Plan Review Details - Project Z12040015
Plan Review Stops For Project Z12040015
Review Stop FIRE FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No 2 Status P Date 05-23-2012 Cont ID  
Sent By ddaniels Date 05-23-2012 Time 14:02 Rev Time 0.00
Received By ddaniels Date 05-23-2012 Time 14:02 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop FIRE FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No 1 Status F Date 05-08-2012 Cont ID  
Sent By ddaniels Date 05-08-2012 Time 09:03 Rev Time 0.00
Received By ddaniels Date 05-08-2012 Time 09:02 Sent To  
Notes
2012-05-08 09:07:09 
 FIRE DEPARTMENT REVIEW ****DENIED***
  
 1.) THERE IS CONCERN REGARDING THE 10 FT WIDE SECOND
 DRIVE THRU WINDOW AND THE ABILITY OF FIRE OR EMS
 VEHICLES TO MAKE THE TURN.
  
  
 DERRICK L. DANIELS, BATTALION CHIEF
 WEST PALM BEACH FIRE RESCUE
 OFFICE OF THE FIRE MARSHAL
 (561) 805-6722
  
Review Stop STORM STORMWATER
Rev No 2 Status P Date 06-22-2012 Cont ID  
Sent By jroach Date 06-22-2012 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By jroach Date 06-22-2012 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2012-07-31 14:10:41COMMENTS TO BE ADDRESSED AT PERMITTING.
  
 QUESTIONS/COMMENTS, CONTACT JOHN ROACH, SENIOR PLANNER,
 AT (561) 822-1448.
Review Stop STORM STORMWATER
Rev No 1 Status F Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 05-09-2012 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date 05-09-2012 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2012-05-09 06:53:231. PROVIDE DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS DEMONSTRATING SITE IS
 PROVIDING REQUIRED WATER QUALITY TREATMENT FOR THE
 ADDITIONAL IMPERVIOUS AREA OF THE SITE.
 2. SURVEY AND SITE PLAN AT DIFFERENT SCALES.
 3. SURVEY NOT SIGNED AND SEALED.
 4. NO CIVIL DRAWINGS PROVIDED.
  
 TRACY L. WARD, P.E.
 SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER
 ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 OFFICE 561-494-1120
Review Stop TRAFFIC TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No 2 Status P Date 05-23-2012 Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 05-23-2012 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By bcollins Date 05-23-2012 Time 10:27 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop TRAFFIC TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 04-30-2012 Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 04-30-2012 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By bcollins Date 04-30-2012 Time 15:33 Sent To  
Notes
2012-04-30 15:36:24THERE IS CONCERN REGARDING THE 10 FT WIDE SECOND DRIVE
 -THROUGH WINDOW AND THE ABILITY OF VEHICLES TO MAKE
 THAT TURN, ESPECIALLY LARGER VEHICLES. THE MERGE POINT
 STRIPE, IDENTIFIED AS P ON PLANS SHOULD BE WHITE NOT
 YELLOW IF VEHICLES ARE TO CROSS THAT LINE. SHOULD BE
 WHITE
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 4 Status P Date 06-22-2012 Cont ID  
Sent By jroach Date 06-22-2012 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By jroach Date 06-22-2012 Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 3 Status F Date 06-20-2012 Cont ID  
Sent By jroach Date 06-20-2012 Time 13:34 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jroach Date 06-20-2012 Time 13:34 Sent To  
Notes
2012-06-20 13:35:36ZONING PLANS AND PLATS REVIEW COMMITTEE (PPRC) REVIEW
 ___________________________________________
  
 DATE OF REVIEW: 06.20.2012
 PROJECT NO.: Z04120015
 CASE NO.: PB 1087UUU
 ADDRESS: 9835 OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD
 APPLICANT/CONTACT: CLIFF TORRES, CORPORATE PROPERTY
 SERVICES, INC.
 TELEPHONE NO.: 954.426.5144
 SCOPE OF REVIEW: MODIFICATIONS TO EXISTING DRIVE-THRU
 TO PROVIDE FOR A DOUBLE-DRIVE THRU.
 ___________________________________________
  
 PLEASE PROVIDE A WRITTEN RESPONSE TO THE FOLLOWING
 REVIEW COMMENTS. THE TEXT IN "ALL CAPS" IS ADDITIONAL
 INFORMATION PROVIDED AS A RESULT OF THE RESUBMITTED
 PLANS:
  
 6. PLEASE PROVIDE A LANDSCAPE DATA TABLE INDICATING HOW
 THE PROPOSAL COMPLIES WITH ARTICLE XIV OF THE ZLDRS.
 FOR EXAMPLE, INDICATE THE NUMBER OF SHADE TREES
 REQUIRED/PROVIDED, NUMBER OF FLOWERING TREES
 REQUIRED/PROVIDED, ETC. PLEASE NOTE THAT EXISTING
 LANDSCAPING TO REMAIN WILL BE COUNTED TOWARDS THESE
 REQUIREMENTS. ADDITIONALLY, ONLY LANDSCAPING WITHIN THE
 SUBJECT PROPERTY LINES SHALL BE INCLUDED; LANDSCAPING
 ON ADJACENT PROPERTY WILL NOT BE COUNTED TOWARD
 SATISFYING THE REQUIREMENTS. THE DATA TABLE PROVIDED
 DOES NOT ACCOUNT FOR THE ENTIRE SITE, EXISTING TREES,
 ETC. ADDITIONALLY, THE AMOUNT OF OPEN SPACE IS DEFINED
 AS THE LOT AREA MINUS THE BUILDING COVERAGE. ACCORDING
 TO THE SITE PLAN, THIS WOULD BE 30,755 SQUARE FEET. ALL
 REQUIREMENTS SHOULD BE BASED UPON THIS. A SAMPLE TABLE
 IS PROVIDED BELOW:
  
 LOT AREA: 34272 SQ FT
 BUILDING COVERAGE: 3517 SQ FT
 OPEN SPACE: 30755 SQ FT
  
  
 SHADE TREES
  REQUIRED: 1 TREE/1600 SQ FT X TREES
  
  PROVIDED:
  EXISTING TO REMAIN: X TREES
  PROPOSED: X TREES
  TOTAL: X TREES
  
 FLOWERING TREES
  REQUIRED: 1 TREE/6400 SQ FT X TREES
  
  PROVIDED:
  EXISTING TO REMAIN: X TREES
  PROPOSED: X TREES
  TOTAL: X TREES
  
 SHRUBS
  REQUIRED: 1 SHRUB/500 SQ FT X SHRUBS
  
  PROVIDED:
  EXISTING TO REMAIN: X SHRUBS
  PROPOSED: X SHRUBS
  TOTAL: X SHRUBS
  
 ___________________________________________
  
  
 PLEASE NOTE THE FOLLOWING WHEN RESUBMITTING:
  
 A) WRITTEN RESPONSES TO COMMENTS MADE BY ALL
 DEPARTMENTS SHALL BE PROVIDED UPON RESUBMISSION.
  
 B) 6 SETS OF REVISED PLANS AND/OR DOCUMENTS SHALL BE
 PROVIDED, ALONG WITH ONE (1) REDUCED COPY (11IN X
 17IN), AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY OF ALL PLANS.
  
 C) PLEASE NOTE THAT RE-SUBMITTALS MAY BE SUBJECT TO
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS.
  
 D) IF NO RESPONSE IS RECEIVED WITHIN 60 DAYS OF THE
 ISSUANCE OF THESE COMMENTS, THE APPLICATION WILL BE
 CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN AND ANY FURTHER ACTION WILL
 REQUIRE SUBMISSION OF A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION.
  
 E) PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1)
 RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED
 COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE
 APPLICANT WILL BE ACCESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE
 WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE.
 ___________________________________________
  
 QUESTIONS/COMMENTS, PLEASE CONTACT THE FOLLOWING:
  
 JOHN ROACH, SENIOR PLANNER
 CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH
 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT ? PLANNING DIVISION
 401 CLEMATIS STREET - P.O. BOX 3366
 WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33402
  
 PHONE: 561.822.1435
 FAX: 561.822.1460
  
 EMAIL: [email protected]
  
 WWW.CITYOFWPB.COM
  
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 2 Status F Date 05-22-2012 Cont ID  
Sent By jroach Date 05-22-2012 Time 15:25 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jroach Date 05-22-2012 Time 15:24 Sent To  
Notes
2012-05-22 16:16:02ZONING PLANS AND PLATS REVIEW COMMITTEE (PPRC) REVIEW
 ___________________________________________
  
 DATE OF REVIEW: 05.22.2012
 PROJECT NO.: Z04120015
 CASE NO.: PB 1087UUU
 ADDRESS: 9835 OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD
 APPLICANT/CONTACT: CLIFF TORRES, CORPORATE PROPERTY
 SERVICES, INC.
 TELEPHONE NO.: 954.426.5144
 SCOPE OF REVIEW: MODIFICATIONS TO EXISTING DRIVE-THRU
 TO PROVIDE FOR A DOUBLE-DRIVE THRU.
 ___________________________________________
  
 PLEASE PROVIDE A WRITTEN RESPONSE TO THE FOLLOWING
 REVIEW COMMENTS:
  
 3. THE EASTERN MOST CURB, SOUTH OF THE PROPOSED
 DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE, SHOULD BE MOVED OUT TO THE LOCATION
 OF THE PROPOSED YELLOW STRIP AND ADDITIONAL LANDSCAPING
 CAN BE INSTALLED IN THIS AREA. WHY PLACE THE YELLOW
 STRIPE? WHY CAN'T THE CURB BE PLACED IN THE LOCATION OF
 THE PROPOSED YELLOW STRIPE?
  
 6. PLEASE PROVIDE A LANDSCAPE DATA TABLE INDICATING HOW
 THE PROPOSAL COMPLIES WITH ARTICLE XIV OF THE ZLDRS.
 FOR EXAMPLE, INDICATE THE NUMBER OF SHADE TREES
 REQUIRED/PROVIDED, NUMBER OF FLOWERING TREES
 REQUIRED/PROVIDED, ETC. PLEASE NOTE THAT EXISTING
 LANDSCAPING TO REMAIN WILL BE COUNTED TOWARDS THESE
 REQUIREMENTS. ADDITIONALLY, ONLY LANDSCAPING WITHIN THE
 SUBJECT PROPERTY LINES SHALL BE INCLUDED; LANDSCAPING
 ON ADJACENT PROPERTY WILL NOT BE COUNTED TOWARD
 SATISFYING THE REQUIREMENTS.
  
 7. IS THE PARKING AREA EAST OF THE EXISTING BUILDING
 PROPOSED TO BE RESTRIPED? IT APPEARS THAT THE STALL
 DIMENSIONS DO NOT MEET THE MINIMUM OF THE ZLDRS,
 SPECIFICALLY THE ROW OF PARKING IMMEDIATELY ADJACENT TO
 THE BUILDING AND WALKWAY. IS THIS AN ERROR ON THE
 PLANS, OR WAS IT CONSTRUCTED IMPROPERLY? PLEASE
 CLARIFY. THE OVERHANG ON THE SIDEWALK SHALL NOT EXCEED
 TWO (2) FEET. LET'S DISCUSS FURTHER.
  
 8. PROPOSED TREES ARE TO BE A MINIMUM OF 5 FEET CLEAR
 TRUNK, AND 8 FEET OVERALL HEIGHT.
  
 9. PLEASE CLARIFY WHY THE DRIVE AISLE SOUTH OF THE
 BUILDING IS LESS THAN 24 FEET WIDE. I BELIEVE THESE
 SPACES WERE TO INCORPORATE A 2 FOOT OVERHANG OVER THE
 SIDEWALK, AND ONLY BE 16.77 FEET IN LENGTH FROM THE
 FACE OF THE CURB. WHAT IS SHOWN ON THE PLAN DIFFERS
 FROM WHAT WHAT PREVIOUSLY APPROVED/BUILT. LET'S DISCUSS
 FURTHER.
 ___________________________________________
  
 PLEASE NOTE THE FOLLOWING WHEN RESUBMITTING:
  
 A) WRITTEN RESPONSES TO COMMENTS MADE BY ALL
 DEPARTMENTS SHALL BE PROVIDED UPON RESUBMISSION.
  
 B) 6 SETS OF REVISED PLANS AND/OR DOCUMENTS SHALL BE
 PROVIDED, ALONG WITH ONE (1) REDUCED COPY (11IN X
 17IN), AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY OF ALL PLANS.
  
 C) PLEASE NOTE THAT RE-SUBMITTALS MAY BE SUBJECT TO
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS.
  
 D) IF NO RESPONSE IS RECEIVED WITHIN 60 DAYS OF THE
 ISSUANCE OF THESE COMMENTS, THE APPLICATION WILL BE
 CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN AND ANY FURTHER ACTION WILL
 REQUIRE SUBMISSION OF A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION.
  
 E) PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1)
 RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED
 COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE
 APPLICANT WILL BE ACCESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE
 WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE.
 ___________________________________________
  
 QUESTIONS/COMMENTS, PLEASE CONTACT THE FOLLOWING:
  
 JOHN ROACH, SENIOR PLANNER
 CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH
 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT ? PLANNING DIVISION
 401 CLEMATIS STREET - P.O. BOX 3366
 WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33402
  
 PHONE: 561.822.1435
 FAX: 561.822.1459
  
 EMAIL: [email protected]
  
 WWW.CITYOFWPB.COM
  
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 05-09-2012 Cont ID  
Sent By jroach Date 05-09-2012 Time 12:50 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jroach Date 05-09-2012 Time 12:50 Sent To  
Notes
2012-05-09 12:50:19ZONING PLANS AND PLATS REVIEW COMMITTEE (PPRC) REVIEW
 ___________________________________________
  
 DATE OF REVIEW: 05.09.2012
 PROJECT NO.: Z04120015
 CASE NO.: PB 1087UUU
 ADDRESS: 9835 OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD
 APPLICANT/CONTACT: CLIFF TORRES, CORPORATE PROPERTY
 SERVICES, INC.
 TELEPHONE NO.: 954.426.5144
 SCOPE OF REVIEW: MODIFICATIONS TO EXISTING DRIVE-THRU
 TO PROVIDE FOR A DOUBLE-DRIVE THRU.
 ___________________________________________
  
 PLEASE PROVIDE A WRITTEN RESPONSE TO THE FOLLOWING
 REVIEW COMMENTS:
  
 1. PARKING STALL DETAIL SHALL CONFORM TO MINIMUM CITY
 REQUIREMENTS (SEE ATTACHED).
  
 2. THE DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE DOES NOT MEET THE MINIMUM
 CITY REQUIREMENTS. THE OPENING SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 12
 FEET 6 INCHES WIDE.
  
 3. THE EASTERN MOST CURB, SOUTH OF THE PROPOSED
 DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE, SHOULD BE MOVED OUT TO THE LOCATION
 OF THE PROPOSED YELLOW STRIP AND ADDITIONAL LANDSCAPING
 CAN BE INSTALLED IN THIS AREA.
  
 4. DETAILS OF SIGNAGE, MENU BOARDS, ETC. WILL NEED TO
 BE PROVIDED TO ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH THE ZLDRS.
  
 5. PLEASE CLARIFY WHY THE "PROPERTY LINE" LABEL IS
 POINTING TO THE LANDSCAPE AREA NORTH OF THE EXISTING
 MONUMENT SIGN. PLEASE CORRECT.
  
 6. PLEASE PROVIDE A LANDSCAPE DATA TABLE INDICATING HOW
 THE PROPOSAL COMPLIES WITH ARTICLE XIV OF THE ZLDRS.
 FOR EXAMPLE, INDICATE THE NUMBER OF SHADE TREES
 REQUIRED/PROVIDED, NUMBER OF FLOWERING TREES
 REQUIRED/PROVIDED, ETC. PLEASE NOTE THAT EXISTING
 LANDSCAPING TO REMAIN WILL BE COUNTED TOWARDS THESE
 REQUIREMENTS. ADDITIONALLY, ONLY LANDSCAPING WITHIN THE
 SUBJECT PROPERTY LINES SHALL BE INCLUDED?LANDSCAPING ON
 ADJACENT PROPERTY WILL NOT BE COUNTED TOWARD SATISFYING
 THE REQUIREMENTS.
  
 7. IS THE PARKING AREA EAST OF THE EXISTING BUILDING
 PROPOSED TO BE RESTRIPED? IT APPEARS THAT THE STALL
 DIMENSIONS DO NOT MEET THE MINIMUM OF THE ZLDRS,
 SPECIFICALLY THE ROW OF PARKING IMMEDIATELY ADJACENT TO
 THE BUILDING AND WALKWAY. IS THIS AN ERROR ON THE
 PLANS, OR WAS IT CONSTRUCTED IMPROPERLY? PLEASE
 CLARIFY.
  
 8. PROPOSED TREES ARE TO BE A MINIMUM OF 5 FEET CLEAR
 TRUNK, AND 8 FEET OVERALL HEIGHT.
  
 9. PLEASE CLARIFY WHY THE DRIVE AISLE SOUTH OF THE
 BUILDING IS LESS THAN 24 FEET WIDE. I BELIEVE THESE
 SPACES WERE TO INCORPORATE A 2 FOOT OVERHANG OVER THE
 SIDEWALK?AND ONLY BE 16.77 FEET IN LENGTH FROM THE FACE
 OF THE CURB.
 ___________________________________________
  
 PLEASE NOTE THE FOLLOWING WHEN RESUBMITTING:
  
 A) WRITTEN RESPONSES TO COMMENTS MADE BY ALL
 DEPARTMENTS SHALL BE PROVIDED UPON RESUBMISSION.
  
 B) 6 SETS OF REVISED PLANS AND/OR DOCUMENTS SHALL BE
 PROVIDED, ALONG WITH ONE (1) REDUCED COPY (11IN X
 17IN), AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY OF ALL PLANS.
  
 C) PLEASE NOTE THAT RE-SUBMITTALS MAY BE SUBJECT TO
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS.
  
 D) IF NO RESPONSE IS RECEIVED WITHIN 60 DAYS OF THE
 ISSUANCE OF THESE COMMENTS, THE APPLICATION WILL BE
 CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN AND ANY FURTHER ACTION WILL
 REQUIRE SUBMISSION OF A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION.
  
 E) PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1)
 RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED
 COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE
 APPLICANT WILL BE ACCESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE
 WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE.
 ___________________________________________
  
 QUESTIONS/COMMENTS, PLEASE CONTACT THE FOLLOWING:
  
 JOHN ROACH, SENIOR PLANNER
 CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH
 DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT ? PLANNING DIVISION
 401 CLEMATIS STREET - P.O. BOX 3366
 WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33402
  
 PHONE: 561.822.1435
 FAX: 561.822.1459
  
 EMAIL: [email protected]
  
 WWW.CITYOFWPB.COM
  
  Print


Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved