| 2012-06-07 23:30:28 | ZONING PLANS AND PLATS REVIEW COMMITTEE (PPRC) REVIEW |
| | ___________________________________________ |
| | |
| | DATE OF REVIEW: 06.07.2012 |
| | PROJECT NO.: Z12050006 |
| | CASE NO.: PB 1388C |
| | ADDRESS: 5750 NORTH FLAGLER DRIVE |
| | APPLICANT/CONTACT: GREGORY S. KINO |
| | TELEPHONE NO.: 561.820.0329 |
| | ___________________________________________ |
| | |
| | PLEASE PROVIDE A WRITTEN RESPONSE TO THE FOLLOWING |
| | REVIEW COMMENTS: |
| | |
| | IMPORTANT?AS THE PROPOSED MODIFICATIONS DO NOT QUALIFY |
| | AS A MAJOR AMENDMENT TO THE EXISTING DEVELOPMENT OF |
| | SIGNIFICANT IMPACT (DSI), AN EXTENSION OF THE |
| | COMMENCEMENT DEADLINE WOULD REQUIRE THE APPROVAL OF A |
| | NEW DSI. |
| | |
| | 1. THE AFFIDAVIT FOR OBTAINING THE PROPERTY OWNERS LIST |
| | (PAGE 20 OF THE DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION) WAS NOT |
| | SIGNED/NOTARIZED. PLEASE PROVIDE AN ORIGINAL |
| | SIGNED/NOTARIZED AFFIDAVIT. |
| | |
| | 2. PLEASE PROVIDE UPDATED UTILITY LETTERS WHICH INCLUDE |
| | "NO OBJECTION" FOR THE DOCK, AS WELL AS THE RESIDENTIAL |
| | DEVELOPMENT. |
| | |
| | 3. PLEASE NOTE THAT THE CLASS A SPECIAL USE PERMIT FOR |
| | THE DOCK WILL BE CONSIDERED AS A SEPARATE APPLICATION. |
| | AS SUCH, THE FOLLOWING FEES ARE DUE: |
| | |
| | DSI CLASS A |
| | ------------ ------------ |
| | APPLICATION FEES $3,000 $3,000 |
| | WAIVERS $1,200 |
| | ADVERTISING $216 $216 |
| | ENGINEERING $848 $424 |
| | ------------ ------------ |
| | TOTAL $4064 $4840 |
| | PAID $4064 $1200 |
| | ----------- ------------ |
| | BALANCE DUE $0 $3640 |
| | |
| | 4. PLEASE PROVIDE 15 SETS OF PLANS FOR THE PROPOSED |
| | DOCK, PREPARED BY A REGISTERED ENGINEERING, SHOWING THE |
| | LOCATION OF THE ENTIRE DOCK, SIZE, CONFIGURATION |
| | SETBACKS, SECTIONS/ELEVATIONS, ETC., OR PROVIDE MORE |
| | DETAIL ON THE SITE PLAN. PLEASE ENSURE THAT THE |
| | DRAWINGS MATCH THAT WHICH WAS APPROVED BY THE |
| | PERMITTING AGENCIES (I.E. FDEP AND ARMY CORPS) AND THAT |
| | ALL CONDITIONS AND REQUIREMENTS OF SUCH REGULATORY |
| | AGENCIES ARE REFLECTED (I.E. HANDRAILS, SIGNAGE, ETC.). |
| | |
| | 5. HAS THE PROPOSED DOCK OBTAINED APPROVAL FROM THE |
| | FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION (FDEP)? |
| | PLEASE PROVIDE A COPY OF THE REGULATORY APPROVAL. |
| | |
| | 6. PLEASE PROVIDE A COPY OF THE MARINE GRASSES |
| | STUDY?THE STUDY PROVIDED WITHIN THE SFWMD PERMIT IS NOT |
| | LEGIBLE. |
| | |
| | 7. SECTION 94-304(E)(1)(C)(5)(II) OF THE CITY'S ZONING |
| | AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS (ZLDRS) REQUIRES THAT |
| | POTABLE WATER AND ELECTRIC SERVICE BE PROVIDED TO EACH |
| | MOORING SLIP. ADDITIONALLY, ONE SANITARY PUMP OUT |
| | RECEPTACLE SHALL BE PROVIDED FOR EACH EIGHT MOORING |
| | SLIPS, OR FRACTION THEREOF. PLEASE CONFIRM THAT SUCH |
| | FACILITIES WILL BE PROVIDED. |
| | |
| | 8. PLEASE REVISE THE SURVEY TO INCLUDE THE OVERALL LOT |
| | SQUARE FOOTAGE AND ACREAGE. |
| | |
| | 9. PLEASE PROVIDE 15 SETS OF ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS |
| | SHOWING ALL PROPOSED STRUCTURES. |
| | |
| | 10. SHEET SP-2 DOES NOT APPEAR TO HAVE PRINTED |
| | CORRECTLY?SOME INFORMATION IS MISSING. |
| | |
| | 11. THE FRONT SETBACK FROM NORTH FLAGLER DRIVE SHALL BE |
| | MEASURED FROM THE PROPERTY LINE TO THE CLOSEST POINT OF |
| | THE STRUCTURE. THERE DOES NOT APPEAR TO BE A DIMENSION |
| | SHOWN FOR THE SETBACK PROVIDED FOR THE TOWNHOMES IN THE |
| | NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE PROPERTY. |
| | |
| | 12. SHEET SP-1 IS UNCLEAR, WHERE ARE THE EXTENTS OF THE |
| | BUILDINGS? |
| | |
| | 13. THE REAR SETBACK OF THE WATERFRONT VILLAS SHALL BE |
| | MEASURED FROM THE PROPERTY LINE TO THE CLOSEST POINT OF |
| | THE BUILDING. IT APPEARS THAT A PORTION OF THE |
| | STAIRCASE EXTENDS CLOSER TO THE PROPERTY LINE THAN |
| | WHERE THE SETBACK IS CURRENTLY BEING MEASURED TO. |
| | |
| | 14. WALLS SHALL NOT EXCEED 48 INCHES IN HEIGHT WITHIN |
| | THE FRONT SETBACK. HEIGHT SHALL BE MEASURED FROM GRADE |
| | TO THE HIGHEST POINT ON THE WALL. DETAIL 402 SHOWS THE |
| | WALLS ALONG NORTH FLAGLER DRIVE AS BEING OVER 5 FEET IN |
| | HEIGHT. DETAIL 403 DOES NOT MATCH DETAIL 402 AND SHOWS |
| | A WALL THAT IS 6 FEET IN HEIGHT. ENSURE THAT ALL DETAIL |
| | MATCH ACCORDINGLY AND DO NOT EXCEED 48 INCHES WITHIN |
| | THE FRONT SETBACK. |
| | |
| | 15. RESIDENTIAL PERMANENT IDENTIFICATION SIGNS SHALL |
| | NOT EXCEED 4 FEET IN HEIGHT AND SHALL NOT EXCEED 48 |
| | SQUARE FEET PER SIGN FACE. |
| | |
| | 16. PLEASE PROVIDE THE SETBACKS OF THE PROPOSED |
| | FREESTANDING SIGN FROM THE WEST PROPERTY LINE. |
| | |
| | 17. PURSUANT TO SECTION 94-443(C)(1) OF THE CITY'S |
| | ZLDRS, VEHICULAR USE AREAS SHALL BE SCREENED FROM |
| | RESIDENTIAL USES AND DISTRICTS BY A 36 INCH HIGH BRICK, |
| | DECORATIVE CONCRETE, OR OTHER DECORATIVE MASONRY, OR |
| | COMPARABLY DURABLE WOOD OR METAL WALL. NO WALL IS SHOWN |
| | ALONG THE NORTH PROPERTY LINE. |
| | |
| | 18. ALL LANDSCAPE AREAS SHALL BE PROTECTED FROM VEHICLE |
| | ENCROACHMENT BY TYPE D CURBING. NO CURBING IS SHOWN ON |
| | THE WEST SIDE OF THE WATERFRONT VILLAS. |
| | |
| | 19. PLEASE PROVIDE A PARKING STRIPING DETAIL. |
| | |
| | 20. WILL THREE (3) DUMPSTERS BE SUFFICIENT? ARE THERE |
| | ADDITIONAL TRASH RECEPTACLES FOR THE TOWER BUILDING? IF |
| | SO, HOW ARE THEY TO BE PICKED UP? |
| | ___________________________________________ |
| | |
| | PLEASE NOTE THE FOLLOWING WHEN RESUBMITTING: |
| | |
| | A) WRITTEN RESPONSES TO COMMENTS MADE BY ALL |
| | DEPARTMENTS SHALL BE PROVIDED UPON RESUBMISSION. |
| | |
| | B) 15 SETS OF REVISED PLANS AND/OR DOCUMENTS SHALL BE |
| | PROVIDED, ALONG WITH ONE (1) REDUCED COPY (11IN X |
| | 17IN), AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY OF ALL PLANS. |
| | |
| | C) PLEASE NOTE THAT RE-SUBMITTALS MAY BE SUBJECT TO |
| | ADDITIONAL COMMENTS. |
| | |
| | D) IF NO RESPONSE IS RECEIVED WITHIN 60 DAYS OF THE |
| | ISSUANCE OF THESE COMMENTS, THE APPLICATION WILL BE |
| | CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN AND ANY FURTHER ACTION WILL |
| | REQUIRE SUBMISSION OF A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION. |
| | |
| | E) PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1) |
| | RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED |
| | COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE |
| | APPLICANT WILL BE ACCESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE |
| | WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE. |
| | |
| | IN ORDER TO BE CONSIDERED FOR THE NEXT AVAILABLE |
| | PLANNING BOARD HEARING, ALL COMMENTS SHALL BE ADDRESSED |
| | AND PLANS SUBMITTED TO THE DEVELOPMENT SERVICES |
| | DEPARTMENT - PLANNING DIVISION NO LATER THAN FRIDAY, |
| | JUNE 22, 2012. SUBMITTAL BY THIS DEADLINE DOES NOT |
| | GUARANTEE THAT THIS APPLICATION WILL BE PLACED ON SUCH |
| | AGENDA. |
| | ___________________________________________ |
| | |
| | QUESTIONS/COMMENTS, PLEASE CONTACT THE FOLLOWING: |
| | |
| | JOHN ROACH, SENIOR PLANNER |
| | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH |
| | DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT ? PLANNING DIVISION |
| | 401 CLEMATIS STREET - P.O. BOX 3366 |
| | WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33402 |
| | |
| | PHONE: 561.822.1435 |
| | FAX: 561.822.1459 |
| | |
| | EMAIL: [email protected] |
| | |
| | WWW.CITYOFWPB.COM |
| | |