Plan Review Details - Project Z11100008
Plan Review Stops For Project Z11100008
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 2 Status P Date 02-10-2012 Cont ID  
Sent By lmartine Date 02-10-2012 Time 13:51 Rev Time 0.00
Received By ahansen Date 02-10-2012 Time 13:51 Sent To  
Notes
2012-02-10 14:18:382ND REVIEW
  
  
 REVIEW COMMENTS FROM 11/21/11 PLUS ADDITIONAL ELEMENTS
 (FIELD HOUSE STRUCTURES AND BLEACHERS) WILL BE INCLUDED
 FOR PERMITTING.
  
  
  
 THANK YOU,
 LUIS MARTINEZ
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 1 Status P Date 11-21-2011 Cont ID  
Sent By lmartine Date 11-21-2011 Time 13:28 Rev Time 0.00
Received By tward Date 11-21-2011 Time 13:28 Sent To  
Notes
2011-11-21 13:46:04BUILDING REVIEW COMMENTS
  
  
 SEPARATE BUILDING PERMITS WILL BE REQUIRED FOR THE
 FIELD HOUSE STRUCTURE, ELECTRICAL SITE LIGHTING,
 IRRIGATION, PARKING AND DRAINAGE.
  
  
  
  
  
  
 LUIS MARTINEZ
 561-805-6710
Review Stop STORM STORMWATER
Rev No 1 Status P Date 11-29-2011 Cont ID  
Sent By tward Date 11-29-2011 Time 11:45 Rev Time 0.00
Received By tward Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2012-02-13 16:00:102/6/12 SUBMITTAL
 1. STORMWATER RESPONSES ACCEPTABLE.
2011-11-29 11:40:171. EXISTING SFWMD ERP PERMIT TO BE MODIFIED FOR
 ADDITIONAL AREA (PARCEL B), NEW PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT
 AND PROPOSED SURFACE WATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM.
 2. CONSTRUCTION NPDES PERMIT AND EROSION CONTROL PLAN
 WILL BE REQUIRED BEFORE CONSTRUCTION.
 3. PRIVATE EASEMENT NEEDED (UNLESS SAME PROPERTY OWNER)
 FOR THE PROPOSED DRAINAGE SYSTEM CROSSING ACROSS THE
 PALM BEACH JEWISH COMMUNITY CAMPUS.
  
Review Stop SURVEY SURVEYING
Rev No 1 Status P Date 11-18-2011 Cont ID  
Sent By vnoel Date 11-18-2011 Time 07:38 Rev Time 0.00
Received By vnoel Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2011-11-18 07:41:171. REPLAT WILL NOT BE REQUIRED.
 2. UNDERLYING FPL, BELLSOUTH AND PBC UTILITY EASEMENTS
 WILL NEED TO BE TERMINATED BY SAME.
  
Review Stop TRAFFIC TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No 2 Status P Date 02-16-2012 Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 02-16-2012 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By bcollins Date 02-16-2012 Time 15:22 Sent To  
Notes
2012-02-16 15:21:40COMMENTS ADDRESSED
Review Stop TRAFFIC TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No 1 Status F Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 11-17-2011 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By bcollins Date 11-17-2011 Time 13:14 Sent To  
Notes
2011-11-17 13:15:28SITE PLAN NEEDS TO SHOW STOP BAR AND STOP SIGN AT EXIT
 TO MILITARY TRAIL AS WELL AS AT INTERNAL LOCATIONS
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 2 Status P Date 02-24-2012 Cont ID  
Sent By ahansen Date 02-24-2012 Time 15:07 Rev Time 0.00
Received By ahansen Date 02-24-2012 Time 15:05 Sent To  
Notes
2012-02-24 15:07:58THE PLANNING DIVISION APPROVES SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING
 CONDITIONS:
 1) THE PROPOSED SCOREBOARDS SHALL BE NO HIGHER THAN 30
 FEET AND SHALL NOT HAVE TEXT ON THE BACKFACE. FURTHER,
 ALL SCOREBOARDS SHALL FACE INTERNAL TO THE SITE.
  
 2) THE PHASE 3 LIGHT POLES FOR THE BASEBALL FIELD
 IDENTIFIED AS LOCATIONS A1-A2, B1-B2, C1-C2, AND D1-D2
 IN THE PHOTOMETRIC OR ILLUMINATION PLANS EXCEED THE
 MAXIMUM ELEVATION PERMITTED BY THE CODE. AS A RESULT,
 THE APPLICANT SHALL EITHER REDUCE THE POLE HEIGHT TO
 COMPLY WITH THE CODE OR RECEIVE VARIANCE APPROVAL PRIOR
 TO SUBMITTING FOR PERMITS FOR PHASE 3 CONSTRUCTION.
  
 3) AS PART OF PHASE 3, A SIDEWALK SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED
 PARALLEL TO THE VEHICULAR ENTRANCE TO THE NORTH PARKING
 LOT TO CONNECT THE PUBLIC SIDEWALK ALONG MILITARY TRAIL
 WITH THE PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION NETWORK INTERNAL TO THE
 SPORTS FIELDS AREA. THIS SIDEWALK SHALL BE SHOWN ON THE
 BUILDING PERMITS SUBMITTED AS PART OF PHASE 3.
  
 4) THE PHASE 3 FINAL LANDSCAPE PLANS SHALL BE SUBMITTED
 TO THE PLANNING DIVISION AS A MINOR SITE PLAN AMENDMENT
 PRIOR TO THE PHASE 3 BUILDING PERMIT SUBMITTAL. THESE
 PLANS SHALL IDENTIFY A REPLACEMENT PLAN FOR THE 153
 TREES CURRENTLY PROPOSED TO BE REMOVED IN PHASE 3, AS
 WELL AS THE 29 SABALS TO BE RELOCATED IN PHASE 3 AS
 IDENTIFIED IN THE TREE DISPOSITION SUMMARY OF LA-1. IN
 ADDITION, THE PLANS SHALL REFLECT THE REPLACEMENT PLAN
 FOR THE ADDITIONAL 193 TREES THAT WERE IDENTIFIED FOR
 REPLACEMENT AS PART OF TREE ALTERATION PERMIT TP05-1013
 ISSUED IN 2005 FOR THE REMOVAL OF NATIVE VEGETATION
 EXISTING AT THE TIME ON THE CATALINA SITE.
  
 5) TO ADDRESS POTENTIAL CONFLICTS WITH UTILITY LINES,
 REPLACEMENT OAK TREES ALONG MILITARY TRAIL SHALL BE
 SUBSTITUTED CONSISTENT WITH MEMO FROM HELEN COHEN OF
 URBAN DESIGN KILDAY STUDIOS TO ALEX HANSEN, DATED
 FEBRUARY 22, 2012. THE LANDSCAPE PLANS SUBMITTED AS
 PART OF THE PHASE 1 LANDSCAPE PERMIT SHALL BE UPDATED
 TO REFLECT THESE SUBSTITUTIONS.
  
 ALEX HANSEN
 (561) 822-1463
  
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 12-08-2011 Cont ID  
Sent By ahansen Date 12-08-2011 Time 16:32 Rev Time 0.00
Received By ahansen Date 12-08-2011 Time 16:32 Sent To  
Notes
2011-12-08 16:33:56PLANNING FAILED
  
 PLEASE NOTE TO RESPOND TO COMMENTS IN WRITING
 1. ON SHEET SP-1 PLEASE INDICATE THE LENGTH OF THE
 BICYCLE PAD AREA IN THE BICYCLE RACK DETAIL.
  
 2. ON SHEET SP-1 PLEASE INCLUDE THE BIKE PARKING
 INFORMATION IN THE SITE DATA TABLE
  
 3. ON SHEET SP-1 PLEASE INCLUDE THE DIMENSIONS OF THE
 BIKE PARKING PAD ON THE AREA WHERE IT IS IDENTIFIED ON
 THE SITE PLAN
  
 4. ON SHEET SP-1 PLEASE AMEND THE HANDICAPPED PARKING
 SPACES DETAIL AS IT INCLUDES INCORRECT STRIPE
 DIMENSIONS.
  
 5. SHEET SP-1 INCLUDES A "TEAMS/SCOREKEEPER AREA" TO
 THE EAST OF THE PHASE 1 SOCCER/LACROSSE GAME FIELD AND
 WITHIN THE 25? FRONT SETBACK. PLEASE DESCRIBE WHAT THE
 "TEAMS/SCOREKEEPER AREA" CONSISTS OF. NO STRUCTURES MAY
 BE LOCATED WITHIN FRONT SETBACK.
  
 6. SECTION 94-310(D) OF THE CODE STATES THAT "ANY
 OPERATION OR ACTIVITY PRODUCING GLARE SHALL BE
 CONDUCTED SO THAT DIRECT OR INDIRECT LIGHT FROM THE
 SOURCE SHALL NOT CAUSE ILLUMINATION IN EXCESS OF 0.5
 FOOT CANDLES WHEN MEASURED IN A RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT."
 THE PHOTOMETRIC PLANS PROVIDED DO NOT IDENTIFY
 ILLUMINATION LEVELS FOR THE ADJACENT TO RESIDENTIAL
 DISTRICTS RESULTING FROM THE PROPOSED PHOTOMETRIC PLAN
 FOR OXBRIDGE. PLEASE AMEND THE PLAN TO IDENTIFY THE
 ILLUMINATION LEVELS ON THE ADJACENT RESIDENTIAL AREAS
 TO THE WEST AND NORTH RESULTING FROM THE PROPOSED
 OXBRIDGE PHOTOMETRIC PLAN.
  
 7. THE PROPOSED PHOTOMETRIC PLAN INDICATES THAT THE
 POLES FOR THE DIFFERENT ATHLETIC FIELDS HAVE HEIGHTS
 RANGING FROM 70 TO 80 FEET. SECTION 94-202 IDENTIFIES
 THAT THE MAXIMUM HEIGHT FOR THE COMMUNITY SERVICE (CS)
 DISTRICT IS 60 FEET. SECTION 94-306 ALLOWS FOR CERTAIN
 FEATURES TO EXCEED DISTRICT HEIGHT REQUIREMENTS BY TEN
 PERCENT, WHICH WOULD RESULT IN A MAXIMUM PERMITTED
 HEIGHT OF 66 FEET. PLEASE AMEND THE PHOTOMETRIC PLAN IN
 ORDER TO COMPLY WITH THIS REQUIREMENT.
  
 8. WHAT, IF ANY, LIGHTING IS BEING PROVIDED FOR THE
 PARKING AREA IN THE 1.48 ACRE PARCEL? IF ANY LIGHTING
 IS BEING PROPOSED PLEASE INCLUDED IT IN THE PHOTOMETRIC
 PLAN.
  
 9. ON SHEET LA-3 THERE ARE SOME CONFLICTS BETWEEN THE
 LOCATIONS OF PROPOSED LIGHT POLES AND THE LOCATIONS OF
 EXISTING AND PROPOSED TREES. PLEASE ADDRESS THIS
 CONFLICT.
  
 10. PLEASE CONSIDER PROVIDING THE PARKING SPACE
 OVERHANG INSTEAD OF WHEEL STOP WHEN PARKING IS ADJACENT
 TO LANDSCAPING. LOOK AT ITEM 2 IN FIGURE XIV-2 (ARTICLE
 XIV) OF THE CODE.
  
 11. PLEASE VERIFY SIDEWALK ACCESSIBLE ROUTE DIMENSIONS
 WHERE LIGHT POLES ARE ADJACENT TO HANDICAPPED SPACES IN
 THE PLAN.
  
 12. PLEASE PROVIDE AN EXPLANATION OF HOW THE PROPOSED
 PHASING OF THE PROJECT WOULD WORK, INCLUDING ACCESS TO
 THE DIFFERENT FACILITIES IDENTIFIED IN THE DIFFERENT
 PHASES. OF PARTICULAR CONSIDERATION WOULD BE THE ACCESS
 TO THE GAME FIELD IDENTIFIED IN PHASE 1.
  
 13. PLEASE INCLUDE THE DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE DIMENSIONS IN
 THE AREA WHERE IT IS IDENTIFIED IN THE OVERALL SITE
 PLAN IN SHEET SP-1.
  
 14. PLEASE IDENTIFY THE TYPE OF MOISTURE SENSING
 CONTROLLER IDENTIFIED IN THE XERISCAPE CALCULATIONS.
  
 15. IN THE LANDSCAPE PLANS, PLEASE CROSS-REFERENCE THE
 32 TREES THAT ARE BEING RELOCATED BY PROVIDING THEIR
 REFERENCE NUMBER USED IN THE TREE DISPOSITION PLAN.
  
 16. WHAT IS THE TIME FRAME FOR THE REMOVAL/RELOCATION
 OF THE TREES ON THE 1.5 ACRE PARCEL? PLEASE PROVIDE A
 REPLACEMENT PLAN FOR THE 153 TREES THAT ARE BEING
 IDENTIFIED IN THE TREE DISPOSITION PLAN (EXHIBIT A). IF
 TREES WILL NOT BE REMOVED IN NEAR FUTURE, THIS CAN BE
 PROVIDED DURING PREPARATION OF PHASE III.
  
 17. THERE APPEAR TO BE INCONSISTENCIES BETWEEN THE
 EXISTING TREE COUNT IN EXHIBIT A AND THE EXISTING COUNT
 INFORMATION IN CHART IN SHEET LA-1, PLEASE ADDRESS.
  
 18. THERE APPEAR TO BE INCONSISTENCIES BETWEEN THE
 NUMBER OF TREES IDENTIFIED IN THE RELOCATION SUMMARY OF
 EXHIBIT A AND THE RELOCATION INFORMATION IN SHEET LA-6,
 PLEASE ADDRESS.
  
 19. PLEASE PROVIDE A TREE DISPOSITION SUMMARY TABLE FOR
 THE 12.14 ACRE PARCEL AND INDICATE THE PROPOSED
 DISPOSITION OF THE 290 RELOCATED SABAL PALMS AND 254
 TREES IDENTIFIED IN TREE ALTERATION PERMIT TP05-1013.
  
 20. SHEET LA 1 IDENTIFIES 6 EXISTING FLOWERING TREES
 FOR PHASE 3. PLEASE IDENTIFY THEM IN THE PLAN.
  
 21. PER SECTION 94-611 OF THE ZONING AND LAND
 DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS, THE 18 CRAPE MYRTLES
 IDENTIFIED IN SHEET LA-6 WITH THE SPECIFICATIONS AS
 PROVIDED IN THE PLAN ARE NOT CONSIDERED A FLOWERING
 TREE AS IT HAS MULTI STEMS, WHICH IS INCOSISTENT WITH
 THE DEFINITION OF TREE.
  
  
 IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT ME:
  
 ALEX HANSEN
 SENIOR PLANNER
 822-1463
 [email protected]
  
  Print


Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved