City of West Palm Beach eGovPlus

Plan Review Details - Project Z10120009

Plan Review Stops For Project Z10120009

Review Stop	B			BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No	2	Status	P	Date	06-13-2011			Cont ID
Sent By	eschneid			Date	06-13-2011	Time	09:52	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	eschneid			Date		Time		Sent To

Notes

2011-06-13 09:52:26

SITE PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS ADDRESSED.

Review Stop	B			BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No	1	Status	F	Date	01-12-2011			Cont ID
Sent By	lmartine			Date	01-12-2011	Time	08:34	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	lmartine			Date	01-12-2011	Time	08:34	Sent To

Notes

2011-01-12 09:39:58	BUILDING REVIEW COMMENTS



	EACH BUILDING WILL REQUIRE A SEPARATE PERMIT.

	THE BUILDINGS SHALL COMPLY WITH FLOOD ZONE
	REQUIREMENTS.

	BOTH BUILDINGS SHALL PROVIDE FULL COMPLIANCE WITH
	CHAPTER 11 (ACCESSIBILITY) 2007 FBC.

	THE ACADEMIC BUILDING CALLS FOR A CONNECTOR TO AN
	EXISTING 2 STORY, ARE WE NOW ONE LARGER BUILDING OR IS
	THE DESIGNERS INTENTION TO HAVE TWO BUILDINGS? THE
	DESIGN CRITERIA WAS NOT INCLUDED WITH THIS SUBMITTAL.

	THERE APPEARS TO BE AN ATRIUM IN THE ACADEMICS
	BUILDING, PLEASE SEE REQUIEMENTS IN SECTION 404 FBC.

	A THRESHOLD PLAN AND APPROVED INSPECTOR WILL BE
	REQUIRED FOR ANY BUILDING MEETING THE DEFINITION OF
	"THRESHOLD BUILDING" AS DEFINED IN CHAPTER 2, FBC.





	LUIS MARTINEZ
	561-805-6710

Review Stop	ENG - PPRC			ENGINEERING - PPRC
Rev No	2	Status	P	Date	06-13-2011			Cont ID
Sent By	eschneid			Date	06-13-2011	Time	09:52	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	eschneid			Date		Time		Sent To

Notes

2011-06-13 09:53:02

SITE PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS ADDRESSED.

Review Stop	ENG - PPRC			ENGINEERING - PPRC
Rev No	1	Status	F	Date	01-12-2011		Cont ID
Sent By	mgonzale			Date	01-12-2011	Time	Rev Time	1.00
Received By	mgonzale			Date	01-12-2011	Time	Sent To

Notes

2011-01-12 09:52:10	#1 PROPOSED DRIVEWAY UNTO FLAGLER ENCROACHES INTO
	EXISTING DRIVEWAY.
	PLEASE USE STANDARD CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH CONCRETE
	DRIVEWAY APRON DETAIL.

	#2 ADDRESS GARBAGE PICK-UP ACCESSABILITY WITH GATES IN
	PLACE ON COCOANUT LANE AND TUXEDO LANE.

	#3 TRAFFIC CALMING SPEED TABLE AND CROSSWALK EXTENDS
	INTO THE PROPERTY TO THE SOUTH.
	A SEPARATE PERMIT WOULD HAVE TO BE OBTAINED BY THAT
	PROPERTY OWNER FOR SUCH IMPROVEMENTS.

	#4 PLEASE BE ADVISE THE PALM BEACH COUNTY PROPERTY
	APPRAISERS INFORMATION DOES NOT SHOW THE CORRECT
	DIMENSION FOR THE PROPERTY,
	COMPARE LOT WHERE EXISTING PALM BEACH DAY ACADEMY
	WILLIAM PITT HOUSE SITS AND ALSO LOOK ALONG FLAGLER
	DRIVE. IT MAY BE TO YOUR BEST INTEREST
	TO HAVE THE COUNTY CORRECT THIS IMFORMATION AS IT MAY
	AFFECT YOUR STORMWATER FEES WHEN PERVIOUS AND
	IMPERVIOUS AREAS ARE CALCULATED.

	MANUEL JULIAN GONZALEZ
	ENGINEERING PROJECT COORDINATOR
	ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
	401 CLEMATIS STREET, 4TH FLOOR
	WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33401
	(MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. BOX 3366, ZIP 33402)
	MAIN PHONE: (561) 822-1200
	DIRECT: (561) 494-1085
	FAX: (561) 494-1116
	MOBILE: (561) 644-7301
	EMAIL: [email protected]
	WWW.WPB.ORG/ENGINEERING

Review Stop	FIRE			FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No	2	Status	P	Date	06-13-2011			Cont ID
Sent By	eschneid			Date	06-13-2011	Time	09:53	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	eschneid			Date		Time		Sent To

Notes

2011-06-13 09:53:35

SITE PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS ADDRESSED.

Review Stop	FIRE			FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No	1	Status	F	Date	01-03-2011			Cont ID
Sent By	mcarsill			Date	01-03-2011	Time	13:48	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	mcarsill			Date	01-03-2011	Time	12:58	Sent To

Notes

2011-01-03 13:48:20	1957 SOUTH FLAGLER DRIVE
	PLANNING BOARD CASE NUMBER 1600 C (Z10120009)

	1. BUILDING ADDRESSES ARE REQUIRED.

	2. PLEASE INDICATE ON THE FUTURE PLANS ALL FIRE SAFETY
	SYSTEMS AND DEVICES. THEY INCLUDE AUTOMATIC FIRE
	SPRINKLER SYSTEMS, FIRE ALARM SYSTEMS, EXIT DOORS,
	ILLUMINATED EXIT SIGNS, EMERGENCY LIGHTS, TACTILE
	SIGNAGE, PORTABLE FIRE EXTINGUISHERS, INTERIOR FINISH
	CLASSIFICATIONS, DUPLEX OUTLET COVERS, PANIC HARDWARE,
	ETC.

	3. THE LOWER CAMPUS BUILDING WILL NEED TO COMPLY WITH
	THE EDUCATIONAL REQUIREMENTS OF THE FLORIDA FIRE
	PREVENTION CODE.

	4. THE GYMNASIUM BUILDING WILL NEED TO COMPLY WITH THE
	ASSEMBLY REQUIREMENTS OF THE FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION
	CODE.

	5. PLEASE INDICATE SEATING ARRANGEMENTS FOR THE
	GYMNASIUM AND STAGE AREA.

	6. PLEASE PROVIDE MECHANICAL PROTECTION FOR THE FIRE
	SAFETY EQUIPMENT CONTAINED WITHIN THE GYMNASIUM.

	7. PLEASE INDICATE THE TYPES AND HEIGHTS OF THE
	STORAGE.

	8. PLEASE INDICATE RISE AND RUN FOR ALL STAIRS. PLEASE
	PROVIDE DETAILS ON RAMPS FOR THE GYM.

	9. KNOX-BOXES WILL BE REQUIRED. ALSO KNOX LOCKING CAPS
	WILL BE REQUIRED FOR THE FIRE SPRINKLER CONNECTIONS.

	10. PLEASE EXPLAIN MIRROR / DANCE BAR.

	11. PLEASE PROVIDE FIRE-STOPPING DETAILS.

	12. PLEASE PROVIDE A DOOR SCHEDULE.

	13. PLEASE INDICATE LOCATIONS OF PHYSICALLY CHALLENGED
	SEATING.

	14. PLEASE PROVIDE MORE DETAILS ON THE CONNECTOR
	BRIDGE.

	15. PLEASE PROVIDE MORE DETAILS ON TENSILE FABRIC
	CANOPY.

	16. PLEASE EXPLAIN "OPEN TO BELOW" AREA BETWEEN FIRST
	AND SECOND FLOOR OF THE EDUCATIONAL BUILDING.

	17. PLEASE PROVIDE MORE DETAILS ON STAIRS 1 & 2.

	18. TRAFFIC CALMING AND SPEED TABLES SHOWN ON THE
	MASTER PLAN SHALL NOT INTERFERE WITH FIRE RESCUE
	ACCESS.

	19. MULTIPLE VEHICLE AND PEDESTRIAN GATES ARE SHOWN ON
	THE MASTER PLAN. A REVIEW OF THESE GATES ARE TO OCCUR.
	SOME OF THESE GATES MAY IMPACT EXIT DISCHARGE AND FIRE
	AND PARAMEDICAL SERVICE DELIVERY.

	20. THE APPROPRIATE DEMOLITION PERMITS AND UTILITY
	LETTERS ARE TO BE SUBMITTED TO THE CONSTRUCTION
	SERVICES DEPARTMENT.

	21. WHAT USE WILL THE RELOCATED BUILDING BE USED FOR.

	22. FIRE ALARM SYSTEMS ARE TO BE MONITORED BY A
	LICENSED COMPANY APPROVED BY A THIRD PARTY CAPABLE OF
	PROVIDING CENTRAL STATION SERVICE.

	23. SUITABLE ROADS ARE TO BE PROVIDED FOR FIRE AND
	PARAMEDICAL ACCESS DURING CONSTRUCTION.


	DENIED


	MIKE CARSILLO, BATTALION CHIEF
	BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION

Review Stop	L		LANDSCAPING
Rev No	3	Status	Date		Cont ID
Sent By			Date	Time	Rev Time	0.00
Received By			Date	Time	Sent To

Notes

***NONE***

Review Stop	L			LANDSCAPING
Rev No	2	Status	F	Date	06-10-2011			Cont ID
Sent By	rkussner			Date	06-10-2011	Time	17:43	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	rkussner			Date	06-10-2011	Time	17:43	Sent To

Notes

2011-06-10 17:55:55	*LANDSCAPE REVIEW FAILED*

	PLEASE RESPOND TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN WRITTEN FORMAT.

	1. PURSUANT TO SECTION 94-442 (D), PRIVATE LAND AND
	PUBLIC RIGHTS-OF-WAY BETWEEN STREET OR SIDEWALK
	SURFACES AND REQUIRED BUFFER STRIPS AND LANDSCAPED OPEN
	SPACE AREAS SHALL BE PLANTED WITH GRASS. PLEASE SHOW
	SOD IN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY, ADJACENT TO OLIVE AVENUE

	2. REPEAT COMMENT: PURSUANT TO SECTION 94-448 (D) (2),
	THE LANDSCAPE PLAN SHALL CONTAIN ALL OF THE ELEMENTS
	ENUMERATED IN THIS SECTION, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED
	TO IDENTIFICATION OF ALL AIR CONDITIONING UNITS,
	GENERATORS AND ALL OTHER MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT. PLEASE
	PROVIDE THE LOCATION OF THESE ITEMS AND THE MANNER IN
	WHICH THEY WILL BE SCREENED.

	3. THE PROPOSED LANDSCAPING ALONG FLAGLER ON SHEET L-2
	DOES NOT MATCH THER CURVILIINEAR BEDS SHOWN IN THE
	DETAIL ON L-4. THE LANDSCAPING WAS TO FILL A MUCH
	LARGER AREA OF THE LANDSCAPE SETBACK.


	IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT ROBERT
	KUSSNER @ (561) 822-1462.

Review Stop	L			LANDSCAPING
Rev No	1	Status	F	Date	01-10-2011			Cont ID
Sent By	rkussner			Date	01-10-2011	Time	15:05	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	rkussner			Date	01-10-2011	Time	15:05	Sent To

Notes

2011-01-10 17:24:31	*LANDSCAPE REVIEW FAILED*

	PLEASE RESPOND TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN WRITTEN FORMAT.

	1. PURSUANT TO SECTION 94-443 (C) (3) (A), EACH
	TERMINAL LANDSCAPE ISLAND SHALL CONTAIN AT LEAST ONE
	SHADE OR FLOWERING TREE. TWO TERMINAL TREES ARE MISSING
	(ONE AT WEST END AND ONE AT EAST END) IN THE PARKING
	LTO CLOSEST TO OLIVE AVENUE.

	2. PURSUANT TO SECTION 94-443 (B) (4), AT LEAST ONE
	SHADE OR FLOWERING TREE SHALL BE PLANTED IN A REQUIRED
	BUFFER STRIP FOR EACH 30 LINEAR FEET OR PORTION
	THEREOF. WHEN USING GROUPINGS OF PALMS TO MEET THIS
	REQUIREMENT SUCH AS THOSE PALMS PROPOSED ADJACENT TO
	TUXEDO LANE, THE SPACING IS MEASURED FROM THE MIDDLE
	PALM IN ONE GROUP TO THE MIDDLE PALM OF THE NEXT GROUP.
	THE SPACING BETWEEN THE PALM GROUPINGS EXCEEDS 30 FEET.

	3. THE LANDSCAPE STRIP ADJACENT TO TUXEDO LANE
	MENTIONED ABOVE DOES NOT APPEAR TO BE WIDE ENOUGH TO
	ALLOW FOR A TWO FOOT VEHICULAR OVERHANG AND THE
	PROPOSED PALMS AND HEDGE. PLEASE PROVIDE ALL
	DIMENSIONS. IN ADDITION, THERE WAS A PREVIOUS
	DISCUSSION CONCERNING THE USE OF TREE GRATES IN THE
	SIDEWALK TO ALLOW MORE SPACE FOR THE ROOT BALLS OF THE
	PROPOSED PALMS. PLEASE PROVIDE A DETAIL FOR THE GRATES.

	4. PURSUANT TO SECTION 94-442 (D), PRIVATE LAND AND
	PUBLIC RIGHTS-OF-WAY BETWEEN STREET OR SIDEWALK
	SURFACES AND REQUIRED BUFFER STRIPS AND LANDSCAPED OPEN
	SPACE AREAS SHALL BE PLANTED WITH GRASS. PLEASE SHOW
	SOD IN THE RIGHT-OF-WAY, ADJACENT TO FLAGLER DRIVE.

	5. PURSUANT TO SECTION 94-443 (B) (4), AT LEAST ONE
	SHADE OR FLOWERING TREE SHALL BE PLANTED IN A REQUIRED
	BUFFER STRIP FOR EACH 30 LINEAR FEET OR PORTION
	THEREOF. THE SPACING OF TREES ALONG FLAGLER DRIVE DOES
	NOT MEET THIS REQUIREMENT THE LANDSCAPING ALONG THE 25
	FOOT LANDSCAPE STRIP IS QUITE WEAK AND SHOULD BE
	UPGRADED. A DETAIL ON THE LANDSCAPE BUFFER DETAIL SHEET
	SHOWS WHAT THIS BIO-SWALE AND LANDSCAPING SHOULD LOOK
	LIKE BUT IS NOT REFLECTED ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN. .

	6. ALL UTILITIES, EASEMENTS, SITE LIGHTING, AND
	ANYTHING ELSE THAT MAY IMPACT THE LANDSCAPING SHALL BE
	SHOWN ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN TO AVOID CONFLICTS IN THE
	FIELD.

	7. PURSUANT TO SECTION 94-448 (D) (2), THE LANDSCAPE
	PLAN SHALL CONTAIN ALL OF THE ELEMENTS ENUMERATED IN
	THIS SECTION, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO
	IDENTIFICATION OF ALL AIR CONDITIONING UNITS,
	GENERATORS AND ALL OTHER MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT. PLEASE
	PROVIDE THE LOCATION OF THESE ITEMS AND THE MANNER IN
	WHICH THEY WILL BE SCREENED.

	8. THE LANDSCAPE PLAN SHALL BE DRAWN TO A LARGER SCALE
	SUCH AS 1"=20'-0" OR 1"=10' - 0" WITH SMALLER AND MORE
	DETAILED AREAS DRAWN TO AN EVEN LARGER SCALE SUCH AS
	1"= 4'-0".

	9. THE SITE DETAIL SHEET AND THE LANDSCAPE BUFFER
	DETAIL SHEET SHALL BE PART OF THE LANDSCAPE PLANS.

	10. PLEASE PROVIDE A COMPLETE LANDSCAPE PLAN THAT SHOWS
	THE FINAL LANDSCAPE AFTER ALL THE PHASES HAVE BEEN
	COMPLETED. THE LANDSCAPE CALCULATIONS AND XERISCAPE
	REQUIREMENTS SHALL REFLECT THE FINAL AND COMPLETE PLAN.
	THIS PLAN SHALL BE IN ADDITION OT THE PHASED PLANS.

	11. PLEASE REVISE THE LANDSCAPE CALCULATIONS. OPEN
	SPACE IS THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE TOTAL LOT AREA AND
	THE SQUARE FOOTAGE OF THE STRUCTURES. THE PLAY AREAS
	ARE NOT EXCLUDED WHEN FIGURING OPEN SPACE.


	IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT ROBERT
	KUSSNER @ (561) 822-1462.

Review Stop	PARK			PARKING
Rev No	2	Status	P	Date	06-13-2011			Cont ID
Sent By	eschneid			Date	06-13-2011	Time	09:54	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	eschneid			Date		Time		Sent To

Notes

2011-06-13 09:54:24

SITE PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS ADDRESSED.

Review Stop	PARK			PARKING
Rev No	1	Status	F	Date	01-08-2011			Cont ID
Sent By	ssamuels			Date	01-08-2011	Time	19:19	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	ssamuels			Date	01-08-2011	Time	19:18	Sent To

Notes

2011-01-08 19:24:22	MISSING COMPACT SPACES NOT SHOWN ON THE PARKING DATA
	TABLE.
	SHOW VISITOR PARKING SIGN AND DIRECTION
	SHOW REGULAR PARKING SPACES ON THE DETAIL DATA TABLE
	MAKE SURE THERE IS BOLLARD POST FOR PARKING SPACES
	BESIDE BUILDING
	SHOW CORRECT DATA FOR BICYCLE RACK ON PLAN

Review Stop	POLICE			POLICE
Rev No	2	Status	F	Date	06-13-2011			Cont ID
Sent By	eschneid			Date	06-13-2011	Time	09:54	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	eschneid			Date		Time		Sent To

Notes

2011-06-13 09:55:40	THE BENCH SHOWN ON THE PLAN IS NOT IN A SECURED AREA.
	IT SHALL BE A DIVIDED STYLE.

Review Stop	POLICE			POLICE
Rev No	1	Status	F	Date		Cont ID
Sent By				Date	Time	Rev Time	0.00
Received By				Date	Time	Sent To

Notes

2011-01-11 14:35:17	* USE DIVIDED BENCHES
	* HOW WILL YOU RESTRICT ACCESS INTO THE BUILDINGS?
	* COMMUNICATION IN THE CLASSROOMS?
	* SECURITY?
	* OTHER BOLLARDS, I DID NOT SEE ADDITIONAL LIGHTING

	A. PRE-WIRING BUILDINGS FOR ALARM SYSTEM, ELECTRONIC
	ACCESS CONTROL, RESTRICTED KEY CONTROL SYSTEM, DOUBLE
	CYLINDER LOCKS ON CLASSROOM DOORS, VANDAL-RESISTANT
	LEVER LOCKS, ETC.
	B. CLASSROOMS SHALL ALL HAVE WINDOWS, ESPECIALLY TO ANY
	OPEN AREAS LIKE THE COURTYARD AND PARKING LOT, THUS
	CREATING CONTROLLED OWNERSHIP OF THESE AREAS.
	C. CLASSROOM ENTRY AND EXIT DOORS SHALL ALL HAVE A
	WINDOW OR PEEPHOLE VIEWER TO IDENTIFY VISITORS AND TO
	DETECT NON-APPROVED USERS.
	D. CLASSROOM DOORS SHALL NOT BE RECESSED, BUT MOUNTED
	FLUSH WITH THE HALLWAYS???TO FORCE STUDENTS TO WALK IN
	THE CENTER OF THE HALLWAY, ALLOW TEACHERS TO BE VISIBLE
	FOR HALLWAY MONITORING, AND HELP ELIMINATE STUDENTS
	FROM LEANING AGAINST OR PLACING FEET ON THE WALLS.
	E. BATHROOMS SHALL ALL BE PLACED NEAR ADMINISTRATIVE
	OFFICES OR IN HIGHLY CONSPICUOUS LOCATIONS FOR CONSTANT
	MONITORING.
	F. BICYCLE RACKS SHALL BE PLACED IN CLOSE PROXIMITY TO
	BUILDING AND NOT IN THE PARKING LOT.
	G. CIRCULAR ROUNDABOUTS, DROP-OFF AREAS, AND BUS LOOPS
	NEED TO BE ONE WAY WITH SIGNAGE AND PAVEMENT STRIPING
	STATING SAME.
	H. SECURE BARRIERS TO PREVENT UNAUTHORIZED ACCESS TO
	SCHOOL GROUNDS, SCHOOL OR RESTRICTED AREAS SHALL BE
	PROVIDED.
	I. CENTRALIZED CROSSWALKS SHALL BE A RAISED WALKWAY,
	WHICH ALLOW PEDESTRIAN TRAFFIC TO BE BETTER SEEN BY
	MOTOR VEHICLE DRIVERS. ALSO SERVES AS A TRAFFIC CALMING
	DEVICE.
	J. LANDSCAPE MEDIANS THAT RUN PARALLEL TO STUDENT
	DROP-OFF/PICK-UP AREAS NEED TO BE PLANTED IN SUCH A WAY
	TO CREATE A SOLID VEGETATIVE HEDGE WALL. DOING SO WILL
	MAKE IT RESTRICTIVE AND IMPRACTICAL FOR PEDESTRIAN
	TRAFFIC TO USE THE LANDSCAPE MEDIAN AS A SHORTCUT
	PATHWAY. TO MAINTAIN DRIVER SIGHT VISIBILITY THE HEDGE
	SHALL ALWAYS BE MAINTAINED AT A MAXIMUM HEIGHT OF 24
	INCHES.
	K. EXTERIOR SERVICE ROLL UP DOORS SHALL BE TARGET
	HARDENED.

Review Stop	STORM			STORMWATER
Rev No	2	Status	P	Date	06-13-2011			Cont ID
Sent By	eschneid			Date	06-13-2011	Time	09:51	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	eschneid			Date		Time		Sent To

Notes

2011-06-13 09:51:36

SITE PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS ADDRESSED.

Review Stop	STORM			STORMWATER
Rev No	1	Status	F	Date	01-12-2011			Cont ID
Sent By	vnoel			Date	01-12-2011	Time	06:35	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	vnoel			Date		Time		Sent To

Notes

2011-01-12 06:37:05	1. PREVIOUS COMMENTS FROM PD APPLICATION STILL APPLY
	FOR PRE AND POST DISCHARGE WATER QUALITY CALCULATIONS.

Review Stop	SURVEY			SURVEYING
Rev No	2	Status	P	Date	06-13-2011			Cont ID
Sent By	eschneid			Date	06-13-2011	Time	09:50	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	eschneid			Date	06-13-2011	Time	09:50	Sent To

Notes

2011-06-13 09:50:50

SITE PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS ADDRESSED.

Review Stop	SURVEY			SURVEYING
Rev No	1	Status	F	Date	01-11-2011			Cont ID
Sent By	vnoel			Date	01-11-2011	Time	09:02	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	vnoel			Date	01-11-2011	Time	09:01	Sent To

Notes

2011-01-11 09:03:45	1. PLEASE PREPARE TIMELINE SHOWING PLATTING,
	CONSTRUCTION, ETC.
	2. ALL PREVIOUS CONDITIONS CONCERNING EASEMENTS AND
	ABANDONMENTS STILL APPLY.

Review Stop	Z			ZONING
Rev No	2	Status	F	Date	06-13-2011			Cont ID
Sent By	eschneid			Date	06-13-2011	Time	09:46	Rev Time	0.00
Received By	eschneid			Date	06-13-2011	Time	09:46	Sent To

Notes

2011-06-13 09:47:17	CASE NO. PB1600C 1ST RESUBMITTAL COMMENTS
	PALM BEACH DAY ACADEMY
	FORMAL SITE PLAN REVIEW FOR NEW BUILDINGS
	1901 SOUTH FLAGLER DRIVE
	JUNE 7, 2011

	- CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446

	- PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN
	WRITTEN FORMAT.

	- WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF SIX
	(6) PAPER COPIES AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY IN .PNG FORMAT
	OF ALL PLANS. PLEASE NOTE THAT CHANGES ON THE
	RESUBMITTED PLANS MAY RESULT IN ADDITIONAL COMMENTS.

	- PLEASE NOTE THAT IF THE PLANNING AND ZONING
	DEPARTMENT HAS NOT RECEIVED A RESPONSE TO THE PPRC
	COMMENTS WITHIN 60 DAYS FROM THE DATE OF THESE COMMENTS
	(AUGUST 7, 2011), THE CASE SHALL BE CONSIDERED
	WITHDRAWN. ANY FURTHER ACTION SHALL REQUIRE A NEW
	DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION.

	- PLEASE NOTE THAT ADDITIONAL RESUBMITTALS WILL BE
	ACCESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE WILL BE 20% OF THE
	ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE ($300).

	1) REPEAT COMMENT - THE CITY COMMISSION APPROVED
	BUILDING HEIGHT IS 36 FEET. THE DATA TABLE LISTS THE
	BUILDING HEIGHT FOR THE NEW STRUCTURES AS 42 FEET.

	THE BUILDING HEIGHT IS CORRECTLY STATED ON THE VERSION
	OF THE MASTER PLAN THAT WILL BE GOING BEFORE THE CITY
	COMMISSION ON JUNE 26. THE CORRECT HEIGHT SHALL BE
	STATED ON THE PLANS RESUBMITTED AS PART OF THE FORMAL
	SITE PLAN.

	A. REPEAT COMMENT - THE CITY MEASURES THE HEIGHT OF
	STRUCTURES FROM THE FINISHED GRADE NOT THE FINISHED
	FLOOR. PLEASE PROVIDE THE HEIGHT DIMENSIONS BASED ON
	THIS STANDARD.

	THE DIMENSIONS COMPLYING WITH THIS STANDARD WERE NOT
	INCLUDED ON THE RESUBMITTED ELEVATIONS. STAFF WILL
	REQUIRE THIS DIMENSION AT TIME OF BUILDING PERMIT, SO
	IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT THE DIMENSION BE SHOWN WITH THE
	RESUBMITTAL.

	B. REPEAT COMMENT - PROVIDE THE HEIGHT DIMENSIONS FOR
	ALL ELEMENTS OF THE BUILDINGS (EX. TOPS OF PARAPETS AND
	OTHER ARCHITECTURAL ELEMENTS).

	THE DIMENSION TO THE TOP OF THE TOP OF THE TENSILE
	FABRIC CANOPY AND ITS SUPPORTS WAS NOT PROVIDED. PLEASE
	NOTE THAT THE DIMENSIONS GIVEN FOR THE OTHER ELEMENTS
	WERE FROM FINISHED FLOOR NOT FINISHED GRADE.

	C. COMMENT MODIFIED - PLEASE NOTE THAT THE
	ARCHITECTURAL ELEMENTS AND MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT MAY NOT
	EXCEED 50 FEET.

	THE ARCHITECTURAL ELEMENT HEIGHT IS STATED ON THE
	VERSION OF THE MASTER PLAN THAT WILL BE GOING BEFORE
	THE CITY COMMISSION ON JUNE 26. THE CORRECT HEIGHT
	SHALL BE STATED ON THE PLANS RESUBMITTED AS PART OF THE
	FORMAL SITE PLAN.

	2) REPEAT COMMENT - THE NORTH ELEVATION OF THE
	EDUCATION BUILDING SHOWS A STRUCTURAL OVERHANG AT THE
	2ND FLOOR. STRUCTURAL INTRUSIONS MAY PROJECT NO FURTHER
	THAN THREE (3) FEET INTO ANY REQUIRED SETBACK. PLEASE
	PROVIDE DIMENSIONS FOR THE OVERHANG ON BOTH THE
	ELEVATION DRAWINGS AND THE SITE PLAN TO VERIFY THAT THE
	OVERHANG IS NO CLOSER THAN 12 FEET FROM THE NORTH
	PROPERTY LINE.

	DIMENSIONS NOT INCLUDED.

	3) REPEAT COMMENT - PROVIDE DETAILS FOR THE PROPOSED
	WALL ALONG FLAGLER DRIVE AND SOUTH OLIVE AVENUE,
	ESPECIALLY HEIGHT AND MATERIAL.

	THE HEIGHT (4 FEET) AND MATERIAL (CONCRETE) WERE STATED
	ON THE PLANS FOR THE FLAGLER DRIVE WALL, BUT NO
	ELEVATION DETAIL WAS PROVIDED (AS STATED ON THE PLANS).
	A NOTE SHALL BE ADDED FOR THE S. OLIVE WALL STATING,
	"WALL SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH HISTORIC
	PRESERVATION DIVISION APPROVED DESIGN".

	4) REPEAT COMMENT - THE PLANS, ELEVATIONS AND COLOR
	RENDERING ALL SHOW SIGNAGE. PROVIDE SIGNAGE DETAILS SO
	STAFF MAY REVIEW FOR CODE COMPLIANCE. THIS WILL ENSURE
	THAT THE SIGN PERMITTING PROCESS GOES SMOOTHLY.

	NO SIGNAGE DETAILS PROVIDED.

	5) CLARIFICATION REQUIRED - PROVIDE THE LOCATIONS OF
	ALL TRANSFORMERS, GENERATORS, BACKFLOW PREVENTERS, AC
	UNITS, AND OTHER MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT AND HOW IT WILL
	BE SCREENED BY LANDSCAPE OR ARCHITECTURAL FEATURES.

	THE MASTER PLAN INCLUDES SCREENING FOR TRANSFORMERS. IS
	THIS THE METHOD THAT ALL MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT WILL USE
	TO SCREEN? NOTE: GENERATORS REQUIRE AN ENCLOSURE AS
	WELL AS LANDSCAPE. THE LANDSCAPE PLAN DOES NOT APPEAR
	TO HAVE A TRANSFORMER SHOWN, AND THE BACKFLOW PREVENTER
	AND ONE OF THE FIRE HYDRANTS ARE LOCATED WITHIN
	PLANTING BEDS. THE PLANTING BEDS NEED TO BE ADJUSTED
	AND ALL EFFORT SHOULD BE MADE TO DETERMINE THE LOCATION
	OF ANY TRANSFORMERS NOW, PRIOR TO THE PLAN BEING
	FINALIZED.

	6) CLARIFICATION REQUIRED - PROVIDE THE LOCATION AND
	DETAILS OF ALL LIGHTING ON THE CAMPUS.

	THE SPECIFIC HEIGHT OF THE PEDESTRIAN LIGHTS IS NOT
	LISTED, BUT RATHER A RANGE FROM 24 TO 42 INCHES IS
	GIVEN. WHICH HEIGHT IS PROPOSED? THE HISTORIC
	PRESERVATION DIVISION SHALL APPROVE THE LIGHTS WITHIN
	THE MANGO PROMENADE HISTORIC DISTRICT. THE PARKING LOT
	LIGHTS WITHIN THE DISTRICT SHALL BE RESIDENTIAL IN
	NATURE AND CONFORM TO THE CHARACTER OF THE DISTRICT.
	PLEASE CONTACT FRIEDERIKE MITTNER, CITY HISTORIC
	PRESERVATION PLANNER.

	7) CLARIFICATION REQUIRED - A PHOTOMETRIC PLAN IS
	REQUIRED. PLEASE NOTE THAT THE PLAN SHALL SHOW THAT
	LIGHT LEVELS DO NOT EXCEED 0.5 FOOT CANDLES AT THE
	NEIGHBORING RESIDENTIALLY ZONED PROPERTIES [SECTION
	94-310(D)].

	PLEASE PROVIDE INFORMATION ON THE PROPOSED HOURS OF
	OPERATION FOR THE PARKING LOT LIGHTING. PLEASE REMEMBER
	THAT THE PARKING LOT IS ADJACENT TO RESIDENTIAL HOMES.

	8) REPEAT COMMENT - THE SITE AND CIVIL PLANS SHALL
	INCLUDE THE DIMENSIONS OF THE BICYCLE RACK (IT DOES NOT
	SCALE AS DEEP ENOUGH ON THE CIVIL PLAN).

	THE BICYCLE RACK IS SHOWN AS 14 FEET X 6 FEET ON THE
	DETAIL SHEET, YET IT IS SHOWN SMALLER IN BOTH LENGTH
	AND WIDTH ON THE SITE, LANDSCAPE AND CIVIL PLANS. THE
	BICYCLE RACK SHALL BE SHOWN AT ITS CORRECT SIZE ON THE
	PLANS TO PREVENT ANY CONFLICTS.

	9) REPEAT COMMENT - THE "PROJECT TEAM" TABLES ON ALL
	PLANS SHALL BE UPDATED TO REFLECT CORRECT INFORMATION
	(UNITY IS NO LONGER THE OWNER).

	LANDSCAPE PLAN NOT UPDATED.

	10) PARTIAL REPEAT - THE SETBACK PORTION OF THE SITE
	DATA TABLE NEEDS TO SEPARATELY STATE THE SETBACKS FOR
	THE RELOCATED BUILDING. THIS SHALL INCLUDE THE WAIVERS
	APPROVED AS PART OF ORD. NO. 4303-10.

	THE REQUIRED SETBACKS FOR THE RELOCATED BUILDING ARE
	NOT CORRECTLY LISTED - GRANTED WAIVERS BY THE
	ORDINANCE.

	11) MODIFIED COMMENT - THE LANDSCAPE DATA SHALL
	DIFFERENTIATE BETWEEN THE PHASE I AND PHASE II
	LANDSCAPE INSTALLATIONS. PHASE II SHALL ONLY INCLUDE
	THE FOUNDATION PLANTING FOR THE ATHLETIC BUILDING.

	THE PHASING SHALL BE REVISED TO INCLUDE THE PARKING LOT
	RELOCATION AS PHASE I WITH THE EDUCATION AND ATHLETIC
	BUILDINGS AS PHASE II AND PHASE III, RESPECTIVELY.

	12) REPEAT COMMENT - THE SIZE AND SPECIES OF ALL
	EXISTING AND RELOCATED TREES AND SHRUBS SHALL BE
	PROVIDED ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN. THE LANDSCAPE PLAN
	APPROVED WITH THIS APPLICATION WILL SERVE AS THE
	LANDSCAPE PLAN OF RECORD, SO ALL DETAILS ARE NEEDED.

	THE LANDSCAPE PLANS SHOW A NEW TREE IN THE SOUTHERN ROW
	OF EMPLOYEE PARKING. THE WAIVER TO ALLOW UP TO 14
	PARKING SPACES IN A ROW WAS SPECIFICALLY GRANTED TO
	PRESERVE THE EXISTING MATURE LIVE OAK TREE. THIS TREE
	MAY NOT BE REMOVED. IF IT IS CURRENTLY LOCATED NOT AS
	THE ISLAND IS SHOWN, THEN PLEASE DISCUSS WITH STAFF
	SOME SOLUTIONS THAT MAY BE APPROPRIATE, SUCH AS A
	RECONFIGURATION OF THE LOT TO FLIP THE LOCATION OF THE
	DEDICATED TURN AROUND SPACE TO NORTH PARKING ROW.

	13) REPEAT COMMENT - PROVIDE THE LANDSCAPE BUFFER
	DETAILS SHEET WITH THE LANDSCAPE PLAN NOT THE MASTER
	PLAN. ADDITIONALLY, THE LANDSCAPE BUFFER DETAIL SHEET
	CROSS SECTIONS DO NOT MATCH THE LOCATIONS DESIGNATED ON
	THE MASTER PLAN. SOME OF THEM DO NOT REFLECT THE
	LANDSCAPE PROPOSED ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN.

	BUFFER DETAILS NOT CONSISTENT WITH PLAN.

	14) REPEAT COMMENT - THE 25 FOOT LANDSCAPE AREA ALONG
	FLAGLER DRIVE HAS CHANGED FROM THE CONCEPTUAL LANDSCAPE
	PLAN APPROVED AS PART OF ORD. NO. 4303-10. THIS AREA IS
	TO HAVE UPLAND MEANDERING LANDSCAPE OR BE A BIOSWALE
	WITH APPROPRIATE MEANDERING LANDSCAPE. IT IS SHOWN ON
	THE SUBMITTED PLANS AS AN OPEN SODDED AREA, WHICH
	COMBINED WITH THE CIVIL PLAN'S PROPOSED DRAINAGE
	INDICATES THAT IT WILL BE A 25 FOOT WIDE UNLANDSCAPED
	SWALE. THIS IS NOT APPROPRIATE FOR A FLAGLER DRIVE
	LANDSCAPE BUFFER, NOR DOES IT MEET THE LANDSCAPE CODE
	BUFFER REQUIREMENTS. THE FOUNDATION PLANTING FOR THE
	ATHLETIC BUILDING MAY NOT DOUBLE AS THE REQUIRED
	LANDSCAPE BUFFER.

	RESPONSE PROVIDED WAS "NEED AN ANSWER". STAFF REQUIRES
	A BIT MORE NARRATIVE FOR THIS COMMENT TO BE ADDRESSED
	OR PREFERABLY, THE PLANS TO BE REVISED.

	15) REPEAT COMMENT - PER ORD. NO. 4303-10, ALL NEW
	TREES SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 14 FEET IN HEIGHT AT
	INSTALLATION. NOT ALL OF THE TREES SPECIFIED ON THE
	LANDSCAPE PLAN MEET THIS REQUIREMENT.

	THE 14 FOOT MINIMUM HEIGHT REQUIREMENT FOR ALL NEW
	TREES WAS TO OFFSET ALL OF THE REQUESTED LANDSCAPE
	WAIVERS, INCLUDING THE LANDSCAPE BUFFER INTERRUPTION
	ALONG COCOANUT AND TUXEDO LANES AND THE REDUCED BUFFER
	ADJACENT TO THE EMPLOYEE PARKING.

	16) MODIFIED COMMENT - PER ORD. NO. 4303-10, THE
	OVERNIGHT BUS PARKING SPACES SHALL BE SCREENED FROM THE
	RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOOD. THE LANDSCAPE MATERIAL
	PROPOSED ALONG COCOANUT LANE, WEST OF THE BUS PARKING,
	DOES NOT PROVIDE ADEQUATE SCREENING OF THE BUSSES. THE
	MATERIAL SHALL BE OF A SUFFICIENT HEIGHT TO SCREEN THE
	BUSSES AT INSTALLATION. STAFF RECOMMENDS THE
	INSTALLATION OF A SIX (6) FOOT PODOCARPUS HEDGE. THE
	HEDGE SHOULD BE LOCATED AS CLOSE TO THE PROPOSED FENCE
	AS POSSIBLE. THE TREES SHALL BE LOCATED BETWEEN THE
	HEDGE AND THE PEDESTRIAN WALKWAY.

	AT THE MEETING ON JANUARY 26, 2011, THE PBDA AGREED TO
	INSTALL A SIX (6) FOOT TALL PODOCARPUS HEDGE ALONG
	COCOANUT TO SCREEN THE BUSES IN ORDER TO COMPLY WITH
	THE ORDINANCE.

	17) REPEAT COMMENT - PLEASE REMEMBER THAT PER ORD. NO.
	4303-10, THE FOLLOWING ARE REQUIRED PRIOR TO THE FIRST
	BUILDING PERMIT:

	THE FIRST BUILDING PERMITS HAVE BEEN SUBMITTED AND THE
	LISTED ITEMS HAVE NOT BEEN PROVIDED. PLEASE NOTE THAT
	A., C. AND D. WILL BE REQUIRED FOR THE NEW PHASE II
	DEVELOPMENT - CONSTRUCTION OF BUILDINGS AND THE
	RELOCATION OF THE ROADWAY.

	A. PROVIDE THE PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT WITH A
	TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN, APPROVED BY THE CITY'S TRAFFIC
	ENGINEER, WHICH INCLUDES THE LOCATIONS OF THE TRAFFIC
	DIRECTING PERSONNEL AND A WRITTEN NARRATIVE HOW THE
	TRAFFIC CONTROL OPERATIONS WILL FUNCTION FOR THE
	PICK-UP AND DROP-OFF TIMES. THE COST TO CONSTRUCT,
	INSTALL AND MAINTAIN ANY OFF-SITE SIGNAGE OR TRAFFIC
	CONTROL AIDES SHALL BE BORNE BY THE PBDA.

	B. PREPARE A CONSTRUCTION SITE SECURITY AND MANAGEMENT
	PLAN FOR APPROVAL BY THE CITY'S POLICE DEPARTMENT CRIME
	PREVENTION THROUGH ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGN (CPTED)
	OFFICIAL.

	C. RECORD A PLAT FOR THE ENTIRE PBDA CAMPUS. PRIOR TO
	RECORDATION, THE PLAT SHALL BE SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW
	THROUGH THE MINOR SUBDIVISION PROCESS TO INCLUDE ALL
	REQUIRED EASEMENTS. THE RELOCATION AND/OR ABANDONMENT
	OF EASEMENTS WILL REQUIRE APPLICATIONS TO BE FILED WITH
	THE ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT.

	D. SUBMIT COMPREHENSIVE EMERGENCY PLANS TO THE FIRE
	DEPARTMENT FOR THEIR APPROVAL.

	18) NEW COMMENT - PLEASE EXPLAIN THE NEW OUTDOOR STAGE
	ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF THE ACADEMICS BUILDING. HOW WILL
	IT BE ACCESSED?

	19) NEW COMMENT - THE REVISED MASTER PLAN SHALL INCLUDE
	THE RELOCATED ADA WALKWAY FROM THE EMPLOYEE PARKING LOT
	AND THE REVISED PARKING TABLE WHICH CORRECTS THE
	PARKING COUNTS AND THE BUS PARKING.

	20) NEW COMMENT - THE CROSS SECTION PROVIDED WITH THE
	SITE WORK PERMIT PAVING AND DRAINAGE PLANS SHOWS THAT
	0.5 FEET OF THE REQUIRED 8.5 FOOT WIDE PARALLEL PARKING
	SPACE IS IN THE TUXEDO LANE RIGHT-OF-WAY. THIS NEEDS TO
	BE ADDRESSED. A POSSIBILITY IS TO SHIFT THE FEATURES TO
	THE SOUTH INTO THE EXCESS 0.7 FEET ADJACENT TO THE
	LANDSCAPE BUFFER. PLEASE ENSURE THAT THE EXISTING
	ORANGE COURT CIRCLES ARE CORRECTLY REFLECTED AND THAT
	LANDSCAPE IS ADJUSTED ACCORDINGLY (THE PLANS APPEAR TO
	SHOW HEDGES IN THE 2 FOOT PARKING OVERHANG).

	21) NEW COMMENT - THE BUS PARKING DETAIL IS IN CORRECT
	AS IT SHOWS A HEDGE IN FRONT OF IT, NOT AS SIDEWALK AS
	SHOWN ON THE PLANS. THE PARALLEL PARKING SPACE DETAIL
	SHOWS THE PARKING SPACE AT 22 FEET LONG. A COMPACT
	PARKING SPACE DETAIL IS REQUIRED.

Review Stop	Z			ZONING
Rev No	1	Status	F	Date	01-07-2011			Cont ID
Sent By	eschneid			Date	01-07-2011	Time	16:25	Rev Time	4.00
Received By	eschneid			Date	01-07-2011	Time	16:25	Sent To

Notes

2011-01-07 16:26:13	CASE NO. PB1600C
	PALM BEACH DAY ACADEMY
	FORMAL SITE PLAN REVIEW FOR NEW BUILDINGS
	1957 SOUTH FLAGLER DRIVE

	- CONTACT ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1446

	- PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN
	WRITTEN FORMAT.

	- WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF SIX
	(6) PAPER COPIES AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY IN .PNG FORMAT
	OF ALL PLANS. PLEASE NOTE THAT CHANGES ON THE
	RESUBMITTED PLANS MAY RESULT IN ADDITIONAL COMMENTS.

	- PLEASE NOTE THAT IF THE PLANNING AND ZONING
	DEPARTMENT HAS NOT RECEIVED A RESPONSE TO THE PPRC
	COMMENTS WITHIN 60 DAYS FROM THE DATE OF PPRC MEETING
	(MARCH 12, 2011), THE CASE SHALL BE CONSIDERED
	WITHDRAWN. ANY FURTHER ACTION SHALL REQUIRE A NEW
	DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION.

	- PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1)
	RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED
	COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE
	APPLICANT WILL BE ACCESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE
	WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE ($300).

	1) PROVIDE SIGNED OWNERS CONSENT.

	2) PROVIDE COPIES OF THE UTILITY LETTERS THAT WERE
	SUBMITTED WITH THE MASTER PLAN APPLICATION, NOT THE
	CLASS B APPLICATION.

	3) PROVIDE PICTURES OF THE EXISTING CLASSROOM BUILDING
	(ONE BUILT IN 2000). THE NEW BUILDINGS THAT ARE PART OF
	THIS APPLICATION SHALL BLEND ARCHITECTURALLY WITH THE
	EXISTING BUILDING.

	4) PROVIDE A NARRATIVE THAT DESCRIBES HOW THE
	ELEVATIONS WILL BE SHOWN TO THE COMMISSION AND THE
	NEIGHBORHOOD AS REQUIRED BY ORD. NO. 4303-10.

	5) THE CITY COMMISSION APPROVED BUILDING HEIGHT IS 36
	FEET. THE DATA TABLE LISTS THE BUILDING HEIGHT FOR THE
	NEW STRUCTURES AS 42 FEET.

	A. THE CITY MEASURES THE HEIGHT OF STRUCTURES FROM THE
	FINISHED GRADE NOT THE FINISHED FLOOR. PLEASE PROVIDE
	THE HEIGHT DIMENSIONS BASED ON THIS STANDARD.

	B. PROVIDE THE HEIGHT DIMENSIONS FOR ALL ELEMENTS OF
	THE BUILDINGS (EX. TOPS OF PARAPETS AND OTHER
	ARCHITECTURAL ELEMENTS).

	C. PLEASE NOTE THAT THE ARCHITECTURAL ELEMENTS AND
	MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT MAY EXCEED THE HEIGHT (36 FEET) BY
	UP TO 10%, WHICH WOULD ALLOW THE MAXIMUM HEIGHT OF
	THESE TO 39.5 FEET.

	6) THE FLAGLER DRIVE ELEVATION OF THE ATHLETIC BUILDING
	DOES NOT RELATE APPROPRIATELY TO FLAGLER DRIVE. THE
	MAJORITY OF THE BUILDINGS ALONG FLAGLER DRIVE FACE
	FLAGLER DRIVE WITH SIGNIFICANT AMOUNTS OF FENESTRATION.
	MORE FENESTRATION (NOT JUST ADDITIONAL GLASS BLOCK) IS
	REQUIRED ALONG FLAGLER DRIVE. THIS COULD BE
	ACCOMPLISHED BY ADDING WINDOWS ON THE UPPER PORTION OF
	THE FACADE TO MIMIC THE EDUCATION BUILDING. ADDITIONAL
	FENESTRATION SHOULD ALSO BE EXPLORED ON THE LOWER
	PORTION OF THE BUILDING.

	7) THE WEST AND SOUTH ELEVATIONS OF THE ATHLETIC
	BUILDING HAVE LARGE AREAS OF BLANK WALL WITH NO
	ARCHITECTURAL RELIEF. DETAILING SHALL BE INSTALLED TO
	BREAK UP THIS MASS.

	8) THE NORTH ELEVATION OF THE EDUCATION BUILDING SHOWS
	A STRUCTURAL OVERHANG AT THE 2ND FLOOR. STRUCTURAL
	INTRUSIONS MAY PROJECT NO FURTHER THAN THREE (3) FEET
	INTO ANY REQUIRED SETBACK. PLEASE PROVIDE DIMENSIONS
	FOR THE OVERHANG ON BOTH THE ELEVATION DRAWINGS AND THE
	SITE PLAN TO VERIFY THAT THE OVERHANG IS NO CLOSER THAN
	12 FEET FROM THE NORTH PROPERTY LINE.

	9) PROVIDE DETAILS OF THE COVERED DROP-OFF. STAFF NEEDS
	TO REVIEW ELEVATION DRAWINGS, INCLUDING HEIGHT AND SIZE
	DIMENSIONS AND MATERIAL. ADDITIONALLY, IT IS DIFFICULT
	TO DETERMINE THE EXACT DIMENSIONS OF THE COVERED AREA
	ON THE SITE, LANDSCAPE AND CIVIL PLANS DUE TO MULTIPLE
	CROSSING LINES.

	10) PROVIDE DETAILS FOR THE PROPOSED WALL ALONG FLAGLER
	DRIVE AND SOUTH OLIVE AVENUE, ESPECIALLY HEIGHT AND
	MATERIAL.

	11) PROVIDE THE PROPOSED HEIGHT OF THE ALUMINUM GATES.
	ONLY THE ALUMINUM FENCING IS CALLED OUT AT FOUR (4)
	FEET IN HEIGHT.

	12) THE PLANS, ELEVATIONS AND COLOR RENDERING ALL SHOW
	SIGNAGE. PROVIDE SIGNAGE DETAILS SO STAFF MAY REVIEW
	FOR CODE COMPLIANCE. THIS WILL ENSURE THAT THE SIGN
	PERMITTING PROCESS GOES SMOOTHLY.

	13) PROVIDE THE LOCATIONS OF ALL TRANSFORMERS,
	GENERATORS, BACKFLOW PREVENTERS, AC UNITS, AND OTHER
	MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT AND HOW IT WILL BE SCREENED BY
	LANDSCAPE OR ARCHITECTURAL FEATURES.

	14) PROVIDE THE LOCATION AND DETAILS OF ALL LIGHTING ON
	THE CAMPUS TO ENSURE THAT THERE ARE NO CONFLICTS WITH
	PROPOSED OR EXISTING LANDSCAPE. THE LOCATIONS OF THE
	PEDESTRIAN LIGHTS NEED TO BE INCLUDED ON THE LANDSCAPE
	PLAN. PLEASE PROVIDE THE HEIGHT OF THE PEDESTRIAN
	LIGHTS.

	15) A PHOTOMETRIC PLAN IS REQUIRED. PLEASE NOTE THAT
	THE PLAN SHALL SHOW THAT LIGHT LEVELS DO NOT EXCEED 0.5
	FOOT CANDLES AT THE NEIGHBORING RESIDENTIALLY ZONED
	PROPERTIES [SECTION 94-310(D)].

	16) THE BICYCLE RACK DETAILS (SITE DETAILS SHEET) SHALL
	ACCURATELY BE SHOWN AS IT IS PLANNED TO BE INSTALLED -
	SIX (6) SPACES AND CORRECT DIMENSIONS FOR SIX (6)
	SPACES. ADDITIONALLY, THE SITE AND CIVIL PLANS SHALL
	INCLUDE THE DIMENSIONS OF THE BICYCLE RACK (IT DOES NOT
	SCALE AS DEEP ENOUGH ON THE CIVIL PLAN) AND THE "FINAL
	LOCATION TO BE DETERMINED" LABEL SHALL BE REMOVED FROM
	THE LANDSCAPE PLAN.

	17) THE "PROJECT TEAM" TABLES ON ALL PLANS SHALL BE
	UPDATED TO REFLECT CORRECT INFORMATION (EX. UNITY IS NO
	LONGER THE OWNER).

	18) THE SETBACK PORTION OF THE SITE DATA TABLE NEEDS TO
	SEPARATELY STATE THE SETBACKS FOR THE PHASE I CLASSROOM
	BUILDINGS (NEW AND EXISTING), THE PHASE II BUILDING,
	THE PITT BUILDING AND THE RELOCATED BUILDING. THIS
	SHALL INCLUDE THE WAIVERS APPROVED AS PART OF ORD. NO.
	4303-10.

	19) THE SITE DATA TABLES ON THE SITE AND LANDSCAPE
	PLANS DO NOT LIST THE SAME DATA VALUES. ALL TABLES NEED
	TO AGREE. NEED TO DISCUSS A MORE EFFECTIVE ORGANIZATION
	OF THE INFORMATION WITH STAFF.

	20) PROVIDE DIMENSION LINES FROM THE INSIDE CURB TO
	INSIDE CURB FOR ALL PARKING ROWS ON BOTH THE SITE AND
	CIVIL PLANS. THIS DIMENSION SHALL MATCH THE DIMENSION
	OF THE SUM OF THE PARKING SPACE WIDTHS (THIS DOES NOT
	APPEAR TO BE THE CASE WHEN THE PARKING AREA WITH THE
	BUS SPACES WAS SCALED ON THE CIVIL PLAN).

	21) THE STAFF DOES NOT SUPPORT THE SHIFTING OF THE
	WESTERN PARKING LOT TO AGAINST THE BUILDING. WHILE IT
	IS COMMENDABLE TO PROVIDE LARGER LANDSCAPE ISLANDS FOR
	LARGER TREES, STAFF FEELS THAT IT IS MORE IMPORTANT TO
	PROVIDE A GREATER BUFFER BETWEEN SOUTH OLIVE AVENUE AND
	THE WESTERN EDGE OF THE PARKING LOT. ADDITIONALLY, THAT
	IS THE CONFIGURATION APPROVED BY THE HISTORIC
	PRESERVATION BOARD. THE PROPOSED CONFIGURATION ALSO
	ELIMINATES THE REQUIRED TERMINAL ISLAND TREE FOR THE
	NORTH ROW OF PARKING.

	22) THE COMPACT SPACES NEED TO BE ADDED TO THE PARKING
	DATA TABLE.

	23) IF ALL SEVEN (7) VISITOR PARKING SPACES ARE
	OCCUPIED, WHERE WILL AN ADDITIONAL VISITOR PARK? HOW
	WILL THE VISITOR BE DIRECTED TO THAT PARKING SPACE?

	24) SHOW ALL OF THE PROPOSED UTILITIES AND LIGHTING ON
	THE LANDSCAPE PLAN. THERE SHALL BE NO CONFLICTS WITH
	EXISTING OR PROPOSED LANDSCAPE.

	25) THE LANDSCAPE PLAN APPROVED AS PART OF THE FORMAL
	SITE PLAN WILL BE THE FINAL LANDSCAPE PLAN, SO PLEASE
	REMOVE "CONCEPTUAL" FROM THE TITLE.

	26) THE LANDSCAPE DATA SHALL DIFFERENTIATE BETWEEN THE
	PHASE I AND PHASE II LANDSCAPE INSTALLATIONS. PHASE II
	SHALL ONLY INCLUDE THE FOUNDATION PLANTING FOR THE
	ATHLETIC BUILDING.

	27) THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE PLAY AREA PARKING LOT
	SHALL BE MODIFIED TO PROVIDE ADDITIONAL AREA TO PROTECT
	THE EXISTING TREES ROOT SYSTEM.

	28) THE SIZE AND SPECIES OF ALL EXISTING AND RELOCATED
	TREES AND SHRUBS SHALL BE PROVIDED ON THE LANDSCAPE
	PLAN. THE LANDSCAPE PLAN APPROVED WITH THIS APPLICATION
	WILL SERVE AS THE LANDSCAPE PLAN OF RECORD, SO ALL
	DETAILS ARE NEEDED.

	29) THE SITE PLAN SHOWS A FIVE (5) FOOT LANDSCAPE
	BUFFER ALONG THE SOUTH AND WEST SIDES OF THE PITT
	BUILDING, YET THERE IS NO LANDSCAPE SHOWN IN THESE
	AREAS ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN. THE CIVIL PLAN DOES NOT
	SHOW AN AREA TO ACCOMMODATE LANDSCAPE.

	30) PROVIDE THE LANDSCAPE BUFFER DETAILS SHEET WITH THE
	LANDSCAPE PLAN NOT THE MASTER PLAN. ADDITIONALLY, THE
	LANDSCAPE BUFFER DETAIL SHEET CROSS SECTIONS DO NOT
	MATCH THE LOCATIONS DESIGNATED ON THE MASTER PLAN. SOME
	OF THEM DO NOT REFLECT THE LANDSCAPE PROPOSED ON THE
	LANDSCAPE PLAN.

	31) THE 25 FOOT LANDSCAPE AREA ALONG FLAGLER DRIVE HAS
	CHANGED FROM THE CONCEPTUAL LANDSCAPE PLAN APPROVED AS
	PART OF ORD. NO. 4303-10. THIS AREA IS TO HAVE UPLAND
	MEANDERING LANDSCAPE OR BE A BIOSWALE WITH APPROPRIATE
	MEANDERING LANDSCAPE. IT IS SHOWN ON THE SUBMITTED
	PLANS AS AN OPEN SODDED AREA, WHICH COMBINED WITH THE
	CIVIL PLAN'S PROPOSED DRAINAGE INDICATES THAT IT WILL
	BE A 25 FOOT WIDE UNLANDSCAPED SWALE. THIS IS NOT
	APPROPRIATE FOR A FLAGLER DRIVE LANDSCAPE BUFFER, NOR
	DOES IT MEET THE LANDSCAPE CODE BUFFER REQUIREMENTS.
	THE FOUNDATION PLANTING FOR THE ATHLETIC BUILDING MAY
	NOT DOUBLE AS THE REQUIRED LANDSCAPE BUFFER.

	32) PER ORD. NO. 4303-10, ALL NEW TREES SHALL BE A
	MINIMUM OF 14 FEET IN HEIGHT AT INSTALLATION. NOT ALL
	OF THE TREES SPECIFIED ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN MEET THIS
	REQUIREMENT.

	33) PER ORD. NO. 4303-10, THE RELOCATED PUBLIC
	PEDESTRIAN ACCESS EASEMENT SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED OF A
	DECORATIVE MATERIAL TO MIRROR ORANGE COURT. THE CIVIL
	PLAN SHOWS A CONCRETE SIDEWALK. THIS DOES NOT MEET THE
	CONDITION OF THE ORDINANCE. PROVIDE DETAILS TO SHOW
	THAT THE RELOCATED PEDESTRIAN ACCESS EASEMENT COMPLIES
	WITH THE ORDINANCE.

	34) WILL THE NEW EDUCATION BUILDING SHARE THE ELEVATOR
	WITH THE EXISTING CLASSROOM BUILDING?

	35) PER ORD. NO. 4303-10, THE OVERNIGHT BUS PARKING
	SPACES SHALL BE SCREENED FROM THE RESIDENTIAL
	NEIGHBORHOOD. THE LANDSCAPE MATERIAL PROPOSED ALONG
	COCOANUT LANE, WEST OF THE BUS PARKING, DOES NOT
	PROVIDE ADEQUATE SCREENING OF THE BUSSES. THE MATERIAL
	SHALL BE OF A SUFFICIENT HEIGHT TO SCREEN THE BUSSES AT
	INSTALLATION. STAFF RECOMMENDS THE INSTALLATION OF AN
	EIGHT (8) TO TEN (10) FOOT PODOCARPUS HEDGE. THE HEDGE
	SHOULD BE LOCATED AS CLOSE TO THE PROPOSED FENCE AS
	POSSIBLE. THE TREES SHALL BE LOCATED BETWEEN THE HEDGE
	AND THE PEDESTRIAN WALKWAY.

	36) PLEASE REMEMBER THAT PER ORD. NO. 4303-10, THE
	FOLLOWING ARE REQUIRED PRIOR TO THE FIRST BUILDING
	PERMIT:

	A. PROVIDE THE PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT WITH A
	TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN, APPROVED BY THE CITY'S TRAFFIC
	ENGINEER, WHICH INCLUDES THE LOCATIONS OF THE TRAFFIC
	DIRECTING PERSONNEL AND A WRITTEN NARRATIVE HOW THE
	TRAFFIC CONTROL OPERATIONS WILL FUNCTION FOR THE
	PICK-UP AND DROP-OFF TIMES. THE COST TO CONSTRUCT,
	INSTALL AND MAINTAIN ANY OFF-SITE SIGNAGE OR TRAFFIC
	CONTROL AIDES SHALL BE BORNE BY THE PBDA.

	B. PREPARE A CONSTRUCTION SITE SECURITY AND MANAGEMENT
	PLAN FOR APPROVAL BY THE CITY'S POLICE DEPARTMENT CRIME
	PREVENTION THROUGH ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGN (CPTED)
	OFFICIAL.

	C. RECORD A PLAT FOR THE ENTIRE PBDA CAMPUS. PRIOR TO
	RECORDATION, THE PLAT SHALL BE SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW
	THROUGH THE MINOR SUBDIVISION PROCESS TO INCLUDE ALL
	REQUIRED EASEMENTS. THE RELOCATION AND/OR ABANDONMENT
	OF EASEMENTS WILL REQUIRE APPLICATIONS TO BE FILED WITH
	THE ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT.

	D. SUBMIT COMPREHENSIVE EMERGENCY PLANS TO THE FIRE
	DEPARTMENT FOR THEIR APPROVAL.

	E. SUBMIT TO THE ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT SIGNED
	AND SEALED ENGINEERING CALCULATIONS TO DEMONSTRATE THAT
	WATER QUALITY IS BEING MAINTAINED FOR THE SITE AND THAT
	POST DEVELOPMENT OFF-SITE DISCHARGE DOES NOT EXCEED THE
	PREDEVELOPMENT OFF-SITE DISCHARGE.