| 2023-04-26 14:26:24 | |
| | |
| | E23020014 ??? TRANSIT VILLAGE INIT. SUBMITTAL 2.10.2023 |
| | COMMENTS FROM RICK ROSSANO, PROJECT COORDINATOR, |
| | ENGINEERING SERVICES DEPT., 561-494-1098 |
| | [email protected] : |
| | 1. CONFIRM THAT A COMPLETED LOS ANALYSIS SUMMARY TABLE |
| | HAS BEEN SUBMITTED DIRECTLY TO ENGINEERING (SHEET 33 OF |
| | CITY OF WPB DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION). |
| | 2. CHECK TO SEE IF FDEP FORMS FOR PROPOSED SANITARY |
| | SEWER ARE REQUIRED. |
| | 3. COORDINATE WITH MARK HURLEY, FIELD CUSTOMER SERVICE |
| | SUPERVISOR WITH CITY OF WPB PUBLIC UTILITIES, REGARDING |
| | PLACEMENT OF BACKFLOW DEVICES AND WATER METERS. CONTACT |
| | HIM AT 561-494-2262 OR [email protected] |
| | 4. PLANS SHALL SHOW EXISTING AND PROPOSED LOCATIONS AND |
| | DIMENSIONS OF ALL WATER, STORMWATER, AND SANITARY AND |
| | SEWER LINES AND CLEANOUTS, GREASE TRAPS, ETC. INCLUDING |
| | STUBS TO EACH PROPERTY LINE FOR WATER AND SANITARY |
| | SEWERS, THE MAKE AND MODEL OF ALL VALVES, POTABLE AND |
| | IRRIGATION METERS, BACKFLOWS, FIRE HYDRANTS AND FDCS, |
| | AND OTHER DEVICES TO BE INSTALLED ON THE SYSTEM, CATCH |
| | BASINS, CULVERTS, DITCHES INCLUDING GRADES, PIPES |
| | SIZES, MATERIALS, ELEVATIONS, ASSUMPTIONS, |
| | CALCULATIONS, INVERT ELEVATIONS FOR ALL INLETS AND |
| | MANHOLES AND PROFILES OF SANITARY SEWER LINES. GATE |
| | VALVE BOXES SHALL NOT BE INSTALLED IN CURB OR SIDEWALK. |
| | ALL AVAILABLE ELEVATION SHALL BE SHOWN ON THE PROFILE |
| | VIEW. DIRECTION OF FLOW SHALL BE SHOWN ON PLAN VIEW ON |
| | PLAN VIEW FOR ALL SANITARY AND STORM SEWERS. PLEASE |
| | SHOW SLOPE % ON ALL SANITARY LINES AND CALL OUT |
| | MATERIAL. ADDITIONALLY, PLAN VIEW SHALL SHOW ALL |
| | EXISTING AND PROPOSED UNDERGROUND UTILITY LAYOUT, |
| | INCLUDING FIBER OPTIC, ELECTRIC, GAS, AND CABLEVISION & |
| | TELECOMMUNICATION FACILITIES INCLUDING PIPES SIZES AND |
| | MATERIALS, LOCATED ON THE RIGHT-OF-WAY. |
| | 5. PLEASE CUT AND CAP UTILITIES NOT IN USE AND REMOVE |
| | ANY ABANDONED UTILITY LINES LARGER THAN 2 INCHES FROM |
| | CITY RIGHT OF WAY. (SHEET C14 ??? CONFIRM PUBLIC |
| | UTILITIES APPROVED GROUTING/ABANDONING EXISTING 6 IN. |
| | FORCE MAIN). |
| | 6. PLEASE SHOW EXISTING AND PROPOSED UTILITY EASEMENTS, |
| | INCLUDING THOSE PROPOSED TO ALLOW ACCESS FOR CITY |
| | PERSONNEL TO PROPOSED UTILITY WATER METERS. |
| | 7. PLEASE PROVIDE ENLARGED VIEW ON PLANS OF PROPOSED |
| | LOCATION OF WATER METER AND BACKFLOW PREVENTION, AND |
| | EXISTING METER AND BACKFLOW (TO BE REMOVED?). |
| | 8. SHEETS C-14 AND C-15: PLEASE OUTLINE AREAS OF WATER |
| | CONNECTION ON THE 30 SCALE PORTION OF PLAN SHEETS. |
| | 9. BACKFLOWS SHALL BE INSTALLED ON PRIVATE PROPERTY |
| | OUTSIDE OF EASEMENTS AND RIGHTS OF WAY. DOMESTIC WATER |
| | METERS SHALL BE INSTALLED IMMEDIATELY ADJACENT TO |
| | PROPERTY LINE. 3 INCH AND LARGER WATER METERS SHALL BE |
| | INSTALLED ABOVE-GROUND ONLY. |
| | 10. PLEASE CONFIRM PUB. UTILITIES CUSTOMER SERVICE WILL |
| | ALLOW METER IN SIDEWALK AS SHOWN ON SHEET C-14. |
| | 11. SHEET C-14, PLEASE RELOCATE NOTE ???TO BE |
| | VACATED???, SOME TEXT IS OBSCURED. |
| | 12. PLEASE CALLOUT DOMESTIC BACKFLOW PREVENTER AS RPPA |
| | AND FIRE BACKFLOW PREVENTER AS DCDA. SPECIFY LEAD FREE |
| | DESIGN ON ALL BACKFLOWS. |
| | 13. ENGINEERING PLANS SHALL INCLUDE PIGGING, FLUSHING |
| | AND SAMPLE POINTS ON ANY WATER RUNS 60 FT. IN LENGTH OR |
| | GREATER. |
| | 14. FOR FORMAL ENGINEERING SUBMITTAL, SFWMD ERP AND |
| | NPDES NOI REQUIREMENTS WILL BE ENFORCED. |
| | - AN NOI IS REQUIRED FOR PROJECTS THAT: |
| | - 1) DISTURB ONE OF MORE ACRES OF LAND OR DISTURB LESS |
| | THAN ON ACRE OF LAND BUT ARE PART OF A COMMON PLAN OF |
| | DEVELOPMENT OR SALE; |
| | - 2) DISCHARGE STORMWATER TO SURFACE WATERS OF THE |
| | STATE OR TO SURFACE WATERS OF THE STATE THROUGH A |
| | MUNICIPAL SEPARATE STORM SEWER SYSTEM (MS4). |
| | - THE SFWMD ERP CAN BE OBTAINED THROUGH A 10-2 SELF |
| | CERTIFICATION THROUGH FDEP OR AN ERP APPLICATION |
| | THROUGH SFWMD. EITHER WAY, THE DEVELOPER/ENGINEER SHALL |
| | SUBMIT A COPY OF THE ERP PERMIT OR FDEP ACKNOWLEDGEMENT |
| | OF THE 10-2 CERTIFICATION. |
| | 15. PROVIDE PROFILE AND CLEARANCES BETWEEN WATER, SEWER |
| | AND STORM LINES AT ALL UTILITY CROSSINGS WITHIN ROW PER |
| | CITY OF WEST PALM BEACH STANDARD DETAIL GN-2 SERIES. |
| | PLEASE SHOW ALL EXISTING AND PROPOSED UNDERGROUND |
| | UTILITY LAYOUT, INCLUDING FIBER OPTIC, ELECTRIC, GAS, |
| | AND CABLEVISION & TELECOMMUNICATION FACILITIES WITH |
| | PIPE MATERIAL AND SIZE, LOCATED ON THE RIGHT-OF-WAY. |
| | 16. WHEN SUBMITTING APPROVED MATERIALS LIST, PLEASE |
| | PROVIDE MATERIAL/CUT SHEETS FOR ALL PROPOSED BACKFLOW |
| | DEVICES SHOWING SPECIFIC MODEL NUMBER AND SPECIFYING |
| | USC APPROVED LEAD-FREE DESIGN. |
| | 17. PLEASE CLEARLY LABEL ROAD RIGHT OF WAY. |
| | 18. IF SANITARY LINES ARE PROPOSED IN ROW PLEASE SHOW |
| | ADJACENT SANITARY LATERAL LOCATIONS AND SHOW ADDRESSES |
| | OF ADJACENT PARCELS. |
| | 19. IF WATER LINES ARE BEING REPLACED IN ROW, SHOW |
| | ADJACENT PARCEL ADDRESSES. |
| | 20. PLEASE PROVIDE LEGEND ON ALL PLAN SHEETS TO INCLUDE |
| | STREETLIGHT, SIGN POSTS, TRANSFORMER BOXES ETC. |
| | 21. PLEASE RESPOND TO ALL COMMENTS IN WRITING AND |
| | INCLUDE PROJECT NAME, ADDRESS AND PERMIT NUMBER |
| | (E-XXXXXXXX). |
| | COMMENTS FROM MARK HURLEY, FIELD CUSTOMER SERVICE |
| | SUPER., WPB PUBLIC UTILITIES, 561-822-2262 OR |
| | [email protected]: |
| | |
| | -EXISTING BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY IS OUT OF COMPLIANCE FOR |
| | ANNUAL BACKFLOW TESTING. NEEDS TO HAVE PASSING TEST |
| | REPORT SUBMITTED TO [email protected] OR |
| | WATER SERVICE WILL BE LOCKED OFF. |
| | -SHEET C14. BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY IS LIKELY NOT LEAD-FREE |
| | COMPLIANT AND WOULD HAVE TO BE REPLACED WITH NEW LEAD |
| | FREE RP BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY. |
| | -SHEET C14. EITHER RELOCATE EXISTING METER BOX OUT OF |
| | SIDEWALK, OR HAVE IT REPLACED AND ENSURE THAT CONCRETE |
| | IS POURED 6 INCH THICK AROUND IT 18 INCHES OUT AND THAT |
| | IT IS NOT IN A SIDEWALK JOINT. |
| | -VERIFY PRIVATE FIRE SYSTEM WILL NOT HAVE ANY ADDED |
| | CHEMICALS OR AUXILIARY WATER SUPPLIES SUCH AS WELLS. |
| | -SHEET C14 ENLARGED VIEW: |
| | CALLOUT SAYS 8 INCH, BUT PIPE IS LABELED 6 INCH; |
| | *IRRIGATION WATER SERVICE DESIGN IS NONSTANDARD TAPPED |
| | OFF DOMESTIC WATER SERVICE - WILL IT CREATE FLOW AND |
| | PRESSURE DEFICIENCIES FOR THE DOMESTIC WATER SERVICE?; |
| | *LABEL LIFT STATION BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY AS RP TYPE AND |
| | VERIFY IT WILL NOT FEED FROM FIRELINE WATER; |
| | *LABEL ANY PROPOSED UTILITY EASEMENTS AND ENSURE THAT |
| | BACKFLOW ASSEMBLIES ARE NOT INSIDE THEM. |
| | *ADD GRAPHIC SCALE AND SPOT ELEVATION. |
| | -SHEET C14: |
| | *LABEL 4 INCH FORCE MAIN WITH PIPE MATERIAL TYPE; |
| | CALLOUT HORIZONTAL CLEARANCE DISTANCE BETWEEN FORCE |
| | MAIN AND FIRELINE; AND CALLOUT CROSSINGS. |
| | *ADD FLOW CALCULATIONS FOR SIX INCH METERED WATER |
| | SERVICE AS DIRECTED IN NOTE 7 OF WATER SERVICE STANDARD |
| | DETAIL WS7. |
| | *ADD FLOW CALCULATIONS FOR 8 INCH FIRELINE WATER |
| | SERVICE AS DIRECTED IN NOTE 9 OF WATER SERVICE STANDARD |
| | DETAIL WS5. |
| | *DOES SHEET NOTE 3 APPLY? |
| | *ADD PROPERTY ADDRESS ACROSS THE STREET TO THE WEST. |
| | *IRRIGATION BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY CANNOT BE IN RIGHT OF |
| | WAY. MUST BE ON PRIVATE PROPERTY. |
| | *TWO OF THE FORCE MAIN CROSSING CALLOUTS MAY NEED SIZE |
| | CORRECTED. |
| | -SHEET C15 ENLARGED VIEW: |
| | *ADD GRAPHIC SCALE AND SPOT ELEVATION. |
| | *LABEL ANY PROPOSED UTILITY EASEMENTS AND ENSURE THAT |
| | BACKFLOW ASSEMBLIES ARE NOT INSIDE THEM. |
| | *ADD LEGEND OR CALLOUT THE DIFFERENT FRANCHISE UTILITY |
| | TYPES AND ENSURE THAT FIRE HYDRANT WILL NOT CONFLICT |
| | WITH THEM. |
| | *THERE ARE A BUNCH OF FRANCHISE UTILITIES NEAR THE |
| | METERED WATER SERVICES. PROVIDE PROFILE (LOOKING NORTH |
| | OR SOUTH) SHOWING ALL THE UTILITIES SO CAN ENSURE NO |
| | CONFLICTS. |
| | *IF EXISTING GATE VALVE OFF 12 INCH DIP IS CONNECTED TO |
| | 36 INCH WATER MAIN, THEN SHOW THAT MORE CLEARLY. |
| | *CALL OUT AND LABELED ALL WATER PIPE AND COMPONENT |
| | FITTINGS BETWEEN WATER MAIN AND METERS. |
| | *SHOW UNDERGROUND GATE VALVE SYMBOL FOR FIRELINE. |
| | -SHEET C15: |
| | *ADD FLOW CALCULATIONS FOR 8 INCH FIRELINE WATER |
| | SERVICE AS DIRECTED IN NOTE 9 OF WATER SERVICE STANDARD |
| | DETAIL WS5. |
| | *ADD FLOW CALCULATIONS FOR SIX INCH METERED WATER |
| | SERVICE AS DIRECTED IN NOTE 7 OF WATER SERVICE STANDARD |
| | DETAIL WS7. |
| | *LABEL 4 INCH FORCE MAIN WITH PIPE MATERIAL TYPE. |
| | *DOMESTIC WATER SERVICE PIPING LOOKS LIKE IT IS RUNNING |
| | THROUGH EXFILTRATION TRENCH. IS THAT PROBLEMATIC? |
| | *CLEARWATER DRIVE LABEL LOOKS LIKE IT MAY BE OBSCURING |
| | FIRELINE WATER SERVICE PIPING. |
| | -SHEET C18: ADD MARKUP NOTE TO WS1 SAYING THAT DUAL |
| | CHECK IS NOT USED WHEN A BACKFLOW ASSEMBLY IS BEING |
| | INSTALLED. |
| | -ADD NOTE ON SHEETS C14 AND C15 TO REFER TO WPB WATER |
| | SERVICE STANDARD DETAILS FOR THE METERED WATER SERVICES |
| | AND BACKFLOW ASSEMBLIES. |
| | -ADD WATER SERVICE STANDARD DETAIL WS2 TO PLAN SET. |
| | -ON SHEET C25, SHOW EXISTING METERED WATER SERVICE AND |
| | ENSURE THAT FLASHING STOP SIGN IS DISTANCED FROM IT. |
| | -ADD MOST REVISED COPY OF LANDSCAPING PLAN IN |
| | RESUBMITTAL PACKAGE AND ENSURE NO LOCATION CONFLICTS |
| | BETWEEN TREES AND UTILITIES. |
| | |
| | COMMENTS FROM TRACY WARD, SR. STORMWATER ENG., |
| | ENGINEERING SERVICES, [email protected] 561-494-1120: |
| | 1. REVISE THE BOUNDARY LINES (LOCATION, BEARINGS AND |
| | DISTANCES) ON THE AFFECTED SHEETS. PROJECT SURVEYOR |
| | WILL BE REVISING AT LEAST THE NORTH PROPERTY |
| | LINE(S)/SOUTH R/W LINE OF BANYAN BLVD. |
| | |
| | 2. ADD VERTICAL DATUM REFERENCE ON EVERY SHEET WITH |
| | ELEVATION INFORMATION, INCLUDING THESE SHEETS: C-03, |
| | C-04, C-09, C-10, C-13, C-16, C-17, C-25 AND C-26. |
| | |
| | 3. CONFIRM ALL EXISTING SPOT GRADES ON THE PLANS ARE IN |
| | REFERENCE TO NGVD1929. THE SPOT GRADE OF 16.08 NORTH OF |
| | THE CURB INLET ON BANYAN BLVD APPEARS SUSPECT. |
| | |
| | 4. WET SEASON HIGH WATER TABLE ELEVATION CALLOUTS VARY |
| | THROUGHOUT THE PLANS. SEE COMMENT #1 UNDER DRAINAGE |
| | CALCULATIONS BELOW AS WELL. |
| | A. SHEET C-09: 11.00 FT NGVD AND 13.00 FT NGVD |
| | B. SHEET C-10: 13.00 FT NGVD AND 11.50 FT NAVD (ONLY |
| | USE ONE VERTICAL DATUM) |
| | C. DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS ??? 11.00 FT NGVD. |
| | |
| | 5. PROVIDE SEPARATE SET OF PLANS FOR CLEARWATER DRIVE |
| | IMPROVEMENTS. |
| | A. PROVIDE PLAN AND PROFILE. ON THE PROFILE SHOW ALL |
| | EXISTING AND PROPOSED UTILITIES |
| | B. PROVIDE EXISTING TOPOGRAPHY OF THE R/W. |
| | C. INCLUDE DETAILS FOR PAVEMENT DESIGN, DRAINAGE AND |
| | SANITARY SEWER STRUCTURES, SIDEWALK, CURBING, ETC. |
| | |
| | 6. SHEET C-03 |
| | A. WHAT IS CONNECTED TO THE SOUTH END OF THE DRAINAGE |
| | PIPE LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF THE EXISTING BUS |
| | SHELTER LOCATED APPROXIMATELY 160 FEET FROM THE SOUTH |
| | PROPERTY CORNER? CAN THE STORM PIPE BE |
| | REMOVED/ABANDONED? |
| | B. ADJUST THE LEADER ARROWS FOR THE REMOVAL OF THE |
| | EXISTING 2??? VALLEY GUTTER (ONE LEADER IS CURRENTLY |
| | POINTING TO CENTERLINE STRIPING NEAR THE CLEARWATER |
| | DRIVE LABEL [APPROX.. 120 FEET NORTH OF THE SOUTH |
| | PROPERTY CORNER AND 30 FEET WEST OF THE WEST PROPERTY |
| | LINE]; ONE LEADER IS POINTING TO 36??? WM [APPROX.. 255 |
| | FEET NORTH OF THE SOUTH PROPERTY CORNER AND 20 FEET |
| | WEST OF WEST PROPERTY LINE]). |
| | C. IN THE NOTE ???EXIST. ASPHALT DRIVE AND CURBING TO |
| | BE REMOVED EAST OF PROPOSED CURB???, WHICH PROPOSED |
| | CURB DOES IT REFER TO. (THIS NOTE IS APPROX.. 520 FEET |
| | NORTH OF THE SOUTH PROPERTY CORNER AND 95 FEET WEST OF |
| | THE WEST PROPERTY LINE. |
| | D. THE EXISTING CONCRETE PLAZA WEST OF THE BUS ONLY |
| | PARKING SPACES IS CALLED OUT TO REMAIN BUT THE GRADES |
| | ON SHEET C-06 SHOW THE ADJACENT ASPHALT WILL BE LOWERED |
| | OVER 1.5 FEET (FOR EXAMPLE: 21.36 TO 19.75 FT NGVD; |
| | 21.69 TO 19.90 FT NGVD). |
| | E. INDICATE IF ANY SIDEWALK ALONG CLEARWATER DRIVE WILL |
| | BE REMOVED. |
| | |
| | 7. SHEET C-04 |
| | A. CALL OUT THE REMOVAL/REPLACEMENT OF THE SANITARY |
| | SEWER MAIN IN CLEARWATER DRIVE. |
| | B. INDICATE IF ANY SIDEWALK ALONG CLEARWATER DRIVE WILL |
| | BE REMOVED. |
| | |
| | 8. SHEET C-06 |
| | A. PROVIDE PROPOSED SPOT GRADES AT THE BOTTOM OF THE |
| | FLUMES LOCATED TO THE SOUTHWEST OF STRUCTURE S-1. |
| | SUGGEST ALIGNING THE BOTTOM OF THE FLUMES AND HARDENING |
| | THE SPACE BETWEEN THE FLUME BOTTOMS TO LIMIT THE |
| | EROSION. |
| | B. IN THE STORM STRUCTURE TABLE: |
| | I. ADD THE NUMBER OF PRB???S TO EACH STRUCTURE. |
| | II. PROVIDE PROPOSED RIM ELEVATION FOR EXISTING |
| | DRAINAGE STRUCTURES |
| | III. VERIFY THE RIM/GRATE ELEVATIONS FOR ALL |
| | STRUCTURES. |
| | C. SHOW A SWALE LINE OR FLOW ARROWS ON EITHER SIDE OF |
| | S-1 TO INDICATE DEPRESSED AREA UP TO THE PEDESTRIAN |
| | CROSSOVER. WHAT IS THE EXISTING GRATE ELEVATION OF |
| | STRUCTURE S-1? |
| | D. INVERT ELEVATION OF 15.00 FT NGVD AT STRUCTURE S-3 |
| | CREATES AN ADVERSE SLOPE ON THE PIPES FROM STRUCTURES |
| | S-1 AND S-2. |
| | E. PROVIDE EXISTING INVERT ELEVATIONS FOR THE STORM |
| | PIPES IN THE OPEN SPACE AREA AT THE SOUTH END OF THE |
| | SITE. |
| | F. RELOCATE EXFILTRATION TRENCHES AWAY FROM AREAS WITH |
| | TREES. |
| | |
| | 9. SHEET C-07 |
| | A. SECTION A-A ON SHEET C-12 SOWS THE HIGH POINT OF THE |
| | DRIVEWAY TO BE 8 FEET BEHIND THE SIDEWALK. THE |
| | RIM/GRATE ELEVATIONS FOR THE DRAINAGE STRUCTURES TO THE |
| | EAST OF THE ARE HIGHER THAN THE PAVEMENT ELEVATIONS OF |
| | 18.60 AND 18.30 FT NGVD AT THE ???HIGH POINT??? OF THE |
| | DRIVEWAY. |
| | B. SECTION B-B ON SHEET C-12 SHOWS THE DRIVEWAY HIGH |
| | POINT AT 3.5 FEET EAST OF THE R/W. THE GRATE ELEVATION |
| | 20.20 FT NGVD OF STRUCTURE S-23 IS HIGHER THAN THE SPOT |
| | GRADES OF 18.65 FT NGVD AT THE ???HIGH POINT??? OF THE |
| | DRIVEWAY. |
| | C. THE RIM ELEVATION FOR MH S-22 IS LOWER THAN THE |
| | GRATE ELEVATION OF THE NEARBY INLET S-23. |
| | D. IN THE STORM STRUCTURE TABLE: |
| | I. LIST THE NUMBER OF PRBS FOR EACH STRUCTURE. INCLUDE |
| | A PRB IN EITHER THE DOWNSTREAM SIDE OF STRUCTURE S-33, |
| | S-34, OR S-35 TO KEEP FLOATABLES FROM ENTERING THE |
| | CITY???S MS4. |
| | II. LABEL THE CONTROL STRUCTURES AND LIST THE CONTROL |
| | ELEVATION (SLOT ELEVATION) AND OVERFLOW ELEVATION (WEIR |
| | ELEVATION). |
| | III. VERIFY THE RIM/GRATE ELEVATIONS FOR ALL |
| | STRUCTURES. |
| | E. INVERT ELEVATION OF 13.00 FT NGVD AT STRUCTURE S-53 |
| | CREATES AN ADVERSE PIPE SLOPE TO STRUCTURE S-54. |
| | F. INVERT ELEVATION OF 14.00 FT NGVD AT STRUCTURE S-33 |
| | CREATES AN ADVERSE PIPE SLOPE TO STRUCTURE S-32 |
| | G. INVERT ELEVATIONS OF 15.00 FT NGVD AT STRUCTURE S-26 |
| | CREATES ADVERSE PIPE SLOPES TO EITHER OR BOTH PIPES TO |
| | STRUCTURES S-25 AND S-27. |
| | H. CAN THE INVERT ELEVATION OF 14.00 FT NGVD AT |
| | STRUCTURES S-45 AND S-45A BE LOWERED? SHEET C-15 SHOWS |
| | THE 6??? FM WILL HAVE A TOP OF PIPE ELEVATION OF 11.00 |
| | FT NGVD. |
| | I. CONFIRM THERE IS OR WILL BE A SOUTH INVERT AT |
| | STRUCTURE S-43. |
| | J. THE SYMBOL FOR STRUCTURE S-47 IS HIDING A SPOT GRADE |
| | CALLOUT. |
| | K. SECTION E-E SHOULD POINT TO THE EAST. |
| | L. CALLOUT RCP PIPE WITHIN THE CLEARWATER DRIVE R/W. |
| | M. SHOW PAVEMENT RESTORATION ON BANYAN BLVD FOR THE |
| | PROPOSED UTILITY CONNECTIONS IN THE R/W. |
| | N. LABEL ALL EXISTING STORM PIPE SIZES AND MATERIAL ON |
| | CLEARWATER DRIVE AND BANYAN BLVD. |
| | O. RELOCATE EXFILTRATION TRENCHES AWAY FROM AREAS WITH |
| | TREES. |
| | P. JUSTIFY THE NUMBER OF OUTFALL PIPES AND THE OUTFALL |
| | PIPE DIAMETER(S) IF LARGER THAN 15 INCHES. |
| | |
| | 10. SHEET C-09 |
| | A. CONTROL STRUCTURE DETAIL |
| | I. REVISE THE STRUCTURE NUMBERS |
| | II. COORDINATE PIPE INVERTS AND PIPE SIZES WITH THE |
| | INFORMATION IN THE STORM STRUCTURE TABLE ON SHEET C-07 |
| | III. REDUCE THE SLOT HEIGHT, RAISE THE WEIR ELEVATION |
| | OR REDRAW THE WEIR IN SECTION VIEW. THE CURRENT |
| | DIMENSIONS AND ELEVATIONS WOULD CREATE A WEIR CONDITION |
| | AT THE SLOT LOCATION INSTEAD OF S SLOT. |
| | B. PROVIDE DETAIL FOR THE CONTROL STRUCTURE FOR THE |
| | CLEARWATER DRIVE EXFILTRATION TRENCH. |
| | C. EXFILTRATION TRENCH DETAIL ??? |
| | I. THE TRENCH HEIGHT WILL NOT BE COMPLETELY SURCHARGED |
| | WITH A SLOT ELEVATION OF 15.50 FEET NGVD AND TOP OF |
| | TRENCH ELEVATION OF 16.50 FT NGVD. CONSIDER RAISING THE |
| | SLOT ELEVATION TO MAXIMIZE THE ON-SITE STORAGE. |
| | II. IF SHWL ELEVATION IS 11.00 FT NGVD, THEN ADJUST |
| | LEADER ARROW TO POINT TO THE BOTTOM OF THE TRENCH |
| | INSTEAD OF THE PIPE ELEVATION. |
| | III. LIST PIPE MATERIAL AS EITHER HDPE OR RCP. |
| | |
| | IV. SHOW AND LABEL PRB???S IN BOTH STRUCTURES IN THE |
| | ELEVATION VIEW. |
| | |
| | D. PERVIOUS PAVERS SECTION |
| | I. SHOW ON THE PGD SHEETS OR SEPARATE DETAIL BLOWUPS |
| | WHERE THE UNDERDRAIN PIPES WILL BE LOCATED AND WHERE |
| | THEY WILL CONNECT TO THE DRAINAGE SYSTEM. |
| | |
| | 11. SHEET C-10 |
| | A. COORDINATE HIGH WATER TABLE ELEVATIONS AND VERTICAL |
| | DATUMS. |
| | |
| | 12. SHEET C-12 |
| | A. REVISE LOCATION OF BANYAN BLVD CENTERLINE AND R/W |
| | LINE LOCATIONS PER REVISED PROPERTY BOUNDARY. |
| | B. THE SECTIONS LIST COMPACTED SUBGRADE??? BUT THE |
| | PAVEMENT LEGEND HAS ???COMPACTED SUB-BASE??? |
| | |
| | 13. SHEET C-13 |
| | A. SECTION G-G |
| | I. WHAT DO THE 1S AND 2S CALLOUTS REPRESENT? |
| | II. EXFILTRATION TRENCH SHOWN ON BOTH SIDES OF THE |
| | XERISCAPING ON THE SECTION BUT SHEET C-06 SHOWS NO |
| | EXFILTRATION PIPE AND SOLID PIPE ON THE WEST SIDE OF |
| | THE XERISCAPING. |
| | B. SECTION H-H |
| | I. EXFILTRATION TRENCH SHOWN ON THE SECTION BUT SHEET |
| | C-07 SHOWS SOLID PIPE. |
| | II. SHEET C-07 SHOWS PERVIOUS PAVERS ON THE RIGHT SIDE |
| | OF THE ITC PARCEL LINE. THE SECTION CALLOUTS |
| | NON-PERVIOUS BASE MATERIAL. |
| | |
| | 14. SHEET C-14B |
| | A. NUMBER THE PROPOSED PRIVATE LIFT STATION. |
| | B. PROVIDE VERTICAL CLEARANCES (TOP/BOTTOM OF OUTSIDES |
| | OF PIPES) BETWEEN THE 4??? FM AND OTHER UTILITIES. |
| | |
| | 15. SHEET C-15 |
| | A. NUMBER THE PROPOSED PRIVATE LIFT STATION. |
| | B. PROVIDE VERTICAL CLEARANCES (TOP/BOTTOM OF OUTSIDES |
| | OF PIPES) BETWEEN THE WATER MAINS AND THE STORM PIPE |
| | CROSSINGS. |
| | C. TWO SSMH???S NUMBERED #1. |
| | D. CONFLICT CROSSING INFORMATION LISTS THE FM AS 6??? |
| | ON SOME AND 4??? ON ONE. |
| | E. COORDINATE STORM PIPE SIZES/PIPE ELEVATIONS IN THE |
| | CONFLICT CROSSING INFORMATION WITH THE PIPE |
| | SIZES/INVERT ELEVATIONS ON THE PGD SHEETS. ELEVATIONS |
| | FOR THE OUTSIDE OF THE PIPES (TOP OR BOTTOM) SHOULD BE |
| | LISTED IN THE CONFLICT CROSSING INFORMATION. |
| | F. ADJUST HATCHING ON THE KEY MAP. CAN THE KEY MAP BE |
| | MOVED UP SO THAT THE TITLE APPEARS WITHIN THE SHEET |
| | BORDER? |
| | |
| | 16. SHEET C-16 |
| | A. COORDINATE STORM PIPE INFORMATION WITH THE |
| | INFORMATION PROVIDED ON SHEET C-07. RCP PIPE TO BE USED |
| | FOR STORM PIPES IN THE R/W. |
| | |
| | 17. SHEET C-17 |
| | A. COORDINATE PIPE SIZES AND ELEVATIONS WITH THE PGD |
| | AND W&S PLAN SHEETS. |
| | B. ADD THE MANHOLE NUMBERS. |
| | C. PROVIDE A SCALE BAR. THE SCALES APPEAR TO BE 1??? = |
| | 40??? (H) AND 1??? = 4??? (V) WHEN PRINTED ON 24??? X |
| | 36??? PAPER. SHEET CALLS OUT THE SCALE AS 1:30 (H) AND |
| | 1:3 (V) |
| | |
| | 18. SHEET C-25 |
| | A. LABEL THE LIFT STATION NUMBER OR LIST AS NORTH OR |
| | SOUTH AND COORDINATE WITH THE W&S PLANS. |
| | B. PROVIDE THE VERTICAL DATUM. |
| | C. CONFIRM THE ELEVATIONS ARE IN REFERENCE TO NGVD. |
| | D. CONFIRM SIZE OF FM WITH WHAT IS SHOWN ON THE W&S |
| | PLANS. |
| | E. REVIEW ASSUMPTIONS FOR THE GROUNDWATER TABLE |
| | ELEVATION IN THE WETWELL FLOATATION CALCULATIONS (SEE |
| | COMMENT #1 BELOW FOR DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS). |
| | |
| | 19. SHEET C-26 |
| | A. LABEL THE LIFT STATION NUMBER OR LIST AS NORTH OR |
| | SOUTH AND COORDINATE WITH THE W&S PLANS. |
| | B. PROVIDE THE VERTICAL DATUM. |
| | C. CONFIRM THE ELEVATIONS ARE IN REFERENCE TO NGVD. |
| | D. CONFIRM SIZE OF FM WITH WHAT IS SHOWN ON THE W&S |
| | PLANS. |
| | E. COORDINATE THE ELEVATIONS WITH THE INFORMATION SHOWN |
| | ON THE W&S PLAN SHEETS. |
| | F. REVIEW ASSUMPTIONS FOR THE GROUNDWATER TABLE |
| | ELEVATION IN THE WETWELL FLOATATION CALCULATIONS (SEE |
| | COMMENT #1 BELOW FOR DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS). |
| | |
| | DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS |
| | 1. HOW WAS THE WET SEASON WATER LEVEL ELEVATION OF |
| | 11.00 FT NGVD DETERMINED? PREVIOUS PERMITS FOR THE SITE |
| | LIST THE WET SEASON WATER TABLE CONTROL ELEVATION AT |
| | 14.50 FEET NGVD. THE CITY TRIES TO MAINTAIN THE WATER |
| | LEVEL IN CLEAR LAKE (LOCATED LESS THAN 1,000 FEET TO |
| | THE WEST OF THE SITE) AT 14.5 FT NGVD AND THE WATER |
| | LEVEL IN THE EAST LOBE OF CLEAR LAKE (LOCATED LESS THAN |
| | 300 FEET TO THE NORTH OF THE SITE) AT THIS 14.5 FT NGVD |
| | STAGE OR HIGHER. |
| | |
| | 2. REVISE THE EXFILTRATION TRENCH CALCULATIONS TO MATCH |
| | THE PROPOSED TRENCH DIMENSIONS IN THE PLANS. NOTE DU IS |
| | THE VERTICAL DISTANCE BETWEEN: (A) THE HIGHER OF THE |
| | TRENCH BOTTOM OR WET SEASON WATER LEVEL (BOTH ARE 11.00 |
| | FT NGVD); AND (B) THE LOWER OF THE CONTROL ELEVATION |
| | (15.50 FEET NGVD) OR TOP OF TRENCH ELEVATION (16.50 FT |
| | NGVD). |
| | |
| | 3. REVISE THE ICPR MODELING TO MATCH THE PROPOSED WEIR |
| | ELEVATION. CAN THE WEIR/SLOT ELEVATION BE RAISED? THERE |
| | IS PLENTY OF FREEBOARD BETWEEN THE LOWEST RIM/GRATE |
| | ELEVATION AND THE PEAK 25-YEAR 3-DAY STAGE. |
| | |
| | 4. THE EXISTING CONDITIONS MODELING SHOULD BE AS THE |
| | SITE EXISTS TODAY INSTEAD OF AS IT EXISTED AS A TRAIN |
| | YARD AND RAIL SPUR. |
| | |
| | 5. WHY TWO OUTFALL PIPES? IT WAS MENTIONED IN THE |
| | OPENING PARAGRAPH OF THE DRAINAGE NARRATIVE THAT THE |
| | SITE WAS PREVIOUSLY DESIGNED/PERMITTED WITH NO |
| | DISCHARGE TO OFFSITE AREAS FOR THE 25-YEAR 3-DAY EVENT. |
| | ONE OUTFALL PIPE SHOULD BE SUFFICIENT TO CONVEY RUNOFF |
| | FROM THE SITE FOR STORMS LARGER THAN THE 25-YEAR 3-DAY |
| | DESIGN EVENT. |
| | |
| | |
| | COMMENTS FROM RICKY ELIZONDO, PUB. UTILITIES PLANS |
| | EXAMINER, [email protected] , 561-494-1101: |
| | PU COMMENTS SENT THRU SHARED DRIVE (MADE BY LL) |
| | |
