| 2023-05-01 13:35:44 | E-23040008??? INITIAL SUBMITTAL REVIEW COMMENTS 3/30 |
| | (4/7SITE PLAN APPROVAL LETTER SUBMITTED) |
| | |
| | COMMENTS FROM LINDA M. QUINONES-CINTRON, PROJECT |
| | COORDINATOR, ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPT., 561-494-1085 |
| | [email protected] : |
| | |
| | 1. CONFIRM THAT A COMPLETED LOS ANALYSIS SUMMARY TABLE |
| | HAS BEEN SUBMITTED DIRECTLY TO ENGINEERING (SHEET 33 OF |
| | CITY OF WPB DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION). |
| | 2. CHECK TO SEE IF FDEP FORMS FOR PROPOSED SANITARY |
| | SEWER ARE REQUIRED. |
| | 3. COORDINATE WITH MARK HURLEY, FIELD CUSTOMER SERVICE |
| | SUPERVISOR WITH CITY OF WPB PUBLIC UTILITIES, REGARDING |
| | PLACEMENT OF BACKFLOW DEVICES AND WATER METERS. CONTACT |
| | HIM AT 561-494-2262 OR [email protected] |
| | 4. WHEN SUBMITTING APPROVED MATERIALS LIST, PLEASE |
| | PROVIDE MATERIAL/CUT SHEETS FOR ALL PROPOSED BACKFLOW |
| | DEVICES SHOWING SPECIFIC MODEL NUMBER AND SPECIFYING |
| | USC APPROVED LEAD-FREE DESIGN. |
| | 5. PLEASE RESPOND TO ALL COMMENTS IN WRITING AND |
| | INCLUDE PROJECT NAME, ADDRESS AND PERMIT NUMBER |
| | (E-XXXXXXXX). |
| | |
| | COMMENTS FROM MARK HURLEY, FIELD CUSTOMER SERVICE |
| | SUPER., WPB PUBLIC UTILITIES, 561-822-2262 OR |
| | [email protected]: |
| | |
| | -HISTORIC PICTURES OF AREA SHOW UTILITY LOCATES NEAR |
| | WORK AREA ON OKEECHOBEE. SHOW AND LABEL FRANCHISE |
| | UTILITIES NEAR WORK AREAS. |
| | |
| | -CANNOT HAVE TWO FIRELINE DETECTOR METERS FOR ONE MAIN |
| | FIRELINE ACCOUNT. (A DETECTOR METER HAS TO GO ON EACH |
| | CONTAINMENT FIRELINE BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY) |
| | |
| | -VERIFY PRIVATE FIRE SYSTEM DOES NOT HAVE ADDED |
| | CHEMICALS OR AUXILIARY WATER SUPPLY SUCH AS A WELL. |
| | |
| | -SHEET 11: PLEASE REMOVE STANDARD DETAILS FOR LARGE |
| | WATER METERS IF NO LARGE WATER METERS ARE BEING |
| | PROPOSED. (3, 4, 4.1) |
| | |
| | -ADD FLOW CALCULATIONS TO SHEET C09 AS DIRECTED IN |
| | STANDARD DETAIL WS5 NOTE 9. |
| | |
| | -REMOVE WPB WATER SERVICE STANDARD DETAIL WS7 FROM PLAN |
| | SET IF WILL NOT BE USED. |
| | |
| | -ON LABELS FOR METERS AND BACKFLOWS, ADD REFERENCE TO |
| | THE ASSOCIATED WPB STANDARD DETAIL. |
| | |
| | -ADD WPB WATER SERVICE STANDARD DETAIL WS2 TO PLAN SET. |
| | |
| | -ADD MARKUP NOTE TO WS1 THAT DUAL CHECK VALVE NOT USED |
| | WHEN A BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY IS BEING INSTALLED. |
| | |
| | -CALLOUT MINIMUM CLEARANCE DISTANCE BETWEEN BACKFLOW |
| | ASSEMBLY AND FIRE HYDRANT PER STANDARD DETAIL P-8. |
| | |
| | -SHEET C09: LEGEND AND ABBREVIATION LIST NOT READABLE |
| | (BLURRY). |
| | |
| | -UPDATE SHEET INDEX ON C01. IT NOT SEEM ACCURATE. |
| | |
| | -IN RESUBMITTAL PACKAGE, PROVIDE UPDATED LANDSCAPING |
| | PLANS. |
| | |
| | -WILL EXISTING METERED WATER SERVICE CONTINUE TO BE |
| | USED BY PROPERTY IN THE FUTURE? |
| | |
| | COMMENTS FROM TRACY WARD, SR. STORMWATER ENG., |
| | ENGINEERING SERVICES, [email protected] 561-494-1120: |
| | |
| | 1. DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS |
| | A. PROPOSED LAND USE SUMMARY ??? ROOF PARKING AREA |
| | COUNTED TWICE? (TOTAL AREA = 8.27 ACRES VS. 7.40 ACRES) |
| | B. PROPOSED SOIL STORAGE LAND USE SUMMARY TABLE ??? |
| | ROOF PARKING LISTED AS LAKE AREA? |
| | C. THE INVERT ELEVATION OF THE BLEEDER WILL NEED TO BE |
| | SET AT OR ABOVE ELEVATION 12.8 FT NAVD INSTEAD OF 12.5 |
| | FT NAVD SO THAT ALL OF THE TREATMENT VOLUME IS RETAINED |
| | BEHIND THE CONTROL STRUCTURE. THE ALTERNATE |
| | EXFILTRATION TRENCH EQUATION MAY HAVE TO BE CONSIDERED |
| | BECAUSE IN THIS SCENARIO THE TRENCH WIDTH OF 10 FEET IS |
| | MORE THAN TWICE THE EFFECTIVE TRENCH HEIGHT (DU + DS) |
| | OF 4.3 FEET. |
| | D. PROVIDE THE BASIN RESULTS (SHOWING TOTAL RUNOFF |
| | VOLUMES) FOR THE ICPR MODEL RUNS. |
| | |
| | 2. SHEET C-04 DEMOLITION PLAN |
| | A. PROVIDE A LEGEND FOR THE VARIOUS HATCH SYMBOLS ON |
| | THE PLAN. |
| | B. PROVIDE HATCH LINE OVER THE UTILITY LINES TO BE |
| | REMOVED. |
| | C. THE DRAINAGE SYSTEM NORTH OF THE EXISTING CAR |
| | DELIVERY AREA (AS LABELED ON SHEET C-05) IS LABELED TO |
| | REMAIN BUT DOES NOT APPEAR ON SHEET C-05 (PGD PLAN). |
| | D. THE DRAINAGE SYSTEM THAT WOULD BE WEST OF STRUCTURE |
| | DBI NO. 12 (AS LABELED ON SHEET C-05) IS LABELED TO |
| | REMAIN BUT DOES NOT APPEAR ON SHEET C-05 (PGD PLAN). |
| | E. CALLOUT SIDEWALK AND CURB AND GUTTER REPLACEMENT |
| | WITHIN OKEECHOBEE BLVD R/W. THESE ARE SHOWN ON SHEET |
| | C-02 (SITE PLAN). |
| | |
| | 3. SHEET C-05 PGD PLAN |
| | A. PROVIDE GRADES FOR THE ACCESSIBILITY ROUTE AND |
| | HANDICAP PARKING SPACES TO ENSURE THE SLOPES MEET ADA |
| | CRITERIA. |
| | B. OVERFLOW WEIR ELEVATION AT STRUCTURE NO. 20 IS 16.11 |
| | FT NAVD. SEVERAL CATCH BASINS AND PARKING SPACES |
| | (PREDOMINANTLY IF NOT ENTIRELY) OUTSIDE THE PUBLIC |
| | VEHICULAR ACCESSIBLE AREAS ARE LOWER THAN THE OVERFLOW |
| | WEIR ELEVATION. LOWEST CATCH BASIN GRATE ELEVATION |
| | APPEARS TO BE 13.5 FT NAVD. |
| | C. ADD THE SEIR ELEVATION TO THE CONTROL STRUCTURE NO. |
| | 20 INFORMATION. |
| | D. STRUCTURE NO. 13 WILL NEED A PRB. |
| | E. CROSS SECTION A-A SHOULD POINT IN THE OPPOSITE |
| | DIRECTION. |
| | F. PROVIDE A DETAIL FOR THE FLUMES DRAINING TO THE |
| | SWALE AREA WHERE STRUCTURE NO. 12 IS LOCATED. |
| | G. SUGGEST SLOPING THE SWALE AREA TO DRAIN BETTER. |
| | H. IT APPEARS THE SWALE WILL HAVE SIDE SLOPES OF NEARLY |
| | 2:1 BETWEEN STRUCTURE NO. 12 AND THE TOP OF CURB |
| | ELEVATION 17.95 AT THE CORNER OF SOUTH PARKING AREA. |
| | |
| | 4. SHEET C-08 CROSS SECTIONS |
| | A. PROVIDE VERTICAL DATUM REFERENCE AND CONVERSION |
| | EQUATION TO NGVD1929. |
| | B. LABEL THE PUBLIC R/W???S ON THE CROSS SECTIONS |
| | (ALLEY FOR SECTIONS A-A AND B-B, OKEECHOBEE BLVD FOR |
| | SECTIONS D-D AND F-F, CONGRESS AVE FOR SECTION E-E). |
| | C. SECTION A-A ??? ARE THE 20-FT AISLE WIDTHS WIDE |
| | ENOUGH TO BACK OUT OF THE PARKING SPACES? |
| | D. SECTION C-C ??? |
| | I. 2-FT PARKING OVERHANG AREA SHOULD NOT BE HIGHER THAN |
| | THE CURB. |
| | II. ARE THE 20-FT AISLE WIDTHS WIDE ENOUGH TO BACK OUT |
| | OF THE PARKING SPACES? |
| | E. SECTION D-D ??? CALLOUT THE 2-FT PARKING OVERHANG |
| | NEAR THE PROPERTY BOUNDARY |
| | F. SECTION E-E ??? |
| | I. LABEL THE MINIMUM ELEVATION (16.15 FT NAVD) ON THE |
| | DRIVEWAY. |
| | II. SECTION IS AT THE EXISTING DRIVEWAY. SHOW DROP CURB |
| | AND SIDEWALK SLOPE INSTEAD OF EXISTING TYPE F CURB AND |
| | GUTTER. |
| | |
| | 5. SHEET C-17 PMS PLAN |
| | A. ARE THE STOP BAR AND STOP SIGN NEEDED AT THE |
| | SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE SITE IN FRONT OF THE BOLLARDS? |
| | B. 9??? PARKING SPACE WIDTH SHIFTED FOR THE EAST |
| | PARKING SPACES ALONG OKEESHOBEE BLVD. |
| | C. WHAT DO THE NUMBERS IN THE TRIANGLES REPRESENT? |
| | |
| | 6. SHEET C-18 EROSION CONTROL PLAN |
| | A. ADD FLOATING TURBIDITY BARRIER FOR THE OUTFALL INTO |
| | THE CANAL NORTH OF THE ALLEY. |
| | |
| | 7. SHEET L-2.0 LANDSCAPE PLAN |
| | A. SHOW ROOT BARRIER BETWEEN TREES AND PROPOSED |
| | EXFILTRATION TRENCHES. |
| | |
| | COMMENTS FROM RICKY ELIZONDO, PUB. UTILITIES PLANS |
| | EXAMINER, [email protected] , 561-494-1101: |
| | |
| | -PLEASE ENSURE SHEETS ARE TO SCALE WHEN PRINTED ON |
| | 11X17 PAPER |
| | -SHOW ALL DRY UTILITIES WITHIN THE PROJECT SCOPE |
| | -CALL OUT ALL EXISTING AND PROPOSED VALVES AND |
| | APPURTENANCES FOR BOTH WATER AND SEWER |
| | -TAP CANNOT BE MADE OFF OF FIRE HYDRANT PER DETAIL P-8 |
| | -BACKFLOW FOR METER TO BE PLACED OUTSIDE OF EASEMENT |
| | PER WS-1 |
| | -RECORDS SHOW EXISTING METER ON OKEECHOBEE, PLEASE |
| | VERIFY AND DENOTE WHAT WILL HAPPEN TO IT (POTENTIAL USE |
| | FOR SERVICE INSTEAD OF HYDRANT TAP?) |
| | |
| | |
| | FEEL FREE TO CONTACT US IF YOU HAVE ANY QUESTIONS OR |
| | CONCERNS, THANKS. |
| | LINDA M. QUINONES-CINTRON, PROJECT COORDINATOR, |
| | ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPARTMENT (561) 494-1085 |
| | [email protected] |
| | |
| | |
