Plan Review Details - Project Z12030026
Plan Review Stops For Project Z12030026
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 1 Status N Date 04-10-2012 Cont ID  
Sent By lmartine Date 04-10-2012 Time 16:53 Rev Time 0.00
Received By lmartine Date 04-10-2012 Time 16:53 Sent To  
Notes
2012-04-10 16:54:04SEE # Z12030022
Review Stop POLICE POLICE
Rev No 1 Status F Date 04-05-2012 Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 04-05-2012 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date 04-05-2012 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2012-04-05 13:11:40CONSTRUCTION SITE SECURITY PLAN
 PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF THE FIRST BUILDING PERMIT, THE
 APPLICANT SHALL PREPARE A CONSTRUCTION SITE SECURITY
 AND MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR APPROVAL BY THE CITY OF WEST
 PALM BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT CPTED OFFICIAL.
 A. AFTER SITE CLEARING AND PLACEMENT OF CONSTRUCTION
 TRAILERS, THE DEVELOPER/PROJECT MANAGER SHALL INSTITUTE
 SECURITY MEASURES TO REDUCE OR ELIMINATE OPPORTUNITIES
 FOR THEFT. THE MANAGEMENT PLAN SHALL INCLUDE, BUT NOT
 BE LIMITED TO, TEMPORARY LIGHTING, SECURITY PERSONNEL,
 VEHICLE BARRIERS, CONSTRUCTION/VISITOR PASS,
 REDUCE/MINIMIZE ENTRY/EXIT POINTS, ENCOURAGE
 SUBCONTRACTORS TO SECURE MACHINERY, TOOLS AT END OF
 WORK DAY, FENCING WITH SCREENING AND OR ANY OTHER
 MEASURE DEEMED APPROPRIATE TO PROVIDE A SAFE AND SECURE
 WORKING ENVIRONMENT.
 B. THE SECURITY MANAGEMENT PLAN SHALL BE MAINTAINED
 THROUGHOUT THE CONSTRUCTION PHASE OF THE PROJECT.
 NON-COMPLIANCE WITH THE APPROVED PLAN SHALL RESULT IN A
 STOP-WORK ORDER FOR THE ENTIRE PLANNED UNIT
 DEVELOPMENT.
 C. PROPERTY SHALL BE POST ?NO TRESPASSING? SIGNS EVERY
 500 FEET AROUND THE PERIMETER OF THE SITE, SIGNED
 AFFIDAVIT MUST BE SIGNED AT THE POLICE DEPARTMENT.
 822-1621
  
  
  SECURITY MEASURES FOR SUBWAY
  
 (1) A FULLY FUNCTIONING AND OPERATIONAL CCTV SYSTEM
 CAPABLE OF RECORDING AND RETRIEVING AN IDENTIFIABLE
 IMAGE TO ASSIST IN OFFENDER IDENTIFICATION AND
 APPREHENSION. DRIVE THRU LANES WILL HAVE PROPER
 LIGHTING AND CCTV COVERAGE.
 A) CAMERA COVERAGE OF THE DRIVE UP WINDOW, OUTSIDE AND
 INSIDE, THE FRONT CASH REGISTERS, FRONT DOOR AND REAR
 DOOR ON THE EXTERIOR AND INTERIOR.
  
 (2) A DROP SAFE WILL BE INSTALLED FOR RESTRICTED ACCESS
 TO CASH RECEIPTS.
  
 (3) A CONSPICUOUS NOTICE AT THE ENTRANCE AND DRIVE
 THROUGH WINDOW WHICH STATES THAT THE CASH REGISTER
 CONTAINS A LIMITED AMOUNT OF CASH.
  
 (4) HEIGHT MARKERS AT THE ENTRANCE AND EXITS WHICH
 DISPLAY HEIGHT MEASURES.
  
 (5) A CASH MANAGEMENT POLICY TO LIMIT THE CASH ON HAND
 AT ALL TIMES.
  
 (6). LANDSCAPING WILL NOT EXCEED 18? TO 2? IN MATURITY.
  
 (7) REAR DOORS WILL HAVE A VIEWING WINDOW, OR PEEPHOLE
 AND A DOOR BELL MOUNTED OUTSIDE, CHIME CONTACT ON THE
 DOOR ALERTING WHEN THE DOOR IS OPENED, AND CCTV
 COVERAGE ON THE EXTERIOR AND INTERIOR OF THE
 RESTAURANT.
  
 (8) WINDOWS SHOULD HAVE A CLEAR AND UNOBSTRUCTED VIEW
 FROM OUTSIDE THE BUILDING AND IN A NORMAL LINE OF SIGHT
 OF THE CASH REGISTER AND SALES TRANSACTION AREA. WHERE
 WINDOW TINTING IS PRESENT, IT SHALL NOT REDUCE EXTERIOR
 VIEW FROM A NORMAL LINE OF SIGHT OF THE CASH REGISTER
 AND SALES TRANSACTION AREA.
 (9) RESTAURANT SHALL BE EQUIPPED WITH A SILENT ALARM TO
 A PRIVATE SECURITY AGENCY. PANIC ALARMS SHOULD BE
 LOCATED IN THE CASHIER AREA AND THE DRIVE UP WINDOW.
  
 (10) PROVIDE AT LEAST TWO EMPLOYEES ON THE PREMISES AT
 ALL TIMES BETWEEN THE HOURS OF 11:00 P.M. 5:00 A.M.
  
 (11) LOCK THE BUSINESS INTERIOR EAT IN AREA BETWEEN THE
 HOURS OF 11:00 P.M. TO 5:00 A.M., TRANSACT BUSINESS
 THROUGH THE DRIVE UP WINDOW.
  
  COMMENTS
 1. ARE THERE PUBLIC RESTROOMS?
 2. STOP SIGN SHOULD BE POSTED ON THE SW CORNER EXITING
 THE DRIVE UP WINDOW WHERE PEDESTRIAN TRAFFIC WILL BE
 CROSSING TO ENTER THE RESTAURANT.
 3. PEDESTRIAN CROSS WALK CLEARLY MARKED FOR CROSSING
 4. SHORTEN THE LENGTH OF THE PLANTER IN THE DRIVE UP
 WINDOW, ENABLING A VEHICLE TO SEE PEDESTRIAN TRAFFIC
 WALKING TO THE RESTAURANT.
 5. POST A SIGN AT THE DRIVE UP WARNING OF A PEDESTRIAN
 WALKWAY.
 6. WHAT ARE THE HOURS OF OPERATION?
  
  
  
Review Stop TRAFFIC TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 04-10-2012 Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 04-10-2012 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date 04-10-2012 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2012-04-10 08:05:22THE PROXIMITY OF THE DRIVE-THRU EXIT, THE HANDICAPPED
 PARKING SPACE, AND THE INGRESS FROM SOUTHERN BOULEVARD
 PROVIDE POTENTIAL SAFETY ISSUES DUE TO VEHICLE
 CONFLICTS IN A RELATIVELY SHORT SPACE. BASED ON THE
 CURRENT SITE PLAN EITHER THE DRIVE-THRU SHOULD BE
 ELIMINATED OR THE INGRESS FROM SOUTHERN ELIMINATED.
 RELOCATION OF THE BUILDING MAY RESOLVE THESE ISSUES.
 HOWEVER, HISTORIC PRESERVATION ISSUES APPEAR TO
 RESTRICT RELOCATION OF THE BUILDING TO AN OPTIMAL
 LOCATION FOR EGRESS AND DRIVE-THRU OPERATIONS.
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 04-10-2012 Cont ID  
Sent By fmittner Date 04-10-2012 Time 16:30 Rev Time 0.00
Received By fmittner Date 04-10-2012 Time 16:30 Sent To  
Notes
2012-04-10 16:29:58CASE NOS. PB 1621, 1621A, HPB 12-07
 SUBWAY ? FLU, REZONING, CLASS B
 901 SOUTHERN BOULEVARD
  
 - CONTACT FRIEDERIKE MITTNER @ (561) 822-1457
  
 - PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN
 WRITTEN FORMAT.
  
 - WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF TEN
 (10) PAPER COPIES AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY IN .PNG FORMAT
 OF ALL PLANS. PLEASE NOTE THAT CHANGES ON THE
 RESUBMITTED PLANS MAY RESULT IN ADDITIONAL COMMENTS.
  
 - THE PPRC COMMENTS SHALL BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED AND
 SUBMITTED TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT BY 5 PM
 ON APRIL 20, 2012, TO BE SCHEDULED FOR THE MAY 15,
 2012, PLANNING BOARD MEETING.
  
 - PLEASE NOTE THAT IF THE PLANNING AND ZONING
 DEPARTMENT HAS NOT RECEIVED A RESPONSE TO THE PPRC
 COMMENTS WITHIN 60 DAYS FROM THE DATE OF THE PPRC
 MEETING (APRIL 11, 2012), THE CASE SHALL BE CONSIDERED
 WITHDRAWN. ANY FURTHER ACTION SHALL REQUIRE A NEW
 DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION.
  
 - PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1)
 RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED
 COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE
 APPLICANT WILL BE ACCESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE
 WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE ($600).
  
 THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS ADDRESS THE FUTURE LAND USE,
 REZONING, CLASS B AND SITE PLAN APPLICATIONS. NOTE: NOT
 ALL COMMENTS WILL APPLY TO ALL APPLICATIONS, BUT FOR
 BREVITY, ALL COMMENTS WERE COMBINED.
  
 1) PLEASE PROVIDE THE CITY WITH A LETTER FROM FPL
 STATING THE PROPOSED LANDSCAPING IS PERMITTED IN THEIR
 EASEMENT.
  
 2) THE LANDSCAPE PLANS SHALL BE CORRECTLY CALCULATED
 USING GREEN NOT OPEN SPACE. PLEASE INDICATE PERCENTAGE
 CALCULATIONS.
  
 3) CONCERN ABOUT THE HOLLY BEING PLANTED NEXT TO A
 POLE, PLEASE REVIEW LANDSCAPE PLAN THOROUGHLY FOR
 FEASIBILITY OF PLANTS AND HEIGHTS.
  
 4) BUILDING REQUIRES 30% FOUNDATION PLANTINGS
  
 5) THE DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE MUST BE SETBACK AT LEAST 5?
 FROM THE SIDE PROPERTY LINE, BE OF THE PROPER
 DIMENSIONS (12?-6? OPENING SIZE) AND BE LANDSCAPED ON
 THREE SIDES.
  
 6) PLEASE PROVIDE A PHOTOMETRICS PLAN AND LIGHTING
 DETAILS FOR THE SITE. CANNOT EXCEED 0.5 FOOTCANDLES AT
 THE RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY LINE AND NO GLARE INTO THE
 RIGHT OF WAY. POLES SHALL NOT EXCEED 15? IN HEIGHT.
  
 7) PLEASE CLEARLY DIMENSION THE SIGNAGE ON THE
 BUILDING. CLEARLY INDICATE WHERE DIRECTIONAL SIGNAGE
 AND MENU BOARD WILL BE LOCATED.
  
 8) COMPACT SPACES (# 10) ARE NOT PERMITTED FOR THIS
 AMOUNT OF PARKING SPACES. PARKING SPACE #1 NEEDS TO
 ACCOMMODATE CURBING
  
 9) D CURBS ARE REQUIRED WHICH PERMIT A 2? OVERHANG.
 PLEASE REVISE PLANS ACCORDINGLY.
  
 10) PLEASE CLEARLY INDICATE WHERE THE MECHANICAL
 EQUIPMENT WILL BE PLACED AND THE DIMENSIONS AND
 SCREENING FOR IT.
  
 11) STAFF SUGGESTS USING CURBING INSTEAD OF WHEEL STOPS
 TO ALLOW THE FRONT OF THE CAR TO OVERHANG A GREEN AREA.
 PLEASE REFER TO FIGURE XIV-2 IN ARTICLE XIV OF THE
 ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS. THIS WOULD
 ALLOW MORE AREA FOR ROOT GROWTH, WHICH WOULD BE
 ESPECIALLY BENEFICIAL ALONG THE NORTH PROPERTY LINE.
 PLEASE NOTE THAT NO LANDSCAPE MATERIAL OVER 6 INCHES IN
 HEIGHT.
  
 12) THE JUSTIFICATION STATEMENTS FOR THE COMPREHENSIVE
 PLAN AMENDMENT, THE REZONING, AND THE CLASS B SPECIAL
 USE INCORRECTLY INDICATE THAT THE CURRENT FUTURE LAND
 USE DESIGNATION FOR THE SUBJECT SITE IS MULTIFAMILY,
 WHEN IT IS ACTUALLY SINGLE FAMILY. THE JUSTIFICATION
 STATEMENTS NEED TO BE MODIFIED TO ACCURATELY REFLECT
 THE CURRENT FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION.
  
 13) THE SITE PLAN INCORRECTLY INDICATES THAT THE
 CURRENT FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION FOR THE SUBJECT
 SITE IS MULTIFAMILY, WHEN IT IS ACTUALLY SINGLE FAMILY.
 THE SITE PLAN NEEDS TO BE MODIFIED TO ACCURATELY
 REFLECT THE CURRENT FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION.
  
 14) PER SECTION 94-485 OF ARTICLE XV - PARKING- OF THE
 CITY'S ZONING AND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS, THE PROPOSED
 PROJECT WOULD NEED TO PROVIDE BICYCLE PARKING FOR ONE
 (1) BICYCLE. THE SITE PLAN SUBMITTED BY THE APPLICANT
 DOES NOT INCLUDE ANY BICYCLE PARKING. PLEASE AMEND TO
 SITE PLAN TO INCLUDE ONE BIKE PARKING SPACE CONSISTENT
 WITH THE GUIDELINES OF THE BIKE PARKING GUIDELINES
 MANUAL THAT IS BEING PROVIDED TO THE APPLICANT
 SEPARATELY.
  
 15) THE APPLICANT'S LAND USE AMENDMENT TRAFFIC STUDY
 PREPARED BY SUSAN O'ROURKE INDICATES THAT THIS LAND USE
 AMENDMENT WILL GENERATE AN IMPACT OF 496 DAILY TRIPS,
 49 AM PEAK HOUR TRIPS, AND 33 PM PEAK HOUR TRIPS. THE
 TRAFFIC STUDY ALSO INDICATES THAT THE PROJECT DOES NOT
 REQUIRE FURTHER ANALYSIS BECAUSE PER THE COUNTY POLICY
 3.5-D, THE NET IMPACT IS INSIGNIFICANT BECAUSE IT IS
 LESS THAN 50 PEAK HOUR TRIPS. TABLE 3.5-1 SIGNIFICANT
 IMPACT OF COUNTY POLICY 3.5-D, ESTABLISHES THAT A
 PROJECTS NET IMPACT IS INSIGNIFICANT IF IT GENERATES
 LESS THAN 50 DAILY TRIPS. BECAUSE THIS LAND USE
 AMENDMENT WOULD GENERATE 496 ADDITIONAL DAILY TRIPS,
 THE STUDY NEEDS TO EVALUATE IMPACTS ON THE DIRECTLY
 ACCESSED LINKS (SOUTHERN BOULEVARD AND PARKER AVENUE)
 FOR BOTH EXISTING CONDITIONS AS WELL AS FOR THE LONG
 RANGE TIMEFRAME, CONSISTENT WITH THE MPO'S LONG RANGE
 TRANSPORTATION PLAN. AS A RESULT, THE LAND USE
 AMENDMENT TRAFFIC STUDY NEEDS TO BE REVISED
 ACCORDINGLY.
  
 16) THE AMENDMENT PACKET REFERENCES THAT THE PROPOSED
 COMMERCIAL USES WILL BE LIMITED TO NO MORE THAN 2,000
 SQUARE FEET AND THE LOS ANALYSIS WAS PERFORMED
 REFLECTING THE IMPACTS OF 2,000 SQUARE FEET OF
 COMMERCIAL USES. MORE SPECIFICALLY, THE TRAFFIC STUDY
 LIMITS THE ANALYSIS TO 2,000 SQUARE FEET OF FAST FOOD
 RESTAURANT WITH DRIVE-THROUGH WITH A NET DAILY TRIP
 GENERATION OF 506 TRIPS. AS SUCH, THE PROPOSED LAND USE
 AMENDMENT SHOULD INCLUDE A LIMITATION SUCH AS THE ONE
 BELOW:
  
 DEVELOPMENT OF THE PROPERTY SHALL BE LIMITED TO USES
 PERMITTED IN THE COMMERCIAL FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION
 THAT HAVE A DAILY TRIP GENERATION THAT IS EQUIVALENT
 TO, OR LESS THAN 506 DAILY TRIPS. THIS EQUIVALENCY
 SHALL BE DEMONSTRATED IN AN UPDATED TRAFFIC STUDY IN
 COMPLIANCE WITH THE LAND USE AMENDMENT TRAFFIC STUDY
 REQUIREMENTS IN EFFECT AT THE TIME AND PREPARED BY A
 LICENSED ENGINEER. THE UPDATED STUDY SHALL OUTLINE THE
 NUMBER OF DAILY TRIPS ASSOCIATED WITH THE PROPOSED USE
 AND INTENSITY/BUILDING AREA AND BE SUBMITTED TO THE
 CITY FOR ITS APPROVAL BEFORE ANY ALTERNATIVE USES ARE
 ALLOWED.
  
 17) THE SUMMARY TABLE OF LEVEL OF SERVICE IMPACTS NEEDS
 TO BE REVISED TO REFLECT IN THE TRAFFIC SECTION THAT
 THE PROPOSED FLU DESIGNATION (AS CONDITIONED) WOULD
 GENERATE 506 DAILY TRIPS FOR A RESULTING IMPACT OF 496
 DAILY TRIPS. THE TRAFFIC SECTION IN THE LOS TABLE
 CURRENTLY INDICATES THAT THE "ANALYSIS OF THE 2020
 PLANNING HORIZON MEETS THE LOS STANDARD". AS REFERENCED
 IN A PREVIOUS COMMENT, THE APPLICANT FAILED TO PERFORM
 A COMPLETE ANALYSIS TO DETERMINE THE TRAFFIC LOS
 IMPACTS OF THIS AMENDMENT. ALSO, THE APPLICANT WOULD
 NEED TO PERFORM A LONG RANGE ANALYSIS CONSISTENT WITH
 THE MPO'S LONG RANGE TRANSPORTATION PLAN (CURRENTLY
 YEAR 2035). AS A RESULT, THIS SECTION OF THE LOS TABLE
 WILL NEED TO BE CHANGED ACCORDINGLY.
  
 18) A TRAFFIC CONFLICT EXISTS AT SOUTH END OF PROPERTY.
 APPLICANT SHALL EITHER ELIMINATE THE DRIVE-THRU OR THE
 ENTRANCE ONTO THE SITE FORM SOUTHERN.
  
  Print


Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved