORE
 ENGINEERING WILL REQUIRE DEVELOPER TO PROVIDE FLOW
 DATA. COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH UPGRADES TO EXISTING
 INFRASTRUCTURE WILL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF
 DEVELOPMENT CAUSING THE MOST IMPACT.
  
 #3 DEVELOPER WILL BE REQUIRED TO RESUBMIT TO
 ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR RE-REVIEW OF INFRASTRUCTURE
 ELEMENTS SUCH AS PAVING, DRAINAGE, SANITATION, WATER
 AND SEWER. THIS WILL INCLUDE REVISED PLANS TO PALM
 BEACH COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT AND FLORIDA DEPARTMENT
 OF ENVIRONMENTIAL.
  
 #4 PROVIDE APPROVAL FROM PALM BEACH COUNTY ROW AND
 TRAFFIC ON THE PROPOSED INCREASE.
  
  
Review Stop FIRE FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No 2 Status P Date 07-23-2013 Cont ID  
Sent By mcarsill Date 07-23-2013 Time 09:50 Rev Time 0.00
Received By mcarsill Date 07-23-2013 Time 09:19 Sent To  
Notes
2013-07-23 09:50:01PALM BEACH OUTLETS
 FORMAL SITE PLAN REVIEW APPLICATION
 PPRC COMMENTS
 CASE NO. PB951 U & V (PB Z13050021 & Z13050022)
  
  
 1. FIBERGLASS SHADES NOTED ON SOME OF THE ELEVATION
 DRAWINGS. PLEASE PROVIDE FLAMESPREAD DETAILS.
  
 2. PLEASE REMOVE EMERGENCY PHONES FROM THE DRAWINGS AS
 IT BEEN EXPLAINED THAT NONE WILL BE PRESENT.
  
 3. KNOX BOXES NEED TO BE ORDERED IN SUFFICIENT QUANTITY
 SO AS TO KEEP UP WITH CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES.
  
 4. THE INSTALLATION OF LANDSCAPING SHALL NOT INTERFERE
 WITH ACCESS TO ANY FIRE HYDRANTS OR FIRE PROTECTION
 DEVICES.
  
 5. IS ANY THOUGHT ON ESTABLISHING AUTOMATIC EXTERNAL
 DEFIBRILLATORS (AED'S) ON SITE IN CASE OF CARDIAC
 ARREST EMERGENCIES. EQUIPMENT AND TRAINING ELEMENTS
 WOULD NEED TO BE CONSIDERED FOR THIS IMPORTANT LIFE
 SAVING PROGRAMMING.
  
 6. PLEASE BEGIN TO SUBMIT EMERGENCY PLANS FOR THE
 INDIVIDUAL BUILDINGS OR THE ENTIRE COMPLEX SO THAT THEY
 CAN BE REVIEWED PRIOR TO MOVE IN.
  
 7. THE CORRESPONDENCE FROM URBAN DESIGN KILDAY DATED
 JUNE 21, 2013 SUGGESTS THAT FIRE RESCUE COMMENTS WILL
 BE ADDRESSED AT TIME OF PERMIT APPLICATION SUBMITTAL.
  
  
 APPROVED PROVISO:
  
  
  
 MICHAEL E. CARSILLO, ASSISTANT FIRE CHIEF
 WEST PALM BEACH FIRE RESCUE
Review Stop FIRE FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No 1 Status F Date 06-04-2013 Cont ID  
Sent By mcarsill Date 06-04-2013 Time 13:25 Rev Time 0.00
Received By mcarsill Date 06-04-2013 Time 12:49 Sent To  
Notes
2013-06-04 13:51:52PLANNING BOARD CASE NOS. 891U (Z13050021) AND 891V
 (Z13050022)
 1801 PALM BEACH LAKES BLVD.
 ERIC SCHNEIDER, PRINCIPAL PLANNER
  
 THIS REVIEW CAN ONLY BE CONSIDERED PRELIMINARY AS OTHER
 REQUIREMENTS MAY BE NECESSARY WHEN A FULL SET OF
 DRAWINGS ARE PROVIDED.
  
 1. WET FIRE HYDRANTS ARE REQUIRED PRIOR TO, DURING,
 AFTER CONSTRUCTION.
  
 2. PLEASE SUBMIT COMPLETE ARCHITECTURAL, MECHANICAL,
 ELECTRICAL, PLUMBING, FIRE SPRINKLER AND FIRE ALARM
 PLANS FOR REVIEW.
  
 3. PLEASE SUBMIT SEPARATE HOOD, DUCT, AND FIRE
 SUPPRESSION SYSTEM PLANS FOR ALL RESTAURANTS.
  
 4. BUILDING ADDRESSES REQUIRED. A MINIMUM OF AT LEAST
 6" HIGH NUMBERS THAT CONTRAST WITH THE BACKGROUND THEY
 ARE AFFIXED TO,
  
 5. ALL CANOPIES THAT EXTEND OR COVER PEDESTRIANS ARE TO
 BE PROPERLY FIRE RETARDANT.
  
 6. TACTILE SIGNAGE REQUIRED ALL EXIT DOORS.
  
 7. PLEASE INDICATE ON THE PLANS ALL VERTICAL AND
 HORIZONTAL FIRE WALL SEPARATIONS.
  
 8. ALL LIGHTNING PROTECTION TO COMPLY WITH NFPA 780.
  
 9. NO STORAGE WILL BE PERMITTED IN ANY ELECTRICAL OR
 MECHANICAL ROOMS.
  
 10. ALL FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEMS SHALL COMPLY WITH NFPA
 13.
  
 11. ALL FIRE ALARM SYSTEMS SHALL COMPLY WITH NFPA 72.
  
 12. DEMOLITION, RENOVATION AND CONSTRUCTION TO COMPLY
 WITH NFPA 241.
  
 13. PLEASE PROVIDE FLAME SPREAD DETAILS ON FOAM EIFS
 BANDS PLANNED FOR THE BUILDINGS.
  
 14. EXITS ARE TO BE PROVIDED DURING CONSTRUCTION.
  
 15. FIRE AND PARAMEDICAL ACCESS IS TO BE PROVIDED
 DURING CONSTRUCTION.
  
 16. LIFE SAFETY PLANS ARE TO BE PROVIDED FOR EACH
 BUILDING ILLUSTRATING EXITS, TRAVEL DISTANCES, DEAD-END
 CORRIDORS, OCCUPANT LOADS, ETC.
  
 17. PLEASE PROVIDE MORE DETAILS ON EMERGENCY PHONES.
  
 18. ALL ELECTRICAL APPLIANCES, FIXTURES, AND DEVICES
 SHALL COMPLY WITH NFPA 70, THE NATIONAL ELECTRICAL
 CODE.
  
 19. PLEASE ILLUSTRATE ALL PORTABLE FIRE EXTINGUISHER
 LOCATIONS.
  
 20. SEVERAL OF THE RETAIL STORES WILL BE CLASSIFIED AS
 CLASS A MERCANTILE OCCUPANCIES SO THEY MUST COMPLY WITH
 THAT CATEGORY OF NFPA 101, THE LIFE SAFETY CODE, 2009
 EDITION.
  
 21. PLEASE INDICATE ON THE DRAWINGS ALL INTERIOR
 CLASSIFICATIONS FOR ALL WALLS AND CEILINGS.
  
 22. TRASH AND DEBRIS IS NOT PERMITTED TO ACCUMULATE ON
 THE CONSTRUCTION SITE.
  
 23. ALL FIRE DOORS ARE TO BE PROPERLY RATED AND TAGGED
 AND BE EQUIPPED WITH SELF-CLOSING DEVICES THAT CAUSES
 THE DOORS TO POSITIVELY LATCH. RATED FIRE DOORS ARE
 REQUIRED TO BE EQUIPPED WITH RATED HARDWARE.
  
 24. ALL FIRE RATED PENETRATIONS ARE TO BE PROPERLY
 SEALED.
  
 25. PANIC HARDWARE IS REQUIRED ON ALL DOORS SUBJECT TO
 OCCUPANT LOADS OF 100 OR MORE PERSONS. FIRE EXIT PANIC
 HARDWARE IS REQUIRED ON ALL FIRE DOORS WITH OCCUPANTS
 LOAD OF 100 ORE MORE PERSONS.
  
 26. SEATING DIAGRAMS FOR ALL RESTAURANTS IS REQUIRED.
 ALL SEATING DIAGRAMS SHALL INDICATE HANDICAPPED
 SEATING.
  
 27. LOW VOLTAGE PERMITS ARE REQUIRED FOR ALL LOW
 VOLTAGE EQUIPMENT.
  
 28. KNOX-BOXES ARE REQUIRED ON BUILDINGS FOR FIRE
 RESCUE ACCESS.
  
 29. OCCUPANT LOADS ARE TO BE DETERMINED BY THE BUREAU
 OF FIRE PREVENTION FOR ALL RESTAURANTS. THESE OCCUPANT
 LOADS ARE TO BE POSTED.
  
 30. ALL WALK-IN COOLERS AND FREEZERS SHALL BE FIRE
 SPRINKLER PROTECTED.
  
 31. ALL OUTDOOR SEATING AREAS THAT ARE COVERED ARE TO
 BE FIRE SPRINKLER PROTECTED.
  
 32. SUFFICIENT DETAILS ARE TO BE PROVIDED FOR ALL
 MEZZANINES AT THE SITE.
  
 33. SEPARATE SHOP DRAWINGS ARE REQUIRED FOR ALL FIRE
 SPRINKLER AND FIRE ALARM SYSTEM INSTALLATIONS.
  
 34. PLEASE INDICATE PRESCRIPTIVE STRENGTH REQUIREMENTS
 FOR ALL HANDRAILS AND GUARDRAILS.
  
 35. HANDRAILS ARE TO BE PROVIDED ON BOTH SIDES OF NEW
 STAIRS.
  
 36. NO WORK IS TO COMMENCE WITHOUT VALID APPROVALS AND
 PERMITS.
  
  
 DENIED
  
  
  
 MICHAEL E. CARSILLO, ASSISTANT FIRE CHIEF
 WEST PALM BEACH FIRE RESCUE
  
Review Stop L LANDSCAPING
Rev No 1 Status   Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time  
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop PARK PARKING
Rev No 2 Status P Date 07-13-2013 Cont ID  
Sent By ssamuels Date 07-13-2013 Time 15:27 Rev Time 0.00
Received By ssamuels Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop PARK PARKING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 06-11-2013 Cont ID  
Sent By ssamuels Date 06-11-2013 Time 20:38 Rev Time 0.00
Received By ssamuels Date 06-11-2013 Time 20:38 Sent To  
Notes
2013-06-11 20:48:51MOST LOTS LAYER IS VERY DIFFICULT TO READ. CANT PROVIDE
 ACCURATE COMPARASION WITH SPACES AND NUMBER.
Review Stop POLICE POLICE
Rev No 1 Status F Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By ktucker Date 06-12-2013 Time 10:51 Sent To  
Notes
2013-06-12 11:50:52BUILDINGS ALONG PBL BLVD OUTPARCELS (BLDG D,E,F,G,H),
 POWER CENTER (A,B,BII,C) SHALL COMPLY WITH BELOW
 GUIDELINES.
  
 ** AT THIS TIME THERE IS NOT ENOUGH SUFFICIENT
 INFORMATION FOR COMMENT ON EACH BUILDING. ADDITIONAL
 INFORMATION WILL BE REQUESTED, AND THE POLICE
 DEPARTMENT WILL HAVE ADDITIONAL COMMENTS AS THE REVIEW
 PROCESS CONTINUES. THE CRIME PREVENTION OFFICER WILL
 PERIODICALLY BE ON SITE TO ENSURE CPTED PLANS ARE BEING
 FOLLOWED.
  
  
 THE POLICE DEPARTMENT RECOMMENDS C.P.T.E.D. PRINCIPLES
 AND A RISK AND VULNERABILITY ASSESSMENT ARE INTRODUCED
 INTO THE DESIGN STAGE. FOR A BUILDING TO BE TRULY
 SECURE, SECURITY CONSIDERATIONS MUST BE IN THE
 ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS FROM THE BEGINNING.
 CPTED INVOLVES DESIGNING THE BUILT ENVIRONMENT TO
 REDUCE THE OPPORTUNITY FOR CRIME AND DISORDER. THIS
 APPROACH TO SECURITY DESIGN RECOGNIZES THE INTENDED USE
 OF SPACE IN A BUILDING AND IS DIFFERENT FROM
 TRADITIONAL SECURITY PRACTICES, WHICH FOCUSES ON
 DENYING ACCESS TO A CRIME TARGET WITH BARRIERS AND
 TECHNIQUES SUCH AS LOCKS, ALARMS, FENCES, AND GATES.
 CPTED TAKES ADVANTAGE OF OPPORTUNITIES FOR NATURAL
 SURVEILLANCE, ACCESS CONTROL AND TERRITORIAL
 REINFORCEMENT. THE DESIGN PROCESS SHOULD INCLUDE CPTED
 SO THAT NATURAL AND NORMAL USES OF THE ENVIRONMENT WILL
 MEET THE SAME GOALS AS PHYSICAL AND TECHNICAL
 PROTECTION METHODS.
  
  
 1. PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF THE FIRST BUILDING PERMIT,
 THE APPLICANT SHALL SUBMIT A CONSTRUCTION SITE SECURITY
 AND MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE
 POLICE DEPARTMENT. AFTER SITE CLEARING AND PLACEMENT OF
 CONSTRUCTION TRAILERS, THE DEVELOPER/PROJECT MANAGER
 SHALL INSTITUTE SECURITY MEASURES TO REDUCE OR
 ELIMINATE OPPORTUNITIES FOR THEFT. THE MANAGEMENT PLAN
 SHALL INCLUDE, BUT NOT BE LIMITED TO, TEMPORARY
 LIGHTING, SECURITY PERSONNEL, VEHICLE BARRIERS,
 CONSTRUCTION/VISITOR PASS, REDUCE/MINIMIZE ENTRY/EXIT
 POINTS, ENCOURAGE SUBCONTRACTORS TO SECURE MACHINERY,
 TOOLS AT END OF WORK DAY, FENCING WITH SCREENING AND OR
 ANY OTHER MEASURE DEEMED APPROPRIATE TO PROVIDE A SAFE
 AND SECURE WORKING ENVIRONMENT. NONCOMPLIANCE WITH THE
 APPROVED SECURITY AND MANAGEMENT PLAN MAY RESULT IN A
 STOP-WORK ORDER. NO TRESPASSING SIGNS NEED TO BE POSTED
 EVERY FIVE-HUNDRED FEET (500) AROUND THE PERIMETER OF
 THE CONSTRUCTION SITE AND A SIGNED AFFIDAVIT NEEDS TO
 BE ON FILE WITH THE WEST PALM BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT
 (561-822-1620)
  
  
 2. PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF THE FIRST CERTIFICATE OF
 OCCUPANCY NUMERICAL ADDRESSES SHALL BE PLACED AT THE
 FRONT AND REAR OF THE BUILDING. EACH NUMERICAL ADDRESS
 SHALL BE ILLUMINATED FOR NIGHTTIME VISIBILITY WITH AN
 UNINTERRUPTIBLE A.C. POWER SOURCE, SHALL BE A DIFFERENT
 COLOR THAN THE COLOR OF THE SURFACE TO WHICH IT IS
 ATTACHED. THE REAR DOORS OF THE BUILDING SHALL HAVE AN
 ILLUMINATED NUMBERS ON OR ALONG SIDE THE DOOR.
  
 3. PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF THE FIRST CERTIFICATE OF
 OCCUPANCY ALL ON-SITE LIGHTING SHALL BE INSTALLED. ALL
 ON-SITE LIGHTING SHALL CONSIST OF LED WITH FULL CUT OFF
 FIXTURE AND LIGHTING SHALL NOT CONFLICT WITH PLANTED
 LANDSCAPING. LUMINARY TYPE SHOULD OPTIMIZE LIGHT
 DISTRIBUTION AND MINIMIZE GLARE AN UP LIGHTING.
  
 4. PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF THE FIRST CERTIFICATE OF
 OCCUPANCY THE APPLICANT SHALL PROVIDE PHOTOCELL SENSOR
 ENGAGED DUSK TO DAWN LIGHTING IN THE REAR OF ALL
 BUILDINGS AND SENSITIVE AREAS.
  
 5. PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY
 FOR THE BUILDING, THE FOLLOWING SECURITY MEASURES SHALL
 BE INSTALLED, AND REVIEWED AND APPROVED BY THE POLICE
 DEPARTMENT.
 A. SENSITIVE AREAS SHALL BE EQUIPPED WITH AN INTRUSION
 ALARM/CCTV SYSTEM.
 B. DOORS SHALL BE EQUIPPED WITH METAL PLATE OVER
 THRESHOLD OF THE LOCKING MECHANISM. (FRONT AND REAR)
 REAR DOORS OF ALL STORES SHOULD BE HANDLE FREE.
 C. EXTERIOR/INTERIOR PEDESTRIAN DOORS WHICH PROVIDE
 ACCESS TO THE OUTSIDE SHALL BE SOLID CORE, EQUIPPED
 WITH AUTOMATIC HYDRAULIC CLOSURE DEVICE AND A MINIMUM
 100 SQUARE INCH VISION PANEL. WHERE APPLICABLE
 EMERGENCY DOORS SHALL HAVE NO EXTERIOR HANDLES. PANIC
 HARDWARE SHALL HAVE SELF LOCKING MECHANISM, MAY HAVE
 ONE LOCKING POINT AND SHALL HAVE A PROTECTIVE ASTRAGAL
 ATTACHED TO THE EXTERIOR OF THE DOOR, WHICH WILL COVER
 OPENING BETWEEN THE DOOR AND FRAME, IT SHOULD EXTEND
 ONE INCH BEYOND EDGE OF THE DOOR TO WHICH IT IS
 ATTACHED.
 D. ALL DOORS THAT EXIT OUT SHALL HAVE A 180 DEGREE VIEW
 HOLES.
 E. CASE HARDENED COMMERCIAL GRADE DEAD BOLT LOCKS SHALL
 BE INSTALLED ON ALL STORE FRONTS AND SENSITIVE AREA
 DOORS WITH MINIMUM OF ONE INCH THROW INTO THE STRIKE
 RECEIVING THE BOLT. THE CYLINDER SHALL HAVE A CYLINDER
 GUARD (SPIN GUARD) AND A MINIMUM OF FIVE-PIN TUMBLERS.
 F. DOOR HINGES SHALL BE INSTALLED ON INTERIOR SIDE OF
 DOOR OR NON REMOVABLE HINGE PINS OR A MECHANICAL
 INTERLOCK TO PRECLUDE REMOVAL OF DOOR FROM THE
 EXTERIOR.
 G. RESTROOMS SHALL BE PLACED IN CENTRAL AREA
 H. A HIGH RESOLUTION COLOR DIGITAL WIDE ANGLE VIDEO
 CAMERA SYSTEM WITH MONITORING, PHOTO PROCESSING, FREEZE
 FRAME AND ZOOM (PTL) CAPABILITIES SHALL BE INSTALLED IN
 THE INTERIOR AND EXTERIOR AREAS OF A BUSINESS/BUILDING.
 J. DOORS SECURED BY ELECTRICAL OPERATION SHALL HAVE A
 KEY PAD-SWITCH TO OPEN
 THE DOOR WHEN IN A CLOSED POSITION, OR BY A SIGNAL
 LOCKING DEVICE.
 K. INSTALL PEDESTRIAN SCALE LIGHTING WITH FULL CUT OFF
 FIXTURES ALONG WALKWAYS.
 L. CROSSWALKS SHALL BE RAISED OR DELINEATED BY THE USE
 OF CONTRASTING PAVER BLOCKS AS OPPOSED TO SURFACE
 STRIPING.
 M. BENCHES SHALL BE DIVIDED STYLE AND HAVE ADEQUATE
 LIGHTING IN THE AREA THEY ARE LOCATED. BENCHES SHOULD
 ALSO BE IN OPEN VIEW TO ELIMINATE CONCEALMENT AREAS.
 O. BIKE RACKS SHOULD BE IN A HIGH VISIBILITY AREA, NOT
 IN THE PARKING LOT, FOR EASY SURVEILLANCE AND SAFETY.
 P. WAY FINDING SIGNS SHOULD BE IN HIGH TRAFFIC AREAS
  
  
  AUTOMATED TELLER MACHINES
 ATM LOCATIONS SHALL BE IN AREAS WITH THE GREATEST
 NATURAL SURVEILLANCE AND INDEPENDENT FROM THE BUILDING.
 A. AUTOMATED TELLER MACHINES (ATM?S) SHALL COMPLY WITH
 FSS 655.966.
 B. ATM?S SHALL BE LOCATED ON MAIN ROADS IF APPLICABLE
 AND BE VISIBLE FROM THE ROADWAY.
 C. ATMS SHALL NOT BE HIDDEN BY ANY LANDSCAPING OR OTHER
 FIXED OBJECT THAT WOULD PREVENT CLEAR VISIBILITY.
 D. ATMS SHALL HAVE HIGH-RESOLUTION COLOR DIGITAL VIDEO
 CAMERA SYSTEM INSTALLED.
 E. ATMS SHALL HAVE HIGH ILLUMINATION OF WALKWAYS
 LEADING TO AND FROM IT.
 F. LIGHTING SHALL BE POSITIONED SO AS NOT TO CAUSE
 GLARE ON VIDEO RECORDING.
 G. CONVEX MIRROR SHALL BE INSTALLED AND STRATEGICALLY
 PLACED TO ALLOW ATM OPERATOR TO IDENTIFY ANY
 APPROACHING PERSON(S) AND/OR POTENTIAL SUSPECT(S).
 H. ATMS SHALL HAVE AN ALARM SYSTEM COMPONENT, SHOCK AND
 SEISMIC SENSORS, SUFFICIENT WEIGHT AND TENSILE
 STRENGTH, HEAT DETECTORS, DOOR CONTACTS AND LOCKING
 MECHANISMS, TO DETER ATTACKS TO THE MACHINE ITSELF.
 DEVICES ARE NEEDED TO PROVIDE EARLY WARNING OF AN
 IMPENDING ATTACK.
 I. ATMS SHOULD HAVE A SECURE CLOSET TO SERVICE THE
 MACHINE.
  
 WHOLE FOODS
  
 WILL COMPLY WITH THE ABOVE GUIDELINES ** AT THIS TIME
 THERE IS NOT ENOUGH SUFFICIENT INFORMATION FOR COMMENT
 FOR THIS BUSINESS. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WILL BE
 REQUESTED, AND THE POLICE DEPARTMENT WILL HAVE
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS AS THE REVIEW PROCESS CONTINUES.
 SECURITY: LIGHTING, CCTV, ALARM, INTERIOR LAYOUT
 INFORMATION WILL BE NEEDED.
  
 BUILDING E, BUSINESS WITH DRIVE THRU ATTACHED:
  
 AT THIS TIME THERE IS NOT ENOUGH SUFFICIENT INFORMATION
 FOR COMMENT FOR THIS BUSINESS. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
 WILL BE REQUESTED, AND THE POLICE DEPARTMENT WILL HAVE
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS AS THE REVIEW PROCESS CONTINUES.
 THE CRIME PREVENTION OFFICER WILL PERIODICALLY BE ON
 SITE TO ENSURE CPTED PLANS ARE BEING FOLLOWED.
 SECURITY: LIGHTING, CCTV, ALARM, INTERIOR LAYOUT
 INFORMATION WILL BE NEEDED.
  
 BJ?S BREWHOUSE: WILL COMPLY WITH THE ABOVE GUIDELINES,
 RESTAURANT SHALL BE EQUIPPED WITH THE FOLLOWING
 SECURITY DEVICES AND STANDARDS:
 (1) A FULLY FUNCTIONING AND OPERATIONAL CCTV SYSTEM
 CAPABLE OF RECORDING AND RETRIEVING AN IDENTIFIABLE
 IMAGE TO ASSIST IN OFFENDER IDENTIFICATION AND
 APPREHENSION THROUGH OUT THE RESTAURANT, INTERIOR AND
 EXTERIOR. MONITOR IN THE MANAGEMENT OFFICE
 (2) A DROP SAFE OR CASH MANAGEMENT DEVICE FOR
 RESTRICTED ACCESS.
 (3) HEIGHT MARKERS AT THE ENTRANCE AND EXITS WHICH
 DISPLAY HEIGHT MEASURES.
 (4) OUT DOOR DINING WILL HAVE PROPER LIGHTING AND CCTV
 COVERAGE.
 (7) ALL EXITING DOORS WILL HAVE A VIEWING WINDOW, DOOR
 CHIME MOUNTED OUTSIDE AND CCTV COVERAGE
 (8) RESTAURANT SHALL BE EQUIPPED WITH A SILENT ALARM TO
 A PRIVATE SECURITY AGENCY
  
 POWER CENTER WILL COMPLY WITH THE ABOVE GUIDLINES** AT
 THIS TIME THERE IS NOT ENOUGH SUFFICIENT INFORMATION
 FOR COMMENT FOR THIS BUSINESS. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
 WILL BE REQUESTED, AND THE POLICE DEPARTMENT WILL HAVE
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS AS THE REVIEW PROCESS CONTINUES.
 SECURITY: LIGHTING, CCTV, ALARM, INTERIOR LAYOUT
 INFORMATION WILL BE NEEDED.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
Review Stop PW PUBLIC WORKS
Rev No 1 Status   Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time  
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop STORM STORMWATER
Rev No 1 Status F Date 06-06-2013 Cont ID  
Sent By tward Date 06-06-2013 Time 17:52 Rev Time  
Received By tward Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2013-06-06 17:53:531. NO CIVIL PLANS PROVIDED.
 2. NO DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS PROVIDED.
 3. MODIFICATION TO SFWMD ERP WILL BE REQUIRED.
  
Review Stop SURVEY SURVEYING
Rev No 1 Status   Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time  
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop TRAFFIC TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No 2 Status P Date 08-12-2013 Cont ID  
Sent By eschneid Date 08-12-2013 Time 14:35 Rev Time 0.00
Received By eschneid Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2013-08-12 14:35:59PARKING REMOVED FROM PLANS.
Review Stop TRAFFIC TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No 1 Status F Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By bcollins Date 06-12-2013 Time 10:15 Sent To  
Notes
2013-06-12 10:19:36CONCUR WITH ERIC SCHNEIDER'S NOTE 5 REGARDING PARKING
 SPACES IN PBA 1. THESE SPACES REQUIRE TRAFFIC TO BACK
 UP INTO AN ACCESS DRIVE AS OPPOSED TO A PARKING AISLE.
 PLEASE CONFIRM THAT THE TOTAL DEVELOPMENT IS BELOW THE
 THRESHOLD ESTABLISHED FOR TRAFFIC ADEQUACY.
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 3 Status F Date 10-07-2013 Cont ID  
Sent By eschneid Date 10-07-2013 Time 16:50 Rev Time 0.00
Received By eschneid Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2013-10-07 16:50:45SIGN PROGRAM ONLY
  
 CASE NO. 891U - 9-25-13 RESUBMITTAL
 PALM BEACH OUTLETS PBA 1, 2B & 4 FSPR SIGNAGE PROGRAM
 1801 PALM BEACH LAKES BOULEVARD
  
 - CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446
  
 - PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN
 WRITTEN FORMAT.
  
 - WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF FOUR
 (4) PAPER COPIES AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY IN .PDF FORMAT
 OF ALL PAGES. PLEASE NOTE THAT CHANGES ON THE
 RESUBMITTED PLANS MAY RESULT IN ADDITIONAL COMMENTS.
  
 1) SIGN TYPE 1- SIZE OK
  
 VERIFY LOCATION OF THE BOX AREA.
  
 2) SIGN TYPE 2 - SIZE OK
  
 VERIFY LOCATION OF THE BOX AREA.
  
 3) SIGN TYPE 3 - SIZE OK
  
 VERIFY LOCATION OF THE BOX AREA.
  
 ADD NOTE THAT NO SIGNAGE OR LOGOS MAY BE INSTALLED ON
 THE BASE OF THE SIGN.
  
 4) SIGN TYPE 4 - SIZE OK
  
 ADD NOTE THAT NO SIGNAGE OR LOGOS MAY BE INSTALLED ON
 THE BASE OF THE SIGN.
  
 5) SIGN TYPE 5 - SIZE OK
  
 6) SIGN TYPE 6
  
 A. EITHER ADD NOTE ON PAGE 8 THAT SIGNAGE IS NOT
 PERMITTED ON THE SLOPE OF THE AWNING, OR REMOVE THE
 DASHED LINES FROM THE SLOPE OF THE AWNING. WHILE THE
 GRAPHIC IS THE SAME AS THE ONE IN THE DESIGN
 GUIDELINES, THE DASHED LINES ON THE AWNING SLOPE GIVE
 THE IMPRESSION THAT SIGNS ARE PERMITTED AT THAT
 LOCATION. THIS SHALL BE CLARIFIED SO THAT SOMEONE DOES
 NOT JUST LOOK AT THE PICTURE WITHOUT READING THE TEXT
 AND ASSUME SIGNAGE IS PERMITTED ON THE SLOPE OF THE
 AWNING.
  
 B. PLEASE ADD A TOTAL LINE FOR THE WEST FA?ADE ALLOWED
 SIGNAGE SINCE IT IS A POOL.
  
 7) SIGN TYPE 7
  
 PLEASE CLARIFY - IS PHASE II BEING SUBMITTED AT A LATER
 DATE?
  
 8) SIGN TYPE 10
  
 ADD NOTE THAT NO SIGNAGE OR LOGOS MAY BE INSTALLED ON
 THE BASE OF THE SIGN.
  
 9) SIGN TYPE 11
  
 ADD NOTE THAT NO SIGNAGE OR LOGOS MAY BE INSTALLED ON
 THE BASE OF THE SIGN.
  
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 2 Status P Date 08-12-2013 Cont ID  
Sent By eschneid Date 08-12-2013 Time 14:49 Rev Time 0.00
Received By eschneid Date 08-12-2013 Time 14:49 Sent To  
Notes
2013-08-12 14:49:58SOME ITEMS CONDITIONED ON APPROVAL LETTER.
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 06-11-2013 Cont ID  
Sent By eschneid Date 06-11-2013 Time 11:19 Rev Time 8.00
Received By eschneid Date 06-11-2013 Time 11:19 Sent To  
Notes
2013-06-11 11:19:45CASE NO. PB951U
 PALM BEACH OUTLETS - PBA 1, 2B & 4 FSPR
 1801 PALM BEACH LAKES BOULEVARD
  
 - CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446
  
 - PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN
 WRITTEN FORMAT.
  
 - WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF SIX
 (6) PAPER COPIES AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY IN .PDF FORMAT
 OF ALL PLANS. PLEASE NOTE THAT CHANGES ON THE
 RESUBMITTED PLANS MAY RESULT IN ADDITIONAL COMMENTS.
  
 - PLEASE NOTE THAT IF THE PLANNING DIVISION HAS NOT
 RECEIVED A RESPONSE TO THE PPRC COMMENTS WITHIN 60 DAYS
 FROM THE DATE OF THE PPRC MEETING (AUGUST 12, 2013),
 THE CASE SHALL BE CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN. ANY FURTHER
 ACTION SHALL REQUIRE A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION.
  
 - PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1)
 RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED
 COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE
 APPLICANT WILL BE ACCESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE
 WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE ($300).
  
 1) CHECK THE ELEVATION TAGS - SOME OF THE BUILDINGS ARE
 USING ZERO FEET AS THE AFF AND OTHERS USE 100 FEET,
 WITH THE ELEVATIONS MIXING BETWEEN THE TWO CALIBRATIONS
 AS THE ELEVATION DIMENSIONS ARE CALLED OUT ON THE
 BUILDING.
  
 2) ARCHITECTURAL ELEVATIONS SHALL VERIFY THAT THE
 ROOFTOP MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT WILL BE SCREENED FOR ALL
 BUILDINGS.
  
 3) THE PARKING LOT LAYER IS NOT READABLE (FADED) ON
 MANY OF THE SHEETS MAKING IT UNABLE TO VERIFY PARKING
 COUNTS AND SOME PARKING LOT FEATURES.
  
 4) PARKING SPACES WHICH ARE OCCUPIED BY CART CORRALS
 MAY NOT BE COUNTED IN THE PARKING "PROVIDED" TOTAL.
 THEY NUMERIC TAGS FOR THE PARKING ROWS INCLUDE THE
 SPACES WITH THE CART CORRALS.
  
 5) THE PARKING SPACES THAT ARE LOCATED ALONG THE MIDDLE
 ENTRY DRIVE INTO PBA 1 PRESENT A DANGEROUS COMBINATION
 OF BACKING OUT INTO A HIGHER VOLUME, HIGHER SPEED
 DRIVEWAY. ESPECIALLY THE TWO SPACE BAY WHICH HAS A HIGH
 CONFLICT POTENTIAL WITH CARS LEAVING PBA 1.
  
 6) THE RADIUS ON THE ENDS OF A ROW OF INTERIOR PARKING
 ISLANDS ON SHEET FSP-2 IS INCORRECT. THEY NEED TO
 EXTEND THE LENGTH OF THE SPACE BEFORE ARCING.
  
 7) SHEET FSP-7 SHOWS A SIGN IN A PARKING SPACE.
  
 8) THE NEW MEDIANS IN THE ACCESS "A" ENTRY DRIVE SHOW
 PAINTED AREAS ADJACENT TO THEM. PLEASE EXAMINE THE
 WIDENING OF THESE FOR ADDITIONAL LANDSCAPE (SHEET LP-7
 GROUND COVER TAG POINTS TO THIS AREA).
  
 9) PROVIDE A DIRECT PEDESTRIAN ROUTE FROM THE WEST SIDE
 OF PBA 2A (NEAR VALET) TO THE NORTH SIDE OF THE PBA 1
 BUILDING. THE PROPOSED SIDEWALK NETWORK PROVIDES A
 CONNECTION, BUT NOT A DIRECT ROUTE BETWEEN THE
 BUILDINGS. THE NATURAL INSTINCT WILL BE FOR CUSTOMERS
 TO WALK THE DIRECT ROUTE, WHICH IS EITHER IN THE DRIVE
 AISLE OR IN THE LANDSCAPE AREA. THIS BECOMES EVEN MORE
 NECESSARY WITH THE CONSTRUCTION OF PHASE 2, WHERE THE
 BUILDINGS ARE EVEN CLOSER TOGETHER.
  
 10) PLEASE EXPLAIN HOW BUILDINGS C & E HAVE ?DIRECT
 PEDESTRIAN ACCESS TO THE SIDEWALK ON PALM BEACH LAKES
 BOULEVARD? AS REQUIRED BY THE DESIGN GUIDELINES.
  
 11) WHAT IS THE PURPOSE OF THE WALKWAY THROUGH THE
 PARKING AREA IN FRONT OF BUILDING B-1? FOR IT BEING A
 SUBSTANTIAL WALKWAY, IT DOES NOT REALLY HELP CONNECT
 THE SITE IN A LOCATION THAT YOU WOULD EXPECT A
 PEDESTRIAN TO WALK (SUCH AS ALONG THE INTERIOR DRIVE
 AISLES). IT DOES NOT TIE INTO A DIRECT CROSSING OF THE
 ENTRY ROAD, NOR DOES IT PROVIDE A ROUTE THAT WOULD GET
 YOU CONVENIENTLY TO THE OUTLET PORTION OF THE SITE OR
 THE RESTAURANT ROW. AN ADDITIONAL CROSSING POINT OF
 ACCESS DRIVE A SHOULD BE PROVIDED BETWEEN PBA 1 AND THE
 RESTAURANT ROW.
  
 12) LP-3 AND FSP-3 SHOW DIFFERENT PROPERTY BOUNDARY
 CONFIGURATIONS AT THE CONGRESS AVENUE ENTRY DRIVE.
  
 13) BICYCLE RACK CALCULATIONS ROUND UP. PLEASE CORRECT
 ON THE "REQUIRED"? LINE ITEM.
  
 14) PROVIDE THE BICYCLE PAD DIMENSIONS ON THE SITE PLAN
 FOR EACH PAD.
  
 15) SOME BICYCLE SPACES SHALL BE PROVIDED AT THE NORTH
 END OF BUILDING A. THE 20-SPACE RACKS MAY HAVE THEIR
 NUMBERS REDUCED TO ALLOW FOR THE MORE EVEN DISTRIBUTION
 OF BICYCLE PARKING FACILITIES FOR PBA 1.
  
 16) THE BICYCLE PAD AT THE SOUTH END OF BUILDING C
 SHALL HAVE THE SIX FOOT DEPTH FOR THE ENTIRE REQUIRED
 PAD WIDTH.
  
 17) THE BUILDING H BICYCLE RACK NEEDS TO BE RELOCATED
 TO A MORE VISIBLE LOCATION CLOSER TO THE ENTRANCE OF
 BUILDING H.
  
 18) PROVIDE WRITTEN VERIFICATION FROM THE SANITATION
 DIVISION THAT THE DUMPSTER LOCATIONS AND ORIENTATIONS
 ARE ADEQUATE FOR GARBAGE COLLECTION.
  
 19) A NUMBER OF THE LOADING AREAS ARE LOCATED IN FRONT
 OF DUMPSTER ENCLOSURES. NO LOADING MAY OCCUR WITHIN AN
 HOUR OF THE SCHEDULED TRASH OR RECYCLING PICK-UP.
  
 20) THIS PLAN SHOWS EXTENSIVE USE OF CRAPE MYRTLE TREES
 IN THE PARKING LOT ISLANDS TO THE NORTH AND WEST
 PORTIONS OF THE SITE. SINCE THESE TREES SHED THEIR
 LEAVES FOR MANY MONTHS OUT OF THE YEAR, THEY DON'T MAKE
 THE BEST PARKING LOT TREES TO PROVIDE SHADE. PLEASE
 EXPLAIN WHY THEY ARE BEING USED IN SUCH ABUNDANCE IN
 THE PARKING AREAS.
  
 21) IS IT THE INTENT TO COUNT THE FACAHATCHEE GRASS AS
 THE REQUIRED BUFFER HEDGE ALONG I-95?
  
 22) COCONUT AND MONTGOMERY PALMS MAY NOT BE USED AS
 PARKING LOT INTERIOR OR TERMINAL TREES UNLESS THEY ARE
 INSTALLED IN GROUPS OF THREE. THIS CONDITION OCCURS IN
 THE PARKING LOT SOUTH OF BUILDING C & D.
  
 23) THE PARKING AREA IN FRONT OF BUILDING F INCLUDES 6
 LT TREES. THIS TYPE IS NOT ON THE PLANT LIST AND LOOKS
 LIKE A DOUBLE COUNT OF THE TA TREES IN THE SAME AREA.
 PLEASE VERIFY YOUR OVERALL TREE COUNTS
  
 24) TERMINAL ISLAND TREES ARE REQUIRED AT BOTH ENDS OF
 THE TRUCK LOADING/STAGING PARKING AREA NORTH OF PBA 1.
  
 25) OAK TREE NO. 445 APPEARS TO BE IN THE DRIVE AISLE.
  
 26) SHEET LP-8 HAS TWO TERMINAL ISLANDS WITH NO TREES,
 ONE TREE SHOWN NOT IN THE TERMINAL ISLAND BUT RATHER IN
 FRONT OF THE DUMPSTER OPENING AND ONE MEDJOOL THAT
 SHOULD BE LOCATED MORE CENTRALLY IN THE TERMINAL ISLAND
 WHERE TWO PARKING ROWS MEET.
  
 27) WHY ARE OAK TREES BEING RELOCATED INTO AN AREA THAT
 WILL BE THE FOOTPRINT OF THE PHASE 2 EXPANSION? THIS
 SEEMS COUNTERPRODUCTIVE AS THESE TREES WILL NEED TO BE
 RELOCATED AGAIN. THE PHASE 2 LANDSCAPE PLAN SHOWS 2 OF
 THE 3 AFFECTED OAK TREES RELOCATED (ONE INTO A NOT
 SUSTAINABLE TERMINAL ISLAND LOCATION WHERE THE OTHER
 TERMINAL TREE IS MISSING).
  
 28) THE FOUNDATION PLANTING TABLE ON SHEET LP-10 LISTS
 THE TOTAL LINEAR FEET AROUND EACH BUILDING, BUT FAILS
 TO SHOW THE LINEAR FEET OF FOUNDATION PLANTING PROVIDED
 FOR EACH BUILDING.
  
 29) PLANT HEDGES AT THE BASE OF ALL DUMPSTER
 ENCLOSURES.
  
 30) PROVIDE LANDSCAPE MATERIAL ALONG THE WEST SIDE OF
 THE COMPACTOR SCREEN WALLS BEHIND ALL OF THE BUILDINGS
 IN PBA 1.
  
 31) THERE ARE A LOT OF SODDED AREAS ALONG THE REAR OF
 THE BUILDINGS IN PBA 1. PLEASE CONSIDER PLANTING SOME
 HEDGES ALONG THE BASE OF THE BUILDING.
  
 32) THE MULCH BED BEHIND BUILDING A IS NOT PERMITTED.
  
 33) THE BUILDING J-11 SERVICE COURT DOES NOT SHOW THE
 REQUIRED LANDSCAPE ACROSS FROM THE OPENING.
  
 34) SCREEN THE TRANSFORMERS WITH HEDGES ON THE NON-DOOR
 SIDES.
  
 35) HOW WILL THE 10 FOOT ELECTRIC UTILITY EASEMENT NOT
 AFFECT REQUIRED LANDSCAPE, ESPECIALLY SINCE IT
 TRAVERSES LANDSCAPE ISLANDS AND A FEW TREE GRATES?
  
 35) LIVE OAK #55 SEEMS EXTREMELY CLOSE TO UTILITY
 INFRASTRUCTURE. PLEASE REVIEW.
  
 37) THE NEW TREES IN THE PALM BEACH LAKES BUFFER IN
 FRONT OF BUILDING E APPEAR TO HAVE CONFLICTS WITH
 UTILITY INFRASTRUCTURE. PLEASE REVIEW.
  
 38) AN EXFILTRATION TRENCH IS NOW SHOWN BISECTING A
 TERMINAL ISLAND IN FRONT OF BUILDING B-1 FORCING THE
 SHIFTING OF A TREE OUT OF THE ISLAND. THIS WAS NOT
 PERMITTED ON THE PREVIOUS PLAN AND IS NOT PERMITTED ON
 THIS REDESIGN.
  
 39) PLEASE DO NOT CREATE CONFLICTS WITH TREES AND LIGHT
 POLES:
  
 A. ONE OF THE LIGHT POLES IN A TERMINAL ISLAND BY
 BUILDING E LOOKS VERY CLOSE TO THE TREE.
 B. OAK TREE NO. 689 HAS A LIGHT POLE LOCATED EXTREMELY
 CLOSE TO IT, ESPECIALLY IN LIGHT OF THE PLACEMENT OF
 THE TREE IN A LARGE LANDSCAPE ISLAND WHICH WILL LET THE
 TREE GROW TO A LARGER SIZE.
 C. OAK TREE NOS. 39 AND 40 SEEM CLOSE TOGETHER IN THE
 ISLAND AND HAVE A LIGHT POLE BETWEEN THEM.
 D. LIGHT POST BETWEEN 2 GUMBO LIMBO TREES IN THE
 PARKING AREA IN FRONT OF BUILDING B1.
  
 40) SHEETS FSP-2 AND LP-2 HAVE A LIGHT POLE SHOWN IN A
 PARKING SPACE.
  
 41) THE OVERALL REAR ELEVATION FOR BUILDING B2 IS
 MISLABELED.
  
 42) FOR BUILDING C, PLEASE CONSIDER CHANGING THE MIDDLE
 PANEL ON THE SOUTH FA?ADE, WEST OF THE WALL WITH THE
 SEATING AREA, TO HAVE THE SIMILAR RHYTHM AS THE WEST
 FA?ADE TO COMPLY MORE WITH THE DESIGN GUIDELINES.
  
 43) FOR BUILDING C, PLEASE EXPLAIN THE TEMPORARY
 HOLIDAY STORAGE AND THE TRAILER MOUNTED GENERATOR.
  
 44) VARIOUS PLANS SHOW BUILDING E HAVING 1,084 SQ. FT.
 OR 1,684 SQ. FT.
  
 45) THE DESIGN GUIDELINES ALLOW TWO, 10 FOOT WIDE DRIVE
 AISLES. THE PLANS FOR BUILDING E SHOW ONE, 20 FOOT WIDE
 DRIVE AISLE, WHICH IS NOT PERMITTED. WHY DOES THE DRIVE
 AISLE NEED TO BE SO WIDE WHEN THE STACKING AND BY-PASS
 ARE ONLY AT THE EASTERN PORTION OF THE DRIVE AISLE?
  
 46) SHOW THE FIVE CAR STACKING DISTANCE FOR THE
 BUILDING E DRIVE-THRU.
  
 47) PLEASE EXPLAIN WHERE THE DRIVE-THRU ORDER SCREENS
 AND SERVICE WINDOWS WILL BE FOR BUILDING E.
  
 48) THE EAST WALL OF BUILDING F (BJ'S) IS A RUN OF MORE
 THAN 50 FEET WITHOUT ANY BREAKS IN THE HORIZONTAL
 PLANE. PLEASE INCORPORATE ELEMENTS IN ACCORDANCE WITH
 THE DESIGN GUIDELINES.
  
 49) THE LEFT ELEVATION OF BUILDING G HAS NO WINDOWS ON
 THE PALM BEACH LAKES FRONTAGE. ADDITIONALLY, THE
 FOOTPRINT ON THE ARCHITECTURAL PLAN DOES NOT MATCH THE
 FOOTPRINT ON THE SITE PLAN.
  
 50) PLEASE SUPPLY BETTER SIDE VIEW OF BUILDING G -
 PREFERABLY AN EXAMPLE OF ONE THAT IS CURRENTLY BUILT.
 THE PARAPET AND ARCHED PARAPET DO NOT LOOK LIKE THEY
 SEAMLESSLY INTEGRATE WITH THE BUILDING FROM THE
 SUPPLIED ELEVATION DRAWINGS. IS THE SEMICIRCULAR AWNING
 PROTRUDING FROM THE BUILDING WITH NO SUPPORTS?
  
 51) PLEASE NOTE THAT THE RR ON THE ENTRY DOOR TO
 BUILDING G IS SIGNAGE.
  
 52) THESE PLANS REFLECT CHANGES TO THE APPROVED
 BUILDING PERMIT PLANS FOR BUILDING J. PLEASE BE AWARE
 THAT ONCE APPROVED, THESE BECOME THE PLAN OF RECORD,
 AND THE BUILDING PERMIT PLANS WILL NEED TO BE REVISED
 PRIOR TO A C.O. FOR BUILDING J.
  
 53) WHAT IS THE DISTANCE SEPARATING THE BOLLARDS IN THE
 BUILDING J ENTRYWAYS? THIS DIMENSION SHALL BE INCLUDED
 ON THE PLANS.
  
 54) THE SCREEN WALLS REFERENCED TO THE WEST OF BUILDING
 J-1 DOES NOT APPEAR ON SHEET FSP-2.1 (SHOWN ON FSP-2).
  
 55) THE REVISED SOUTH ELEVATIONS WHICH INCLUDE BUILDING
 J-1 DO NOT SHOW THE NEW LOADING DOCK AREA EXTENSION.
  
 56) THERE NEEDS TO BE LANDSCAPE ON THE WEST SIDE OF THE
 SCREEN WALL FOR THE NEW TRANSFORMER LOCATION AT
 BUILDING J-1.
  
 57) SHEET LP-2.1 HAS BUILDING FOOTPRINT LAYER MISSING.
  
 58) THE BICYCLE RACK WEST OF J-11 SHALL BE MOVED TO A
 LOCATION THAT IS CLOSER TO AN ENTRY POINT TO THE OUTLET
 CENTER.
  
 59) THE COMPACTOR FOR BUILDING J-11 IS VISIBLE DIRECTLY
 ACROSS FROM THE SERVICE BAY OPENING WHICH IS NOT
 PERMITTED BY THE DESIGN GUIDELINES.
  
 60) SIGN PLAN REVIEW IS PENDING.
  
  Print


Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved