Plan Review Details - Project Z13040025
Plan Review Stops For Project Z13040025
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 1 Status N Date 05-07-2013 Cont ID  
Sent By lmartine Date 05-07-2013 Time 09:42 Rev Time 0.00
Received By lmartine Date 05-07-2013 Time 09:42 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop FIRE FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No 2 Status F Date 06-17-2013 Cont ID  
Sent By jroach Date 06-17-2013 Time 11:59 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jroach Date 06-17-2013 Time 11:59 Sent To  
Notes
2013-06-17 11:59:53THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS WERE RECEIVED FROM M. CARSILLO
 VIA EMAIL ON 6/11/13....
  
 THIS REVIEW CAN ONLY BE CONSIDERED PRELIMINARY AS OTHER
 REQUIREMENTS MAY BE NECESSARY WHEN A FULL SET OF
 DRAWINGS ARE PROVIDED.
  
 1. SUBMIT COMPLETE PLANS FOR THE PROPOSED MAINTENANCE,
 CENTRAL CHILLER PLANT.
 2. BIKE RACK DETAIL ON SHEET CSP-1 INDICATES BICYCLE
 PARKING WILL BE PROVIDED PER THE OAKTON COMMONS CPD
 DESIGN GUIDELINES.
 3. A FIRE HYDRANT MAY NOT BE CALLED OUT ON SHEET CSP-1,
 SOUTHWEST CORNER. THIS HYDRANT IS SHOWN ON SHEET C-1.
 4. ALL DEMOLITION, RENOVATION, AND CONSTRUCTION TO
 COMPLY WITH NFPA 241. DEMOLITION PERMITS WILL BE
 REQUIRED PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF ANY DEMOLITION
 ACTIVITIES.
 5. ALL ELECTRICAL WORK TO COMPLY WITH NFPA 70, THE
 NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE.
 6. ALL UTILITIES ARE TO BE PROPERLY LOCATED PRIOR TO
 EXCAVATION.
 7. LANDSCAPING PLACEMENT NEAR FIRE HYDRANTS SHALL
 PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF AT LEAST 7 ? FEET CLEARANCE TO THE
 FRONT AND SIDES AND AT LEAST 4 FEET TO THE REAR OF
 THEM.
  
 MICHAEL E. CARSILLO, ASSISTANT FIRE CHIEF
 WEST PALM BEACH FIRE RESCUE
  
Review Stop FIRE FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No 1 Status N Date 04-30-2013 Cont ID  
Sent By ddaniels Date 04-30-2013 Time 11:57 Rev Time 0.00
Received By ddaniels Date 04-30-2013 Time 11:57 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop PARK PARKING
Rev No 1 Status N Date 05-08-2013 Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 05-08-2013 Time   Rev Time  
Received By   Date 05-08-2013 Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop POLICE POLICE
Rev No 1 Status N Date 05-06-2013 Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 05-06-2013 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By ktucker Date 05-06-2013 Time 13:57 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop STORM STORMWATER
Rev No 1 Status N Date 05-08-2013 Cont ID  
Sent By tward Date 05-08-2013 Time 11:27 Rev Time  
Received By tward Date 05-08-2013 Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop SURVEY SURVEYING
Rev No 2 Status P Date 05-31-2013 Cont ID  
Sent By vnoel Date 05-31-2013 Time 10:32 Rev Time 0.00
Received By vnoel Date 05-31-2013 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2013-05-31 10:32:43PASSED WITH CONDITIONS:
  
 1. REPLAT PRIOR TO FINAL APPROVAL.
 2. ANY ADDITIONAL EASEMENTS BE GRANTED EITHER BY REPLAT
 OR SEPARATE DOCUMENT.
Review Stop SURVEY SURVEYING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 05-07-2013 Cont ID  
Sent By vnoel Date 05-07-2013 Time 08:23 Rev Time  
Received By vnoel Date 05-07-2013 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2013-05-07 08:48:151. AFTER ABANDONMENT OF CHADBOURNE CT. ENTIRE PROPERTY
 WILL NEED TO BE REPLATTED AS A CONDITION OF FINAL SITE
 PLAN APPROVAL.
 2. EASEMENTS MAY BE REQUIRED ALONG OLIVE AND FLAGLER
 FOR EXISTING AND/OR PROPOSED UTILITIES AND SIDEWALKS.
 3. PROPOSED LANDSCAPING SHOULD NOT CONFLICT WITH
 EXISTING OR PROPOSED UTILITIES.
 4. SEPARATE SUBMITTAL WILL NEED TO BE MADE FOR
 SITE/CIVIL AND PLAT TO ENGINEERING SERVICES.
Review Stop TRAFFIC TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No 2 Status   Date 05-28-2013 Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 05-28-2013 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By bcollins Date 05-28-2013 Time 14:29 Sent To  
Notes
2013-05-28 14:29:00BASED ON THE APPLICANT'S TRAFFIC STUDY FOR THE FUTURE
 LAND USE AMENDMENT, A TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY SHALL BE
 SUBMITTED TO DETERMINE THE IMPACTS ON ADJACENT ROADWAYS
 AND INTERSECTIONS. THIS STUDY SHALL EVALUATE THE
 INTERSECTIONS OF OLIVE WITH BELVEDERE,
 LAKEVIEW/OKEECHOBEE, AND ALL SITE DRIVEWAYS, AND THE
 INTERSECTIONS OF FLAGLER WITH OKEECHOBEE/LAKEVIEW AND
 ALL SITE DRIVEWAYS. PRIOR TO INITIATING THE STUDY, THE
 TRAFFIC ENGINEER SHALL MEET WITH STAFF TO REVIEW TRIP
 DISTRIBUTION AND OTHER ASSUMPTIONS. THE STUDY SHALL
 INCLUDE THE TRAFFIC IMPACT OF THE PROPOSED CHAPEL BY
 THE LAKE DEVELOPMENT. THIS STUDY WILL BE SUBMITTED AT
 THE TIME OF FORMAL SITE PLAN SUBMISSION.
Review Stop TRAFFIC TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No 1 Status   Date 05-08-2013 Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 05-08-2013 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By bcollins Date 05-08-2013 Time 08:34 Sent To  
Notes
2013-05-28 14:31:41NOTES WERE INTENDED TO HAVE BEEN INCLUDED WITH CHAPEL
 BY THE LAKE SUBMISSION
2013-05-08 08:40:30PLEASE PROVIDE TRAFFIC ANALYSIS OF SITE
 DRIVEWAY/FLAGLER DRIVE. SHOW DRIVEWAYS ON WEST SIDE OF
 FLAGLER IN RELATION TO SITE DRIVEWAY AND SHOW EXISTING
 STRIPING ON FLAGLER DRIVE. USE AUTOTURN TO CONFIRM
 ACCESS AN EGRESS OF TRUCKS TO AND FROM LOADING ZONE.
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 2 Status F Date 06-28-2013 Cont ID  
Sent By jroach Date 06-28-2013 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By jroach Date 06-28-2013 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2015-11-30 14:57:21ZONING PLAN REVIEW
 ___________________________________________
  
 DATE OF REVIEW: 06.28.2013
 PROJECT NO.: Z13040024 & Z13040025
 CASE NO.: PB CASE #1231B & C
 ADDRESS: 1101 SOUTH FLAGLER DRIVE
 APPLICANT/CONTACT: KERRY KILDAY, OF URBAN DESIGN KILDAY
 STUDIOS
 TELEPHONE NO.: 561.366.1100
 SCOPE OF REVIEW: FUTURE LAND USE MAP AMENDMENT AND
 MAJOR PD AMENDMENT ? MODIFY THE BOUNDARIES OF THE
 PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AND PROVIDE FOR FUTURE IMPROVEMENTS
 TO THE SITE.
 ___________________________________________
  
 REVIEW STATUS: FAILED
 ___________________________________________
  
 PLEASE PROVIDE A WRITTEN RESPONSE TO THE FOLLOWING PLAN
 REVIEW COMMENTS:
  
 1. DO THE ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES NEED TO BE
 DISTRIBUTED TO ACCOUNT FOR THE VARIOUS USES/ENTRANCES
 INTO THE BUILDINGS?
  
 2. THE SITE DATA TABLE INDICATES THAT 494 PARKING
 SPACES ARE PROVIDED, BUT THE PLANS INDICATE 493; PLEASE
 ADJUST ACCORDINGLY.
 ___________________________________________
  
 PLEASE NOTE THAT SUBMITTAL OF ADDITIONAL AND/OR REVISED
 MATERIALS MAY RESULT IN NEW PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS.
 ___________________________________________
  
 QUESTIONS/COMMENTS, PLEASE CONTACT THE FOLLOWING:
  
 JOHN P. ROACH, AICP, PRINCIPAL PLANNER
 CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH
 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT ? PLANNING DIVISION
 401 CLEMATIS STREET - P.O. BOX 3147
 WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33402
  
 P: 561.822.1448
 F: 561.822.1460
  
 E: [email protected]
  
 W: WPB.ORG
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 05-08-2013 Cont ID  
Sent By jroach Date 05-08-2013 Time 10:32 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jroach Date 05-08-2013 Time 10:32 Sent To  
Notes
2013-05-08 10:32:20ZONING PLANS AND PLATS REVIEW COMMITTEE (PPRC) REVIEW
 ___________________________________________
  
 DATE OF REVIEW: 05.08.2013
 PROJECT NO.: Z13040024 & Z13040025
 CASE NO.: PB CASE #1231B & C
 ADDRESS: 1101 SOUTH FLAGLER DRIVE
 APPLICANT/CONTACT: KERRY KILDAY, OF URBAN DESIGN KILDAY
 STUDIOS
 TELEPHONE NO.: 561.366.1100
 SCOPE OF REVIEW: FUTURE LAND USE MAP AMENDMENT AND
 MAJOR PD AMENDMENT ? MODIFY THE BOUNDARIES OF THE
 PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AND PROVIDE FOR FUTURE IMPROVEMENTS
 TO THE SITE.
 ___________________________________________
  
 PLEASE PROVIDE A WRITTEN RESPONSE TO THE FOLLOWING
 REVIEW COMMENTS:
  
 1. PLEASE CLARIFY THE STATEMENT ON THE PLAN INDICATING
 THAT ?FINAL DESIGN SHALL BE APPROVED AS PART OF A
 FUTURE FORMAL SITE PLAN REVIEW?. I BELIEVE ANY CHANGES
 TO THE PLAN AND THE PROCESS REQUIRED TO DO SO WOULD BE
 REGULATED BY SECTION 94-207(E) ? AMENDMENTS TO APPROVED
 PLANNED DEVELOPMENTS. SOME AMENDMENTS MAY BE CONSIDERED
 MAJOR AMENDMENTS AND REQUIRE A PUBLIC HEARING PROCESS.
 2. ACCORDING TO THE LETTER FROM FPU, THERE ARE GAS
 FACILITIES WITHIN THE BOUNDARIES OF THE DEVELOPMENT.
 PLEASE ENSURE THAT NO LANDSCAPE MATERIAL CONFLICTS WITH
 SUCH UTILITIES.
 3. PLEASE PROVIDE UTILITY LETTERS FROM THE FOLLOWING?
 A. AT&T
 B. FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT
 C. CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH
 4. PLEASE PROVIDE A LETTER APPROVING TRAFFIC
 CONCURRENCY FOR THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT.
 5. WITH REGARD TO THE FUTURE LAND USE TRAFFIC ANALYSIS?
 A. THE TABLE SHOWN ON PAGE 2 APPEARS TO BE INCORRECT.
 IT LISTS THE EXISTING DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL FOR PARCELS
 5 AND 6 INCORRECTLY. THE EXISTING POTENTIAL FOR PARCEL
 5 SHOULD BE 20,255 SQ. FT., WHILE THE EXISTING
 POTENTIAL OF PARCEL 6 SHOULD BE 16,008 SQ. FT. IT
 APPEARS THAT THE TRIP GENERATION TABLES ACCURATELY
 REFLECT THIS.
 6. PLEASE BE SURE TO PROVIDE AN ELECTRONIC COPY OF THE
 SURVEY.
 7. THERE WILL HAVE TO BE COORDINATION IN THE TIMING OF
 THE FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH IMPROVEMENTS, AND THE
 DEVELOPMENT PROPOSED FOR CHAPEL BY THE LAKE. THE
 PARKING ON THE FIRST BAPTIST CHURCH PARCEL WILL NEED TO
 BE CONFORMING TO THE MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY?S
 ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS (ZLDRS) PRIOR
 TO THE REMOVAL OF ANY OF THE PARKING ON THE CHAPEL BY
 THE LAKE PARCEL(S).
 8. PLEASE BE SURE THAT THE SURVEY AND SITE/LANDSCAPE
 PLANS ACCURATELY REFLECT ALL EASEMENTS. JUST WANT TO
 CONFIRM THAT THE ONLY PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT IS ALONG
 THE SOUTH PROPERTY LINE.
 9. PLEASE PROVIDE CONFIRMATION FROM THE CITY?S
 ENGINEERING AND PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT THAT ONLY ONE
 (1) DUMPSTER WILL BE SUFFICIENT. IT APPEARS THAT NO
 DUMPSTERS ARE BEING PROVIDED FOR THE 2-STORY BUILDINGS
 IN THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE PROPERTY, AND IS ONE
 SUFFICIENT FOR ALL OTHER ACTIVITIES ASSOCIATED WITH THE
 CHURCH FACILITY?
 10. PLEASE NOTE THAT THE MAXIMUM FAR PERMITTED WITHIN
 THE CSPD IS 1.0, NOT 0.75; THE SITE DATE TABLE ON SHEET
 CSP-1 IS INCORRECT.
 11. PLEASE NOTE THAT THERE WILL HAVE TO BE A CONDITION
 PLACED IN THE DEVELOPMENT ORDER THAT NO ADDITIONAL
 RESIDENTIAL DWELLING UNITS MAY BE CONSTRUCTED WITHIN
 THE CSPD AND THAT THE EXISTING UNITS MAY NOT BE
 EXPANDED SO AS TO CREATE A NEW NONCONFORMITY, OR
 INCREASE THE ?EXISTING? NONCONFORMITY.
 12. PLEASE NOTE THE HEIGHTS AND/OR PROVIDE DETAILS OF
 ALL EXISTING/PROPOSED FENCING. IT APPEARS THAT THE ONLY
 FENCING ON THE PROPERTY IS AROUND THE OUTDOOR PLAY ARE,
 BUT IT ALSO SHOWS A FENCE EXTENDING WEST ACROSS THE
 DRIVE AISLE, AND THEN NORTH ALONG OLIVE AVENUE; IS THIS
 FENCE PROPOSED TO REMAIN? ENSURE THAT FENCES WITHIN THE
 FRONT SETBACK DO NOT EXCEED FOUR (4) FEET IN HEIGHT.
 13. IS ANY EXTERIOR LIGHTING BEING PROPOSED? LIGHTING
 SHALL NOT EXCEED 1.0 FOOTCANDLES WHEN MEASURED AT THE
 PROPERTY LINE.
 14. ALL PARKING STRIPING SHALL MEET THE MINIMUM
 REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY?S ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT
 REGULATIONS. YOU MAY EMAIL ME AND I CAN SEND YOU A COPY
 OF THE DETAIL TO BE INSERTED INTO THE PLANS.
 15. PURSUANT TO SECTION 94-313(1)(A), NONRESIDENTIAL
 DEVELOPMENT EXCEEDING 300 PARKING SPACES SHALL NOT HAVE
 MORE THAN TWO (2) ACCESS POINTS ONTO EACH RIGHT-OF-WAY.
 ADDITIONALLY, SECTION 94-313(1)(B) PROVIDES THAT NO
 PROPERTY SHALL HAVE A TOTAL OF MORE THAN FOUR (4)
 ACCESS POINTS.
 16. THERE HAVE BEEN CONCERNS EXPRESSED ABOUT THE
 POTENTIAL LOSS OF STUDENT HOUSING FOR THE UNIVERSITY.
 HAS THERE BEEN ANY COORDINATION WITH THE UNIVERSITY AS
 TO HOW THESE LOSS OF UNITS WILL BE ACCOUNTED FOR?
 17. WITHIN THE LANDSCAPE DATA TABLE ON SHEET LP-1,
 PLEASE BE SURE THAT THE ?PROVIDED? NUMBERS ACCURATELY
 REFLECT WHAT IS SHOWN ON THE PLAN?AND NOT THAT IT IS
 EXACTLY THE MINIMUM REQUIRED.
 18. PLEASE PROVIDE THE ACTUAL PLANT COUNTS IN THE PLANT
 LIST.
 19. IN THE ANGLED PARKING IN THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF
 THE PROPERTY, PLEASE CONSIDER ?SAW-TOOTHING? THE CURB
 LINE AND REMOVING THE WHEEL STOPS TO INCREASE THE
 AMOUNT OF IMPERVIOUS AREA. THIS CAN ALSO BE DONE IN THE
 ANGLED PARKING ON THE EAST SIDE OF THE PROPERTY.
 20. STAFF IS CONTINUING TO REVIEW THE TRAFFIC IMPACT
 ANALYSIS AND MAY HAVE SOME PRELIMINARY CONCERNS WITH
 REGARD TO THE PROPOSED TRIP DISTRIBUTION AND MAY WANT
 TO FOLLOW UP WITH THE APPLICANT?S TRAFFIC CONSULTANT IN
 THE NEAR FUTURE.
 21. IT APPEARS THAT THE SIDEWALKS AND ACCESS AISLES FOR
 THE ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES DO NOT LINE UP.
 22. TWO (2) SHADE TREES ARE MISSING IN THE LANDSCAPE
 ISLAND IN THE SOUTHERN PORTION OF THE PROPERTY WHERE
 THERE IS CROSS-ACCESS TO THE ADJACENT PROPERTY.
 23. HAS THERE BEEN ANY CONSIDERATION OF UTILIZING BERMS
 OR OTHER VARIATIONS IN TOPOGRAPHY TO ENHANCE THE
 BUFFER?
 24. IS THERE ANY CONSIDERATION OF UTILIZING AN
 ALTERNATIVE MATERIAL FOR THOSE PARKING SPACES THAT WILL
 BE USED INFREQUENTLY? THIS WOULD REQUIRE THE CITY TO
 CONSIDER A TEXT CHANGE TO THE ZONING AND LAND
 DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS, BUT THIS MAY BE A GOOD CASE
 STUDY. STAFF WOULD LIKE TO DISCUSS THIS FURTHER WITH
 THE APPLICANT AND SEE WHAT POSSIBILITIES ARE AVAILABLE.
 25. PLEASE INDICATE THE LOCATION OF THE BIKE RACKS AND
 PROVIDE A DETAIL OF THE RACK THAT IS PROPOSED. BE SURE
 THAT THE RACK CONFORMS TO THE CITY?S MINIMUM
 REQUIREMENTS.
 26. DO THE ACCESSIBLE PARKING SPACES NEED TO BE
 DISTRIBUTED TO ACCOUNT FOR THE VARIOUS USES/ENTRANCES
 INTO THE BUILDINGS?
 27. THE SITE DATA TABLE INDICATES THAT 494 PARKING
 SPACES ARE PROVIDED, BUT THE PLANS INDICATE 493; PLEASE
 ADJUST ACCORDINGLY.
 28. PLEASE PROVIDE INFORMATION PERTAINING TO THE
 CHILLER/MAINTENANCE BUILDING. IS THIS BUILDING PROPOSED
 AT THIS TIME, OR IS IT FUTURE CONSTRUCTION?
 ___________________________________________
  
 PLEASE NOTE THE FOLLOWING WHEN RESUBMITTING:
  
 A) WRITTEN RESPONSES TO COMMENTS MADE BY ALL
 DEPARTMENTS SHALL BE PROVIDED UPON RESUBMISSION.
  
 B) 15 SETS OF REVISED PLANS AND/OR DOCUMENTS SHALL BE
 PROVIDED, ALONG WITH ONE (1) REDUCED COPY (11IN X
 17IN), AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY OF ALL PLANS.
  
 C) PLEASE NOTE THAT RE-SUBMITTALS MAY BE SUBJECT TO
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS.
  
 D) IF NO RESPONSE IS RECEIVED WITHIN 60 DAYS OF THE
 ISSUANCE OF THESE COMMENTS, THE APPLICATION WILL BE
 CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN AND ANY FURTHER ACTION WILL
 REQUIRE SUBMISSION OF A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION.
  
 E) PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1)
 RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED
 COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE
 APPLICANT WILL BE ACCESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE
 WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE.
  
 F) IN ORDER TO BE CONSIDERED FOR THE JUNE 18, 2013
 PLANNING BOARD AGENDA, ALL COMMENTS SHALL BE
 SATISFACTORILY ADDRESSED. PLEASE SUBMIT ALL REVISED
 DOCUMENTS/PLANS NO LATER THAN FRIDAY, MAY 17, 2013.
  
 G) TO BE PLACED ON THE JUNE 18, 2013 PLANNING BOARD
 AGENDA, SIGNS SHALL BE POSTED ON THE PROPERTY NO LATER
 THAN JUNE 3, 2013. SIGNAGE SHALL CONFORM AND BE
 INSTALLED WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY?S ZONING
 AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS, AS ALSO PROVIDED IN
 THE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION. A SIGNED AND NOTARIZED
 AFFIDAVIT SHALL BE PROVIDED BY THE DEADLINE REFERENCED
 ABOVE.
 ___________________________________________
  
 QUESTIONS/COMMENTS, PLEASE CONTACT THE FOLLOWING:
  
 JOHN ROACH, PRINCIPAL PLANNER
 CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH
 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT ? PLANNING DIVISION
 401 CLEMATIS STREET - P.O. BOX 3147
 WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33402
  
 PHONE: 561.822.1448
 FAX: 561.822.1460
  
 EMAIL: [email protected]
  
 WWW.WPB.ORG
  
  Print


Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved