 |
Plan Review Details - Project Z13040029
| Plan Review Stops For Project Z13040029 |
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
01-10-2014 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jroach |
Date |
01-10-2014 |
Time |
09:57 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jroach |
Date |
01-10-2014 |
Time |
09:57 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
N |
Date |
05-07-2013 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
lmartine |
Date |
05-07-2013 |
Time |
09:45 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
lmartine |
Date |
05-07-2013 |
Time |
09:45 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
ENG - PPRC |
ENGINEERING - PPRC |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
01-09-2014 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jroach |
Date |
01-09-2014 |
Time |
09:48 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jroach |
Date |
01-09-2014 |
Time |
09:48 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2014-02-25 09:49:43 | PURSUANT TO AN EMAIL FROM MANNY GONZALEZ, DATED 1/9/14, | | | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS WERE MADE, AND WILL BE ADDRESSED | | | AT TIME OF PERMITTING: | | | | | | 1) MY ONLY COMMENT WOULD BE THAT FIRELINE WILL HAVE TO | | | BE LOOPED. | | | | | | 2) I SEE A STORM OUTFALL MISSING FROM PLANS. BUT I AM | | | SURE TRACY WARD WILL SEND YOU COMMENT ON THAT. | | | | | | MANUEL JULIAN GONZALEZ | | | ENGINEERING PROJECT COORDINATOR | | | ENGINEERING SERVICES AND PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT | | | 401 CLEMATIS STREET, 4TH FLOOR | | | WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33401 | | | (MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. BOX 3366, ZIP 33402) | | | MAIN PHONE: (561) 822-1200 | | | DIRECT: (561) 494-1085 | | | FAX: (561) 494-1116 | | | MOBILE: (561) 644-7301 | | | EMAIL: [email protected] | | | WWW.WPB.ORG/ENGINEERING |
|
|
| Review Stop |
ENG - PPRC |
ENGINEERING - PPRC |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
02-25-2014 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jroach |
Date |
02-25-2014 |
Time |
09:38 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jroach |
Date |
02-25-2014 |
Time |
09:38 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
01-10-2014 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jroach |
Date |
01-10-2014 |
Time |
09:50 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jroach |
Date |
01-10-2014 |
Time |
09:50 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2014-02-25 09:51:07 | PURSUANT TO AN EMAIL FROM PETER LEDUC, DATED 1/10/14, | | | THE FOLLOWING COMMENT WAS MADE: | | | | | | WITH THIS PRELIMINARY CONCEPTUAL REVIEW THE FIRE | | | PREVENTION BUREAU HAS NO OBJECTIONS. FURTHER EVALUATION | | | AND REVIEW IS NECESSARY GOING FORWARD. | | | | | | PETER LEDUC | | | FIRE MARSHAL | | | BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION | | | WEST PALM BEACH FIRE RESCUE | | | 500 NORTH DIXIE HIGHWAY | | | WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33401 | | | OFFICE: (561) 804-4709 | | | FAX: (561) 804-4774 | | | EMAIL: [email protected] |
|
|
| Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
07-02-2013 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jroach |
Date |
07-02-2013 |
Time |
09:37 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jroach |
Date |
07-02-2013 |
Time |
09:37 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2014-02-25 09:38:28 | ALL PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED COMMENTS HAVE EITHER BEEN | | | SATISFIED, WILL BE ADDRESSED AT TIME OF PERMITTING, OR | | | OTHERWISE ADDRESSED THROUGH CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL. | | | | | | QUESTIONS/COMMENTS, PLEASE CONTACT JOHN ROACH, | | | PRINCIPAL PLANNER, AT (561) 822-1448. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
06-17-2013 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jroach |
Date |
06-17-2013 |
Time |
11:56 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jroach |
Date |
06-17-2013 |
Time |
11:56 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2013-06-17 11:57:10 | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS WERE RECEIVED FROM M. CARSILLO | | | VIA EMAIL ON 6/11/13... | | | | | | 1. WET FIRE HYDRANTS ARE REQUIRED PRIOR TO, DURING, AND | | | AFTER CONSTRUCTION. | | | 2. CONSTRUCTION, DEMOLITION, AND RENOVATION TO COMPLY | | | WITH NFPA 241. | | | 3. NO EXTERIOR DOORS DISPLAYED ON SHEET SP-1. | | | 4. ALL FIRE ACCESS LANES ARE TO BE AT LEAST 20 FEET | | | WIDE, AND BE CAPABLE OF SUPPORTING FIRE AND PARAMEDICAL | | | EQUIPMENT. | | | 5. ANY AREA THAT ANY FIRE AND PARAMEDICAL EQUIPMENT | | | MUST PASS UNDER MUST PROVIDE AT LEAST 13?-6? CLEARANCE. | | | 6. A FIRE COMMAND ROOM MUST BE PROVIDED AND ALL | | | EQUIPMENT REQUIRED SHALL BE INSTALLED IN THIS ROOM. | | | 7. STAIRS ARE TO BE KEPT UP WITH CONSTRUCTION. | | | 8. TRASH AND DEBRIS SHALL BE REMOVED FROM THE SITE | | | DAILY. | | | 9. PROVIDE SEPARATE PLANS AND PERMITS FOR ALL SECURITY | | | AND ACCESS GATES. | | | 10. TACTILE SIGNAGE REQUIRED AT ALL EXIT DOORS. | | | 11. STAIRWELL IDENTIFICATION SIGNS ARE REQUIRED INSIDE | | | THE STAIRWELLS. | | | 12. ALL NEW STAIRS AND RAMPS ARE REQUIRED TO HAVE | | | HANDRAILS ON BOTH SIDES. | | | 13. SMOKE ALARMS ARE REQUIRED WITHIN THE APARTMENTS. | | | 14. THE ENTIRE BUILDING IS TO BE EQUIPPED WITH A | | | COMPLETE AUTOMATIC FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM. | | | 15. THE ENTIRE BUILDING IS TO BE EQUIPPED WITH A | | | COMPLETE FIRE ALARM SYSTEM WITH VOICE EVACUATION. | | | 16. PLEASE DECLARE CONSTRUCTION TYPE FOR THE BUILDING. | | | 17. PLEASE PROVIDE A LIFE SAFETY PLAN ILLUSTRATING | | | OCCUPANT LOADS, TRAVEL DISTANCES, DEAD-END CORRIDORS, | | | AND ALL FIRE SAFETY EQUIPMENT. | | | 18. PLEASE ILLUSTRATE ALL VERTICAL AND HORIZONTAL FIRE | | | SEPARATIONS. | | | 19. PLEASE ILLUSTRATE ALL FIRE RATINGS OF ALL VERTICAL | | | SHAFTS. | | | 20. PLEASE PROVIDE A DOOR SCHEDULE INDICATING FIRE | | | RATINGS AND APPROPRIATE HARDWARE. | | | 21. PLEASE PROVIDE DETAILS ON ALL STAIRS. (RISE, RUN, | | | AND TREAD DEPTH) | | | 22. THE PARKING GARAGE IS TO COMPLY WITH NFPA 88A. | | | 23. BUILDING ADDRESS IS REQUIRED. | | | 24. A COMPLETE WET STANDPIPE SYSTEM IS REQUIRED FOR THE | | | BUILDING. | | | 25. PLEASE ILLUSTRATE FIRE EXTINGUISHER LOCATIONS. | | | 26. BUILDING ADDRESS IS REQUIRED. A MINIMUM OF AT LEAST | | | 6? HIGH NUMBERS ARE REQUIRED. | | | 27. PLEASE EXPLAIN FIREMAN?S VESTIBULES SHOWN ON THE | | | DRAWINGS. | | | 28. PLEASE INDICATE STRETCHER ACCESSIBLE ELEVATOR. | | | 29. PLEASE PROVIDE COMPLETE DETAILS ON EMERGENCY | | | GENERATOR AND FIRE PUMP ASSEMBLY. | | | 30. PLEASE DISPLAY ALL EMERGENCY LIGHTS AND ILLUMINATED | | | EXIT SIGNS FOR THE PROJECT. | | | 31. PLEASE PROVIDE PRESCRIPTIVE STRENGTH REQUIREMENTS | | | FOR GLASS RAILING. | | | 32. SEPARATE PLANS AND PERMITS REQUIRED FOR APARTMENT | | | CONSTRUCTION. | | | 33. PLEASE DESCRIBE WHAT ACTIVITIES WILL OCCUR ON THE | | | MEZZANINE AND AMENITY LEVEL. | | | 34. A KNOX-BOX WILL BE REQUIRED FOR THE PROJECT. | | | 35. PLEASE PROVIDE PRESSURIZATION INFORMATION FOR THE | | | STAIRS AND ELEVATOR SHAFTS. | | | 36. PLEASE PROVIDE DETAILS ON FUEL USE, STORAGE, AND | | | HANDLING FOR THE GENERATOR. | | | 37. PLEASE DESCRIBE FIRE SEPARATION FOR THE MECHANICAL, | | | MAINTENANCE, AND LOADING DOCK AREA. | | | 38. ELEVATOR WARNING SIGNS WILL BE REQUIRED AT ALL | | | ELEVATOR OPENINGS. | | | 39. ANY CANOPY THAT IS CONSTRUCTED OF COMBUSTIBLE | | | MATERIALS OR IS ABOVE ANY STORAGE SHALL BE FIRE | | | SPRINKLER PROTECTED. | | | 40. THE PROPOSED 8? FIRE MAIN APPEARS TO BE A DEAD-END | | | MAIN. THIS MAIN SHOULD BE COMPLETELY LOOPED. | | | 41. KNOX-BOX LOCKING CAPS WILL BE REQUIRED FOR THE FIRE | | | DEPARTMENT CONNECTIONS. (FDC) | | | 42. PLEASE PROVIDE DETAILS ON ALL INTERIOR FINISH | | | CLASSIFICATIONS FOR WALLS AND CEILINGS. | | | 43. SEPARATE PLANS AND PERMITS REQUIRED FOR THE FIRE | | | SPRINKLER AND FIRE ALARM SYSTEMS. | | | 44. PLEASE PROVIDE DETAILS ON GARAGE EXHAUST SYSTEM. | | | 45. MORE INFORMATION NEEDED ON THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE | | | COOLING TOWER DISPLAYED ON PAGE A-8. | | | 46. PLEASE PROVIDE STAIR ELEVATIONS. | | | 47. PLEASE INDICATE HOW FIRE RESCUE COMMUNICATIONS WILL | | | BE ACHIEVED IN THIS HIGH-RISE RESIDENTIAL BUILDING. IS | | | A BIDIRECTIONAL AMPLIFICATION DEVICE PLANNED TO BE | | | USED. | | | 48. THE VEHICLES DISPLAYED ON AUTO-TURN EXHIBIT ARE NOT | | | REPRESENTATIVE OF THE LARGEST VEHICLES FIRE RESCUE WILL | | | USED TO RESPOND TO THIS LOCATION. | | | 49. PLEASE PROVIDE OCCUPANT LOADS FOR ALL FLOORS AND | | | ALL LOCATIONS. | | | 50. PLEASE DISPLAY LOCATIONS WHERE ?NO EXIT? SIGNS WILL | | | NEED TO BE PLACED TO AVOID CONFUSION. | | | 51. ALL ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT AND DEVICES TO COMPLY WITH | | | NFPA 70, THE NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE. | | | 52. ALL LIGHTNING PROTECTION TO COMPLY WITH NFPA 780. | | | 53. PROPER CLEARANCES ARE TO BE PROVIDED TO FIRE | | | HYDRANTS. | | | | | | DENIED | | | | | | MICHAEL E. CARSILLO, ASSISTANT FIRE CHIEF | | | WEST PALM BEACH FIRE RESCUE | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
N |
Date |
04-30-2013 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
ddaniels |
Date |
04-30-2013 |
Time |
12:02 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
ddaniels |
Date |
04-30-2013 |
Time |
12:01 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
L |
LANDSCAPING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
N |
Date |
02-25-2014 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jroach |
Date |
02-25-2014 |
Time |
09:33 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jroach |
Date |
02-25-2014 |
Time |
09:33 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2014-02-25 09:33:57 | ALL LANDSCAPE COMMENT CAN BE FOUND WITHIN THE ZONING | | | REVIEW. | | | | | | QUESTIONS/COMMENTS, CONTACT JOHN ROACH, PRINCIPAL | | | PLANNER, AT (561) 822-1448. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
PARK |
PARKING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
01-10-2014 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jroach |
Date |
01-10-2014 |
Time |
09:52 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jroach |
Date |
01-10-2014 |
Time |
09:52 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2014-02-25 09:54:26 | PURSUANT TO AN EMAIL FROM SEAN SAMUELS, DATED 1/10/14, | | | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS WERE MADE: | | | | | | 1) LOADING ZONE NEED TO PROVIDE SPECIFICATION PER CITY | | | OF WPB ZLDR | | | 2) PROVIDE A ADA VAN ACCESSIBLE SIGN | | | 3) ARE STACKER PARKING LIFT OPERATED. WHAT THE HEIGHT | | | 4) PLEASE DOUBLE CHECK COUNT VS ACTUAL SPACES | | | 5) NO ADA SPACE WAS ON THE FIRST SPACE. | | | 6) CONCERN OF MIXING ANGLE PARKING WITH 90 DEGREE | | | PARKING. | | | | | | SEAN SAMUELS CCP | | | PARKING FACILITY SUPERVISOR | | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | 500 BANYAN BLVD | | | WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33401 | | | PHONE: 561/822-1507 | | | CELL 561/644-7385 | | | | | | IT WAS CONFIRMED BY JOHN ROACH, PRINCIPAL PLANNER, THAT | | | THE ABOVE COMMENTS HAD BEEN ADDRESSED OR OTHERWISE | | | SATISFIED THROUGH CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL. | | | | | | QUESTIONS/COMMENTS, CONTACT JOHN ROACH PRINCIPAL | | | PLANNER, AT (561) 822-1448. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
PARK |
PARKING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
05-31-2013 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jroach |
Date |
05-31-2013 |
Time |
09:32 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jroach |
Date |
05-31-2013 |
Time |
09:32 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2014-02-25 09:32:57 | NO COMMENTS WERE ISSUED BY THIS PLAN REVIEWER. | | | | | | QUESTIONS/COMMENTS, CONTACT JOHN ROACH, PRINCIPAL | | | PLANNER, AT (561) 822-1448. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
POLICE |
POLICE |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
01-10-2014 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jroach |
Date |
01-10-2014 |
Time |
09:54 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jroach |
Date |
01-10-2014 |
Time |
09:54 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2014-02-25 09:55:26 | NO ADDITIONAL COMMENTS MADE. | | | | | | QUESTIONS/COMMENTS, CONTACT JOHN ROACH, PRINCIPAL | | | PLANNER, AT (561) 822-1448. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
POLICE |
POLICE |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
07-02-2013 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jroach |
Date |
07-02-2013 |
Time |
09:24 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jroach |
Date |
07-02-2013 |
Time |
09:24 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2014-02-25 09:25:18 | ALL COMMENTS WERE ADDRESSED OR OTHERWISE SATISFIED AS | | | CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL. | | | | | | QUESTIONS/COMMENTS, CONTACT JOHN ROACH, PRINCIPAL | | | PLANNER, AT (561) 822-1448. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
POLICE |
POLICE |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
05-30-2013 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
05-30-2013 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
|
Date |
05-30-2013 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2013-05-30 13:57:34 | COMMENTS ARE THE SAME, I SEE THAT THE BIKE IMPOUND IS | | | ENCLOSED, BUT IS THERE ACCESS CONTROL, CCTV? | | | | | | ROOF TOP ACCESS CONTROL WILL BE NEEDED | | | LOADING AREA WILL NEED ACCESS CONTROL, LIGHTING AND | | | CCTV | | | BIKE STORAGE: ACCESS CONTROL? SHOULD BE CCTV | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | CONDITIONS FOR APPROVAL | | | PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF THE FIRST BUILDING PERMIT, THE | | | APPLICANT SHALL PREPARE A CONSTRUCTION SITE SECURITY | | | AND MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR APPROVAL BY THE CITY OF WEST | | | PALM BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT CPTED OFFICIAL. | | | A. AFTER SITE CLEARING AND PLACEMENT OF CONSTRUCTION | | | TRAILERS, THE DEVELOPER/PROJECT MANAGER SHALL INSTITUTE | | | SECURITY MEASURES TO REDUCE OR ELIMINATE OPPORTUNITIES | | | FOR THEFT. THE MANAGEMENT PLAN SHALL INCLUDE, BUT NOT | | | BE LIMITED TO, TEMPORARY LIGHTING, SECURITY PERSONNEL, | | | VEHICLE BARRIERS, CONSTRUCTION/VISITOR PASS, | | | REDUCE/MINIMIZE ENTRY/EXIT POINTS, ENCOURAGE | | | SUBCONTRACTORS TO SECURE MACHINERY, TOOLS AT END OF | | | WORK DAY, FENCING WITH SCREENING AND OR ANY OTHER | | | MEASURE DEEMED APPROPRIATE TO PROVIDE A SAFE AND SECURE | | | WORKING ENVIRONMENT. | | | B. THE SECURITY MANAGEMENT PLAN SHALL BE MAINTAINED | | | THROUGHOUT THE CONSTRUCTION PHASE OF THE PROJECT. | | | NON-COMPLIANCE WITH THE APPROVED PLAN SHALL RESULT IN A | | | STOP-WORK ORDER FOR THE ENTIRE PLANNED UNIT | | | DEVELOPMENT. | | | C. PROPERTY SHALL BE POST ?NO TRESPASSING? SIGNS EVERY | | | 500 FEET AROUND THE PERIMETER OF THE SITE. | | | | | | | | | IN LOOKING AT THE PROPOSED PLANS: | | | | | | ROOF TOP ACCESS CONTROL WILL BE NEEDED | | | LOADING AREA WILL NEED ACCESS CONTROL, LIGHTING AND | | | CCTV | | | BIKE STORAGE: IS IT ENCLOSED? ACCESS CONTROL? SHOULD BE | | | CCTV | | | PARKING GARAGE | | | DESIGN | | | A. PARKING GARAGE FIRST LEVEL SHALL HAVE RESTRICTED | | | ACCESS FROM EXTERIOR COMMON GROUND AREA. | | | B. GROUND LEVEL PEDESTRIAN EXITS THAT OPEN INTO | | | NON-SECURE AREAS SHALL BE EMERGENCY EXITS ONLY AND | | | FITTED WITH PANIC BAR HARDWARE. | | | C. CENTER OF THE GARAGE SHALL HAVE CONNECTIVITY TO ALL | | | CROSSWALKS. | | | D. DIRECTIONAL ARROWS AND SIGNAGE INDICATING EXITS, | | | STAIRS, AND ELEVATORS SHALL BE PROVIDED. | | | E. PEDESTRIAN ENTRANCES SHALL BE ADJACENT TO VEHICLE | | | ENTRANCES, OPEN AND FREE OF HIDDEN SPACES AND WIRED FOR | | | CCTV SURVEILLANCE. | | | F. PUBLIC AND PRIVATE PARKING SPACES SHALL BE | | | DESIGNATED. | | | G. WALLS AND SUPPORT STRUCTURES SHALL ALL BE | | | CONSTRUCTED WITH OPEN SIDES TO AVOID CREATION OF HIDDEN | | | SPACES. | | | H. ACCESS POINTS TO THE FACILITY SHALL BE MINIMIZED. | | | I. CEILINGS AND SOLID WALLS IN THE PARKING GARAGE SHALL | | | BE OF REFLECTIVE MATERIAL TO INCREASE BRIGHTNESS WITHIN | | | THE FACILITY. | | | J. CONVEX MIRRORS SHALL BE INSTALLED IN STAIRWELL AND | | | ELEVATOR AREAS. | | | K. UTILIZE SECURITY VISION DOORS AT ENTRANCE TO | | | STAIRWELLS ON EACH FLOOR. | | | | | | ELEVATORS | | | A. ELEVATORS SHALL BE EQUIPPED WITH EMERGENCY TWO-WAY | | | COMMUNICATION. | | | B. ELEVATORS SHALL HAVE NO STOP BUTTON. | | | C. ELEVATORS SHALL BE LOCATED CLOSE TO THE MAIN | | | ENTRANCE, CONSTRUCTED TO AVOID HIDDEN SPACES AND | | | UTILIZE CCTV SURVEILLANCE. | | | STAIRWELLS | | | A. STAIRWELLS SHOULD BE WELL LIT OR HAVE AN OPEN | | | DESIGN. | | | LIGHTING | | | A. THE EXTERIOR OF THE PARKING GARAGE SHALL BE WELL LIT | | | ON ALL SIDES. | | | B. CEILINGS AND SOLID WALLS IN THE PARKING GARAGE SHALL | | | BE OF REFLECTIVE MATERIAL TO INCREASE REFLECTIVENESS OF | | | THE LIGHTING LUMINARIES. | | | C. ALL LIGHTING SHALL BE VANDALISM RESISTANT. | | | D. LIGHTING SHOULD BE PLACED WHERE USERS REQUIRE | | | LIGHTS: OVER VEHICLES, STAIRWELLS, | | | CCTV CAMERAS. | | | E. LIGHTING FIXTURES SHOULD BE EXTENDED PAST THE BEAMS | | | IN THE GARAGE CEILING | | | F. ALL LIGHTING SHALL ADHERE TO ILLUMINATING | | | ENGINEERING SOCIETY OF NORTH AMERICA (IESNA) STANDARDS | | | FOR PARKING GARAGES UTILIZING LED LIGHTING. IF | | | NECESSARY, PLEASE CONTACT THEM AT (212) 248-5000 FOR | | | FURTHER INFORMATION. ENHANCED LIGHTING SHALL BE USED AT | | | ENTRANCE/EXITS TO REDUCE TRANSITION (FROM DAYLIGHT) | | | WHEN ENTERING STRUCTURE. | | | | | | CAMERAS | | | A. CCTV CAMERAS LOCATED ON EACH FLOOR OF THE PARKING | | | GARAGE (AS WELL AS MONITORING ACCESS POINTS, ATTENDANT | | | BOOTH, STAIRWELLS, LOBBY, ETC.). | | | B. THE MONITORING AND CONTROL OF THE CCTV CAMERAS SHALL | | | BE AT A CENTRAL MONITORING OFFICE OR BOOTH. | | | C. A HIGH-RESOLUTION COLOR DIGITAL VIDEO CAMERA SYSTEM | | | WITH MONITORING AND PHOTO PROCESSING PRINTOUT | | | CAPABILITIES SHALL BE USED. | | | LANDSCAPING | | | A. VEGETATION, PLANT GROWTH AND LANDSCAPING AROUND THE | | | PERIMETER OF THE PARKING GARAGE SHALL BE MINIMIZED AT | | | HEIGHT OF NO MORE THAN 3 FEET AND TREE CANOPIES PRUNED | | | ABOVE 8 FT FOR MATURE TREES. CLEAR ZONE FOR VISIBILITY | | | BETWEEN 3 AND 8 FEET. | | | | | | APARTMENT SECURITY | | | | | | DOORS | | | A. DOOR LEADING INTO A RESIDENTIAL UNIT, SHALL BE SOLID | | | CORE. | | | B. EXTERIOR DOORS SHALL BE EQUIPPED WITH A 180-DEGREE | | | PEEPHOLE AND NON-REMOVABLE SECURITY HINGES. | | | LOCKS | | | A. ALL DOORS SHALL BE EQUIPPED WITH SINGLE CYLINDER | | | DEAD BOLT LOCK WITH A MINIMUM THROW OF ONE INCH AND AN | | | EMBEDMENT OF NOT LESS 5/8 INCH INTO THE HOLDING DEVICE. | | | PICK PLATES SHOULD ALSO BE PLACED ALL EXTERIOR DOORS. | | | MISCELLANEOUS | | | A. STAIRWAYS (TO INCLUDE RISERS/BANISTERS) AND | | | BALCONIES SHALL PROVIDE OPEN VIEWS. | | | B. SALES CENTER, CLUBHOUSE AND RECREATIONAL FACILITIES | | | SHALL BE PRE-WIRED TO ALARM CENTER. | | | C. RECREATION BUILDING AND POOL ACCESS SHALL BE | | | RESTRICTED, BY KEY, KEY FOB, OR CARD ACCESS | | | D. BICYCLE SPACES SHALL BE LOCATED IN CLOSE PROXIMITY | | | TO THE FRONT OF BUILDINGS AND NOT IN PARKING LOTS. | | | E. MAILBOX LOCATIONS SHALL BE IN A WELL LIT, HIGH | | | TRAFFIC LOCATION. | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
POLICE |
POLICE |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
05-06-2013 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
05-06-2013 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
ktucker |
Date |
05-06-2013 |
Time |
14:37 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2013-05-06 14:37:19 | CONDITIONS FOR APPROVAL | | | PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF THE FIRST BUILDING PERMIT, THE | | | APPLICANT SHALL PREPARE A CONSTRUCTION SITE SECURITY | | | AND MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR APPROVAL BY THE CITY OF WEST | | | PALM BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT CPTED OFFICIAL. | | | A. AFTER SITE CLEARING AND PLACEMENT OF CONSTRUCTION | | | TRAILERS, THE DEVELOPER/PROJECT MANAGER SHALL INSTITUTE | | | SECURITY MEASURES TO REDUCE OR ELIMINATE OPPORTUNITIES | | | FOR THEFT. THE MANAGEMENT PLAN SHALL INCLUDE, BUT NOT | | | BE LIMITED TO, TEMPORARY LIGHTING, SECURITY PERSONNEL, | | | VEHICLE BARRIERS, CONSTRUCTION/VISITOR PASS, | | | REDUCE/MINIMIZE ENTRY/EXIT POINTS, ENCOURAGE | | | SUBCONTRACTORS TO SECURE MACHINERY, TOOLS AT END OF | | | WORK DAY, FENCING WITH SCREENING AND OR ANY OTHER | | | MEASURE DEEMED APPROPRIATE TO PROVIDE A SAFE AND SECURE | | | WORKING ENVIRONMENT. | | | B. THE SECURITY MANAGEMENT PLAN SHALL BE MAINTAINED | | | THROUGHOUT THE CONSTRUCTION PHASE OF THE PROJECT. | | | NON-COMPLIANCE WITH THE APPROVED PLAN SHALL RESULT IN A | | | STOP-WORK ORDER FOR THE ENTIRE PLANNED UNIT | | | DEVELOPMENT. | | | C. PROPERTY SHALL BE POST ?NO TRESPASSING? SIGNS EVERY | | | 500 FEET AROUND THE PERIMETER OF THE SITE. | | | | | | | | | IN LOOKING AT THE PROPOSED PLANS: | | | | | | ROOF TOP ACCESS CONTROL WILL BE NEEDED | | | LOADING AREA WILL NEED ACCESS CONTROL, LIGHTING AND | | | CCTV | | | BIKE STORAGE: IS IT ENCLOSED? ACCESS CONTROL? SHOULD BE | | | CCTV | | | PARKING GARAGE | | | DESIGN | | | A. PARKING GARAGE FIRST LEVEL SHALL HAVE RESTRICTED | | | ACCESS FROM EXTERIOR COMMON GROUND AREA. | | | B. GROUND LEVEL PEDESTRIAN EXITS THAT OPEN INTO | | | NON-SECURE AREAS SHALL BE EMERGENCY EXITS ONLY AND | | | FITTED WITH PANIC BAR HARDWARE. | | | C. CENTER OF THE GARAGE SHALL HAVE CONNECTIVITY TO ALL | | | CROSSWALKS. | | | D. DIRECTIONAL ARROWS AND SIGNAGE INDICATING EXITS, | | | STAIRS, AND ELEVATORS SHALL BE PROVIDED. | | | E. PEDESTRIAN ENTRANCES SHALL BE ADJACENT TO VEHICLE | | | ENTRANCES, OPEN AND FREE OF HIDDEN SPACES AND WIRED FOR | | | CCTV SURVEILLANCE. | | | F. PUBLIC AND PRIVATE PARKING SPACES SHALL BE | | | DESIGNATED. | | | G. WALLS AND SUPPORT STRUCTURES SHALL ALL BE | | | CONSTRUCTED WITH OPEN SIDES TO AVOID CREATION OF HIDDEN | | | SPACES. | | | H. ACCESS POINTS TO THE FACILITY SHALL BE MINIMIZED. | | | I. CEILINGS AND SOLID WALLS IN THE PARKING GARAGE SHALL | | | BE OF REFLECTIVE MATERIAL TO INCREASE BRIGHTNESS WITHIN | | | THE FACILITY. | | | J. CONVEX MIRRORS SHALL BE INSTALLED IN STAIRWELL AND | | | ELEVATOR AREAS. | | | K. UTILIZE SECURITY VISION DOORS AT ENTRANCE TO | | | STAIRWELLS ON EACH FLOOR. | | | | | | ELEVATORS | | | A. ELEVATORS SHALL BE EQUIPPED WITH EMERGENCY TWO-WAY | | | COMMUNICATION. | | | B. ELEVATORS SHALL HAVE NO STOP BUTTON. | | | C. ELEVATORS SHALL BE LOCATED CLOSE TO THE MAIN | | | ENTRANCE, CONSTRUCTED TO AVOID HIDDEN SPACES AND | | | UTILIZE CCTV SURVEILLANCE. | | | STAIRWELLS | | | A. STAIRWELLS SHOULD BE WELL LIT OR HAVE AN OPEN | | | DESIGN. | | | LIGHTING | | | A. THE EXTERIOR OF THE PARKING GARAGE SHALL BE WELL LIT | | | ON ALL SIDES. | | | B. CEILINGS AND SOLID WALLS IN THE PARKING GARAGE SHALL | | | BE OF REFLECTIVE MATERIAL TO INCREASE REFLECTIVENESS OF | | | THE LIGHTING LUMINARIES. | | | C. ALL LIGHTING SHALL BE VANDALISM RESISTANT. | | | D. LIGHTING SHOULD BE PLACED WHERE USERS REQUIRE | | | LIGHTS: OVER VEHICLES, STAIRWELLS, | | | CCTV CAMERAS. | | | E. LIGHTING FIXTURES SHOULD BE EXTENDED PAST THE BEAMS | | | IN THE GARAGE CEILING | | | F. ALL LIGHTING SHALL ADHERE TO ILLUMINATING | | | ENGINEERING SOCIETY OF NORTH AMERICA (IESNA) STANDARDS | | | FOR PARKING GARAGES UTILIZING LED LIGHTING. IF | | | NECESSARY, PLEASE CONTACT THEM AT (212) 248-5000 FOR | | | FURTHER INFORMATION. ENHANCED LIGHTING SHALL BE USED AT | | | ENTRANCE/EXITS TO REDUCE TRANSITION (FROM DAYLIGHT) | | | WHEN ENTERING STRUCTURE. | | | | | | CAMERAS | | | A. CCTV CAMERAS LOCATED ON EACH FLOOR OF THE PARKING | | | GARAGE (AS WELL AS MONITORING ACCESS POINTS, ATTENDANT | | | BOOTH, STAIRWELLS, LOBBY, ETC.). | | | B. THE MONITORING AND CONTROL OF THE CCTV CAMERAS SHALL | | | BE AT A CENTRAL MONITORING OFFICE OR BOOTH. | | | C. A HIGH-RESOLUTION COLOR DIGITAL VIDEO CAMERA SYSTEM | | | WITH MONITORING AND PHOTO PROCESSING PRINTOUT | | | CAPABILITIES SHALL BE USED. | | | LANDSCAPING | | | A. VEGETATION, PLANT GROWTH AND LANDSCAPING AROUND THE | | | PERIMETER OF THE PARKING GARAGE SHALL BE MINIMIZED AT | | | HEIGHT OF NO MORE THAN 3 FEET AND TREE CANOPIES PRUNED | | | ABOVE 8 FT FOR MATURE TREES. CLEAR ZONE FOR VISIBILITY | | | BETWEEN 3 AND 8 FEET. | | | | | | APARTMENT SECURITY | | | | | | DOORS | | | A. DOOR LEADING INTO A RESIDENTIAL UNIT, SHALL BE SOLID | | | CORE. | | | B. EXTERIOR DOORS SHALL BE EQUIPPED WITH A 180-DEGREE | | | PEEPHOLE AND NON-REMOVABLE SECURITY HINGES. | | | LOCKS | | | A. ALL DOORS SHALL BE EQUIPPED WITH SINGLE CYLINDER | | | DEAD BOLT LOCK WITH A MINIMUM THROW OF ONE INCH AND AN | | | EMBEDMENT OF NOT LESS 5/8 INCH INTO THE HOLDING DEVICE. | | | PICK PLATES SHOULD ALSO BE PLACED ALL EXTERIOR DOORS. | | | MISCELLANEOUS | | | A. STAIRWAYS (TO INCLUDE RISERS/BANISTERS) AND | | | BALCONIES SHALL PROVIDE OPEN VIEWS. | | | B. SALES CENTER, CLUBHOUSE AND RECREATIONAL FACILITIES | | | SHALL BE PRE-WIRED TO ALARM CENTER. | | | C. RECREATION BUILDING AND POOL ACCESS SHALL BE | | | RESTRICTED, BY KEY, KEY FOB, OR CARD ACCESS | | | D. BICYCLE SPACES SHALL BE LOCATED IN CLOSE PROXIMITY | | | TO THE FRONT OF BUILDINGS AND NOT IN PARKING LOTS. | | | E. MAILBOX LOCATIONS SHALL BE IN A WELL LIT, HIGH | | | TRAFFIC LOCATION. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
PW |
PUBLIC WORKS |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
01-10-2014 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jroach |
Date |
01-10-2014 |
Time |
09:55 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jroach |
Date |
01-10-2014 |
Time |
09:55 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2014-02-25 09:55:57 | NO ADDITIONAL COMMENTS MADE. | | | | | | QUESTIONS/COMMENTS, CONTACT JOHN ROACH, PRINCIPAL | | | PLANNER, AT (561) 822-1448. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
PW |
PUBLIC WORKS |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
05-31-2013 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jroach |
Date |
05-31-2013 |
Time |
09:25 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jroach |
Date |
05-31-2013 |
Time |
09:25 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2014-02-25 09:26:04 | NO COMMENTS WERE EVER ISSUED BY THIS REVIEWER. | | | | | | QUESTIONS/COMMENTS, PLEASE CONTACT JOHN ROACH, | | | PRINCIPAL PLANNER, AT (561) 822-1448. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
STORM |
STORMWATER |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
01-10-2014 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jroach |
Date |
01-10-2014 |
Time |
09:56 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jroach |
Date |
01-10-2014 |
Time |
09:56 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2014-02-25 09:56:26 | NO ADDITIONAL COMMENTS MADE. | | | | | | QUESTIONS/COMMENTS, CONTACT JOHN ROACH, PRINCIPAL | | | PLANNER, AT (561) 822-1448. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
STORM |
STORMWATER |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
05-31-2013 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jroach |
Date |
05-31-2013 |
Time |
09:24 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jroach |
Date |
05-31-2013 |
Time |
09:23 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2014-02-25 09:24:11 | PURSUANT TO EMAIL SENT ON MAY 24, 2013, ALL COMMENTS | | | WERE TO BE INSERTED IN COMMUNITYPLUS PRIOR TO MAY 31, | | | 2013. IF NOT COMMENTS WERE INSERTED BY THAT TIME, IT | | | WAS ASSUMMED THAT ALL COMMENTS HAD BEEN ADDRESSED. NO | | | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS WERE ISSUED BY THIS REVIEW PRIOR TO | | | THAT TIME; THEREFORE, THE ASSUMPTION WAS MADE THAT ALL | | | COMMENTS HAD BEEN ADDRESSED AND/OR WERE ADDRESSED | | | THROUGH CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL. | | | | | | QUESTIONS/COMMENTS, PLEASE CONTACT JOHN ROACH, | | | PRINCIPAL PLANNER, AT (561) 822-1448. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
STORM |
STORMWATER |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
05-08-2013 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
tward |
Date |
05-08-2013 |
Time |
11:32 |
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
tward |
Date |
05-08-2013 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2013-05-08 11:44:30 | 1. PROVIDE COPY OF SFWMD ERP OR NO-NOTICE PERMIT PRIOR | | | TO START OF CONSTRUCTION. | | | 2. PROVIDE COPY OF NPDES NOI PERMIT PRIOR TO START OF | | | CONSTRUCTION. | | | 3. PROVIDE DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS, INCLUDING LAND USE | | | BREAKDOWN (PERVIOUS, IMPERVIOUS, BUILDING, ETC), WATER | | | QUALITY TREATMENT, ETC., WITH THE CITY'S ENGINEERING | | | PERMIT APPLICATION. | | | 4. PROVIDE SWPPP PLAN WITH THE CITY'S ENGINEERING | | | PERMIT APPLICATION. | | | 5. INDICATE VERTICAL DATUM ON THE PLANS (SHOULD BE NGVD | | | 1929). | | | 6. RE-ROUTING OF OUTFALL PIPING OF FLAGLER DRIVE | | | DRAINAGE TO BE DESIGNED TO HAVE NO ADVERSE IMPACT TO | | | THE HYDRAULIC GRADE LINE OF THE FLAGLER DRIVE DRAINAGE | | | SYSTEM. | | | 7. PROVIDE AN EASEMENT IN FAVOR OF THE CITY OVER THE | | | RE-DIRECTED DRAINAGE SYSTEM CONVEYING RUNOFF FROM | | | FLAGLER DRIVE TO THE OUTFALL. | | | 8. SUGGEST PLUG AND GROUT FILL THE OUTFALL PIPE | | | PROPOSED TO BE ABANDONED AT SEAWALL. | | | | | | TRACY L. WARD, P.E. | | | SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER | | | ENGINEERING AND PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT | | | (561) 494-1120 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
SURVEY |
SURVEYING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
01-10-2014 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jroach |
Date |
01-10-2014 |
Time |
09:56 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jroach |
Date |
01-10-2014 |
Time |
09:56 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2014-02-25 09:57:00 | NO ADDITIONAL COMMENTS MADE. | | | | | | QUESTIONS/COMMENTS, CONTACT JOHN ROACH, PRINCIPAL | | | PLANNER, AT (561) 822-1448. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
SURVEY |
SURVEYING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
05-31-2013 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
vnoel |
Date |
05-31-2013 |
Time |
10:56 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
vnoel |
Date |
05-31-2013 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2013-05-31 10:56:05 | PASSED WITH CONDITIONS: | | | 1. PLAT PRIOR TO FINAL APPROVAL. | | | 2. ANY REQUIRED EASEMENTS BY PLAT OR SEPARATE DOCUMENT. | | | 3. FINAL APPROVAL OF ENGINEERING DESIGN WILL BE BASED | | | ON SEPARATE | | | SUBMITTAL AND REVIEW TO ENGINEERING SERVICES. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
SURVEY |
SURVEYING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
05-08-2013 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
05-08-2013 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
|
| Received By |
|
Date |
05-08-2013 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2013-05-08 07:25:53 | 1. PROPERTY WILL NEED TO BE PLATTED AS CONDITION OF | | | FINAL SITE PLAN APPROVAL. | | | 2. EASEMENTS WILL BE REQUIRED FOR EXISTING AND/OR | | | PROPOSED OUTFALL. | | | 3. PROPOSED LANDSCAPING SHOULD NOT CONFLICT WITH | | | EXISTING OR PROPOSED UTILITIES. | | | 4. SEPARATE SUBMITTAL WILL NEED TO BE MADE FOR | | | SITE/CIVIL AND PLAT TO ENGINEERING SERVICES. | | | 5. METER VAULT WILL NEED TO BE MOVED OUT OF R/W. THE | | | PROPOSED 8" GRAVITY SANITARY SEWER WILL BE PRIVATE. | | | 6. SANITATION WILL REVIEW FOR ACCESS TO PROPOSED | | | LOADING. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
TRAFFIC |
TRAFFIC ENGINEERING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
01-09-2014 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jroach |
Date |
01-09-2014 |
Time |
09:45 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jroach |
Date |
01-09-2014 |
Time |
09:45 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2014-02-25 09:47:36 | PURSUANT TO EMAIL FROM BRIAN COLLINS, DATED 1/9/14, THE | | | FOLLOWING COMMENTS NEED TO BE ADDRESSED AS CONDITIONS | | | OF APPROVAL: | | | | | | 1) APPLICANT NEEDS TO SUBMIT A SIGNING AND STRIPING | | | PLAN FOR FLAGLER DRIVE IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE PROPOSED | | | ACCESS AND EGRESS POINTS. | | | | | | THE FOLLOWING COMMENT WAS ALSO MADE, BUT IT WAS | | | DETERMINED THAT THE PARKING AT THE ENTRY WAS VALET | | | STORAGE ONLY AND THEREFORE HAD NO OPPOSITION: | | | | | | 1) THE FOUR 90 DEGREE PARKING SPACES AT THE ENTRANCE | | | ARE ANGLED TO MAKE ENTRY DIFFICULT FROM THE ENTRY | | | DRIVE. VEHICLES BACKING OUT WOULD BE FACING THE | | | OPPOSING ONE-WAY DIRECTION OF TRAFFIC. | | | | | | BRIAN A. COLLINS, P.E. | | | CITY TRAFFIC ENGINEER | | | TRANSPORTATION DIVISION | | | ENGINEERING AND PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT | | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | | | | TEL:(561) 494 - 1040 | | | FAX:(561) 494 - 1069 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
TRAFFIC |
TRAFFIC ENGINEERING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
05-31-2013 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jroach |
Date |
05-31-2013 |
Time |
09:19 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jroach |
Date |
05-31-2013 |
Time |
09:19 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2014-02-25 09:22:08 | PURSUANT TO EMAIL SENT ON MAY 24, 2013, ALL COMMENTS | | | WERE TO BE INSERTED IN COMMUNITYPLUS PRIOR TO MAY 31, | | | 2013. IF NOT COMMENTS WERE INSERTED BY THAT TIME, IT | | | WAS ASSUMMED THAT ALL COMMENTS HAD BEEN ADDRESSED. NO | | | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS WERE ISSUED BY THIS REVIEW PRIOR TO | | | THAT TIME; THEREFORE, THE ASSUMPTION WAS MADE THAT ALL | | | COMMENTS HAD BEEN ADDRESSED AND/OR WERE ADDRESSED | | | THROUGH CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL. | | | | | | QUESTIONS/COMMENTS, PLEASE CONTACT JOHN ROACH, | | | PRINCIPAL PLANNER, AT (561) 822-1448. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
TRAFFIC |
TRAFFIC ENGINEERING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
05-07-2013 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
05-07-2013 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
bcollins |
Date |
05-07-2013 |
Time |
16:57 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2013-05-07 16:54:01 | A TRAFFIC IMPACT SUDY SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO DETERMINE | | | THE IMPACTS ON ADJACENT ROADWAYS AND INTERSECTIONS. | | | THIS STUDY SHALL EVALUATE THE INTERSECTIONS OF OLIVE | | | WITH BELVEDERE, LAKEVIEW/OKEECHOBEE, AND ALL SITE | | | DRIVEWAYS, AND THE INTERSECTIONS OF FLAGLER WITH | | | OKEECHOBEE/LAKEVIEW AND ALL SITE DRIVEWAYS. PRIOR TO | | | INITIATING THE STUDY, THE TRAFFIC ENGINEER SHALL MEET | | | WITH STAFF TO REVIEW TRIP DISTRIBUTION AND OTHER | | | ASSUMPTIONS. THE STUDY SHALL INCLUDE THE TRAFFIC IMPACT | | | OF THE PROPOSED CHAPEL BY THE LAKE DEVELOPMENT. | | | | | | TABLE 6 IN THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TRAFFIC ANALYIS | | | SHOULD BE AMENDED TO REFLECT THAT FLAGLER DRIVE | | | /WASHINGTON ROAD IS ONLY 2 LANES SOUTH OF BARCELONA AND | | | PARKER AVENUE IS 3 LANES BETWEEN SOUTHERN BOULEVARD TO | | | HOWARD PARK. | | | | | | THE 2 FULL ACCESS DRIVEWAYS ON OLIVE AVENUE ARE ONLY | | | 100 FT. APART WHICH COULD CREATE OPERATIONAL | | | DIFFICULTIES. | | | | | | THE FORMAL SITE PLAN SHOULD SHOW ALL STOP SIGNS AND | | | STOP BARS. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
01-10-2014 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jroach |
Date |
01-10-2014 |
Time |
09:58 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jroach |
Date |
01-10-2014 |
Time |
09:57 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2014-02-25 09:59:10 | ANY OUTSTANDING COMMENTS WERE BEING ADDRESSED AS | | | CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL. | | | | | | QUESTIONS/COMMENTS, CONTACT JOHN ROACH, PRINCIPAL | | | PLANNER, AT (561) 822-1448. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
07-02-2013 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jroach |
Date |
07-02-2013 |
Time |
09:22 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jroach |
Date |
07-02-2013 |
Time |
09:22 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2014-02-25 09:23:42 | ALL PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED COMMENTS WERE ADDRESSED, OR | | | OTHERWISE SATISFIED WITH CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL. | | | | | | QUESTIONS/COMMENTS, PLEASE CONTACT JOHN ROACH, | | | PRINCIPAL PLANNER, AT (561) 822-1448. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
06-25-2013 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jroach |
Date |
06-25-2013 |
Time |
15:54 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jroach |
Date |
06-25-2013 |
Time |
15:54 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2013-06-25 16:14:47 | ZONING PLANS AND PLATS REVIEW COMMITTEE (PPRC) REVIEW | | | ___________________________________________ | | | | | | DATE OF REVIEW: 06.25.2013 | | | PROJECT NO.: Z13040028 & Z13040029 | | | CASE NO.: PB CASE #1635 & 1635A | | | ADDRESS: 1112 SOUTH FLAGLER DRIVE | | | APPLICANT/CONTACT: KERRY KILDAY, OF URBAN DESIGN KILDAY | | | STUDIOS | | | TELEPHONE NO.: 561.366.1100 | | | SCOPE OF REVIEW: FUTURE LAND USE MAP AMENDMENT AND | | | RESIDENTIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT - CONSTRUCTION OF A | | | 96-UNIT MULTIFAMILY CONDOMINIUM. | | | ___________________________________________ | | | | | | PLEASE PROVIDE A WRITTEN RESPONSE TO THE FOLLOWING | | | REVIEW COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1. PLEASE PROVIDE A COPY OF A TRAFFIC CONCURRENCY | | | REVIEW LETTER FROM PALM BEACH COUNTY. WHILE THE | | | PROPOSED PROJECT IS EXEMPT FROM TRAFFIC CONCURRENCY | | | (EASTWARD HO!), A REVIEW BY PALM BEACH COUNTY IS | | | REQUIRED. | | | | | | 2. NOTATION, DETAILS, ETC. SHALL BE PROVIDED REGARDING | | | THE LANDSCAPE SCREEN TO BE PLACED ON THE SOUTH WALL OF | | | THE PARKING STRUCTURE. | | | | | | 3. THE ELEVATIONS DO NOT APPEAR TO MATCH WHAT IS | | | PROVIDED ON THE SITE/LANDSCAPE PLANS. THE ELEVATIONS | | | SHOW TERRACING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE BUILDING, | | | AS WELL AS ALONG THE EAST ELEVATION, WHICH DOES NOT | | | APPEAR TO EXIST ON THE SITE AND LANDSCAPE PLANS. | | | ADDITIONALLY, IF LANDSCAPING IS GOING TO BE SHOWN ON | | | THE ELEVATIONS, PLEASE JUST ENSURE THAT WHAT IS SHOWN | | | IS AN ACCURATE REPRESENTATION OF WHAT IS PROPOSED ON | | | THE LANDSCAPE PLANS THEMSELVES. | | | | | | 4. PLEASE NOTE THAT THE 3D RENDERINGS PROVIDED DO NOT | | | MATCH THE SITE/LANDSCAPE PLANS PROPOSED. PLEASE ENSURE | | | THAT THE RENDERINGS ACCURATELY DEPICT THE PROPOSED | | | DEVELOPMENT PRIOR TO PUBLIC HEARINGS. | | | | | | 5. THE HEIGHT OF THE PERMANENT MONUMENT SIGN SHALL NOT | | | EXCEED FOUR (4) FEET IN HEIGHT. | | | | | | 6. PLEASE MAKE SURE THAT STRUCTURAL COLUMNS DO NOT | | | ENCROACH INTO PARKING SPACES OR DRIVE AISLES. AT THE | | | FAR NORTH END OF THE LOWER LEVEL PARKING DECK, THERE | | | APPEARS TO BE A COLUMN THAT ENCROACHES INTO THE RAMP, | | | SPECIFICALLY TRAFFIC HEADING IN THE "DOWN" DIRECTION. | | | | | | 7. THE TWO (2) 2-CAR GARAGES LOCATED ON THE UPPER LEVEL | | | PARKING DECK DO NOT APPEAR TO HAVE 24 FEET OF BACK-OUT | | | BETWEEN THE GARAGE DOOR AND THE STRUCTURAL COLUMN. | | | | | | THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ARE NOT CODE-RELATED, HOWEVER | | | ARE PROVIDED BY STAFF FOR CONSIDERATION: | | | | | | A. THERE SHOULD BE A PEDESTRIAN CONNECTION AT THE NORTH | | | END OF THE SITE FROM THE PUBLIC SIDEWALK TO THE LOBBY | | | LEVEL SO THAT PEDESTRIANS COMING FROM THE NORTH DO NOT | | | HAVE TO WALK UP THE DRIVEWAY, OR GO ALL THE WAY TO THE | | | SOUTH END OF THE PROPERTY. | | | | | | B. THE TENANT STORAGE DOORS ARE SHOWN SWINGING OUT INTO | | | THE PARKING SPACE...THIS WILL CONFLICT WITH ANY CAR | | | THAT IS PARKED THERE. TENANTS WILL BE REQUIRED TO MOVE | | | THEIR CARS IN ORDER TO ACCESS THE STORAGE AREA. | | | | | | C. MAKE SURE THAT THE SUBMITTED PLANS ALSO ADDRESS THE | | | ISSUE OF THE HEIGHT OF THE FRONT PLAZA, AS DISCUSSED | | | PREVIOUSLY. PURSUANT TO PREVIOUS DISCUSSIONS, THE | | | HEIGHT OF THE GARAGE IN THAT AREA WAS TO BE LOWERED AND | | | THE SLOPE LEADING UP TO THE WATER FEATURE WAS TO BE | | | ADJUSTED ACCORDINGLY. | | | | | | D. LANDSCAPE SCREENING, CONSISTING OF HEDGES, ETC. | | | SHOULD BE CONSIDERED AROUND THE UTILITY ELEMENTS ALONG | | | SOUTH FLAGLER DRIVE (I.E. BACKFLOW PREVENTER, ETC.) | | | ___________________________________________ | | | | | | PLEASE NOTE THE FOLLOWING WHEN RESUBMITTING: | | | | | | A) WRITTEN RESPONSES TO COMMENTS MADE BY ALL | | | DEPARTMENTS SHALL BE PROVIDED UPON RESUBMISSION. | | | | | | B) 15 SETS OF REVISED PLANS AND/OR DOCUMENTS SHALL BE | | | PROVIDED, ALONG WITH ONE (1) REDUCED COPY (11IN X | | | 17IN), AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY OF ALL PLANS. | | | | | | C) PLEASE NOTE THAT RE-SUBMITTALS MAY BE SUBJECT TO | | | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS. | | | | | | D) IF NO RESPONSE IS RECEIVED WITHIN 60 DAYS OF THE | | | ISSUANCE OF THESE COMMENTS, THE APPLICATION WILL BE | | | CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN AND ANY FURTHER ACTION WILL | | | REQUIRE SUBMISSION OF A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION. | | | | | | E) PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1) | | | RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED | | | COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE | | | APPLICANT WILL BE ACCESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE | | | WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE. | | | | | | F) IN ORDER TO BE CONSIDERED FOR THE JULY 16, 2013 | | | PLANNING BOARD AGENDA, ALL COMMENTS SHALL BE | | | SATISFACTORILY ADDRESSED. PLEASE SUBMIT ALL REVISED | | | DOCUMENTS/PLANS NO LATER THAN TUESDAY, JULY 2, 2013. | | | ___________________________________________ | | | | | | QUESTIONS/COMMENTS, PLEASE CONTACT THE FOLLOWING: | | | | | | JOHN ROACH, PRINCIPAL PLANNER | | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT - PLANNING DIVISION | | | 401 CLEMATIS STREET - P.O. BOX 3147 | | | WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33402 | | | | | | PHONE: 561.822.1448 | | | FAX: 561.822.1460 | | | | | | EMAIL: [email protected] | | | | | | WWW.WPB.ORG | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
05-08-2013 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
jroach |
Date |
05-08-2013 |
Time |
12:41 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jroach |
Date |
05-08-2013 |
Time |
12:41 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2013-05-08 12:41:18 | ZONING PLANS AND PLATS REVIEW COMMITTEE (PPRC) REVIEW | | | ___________________________________________ | | | | | | DATE OF REVIEW: 05.08.2013 | | | PROJECT NO.: Z13040028 & Z13040029 | | | CASE NO.: PB CASE #1635 & 1635A | | | ADDRESS: 1112 SOUTH FLAGLER DRIVE | | | APPLICANT/CONTACT: KERRY KILDAY, OF URBAN DESIGN KILDAY | | | STUDIOS | | | TELEPHONE NO.: 561.366.1100 | | | SCOPE OF REVIEW: FUTURE LAND USE MAP AMENDMENT AND | | | RESIDENTIAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT ? CONSTRUCTION OF A | | | 96-UNIT MULTIFAMILY CONDOMINIUM. | | | ___________________________________________ | | | | | | PLEASE PROVIDE A WRITTEN RESPONSE TO THE FOLLOWING | | | REVIEW COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1. PLEASE PROVIDE A COPY OF A TRAFFIC CONCURRENCY | | | REVIEW LETTER FROM PALM BEACH COUNTY. WHILE THE | | | PROPOSED PROJECT IS EXEMPT FROM TRAFFIC CONCURRENCY | | | (EASTWARD HO!), A REVIEW BY PALM BEACH COUNTY IS | | | REQUIRED. | | | 2. PLEASE PROVIDE AN APPROVAL OF THE LEVEL OF SERVICE | | | ANALYSIS FROM THE SCHOOL DISTRICT OF PALM BEACH COUNTY. | | | 3. PLEASE PROVIDE COPIES OF ALL UTILITY LETTERS. THE | | | FOLLOWING LETTERS HAVE NOT BEEN SUBMITTED: | | | A. AT&T | | | B. FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT | | | C. CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | 4. PLEASE CONFIRM THAT THERE ARE NO EASEMENTS ON THE | | | PROPERTY. | | | 5. WHAT IS THE STATUS OF NEIGHBORHOOD MEETINGS, ETC.? | | | HAS ANY OFFICIAL COMMUNICATION BEEN PROVIDED FROM THE | | | ADJACENT CONDOMINIUM AND NEARBY RESIDENTIAL | | | NEIGHBORHOODS? WHAT ADDITIONAL OUTREACH IS PLANNED | | | PRIOR TO THE FIRST PUBLIC HEARING. | | | 6. THE PARKING DETAIL SHALL CONFORM TO THE MINIMUM | | | REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY?S ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT | | | REGULATIONS (ZLDRS). | | | 7. PLEASE CONFIRM THAT THE MAIN ENTRANCE DOES NOT | | | CONTAIN A COVERED CANOPY EXTENDING TO THE WATER | | | FEATURE. | | | 8. THE IN-BOUND AND OUT-BOUND ENTRY DRIVES DO NOT | | | APPEAR TO LINE UP ON MANY OF THE PAGES. | | | 9. PLEASE BE SURE THE SITE PLAN SHOWS THE OUTLINE OF | | | ALL OF THE CANOPIES/STRUCTURAL INTRUSIONS. IT APPEARS | | | THAT THERE IS A CANOPY LINE OR OTHER STRUCTURAL | | | OVERHANG SHOWN ON SHEETS A-3 AND A-4 THAT IS NOT SHOWN | | | ELSEWHERE. | | | 10. PLEASE PROVIDE THE SETBACKS TO ALL OF THE OPEN-AIR | | | PAVILIONS. PLEASE NOTE THAT ALL ACCESSORY STRUCTURES | | | SHALL BE AT LEAST FIVE (5) FEET FROM SIDE AND REAR | | | PROPERTY LINES. | | | 11. PLEASE PROVIDE DETAILS OF THE PAVILIONS?HEIGHT, | | | ARCHITECTURAL DETAIL, ETC. | | | 12. PLEASE CLARIFY THE FIRE LINE ON THE PLANS?IN SOME | | | AREAS IT IS SHOWN AS A DASHED LINE?IN OTHERS IT APPEARS | | | TO BE A SOLID LINE. | | | 13. CAN YOU PLEASE SEPARATE THE LANDSCAPE PLAN INTO ONE | | | SHEET THAT SHOWS GRADE-LEVEL PLANTING, AND THE OTHER | | | SHEETS SHOWING TERRACE LEVEL AND AMENITY/POOL LEVEL | | | PLANTING, ETC. | | | 14. THE EAST AND WEST ELEVATIONS APPEAR TO BE LABELED | | | INCORRECTLY. | | | 15. CONSIDERATION NEEDS TO BE MADE REGARDING THE SOUTH | | | ELEVATION THE FACT THAT 40+ FEET OF BLANK WALL APPEARS | | | TO BE FACING THE ADJACENT RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT. | | | WHILE THERE IS LANDSCAPING PROPOSED WITHIN THE BUFFER, | | | ARE OPTIONS AVAILABLE TO HELP SOFTEN THE APPEARANCE OF | | | THIS? | | | 16. THE OUTLINE OF THE BUILDING DOES NOT APPEAR TO | | | MATCH THAT SHOWN ON THE FLOOR PLANS?OR DOES THE SITE | | | PLAN SHOW THE OUTLINE OF THE RAILINGS? PLEASE CLARIFY. | | | 17. URBAN DESIGN STAFF IS WONDERING IF ALTERNATIVES | | | COULD BE CONSIDERED FOR THE FRONT CIRCULATION PATTERN | | | AND PLAZA CONFIGURATION TO CREATE A SPACE THAT IS MORE | | | INTEGRATED AND IS A CONTINUATION OF THE CITY?S PUBLIC | | | WATERFRONT, AS OPPOSED TO SPACE THAT IS ENTIRELY | | | PRIVATE AND ONLY SERVES AS AN ENTRANCE INTO THE | | | PROJECT. | | | 18. PLEASE NOTE THAT THE 3D RENDERINGS PROVIDED DO NOT | | | MATCH THE SITE/LANDSCAPE PLANS PROPOSED. PLEASE ENSURE | | | THAT THE RENDERINGS ACCURATELY DEPICT THE PROPOSED | | | DEVELOPMENT PRIOR TO PUBLIC HEARINGS. | | | 19. THE CITY?S ENGINEERING AND PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT | | | WILL NEED TO SIGN OFF ON THE PROPOSED TRASH AREA AND | | | THE CIRCULATION PATTERN REQUIRED FOR INGRESS/EGRESS. | | | 20. PLEASE NOTE THAT THE POOL WILL NEED TO BE ENCLOSED | | | BY A FENCE OR SIMILAR STRUCTURE AT LEAST FOUR (4) FEET | | | IN HEIGHT TO PREVENT ACCESS. SELF-CLOSING AND | | | SELF-LATCHING GATES SHALL BE PROVIDED. | | | 21. TANDEM PARKING SPACES MAY BE PROVIDED SO LONG AS | | | THE TANDEM SPACES ARE ASSIGNED TO THE SAME UNIT. | | | ADDITIONALLY, A RESTRICTIVE COVENANT WILL BE REQUIRED | | | TO BE RECORDED IN THE PUBLIC RECORDS UTILIZING A | | | CITY-APPROVED FORM. ALL GUEST SPACES SHALL NOT BE | | | TANDEM. | | | 22. PURSUANT TO SECTION 94-305(C)(2) ACCESSORY | | | STRUCTURES SHALL BE SET BACK A MINIMUM OF 15 FEET FROM | | | THE SEAWALL. | | | 23. WALLS WITHIN THE FRONT SETBACK SHALL NOT EXCEED | | | FOUR (4) FEET IN HEIGHT?PLEASE ADJUST THE WALL ON THE | | | SOUTH PROPERTY LINE ACCORDINGLY. | | | 24. THE SITE PLAN INDICATES A UTILITY EASEMENT IN THE | | | SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE PROPERTY. IS THIS EXISTING OR | | | PROPOSED? PLEASE CLARIFY. | | | 25. PLEASE PROVIDE ADDITIONAL DETAILS WITH REGARD TO | | | THE FRONT PLAZA. IT IS UNCLEAR AS TO WHAT IS RETAINING | | | WALLS, PLANTERS, ETC. | | | 26. PURSUANT TO SECTION 94-313(1)(A), DEVELOPMENTS OF | | | GREATER THAN 75 RESIDENTIAL UNITS SHALL BE LIMITED TO | | | TWO (2) ACCESS POINTS. | | | 27. PLEASE PROVIDE DETAILS REGARDING ANY PROPOSED | | | SIGNAGE. | | | 28. PLEASE PROVIDE THE SETBACK FROM THE FREESTANDING | | | SIGN TO THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY. IS THIS A DIRECTIONAL | | | SIGN OR IS IT PERMANENT IDENTIFICATION FOR THE | | | DEVELOPMENT? | | | 29. PLEASE MAKE SURE THAT STRUCTURAL COLUMNS DO NOT | | | ENCROACH INTO PARKING SPACES. THERE APPEARS TO BE A | | | CONFLICT ON SHEET A-1. | | | 30. SOME CONSIDERATIONS MAY NEED TO BE MADE REGARDING | | | MANEUVERABILITY WITHIN THE PARKING STRUCTURE. SEVERAL | | | PARKING SPACES APPEAR TO BE VERY DIFFICULT TO MANEUVER | | | OUT OF, ESPECIALLY WITH TANDEM PARKING BEING PROVIDED. | | | 31. SOME TURN-AROUND SPACES MAY BE REQUIRED TO PROVIDE. | | | 32. IT MAY JUST BE AN ISSUE IN THE LINE THICKNESS ON | | | THE PLANS, BUT MANY OF THE PARKING SPACES APPEAR TO BE | | | SHORT. PLEASE VERIFY. | | | 33. WHAT ARE THE TWO (2) DOORS EXITING TO THE WEST ON | | | SHEET A-2 PROVIDE ACCESS TO? IT APPEARS THAT THIS | | | SECTION IS BELOW THE GRADE OF THE DROP-OFF AREA. PLEASE | | | CLARIFY. | | | 34. PLEASE PROVIDE A DETAIL OF THE WALL PROPOSED ON THE | | | SOUTH PROPERTY LINE. | | | 35. SHADE/FLOWERING TREES SHALL BE PROVIDED AT ONE (1) | | | PER 30 LINEAR FEET ALONG THE WEST PROPERTY LINE. | | | CLUSTERING MAY BE PERMITTED OR PLANTED IRREGULARLY, BUT | | | PLEASE CLARIFY HOW THIS PROVISION IS BEING MET. | | | ___________________________________________ | | | | | | PLEASE NOTE THE FOLLOWING WHEN RESUBMITTING: | | | | | | A) WRITTEN RESPONSES TO COMMENTS MADE BY ALL | | | DEPARTMENTS SHALL BE PROVIDED UPON RESUBMISSION. | | | | | | B) 15 SETS OF REVISED PLANS AND/OR DOCUMENTS SHALL BE | | | PROVIDED, ALONG WITH ONE (1) REDUCED COPY (11IN X | | | 17IN), AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY OF ALL PLANS. | | | | | | C) PLEASE NOTE THAT RE-SUBMITTALS MAY BE SUBJECT TO | | | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS. | | | | | | D) IF NO RESPONSE IS RECEIVED WITHIN 60 DAYS OF THE | | | ISSUANCE OF THESE COMMENTS, THE APPLICATION WILL BE | | | CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN AND ANY FURTHER ACTION WILL | | | REQUIRE SUBMISSION OF A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION. | | | | | | E) PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1) | | | RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED | | | COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE | | | APPLICANT WILL BE ACCESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE | | | WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE. | | | | | | F) IN ORDER TO BE CONSIDERED FOR THE JUNE 18, 2013 | | | PLANNING BOARD AGENDA, ALL COMMENTS SHALL BE | | | SATISFACTORILY ADDRESSED. PLEASE SUBMIT ALL REVISED | | | DOCUMENTS/PLANS NO LATER THAN FRIDAY, MAY 17, 2013. | | | | | | G) TO BE PLACED ON THE JUNE 18, 2013 PLANNING BOARD | | | AGENDA, SIGNS SHALL BE POSTED ON THE PROPERTY NO LATER | | | THAN JUNE 3, 2013. SIGNAGE SHALL CONFORM AND BE | | | INSTALLED WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY?S ZONING | | | AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS, AS ALSO PROVIDED IN | | | THE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION. A SIGNED AND NOTARIZED | | | AFFIDAVIT SHALL BE PROVIDED BY THE DEADLINE REFERENCED | | | ABOVE. | | | ___________________________________________ | | | | | | QUESTIONS/COMMENTS, PLEASE CONTACT THE FOLLOWING: | | | | | | JOHN ROACH, PRINCIPAL PLANNER | | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT ? PLANNING DIVISION | | | 401 CLEMATIS STREET - P.O. BOX 3147 | | | WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33402 | | | | | | PHONE: 561.822.1448 | | | FAX: 561.822.1460 | | | | | | EMAIL: [email protected] | | | | | | WWW.WPB.ORG | | | |
|
|
| |
Print |
|
Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved |
 |