Plan Review Details - Project Z12040009
Plan Review Stops For Project Z12040009
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 2 Status P Date 07-11-2012 Cont ID  
Sent By lmartine Date 07-11-2012 Time 09:33 Rev Time 0.00
Received By lmartine Date 07-11-2012 Time 09:33 Sent To  
Notes
2012-07-11 09:41:29BUILDING REVIEW COMMENTS
  
  
 FSR-9,
 THE PRE-CAST WALL SYSTEM WIND LOAD INFO IS INCORRECT.
  
 ALL SHEETS,
 ACCESSIBLE PARKING IS NOT SHOWN FOR THE FUTURE PBA'S.
  
  
 LUIS MARTINEZ
 561-805-6710
  
  
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 1 Status P Date 05-08-2012 Cont ID  
Sent By lmartine Date 05-08-2012 Time 16:26 Rev Time 0.00
Received By lmartine Date 05-08-2012 Time 16:26 Sent To  
Notes
2012-05-08 16:49:01BUILDING REVIEW COMMENTS
  
  
  
 NO PLANS WERE SUBMITTED FOR BUILDING H-9 OR THE
 PROPOSED BUILDING PADS.
  
 THE PRELIMINARY SIGN PACKAGE LOOKS GOOD FOR NOW.
  
 PLEASE SEE 2010 FBC (ACCESSIBILITY) SECTIONS 208.3 AND
 502 FOR PARKING SPACE LOCATION AND DISPERSEMENT.
  
 ALSO, SHEET FSP-9 CODE ANALYSIS SHOULD REFLECT THE 2010
 FBC AND ASCE 7-10.
  
  
  
 LUIS MARTINEZ
 561-805-6710
  
  
Review Stop ENG - PPRC ENGINEERING - PPRC
Rev No 1 Status F Date 07-10-2012 Cont ID  
Sent By bmoree Date 07-10-2012 Time 15:25 Rev Time 0.00
Received By bmoree Date 07-10-2012 Time 15:20 Sent To  
Notes
2012-07-10 15:25:46PALM BEACH OUTLETS
  
 1. APPLICANT HAS SUBMITTED FOR PRELIMINARY UTILITY
 REVIEW.
 2. ENGINEERING WILL MAKE SUBSTANTIVE COMMENTS DURING
 THE FORMAL CIVIL DRAWING REVIEW PROCESS (SITE, WATER,
 SEWER, STORMWATER).
  
 BRIAN R. MOREE, MPA, FCHP
 ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION MANAGER
 CONSTRUCTION ADMINISTRATION
 ENGINEERING SERVICES & PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
 401 CLEMATIS STREET
 FOURTH FLOOR
 WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33401
 OFFICE: 561-494-1098
 MOBILE: 561-644-7270
 EMAIL: [email protected]
 WEB: WWW.WPB.ORG/ENGINEERING
  
Review Stop FIRE FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No 3 Status P Date 09-07-2012 Cont ID  
Sent By eschneid Date 09-07-2012 Time 16:02 Rev Time 0.00
Received By eschneid Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2012-09-07 16:02:41FINAL REVIEW WILL BE AT TIME OF BUILDING PERMIT.
Review Stop FIRE FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No 2 Status F Date 07-06-2012 Cont ID  
Sent By ddaniels Date 07-06-2012 Time 18:52 Rev Time 0.00
Received By ddaniels Date 07-06-2012 Time 18:52 Sent To  
Notes
2012-07-06 19:01:37PLANS REVIEWED BY FIRE ***DENIED***
  
  
 1.) DESIGN SHALL CONFORM TO THE 2010 EDITION OF THE
 FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE WHICH CONTAINS THE FLORIDA
 EDITION OF NFPA 1 AND NFPA 101.
 2.) ALL DEMOLITION WORK SHALL CONFORM TO THE
 REQUIREMENTS OF NFPA 241. TRASH AND CONSTRUCTION DEBRIS
 SHALL BE REMOVED FROM THE SITE DAILY.
 3.) FIRE DEPARTMENT ACCESS ROADS SHALL HAVE A SURFACE
 DESIGNED TO ACCOMMODATE FIRE APPARATUS WEIGHING AT
 LEAST 32 TONS. ACCESS ROADS SHALL HAVE AN UNOBSTRUCTED
 WIDTH OF NOT LESS THAN 20 FEET AND AN UNOBSTRUCTED
 VERTICAL CLEARANCE OF NOT LESS THAN 13 FEET 6 INCHES
 PER SECTION 18.2.3.4.1.1 OF THE FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION
 CODE ? NFPA 1 UNIFORM FIRE CODE.
 4.) PROVIDE DETAILED INFROMATION ON LOCATION OF FDC.
  
  
 DERRICK L. DANIELS, BATTALION CHIEF
 WEST PALM BEACH FIRE RESCUE
 OFFICE OF THE FIRE MARSHAL
 (561) 805-6733
  
Review Stop FIRE FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No 1 Status F Date 05-08-2012 Cont ID  
Sent By ddaniels Date 05-08-2012 Time 11:17 Rev Time 0.00
Received By ddaniels Date 05-07-2012 Time 17:11 Sent To  
Notes
2012-05-07 17:17:23PLANS REVIEWED BY FIRE
  
  
 1.) DESIGN SHALL CONFORM TO THE 2010 EDITION OF THE
 FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE WHICH CONTAINS THE FLORIDA
 EDITION OF NFPA 1 AND NFPA 101.
 2.) ALL DEMOLITION WORK SHALL CONFORM TO THE
 REQUIREMENTS OF NFPA 241. TRASH AND CONSTRUCTION DEBRIS
 SHALL BE REMOVED FROM THE SITE DAILY.
 3.) FIRE DEPARTMENT ACCESS ROADS SHALL HAVE A SURFACE
 DESIGNED TO ACCOMMODATE FIRE APPARATUS WEIGHING AT
 LEAST 32 TONS. ACCESS ROADS SHALL HAVE AN UNOBSTRUCTED
 WIDTH OF NOT LESS THAN 20 FEET AND AN UNOBSTRUCTED
 VERTICAL CLEARANCE OF NOT LESS THAN 13 FEET 6 INCHES
 PER SECTION 18.2.3.4.1.1 OF THE FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION
 CODE ? NFPA 1 UNIFORM FIRE CODE.
 4.) PROVIDE DETAILED INFROMATION ON LOCATION OF FDC.
  
  
 DERRICK L. DANIELS, BATTALION CHIEF
 WEST PALM BEACH FIRE RESCUE
 OFFICE OF THE FIRE MARSHAL
 (561) 805-6733
  
Review Stop POLICE POLICE
Rev No 3 Status P Date 09-07-2012 Cont ID  
Sent By eschneid Date 09-07-2012 Time 16:04 Rev Time 0.00
Received By eschneid Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2012-09-07 16:05:05FINAL REVIEW WILL BE AT TIME OF BUILDING PERMIT.
Review Stop POLICE POLICE
Rev No 2 Status F Date 07-06-2012 Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By ktucker Date 08-10-2012 Time 09:12 Sent To  
Notes
2012-07-06 13:57:10BELOW ARE COMMENTS FROM MAY 9, 2012, I DID NOT SEE
 THESE COMMENTS ADDRESSED. (I TOOK OUT THE COMMENTS THAT
 WERE ADDRESSED ON THE PLANS.)
  
 ALL STORE DOORS EXITING INTO THE SERVICE AREAS NEED
 PEEP/VIEW HOLES
  
 WHERE WILL THE PALM TRAN BUS STOP LOCATED?
  
 WILL BE LOOKING FOR:
  
 1. NUMERICAL ADDRESSES SHALL BE PLACED AT THE FRONT AND
 REAR OF THE BUILDING. EACH NUMERICAL ADDRESS SHALL BE
 ILLUMINATED FOR NIGHTTIME VISIBILITY WITH AN
 UNINTERRUPTIBLE A.C. POWER SOURCE, SHALL CONSIST OF SIX
 (6) INCH HIGH NUMBERS AND SHALL BE A DIFFERENT COLOR
 THAN THE COLOR OF THE SURFACE TO WHICH IT IS ATTACHED.
 THE REAR DOORS OF THE BUILDING SHALL HAVE AN
 ILLUMINATED 6 INCH NUMBER ON OR ALONG SIDE THE DOOR.
  
 2. PROVIDE PHOTOCELL SENSOR ENGAGED DUSK TO DAWN
 LIGHTING IN THE REAR OF THE BUILDING.
  
 3. DOORS SHALL BE EQUIPPED WITH METAL PLATE OVER
 THRESHOLD OF THE LOCKING MECHANISM. (FRONT AND REAR)
  
 4. ALL DOORS THAT EXIT OUT SHALL HAVE A 180 DEGREE VIEW
 HOLES.
  
 5. CASE HARDENED COMMERCIAL GRADE DEAD BOLT LOCKS SHALL
 BE INSTALLED ON ALL STORE FRONTS AND AREA DOORS WITH
 MINIMUM OF ONE INCH THROW INTO THE STRIKE RECEIVING THE
 BOLT. THE CYLINDER SHALL HAVE A CYLINDER GUARD (SPIN
 GUARD) AND A MINIMUM OF FIVE-PIN TUMBLERS.
  
 6. ALL STORE FRONTS SHOULD HAVE IMPACT RESISTANT GLASS
 OR HAVE BURGLARY RESISTANT GLAZING
  
 7. DOORS SECURED BY ELECTRICAL OPERATION SHALL HAVE A
 KEY PAD-SWITCH TO OPEN THE DOOR WHEN IN A CLOSED
 POSITION, OR BY A SIGNAL LOCKING DEVICE.
  
 8. IF INSTALLED, BENCHES SHALL BE DIVIDED STYLE AND
 HAVE ADEQUATE LIGHTING IN THE AREA THEY ARE LOCATED.
 BENCHES SHOULD ALSO BE IN OPEN VIEW TO ELIMINATE
 CONCEALMENT AREAS.
  
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS/QUESTIONS:
  
 * WILL THERE BE A KIOSK AT THE VALET AREA? PLEASE
 INDICATE WHAT WILL BE USED TO SECURE THE KEYS OF THE
 CUSTOMERS
 * WILL THERE BE ATM LOCATIONS INSIDE THE MALL PLAZA?
 * I WOULD LIKE TO SEE THE FIXTURES THAT WILL BE USED
 INSIDE THE MALL PLAZA AND LOCATIONS
 * WILL VIEW WINDOWS/PEEP HOLES BE INSTALLED IN ALL REAR
 EXITING DOORS OF ALL STORES?
  
 PLEASE ADHERE TO THE CONSTRUCTION SITE SECURITY PLAN
 THAT WAS SUBMITTED AT THE START OF THE PROJECT.
 REMEMBER THAT THE PD WILL NEED GATE ACCESS ONCE THE
 FENCE IS INSTALLED.
  
 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WILL BE REQUESTED, AND THE
 POLICE DEPARTMENT WILL HAVE ADDITIONAL COMMENTS AS THE
 PROCESS CONTINUES. THE CRIME PREVENTION OFFICER WILL
 PERIODICALLY BE ON SITE TO ENSURE CPTED PLANS AND THE
 CONSTRUCTION SITE SECURITY PLAN IS BEING FOLLOWED.
  
  
Review Stop POLICE POLICE
Rev No 1 Status P Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By ktucker Date 08-10-2012 Time 09:12 Sent To  
Notes
2012-05-09 10:37:43ON THE PARKING LOT/PEDESTRIAN LIGHTING FOR THE PB
 OUTLET MALL, I WOULD LIKE SEE LED LIGHTING. LED
 LIGHTING IS A BETTER QUALITY GIVING A BRIGHTER, WHITER
 LIGHT. LED?S CONSUME 50% TO 90% LESS POWER THEY ARE
 EXTREMELY DURABLE AND HAVE MORE LONGEVITY THAN METAL
 HALIDE. LEDS ARE INITIALLY EXPENSIVE, ALTHOUGH THE COST
 IS RECOUPED OVER TIME IN ENERGY, POWER AND REPLACEMENT
 SAVINGS.
  
 LANDSCAPE PLAN IN PARKING LOT DOES NOT SEEM TO
 INTERFERE WITH THE LIGHT POLES THAT ARE SHOWN, BUT I
 WOULD LIKE A SEPARATE PLAN SHOWING ME THE LIGHTING
 LAYOUT FOR THE PARKING LOT AND THE FIXTURES/HEADS TO BE
 USED.
  
 IN ADDITION PLEASE SHOW ME THE PEDESTRIAN LIGHTING AND
 THE FIXTURES TO BE USED, ON THE PLAN NOW IT APPEARS
 THEY ARE OPEN FIXTURES, NOT FULL CUTOFF. A FULL CUTOFF
 LIGHTING FIXTURE WILL CREATE ESSENTIALLY NO GLARE. ALL
 THE LIGHT IS USED, NONE IS WASTED.
  
 CONSIDER A KIOSK BY THE TOUR BUS LOADING/UNLOADING AREA
  
 ALL STORE DOORS EXITING INTO THE SERVICE AREAS NEED
 PEEP/VIEW HOLES
  
 WHERE WILL THE PALM TRAN BUS STOP LOCATED?
  
  
  
  
  
 BLDG H-9 WILL BE LOOKING FOR:
  
 1. NUMERICAL ADDRESSES SHALL BE PLACED AT THE FRONT AND
 REAR OF THE BUILDING. EACH NUMERICAL ADDRESS SHALL BE
 ILLUMINATED FOR NIGHTTIME VISIBILITY WITH AN
 UNINTERRUPTIBLE A.C. POWER SOURCE, SHALL CONSIST OF
 TWELVE (12) INCH HIGH NUMBERS AND SHALL BE A DIFFERENT
 COLOR THAN THE COLOR OF THE SURFACE TO WHICH IT IS
 ATTACHED. THE REAR DOORS OF THE BUILDING SHALL HAVE AN
 ILLUMINATED 6 INCH NUMBER ON OR ALONG SIDE THE DOOR.
  
 2. ALL ON-SITE LIGHTING SHALL CONSIST OF METAL HALIDE
 (OR EQUIVALENT LIGHTING APPROVED BY THE POLICE
 DEPARTMENT) WITH FULL CUT OFF FIXTURE AND LIGHTING
 SHALL NOT CONFLICT WITH PLANTED LANDSCAPING. LUMINARY
 TYPE SHOULD OPTIMIZE LIGHT DISTRIBUTION AND MINIMIZE
 GLARE AN UP LIGHTING.
  
 3. PROVIDE PHOTOCELL SENSOR ENGAGED DUSK TO DAWN
 LIGHTING IN THE REAR OF THE BUILDING.
  
 4. DOORS SHALL BE EQUIPPED WITH METAL PLATE OVER
 THRESHOLD OF THE LOCKING MECHANISM. (FRONT AND REAR)
  
 5. ALL DOORS THAT EXIT OUT SHALL HAVE A 180 DEGREE VIEW
 HOLES.
  
 6. CASE HARDENED COMMERCIAL GRADE DEAD BOLT LOCKS SHALL
 BE INSTALLED ON ALL STORE FRONTS AND AREA DOORS WITH
 MINIMUM OF ONE INCH THROW INTO THE STRIKE RECEIVING THE
 BOLT. THE CYLINDER SHALL HAVE A CYLINDER GUARD (SPIN
 GUARD) AND A MINIMUM OF FIVE-PIN TUMBLERS.
  
 7. ALL STORE FRONTS SHOULD HAVE IMPACT RESISTANT GLASS
 OR HAVE BURGLARY RESISTANT GLAZING
  
 8. DOORS SECURED BY ELECTRICAL OPERATION SHALL HAVE A
 KEY PAD-SWITCH TO OPEN THE DOOR WHEN IN A CLOSED
 POSITION, OR BY A SIGNAL LOCKING DEVICE.
  
 9. INSTALL TWELVE FOOT (12) PEDESTRIAN SCALE LIGHTING
 WITH FULL CUT OFF FIXTURES ALONG WALKWAYS.
  
 10. IF INSTALLED, BENCHES SHALL BE DIVIDED STYLE AND
 HAVE ADEQUATE LIGHTING IN THE AREA THEY ARE LOCATED.
 BENCHES SHOULD ALSO BE IN OPEN VIEW TO ELIMINATE
 CONCEALMENT AREAS.
  
 11.IF BIKE RACKS ARE INSTALLED THEY SHOULD BE AT THE
 FRONT OF THE BUILDING FOR EASY SURVEILLANCE AND SAFETY.
  
 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION WILL BE REQUESTED, AND THE
 POLICE DEPARTMENT WILL HAVE ADDITIONAL COMMENTS AS THE
 REVIEW PROCESS CONTINUES. THE CRIME PREVENTION OFFICER
 WILL PERIODICALLY BE ON SITE TO ENSURE CPTED PLANS ARE
 BEING FOLLOWED.
  
Review Stop STORM STORMWATER
Rev No 2 Status P Date 09-07-2012 Cont ID  
Sent By eschneid Date 09-07-2012 Time 16:06 Rev Time 0.00
Received By eschneid Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2012-09-07 16:07:14COMMENTS FROM PRIOR REVIEW TO BE ADDRESSED AT TIME OF
 ENGINEERING PERMIT SUBMITTAL.
Review Stop STORM STORMWATER
Rev No 1 Status F Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2012-05-09 08:09:171. NO CIVIL ENGINEERING PLANS PROVIDED.
 2. PROVIDE COPY OF SFWMD ERP CONSTRUCTION PERMIT WITH
 FINAL PLANS.
 3. PROVIDE STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN WITH
 FINAL PLANS.
 4. PROVIDE DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS SIGNED AND SEALED BY A
 FLORIDA P.E. SHOWING LAND USE BEAKDOWN (PERVIOUS,
 IMPERVIOUS, BUILDING, ETC.), WATER QUALITY TREATMENT
 VOLUMES (REQUIRED, PROVIDED) AND DESIGN STORM FLOOD
 STAGES (5-YEAR 24-HOUR, 25-YEAR 72-HOUR AND 100-YEAR
 72-HOUR ZERO DISCHARGE).
 5. PROVIDE AN INSPECTION REPORT OF THE STORM PIPE
 CULVERTS WITHIN THE 50' DRAINAGE EASEMENT ALONG THE
 NORTH SIDE OF THE SITE.
  
 TRACY L. WARD, P.E.
 SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER
 ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 OFFICE 561-494-1120
Review Stop SURVEY SURVEYING
Rev No 3 Status N Date 09-07-2012 Cont ID  
Sent By eschneid Date 09-07-2012 Time 16:14 Rev Time 0.00
Received By eschneid Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop SURVEY SURVEYING
Rev No 2 Status F Date 07-09-2012 Cont ID  
Sent By vnoel Date 07-09-2012 Time 08:45 Rev Time 0.00
Received By vnoel Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2012-07-03 08:52:111. PRIOR TO BOUNDARY PLAT APPROVAL, SUBMITTAL TO
 ENGINEERING FOR TECHNICAL REVIEW AND PRM INSPECTION IS
 REQUIRED.
 FEES ARE $1236.00 (SUBDIVISION FINAL PLAT) AND $265.00
 (PRM INSPECTION).
Review Stop SURVEY SURVEYING
Rev No 1 Status   Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2012-05-08 08:49:411. OVERALL BOUNDARY PLAT HAS NOT BEEN SUBMITTED TO
 ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR REVIEW.
 2. ANY FUTURE RIGHT-OF-WAYS WITHIN OVERALL PROJECT
 SHOULD BE SHOWN FOR ANY ISSUES WITH ANY FEE SIMPLE
 PARCELS.
 3. NOTE CONCERNING TERMINAL ISLAND TREES IN DRAINAGE
 MAINLINES ON SHEET FSP-3 SHOULD BE ADDED TO LANDSCAPE
 PLANS.
 4. CONTRARY TO THE ABOVE, THERE ARE TREES OVER
 MAINLINES SHOWN ON LP-3 AND 4.
Review Stop TRAFFIC TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No 1 Status P Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 04-30-2012 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By bcollins Date 04-30-2012 Time 15:43 Sent To  
Notes
2012-04-30 15:44:10NO COMMENTS
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 5 Status P Date 11-05-2012 Cont ID  
Sent By eschneid Date 11-05-2012 Time 10:28 Rev Time 1.00
Received By eschneid Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 4 Status   Date 10-16-2012 Cont ID  
Sent By eschneid Date 10-16-2012 Time 10:24 Rev Time 4.00
Received By eschneid Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2012-11-28 10:25:05CASE NO. PB 891R
 PALM BEACH OUTLETS FORMAL SITE PLAN REVIEW
 1801 PALM BEACH LAKES BOULEVARD
 4TH SUBMITTAL
  
 - CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446
  
 - PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN
 WRITTEN FORMAT.
  
 - WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF SIX
 (6) PAPER COPIES AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY IN .PDF FORMAT
 OF ALL REVISED PLANS. PLEASE NOTE THAT CHANGES ON THE
 RESUBMITTED PLANS MAY RESULT IN ADDITIONAL COMMENTS.
  
 - PLEASE NOTE THAT IF THE PLANNING DIVISION HAS NOT
 RECEIVED A RESPONSE TO THE COMMENTS WITHIN 60 DAYS FROM
 THE DATE OF THESE COMMENTS (DECEMBER 15, 2012), THE
 CASE SHALL BE CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN. ANY FURTHER ACTION
 SHALL REQUIRE A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION.
  
 1) THE DATA FOR THE FOUNDATION PLANTING AT THE
 PERIMETER OF THE OUTLET CENTER DIFFERS ON SHEETS LPC
 AND LP-10. THIS INFORMATION SHALL BE CONSISTENT AMONG
 THE PLANS.
  
 2) STAFF IS UNABLE TO VERIFY IF ALL OF THE EXFILTRATION
 DRAIN VS. TREE PLACEMENT CONFLICTS HAVE BEEN RESOLVED
 SINCE THE EXFILTRATION LAYER IS NOT SHOWN ON SHEETS
 LP-5, LP-6, LP-7 AND LP-8. ADDITIONALLY, WHY IS THE
 UNDERGROUND UTILITY LAYER SHOWN ON HALF OF THE SITE
 PLANS? THE LAYER SHOULD EITHER BE ON ALL OR NONE OF THE
 SITE PLANS. PLEASE NOTE THAT THERE IS A LANDSCAPE
 ISLAND WITH TWO GUMBO LIMBO TREES IN PBA #1 WHICH
 APPEARS TO HAVE THE EXFILTRATION TRENCH CONSTRUCTED
 UNDER THE ISLAND.
  
 3) REPEAT COMMENT - THE EXFILTRATION LINES ON SHEET
 LP-4 THAT CURRENTLY RUN UNDER THE LANDSCAPE ISLANDS
 SHALL BE REDESIGNED SO THAT THERE IS NO CONFLICT WITH
 THE LANDSCAPE ISLANDS. THIS IS ESPECIALLY IMPORTANT NOW
 THAT THE TREES HAVE BEEN MOVED TO THEIR PROPER
 LOCATIONS IN THE TERMINAL ISLANDS. THE STORMWATER
 ENGINEER HAS STATED THAT THE LINES CAN BE INSTALLED TO
 AVOID THE TERMINAL ISLANDS.
  
 4) REPEAT COMMENT - THE BAYS OPPOSITE THE OPENINGS TO
 THE SERVICE BAYS SHALL HAVE THEIR DOORS PLACED SUCH
 THAT THEY ARE NOT LOCATED IN FRONT OF THE OPENING. THE
 REVISED PLANS SUBMITTED FOR THE FOUNDATION PERMIT SHOW
 DOORS NOT ONLY ON THE NORTH AND WEST SIDES AT THE
 OPENING, BUT NOW ADDITIONALLY SHOW DOORS OPPOSITE THE
 OPENING FOR THE SOUTHERN SERVICE BAYS. THE EASTERN
 SERVICE BAY SHOWS A RELOCATED HALLWAY WHICH COULD BE
 POSITIONED DIFFERENTLY AND THE DOOR ISSUES WOULD NOT
 EXIST IN THIS SERVICE BAY.
  
 5) REPEAT COMMENT - PROVIDE WRITTEN VERIFICATION FROM
 PALM TRAN THAT THE DESIGN OF THE TRANSFER FACILITY IS
 ACCEPTABLE.
  
 6) PLEASE PROVIDE EITHER HEDGES OR GROUND COVER
 PLANTING IN THE 2.6 FOOT WIDE NON-SIDEWALK AREA
 ADJACENT TO THE BUS SHELTERS ALONG THE CHASE PARCEL TO
 PROVIDE A VISUAL BUFFER, NOT JUST SOD WITH THE TREES.
  
 7) THE PARKING SPACE LAYER IS NOT SHOWN ON SHEET FSP-5.
  
 8) H. THE PARK AND RIDE/CARPOOL SIGN INCLUDED WITH THE
 RESUBMITTAL IS NOT ACCEPTABLE. THE PARK AND RIDE TEXT
 SHALL BE MORE PROMINENT AND THE PALM BEACH OUTLETS TEXT
 SHALL BE LESS PROMINENT. STAFF SUPPORTED THE INITIAL
 CONCEPT DRAWING PRESENTED TO STAFF IN AN E-MAIL ON
 SEPTEMBER 23, 2012.
  
 9) THE MATCH LINE ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF SHEET LP-5
 SHOULD REFERENCE SHEET LP-6 NOT SHEET LP-7.
  
 10) ONE OF THE PARKING SPACES ON SHEET FSP-5 IS MISSING
 A WHEEL STOP.
  
 11) SHEET FSP-6 INCLUDES A PARKING ROW LABELED WITH
 NINE PARKING SPACES WHEN ONLY EIGHT EXIST. THE PARKING
 TABLE SHALL BE ADJUSTED IF NECESSARY.
  
 12) THE CROSSWALK WEST OF THE PALM TRAN FACILITY SHOWN
 ON SHEET FSP-4 DOES NOT ALIGN WITH THE SIDEWALK RAMPS.
  
 13) STAFF HAS COMPARED THE SUBMITTED FORMAL SITE PLAN
 (FSP) TO THE MOST RECENT SET OF CIVIL PLANS, DATED
 SEPTEMBER 21, 2012, SUBMITTED TO THE ENGINEERING
 SERVICES DEPARTMENT AND FOUND NUMEROUS DISCREPANCIES
 AMONG THE PLANS, AS LISTED BELOW:
  
 A. THE FIRE HYDRANT LOCATIONS DIFFER ON MANY SHEETS.
 THIS INCLUDES RELOCATED AND NEW HYDRANTS NOT SHOWN ON
 THE FSP.
  
 B. SIDEWALKS ARE NOT IN THE SAME LOCATIONS, TO INCLUDE
 THE CIVIL PLANS NOT SHOWING THE PEDESTRIAN CONNECTIONS
 BETWEEN PBA #1 AND PBA #2A. INTERIOR ISLAND AND
 LANDSCAPE IS AFFECTED.
  
 C. THERE ARE SERVICE COURT ENTRANCES WHICH ARE IN
 DIFFERENT LOCATIONS.
  
 D. THE OUTLETS BUILDINGS ARE SHOWN WITH DIFFERING
 FOOTPRINTS AND SQUARE FOOTAGE AMOUNTS BETWEEN THE TWO
 PLANS.
  
 E. THE CIVIL PLANS SHOW ALL OF THE PARKING AND LOADING
 BEING CONSTRUCTED FOR THE ENTIRE SITE AT THIS TIME.
 THIS IS NOT SHOWN ON THE FSP AND VIOLATES THE DESIGN
 GUIDELINES.
  
 F. THE PAVING PLAN SPECIFIES THAT ALL OF THE AREAS
 SHOWN AS DECORATIVE PAVERS ON THE FSP WILL BE EITHER
 ASPHALT OR CONCRETE.
  
 G. THE DIAMOND TREE CUT OUTS REMAIN ON SHEETS C 403 AND
 C 404 AFTER HAVING BEEN REMOVED ON THE FSP.
  
 H. THE BICYCLE RACKS, WHICH ARE PERMITTED UNDER THE
 CIVIL PLANS, ARE NOT SHOWN FOR THE OUTLET BUILDINGS.
 FURTHERMORE, THE BICYCLE RACKS AND PAD DETAILS ARE
 SHOWN AS THE WAVE MODEL, WHICH IS NOT PERMITTED IN THE
 CITY.
  
 I. THERE IS MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT SHOWN IN DIFFERENT
 LOCATIONS AMONG THE PLANS, WHICH AFFECTS THE LANDSCAPE
 DESIGN. AN EXAMPLE IS THE LIFT STATION ALONG CONGRESS
 AVENUE, EAST OF PBA #3. FURTHERMORE, THE PLACEMENT OF
 THE LIFT STATION HAS REPLACED THE REQUIRED INTERIOR
 ISLAND TREE, WHICH IS NOT ACCEPTABLE.
  
 J. THE CHANGES TO THE AREA AROUND THE PALM TRAN
 FACILITY (NUMBER OF PARKING SPACES) ARE NOT REFLECTED
 ON THE CIVIL PLANS.
  
 K. THE CIVIL PLANS SHOW A CHAIN LINK FENCE AROUND THE
 CANAL IN THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE SITE. THE FSP DOES
 NOT SHOW A FENCE IN THIS LOCATION. ADDITIONALLY, THE
 DESIGN GUIDELINES PROHIBIT CHAIN LINK FENCES WITHIN THE
 PALM BEACH OUTLETS CPD.
  
 L. THE CIVIL PLANS, PRESUMABLY WHAT WILL BE USED TO
 PHYSICALLY CONSTRUCT THE SITE, DO NOT INCLUDE ANY
 DIMENSIONS FOR THE LANDSCAPE ISLANDS, THE DIVIDER
 MEDIANS, ETC. DIMENSIONS, AS LISTED ON THE FSP, SHALL
 BE INCLUDED ON THE CIVIL PLANS SO THAT THE SITE WILL BE
 CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE APPROVED PLANS.
  
 14) THE WHEEL STOPS INCLUDED WITH THE CIVIL DETAILS DO
 NOT COMPLY WITH FIGURE XIV-2 OF THE ZONING AND LAND
 DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS.
  
 15) THE PLANS MENTION THAT THE 60 FOOT DRAINAGE
 EASEMENT WILL BE ABANDONED, YET PROOF OF THIS HAS NOT
 BEEN PROVIDED.
  
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 3 Status F Date 09-07-2012 Cont ID  
Sent By eschneid Date 09-07-2012 Time 16:22 Rev Time 12.00
Received By eschneid Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2012-09-07 16:23:29CASE NO. PB 891R
 PALM BEACH OUTLETS FORMAL SITE PLAN REVIEW
 1801 PALM BEACH LAKES BOULEVARD
 3RD SUBMITTAL
  
 - CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446
  
 - PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN
 WRITTEN FORMAT.
  
 - WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF SIX
 (6) PAPER COPIES AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY IN .PDF FORMAT
 OF ALL PLANS. PLEASE NOTE THAT CHANGES ON THE
 RESUBMITTED PLANS MAY RESULT IN ADDITIONAL COMMENTS.
  
 - PLEASE NOTE THAT IF THE PLANNING DIVISION HAS NOT
 RECEIVED A RESPONSE TO THE COMMENTS WITHIN 60 DAYS FROM
 THE DATE OF THESE COMMENTS (SEPTEMBER 7, 2012), THE
 CASE SHALL BE CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN. ANY FURTHER ACTION
 SHALL REQUIRE A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION.
  
 1) REPEAT COMMENT - NO DATA WAS PROVIDED ON THE
 FOUNDATION PLANTING FOR THE OUTLET CENTER. THE LINEAR
 FEET OF THE OUTLET CENTER AND THE LINEAR FEET OF THE
 FOUNDATION PLANNING WERE NOT PROVIDED TO VERIFY THE 85%
 PROPOSED NUMBER INCLUDED ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN.
 VISUALLY IT APPEARS TO MEET THE STANDARDS BUT PLEASE
 PROVIDE THE PRECISE CALCULATIONS.
  
 2) THE SILVER BUTTONWOODS IN THE PARKING LOT DO NOT
 MEET THE 12-14 FOOT AT INSTALLATION REQUIREMENT (THIS
 WAS MISTAKENLY STATED AS I-95 TREES ON PRIOR COMMENT).
  
 3) REPEAT COMMENT - THE PALM HEIGHTS AT SIX (6) AND
 EIGHT (8) FEET OF GREY WOOD ARE NOT ACCEPTABLE FOR THE
 ENTRY DRIVES AND THE PARKING LOTS.
  
 4) REPEAT COMMENT - THE PLANS DO NOT SHOW ALL THE
 ISLANDS FULLY PLANTED WITH GROUND COVER THAT DO NOT
 HAVE TREES/PALMS. SEE SHEET LP-3.
  
 5) REPEAT COMMENT - PLEASE CHECK THE EXFILTRATION DRAIN
 VS. TREE PLACEMENT. EX. SHEET LP-3 MONTGOMERY PALM
 ALONG THE ENTRY DRIVE SEEMS TO HAVE A CONFLICT.
  
 6) SHEET LP-3 HAS A PURPLE TRUMPET TREE SHOWN PLANTED
 IN A PARKING SPACE.
  
 7) THE EXFILTRATION LINES ON SHEET LP-4 THAT CURRENTLY
 RUN UNDER THE LANDSCAPE ISLANDS SHALL BE REDESIGNED SO
 THAT THERE IS NO CONFLICT WITH THE LANDSCAPE ISLANDS.
 THE DIAMONDS SHALL BE REMOVED AND THE TREES SHALL BE
 LOCATED IN THE LANDSCAPE ISLANDS.
  
 8) REPEAT COMMENT - THE BAYS OPPOSITE THE OPENINGS TO
 THE SERVICE BAYS SHALL HAVE THEIR DOORS PLACED SUCH
 THAT THEY ARE NOT LOCATED IN FRONT OF THE OPENING.
 THERE ARE DOORS SHOWN DIRECTLY ACROSS FROM THE SERVICE
 BAY OPENING FOR BUILDINGS J-1 AND J-5 WHEN THERE IS AN
 OPPORTUNITY TO LOCATE THE DOORS ELSEWHERE ON THE BAY.
  
 9) REPEAT COMMENT - THE BICYCLE RACKS SHALL NOT BE
 LOCATED ON THE BUILDING ENDS BY THE SERVICE COURTS. THE
 CODE REQUIRES THEM TO BE LOCATED IN CONVENIENT, HIGHLY
 VISIBLE, ACTIVE AREAS NEAR PRINCIPAL ENTRANCES. THE
 SOUTHEASTERN AND WESTERN BICYCLE RACKS DO NOT MEET THIS
 STANDARD AND, PER RICK GREENE, PLANNING MANAGER, SHALL
 BE RELOCATED TO THE NORTH SIDE OF THE OUTLET CENTER
 NEAR THE ENTRANCES.
  
 10) ALL OF THE BICYCLE RACK PADS ARE SHOWN AT 11.6 FEET
 IN WIDTH. THIS IS THE CORRECT WIDTH FOR THE PADS WITH
 FOUR BICYCLE RACK ELEMENTS, BUT IS WIDER THAN WHAT IS
 REQUIRED FOR THE TWO PADS WITH THREE BICYCLE RACK
 ELEMENTS. IF THE PADS ARE TO BE INSTALLED AT 11.6 FEET
 IN WIDTH, THEN STAFF SUGGESTS INSTALLING ONE MORE
 BICYCLE RACK ELEMENT ON EACH PAD OR ENSURING THAT THE
 THREE PROPOSED BICYCLE RACK ELEMENTS ARE INSTALLED IN A
 LOCATION SO THAT A FOURTH CAN BE INSTALLED IF
 NECESSARY.
  
 11) REPEAT COMMENT - PROVIDE WRITTEN VERIFICATION FROM
 PALM TRAN THAT THE DESIGN OF THE TRANSFER FACILITY IS
 ACCEPTABLE. HAS IT BEEN VERIFIED THAT THE BUSSES CAN
 MAKE ALL OF THE TURNS AND THAT THE PROPOSED LANDSCAPE
 IN THE AREA DOES NOT BLOCK THE VIEW OF THE DRIVERS WHEN
 MAKING TURNS?
  
 12) THE TERMINAL ISLAND ADJACENT TO THE ADA PARKING
 SPACE ACCESS AISLE NEAR THE PALM TRAN FACILITY SHALL BE
 EXTENDED THE FULL LENGTH OF THE SPACE PER THE ZONING
 AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS.
  
 13) REPEAT COMMENT - PROVIDE DETAILS ON THE FINAL BUS
 SHELTER LAYOUT, TO INCLUDE SETBACKS AND THE TYPE OF
 BENCHES TO BE INSTALLED. PLEASE BE MINDFUL THAT THE
 POLICE DEPARTMENT IS REQUIRING DIVIDED BENCHES AT THIS
 LOCATION. WHERE IS THE LANDSCAPE BUFFER IN THIS AREA?
 WHERE IS THE LIGHTING LOCATED?
  
 14) SOME OF THE LIGHT POLES ARE LOCATED VERY CLOSE TO
 TREES, ESPECIALLY ALONG THE NORTHERN BOUNDARY. PLEASE
 ENSURE THAT THE LIGHT POLES ARE NOT PLACED SUCH THAT
 THEY WILL REQUIRE SEVERE TREE TRIMMING AS THE TREE
 GROWS. PLEASE CONSIDER THE USE OF LED LIGHTING FOR
 SAFETY AND TO REDUCE YOUR ENERGY CONSUMPTION.
  
 15) PLEASE VERIFY THAT THE CURBS ALONG THE SODDED
 FUTURE DEVELOPMENT AREAS ARE OF A TYPE "D" OR
 EQUIVALENT.
  
 16) NOT ALL PARKING SPACES SHOW WHEEL STOPS. EX. ON
 SHEETS FSP-2 & FSP-4. PLEASE NOTE THAT IN A NUMBER OF
 LOCATIONS THE HEAD OF THE PARKING SPACE CURB LINE COULD
 BE MOVED TO WHERE THE WHEEL STOPS ARE SHOWN AND THE
 CARS WOULD OVERHANG A SODDED AREA INSTEAD OF ASPHALT.
 THIS WOULD REDUCE THE COST OF PROVIDING A CURB AND
 WHEEL STOPS, INCREASE THE LANDSCAPE AREA ON THE SITE,
 AND ALLOW FOR ADDITIONAL PERVIOUS AREA.
  
 17) THE NEW PARKING ROW SHOWN IN PBA 3 DOES NOT HAVE
 THE REQUIRED TERMINAL TREES.
  
 18) PLEASE DESCRIBE THE USE OF THE FOUR SPACE PARKING
 LOT ADJACENT TO THE WPBPD OFFICE? WILL THIS BE
 RESTRICTED PARKING (I.E. NOT OPEN TO PUBLIC)? IF IT
 INCLUDES PUBLIC PARKING, THERE WILL NEED TO BE AN ADA
 SPACE, PER LUIS MARTINEZ, CHIEF BUILDING PLANS
 EXAMINER.
  
 19) THE FORMAL SITE PLAN APPROVAL IS FOR THE ULTIMATE
 BUILD-OUT OF PBA 2A, ANCILLARY PARKING THROUGHOUT THE
 SITE AND THE PALM TRAN FACILITY. PER THE SECTION IX OF
 THE DESIGN GUIDELINES, PLEASE PROVIDE INTERIM (PHASING)
 PLANS TO SHOW THE BUILD OUT SCENARIOS LISTED BELOW. THE
 PLANS SHALL CLEARLY SHOW, GRAPHICALLY AND IN TABULAR
 FORM, HOW THE MINIMUM PARKING IS BEING MET FOR THE
 BUILDINGS WHICH ARE OCCUPIED AND OCCUPIABLE, HOW THE
 CONSTRUCTION STAGING/PARKING IS BEING ACHIEVED, HOW
 CIRCULATION IS GOING TO BE MAINTAINED TO THE VARIOUS
 BUILDINGS, PARKING AREAS AND CONSTRUCTION AREA. THERE
 SHALL BE SUFFICIENT PARKING FOR ALL THE USERS. INTERIM
 PARKING AREA USAGE, SUCH AS PBA 3, SHALL ALSO BE
 OUTLINED (TIMING, DURATION, ETC.).
  
 A. THE FASHION OUTLET BUILDINGS PLUS THE EXISTING JC
 PENNY, THE VACANT BANK BUILDING, PALM TRAN BUS TRANSFER
 AREA AND FIRESTONE.
  
 B. THE FASHION OUTLET BUILDINGS PLUS THE EXISTING JC
 PENNY, THE VACANT BANK BUILDING, PALM TRAN BUSS
 TRANSFER AREA AND FIRESTONE AND THE CONSTRUCTION OF PBA
 1.
  
 20) SIGN PLAN COMMENTS:
  
 A. SIGN TYPE 6 & 7 CANOPY SIGNS EXTEND PAST THE FACE OF
 THE CANOPY, WHICH DOES NOT CONFORM TO THE APPROVED
 DESIGN GUIDELINES.
  
 B. THE TOWER SIGNAGE IS NOT CALCULATED CORRECTLY ON THE
 SIGN PLAN. THIS SIGNAGE FALLS WITHIN THE TWO (2) SQUARE
 FEET FOR ONE (1) LINEAR FOOT OF FACADE REQUIREMENT.
 PLEASE NOTE THAT SINCE THE SIGN ZONE ON THE TOWERS IS
 41 FEET HIGH, THE SIGNS ON EACH SIDE OF THE TOWER WILL
 BE VISIBLE AND ARE NOT COUNTED AS "INTERIOR" SIGNAGE.
 ALL SIGNAGE ON THE TOWER WILL NEED TO ADHERE TO THE
 SIGN SQUARE FOOTAGE REQUIREMENTS.
  
 C. PLEASE DO NOT COUNT THE LINEAR FEET OF THE SCREEN
 WALLS AND THE LINEAR FEET OF THE BUILDING FACADE TO
 DETERMINE THE PERMITTED SIGN SQUARE FOOTAGE. ONLY THE
 EXTERIOR BUILDING FACADE COUNTS. HOWEVER, THE SIGNS MAY
 BE LOCATED ON THE SCREEN WALLS.
  
 D. THE FACADE CALCULATION KEY DIAGRAM SHALL BE REVISED.
  
 E. THE PERMANENT WINDOW SIGNAGE IS ONLY PERMITTED TO BE
 10% NOT 25% AS STATED IN THE SIGN PLAN.
  
 F. SIGN TYPE 10 IS ONLY PERMITTED TO BE 22 SQUARE FEET
 PER SIDE, NOT 24 SQUARE FEET AS SHOWN.
  
 G. SIGN TYPE 11 IS ONLY PERMITTED TO BE 24 SQUARE FEET
 PER SIDE, NOT 33 SQUARE FEET AS SHOWN.
  
 H. THE PARK AND RIDE/CARPOOL SIGNS SHALL BE INCLUDED IN
 THE INITIAL SIGN PROGRAM. THE SPECIFICS NEED TO BE
 APPROVED BY ALEX HANSEN, SENOR TRANSPORTATION PLANNER.
  
 - NOTWITHSTANDING THE COMMENTS PROVIDED ABOVE, THE
 ACTUAL FOOTPRINT OF THE OUTLET CENTER AND THE
 ELEVATIONS (EXCLUDING THE SERVICE DOOR COMMENT) APPEAR
 TO MEET THE PALM BEACH OUTLET DESIGN GUIDELINES. PLEASE
 REMEMBER THAT ROOFTOP MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT SHALL BE
 SCREENED. STAFF WAS UNABLE TO EVALUATE THIS REQUIREMENT
 SINCE NO BUILD OUT PLANS WERE SUBMITTED, BUT THIS WILL
 BE REVIEWED AT THE TIME OF PERMITTING.
  
 STAFF WILL BE HAPPY TO MEET WITH YOU TO DISCUSS ANY
 COMMENTS YOU WOULD LIKE TO DISCUSS IN MORE DETAIL.
  
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 2 Status F Date 07-06-2012 Cont ID  
Sent By eschneid Date 07-06-2012 Time 20:03 Rev Time 5.00
Received By eschneid Date 07-06-2012 Time 20:03 Sent To  
Notes
2012-07-06 20:04:09CASE NO. PB 891R
 PALM BEACH OUTLETS FORMAL SITE PLAN REVIEW
 1801 PALM BEACH LAKES BOULEVARD
 2ND SUBMITTAL
  
 - CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446
  
 - PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN
 WRITTEN FORMAT.
  
 - WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF SIX
 (6) PAPER COPIES AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY IN .PDF FORMAT
 OF ALL PLANS. PLEASE NOTE THAT CHANGES ON THE
 RESUBMITTED PLANS MAY RESULT IN ADDITIONAL COMMENTS.
  
 - PLEASE NOTE THAT IF THE PLANNING DIVISION HAS NOT
 RECEIVED A RESPONSE TO THE PPRC COMMENTS WITHIN 60 DAYS
 FROM THE DATE OF THESE COMMENTS/THE PPRC MEETING (JULY
 11, 2012), THE CASE SHALL BE CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN. ANY
 FURTHER ACTION SHALL REQUIRE A NEW DEVELOPMENT
 APPLICATION.
  
 -A RESUBMITTAL FEE OF $300 IS REQUIRED FOR ALL FUTURE
 RESUBMITTALS.
  
 1) THERE ARE ELEMENTS OF THE PROPOSED PLANS WHICH DO
 NOT MEET THE PROPOSED DESIGN GUIDELINES. ADDITIONALLY,
 THE FORMAL SITE PLAN CANNOT BE APPROVED UNTIL THE CITY
 COMMISSION APPROVES THE MAJOR PLANNED DEVELOPMENT
 AMENDMENT.
  
 2) ADDITIONAL COMMENTS MAY BE FORTHCOMING WITH
 RESUBMITTED PLANS.
  
 3) STAFF HAS NOT COMPLETED ITS REVIEW OF THE TREE
 SURVEY AND TREE ALTERATION PERMIT AND HOW THE
 PRESERVED/RELOCATED TREES RELATED TO THE PROPOSED
 LANDSCAPE PLAN. THIS ANALYSIS WILL BE COMPLETED BEFORE
 THE END OF JULY.
  
 4) THE LIGHT POSTS AND ALL UTILITY LINES SHALL BE SHOWN
 ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN.
  
 5) THE CONGRESS AVENUE/CHASE BANK BUFFER REQUIRES 53
 TREES. PLANS STATE ONLY 43 TREES ARE PROVIDED. 10 MORE
 TREES ARE REQUIRED TO COMPLY WITH CODE. PLEASE REMEMBER
 YOUR COMMITMENT TO PROVIDING MORE TREES THAN THE CODE
 REQUIRES ON-SITE.
  
 6) THE PALM BEACH LAKE BUFFER REQUIRES 78 TREES. PLANS
 STATE ONLY 56 TREES ARE PROVIDED. 22 MORE TREES ARE
 REQUIRED TO COMPLY WITH CODE. PLEASE REMEMBER YOUR
 COMMITMENT TO PROVIDING MORE TREES THAN THE CODE
 REQUIRES ON-SITE.
  
 '7) THE FUTURE DEVELOPMENT PADS MAY NOT COUNT TOWARD
 MEETING THE REQUIRED LANDSCAPE OR PERVIOUS AREA
 REQUIREMENTS.
  
 8) NO DATA WAS PROVIDED ON THE FOUNDATION PLANTING FOR
 THE OUTLET CENTER. ADDITIONALLY, NO DATA WAS PROVIDED
 AS TO HOW THE PLANTER BOXES AND POTTED PLANTS DO NOT
 EXCEED THE REQUIREMENTS STATED IN THE DESIGN GUIDELINES
 FOR THE MINIMUM REQUIRED LANDSCAPE PERCENTAGE.
  
 9) THE SILVER BUTTONWOODS ALONG I-95 THAT ARE NOW
 PROPOSED TO BE REPLACED DO NOT MEET THE 12-14 FOOT AT
 INSTALLATION REQUIREMENT.
  
 10) THE PALM HEIGHTS MAY NOT COMPLY WITH THE APPROVED
 DESIGN GUIDELINES.
  
 11) REPEAT COMMENT - THERE ARE MONTGOMERY PALMS AND A
 GUMBO LIMBO TREE SHOWN LOCATED ABOVE THE EASTERN
 DRAINAGE LINES. WHY ARE NO PALMS IN THE TERMINAL
 ISLANDS OVER THE EAST/WEST DRAINAGE PIPE? IT IS BURIED
 SUFFICIENT DEPTH FOR PALMS AND THEN THE TERMINAL ISLAND
 REQUIREMENT WOULD BE MET. - STAFF IS CONFUSED WHY
 UNIFORM PLANTING FOR THE SAME CONDITIONS DO NOT EXIST.
 ADDITIONALLY, THE PLANS DO NOT SHOW ALL THE ISLANDS
 FULLY PLANTED WITH GROUND COVER THAT DO NOT HAVE
 TREES/PALMS. THIS COMMENT ALSO APPLIES TO THE
 EXFILTRATION SHEET LP-4
  
 12) REPEAT COMMENT - PLEASE CHECK THE EXFILTRATION
 DRAIN VS. TREE PLACEMENT. NEW EX. SHEET LP-3 MONTGOMERY
 PALM ALONG THE ENTRY DRIVE SEEMS TO HAVE A CONFLICT.
  
 13) SHEET LP-2 HAS A PALM TREE IN THE ACCESSIBLE AISLE
 WHICH GOES THROUGH A TREE ISLAND AND ON TOP OF WHAT
 APPEARS TO BE A FIRE HYDRANT. ALL PLANS SHALL BE
 VERIFIED TO ENSURE NO CONFLICTS.
  
 14) PALM TREES USED FOR REQUIRED TREES, SUCH AS IN
 PARKING ISLANDS, SHALL BE CLUSTERED IN GROUPS OF THREE,
 NOT TWO OR SOLO AS SHOWN ON THE PLANS, UNLESS THEY ARE
 ROYAL PALMS OR SUCKERING PALMS.
  
 15) THE SERVICE AREAS ARE NOT SCREENED IN ACCORDANCE
 WITH THE PROPOSED DESIGN GUIDELINES.
  
 16) WHY DON'T THE GRAND PEDESTRIAN ENTRY WALKWAYS LEAD
 TO THE PEDESTRIAN WAY BETWEEN THE BUILDINGS? GIVING UP
 THE VIEW CORRIDOR TO PARKING AISLES DOES NOT SEEM LIKE
 THE BEST SITE DESIGN STRATEGY.
  
 17) THE AREA BETWEEN PBA #1 AND PBA #4 SHALL BE GRASSED
 UNTIL FUTURE DEVELOPMENT.
  
 18) THE 139 PALM CREDITS LISTED ON THE SHEET LP-C ARE
 INCORRECT AS NOT ALL REMAINING AND RELOCATED PALMS ARE
 A 1 TO 1 TRADE OUT - EX. SABAL PALMS. THE PALMS SHALL
 BE BROKEN DOWN BY TYPE - 1 FOR 1 VS. 2 FOR 1.
  
 19) PROVIDE THE PERCENTAGE OF PALM SUBSTITUTION TABLE.
  
 20) THE SIGN PROGRAM WILL BE REVIEWED FOR COMPLIANCE
 WITH THE DESIGN GUIDELINES THAT ARE APPROVED AT FIRST
 READING BY THE CITY COMMISSION ON AUGUST 6, 2012.
  
 21) THE BAYS OPPOSITE THE OPENINGS TO THE SERVICE BAYS
 SHALL HAVE THEIR DOORS PLACED SUCH THAT THEY ARE NOT
 LOCATED IN OPENING. THE DOOR PLACEMENT MAY NOT
 INTENTIONALLY CONFLICT WITH THE REQUIRED SERVICE ARE
 FOUNDATION PLANTING. THE SUBMITTED PLANS AND RENDERINGS
 SHOW DOORS AT A NUMBER OF SERVICE BAY OPENINGS.
  
 22) THE WALLS ALONG THE NORTH, EAST AND SOUTH OF THE
 OUTLET CENTER (BOTH BUILDING AND SCREEN WALLS) DO NOT
 COMPLY WITH THE DESIGN GUIDELINE REQUIREMENT FOR NOT
 HAVING GREATER THAN 50 FEET OF BLANK WALL. SCORING
 LINES ARE NOT LISTED AS ONE OF THE EXTERIOR FA?ADE
 TREATMENTS.
  
 23) THE REQUIRED MINOR AMENDMENT TO UPDATE THE MASTER
 PLAN WAS NOT SUBMITTED.
  
 24) THE BICYCLE RACKS SHALL NOT BE LOCATED ON THE
 BUILDING ENDS BY THE SERVICE COURTS. THE CODE REQUIRES
 THEM TO BE LOCATED CONVENIENT, HIGHLY VISIBLE, ACTIVE
 AREAS NEAR PRINCIPAL ENTRANCES.
  
 25) PROVIDE THE BICYCLE PAD DIMENSIONS ON THE PLANS FOR
 THE SPECIFIC NUMBER OF RACKS ON THE PAD.
  
 26) PROVIDE WRITTEN VERIFICATION FORM PALM TRAN THAT
 THE TRANSFER FACILITY IS ACCEPTABLE.
  
 27) PROVIDE DETAILS ON THE FINAL BUS SHELTER LAYOUT, TO
 INCLUDE SETBACKS.
  
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 05-09-2012 Cont ID  
Sent By eschneid Date 05-09-2012 Time 13:03 Rev Time 5.00
Received By eschneid Date 05-09-2012 Time 13:03 Sent To  
Notes
2012-05-09 13:03:36CASE NO. PB 891R
 PALM BEACH OUTLETS FORMAL SITE PLAN REVIEW
 1801 PALM BEACH LAKES BOULEVARD
  
 - CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446
  
 - PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN
 WRITTEN FORMAT.
  
 - WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF SIX
 (6) PAPER COPIES AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY IN .PDF FORMAT
 OF ALL PLANS. PLEASE NOTE THAT CHANGES ON THE
 RESUBMITTED PLANS MAY RESULT IN ADDITIONAL COMMENTS.
  
 - PLEASE NOTE THAT IF THE PLANNING DIVISION HAS NOT
 RECEIVED A RESPONSE TO THE PPRC COMMENTS WITHIN 60 DAYS
 FROM THE DATE OF THESE COMMENTS/THE PPRC MEETING (JULY
 9, 2012), THE CASE SHALL BE CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN. ANY
 FURTHER ACTION SHALL REQUIRE A NEW DEVELOPMENT
 APPLICATION.
  
 - PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1)
 RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED
 COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE
 APPLICANT WILL BE ACCESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE
 WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE ($300).
  
 1) ZONING IS NOT PROVIDING A FULL REVIEW OF THE
 SUBMITTED PLANS AS IT IS RECOGNIZED THAT SOME REVISIONS
 TO THE DESIGN GUIDELINES AND THE DISCUSSIONS WITH PALM
 TRAN WILL AFFECT THE SITE DESIGN. PLEASE REMEMBER THAT
 THE FORMAL SITE PLAN CANNOT BE APPROVED UNTIL THE CITY
 COMMISSION APPROVES THE MAJOR PLANNED DEVELOPMENT
 AMENDMENT.
  
 2) THE PHOTOMETRIC PLAN SHOWS SOME AREAS WHERE THE
 ILLUMINATION LEVEL IS IN EXCESS OF 0.5 FOOT CANDLES IN
 CLOSE PROXIMITY TO THE RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY LINE.
 PLEASE VERIFY THAT THE FOOT CANDLE MEASUREMENTS WITHIN
 THE RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT DO NOT EXCEED CODE
 REQUIREMENTS. ADDITIONALLY, THERE ARE A FEW LOCATIONS
 ALONG PALM BEACH LAKES BOULEVARD, AWAY FROM THE
 ENTRANCES, WHERE THE LIGHTING LEVELS EXCEED 1.0 FOOT
 CANDLES AT THE CPD BOUNDARY AND BEYOND. PLEASE EXPLAIN.
  
 3) IT APPEARS THAT THERE MAY BE SOME CONFLICT WITH THE
 PROPOSED OAK TREES AND THE LIGHT POLES ALONG THE
 NORTHERN PROPERTY LINE. PLEASE CHECK THE SPACING OF THE
 LIGHT POLES FROM THE TREES SO THERE IS NO LONG TERM
 CONFLICT AS THE TREES GROW.
  
 4) ARE THE LIGHT POSTS ALONG THE NORTH PROPERTY LINE
 EXISTING OR NEW? IF THESE ARE NEW POLES, THEN THEY
 SHALL BE LOCATED A MINIMUM OF 15 FEET FROM THE PROPERTY
 LINE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE RESIDENTIAL SETBACK
 REQUIREMENTS. ADDITIONALLY, THE POLES SHALL COMPLY WITH
 THE HEIGHT REQUIREMENTS ADJACENT TO RESIDENTIAL ZONING
 DISTRICTS (30 FEET).
  
 5) PLEASE CHECK THE NOTATIONS ON THE PLANT LIST. SOME
 USE * OTHERS **. THERE IS NO ** ON THE KEY PLAN.
  
 6) PLEASE NOTE THAT THE REQUIRED AMOUNT OF LANDSCAPE
 MATERIAL ROUNDS UP, SO PLEASE ADJUST THE LANDSCAPE DATA
 TABLE, EX. 939 SHADE TREES REQUIRED.
  
 7) THE CODE REQUIRES THAT THE REQUIRED VISIBILITY
 TRIANGLES BE CLEAR FROM 18 INCHES, NOT 30 INCHES AS
 STATED ON LP-C.
  
 8) THERE ARE DISCREPANCIES BETWEEN THE TREE RELOCATION
 PLAN AND THE LANDSCAPE PLAN AS TO SAVED AND RELOCATED
 TREES. PLEASE SEE TREE 555 AS AN EXAMPLE. STAFF WOULD
 LIKE TO HAVE A SEPARATE MEETING TO DISCUSS THE TREE
 ALTERATION PERMIT SUBMITTAL BASED ON THE STAFF SITE
 VISIT.
  
 9) PLEASE VERIFY YOUR TREE SEPARATION ALONG THE
 NORTHERN PROPERTY LINE. THE CODE REQUIRES TREES EVERY
 30 FEET, YET THE TREES ALONG THE NORTHERN PROPERTY LINE
 AVERAGE 35 TO 40 FEET APART. AS THESE ARE NEW AND
 RELOCATED TREES, THE STANDARD SHALL BE MET.
  
 10) PLEASE FILL IN THE LARGE GAPS ON THE NORTH AND WEST
 BUFFERS OF PDA 3 WITH A TREE OR PALM(S) - BETWEEN THE
 REMAINING SABAL PLAMS.
  
 11) THE BUFFER ALONG PBA 5 REQUIRES AN ADDITIONAL TREE.
  
 12) THE SILVER BUTTONWOODS ALONG I-95 APPEAR TO BE
 SPACED IRREGULARLY AND SOME ARE IN EXCESS OF 30 FEET
 APART. PLEASE PROVIDE THE CALCULATION THAT THERE ARE
 THE SUFFICIENT NUMBERS OF TREES AS REQUIRED BY THE
 FRONTAGE. GROUPING IS ACCEPTABLE AS THERE ARE EXISTING
 TREES THAT ARE BEING AUGMENTED.
  
 13) PLEASE VERIFY THAT THE INSIDE WITH OF THE PARKING
 ISLANDS IS FIVE (5) FEET. PLAN SCALE IS TOO SMALL TO
 MEASURE.
  
 14) THERE ARE PARKING ISLANDS THAT DO NOT HAVE TREES IN
 THEM. CODE REQUIRES TREES TO TERMINATE EACH PARKING
 ROW.
  
 15) THERE ARE MONTGOMERY PALMS AND A GUMBO LIMBO TREE
 SHOWN LOCATED ABOVE THE EASTERN DRAINAGE LINES. WHY ARE
 NO PALMS IN THE TERMINAL ISLANDS OVER THE EAST/WEST
 DRAINAGE PIPE? IT IS BURIED SUFFICIENT DEPTH FOR PALMS
 AND THEN THE TERMINAL ISLAND REQUIREMENT WOULD BE MET.
  
 16) PLEASE CHECK THE EXFILTRATION DRAIN VS. TREE
 PLACEMENT. EX. NORTHEAST CORNER OF LP-7 SEEMS TO HAVE A
 CONFLICT.
  
 17) PALM TREES USED FOR REQUIRED TREES, SUCH AS IN
 PARKING ISLANDS, SHALL BE CLUSTERED IN GROUPS OF THREE,
 NOT TWO OR SOLO AS SHOWN ON THE PLANS, UNLESS THEY ARE
 ROYAL PALMS OR SUCKERING PALMS.
  
 18) PLEASE CONSIDER GROUND COVER PLANTING INSTEAD OF
 SOD IN THE PARKING ISLANDS.
  
  Print


Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved