Plan Review Details - Project Z13020008
Plan Review Stops For Project Z13020008
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 1 Status   Date 03-13-2013 Cont ID  
Sent By eschneid Date 03-13-2013 Time 19:14 Rev Time  
Received By eschneid Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop ENG - PPRC ENGINEERING - PPRC
Rev No 1 Status   Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time  
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop FIRE FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No 1 Status   Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time  
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop L LANDSCAPING
Rev No 1 Status   Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time  
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop PARK PARKING
Rev No 1 Status   Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time  
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop POLICE POLICE
Rev No 1 Status   Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time  
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop PW PUBLIC WORKS
Rev No 1 Status   Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time  
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop STORM STORMWATER
Rev No 1 Status   Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time  
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop SURVEY SURVEYING
Rev No 3 Status P Date 10-24-2013 Cont ID  
Sent By vnoel Date 10-24-2013 Time 07:33 Rev Time 0.00
Received By vnoel Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2013-10-24 07:35:36PASSED, BUT:
 1. HAVE APPLICANT PROVIDE ONE SIGNED AND SEALED COPY OF
 SURVEY.
 2. UNITY OF TITLE IS BEING PREPARED.
  
Review Stop SURVEY SURVEYING
Rev No 2 Status F Date 03-28-2013 Cont ID  
Sent By vnoel Date 03-28-2013 Time 13:33 Rev Time 0.00
Received By vnoel Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2013-03-28 13:58:181. SCALE OF SURVEY TOO SMALL. ENLARGE TO 1" = 30' OR
 40'.
 2. NOT ALL IMPROVEMENTS ARE SHOWN. NORTHERN ENTRANCE
 AREA INCOMPLETE; LIFT STATION IN SE CORNER NOT SHOWN,
 SIDEWALKS, ETC.
 3. HAVE PROPERTY CORNERS FLAGGED OR PAINTED. SITE VISIT
 NOTED CORNERS AS REQUIRED BY CHAPTER 5J-17 HAVE NOT
 BEEN SET.
 4. ITEMS 13, 15-17, 27 AND 28 IN SCHEDULE B NOT SHOWN
 OR LABELLED.
 5. PUMP STATION EASEMENT IN ORB 6267/1056 NOT SHOWN OR
 IN TITLE POLICY.
 6. EASEMENT IN ITEM 11, SCHEDULE B NOT SHOWN CORRECTLY.
 7. EASEMENT IN ORB 2443/196 NOT SHOWN ALONG 45TH STREET
 R/W.
 8. BEARING BASE CALLS FOR PARCEL B NOT DESCRIBED.
 9. LEGAL DESCRIPTION DOES NOT MATCH DEEDS PROVIDED.
 DESCRIPTION SHOULD BE PER DEEDS, NOT LEASED AREAS.
 10. PER PLANNING, SETBACKS ARE INCORRECT.
Review Stop SURVEY SURVEYING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 03-12-2013 Cont ID  
Sent By vnoel Date 03-12-2013 Time 08:46 Rev Time  
Received By vnoel Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2013-03-12 08:47:111. NO SURVEYS PROVIDED.
 2. UNITY OF TITLE APPLICATION RECEIVED AND BEING
 REVISED.
Review Stop TRAFFIC TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No 1 Status   Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time  
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 3 Status P Date 02-26-2016 Cont ID  
Sent By eschneid Date 02-26-2016 Time 09:16 Rev Time 0.00
Received By eschneid Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 2 Status F Date 03-28-2013 Cont ID  
Sent By eschneid Date 03-28-2013 Time 17:17 Rev Time 0.00
Received By eschneid Date 03-28-2013 Time 17:17 Sent To  
Notes
2013-03-28 17:17:43CASE NO. PB 1223F
 WEST PALM HOSPITAL SIGNAGE PROGRAM 1ST RESUBMITTAL
 2201 45TH STREET
  
 - CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446
  
 - PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN
 WRITTEN FORMAT.
  
 - WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF TEN
 (10) PAPER COPIES AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY IN .PNG FORMAT
 OF ALL PLANS. PLEASE NOTE THAT CHANGES ON THE
 RESUBMITTED PLANS MAY RESULT IN ADDITIONAL COMMENTS.
  
 - THE RESBMITTAL COMMENTS SHALL BE SUFFICIENTLY
 ADDRESSED AND SUBMITTED TO THE PLANNING DIVISION BY 5
 PM ON MONDAY, APRIL 15, 2013, TO BE SCHEDULED FOR THE
 MAY 21, 2013 PLANNING BOARD MEETING.
  
 - PLEASE NOTE THAT IF THE PLANNING DIVISION HAS NOT
 RECEIVED A RESPONSE TO THE RESUBMITTAL COMMENTS WITHIN
 60 DAYS FROM THE DATE OF THESE COMMENTS (MARCH 29,
 2013), THE CASE SHALL BE CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN. ANY
 FURTHER ACTION SHALL REQUIRE A NEW DEVELOPMENT
 APPLICATION.
  
 - PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1)
 RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED
 COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE
 APPLICANT WILL BE ACCESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE
 WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE ($600).
  
 - PUBLIC HEARING NOTIFICATION SIGNAGE SHALL BE POSTED
 IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF ORDINANCE NO.
 4357-11.
  
 1) THE SURVEY PROVIDED WITH THE RESUBMITTAL FAILS TO
 SHOW THE EXISTING CONDITIONS AT THE NORTHERN DRIVEWAY -
 MISSING EXISTING SIGN, THE CURBING AND OTHER FEATURES
 SUCH AS THE BACKFLOW PREVENTER AND FIRE HYDRANT. IT IS
 IMPORTANT TO LOCATE THESE FEATURES ON BOTH THE SURVEY
 AND SUBSEQUENT SITE PLAN IN ORDER TO ENSURE THE SIGN IS
 NOT IMPROPERLY LOCATED.
  
 2) REPEAT COMMENT - THE SITE PLAN NEEDS TO BE TO SCALE.
 ADDITIONALLY, THE ENTRY SIGN AREAS SHALL BE PROVIDED AT
 A SCALE NO GREATER THAN 1:30 WITH THE SIGNS SHOWN AT
 ACCURATE SIZE AND IN THE CORRECT LOCATION IN
 RELATIONSHIP TO THE ENTRY FEATURES. STAFF NEEDS TO
 VERIFY THAT THERE IS SUFFICIENT ROOM FOR THE PLACEMENT
 OF THE SPECIFIC EIGHT (8) FOOT LONG SIGNS IN THESE
 LOCATIONS.
  
 3) THE STATED DIMENSIONS ALONG CONGRESS AVENUE LISTED
 ON THE SITE PLAN ARE INCORRECT WHEN COMPARED TO THE
 SURVEY. THE SITE PLAN SHOWS APPROXIMATELY 30 MORE
 LINEAR FEET THEN THE SURVEY. SURVEY - 1,275 LINEAR FEET
 VS. SITE PLAN - 1,342 LINEAR FEET. THIS AFFECTS THE
 AMOUNT OF SIGNAGE PERMITTED. DUE TO THE PENDING UNITY
 OF TITLE TO ALLOW THE SIGNS ON 45TH STREET, THE
 CONGRESS AVENUE FRONTAGE IS CONSIDERED THE SIDE
 PROPERTY LINE. SIGNS ALONG THE SIDE PROPERTY LINE ARE
 LIMITED TO 50% OF THE LINEAR FRONTAGE, THUS A TOTAL OF
 637.5 SQUARE FEET OF FREE STANDING SIGNAGE IS
 PERMITTED. EACH FACE OF THE TWO PROPOSED SIGNS MAY BE A
 MAXIMUM OF 159 SQUARE FEET.
  
 4) REPEAT COMMENT - THE SITE PLAN SHOWS SIGNS THAT ARE
 APPROXIMATELY 87 SQUARE FEET PER FACE, NOT 64 SQUARE
 FEET AS LISTED. THE TEXT PROVIDES FOR SIGNS THAT ARE
 102 SQUARE FEET IN SIZE, YET LISTS THAT SIGNS MAY BE A
 MAXIMUM OF 75 SQUARE FEET PER FACE. PLEASE NOTE THAT
 THE ENTIRE MASS OF THE SIGN IS COUNTED TOWARD THE
 SQUARE FOOTAGE, NOT JUST THE SIGN COPY - SEE SECTION
 94-405(A) OF THE ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT
 REGULATIONS. A MEETING IS REQUIRED TO DETERMINE THE WAY
 THE FREE STANDING SIGNS WILL BE REGULATED, TO CLEAR UP
 THE DISCREPANCIES AND TO DISCUSS HOW FUTURE CHANGES CAN
 BE HANDLED.
  
 5) THE DIRECTIONAL SIGN TEXT SETS THE MAXIMUM HEIGHT
 AND WIDTH OF THE SIGN AT 6' X 3' FOR AN 18 SQUARE FOOT
 SIGN, YET IT SETS THE MAXIMUM SIGN AREA AT 15 SQUARE
 FEET PER SIGN FACE. PLEASE EXPLAIN THIS DISCREPANCY.
 THE SITE PLAN DOES NOT INCLUDE THE FULL WIDTH OF THE
 SIGN - IF SHOWS A DIMENSION OF 2 FEET 9.5 INCHES, BUT
 FAILS TO INCLUDE THE PORTIONS OF THE TEXT BOX WHICH
 EXTEND PAST THE MONUMENT PART OF THE SIGN. PLEASE NOTE
 THAT THE ENTIRE MASS OF THE SIGN IS COUNTED TOWARD THE
 SQUARE FOOTAGE, NOT JUST THE SIGN COPY - SEE SECTION
 94-405(A) OF THE ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT
 REGULATIONS.
  
 6) THE PROPOSAL IS NOW TO INCLUDE ONLY 6 DIRECTIONAL
 SIGNS ON THE SITE. PLEASE NOTE THAT YOUR RESPONSE
 STATED THAT THE APPLICANT WOULD LIKE THE FLEXIBILITY IN
 FUTURE DIRECTIONAL SIGN PLACEMENT. STAFF IS WILLING TO
 ADD A PROVISION TO THE SIGNAGE PROGRAM THAT PERMITS THE
 INSTALLATION OF ADDITIONAL DIRECTIONAL SIGNS IF A MINOR
 PLANNED DEVELOPMENT AMENDMENT IS APPROVED FOR THE
 ADDITIONAL SIGN(S) LOCATION(S).
  
 7) THE DIRECTIONAL SIGNS SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM SETBACK
 FROM CONGRESS AVENUE SO THAT THEY ARE NOT CONFUSED WITH
 PROJECT IDENTIFICATION SIGNS. STAFF HAS REVIEWED THE
 PROPOSED PLACEMENT LOCATIONS AND WILL RECOMMEND A 100
 FOOT MINIMUM SETBACK FOR DIRECTIONAL SIGNS.
  
 8) WALL SIGNAGE - STAFF AGREES THAT A MEETING IS
 NECESSARY TO CLARIFY THE WALL SIGNAGE COMMENTS GOING
 FORWARD. THE EXISTING FA?ADE AREA IS NECESSARY TO
 DETERMINE THE AMOUNT OF WALL SIGNAGE SQUARE FOOTAGE
 PERMITTED ON THE BUILDINGS. THIS THEN DETERMINES IF A
 WAIVER TO THE AMOUNT OF SIGNAGE IS REQUIRED. THE NUMBER
 OF SIGNS PROPOSED WILL REQUIRE A WAIVER FROM THE NUMBER
 OF SIGNS PERMITTED ON THE SITE.
  
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 03-13-2013 Cont ID  
Sent By eschneid Date 03-13-2013 Time 20:13 Rev Time 0.00
Received By eschneid Date 03-13-2013 Time 19:14 Sent To  
Notes
2013-03-13 20:13:09CASE NO. PB 1223F
 WEST PALM HOSPITAL SIGNAGE PROGRAM
 2201 45TH STREET
  
 - CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446
  
 - PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN
 WRITTEN FORMAT.
  
 - WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF TEN
 (10) PAPER COPIES AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY IN .PNG FORMAT
 OF ALL PLANS. PLEASE NOTE THAT CHANGES ON THE
 RESUBMITTED PLANS MAY RESULT IN ADDITIONAL COMMENTS.
  
 - THE PPRC COMMENTS SHALL BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED AND
 SUBMITTED TO THE PLANNING DIVISION BY 5 PM ON FRIDAY,
 MARCH 22, 2013, TO BE SCHEDULED FOR THE APRIL 16, 2013
 PLANNING BOARD MEETING.
  
 - PLEASE NOTE THAT IF THE PLANNING DIVISION HAS NOT
 RECEIVED A RESPONSE TO THE PPRC COMMENTS WITHIN 60 DAYS
 FROM THE DATE OF THESE COMMENTS/THE PPRC MEETING (MAY
 13, 2013), THE CASE SHALL BE CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN. ANY
 FURTHER ACTION SHALL REQUIRE A NEW DEVELOPMENT
 APPLICATION.
  
 - PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1)
 RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED
 COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE
 APPLICANT WILL BE ACCESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE
 WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE ($600).
  
 - PUBLIC HEARING NOTIFICATION SIGNAGE SHALL BE POSTED
 IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF ORDINANCE NO.
 4357-11.
  
 1) THE DISC PROVIDED WITH THE APPLICATION DID NOT
 CONTAIN ANY PLANS.
  
 2) NO SURVEY WAS PROVIDED WITH THE APPLICATION. AN ALTA
 SURVEY IS REQUIRED OF THE ENTIRE PROPERTY THAT IS ZONED
 COMMUNITY SERVICE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT.
  
 3) PROVIDE THE LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPERTY ZONED
 CSPD ELECTRONICALLY IN .WORD FORMAT.
  
 4) THE SITE PLAN NEEDS TO BE TO SCALE AND INCLUDE
 SETBACKS FOR MONUMENT SIGN (M).
  
 5) THE DIMENSIONS ALONG CONGRESS AVENUE WERE NOT
 PROVIDED. STAFF IS UNABLE TO CALCULATE THE AMOUNT OF
 SQUARE FOOTAGE REQUESTED VS. THE AMOUNT OF SQUARE
 FOOTAGE PERMITTED.
  
 6) THERE ARE DISCREPANCIES WITH HOW THE SIGN AREA IS
 CALCULATED ON THE SITE PLAN AND IN THE TEXT. THE SIGN
 PLAN SHOWS THE COPY AREA OF THE PROJECT ID SIGN AT
 63.96 SQUARE FEET PER FACE AND THE DIRECTIONAL SIGN AT
 12.75 SQUARE FEET PER FACE. THE TEXT HAS BIGGER SIGN
 AREA FOR BOTH OF THESE. ADDITIONALLY, THE DIMENSION
 DERIVED FROM MULTIPLYING THE HEIGHT X WIDTH OF BOTH
 SIGNS IS GREATER THAN THE TEXT LISTED SIGN AREA. IF IT
 IS THE INTENT TO HAVE THE SPECIFIC PANELS THAT REGULATE
 THE COPY AREA MOUNTED TO A MONUMENT WITH A SET SIZE,
 THEN THIS NEEDS TO BE SPECIFIED. HAVING THE DISCREPANCY
 AND LISTING A SIGN MAXIMUM SIZE CREATES PROBLEMS IF THE
 DESIGN OF THE SIGN IS CHANGED IN THE FUTURE.
  
 7) THE SITE PLAN STATES ONLY 6 DIRECTIONAL SIGNS WILL
 BE PERMITTED, YET THE TEXT STATES NO MAXIMUM NUMBER.
 PLEASE CLARIFY.
  
 8) ONE OF THE DIRECTIONAL SIGNS IS LOCATED IN A
 TERMINAL LANDSCAPE ISLAND. THE SIGNS MAY NOT INTERFERE
 WITH LOCATIONS FOR REQUIRED TREES. PLEASE NOTE THAT IF
 REQUIRED LANDSCAPING IS MISSING IN THE VICINITY OF A
 PROPOSED SIGN, THE LANDSCAPE SHALL BE INSTALLED.
  
 9) THE DIRECTIONAL SIGNS SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM SETBACK
 FROM CONGRESS AVENUE.
  
 10) THE WALL SIGN PRIMARY PROJECT IDENTIFICATION TYPE
 DOES NOT MATCH THE 2 APPROVED WALL SIGNS IN SIZE AND
 NUMBER PERMITTED. PLEASE EXPLAIN. NOTE: FOUR WALL SIGNS
 EXCEED CODE ALLOWANCE.
  
 11) THE SQUARE FOOTAGE OF THE BUILDING FA?ADE AND THE
 MAXIMUM WALL SIGN SQUARE FOOTAGE SHALL BE PROVIDED SO
 THAT STAFF CAN DETERMINE THE REQUESTED VS. PERMITTED
 SQUARE FOOTAGE.
  
 12) WHY IS THE PROPOSED HEIGHT OF THE EMERGENCY SIGN AT
 32" WHEN THE ONES CURRENTLY CONSTRUCTED ARE ONLY 30" IN
 HEIGHT? THE SIGN PLAN SHOULD INCORPORATE THE APPROVED
 EXISTING CONDITIONS WHENEVER POSSIBLE.
  
 13) THE WALL SERVICE SIGNS SHOW DIFFERENT HEIGHTS ON
 THE PLAN AND IN THE TEXT (30" VS 32"). THE MAXIMUM
 SQUARE FOOTAGE PERMITTED FOR THIS TYPE OF SIGN AND THE
 MAXIMUM SIZE OF THIS TYPE OF SIGN IS REQUIRED FOR STAFF
 TO CALCULATE HOW MUCH ADDITIONAL SIGNAGE IS BEING
 REQUESTED (SEE COMMENT 11).
  
  Print


Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved