| 2012-06-12 16:09:11 | PB 1248Q |
| | MORSELIFE PACE PROGRAM MAJOR AMENDMENT |
| | 4847 FRED GLADSTONE DRIVE |
| | |
| | - CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446 |
| | |
| | - PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN |
| | WRITTEN FORMAT. |
| | |
| | - WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF TEN |
| | (10) PAPER COPIES AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY IN .PNG FORMAT |
| | OF ALL PLANS. PLEASE NOTE THAT CHANGES ON THE |
| | RESUBMITTED PLANS MAY RESULT IN ADDITIONAL COMMENTS. |
| | |
| | - THE PPRC COMMENTS SHALL BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED AND |
| | SUBMITTED TO THE PLANNING DIVISION BY 5 PM ON FRIDAY, |
| | JUNE 22, 2012, TO BE SCHEDULED FOR THE JULY 17, 2012 |
| | PLANNING BOARD MEETING. |
| | |
| | - PLEASE NOTE THAT IF THE PLANNING DIVISION HAS NOT |
| | RECEIVED A RESPONSE TO THE PPRC COMMENTS WITHIN 60 DAYS |
| | FROM THE DATE OF THESE COMMENTS/THE PPRC MEETING |
| | (AUGUST 22, 2012), THE CASE SHALL BE CONSIDERED |
| | WITHDRAWN. ANY FURTHER ACTION SHALL REQUIRE A NEW |
| | DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION. |
| | |
| | - PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1) |
| | RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED |
| | COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE |
| | APPLICANT WILL BE ACCESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE |
| | WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE ($600). |
| | |
| | - PUBLIC HEARING NOTIFICATION SIGNAGE SHALL BE POSTED |
| | IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF ORDINANCE NO. |
| | 4357-11. |
| | |
| | 1) PLEASE PROVIDE A COPY OF THE PALM BEACH COUNTY |
| | TRAFFIC CONCURRENCY LETTER APPROVING THE NEW VEHICLE |
| | TRIPS. |
| | |
| | 2) THE 7,000 SQUARE FOOT ADDITION WILL BE PROCESSED |
| | THROUGH THE FORMAL SITE PLAN REVIEW PROCESS. DETAILED |
| | SITE AND LANDSCAPE PLANS AND ELEVATIONS WILL BE |
| | REQUIRED WITH THE APPLICATION AND A DETAILED SITE |
| | REVIEW WILL BE PERFORMED AT THAT TIME. NOT IF TREES ARE |
| | TO BE REMOVED OR RELOCATED, A TREE ALTERATION PERMIT IS |
| | REQUIRED. |
| | |
| | 3) THE PARKING CALCULATIONS FOR THE MORSE GERIATRIC |
| | CENTER SHALL BE BROKEN OUT INTO EACH ELEMENT. IT |
| | APPEARS THAT THE PARKING "REQUIRED" IS UNDERSTATED AS |
| | IT DOES NOT FACTOR IN THE ENTIRE OFFICE SQUARE FOOTAGE. |
| | THERE STILL APPEARS TO BE EXCESS IN THE TOTAL PROVIDED |
| | PARKING. |
| | |
| | 4) THE DAYCARE FACILITIES, ADULT, PARKING REQUIREMENT |
| | OF THE ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS SHALL BE |
| | USED. THE REQUIRED 5 VISITOR SPACES ARE NOT INCLUDED ON |
| | THE PARKING TABLE. |
| | |
| | 5) THE MASTER PLAN SHALL DESIGNATE THE LOCATION OF THE |
| | VAN PARKING. IT SHALL BE SCREENED FROM THE ADJACENT |
| | RESIDENTIAL. |
| | |
| | 6) PLEASE PROVIDE THE DIMENSIONS OF THE VANS, SO THAT |
| | STAFF CAN VERIFY THE VANS WILL FIT IN THEIR INTENDED |
| | PARKING SPACES. |
| | |
| | 7) THE LATEST PROPERTY APPRAISER AERIAL SHOWS THE |
| | MORSELIFE PARKING LOT FULL. THERE DO NOT APPEAR TO BE |
| | ENOUGH OPEN PARKING SPACES TO PARK AN ADDITIONAL 60 |
| | EMPLOYEES, 5 GUESTS AND 15 VANS. PLEASE EXPLAIN. |
| | |
| | 8) STAFF ONLY COUNTS 299 PARKING SPACES DRAWN ON THE |
| | PLAN, NOT 306 SPACES AS LISTED PARKING TABLE. THE |
| | LATEST AERIAL SHOWS THAT THE 299 SPACES AS SHOWN ON THE |
| | PLAN ARE INCORRECT. THE AERIAL SHOWS A NUMBER OF ACCESS |
| | AISLES IN THE PARKING LOT WHICH ARE NOT REFLECTED ON |
| | PLAN. THIS WOULD REDUCE THE PARKING COUNT FURTHER. |
| | PARKING LOT INTERIOR AND TERMINAL ISLANDS ALSO APPEAR |
| | TO BE INCORRECTLY SHOWN. PLEASE CORRECT THE PARKING |
| | LAYOUT AND THE PARKING NUMBERS. |
| | |
| | 9) WHERE IS THE OUTDOOR RECREATION AREA FOR THE PROGRAM |
| | PARTICIPANTS? |
| | |