| Plan Review Stops For Project Z11120014 |
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
12-20-2012 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
lmartine |
Date |
02-08-2012 |
Time |
09:08 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
aaponte |
Date |
12-17-2012 |
Time |
12:17 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2012-02-08 10:15:39 | BUILDING REVIEW COMMENTS | | | | | | | | | | | | BUILDING PERMIT APPLICATIONS SUBMITTED AFTER MARCH 15TH | | | 2012 WILL BE REVIEWED WITH THE FLORIDA BUILDING CODE ( | | | FBC ) 2010 EDITION. | | | | | | ALL PUBLIC USE AREAS SHALL BE ACCESSIBLE PER FBC | | | CHAPTER 11. IDENTIFY REQUIRED ACCESSIBLE SLEEPING | | | ROOMS. | | | | | | PLEASE SEE FBC SECT. 505 FOR MEZZANINE REQUIREMENTS IE: | | | ALLOWABLE AREA, EGRESS AND VERTICAL ACCESSIBILITY. | | | | | | SEE FBC 1024 EXCEPTION: 1.1, YOUR INTERIOR STAIR EXIT | | | DISCHARGE SHALL OPEN TO A FREE AND UNOBSTRUCTED WAY TO | | | THE EXTERIOR OF THE BUILDING READILY VISIBLE AND | | | IDENTIFIABLE. EXIT CAPACITY CALCULATIONS SHOWING LESS | | | THAN 50% OF TOTAL OCCUPANCY WILL BE REQUIRED ON THE | | | LIFE SAFETY PLAN. | | | | | | PROVIDE ALLOWABLE OPENING AREA CALCULATIONS FOR THE | | | NORTH AND EAST ELEVATIONS, SEE FBC 704.8. ALSO SHOW | | | COMPLIANCE WITH 704.9 FOR VERTICAL SEPARATION OF | | | OPENINGS. | | | | | | FBC 1406.2 WILL APPLY FOR ANY COMBUSTIBLE MATERIALS. | | | | | | PAGE A-1, CLEMATIS ST. EXIT STAIR DOOR SEEMS TO BE | | | SLIGHTLY ENCROACHING THE PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY WHEN FULLY | | | OPEN. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | THANK YOU, | | | LUIS MARTINEZ | | | 561-805-6710 | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
ENG - PPRC |
ENGINEERING - PPRC |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
05-01-2012 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
05-01-2012 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
bmoree |
Date |
05-01-2012 |
Time |
13:57 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2012-05-01 13:58:47 | 1. ENGINEERING SERVICES PERMITS ALL SITE DEVELOPMENT | | | CIVIL ENGINEERING AND RIGHT-OF-WAY IMPROVEMENTS. A | | | SEPARATE PERMIT APPLICATION MUST BE SUBMITTED FOR THIS | | | PROJECT DIRECTLY TO ENGINEERING SERVICES. ALL | | | APPLICABLE DOCUMENTS ARE AVAILABLE ON THE CITY'S WEB | | | PAGE. (CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH, ENGINEERING SERVICES, | | | FORMS AND PUBLICATIONS) | | | | | | 2. METAL CABINET IDENTIFIED ADJACENT THE BUILDING'S NW | | | CORNER IN C-2, IS AN ELECTRICAL CABINET FOR THE THE | | | CITY'S STREET LIGHTING. THE CABINET APPEARS IT MAY | | | CONFLICT WITH THE PROPOSED ADA RAMP. IF THE CABINET IS | | | IN CONFLICT THE DEVELOPER SHOULD CONTACT THE CITY AS | | | SOON AS POSSIBLE REGARDING A RELOCATION PLAN. IF THE | | | CABINET IS TO REMAIN, THE CITY MAY CONSIDER ALLOWING | | | THE CABINET TO BE PAINTED TO BLEND WITH THE BUILDING | | | ARCHITECTURE. | | | | | | 3. PROPOSED UTILITY WORK ON C-2 IS DESIGNED ON OUTDATED | | | AS-BUILT RECORDS. UPDATED FDOT AS-BUILTS RECORDS WERE | | | PROVIDED TO THE PROJECT EOR FOR REVISION. | | | | | | 4. LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY MUST BE | | | REVISED TO A MATCHED CORRIDOR PLAN. | | | | | | 5. REPLACE STANDARD DETAILS IN C-3 WITH APPLICABLE CITY | | | OR FDOT DESIGN STANDARD DETAILS. | | | | | | 6. SUBMIT AN AERIAL UTILITY RELOCATION PLAN FOR ANY | | | PROPOSED WORK IN THE ALLEY OR PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY. | | | | | | 7. PUBLIC SIDEWALKS AND ROADWAYS MAY NOT BE OBSTRUCTED, | | | BLOCKED, OR UTILIZED FOR CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY, | | | MATERIAL DROP-OFF, MATERIAL STORAGE, MATERIAL | | | INGRESS/EGRESS, OFF-LOADING, OR ANY OTHER RELATED | | | CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY WITHOUT THE A VALID RIGHT-OF-WAY | | | CONSTRUCTION PERMIT AS ISSUED BY ENGINEERING SERVICES. | | | I IT IS HIGHLY RECOMMENDED THE PROJECT SCHEDULE A | | | MEETING WITH ENGINEERING SERVICES AS SOON AS POSSIBLE | | | TO DISCUSS PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULES, | | | METHODOLOGY, AND NEEDS. | | | | | | 8. CURB PROFILE AND WIDTH MUST MATCH EXISTING. EXISTING | | | CURB WIDTH IS 12". | | | | | | BRIAN R. MOREE | | | ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION MANAGER | | | ENGINEERING SERVICES | | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | 401 CLEMATIS STREET | | | WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33401 | | | 561-494-1098 OFFICE | | | 561-644-7270 MOBILE |
|
|
| Review Stop |
ENG - PPRC |
ENGINEERING - PPRC |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
02-09-2012 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
bmoree |
Date |
02-09-2012 |
Time |
09:54 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
bmoree |
Date |
02-09-2012 |
Time |
09:53 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2012-02-09 10:01:49 | 1. ENGINEERING SERVICES PERMITS ALL SITE DEVELOPMENT | | | CIVIL ENGINEERING AND RIGHT-OF-WAY IMPROVEMENTS. A | | | SEPARATE PERMIT APPLICATION MUST BE SUBMITTED FOR THIS | | | PROJECT DIRECTLY TO ENGINEERING SERVICES. ALL | | | APPLICABLE DOCUMENTS ARE AVAILABLE ON THE CITY'S WEB | | | PAGE. (CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH, ENGINEERING SERVICES, | | | FORMS AND PUBLICATIONS) | | | | | | 2. METAL CABINET IDENTIFIED ADJACENT THE BUILDING'S NW | | | CORNER IN C-2, IS AN ELECTRICAL CABINET FOR THE THE | | | CITY'S STREET LIGHTING. THE CABINET APPEARS IT MAY | | | CONFLICT WITH THE PROPOSED ADA RAMP. IF THE CABINET IS | | | IN CONFLICT THE DEVELOPER SHOULD CONTACT THE CITY AS | | | SOON AS POSSIBLE REGARDING A RELOCATION PLAN. IF THE | | | CABINET IS TO REMAIN, THE CITY MAY CONSIDER ALLOWING | | | THE CABINET TO BE PAINTED TO BLEND WITH THE BUILDING | | | ARCHITECTURE. | | | | | | 3. PROPOSED UTILITY WORK ON C-2 IS DESIGNED ON OUTDATED | | | AS-BUILT RECORDS. UPDATED FDOT AS-BUILTS RECORDS WERE | | | PROVIDED TO THE PROJECT EOR FOR REVISION. | | | | | | 4. LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY MUST BE | | | REVISED TO A MATCHED CORRIDOR PLAN. | | | | | | 5. REPLACE STANDARD DETAILS IN C-3 WITH APPLICABLE CITY | | | OR FDOT DESIGN STANDARD DETAILS. | | | | | | 6. SUBMIT AN AERIAL UTILITY RELOCATION PLAN FOR ANY | | | PROPOSED WORK IN THE ALLEY OR PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY. | | | | | | 7. PUBLIC SIDEWALKS AND ROADWAYS MAY NOT BE OBSTRUCTED, | | | BLOCKED, OR UTILIZED FOR CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY, | | | MATERIAL DROP-OFF, MATERIAL STORAGE, MATERIAL | | | INGRESS/EGRESS, OFF-LOADING, OR ANY OTHER RELATED | | | CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY WITHOUT THE A VALID RIGHT-OF-WAY | | | CONSTRUCTION PERMIT AS ISSUED BY ENGINEERING SERVICES. | | | I IT IS HIGHLY RECOMMENDED THE PROJECT SCHEDULE A | | | MEETING WITH ENGINEERING SERVICES AS SOON AS POSSIBLE | | | TO DISCUSS PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULES, | | | METHODOLOGY, AND NEEDS. | | | | | | | | | BRIAN R. MOREE | | | ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION MANAGER | | | ENGINEERING SERVICES | | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | 401 CLEMATIS STREET | | | WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33401 | | | 561-494-1098 OFFICE | | | 561-644-7270 MOBILE | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
10-19-2012 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
ddaniels |
Date |
10-19-2012 |
Time |
13:04 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
ddaniels |
Date |
10-19-2012 |
Time |
13:03 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
04-23-2012 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
ddaniels |
Date |
04-23-2012 |
Time |
09:08 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
ddaniels |
Date |
04-23-2012 |
Time |
09:07 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2012-04-23 09:11:19 | FIRE PLAN REVIEW | | | | | | PLANS REVIEWED BY FIRE ***DENIED*** | | | | | | | | | 1.) DESIGN SHALL CONFORM TO THE 2010 EDITION OF THE | | | FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE WHICH CONTAINS THE FLORIDA | | | EDITION OF NFPA 1 AND NFPA 101. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | DERRICK L. DANIELS, BATTALION CHIEF | | | WEST PALM BEACH FIRE RESCUE | | | FIRE & LIFE SAFETY PLAN REVIEW | | | (561) 805-6733 | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
04-04-2012 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
ddaniels |
Date |
04-04-2012 |
Time |
11:40 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
ddaniels |
Date |
03-01-2012 |
Time |
11:38 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2012-03-01 11:38:31 | 02/07/2012 PLANNING BOARD CASE NO. 11-02 (Z11120014) | | | 335 CLEMATIS STREET | | | REVIEW COMMENTS - FIRE DEPARTMENT | | | | | | | | | 1. DESIGN SHALL CONFORM TO THE 2010 EDITION OF THE | | | FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE WHICH CONTAINS THE FLORIDA | | | EDITION OF NFPA 1 AND NFPA 101. | | | 2. ALL DEMOLITION WORK SHALL CONFORM TO THE | | | REQUIREMENTS OF NFPA 241. TRASH AND CONSTRUCTION DEBRIS | | | SHALL BE REMOVED FROM THE SITE DAILY. | | | 3. THE ENTRANCE INTO THE VALET SERVICES SHOWS THE FLOW | | | OF TRAFFIC TRAVELING IN THE WRONG DIRECTION (NORTH) ON | | | DIXIE HIGHWAY. ONE WAY TRAFFIC (SOUTH) EXITS AT THIS | | | LOCATION. | | | 4. LOCATE THE FIRE PUMP ROOM ON THE FIRST FLOOR; | | | PREFERABLY WITH EXTERIOR ACCESS. | | | 5. SEVERAL OF THE DOORS ON THE THIRD FLOOR AND ROOF | | | (ASSEMBLY OCCUPANCY) SWING AGAINST THE PATH OF EGRESS. | | | 6. INDICATE THE LOCATION FOR EMERGENCY VEHICLES TO | | | PARK/STAGE DURING A MEDICAL OR FIRE EMERGENCY. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | DERRICK L. DANIELS, BATTALION CHIEF | | | WEST PALM BEACH FIRE RESCUE | | | FIRE & LIFE SAFETY PLAN REVIEW | | | (561) 805-6733 | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
POLICE |
POLICE |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
|
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
POLICE |
POLICE |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
02-07-2012 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
02-07-2012 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
|
Date |
02-06-2012 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2012-04-11 09:56:46 | CONSTRUCTION SITE SECURITY PLAN NEEDS TO BE SUBMITTED | | | PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION TO THE CRIME PREVENTION OFFICE | | | | | 2012-02-07 13:45:20 | | | | * MOVE THE ATM OUT OF THE CORNER AND PLACE INSIGHT OF | | | THE CONCIERGE OR CHECK IN AREA | | | * GLASS DOOR LEADING INTO THE BUSINESS CENTER | | | * GLASS DOOR FOR THE LOBBY OFFICE OR A VIEWING WINDOW | | | OVERLOOKING THE CHECK IN | | | * DOORS THAT ARE OFF THE ELEVATOR LOBBY ? ARE THE | | | GLASS? | | | * HOW ARE YOU CONTROLLING ENTRY TO SENSITIVE AREAS AND | | | AREAS NOT FOR GUESTS? | | | * CAMERA LOCATIONS? | | | * SECURITY OFFICE? | | | * LIGHTING FOR PARKING GARAGE? LIGHTING FOR POOL AREAS? | | | * DO NOT LIKE THE ENTRY OFF DIXIE HWY? | | | * WHERE WILL THE PARKING BE FOR VALET, WILL THAT AREA | | | BE SECURE? | | | | | | A. GUESTROOMS ALL NEED TO HAVE ELECTRONIC CARD ACCESS | | | VERSUS MECHANICAL LOCKING SYSTEM. | | | B. DOORS SHALL BE SOLID-CORE WOOD OR METAL, AND BE | | | SELF-CLOSING AND SELF-LOCKING. THE DOOR LOCK MUST | | | CONSIST OF A HIGH QUALITY DEADBOLT WITH AT LEAST A | | | ONE-INCH BOLT. THE LOCK STRIKE-PLATE MUST BE BOLTED | | | SECURELY TO THE METAL DOORFRAME OR BY USING THREE-INCH | | | SCREWS WHEN ATTACHED TO A WOOD DOORJAMB. ACCESSIBLE | | | SLIDING WINDOWS MUST HAVE SECONDARY SECURITY DEVICES | | | ATTACHED TO PREVENT FORCED ENTRY OR LIFTING OUT OF THE | | | FRAME. | | | C. EACH GUESTROOM SHALL BE PROVIDED WITH IN-ROOM | | | ELECTRONIC SAFES. | | | D. EXTERIOR BUILDING LIGHTING SHALL BE REQUIRED FOR ALL | | | EXIT WAY, EMERGENCY ACCESS, STAIRWAY AND UTILITY ROOM | | | DOORS. | | | E. POOL AREA RESTRICTED ACCESS HELPS PREVENT | | | UNAUTHORIZED USE, CURBS POTENTIAL VANDALISM AND | | | PROVIDES GREATER SECURITY AND PROTECTION TO POOL USERS, | | | ESPECIALLY CHILDREN. | | | F. MAIN ENTRANCE SHALL LEAD DIRECTLY TO THE FRONT LOBBY | | | AREA WITH VISIBLE SIGNAGE INDICATING SO. | | | G. BEVERAGE MACHINES SHALL BE KEPT IN OPEN AREAS. | | | H. PAY PHONES SHALL BE KEPT IN OPEN AREAS, PREFERABLY | | | WITHIN VIEW OF THE FRONT DESK. | | | I. LEGENDS, MARQUIS MAPS, ETC., SHALL BE USED | | | INDICATING LOCATIONS OF CONFERENCE ROOMS, ELEVATORS, | | | STAIRS, LOBBY AREAS, RESTAURANTS, POOL, TENNIS COURT, | | | WORKOUT ROOM, ETC. | | | J. GIFT SHOP WINDOWS SHALL BE CLEAR TO INCREASE NATURAL | | | SURVEILLANCE | | | K. ATM INSTALLATION SHALL MEET FSS REQUIREMENTS | | | L. STAIRWELLS SHALL HAVE CONVEX MIRRORS INSTALLED AT | | | LANDINGS FOR EACH LEVEL. | | | M. INTERIOR OF ELEVATORS SHALL UTILIZE MIRRORS AND CCTV | | | N. INSTALL CCTV FOR SURVEILLANCE OF LOBBY, STAIRWELLS, | | | PARKING LOTS AND SERVICE AREAS OF BANQUET ROOMS. | | | | | | | | | CONDITIONS FOR APPROVAL | | | PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF THE FIRST BUILDING PERMIT, THE | | | APPLICANT SHALL PREPARE A CONSTRUCTION SITE SECURITY | | | AND MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR APPROVAL BY THE CITY OF WEST | | | PALM BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT CPTED OFFICIAL. | | | A. AFTER SITE CLEARING AND PLACEMENT OF CONSTRUCTION | | | TRAILERS, THE DEVELOPER/PROJECT MANAGER SHALL INSTITUTE | | | SECURITY MEASURES TO REDUCE OR ELIMINATE OPPORTUNITIES | | | FOR THEFT. THE MANAGEMENT PLAN SHALL INCLUDE, BUT NOT | | | BE LIMITED TO, TEMPORARY LIGHTING, SECURITY PERSONNEL, | | | VEHICLE BARRIERS, CONSTRUCTION/VISITOR PASS, | | | REDUCE/MINIMIZE ENTRY/EXIT POINTS, ENCOURAGE | | | SUBCONTRACTORS TO SECURE MACHINERY, TOOLS AT END OF | | | WORK DAY, FENCING WITH SCREENING AND OR ANY OTHER | | | MEASURE DEEMED APPROPRIATE TO PROVIDE A SAFE AND SECURE | | | WORKING ENVIRONENT. | | | B.THE SECURITY MANAGEMENT PLAN SHALL BE MAINTAINED | | | THROUGHOUT THE CONSTRUCTION PHASE OF THE PROJECT. | | | NON-COMPLIANCE WITH THE APPROVED PLAN SHALL RESULT IN A | | | STOP-WORK ORDER FOR THE ENTIRE PLANNED UNIT | | | DEVELOPMENT. | | | C. PROPERTY SHALL BE POST ?NO TRESPASSING? SIGNS EVERY | | | 500 FEET AROUND THE PERIMETER OF THE SITE. | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
STORM |
STORMWATER |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
12-17-2012 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
tward |
Date |
12-17-2012 |
Time |
12:16 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
tward |
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
STORM |
STORMWATER |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
03-28-2012 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
tward |
Date |
03-28-2012 |
Time |
11:55 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
tward |
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2012-03-28 12:00:28 | 1. STANDARD FDOT F CURB AND GUTTER IS 2 FEET WIDE (6 | | | INCH CURB AND 18 INCH GUTTER). PROPOSED F CURB AND | | | GUTTER SHOULD ALSO BE 2 FEET WIDE BUT WITH 12" CURB AND | | | 12" GUTTER TO MATCH EXISTING CURB AND GUTTER | | | SURROUNDING THE SITE. | | | | | | TRACY L. WARD, P.E. | | | SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER | | | ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | | 561-494-1120 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
STORM |
STORMWATER |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
|
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2012-01-30 06:57:29 | 1. MATCH SECTION OF EXISTING 'F' CURB AND GUTTER | | | 2. WHERE WILL ROOF DRAINS DISCHARGE? | | | 3. ACCOMMODATE ROOF DOWN SPOUT OF ADJACENT BUILDING. | | | 4. NO DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS PROVIDED. | | | 5. STORMWATER TREATMENT VOLUMES TO BE PROVIDED PER | | | SFWMD CRITERIA. | | | 6. EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN WILL BE REQUIRED. | | | | | | TRACY L. WARD, P.E. | | | SENIOR STORMWATER ENGINEER | | | ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | | TELEPHONE 561-494-1120 | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
SURVEY |
SURVEYING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
02-08-2012 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
vnoel |
Date |
02-08-2012 |
Time |
08:05 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
vnoel |
Date |
02-08-2012 |
Time |
07:07 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2012-02-08 08:04:40 | 1. PROVIDE FULL-SIZE SIGNED AND SEALED COPY OF SURVEY. | | | 2. UNITY OF TITLE WILL BE REQUIRED. | | | 3. ADD RIGHT-OF-WAY LINES TO EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS. | | | 4. IS DIXIE HWY PROPOSED TO BE CHANGED FROM A ONE TO A | | | TWO-WAY STREET? ALSO ALLEY IS ONE-WAY EAST ONLY PER | | | CITY CODE. | | | 5. SIDEWALK EASEMENTS WILL BE REQUIRED FOR ADDITIONAL | | | SIDEWALK. | | | 6. CLEMATIS STREET IS OUT TO BID FOR IMPROVEMENTS. | | | CONTACT JEFF HALVERSON AT 494-1092 IN ENGINEERING FOR | | | ANY PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS. | | | 7. MORE DETAIL WILL BE NEEDED FOR SOUTH PORTION OF EAST | | | PROPERTY LINE THAT IS SUBJECT TO THE PARTY WALL | | | AGREEMENT. | | | 8. WHO OWNS THE TRASH COMPACTOR IN NE CORNER OF | | | PROPERTY? |
|
|
| Review Stop |
TRAFFIC |
TRAFFIC ENGINEERING |
| Rev No |
4 |
Status |
P |
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
12-19-2012 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
bcollins |
Date |
12-19-2012 |
Time |
14:05 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2012-12-19 14:06:17 | REVISED DRIVEWAY PER ORIGINAL COMMENTS |
|
|
| Review Stop |
TRAFFIC |
TRAFFIC ENGINEERING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
06-13-2012 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
06-13-2012 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
bcollins |
Date |
06-13-2012 |
Time |
10:40 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2012-06-13 10:38:51 | ACCESS CAN BE ACHIEVED DIRECTLY FROM DIXIE HIGHWAY, IN | | | THE DIRECTION OF TRAFFIC FLOW ON DIXIE HIGHWAY, BY | | | ANGLING THE DRIVEWAY SO AS NOT TO ENTER FROM THE ALLEY. | | | ENTERING FROM THE PROPOSED SOUTHERN HOTEL DRIVEWAY | | | WOULD REQUIRE A 180 DEGREE TURN WHICH COULD PRESENT | | | OPERATIONAL AND SAFETY ISSUES. ALL VALET EGRESS FROM | | | THE CITY CENTER GARAGE SHOULD BE FROM BANYAN BOULEVARD. | | | THIS WILL MINIMIZE CONFLICTS WITH THE ENTRANCE/EXIT OF | | | THE CITY CENTER GARAGE ON DIXIE HIGHWAY. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
TRAFFIC |
TRAFFIC ENGINEERING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
04-20-2012 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
04-20-2012 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
bcollins |
Date |
04-20-2012 |
Time |
14:25 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2012-04-20 14:24:14 | ORIGINAL COMMENTS STILL APPLICABLE. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
TRAFFIC |
TRAFFIC ENGINEERING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
02-06-2012 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
02-06-2012 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
bcollins |
Date |
04-20-2012 |
Time |
14:25 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2012-02-06 13:52:33 | CIRCULATION - ACCESS FOR THE VALET SHOULD BE FROM THE | | | NORTH DRIVEWAY (ALLEY) AND EXIT FROM THE SOUTH DRIVEWAY | | | SINCE DIXIE HIGHWAY IS ONE-WAY SOUTHBOUND. THIS WILL | | | ALSO MINIMIZE CONFLICTS WITH THE ENTRANCE/EXIT OF THE | | | CITY CENTER GARAGE. ENTERING FROM THE SOUTH WOULD | | | REQUIRE A 180 DEGREE TURN.TURNING TEMPLATES SHOULD BE | | | SHOWN ON THE PLAN. SHEET NO. A.03 (RENDERING) SHOWS | | | TRAFFIC MOVING IN THE WRONG DIRECTION ON DIXIE HIGHWAY. | | | CITY CODE SHOWS ALLEY AS ONE-WAY EAST. LANDSCAPING | | | AND/OR STRUCTURES MUST NOT BLOCK SIGHT DISTANCE AT | | | EXIT. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
P |
Date |
12-20-2012 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
aaponte |
Date |
12-20-2012 |
Time |
13:52 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
aaponte |
Date |
12-20-2012 |
Time |
13:52 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
04-19-2012 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
aaponte |
Date |
04-19-2012 |
Time |
09:03 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
aaponte |
Date |
04-19-2012 |
Time |
09:03 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2012-04-19 09:40:27 | LANDSCAPE COMMENTS: | | | - LANDSCAPE ALONG DIXIE HWAY SHALL MATCH EXISTING ON | | | OTHER SIDE OF THE STREET. ONLY ONE DATE PALM AT THE | | | CORNER AND MAJESTY PALMS IN THE REST OF THE FRONTAGE. | | | - TO MAINTAIN CONSISTENCY WITH EXISTING STREETSCAPE | | | ANNUALS SHALL NOT BE PLANTED AROUND PALMS. | | | - PLEASE INDICATE PROPOSED LANDSCAPE ALONG THE ALLEY IN | | | THE GROUND LEVEL FLOOR PLAN (A-1) | | | - PLEASE INCLUDE A NOTE ON DRAWINGS INDICATING THE | | | MATERIAL OF SIDEWALK. CLEMATIS SIDE TO MATCH EXISTING. | | | - THE SIZE AND DIAMETER OF THE PROPOSED TREES ARE NOT | | | INCLUDED. PLEASE PROVIDE INFORMATION TO CONFIRM HOW THE | | | CALCULATIONS FOR TREE CANOPY WERE DONE. | | | | | | SITE PLAN COMMENTS: | | | - INLET ALONG CLEMATIS STREET SHALL BE CHANGED TO | | | APPROPRIATE INLET WHEN A CURB IS PRESENT. THE EXISTING | | | ONE IS FOR A DRIVEWAY CONFIGURATION. PLANTER SHALL BE | | | ADJUSTED TO MAINTAIN A CONSISTENT CURB LINE. | | | - PLEASE DISCUSS WITH THE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT THE | | | REQUIRED DIMENSIONS OF THE PROPOSED CURB. APPROVAL BY | | | THE ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT ON THE CHANGE ON CURB | | | DIMENSION WILL BE REQUIRED.ULTIMATE SETBACK LOCATION | | | SHALL BE ADJUSTED ACCORDINGLY. | | | - RESPONSE TO COMMENT NUMBER 2 SHALL BE ADJUSTED. FIRST | | | FLOOR DOORS MUST BE RECESSSED SO AS NOT TO SWING INTO | | | THE REQUIRED SETBACK (SEC 94-109 SETBACK DEFINITION). | | | - CHANGES TO THE PODIUM ELEVATION STILL DO NOT ADDRESS | | | STAFF CONCERN ON COMPATIBILITY OF BUILDING SCALE. STAFF | | | SUGGEST UTILIZING THE COMEAU BUILDING AS REFERENCE FOR | | | SCALE. IN THE COMEAU CASE, THE LOWER POTION OF THE | | | VERTICAL AWNING VALANCE IS LOCATED AT 9' IN HEIGHT. | | | PLEASE EXPLORE THE OPTION OF REFLECING THE 3 STORIES | | | EXISTING INT HE PODIUM, SO TO REDUCE THE PEDESTRIAN | | | SCALE.AWNINGS SHALL ALSO BE MORE HORIZONTAL THAN | | | VERTICAL, REALLY PROTECTING PEDESTRIANS FROM THE | | | WEATHER. | | | - PLEASE CLARIFY WHAT IS THE SITUATION WITH THE | | | EXISTING FIRE EXIT FROM THE NEIGHBORING PROPERTY INTO | | | YOUR PROPERTY. | | | | | | NEXT STEPS: | | | 1. ALL COMMENTS FROM THE PPRC SHALL BE ADDRESSED. | | | 2. DAC APPLICATION SHALL BE SUBMITTED FOR: 1) THE 3RD | | | FLOOR PORCH ENCROACHMENT VARIANCE; 2) SPECIAL REVIEW; | | | AND 3) APPROVAL OF TDR TRANSFER APPROVAL. | | | 3. AFTER DAC APPROVAL, A SITE PLAN APPROVAL LETTER MAY | | | BE ISSUED. | | | | | | FOR ADDITIONAL COMMENTS PLEASE CONTACT ANA MARIA APONTE | | | AT 561-822-1439. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
02-07-2012 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
aaponte |
Date |
02-07-2012 |
Time |
12:30 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
aaponte |
Date |
02-07-2012 |
Time |
12:30 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2012-02-07 12:30:02 | 1. PLEASE INDICATE THE PROPERTY LINE AND REQUIRED | | | SETBACK ON ALL FLOORS TO CLEARLY DEPICT COMPLIANCE WITH | | | MINIMUM REQUIRED SETBACK AND HORIZONTAL ENCROACHMENTS. | | | REQUIRED SETBACK IS MEASURED FROM THE BACK OF THE | | | EXISTING CURB CLOSER TO THE PROPERTY LINE (SHEET A 1.1) | | | DIXIE HIGHWAY SETBACK SHALL BE 16' (15'-5" DEPICTED ON | | | SHEET C-1); CLEMATIS STREET SHALL BE 10'-7". ALL | | | BUILDING FACES SHALL BE BEHIND THE REQUIRED SETBACK. | | | DEPICTED SETBACK ON TOP OF 2ND FLOOR SEEMS TO BE LESS | | | THAN THE 56' REQUIRED. | | | 2. FIRST FLOOR DOORS ARE NOT PERMITTED TO SWING INTO | | | THE REQUIRED SETBACK. | | | 3. STREETSCAPE ON DIXIE HWAY AND CLEMATIS STREET SHALL | | | MATCH THE STREET DESIGN INCLUDING CLEMATIS PAVERS AND | | | LANDSCAPE. THE PAVERS FROM CLEMATIS STREET SHALL TURN | | | THE CORNER ON DIXIE AND CONTINUE. | | | 4. PLEASE STUDY THE POSSIBLITY OF RELOCATING THE FIBER | | | OPTIC VAULT AND TRAFFIC SIGNAL BOX TO A LESS PROMINENT | | | LOCATION. | | | 5. OPEN SPACE REQUIREMENT IS MEASURED AS A PERCENTAGE | | | OF THE LOT AREA. 2,441 SF REQUIRED. PLEASE CORRECT | | | INFORMATION ON SHEET C-1. | | | 6. PLEASE CORRECT FAR INFORMATIN ON COVER PAGE. | | | ADDITIONAL FAR IS 3.0 | | | 7. PLEASE MODIFY THE BUILDING DATA TABLE TO LIST AS | | | GROSS BUILDING AREA SUCH AREA INCLUDED IN THE FAR | | | ACCORDING TO THE DEFINITION ON CODE. LIST MECHANICAL, | | | ELECTRICAL AND OTHER SQUARE FOOTAGE NOT INCLUDED IN | | | FAR; AND LIST TOTAL BUILDING AREA AS THE SUMMATION OF | | | BOTH NUMBERS. | | | 8. PARKING IS NOT REQUIRED FOR THIS PROJECT ACCORDING | | | TO SECTION 94-122(E)(1). | | | 9. PLEASE PROVIDE INFORMATION TO CONFIRM COMPLIANCE THE | | | THE REQUIRED 30% VEGETATED AREA AND 20% TREE CANOPY | | | PRESCRIBED FOR THE ROOFTOP TERRACE. | | | 10. PLEASE PROVIDE DIMENSIONS TO VERIFY COMPLIANCE WITH | | | MAXIMUM HORIZONTAL ENCROACHMENT FOR EACH TYPE OF | | | ELEMENT (TABLE IV-5). | | | 11. FOR THE GROUND FLOOR, PLEASE PROVIDE INFORMATION TO | | | CONFIRM COMPLIANCE WITH HORIZONTAL PROJECTION THAT HAVE | | | A MINIMUM CUMULATIVE HORIZONTAL LENGHT OF 50% OF THE | | | BUIDLING FRONTAGE (TABLE IV-4). | | | 12. 3RD FLOOR COVERED PORCH IN ENCROACHING BEYOND THE | | | 10' MAXIMUM ALLOWED ENCROACHMENT INTO A REQUIRED | | | SETBACK. | | | 13. EAST ELEVATION OPENINGS ON THE 3RD FLOOR ARE | | | LOCATED ON THE PROPERTY LINE, AND CAN BE BLOCKED BY A | | | FUTURE NEIGHBORING BUILDING. | | | 14. MAXIMUM HEIGHT, WICH INCLUDES ALL VERTICAL | | | PROJECTIONS SHALL BE INDICATED. | | | 15. PLEASE INCLUDE A TABLE INDICATING THE AMOUNT OF | | | TDRS NECESSARY FOR THE PROJECT. ANY SQUARE FOOTAGE | | | ABOVE THE 3.5 FAR ALLOWED BY THE ZONING DESIGNATION. | | | | | | A MEETING WITH THE HISTORIC PRESERVATION PLANNER SHALL | | | BE SCHEDULED TO DISCUSS THE ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW | | | COMMENTS. INITIAL COMMENTS ARE AS FOLLOWS: | | | 1. PLEASE REVISIT PROPOSED MANSARD ROOF SINCE THE | | | INSPIRATION FROM COMEAU BUILDING IS NOT | | | ORIGINAL.ALTERNATIVE OPTIONS FOR RAILINGS MAY BE | | | DISCUSSED, UTILIZING METAL OR BARREL TYLE RAILINGS. | | | 2. THE PROPOSED HUMAN SCALE OF THE 1ST FLOOR IS NOT | | | COMPATIBLE WITH THE EXISTING BUILDINGS ON CLEMATIS | | | STREET (SHEET A 13.1). | | | 3. WINDOW MUTINS ON 1ST FLOOR ARE NOT APPROPRIATE FOR | | | THE PROPOSED NEO MEDITERRANEAN REVIVAL WITH MOORISH | | | INCLUENCED BUILDING. | | | 4. PLEASE REVISE THE PROPORTION OF THE FREE STANDING | | | SPIRAL COLUMNS. TOO HEAVY, SHOULD BE THINNER. | | | 5. PROPOSED MOORISH ARCH MAY BE A TREFOIL ARCH. | | | | | | FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION PLEASE CONTACT ANA MARIA | | | APONTE AT 561-822-1439. | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
Print |