Plan Review Details - Project Z12020017
Plan Review Stops For Project Z12020017
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 1 Status N Date 04-11-2012 Cont ID  
Sent By lmartine Date 04-11-2012 Time 09:54 Rev Time 0.00
Received By lmartine Date 04-11-2012 Time 09:54 Sent To  
Notes
2012-04-11 09:55:16SEE Z12020015
Review Stop POLICE POLICE
Rev No 1 Status F Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By ktucker Date 05-29-2013 Time 11:24 Sent To  
Notes
2013-05-29 11:26:54THERE NEEDS TO BE NIGHT TIME LIGHTING THROUGH OUT THE
 PARK, SO THERE CAN BE A VISUAL INSIDE THE PARK FROM THE
 STREET FOR SECURITY PURPOSES
  
 A CCTV NEEDS TO BE MOUNTED ON THE RECREATION BUILDING
 AND A CAMERA FACING THE PLAYGROUND WOULD BE A GREAT
 ASSET
  
 HOW WILL YOU RESTRICT USERS FROM THE WALKING PATH AT
 NIGHT?
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 3 Status P Date 06-19-2013 Cont ID  
Sent By ahansen Date 06-19-2013 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date 06-18-2013 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2013-06-19 15:22:231. SP-1. THE SITE PLAN SUBMITTED BY THE APPLICANT
 INCLUDES A BICYCLE RACK PARKING MODEL THAT IS NOT
 ACCEPTED BY THE CITY. IN ADDITION, THE SITE PLAN DOES
 NOT INCLUDE THE DIMENSIONS OF THE AREA WHERE THE BIKE
 PARKING IS PROPOSED TO BE INSTALLED. PLEASE AMEND TO
 SITE PLAN TO INCLUDE A BIKE RACK PARKING MODEL
 CONSISTENT WITH THE GUIDELINES OF THE BIKE PARKING
 GUIDELINES MANUAL THAT IS BEING PROVIDED TO THE
 APPLICANT SEPARATELY AND PLEASE INCLUDE ON THE SITE
 PLAN THE DIMENSIONS OF THE PAD AREA WHERE THE BIKE
 PARKING IS PROPOSED TO BE INSTALLED AS WELL AS A BIKE
 PARKING PAD DETAIL.
  RESPONSE: THE SP-1 SHEET HAS BEEN AMENDED TO COMPLY
 WITH THE GUIDELINES.
  
 CITY COMMENT: WHILE THE REVISED SITE PLAN DOES INCLUDE
 A BIKE RACK MODEL CONSISTENT WITH THE CITY?S
 GUIDELINES, THE SITE PLAN WAS NOT REVISED TO INCLUDE
 THE DIMENSIONS OF THE PAD AREAS WHERE THE BIKE RACKS
 ARE PROPOSED TO BE INSTALLED. IN ADDITION, THE REVISED
 SITE PLAN DOES NOT INCLUDE A BIKE PARKING PAD DETAIL.
 PLEASE REVISE THE SITE PLAN ACCORDINGLY AND ENSURE THAT
 THE DIMENSIONS OF THE PAD AREA AND THE LOCATION OF THE
 BIKE RACKS WITHIN THE PAD ARE CONSISTENT WITH THE BIKE
 PARKING GUIDELINES MANUAL THAT WAS PROVIDED TO THE
 APPLICANT AT THE TIME OF THE ORIGINAL COMMENT.
 RESPONSE: THE SP-1 SHEET HAS BEEN AMENDED TO COMPLY
 WITH THE GUIDELINES.
  
 CITY COMMENT: COMMENT ADDRESSED
  
  
 2. SP-1. THE SITE DATA TABLE CURRENTLY INCLUDED IN THE
 PROPOSED SITE PLAN PROVIDED BY THE APPLICANT INCLUDES
 THE REQUIRED SITE STANDARDS FOR COMMUNITY CENTER AS
 WELL AS THE PROPOSED DIMENSIONS FOR THIS PROJECT. SINCE
 THE PROPOSED ZONING FOR THIS SITE IS ROS, PLEASE
 REPLACE THE COMMUNITY CENTER SITE STANDARDS IN THE
 TABLE WITH THE REQUIRED SITE STANDARDS FOR THE ROS
 ZONING DISTRICT.
  RESPONSE: THE SP-1 SHEET HAS BEEN AMENDED TO REFLECT
 THE REQUIRED SITE STANDARDS FOR ROS ZONING DISTRICT.
  
 CITY COMMENT: COMMENT ADDRESSED
  
  
 3. SP-1. ALONG THE 45TH AND PARKE AVENUE FRONTAGES, THE
 SITE INDICATES THAT A 4? CHAIN LINK FENCE WILL BE
 CONSTRUCTED. STAFF SUGGESTS THAT THE CHAIN LINK FENCE
 ON THESE TWO SIDES BE VINYL COATED.
  RESPONSE: THE SP-1 SHEET HAS BEEN AMENDED TO REFLECT
 THE VINYL COATED CHAIN LINK FENCES.
  
 CITY COMMENT: COMMENT ADDRESSED
  
  
 4. SP-1. THE DEAD-END PARKING ROW REQUIRES A DEDICATED
 TURN AROUND SPACE IN ADDITION TO THE TURN ASSIST AREA.
 PLEASE AMEND THE SITE PLAN ACCORDINGLY.
  RESPONSE: SP-1 HAS BEEN AMENDED TO SHOW THE TURNAROUND
 SPACE.
  
 CITY COMMENT: PLEASE INCLUDE ALL THE DIMENSIONS FOR THE
 TURNAROUND SPACE THAT WAS INCLUDED IN THE REVISED SITE
 PLAN. THE SITE PLAN DOES SHOW THE LENGTH OF THE SPACE
 (18 FT.) BUT IT DOES NOT SHOW ITS WIDTH.
 RESPONSE: SP-1 HAS BEEN AMENDED TO SHOW THE DIMENSIONS
 OF THE TURNAROUND SPACE.
  
 CITY COMMENT: COMMENT ADDRESSED
  
  
 5. SP-1. PLEASE CLARIFY WHETHER ANY OUTDOOR LIGHTING IS
 PROPOSED FOR THIS SITE. IF ANY OUTDOOR LIGHTING IS
 BEING PROPOSED PLEASE PROVIDE A PHOTOMETRIC PLAN FOR
 THIS SITE. ALSO, PLEASE INDICATE THE PROPOSED HOURS OF
 OPERATION OF BOTH THE PARK AND THE COMMUNITY CENTER.
  RESPONSE: A PHOTOMETRIC PLAN HAS BEEN SUBMITTED WITH
 THE RESUBMITTAL. THE PARK WILL BE OPEN SUNRISE TO
 SUNSET. AT THIS TIME IT IS TOO EARLY TO DETERMINE THE
 HOURS THE NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER WILL BE OPEN, HOWEVER
 THERE WILL BE NIGHTTIME ACTIVITIES.
  
 CITY COMMENT: SHEET PH-1 OF THE PHOTOMETRIC PLAN
 SUBMITTED WITH THE RESUBMITTAL CONTAINS THE FOLLOWING
 NOTE:
  
 "LIGHTING REQUIREMENTS
 PER THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH"
  
 "ALL BUILDINGS SHALL PROVIDE EXTERIOR LIGHTING EVERY
 NIGHT FROM DUSK TO DAWN TO ILLUMINATE BUILDING
 ENTRANCES, SIDEWALKS, AND PATHS AT A MINIMUM OF 0.6
 FOOTCANDLES AS MEASURED AT THE BACK EDGE OF THE CURB
 AND ONE FOOT ABOVE THE SIDEWALK. THIS MEASUREMENT SHALL
 INCLUDE LIGHT EMANATING FROM PUBLIC AND PRIVATE
 SOURCES. UNSHIELDED LIGHT FIXTURES SHALL BE PROHIBITED.
 THE MAXIMUM MEASURE SHALL BE NO MORE THAN 1.0
 FOOTCANDLE."
  
 PLEASE BE AWARE THAT THE ABOVE REQUIREMENT DOES NOT
 COME FROM THE CITY'S ZONING CODE OR BUILDING CODE. THE
 ONLY LIGHTING REQUIREMENT IN THE ZONING CODE THAT WOULD
 BE APPLICABLE TO THIS SITE IS INCLUDED IN SECTION
 94-310(D) AND STATES THAT "ANY OPERATION OR ACTIVITY
 PRODUCING GLARE SHALL BE CONDUCTED SO THAT DIRECT OR
 INDIRECT LIGHT FROM THE SOURCE SHALL NOT CAUSE
 ILLUMINATION IN EXCESS OF 0.5 FOOT CANDLES WHEN
 MEASURED IN A RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT."
  
 PLEASE CLARIFY THE SOURCE OF THE NOTE INCLUDED IN SHEET
 PH-1 OF THE PHOTOMETRIC PLAN AND AMEND THE NOTE
 CURRENTLY REFERENCED IN THE PHOTOMETRIC PLAN TO REFLECT
 THE LANGUAGE IN SECTION 94-310(D) OF THE ZONING CODE.
 RESPONSE: THE NOTE HAS BEEN REMOVED FROM THE
 PHOTOMETRIC PLAN AND REPLACED WITH A NOTE THAT STATES:
 "PER THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH ZONING CODE SECTION
 94-310(D) (SHEET 2)
  
 CITY COMMENT: COMMENT ADDRESSED
  
  
 6. SP-1. FOR THE SOUTHWEST 4 PARKING SPACES, STAFF
 SUGGESTS USING CURBING INSTEAD OF WHEEL STOPS TO ALLOW
 THE FRONT OF THE CAR TO OVERHANG A GREEN AREA. PLEASE
 REFER TO FIGURE XIV-2 IN ARTICLE XIV OF THE ZONING AND
 LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS. THIS WOULD ALLOW MORE
 AREA FOR ROOT GROWTH FOR THE PROPOSED TREES. PLEASE
 NOTE THAT NO LANDSCAPE MATERIAL OVER 6 INCHES IN HEIGHT
 MAY BE PLANTED IN THE OVERHANG AREA. IF THE OVERHANG IS
 NOT USED, THEN BOTH CURB AND WHEEL STOPS ARE NOT
 REQUIRED.
  RESPONSE: ACKNOWLEDGED AND EXECUTED AS SUGGESTED.
  
 CITY COMMENT: PLEASE INCLUDE A PARKING DETAIL IN THE
 SITE PLAN THAT REFLECTS THIS PARKING SPACE
 CONFIGURATION.
 RESPONSE: THE SITE PLAN HAS BEEN REVISED TO SHOW THE
 ADDITIONAL PARKING SPACE DETAIL.
  
 CITY COMMENT: COMMENT ADDRESSED
  
  
 7. SP-1. PLEASE PROVIDE THE INNER DIMENSIONS FOR THE
 STRIPING ON THE PARKING DETAIL. THE CITY REQUIRES 12
 INCHES BETWEEN THE STRIPES.
  RESPONSE: THE PARKING DETAIL HAS BEEN REVISED TO
 REFLECT THE INNER DIMENSIONS FOR THE STRIPING.
  
 CITY COMMENT: COMMENT ADDRESSED
  
  
 8. LP-1. PLEASE AMEND THE LANDSCAPE PLAN INCLUDE A TREE
 AT THE END OF THE PARKING ROW ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF THE
 PARKING LOT CONSISTENT WITH THE TERMINAL ISLAND
 REQUIREMENTS OF ARTICLE XIV, SECTION 94-443 (C)(3)A.
 THESE CHANGES MAY RESULT IN THE RELOCATION OF THE CATCH
 BASIN PROPOSED TO BE LOCATED TO THE SOUTHWEST OF THE
 PARKING LOT.
  RESPONSE: LP-1 HAS BEEN AMENDED AS REQUESTED.
  
 CITY COMMENT: COMMENT ADDRESSED
  
  
 9. LP-1. PLEASE CONSIDER RELOCATING THE PROPOSED CATCH
 BASIN THAT WOULD BE LOCATED NEAR THE PROPOSED LIVE OAK
 TO THE SOUTHWEST OF THE CHILDREN?S PLAY AREA IN ORDER
 TO PREVENT A POTENTIAL FUTURE CONFLICT.
  RESPONSE: LP-1 HAS BEEN AMENDED AS REQUESTED.
  
 CITY COMMENT: COMMENT ADDRESSED
  
  
  
 10. LP-1. PLEASE VERIFY THAT THERE IS NO CONFLICT
 BETWEEN THE PROPOSED LIVES OAKS ALONG THE LANDSCAPE
 BUFFER ON THE WEST SIDE OF THE PROPERTY AND THE
 EXISTING PREMIERE PARK OF COMMERCE BUFFER TREES.
 RESPONSE: THERE ARE NO CONFLICTS.
  
 CITY COMMENT: COMMENT ADDRESSED
  
  
 11. NEW COMMENT LP-1. UNDER THE LANDSCAPE DATA, PLEASE
 CLARIFY IF THE 26 PALMS IDENTIFIED IN THE PLAN ARE
 BEING PROVIDED IN ADDITION TO THE REQUIRED SHADE TREES,
 OR WHETHER THEY ARE SUBSTITUTING FOR REQUIRED SHADE
 TREES. IF THE PALMS ARE BEING PROVIDED IN ADDITION TO
 THE REQUIRED SHADE TREES, THEN THEY ARE NOT SUBJECT TO
 THE 35% MAXIMUM SUBSTITUTION REQUIREMENT AS THE
 LANDSCAPE DATA APPEARS TO INDICATE.
 RESPONSE: THE LP-1 HAS BEEN AMENDED TO CLARIFY THIS
 COMMENT
  
 CITY COMMENT: THE APPLICANT'S REVISED LANDSCAPE DATA
 TABLE IN LP-1 DOES NOT INCLUDE ANY REFERENCE TO THE 26
 PALMS WHICH ARE REFLECTED IN THE LANDSCAPE PLAN. THE
 APPLICANT NEEDS TO REFLECT THESE PALMS IN THE LANDSCAPE
 DATA TABLE.
  
 RESPONSE: THE APPLICANT AMENDED LP-1 TO ADDRESS THIS
 COMMENT.
  
 CITY COMMENT: COMMENT ADDRESSED AS A RESULT TO REVISION
 TO LANDSCAPE DATA TABLE REFLECTED IN PLANS DATED
 6/18/13
  
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 2 Status F Date 06-14-2013 Cont ID  
Sent By Alex Date 06-14-2013 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date 06-14-2013 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2013-06-14 16:09:341. SP-1. THE SITE PLAN SUBMITTED BY THE APPLICANT
 INCLUDES A BICYCLE RACK PARKING MODEL THAT IS NOT
 ACCEPTED BY THE CITY. IN ADDITION, THE SITE PLAN DOES
 NOT INCLUDE THE DIMENSIONS OF THE AREA WHERE THE BIKE
 PARKING IS PROPOSED TO BE INSTALLED. PLEASE AMEND TO
 SITE PLAN TO INCLUDE A BIKE RACK PARKING MODEL
 CONSISTENT WITH THE GUIDELINES OF THE BIKE PARKING
 GUIDELINES MANUAL THAT IS BEING PROVIDED TO THE
 APPLICANT SEPARATELY AND PLEASE INCLUDE ON THE SITE
 PLAN THE DIMENSIONS OF THE PAD AREA WHERE THE BIKE
 PARKING IS PROPOSED TO BE INSTALLED AS WELL AS A BIKE
 PARKING PAD DETAIL.
  RESPONSE: THE SP-1 SHEET HAS BEEN AMENDED TO COMPLY
 WITH THE GUIDELINES.
  
 CITY COMMENT: WHILE THE REVISED SITE PLAN DOES INCLUDE
 A BIKE RACK MODEL CONSISTENT WITH THE CITY?S
 GUIDELINES, THE SITE PLAN WAS NOT REVISED TO INCLUDE
 THE DIMENSIONS OF THE PAD AREAS WHERE THE BIKE RACKS
 ARE PROPOSED TO BE INSTALLED. IN ADDITION, THE REVISED
 SITE PLAN DOES NOT INCLUDE A BIKE PARKING PAD DETAIL.
 PLEASE REVISE THE SITE PLAN ACCORDINGLY AND ENSURE THAT
 THE DIMENSIONS OF THE PAD AREA AND THE LOCATION OF THE
 BIKE RACKS WITHIN THE PAD ARE CONSISTENT WITH THE BIKE
 PARKING GUIDELINES MANUAL THAT WAS PROVIDED TO THE
 APPLICANT AT THE TIME OF THE ORIGINAL COMMENT.
 RESPONSE: THE SP-1 SHEET HAS BEEN AMENDED TO COMPLY
 WITH THE GUIDELINES.
  
 CITY COMMENT: COMMENT ADDRESSED
  
  
 2. SP-1. THE SITE DATA TABLE CURRENTLY INCLUDED IN THE
 PROPOSED SITE PLAN PROVIDED BY THE APPLICANT INCLUDES
 THE REQUIRED SITE STANDARDS FOR COMMUNITY CENTER AS
 WELL AS THE PROPOSED DIMENSIONS FOR THIS PROJECT. SINCE
 THE PROPOSED ZONING FOR THIS SITE IS ROS, PLEASE
 REPLACE THE COMMUNITY CENTER SITE STANDARDS IN THE
 TABLE WITH THE REQUIRED SITE STANDARDS FOR THE ROS
 ZONING DISTRICT.
  RESPONSE: THE SP-1 SHEET HAS BEEN AMENDED TO REFLECT
 THE REQUIRED SITE STANDARDS FOR ROS ZONING DISTRICT.
  
 CITY COMMENT: COMMENT ADDRESSED
  
  
 3. SP-1. ALONG THE 45TH AND PARKE AVENUE FRONTAGES, THE
 SITE INDICATES THAT A 4? CHAIN LINK FENCE WILL BE
 CONSTRUCTED. STAFF SUGGESTS THAT THE CHAIN LINK FENCE
 ON THESE TWO SIDES BE VINYL COATED.
  RESPONSE: THE SP-1 SHEET HAS BEEN AMENDED TO REFLECT
 THE VINYL COATED CHAIN LINK FENCES.
  
 CITY COMMENT: COMMENT ADDRESSED
  
  
 4. SP-1. THE DEAD-END PARKING ROW REQUIRES A DEDICATED
 TURN AROUND SPACE IN ADDITION TO THE TURN ASSIST AREA.
 PLEASE AMEND THE SITE PLAN ACCORDINGLY.
  RESPONSE: SP-1 HAS BEEN AMENDED TO SHOW THE TURNAROUND
 SPACE.
  
 CITY COMMENT: PLEASE INCLUDE ALL THE DIMENSIONS FOR THE
 TURNAROUND SPACE THAT WAS INCLUDED IN THE REVISED SITE
 PLAN. THE SITE PLAN DOES SHOW THE LENGTH OF THE SPACE
 (18 FT.) BUT IT DOES NOT SHOW ITS WIDTH.
 RESPONSE: SP-1 HAS BEEN AMENDED TO SHOW THE DIMENSIONS
 OF THE TURNAROUND SPACE.
  
 CITY COMMENT: COMMENT ADDRESSED
  
  
 5. SP-1. PLEASE CLARIFY WHETHER ANY OUTDOOR LIGHTING IS
 PROPOSED FOR THIS SITE. IF ANY OUTDOOR LIGHTING IS
 BEING PROPOSED PLEASE PROVIDE A PHOTOMETRIC PLAN FOR
 THIS SITE. ALSO, PLEASE INDICATE THE PROPOSED HOURS OF
 OPERATION OF BOTH THE PARK AND THE COMMUNITY CENTER.
  RESPONSE: A PHOTOMETRIC PLAN HAS BEEN SUBMITTED WITH
 THE RESUBMITTAL. THE PARK WILL BE OPEN SUNRISE TO
 SUNSET. AT THIS TIME IT IS TOO EARLY TO DETERMINE THE
 HOURS THE NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER WILL BE OPEN, HOWEVER
 THERE WILL BE NIGHTTIME ACTIVITIES.
  
 CITY COMMENT: SHEET PH-1 OF THE PHOTOMETRIC PLAN
 SUBMITTED WITH THE RESUBMITTAL CONTAINS THE FOLLOWING
 NOTE:
  
 "LIGHTING REQUIREMENTS
 PER THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH"
  
 "ALL BUILDINGS SHALL PROVIDE EXTERIOR LIGHTING EVERY
 NIGHT FROM DUSK TO DAWN TO ILLUMINATE BUILDING
 ENTRANCES, SIDEWALKS, AND PATHS AT A MINIMUM OF 0.6
 FOOTCANDLES AS MEASURED AT THE BACK EDGE OF THE CURB
 AND ONE FOOT ABOVE THE SIDEWALK. THIS MEASUREMENT SHALL
 INCLUDE LIGHT EMANATING FROM PUBLIC AND PRIVATE
 SOURCES. UNSHIELDED LIGHT FIXTURES SHALL BE PROHIBITED.
 THE MAXIMUM MEASURE SHALL BE NO MORE THAN 1.0
 FOOTCANDLE."
  
 PLEASE BE AWARE THAT THE ABOVE REQUIREMENT DOES NOT
 COME FROM THE CITY'S ZONING CODE OR BUILDING CODE. THE
 ONLY LIGHTING REQUIREMENT IN THE ZONING CODE THAT WOULD
 BE APPLICABLE TO THIS SITE IS INCLUDED IN SECTION
 94-310(D) AND STATES THAT "ANY OPERATION OR ACTIVITY
 PRODUCING GLARE SHALL BE CONDUCTED SO THAT DIRECT OR
 INDIRECT LIGHT FROM THE SOURCE SHALL NOT CAUSE
 ILLUMINATION IN EXCESS OF 0.5 FOOT CANDLES WHEN
 MEASURED IN A RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT."
  
 PLEASE CLARIFY THE SOURCE OF THE NOTE INCLUDED IN SHEET
 PH-1 OF THE PHOTOMETRIC PLAN AND AMEND THE NOTE
 CURRENTLY REFERENCED IN THE PHOTOMETRIC PLAN TO REFLECT
 THE LANGUAGE IN SECTION 94-310(D) OF THE ZONING CODE.
 RESPONSE: THE NOTE HAS BEEN REMOVED FROM THE
 PHOTOMETRIC PLAN AND REPLACED WITH A NOTE THAT STATES:
 "PER THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH ZONING CODE SECTION
 94-310(D) (SHEET 2)
  
 CITY COMMENT: COMMENT ADDRESSED
  
  
 6. SP-1. FOR THE SOUTHWEST 4 PARKING SPACES, STAFF
 SUGGESTS USING CURBING INSTEAD OF WHEEL STOPS TO ALLOW
 THE FRONT OF THE CAR TO OVERHANG A GREEN AREA. PLEASE
 REFER TO FIGURE XIV-2 IN ARTICLE XIV OF THE ZONING AND
 LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS. THIS WOULD ALLOW MORE
 AREA FOR ROOT GROWTH FOR THE PROPOSED TREES. PLEASE
 NOTE THAT NO LANDSCAPE MATERIAL OVER 6 INCHES IN HEIGHT
 MAY BE PLANTED IN THE OVERHANG AREA. IF THE OVERHANG IS
 NOT USED, THEN BOTH CURB AND WHEEL STOPS ARE NOT
 REQUIRED.
  RESPONSE: ACKNOWLEDGED AND EXECUTED AS SUGGESTED.
  
 CITY COMMENT: PLEASE INCLUDE A PARKING DETAIL IN THE
 SITE PLAN THAT REFLECTS THIS PARKING SPACE
 CONFIGURATION.
 RESPONSE: THE SITE PLAN HAS BEEN REVISED TO SHOW THE
 ADDITIONAL PARKING SPACE DETAIL.
  
 CITY COMMENT: COMMENT ADDRESSED
  
  
 7. SP-1. PLEASE PROVIDE THE INNER DIMENSIONS FOR THE
 STRIPING ON THE PARKING DETAIL. THE CITY REQUIRES 12
 INCHES BETWEEN THE STRIPES.
  RESPONSE: THE PARKING DETAIL HAS BEEN REVISED TO
 REFLECT THE INNER DIMENSIONS FOR THE STRIPING.
  
 CITY COMMENT: COMMENT ADDRESSED
  
  
 8. LP-1. PLEASE AMEND THE LANDSCAPE PLAN INCLUDE A TREE
 AT THE END OF THE PARKING ROW ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF THE
 PARKING LOT CONSISTENT WITH THE TERMINAL ISLAND
 REQUIREMENTS OF ARTICLE XIV, SECTION 94-443 (C)(3)A.
 THESE CHANGES MAY RESULT IN THE RELOCATION OF THE CATCH
 BASIN PROPOSED TO BE LOCATED TO THE SOUTHWEST OF THE
 PARKING LOT.
  RESPONSE: LP-1 HAS BEEN AMENDED AS REQUESTED.
  
 CITY COMMENT: COMMENT ADDRESSED
  
  
 9. LP-1. PLEASE CONSIDER RELOCATING THE PROPOSED CATCH
 BASIN THAT WOULD BE LOCATED NEAR THE PROPOSED LIVE OAK
 TO THE SOUTHWEST OF THE CHILDREN?S PLAY AREA IN ORDER
 TO PREVENT A POTENTIAL FUTURE CONFLICT.
  RESPONSE: LP-1 HAS BEEN AMENDED AS REQUESTED.
  
 CITY COMMENT: COMMENT ADDRESSED
  
  
  
 10. LP-1. PLEASE VERIFY THAT THERE IS NO CONFLICT
 BETWEEN THE PROPOSED LIVES OAKS ALONG THE LANDSCAPE
 BUFFER ON THE WEST SIDE OF THE PROPERTY AND THE
 EXISTING PREMIERE PARK OF COMMERCE BUFFER TREES.
 RESPONSE: THERE ARE NO CONFLICTS.
  
 CITY COMMENT: COMMENT ADDRESSED
  
  
 11. NEW COMMENT LP-1. UNDER THE LANDSCAPE DATA, PLEASE
 CLARIFY IF THE 26 PALMS IDENTIFIED IN THE PLAN ARE
 BEING PROVIDED IN ADDITION TO THE REQUIRED SHADE TREES,
 OR WHETHER THEY ARE SUBSTITUTING FOR REQUIRED SHADE
 TREES. IF THE PALMS ARE BEING PROVIDED IN ADDITION TO
 THE REQUIRED SHADE TREES, THEN THEY ARE NOT SUBJECT TO
 THE 35% MAXIMUM SUBSTITUTION REQUIREMENT AS THE
 LANDSCAPE DATA APPEARS TO INDICATE.
 RESPONSE: THE LP-1 HAS BEEN AMENDED TO CLARIFY THIS
 COMMENT
  
 CITY COMMENT: THE APPLICANT'S REVISED LANDSCAPE DATA
 TABLE IN LP-1 DOES NOT INCLUDE ANY REFERENCE TO THE 26
 PALMS WHICH ARE REFLECTED IN THE LANDSCAPE PLAN. THE
 APPLICANT NEEDS TO REFLECT THESE PALMS IN THE LANDSCAPE
 DATA TABLE.
  
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 04-26-2013 Cont ID  
Sent By Alex Date 04-26-2013 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date 04-26-2013 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2013-04-26 16:34:591. SP-1. THE SITE PLAN SUBMITTED BY THE APPLICANT
 INCLUDES A BICYCLE RACK PARKING MODEL THAT IS NOT
 ACCEPTED BY THE CITY. IN ADDITION, THE SITE PLAN DOES
 NOT INCLUDE THE DIMENSIONS OF THE AREA WHERE THE BIKE
 PARKING IS PROPOSED TO BE INSTALLED. PLEASE AMEND TO
 SITE PLAN TO INCLUDE A BIKE RACK PARKING MODEL
 CONSISTENT WITH THE GUIDELINES OF THE BIKE PARKING
 GUIDELINES MANUAL THAT IS BEING PROVIDED TO THE
 APPLICANT SEPARATELY AND PLEASE INCLUDE ON THE SITE
 PLAN THE DIMENSIONS OF THE PAD AREA WHERE THE BIKE
 PARKING IS PROPOSED TO BE INSTALLED AS WELL AS A BIKE
 PARKING PAD DETAIL.
  RESPONSE: THE SP-1 SHEET HAS BEEN AMENDED TO COMPLY
 WITH THE GUIDELINES.
  
 CITY COMMENT: WHILE THE REVISED SITE PLAN DOES INCLUDE
 A BIKE RACK MODEL CONSISTENT WITH THE CITY?S
 GUIDELINES, THE SITE PLAN WAS NOT REVISED TO INCLUDE
 THE DIMENSIONS OF THE PAD AREAS WHERE THE BIKE RACKS
 ARE PROPOSED TO BE INSTALLED. IN ADDITION, THE REVISED
 SITE PLAN DOES NOT INCLUDE A BIKE PARKING PAD DETAIL.
 PLEASE REVISE THE SITE PLAN ACCORDINGLY AND ENSURE THAT
 THE DIMENSIONS OF THE PAD AREA AND THE LOCATION OF THE
 BIKE RACKS WITHIN THE PAD ARE CONSISTENT WITH THE BIKE
 PARKING GUIDELINES MANUAL THAT WAS PROVIDED TO THE
 APPLICANT AT THE TIME OF THE ORIGINAL COMMENT.
  
  
  
 2. SP-1. THE SITE DATA TABLE CURRENTLY INCLUDED IN THE
 PROPOSED SITE PLAN PROVIDED BY THE APPLICANT INCLUDES
 THE REQUIRED SITE STANDARDS FOR COMMUNITY CENTER AS
 WELL AS THE PROPOSED DIMENSIONS FOR THIS PROJECT. SINCE
 THE PROPOSED ZONING FOR THIS SITE IS ROS, PLEASE
 REPLACE THE COMMUNITY CENTER SITE STANDARDS IN THE
 TABLE WITH THE REQUIRED SITE STANDARDS FOR THE ROS
 ZONING DISTRICT.
  RESPONSE: THE SP-1 SHEET HAS BEEN AMENDED TO REFLECT
 THE REQUIRED SITE STANDARDS FOR ROS ZONING DISTRICT.
  
 CITY COMMENT: COMMENT ADDRESSED
  
  
 3. SP-1. ALONG THE 45TH AND PARKE AVENUE FRONTAGES, THE
 SITE INDICATES THAT A 4? CHAIN LINK FENCE WILL BE
 CONSTRUCTED. STAFF SUGGESTS THAT THE CHAIN LINK FENCE
 ON THESE TWO SIDES BE VINYL COATED.
  RESPONSE: THE SP-1 SHEET HAS BEEN AMENDED TO REFLECT
 THE VINYL COATED CHAIN LINK FENCES.
  
 CITY COMMENT: COMMENT ADDRESSED
  
  
 4. SP-1. THE DEAD-END PARKING ROW REQUIRES A DEDICATED
 TURN AROUND SPACE IN ADDITION TO THE TURN ASSIST AREA.
 PLEASE AMEND THE SITE PLAN ACCORDINGLY.
  RESPONSE: SP-1 HAS BEEN AMENDED TO SHOW THE TURNAROUND
 SPACE.
  
 CITY COMMENT: PLEASE INCLUDE ALL THE DIMENSIONS FOR THE
 TURNAROUND SPACE THAT WAS INCLUDED IN THE REVISED SITE
 PLAN. THE SITE PLAN DOES SHOW THE LENGTH OF THE SPACE
 (18 FT.) BUT IT DOES NOT SHOW ITS WIDTH.
  
  
  
 5. SP-1. PLEASE CLARIFY WHETHER ANY OUTDOOR LIGHTING IS
 PROPOSED FOR THIS SITE. IF ANY OUTDOOR LIGHTING IS
 BEING PROPOSED PLEASE PROVIDE A PHOTOMETRIC PLAN FOR
 THIS SITE. ALSO, PLEASE INDICATE THE PROPOSED HOURS OF
 OPERATION OF BOTH THE PARK AND THE COMMUNITY CENTER.
  RESPONSE: A PHOTOMETRIC PLAN HAS BEEN SUBMITTED WITH
 THE RESUBMITTAL. THE PARK WILL BE OPEN SUNRISE TO
 SUNSET. AT THIS TIME IT IS TOO EARLY TO DETERMINE THE
 HOURS THE NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER WILL BE OPEN, HOWEVER
 THERE WILL BE NIGHTTIME ACTIVITIES.
  
 CITY COMMENT: SHEET PH-1 OF THE PHOTOMETRIC PLAN
 SUBMITTED WITH THE RESUBMITTAL CONTAINS THE FOLLOWING
 NOTE:
  
 "LIGHTING REQUIREMENTS
 PER THE CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH"
  
 "ALL BUILDINGS SHALL PROVIDE EXTERIOR LIGHTING EVERY
 NIGHT FROM DUSK TO DAWN TO ILLUMINATE BUILDING
 ENTRANCES, SIDEWALKS, AND PATHS AT A MINIMUM OF 0.6
 FOOTCANDLES AS MEASURED AT THE BACK EDGE OF THE CURB
 AND ONE FOOT ABOVE THE SIDEWALK. THIS MEASUREMENT SHALL
 INCLUDE LIGHT EMANATING FROM PUBLIC AND PRIVATE
 SOURCES. UNSHIELDED LIGHT FIXTURES SHALL BE PROHIBITED.
 THE MAXIMUM MEASURE SHALL BE NO MORE THAN 1.0
 FOOTCANDLE."
  
 PLEASE BE AWARE THAT THE ABOVE REQUIREMENT DOES NOT
 COME FROM THE CITY'S ZONING CODE OR BUILDING CODE. THE
 ONLY LIGHTING REQUIREMENT IN THE ZONING CODE THAT WOULD
 BE APPLICABLE TO THIS SITE IS INCLUDED IN SECTION
 94-310(D) AND STATES THAT "ANY OPERATION OR ACTIVITY
 PRODUCING GLARE SHALL BE CONDUCTED SO THAT DIRECT OR
 INDIRECT LIGHT FROM THE SOURCE SHALL NOT CAUSE
 ILLUMINATION IN EXCESS OF 0.5 FOOT CANDLES WHEN
 MEASURED IN A RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT."
  
 PLEASE CLARIFY THE SOURCE OF THE NOTE INCLUDED IN SHEET
 PH-1 OF THE PHOTOMETRIC PLAN AND AMEND THE NOTE
 CURRENTLY REFERENCED IN THE PHOTOMETRIC PLAN TO REFLECT
 THE LANGUAGE IN SECTION 94-310(D) OF THE ZONING CODE.
  
  
  
 6. SP-1. FOR THE SOUTHWEST 4 PARKING SPACES, STAFF
 SUGGESTS USING CURBING INSTEAD OF WHEEL STOPS TO ALLOW
 THE FRONT OF THE CAR TO OVERHANG A GREEN AREA. PLEASE
 REFER TO FIGURE XIV-2 IN ARTICLE XIV OF THE ZONING AND
 LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS. THIS WOULD ALLOW MORE
 AREA FOR ROOT GROWTH FOR THE PROPOSED TREES. PLEASE
 NOTE THAT NO LANDSCAPE MATERIAL OVER 6 INCHES IN HEIGHT
 MAY BE PLANTED IN THE OVERHANG AREA. IF THE OVERHANG IS
 NOT USED, THEN BOTH CURB AND WHEEL STOPS ARE NOT
 REQUIRED.
  RESPONSE: ACKNOWLEDGED AND EXECUTED AS SUGGESTED.
  
 CITY COMMENT: PLEASE INCLUDE A PARKING DETAIL IN THE
 SITE PLAN THAT REFLECTS THIS PARKING SPACE
 CONFIGURATION.
 RESPONSE: THE SITE PLAN HAS BEEN REVISED TO SHOW THE
 ADDITIONAL PARKING SPACE DETAIL.
  
 CITY COMMENT: COMMENT ADDRESSED
  
  
 7. SP-1. PLEASE PROVIDE THE INNER DIMENSIONS FOR THE
 STRIPING ON THE PARKING DETAIL. THE CITY REQUIRES 12
 INCHES BETWEEN THE STRIPES.
  RESPONSE: THE PARKING DETAIL HAS BEEN REVISED TO
 REFLECT THE INNER DIMENSIONS FOR THE STRIPING.
  
 CITY COMMENT: COMMENT ADDRESSED
  
  
 8. LP-1. PLEASE AMEND THE LANDSCAPE PLAN INCLUDE A TREE
 AT THE END OF THE PARKING ROW ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF THE
 PARKING LOT CONSISTENT WITH THE TERMINAL ISLAND
 REQUIREMENTS OF ARTICLE XIV, SECTION 94-443 (C)(3)A.
 THESE CHANGES MAY RESULT IN THE RELOCATION OF THE CATCH
 BASIN PROPOSED TO BE LOCATED TO THE SOUTHWEST OF THE
 PARKING LOT.
  RESPONSE: LP-1 HAS BEEN AMENDED AS REQUESTED.
  
 CITY COMMENT: COMMENT ADDRESSED
  
  
 9. LP-1. PLEASE CONSIDER RELOCATING THE PROPOSED CATCH
 BASIN THAT WOULD BE LOCATED NEAR THE PROPOSED LIVE OAK
 TO THE SOUTHWEST OF THE CHILDREN?S PLAY AREA IN ORDER
 TO PREVENT A POTENTIAL FUTURE CONFLICT.
  RESPONSE: LP-1 HAS BEEN AMENDED AS REQUESTED.
  
 CITY COMMENT: COMMENT ADDRESSED
  
  
  
 10. LP-1. PLEASE VERIFY THAT THERE IS NO CONFLICT
 BETWEEN THE PROPOSED LIVES OAKS ALONG THE LANDSCAPE
 BUFFER ON THE WEST SIDE OF THE PROPERTY AND THE
 EXISTING PREMIERE PARK OF COMMERCE BUFFER TREES.
 RESPONSE: THERE ARE NO CONFLICTS.
  
 CITY COMMENT: COMMENT ADDRESSED
  
  
 11. NEW COMMENT LP-1. UNDER THE LANDSCAPE DATA, PLEASE
 CLARIFY IF THE 26 PALMS IDENTIFIED IN THE PLAN ARE
 BEING PROVIDED IN ADDITION TO THE REQUIRED SHADE TREES,
 OR WHETHER THEY ARE SUBSTITUTING FOR REQUIRED SHADE
 TREES. IF THE PALMS ARE BEING PROVIDED IN ADDITION TO
 THE REQUIRED SHADE TREES, THEN THEY ARE NOT SUBJECT TO
 THE 35% MAXIMUM SUBSTITUTION REQUIREMENT AS THE
 LANDSCAPE DATA APPEARS TO INDICATE.
  
  
2013-04-26 14:57:41APPLICANT INDICATED IN MAY 2012 THAT THEY WISHED TO
 DELAY THEIR RESPONSES TO SITE PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS AND
 WILL SUBMIT RESPONSES WITH NEEDED INFORMATION IN THE
 FUTURE
2013-04-26 14:54:38Z12020015 PB 1620 FLU AMENDMENT Z12020016 PB 1620A
 REZONING
 1) THE APPLICANT IS REQUESTING A FUTURE LAND USE
 AMENDMENT FROM CONSERVATION (CON) TO COMMUNITY SERVICE
 (CS) FOR TWO PARCELS TOTALING 6.11 ACRES OF LAND AND A
 REZONING OF ONE OF THE TWO PARCELS TOTALING 1.89 ACRES
 FROM CONSERVATION (CON) TO RECREATION & OPEN SPACE
 (ROS). THIS PROPOSAL WOULD RESULT IN A 4.22 ACRE PARCEL
 WITH A CS FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION AND A CON ZONING
 DESIGNATION. TABLE I-1 OF ARTICLE 1 OF THE ZONING AND
 LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS INDICATES THAT A CS FUTURE
 LAND USE AND CON ZONING DESIGNATION ARE INCOMPATIBLE.
 AS A RESULT, THE APPLICATION SHOULD BE REVISED TO
 EITHER: A) HAVE BOTH PARCELS BE SUBJECT TO THE PROPOSED
 LAND USE AMENDMENT TO CS AND THE REZONING TO ROS, OR B)
 HAVE ONLY THE 1.89 ACRE PARCEL BE SUBJECT TO THE
 PROPOSED LAND USE AMENDMENT AND REZONING.
  
 2) THE APPLICANT PROVIDED A TRAFFIC STATEMENT FOR THE
 PROPOSED LAND USE AMENDMENT FOR THE 1.89 ACRE PARCEL,
 BUT NOT FOR THE OVERALL 6.11 ACRE SITE. BASED ON THE
 PREVIOUS COMMENT, IF THE APPLICANT DESIRES TO PURSUE A
 LAND USE AMENDMENT FOR THE PARCELS TOTALING 6.11 ACRES
 THEN THE TRAFFIC ANALYSIS WOULD NEED TO BE REVISED TO
 EVALUATE BOTH PARCELS.
  
 3) THE TRAFFIC STATEMENT PROVIDED BY THE APPLICANT DOES
 NOT MEET THE REQUIREMENTS FOR A LAND USE AMENDMENT
 TRAFFIC REPORT CONSISTENT WITH COUNTY LAND USE POLICY
 3.5-D. THE TRAFFIC REPORT NEEDS TO COMPARE THE TRAFFIC
 IMPACTS OF THE MOST TRAFFIC INTENSIVE DEVELOPMENT
 POTENTIAL PERMITTED UNDER THE CONSERVATION FLU
 DESIGNATION VERSUS THAT PERMITTED UNDER THE CS
 DESIGNATION. ALSO, THE ANALYSIS NEEDS TO BE PERFORMED
 FOR BOTH THE EXISTING YEAR AND FOR THE LONG RANGE
 PLANNING HORIZON. IF THE APPLICANT WISHES TO RESTRICT
 THE DEVELOPMENT PERMITTED UNDER THE PROPOSED CS LAND
 USE DESIGNATION THEN THE LAND USE AMENDMENT MUST BE
 CONDITIONED TO THOSE SPECIFIC USES AND INTENSITIES
 REQUESTED BY THE APPLICATION. THE APPLICANT?S LAND USE
 AMENDMENT TRAFFIC STATEMENT NEEDS TO BE REVISED
 ACCORDINGLY.
  
 4) THE APPLICANT NEEDS TO PROVIDE A SUMMARY TABLE OF
 LEVEL OF SERVICE (LOS) IMPACTS FOR THE SERVICE
 PROVIDERS.
  
 Z12020018 ZBA 3290
 1) SP-1. THE SITE PLAN SUBMITTED BY THE APPLICANT
 INCLUDES A BICYCLE RACK PARKING MODEL THAT IS NOT
 ACCEPTED BY THE CITY. IN ADDITION, THE SITE PLAN DOES
 NOT INCLUDE THE DIMENSIONS OF THE AREA WHERE THE BIKE
 PARKING IS PROPOSED TO BE INSTALLED. PLEASE AMEND TO
 SITE PLAN TO INCLUDE A BIKE RACK PARKING MODEL
 CONSISTENT WITH THE GUIDELINES OF THE BIKE PARKING
 GUIDELINES MANUAL THAT IS BEING PROVIDED TO THE
 APPLICANT SEPARATELY AND PLEASE INCLUDE ON THE SITE
 PLAN THE DIMENSIONS OF THE PAD AREA WHERE THE BIKE
 PARKING IS PROPOSED TO BE INSTALLED AS WELL AS A BIKE
 PARKING PAD DETAIL.
  
 2) SP-1. THE SITE DATA TABLE CURRENTLY INCLUDED IN THE
 PROPOSED SITE PLAN PROVIDED BY THE APPLICANT INCLUDES
 THE REQUIRED SITE STANDARDS FOR COMMUNITY CENTER AS
 WELL AS THE PROPOSED DIMENSIONS FOR THIS PROJECT. SINCE
 THE PROPOSED ZONING FOR THIS SITE IS ROS, PLEASE
 REPLACE THE COMMUNITY CENTER SITE STANDARDS IN THE
 TABLE WITH THE REQUIRED SITE STANDARDS FOR THE ROS
 ZONING DISTRICT.
  
 3) SP-1. ALONG THE 45TH AND PARKE AVENUE FRONTAGES, THE
 SITE INDICATES THAT A 4? CHAINLINK FENCE WILL BE
 CONSTRUCTED. STAFF SUGGESTS THAT THE CHAINLINK FENCE ON
 THESE TWO SIDES BE VINYL COATED.
  
 4) SP-1. THE DEAD-END PARKING ROW REQUIRES A DEDICATED
 TURN AROUND SPACE IN ADDITION TO THE TURN ASSIST AREA.
 PLEASE AMEND THE SITE PLAN ACCORDINGLY.
  
 5) SP-1. PLEASE CLARIFY WHETHER ANY OUTDOOR LIGHTING IS
 PROPOSED FOR THIS SITE. IF ANY OUTDOOR LIGHTING IS
 BEING PROPOSED PLEASE PROVIDE A PHOTOMETRIC PLAN FOR
 THIS SITE. ALSO, PLEASE INDICATE THE PROPOSED HOURS OF
 OPERATION OF BOTH THE PARK AND THE COMMUNITY CENTER.
  
 6) SP-1. FOR THE SOUTHWEST 4 PARKING SPACES, STAFF
 SUGGESTS USING CURBING INSTEAD OF WHEEL STOPS TO ALLOW
 THE FRONT OF THE CAR TO OVERHANG A GREEN AREA. PLEASE
 REFER TO FIGURE XIV-2 IN ARTICLE XIV OF THE ZONING AND
 LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS. THIS WOULD ALLOW MORE
 AREA FOR ROOT GROWTH FOR THE PROPOSED TREES. PLEASE
 NOTE THAT NO LANDSCAPE MATERIAL OVER 6 INCHES IN HEIGHT
 MAY BE PLANTED IN THE OVERHANG AREA. IF THE OVERHANG IS
 NOT USED, THEN BOTH CURB AND WHEEL STOPS ARE NOT
 REQUIRED.
  
 7) SP-1. PLEASE PROVIDE THE INNER DIMENSIONS FOR THE
 STRIPING ON THE PARKING DETAIL. THE CITY REQUIRES 12
 INCHES BETWEEN THE STRIPES.
  
 8) LP-1. PLEASE AMEND THE LANDSCAPE PLAN INCLUDE A TREE
 AT THE END OF THE PARKING ROW ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF THE
 PARKING LOT CONSISTENT WITH THE TERMINAL ISLAND
 REQUIREMENTS OF ARTICLE XIV, SECTION 94-443 (C)(3)A.
 THESE CHANGES MAY RESULT IN THE RELOCATION OF THE CATCH
 BASIN PROPOSED TO BE LOCATED TO THE SOUTHWEST OF THE
 PARKING LOT.
  
 9) LP-1. PLEASE CONSIDER RELOCATING THE PROPOSED CATCH
 BASIN THAT WOULD BE LOCATED NEAR THE PROPOSED LIVE OAK
 TO THE SOUTHWEST OF THE CHILDREN?S PLAY AREA IN ORDER
 TO PREVENT A POTENTIAL FUTURE CONFICT.
  
 10) LP-1. PLEASE VERIFY THAT THERE IS NO CONFLICT
 BETWEEN THE PROPOSED LIVES OAKS ALONG THE LANDSCAPE
 BUFFER ON THE WEST SIDE OF THE PROPERTY AND THE
 EXISTING PREMIERE PARK OF COMMERCE BUFFER TREES.
  
 PLEASE FEEL FREE TO CONTACT ALEX HANSEN, AICP, SENIOR
 PLANNER, AT 561-822-146 OR [email protected] IF YOU HAVE
 ANY QUESTIONS.
  Print


Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved