Plan Review Details - Project Z13040022
Plan Review Stops For Project Z13040022
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 1 Status P Date 05-07-2013 Cont ID  
Sent By lmartine Date 05-07-2013 Time 09:54 Rev Time 0.00
Received By lmartine Date 05-07-2013 Time 09:54 Sent To  
Notes
2013-05-07 10:12:01PHASE 1
 THE WELLNESS BUILDING LOOKS FINE IN LAYOUT AND DESIGN.
  
 PHASE 2
 CHAPEL PLANS WERE NOT PROVIDED. AS FOR THE PROPOSED
 EXPANSIONS PLEASE BE AWARE OF CHAPTERS 5 AND 6 OF THE
 2010 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE FOR HEIGHT AND AREA INCREASE
 REQUIREMENTS, ESPECIALLY THE (OLDER ADULT/DETOX
 BUILDING).
  
  
  
 LUIS MARTINEZ
 561-805-6710
Review Stop ENG - PPRC ENGINEERING - PPRC
Rev No 1 Status   Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time  
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop FIRE FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No 1 Status   Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time  
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop L LANDSCAPING
Rev No 1 Status   Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time  
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop PARK PARKING
Rev No 1 Status   Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time  
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop POLICE POLICE
Rev No 1 Status F Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By ktucker Date 05-07-2013 Time 08:42 Sent To  
Notes
2013-05-07 08:44:42* ALL ENTRY DOORS, OFF OF THE TRAIL/EXERCISE PATHS
 SHOULD HAVE CONTROLLED ACCESS
 * LIGHTING SHOULD BE UNDER THE ARBOR IN THE PARKING LOT
 * CCTV FOR THE WELLNESS CENTER, CAMERAS IN AREAS:
 HALLWAY, GYM, POOL AREA, LOBBY, PATIO
  
 CONDITIONS FOR APPROVAL
 PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF THE FIRST BUILDING PERMIT, THE
 APPLICANT SHALL PREPARE A CONSTRUCTION SITE SECURITY
 AND MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR APPROVAL BY THE CITY OF WEST
 PALM BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT CPTED OFFICIAL.
 A. AFTER SITE CLEARING AND PLACEMENT OF CONSTRUCTION
 TRAILERS, THE DEVELOPER/PROJECT MANAGER SHALL INSTITUTE
 SECURITY MEASURES TO REDUCE OR ELIMINATE OPPORTUNITIES
 FOR THEFT. THE MANAGEMENT PLAN SHALL INCLUDE, BUT NOT
 BE LIMITED TO, TEMPORARY LIGHTING, SECURITY PERSONNEL,
 VEHICLE BARRIERS, CONSTRUCTION/VISITOR PASS,
 REDUCE/MINIMIZE ENTRY/EXIT POINTS, ENCOURAGE
 SUBCONTRACTORS TO SECURE MACHINERY, TOOLS AT END OF
 WORK DAY, FENCING WITH SCREENING AND OR ANY OTHER
 MEASURE DEEMED APPROPRIATE TO PROVIDE A SAFE AND SECURE
 WORKING ENVIRONMENT.
 B. THE SECURITY MANAGEMENT PLAN SHALL BE MAINTAINED
 THROUGHOUT THE CONSTRUCTION PHASE OF THE PROJECT.
 NON-COMPLIANCE WITH THE APPROVED PLAN SHALL RESULT IN A
 STOP-WORK ORDER FOR THE ENTIRE PLANNED UNIT
 DEVELOPMENT.
 C. PROPERTY SHALL BE POST ?NO TRESPASSING? SIGNS EVERY
 500 FEET AROUND THE PERIMETER OF THE SITE.
  
 WELLNESS BUILDING
 LIGHTING
 A. LIGHT POLES 10 ? 15 FOOT HIGH FOR PEDESTRIAN-SCALE
 LIGHTING SHALL BE USED FOR ALL PEDESTRIAN WALKWAYS.
 B. PARKING LOT LIGHTING SHALL USE 20 -25 FOOT POLES.
 C. LANDSCAPING SHALL NOT OBSTRUCT VIEW OF LIGHTING AND
 WALKWAYS.
 D. TIMER CLOCK OR PHOTOCELL SENSOR-ENGAGED LIGHTING FOR
 ABOVE OR NEAR ENTRYWAYS TO BUILDINGS FOR DUSK TO DAWN
 OPERATION SHALL BE PROVIDED.
 E. ENTRANCE SIGN LIGHTING SHALL BE PROVIDED. DIRECTORY
 SHOULD BE AT ALL ENTRANCES WITH LIGHTING
 F. BUILDING LIGHTING (NON-GLARE) SHALL BE AROUND
 PERIMETER ON ALL SIDE.
 NUMERICAL ADDRESS
 A. ILLUMINATION FOR NIGHTTIME VISIBILITY IS REQUIRED.
 ADDRESS SHOULD BE PLACED UNDER A LIGHT FIXTURE OR BE
 BACK LIT.
 B. BI-DIRECTIONAL VISIBILITY FROM THE ROADWAY IS
 REQUIRED.
 C. ADDRESS NUMBERS ON SUITES/OFFICES WITHIN
 MULTI-TENANT BUILDINGS SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 6 INCHES
 HIGH.
 D. BUILDING NUMBERS SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 12 INCHES
 HIGH AND PLACED IN A CONSPICUOUS LOCATION AWAY FROM
 LANDSCAPING. MULTIPLE LOCATIONS MAY BE REQUIRED.
 NUMBERS OF CONTRASTING COLORS SHOULD BE USED.
 DOORS
 A. EXTERIOR DOORS SHALL ALL BE EQUIPPED WITH SECURITY
 HINGES AND SHALL BE REINFORCED WITH CASE HARDENED
 STRIKE PLATES. CASE HARDENED DEADBOLT LOCKS SHALL BE
 PROVIDED ON ALL EXTERIOR DOORS WITH A MINIMUM (1) INCH
 THROW OR MECHANICAL INTERLOCK.
 B. GLASS PERIMETER DOORS SHALL BE EQUIPPED WITH CASE
 HARDENED GUARD RINGS TO PROTECT THE MORTISE LOCK
 CYLINDER.
 C. REAR DOORS SHALL BE EQUIPPED WITH 180-DEGREE
 PEEPHOLE/ SECURITY VIEWER.
 DESIGN
 A. BUILDING ARCHITECTURE SHALL ALLOW FOR ENHANCED
 NATURAL SURVEILLANCE OF ALL PARKING LOTS AND PROVIDE A
 SENSE OF SECURITY TO PATRONS AND VISITORS.
 B. DRIVE-THRU LANES SHALL HAVE ONE WAY SIGNAGE STATING
 SAME.
 C. LANDSCAPING SHALL NOT OBSTRUCT VIEW FROM WINDOWS OR
 WALKWAYS.
 D. CROSSWALKS SHALL BE RAISED AND DELINEATED BY USING
 CONTRASTING PAVER BLOCKS AS OPPOSED TO SURFACE
 STRIPING.
 E. ALL BUILDINGS SHALL BE PRE-WIRED FOR CLOSED-CIRCUIT
 TELEVISION (CCTV) AND ALARM SYSTEMS.
 F. DUMPSTERS SHALL NOT ALLOW FOR EASY CONCEALMENT,
 CREATE BLIND SPOTS OR HIDING AREAS AND SHOULD BE ABLE
 TO BE LOCKED.
 G. SIGNS SHALL CLEARLY IDENTIFY PUBLIC ENTRANCES.
 H. LANDSCAPING SHALL BE MAINTAINED AT 3 FEET OR LESS.
 TREES SHALL BE INSTALLED SO AS NOT TO CONFLICT WITH THE
 LIGHTING SYSTEM. LOWER CANOPY LIMBS ON TREES SHALL BE
 MAINTAINED AT 8 FEET OR HIGHER.
 I. BIKE RACKS SHOULD BE AT THE FRONT OF THE BUILDING OR
 COMPLEX, NOT IN THE PARKING LOT FOR EASY SURVEILLANCE
 AND SAFETY
  
 TRAILS AND PATHWAYS
  
 LIGHTING
 A. LIGHT POLES 10 ? 15 FOOT HIGH FOR PEDESTRIAN-SCALE
 LIGHTING SHALL BE USED FOR ALL PEDESTRIAN WALKWAYS.
 B. PARKING LOT LIGHTING SHALL USE 20 -25 FOOT POLES.
 C. LANDSCAPING SHALL NOT CONFLICT WITH LIGHTING (TO
 INCLUDE LONG-TERM TREE CANOPY GROWTH).
 D. TIMER CLOCK OR PHOTOCELL SENSOR-ENGAGED LIGHTING FOR
 DUSK TO DAWN OPERATION FOR ALL PEDESTRIAN SIDEWALKS.
 E. LIGHTING FOR ENTRANCE SIGN TO PATHWAYS SHALL BE
 PROVIDED TO ALLOW NIGHTTIME USE OF PEDESTRIAN WALKWAYS.
  
 DESIGN
 A. BENCHES SHALL HAVE ADEQUATE LIGHTING IF THEY ARE
 INTENDED FOR NIGHTTIME USE AND BE LOCATED IN OPEN VIEW
 TO ELIMINATE CONCEALMENT AREAS.
 B. BENCHES WILL BE DIVIDED STYLE SEATING.
 C. SHALL BE DESIGNED TO MAXIMIZE NATURAL SURVEILLANCE
 OF THE PEDESTRIAN USERS THROUGH SELECTIVE VEGETATIVE
 MANAGEMENT PRACTICES.
 D. GROUND COVER SHALL BE NO HIGHER THAN 24 INCHES, WITH
 TREES HAVING A MINIMUM 7-FOOT CLEAR TRUNK SPACE FOR A
 NATURAL SURVEILLANCE WINDOW.
 E. INSTALL 12-FOOT PEDESTRIAN-SCALE LIGHTING. AS A
 GENERAL RULE, THE MINIMUM LIGHTING INTENSITY AT ANY
 POINT ALONG THE PATH SHALL BE AT 0.6 FOOT-CANDLES.
 F. SIGHT LINES SHALL HAVE A 12-FOOT CLEAR DISTANCE
 SPACE AT ENTRY POINTS, CURVES, MERGERS, INTERSECTIONS,
 ETC.
 G. INSTALL SIGNAGE TO PROMOTE ENHANCED SAFETY AND
 AWARENESS.
  
  
  
Review Stop PW PUBLIC WORKS
Rev No 1 Status   Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time  
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop STORM STORMWATER
Rev No 5 Status F Date 09-10-2014 Cont ID  
Sent By tward Date 09-10-2014 Time 12:04 Rev Time 0.00
Received By tward Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2014-09-10 12:17:581.SANITARY PIPE BETWEEN S-2 AND EXISTING SANITARY
 MANHOLE IS SHOWN TO BE 43 FEET AT 0.4% SLOPE ON SHEET
 C-2. THE DESIGN PIPE INVERT ELEVATIONS ARE SHOWN TO BE
 13.73 FEET AT S-2 AND 13.66 AT EXISTING MANHOLE. THE
 PIPE SLOPE CALCULATES TO BE 0.16% USING THESE INVERT
 ELEVATIONS AND 43' PIPE LENGTH.
  
 2. TREES ARE PROPOSED OVER THE PROPOSED EXFILTRATION
 TRENCH AT SE CORNER OF SITE. RELOCATE THE TREES OR
 EXFILTRATION TRENCH.
  
 3. INCLUDE WEIRS IN THE DRAINAGE SYSTEM PRIOR TO THE
 OUTLET STRUCTURES IN THE RETENTION AREAS TO SURCHARGE
 THE EXFILTRATION TRENCHES.
  
 4. PER THE DRAINAGE EASEMENT RECORDED IN ORB 13931 PG
 621, PROVIDE AN ACCEPTANCE LETTER FROM TENET ST. MARY'S
 THAT THE PROPOSED STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM WILL NOT
 ADVERSELY AFFECT TENET ST. MARY'S. THIS LETTER MAY BE
 SUBMITTED WITH THE ENGINEERING PERMIT APPLICATION.
  
 TRACY L. WARD, P.E.
 SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER
 ENGINEERING AND PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
 561-494-1120
  
Review Stop STORM STORMWATER
Rev No 4 Status F Date 06-03-2014 Cont ID  
Sent By tward Date 06-03-2014 Time 11:15 Rev Time 0.00
Received By tward Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2014-06-03 11:18:231. RESPONSE TO ROUND 3 OF COMMENTS INDICATED DRAINAGE
 CALCULATIONS WERE ATTACHED. THESE CALCULATIONS WERE NOT
 FOUND IN THE 6/3/14 SUBMITTAL PACKAGE.
 2. VERIFY SLOPE/PIPE INVERTS OF SANITARY PIPE BETWEEN
 STRUCTURE S-2 AND EXISTING SANITARY MANHOLE.
 3. PER THE DRAINAGE EASEMENT RECORDED IN ORB 13931 PG
 621, PROVIDE AN ACCEPTANCE LETTER FROM TENET ST. MARY'S
 THAT THE PROPOSED STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM WILL NOT
 ADVERSELY AFFECT TENET ST. MARY'S. THIS LETTER MAY BE
 SUBMITTED WITH THE ENGINEERING PERMIT APPLICATION.
  
 TRACY L. WARD, P.E.
 SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER
 ENGINEERING AND PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
 561-494-1120
  
Review Stop STORM STORMWATER
Rev No 3 Status F Date 03-01-2014 Cont ID  
Sent By tward Date 03-01-2014 Time 15:47 Rev Time 0.00
Received By tward Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2014-03-01 15:51:53PREVIOUS COMMENTS FROM LAST REVIEW NOT ADDRESSED.
  
 1. CONCEPTUAL CIVIL PLAN NOT CHANGED.
 2. UTILITIES SHOWN ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN DO NOT MATCH
 WHAT IS SHOWN ON THE CONCEPTUAL CIVIL PLAN.
  
 TRACY L. WARD, P.E.
 SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER
 ENGINEERING AND PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
 561-494-1120
Review Stop STORM STORMWATER
Rev No 2 Status F Date 07-24-2013 Cont ID  
Sent By tward Date 07-24-2013 Time 08:09 Rev Time 0.00
Received By tward Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2013-08-15 20:33:08COMMENTS ON ENGINEERING PLANS PROVIDED BY DANIELLE ON
 8/5/13:
 1. THE UTILITIES SHOWN ON THE LANDSCAPE PLANS (S&S
 6/18/13) DO NOT MATCH THE UTILITIES SHOWN ON THE
 ENGINEERING PLAN (S&S 8/1/13) FOR EXAMPLE, THE
 LANDSCAPE PLAN DOES NOT SHOW THE DRAINAGE PIPE GOING
 ACROS THE EAST DRIVEWAY ENTRANCE.
 2. IT APPEARS THE SCALE BAR ON ENGINEERING PLAN SHOULD
 INDICATE 1" = 30 FEET, NOT 1" = 20 FEET.
 3. ALL PLANS (SITE PLAN, ENGINEERING PLAN, LANDSCAPE,
 ETC.) SHOULD BE SHOWN AT THE SAME SCALE.
 4. ELEVATIONS NEED TO BE SHOWN IN REFERENCE TO NGVD
 1929 VERTICAL DATUM. PUTTING THE CONVERSION BETWEEN
 NGVD AND NAVD 1988 AS A NOTE ON THE PLANS IS NOT
 SUFFICIENT.
 5. RELOCATE THE EXISTING SANITARY PIPE FROM UNDER THE
 PROPOSED DETENTION POND.
 6. WHERE DOES THE DRAINAGE SYSTEM OUTFALL TO? IS THERE
 A PROPOSED CONTROL STRUCTURE? THERE IS NOT AN EXISTING
 DRAINAGE SYSTEM SHOWN ALONG THE EAST PROPERTY LINE.
 7. PROVIDE DESIGN DATA, IF AVAILABLE, FOR THE DETENTION
 AREA, GRADING PLAN, AND DRAINAGE SYSTEM.
  
 TRACY L. WARD, P.E.
 SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER
 ENGINEERING AND PUBLIC WORKS DEPT.
 (561) 494-1120
  
2013-07-24 08:10:34NO ENGINEERING PLANS OR CALCULATIONS IN THE JUNE 19,
 2013 SUBMITTAL.
  
 TRACY L. WARD, P.E.
 SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER
 ENGINEERING AND PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
 (561) 494-1120
Review Stop STORM STORMWATER
Rev No 1 Status F Date 05-08-2013 Cont ID  
Sent By tward Date 05-08-2013 Time 11:45 Rev Time  
Received By tward Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2013-05-08 11:53:231. PROVIDE COPY OF SFWMD ERP OR NO-NOTICE PERMIT PRIOR
 TO START OF CONSTRUCTION.
 2. PROVIDE COPY OF NPDES NOI PERMIT PRIOR TO START OF
 CONSTRUCTION.
 3. PROVIDE DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS, INCLUDING LAND USE
 BREAKDOWN (PERVIOUS, IMPERVIOUS, BUILDING, ETC), WATER
 QUALITY TREATMENT, ETC., WITH THE CITY'S ENGINEERING
 PERMIT APPLICATION.
 4. PROVIDE SWPPP PLAN WITH THE CITY'S ENGINEERING
 PERMIT APPLICATION.
 5. NO ENGINEERING PLANS OR CALCULATIONS PROVIDED.
 6. RELOCATE PROPOSED RETENTION AREA OUT OF THE UTILITIY
 EASEMENT.
 7. RELOCATE PROPOSED TREE FROM UTILITY EASEMENT.
 8. ELEVATIONS TO BE IN REFERENCE TO NGVD 1929.
 9. PROPOSED GRAVITY SEWER MAY "FIT" INSIDE THE 25'
 UTILITY EASEMENT. THE UE MAY CONTAIN A PUBLIC WATER
 MAIN, PRIVATE FORCE MAIN AND OVERHEAD ELECTRIC.
 10. WILL SITE HAVE MASTER WATER METER OR WILL EASEMENTS
 BE PROVIDED OVER THE WATER MAIN?
 11. SHOW EXISTING AND PROPOSED UTILITIES ON THE
 LANDSCAPE PLANS.
 12. FPL EASEMENT DIMENSION NOT SHOWN IN RIGHT PLACE ON
 LANDSCAPE PLANS.
 13. RETENTION AREA SHOULD BE LABELED PHASE 1 ON
 LANDSCAPE PLANS.
  
 TRACY L. WARD, P.E.
 SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER
 ENGINEERING AND PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
 (561) 494-1120
  
Review Stop SURVEY SURVEYING
Rev No 7 Status F Date 09-03-2014 Cont ID  
Sent By vnoel Date 09-03-2014 Time 12:39 Rev Time 0.00
Received By vnoel Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2014-09-03 12:39:241. PREVIOUS COMMENTS OF UNITY OF TITLE, PLAT AND
 SITE/CIVIL SUBMITTAL STILL PERTAIN.
 2. PROVIDE LETTER FROM TENET CONCERNING THE DRAINAGE
 AREA WHEN WORKED OUT. WILL BE NEEDED PRIOR TO
 SITE/CIVIL SUBMITTAL.
 3. UTILITY ADJUSTMENTS HAVE BEEN MADE.
Review Stop SURVEY SURVEYING
Rev No 6 Status F Date 06-10-2014 Cont ID  
Sent By vnoel Date 06-10-2014 Time 08:26 Rev Time 0.00
Received By vnoel Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2014-06-10 08:32:131. PREVIOUS COMMENTS OF UNITY OF TITLE, PLAT AND
 SITE/CIVIL SUBMITTAL STILL PERTAIN.
 2. WHAT IS STATUS OF RETENTION EASEMENT?
 3. REMOVE EASEMENTS FOR WATER AND SEWER. ON SITE LINES
 WILL BE PRIVATE. RELOCATE METER AND CLEAN OUT TO JUST
 INSIDE EXISTING UTILITY EASEMENT.
Review Stop SURVEY SURVEYING
Rev No 5 Status F Date 02-26-2014 Cont ID  
Sent By vnoel Date 02-26-2014 Time 07:37 Rev Time 0.00
Received By vnoel Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2014-02-26 07:39:31PREVIOUS COMMENTS NOT ADDRESSED:
  
 1. ELEVATIONS ON SURVEY DESCRIBED AS NGVD. SAME
 ELEVATIONS ON ENGINEERING PLAN CALL OUT AS NAVD 88 AND
 TO ADD 1.55'.
 2. WHAT IS DEPTH OF PROPOSED RETENTION AREA OVER THE
 EXISTING 10" S.S.?
 3. MOVE WATER METER TO JUST INSIDE THE UTILITY
 EASEMENT. ON SITE LINE WILL BE PRIVATE.
 4. INSTALL CLEAN OUT JUST OUTSIDE OF UTILITY EASEMENT
 FOR POINT OF CONNECTION FOR SANITARY LINE.
 5. PREVIOUS COMMENTS CONCERNING UNITY OF TITLE, PLAT,
 AND RELEASE OF RETENTION STILL APPLY.
Review Stop SURVEY SURVEYING
Rev No 4 Status   Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2013-08-28 12:36:081. ELEVATIONS ON SURVEY DESCRIBED AS NGVD. SAME
 ELEVATIONS ON ENGINEERING PLAN CALL OUT AS NAVD 88 AND
 TO ADD 1.55'.
 2. WHAT IS DEPTH OF PROPOSED RETENTION AREA OVER THE
 EXISTING 10" S.S.?
 3. MOVE WATER METER TO JUST INSIDE THE UTILITY
 EASEMENT. ON SITE LINE WILL BE PRIVATE.
 4. INSTALL CLEAN OUT JUST OUTSIDE OF UTILITY EASEMENT
 FOR POINT OF CONNECTION FOR SANITARY LINE.
 5. PREVIOUS COMMENTS CONCERNING UNITY OF TITLE, PLAT,
 AND RELEASE OF RETENTION STILL APPLY.
  
  
Review Stop SURVEY SURVEYING
Rev No 3 Status F Date 07-17-2013 Cont ID  
Sent By vnoel Date 07-17-2013 Time 09:39 Rev Time 0.00
Received By vnoel Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2013-07-17 09:41:05NO REVISED SURVEY OR CONCEPTUAL ENGINEERING PLANS WERE
 SUBMITTED WITH JUNE 19TH RESUBMITTAL.
Review Stop SURVEY SURVEYING
Rev No 2 Status F Date 05-09-2013 Cont ID  
Sent By vnoel Date 05-09-2013 Time 07:49 Rev Time 0.00
Received By vnoel Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2013-05-09 08:20:22ORIGINAL COMMENTS:
 1. SEPARATE EASEMENT MAY BE NEEDED FOR ANY ON-SITE
 PUBLIC UTILITIES.
 2. SITE/CIVIL REVIEW IS REQUIRED THROUGH ENGINEERING
 SERVICES.
 3. BOUNDARY PLAT WILL BE REQUIRED. APPLICATION IS MADE
 THRU ENGINEERING.
  
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS 5/9/13:
  
 1. ON SURVEY, RENUMBER NOTES OR ADD #'S 8 AND 9.
 2. ADD DATUM TO NOTE #10.
 3. DEFINE VERTICAL DATUM.
 4. EXISTING RETENTION AREA IN ORB 13931/621 WILL NEED
 TO BE RELEASED OR MODIFIED.
 5. REMOVE PROPOSED RETENTION AREA FROM WITHIN THE 25'
 UE.
 6. LANDSCAPING WITHIN 20' UE ALONG EAST LINE WILL NEED
 APPROVAL OF EASEMENT HOLDER.
 7. ON CONCEPTUAL ENG. PLAN, MOVE WATER METER LOCATION
 TO JUST OUTSIDE FPL EASEMENT.
 8. REVISE SANITARY LINE TO CONNECT SOUTH OF PROPOSED
 CHAPEL WITH CLEANOUT JUST OUTSIDE FPL EASEMENT.
 9. REVISE NOTE AND ELEVATIONS TO NGVD 29 ON ENG. PLAN.
 10. UNITY OF TITLE WILL BE REQUIRED PRIOR TO PLAT
 RECORDATION.
Review Stop SURVEY SURVEYING
Rev No 1 Status F Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time  
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2013-05-08 07:21:131. SEPARATE EASEMENT MAY BE NEEDED FOR ANY ON-SITE
 PUBLIC UTILITIES.
 2. SITE/CIVIL REVIEW IS REQUIRED THROUGH ENGINEERING
 SERVICES.
 3. BOUNDARY PLAT WILL BE REQUIRED. APPLICATION IS MADE
 THRU ENGINEERING.
Review Stop TRAFFIC TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No 1 Status   Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time  
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 4 Status   Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By dkittred Date 08-28-2014 Time 16:56 Sent To  
Notes
2014-09-17 17:27:33PLANNING AND ZONING COMMENTS:
  
 9/17/14
  
 PASSED WITH CONDITIONS THAT CAN BE ADDRESSED AT TIME OF
 BUILDING PERMIT SUBMITTAL:
  
 1. A REGULATING PLAN INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO
 PARKING STRIPING DETAIL, DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE, AND THE
 BICYCLE RACK DETAIL UTILZING AN INVERTED 'U', POST AND
 CIRCLE, OR SIMILAR TYPE RACK WITH APPROPRIATE RACK
 SPACING INDICATED SHALL BE INCLUDED.
  
 2. A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT WILL BE REQUIRED THROUGH
 THE PLANNING DIVISION IF ANY TREES ON THE SITE WILL
 NEED TO BE REMOVED OR RELOCATED FOR THIS PROJECT.
 ISSUANCE OF THE TREE ALTERATION PERMIT WILL BE REQUIRED
 PRIOR TO ZONING APPROVAL OF ANY SITE WORK FOR THIS
 PROJECT.
  
 IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT:
  
 DANIELLE J. KITTREDGE, AICP
 SENIOR PLANNER
 PLANNING & ZONING DIVISION
 PHONE: (561)-822-1443
 EMAIL: [email protected]
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 3 Status F Date 06-10-2014 Cont ID  
Sent By dkittred Date 06-10-2014 Time 10:47 Rev Time 0.00
Received By dkittred Date 06-02-2014 Time 09:41 Sent To  
Notes
2014-06-10 10:47:19PLANNING AND ZONING COMMENTS:
  
 6/10/14 (BASED ON 5/30/14 SUBMITTAL COMMENTS FROM
 2/25/14 HAVE BEEN REVISED TO WHAT IS LISTED BELOW)
  
 1. ORDINANCE NO. 4489-13 APPROVED THE SUBJECT PROPERTY
 FOR A 16,988 SQUARE FOOT BUILDING. THE LAST REVISED
 PLANS HAVE INDICATED AN INCREASE OF THE BUILDING SQUARE
 FOOTAGE TO 17,330 SQUARE FEET. THIS INCREASE IN SQUARE
 FOOTAGE WILL REQUIRE A MINOR PD AMENDMENT.
  
 2. THERE IS NO TREE PROVIDED IN THE NORTHWESTERN MOST
 LANDSCAPE ISLAND. ADDITIONALLY, THE TREES FOR THE
 LANDSCAPE BUFFER ALONG THE WESTERN SIDE OF THE NORTH
 BUFFER HAVE BEEN OMITTED. PLEASE PROVIDE TREES TO CODE
 OR EXPLAIN WHY NO TREES CAN BE PROVIDED IN THIS
 LOCATION. THIS COMMENT CAN BE ADDRESSED DURING
 SUBMITTAL OF THE LANDSCAPE PERMIT THROUGH THE BUILDING
 DIVISION FOR THIS PROJECT.
  
 3. BICYCLE PARKING WILL NEED TO BE PROVIDED ON THE SITE
 PER ZLDR SEC. 94-485(Q). PLAN WILL NEED TO INCLUDE
 CALCULATION AND DETAIL WITH RACK STYLE AND SPACING.
 THIS COMMENT CAN BE ADDRESSED DURING SUBMITTAL OF THE
 BUILDING PERMIT FOR THIS PROJECT.
  
 4. A REGULATING PLAN INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO,
 PARKING STRIPING DETAIL AND DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE WILL
 NEED TO BE INCLUDED AT THE TIME OF SUBMITTAL OF A
 BUILDING PERMIT FOR THIS PROJECT.
  
 5. A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT WILL BE REQUIRED THROUGH
 THE PLANNING DIVISION IF ANY TREES ON THE SITE WILL
 NEED TO BE REMOVED OR RELOCATED FOR THIS PROJECT.
 ISSUANCE OF THE TREE ALTERATION PERMIT WILL BE REQUIRED
 PRIOR TO ZONING APPROVAL OF ANY SITE WORK FOR THIS
 PROJECT.
  
 6. SITE PLAN SHEET (SP.1) OF THE SUBMITTAL FROM MAY 30,
 2014 IS NOT SIGNED AND SEALED. SOMEONE CAN COME TO THE
 PLANNING DIVISION TO SIGN AND SEAL THE SHEETS OR FOUR
 NEW SHEETS THAT ARE SIGNED AND SEALED CAN BE SUBMITTED.
  
 PLEASE NOTE, WRITTEN RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS MADE
 BY DEPARTMENTS SHALL BE PROVIDED IN WRITTEN FORMAT WHEN
 RESUBMITTING. CHANGES TO EACH SET OF PLANS SHOULD BE
 CLOUDED OR OTHER SIMILAR NOTATION INDICATING WHERE
 CHANGES HAVE BEEN MADE.
  
 IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT:
  
 DANIELLE J. KITTREDGE, AICP
 SENIOR PLANNER
 PLANNING & ZONING DIVISION
 PHONE: (561)-822-1443
 EMAIL: [email protected]
  
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 2 Status P Date 02-27-2014 Cont ID  
Sent By dkittred Date 02-27-2014 Time 14:09 Rev Time 0.00
Received By dkittred Date 02-24-2014 Time 13:28 Sent To  
Notes
2014-02-27 13:57:31PLANNING AND ZONING COMMENTS:
  
 2/25/14
  
 1. THERE IS NO TREE PROVIDED IN THE NORTHWESTERN MOST
 LANDSCAPE ISLAND. ADDITIONALLY, THE TREES FOR THE
 LANDSCAPE BUFFER ALONG THE WESTERN SIDE OF THE NORTH
 BUFFER HAVE BEEN OMITTED. PLEASE PROVIDE TREES TO CODE
 OR EXPLAIN WHY NO TREES CAN BE PROVIDED IN THIS
 LOCATION. THIS COMMENT CAN BE ADDRESSED DURING
 SUBMITTAL OF THE LANDSCAPE PERMIT THROUGH THE BUILDING
 DIVISION FOR THIS PROJECT.
  
 2. A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT WILL BE REQUIRED THROUGH
 THE PLANNING DIVISION IF ANY TREES ON THE SITE WILL
 NEED TO BE REMOVED OR RELOCATED FOR THIS PROJECT.
  
 3. UNITY OF TITLE (OR OTHER - SEE SURVEYING'S COMMENTS)
 WILL BE REQUIRED PRIOR TO APPLYING FOR A BUILDING
 PERMIT.
  
 4. SITE PLAN SHEET (SP.1) OF THE SUBMITTAL FROM JUNE
 19, 2013 IS NOT SIGNED AND SEALED. SOMEONE CAN COME TO
 THE PLANNING DIVISION TO SIGN AND SEAL THE SHEETS OR
 FOUR NEW SHEETS THAT ARE SIGNED AND SEALED CAN BE
 SUBMITTED.
  
 PLEASE NOTE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS MADE
 BY DEPARTMENTS SHALL BE PROVIDED IN WRITTEN FORMAT WHEN
 RESUBMITTING.
  
 IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT:
  
 DANIELLE J. KITTREDGE, AICP
 SENIOR PLANNER
 PLANNING & ZONING DIVISION
 PHONE: (561)-822-1443
 EMAIL: [email protected]
  
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 05-06-2013 Cont ID  
Sent By ajones Date 05-06-2013 Time 15:17 Rev Time 0.00
Received By ajones Date 05-06-2013 Time 15:17 Sent To  
Notes
2013-05-06 16:24:145/6/13:
 GENERAL COMMENTS: WHEN RESUBMITTING:
 A. PROVIDE WRITTEN RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS MADE BY
 DEPARTMENTS IN A WRITTEN FORMAT WHEN RESUBMITTING.
 B. 15 SETS OF REVISED PLANS AND/OR DOCUMENTS SHALL BE
 PROVIDED, ALONG WITH ONE REDUCED COPY AND AN ELECTRONIC
 COPY OF ALL PLANS.
 C. IF NO RESPONSE IS RECEIVED WITHIN 60 DAYS OF THE
 ISSUANCE OF THESE COMMENTS, THE APPLICATION WILL BE
 CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN AND ANY FURTHER ACTION WILL
 REQUIRE SUBMISSION OF A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION.
 D. PLEASE NOT THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1)
 RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED
 COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE
 APPLICANT WILL BE ACCESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE
 WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE.
 E. IN ORDER TO BE CONSIDERED FOR THE JUNE 18, 2013
 PLANNING BOARD MEETING, ALL PLANS MUST BE REVISED AND
 RESUBMITTED BY MAY 24 2013.
  
 SITE PLAN:A. THE LOCATION OF THE PROPOSED WELLNESS
 BUILDING ARE BEING CONSTRUCTED OVER A WATER MAIN.
  B. A UNITY OF TITLE WILL BE REQUIRED PRIOR TO APPLYING
 FOR A BUILDING PERMIT.
  C. THE FOLLOWING LETTERS ARE NEEDED PRIOR TO
 SCHEDULING BEFORE THE PLANNING BOARD:
  - UTILITY LETTERS FROM COMCAST AND FLORIDA PUBLIC
 UTILITIES
  - A TRAFFIC LETTER FROM PALM BEACH COUNTY
  D. PROVIDE A BREAKDOWN OF PARKING FOR THE EXISTING AND
 PROPOSED PARKING FOR PHASE I OF THE DEVELOPMENT.
  E. THE PROPOSED CONNECTION TO ST. MARY?S PROPERTY WILL
 REQUIRE A MINOR AMENDMENT TO ST. MARY?S AND HANLEY
 CSPD?S.
  
 LANDSCAPING:
 A. INTERIOR ISLANDS SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR EVERY TEN
 PARKING SPACES OR FRACTION THEREOF. INTERIOR LANDSCAPE
 ISLANDS SHALL BE AT LEAST FIVE FEET WIDE AND SHALL
 CONTAIN AT LEAST ONE SHADE OR FLOWERING TREE. THE
 PARKING ON THE SOUTH WEST SECTION OF PHASE 1 SHOWS AN
 INTERIOR ISLAND WITH ONLY SOD.
  B. THE LANDSCAPE PLAN TABLE INDICATED THAT THERE ARE
 SEVEN (7) LIVE OAK TREES AND I ONLY IDENTIFIED FOUR (4)
 ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN.
  C. PROVIDE A TABLE ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN SHOWING A
 BREAKDOWN OF SPECIES BE REQUIRED/PROVIDED, OPEN SPACE
 AND XERISCAPING REQUIREMENTS.
  
 ANGELLA VANN, AICP
 561-822-1441
 [email protected]
  
  Print


Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved