Plan Review Details - Project Z09110003
Plan Review Stops For Project Z09110003
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 1 Status P Date 12-09-2009 Cont ID  
Sent By lmartine Date 12-09-2009 Time 09:48 Rev Time 0.00
Received By lmartine Date 12-09-2009 Time 09:48 Sent To  
Notes
2009-12-09 10:21:43BUILDING REVIEW COMMENTS
  
  
  
 2007 FLORIDA BUILDING CODE WILL APPLY. NOTE CHAPTER 8
 OF THE FLORIDA" EXISTING BUILDING CODE" FOR LEVEL 3
 ALTERATIONS AND ADDITIONS. BUILDING CODE ANALYSIS SHALL
 REFERENCE A TYPE 1, A-3, THRESHOLD BUILDING.
  
 NO FLOOR PLAN OR EGRESS PLAN PROVIDED.
  
  
  
 LUIS MARTINEZ
 561-805-6710
Review Stop ENG-P ENGINEERING PLANNING REVIEW
Rev No 1 Status F Date 11-30-2009 Cont ID  
Sent By efabian Date 11-30-2009 Time 16:43 Rev Time 0.00
Received By efabian Date 11-30-2009 Time 09:26 Sent To  
Notes
2009-11-30 16:58:35PLEASE PROVIDE MORE SPECIFIC INFORMATION AS TO THE TYPE
 OF INSTITUTION PROPOSED TO DETERMINE WATER USAGE
 DEMANDS. IT IS UNDERSTOOD THAT THE PROPOSED ADDITION IS
 TO BE A "CULTURAL FACILITY", BUT MORE SPECIFICALLY,
 WHAT OTHER WATER USAGES SHALL BE REQUIRED. THIS DATA
 WILL DETERMINE THE SERVICE SYSTEM TYPE AND SIZE
 ADEQUATE TO SERVICE THE FACILITY.
  
 THE LOCATION OF THE PROPOSED WATER SERVICES CROSS
 CONNECTIONS, I.E., DDCV AND RPZ AND WATER METER, MAY
 HAVE TO BE REPOSITIONED/MOVED CLOSER TO THE WATER MAIN
 CONNECTION.
  
 CURRENTLY SOLID WASTE REMOVAL AT THIS SITE IS A 4
 CU./YDS. DUMPSTER WITH NO ENCLOSURE.
 PLEASE PROVIDE AN EASILY ACCESSIBLE SPACE FOR A
 DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE PER CITY'S STANDARD DETAIL GC-9.
  
 PLEASE ADDRESS ANY QUESTIONS TO PLAN REVIEWER:
  
 EMERY P. FABIAN
 ENGINEERING PROJECT COORDINATOR
 ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 401 CLEMATIS STREET, 4TH FLOOR
 WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33401
 PHONE: 561-822-1200
 FAX: 561-494-1116
  
 EMAIL: [email protected]
  
Review Stop FIRE FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No 1 Status F Date 12-01-2009 Cont ID  
Sent By mcarsill Date 12-01-2009 Time 15:15 Rev Time 0.00
Received By mcarsill Date 12-01-2009 Time 15:06 Sent To  
Notes
2009-12-01 15:15:04 
 1. THE NEW ADDITION SHALL BE DESIGNED AND CONSTRUCTED
 TO FLORIDA BUILDING CODE 2007 AND THE FLORIDA FIRE
 PREVENTION CODE 2007 EDITION.
  
 2. CONSTRUCTION, DEMOLITION, AND RENOVATION TO COMPLY
 WITH NFPA 241.
  
 3. COULD LOCATE ONLY ONE PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANT ON THE
 WATER AND WASTEWATER PLAN. ADDITIONAL FIRE HYDRANTS
 WILL BE REQUIRED.
  
 4. THE PROPOSED FIRE DEPARTMENT CONNECTION SHALL BE
 EQUIPPED WITH LOCKING KNOX CAPS.
  
 5. ELECTRONIC TAMPER SWITCHES, CHAIN AND LOCK REQUIRED
 ON FIRELINE BACKFLOW DEVICE.
  
 6. DEMOLITION PERMIT REQUIRED FOR THE REMOVAL OF THE
 EXISTING ONE STORY BUILDINGS.
  
 7. SUBMIT COMPLETE ARCHITECTURAL, MECHANICAL,
 ELECTRICAL, PLUMBING, FIRE SPRINKLER AND FIRE ALARM
 DRAWINGS.
  
 8. A KNOX-BOX WILL BE REQUIRED.
  
 9. SEPARATE PLANS AND PERMITS REQUIRED FOR THE FIRE
 SPRINKLER AND FIRE ALARM SYSTEMS.
  
 10. THE FIRE SPRINKLER AND FIRE ALARM SYSTEM SHALL BE
 MONITORED BY A UL LISTED CENTRAL STATION APPROVED FOR
 CENTRAL STATION SERVICE.
  
 11. PLEASE PROVIDE A LIFE SAFETY PLAN ILLUSTRATING ALL
 LIFE SAFETY FEATURES. THESE INCLUDE EXIT DOORS, EXIT
 SIGNS, EMERGENCY LIGHTS, TACTILE SIGNAGE, FIRE ALARM,
 AND PORTABLE FIRE EXTINGUISHING EQUIPMENT.
  
 DENIED
  
  
 MIKE CARSILLO, BATTALION CHIEF
 BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION
 (561) 804-4709 PHONE
 (561) 804-4774 FAX
Review Stop L LANDSCAPING
Rev No 2 Status F Date 02-23-2010 Cont ID  
Sent By rkussner Date 02-23-2010 Time 11:47 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rkussner Date 02-23-2010 Time 11:47 Sent To  
Notes
2010-02-23 12:15:03***LANDSCAPE REVIEW FAILED***
  
 1. REPEAT COMMENT: ALL UTILITIES, EASEMENTS, STREET
 LIGHTS AND ANYTHING ELSE THAT MAY INTERFERE WITH THE
 PROPOSED LANDSCAPING SHALL BE SHOWN ON THE LANDSCAPE
 PLAN TO AVOID CONFLICTS IN THE FIELD. THOUGH SOME OF
 THESE ITEMS HAVE BEEN IDENTIFIED ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN,
 ALL OF THESE ITEMS SHALL BE SHOWN AT THIS TIME.
 CONFLICTS HAVE BEEN OBSERVED AND CHANGES WILL BE
 REQUIRED. SEWER AND WATER LINES ARE CUTTING UNDER
 LANDSCAPED AREAS WHERE TREES AND OTHER PLANT MATERIAL
 ARE PROPOSED. A PORTION OF THE DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE AND
 VARIOUS TREES AND SHRUBS ARE SHOWN WITHIN UTILITY
 EASEMENTS. A LETTER OF APPROVAL FROM THE EASEMENT
 HOLDER TO CONSTRUCT A WALL OR PLANT WITHIN THE EASEMENT
 WILL BE REQUIRED,
  
 2. THE PROPOSED LIVE OAKS ADJACENT TO THE WEST ENTRANCE
 INTO THE BUILDING ARE PROPOSED TO BE PLANTED LESS THAN
 TWELVE FEET APART. THE ISLANDS ARE NARROW AND THESE
 LARGE TREES WILL BE TOO CLOSE TOGETHER. THE OAKS SHOULD
 BE FLIP-FLOPPED WITH THE PROPOSED CRAPE MYRTLES SHOWN
 IN THE TERMINAL ISLANDS WITHIN THE SAME PARKING ROW.
  
 3. THE LANDSCAPE ISLAND ON THE NORTH SIDE OF THE
 RECYCLING ENCLOSURE SHALL EXTEND THE FULL LENGTH OT THE
 ADJACENT PARKING STALL.
  
 4. IF THE EXISTING CHAIN LINK FENCE EAST OF THE NEW
 ADDITION (NORTH PORTION OF PROPERTY) IS GALVANIZED,
 STAFF SUGGESTS THAT IT BE CHANGED TO A VINYL CLAD CHAIN
 LINK FENCE OR PLANT A HEDGE OR OTHER PLANT MATERIAL ON
 THE STREET SIDE OF THIS FENCE TO HELP SCREEN IT.
  
 5. IN KEEPING WITH XERISCAPE GUIDELINES AND TO REDUCE
 MAINTENANCE, STAFF RECOMMENDS THAT THE PALM GROUPINGS
 ALONG THE I-95 WALL BE UNDER PLANTED WITH FAKAHATCHEE
 GRASS OR OTHER LOW MAINTENANCE PLANTINGS.
  
 IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT ROBERT
 KUSSNER @ (561) 822-1462,
Review Stop L LANDSCAPING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 12-03-2009 Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 12-03-2009 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By rkussner Date 12-03-2009 Time 14:04 Sent To  
Notes
2009-12-03 17:03:46***LANDSCAPE REVIEW FAILED***
 PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN WRITTEN
 FORMAT.
  
 1. PURSUANT TO SECTION 94-442 (D), PRIVATE LAND AND
 PUBLIC RIGHTS-OF-WAY BETWEEN STREET OR SIDEWALK
 SURFACES AND REQUIRED BUFFER STRIPS AND LANDSCAPED OPEN
 SPACE AREAS SHALL BE PLANTED WITH GRASS. GRASS AREAS
 SHALL BE SODDED. THERE IS A DIRT ROAD ALONG THE WEST
 PERIMETER OF THE SITE THAT SHOULD EITHER BE PAVED IF IT
 IS A REQUIRED ACCESS OR THE ROAD SHOULD BE REMOVED AND
 THE AREA SHALL BE FULLY SODDED.
  
 2. PLEASE PROVIDE THE TABULATION NECESSARY FOR THE
 EVALUATION OF COMPLIANCE WITH ARTICLE XIV OF THE ZONING
 AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS, INCLUDING THE
 XERISCAPE DESIGN OPTIONS.
  
 3. PURSUANT TO SECTION 94-443 (B)(1), FOR ALL
 NONRESIDENTIAL USES, THE LANDSCAPE BUFFER STRIP SHALL
 BE AT LEAST FIVE FEET WIDE ALONG THE ENTIRE EDGE OF
 PROPERTY WHEN ADJACENT TO A PUBLIC THOROUGHFARE, AND
 WHEN ADJACENT TO NONRESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICTS.
  
 4. PURSUANT TO SECTION 94-443 (C) (TABLE XIV-1), TREES
 SHALL BE PLANTED AT 30-FOOT INTERVALS AND HEDGES SHALL
 BE PLANTED AT TWO-FOOT INTERVALS FOR EACH REQUIRED
 LANDSCAPE BUFFER. THIS APPLIES TO THE WEST, SOUTH AND
 EAST SIDES OF THE PARKING LOT.
  
 5. PURSUANT TO SECTION 94-444 (B), OUTDOOR
 INCINERATORS, GARBAGE OR TRASH RECEPTACLES, FUEL OIL OR
 PROPANE TANKS, GENERATORS, AND STORAGE RACKS AND ALL
 OTHER MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT SHALL NOT BE PERMITTED
 UNLESS APPROPRIATE SCREENING IS PROVIDED. SCREENING
 SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED OF BRICK, DECORATIVE CONCRETE,
 OTHER DECORATIVE MASONRY, OR COMPARABLY DURABLE WOOD
 AND STEEL. WALLS SHALL BE LANDSCAPED WITH SHRUBS AND
 HEDGES PLANTED AT TOW-FOOT INTERVALS. A FOUR-SIDED
 ENCLOSURE WITH AN OBSCURING GATE MAY BE REQUIRED AS A
 CONDITION OF SITE PLAN APPROVAL. PLEASE IDENTIFY THE
 LOCATION OF THE DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE AND ALL OTHER
 MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT AND SHOW THE MANNER IN WHICH THESE
 ITEMS WILL BE SCREENED. THERE ARE EXISTING WOOD AND
 CHAIN LINK FENCES IN SEVERAL LOCATIONS. THESE SHALL BE
 SCREENED WITH SHRUBBERY.
  
 6. PURSUANT TO SECTION 94-443 (E)(1), AT LEAST 30
 PERCENT OF THE LINEAR FEET AROUND THE EXTERIOR FO ALL
 COMMERCIAL STRUCTURES SHALL BE PLANTED WITH TREES,
 SHRUBS OR HEDGES. FOUNDATION PLANTING WILL BE REQUIRED
 ALONG THE NORTH AND WEST SIDES OF THE EXISTING
 BUILDING---AT A MINIMUM. VERTICAL LANDSCAPE ELEMENTS
 ARE SUGGESTED TO ACCENTUATE THE ARCHITECTURE AND CREATE
 MORE INTEREST. A LAYERING OF THE PLANTING ADJACENT TO
 THE BUILDING SUCH AS PLANTING GROUND COVER IN FRONT OF
 THE HEDGE MATERIAL WOULD BE STRONGLY SUGGESTED. BY
 PLANTING GROUND COVER BENEATH THE PALMS AND ELIMINATING
 THE SMALL AMOUNT OF SOD WOULD FOLLOW ACCEPTED XERISCAPE
 GUIDELINES. BECAUSE THE PARKING LOT USED BY THE PUBLIC
 WRAPS AROUND THE SOUTH SIDE OF THE BUILDING, FOUNDATION
 PLANTING ALONG THAT ELEVATIONS IS STRONGLY SUGGESTED.
  
 7. BECAUSE OF THE USE, BUS PARKING STALLS SHOULD BE
 PROVIDED. UPON MY SITE VISIT, I OBSERVED THREE (3)
 SCHOOL BUSES PARKED ON THE DIRT AT THE NORTHWEST TIP OF
 THE SITE.
  
 8. THE LOADING ZONE DOES NOT APPEAR TO BE CONVENIENT TO
 MAKING DELIVERIES IN ITS PROPOSED LOCATION.
  
 9. SHEET TP-2 INDICATES THAT 38 TREES WILL BE REMOVED.
 PLEASE TABULATE THE TOTAL TREE CALIPER INCHES OF LOSS
 AND INDICATE THE CALIPER INCHES OF TREES TO BE
 INSTALLED. THE APPLICANT SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE TO
 MITIGATE THE DIFFERENCE. IF MITIGATION IS REQUIRED AND
 IT CANNOT BE ACCOMMODATED ON SITE, A ROW OF ROYAL PALMS
 ALONG THE OPPOSITE SIDE OF THE ROAD IN FRONT OF THE
 FACILITY WOULD MAKE THE BIGGEST IMPACT.
  
 10. THERE IS NOT ENOUGH ROOM AT THE ENTRY TO
 ACCOMMODATE THE SIX (6) PROPOSED ROYAL PALMS. THE AREA
 MAY ACCOMMODATE FOUR (4) PALMS.
  
 11. STAFF SUGGESTS THAT THE PROPOSED ROYAL PALMS TO BE
 PLANTED ADJACENT TO THE ROAD ON THE WEST SIDE OF THE
 ENTRY BE PLANTED IN LINE WITH THOSE ON THE EAST SIDE OF
 THE ENTRY. THE PROPOSED SIDEWALK COULD BE NARROWED AND
 A CUT-OUT COULD BE MADE IN THE EXISTING SIDEWALK TO
 ALLOW A SPACE FOR THE PALM.
  
 12. ALL UTILITIES, EASEMENTS, STREET LIGHTS AND
 ANYTHING ELSE THAT MAY INTERFERE WITH THE PROPOSED
 LANDSCAPING SHALL BE SHOWN ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN TO
 AVOID CONFLICTS INT HE FIELD.
  
 13. PURSUANT TO SECTION 94-443 (C)(3(A), EACH ROW OF
 PARKING SPACES SHALL BE TERMINATED BY LANDSCAPE ISLANDS
 AND EVERY ISLAND SHALL CONTAIN AT LEAST ONE (1) SHADE
 TREE. THE TERMINAL ISLANDS AT THE NORTHWEST AND
 SOUTHWEST CORNERS OF THE PARKING LOT ARE MISSING TREES.
 THE ELIMINATION OF THE TREE AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF
 THE LOT MAY BE FORGIVEN IF IT CAN BE DEMONSTRATED THAT
 THE CANOPY OF THE EXISTING FICUS TREE ALONG THE
 PERIMETER OF THE SITE WILL NOT ALLOW ENOUGH ROOM FOR A
 NEW TREE TO DEVELOP.
  
 IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT ROBERT
 KUSSNER @ (561) 822-1462.
Review Stop PARK PARKING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 12-05-2009 Cont ID  
Sent By ssamuels Date 12-05-2009 Time 21:24 Rev Time 0.00
Received By ssamuels Date 12-05-2009 Time 21:22 Sent To  
Notes
2009-12-05 21:29:04NOT ENOUGH INFORMATION TO REVIEW THIS PROJECT. THE
 FOLLOWING IS REQUIRED - DETAIL DATA SHEET SHOWING
 PARKING STALL,ADA STALL, SYMBOL AND ADA SIGN
 SPECIFICATION.
Review Stop POLICE POLICE
Rev No 1 Status F Date 12-03-2009 Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 12-03-2009 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date 12-03-2009 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2009-12-03 13:01:51NOT ENOUGH INFORMATION TO REVIEW THIS PROJECT. LISTED
 BELOW IS WHAT I WILL BE LOOKING FOR IN ADDITION TO:
 EXITS, LIGHTING, LIGHTING FIXTURES, LOCKS, ALARMS AND
 CAMERA SYSTEM. IS THERE AN OUTSIDE DECKING?
  
  
 1.1 LIGHTING
 A. PARKING LOT AND PEDESTRIAN LIGHTING SHALL BE:
 A) HIGH EFFICACY OF GREATER THAN 70 LUMENS PER WATT
 B) A KELVIN TEMPERATURE OF 3,500 K OR GREATER THAN
 KELVIN TEMPERATURE
 C) COLOR RENDERING INDEX (CRI) OF 70 OR GREATER
 D) LAMP LIFE OF 20 THOUSAND HOURS OR GREATER.
 B. LIGHT POLES 10 ??? 15 FOOT HIGH FOR PEDESTRIAN-SCALE
 LIGHTING SHALL BE USED FOR ALL PEDESTRIAN WALKWAYS.
 C. PARKING LOT LIGHTING SHALL USE 20 -25 FOOT POLES.
 D. LANDSCAPING SHALL NOT OBSTRUCT VIEW OF WINDOWS,
 BUILDING ADDRESS NUMBERS, LIGHTING AND WALKWAYS.
 E. TIMER CLOCK OR PHOTOCELL SENSOR-ENGAGED LIGHTING FOR
 ABOVE OR NEAR ENTRYWAYS TO BUILDINGS FOR DUSK TO DAWN
 OPERATION SHALL BE PROVIDED.
 F. ENTRANCE SIGN LIGHTING SHALL BE PROVIDED. DIRECTORY
 SHOULD BE AT ALL ENTRANCES WITH LIGHTING
 G. BUILDING LIGHTING (NON-GLARE) SHALL BE AROUND
 PERIMETER ON ALL SIDE.
 1.2 NUMERICAL ADDRESS
 A. ILLUMINATION FOR NIGHTTIME VISIBILITY IS REQUIRED.
 ADDRESS SHOULD BE PLACED UNDER A LIGHT FIXTURE OR BE
 BACK LIT.
 B. BI-DIRECTIONAL VISIBILITY FROM THE ROADWAY IS
 REQUIRED.
 C. ADDRESS NUMBERS ON SUITES/OFFICES WITHIN
 MULTI-TENANT BUILDINGS SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 6 INCHES
 HIGH.
 D. BUILDING NUMBERS SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 12 INCHES
 HIGH AND PLACED IN A CONSPICUOUS LOCATION AWAY FROM
 LANDSCAPING. MULTIPLE LOCATIONS MAY BE REQUIRED.
 NUMBERS OF CONTRASTING COLORS SHOULD BE USED.
 1.3 DOORS
 A. EXTERIOR DOORS SHALL ALL BE EQUIPPED WITH SECURITY
 HINGES AND SHALL BE REINFORCED WITH CASE HARDENED
 STRIKE PLATES. CASE HARDENED DEADBOLT LOCKS SHALL BE
 PROVIDED ON ALL EXTERIOR DOORS WITH A MINIMUM (1) INCH
 THROW OR MECHANICAL INTERLOCK.
 B. GLASS PERIMETER DOORS SHALL BE EQUIPPED WITH CASE
 HARDENED GUARD RINGS TO PROTECT THE MORTISE LOCK
 CYLINDER.
 C. REAR DOORS SHALL BE EQUIPPED WITH 180-DEGREE
 PEEPHOLE/ SECURITY VIEWER.
 1.4 MAILBOXES
 A. MAILBOX LOCATIONS SHALL BE IN A WELL LIT, HIGH
 TRAFFIC LOCATION.
 1.5 DESIGN
 A. BUILDING ARCHITECTURE SHALL ALLOW FOR ENHANCED
 NATURAL SURVEILLANCE OF ALL PARKING LOTS AND PROVIDE A
 SENSE OF SECURITY TO PATRONS AND VISITORS.
 B. ALL BUILDINGS SHALL BE PRE-WIRED FOR CLOSED-CIRCUIT
 TELEVISION (CCTV) AND ALARM SYSTEMS
 C. SIGNS SHALL CLEARLY IDENTIFY PUBLIC ENTRANCES.
 D CONVEX MIRRORS SHALL BE INSTALLED IN STAIRWELL
 ENABLING VIEWS OF UPPER AND LOWER
 STAIRWELLS
 E. BIKE RACKS SHOULD BE AT THE FRONT OF THE BUILDING OR
 COMPLEX, NOT IN THE PARKING LOT
 FOR EASY SURVEILLANCE AND SAFETY.
  
Review Stop STORM STORMWATER
Rev No 2 Status   Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By jrenault Date 02-12-2010 Time 11:41 Sent To  
Notes
2010-02-12 11:46:44ALSO PROVIDE CALCS TO DEMONSTRATE WHAT , IF ANY ,
 AFFECT THIS PROJECT WILL HAVE ON THE ZOO AND THE PARK
 DRAINAGE SYSTEMS.
Review Stop STORM STORMWATER
Rev No 1 Status F Date 12-07-2009 Cont ID  
Sent By jrenault Date 12-07-2009 Time 13:48 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jrenault Date 02-12-2010 Time 11:37 Sent To  
Notes
2009-12-07 13:57:16PROVIDE COPY OF SFWMD PERMIT AND CALCS , INCLUDING BUT
 NOT LIMITED TO WATER QUALITY , ALLOWABLE DISCHARGE AND
 C-51 COMPENSATING STORAGE. PROVIDE POLLUTION AND
 EROSION CONTROL MEASURES.
Review Stop SURVEY SURVEYING
Rev No 1 Status F Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 12-04-2009 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date 12-04-2009 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2009-12-04 09:18:471. WHAT DO THE PUMPS/TRAILER/SHED CONTROL AS IT APPEARS
 THAT POWER IS BEING REMOVED? HAS THE ZOO BEEN MADE
 AWARE OF THE PROPOSED PLAN.
 2. HAS ANY THOUGHT BEEN GIVEN INTO ROUTING THE STORM
 WATER INTO THE SOUTHERN ADJACENT POND?
 3. ANY GARBAGE COLLECTION BEING REQUIRED?
 4. LAW DEPT. REVIEW WILL BE REQUIRED FOR ANY LEASE
 MODIFICATIONS.
 5. THE DRAINAGE AND FILLING OF THE LAKES WILL NEED TO
 BE REVIEWED BY JEFF RENAULT, STORMWATER ENGINEER, THE
 PARKS & REC DEPT. AND SFWMD.
Review Stop TRAFFIC TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 12-01-2009 Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 12-01-2009 Time   Rev Time 0.50
Received By   Date 11-30-2009 Time   Sent To  
Notes
2009-12-01 13:52:27- PLEASE PROVIDE A COPY OF THE APPROVAL LETTER FROM PBC
 REGARDING TRAFFIC PERFORMANCE STANDARDS.
  
 - PROVIDE A STOP BAR AND STOP SIGN AT THE ACCESS DRIVE
 TO THE EXISTING DIRT ROAD (WEST SIDE OF PARKING LOT).
  
 REVIEWED BY M BEADLES FOR B COLLINS
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 12-07-2009 Cont ID  
Sent By jroach Date 12-07-2009 Time 19:48 Rev Time 0.00
Received By jroach Date 12-07-2009 Time 19:48 Sent To  
Notes
2009-12-07 19:48:47ZONING PLANS AND PLATS REVIEW COMMITTEE (PPRC) REVIEW
  
 CASE NO.: ZBA 3258
 ADDRESS: 4801 DREHER TRAIL NORTH
 APPLICANT/CONTACT: JON SCHMIDT
 TELEPHONE NO.: 561.684.6141
 SCOPE OF APPLICATION: EXPANSION TO EXISTING CULTURAL
 FACILITY
  
 PLEASE PROVIDE A WRITTEN RESPONSE TO THE FOLLOWING
 REVIEW COMMENTS:
  
 1. AS REQUIRED BY THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS (ZBA)
 APPLICATION, FIFTEEN (15) SETS OF ARCHITECTURAL PLANS
 SHALL BE PROVIDED.
  
 2. THE PROPOSED EXPANSION SHALL GO BEFORE THE PARKS &
 RECREATION ADVISORY COMMITTEE (PRAC) PRIOR TO THE
 SCHEDULING BEFORE THE ZBA. ADDITIONALLY, A PRESENTATION
 SHALL BE MADE TO THE CITY COMMISSION, IN AN APPROPRIATE
 FORUM, PRIOR TO SCHEDULING BEFORE THE ZBA.
  
 3. ALL REMAINING UTILITY LETTERS SHALL BE PROVIDED
 (FLORIDA PUBLIC UTILITIES, COMCAST, FLORIDA POWER &
 LIGHT, AND CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH PUBLIC UTILITIES).
  
 4. PLEASE CLARIFY WHAT THE DIFFERENT LINE STYLES ARE
 FOR WHAT IS PRESUMED TO BE THE LEASE BOUNDARIES. IS
 INTERSTATE-95 A PART OF THE LEASE? THE LINE THAT RUNS
 PARALLEL TO THE SOUND WALL/FENCE DOES NOT SEEM TO
 CORRESPOND WITH THE LIMITS OF THE INTERSTATE-95
 RIGHT-OF-WAY, AS SHOWN ON THE SURVEY. ADDITIONALLY,
 WHAT AREA OF LAND IS THE SITE/LANDSCAPE DATA TABLES
 GENERATED FROM?
  
 5. THE EASEMENTS SHOWN ON THE SITE/LANDSCAPE PLANS DO
 NOT MATCH THE SURVEY. PLEASE ENSURE THAT ALL PLANS ARE
 CONSISTENT.
  
 6. AS DISPLAYED, LANDSCAPING IS PROPOSED TO BE
 INSTALLED WITHIN THE EXISTING FP&L UTILITY EASEMENTS.
 WRITTEN CONSENT FROM THE EASEMENT HOLDER SHALL BE
 OBTAINED PRIOR TO SCHEDULING BEFORE THE ZBA.
  
 7. IF THE EXISTING DIRT ROAD IS TO REMAIN, IT SHALL BE
 PAVED AND MAINTAINED IN ACCORDANCE TO THE MINIMUM
 STANDARDS. PLEASE CLARIFY WHY THE EXISTING FENCE IS TO
 REMAIN; ITS LOCATION AND CONDITION AS PROPOSED DOES NOT
 APPEAR TO BE FUNCTIONAL AND SHALL BE REMOVED.
  
 8. THERE ARE SEVERAL NEW TREES BEING PROPOSED WITHIN
 CLOSE PROXIMITY TO EXISTING OVERHEAD LINES. PLEASE
 VERIFY THAT THERE ARE NO CONFLICTS.
  
 9. PLEASE LOCATE AND IDENTIFY ALL ABOVE-GROUND UTILITY
 AND MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT ON THE SITE/LANDSCAPE PLANS.
 ADDITIONALLY, SCREENING MAY BE REQUIRED.
  
 10. IT APPEARS THAT THERE MAY BE CONFLICT BETWEEN AT
 LEAST ONE (1) OF THE ROYAL PALMS PROPOSED AT THE
 NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE EXISTING BUILDING AND EXISTING
 UNDERGROUND UTILITIES. PLEASE ADJUST ACCORDINGLY TO
 ENSURE MINIMUM SEPARATION REQUIREMENTS.
  
 11. IN ADDITION TO THE PREVIOUS COMMENT, THERE ALSO
 APPEARS TO BE CONFLICT WITH THE PROPOSED UNDERGROUND
 UTILITIES ASSOCIATED WITH THE NEW ADDITION.
  
 12. PLEASE IDENTIFY THE PROPOSED LIMITS OF THE NEW POND
 CONFIGURATION AND HOW THIS RELATES TO THE PROPOSED
 PARKING LOT. DOES THIS INFLUENCE THE DRAINAGE
 CAPACITY/SYSTEM? IF SO, HAVE THE NECESSARY APPROVALS
 BEEN OBTAINED FOR SUCH MODIFICATION? WILL THE EXISTING
 FENCE SIMPLY DEAD-END, OR WILL IT BE RECONFIGURED
 AROUND THE PROPOSED PARKING LOT? EXISTING FENCING NEEDS
 TO BE CLEANED UP AND FENCING THAT NO LONGER IS
 FUNCTIONAL SHALL BE REMOVED. ADDITIONAL DETAIL IN THIS
 AREA SHALL BE PROVIDED AND ANY APPROVAL DOCUMENTS SHALL
 BE OBTAINED PRIOR TO SCHEDULING BEFORE THE ZBA.
  
 13. SEVERAL EXISTING LIGHT POLES APPEAR TO CONFLICT
 WITH PROPOSED SIDEWALKS ALONG THE NORTH AND NORTHWEST
 SIDES OF THE ADDITION AND EXISTING STRUCTURE. PLEASE
 CLARIFY AS TO WHETHER THESE WILL REMAIN OR IF THEY ARE
 BEING REMOVED/RELOCATED.
  
 14. A PARKING SPACE STRIPING DETAIL SHALL BE PROVIDED
 INDICATING COMPLIANCE WITH THE ZONING AND LAND
 DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS (ZLDRS).
  
 15. ADDITIONAL SCREENING, IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION
 94-444(D) OF THE ZLDRS, SHALL BE PROVIDED AROUND THE
 EXISTING A/C AREA. ADDITIONALLY, PLEASE NOTE THE
 LOCATION OF THE MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT THAT WILL BE
 REQUIRED FOR THE NEW ADDITION.
  
 16. THE PROPOSED FLOOR AREA OF THE NEW ADDITION, AS
 IDENTIFIED IN THE SITE DATA TABLE AND PROJECT FACT
 SHEET, DOES NOT MATCH THAT IDENTIFIED WITHIN THE
 TRAFFIC STUDY AND CONCURRENCY LETTER. PLEASE CLARIFY.
  
 17. SUFFICIENT DETAIL NEEDS TO BE PROVIDED TO ENSURE
 COMPLIANCE WITH THE ZLDRS; DIMENSIONING OF IMPROVEMENTS
 NEEDS TO BE PROVIDED (I.E. LANDSCAPE ISLANDS, DRIVE
 AISLES, PARKING ROWS, ETC.), IDENTIFY LOCATIONS OF
 EXTERIOR DOORWAYS, ETC.
  
 18. PLEASE CONSIDER REDISTRIBUTING THE LANDSCAPE
 ISLANDS WITHIN THE PARKING LOT TO MAKE THEM EVENLY
 SPACED WITHIN THE PARKING ROWS.
  
 19. THERE ARE SEVERAL LOCATIONS SOUTH OF THE EXISTING
 BUILDING WHERE POWER POLES APPEAR TO CONFLICT WITH
 PROPOSED LANDSCAPING WITHIN THE PARKING LOT ISLANDS.
  
 20. PLEASE CONSIDER PROVIDING ADDITIONAL LANDSCAPING
 BETWEEN THE EXISTING PORTABLE ALUMINUM BUILDING AND THE
 PROPOSED PARKING LOT.
  
 21. PURSUANT TO SECTION 94-485(O)(1) OF THE ZLDRS,
 PARKING LOTS CONTAINING 101 PARKING SPACES SHALL
 PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF FIVE (5) DISABLED SPACES; ONLY
 FOUR (4) ARE PROVIDED.
  
 22. PURSUANT TO SECTION 94-485(P) OF THE ZLDRS, THE
 LOADING SPACE SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 10 FEET X 50 FEET;
 THE SITE DATE TABLE INDICATES A MINIMUM OF 15 FEET X 55
 FEET. PLEASE ADJUST ACCORDINGLY.
  
 23. THE LOCATION OF THE PROPOSED LOADING SPACE DOES NOT
 APPEAR TO FUNCTION CORRECTLY. THE LOCATION AND ANGLE
 MAKE IT DIFFICULT TO ENTER/EXIT THE SPACE WITHOUT
 CROSSING TRAFFIC AND THERE APPEARS TO BE NO CONNECTION
 BETWEEN THE LOADING AREA AND THE EXISTING/PROPOSED
 BUILDING.
  
 24. THE LOCATION AND NUMBER OF BICYCLE PARKING SPACES
 SHALL BE INDENTIFIED. ONE (1) BICYCLE SPACE SHALL BE
 PROVIDED FOR EVERY 20 AUTOMOBILE SPACES. A DETAIL OF
 THE PROPOSED BICYCLE RACK SHALL BE PROVIDED AND SHALL
 CONFORM TO THE CITY???S MINIMUM CRITERIA.
  
 25. PLEASE INDICATE THE NUMBER OF PARKING SPACES FROM
 THE EXISTING PARKING LOT THAT ARE BEING RECONSTRUCTED.
  
 26. DUE TO THE NATURE OF THE USE OF THE STRUCTURE, IT
 IS STRONGLY ENCOURAGED THAT ADDITIONAL PARKING BE
 PROVIDED FOR BUSES. BUSES SHALL NOT BE PARKED ON GRASS
 AND/OR THE DIRT ROAD, AND LOADING/UNLOADING SHOULD NOT
 INTERFERE WITH THE NORMAL FLOW OF TRAFFIC.
  
 27. THE MINIMUM REQUIRED LANDSCAPING BUFFERING SHALL BE
 PROVIDED ALONG THE WEST PROPERTY LINE. IN ADDITION,
 BUFFERING SHALL BE PROVIDED BETWEEN THE PROPOSED
 PARKING AND THE PALM BEACH ZOO PROPERTY LOCATED TO THE
 SOUTH.
  
 28. PLEASE CLARIFY AS TO WHETHER OR NOT THE EXISTING
 CONCRETE PAD (FORMER TENT SITE) WILL BE REMOVED. THE
 SITE PLAN INDICATES IS LOCATION, BUT DOES NOT IDENTIFY
 WHAT WILL OCCUR. THE CONCEPTUAL DRAINAGE PLAN NOTES
 THAT IT IS TO BE REMOVED.
  
 29. PLEASE IDENTIFY THE LOCATION OF ANY
 EXISTING/PROPOSED DUMPSTERS. ALL GARBAGE RECEPTACLES
 SHALL BE SCREENED IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 94-444(B)
 OF THE ZLDRS.
  
 PLEASE NOTE THE FOLLOWING WHEN RESUBMITTING:
  
 A) WRITTEN RESPONSES TO COMMENTS MADE BY ALL
 DEPARTMENTS SHALL BE PROVIDED UPON RESUBMISSION.
  
 B) 15 SETS OF REVISED PLANS AND/OR DOCUMENTS SHALL BE
 PROVIDED, ALONG WITH ONE (1) REDUCED COPY (11 INCHES X
 17 INCHES), AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY OF ALL PLANS.
  
 C) PLEASE NOTE THAT RE-SUBMITTALS MAY BE SUBJECT TO
 ADDITIONAL COMMENTS.
  
 D) IF NO RESPONSE IS RECEIVED WITHIN 60 DAYS OF THE
 ISSUANCE OF THESE COMMENTS, THE APPLICATION WILL BE
 CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN AND ANY FURTHER ACTION WILL
 REQUIRE SUBMISSION OF A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION.
  
 E) PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1)
 RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED
 COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE
 APPLICANT WILL BE ACCESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE
 WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE.
  
 QUESTIONS/COMMENTS, PLEASE CONTACT THE FOLLOWING:
  
 JOHN ROACH, SENIOR PLANNER
 CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH
 PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT
 401 CLEMATIS STREET - P.O. BOX 3366
 WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33402
  
 PHONE: 561.822.1435
 FAX: 561.822.1459
  
 EMAIL: [email protected]
  
 WWW.CITYOFWPB.COM
  
  Print


Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved