| Plan Review Stops For Project Z10050019 |
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
07-21-2010 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
lmartine |
Date |
07-15-2010 |
Time |
14:51 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
lfranco |
Date |
07-15-2010 |
Time |
14:54 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2010-07-15 14:55:17 | NOTE #2 FROM PREVIOUS REVIEW WAS NOT ADDRESS, THE SITE | | | PLAN PROVIDED STILL SHOWS EXPOSURE B. | | | | | | LUIS MARTINEZ |
|
|
| Review Stop |
B |
BUILDING (STRUCTURAL) |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
06-09-2010 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
lmartine |
Date |
06-09-2010 |
Time |
10:50 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
lmartine |
Date |
06-09-2010 |
Time |
10:50 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2010-06-09 11:09:05 | BUILDING REVIEW COMMENTS | | | | | | | | | | | | 1) | | | SITE PLAN NORTH ELEVATION, EXTEND CONCRETE WALK TO PICK | | | UP ACCESS AISLE FOR H/C PARKING SPACES. | | | | | | 2) | | | COVER SHEET , THE WIND EXPOSURE CLASSIFICATION SHOULD | | | BE 'C' VRS. 'B'. EXPLAIN TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION 1A OR | | | TYPE V ? | | | | | | 3) | | | PLEASE SEE 2007 FBC SECTION 434, ADDITIONAL | | | REQUIREMENTS FOR ALF'S. | | | | | | 4) | | | COUNTY IMPACT FEES WILL BE REQUIRED. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | LUIS MARTINEZ | | | 561-805-6710 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
ENG-P |
ENGINEERING PLANNING REVIEW |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
N |
Date |
06-08-2010 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
efabian |
Date |
06-08-2010 |
Time |
08:48 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
efabian |
Date |
06-08-2010 |
Time |
08:48 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2010-06-08 08:53:26 | PHASE 1 PROPOSED 3,019 SQ. FT. EXPANSION WILL HAVE NO | | | SIGNIFICANT IMPACT ON EXISTING WATER DEMANDS. | | | | | | EMERY P. FABIAN | | | ENGINEERING PROJECT COORDINATOR | | | ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT | | | 401 CLEMATIS STREET, 4TH FLOOR | | | WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33401 | | | PHONE: 561-822-1200 | | | FAX: 561-494-1116 | | | MOBILE: 561-662-2269 | | | EMAIL: [email protected] | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
07-26-2010 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
mcarsill |
Date |
07-26-2010 |
Time |
07:36 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
mcarsill |
Date |
07-26-2010 |
Time |
07:34 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2010-07-26 07:36:00 | PLAN REVIEW COMMENTS PROVIDED LAND DESIGN SOUTH APPEAR | | | SATISFACTORY. | | | | | | | | | MIKE CARSILLO, BATTALION CHIEF | | | BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
FIRE |
FIRE DEPARTMENT |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
05-28-2010 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
mcarsill |
Date |
05-28-2010 |
Time |
11:29 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
lfranco |
Date |
05-28-2010 |
Time |
11:29 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2010-05-28 11:29:32 | PLANNING BOARD CASE # 1601 | | | 1101-54TH STREET | | | Z10050019 | | | | | | | | | 1. WRONG FIRE DEPARTMENT LISTED ON COVER PAGE. WEST | | | PALM BEACH FIRE RESCUE STATION # 3 IS LOCATED AT 5050 | | | BROADWAY NOT PALM BEACH COUNTY FIRE RESCUE. | | | | | | 2. TACTILE SIGNAGE REQUIRED AT EXIT DOOR LOCATIONS. | | | | | | 3. DEMOLITION, RENOVATION, AND CONSTRUCTION TO COMPLY | | | WITH NFPA 241. | | | | | | 4. THE EXISTING FIRE ALARM SYSTEM, FIRE SPRINKLER | | | SYSTEM, FIRE PUMP, HOOD EXTINGUISHING SYSTEM, EMERGENCY | | | LIGHTING, EXIT DOORS, AND SIMILAR ITEMS SHALL BE | | | INSPECTED BY LICENSED CERTIFIED CONTRACTORS TO ENSURE | | | PROPER OPERATION. | | | | | | 5. PLEASE INDICATE PRESCRIPTIVE STRENGTH REQUIREMENTS | | | FOR HANDRAILS AND GUARDRAILS. | | | | | | 6. SEPARATE PLANS AND PERMITS REQUIRED FOR ANY | | | MODIFICATIONS TO ANY SAFETY SYSTEMS. | | | | | | 7. WRONG LIFE SAFETY CODE LISTED ON PAGE A-1 PROPOSED. | | | SHOULD READ 2006 EDITION NOT 2003 EDITION. | | | | | | 8. SEPARATE PLANS AND PERMITS REQUIRED FOR PHASE II | | | CONSTRUCTION. | | | | | | 9. PLEASE PROVIDE FIRESTOPPING DETAILS ON PLANS. | | | | | | 10. PLEASE PROVIDE DOOR SCHEDULE. | | | | | | 11. PLEASE PROVIDE DETAILS ON LIQUID PETROLEUM BOXES | | | DISPLAYED ON BOUNDARY SURVEY. | | | | | | 12. THE PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANT SHALL BE INSTALLED, | | | INSPECTED, TESTED, AND APPROVED PRIOR TO OCCUPANCY. | | | | | | 13. FIRE LANES NOT DISPLAYED ON PAGE SP.1. PLEASE | | | ILLUSTRATE FIRE LANE LOCATIONS. | | | | | | 14. A KNOX BOX WILL BE REQUIRED. PLEASE SEE | | | WWW.KNOXBOX.COM. | | | | | | 15. PLEASE ILLUSTRATE ALL EXISTING FIRE WALLS AND SMOKE | | | BARRIERS. | | | | | | 16. PLEASE ILLUSTRATE ALL PORTABLE FIRE EXTINGUISHER | | | LOCATIONS. | | | | | | | | | DENIED | | | | | | | | | MIKE CARSILLO, BATTALION CHIEF | | | BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION | | | (561) 804-4724 PHONE | | | (561) 804-4774 FAX | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
HIST |
HISTORICAL |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
P |
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
08-23-2010 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
|
Date |
08-23-2010 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2010-08-23 09:44:22 | APPROVED WITH CONDITIONS. CONDITIONS ARE AS FOLLOWS: | | | | | | 1. CENTER PARAPET TO BE STEPPED. | | | 2. SIDE PARAPETS TO BE CURVED - SIMILAR TO EXISITNG | | | BUILDING. | | | 3. MAIN ENTRY DOOR TO BE CENTERED. | | | 4. STUCCO BAND TO BE ELIMINATED AT VERTIVAL PORTION OF | | | BUILDING WITH SMALL ARCHED WINDOWS. | | | 5. SQUARE WINDOWS TOWARDS SOUTH SIDE OF BUILDING TO | | | EITHER ADD A VERTICAL MUNTIN BAR OR REDUCE IN SIZE TO | | | BE VERTICAL INORIENTATION. | | | | | | FRIEDERIKE MITTNER 822-1457 | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
HIST |
HISTORICAL |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
07-13-2010 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
07-13-2010 |
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
|
Date |
07-13-2010 |
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2010-07-13 10:46:21 | 1.) NO JUSTIFICATION HAS BEEN PROVIDED THAT THE | | | BUILDING IS STRUCTURALLY UNSOUND AND CANNOT BE | | | REHABILITATED. | | | 2.) NO JUSTIFICATION HAS BEEN PROVIDED THAT THE FACADE | | | PORTION OF THE BUILDING CANNOT BE INCORPORATED INTO THE | | | NEW PROJECT. | | | 3.) CURRENT ELEVATIONS DO NOT REFLECT ENOUGH OF THE | | | CHARACTER DEFINING FEATURES OF THE EXISTING BUILDING, | | | NOR ARE THEY EXECUTED IN A TRADITIONAL DETAIL ORIENTED | | | MANNER. SUCH AS THE USE OF BARREL TILE ON THE SHED | | | PORTION OF THE ROOF, A MORE STEPPED PARAPET, LESS OF AN | | | APPLIED SYMMETRICAL APPROACH TO THE PARAPETS, A CORRECT | | | PROPORTION OF THE ARCHES AT THE ARCADE. | | | | | | FOR ADDITIONAL QUESTIONS CONTACT: FRIEDERIKE MITTNER | | | (561) 822-1457 |
|
|
| Review Stop |
L |
LANDSCAPING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
08-04-2010 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rkussner |
Date |
08-04-2010 |
Time |
17:04 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rkussner |
Date |
08-04-2010 |
Time |
17:04 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2010-08-04 17:07:10 | ***LANDSCAPE REVIEW FAILED*** | | | | | | PLEASE RESPOND TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN WRITTEN FORMAT. | | | | | | 1. THE LANDSCAPE PLAN APPEARS TO BE CORRECT AND IS | | | BASED ON THE FOOTPRINT OF THE NEW BUILDING ADDITION. | | | HOWEVER, THE SITE PLAN DOES NOT MATCH THE LANDSCAPE | | | PLAN. ALL PLANS MUST BE CONSISTENT. | | | | | | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT ROBERT | | | KUSSNER @ (561) 822-1462. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
L |
LANDSCAPING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
07-14-2010 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rkussner |
Date |
07-14-2010 |
Time |
11:52 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rkussner |
Date |
07-14-2010 |
Time |
11:52 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2010-07-14 11:57:49 | ***LANDSCAPE REVIEW FAILED*** | | | | | | PLEASE RESPOND TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN WRITTEN FORMAT. | | | | | | 1. PURSUANT TO SECTION 94-445 (4) (A), THE PROPOSED | | | JATROPHA TREES ALONG THE NORTH PERIMETER SHALL BE A | | | MINIMUM OF EIGHT FEET IN HEIGHT AND POSSESS A MINIMUM | | | OF FIVE FEET OF CLEAR TRUNK SPACE. | | | | | | 2. THE PROPOSED BUILDING FOOTPRINT AND PATIO AREAS ARE | | | NOT ACCURATELY SHOWN ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN. PLEASE | | | REVISE THE LANDSCAPE PLAN TO BE CONSISTENT WITH THE | | | SITE PLAN. | | | | | | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT ROBERT | | | KUSSNER @ (561) 822-1462. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
L |
LANDSCAPING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
06-08-2010 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
rkussner |
Date |
06-08-2010 |
Time |
14:53 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
rkussner |
Date |
06-08-2010 |
Time |
14:53 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2010-06-08 15:26:45 | ***LANDSCAPE REVIEW FAILED*** | | | | | | PLEASE RESPOND TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN WRITTEN FORMAT. | | | | | | 1. PURSUANT TO SECTION 94-443 (A) (2), THE REQUIRED | | | LANDSCAPE BUFFER THAT SEPARATES A RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY | | | FROM A NONRESIDENTIAL USE SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF FIVE | | | FEET IN WIDTH. IN ADDITION TO THE REQUIRED HEDGE, ONE | | | SHADE OR FLOWERING TREE SHALL BE PLANTED FOR EACH 30 | | | LINEAR FEET OR PORTION THEREOF. THE PERIMETER BUFFER | | | ALONG THE NORTH SIDE OF THE SITE TOWARD THE EAST END | | | DOES NOT COMPLY WITH THIS REQUIREMENT. BECAUSE THE OLD | | | BUILDING IS BEING REMOVED, STAFF RECOMMENDS THAT THE | | | PARKING LOT BE SHIFTED TOWARD THE SOUTH TO ALLOW FOR | | | THE REQUIRED BUFFER AND TREES. | | | | | | 2. STAFF RECOMMENDS THAT THE HEDGE ADJACENT TO THE | | | DRIVE AISLE AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE SITE BE | | | ELIMINATED. THE HEDGE, IF ALLOWED TO GROW IN HEIGHT, | | | WOULD PROVIDE AN AREA FOR CRIME BECAUSE OF THE LACK FO | | | VISIBILITY FROM THE REST OF THE SITE. IF AN INFORMAL | | | SITTING AREA IS THE INTENDED USE FOR THIS SECTION OF | | | THE SITE, PERHAPS A LOW PICKET FENCE WITH OPEN SPACE | | | BETWEEN THE SLATS WOULD BE A BETTER SOLUTION. | | | | | | 3. THE LANDSCAPE PLAN DOES NOT REFLECT WHAT WILL BE | | | PLANTED AT THE END OF PHASE ONE, ONCE THE OLD BUILDING | | | HAS BEEN REMOVED. PLEASE PROVIDE A LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR | | | THE ENTIRE SITE FOR EACH OF THE PROPOSED PHASES. | | | | | | 4. ALL OTHER LANDSCAPE CONCERNS HAVE BEEN PREVIOUSLY | | | ADDRESSED. | | | | | | IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT ROBERT | | | KUSSNER @ (561) 822-1462. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
PARK |
PARKING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
P |
Date |
06-01-2010 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
ssamuels |
Date |
06-01-2010 |
Time |
17:55 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
ssamuels |
Date |
06-01-2010 |
Time |
17:55 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
|
|
| Review Stop |
POLICE |
POLICE |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2010-06-09 11:11:53 | * LIGHTING FOR THE PARKING LOT AND BUILDING EXTERIOR? | | | * LOCKS? | | | * SIGNS SHALL CLEARLY IDENTIFY PUBLIC ENTRANCES | | | * CONVEX MIRRORS SHALL BE INSTALLED IN STAIRWELL | | | ENABLING VIEWS OF UPPER AND LOWER STAIRWAYS. | | | * REAR DOORS SHALL BE EQUIPPED WITH 180-DEGREE | | | PEEPHOLE/ SECURITY VIEWER | | | * EXTERIOR DOORS SHALL ALL BE EQUIPPED WITH SECURITY | | | HINGES AND SHALL BE REINFORCED WITH CASE HARDENED | | | STRIKE PLATES. CASE HARDENED DEADBOLT LOCKS SHALL BE | | | PROVIDED ON ALL EXTERIOR DOORS WITH A MINIMUM (1) INCH | | | THROW OR MECHANICAL INTERLOCK. | | | * ACCESS CONTROL FOR PATIO AREA? | | | * ACCESS CONTROL FOR THE LOBBY AREA, CONSIDER OPENING | | | UP THE RECEPTION DESK, BY GLASS OR REMOVING THE SIDE | | | WALL FOR BETTER VIEW OF THE LOBBY AREA AND HALLWAY | | | * CAMERA/CCTV ? | | | * ACCESS CONTROL FOR SENSITIVE AREAS? | | | | | | | | | 10.1 CONDITIONS FOR APPROVAL | | | PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF THE FIRST BUILDING PERMIT, THE | | | APPLICANT SHALL PREPARE A CONSTRUCTION SITE SECURITY | | | AND MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR APPROVAL BY THE CITY OF WEST | | | PALM BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT CPTED OFFICIAL. | | | A. AFTER SITE CLEARING AND PLACEMENT OF CONSTRUCTION | | | TRAILERS, THE DEVELOPER/PROJECT MANAGER SHALL INSTITUTE | | | SECURITY MEASURES TO REDUCE OR ELIMINATE OPPORTUNITIES | | | FOR THEFT. THE MANAGEMENT PLAN SHALL INCLUDE, BUT NOT | | | BE LIMITED TO, TEMPORARY LIGHTING, SECURITY PERSONNEL, | | | VEHICLE BARRIERS, CONSTRUCTION/VISITOR PASS, | | | REDUCE/MINIMIZE ENTRY/EXIT POINTS, ENCOURAGE | | | SUBCONTRACTORS TO SECURE MACHINERY, TOOLS AT END OF | | | WORK DAY, FENCING WITH SCREENING AND OR ANY OTHER | | | MEASURE DEEMED APPROPRIATE TO PROVIDE A SAFE AND SECURE | | | WORKING ENVIRONMENT. | | | B. THE SECURITY MANAGEMENT PLAN SHALL BE MAINTAINED | | | THROUGHOUT THE CONSTRUCTION PHASE OF THE PROJECT. | | | NON-COMPLIANCE WITH THE APPROVED PLAN SHALL RESULT IN A | | | STOP-WORK ORDER FOR THE ENTIRE PLANNED UNIT | | | DEVELOPMENT. | | | C. PROPERTY SHALL BE POST ???NO TRESPASSING??? SIGNS | | | EVERY 500 FEET AROUND THE PERIMETER OF THE SITE. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | PPRC: APRIL 8, 2009 | | | | | | | | | ZBA CASE NO. 3246 | | | CLASS B SPECIAL USE PERMIT | | | BESHANT HEALTH CARE, INC. | | | | | | | | | COMMENTS: | | | DRIVEWAY ENTERING PROPERTY NEEDS LIGHTING AND TREE | | | TRIMMING. | | | SECURITY SYSTEM SHOULD BE REPAIRED/INSTALLED TO COVER | | | HIGH TRAFFIC AREAS: LOBBIES, DELIVERY AREA, PUBLIC | | | ACCESS ROOMS, BALCONIES, PARKING LOTS. | | | ENTRY IN TO THE LOBBY SHOULD BE CONTROLLED ACCESS | | | FENCING NEEDS REPAIR, HEDGES TRIMMED DOWN OR CLEARED | | | OUT | | | UPGRADE LOCKS | | | INSTALL PEEPHOLES IN DOORS LEADING OUTSIDE | | | | | | CPTED REQUIREMENTS | | | | | | THE FOLLOWING SUGGESTIONS ARE MADE FOR THE PURPOSE OF | | | REDUCING THE LIKELIHOOD OF CRIMINAL ACTIVITY. WHILE NO | | | GUARANTEE CAN BE STATED OR IMPLIED, THE CONCEPTS OF | | | CPTED HAVE PROVEN THEMSELVES INTERNATIONALLY. THE WEST | | | PALM BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT OFFERS THESE SUGGESTIONS | | | AS A PUBLIC SERVICE, WITH THE UNDERSTANDING THAT THERE | | | IS NO WAY TO PREDICT OR PREVENT ALL CRIME RISKS. THE | | | PURPOSE OF THESE REQUIREMENTS IS TO REDUCE FORMABILITY | | | OF CRIME, BY MAKING A GOOD FAITH EFFORT TO PROVIDE A | | | SAFE ENVIRONMENT. | | | BELOW IS A LIST OF CRIME PREVENTION RECOMMENDATIONS TO | | | HELP DETER CRIMINAL ACTIVITY. | | | 1.9 LIGHTING | | | A. EXTERIOR LIGHTING SHALL BE METAL HALIDE | | | B. LANDSCAPING SHALL NOT CONFLICT WITH LIGHTING (TO | | | INCLUDE LONG-TERM TREE CANOPY GROWTH). | | | C. LANDSCAPING SHALL NOT OBSTRUCT VIEW OF WINDOWS, | | | BUILDING ADDRESS NUMBERS, AND WALKWAYS. | | | D. TIMER CLOCK OR PHOTOCELL SENSOR-ENGAGED LIGHTING FOR | | | ABOVE OR NEAR ENTRYWAYS AND ALL PEDESTRIAN SIDEWALKS | | | SHALL BE PROVIDED. | | | E. PARKING LOT LIGHTING SHOULD BE 25-FOOT POLES. | | | F. PEDESTRIAN-SCALE LIGHTING SHALL BE USED FOR ALL | | | STREET AND PEDESTRIAN WALKWAYS. IT IS SUGGESTED THAT | | | 12-FOOT LIGHT POLES BE USED FOR THE STREET LIGHTING. | | | G. LIGHTING FOR ENTRANCE SIGN SHALL BE PROVIDED. | | | H. LIGHTING ON BUILDINGS SHALL BE AROUND PERIMETER OF | | | ALL SIDES AND ON PEDESTRIAN WALKWAY SURROUNDING THE | | | BUILDINGS. | | | 1.10 NUMERICAL ADDRESS | | | A. ILLUMINATED FOR NIGHTTIME VISIBILITY IS REQUIRED. | | | B. BI-DIRECTIONAL VISIBILITY FROM THE ROADWAY IS | | | REQUIRED. | | | C. ADDRESS NUMBERS ON DOORS NEED TO BE A MINIMUM OF 6 | | | INCHES HIGH. | | | D. BUILDING NUMBERS SHALL TO BE A MINIMUM OF 12 INCHES | | | HIGH AND PLACED IN A CONSPICUOUS LOCATION AWAY FROM | | | LANDSCAPING. | | | 1.11 EXTERIOR | | | A. EXTERIOR BUILDING LIGHTING SHALL BE REQUIRED FOR ALL | | | EXIT WAY, EMERGENCY ACCESS, STAIRWAY AND UTILITY ROOM | | | DOORS. | | | B. SECONDARY ACCESS, OTHER THAN MAIN LOBBY, SHALL BE | | | AVAILABLE BY CONTROLLED ACCESS. | | | C. MAIN ENTRANCE SHALL LEAD DIRECTLY TO THE FRONT LOBBY | | | AREA WITH VISIBLE SIGNAGE INDICATING SO. | | | D. TRAFFIC LEADING TO LOBBY OVERHANG AND/OR CIRCULAR | | | DRIVE SHALL BE ONE WAY WITH SIGNAGE STATING SAME. | | | E. STAIRWELLS SHALL HAVE CONVEX MIRRORS INSTALLED AT | | | LANDINGS FOR EACH LEVEL. | | | F. INTERIOR OF ELEVATORS SHALL UTILIZE MIRRORS AND CCTV | | | G. INSTALL CCTV FOR SURVEILLANCE OF LOBBY, STAIRWELLS, | | | PARKING LOTS AND SERVICE AREAS OF PUBLIC ACTIVITY | | | ROOMS. | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
STORM |
STORMWATER |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jrenault |
Date |
07-21-2010 |
Time |
09:46 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2010-07-21 09:48:11 | SAME COMMENTS AS BEFORE |
|
|
| Review Stop |
STORM |
STORMWATER |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
jrenault |
Date |
06-07-2010 |
Time |
13:25 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2010-06-07 13:27:05 | SEE PREVIOUS PPRC REVIEW COMMENTS FOR THIS SITE DATED | | | 4-8-09. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
SURVEY |
SURVEYING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
07-14-2010 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
vnoel |
Date |
07-14-2010 |
Time |
10:17 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
vnoel |
Date |
07-14-2010 |
Time |
10:17 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2010-07-14 10:18:22 | PREVIOUS COMMENTS NOT ADDRESSED: | | | | | | 1. NO PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING PLAN PROVIDED. | | | 2. BOUNDARY PLAT WILL BE REQUIRED. APPLICATION CAN BE | | | MADE THRU ENGINEERING SERVICES. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
SURVEY |
SURVEYING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
|
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2010-06-07 13:02:35 | 1. NO PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING PLAN PROVIDED. | | | 2. BOUNDARY PLAT WILL BE REQUIRED. APPLICATION CAN BE | | | MADE THRU ENGINEERING SERVICES. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
TRAFFIC |
TRAFFIC ENGINEERING |
| Rev No |
3 |
Status |
F |
Date |
08-10-2010 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
bcollins |
Date |
08-10-2010 |
Time |
11:43 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2010-08-10 11:40:20 | BASED ON THE AUTO TURN PLOT, THE DRIVE AISLE ON THE | | | EAST SIDE OF THE BUILDING SHOULD BE WIDENED TO 24 FT. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
TRAFFIC |
TRAFFIC ENGINEERING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
bcollins |
Date |
07-19-2010 |
Time |
08:36 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2010-07-19 08:32:20 | PREVIOUS COMMENTS NOT ADDRESSED ON JUNE 25, 2010 SITE | | | PLAN |
|
|
| Review Stop |
TRAFFIC |
TRAFFIC ENGINEERING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
|
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
|
Date |
|
Time |
|
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
bcollins |
Date |
06-07-2010 |
Time |
14:46 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2010-06-07 14:48:11 | DEMONSTRATE HOW TRUCKS BACK OUT OF LOADING AREA | | | (AUTOTURN). INSTALL DO NOT ENTER SIGN WHERE ONE-WAY | | | SIGN IS SHOWN ACROSS FROM LOADING AREA. |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
2 |
Status |
F |
Date |
07-13-2010 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
lfranco |
Date |
07-13-2010 |
Time |
12:30 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
lfranco |
Date |
07-13-2010 |
Time |
12:30 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2010-07-21 20:27:40 | PLANNING AND ZONING: | | | | | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT | | | | | | | | | PLANS AND PLATS REVIEW COMMITTEE | | | JUNE 9, 2010 | | | PLANNING BOARD CASE NO. 1601 | | | 1101 54TH STREET | | | HILLCREST MANOR ASSISTED LIVING FACILITY ("ALF") | | | REZONING FROM COMMUNITY SERVICE ("CS") TO COMMUNITY | | | SERVICE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT ("CSPD") | | | | | | | | | RE-SUBMITTAL: 6/25/10 AND 6/28/10 | | | GENERAL COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1. PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN A WRITTEN | | | FORMAT. PLEASE NOTE, IF THE PLANNING AND ZONING | | | DEPARTMENT HAS NOT RECEIVED A RESPONSE TO THE PPRC | | | COMMENTS WITHIN SIXTY (60) DAYS FROM THE PPRC MEETING, | | | THE CASE SHALL BE CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN. ANY FURTHER | | | ACTION SHALL REQUIRE RE-SUBMITTAL OF A NEW DEVELOPMENT | | | APPLICATION. | | | | | | 2. PROVIDE REVISIONS ADDRESSING PPRC COMMENTS NO LATER | | | THAN JULY 27, 2010, IN ORDER TO BE SCHEDULED TO THE | | | AUGUST 17, 2010, PLANNING BOARD MEETING (ALL COMMENTS | | | MUST BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED), OTHERWISE, YOU WILL BE | | | SCHEDULED TO THE NEXT AVAILABLE PLANNING BOARD MEETING. | | | RE-SUBMITTAL MAY BE SUBJECT TO ADDITIONAL COMMENTS. | | | | | | 3. PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING NUMBER OF SETS OF PLANS ALONG | | | WITH AN ELECTRONIC .PNG OR .JPG FILE OF REVISED PLANS: | | | A. 2 SETS 8"X11" OF SURVEY; | | | | | | | | | JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT/ GENERAL APPLICATION: | | | 5. JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT STATES A DIFFERENT SQUARE | | | FOOTAGE OF EXISTING BUILDING (61,781 SQ.FT.) AND | | | PROPOSED ADDITION (3,019 SQ.FT.) VS. THE PALM BEACH | | | COUNTY TRAFFIC PERFORMANCE STANDARDS REVIEW LETTER | | | (63,000 SQ.FT. EXISTING AND A 1,800 SQ.FT ADDITION). | | | REVISE DOCUMENTS ACCORDINGLY. | | | | | | RE-SUBMITTAL: REVISE JUSTIFICATION TO ADDRESS HISTORIC | | | COMMENTS AND ANY OTHER PENDING ITEMS THAT WERE NOT | | | INCLUDED. THERE ARE STILL SQUARE-FOOTAGE DISCREPANCIES | | | WITH THE JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT AND PLANS WITH THE PBC | | | TRAFFIC LETTER SQUARE FOOTAGE OF NEW ADDITION AND TOTAL | | | BLDG. SQ. FTG. | | | | | | | | | SITE PLAN: | | | | | | 7. THERE APPEARS TO BE THREE (3) DEVELOPMENT PHASES | | | (DEMOLITION, NEW ADDITION OF BUILDING AND VACANT LAND | | | (1.3 ACRES) ON THE WESTERN PORTION OF THE PROPERTY. | | | PLEASE REVISE JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT, SITE PLANS | | | (INCLUDING SITE DATA) AND ARCHITECTURAL PLANS | | | ACCORDINGLY. | | | | | | RE-SUBMITTAL: SHEET A-2 SHOWS A PROPOSED NEW CASTSTONE | | | CORNICE TOWARD THE SOUTH WEST SIDE OF THE BUILDING AND | | | A NEW STAMPED CONCRETE PATIO WITH ALUMINUM RAIL THAT IS | | | NOT SHOWN ON THE LANDSCAPE PLANS OR SITE PLAN. REVISE | | | ALL DRAWINGS TO CORRELATE. | | | | | | 8. ARCHITECTURAL PLANS: | | | | | | A. COVER SHEET, LOCATION MAP, DELINEATE PHASES SHOWING | | | EXISTING BUILDING FOOTPRINT, DEMOLITION AREA AND FUTURE | | | DEVELOPMENT AREA ON THE WESTERN SIDE OF THE PROPERTY; | | | AND | | | | | | RE-SUBMITTAL: SHEET A-2 SHOWS A PROPOSED NEW CASTSTONE | | | CORNICE TOWARD THE SOUTH WEST SIDE OF THE BUILDING AND | | | A NEW STAMPED CONCRETE PATIO WITH ALUMINUM RAIL THAT IS | | | NOT SHOWN ON THE LANDSCAPE PLANS OR SITE PLAN. REVISE | | | ALL DRAWINGS TO CORRELATE. | | | | | | C. THE HISTORIC DIVISION WOULD LIKE TO DISCUSS OPTIONS | | | THAT INCLUDE THE POSSIBILITY OF PRESERVING THE BUILDING | | | OR A PORTION OF THE BUILDING, SUCH AS THE FACADE. | | | PLEASE CONTACT FRIEDERIKE MITTNER, CITY HISTORIC | | | PRESERVATION PLANNER @ (561) 822-1457 FOR ADDITIONAL | | | INFORMATION; AND, | | | | | | RE-SUBMITTAL, REVISE DOCUMENTS ACCORDINGLY AND INCLUDE | | | RESPONSE OF JUSTIFICATION TO DEMOLISH A HISTORIC | | | STRUCTURE PER HISTORIC DEPARTMENT'S REVIEW. | | | | | | | | | LINDA MIA FRANCO, | | | SENIOR PLANNER | | | PLANNING AND ZONING | | | TEL: (561) 822-1443 | | | EMAIL: [email protected] | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| Review Stop |
Z |
ZONING |
| Rev No |
1 |
Status |
F |
Date |
06-07-2010 |
|
|
Cont ID |
|
| Sent By |
lfranco |
Date |
06-07-2010 |
Time |
13:19 |
Rev Time |
0.00 |
| Received By |
lfranco |
Date |
06-04-2010 |
Time |
9:15 |
Sent To |
|
|
| Notes |
| 2010-06-04 14:09:51 | PLANNING AND ZONING: | | | | | | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH | | | PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT | | | | | | | | | PLANS AND PLATS REVIEW COMMITTEE | | | JUNE 9, 2010 | | | PLANNING BOARD CASE NO. 1601 | | | 1101 54TH STREET | | | HILLCREST MANOR ASSISTED LIVING FACILITY ("ALF") | | | REZONING FROM COMMUNITY SERVICE ("CS") TO COMMUNITY | | | SERVICE PLANNED DEVELOPMENT ("CSPD") | | | | | | GENERAL COMMENTS: | | | | | | 1. PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN A WRITTEN | | | FORMAT. PLEASE NOTE, IF THE PLANNING AND ZONING | | | DEPARTMENT HAS NOT RECEIVED A RESPONSE TO THE PPRC | | | COMMENTS WITHIN SIXTY (60) DAYS FROM THE PPRC MEETING, | | | THE CASE SHALL BE CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN. ANY FURTHER | | | ACTION SHALL REQUIRE RE-SUBMITTAL OF A NEW DEVELOPMENT | | | APPLICATION. | | | | | | 2. PROVIDE REVISIONS ADDRESSING PPRC COMMENTS NO LATER | | | THAN FRIDAY JUNE 25, 2010, IN ORDER TO BE SCHEDULED TO | | | THE AUGUST 17, 2010, PLANNING BOARD MEETING (ALL | | | COMMENTS MUST BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED), OTHERWISE, | | | YOU WILL BE SCHEDULED TO THE NEXT AVAILABLE PLANNING | | | BOARD MEETING. | | | RE-SUBMITTALS MAY BE SUBJECT TO ADDITIONAL COMMENTS. | | | | | | 3. PROVIDE THE FOLLOWING NUMBER OF SETS OF PLANS ALONG | | | WITH AN ELECTRONIC .PNG OR .JPG FILE OF REVISED PLANS: | | | A. 2 SETS 8"X11" OF SURVEY; | | | | | | 4. AN ADVERTISING FEE OF $216 WAS DUE AT THE TIME OF | | | SUBMITTAL THAT WAS NEVER PAID. SAID FEE IS DUE BY | | | MONDAY, JUNE 14, 2010, IN ORDER TO MOVE THE PROJECT | | | FORWARD. | | | | | | JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT/ GENERAL APPLICATION: | | | 5. JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT STATES A DIFFERENT SQUARE | | | FOOTAGE OF EXISTING BUILDING (61,781 SQ.FT.) AND | | | PROPOSED ADDITION (3,019 SQ.FT.) VS. THE PALM BEACH | | | COUNTY TRAFFIC PERFORMANCE STANDARDS REVIEW LETTER | | | (63,000 SQ.FT. EXISTING AND A 1,800 SQ.FT ADDITION). | | | REVISE DOCUMENTS ACCORDINGLY. | | | | | | 6. SURVEY: PURSUANT TO APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS (M.), | | | PROVIDE CURRENT TITLE POLICY INFORMATION ON SURVEY, | | | INCLUDING TOTAL ACREAGE TO THE NEAREST ONE-HUNDREDTH | | | (1/100) OF AN ACRE. | | | | | | SITE PLAN: | | | | | | 7. THERE APPEARS TO BE THREE (3) DEVELOPMENT PHASES | | | (DEMOLITION, NEW ADDITION OF BUILDING AND VACANT LAND | | | (1.3 ACRES) ON THE WESTERN PORTION OF THE PROPERTY. | | | PLEASE REVISE JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT, SITE PLANS | | | (INCLUDING SITE DATA) AND ARCHITECTURAL PLANS | | | ACCORDINGLY. | | | | | | 8. ARCHITECTURAL PLANS: | | | | | | A. COVER SHEET, LOCATION MAP, DELINEATE PHASES SHOWING | | | EXISTING BUILDING FOOTPRINT, DEMOLITION AREA AND FUTURE | | | DEVELOPMENT AREA ON THE WESTERN SIDE OF THE PROPERTY; | | | AND | | | | | | B. SHEET A-2 (FIRST FLOOR) DEPICTS THE PROPOSED | | | BUILDING PLANS WITHOUT THE EXISTING PORTION OF THE | | | OLDEST PART OF THE BUILDING THAT IS APPROXIMATELY 85 | | | YEARS OLD. STAFF UNDERSTANDS FROM CONVERSATIONS WITH | | | THE AGENT, THAT THE INTENT FROM THE OWNER IS TO | | | DEMOLISH THIS PORTION, IN ORDER TO CONSTRUCT A NEW | | | 3,019 SQUARE FOOT ADDITION. THE JUSTIFICATION DOES NOT | | | STATE THIS INFORMATION, NOR DOES IT SHOW THE TIMEFRAME | | | THAT THE ADDITION WILL TAKE PLACE. WILL THE BUILDING | | | REMAIN WITHOUT THE ADDITION FOR SOME TIME?....MONTHS, | | | YEARS? IF SO, WHAT IS THE PLAN FOR THIS AREA IN THE | | | MEANTIME? WILL THERE BE SOME VEGETATION/LANDSCAPING | | | INCORPORATED; AND, | | | | | | | | | C. THE HISTORIC DIVISION WOULD LIKE TO DISCUSS OPTIONS | | | THAT INCLUDE THE POSSIBILITY OF PRESERVING THE BUILDING | | | OR A PORTION OF THE BUILDING, SUCH AS THE FACADE. | | | PLEASE CONTACT FRIEDERIKE MITTNER, CITY HISTORIC | | | PRESERVATION PLANNER @ (561) 822-1457 FOR ADDITIONAL | | | INFORMATION; AND, | | | D. SHEET A-1 THROUGH A-4, PHASE II SHOWS THE PROPOSED | | | NEW ADDITION; HOWEVER, IT DOES NOT DELINEATE OR PROVIDE | | | AREA OF WORK FOR PHASE II TO CORRELATE WITH ALL OTHER | | | DOCUMENTATION. IF PHASES ARE CHANGED TO THREE (3) | | | PHASES INSTEAD OF TWO (2), COORDINATE ALL PLANS AND | | | DOCUMENTS ACCORDINGLY. | | | | | | 9. IS THE EXISTING "OPEN SPACE" AREA SHOWN ON THE | | | LANDSCAPE PLANS, SHEET LP-1, PROPOSED TO BE USED AS A | | | "GARDEN AREA" AMENITY? WILL IT BE USED BY THE | | | RESIDENTS? IF SO, PROVIDE SOME PEDESTRIAN STRIPPING OR | | | PAVERS (DELINEATION) INDICATING PEDESTRIAN TRAFFIC | | | CROSSING THE RIGHT-OF-WAY. | | | | | | | | | LINDA MIA FRANCO, | | | SENIOR PLANNER | | | PLANNING AND ZONING | | | TEL: (561) 822-1443 | | | EMAIL: [email protected] | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
Print |
