Plan Review Details - Project Z09070016
Plan Review Stops For Project Z09070016
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 2 Status F Date 08-27-2009 Cont ID  
Sent By eschneid Date 08-27-2009 Time 11:56 Rev Time 0.00
Received By eschneid Date 08-27-2009 Time 11:56 Sent To  
Notes
2009-08-27 12:00:55FAILED
 PER REVIEW BY ROBERT BROWN, CONSTRUCTION SERVICES
 DEPARTMENT
  
 REPEAT COMMENT: PRELIMINARY FLOOR PLANS HAVE EGRESS AND
 ACCESSIBILITY ISSUES.
  
 1) THE PROVISION OF THE KITCHENETTE AND MULTI-PURPOSE
 SPACE ON THE 2ND FLOOR REQUIRE AN ELEVATOR. THE PLANS
 SHALL BE REVISED ACCORDINGLY.
  
 2) THE ACCESSIBLE WALKWAY FROM THE PUBLIC SIDEWALK
 NEEDS TO BE RELOCATED TO PROVIDE THE MOST DIRECT ROUTE.
  
 3) THE HC PARKING SPACE SHALL BE THE CLOSEST PARKING
 SPACE TO THE ENTRANCE TO THE BUILDING.
Review Stop B BUILDING (STRUCTURAL)
Rev No 1 Status F Date 08-12-2009 Cont ID  
Sent By lmartine Date 08-12-2009 Time 10:36 Rev Time 0.00
Received By MMARTINE Date 08-12-2009 Time 11:55 Sent To  
Notes
2009-08-12 10:48:15PRELIMINARY FLOOR PLANS HAVE EGRESS AND ACCESSIBILITY
 ISSUES. PLEASE EXPLAIN THE PARKING SPACES CROSSING
 PROPERTY LINES TO THE NORTH THAT ABUT THE SMITH AND
 MOORE BUILDING.
  
  
 LUIS MARTINEZ
 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES
 561-805-6710
Review Stop ENG-APP ENGINEERING APP. REVIEW
Rev No 2 Status P Date 08-27-2009 Cont ID  
Sent By eschneid Date 08-27-2009 Time 11:12 Rev Time 0.00
Received By eschneid Date 08-27-2009 Time 11:12 Sent To  
Notes
2009-08-27 11:13:18DUMPSTER ARRAINGMENTS OK PER 8/26/09 E-MAIL FROM EMERY
 FABIAN.
Review Stop ENG-APP ENGINEERING APP. REVIEW
Rev No 1 Status N Date 08-03-2009 Cont ID  
Sent By efabian Date 08-03-2009 Time 15:15 Rev Time 0.00
Received By EFABIAN Date 08-07-2009 Time 17:43 Sent To  
Notes
2009-08-03 15:21:15NOTE: ENGINEERING SERVICES HAS NO OBJECTION TO AMEND
 THE SITE TO INCLUDE A PROPOSED ORTHODONTIST'S OFFICE.
 HOWEVER PLEASE OBSERVE THE FOLLOWING CONCERNS THIS
 DEPARTMENT REQUESTS:
  
  
 1. PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING/WATER SERVICE
 PLANS/CONNECTIONS ARE NOT SHOWN AS PER CITY OF WEST
 PALM BEACH'S STANDARDS (WS-9 & WS-10). THE DISTANCES
 SHOWN (SHEET C-1) BETWEEN THE DCDA, BFP AND PROPERTY
 LINE, EXCEED THE ALLOWABLE DISTANCE (3 FEET MAXIMUM).
 IT WILL BE NECESSARY TO REDESIGN THE CONFIGURATION OF
 THE LOCATION OF THESE CROSS-CONNECTIONS TO A SMALLER
 FOOTPRINT/EASEMENT AND MORE CONFINED TO THE S.E. CORNER
 OF THE PROPERTY.
  
 2. SHEET C-1 SHOWS A TRUCK INSIDE THE LOWER PARKING
 LEVEL. THIS IS INSUFFICIENT CLEARANCE (26 FEET MIN.
 UNOBSTRUCTED VERTICAL HEIGHT), TO OPERATE A SANITATION
 TRUCK, IF THAT IS THE INTENT. IT WAS ALSO PREVIOUSLY
 AGREED UPON TO SERVICE SOLID WASTE DUMPSTERS AT A
 STAGING AREA ON THE SERVICE ENTRANCE DRIVEWAY.
  
 3. PLEASE PROVIDE TECHNICAL PLAN DETAILS DEPICTING THE
 STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY OF THE PROPOSED BARRIER WALL/FLOOR
 SYSTEM FOR THE PROPOSED MULTI-LEVEL UNDERGROUND PARKING
 FACILITIES THAT IS SUFFICIENT TO ENSURE THE ENTIRE
 UNDERGROUND COMPLEX SHALL REMAIN PROTECTED FROM WATER
 INTRUSION AT THE PROPOSED FLOOD ZONE A5 SITE, (AT
 PLUS/MINUS ELEVEN FEET BELOW SEA LEVEL), SHALL KEEP THE
 FACILITY DRY AT ALL TIMES.
  
 PLEASE CONTACT THE REVIEWER FOR ANY QUESTIONS:
  
 EMERY P. FABIAN
 ENGINEERING PROJECT COORDINATOR
 ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 401 CLEMATIS STREET, 4TH FLOOR
 WEST PALM BEACH, FL 33401
 PHONE: 561-822-1200
 FAX: 561-494-1116
  
 EMAIL: [email protected]
  
  
  
  
Review Stop FIRE FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No 2 Status P Date 08-27-2009 Cont ID  
Sent By eschneid Date 08-27-2009 Time 11:18 Rev Time 0.00
Received By eschneid Date 08-27-2009 Time 11:18 Sent To  
Notes
2009-08-27 11:19:05ALL PPRC COMMENTS TO BE ADDRESSED DURING BUILDING
 PERMIT PROCESS.
Review Stop FIRE FIRE DEPARTMENT
Rev No 1 Status F Date 07-29-2009 Cont ID  
Sent By mcarsill Date 07-29-2009 Time 15:30 Rev Time 0.00
Received By mcarsill Date 07-29-2009 Time 15:15 Sent To  
Notes
2009-07-29 15:30:191. BUILDING ADDRESS REQUIRED. A MINIMUM OF AT LEAST 6"
 HIGH AND 1" WIDE NUMBERS ARE REQUIRED.
  
 2. PLEASE INDICATE ON THE PERMITTED SET OF PLANS ALL
 SAFETY RELATED SYSTEMS AND DEVICES. THEY INCLUDE
 ILLUMINATED EXIT SIGNS, EMERGENCY LIGHTS, AND PORTABLE
 FIRE EXTINGUISHERS.
  
 3. PLEASE REVIEW THE FLORIDA FIRE PREVENTION CODE, NEW
 BUSINESS OCCUPANCIES FOR THE REQUIREMENTS FOR A SINGLE
 MEANS OF EGRESS. A SINGLE MEANS OF EGRESS IS SHOWN FROM
 THE SECOND FLOOR; HOWEVER SOME CODE REQUIREMENTS DO NOT
 APPEAR TO BE MET.
  
 4. PLEASE INDICATE INTERIOR FINISH CLASSIFICATIONS FOR
 WALLS AND CEILINGS.
  
 5. DESIGNATED EMPLOYEES SHALL RECEIVE FIRE EXTINGUISHER
 TRAINING.
  
 6. ALL WORK IS REQUIRED TO BE PROPERLY PERMITTED PRIOR
 TO STARTING CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES.
  
 7. ALL CONSTRUCTION, DEMOLITION, AND RENOVATION TO
 COMPLY WITH NFPA 241.
  
 8. THIS LIST SHALL NOT BE CONSIDERED ALL INCLUSIVE
 RELATED TO CODE REQUIREMENTS.
  
  
 MIKE CARSILLO, BATTALION CHIEF
 BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION
 804-4709 PHONE
 804-4774 FAX
Review Stop L LANDSCAPING
Rev No 2 Status F Date 08-25-2009 Cont ID  
Sent By rkussner Date 08-25-2009 Time 16:01 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rkussner Date 08-25-2009 Time 16:29 Sent To  
Notes
2009-08-25 16:12:33***LANDSCAPE REVIEW FAILED***
  
 1. PURSUANT TO SECTION 94-443(C)(3)(A), EACH ROW OF
 PARKING SPACES SHALL BE TERMINATED BY LANDSCAPE ISLANDS
 OF NOT LESS THAN FIVE FEET IN WDTH AND NOT LESS THAN
 THE LENGTH OF THE ADJACENT PARKING STALL. THE TERMINAL
 LANDSCAPE ISLAND AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE
 PROPOSED BUILDING HAS LESS THAN A FIVE FOOT WIDE INSIDE
 DIMENSION. PLEASE ENLARGE THE ISLAND AND THE LANDSCAPE
 SPACE ADJACENT TO IT WHERE THE ADONIDIA PALMS ARE
 PROPOSED.
  
 2. REPEAT COMMENT: SITE LIGHTING SHALL BE SHOWN ON THE
 LANDSCAPE PLAN TO AVOID ANY CONFLICTS WITH PROPOSED
 TREES. THE LIGHTING PLAN SHALL BE SUBMITTED AND
 APPROVED THROUGH THIS REVIEW PROCESS.
  
 IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT ROBERT
 KUSSNER @ (561) 822-1462.
Review Stop L LANDSCAPING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 08-07-2009 Cont ID  
Sent By rkussner Date 08-07-2009 Time 16:18 Rev Time 0.00
Received By rkussner Date 08-07-2009 Time 16:18 Sent To  
Notes
2009-08-07 17:35:56***LANDSCAPE COMMENTS***
  
 1. PURSUANT TO SECTION 94-443 (D)(2)(A), AT LEAST ONE
 SHADE OF FLOWERING TREE FOR EACH DWELLING UNIT FOR
 MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURES WITH SIX OR MORE
 UNITS PER STRUCTURE SHALL BE PLANTED ON THE EXTERIOR OF
 ALL STRUCTURES. PLEASE PROVIDE THE CALCULATIONS THAT
 DEMONSTRATE COMPLIANCE WITH THIS REQUIREMENT.
  
 2. PURSUANT TO SECTION 94-443(C)(3)(A), EACH ROW OF
 PARKING SPACES SHALL BE TERMINATED BY LANDSCAPE ISLANDS
 OF NOT LESS THAN FIVE FEET IN WIDTH AND NOT LESS THAN
 THE LENGTH OF THE ADJACENT PARKING STALL. THE
 LANDSCAPED ISLAND SHALL CONTAIN AT LEAST ONE SHADE OR
 FLOWERING TREE. THE PARKING ROW LOCATED AT THE
 NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE PROPERTY THAT IS PARTIALLY
 OFF-SITE DOES NOT MEET THIS REQUIREMENT.
  
 3. PURSUANT TO SECTION 94-485 (E), PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF
 A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY, ALL PARKING AND LOADING
 SPACES, ACCESS DRIVES, AND MANEUVERING LANES SHALL BE
 PAVED WITH A NONDUSTING SURFACE IN COMPLIANCE WITH
 STANDARDS SPECIFIED BY THE CITY. THE PLANNING DIRECTOR,
 IN COORDINATION WITH THE CITY'S ENGINEERS, MAY APPROVE
 TYPES OF PAVING NOT SPECIFIED UPON A FINDING THAT SUCH
 OTHER TYPES ARE EQUIVALENT IN APPEARANCE AND
 DURABILITY. GRASS PARKING HAS BEEN PROPOSED IN THE AREA
 OF THE SITE MENTIONED IN THE ITEM ABOVE. PLEASE SHOW
 THE LIMITS OF THE PROPOSED GRASS BLOCK. GRASS BLOCK IS
 TYPICALLY NOT APPROVED IN PARKING LOTS THAT ARE
 OCCUPIED MORE THAN ONCE OR TWICE PER WEEK SUCH AS
 CHURCH OVERFLOW PARKING.
  
 4. PURSUANT TO SECTION 94-442 (D), PRIVATE LAND AND
 PUBLIC RIGHTS-OF-WAY BETWEEN STREET OR SIDEWALK
 SURFACES AND REQUIRED BUFFER STRIPS AND LANDSCAPE OPEN
 SPACE AREAS SHALL BE PLANTED WITH GRASS. GRASS AREAS
 SHALL BE SODDED. THIS INCLUDES ALL RIGHTS-OF-WAY.
  
 5. PURSUANT TO SECTION 94-445 (4)(G)(3), AUTOMATIC
 IRRIGATION SYSTEMS SHALL BE USED FOR THE CULTIVATED
 LANDSCAPE AREAS FOR ALL PROPERTIES. THIS INCLUDES THE
 ADJACENT RIGHTS-OF-WAY.
  
 6. SITE LIGHTING SHALL BE SHOWN ON THE LANDSCAPE PLAN
 TO AVOID ANY CONFLICTS WITH PROPOSED TREES.
  
 7. THE COMBINATION OF CURBING AND CAR-STOPS HAS BEEN
 PROPOSED IN THE WEST PARKING LOT. IN ORDER TO SAVE
 MONEY AND INCREASE THE LANDSCAPE AREA, THE CURBING
 SHOULD BE INSTALLED IN PLACE OF THE CAR STOPS. THE TWO
 FOOT AREA BEYOND THE CURBING CAN BE CONVERTED INTO
 GREEN SPACE. BECAUSE THIS IS A VEHICLE OVERHANG AREA,
 NO SHRUBS, TREES OR TALL GROUND COVER CAN BE PLANTED
 WITHIN THIS TWO FOOT STRIP, BUT THE ADDED GREEN SPACE
 WILL ALLOW THE TREES TO HAVE A LARGER AREA IN WHICH TO
 SPREAD THEIR ROOTS.
  
  
 IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS, PLEASE CONTACT ROBERT
 KUSSNER @ (561) 822-1462.
Review Stop PARK PARKING
Rev No 2 Status P Date 08-27-2009 Cont ID  
Sent By eschneid Date 08-27-2009 Time 11:19 Rev Time 0.00
Received By eschneid Date 08-27-2009 Time 11:19 Sent To  
Notes
2009-08-27 11:20:00DETAILS PROVIDED.
Review Stop PARK PARKING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 08-06-2009 Cont ID  
Sent By ssamuels Date 08-06-2009 Time 19:43 Rev Time 0.00
Received By ssamuels Date 08-06-2009 Time 19:42 Sent To  
Notes
2009-08-06 19:49:59DETAIL SHEET ON PARKING SPECIFICATION NOT PROVIDED.
  
 ADA SPECIFICATION ARE VERY IMPORTANT.
Review Stop POLICE POLICE
Rev No 2 Status P Date 08-27-2009 Cont ID  
Sent By eschneid Date 08-27-2009 Time 11:21 Rev Time 0.00
Received By eschneid Date 08-27-2009 Time 11:21 Sent To  
Notes
2009-08-27 11:22:33NO OUTSTANDING SITE PLAN ITEMS.
  
 INTERIOR ITEMS TO BE ADDRESSED AT BUILDING PERMIT.
Review Stop POLICE POLICE
Rev No 1 Status N Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2009-08-05 11:30:10INTERIOR:
  
 A. PLACE GLASS IN THE SEATING AREA FOR A CLEAR VIEW
 INTO THE SEATING AREA FROM THE RECEPTION DESK
 B. PLACE DOOR ACROSS THE HALLWAY LEADING INTO THE BACK
 PATIENT AREA. (ACROSS THE RECEPTION DESK, AFTER THE
 PATIENT RESTROOM.)
 C. PLACE A SWINGING TYPE DOOR ACROSS THE RECEPTION AREA
 ENTRY.
 D. HOW ARE YOU RESTRICTING ACESS INTO STAIRWELL LEADING
 TO THE SECOND FLOOR?
  
 NO LIGHTING IS SHOWN ON THE PLAN, THIS NEEDS TO BE
 SUBMITTED SO IT CAN BE CHECKED AGAINST THE LANSCAPE
 PLAN THAT WAS SUBMITTED.
  
 3 COMMERCIAL SECURITY
  
 3.1 LIGHTING
 A. PARKING LOT AND PEDESTRIAN LIGHTING SHALL BE:
 A) HIGH EFFICACY OF GREATER THAN 70 LUMENS PER WATT
 B) A KELVIN TEMPERATURE OF 3,500 K OR GREATER THAN
 KELVIN TEMPERATURE
 C) COLOR RENDERING INDEX (CRI) OF 70 OR GREATER
 D) LAMP LIFE OF 20 THOUSAND HOURS OR GREATER.
 B. LIGHT POLES 10 ??? 15 FOOT HIGH FOR PEDESTRIAN-SCALE
 LIGHTING SHALL BE USED FOR ALL PEDESTRIAN WALKWAYS.
 C. PARKING LOT LIGHTING SHALL USE 20 -25 FOOT POLES.
 D. LANDSCAPING SHALL NOT OBSTRUCT VIEW OF WINDOWS,
 BUILDING ADDRESS NUMBERS, LIGHTING AND WALKWAYS.
 E. TIMER CLOCK OR PHOTOCELL SENSOR-ENGAGED LIGHTING FOR
 ABOVE OR NEAR ENTRYWAYS TO BUILDINGS FOR DUSK TO DAWN
 OPERATION SHALL BE PROVIDED.
 F. ENTRANCE SIGN LIGHTING SHALL BE PROVIDED.
 G. BUILDING LIGHTING (NON-GLARE) SHALL BE AROUND
 PERIMETER ON ALL SIDE.
  
 3.2 NUMERICAL ADDRESS
 A. ILLUMINATION FOR NIGHTTIME VISIBILITY IS REQUIRED.
 ADDRESS SHOULD BE PLACED UNDER A LIGHT FIXTURE OR BE
 BACK LIT.
 B. BI-DIRECTIONAL VISIBILITY FROM THE ROADWAY IS
 REQUIRED.
 C. ADDRESS NUMBERS ON SUITES/OFFICES WITHIN
 MULTI-TENANT BUILDINGS SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 6 INCHES
 HIGH.
 D. BUILDING NUMBERS SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 12 INCHES
 HIGH AND PLACED IN A CONSPICUOUS LOCATION AWAY FROM
 LANDSCAPING. MULTIPLE LOCATIONS MAY BE REQUIRED.
 NUMBERS OF CONTRASTING COLORS SHOULD BE USED.
  
 3.3 DOORS
 A. EXTERIOR DOORS SHALL ALL BE EQUIPPED WITH SECURITY
 HINGES AND SHALL BE REINFORCED WITH CASE HARDENED
 STRIKE PLATES. CASE HARDENED DEADBOLT LOCKS SHALL BE
 PROVIDED ON ALL EXTERIOR DOORS WITH A MINIMUM (1) INCH
 THROW OR MECHANICAL INTERLOCK.
 B. GLASS PERIMETER DOORS SHALL BE EQUIPPED WITH CASE
 HARDENED GUARD RINGS TO PROTECT THE MORTISE LOCK
 CYLINDER.
 C. REAR DOORS SHALL BE EQUIPPED WITH 180-DEGREE
 PEEPHOLE/ SECURITY VIEWER.
  
 3.5 DESIGN
 A. BUILDING ARCHITECTURE SHALL ALLOW FOR ENHANCED
 NATURAL SURVEILLANCE OF ALL PARKING LOTS AND PROVIDE A
 SENSE OF SECURITY TO PATRONS AND VISITORS.
 B. LANDSCAPING SHALL NOT OBSTRUCT VIEW FROM WINDOWS OR
 WALKWAYS.
 C. ALL BUILDINGS SHALL BE PRE-WIRED FOR CLOSED-CIRCUIT
 TELEVISION (CCTV) AND ALARM SYSTEMS.
 D. DUMPSTERS SHALL NOT ALLOW FOR EASY CONCEALMENT,
 CREATE BLIND SPOTS OR HIDING AREAS AND SHOULD BE ABLE
 TO BE LOCKED.
 E. SIGNS SHALL CLEARLY IDENTIFY PUBLIC ENTRANCES.
 F. LANDSCAPING SHALL BE MAINTAINED AT 3 FEET OR LESS.
 TREES SHALL BE INSTALLED SO AS NOT TO CONFLICT WITH THE
 LIGHTING SYSTEM. LOWER CANOPY LIMBS ON TREES SHALL BE
 MAINTAINED AT 8 FEET OR HIGHER.
 G. CONVEX MIRRORS SHALL BE INSTALLED IN STAIRWELL
 ENABLING VIEWS OF UPPER AND LOWER STAIRWAYS.
 H. BIKE RACKS SHOULD BE AT THE FRONT OF THE BUILDING OR
 COMPLEX, NOT IN THE PARKING LOT FOR EASY SURVEILLANCE
 AND SAFETY.
  
Review Stop STORM STORMWATER
Rev No 2 Status P Date 08-27-2009 Cont ID  
Sent By eschneid Date 08-27-2009 Time 11:23 Rev Time 0.00
Received By eschneid Date 08-27-2009 Time 11:23 Sent To  
Notes
2009-08-27 11:31:39PER JEFF RENAULT: A SOUTH FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT
 PERMIT WILL BE REQUIRED PRIOR TO BUILDING PERMIT
 SUBMITTAL. PLEASE CONTACT MR. RENAULT FOR MORE
 INFORMATION.
Review Stop STORM STORMWATER
Rev No 1 Status F Date 08-03-2009 Cont ID  
Sent By jrenault Date 08-03-2009 Time 11:17 Rev Time 0.00
Received By JRENAULT Date 08-03-2009 Time 11:23 Sent To  
Notes
2009-08-03 11:51:311. PROVIDE CALCULATIONS TO DEMONSTRATE THAT WATER
 QUALITY IS BEING PROVIDED
 2. PROVIDE CALCULATIONS TO DEMONSTRATE THAT THE POST
 DEVELOPMENT SITE RUNOFF DOES NOT EXCEED THE PRE
 DEVELOPMENT SITE RUNOFF
 3. IF TREES ARE LOCATED WITHIN 10' OF EXFILTRATION
 TRENCHES , PROVIDE ROOT BARRIER
 4. WHAT IS THE TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA ? IF IT IS 2 ACRES
 OR MORE , PROVIDE A COPY OF THE SFWMD PERMIT
Review Stop SURVEY SURVEYING
Rev No 1 Status F Date   Cont ID  
Sent By   Date   Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By   Date   Time   Sent To  
Notes
2009-08-04 14:58:041. REPLAT WILL BE REQUIRED. A SEPARATE APPLICATION WILL
 NEED TO BE MADE THROUGH ENGINEERING SERVICES.
 2. TWO ON-SITE BENCHMARKS ARE REQUIRED PER MTS.
 3. EXISTING UTILITY EASEMENTS PER PLAT WILL NEED TO BE
 ABANDONED.
 4. THE 20' UTILITY EASEMENT SHOWN ON THE PRELIMINARY
 ENGINEERING PLANS CAN BE DEDICATED BY THE REPLAT.
 5. HOW IS THE PROPOSED PARKING LYING ON THE SOUTH LINE
 OF LOTS 7/8 TO BE HANDLED.
 6. A SIDEWALK AND POSSIBLY A ROADWAY/PARKING EASEMENT
 ALONG ARKONA COURT MAY BE REQUIRED.
 7. IS THE PASSIVE PARK AND EMERGENCY VEHICLE ACCESS
 AREA TO BE DEDICATED TO THE CITY?
  
Review Stop TRAFFIC TRAFFIC ENGINEERING
Rev No 1 Status N Date 08-07-2009 Cont ID  
Sent By   Date 08-07-2009 Time   Rev Time 0.00
Received By bcollins Date 08-07-2009 Time 09:11 Sent To  
Notes
2009-08-07 09:09:06TRAFFIC STUDY TEXT DOES NOT ADDRESS MEDICAL OFFICE
 ACCESS ONTO OLIVE - ONLY RESIDENTIAL ACCESS ON ARKONA.
 APPENDIX GRAPHIC SHOWS LOW VOLUMES AT OLIVE DRIVEWAY.
 CONCURRENCY LETTER MAY BE REQUIRED FOR MEDICAL OFFICE.
 SITE DRIVEWAY ON OLIVE DOES NOT LINE UP WITH
 CRANESNEST.
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 3 Status F Date 11-19-2009 Cont ID  
Sent By eschneid Date 11-19-2009 Time 16:31 Rev Time 1.50
Received By eschneid Date 11-19-2009 Time 16:31 Sent To  
Notes
2009-11-19 16:31:30PB 1559D - THE MODERN RPD EXPANSION
 FAILED
 REVIEWER ERIC SCHNEIDER (561) 822-1446.
  
 - PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN
 WRITTEN FORMAT.
  
 - WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF TEN
 (10) COPIES AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY IN .PNG FORMAT OF
 ALL REVISED PLANS. PLEASE NOTE THAT RE-SUBMITTALS MAY
 BE SUBJECT TO ADDITIONAL COMMENTS.
  
 - PLEASE PROVIDE ALL TEXT DOCUMENTS IN WORD FORMAT.
  
 - THE PPRC RESUBMITTAL COMMENTS SHALL BE SUFFICIENTLY
 ADDRESSED AND SUBMITTED TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING
 DEPARTMENT BY NOON ON MONDAY, NOVEMBER 30, 2009, TO BE
 SCHEDULED FOR THE DECEMBER 15, 2009 PLANNING BOARD
 MEETING.
  
 - PLEASE NOTE THAT IF THE PLANNING AND ZONING
 DEPARTMENT HAS NOT RECEIVED A RESPONSE TO THE COMMENTS
 WITHIN 60 DAYS FROM COMMENT DATE STATED ABOVE, THE CASE
 SHALL BE CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN. ANY FURTHER ACTION SHALL
 REQUIRE RESUBMITTAL OF A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION.
  
 1) PROVIDE THE ANGLE FOR THE NEW ANGLED PARKING SPACES.
  
 2) THE NEW ANGLED PARKING SPACES APPEAR TO BE AT A 60
 DEGREE ANGLE. THE SPACES SHOWN ON THE PLAN ARE ONLY
 14.5 FEET DEEP (NOTE THAT THE MEASURE POINT IS THE
 SHORTEST SIDE).
  
 3) 60 DEGREE ANGLED PARKING REQUIRES AN 18 FOOT WIDE
 DRIVE AISLE. THE 12 FOOT WIDE AISLE AS PROVIDED WOULD
 ONLY SERVE 30 DEGREE ANGLED PARKING.
  
 4) PROVIDE THE RIGHT-OF-WAY CENTER LINE SETBACK TO THE
 BUILDING.
  
 5) PROVIDE THE SET BACK TO THE WALL FROM THE PROPERTY
 LINE.
  
 6) THE WEST ELEVATION IS MISLABELED.
  
 7) CORRECT THE NORTH, EAST AND SOUTH ELEVATIONS BASED
 ON THE NEW BUILDING LAYOUT.
  
 8) PROVIDE DETAILS OF THE PROPOSED BLOCK WALL AND A
 WEST ELEVATION SHOWING THE WALL IN FRONT OF THE
 BUILDING. STAFF HAS CONCERNS THAT THE PLACEMENT AND
 MATERIAL OF THE WALL DOES NOT MEET THE INTENT OF THE
 BUILDING ADDRESSING SOUTH OLIVE AVENUE.
  
 9) HOW WILL ACCESS BE PROVIDED TO THE A/C UNITS? NO
 OPENING IS SHOWN IN THE WALL AND THERE IS NO ACCESS
 FROM THE BUILDING.
  
 10) STAFF WAS UNDER THE IMPRESSION THAT THE INSIDE OF
 THE WALL WOULD BE SCREENED WITH LANDSCAPE TO PROVIDE A
 VIEW FOR THE PATIENTS. IF LANDSCAPE IS PROVIDED, HOW
 WILL IT BE MAINTAINED?
  
 11) THE DESIGN OF THE WEST SIDE OF THE BUILDING READS
 AS THE REAR OF A BUILDING AND THUS DOES NOT INTERACT
 WITH SOUTH OLIVE AVENUE. IN ORDER TO INTEGRATE WITH
 SOUTH OLIVE AVENUE AND THE MANGO PROMENADE
 NEIGHBORHOOD, PLEASE ADD A PORCH TO THE WEST FACADE OF
 THE BUILDING. STAFF RECOMMENDS THAT IT BE LOCATED IN
 FRONT OF THE ORTHO TREATMENT BAYS. THERE ARE SEVERAL
 OPTIONS FOR THE PORCH:
  
 A) A THREE FOOT DEEP ROOFED PORCH EXTENDING FROM THE
 BUILDING.
 B) A FIVE FOOT DEEP PORCH EXTENDING FROM THE BUILDING
 WITH A ROOF EXTENDING THREE FEET FROM THE BUILDING.
 C) MOVE THE BUILDING TWO FEET EAST OR REDUCE THE WEST
 FOOTPRINT TWO FEET AND ADD A FIVE FOOT DEEP, ROOFED
 PORCH.
  
 12) THE PORCH SHALL BE ACCESSED BY A DOOR FROM THE
 INTERIOR OF THE BUILDING - RECOMMEND FRENCH STYLE
 DOOR(S).
  
 13) STAFF WOULD LIKE TO SEE THE PORCH HAVE STEPS TO THE
 GROUND THAT LEAD TO A GATE IN THE WALL TO CREATE THE
 INTERACTION WITH SOUTH OLIVE AVENUE.
  
 14) IN ORDER TO ACHIEVE A MORE RESIDENTIAL APPEARANCE
 ON THE WEST ELEVATION STAFF SUGGESTS USING DIFFERENT
 ROOF SLOPES AND A RELOCATION OF THE CENTER GABLE. STAFF
 IS AVAILABLE TO DISCUSS OPTIONS.
  
 15) PLEASE CLEARLY DEFINE PAVED VS. LANDSCAPE AREAS ON
 THE PLANS. DIFFICULT TO DISCERN AROUND THE BIKE RACK.
  
 16) THE EASTERN PARKING ROW REQUIRES TREES IN THE
 TERMINAL ISLANDS.
  
 17) SHIFT THE TREE IN THE EASTERN TERMINAL ISLAND OF
 THE OFF-SITE PARKING AREA TO THE NORTH. THIS WILL ALLOW
 ITS ROOT SYSTEM MORE SPACE AND ALIGN IT WITH THE
 WESTERN TERMINAL ISLAND TREE.
  
 18) JIM WITMER OF THE CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPARTMENT
 REVIEWED THE LAYOUT OF THE INTERIOR OF THE BUILDING AND
 THE PROPOSED ACCESSIBLE ROUTE ON THE NORTH SIDE OF THE
 BUILDING FOR FLORIDA ACCESSIBILITY CODE COMPLIANCE. HE
 EXPRESSED CONCERNS THAT THE CURRENT DESIGN DOES NOT
 COMPLY WITH THE CODE. SOME OF HIS COMMENTS WILL AFFECT
 THE SITE AND LANDSCAPE PLANS AND ELEVATIONS.
  
 19) THE SANITATION DEPARTMENT HAS NOT YET AGREED TO THE
 ELIMINATION OF THE DUMPSTERS.
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 2 Status F Date 08-27-2009 Cont ID  
Sent By eschneid Date 08-27-2009 Time 11:32 Rev Time 2.50
Received By eschneid Date 08-27-2009 Time 11:32 Sent To  
Notes
2009-08-27 11:53:38FAILED
 REVIEWER ERIC SCHNEIDER (561) 822-1446.
  
 - PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN
 WRITTEN FORMAT.
  
 - WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF TEN
 (10) COPIES AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY IN .PNG FORMAT OF
 ALL REVISED PLANS. PLEASE NOTE THAT RE-SUBMITTALS MAY
 BE SUBJECT TO ADDITIONAL COMMENTS.
  
 - PLEASE PROVIDE ALL TEXT DOCUMENTS IN WORD FORMAT.
  
 - THE PPRC RESUBMITTAL COMMENTS SHALL BE SUFFICIENTLY
 ADDRESSED AN SUBMITTED TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING
 DEPARTMENT BY NOON ON FRIDAY, SEPTEMBER18, 2009, TO BE
 SCHEDULED FOR THE OCTOBER 20, 2009 PLANNING BOARD
 MEETING.
  
 - PLEASE NOTE THAT IF THE PLANNING AND ZONING
 DEPARTMENT HAS NOT RECEIVED A RESPONSE TO THE PPRC
 COMMENTS WITHIN 60 DAYS FROM THE DATE STATED ABOVE, THE
 CASE SHALL BE CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN. ANY FURTHER ACTION
 SHALL REQUIRE RESUBMITTAL OF A NEW DEVELOPMENT
 APPLICATION.
  
 - PLEASE NOTE THAT DUE TO THE REPEAT COMMENTS BELOW,
 THE NEXT RESUBMITTAL SHALL BE ACCESSED A RESUBMITTAL
 FEE OF $600 (20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE).
  
 1. REPEAT COMMENT: PROVIDE A COPY OF THE APPROVED SITE
 AND LANDSCAPE PLANS WITH ALL REQUIRED DEVELOPMENT
 CALCULATIONS FOR THIS APPLICATION FILE. THESE PLANS
 SHALL INCLUDE THE PARKING AND UTILITY SERVICE LEVEL
 PLANS.
  
 - THE APPROVED VERSION WAS NOT SUBMITTED. NOTE THIS MAY
 BY 11"X14" SIZE.
  
 2. REPEAT COMMENT: PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF THREE (3)
 COPIES OF THE EACH OF THE SIGNED AND SEALED SITE AND
 LANDSCAPE PLANS APPROVED BY ORDINANCE NO. 4195-09.
  
 - SUBMITTED SHEETS SP1.1.1, A.1.1.0, A.1.1.1, L1, LP1
 AND LU1 WERE NOT THE VERSION APPROVED BY THE ORDINANCE.
 THE APPROVED PLANS WERE DATED NOVEMBER 20, 2008 AND
 NOVEMBER 21, 2008.
  
 3. REPEAT COMMENT: PROVIDE THE APPROVED PALM BEACH
 COUNTY TRAFFIC CONCURRENCY LETTER, THE CITY SERVICE
 LETTER AND THE FPU LETTER.
  
 - FPU LETTER NOT SUBMITTED.
  
 4. REPEAT COMMENT: NO BICYCLE PARKING HAS BEEN PROVIDED
 FOR THE NEW BUILDING. THE DETAILS OF THE BICYCLE RACK
 AS WELL AS THE DIMENSIONS OF THE PAD SHALL BE PROVIDED
 AND ACCURATELY DEPICTED ON ALL PLANS. THE BICYCLE RACK
 AND ITS PLACEMENT SHALL BE APPROVED BY ALEX HANSEN,
 SENIOR TRANSPORTATION PLANNER.
  
 - THE PARKING RACK DIMENSIONS HAVE NOT BEEN PROVIDED ON
 THE PLANS. PLEASE NOTE THAT THE PHYSICAL DIAGRAM ON THE
 PLAN INCORRECTLY SHOWS THE BICYCLE RACK AND PARKED
 BICYCLES (STAFF REALIZES THE RACKS ON THE PARKING LEVEL
 PLAN WERE SHOWN INCORRECTLY - THESE SHALL BE CORRECTED
 AS WELL).
  
 5. REPEAT COMMENT: PROVIDE THE PARKING DETAILS ON THE
 PLANS.
  
 - THE PARKING DETAILS SHOW PARKING SPACES 9 FEET WIDE
 WHILE THE PLAN DIMENSION ALL THE SPACES AT 8.5 FEET
 WIDE.
  
 6. REPEAT COMMENT: AN ACCESSIBLE ROUTE IS REQUIRED FROM
 THE PUBLIC SIDEWALK TO THE NEW BUILDING.
  
 - ACCESSIBILITY WAS ALSO A CONSTRUCTION SERVICES
 DEPARTMENT COMMENT. STAFF DISCUSSED THE REVISED PLANS
 WITH ROBERT BROWN IN THE CONSTRUCTION SERVICES
 DEPARTMENT AND HE HAS NOT APPROVED THE LOCATION OF THE
 NEW ACCESSIBLE ROUTE AS IT DOES NOT PROVIDE THE MOST
 DIRECT ROUTE THROUGH THE PARKING LOT.
  
 7. REPEAT COMMENT: THE DOORWAYS SHOWN ON THE NORTH SIDE
 OF THE PROPOSED BUILDING DO NOT ALIGN WITH
 APPROPRIATELY SHOWN LANDINGS/SIDEWALKS ON THE SITE OR
 LANDSCAPE PLANS.
  
 - THE SITE PLAN AND CIVIL PLANS CONTINUE TO NOT SHOW A
 DIFFERENTIATION BETWEEN PAVING AND LANDSCAPE ON THE
 NORTH SIDE OF THE BUILDING.
  
 8. REPEAT COMMENT: PROVIDE THE HEIGHT OF THE PROPOSED
 BUILDING AS DEFINED BY THE CITY CODE.
  
 - THE ELEVATIONS DO NOT PROPERLY SHOW THE HEIGHT OF THE
 BUILDING, NOR IS THE BUILDING HEIGHT LISTED ON THE SITE
 PLAN AS STATED IN THE PPRC RESPONSE.
  
 9. REPEAT COMMENT: WHY HAVE THE WEST TOWER SETBACKS
 CHANGED YET THE SQUARE FOOTAGE OF THE MODERN TOWER
 REMAINED THE SAME?
  
 - THERE IS A CHANGE TO AT LEAST ONE WEST DIMENSION LINE
 WHEN ADDED TO THE 1ST BAPTIST PARCEL DIMENSION. THERE
 IS AT LEAST ONE ELEMENT ON THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE
 BUILDING THAT HAS CHANGED.
  
 10. NEW COMMENT BASED ON PPRC RESPONSE: THE PPRC
 RESPONSE INDICATES THAT DR. MCCRANEL WILL OWN HIS LOT
 IN FEE. THIS NEW PROPERTY LINE IS REQUIRED SO THAT THE
 REAR SETBACK FOR THE MODERN CAN BE REVIEWED TO SEE IF
 IT NEEDS TO BE AMENDED. OTHERWISE A NEW MAJOR AMENDMENT
 WILL BE REQUIRED AT THE TIME OF SUBDIVISION.
  
 11. NEW COMMENT BASED ON PPRC RESPONSE: THE SUBMITTAL
 OF A SITE PLAN THAT IS TO SCALE HAS DEMONSTRATED THAT
 THE LANDSCAPE BUFFER ALONG THE SOUTH PARKING LOT
 ADJACENT TO THE PARKING AREA BACK-OUT ASSIST IS NOT
 FIVE FEET IN WIDTH.
  
 12. NEW COMMENT: ALL LANDSCAPE AREAS ARE REQUIRED TO BE
 PROTECTED FROM VEHICULAR ENCROACHMENT BY TYPE "D"
 CURBS.
  
 13. NEW COMMENT: NOT ALL TERMINAL ISLANDS MEET THE
 REQUIRED CURB RADIUS STANDARDS (SECTION 94-443(C)(3)A.)
  
 14. NEW COMMENT: PLEASE PROVIDE THE LOCATION AND
 SCREENING OF ALL GROUND LEVEL MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT FOR
 THE NEW BUILDING, INCLUDING BACKFLOW PREVENTER, AC
 UNITS, GENERATOR, ETC.
  
 15. NEW COMMENT BASED ON PPRC RESPONSE: THE PRELIMINARY
 STORMWATER ITEMS SUBMITTED REFERENCE A PROJECT CALLED
 "GARDENS POINTE". PLEASE EXPLAIN. ALSO, THE ACREAGE IS
 ONLY 2.45 ACRES, NOT THE 2.67 OF THE NEW PROPOSAL.
Review Stop Z ZONING
Rev No 1 Status F Date 08-07-2009 Cont ID  
Sent By eschneid Date 08-07-2009 Time 16:32 Rev Time 5.00
Received By eschneid Date 08-07-2009 Time 16:32 Sent To  
Notes
2009-08-07 16:42:39FAILED
 REVIEWER ERIC SCHNEIDER @ (561) 822-1435
  
 - PLEASE PROVIDE RESPONSES TO REVIEW COMMENTS IN
 WRITTEN FORMAT.
  
 - WHEN RESUBMITTING, PLEASE PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF TEN
 (10) COPIES AND AN ELECTRONIC COPY IN .PNG FORMAT OF
 ALL PLANS. PLEASE NOTE THAT RE-SUBMITTALS MAY BE
 SUBJECT TO ADDITIONAL COMMENTS.
  
 - PLEASE SUPPLY ALL TEXT DOCUMENTS IN WORD FORMAT. THIS
 INCLUDES THE LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE PARCEL.
  
 - THE PPRC COMMENTS SHALL BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED AND
 SUBMITTED TO THE PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENT BY NOON
 ON AUGUST 21, 2009, TO BE SCHEDULED FOR THE SEPTEMBER
 15, 2009 PLANNING BOARD MEETING.
  
 - PLEASE NOTE THAT IF THE PLANNING AND ZONING
 DEPARTMENT HAS NOT RECEIVED A RESPONSE TO THE PPRC
 COMMENTS WITHIN 60 DAYS FROM THE PPRC MEETING, THE CASE
 SHALL BE CONSIDERED WITHDRAWN. ANY FURTHER ACTION SHALL
 REQUIRE RESUBMITTAL OF A NEW DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION.
  
 - PLEASE NOTE THAT YOU WILL BE PERMITTED ONE (1)
 RESUBMITTAL AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. IF PREVIOUSLY-ISSUED
 COMMENTS CONTINUE TO NOT BE SUFFICIENTLY ADDRESSED, THE
 APPLICANT WILL BE ACCESSED A RESUBMITTAL FEE. SUCH FEE
 WILL BE 20% OF THE ORIGINAL APPLICATION FEE.
  
 1. PROVIDE A COPY OF THE APPROVED SITE AND LANDSCAPE
 PLANS WITH ALL REQUIRED DEVELOPMENT CALCULATIONS FOR
 THIS APPLICATION FILE. THESE PLANS SHALL INCLUDE THE
 PARKING AND UTILITY SERVICE LEVEL PLANS.
  
 2. PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF THREE (3) COPIES OF THE EACH OF
 THE SIGNED AND SEALED SITE AND LANDSCAPE PLANS APPROVED
 BY ORDINANCE NO. 4195-09.
  
 3. PROVIDE THE APPROVED PALM BEACH COUNTY TRAFFIC
 CONCURRENCY LETTER, THE CITY SERVICE LETTER AND THE FPU
 LETTER.
  
 4. STAFF OPPOSES THE DEMOLITION OF THE EXISTING
 STRUCTURE. STAFF RECOMMENDS REHABILITATING THE EXISTING
 STRUCTURE IF THE CITY COMMISSION APPROVES OFFICE USE
 FOR THE SITE.
  
 5. THE TRAFFIC STATEMENT DOES NOT MENTION THE IMPACT OF
 THE NEW OFFICE TRIPS ON SOUTH OLIVE AVENUE AND ANY
 MITIGATION, IF ANY, THAT IS REQUIRED BY THAT IMPACT.
  
 6. THE SITE PLAN WITH THE PARKING LOT ON SOUTH OLIVE
 AVENUE AND THE BUILDING TO THE EAST OF THE PARKING IS
 NOT IN CHARACTER WITH THE EXISTING DEVELOPMENT ALONG
 SOUTH OLIVE AND SHALL BE REVISED.
  
 7. THE ARCHITECTURAL PLANS SHOW THE NEW BUILDING
 CONTAINING 4,387 SQUARE FEET, WHILE THE SITE PLAN AND
 PARKING TABLE STATE THAT THE BUILDING CONTAINS 4,397
 SQUARE FEET. ALL PLANS SHALL SHOW SAME CONDITIONS.
  
 8. NO BICYCLE PARKING HAS BEEN PROVIDED FOR THE NEW
 BUILDING. THE DETAILS OF THE BICYCLE RACK AS WELL AS
 THE DIMENSIONS OF THE PAD SHALL BE PROVIDED AND
 ACCURATELY DEPICTED ON ALL PLANS. THE BICYCLE RACK AND
 ITS PLACEMENT SHALL BE APPROVED BY ALEX HANSEN, SENIOR
 TRANSPORTATION PLANNER.
  
 9. THE DUMPSTER ENCLOSURE FOR THE NEW SITE DOES NOT
 MEET MINIMUM SIZE STANDARDS. PROVIDE THE CITY STANDARD
 DETAIL ON THE PLANS.
  
 10. PROVIDE THE PARKING DETAILS ON THE PLANS.
  
 11. PROVIDE WRITTEN VERIFICATION FROM THE CITY???S
 SANITATION DIVISION THAT THE DUMPSTER LOCATION AND
 ORIENTATION IS ACCEPTABLE.
  
 12. THE REQUIRED LANDSCAPE BUFFER ALONG THE NORTH
 PROPERTY LINE SHALL BE PROVIDED.
  
 13. AN ACCESSIBLE ROUTE IS REQUIRED FROM THE PUBLIC
 SIDEWALK TO THE NEW BUILDING.
  
 14. THE DOORWAYS SHOWN ON THE NORTH SIDE OF THE
 PROPOSED BUILDING DO NOT ALIGN WITH APPROPRIATELY SHOWN
 LANDINGS/SIDEWALKS ON THE SITE OR LANDSCAPE PLANS.
  
 15. PROVIDE THE HEIGHT OF THE PROPOSED BUILDING AS
 DEFINED BY THE CITY CODE.
  
 16. THE SCALE ON THE SITE PLAN DOES NOT MATCH TO
 DIMENSIONS PRINTED ON THE SITE PLAN. THE SITE PLAN
 SHALL BE DRAWN TO EASY TO VERIFY SCALE.
  
 17. PROVIDE CROSS-SECTIONS OF THE GRADE OF THE NEW SITE
 IN RELATIONSHIP TO THE EXISTING GRAD ON THE VIKING ARMS
 AND THE SMITH AND MOORE PROPERTIES.
  
 18. THE SITE EXCEEDS THE ALLOWED TWO ACCESS POINTS.
  
 19. WHY HAVE THE WEST TOWER SETBACKS CHANGED YET THE
 SQUARE FOOTAGE OF THE MODERN TOWER REMAINED THE SAME?
  
 20. THE APPROVED PARKING ZONE FOR THE TEMPORARY
 DUMPSTER STAGING HAS BEEN REDUCED TO A SIZE THAT CAN NO
 LONGER ACCOMMODATE A GARBAGE TRUCK ON A FLAT SURFACE.
 THE NEW CONFIGURATION REQUIRES THE TRUCK TO STAGE ON
 THE RAMP. ENLARGE THE DUMPSTER STAGING AREA TO A SIZE
 APPROVED BY THE SANITATION DIVISION AND PROVIDE ALL
 DIMENSIONS ON THE SITE PLAN.
  
 21. SECTION A-A ON SHEET C-1 DOES NOT ACCURATELY
 REFLECT THE PROPOSED PLAN. REVISE THE SECTION.
  
 22. SECTION B-B ON SHEET C-1 DOES NOT SHOW THE
 CONDITION WHERE THE SECTION LINE IS SHOWN ON THE SITE
 PLAN. REVISE.
  
 23. IT IS ZONING STAFF UNDERSTANDING THAT THE WESTERN
 STAIRWAY THAT WAS PREVIOUSLY SHOWN IS REQUIRED AS A
 LIFE SAFETY MEANS OF EGRESS FROM THE UNDERGROUND
 PARKING. PROVIDE WRITTEN VERIFICATION FROM THE
 CONSTRUCTION SERVICES DEPARTMENT THAT THE PARKING
 STRUCTURE MAY BE BUILT WITH ONLY THE REMAINING
 STAIRWELLS AT THE CENTER OF THE TOWER.
  
 24. THE DEAD END PARKING ROW REQUIRES A DEDICATED TURN
 AROUND SPACE AT THE END OF THE ROW.
  
 25. PROVIDE THE LOCATION FOR THE FREE STANDING SIGN.
  
 26. PROVIDE THE LOCATION OF ALL LIGHTING. NOTE THAT IT
 MAY NOT INTERFERE WITH PROPOSED LANDSCAPE.
  
 27. WHAT IS THE PLAN FOR OWNERSHIP OF THE NEW OFFICE?
 IS A SUBDIVISION PLANNED?
  
 28. THE DEFAULT MODERN RPD SETBACKS ARE BASED ON THE
 MF32 ZONING DISTRICT, NOT THE GENERAL RPD SETBACKS AS
 STATED IN THE JUSTIFICATION STATEMENT. ADJUST
 ACCORDINGLY.
  
 29. A WALL IS REQUIRED TO SCREEN THE VEHICULAR USE
 AREAS FROM THE RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICTS TO THE
 NORTH AND SOUTH OF THE SITE.
  
 30. A WALL IS REQUIRED ADJACENT TO VIKING ARMS AND
 SMITH AND MOORE UNLESS THEY HAVE WAIVED THE WALL IN A
 NOTARIZED WAIVER.
  
 31. WHAT ARE THE LONG TERM ALLOWED USES FOR THE
 ADDITIONAL OFFICE?
  
 32. PARKING SPACES SHALL BE LOCATED COMPLETELY ON ONE
 SPECIFIC PROPERTY WITH PROPER TERMINAL ISLANDS. THE
 PROPOSED SHARED PARKING DOES NOT MEET THE CODE
 REQUIREMENT THAT ENTRANCES AND EXITS TO PARKING SPACES
 BE LOCATED IN THE SAME OF LESS RESTRICTIVE ZONING
 DISTRICT. BASED ON THE WAIVERS PREVIOUSLY GRANTED AND
 THE WAIVERS REQUESTED AS PART OF THIS APPLICATION, THE
 MF32 ZONING DISTRICT IS MORE RESTRICTIVE THAN THE
 MODERN RPD.
  
  
  Print


Account Summary | Usage Policy | Privacy Policy
Copyright © 2005 – 2014, SunGard Pentamation, Inc & City of West Palm Beach, FL – All Rights Reserved