Plan Review Details - Project Z11090014
Plan Review Stops For Project Z11090014
Review Stop ENG ENGINEERING CSD
Rev No 1 Status   Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop L LANDSCAPING
Rev No 3 Status P Date 03-20-2012 Cont ID  
Sent By lfranco Date 01-17-2012 Time 12:13 Rev Time 0.00
Received By lfranco Date 01-17-2012 Time 12:13 Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop L LANDSCAPING
Rev No 2 Status F Date 12-30-2011 Cont ID  
Sent By lfranco Date 12-30-2011 Time 16:22 Rev Time 0.00
Received By lfranco Date 12-30-2011 Time 16:22 Sent To  
Notes
2011-12-30 16:23:19LANDSCAPE COMMENT, REVISE SHEETS ON LANDSCAPE PLANS TO
 SHOW THE STORAGE/DISPLAY AREA TO MATCH ENGINEERING
 PLANS.
  
 SEE ZONING COMMENTS.
Review Stop L LANDSCAPING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 10-30-2011 Cont ID  
Sent By lfranco Date 10-28-2011 Time 15:43 Rev Time 0.00
Received By lfranco Date 10-28-2011 Time 15:43 Sent To  
Notes
2011-12-30 15:44:21***LANDSCAPE REVIEW FAILED***
  
 PLEASE RESPOND TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN WRITTEN FORMAT.
  
 1. "LI" WAS NOT IDENTIFIED ON THE PLANT LIST.
  
 2. BECAUSE THIS ENCOMPASSES THE ENTIRE SITE, PLEASE
 SHOW ALL EXISTING AND PROPOSED LANDSCAPING FOR THE
 ENTIRE SITE. ON THE ORIGINAL APPROVED LANDCAPE PLAN,
 LANDSCAPING WAS SHOWN AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE
 SITE BUT THERE WAS NO REFERENCE TO IT ON THE MOST
 RECENT SUBMITTAL. THE LANDSCAPING THAT WAS INSTALLED
 ALONG THE NORTH AND EAST SIDES OF THE MAIN BUILDING WAS
 NEVER APPROVED. PLEASE SHALL THE COMPLETE LAYOUT.
  
 3. PURSUANT TO SECTION 95-448 (D) (2), ON THE LANDSCAPE
 PLAN, PLEASE SHOW ALL UTILITIES, EASEMENTS, SITE
 LIGHTING AND ANYTHING ELSE THAT MAY IMPACT THE PROPOSED
 LANDSCAPING. THERE ARE CONFLICTS BETWEEN SITE LIGHTING
 AND TREES.
  
 4. THE HEDGE ADJACENT TO OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD SHALL BE
 MOVED TO THE INSIDE OF THE LANDSCAPE SETBACK WITH THE
 FLAX LILIES TO BE PLANTED BETWEEN THE HEDGE AND CITY
 SIDEWALK.
  
 5. PLEASE PROVIDE THE XERISCAPE DESIGN OPTIONS.
  
 6. PURSUANT TO SECTION 94-443 (C) (3) (A) EACH ROW OF
 PARKING SPACES SHALL BE TERMINATED BY LANDSCAPE ISLANDS
 OF NOT LESS THAN FIVE FEET IN WIDTH AND NOT LESS THAN
 THE LENGTH OF THE ADJACENT PARKING STALL. THE
 LANDSCAPED ISLAND SHALL CONTAIN AT LEAST ONE SHADE OR
 FLOWERING TREE. THE ISLAND ON THE EAST SIDE FO THE
 ACCESS POINT IN FROM OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD (WEST ACCESS)
 WAS ORIGINALLY A LANDSCAPE ISLAND WHICH HAS BEEN PAVED
 OVER. IT NEEDS TO BE RESTORED. THE PARKING ROWS ON THE
 EAST AND WEST SIDES OF THE PROPOSED BUILDING DO NOT
 MEET THIS REQUIREMENT. THE LANDSCAPE ISLANDS AT THE
 NORTHEAST AND NORTHWEST CORNERS OF THIS MODIFIED AREA
 OF THE SITE ARE MISSING THE REQUIRED TREE.
  
 7. PURSUANT TO SECTION 94-443 (C) THE OWNER OF PROPERTY
 THAT CONTAINS VEHICULAR USE AREAS SHALL INSTALL AND
 MAINTAIN A LANDSCAPE BUFFER WHEN SUCH USES ARE ADJACENT
 TO OR VISIBLE FROM A PUBLIC THOROUGHFARE. PURSUANT TO
 SECTION 94-443 (C) (2), VEHICULAR USE AREAS SHALL BE
 SCREENED FROM THOROUGHFARES AND AND RESIDENTIAL USES
 AND DISTRICTS BY A LANDSCAPE BUFFER OF AT LEAST FIVE
 FEET IN WIDTH. SHADE TREES MUST BE PLANTED AT 30-FOOT
 INTERVALS AND HEDGES SHALL BE PLANTED AT TOW-FOOT
 INTERVALS. THIS APPLIES TO THE WEST AND SOUTH
 (SOUTHWEST CORNER) SIDES OF THE SITE.
  
 8. STAFF RECOMMENDS THE USE OF VERTICAL LANDSCAPE
 ELEMENTS ALONG THE FOUNDATION ON THE NORTH SIDE OF THE
 PROPOSED BUILDING.
  
 IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT ROBERT
 KUSSNER @ (561) 822-1462.
Review Stop POLICE POLICE
Rev No 1 Status   Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
***NONE***
Review Stop SURVEY SURVEYING
Rev No 1 Status   Date 10-06-2011 Cont ID  
Sent By lfranco Date 10-06-2011 Time 9:09 Rev Time 0.00
Received By lfranco Date 10-06-2011 Time 9:09 Sent To  
Notes
2011-12-30 16:11:19COMMENTS CARRIED OVER FOR THE DSI APPLICATION TO THIS
 ISPR APPLICATION REVIEW.
  
  
  
  
 1. PROPERTY WILL NEED TO BE REPLATTED.
 COMMENT STILL OUTSTANDING, CONTACT VINCE NOEL OR LINDA
 MIA FRANCO FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. THE APPLICATION
 PROCESS CAN BE SUBMITTED THROUGH THE PLANNING DIVISION,
 BUT WILL NEED TO BE REVIEWED BY VINCE NOEL (ENGINEERING
 FEES MAY APPLY).
  
  
 UNITY OF CONTROL MAY ALSO BE NEEDED PER PLANNING.
  
  
  
  
 UNITY OF CONTROL WAS RECORDED AND RECEIVED ON 12/2/11
 AND RECEIVED TO PLANNING ON 12/6/11.
  
  
  
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 2 Status P Date 03-20-2012 Cont ID  
Sent By lfranco Date 02-23-2012 Time 12:09 Rev Time 0.00
Received By lfranco Date 02-23-2012 Time 12:08 Sent To  
Notes
2012-03-20 12:13:21PASSED IN THE COMMUNITY PLUS SYSTEM TO CLOSE OUT FILES
 3/20/11. THE APPROVAL LETTER WAS ISSUED BY ANGELLA ON
 2/23/12 AND REVISED BY LMF ON 3/6/ AND 3/12 DRAWINGS
 ADDED
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 09-30-2011 Cont ID  
Sent By lfranco Date 09-30-2011 Time 15:26 Rev Time 0.00
Received By lfranco Date 09-30-2011 Time 15:25 Sent To  
Notes
2011-12-30 15:26:36 
 COMMENTS CARRIED FORWARD FROM THE DSI APPLICATION PB
 934D - Z10110007
  
 PLANNING AND ZONING:
  
 CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH
 PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
  
  
 PLANS AND PLATS REVIEW COMMITTEE
 DECEMBER 18, 2010
 PLANNING BOARD CASE NO. 934D
 420 OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD
 PALM BEACH MOTOR CARS DEVELOPMENT OF SIGNIFICANT IMPACT
 ("DSI") - FISKER SHOWROOM EXPANSION
  
 RE-SUBMITTAL SEPTEMBER 15, 2011 (SOME COMMENTS WERE
 ADDRESSED DURING THE MONTHS OF SEPTEMBER TO DECEMBER):
  
 GENERAL COMMENTS:
  
 1. PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN A WRITTEN
 FORMAT. PLEASE NOTE, IF THE PLANNING AND ZONING
 DEPARTMENT HAS NOT RECEIVED A RESPONSE TO THE PPRC
 COMMENTS WITHIN SIXTY (60) DAYS FROM THE PPRC MEETING,
 THE CASE SHALL BE CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN. ANY FURTHER
 ACTION SHALL REQUIRE RE-SUBMITTAL OF A NEW DEVELOPMENT
 APPLICATION.
  
 3. RESUBMITTAL FEE - FOLLOWING THE PLANS AND PLATS
 REVIEW COMMITTEE MEETING, THE APPLICANT WILL BE
 PERMITTED ONE (1) RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF
 PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE
 SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE APPLICANT WILL BE ACCESSED
 A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL
 APPLICATION FEE.
  
 JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT/GENERAL APPLICATION:
  
 4. DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION - SECTION D - CONCURRENCY:
  
 D. CONCURRENCY: A TRAFFIC LETTER HAS NOT BEEN
 SUBMITTED. IF SUCH A LETTER IS NOT SUBMITTED BY THE
 APPLICANT BY DECEMBER 17, 2010, THE PROJECT WILL NOT BE
 SCHEDULED FOR THE JANUARY 18, 2010, AND WILL BE
 SCHEDULED TO THE NEXT AVAILABLE PLANNING BOARD MEETING.
 ALL OTHER COMMENTS MUST BE ADDRESSED PER COMMENT #2 OF
 THIS REVIEW.
  
  THE FOLLOWING ITEMS ESTABLISHING CONCURRENCY ARE
 REQUIRED AT THE TIME OF THE APPLICATION SUBMITTAL:
  
 A. A TRAFFIC LETTER PROVIDED BY THE PALM BEACH COUNTY
 TRAFFIC DIVISION - (561) 684-4030.
  
 5. DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION - SECTION E - PROJECT FACT
 SHEET: THE ADJACENT PROPERTIES NEED TO BE PROPERTIES
 THAT ARE NOT PART OF THE PALM BEACH MOTOR CARS DSI
 (I.E. PROPERTIES ACROSS OKEECHOBEE BOULEVARD AND DIXIE
 HWY, ETC.)
  
 6. THE ALTA/ACSM LAND TITLE SURVEY SHALL BE WITHIN ONE
 (1) YEAR OLD AND ACCOMPANIED BY A CURRENT OWNERSHIP AND
 ENCUMBRANCE (O & E) REPORT, WHICH SHALL INCLUDE ALL
 EASEMENTS AND RESTRICTIONS OF RECORD, OR A CURRENT
 TITLE POLICY.
  
 A. THE SURVEY TITLE COMMITMENT IS OVER FIVE YEARS OLD
 (TITLE NOTE #1).
  
 B. PROVIDE GROSS LAND AREA (TO THE NEAREST
 ONE-HUNDREDTH (1/100) OF AN ACRE).
  
 RE-SUBMITTAL 9/15/11 - UNDER REVIEW WITH
 ENGINEERING/SURVEYING
  
  
  
 8. P. UNIFIED CONTROL
  
  FIRM EVIDENCE OF THE UNIFIED CONTROL OF THE ENTIRE
 AREA WITHIN THE PETITION AND A STATEMENT FROM THE
 APPLICANT STATING THAT IF THE LAND IS DEVELOPED, THE
 APPLICANT SHALL:
  
 1. DO SO IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE MASTER PLAN OF
 DEVELOPMENT OFFICIALLY ADOPTED FOR THE DISTRICT, IN
 ACCORDANCE WITH THE REGULATIONS EXISTING WHEN THE
 AMENDMENT CREATING THE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT (PD)
 DISTRICT OR SPECIAL USE IS PASSED AND IN ACCORDANCE
 WITH SUCH OTHER CONDITIONS OR MODIFICATIONS AS MAY BE
 ATTACHED TO THE REZONING OF THE LAND TO THE PD
 CLASSIFICATIONS OR SPECIAL USE PERMIT.
  
 2. PROVIDE AGREEMENTS, CONTRACTS, DEED RESTRICTIONS, OR
 SURETIES ACCEPTABLE TO THE CITY FOR COMPLETION OF THE
 UNDERTAKING IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE ADOPTED MASTER PLAN
 AS WELL AS FOR THE CONTINUING FUNCTIONS AND FACILITIES
 AS ARE TO BE PROVIDED, OPERATED OR MAINTAINED AT
 GENERAL PUBLIC EXPENSES; AND
  
 3. BIND ALL DEVELOPMENT SUCCESSORS IN TITLE TO ANY
 COMMITMENTS MADE UNDER (1) AND (2) PRECEDING.
  
 A WRITTEN LETTER OF UNIFIED CONTROL FROM THE APPLICANT
 IS NOT SUFFICIENT. A UNITY CONTROL BINDING ALL
 DEVELOPMENT SUCCESSORS IN TITLE SHALL BE SUBMITTED FOR
 REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE CITY'S LEGAL DEPARTMENT.
 BASED ON DISCUSSIONS WITH THE CITY'S SURVEYOR (VINCE
 NOEL), STAFF UNDERSTANDS THAT A UNITY TITLE IS NOT AN
 OPTION DUE TO THE CITY-OWNED "U-SHAPE" LAND THAT IS
 LOCATED BETWEEN THE LANDS THAT ARE OWNED BY THE OWNER.
  
  
 RE-SUBMITTAL: AS OF 12/6/11 THIS COMMENT HAS BEEN
 ADDRESSED.
  
 9. RESPOND AND ADDRESS SURVEYING COMMENTS BY VINCE
 NOEL. THE PROPERTY HAS TO BE REPLATTED. PLEASE CONTACT
 ME OR VINCE NOEL.
  
  
 **** GENERAL NOTE: PLEASE BE ADVISED THAT ALL
 DISCIPLINE COMMENTS WITH FIRE, BUILDING AND POLICE
 SHALL BE ADDRESSED PRIOR TO FINAL BUILDING PERMIT
 APPROVAL. *****
  
  
 LINDA MIA FRANCO, AICP
 SENIOR PLANNER
 PLANNING AND ZONING
 TEL: (561) 822-1443
 EMAIL: [email protected]
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  Print


Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved